[Page]
[Page]

THE State of the Action Brought by William Fletcher against William Vassall, For Defaming him: TRIED In the Superiour Court at Boston, August Term, A. D. 1752. AND NOW Pending by Appeal TO His Majesty in Council.

BOSTON: Printed in the Year, 1753.

[Page]

PREFACE.

IN the Examination of the Case, which is published at the Desire of some Gentle­men that attended the Trial, the Reader will find, that in the Year 1749, Mr. Vassall seems to have taken a Resolution to be my Ruin; and to accomplish this vile and wicked End [...] to have made it his Practice for above two Years following, to say in all Companies such Things of [...] as had a direct Tendency to blast my Character and Reputation, and is destroy my Trade and Business, without having even the Shadow of Truth to support what he said, or any other Provocation th [...]n my censuring his Conduct in delivering to one Andrew Hall a promissary Note of considerable Value, which be the said Vassall ought to have delivered to me, as plainly appears by the Rule of Court in that Case annex'd hereto, and by doing of which I was wrong'd of the same, besides being [...]arr [...]ed in the Law with the said Hall for above three Years on Account [...]hereof. — It will also appear that Mr. Vassall could have us other Drift i [...] summoning these Evidences which he did, th [...]n to try to fish out how much I was, or had been in Debt, and with what Honour I had dealt; how far his End was answered, or what Effect it could have had in this Case, [...] I been four Times as much in Debt as I was, the Reader will judge. Every Gentleman in Business kn [...]ws, that a Mer­chant of extensive Trade must of Necessary be in Debt. The Question is not, how much he is in Debt? but, with what Honour does be deal? for the more extensive his Trade is, and the more he is in Debt, the greater Damage is it to him to [...] his good Name taken away; as is very elligantly set forth in the following Paragraph taken from the SPECTATOR, Vol. 3. N [...]. 118.

The most unhappy of all Men, and the most exposed to the Malignity or Wan­tonness of the common Voice, is the Trader. Credit is undone in Whispers. The Tradesman's Wound is received from one who is more private and more cruel than the Ruffian with the Lanthorn and Dagger. The manner of repeating a Man's Name, As Mr. Cash, Oh! do you leave your Money at his Shop? Why do you know Mr. Searoom? He is indeed a general Merchant. I say, I have seen, from the Iteration of a Man's Name, hiding one Thought of him, and explaining what you hide, by saying something to his Advantage when you speak, a Merchant hurt in his Credit; and him who every Day he lived, literally added to the Value of his native Country, undone by one who was only a Burthen and a Blemish to it. Since every Body who knows the World is sensible of this great Evil, how careful ought a Man to be in his Language of a Merchant? It may possibly be in the Power of [...] Creature to lay the Ruin of the best Family in the most opulent City; and the more so, the more highly he deserves of his Country; that is to say, the farther he places his We [...] out of his Hands, to draw home that of another Climate.

[Page] In this Case an ill Word may change Plenty into Want, and by a rash Sentence a [...] and generous Fortune may in a few Days be reduced to Beggary. How lit­tle [...] imagine, that an idle Phrase to the Disfavour of a Mer­chant, may be as pernicious in the Consequence, as the Forgery of a Deed to b [...] an In [...]c [...]t [...] would be to a Gentleman? Land stands where it did before a Gen­tleman was calumniated, and the State of a great Action is just as it was before Calumny was offered to diminish it, and there is Time, Place and Occasion, ex­pected to unravel all that is contrived against those Characters; but the Trader who is ready only for probable Demands upon him, can have no Armour against the [...], the Malici [...]s, and the E [...]itus, who are prepared to fill the Cry to his Dishonour. Fire and Sword are slow Engines of Destruction, in Comparison of the B [...]bl [...] in the Case of the Merchant.

For this Reason, I thought it an imitable Piece of Humanity of a Gentleman of my Acquaintance, who had great Variety of Affairs, and used to talk with Warmth enough against Gentlemen by whom he thought himself ill dealt with; that he would never let any thing be urged against a Merchant (with whom he had any Difference) except in a Court of Justice. He used to say, that to speak ill of a Merchant, was to begin his Suit with Judgment and Execution. One cannot, I think, say more on this Occasion, than to repeat, That the Merit of the Merchant is above that of all other Subjects; for while he is untouched in his Credit, his Hand­writing is a more portable Coin for the Service of his Fellow-Citizens, and his Word the Gold of Op [...]r in the Country wherein he resides.

W: Fletcher.

ERRATA.

In the Marginal Note in the first Page, £1500, should be £6000.

In the Marginal Note in the 12th Page, the Word [...] should be [...]

[Page 1]

The CASE of Fletcher & Vassall.

Suffolk, ss. GEORGE the Second, by the Grace of GOD, of Great-Britain, France, and Ireland, KING, Defender of the Faith, &c.

To the Sheriff of our County of Suffolk, his Under-Sheriff or Deputy, Greeting.

WE Command you to Attach the Goods or Estate of William Vassall of Boston, in our said County of Suffolk, Gentleman, to the Value of * Eight Thousand Pounds; and for want thereof to take the Body of the said William Vassall (if he may be found in your Precinct) and him safely keep, so that you have him before our Justices of our Inferiour Court of Common Pleas next to be holden at Boston, in and for our said County of Suffolk, on the first Tuesday of January next; then and there in our said Court to answer unto William Fletcher of Boston aforesaid, Merchant, in a Plea of Trespass upon the Case, for that whereas the said William Fletcher from his Childhood hitherto, hath been a Person of good Credit, Fame and Reputation, and a Person of Integrity and Justice in all his Business, Trade and Commerce with all Men; and for more than Twelve Years last past hath been [...] Merchant of extensive Trade and Commerce with many worthy and great Merchants in diverse Parts beyond Sea, as well as in this Land, and an usual Under­writer of Policies of Insurance in Boston aforesaid, whereby he hath made great Profit and Gain: Nevertheless the said William Vassall, not ignorant of the Premises, but m [...]liciously contriving and intending to ruin the Plantiff's Reputation and good Cha­racter, and to deprive him of his Commerce and Business aforesaid, and of all Profit and Gain to be made thereby, did, at Boston aforesaid, on the second Day of August in the Twenty-third Year of our Reign, in the Presence and Hearing of many of our [...] Subjects, [...]ly, maliciously, and with a loud Voice speak a [...] utter the follow­ing [...] and scandalous Words of and concerning the said William Fletcher, viz. [...] Fletcher meaning the Plantiff) is a very great [...]illain, a Rogue, a S [...]ndrel, a Bankrupt, not worth a Great, not able to pay his Debts, and is Thousands worse than [...]. And the said William Vassall, continuing his Malice against the said Plantiff, [...] on the third Day of [...] aforesaid, in the Hearing of diverse good People, [...], and with a loud Voice, speak and utter the following false and [...] Words concerning the Plantiff, viz. [...] Fletcher (meaning the Plantiff) [...], not worth a Great, not able [...] Pounds worse than Nothing. And the said [...], same Day, in the Presence and Hearing of [...] and [...] the [...] Plaintiff, v [...]z. [...] Fletcher [Page 2](again meaning the Plantiff) is a great Villain, a Rogue, a [...], a Bankrupt, not worth a Great, his House and Farm (meaning the Plantiff's House and Farm) will not half pay his Debts, he is not able to pay his Debts, owes more than he is worth, and is Thousands worse than Nothing. And the said William Vassall, continu­ing his Malice aforesaid against the Plantiff did on the tenth of the same August at Boston aforesaid, in Discourse with diverse Persons concerning the Plantiff, falsely and maliciously say of him the Plantiff in their Hearing, these false and scandalous Words, viz. He (speaking of, and meaning the Plantiff is a vile F [...]ll [...], a Rogue, a Man of bad Principles, a [...]ase Fellow, a very great Rogue, a Rascal, a Sc [...]dr [...], a vile Sc [...]u [...]drel, a very great Sc [...]undrel, a Bankrupt, a [...]heat, a c [...]ating Knave, a Fellow of no Honour, owes more than he is worth, is not able to pay his Debts, and is Thousands worse than nothing. And the said William Vassall there-afterwards on the same Day continuing his Malice against the Plantiff, did, in the Presence and Hearing of diverse of our leige Subjects, falsely, maliciously, and with a loud Voice, speak and utter the following false and scandalous Words of and concerning the Plantiff, viz. Will. Fletcher (meaning the Plantiff) is a vile Fellow, a Rogue, a great Rogue, very great Rogue, a Cheat, a great Cheat, a shuff [...]ing Rascal, and his (meaning the Plantiff's) Credit is not worth a Great; he (meaning the Plantiff is a Rascal, a S [...]undrel, a mean pittiful Fellow, a great Cheat, and no Person would give Six Peace for any De [...]t he owes (meaning the Plantiff owed) and no one would take any Debt he [...]ed (meaning the Plantiff owed) to give any thing for it; for he (meaning the Plantiff) is not able to pay his Debts, he (meaning the Plantiff) owes more than he is worth, and I can prove it: and he (meaning the Plantiff) can't pay his Debts, is worse than nothing, is Thousands worse than nothing, and owes more than he is worth. And the said William Vassall on the seventeenth of October, in the same Year of our Reign, of his further Malice, in the Hearing of diverse worthy and good People did at Boston aforesaid, utter and speak of and concerning the Plantiff these false and scandalous Words, viz. Will. Fletcher (meaning the Plantiff) is a Rogue, a Bankrupt, a Cheat, and a Villain; he (meaning the Plantiff) Bottom'd a Ship for more than she was worth, and cast her away on Purpose to cheat the Bottomers. And at another Time, he (still meaning the Plantiff) bought an old Ship that had been condemned, purely to send his Brother in (meaning the Plantiff's Brother in) to be cast away, in order to get his Brother's Interest and Estate then depending in the Family (meaning his said Brother's Proportion and Share of his Father's Estate then depending in the Law;) and if his Father (meaning the Plantiff's Father) and all the Friends he (meaning the Plantiff) had in the World were on board (meaning [...] board the said Ship) he (meaning the Plantiff) would have cast her away; H [...] (meaning the Plantiff) is a mean spirited [...] Fellow, and loves Money so well that he never did a generous Action in his Life. And the said William Vassall there-afterwards on the same Day of his further Malice, did, in the Hearing of diverse of our leige, Subjects, utter and speak the following false and scandalous Words of and concerning the Plantiff, viz. Will. Fletcher (meaning the Plantiff) is a [...], and loves Money so well that he never [...] a good or generous Action in his Life, he (meaning the Plantiff, is a Rogue, a [...], a Bankrupt, and a Cheat; he (meaning the Plantiff) [...] a Ship for more Money than she was worth, and cast her away on Purpose to cheat the Bottomers; and he (meaning the Plantiff) bought [...] condemned Ship purely to [...] in to be cast away; [Page 3]that he (meaning the Plantiff) might get by it, because there was an Estate depend­ing in the Family (meaning the Family of the Plantiff's late deceased Father) and if his Father (meaning the Plantiff's Father) and all the Friends he had (meaning the Plantiff had) in the World were on board (meaning on board the said Ship) he (meaning the Plantiff) would have cast her away. And the said William Vassall, on the Twenty-first of the same October, at Boston aforesaid, of his further Malice against the Plantiff, speaking of and concerning the Plantiff, in the Hearing of many of our leige Subjects, did speak and utter the following false and scandalous Words concern­ing the Plantiff, viz. I hope he (meaning the Plantiff) will recover Money enough out of the Prize in England to pay his Debts (meaning the Plantiff's Debts;) but if he (meaning the Plantiff) doth recover enough, it must be a very large S [...]m; he (mean­ing the Plantiff) owes more than he is worth, and is not able to pay his Debts. And the said William Vassall on the fifteenth of July last, at Boston aforesaid, speaking of the Plantiff's Conduct, in his Trade. Dealings and Merchandize did of his further Malice, speak and utter the following false and scandalous Words of and concerning the Plantiff, in the Presence and Hearing of diverse of our good Subjects, viz. He (meaning the Plantiff) is a vile Fellow, not fit for Society, a Cheat, a Rogue, and is as great a Rogue and Villain as lives, he (again meaning the Plantiff) is as great a Rogue and Villain as is in the World. And the said William Vassall on the last of July last, at Boston aforesaid, upon a Discourse had and moved concerning the Plantiff's Conduct in his Trade, Merchandize and Dealings, in the Hearing of diverse of our leige Sub­jects, he the said William Vassall, of his further Malice against the Plantiff, did speak and utter the following false and scandalous Words concerning the Plantiff, viz. He (meaning the Plantiff) is not fit Company for any Man; he (meaning the Plantiff) is a Rogue, a Bite, a Cheat, a cheating dishonest Villain, a Knave, a Scoundrel, and I can prove it. By Reason of the speaking of which false and scandalous Words, in Manner as aforesaid, the Plantiff has greatly suffered in his good Name and Reputation, and lost the Good-will and Esteem of many worthy Persons of great Note, Wealth and Business, with whom he before had large and very profitable Tradings in Mer­chandize, who of late have refus'd to Entrust the Plantiff with their Affairs and Busi­ness, or to continue or carry on any Commerce with him to the Damage of the said William Fletcher, as he says, the Sum of Eight Thousand Pounds, which shall then and there be made to appear, with other due Damages; and have you there this Writ, with your Doings therein. Witness Edward Hutchinson, Esq at Boston, this fifth Day of October, in the Twenty-fifth Year of our Reign, [...], 1751.

Ezekiel Goldth-wait, Cler.

I attached the Body of the within-named Defendant William Vassall, and have taken Bond to Respond the Action.

[...] P [...]llard, Sheriff.

Copy examined,

Middlecott Cocke, Cler.

Copy examined,

by Nathaniel Hatch, Cler.

A true Copy examined,

by Nathaniel Hatch, Cler.
[Page 4]

WIlliam Fletcher Plantiff, and William Vassall Defendant, in a Plea of Trespass upon the Case. The Defendant's Plea to the Jurisdiction of the Court.

And the said William Vassall comes and saith, That this Honourable Court ought not to take any further Cognizance of the said Plea; because, he saith, that the said Court is an Inferiour Court, and of Inferiour Jurisdiction, and yet the Words in the said Writ, pretended to be spoken by the said William Vassall, or any of them, are not alledged to be spoken within the Jurisdiction of the same Court, as by Law they ought to be alledged; and this the said William Vassall is ready to Verify; wherefore he prays Judgment, whether the same Court will not take any further Cognizance of the Plea aforesaid,

James Otis, p. D.

And the said William Vassall comes and defends, &c. and, saving the Plea to the Jurisdiction of this Honourable Court as on File, saith, That the Plantiff's Writ is insufficient, and ought to be abated.

