A Brief Survey OF THE Legal Liberties OF THE Dissenters, &c.
IT is no Time now to make Flourishes, and lay down Aphorisms to debate upon: Matters of Fact must speak themselves; and that they may do so, let us bringthem together.
The Toleration was granted to the Dissenters at the Beginning of the Revolution; he that told us, It was not a Courtesy, but a Capitulation, the Performance of an Agreement, not an Act of meer Tenderness and Charity, said True, or he said False; for my Part, I never heard him Confuted, or much said to contradict it.
[Page 4] If the Toleration of Dissenters was a Grant of meer Charity and Mercy, yet it was no other Charity and Mercy than the Church of England, as Christians, were obliged to shew: Persecution for Conscience being contrary to the Principles of the Christian Religion; and if they were oblig'd to grant it, they are equally oblig'd to continue it, unless they can alledge, the Dissenters have done any Thing to forfeit it, which we challenge all the Tories in England to prove.
If the Toleration of Dissenters was a Capitulation, all Capitulations ought to be perform'd; all Agreements ought to be executed; and it is as much their Right to demand the Preserving of it, as it was to demand the Enacting it.
But the Queen, besides all this, has promis'd to continue it, and to preserve it Inviolably; we doubt not Her Majesty meant to do so when She said it, and means so still: But what mean they who would oblige Her, or perswade Her to break Her Word?
We do not say the Parliament offer this; and we doubt not but some People flatter themselves, that all these Things are not only Consistent with, but will be Effectual for the Inviolable Preservation of the Toleration; we shall see presently how it will be prov'd.
The Managers of Persecuting Principles have very pretty Ways with them to cover and guild over the most effectual Measures of Destroying us, with fair Pretences of Preserving us. Perhaps this Taking away the Schools and Academies of the Dissenters is done the better to preserve, &c. Inviolably.
[Page 5] We find in the first Section of the last Occasional Bill, the Enacting Clauses thus Introduced, ‘"Now for the better Securing the said Church, so far is Good, and Quieting the Minds of Her Majesty's Protestant and Dissenting Subjects, and Rendering them Secure in the Exercise of their Religious Worship, &c.’
Be it Enacted
I do not say, That the Bill following those Words, did abridge the said Dissenters of any of their Liberties, in the Exercise of their Religious Worship: But this I will say, That if the Dissenters were so abridg'd by that Act, then joining the Words together, it will follow, That their said Liberties were so abridg'd, the better to Quiet their Minds, and for the Securing them in the Exercise of their Religious Worship; perhaps other Laws may be Bless'd with the like Congruity.
Before we go on to Examine what may, or not be deem'd an Attempt upon, and Inconsistent with the Religious Liberties of the Dissenters, it may be very useful for us to enquire what those Liberties really are; to which Purpose, and that the Dissenters may know how far those Liberties do or do not extend, and when they are or are not Invaded, I believe it very much to the present Purpose to publish the said Toleration Act at large, which, altho' it be put at the End of this Tract, the Reader is desir'd to turn to it, and Peruse it before he goes on any farther.
HAVING now Suppos'd, that the Readers of this Tract have Perus'd the Act of Toleration [Page 6] deliberately, and have thereby a clear Account of what the Dissenters Liberties really are, it will be also Necessary to let them see what it is that the present Depending Bill is to Enact against them, and so we shall presently judge about the Word INVIOLABLY, &c.
It is true, and this is the great Pretence of those who promote this Matter, That the keeping of Schools and Academies for the Instructing and Educating our Children, is not expresly a Part of the Toleration Bill; And therefore say they, The Toleration may be Inviolably preserv'd, notwithstanding the Passing the present Bill
But the Dissenters will refute this by alledging, That the Liberty of Teaching and Instructing our Children, is such an Essential, in the Meaning of a Toleration, that it needs no more to be express'd therein, than a Liberty of going out of our own Houses, or rising out of our Beds, and putting on our Clothes, in Order to a religious Assembly, need to be express'd in that Part of the Act which allows Places to be appointed for that Worship.
