PEACE, (without other En­comiums) it is sufficient to say, merits every Man's Approbati­on, and tho' the whole Town is agitated and angry about it; yet no Man will be found among us, but what will readily own he is for PEACE.

It would be happy for us all, if we could talk of Peace with a little more of it in our Tempers, that we could be at Peace when we pretend to desire Peace; it is to me the strangest Thing in the World, that we are all falling together by the Ears, and making War about Peace. If you talk of one Man, who otherwise we lik'd well enough, hang him, he is a Rogue, he is come over, he is for Peace. The other Side are even with us, and they talking with this or that Acquain­tance; who? Tom... or Jack?... Ay, He is an Honest Fellow enough, a good Natur'd Fellow enough, but he is got in [Page 7] with these furious People, he is all for Blood, nothing but carrying on the War, and pushing all things to Extremities; Death and Destruction are always in his Mouth, he is Mad if you do but talk of Peace to him.

Unhappy Nation! What End can these Things lead us to? Not a Publick Socie­ty, not a Coffee-house, not a Meeting of Friends, not a Visit; but like Jehu to Jeza­bel, who is on my Side? Who? Who is for Peace? Who is for carrying on the War? Society is converted into Cabal, all Publick Meetings appear sorted into Committees, or bandyed into Sides as their Notions of Peace or War encline them.

I cannot but make one brief Observati­on, which may have some Philosophy in it; and I dare say it is all natural; the Note may have its Uses in it, which eve­ry one may improve as they see fit. When you find Men sitting in a Publick Room, say a Coffee-house, or Tavern, and talking of the Publick, Two to One of my Mo­ney, before you hear a Word they say that I tell you at first who are for Peace, and who are for War. The Gentlemen who are for PEACE, you hear them but at a small Distance, their Voices are low, their Speech deliberate, their Words are soft, calm; and spoken easie like the Subject they speak of [Page 8] The other Side that are for War, you may hear them into the Street, or down the Stairs, their Voices are Thunder; they speak the Word War with something of the Noise of War, as if they were giving in the Field the Word of Command, or bidding a Platoon give Fire. Again, look in their Faces, the Men of Peace have it in their Countenances, their Faces are co­vered with Smiles, a sort of Calm and Smoothness of Temper sits on their Brow; they look pleased and serence, like the Spi­rit that possesses them. The Men that are for War seem in a Ferment, their Eyes sparkle, something Boisterous appears in their Faces, they look as uneasie as they talk, and the aversion they have to Peace, shows it self in their Countenances; some cross Lines seem to be drawn over their Faces, by which they discover the Tem­per they stand in as to the Thing that they have in Debate.

Well however, come near to these Gentle­men, and Argue closely with them, and you shall find them all join in this, that Peace in its general Acceptation is a Blessing, which no Man can have a real stated Aversion to; the Off-spring of Heaven, and an Emblem of Eternal Blessedness; no Man can open his M [...]uth against Peace, as such; nor are the Gentlemen I am speaking of, who are a­gainst [Page 9] Peace at this Time, against it in this Sense; let no Man mistake me, I am not writing a Satyr against any Body. 'Tis the unhappy Circumstances of the present Na­tional Temper, that I am speaking of, that we are uneasie to one another, Differing, Dis­puting, Caballing, and sometimes down­right Quarelling, and about what? Not Peace in General, no, every one is for that; but the Peace now to be treated of between the Confederates and the King of France, that's the Uneasiness.

Nor to do every one Justice is the Que­stion among us, whether we shall make Peace with France or no; every Man of Sense, every Man of Principle, every Man that has any knowledg of the Circum­stances of the Nation, or Concern for its Prosperity and Happiness, wishes for Peace, no Man will say that he is not for Peace; the very War is made for Peace; it is the Condition of every Manifesto, every De­claration, all the Alliances, all the Articles of the Confederacies, which lay down the Causes and Beginnings of the War, are full of it. Peace, Peace; to restore the Tran­quility of Europe, to restore the Liberty of Europe, to restore the Ballance of Power in Europe, the whole War turns upon this Point. And to be very plain, the Justice, the Honour, and the Reputation of the [Page 10] Confederacy can be supported, and defend­ed upon no other Foundation, nothing else can justifie the Allies for taking up Arms, neither do they pretend to any other Justifi­cation of it; the Word is, the Necessity they are driven to, there being no other way left them to obtain Peace. Indeed, no War is just, but what is made for Peace; no­thing but Peace can make War lawful. So that Peace being the only thing pre­tended to in the undertaking this War, for any Man to say they do not desire Peace, is to say, they Fight as the Great Turk does, for his Pleasure, for Encrease of his Dominions, for Conquest, and the extend­ing his Power; which is just as much to be Defended as the Pyrates of Madagascar, or as Robbing on the Highway, and no other­wise.

But to come to the Point, the particular Objection lies another way; it is not a Peace in General that our People object against, but the Nature and Circumstances of the Peace; and here we give the Peace an Epithet, which requires some Enquiry into; A GOOD PEACE, this is the Distinction, this alone it is that our whole Dispute turns upon, and the Exposition of the true Meaning, or Acceptation of this Word, is the Subject of this Undertaking.