For that the same Writ is not purchas'd against the said William Vassall according to the Form of Original Writs in that Case made and provided by the Law of this Province, because the said Writ is directed in these Words, viz. To the Sheriff of our County of Suffolk, his Under-Sheriff or Deputy, Greeting; Whereas by the Form of Original Writs in that Case made and provided by the Law of this Province, the same Writ should be directed To the Sheriff or Marshal of the County of Suffolk, his Under-Sheriff or Deputy, Greeting, and not To the Sheriff of the County of Suffolk, his Under-Sheriff or Deputy, Greeting, only, as the Plantiff supposes; and the said Writ was not endors'd with the Sirname of the the said William Fletcher, or with the Sir­name of any Attorney for him, before it was taken out of the Clerk's Office of said Court, as by Law it ought to be; nor is it alledged in said Writ, in what Language the said pretended scandalous Words, or any of them, were spoken.

2dly. For that the said Writ [...] not purchas'd according to the Form of the Original Writ in that Case made an [...] provided by the Law of this Province, because the said Writ is directed To the Sheriff of the County of Suffolk, his Under-Sheriff or Deputy, Greet­ing, whereas by the Form of the Original Writ in that Case made and provided by the Law of this Province, the same Writ should be directed To the Sheriff or Mar­shal of the County of Suffolk, his Under-Sheriff or Deputy, Greeting, only, as the Plan­tiff supposes.

3dly. The said Writ was not endors'd with the Sirname of the said William Fletcher, or with the Sirname of any Attorney for him, before it was taken out of the Clerk's Office of the said Court, as by Law it ought to be.

4thly. It is not alledged in said Writ, in what Language the said pretened scan­dalous Words, or any of them, were spoken, as by Law it ought to be: All which Pleas the said William Vassall is ready to Verify; wherefore he prays Judgment of the said Writ that it be abated and he allow'd his Costs.

James Otis, p. D.
[Page 5]

And the said William Vassall, saving the Pleas to the Jurisdiction and in Abatement of the Writ on File, faith, he is not Guilty in Manner and Form as the Plantiff de­clares, and thereof puts himself upon the Country.

William Vassall.
Copy examined, Middlec [...]tt Cocke, Cler.
Copy examined, By Nathaniel Hatch, Cler.
A True Copy examined, By Nathaniel Hatch, Cler.

N. B. The Court over-rul'd this Plea, and the Case was committed to the Jury without any Witnesses being produced.

William Fletcher Plantiff, and William Vassall Defendant, the Jury find for the Defendant Cost.

Copy examined, Middlecott Cocke, Cler.
Copy examined, By Nathaniel Hatch, Cler.
A true Copy examined, By Nathaniel Hatch, Cler.

N. B. Fletcher Appeal'd from this Judgment to the Superiour Court.

Suffolk, ss. AT a Superiour Court of Judicature held at Boston, for said County on the Third Tuesday of February, A. D. 1752.
William Fletcher, And William Vassall, Trespass on the Case for Defamation.

THE said William Vassall says, That he pleaded to this Declaration in the Court appealed from, that he was not Guilty in Manner and Form as the Plantiff declared; and thereof put himself upon the Country, as by the Copy of the Record of the Case produced, appears, and further says, that in the Proceedings there­upon there was no Replication made thereto, nor any Issue joined; neither is there any Record of such Representation or Issue; wherefore he prays that this Court will not proceed to Tryal upon his Plea.

Jer. Gridley.

Copy examined,

By Nathaniel Hatch, Cler.

A true Copy examined,

By Nathaniel Hatch, Cler.
[Page 6]

N. B. The Plea was again over-rul'd, then Vassall moved for a Continuance of the Case, alledging, That he had some material Witnesses abroad; but he refusing to swear to any particular Thing they had to say,— the Court over-rul'd this also: And the Case was again committed to the Jury, without any Witnesses being pro­duced.— William Fletcher Appellant, William Vassall Appellee: The Jury find for the Appellee, Confirmation of former Judgment, and Costs.— Fletcher review'd the Case to next Superiour Court.

By Virtue of this Writ, I have taken the Body of the within-named William Vassall, and for want of Goods or Estate therein unto me shewn to attach, or found within my Precinct, I have taken Bond, with Sureties for his Appearance at the Court within-mentioned, to make Answer to this Writ o [...] Process, and to abide and perform the Judgment of the said Court thereon.

Richard Foster, Sheriff.

Suffolk, ss. AT a Superiour Court of Judicature held on the second Tuesday of November, A. D. 1752, by Adjournment from the third Tuesday of August preceeding.
William Fletcher, and William Vassall, Trespass on the Case for Defamation.

And the said William Vassall comes and defends, &c. and [...]ing [...]n himself the Benefit of all Exceptions on File, saith, the last-mention'd Judgment [...]n nothing Erroneous, and thereof puts himself upon the Country

J. Otis, p. D.
And the Plantiff likewise. Edmund Trowbridge.
A true Copy examined, by Nathaniel Hatch, Cler.

N. B. The Case was open'd by Col. Otis of Barnstable, in a very concise, gent [...]d and intelligible Manner, to the Approhation of the whole Audience; and then the Witnesses were produc'd by Mr. Fletcher, in Manner following, all being very critically cross-examin'd by Mr. Vassall, viz.

Mr. Joseph Scott, The Rev'd Dr. Jonathan M [...]y [...]ew, The Rev'd Dr. L [...]en [...]er Miller, Mr. Beliher Hancock, Mr. Joseph Royall * Dr. Nathaniel Perkins Mr. Joshua Richardson Mr. John Billings [...] intimate Companions. [...] Mr. [...] Mr. C [...]ing and Mr. Gray's Evidence respecting these [...] being to often in Company with Mr. [...].

Mr. Harrison Gray, Capt. John Catheart, Capt. Isaac Freeman, Mr. Joseph Jackson.

[Page 7]

I Joseph Scott of Boston, [...] the County of Suffolk, and Province of the Massachusetts-Bay in New-England. Brazier, do declare, That in August 1749, some few Days after Mr. William Fletcher the Plantiff sail'd for England, being at Messi [...]. John and Richard Billings's Shop in Boston, about four or five Gentlemen being present, I heard Mr. William Vassall of Boston aforesaid, the Defendant, publickly say diverse Things reflecting of said Fletcher, particularly he said, said William Fletcher was a Rascal, a Scoundrel, a Villain, a Cheat, a cheating Fellow, a Fellow of no Honour, that he had cheated him, and he could prove it, and that he was not fit Company for any Man, and that he never did a generous Action in his Life; that he owed him for some Tickets he had won of him, and that he could not get the Money, and, as I understood him, he had a Note of said Fletcher's for the same, and that he had put it up at Publick Sale at a Clubb at Mrs. Austin's, and that no Man would give any thing for it: This Affair of the Tickets I wonder'd to hear him mention, be­cause I well remember some Time before I heard him say in Publick Company, that said Fletcher had paid him with Honour, and that he tho't himself oblig'd to declare it in all Compa [...]es where he had said to the contrary: Some Time afterwards, while the said Fletcher was in England, being again in said Vassall's Company at Mrs. Burson's opposite to the Brazen-Head, a Number of Gentlemen being present, the said Vassall, speaking of said Fletcher, said, but he was a Villain, a Scroundrel, a Knave, a Cheating Fellow, a Fellow of no Honour, a Man of bad Principles, and had cheated him out of some Money or Tickets he had won of him; upon which I said to said Vassall; * Major, I am surpriz'd you should reflect so upon Mr. Fletcher, for I have heard you declare at Billings 's Shop, before a Number of Gentlemen, that he had paid you that Money with Honour, and that you thought yourself oblig'd to declare it wherever you [...]: He immediately said, it was false, that he had not said so; but putting the Matter a little closer to his, he said, if he had said [...], yet the said Fletcher had not paid him the Depreciation of the [...]; I [...] if he [...] demanded any Depreciation? and to the [...] of my [...] he said he had not: And both of us at that Time being pretty warm [...] the Dispute, the Company desir'd that the Conversation might drop with respect to Mr. Fletcher, for that they were tired with Hearing these Things. The next Day meeting the said Vassall at Billings's Shop, he spoke to me [...] that what had pass'd between us the Night before might be forgot, and that we might not hold Anger with each other; I told him with all my Heart; but I thought he treated Mr. Fletcher's Character too freely: At another Time afterwards at said [...]. 2 Number of Gentlemen being present. I heard the said Vassall declare, that the said Fletcher was a Rogue, a Cheat, a Bite, a Scroundrel, and that he believ'd said Fletcher was Thousands worse than Nothing, and blamed Capt. George Ruggles for taking said Fletcher's Bill on his Brother Thomas Fletcher, for that he was afraid he should never get the Money; and that he would sell it to any Body for a consider­able Discount; but that he hoped said Fletcher would receive Money enough in England at least to pay his Debts; and further he said by way of Question, What a Villain was that Fletcher to send his Brother to Sea in an old condemned Ship which he bought to drown him in? and if it had been in his Power, I believe he would have sent the whole Family in her, if he could have got any Thing by it: [Page 8]And at another Time afterwards I heard the said Vassall say at Billings's, that Will. Fletcher was a vile Rogue, that he was not worth a Groat, and was not able to pay his Debts, a Fellow of no Honour, and not fit for Society, and that his Estate was mortagag'd, and that he had bought a Piece of Land of Mr. Allen, and it was also mortgag'd; and being at divers other Times at Mrs. Burton's, in Company with a Number of Gentlemen, I heard the said Vassall say, that the said Will. Fletcher was a vile Rogue, a Cheat, a base Fellow, a shuffling Fellow, a Fellow of no Honour, and not fit Company for any Man, and that those who kept Company with him were as bad as he; that he was not able to pay his Debts, that he owed more than he was Worth, and was not worth a Gro [...]t: All which Expressions were utter'd by him the said Vassall in the Year 1749, 1750 and 1751, and almost as often as ever I have been in said Vassall 's Company from the Time since Mr. Fletcher's Departure, untill his Return, which was very often, he has utter'd the same Ex­pressions as before-mention'd, or Words to the same Import, and further I would add, that I have been acquainted with the said Fletcher for some Years, and have dealt with him my self, and always found him to deal with Honour and Honesty: All this I declare to be Truth.

Joseph Scott.

The said Joseph Scott further says, That when he heard the aforesaid Expressions at Messi [...]. Billings's Shop, the said John and Richard Billings and Mr. Joshua Rich­ardson, with others whom he cannot now recollect, were present, and when he heard the aforesaid Expressions at Mrs. Burton's, Dr. Nathaniel Perkins, and the said Joshua Richardson, with others, whom he cannot now remember, were present; and for the rest of the Expressions aforesaid, he don't remember the particular Time; and he further says, that he did not commit any of the aforesaid Expressions to Writing within six Months after he had heard them, but believes he comm [...]ed some of them to Writing within twelve Months after he had heard them; and he further adds, that he heard said Vassall say some few Days before Fletcher sail'd for England in July A. D. 1749, that he, said Fletcher, owed more than he was worth, or Words to the same Import, which occasioned him the Depon [...]nt to join with some other Persons in a Suit against said Fletcher; and I heard some of the Clubb which Vassall and myself belong'd to, say Words to the same Import, but it was after I heard said Vassall say it, and the Reason of my Arresting said Fletcher was, as well owing to [...] I heard others say as above, as what I heard Vassall say. [...]

Sworn in Court December 8th. 1752. Attest. Samuel Winthrop, Cler.

The Deponant further [...], that he heard the said Vassall the Defendant say, some short Time after the said William Fletcher the Plantiff went to England last, in 1749, [...] he would do the said Fletcher 's Business on the other Side of the Water: This the said Vassall said at Billings's Shop in Boston, when he, and to the best of the De­pon [...]nt's Remembrance, Mr. William Merchant were present; and when he the said Vassall spake the Words aforesaid, he appeared very angry with [...] Fletcher; That the Conversation was introduc'd by said Vassall about the Notes [...] Tickets.

Sworn in Court December 11th. 1752. Attest. [...], Cler.
A true Copy examined, By Nathaniel Hatch, Cler.
[Page 9]

I Jonathan Mayhew of Boston, in the County of Suffolk, in the Province of the Massachusetts-Bay in New-England, Clerk, do Testify and Declare, That being at the House of Mr. William Vassall of Boston aforesaid, the Defendant, (which was to the best of my Remembrance in the Year 1749) the said Mr. Vassall said diverse Things concerning the Character and Conduct of Mr. William Fletcher of Boston, Merchant, who was then lately gone to Europe; particularly the said Mr. Vassall said, that the said Mr. Fletcher had sent one of his own Brothers to Sea in an old rotten, leaky, or condemn'd Vessel or Ship, with an Intention that she should be cast away or lost; whereupon one present intimating his Doubt concerning the Truth of this Fact, and speaking something in Favour of said Mr. Fletcher, the said Mr. Vas­sall declared that said Fletcher never did a generous Thing or Action in his Life; and that if said Fletcher's own Father, and every Relation he had in the World, had been on board the said Vessel or Ship he would not have scrupled to cast her away; provided he could have gotten any Thing thereby; the said Mr. Vassall did at this Time further declare, what was the said Mr. Fletcher's End and Design in casting the said Vessel away, which to the best of my Remembrance was this, that said Mr. Fletcher might get his Brother's (the Master's) Share of some Money that was likely to come to his Father's Heirs, or the Family: When the Things above-mentioned were spoken there were about six or seven Persons present. I do moreover testify and declare, that being another Time afterwards at the House of Mr. Vassall's abovesaid, he again took Occasion to speak concerning the said Mr. Fletcher, and there being at this Time a Report newly come to Boston to this Purport, That said Fletcher was like to get little or nothing of the Prize-Money, after which he was supposed to be then gone to England, the said Mr. Vassall declared, that he hoped or wished with all his Heart that this might be true; nevertheless the said Mr. Vassall did immediately add, that he hoped said Mr. Fletcher would get enough to pay his Debts, and that if he did so, this must be a very large Sum, because the said Fletcher when he went away was not able to pay his Debts, and that he ow'd more than he was worth, that he was not worth a Groat, or that he was Thousands worse than Nothing; however said Mr. Vassall did at the same Time express some Compassion to said Mr. Fletcher's Wife and Children, and said that he should be sorry if they were reduced to Want and Suffering, but that he should be glad to see said Fletcher himself a Beggar, nothing being too bad for such a Man; when these Things here mention'd were spoken, there was at least [...] Person present besides said Mr. Vassall and my self. I do further Testify and Declare, that being another Time afterwards, at the House of said Mr. Vassall, he spake diverse Things concerning Mr. Fletcher abovesaid, which Things I do not very particularly remember, only in general, that he told two long Stories concerning said Fletcher's abusing him the said Mr. Vassall, one of which Stories related to some Notes of Hand put into his Mr. Vassall 's Possession, which were to be again delivered up by him, in Conformity to the Settlement of some Disputes at that Time subsisting betwixt said Mr. Fletcher and one Mr. Hall; which Trust said Mr. Vassall declared he had dis­charg'd with the utmost Caution and Fidelity; * but that the said Fletcher was dissatis­fy'd with his Conduct in this Affair, and treated him in a very injurious Manner, for that Reason. The other Story related to a Number of Lottery Tickets, which, as the said Mr. Vassall declar'd, said Fletcher was to have paid him for in a short Time, but had for a long while unjustly refus'd or delay'd to do it; which last Narrative said Mr. Vassall gave as an Argument of said Mr. Fletcher's Unfairness and Dishonesty [Page 10]in his Dealings, and as a Specimen thereof: When the Things here related were spoken, there was at least one Person present besides said Mr. Vassall and my self. I do further Testify and Declare, that I have diverse Times, [...] before and after Mr. Fletcher went to England, as above-mention'd, heard said Mr. Vassall speak of said Mr. Fletcher as being a great Rogue, a Scoundrel, a Villian, a Rascal, a tricking shuffling Fellow, a base ungrateful Fellow, a Fellow of no Honour or Honesty, all which Expressions I have, to the best of my Remembrance, heard said Mr. Vassall in Company use concerning said Mr. Fletcher, but not having taken Pains from the first to charge my Memory with Things of this Nature, nor expecting to be called upon as a Witness to them, I cannot at present declare any Thing more particularly con­cerning them. I do further declare, that I have heard the abovesaid Mr. Vassall say, he had offer'd a Note of Hand, * which he had of said Mr. Fletcher's, to sale in publick Company for considerable less than the Note was given for, but that Mr. Fletcher's Credit run so low, that no Body would purchase it.