If any essential Part of the Toleration be taken away, altho' not express'd, how is the Toleration then preserv'd Inviolably?
Farther, the educating of Children is a Part of the religious Duties of a Christian, and among these of the Protestant Religion, more especially regarded as such: If the Dissenters are abridg'd of what is their indispensible Duty, they are persecuted in the most extreme Sense of Persecution; For the Consequence is, they must offend against this Law, because they are [Page 7] bound to obey GOD rather than Man. In offending this Law they must incur a Penalty; not being able to pay the Penalty, they must go to Prison, and in Prison they must perish: So that in Consequence of this Law, the Dissenters will suffer Death for their Religion, and and yet the Toleration be preserved INVIOLABLE.
I think the Plainness of this Case is not to be found Fault with, Religion is nothing more or less than a Serving or Worshipping GOD, our Maker and Lawgiver. The Method is prescrib'd by His Word; Conscience is to every Man the Judge of his own Duty, and the Manner of Performing is this, Conscience is a Sovereign Dictator in the Mind of Men, and it must be obey'd; So it is not meet to make Laws to restrain it, human Power having no judicial Right over it.
As then Conscience must be obey'd, in which the Scripture is clear, Whether it be lawful to obey GOD rather than Man, judge ye? When Laws are made restraining us to such Things as Conscience forbids to do, or commands not to omit, what must we do?
The Answer is plain, We must suffer. True, but then we must say, That this is PERSECUTION: If then Persecution is contrary to the Principles of the Christian Religion, as we have the Authority of Parliament, in the Preamble to the first occasional Bill, to prove; what follows? But that every persecuting Act is an Unchristian Act.
Whether the present depending Bill be a Persecuting, and consequently an unchristian still, let others judge; this Deponent faith not.
[Page 8] It may however be of some Use to enquire into some of the Consequences which the Dissenters may expect from this Law, that those who are to suffer by it, may prepare their Minds for Martyrdom; and they who are to pass it, may consider what Ruin of Families, what Blood of Conscientious Sufferers, what Encrease of Ignorance, and consequently of Error, they are going to be the Cause of; and what terrible Havock they are going to make in the Reformation, which has Enemies enough, and Wounds enough already. Perhaps when these Things come to be seriously reflected upon, they may consider.
Since then the Persecution is thus reviv'd, what must the Dissenters do? Negatively, I'll tell you what they cannot do.
1. They cannot say their Toleration is INVIOLABLY preserv'd: They that think this Bill does not interfere with the Toleration, may here compare them together; The one says, Ease is to be given to tender Consciences; The other says, The tenderest Consciences shall be opprest; one says, The Dissenters shall have Liberty to assemble, and their Children may worship GOD with them: The other says, They shall not have School-masters to instruct them how to Worship; one gives them a Liberty of professing their Dissent; The other denies them the Liberty of being Taught to know why they dissent: This is the ready Way indeed to make Dissenting be a Faction in the next Age, as they pretend it is now not a religious Principle. Thus the Toleration is preserv'd, and not preserv'd at the same Time. The Letter of the Toleration is preserv'd [Page 9] in Deed, but the Substance and essential Parts are destroy'd.
2. They cannot say, they are kindly treated by the Church; and when they look back upon their own Conduct to the Church, they tell them plainly, they have not deserv'd this Usage at their Hands; When they rescued the Church from an evident Ruin in King James's Time, mighty Promises of Temper and Tenderness were made them; let us suppose now the Dissenters parting with them at that Time in this Manner, ‘" Yes, yes, Gentlemen, you promise us fair now, while you are under Apprehensions of the Popish Party. Now you call us Brethren, and talk well of the small Differences between us; and how Charity ought to bury what is past, and to bind us closser for the Time to come, that you find now you have been mistaken, and that we are as faithful to the Protestant Interest as your selves; and you will for ever esteem us the same Christians as your Selves, allowing us a Legal establish'd Liberty, and living in Love and Charity with us; will never more suffer the indifferent Things which are in Dispute among us to divide us. But when, by our Assistance, you are establish'd again, you will forget all these Things. When a Generation rises up, That knows not Joseph, they will call us all Schismaticks, and Recusants again; Couple us with Papists, say we are Dangerous to the Church, and Enemies to Monarchy, and make new Laws against us, destroy the Toleration you now offer us, and persecute us as bad as ever.’