[Page 11] A GOOD PEACE say the Objectors we are all for, but not such a Peace as you would have, or as you would make; and this is the state of the Case. Two Men quar­relling together in this Town, One a West Countryman, the other a North Country­man; among some Scurrility that past be­tween them, says West to his Antagonist, I am no Yorkshireman; why, says North, What have you to say to Yorkshire? Are there not a great many Honest Men in Yorkshire? I would have you know, There are as Honest Men in Yorkshire, as in any Part of England; Ay, ay, says West, that may be true for ought I know; but that is called Honesty in Yorkshire, which is not Honesty in other Places.

This is something like our Case; as one Sort who are charg'd with being against Peace justifie themselves, and say no, we are not against Peace, but are for a Good Peace or none. So those on the other Side, who are for Peace say, they are for no Peace but a Good Peace also. But the Case will lye very much here, and indeed only here, whether that is not called a Good Peace by one Side, which is not called a Good Peace by the other; and so we are brought down by both Parties to the great Enquiry, which is the Subject of the present Discourse, viz.

[Page 12] What is to be understood, by a GOOD PEACE?

In pursuing this Enquiry impartially, it will come of course that we consider the Mistakes which People are naturally led in­to about this Question, and the various Constructions which the Men of this Day are pleased to put upon this Word; which Construction varies as Interest, Party and Opinion leads them.

I shall not spend Time to enquire how it comes to pass, that there are at this time such Mistakes, and so many Opini­ons upon so plain a Question; and how a Nation so clear-sighted as we are, comes to see with such differing Views, put such a differing Sense upon a Word of such Consequence at such a Time as this. For really the unhappy Breach of Parties a­mong us, and the Prejudices which con­stantly attend those Party-Divisions, give us but too plain a Method how to account for them: And it must be, that Men be­ing blinded by their Passions, and their Prejudices, are deprived of the clear, and uninterruped Use of their Judgment, give their Opinions with partiality, as the several Interests of the Parties they es­pouse influence their Judgments.

[Page 13] To come at a right understanding of what we call a good Peace, it seems necessa­ry, with plainness and freedom, to lay down a little Historically the State of the War as it respects Britain, and her Allies; and this I shall do as plainly and briefly as I can.

After the Peace of Reswick, for I shall go back no farther; the King of France hav­ing recognized King William, settled all the Reunions, and surrendred to the Confede­rates what was agreed to be Surrendred; Europe had a pleasing Prospect of a happy and a lasting Peace; there was but one Event which had any thing in it Fatal, or Threatning to the Tranquility of this Part of the World, and this was the Death of Charles II. King of Spain without Issue; which tho' it was not then happened, yet it was probable could not be far off. However, to prevent the Evil Consequen­ces which such an Event might bring up­on Europe; and as the Preamble to the Treaties of Partition says to prevent a new War: The Two Kings of England and France, with the States-General, entred in­to a Convention or Treaty, for bringing all the Claims, and Pretensions to that Suc­cession to a Ballance, this is the so much controverted Treaty, called The Treaty of Partition; in the Preamble to which, are [Page 14] the following Words relating to what I am now treating of.

After the end of this Transaction, Europe was in a perfect Tranquility, I mean as to Nations; for as to Peace at Home, God knows we enjoy'd less of it than ever. But Hea­ven healed our needless Breaches, by ma­king two real Breaches upon us; and find­ing the Nation Sick, and Surfeited with the little Peace we had; he visited us with a New War, and the Death of the King.

The New War began purely on the French side, who made himself Agressor by [Page 15] two Steps taken in a direct Contravention to the Solemn Treaties he had made; tho' those Treaties were ratify'd, and exchang'd in due Form, and so fairly executed, that Europe, and especially England entirely dis­arm'd, laid by their Fleets, and broke their Troops, reducing the Establishment of Forces to the Stint or Limitation of a pro­found Peace.

The two Steps, I speak of, which the French took to break this Peace, were (1.) The Owning, Declaring, and Compliment­ing the Pretender by the Stile and Titles due to King William, as King of England, Scot­land and Ireland, notwithstanding the Article in the Treaty of Reswick, by which he had before acknowledg'd King William. (2.) The other, was the Seizing and Taking Possession of the whole Spanish Monarchy, by Virtue of a Will, or pretended Will of King Charles II. to the Duke of Anjou, and declaring the said Duke of Anjou, King of Spain, &c. notwith­standing his Agreement and solemn Ratifica­tion of the Treaty of Partition then in Force.

These things produced a War as Univer­sal to this Part of Europe as ever was engag'd in; which has now been carry'd on Nine Year and 6 Months, from May the 4 th, 1701. to Octob. the 7th, 1711. Of the Successes and probable End of which I need not en­large here, it may come to be spoken of again.

[Page 16] I must do his most Christian Majesty that Justice, as to say, I never saw or heard, that in all his Manifestoes or Declarations of, or concerning this War, he ever stoop'd to give many Reasons, why he took either of the Steps, except only his own Will and Pleasure, viz. That so he had thought fit to do; (viz.) We have thought fit ra­ther to accept the said Gift of the late King Charles to Our said Grandson, &c.—and we have thought fit to salute the said Prince (meaning the Pretender) by such and such Titles, and the like.