N. B. At the first Time alluded to in the Testimony above, there were present the Rev'd Dr. Miller, Mr. Belcher Hancock, Dr. Nathaniel Perkins, Mr. Samuel Holbrook, Mr. Joshua Richardson and Mr. Joseph Royall: At the second Time alluded to, was present Mr. Joseph Royall: At the third Time alluded to there was present Jeremiah Gridley, Esq

Jonathan Mayhew.

I do further Testify, that I have heard said Mr. Vassall declare, that the said Mr. Fletcher had cheated or design'd to Cheat the Bottomers of one of his Vessels, which Vessel, as I understood Mr. Vassall, was actually cast away or lost, as said Fletcher design'd she should be.

Jonathan Mayhew.
Sworn in Court December 8. 1752. Attest. Samnel Win [...]rop, Cler.

N. B. This Testimony was committed to Writing towards the latter end of February 1752, and not before.

Jonathan Mayhew.
A true Copy examined, by Nathaniel Hatch, Cler.

EBenezer Miller of Braintree, D. D. testifieth and saith, That he being at the House of Mr. William Vassall in Boston, a considerable Time ago, as he the Deponent thinks several Years ago, there then happen'd to be some Discourse about Mr. William Fletcher, and that said Mr. Vassall did utter some Words reflecting upon the Reputation and Circumstances of the said William Fletcher, but what they were the Deponent remembreth not, save that the said William Vassall said, that the said Wil­liam Fletcher sent an old defective Vessel to Sea, which was not able or not likely to perform the Voyage, or Words to that Effect, in which he sent or suffer'd to go his Brother; the Deponent saying it was impossible he should do so if he knew the Vessel to be in so bad a Condition; some Persons replied, that he must know it, for that such a Person's Conscience (naming the Person) would not let him send her to Sea any longer; which Words the Deponent thinks said Mr. Vassall laughingly re­peated; to the best of the Deponent's Remembrance there were present Dr. Mayhew, Dr. Perkins, Mr. Joshua Richardson, and Mr. Joseph Royall, and further saith not the Deponent.

E [...]en [...]zer Miller.
Sworn in Court, December 7. 1752. Attest. Samuel Winthrop, Cler.
A true Copy examined, by Nathaniel Hatch, Cler.
[Page 11]

BElcher Hancock, of lawful Age, testifies, That he has heard Mr. William Vassall say, that Mr. William Fletcher would be in difficult Circumstances, provided he did not recover a Share of the Prize that belong'd to the Family, and likewise that Mr. Fletcher was instrumental of his Brother's going to Sea in a Vessel that was unfit for the Voyage: This the Deponent believes was said before Doctor Miller, Doctor Mayhew, and others in Mr. Vassall's own House in the l [...]tter End of the Year 1749.

Belcher Han [...]k.
Sworn in Court, December 7. 1752. Attest. [...] Winthrop, Cler.
A true Copy examined, by Nathaniel Hatch, Cler.

JOseph Royall of lawful Age, testifieth and faith, That sometime after Mr. William Fletcher sail'd for London, he was in Company with the Rev'd Doctor Miller, Doctor Mayhew, and others, at Mr. William Vassall's House, the said Vassall being present, and upon some Discourse had by the Company concerning the said Mr. Fletcher, the Deponent saith, that to the best of his Remembrance he heard the said Mr. Vassall say, that Fletcher had sent an old Vessel to Sea that had been condemn'd, with his Brother in her, and that his Brother was drowned in her; upon which some of the Company asked, What sort of a Vessel she was? To which said Vassall said, Such a Vessel as Edmond Quincy would not venture, or would refuse to send to Sea, or Words to that Effect; and that he the Deponent has often in diverse Places and at diverse Times heard the said Vassall say, that the said Fletcher was a damn'd Ras­cal, Scoundrel, Villain, a Rogue, a Fellow of no Honour, and such sort of Language, and that in some Tickets they were concern'd in together he had treated him like a damn'd Rascal, and had wrong'd and cheated him in 'em; and that he has heard the said Vassall say something concerning the said Fletcher's bottoming a Vessel or Vessels, the Particulars of which he can't remember, but apprehends the same bore hard on Mr. Fletcher's Character, and further saith not. Joseph Royall.

Sworn in Court December 7. 1752. Attest. Samuel Winthrop, Cler.
A true Copy examined, by Nathaniel Hatch, Cler.

JOshua Richardson of Boston, of lawful Age, testifies and says, That he being at the House of Mr. William Vassall in Boston, in Company with the Rev'd Dr. Miller, Dr. Mayhew, Mr. Hancock, and Mr. Joseph Royall, he heard said Vassall say, That he, meaning Mr. William Fletcher, as this Deponent appre­hended, had bought an old Ship or Vessel that was so bad that Mr. Quincy would not send her to Sea, and had sent his Brother in her, and that he was lost or drowned; upon which some Gentleman in Company said, that he tho't Mr. Fletcher was a different sort of a Man, or a better sort of a Man: And further this Deponent says, That he has heard Mr. Vassall say diverse Times, that Mr. Fletcher owed him Money for Lottery Tickets, and that he had deceived him, and wrong'd him by delaying Payment so long that he had lost Considerable of his Debt by * Depreciation of the Money; and further, that he has heard said Vassall say, That Mr. Fletcher's [Page 12]House was mortgag'd, or that the Deed of it was not in his Possession, or Words to that Effect; and this Deponent further declares, that being at Messi [...]. Billings's Shop, in Company with Mr. Vassall and some other Gentlemen, about which Time a Vessel arrived from London, and soon after her Arrival, there was a Report that Mr. Fletcher's Claim for Prize Money was like to be rejected, or if admitted, he would have but a small Share, upon which Reports being mentioned, some Gentlemen said, that it had cost Mr. Fletcher a great deal of Money in pursuing the Affair, and that if he should finally fail in it, that it would effect his Circumstances very much; upon which Mr Vassall said, that tho' there had been a Difference between Mr. Fletcher and him, and that he tho't Mr. Fletcher had used him very ill, yet he should be sorry to see him and his Family ruin'd; and that he tho't he had as good a Right to a Share in the Price as any of the Vessels that was concern'd in taking of her, in Proportion to her Men and Guns, or Words to that Effect.

Josh [...]a Richardson.
Sworn in Court, December 11th 1752. Attest, Samuel Winthrop,
Cler. A true Copy examined, by Nathaniel Hatch, Cler.

HArrison Gray of Boston, Merchant, Testifieth and Declares, That sometime in the Fall of the Year 1749, he was at Mr. Billings's Shop when Mr. Joshua Richardson came in about Four o'Clock in the Afternoon, and inform'd him, That he had just come from Mr. William Vassall's, where he had din'd in Company with Dr. Miller, Mr. Hancock, Mr. Mayhew, and some others, whom the Deponent doth not now remember, and that he was very much pleas'd with the Conduct of Mr. May­hew; I ask'd him, in what Respect? The said Richardson answer'd, that the Major, meaning Mr. Vassall, had said several severe Things to the Prejudice of Mr. Fletcher, viz. That he had taken Money upon the Bottom of an old Brigantine for more than she was worth, and cast her away on Purpose; that he had purchas'd an old Ship that had been Condemn'd, and put his Brother in Master, with a Design to drown him; and the said Richardson told the Deponent [...]any other Things, that the said Vassall that Afternoon said to the Prejudice of Mr. Fletcher's Character, but the Particulars, at so great a Distance of Time, the Deponent cannot pretend to charge his Memory with: Mr. Richardson said, * That upon hearing such heavy Charges against Mr. Fletcher, Dr. Miller reply'd, that he did not take Mr. Fletcher to be such a Man, or Words to that Effect, and that Mr. Mayhew oppos'd Mr. Vassall with some considerable Warmth, and said, that Mr. Fletcher was his Friend, and that it was not generous to use a Gentleman so behind his Back, and that he was certain Mr. Fletcher was a Man of contrary Character, and that he had Reason from the long Acquaintance he had with him, to esteem him as a Gentleman of Generosity, and as free from the Crime of Covetousness as any Gentleman he was acquainted with, without Exception, or Words of a similar Nature: The Deponent further faith, That in a Day or two after the foregoing Conversation with Mr. Richardson, he was in Company with Mr. Mayhew, when he with Pleasure inform'd him of what Mr. Richardson had said in his Favour, who said he was oblig'd to Mr. Richard­son, and that he tho't he could do no otherwise than he did, when he found Mr. Fletcher's Character so attack'd; and that he tho't it was wrong to treat the [Page 13]Character of an absent Gentleman with so much Freedom; but the Deponent well re­members that Mr. Mayhew declin'd giving a particular Account of the Conversation at Mr. Vassall's Table; and that he the said Mr. Mayhew, either then, or a few Days after, told the Deponent, to the best of the Deponent's Memory, that he had never divulg'd that Conversation to any Person breathing. The Deponent further declares; That sometime after this he was at Mr. Fletcher's House in the Evening, in Company with Mrs. Fletcher, who seem'd to be very much dispirited, upon which he ask'd her, What made her so dull? She reply'd, that her Husband's Character suffering so much by the Means of Mr. Vassall, was enough to make her dull, and that she could not reconcile it how Mr. Mayhew, consistant with his Pretentions of Friendship to her Husband, should be so intimate with Mr. Vassall, who took all Op­portunities to expose her said Husband's Character; upon which the Deponent in­form'd her of the above-mention'd Conversation he had with Mr. Richardson, which gave her considerable Satisfaction to find that she had been mistaken in regard to Mr Mayhew; the Deponent further declares, he has once or twice since been in Com­pany with Mr. Richardson, and that he the said Richardson saith, he doth not re­member his ever having such Conversation as is mention'd above, with the Deponent; but the Deponent, altho' he can't pretend to remember every particular Expression, has a perfect Remembrance of the Substance of what pass'd between them.

Harrison Gray.
Sworn in Court December 8. 1752. Attest. Samuel Winthrop, Cler.
A true Copy examined, by Nathaniel Hatch, Cler.

I Hugh McDaniel of Boston, Rope-maker, testify and say, That on or about the last of June, 1749. Mr. William Fletcher the Plantiff took his Passage on board of Capt. Fones for England, and as there was an Account between said Fletcher and myself, he sent for me to settle, wherein the Ballance was in my Favour Nineteen Hundred Pounds old Tenor, Seven Hundred Pounds of said Ballance he paid me down in Cash, and his Note of Hand for Eleven Hundred Pounds more to be paid in six Months, without Interest, and do solemnly declare, I look'd on said Fletcher's Note at that Time to be as good as any Merchant's in Boston; but about a Month after said Fletcher's Departure from hence, I heard Mr. William Vassall the Defendant declare on the Exchange, that said Fletcher the Plantiff was a damn'd Scoundrel, and was not worth a Great, and that he would never came back again: Hearing this on 'Change, I thought to secure myself in the best Manner I could; accordingly as there was a Ship then bound for England. I drew a Bill on said Fletcher for a Hundred Pounds Sterling; but the Bill coming to his Hand two Months before it was due, sent it back again, and order'd his Brother to pay me, and I do declare I was paid with Honour, and further saith not.

Hugh McDaniel.
Sworn in Court, December 11. 1752. Attest Samuel Winthrop, Cler.
A true Copy examined, by Nathaniel Hatch, Cler.

THomas Gray of Boston, Merchant, upon Oath, testifies and declares, That some Time ago Mr. Mal [...]chy Salter and he [...] Mr. John Dea [...]'s lower Store. [...] [Page 14] Fletcher, the Plantiff, and that he the said Fletcher read to said Salter, a Writ said Fletcher had got prepar'd, to be serv'd upon Mr. Vassall, for a considerable Sum, as Damages for defaming his Character, upon which said Deponent told Mr. Salter 'twould be a kind Part in him to inform Mr. Vassall of it, and while said Salter and the Deponent were together, Mr. Vassall the Defendant came by, and was stopt by Mr. Salter, who acquainted him with the Affair; Mr. Vassall said, it was no News to him, that he had been some Days past expecting the Writ to be served on him, and had appear'd daily upon 'Change, that whenever it was serv'd, he would not get Bail but go to Goal, for he said nothing but what he could prove; the said Vas­sall then call'd Mr. Fletcher several hard Names, whether Rascal or Villain, the said Deponent can't determine, but is pretty certain 'twas one, if not both, and other Words to the like purpose, and said, he would declare the same in open Court; Mr. Vassall afterwards said he understood from some Friends, that Mr. Fletcher had charg'd him with saying some Things to his Disadvantage in Regard to sending away an old Ship he had taken Money upon the Bottom of, but said Vassall said, he knew nothing about that; the said Deponent further declares, that he then imagined that the Reason of Mr. Vassall's expressing himself in such Terms was, a Difference the said Deponent had before been inform'd was subsisting between said Fletcher and Vassall, upon Account of some Notes of Hand, and further this Deponent saith not.

Thomas Gray.

P. S. In the midst of the Conversation Mr. John Dennie came down and join'd the Company.

Sworn in Court December 7. 1752. Attest. Samuel Winthrop, Cler.

The Deponent further declares, that upon Recollection he has not the least Re­membrance of Mr. Vassall's having said any Thing about Mr. Fletcher's Cheating Mrs. Eunice Willard, nor of hearing her Name mention'd; but he withdrew and lest said Vassall, Dennie, and Salter together.

Sworn in Court December 9. 1752. Attest. Samuel Winthrop, Cler.
A true Copy examined, by Nathaniel Hatch Cler.

I John Catheart of lawful Age, Mariner, declare, That the latter End of March 1751, being in Black-River in Jamaica, in discoursing with Mr. William Vassall of Boston the Defendant, concerning a Brigt. I was concern'd in with Mr. William Fletcher of said Boston, the Plantiff, which was cast away, said Vassall ask'd me if she was insur'd? I told him that I had left Orders with Mr. Thomas Fletcher, who did his Brother's Business, to write his Brother William Fletcher, who was then in England, to get Four Hundred and fifty Pounds Sterling insured on my Account; that he (said Vassall) spoke very diminitively of said William Fletcher, and said he wou'd-n't give me Six Pence for it if that was the Case.