[Page 10] When the Dissenter says thus to them, Suppose a certain Grave Divine stands up and Quotes the Words of Hasael the King of Assyria, Is thy Servant a Dog, that be should do this thing? What now would that Grave Divine say, for the Passage is not a Fable, if he were to see this Bill passing the House? would he Plead, that this is not Persecution?
The Question is not only upon the word Persecution, tho' that is answer'd plain enough too: But is it Just? Is it Kind? Is it Grateful? Is it Agreeable to former Pretences? Is it what was Solemnly Promised, when the Church stood in need of the Assistance and Support of the Dissenters, in the time of their Extremity? Is this the Performance of Solemn Engagement to the Dissenters? Is this the Temper you promis'd to come to? Is this the Love and Charity you resolv'd to live in? Monstrous! Perfidious!
3. They cannot say, they are not Persecuted; Persecution is the Constraining and Restraining Conscience by Force and Punishment. To Restrain from what we dare not Omit, is as much Persecution, as to Constrain to what we dare not Comply with. Can any Christian Omit Instructing his Children in the Christian Religion? Dare any Dissenter Educate his Child in that Way which he dares not Conform to himself? Is not that Condemning himself, and Abandoning his Child? Does he not, by that single Act, either declare that he Dissents without any Foundation, or that he Values not the Salvation of his Child?
Conscientious Dissenters have never yet shewn [Page 11] such an Indifferency in the Matter of Conformity; if they had, they could not have been suppos'd to Suffer such Hardships as they now do, to be expelled any Share either in the Trust, Honour, or Profits of their Country's Service.
4. They cannot say, that they are at all oblig'd by this, to farther and future Services; and altho' it is true, that the Dissenters may not withdraw their Hands from the Necessary Services of their Country, as English Men, yet all those Voluntary Services, which, upon all Occasions, they have appear'd Freely and Generously to join in, they must now Restrain, in Order to carry on the more needful Expence of Educating and Instructing their Children Abroad, and keeping Tutors for them in their own Houses, and in Assisting Poor Families to do the same.
There are Affirmative Consequences of their Persecution, which it is not so proper to Mention, only I take the Freedom to tell these Warm People, that there will not one Dissenter's Child the more be brought up in the Church of England by this Persecuting Act; neither will this Lessen, but Encrease the Schism, and the Number of Dissenters in England. It is true, it will straiten the Dissenters in their Educating their Children, put them to Difficulties and Expence. As to the first, they must Suffer it, as an Effect of Persecution: And as to the last, the Money wh [...]ch the Dissenters now freely▪ Contribute to the Church, over and above what the Law demands, (viz.) on Subscription to Charities, to Lecturers, [Page 12] to Poor Clergy, to Briefs, &c. Which it would be the greatest Madness in the Dissenters not to Restrain: These, I say, will Pay all the Difference in the Expence of the Education of their Children, and assist them to Educate the Poor that cannot do it themselves.
Again, seeing the Clergy of the Church are so Sensible of the Effect of our Schoolmasters Teaching the Dissenters Children the Assemblies Catechism, that they should make a Law that they shall not be Instructed in that manner at School, it is a Warm Admonition to the Dissenters to Revive the Ancient Family Discipline and Instruction, which was the Original Method by which the Reformation was begun in this Nation; and by duly Catechising their own Children and Servants, and giving Catechises to the Poor Families that want them, effectually supply the Deffect; and thus the End of these Church Christians (viz.) to lessen Christian Knowledge, instead of encreasing it, shall be Defeated, till they think fit to make another Bill to take the Disscurers Children away from them, as the Papists did to the Protestants in France, or as the Mahometans do now to the Armenian Christians Ge [...]rgia and Moldavia to make Janizaries.