But the more his Majesty thought fit to take those unccommon Steps, and the less Reason he was pleased to give for them, the greater and the juster Reasons they were, why the Confedetates should enter again into that War which was the Conse­quence of it; and this is evidently taken hold of in that Sense by the English and the Dutch in their Respective Declarations of War, as follows:

Whereas, instead of giving the Satisfaction that ought justly to be expected, the French King has added thereunto ( Note, that is, unto the Seizing the Spanish Monarchy) a great Affront and Indignity to US and Our King­doms, in taking upon him to declare the Pre­tended Prince of Wales, King of England, [Page 17] Scotland and Ireland, and has also influenc'd Spain to concur in the same Affront and Indig­nity; we find Our Selves obliged for maintain­ing the Publick Faith for Vindicating the Ho­nour of Our Crown, and to prevent the Mischiefs which all Europe is threatned with, to declare War, &c.

I recapitulate these things, because from these Foundations will best be inferr'd what ought to be esteem'd by all the Confe­derates, A GOOD PEACE; which is bring­ing it down to the Case before me, and of which I shall speak again in its Course.

When the King of France had thought fit, as above, to take these two Steps, Europe immediately broke out into a Flame, the People of England resented in a particular Manner, the Affront put upon their King, in the King of France setting up a Pretender against him, after he had solemnly own'd his Title, and made Treaties with him as King; and Addresses flow'd from all Parts of the Kingdom to the King, expressing their Detestation of that Treatment, and pressing His Majesty to a War.

The other Allies, as much resenting the King of France's sezing upon the Monar­chy of Spain, and setting up his Grandson Philip V. prepar'd for War also upon that Account. Upon these mutual Grievances, was form'd the Treaty call'd the Grand [Page 18] Alliance; in which the particular Demands of the Allies, without which it is made Unlawful for them on either Hand, to make Peace, are particularly stipulated; with this express Condition also, ‘"That it shall not be lawful to any of the Confederates to treat of Peace with the Enemy, without the mutual Assent and Advice of the rest of the Confederates."’—And here again you may have a stated Foundation for what we ought to call a Good Peace. Nor is there in any of these things, any feign'd Constru­ction, or forc'd Sense, by which any one can be led to make the Terms of Peace, more or less: For this, like the Statutes of a Nation, is the Rule to go by.— To the Law, and to the Testimony, was the Word of of Old: To the Grand Alliance, and to the Declaration of the Reasons of the War, is the Word with me, and I believe will be so with all Impartial Men in the World—Here is the Cause of your making War; here is your declar'd Resolution when it shall End, and 'till when it shall not End; and when these Ends are answer'd, the Causes, the Reason, and the Original Mo­tion of the Grand Alliance cease.

And here I must touch a very nice Point, and which yet I shall do plainly, and with Re­spect, I shall be the last Man in Britain that shall endeavour to lessen the Duty and Re­gard [Page 19] that the People of this Nation ought to pay to the Votes, Opinion or Declara­ [...]ions of the Parliament, which is our [...]rue Representative, and whose Actions are our own.—But speaking in the Language of the Confederacy, I say, with humble Submission, no Vote, no Address, no de­clar'd Opinion of the Parliament, as to the Terms of the Peace, can alter at all the Foundation of the War, or bind the rest of the Confederates beyond the Obliga­tions they are under, by Virtue of the Al­ [...]iances and Stipulations of Confederacy they are already engag'd in.

Thus as it is not in the Power of any of the Confederates, legally to make Peace, or treat of Peace, without common Con­sent, &c. So neither is it in the Power of any of the Confederates to impose farther Conditions upon the rest, or to say we will not make Peace, unless such or such things be obtain'd, although those things are not express'd in the said Grand Alliance, which is the only obligatory Limitation of Peace and War.

To explain my self yet farther, with all posible Respect and Regard to the Confe­derates; if any one of the Confederates, or the States or Parliament of their Country should Vote or Declare, That no Peace should be made with France, till such or [Page 20] such Conditions were obtain'd, were it put­ting the whole Spanish Monarchy into such or such Hands as they please to name; if such Conditions are not express'd in the Grand Alliance, I humbly conceive the rest of the Confederates are not oblig'd by that Vote.

I come still nearer to the Point, for as I hope, I say nothing offensive, so I need cover it with no Allegory or Similies, for I hate Disguises.—Our Parliament Voted, and Addressed, and gave it as their Opinion; and her Majesty concurr'd with that Opi­nion, That no Peace could be Safe and Honourable, while any Part of the Spanish Monarchy remain'd in the Possession of the House of Bourbon.—

But if this is neither express'd or imply'd in the said Grand Alliance, which is the Compact and the binding Principle of the War, I leave it to any impartial Hand to make out, how far would these Votes or Ad­dresses be binding upon the rest of the Con­federates.