[Page 15] ISaac Freeman of lawful Age, testifieth and saith, That some Time in the Year 1751, he was at Messi [...]. John and Richard Billings's Shop in Boston, where there was sundry Gentlemen present, among whom was Mr. William Vassall the De­fendant, and that the said Vassall, then speaking of and meaning the Plantiff, said, that Will. Fletcher or Bill. Fletcher was as sorry a Scoundrel, a Villain, a Rascal and scandalous a Fellow as lived, and that he would not take said Fletcher's Word for a Farthing, and he did not believe he was worth a Groat, and that he (said Vassall) said, he once had a Note of said Fletcher's, which he said he offer'd to sell at Vendue before a Number of Gentlemen, and no body would give any-thing for it; and fur­ther, that the said Vassall repeated the Words about the said Fletcher's being a Villain, a Rascal, a scandalous Fellow, and many other Words to the same Effect several Times, very much to the Prejudice of the said Fletcher; upon which the Deponent said, he had often dealt largely with Mr. Fletcher and had always found him a Man of Honour, and thought it was Pity but some of Mr. Fletcher's Friends should let him know what the said Vassall said of him said Fletcher, to which the said Vassall replied, with all his Heart, he should be glad of it for he could prove it, he would say the same to his Face. And the Deponent further saith, that he was Master of the Ship Sophia the Voyage before she went in said Fletcher's Employ, and that after said Fletcher purchased the said Ship, he the said Fletcher would have had this Deponent go the Voyage to Jamaica and the Bay in said Vessel, and that this Deponent should have been willing to have gone in her the same Voyage the said Fletcher's Brother went when he was drowned, had he not at that Time been engag'd in other Persons Employ, and further the Deponent saith not.

Isaac Freeman.
Sworn in Court, December 11. 1752. Attest. Samuel Winthrop, Cler.
A true Copy examined, by Nathaniel Hatch, Cler.

I Joseph Jackson testify and say, That sometime in the Year 1749, I was in Messi [...] John and Richard Billings's Shop, and Mr. William Vassall the Defendant being present, that said William Vassall express'd himself to this Purport, that Mr. William Fletcher was not able to pay his Debts, and that the said William Fletcher sent a Ship to Sea that was not fit to proceed a Voyage; and that said William Fletcher sent a Ship that was lost with a Design to defraud some Gentlemen that was concern'd; and further adds, that from the Report spread by said William Vassall, sometime after William Fletcher sail'd for England, I look'd upon the Money which said Fletcher owed me to be dubious, which before he sail'd I look'd upon to be as good as any Gentleman's in Boston.

[Page 16] Mr. Billings came into Court, and being sworn, was closely examined by Mr. Fletcher, but he could not remember any Thing the said Vassall was charg'd with; at last declared, he did not remember that he ever heard Mr. Vassall say any Thing against Mr. Fletcher's Character: This surpriz'd the Audience, because it was evident that Billings's Shop was the constant Resort of Vassall and his Companions.—Three Days after this Mr. Billings came into Court, and said that Mr. Vassall's Lawyers had pro­miss'd him he should not be sworn,—that he was very much scared and flutter'd when he gave his Evidence before, and pray'd he might have Liberty to bring it in Writing; which was granted, and he produced his Evidence in Writing, upon which he received a severe Reprimand from the Court for his former Beha­viour, and the Court told him, That notwithstanding his present Evidence, they were still surprized at it.—His Evidence is as followeth.

JOhn Billings testifies and declares, That being in Company with Mr. Vassall, the Defendant, he has heard him frequently say, That Mr. William Fletcher the Plantiff, was a Rogue, Rascal, Villain, and such like Names, and that he had cheated him in Regard to some Tickets between them, and further saith not.— This was said while the said Fletcher was in England.

John Billings.
Sworn in Court, December 11. 1752. Attest. Samuel Winthrop, Cler.
A true Copy examined, by Nathaniel Hatch, Cler.

N. B. The following Evidences were summon'd by Mr. Vassall to fish out (as it was term'd) some-thing against Fletcher: After which they were interrogated by Mr. Fletcher, viz.

THomas Cushing of Boston, Merchant, of lawful Age, testifieth, That about a Fortnight or three Weeks before Mr. William Fletcher's Departure for Lon­don, he the Deponent being in Company with Mr. William Vassall, and others, at Messi [...]. John and Richard Billings's Shop, heard Mr. Vassall with some Warmth utter divers Expressions concerning Mr. Fletcher, tending greatly to hurt his Charac­ter and Reputation; particularly, That the said Fletcher was a Man of no Honour, and that he would not trust said Fletcher for a Groat: The Deponent further says, sometime near Mr. Fletcher's Departure for London, he heard it hinted as if Mr. Fletcher was in low Circumstances, about which Time he the Deponent was bound for Mr. Fletcher to Edward Bromfield, Esq as Trustee to the Hon. James Allen, and Andrew Oliver, Esqrs for about the Sum of Two Hundred Pound; Ster­ling, and that he should have endeavour'd to have secured himself with Respect to the same, had he not apprehended the above-mention'd Hints or Reports were ground­less, and arose from Mr. Vassall's talking very freely concerning said Fletcher; of which he was inform'd by Capt. John Billings, who often told him the Deponent, up­on his going into said Billings 's Shop, that said Vassall had been saying of Mr. Fletcher every Thing that was had, and that tended to hurt said Fletcher's Credit.

Thomas Cushing.
Sworn in Court December 9. 1752. Attest. Samuel Winthrop, Cler.
A true Copy examined, by Nathaniel Hatch, Cler.
[Page 17]

JOhn Dennie of lawful Age, Testifies and says, Some short Time after Mr. William Fletcher the Plantiff, returned from London, which was in J [...]ne A. D. 1751, a certain Person mention'd to Mr. William Vassall the Defendant, that he understood that said Fletcher design'd to sue or to take him with a single Writ, for defaming him the said Fletcher; upon which the said Mr. Vassall asked the Person, What he heard Mr. Fletcher had charg'd him with? Upon which the Person told said Vassall, he charg'd him with calling him a Rogue, a Rascal, a Villain, a Cheat; up­on which the said Vassall reply'd, if that is all he charges me with, of calling him a Rogue, a Rascal, a Villain, a Cheat, I own I did, and will go into Court, and own or prove it, for he cheated poor Eunice Willard [...] of a £. 1000 or £. 1500, he took up of her upon the Bottom of a [...], and further this Deponent saith not.

John Dennie.
Sworn in Court, December [...] 1752. Attest. Samuel Winthrop, Cler.
A true Copy examined, by Nathaniel Hatch, Cler.

I William Dennie of Boston, Merchant, declare, That sometime in the Year 1749, I had an Accompt open with Mr. William Fletcher, the Ballance of which due to me was between fourteen and fifteen Hundred Pounds old Tenor; that sometime before he went for London I waited on him, requesting the Payment of said Ballance, when we came to this Agreement, that in his Absence the Money should be paid by his Brother Mr. Thomas Fletcher, and in the mean Time Security given, which was ac­cordingly done to my Satisfaction, and am pretty sure that the giving Security was said Fletcher's own voluntary Offer; that sometime after the said Fletcher's Departure for London, said Ballance was with Honour paid me by his Brother Mr. Thomas Fletcher, and I think with Interest; that I have heard Mr. William Vassall more than once, when speaking of Mr. William Fletcher, say, that he was a Rascal, and Scoundrel, &c.

William Dennie.
Sworn in Court, December 9. 1752. Attest. Samuel Winthrop, Cler.
A true Copy examined, by Nathaniel Hatch, Cler.

BEnjamin Parker of Boston, Merchant, of lawful Age, testifieth and saith, That in the Month of July 1749, he, together with Mr. Le [...]nard Jarvis, bought of Mr. William Fletcher sundry Setts of Bills of Exchange drawn by said Mr. Fletcher on himself, or in his Absence on Nathaniel Paice, Esq of London, to the Value of five Hundred Pounds Sterling, that at the Time of their buying said B [...] they heard Mr. Fe [...]wick had bought Bills of Mr. Fletcher, to the Amount of four or five Hundred Pounds Sterling; that soon after their purchasing said Bills they heard of Mr. Deblois buying Bills also of Mr. Fletcher, to the Amount of Eight Hundred Pounds Sterling; upon hearing of these Drafts they were uneasy about the Payment of their Bills, and acquainted Mr. Fletcher with their Uneasiness; who reply'd, the Bills would be paid, for that he expected to have Effects in London, from the Pro­ceeds of a Vessel he had sent to Carolina, sufficient to discharge said Bills; but as this was not in our Apprehensions sufficient to remove our Uneasiness, it was agreed on between the said Mr. Jarvis and the Deponent, to take such Measures for the Secu­rity of the Money they had paid for said Bills, as they should, upon Consultations with some Gentlemen of the Law, be advis'd to; that some short Time after this the Deponent went to England, that on his Arrival in London, he was acquainted [Page 18] that Part of the said Mr. Fletcher 's Bills were paid, and that the Remainder as they became due were honourably paid, and further this Deponent saith not.

The Drafts of ours were made the 21 •t of July, 1749. Benjamin Parker.
Sworn in Court, December 11th. 1752. Attest. Samuel Winthrop, Cler.
A true Copy examined, by Nathaniel Hatch, Cler.

LEonard Jarvis, of lawful Age, testifies and says, That sometime before Mr. Wil­liam Fletcher went to London, he this Deponent, together with Mr. Benjamin Parker, agreed with said Fletcher for Bills of Exchange to be drawn on himself, or in his Absence on Nathaniel Paice, Esq for five Hundred Pounds Sterling; that sometime after they had paid him considerable Part of the Money for said Bills, they grew very uneasy at some Conversations they had heard relating to Mr. Fletcher's Circumstances; whereupon this Deponent and Benjamin Parker hinted the same to Mr. Fletcher, who mention'd some Methods he had taken to lodge Monies in Eng­land, which gave them Satisfaction; but in two or three Days, according to this De­ponent's best Remembrance, after he had received Mr. Fletcher's Drafts, he was in­form'd that Messi [...]. Gilbert and Lewis Deblois had Bills of Mr. Fletcher's for Eight Hundred Pounds Sterling, which alarm'd him in such a Manner that he made the best Enquiries he could, and of Persons who he thought could best inform him of Mr. Fletcher's Affairs; which Enquiries encreas'd his Uneasiness: Upon which he agreed with his Friend Mr. Parker to take all prudent Precautions both in London, where Mr. Parker was bound, and in New-England; and sometime after, this Deponent advising with a Gentleman of known Character in the Law, took out Writs and at­tach'd Mr. Fletcher's House in Town, and his Farm at Cambridge; * but upon exa­mining the Records for the County of Suffolk, and by Enquiries made by Mr. Sheriff Fester in Middlesex, he found there were no Deeds of either upon Record: This Deponent further says, The Bills of Mr. Fletcher 's were honourably paid. These Drafts of ours were made the 21 •t of July, 1749.

Leonard Jarvis.
Sworn in Court, December 11. 1752. Attest. Samuel Winthrop, Cler.
A true Copy examined, by Nathaniel Hatch, Cler.

I Samuel Champny do declare, That in the Year 1747 I sold Mr. William Fletcher the Farm he now owns in C [...]bridge, for Three Thousand Pounds, and took his Bond for the same in 1748, at which Time I gave the said Fletcher a Deed for the same; that before he went to England he paid between fifteen and sixteen Hundred Pounds, as I called for it, and to my Satisfaction; and that since that the said Fletcher hath paid me about five Hundred Pounds more, and has told me several Times since, that I might have the Remainder whenever I pleased to demand it: Further, I declare, That about a Fortnight past Mr. William Vassall of Boston came to me at my House in Cambridge, and told me, he was inform'd Mr. William Fletcher ow'd me, and ask'd me, What Security I had for it, and if I had a Mortgage for it? I told him I had not; then he ask'd me whether I had a single Bond for it? I told him I had a Bond, and was very easy about it, for Mr. Fletcher always let me [Page 19]have Money whenever I wanted it, and told me that I might have a Thousand Pounds at any Time, if I would give him Notice a Week or ten Days, or a Fortnight at the cut-side, before-hand: Then the said Vassall ask'd me, whether I hadn't taken up Goods of said Fletcher upon that Account, for fear I shou'dn't get my Money? I told him I had not, and that the Goods I had were quite upon another Footing; and further I told him that said Fletcher had always dealt generously and honourably with me.

Samuel Champny.
Sworn in Court December 8. 1752. Attest. Samuel Winthrop, Cler.
A true Copy examined, by Nathaniel Hatch, Cler.

Middlesex, ss. Cambridge, November 27 th. 1752.

THESE may Certify, That I have not receiv'd into my Office the Deed which Mr. Samuel Champny gave of his Father's Estate in Cambridge to Mr. William Fletcher of Boston.

Attest. Fra. Foxcrost, Register of Deeds for Middlesex.
A true Copy examined, by Nathaniel Hatch, Cler.

THomas Hubbard, Esq of lawful Age, testifies and says, That in the Month of July 1749, Mr. William Fletcher bought of him a Snow and her Cargo of Luraber, for which he was to give him £. 11,544, and propos'd to pay him in the following Manner, viz. £. 900 Sterling by the first of April 1750, and the Remainder by a Draft on his Brother Thomas Fletcher, payable in a short Time, which he did accordingly; and for Security of the Payment of the £. 900 Sterling he propos'd to hypothecate the Vessel, to which I objected, as that would be attend­ed with Trouble and Cost, and without an Insurance would be a slender Security; a little Time after this Mr. Fletcher met me on the Exchange, and told me, if it was agreeable to me, he would instead of hypothecating the Vessel for Security, give me a Deed of Mortgage of his Mansion-House at the westerly Part of the Town, which he said was free from any kind of Incumbrance, but should be glad it might not be put upon Record, at least for a Time, to which readily agreed; accordingly on the 24th of July he brought me his promissary Note of Hand for £. 900 Sterling, pay­able the first of April 1750, and a Mortgage-Deed for his House duly executed, and I gave him a Bill of Sale for Vessel and Carge according to Promise; I also then a­greed with him, that in Case he should not succed in the Business he was then bound to London upon, I would not protest his Bills in three Months after the Expiration of the Time therein limited for their Payment, and gave Orders to my Friends not to protest them till they had Orders from me to do it; but hearing in the Fall of the Year 1750, that Mr. Fletcher's Affairs in England were delay'd from Time to Time, and in case of Mortality of either Side, there might some Difficulty a [...]s by my Deed's not being on Record, I did on the 10th of December 1750, and not before, offer it to the Register of Deeds for the County of Suffolk, desiring him to enter it himself, and not let any Body know it if he could conveniently help it, apprehending it was not prudent in me to keep it by me without it's being on Record, which was the Reason of my acting as I did. £. 700, Part of the £. 900, was paid me in March 1751, by Mr. Fletcher himself to my Order in London, the other £ 200 remains unpaid.