Besides this, the Inhumanity of this Law, which admits of a large Description, and which has many Branches Tending to Cruelty, cannot but fill the Minds of our Posterity with Abhorrence of the Church it self, and so make the Breach wider than ever it was before: As all the Sangninary Laws against the Reformation, [Page 13] and against the Primitive Church, could never stop the Progress either of the Christian Religion at first, or of the Protestant Religion afterwards, so neither will this, but will Confirm, Establish, and Encrease the Body of the Dissenters in this Nation. To conclude all,
The Methods which will also be still less to the Dissenters to evade this Act, will of Course have one of these two Effects; either, which we earnestly wish, it will cause the Church to see the Mistake, and Repeal the Rigorous Law; or, as those who run into many Evils, to Support, and rather than Recant the first, it will oblige them to such other and farther Steps of this Kind, as must revive the severest Persecutions, even to Death and Torture; the Consequences we may reasonably expect will end in Judgment from Heaven, and the Confusion of the Nation.
We cannot but hope that these Things may prevail with our Legislators to consider what is before them, and to examine as well the Political as the Christian Arguments which may be offer'd to them against this Bill.
Particularly, how it strikes at the Foundation of Religion, as Christian, and tends to the Destroying the Light and Knowledge of Divine Things in the World, which is the Honour of the Reformation: Whereas, if the Instruction of Children in the Knowledge of Religion is restrain'd, loaded with Difficulties, or limited, it is thereby discouraged, lessen'd and put backward, which is contrary to the Practice of all the Protestant Nations in the World.
[Page 14] Neither is it enough to say, That the Dissenters are the Cause of such Discouragement, for that they may send their Children to Learn the Church Catechism, and to Church Tutors and School-masters. For if the Dissenters cannot in Conscience Conform, neither can they in Conscience teach their Children to Conform; and if that Principle, Conscience, obliges them to keep their Children without any Degree of Learning and Instruction, which they would otherwise have had; the Law that limits their Education to Terms which their Parents cannot comply with, is the unrighteous Cause of that Defect, and thus Ignorance flows in of Course. It is to be hop'd, the Church of England will not be thought to plant it self best in the Ignorance of the People. Christian Knowledge is the Fountain of the Reformation of the Christian Religion. Popery, indeed, may be said to be Founded in Ignorance, and propagated in Superstition, which is the Child of Stupidity and Blindness. But Knowledge, and the Light of the Scriptures, were the Nurses and Founders of the Reformation; and Woe be to that Nation, or People, or Body of Men, who pretend to propagate the Christian Religion by Restraining the Knowledge of Religion in the Minds of the Younger Part of the Nation, who it is their Duty by all possible Means to Instruct.
We find in the Heads of the Bill now Depending, some Things also more particularly Tending to Persecution than is yet mention'd (viz.) The Engaging every one who shall have a License to Teach School, never to be [Page 15] present at a Meeting. This is Restraining the said Teacher, or Schoolmaster from his Liberty of Conscience to preserve his Livelyhood, and making the Salary, or Gain of his Employment, to be a Snare to his Principles.
What the Fines and Penalties are; how Rigorous the Prosecution; how the Dissenters are debarr'd from their Liberty of Appeal to Her Majesty's Superiour Courts of Justice, and left to the Mercy of the Justices of the Peace, without Appeal; and how to be prosecuted in Ecclesiastical Courts, where the Church-Men, who in this Cause are Parties, are made Judges. As these Things are apparent in the Bill, so are they the Height of Persecution, unprecedented; and in their Nature, an Oppression of our Civil Rights as Englishmen.
To close all. How these Things agree with the Toleration, is a Mystery I can by no Means reconcile. Perhaps those who read the Bills both together, and see how and where the Clauses join, and where they part, may see less of Persecution than I can; and that all Men may do so, and judge for themselves, therefore are the Copies Published in this Manner.