This is to me an unanswerable Proof, that the Grand Alliance is the Test, the Foundation to judge of the Condition of the Peace by; and whatever Treaty a­mouns to, or gives to us, all that is agreed to be demanded by that Treaty, may be called A GOOD PEACE, tho' it should not come up to the future Opinions of any set of People whatsoever.

[Page 21] From the Votes and Addresses of the British Parliament, I come to the late Treaty, if it be proper to call it a Treaty, of the Preliminaries settled at the Hague by Mon­sieur Torcy, and the Plenipotentiaries of the Allies.

If by these Preliminaries, the Confede­rates push'd France to a farther Length than the Treaty of Grand Alliance had concerted, well and good; my Answer is this,

The Question before me is, What is the proper Foundation of A GOOD PEACE at this time? To which my Answer is, as before, The Grand Alliance is the Test of a Good Peace; yet as much more as you can, I will never be the Complainer: But I dare not say, that when what is there demand­ed, can be obtain'd, you have any just Rea­son to carry on the War to obtain more; at least, unless all the Confederates agree to do so; for nothing beyond it can be Obligatory upon the whole.

It remains then, that all which shall be said farther relating to a Peace, must be a Comment upon this Text.

There is an Event happened since the making that Alliance, which in that Alli­ance there is no Provision made for; and which, had it been foreseen, the Allies no doubt, would have made some proper Arti­cle to have settled, This is the Death of the Emperor; and this Accident may give us Room to enquire, Whether it does not make some needful Alterations in the Terms on which we are to insist for Peace?

[Page 23] My Answer is plain, I wish some People would bear with my plainness; I say it does not: And here without Fear, or Regard to Power, or Parties, I shall say some Things which I do believe will startle Man kind a little in this Case; at least, if we consider the popular Notions which spread among us.

We have been push'd on, to set up the taking Spain from King Philip, as the REST or Stay of the Confederates; as a Thing that we are all ruin'd and undone without; and the Parliament Vote, Ad­dress, and Declare their Opinion, as be­fore, That no Peace can be Safe, or Honou­rable without it. And yet I must tell you,

There is not one Word of Recovering all the Spanish Monarchy, out of the Hands of the House of Bourbon, in all the Grand Al­liance; so that none of the Confederates are under any Obligations to go that par­ticular Length, and not make Peace with­out it.

My Argument turns upon this Point then, of which this is the Abstract:

If in this way of Arguing, I am put to prove the Assumption, ( viz.) That a Peace may be Honourable, if made according to the Tenour of the Grand Alliance; I make it out thus: The Grand Alliance is a Conventi­on of all the Allies, declaring all the Grie­vances for which they make War, and on what Terms only they will make Peace.

If all the Reasons inducing the War are answered, and all the Demands upon which the War is Declar'd are obtain'd, it can be no longer Just to make War; when it is no longer Just to make War, it is Just we should make Peace; and what­soever is Just in this Case, is Honourable.

I return to the Grand Alliance, I say, There is not one Word of the Terms of Peace, which are mentioned in the Ad­dress of the Parliament, to be found in the Grand Alliance.

The Terms of Peace limitted by the Grand Alliance are these, and none but these.

• 1. An equitable and reasonable Security to his Imperial Majesty, for his Pretensions to the Spanish Succession.
• 2. A particular and sufficient Security of the Kingdoms, Provinces, Dominions, [Page 25] Navigation and Commerce for the Sub­jects of his Majesty of Great Britain, and the States General. See for this, the Treaty of Grand Alliance, entred into by the Three Powers, the Empire, England, and Holland; Septemb. 7. 1701. Articl 1. and 8.

The Observation therefore is not mine [...]nly, it is the Nature of the thing; let any [...]ne tell me how from hence does it ap­pear, that we must fight particularly till [...]ot one Branch of the Spanish Monarchy [...]emain to the House of Bourbone, or that [...]ur Peace will be neither Safe nor Honou­ [...]able without it.

Nor was this all; But, 3. The Parlia­ment was kept at hand by small Adjourn­ments, in order, if need were, to have th [...] Necessity of receding from that Vote, o [...] Address, or Opinion, call it what you will in order to a Peace, made appear, These ar [...] the Things which I say may startle Mankind.

Now, Gentlemen, pray let me ask, Doe [...] the Vote, or Opinion of the Parliamen [...] make the Conditions of a Peace Safe and Honourable? Or is it so in the Consequence and by the Nature of the thing it self? I de­sire to pay a just Deference to the Opinion of Parliaments, but never against the Rea­son and Nature of Things.

Again, the Parliament was to have been desir'd if it had been found necessary, to have receded from that Vote,—What would they have said to the Houses? Would they have ask'd them to Vote for a Peace, which was in their Opinion, not Safe or Honourable? No, no, they would have al­ledged, That such and such things being agreed, it was judg'd both Safe and Honou­rable, and the House must have been de­sir'd to alter their Opinion.

[Page 27] And now, Gentlemen, let no Man mi­ [...]ake me, I am not reflecting on the late [...]inistry in this, or on the late Parliament; [...] is what they ought to have done: No [...]dubt, as Cases and Things alter, the [...]pinions of Men must alter, and Reason [...]quires that they should alter their Opini­ [...]ns; let them be Kings, Queens, Parlia­ [...]ents, or any Body of Men in the World.