Thomas Hubbard.
Sworn in Court December 9. 1752. Attest. Samuel Winthrop, Cler.
A true Copy examined, by Nathaniel Hatch, Cler.
[Page 20]

THE Deposition of Ezekiel Goldthwait, Register of Deeds and Conveyances of Houses and Lands within the County of Suffolk, in the Province of the Mas­sachusetts-Bay in New-England; and the said Deponent declares and says, That on the 10th Day of December 1750, Thomas Hubbard, Esq delivered to him a Deed, bearing Date the first Day of December 1747, which James Allen and Andrew Oliver of Boston, Esqrs as surviving Executors of the last Will and Testament of Thomas Fitch, Esq deceased, for the Sum of Two thousand two hundred and thirty-two Pounds Bills of Credit of the old Tenor, sold and conveyed unto William Fletcher of Boston aforesaid, Merchant, a certain Dwelling-House and Land scituate at the west­erly Part of Boston, and in said Deed bounded as followeth, viz. Southerly on Cam­bridge-Street, and there measures One hundred twenty-eight Feet, Westerly on Staniford-Street Eighty Feet, Northerly on Land of John Staniford, and there measures One hudred twenty-eight Feet, Easterly on Land of the said James Allen, and there measures eighty Feet; and at the same Time said Thomas Hubbard, Esq delivered to the Deponent one other Deed from said William Fletcher, to him said Hubbard, bearing Date the 24th Day of July 1749, wherein said Fletcher con­veyed to said Hubbard the Dwelling-House and Land aforesaid, as a colateral Secu­rity for the Payment of the Sum of Nine Hundred Pounds Sterling, due to him on said Fletcher's Note given to said Hubbard the same Day, and payable on or before the first Day of April, One thousand seven hundred and fifty-one, on the Payment of which, said Deed and Note were to be void; in which last Deed it is mentioned, that the said Fletcher had put into the Hands of said Thomas Hubbard, Esq the Deed a­foresaid given to him by said Allen and Oliver, both which Deeds the said Hubbard desired this Deponent to record; and further, that the Record of the last-mention'd Deed from Mr. Fletcher to Mr. Hubbard remains uncancel'd and undischarg'd to this Day; and the Deponent further says, that when said Hubbard gave him the Deeds aforesaid, he ask'd said Hubbard, why he had kept 'em so long without recording? To which he answer'd, that Mr. Fletcher desired him that he would not soon record 'em, but, said Mr. Hubbard, the Affairs he is gone to England upon seem to be de­lay'd, and I don't know how long he may tarry there, so I think it safest to have them upon Record; but I would have you do it with as much Secrecy as the Nature of it will admit of, — when we parted: The Deponent further says, That upon searching the Records he finds, that said Mr. William Fletcher on the thirty-first Day of May 1744, for the Sum of Five Hundred Pounds old Tenor, purchas'd an Estate in Boston of Benjamin Bagnall, and which the Deponent cannot find he has since sold or convey'd; and further the Deponent says not.

Ezekiel Goldthwait.
Sworn in Court, December 11. 1752. Attest. Samuel Winthrop, Cler.
A true Copy examined, by Nathaniel Hatch, Cler.

I Thomas Fletcher of Boston, declare, That in October 1746, I entered into my Brother William Fletcher's Business in the Warehouse, and wrote for him, and continued in his said Business from that Time untill July 1751, during which Time I never knew any Thing transacted in his Business but what was agreeable to Justice; but in a very short Time after he was gone for England, in the Year 1749. I was surpriz'd to hear a Number of bad Reports spread abroad concerning him, such as these, that he was a bad Man, that his Circumstances were bad, and the like, all [Page 21]which gave me a great deal of Uneasiness and Trouble, as I was left to transact his Business in his absence; that soon after these Reports were spread abroad, diverse Persons with whom my Brother [...] Dealings, came to me and press'd me very much for the Demands they had against my Brother, which put me to uncommon Inconveniencies to [...] their Demands; and in the Year 17 [...], Isaac Hatch and Samuel Tilden, to wh [...]n my Brother was indebted about £. 4000 old Tenor, [...] him for the same, and attac'd [...] Effects in my Hands for Security; the former of which told me, be did not want the Money, provided I would give him Security; and further, at the Request of my said Brother, I have lately examined his Books and Papers, and how his Affairs stood at the Time of going to England in the Year 1749, and find by the best Computation that I can make, that after all the Demands that any Person had against him at that Time, he had a Ballance in his Favour of about Five Thousand Pounds old Tenor, exlusive of his Real Estate in Boston and at Cambridge *E [...]i [...]ed between [...].

Thomas Fletcher.
Sworn in Court December 7. 1752. Attest. Samuel Winthrop, Cler.
A true Copy examined, by Nathaniel Hatch, Cler.

Memorandum.

THAT in this Case the Council for the Defendant mov'd, That Thomas Fletcher, the Plantiff's Book-keeper and a Witness in the Case, might be questioned, Whether a large Quantity of Goods of the Plantiff's were not once se [...]'d by the Custom-House Officers, as being illegally Imported? To this the Plantiff's Council objected, as impertinent to the Issue, and tending to charge the Plantiff with an Offence against which he was not prepared to defend himself: Upon which the Court was divided, Mr. Justice Saltonstall and Mr. Justice Russell were of Opinion, that the Question might be put to the Witness; but the Chief-Justice and Mr. Justice Ly [...] were of a contrary Opinion: Whereupon it was rul'd by the whole Court, That the Witness should not be put to answer that Question. Allow'd to be fil'd in the Case.

Attest. Samuel Winthrop, Cler.
A true Copy examined, by Nathaniel Hatch, Cler.

N. B. The following Witnesses were produced by Mr. Fletcher, to support his Character, and to prove what special Damages he had suffer'd by Means of Mr. Vassall's injurious Treatment.

EDmund Quincy, of lawful Age, Testifies and Declares, That at sundry Times be­tween the latter Part of November 1750, and October 1752, he receiv'd sundry Letters from Messi [...], Thomas and Adrian Hope, Merchants in Amsterdam, re­specting a considerable Sum of Money which Mr. William Fletcher of Boston ow'd the said Hopes; that in the first of said Letters, dated August 4. 1750. the said Messi [...]. Hopes inclos'd an Account of what Mr. Fletcher ow'd them, with a Power [Page 22]of Attorney, and Directions to the said Deponent and Son, to prosecute their De­mand against said Fletcher, in same Letter acquainting the said Deponent, that they apprehended they were in Danger of Suffering, by their having given said Fletcher a Credit of upwards of Two Thousand Pounds Sterling, and urging us to obtain Se­curity for the same by some Means or other; that soon after receipt of the above­mention'd Letter, the said Deponent receiv'd another dated August 10th, with Du­plicate of said Account and Power, in which Letter the said Mess [...] Hopes repeat their Request, that we would procure them here Payment of said Debt, or Security for the same, adding, that they had receiv'd nothing from Mr. Fletcher but Excuses for his non-Complaince with their Demand made in London *; but in their next Letter of August 14th, they advise the said Deponent, that since their last Mr. Fletcher had given them so satisfactory an Answer to their Demand, that they desire their Power against him might not be carried into Execution, and very particu­larly caution'd the said Deponent and Son against any Hint of the same; that in their next Letter of October 13th, the said Mess [...]. Hopes urge the said Deponent and Son to prosecute their Demand against Mr. Fletcher, as the Proposals made were not comply'd with; that in their next of March 4th, in Answer to one they had receiv'd from the said Deponent and Son, they write, they were much pleas'd with the said Deponent and Son, their having procur'd Security of Sixteen Hundred Pounds Sterling Value in Goods, which Mr. Thomas Fletcher had assign'd them, for Ac­count of said Hopes, in Behalt of his Brother Mr. William Fletcher, by an Instru­ment under his Hand, and were to remain where they, were deposited, till Advice arrived from Mess [...]. Hopes that their Demand was satisfy'd; that in their next Let­ter of July 31st. 1751, they advise said Deponent and Son, that Mr. Fletcher had paid them in London, Eight Hundred Pounds Sterling, part of his Debt, and that they esteem'd themselves very happy that the Sixteen Hundred Pounds Security in Goods would prove sufficient to answer their Demand, and that as they had Mr. Fletcher's Bond for the Sixteen Hundred Pounds, then remaining due, they would forward an authenticated Copy of the same, in order to prosecute their Demand in the Law, and in same Letter gave Liberty to deliver up said Security of Goods, for any other which might be esteemed Equivalent, least the Detention of the Goods might be detrimental to Mr. Fletcher; that in their next Letter of August 20th, 1751, Mess [...]. Hopes write, that their said Demand remain'd unsatisfied, but in same Letter say, they were advis'd that Mr. Fletcher's Affairs began to wear a better Aspect than they had done, on the Prospect of a considerable additional Sum of Prize Money; that in sundry following Letters, Messi [...]. Hopes make mention of Mr. Fletcher's Affairs, but seemingly in general with less Concern, till their Letter of May 19th, 1752, in which they advise of his having paid them the full of their Demand: The said Deponent further Testifies, That he had dealt with Mr. Fletcher some Years before his going for London, in all which he had no Reason to suspect his Hones [...]y or Honour, and particularly, about six Months before his Departure, he was in so good Credit with the said Deponent, that he took the said Fletcher's single Note of Hand for about there Thousand Pounds, old Tenor, due to him from another Person, whom the said Deponent discharg'd upon Receipt of said Note, which Note he paid about a quarter Part before his Departure, and the Remainder by his Brother after­wards; [Page 23]and the Deponent further [...]ch, that the principal D [...] when the said Mr. Fletcher ow'd said Mess [...]. Hopes, was per their Account contracted the 29th of J [...]ne 1750; and the said Deponent further saith not.

Edward Quincy.
Sworn in Court, December 5, 1752. Atte [...]. Samuel Winthrop, Cler.
A true Copy examined, by Nathaniel Hatch, Cler.

THE Deposition of [...], of Boston, Mariner, of lawful Age, tersti­fies and says, That on or [...] the fifth of August, A. D. 1752, Old Sti [...]e, being at the House of Mass [...] Thomas and [...] Hopes, Merchants in Amsterdam in [...], those two Gentleman took this Deponent aside from the Compting-House, out of the Hearing of their Clerks, and ask'd him, if he know Mr. William Fletcher in Boston? this Deponent answered, Yes; and that he left him in London the last Fall; and then they ask'd him, what Circumstances he was in? This Deponent answer that he wish'd that he was in as good, they then ask'd, how, in what [...]? this Deponent then said to them, that the Government had granted him Ten Thousand Pounds Sterling, and that he believ'd that he would receive Seven Thousand Pounds more, and that besides, he had got a good Estate in New-England, so that this Circumstances is certainly credible enough; then they said they were wrong inform'd; and this Deponent further said, that he would be bound for Mr. Fletcher's Payment if he ow'd them any Money; and they further said, we have sent him away a great deal; then this Deponent answer'd, that they had no Occasion to be afraid of their Money if he ow'd them any; and they said, they were glad to hear so; and this Deponent then said, that they must have been misinform'd of Mr. Fletcher, and then [...] Thomas and Adrian said, that they were glad to hear that it was so; then this Deponent ask'd them, who the Persons were that gave them such Information? and they said, they were inform'd so, then I said by whom, and what is his Name? and they then told me the Name of the Person, but as he was unknown to this Deponent, he really had forgot the Name, but well remembers that he was a Master of a Vessel; and this Deponent further says, that then Messi [...]. Then as and Adrian Hope lock'd on each other and said, that they were sorry that they had had such Information of him; and further this Deponent saith not.

Narrias Vaughan.

Suffolk, ss. Boston, December 6. 1752.

Narrias Vanghan being sick, and not able to attend the Court, personally appear'd and being solemnly caution'd to declare the whole Truth, made Oath to the afore-written Deposition by him sign'd, That it contains the Truth, the whole Truth and nothing but the Truth; the same being taken at the Request of William Fletcher, to serve in a Cause upon the Review to be heard and try'd at the Superiour Court of Judicature now sitting at Boston, within and for the County of Suffolk, wherein the said William Fletcher was the original Plantiff, and William Vassall Defendant, the said William Vassall being present at the Caption of the Minutes of this Depostion being said, and made no Objection.

Coram me, John Steel, Just. PAC.
A true Copy examined, by Nathaniel Hatch, Cler.
[Page 24]

SAmuel Tilden of Mars [...]ld, in the County of Plymouth, Yeoman, being of lawful Age, Testifieth and saith, That in the Fall of the Year 1750, he settled Accounts with Mr. Thomas Fletcher of Boston, Merchant, on Account of his Brother Mr. William Fletcher, then gone for England, and the Ballance due to him the said Til­den and the other Owners, was about Fifteen Hundred Pounds old Tenor, for which Sum the said Thomas gave his Notes of Hand on Behalf of said William; and that about eight or ten Months afterwards, as near as he can now recollect, it being at the House of Mr. Isaac Hatch at Pembroke, who had lately come from Boston, the Deponent having sometime before heard from Israel Hatch, that Mr Fletcher's House was mortgag'd; he thereupon made Enquiry about it of Mr. Isaac Hatch, who acquainted him, that he was inform'd in Boston by Deacon Hill, that Mr. Fletcher's House was mortgag'd, and that he the said Fletcher would never return back again to this Country; *See Mr Hatch Evidence as [...]. whereupon this Deponent became somewhat uneasy about his Money, and having been inform'd by Mr. Hatch, that Mr. Fletcher was in his Debt, this Deponent ask'd him, whether he intended to sue Mr. Fletcher? who answered, that he could not tell, whether he should sue him or not; but this Deponent observing that Mr. Hatch did not incline to speak freely about that Mat­ter, he apprehended that the said Hatch was jealous, that the Deponent would get Security for his Money before him, whereupon he the Deponent, by the first Opportunity that presented, sent a single Writ against the said Thomas Fletcher, for about Seven Hundred and Fifty Pounds (being what was due to him by promissary Note of Hand) and thereupon he got Security for his Money; and this Deponent farther declared, th [...] if it had not been for these Reports which he heard, he should not have sued for his Money.

Suffolk, ss. December 2. 1752.

The above-nam'd Samuel Tilden, being bound to Sea, appear'd before me, and being carefully examin'd in the Presence of Messi [...]. William Vassall and William Fletcher, in whose Cause (now depending by Appeal in the Superiour Court of Judicature, wherein the said Fletcher is Plantiff, and the said Vassall Defendant, and being caution'd to Testify the whole Truth) he made Oath to the Truth of the above written Declaration; taken out of Court by Consent of both the said Parties before me,

S. D [...]xforth, Jus. Pacis.
A true Copy examined, by Nathaniel Hatch, Cler.

THomas Hill, of Boston, Distiller, of full Age, Testifies and says, That some Time in the Year 1750, he met with Mr. Isaac Hatch, jun. on the Deponent's Whart, and Mr. Hatch told him, Mr. William Fletcher owed him a Sum of Money, and that he (said Hatch) was a going to sue him; upon which I the De­ponent made Answer, that he need not do that, for that Mr. Fletcher had sent a large Quantity of Goods over to New-England; and that Mr. Fletcher was like to recover his Money in London, and that he would be over to New-England in a short Time; upon which Mr. Hatch ask'd me the Deponent, if I would be bound for said Fletcher? to which I made answer, I did not care to be bound for any Man, but if he would take Ru [...], I would pay him the Debt; but as to my saying to said Hatch, that [Page 25]Mr. Fletcher's House was under a Mortgage, and that Mr. Fletcher would never re­turn to New-England, I the Deponent, do declare, I do not remember my saying any such Thing; and verily believe I did not say any such Thing; but it must certainly be a Mistake of said Hatch 's, for I never knew that Mr. Fletcher 's House was mortgag'd, 'till I heard Mr. Speaker Hubbard 's Evidence read in this Court last Night, and never had any Reason to think be (said Fletcher) would not return; and further I the Deponent say, that having a considerable Trade with Mr. Fletcher ever since that Mr. Fletcher has been for himself, more especially from April 1749 to March 1750, when the Amount of their Account was upwards of £. 4000 old Tenor, and when he the said Fletcher settled Accounts with me, I the Deponent was in his Debt up­wards of £. 200 old Tenor, and from May 1750, to January 1752, when the Amount of the Account was upwards of £. 1000 Lawful Money, upon Settle­ment of Account, I was in his Debt, eleven Pounds Lawful Money, in all which Dealings I never found but that Mr. Fletcher was as honest and fair a Trader as any Man I the Deponent [...]ver dealt with.

Thomas Hill.
Sworn in Court, December 9th. 1752. Attest. Samuel Winthrop, Cler.
A true Copy examined, by Nathaniel Hatch, Cler.

JOseph Dowse, of lawful Age, testifieth and saith, That Mr. William Fletcher of Boston, Merchant, in the Year 1746, 1747, and 1748, occasionally underwrote Pollicies of Insurance in his the Deponent's Office; that the said William Fletcher as far as the Deponent could apprehend, was in good Credit and Repute; that no Person (as he knew of) made any Objections to him; that in the Time above­mention'd said Fletcher made considerable Insurance on many of his Vessels in the Deponent's Office, the Priemiums of which he discharg'd with Honour; and before his Departure to England, viz. in June 1749, he settled his Account, and paid the Deponent the Ballance; and that after that, viz. July 10th. 1749, the Deponent sold said William Fletcher Part of a Vessel, and, according to Agreement, took his own Bond, payable in Eight Months without Interest, for £. 2122 13 s. 5 d. old Tenor, and if not then paid to carry Interest; and further saith not.

Joseph Dowse.

The Deponent being asked, If the Bond mention'd in the Deposition was now discharg'd? answer'd, it was not: Further was ask'd, whether it had been demand­ed? Answer'd, No.

Sworn in Court December, 9. 1752. Attest. Samuel Winthrop, Cler.
A true Copy examined, by Nathaniel Hatch, Cler.

STephen Greenleaf of Boston, Merchant, of lawful Age, testifieth and saith, That for many Years last past he has dealt in a Mercantile Way with Mr. William Fletcher, to the Amount of many Thousand Pounds, and that in the whole Course of Business, he always found the said Fletcher behave in all Respects with Ho­nour and Honesty, as become a Merchant; this Deponent further saith, that sometime before Mr. Fletcher sail'd for England this Deponent sold him the said Fletcher, one half Part of a Ship for about four Thousand Pounds, and took the said Fletcher's sole Obligation for the Payment of the same, at a distant Period, being at that Time un­der no Suspicion, but that Mr Fletcher's Circumstances were very good; but that a [Page 26]few Days before the said Fletcher left New-England, this Deponent hearing in a loose and general Way, that Mr. Fletcher's Circumstances were [...]ous, thought himself oblig'd in Faithfulness to Mr. William Vernon, a Gentleman in Rhode-Island, who was partly interested with this Deponent in the said half Part of the Ship, to desire the Favour of the said Fletcher, to get some Person to be bound with him the said Fletcher for so much Money as was due to the said Fernen, but that as to his own Part of said Ship by wanted no Security, being perfectly satisfied with said Fletcher's single Bond; upon which Mr. Fletcher reply'd, that it was disagreable to him to ask any Gentleman to be bound for him, but that he would pay the Money punctually at the Time agreed on, or sooner if his Affairs in England could be soon settled; and added, that it would be agreable to him if this Deponent would advise his Correspon­dent in London, to call upon the said Fletcher for the Amount of those Bonds, and that if he could conveniently discharge them he would do it, but this Deponent never made any Demands (for his own Part, Mr. Vernon's was paid) on the said Fletcher for the same to this Day; and further saith not.

Stephen Greenleaf.
Sworn in Court, December 9. 1752. Attest. Samuel Winthrop, Cler.
A true Copy examined, by Nathaniel Hatch, Cler.

JOhn Go [...], of lawful Age, testifieth and saith, That some short Time before Mr. William Fletcher sail'd for London, he bought one fourth Part of a Ship of this Deponent, and gave his Bond for the same, payable the twenty-fifth Day of March 1752, for the Sum of Two Thousand one Hundred and fifty-eight Pounds, fifteen Shillings, in Bills of the old Tenor, and before he sail'd, he promis'd me he would pay unto Mr. Thomas Lane Merchant in London, One Hundred Pounds Sterling for my Account, being in Part of said Bond, and that if he the said Fletcher could spare it, he would make it up One Hundred and fifty Pounds Sterling, and further promised me, that he would send me any Goods that I should write to him for while in London; I accordingly wrote to Mr. Fletcher for several Things, all of which he comply'd with, not only in sending me what Goods I wrote for, but paying the Money he promis'd to pay Mr. Lane on my Account, with the Addition of the last fifty Pounds; and this Deponent further says, That for several Years before Mr. Fletcher sail'd for London, he had considerable Dealing; with him, and was concern'd with him in several Voyages, and always found him to act with strict Honour and Justice, and never heard that his Credit was the least suspected, 'till some Time after he sail'd for London; and further this Deponent saith not.

John Go [...].
Sworn in Court, December 9. 1752. Attest. Samuel Winthrop, Cler.
A true Copy examined, by Nathaniel Hatch, Cler.

WE Gilbert and Lewis Deblois, of Boston, Braziers, declare, That in July 1749, we purchas'd three Setts of Bills of Exchange of Mr. William Fletcher of Boston, Merchant, who drew the said Bills on himself, to the Value of Eight Hundred Pounds Sterling, payable by himself at distant Periods, and that at that Time we had so good an Opinion of Mr. Fletcher's Credit and Circumstances, that if we had had Occasion of a larger Sum, we should been glad to have taken said Fletcher's Bills therefore; that soon after we purchas'd said Bills of Mr Fletcher, we heard [Page 27]that his Circumstances were bad, which gave us some Uneasiness, least are should lose the Money we had paid him for said Bills; and in order to prevent a Loss we imme­diately sent forward to London, a Power to two Gentlemen there against the said Fletcher, with Orders to secure our Interest in Case the said Bills should not meet with Honour; that notwithstanding what we had heard to the Disadvantage of said Fletcher's Circumstances, the said Bills were all punctually paid as they became due.

Gilbert & L [...] Deblois.

And that those Deponents heard three or four People say, That Mr. Fletcher's Circumstances were bad, and this was two or three Days before said Fletcher went to England, and that they never heard Mr. Vassall say any Thing of Mr. Fletcher's Circumstances, nor any Person that they know dealt with Mr. Fletcher.

Sworn in Court December 11. 1752. Attest. Samuel Winthrop, Cler.
A true Copy examined, by Nathaniel Hatch, Cler.
Mr. William Fletcher, Sir,

AS you are now going to settle at Boston in New-England, if you are inclined to undertake the following Commission, it may introduce us to a further Corres­pondence, you will please to purchase what Dollars you can of full Weight, at a Price not exceeding Four Shillings and Six Peace Sterling each, and consign them on my Account to Thomas Sand, Esq Deputy-Pay master of the Forces at Halifax in Nova-Scotia; get them on as cheap Freight as possible, and send me the earliest Ad­vice possible of what you intend to ship, that I may make the necessary Insurance: You will by the first Opportunity from Time to Time send me the Duplicates of the Bills of Lading, on the Receipt of which I will punctually pay your Drafts on me at Thirty Days Sight; for all which I shall be willing to allow you Two and one half per Cent. Commission.

You'l please to follow Mr. Soul's Direction, in every Thing, as well in continuing as desisting from sending said Dollars.

I am, SIR, Your most humble Servant, William Baker.
A true Copy examined, by Nathaniel Hatch, Cler.

I John Stevens declare and say, That in April 1749, I sail'd from Boston to the West-Indies and London, and that in October 1749, I arriv'd in London, where I met with Mr. William Fletcher of Boston, with whom I was very intimate while there, by which Means I became considerably acquainted with said Fletcher's Trade and Business in London, and that the said Fletcher was in great Credit with some of the most credible and considerable Merchants in London, particularly Mr Bonrry [...]; and that I was applied to by several Gentlemen in London, to in [...]eed with Mr. Fletcher for his Favours, by Gentlemen that were look'd upon to be Men of Worth and Reputation in Trade; I continued in [...] from October 10 th 'till February 10 th then I embark'd for Boston, where I arriv'd in April following, where to my great Surprized heard many ill Reports and bad Things said of said Fletcher, upon which I ask'd Mr. Joseph Scott concerning them, as I took him to be a particular Acquain­tance of said Fletcher's; he gave me for Answer, seemingly with Concern, that he [Page 28]really believ'd [...] all arose from what he heard Mr. Vassall say in publick Company, that said Fletcher was a Cheat, a Scoundrel, a very great Villain, had no Honour in him, sent his Brother to Sea in an old Ship on purpose to drown him, and that he bottom'd a Ship for more than she was worth, to cheat the Bottomers, and that said Fletcher wan't worth a Groat, and not able to pay his Debts, but Thousands worse than nothing; all which said Scott told me in private Conversation at my Return from London, after my hearing these ill Reports of said Fletcher; and said Scott fur­ther told me, that he had once or more Times differed with said Vassall in Vindication of said Fletcher's Character; and further saith not.

John Stevens.
Sworn in Court December 9. 1752. Attest. Samuel Winthrop, Cler.
A true Copy examined, by Nathaniel Hatch, Cler.

I Joseph Grant, jun'. of Boston, do declare, That I have dealt with Mr. William Fletcher of said Boston, to the Amount of Forty-one Thousand Pounds, old Tenor, within the last six Years past, in the Way of Insurance and Merchandize, and that I always found him in all his Dealings with me to be a Man of Honour, and as such, in my Apprehension, he was esteem'd by all the Gentlemen who under-wrote in my Office the same Time Mr. Fletcher did, and that whenever any Loss or Losses hap­pen'd on Pollices under-wrote by him, they were always paid off and discharg'd with Honour.

About Thirty-eight Thousand Pounds of the above, was for Premiums of Insurance wrote in my Office, within the Term of Four Years.

Joseph Grant, jun'.
Sworn in Court, December 9. 1752. Attest. Samuel Winthrop, Cler.
A true Copy examined, by Nathaniel Hatch, Cler.

JOhn Tudor, of lawful Age, Testifieth, That upon looking over his Books he finds he has been constantly trading with Mr. William Fletcher, ever since the Year 1740 to 1752, and not only so, but I have several Times lent him large Sums of Money, in all which he has faithfully and generously paid me; I also find by my Books, that I have lent him several Sums of Money on the Bottom of several Vessels, from the Year 1742 to 1748, and not one of them was cast away while I was concern'd, and the Principal and Premium he always justly paid me according to Agreement; I was also concern'd with him as an Under-writer for a Number of Years in Mr. Grant's Insurance-Office, during which Time I never see any Thing to the best of my Remembrance in Mr. Fletcher which tended to baffle or defraud any Gentleman, amongst the many that met with any Loss; and as far as I could judge, from our Beginning in said Office to the End of the French War, Mr. Fletcher 's Credit and Character stood as fair as any Member's in the Office, and thro' the Course of so many Years, and so many Thousand Pounds Trade as we have had together, I never saw the least Room to suspect either his Honour or Honesty, and that at his going to England he owed this Deponent a Sum of Money, and gave him Secu­rity for it to Satisfaction.

John Tudor.
Sworn in Court, December 7. 1752. Attest. Samuel Winthrop, Cler.
A true Copy examined, by Nathaniel Hatch, Cler.
[Page 29]

THese are to Certify, That in the Year 1745 and 1746, I the Subscriber of Bos­ton, Merchant, had considerable Dealings with Mr. William Fletcher of Bos­ton, Merchant, and have had some Trade with him before and since that Time, he always dealt with me with Honour and Honesty, as Witness my Hand this 8th of December 1752.

Charles Apthorp.
Sworn in Court, December 9. 1752. Attest. Samuel Winthrop, Cler.
A true Copy examined, by Nathaniel Hatch, Cler.

THomas Bell, Esq of New-Castle, in the Province aforesaid, Merchant, being of lawful Age, Testifieth and Declareth, That for Twelve Years last past he hath dealt very largely with Mr. William Fletcher of Boston, in the Province of the Massachusetts-Bay, Merchant, and particularly in the Year 1748, sold him [...]hree new Vessels, viz. A Ship and two Brigantines, which amounted to upwards of £. 20,000; that in June 1749, upon the said Fletcher's being bound for England, he sent and requested of me to come to Boston to settle, and when I came, he said he was very glad to see me, and likewise said, if I hadn't come, he was determin'd to come to Piscataqua to settle before he sail'd; accordingly I settled Accounts with the said Fletcher to the Value of upwards of £. 22,000, at which Time the said Fletcher, fell about £. 9,000 in my Debt, £. 8,000 whereof I took his Bond for, payable in twelve Months, which Sum the said Fletcher's Brother Mr. Thomas Fletcher, who had the Care of his Business, fully and honourably discharg'd before the same became due; and I always found the said William Fletcher, from the first of my Dealings with him to the last, a Man of Truth, of strict Honour and Honesty, and should have been glad at any Time to have trusted the said Fletcher with any Sum of Money I was capable of: The said Thomas Bell further declareth, That in the Fall of the Year 1749, I went down to Boston upon Business, and while I was in Boston, I heard to my great Surprize many bad Reports spread abroad about the said Fletcher, such as these, that he was in bad Circumstances; that all his Estate was mortgag'd; that he was not able to pay his Debts; that he never wou'd return to Boston again; and particularly I was told by sundry Persons, whose Names I do not now remember, neither do I know from whence such Reports sprang, that I was in Danger of loosing what the said Fletcher owed me, and the like; all which gave me great Uneasiness, and oblig'd me to make considerable Enquiry into the said Fletcher's Circumstances; but through the whole I never could find there was any just Grounds for such Re­ports, but on the contrary found by enquiring of Persons who dealt with the said Fletcher, and to whom the said Fletcher ow'd Money, that they had a quite different Opinion of him, and said they were not under any Apprehensions of ever suffering by him, and wou'd warrant that I shoudn't be a Farthing looser by him, the said Fletcher, and that he was a Man of Honour and Estate; but, notwithstanding these Reports gave me so much Uneasiness that I shou'd at that Time have refus'd him the said Fletcher any further Credit, and that I verily believe that these Reports I had heard very much disserv'd the said Fletcher's Credit and Interest, and further [...]aith not, excepting, that if upon Enquiry of the Persons the said Fletcher ow'd, they hadn't said what they did in his Favour, I should certainly have sued the said Fletcher.