This was the Case in the Treaty of Par­ [...]tion; what pass'd upon that Affair, I need [...]ot repeat: But if such a Treaty should yet [...]e found necessary, I make no Question, it [...]hall be yet voted Safe and Honourable; all [...]ther and former Opinions to the contrary [...]n any wise notwithstanding.

I have hinted this, because I know our People run away with it, That the Parlia­ment having made that Address, and given [...]t as their Opinion, That no Peace can be good, i. e. Safe and Honourable, but as before, that all the Spanish Monarchy be taken from the House of Bourbon; and that therefore this only is the Test of A GOOD PEACE, which I think is fairly, and I hope modestly too, confuted.

I have nothing to do in this Discourse, with whom this or that Part of the Spa­nish Monarchy should be given to▪ I am upon the General, and with all Humble Submission to Parliaments Addresses An­swers, [Page 28] That I think it appears with a Non ob­stante to what of that Kind has past, viz. Tha [...] a Safe and Honourable Peace may be made▪ tho' every Branch of the Spanish Monarchy should not be recovered from the House of Bourbon.

This I lay down as my General.

I cannot dismiss this Head, without ob­serving two Things, which being rightly understood, will take off all that any one may think in this is reflecting upon the late Parliament.

• 1. That as the Case stood then, that Vote was agreeable to the State of Things in the World; and to the Prospect the Confederates had before them, both of the Possibility of that Conquest, and of the Necessity of it.
• 2. That as the Case stands now, it is more than probable, that same Par­liament, in the same Interest, and with the same Designs, would have been of another Opinion.

Alteration of Circumstances must for ever be allow'd to be a Reason for Altera­tion of Opinion, in all Cases in the World; nor is it any Reproach to the Wisdom or Integrity of that Parliament, to say, That what might be absolutely necessary then, may be otherwise now.

[Page 29] I am none of them that leave my Readers to guess at Cases, or need that any one should ask, What are these Alterations of Circumstances which have happened since, and which make this Difference, or whether, and how it is more safe to leave part of the Spanish Monarchy in the House of Bourbon now, than it was before?

My Answer is direct, The Revolution which has happened in the House of Austria since that time, whereby the Imperial Crown' is fallen to the same Person to whom was then allotted the Crown of Spain; is the Alteration which I speak of; and I cannot but believe, that according to the Treaty of Partition, and according to the receiv'd Opinion of Europe, for some Ages, it would never be judged Safe that the Crown of Spain should ever be permitted to be given to the Person of an Emperor, any more than of a King of France.—This is an Opinion founded upon all the Principles of Safety, which the Princes of Europe have acted upon for above 70 Years past, ( viz.) The Balance of Power, which by such a Coalition or Conjunction of Power would be entirely broken and dissolved.

Will any Man believe of the last parli­ament, that they would have been of the Opinion, to have given the whole Spanish Monarchy to the Person of an Emperor of [Page 30] Germany? Will any man say, that no Peace can be Safe or Honourable, but what shall put all the Dominions of the Spanish Crown into the Hands of Charles VI.? It is not Dis­honourable Account to give of his Imperial Majesty, to say it would make him too Great for the rest of Europe to be easie un­der; I think I might be allow'd to say the same of the Queen of England.

But I meet with an Objection here, which should be spoken to, ( viz.) What is this to the Purpose? The Parliaments Vote is not upon who you shall give it to, but who you shall take it from; not who shall have it, but who shall not have it. To this Cavil, for it is no more, I answer, that nei­ther do I say who should have it, but who should not; and let this lie for those to Answer to whom it belongs: I know the Question is invidious and ensnaring; and tho' I could Answer it, I believe, Effectual­ly, and to Satisfaction, yet it is not to our Purpose here, and for that Reason I wave it.

The Two Negatives lye before us; The House of Bourbon must not have it, say the Addresses. The Nature of the Things says Now, the Person you would have given it to, must not have it; What then will you do with it?

And this brings me home to the Original Question, What is to be called A GOOD [Page 31] PEACE? As then I have thus stated the Question, I shall come to a direct An­swer as freely as possible.

• 1. That alone can be A GOOD PEACE, where none of the Parties are vested with so much Power as overthrows the Balance of Europe.
• 2. That alone can be A GOOD PEACE, wherein the Great Articles of the Grand Alliance, which were the Be­ginning, and are the Foundation of the War, are fully answered.

In these two Generals are comprised all the Particulars, which require any Ex­planation in this Affair.

• 1. None of the several Parties are to be vested with so much Power as over­throws the Ballance of Europe; that this would be the Case of the Spanish Monarchy were it united either in the Person of a King of France, or of an Emperor of Germany, seems so plain, as needs no farther Debate, and the Reader is only referr'd for Proof of it.

I'll give it you under both their Hands, if any Man can quote better Authority, he is wellcome.