Thomas Bell.
[Page 30]

The above-named Thomas Bell, Esq a Person of good Repute, appear'd before me, and after being duely caution'd to testify the whole Truth, relating to an Action to be try'd in the Superiour Court of Judicature, now held at Boston, for the County of Suffolk, between William Fletcher Plantiff, and William Vassall Defendant, made Oath to the Truth of the above-written Declaration by him subscribed, he living above thirty Miles distant from Boston aforesaid, and the said William Vassall, the ad­verse Party, not dwelling or being within twenty Miles from Portsmouth, where the above Affidavit was taken, was not notified to be present at it.

Sworn before me, Thomas Wibird, Jus ce. of the Peace.

THese Certify, That Thomas Wibird, Esq before whom the Oath (of Thomas Bell, Esq) on the other Part of this Sheet of Paper was made, and who certifies the same at the Bottom of the Oath, under his Hand, is a Justice of the Peace for and within this Province, duly and regularly commissionated and sworn, and is an Officer before whom such Depositions are usually made and taken, and for Certifiing the same, and therefore full Faith and Credit is and ought to be given to such his Attestations, both in Court and without.

In Verity of which, I have caus'd the Publick Seal of the Province to be hereunto affix'd the fourteenth Day of November, and in the Twenty-sixth Year of the Reign of our Sovereign Lord GEORGE the Second, by the Grace of GOD of Great-Britain, France and Ireland, KING, Defender of the Faith, &c. Ann [...]que Domini, 1752.

By his Excellency's Command, B. WENTWORTH.
Theodore Atkinson, Sec [...].
A true Copy examined, by Nathaniel Hatch, Cler.

I Robert Temple of Neddles Island, in the County of Suffolk, do declare upon Oath, That I dealt considerably with Mr. William Fletcher, and have ever found him a Man of Honour and Honesty, and when said Fletcher was going for England, he desir'd our Account might be settled, which was done, and as there was a Ballance in my Favour, he order'd his Brother to pay me; with this I was very well contented, 'till a Month after Mr. Fletcher embark'd for London, when a Friend ask'd me, if Mr. Fletcher did not go away in my Debt? if he did, says he, secure yourself, for I've heard, if all his Debts were paid, he'd not be worth a Groat; this a little sur­priz'd me, and I was determin'd to take the Ballance of my Account in whatever I could get, and accordingly went to Mr. Thomas Fletcher, who then acted for his Brother, and took the Ballance in Molasses, which Article I had no Occasion for, and per which I lost Money; but not being acquainted with Mr. Vassall, can't say I ever heard him say any Thing concerning Mr. Fletcher, neither did I know there was any Controversy between them Gentlemen, 'till after Mr. Fletcher's Return from England.

Robert Temple, jun.
Sworn in Court, December 9. 1752. [...] Attest. Samuel Winthrop, Cler.
A true Copy examined, by Nathaniel Hatch, Cler.
[Page 31]

JOseph Turell, of lawful Age, declares, That almost these three Years last past he hath been employ'd in Mr. Fletcher's Business, in all which Time he never saw any Thing transacted in it, either by his Brother Mr. Thomas Fletcher, who had the Conduct of it when he was gone to England, or by said Fletcher himself after he return'd, but what was agreeable to Honour and Honesty; and that after he had been a little Time in this Emplo [...], he to his Surprize heard many bad Reports spread abroad concerning the said William Fletcher the Plantiff's Character and Cir­cumstances, which to my Knowledge has been the Means of said Fletcher 's Credit's running very low with a great many People, particularly sometime in the Summer 1751, a Person I was to pay Three Hundred Pounds old Tenor to, in Behalf of the said William Fletcher by a Bond, according to my Agreement with him, I offered him the said Fletcher 's Bond, but he utterly refus'd it, and said he would take my Bond, accordingly I gave it, and took the said Fletcher 's Word for the Payment, who honourably discharg'd the same.

Joseph Turell.
Sworn in Court December 11. 1752. Attest. Samuel Winthrop, Cler.
A true Copy examined, by Nathaniel Hatch, Cler.

DAvid Vanborne, of full Age, being duly sworn on the Holy Evangelists of Almighty GOD, declareth, That he hath for these twelve Years past been ac­quainted with Mr. William Fletcher of Boston, and hath had large Dealings with the said Fletcher, in which he the said Fletcher has at all Times conducted him­self with the strictest Integrity and Honour; and the said Vanhorne doth also declare, that he knows several Persons in New-York, that have dealt with the said Fletcher, who generally express'd the greatest Satisfaction with Mr. Fletcher's Dealings with them, and that he never knew of suspected the said Fletcher guilty of the least dishonest or dishonourable Action, and further this Deponent saith not.

David Vanborne.
Sworn this 5th Day of December 1752. Before me, J. Johnson, Recorder of the City and County of New-York.
A true Copy examined, by Nathaniel Hatch, Cler.

GIles Brewer of Boston, Housewright, do declare, That I with Benjamin Eustis, jun [...]. Housewright, were employed by Mr. William Fletcher, of Boston, in the Year 1748 and 1749, in our Trade and Business, and that the said Fletcher dealt with us from first to last with the greatest Honour and Honesty; and upon Mr. Fletcher's going to England we carried in our Account, which amounted to upwards of Twenty-eight Hundred Pounds old Tenor, and there being a Ballance due to us, of about One Hundred Pounds old Tenor, the said Fletcher order'd his Brother to pay it, which was done with Honour, according to Agreement with said Fletcher; and further I have work'd for said Fletcher ever since, and have always found him to deal with the same Honour and Integrity as before.

Giles Brewer.
Sworn in Court, December 7. 1752. Attest. Samuel Winthrop, Cler.
A true Copy examin'd, by National Hatch, Cler.
[Page 32]

WIlliam Warland of Boston, Mason, being of lawful Age, declareth, That he, to­gether with Jonathan Hill of Cambridge, were employ'd by Mr. William Flet­cher of Boston aforesaid, in their Trade, in the Years 1748 and 1749, in building his House, and declare that he dealt with the greatest Honour from first to last, and fully paid us; I likewise declare, that I have dealt with him largely since that Time to this Day, and ever found him a Man of Honour and Justice.

William Warland.
Sworn in Court December 8. 1752. Attest. Samuel Winthrop, Cler.
A true Copy examined, by Nathaniel Hatch, Cler.

I John Scollay, of Boston, in the County of Suffolk, and Province of the Massachu­setts-Bay in New-England, Brazier, Testify and Declare, That I have at Times dealt with Mr. William Fletcher of said Boston, Merchant, from the Year 1738 to this Time, and I don't remember to have found any Thing in my Trade with him from first to last, but what was Fair and Honest; that when he went to England, he then ow'd me Two Hundred and Forty Pounds old Tenor, which was paid to me in his Absence by his Brother Mr. Thomas Fletcher, who I understood transacted his Affairs for him, and I don't remember my being any-ways concern'd but that he would honestly pay me the above Sum.

John Scolley.
Sworn in Court December 7. 1752. Attest. Samuel Winthrop, Cler.
A true Copy examin'd, by Nathaniel Hatch, Cler.

I Samuel Barret, of Boston, Sail-maker, declare, That I have work'd for Mr. William Fletcher of said Boston, for eight Years last past, in which Time I have made and repair'd the Sails of about Forty-five Vessels for him, for which he paid me about five Thousand Pounds old Tenor; and that the said Fletcher has always paid me with the greatest punctuallity, and from my first working for him to this Day, I have found him a Man of strict Honour and Honesty in his Dealings.

Samuel Barrett.
Sworn in Court, December 8. 1752. Attest. Samuel Winthrop, Cler.
A true Copy examined, by Nathaniel Hatch, Cler.

SAmuel Holland, of Boston, Ship-joiner, of lawful Age, declareth, That he hath work'd for Mr. William Fletcher of Boston aforesaid, Merchant, for nine or ten Years last past, in which Time he hath done the Joyner's Work of Thirty five Sail of Vessels for him, and that the said Fletcher hath always paid him in a handsome Manner, and from the first of h [...] Working for him to the last, hath found him a Man of strict Honour and Honesty.

Samuel Holland.
Sworn in Court, December 8. 1752. Attest. Samuel Winthrop, Cler.
A true Copy examined, by Nathaniel Hatch, Cler.
[Page 33]

JAcob Emmons of lawful Age, testifieth and saith, That he has known Mr. William Fletcher ever since he has been engag'd in Merchandize for himself, and done some Thousands of Pounds Worth of Work for said Fletcher, and always found him a just, fair and upright Man in his Dealings, always willing to pay according to Agreement, and no way inclining to Tricking or Cheating his Workmen, but as wil­ling to pay as to employ them; and further this Deponent saith, that he has been ac­quainted with almost all his other Workmen, who manifested or exprest themselves glad to work for Mr. Fletcher, and often said it was a Pity but what Mr. Fletcher should get Money, because he improv'd it for the Good of Mankind; and further, he having had peculiar Opportunity to observe his Behaviour toward them, which was always generous and Gentleman-like; and as to his private Manner of Life in some Mea­sure I have had Opportunity to observe, and never found him guilty of Calumny or Detraction, or any wise speaking Evil of his Neighbour; likewise this Deponent saith, he was acquainted with his Brother Capt. John Fletcher, and work'd on beard the Ship that he went in last, and never observ'd any Thing wanting for the Safety of him or Company, and as he was often at work on beard the said Ship, he never heard the least Suspicion advanc'd, either by the Master of said Ship, or by the Sailors or Tradesmen, that she was insufficient, or that it was in any Way unsafe to go to Sea in her; further this Deponent saith, that he, in Company with others, for a long Time has had an Affair of many Thousand Pounds Sterling depending in England, and that upon Mr. Fletcher's going for England, he apply'd to him, to request him to undertake it for him, but Mr. Fletcher refus'd it, and advis'd him to apply to some Gentleman in England, who he said was more fit to manage such Affairs than he was, but notwithstanding he should been very glad to have had said Fletcher to have un­dertaken it, as he had a very great Opinion of his Capacity and Integrity; f [...]rther this Deponent saith, that he never heard any Thing to Mr. Fletcher's Disadvantage before he fail'd for England; but that not long after he was gone, he heard i [...] nois'd about that his Circumstances were bad, and that he was ask'd in publick Company, in a way reflecting on Mr. Fletcher's Character, whether the said Fletcher was not considerable in his Debt, as he work'd very largely for him? and Hints given to this Purport, that it was apprehended Mr. Fletcher was not sufficiently able to answer all his Demands; to which he made Answer, that he believ'd Mr. Fletcher had where­with to pay every Body what he owed them; and further this Deponent saith, from the Acquaintance he had in the Family, and particularly with Mr. Thomas Fletcher; he was knowing to many Difficulties the said Mr. Thomas Fletcher was put to, in tran­sacting the said William Fletcher's Business, which he was inform'd arose from the bad Reports that had been rais'd about him; and further saith not.

Jacob Emmons.
Sworn in Court, December 7. 1752. Attest. Samuel Winthrop, Cler.
A true Copy examined, by Nathaniel Hatch, Cler.

DAniel Manwarring and Gibbins Sharp, both of Boston, Shipwrights, declare, That for about thirteen Years last past they have worked for Mr. William Fletcher of Boston, aforesaid, Merchant, and have done almost all the Carpenter's-Work he hath had done, during which Time we have rebuilt and fitted to Sea about fifty Sat [...] of Vessels; and do declare, that we never worked for any Man that dealt more with [Page 34]Honour and Honesty in our Lives: we have work'd for most of the Merchants in Town, and always found that his Credit was as good with almost all People, as any Man we ever dealt with; that we never carried in a Bill to him, but he was always ready to pay it, and would always let us have whatever we ask'd for, with the greatest Chearfulness, and found that we could always depend upon what he said; and he never attempted to cut us off a Penny, or make the least Dispute with us; that we never knew him to cheat, o [...] shuffle, or keep back the least Part of any Man's just Du [...] and whenever we told him of any apprehended Necessaries to be done to any Vessel, he always [...]ntreated us to do every Thing that was necessary for the Vessels Safety, and charg'd us to be careful about it, for he never desired any Man to go in a Vessel of his in which he should not have been willing to trust his own Life in, neither would we suffer a Vessel to go out of our Hands to go to Sea, without being in our Opinion sufficient; we further declare, that the Ship Mr. Fletcher 's Brother, Capt. John Fletcher, went in was a Ship strong enough to go to any Part of the World, and a good Ship, and had not some uncommon Accident happen'd to her, for would have lasted some Years we believe.

Daniel Manwarring.
Gibbins Sharp.
Sworn in Court December 7. 1752. Attest. Samuel Winthrop, Cler.
A true Copy examin'd, by Nathaniel Hatch, Cler.

N. B. The Examination of such a Number of Gentlemen, and the Importance of the Case, caus'd such a numerous Audience, that the Court was oblig'd to ad­journ in the Afternoon to Fane [...]il-Hall, the Witnesses were chiefly examin'd, and Colonel Otis as before-mention'd, finish'd for the Plantiff the first Day; on Friday-Morning young Mr. Otis began to speak for the Defendant; through the whole Course of his Pleading [...]e very strenuously insisted upon it, That there was not ou [...] single Word in the Writ that was actionable in this Country, and after saying a great Deal of that Nature, he finish'd what he had to say that Night, with some indecent Reflections upon the Plantiff, * which was of no Service to him or his Client, neither had he the least Colour of Evidence to support him in it. —

Saturday and Monday A. M. was taken up in re-examining some of the Witnesses, and in hearing what the Parties had to say:—Mr. Vassall began, when he acquainted the Court that what he had to say in Vindication of his Conduct, he had committed to Writing at his leisure Hours, that he might not say any Thing rashly, or that was not agreable to Truth.—Accordingly he began to read, the Substance of which was contain'd in about eight or ten Quarto Pages, and the Wh [...]le of what he had to say was on the three following Heads: First, A Number of Lottery-Tickets Mr. Fletcher had ow'd him for: Secondly, A Wager Mr. Fletcher had laid with Mr. Gray about a Barrel of Pork: Thirdly, A Note put into his Hands, to be deliver'd up on the Settlement of some Disputes between Mr. Fletcher and Mr. Hall.