[Page 32] 1. The King of France: His most Christi­an Majesty very frankly acknowleges for his part, That it is not Safe for Eu­rope, that the Crown of Spain should be enjoy'd by the SAME PERSON who is King of France, this you have in the Proposals of Peace, made in his Name, and now under Consideration, Signed by Monsieur Mesnager as fol­lows;

That he will freely and bonâ fide con­sent, to the takeing of all just and reaso­nable Measures, for hindring that the Crowns of France and Spain may never be united on the Head of the same Prince; His Majesty being perswaded that this Excess of Power would be contrary to the Good and Quiet of Europe. Vide the 11th Proposal.

2. The late King William: His Majesty, Declares in the Solemn Treaty be­tween England, Holland and France, called The Second Treaty of Partition; That that Treaty being made for the Good and Safety of Europe, and to prevent future Wars between the Confdeerates therein named, That the Crown of Sqain should never come to be enjoy'd by the Person of an Empe­ror, or a King of France, in these Words;

[Page 33] If the most Serene Arch-Duke should die without Issue, either before or after the Death of the Catholick King, the Share which is hereby assigned to him, shall come to such Male Child of the Emperor, or of the King of the Ro­mans, Except the King of the Romans, MARK THAT, as his Imperial Maje­sty shall assign it to; but on Condition that the said Part shall never be United, nor belong to the Person of him who shall be Emperor, or King of the Ro­mans, or is become one or the other, be it by Succession, Will, Contract of Marriage, Donation, Exchange, Ces­sion, Appeal, Rebolt, or otherwise; as in like manner, the said Share of the Serene Arch-Duke shall never come, or belong to the Person of a Prince, that is or shall be King, or Dauphine of France.

Thus you have the Royal Authority of both these Crown'd Heads, to prove what I have asserted in the First General.

2. That alone can be A GOOD PEACE wherein the Great Articles of the Grand Alliance, which were the Beginning, and are the Founda­tion of the War, are fully answer'd.

For Evidence of this, we need go no far­ther than the Grand Alliance it self.

[Page 34] The Terms of the Grand Alliance, are these:

1. That an Equitable and Reasonable Sa­tisfaction be given to his Imperial Majesty, for his Pretension to theSpa­nish Succession. Vide Grand Alliance, Artic. 11.

Note, here, If the Allies had understood that the whole Spanish Monarchy had de­volv'd to him as his Right, let me ask these Questions:

• 1. Why is it called SATISFACTION FOR the Succession? Why is it not rather said, 'Till he be put into POS­SESSION of the Spanish Monarchy? It would certainly have been express'd otherwise, if it had been meant, He should ever possess it as Emperor.
• 2. Why is it call'd his Imperial Majesty's Pretension to the Succession, and yet put into the Hands of his Brother King Charles?

I must be excus'd making two Remarks upon this: 1. Satisfaction for the Succes­sion plainly infers, His Imperial Majesty was never understood to be the Person that should succeed? It would never else have [Page 35] been called Satisfaction for it. This implies an Equivalent with which he was to be satis­fied instead of it, and plainly acknowledges, that the Confederrates never dreamt of ma­king an Emperor of Germany to be also King of Spain. 2. Whereas it is called his Impe­rial Majesty's Right of Succession, why, then was it given to King Charles? It is evident, this transferring the Crown by Gift to King Charles III. at the same time that we exploded King Charles II. devising it by Gift to King Philip, was but an odd Title, and gave such a Handle to Confirm K. Philip's Right (his Gift being prior to the other) as I never yet could see answer'd. But waving that which I have formerly insisted on, and which is now no more a Question, the Emperor being dead. This Argu­ment may be drawn from it, which I be­lieve can never be answer'd; That the Em­peror demitted his Right to his Brother, because it never could be allow'd tolerable, nor so much as to be thought of, that ever the Allies would agree, an Emperor of Germany should have it, as the very same Foundation of Exorbitance which they were then declaring and fighting against in the King of France.

The King of France then, and the Em­peror finding that on both Sides, the taking the Crown of Spain to themselves, would [Page 36] not go down with the rest of Europe, they respectively put a Third Person in the Place. Philip, and Charles, and both of them, claim the Crown of Spain by Gift, neither having any real Title.

Fate now has decided the Point on one Side, for King Charles is taken out of the Contention, and made Emperor.—Can he then be King of Spain? Certainly, by any of the former Notions of Europe, he can ne­ver be so received.—Well, what is next? Have we any other Branch of the House of Austria to make a Gift to? If we have, let us see him; if we have not, what follows, but to make such a Treaty as in which the Balance of Europe may be secured, and such Powers erected as may reciprocally prevent either the House of Bourbon, or Austria, overrunning Europe; and this I shall call A GOOD PEACE, let who will find out the Medium to bring it to pass.—

The first thing I shall hint from this Ob­sevation, is—This makes me easie, and I believe, if consider'd, would make us all easie on the Subject of a Treaty.

Let who will be the Agents, let what will be the Proposals, the Nature of the thing is such, no Party can suggest that we should not have a Regard to the Balance of Europe; no Peace can be treated on, but upon this Foot: The establishing some Rule [Page 37] of Power, some Generals for the Boun­daries of National Interest, such as may li­mit the Princes of Europe, and prevent fu­ture Encroachments one upon another.