On the first Head he said, That Mr. Fletcher had wrong'd him out of some Tickets he ow'd him for, at least had detain'd the Payment of them so long, that he had lost some Ounces, Pennyweights, and Grains of Silver , in the Depreciation of the Currency, [Page 35]that is, that when the said Fletcher first ow'd him for the Tickets he could with the Currency then fluctuating, purchase so many Ounces, Pennyweights and Grains of Sil­ver more than he could when the said Fletcher paid him;—and not only sustained this Loss, but by his not receiving the Tickets in the Time of it, he was induced to pur­chase a Number of Tickets in the Lottery then to be drawn, and met with such bad Luck, that he sustain'd still a further Loss therein.

On the second Head he said, in order to prove Mr. Fletcher a Man of bad Character, That he was inform'd that he once laid a Wager with Mr. Harrison Gray, of a Beaver Hat, that he the said Fletcher had got a Barrel of better Pork than Mr. Gray had, and in order to win the Wager, the said Fletcher order'd his Cooper in packing the Pork, to put the best Peices on the Top of the Barrel, which said Vassall said, he look'd upon to be a bad Thing.

On the third and last Head he said, That he had formerly two Notes of Hand put into his keeping, sign'd by Mr. Hutchinson and others on the one Part, and by Andrew Hall on the other, which Note of said Hall's was assign'd over to Mr. Fletcher, who then appear'd in the Room of Mr. Hutchinson, &c. The Conditions of which Notes were, that in Case the said Hall should finally recover of the said Fletcher £. 8000 old Tenor, upon the Ballance of all Actions then depending in the Law between them, he was to deliver the Notes to Mr. Hall, otherwise to Mr. Fletcher; that upon the Issue of these Disputes he took uncommon Pains in advising with a Number of his Friends respecting this Matter; but as there had been formerly a Dispute between Mr. Fletcher and him about some Tickets he did not care to determine the Affair, without some other Persons being join'd with him in it,—which was accordingly done, and finally they all agreed that the said Hall ought to have the said Notes, and thereupon he deliver'd them to said Hall; yet the said Fletcher had treated him very ill, notwith­standing all the Pains he had taken in it.

After Mr. Vassall had finish'd as above, which is the Substance of all he said,—Mr. Fletcher desir'd leave to answer him, and to clear himself from those Aspersions which Mr. Vassall had so unjustly charg'd upon him: Accordingly he began with what Mr. Vassall had charg'd him with, in cheating some Persons he had taken Money of on the Bottom of a Ship that was lost: Secondly, With Respect to the Ship his Brother sail'd in: And then by answering all Mr. Vassall had said in Vindication of himself.

As to the First, it appear'd that Mr. Fletcher was on his Journey to New-York (where the said Ship was bound for a Freight he had contracted for, on Account of the Government) at the very Time she was cast ashore on a Reef of Rocks in Nantasket, by an uncommon Storm, and that by her being so cast-away he lost several Thousands of Pounds, not having made any Insurance upon her; and as to the Money he had taken upon the Bottom of said Ship, upon a Dispute arising between him and the Persons he had the Money of, respecting their ha­ving any Right to a Share of what was saved out of said Ship, he produced the fol­lowing Agreement between him and those Persons; and notwithstanding he had sign'd a Bond to each of them (wrote by themselves) whereby they were wholly excluded from any Salvage whatever, yet he generously consented to destroy those Bonds, and leave it upon the Footing of Equity, to three principal Merchants in the Town,—whose Award he also produced — both which are as followeth.

[Page 36]

To Joshua Winslow, Esq John Erving, Esq And, Mr. John Gooch.

Gentlemen,

WE the Subscribers [...]ving let Mr. William Fletcher, jun [...]. Owner of the Ship Hond [...]ras, have the respective Sums of Money fixed to our Names here below, by Way of Bottomree on the Ship aforesaid, which is since cast-away, do hereby choose and appoint you as Arbitrators to determine this Affair between us, and accordingly desire the Favour of you to accept of the same; and we do by this Writing bind ourselves, each one to the other, in the Sum of five Hundred Pounds, (in case of Refusal) to stand by the Award which you shall see cause to bring in against either of us, and also to settle our Affairs in this Case accordingly, as Witness our Hands,

Thomas Cushing, £. 300 0 0 Bottomers.
Jab [...]z Bradbury, £. 195 0 0 Bottomers.
George H [...]lmes, £. 78 10 0 Bottomers.
Eunice Willard, * 0 0 Bottomers.
  £. 703 10 0 old Tenor.
William Fletcher, jun [...]. Owner.
*
Equal to Thirteen Pounds Sterling—This is the Sum which Mr. Vassall represented to be a Thousand or Fifteen Hundred Pounds; and the £. 703 10 s. was all Mr. Fletcher had insur'd to make good a [...] of several Thousand Pounds.£. 130

WE the Subscribers have met and considered of the within-mention'd Affair, which was left to our Determination, and as there was no Bond produced to us, and both Parties agreed, that we should judge of the Case as of a common Bottomry Bond: We are therefore of Opinion, that the Bottomer ought not to re­fund any Part of the Money borrow'd on the Vessel, and that the Materials sav'd do belong wholly to the Owner of the Vessel.

Joshua Winslow, John Erving, John Gooch.
A true Copy examined, by Nathaniel Hatch, Cler.

Secondly, As to the Ship his Brother sail'd in, he made it appear by Capt. Freeman, the former Master of the Ship, and the Tradesmen that fitted her to Sea, that she was a strong good Ship, and sufficient to perform any Voyage whatever, and that she was freighted by the most considerable Merchants in the Town, with a Cargo of Fish, &c. and perform'd the whole of the Voyage to his last hearing from her, without any Da­mage, or Suspicion of Complaint whatever; and there was no room to suspect but that she met with some uncommon Disaster at Sea, as thousands of new Ships have done before.

[...] Mr. Fletcher proceeded to answer what Mr. Vassall had been reading;

First, As to the Tickets, Mr. Fletcher acknowledg'd that he formerly ow'd Mr. Vassall about £. 10 Sterling, for some Tickets, and that the Reason of his not paying Mr. Vassall for them, was owing to the said Vassall's abusing of him on account thereof, but said, he always declar'd in the Time of it, he was ready to do it when­ever [Page 37]Mr. Vassall should acknowledge his Fault; and that upon Mr. Vassall's first Acknowledgment thereof, he instantly paid him to his Satisfaction; and produced Mr. Scott's Evidence, that Mr. Vassall had made such Acknowledgments in several Companies. *

Respecting the Barrel of Pork, Mr. Fletcher said he had formerly in the Year 1745, over a Bowl of Punch with Mr. Harrison Gray (who was commending a Bar­rel of Pork, which afterwards appear'd, he had pick'd out for his own Use [...] [...]aid a bantering Wager with him [...] a Bowl of Punch, to his best Remembrance, that he had got a better Barrel of Pork than said Gray had, upon which Mr. Fletcher said he order'd his Cooper, who was then packing a large Quantity of Pork, to pick out a Barrel of the best of it, in order to win Mr. Gray's Punch, which being done, Mr. Gray acknowledg'd he had lost, and then Mr. Fletcher laugh'd at him about the Manner of his winning the Wager,—but did not remember the Punch was ever paid.

Finally, as to what Mr. Vassall had said ab [...]e the Notes that were put in Trust into his Hands, Mr. Fletcher also acknowledg'd that upon Mr. Vassall's De­termination of the Property of them, he could not help saying, that Mr. Vassall was a — ignorant Fellow, and aid not know the Difference between Six and Eight, and that he should be glad to be satisfy'd that Ignorance was the sole Cause of such a Determination; and beg'd leave to prove what he had asserted: — In order to do this, Mr. Fletcher allow'd the Conditions, upon which those Notes were given to be as Mr. Vassall had asserted, viz. that if said Hall should finally recover against him £. 8000, on the Ballance of all Actions then depending in the Law between them, said Vassall was to deliver said Notes to said Hall, otherwise to him, and then pro­duced a Certificate under the Hand of the Clerk of the Court of all the Actions pend­ing in the Law at the Time when said Notes were given, as also another Certificate under the Hands of Creen, Avery, and Russell, (to whom all the Disputes between him and said Hall were referr'd) that upon the Determination of the Actions afore­said there was not a Ballance of £. 7000 due to said Hall (a [...] is fully set forth in said Certificate in the Appendix) by all which it plainly appears, that the Note ought not to have been deliver'd to Mr. Hall, but to Mr. Fletcher, so that he had good Reason to blame Mr. Vassall as he did:—Mr. Fletcher further said, that he had enquir'd of one of the Gentlemen that was concern'd with Mr. Vassall in the Determination of those Notes, and was acquainted by him, that they had left it to Mr. Vassall to get an Account of those Actions, and that Mr. Vassall had brought them in an Account, which in the Time of it, they tho't was true, but if it was not they were deceiv'd and he hop'd they should be excused on that Account.

As soon as Mr. Fletcher and Mr. Vassall had done speaking, Mr. Gridley for the Defendant, and the King's-Attorney, Edmond Trowbridge, Esq for the Plantiff, closed the Case that Afternoon, and it was committed to the Jury, who bro't in the following

VERDICT.

William Fletcher, Plantiff, We find for the Plantiff Reversion of the former Judgment Two Thousand Pounds § Money Damage, and Cost of Courts.

William Vassall, Defendant, We find for the Plantiff Reversion of the former Judgment Two Thousand Pounds § Money Damage, and Cost of Courts.

And Judgment was given accordingly. From which both Parties appeal'd to Hi s Majesty in Council.

A true Copy examined, by Nathaniel Hatch, Cler.
[Page 38]

APPENDIX.

Middlesex, ss. AT His Majesty's Superiour Court of Judicature, held by Adjourn­ment at Concord, within and for the County of Middlesex, [...] the first Tuesday of August, A. D. 1752.

THE Action depending between Foster Hutchinson Appellant, and Col [...] Trow­bridge, jun [...]. Appellee, is referr'd to Messi [...]. Hugh McDaniel, Giles Tidm [...]rsh, and Thomas Flucker; and it is agreed between William Fletcher and Andrew Hall, who at their Desire are admitted Parties to this Rule, that the Note [...]ed on was made and put into the Hands of William Vassall on the Condition following, viz. that if there was a Ballance due from said Fletcher to said Hall of Eight Thousand Pounds old Tenor on all Actions then depending in the Law between them, said Hall was to have the Note, otherwise, said Fletcher was to have it: Now if said Vassall, and all to whom the Affair was left, were wrong in their Determination, and if said Vassall deliver'd up said Note wrongfully and against his Duty and Trust in the Opinion of the above Referrees, then the said Note is to be void, and the said Trowbridge is to refund all the Money that has already been paid, and the Costs; but if said Referees are of Opinion that said Vassall and all were right in their Determination, and if said Vassall was right in delivering up said Note to said Hall, said Fletcher is to pay the Remainder of said Note, and Costs: The Determination of said Referrees, or of any two of them, to be conclusive: Report to be made to the Court as soon as may be.

Attest. Samuel Winthrop, Cler.

PURSUANT to the before-written Rule of Court, We the Referrees therein­ [...]'d having met together and heard the aforesaid Parties and all therein concern'd, and maturely considered all the Matters and Things offered and alledged on each Side, are of Opinion that there was not a Ballance of Eight Thousand Pounds old▪ Tenor due from the said William Fletcher to the said Andrew Hall upon all Actions then depending in the Law between them, and that Mr. William Vassall and others, to whose Determination that Affair was left and submitted, were wrong in their Deter­mination, and that said William Vassall ought to have deliver'd the Note mention'd in this Rule to Mr. William Fletcher instead of Mr. Andrew Hall: All which is humbly submitted by,

Hugh McDaniel, Giles Ti [...]m [...]rsh, Thomas Flucker.
Attest Samuel Winthrop, Cler.

N. B. In order to explain the above Rule it is to be observed, that the Note aforesaid was given by Mr. Hutchinson and others in the Behalf of Mr. Fletcher as before-mention'd [...] £. 750▪ which Note [...]eing wrongfully given up by said Vassall to said Hall as aforesaid, the Condition which was placed at the Bottom of the Note was t [...]e off, and the Note made over by said Hall to said Trowbridge, who while Mr. Fletcher was in England, [...]ued for and recover'd the same; but upon Mr. Fletcher's Return, a new Trial being [...] the Judgement of Court was reversed; yet Mr. Fletcher being sensible of the injurious Judgment Mr. Vassall had given against him in this Affair, readily proposed to risque the Case again upon the Rule aforesaid: And the said Vassall was fully [...]eard therein, by the above Gentlemen.

[Page 39]

AT the Superiour Court held at Boston, on Thursday the 8th Day of March 1748, by Adjournment from the third Tuesday of February preceeding, there were only Eight Actions between Fletcher and Hall entered, which, together with all Demands, were referr'd to Mess [...] Russell, Avery, and Green, who made their Report thereon, which was accepted by the Court. The Actions abovesaid are entered in the Minute Book in the following Order.

N [...] 76 Fletcher, Ap [...]. v. Hall, on a Promise that in Consideration of £. 9300 old Tenor receiv'd, Fletcher should have the Produce of the Cargoes of three Ves­sels: That Hall took R [...]m and Sugar, being the Produce thereof to his own Use; and in this Action there was a Verdict in Fletcher's Favour for £. 2439 8 [...]. new Tenor, which Verdict was superceeded by the Rule entered into.

77 Fletcher, Apl. v. Hall, on a Policy of Insurance of Le [...]ch's Brigantine, to the Amount of £. 2000 old Tenor: In this Action was a Verdict in Hall's Favour for Costs: Which Verdict was afterwards superceeded by the Rule entered into.

78 Fletcher [...] Hall, Review, on Fletcher's Note to pay Hall £. 9300 old Tenor.

134 Hall Apl. v. Fletcher, on a Policy of Insurance on Hammett's Brigantine to the Amount of £. 2000.

135 Hall Apl. v. Fletcher, Action of De [...]amation.

136 Hall Apl. v. Fletcher, Action for Deficiency of Cargoes.

137 Hall Pl. v. Fletcher, Review on a promissary Note to indemnify Hall from Hire of two Sloops, one for £. 2400 old Tenor, the other for £. 2380.

[...]33 Hall Pl. v. Fletcher, for £. 465 2 s. 6 d. old Tenor, receiv'd by Hall to Fletcher's Use of Wiltshire, &c.

Certified this 18th of January, 1752, by Nathaniel Hatch, Cler.

THIS may Certify, That the above-mention'd Eight Actions were included in the Disputes between the aforesaid Fletcher and Hall referr'd to us by a Rule of Court, and that the Ballance of them, by us awarded in Favour of the said Hall, did not amount to the Sum of Seven Thousand Pounds old Tenor; and further that we do not remember that any Person, except the aforesaid Fletcher, has apply'd to us to know in what Manner those Actions were settled by us.

Jos. Green, John Avery, James Russell.

This keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above is co-owned by the institutions providing financial support to the Text Creation Partnership. This Phase I text is available for reuse, according to the terms of Creative Commons 0 1.0 Universal. The text can be copied, modified, distributed and performed, even for commercial purposes, all without asking permission.