For this Reason, I cannot but think we should all be willing to come to talk of these things—Certainly, to Treat of them, can be of no prejudice; nor can I allow it to be a good Argument, to say, That the French always gain upon us by a Treaty. This is to call all the Confederates Fools, and say, they do not know what they would have; that they make War for they know not what; that they have Generals to fight, but no States Men to treat; that they have Hands, but no Heads; and that all Europe are not able to maintain their Ar­guments against Five French-Men, Plenipo­tentiaries.

The French make Proposals; they would put by the Way of treating by Prelimina­ries, and come to a General Treaty at once; And why should we not venture them at a Treaty? We can insist upon every thing at a General Treaty, as well as at a particular, and can stand to all the necessary Points of the Grand Alliance, as well there as at an­other time.

The treating brings us not the nearer; if France does not come up to reasonable Things, we are where we were. The [Page 38] War goes on, nothing is abated of the Vi­gour of our Armies, or of the needful Pre­parations; the War indeed may influence the Treaty: Thus it was at the Treaty of Westphalia, which held at least Eight Years; thus it was at the Treaty of Nimeguen, which lasted Two Campaigns, yet both at last came to a Conclusion, and so may this perhaps; if it does not, we are never the farther off of Victory, nor the Enemy ever the nearer the End they aim at.

It seems therefore something wonder­ful to me, that People should be allarm'd at a Proposal to treat; we may treat without a Peace, but we can never have a Peace without treating. All that we are allarm'd at hitherto, is the Suggestion or Suspicion of a private Treaty; to bring it then to an open fair Publick Treaty, is the most effe­ctually way both to remove the Suspitions of such a Treaty on one Hand, and to take away the Pretensions for it on the other.

Some alledge a Party among us are a­gainst Peace, are for perpetuating the War, and have their private Ends in view, to be pursued at the Publick Expence. I am in hopes there are no such People among us; however, those People opposing a Treaty, give the best Argument that those that think so can wish for, to support that Al­legation; it is alledged on the other Hand, [Page 39] That Clandestine Negotiations are on Foot, and those that say so, fill the People with Suspicions, and Apprehensions of such Things as I hope are not in any One's Head to at­tempt. A Treaty would effectually remove all those Jealousies, and clear up the Repu­tation of both Parties.

At a Treaty, all the Allies will be pre­sent by their Plenipotentiaries, every Thing will be fully, fairly and openly discuss'd; if any Member of the Confederates are easier, and willinger to be imposed upon than they ought to be, they will be set to Rights in Judgment, or over-rul'd in Vote by the o­ther; if any Member of the Confederacy is more rigid, or more backward, harder to be satisfied with Reason, or forwarder to continue the War than consists with the General Interest, he will be reduced to Reason by the Perswasions, or over-rul'd by the Voices of the other.

The French are not so considerable an E­nemy, that we should be afraid to Engage with them any farther in the War; or so in­considerable, that we should think it below us to Treat; a Treaty takes off all Objecti­ons, tho' they do not propose enough to form a Good Peace, yet in a Treaty we may bring them to it. I can see many Objecti­ons against their Proposals indeed, but I can­not see one against a Treaty.

[Page 40] In a Treaty a Thousand Things may occur, and be said, that may in the End happily Issue this Great Affair in A GOOD PEACE; as I said in the beginning, I find every one joining in their desire to have a good Peace, but how shall they obtain it without a Treaty? A Treaty takes it out of the Hands of those you may suspect, and puts it into the Hands of the Confederates in General; if any Concessions are made to France, which you are afraid of, there they will be discussed, there they will be examin­ed; the Plenipotentiaries of the Allies on eve­ry Side will be watchful, that the Distributi­on of the Dominions be not partial and une­qual to one or to another; that every one has Justice, and that no Advantage be gi­ven more on one hand than another. The Plenipotentiaries of all the Parties are Arbi­trators of every particular Interest respe­ctively.

Certainly a Treaty would end all this Strife; if the French are Sincere in their Of­fers, and in their Proposals for a General Peace, it will appear; if they are not, they will be detected: The Securities they will offer, will be here disputed, the Vali­dity of them determined; if they are re­jected, the Reasons for rejecting them will appear; and if we must carry on the War again, the Necessity will appear; so that [Page 41] People will be satisfied with it, and the more Chearfully bear the Expence. More­over, the Scandal of designing to perpetuate the War will be removed, and every one will see for themselves, why the Treaty broke off, and why the War is carryed on: If a Peace ensues, it is not the less likely to be A GOOD PEACE, for having the whole Body of the Confederate Ministers consenting to it, and coming into it.

I cannot imagine upon what Foot any one can pretend to be backward to a Treaty, and I am the freer to put this Notion of mine in here at this length, because I think it is the only Method to bring the variety of Opinions now among us, to a Point; to reconcile us to one another a lit­tle, and to establish our private Peace, by putting an end to the present Disputes a­mong us; a Thing every good man wishes for, and a Thing none can deny we ex­treamly want.

I cannot but think those People very much mistaken, both on one Side or other, who oppose a Treaty; some say a Treaty will be to no Purpose, and will but amuse us, and all Europe; that it is plain, the Con­federates will insist on the Surrendring all the Spanish Monarchy to the House of Au­stria, and that the French will not part with [Page 42] it, and therefore the War must go on, till the French find themselves in such Circum­stances as to be obliged to quit that sweet Morsel to save the rest: That a Treaty in the mean time is but amusing us, and is a particular Service to the King of France, as it buoys up his People in hopes of a Peace, and urges them to exert their utmost for a­while longer, upon a prospect of a speedy Issue of all their Troubles. On the other Hand, some say a Treaty is design'd only to bring the Confederates into some Confu­sion about the Spanish Monarchy; and that some appearing less tenacious on that Head than others, will make them Jealous of one another, divide them in Opinion; and that the French have more Room in a Trea­ty to lay hold of, and make Advantages from those Differences; and so a Treaty may be a Means to destroy the good Har­mony of the Confederates, rather than to issue in a good Peace.

As to the First, It seems to have no strength of Reasoning at all in it; 'tis begging the Que­stion, to say the Confederates will insist upon the evacuating the whole Spanish Domi­nions to the House of Austria; it is evident, as before the Confederates did appear en­clin'd at the last Treaty, to yield some Point to France, and to allow King Philip to [Page 43] keep Possession of some part of that Monar­chy, rather than continue the Desolations of Europe; and this, when there was a distinct Branch of the House of Austria to possess the rest; it seems probable they may be enclin'd to make larger Concessions now. The Consideration of Europe's Desola­tions being as strong as before, and the House of Austria having now but one Head to receive the rest; to which Head there cannot be equal Reason for giving the rest, to what there was before; and of which Head there may be so many just Fears of the Danger of his possessing it—­The Notion then of the Confederates be­ing resolved to insist positively upon the Evacuation of the Spanish Monarchy with­out any Reserve, is not well grounded, and therefore not a just way of Argu­ing.

As to a Treaty being a Help to France, as it buoys up the Spirits of his People; by so much as he reaps an Advantage by that Mo­mentary, Imaginary Aid—by so much, if it fails, will he suffer then in the Despair he will find his People reduc'd to, when they shall see those Hopes vanish, and that their Miseries are like still to be continued by the Obstinacy of their King, in hazarding their Ruine, to preserve not themselves [Page 44] as France, but the Possession of the whole Spanish Monarchy, by which they can pro­pose to receive little or no Benefit when it is obtain'd, and will be expos'd to the ut­most Desolation in the Disappointment.

This Digression brings me back to the Notion of the Confederates upon such a Treaty, making Concessions to France of some Part of the Spanish Monarchy—And this the People who object, say, cannot consist with A GOOD PEACE.

This Point must be clear'd up as we go, and therefore I resume it now; it is appa­rent, that as before, two Accidents make the Circumstances differ.

• 1. That there was even at the last Treaty, an apparent Willingness in the Confe­derates, to have made some Conces­sions to King Philip, which neverthe­less were thought to be consistent with A GOOD PEACE.
• 2. That there is not now, as there then was, a Branch of the House of Austria, whom there was no Danger to Europe in Establishing on the Spanish Throne, and that therefore farther Concessions perhaps may not only be found con­sistent with, but may be essential to A GOOD PEACE.

It needs not that I should embarrass my self here with that ensnaring Party ma­king Question, What, and how much of the Spanish Monarchy may, and should, upon a Treaty, be given to the present Pos­sessor. But to keep to the Text, viz, The Explanation of the General Term, A Good Peace, I shall lay down some Heads, which without Partiality or Respect to Parties in the least, but speaking really, and bona fide, with all possible Indifference, seem to me to be natural Deductions from the present State of Affairs in Europe; and by which, if cooly consider'd, we may come to understand what is the true and genuine Meaning of the thing we are upon, ( viz.) what we may call A GOOD PEACE.

• 1. That if on a Treaty, France should con­sent entirely to evacuate the Spanish Monarchy, and the Confederates should give up that Monarchy to the Emperor, the Ballance of Power in Europe would be entirely destroy'd, and therefore such a Conclusion could not be allow'd to be A GOOD PEACE.
• 2. That altho' some Part ( God forbid I should say what part, I have nothing to do with that) of the Spanish Monarchy should [Page 46] be conceded to King Philip upon a Treaty, yet such Parts of it might be also given to the Emperor, as might be an equitable and reasonable Satisfaction to his Imperial Majesty for his Pretensi­ons to the Spanish Succession, accord­ing to the very Words of the Treaty of the Grand Alliance quoted before.
• 3. That although some part of the Spanish Succession should by a Treaty re­main to King Philip V. yet such fit­ting Security MAY be given by the King of France, and by King Philip respectively, as may be sufficient and Satisfactory to the Queen of Great Britain, and the States General, and their Allies, for their Kingdoms and Provinces, and for the Navigation and Commerce of their Subjects.
• 4. That such Treaty as shall end in ob­taining such equitable and reasonable Satisfaction to the Empreror, and such Security to the rest of the Allies, may issue in a Firm, Lasting, Safe, Ho­nourable and GOOD PEACE, al­though some Part of the Spanish Mo­narchy should remain to the present King Philip V.

This, I think, may be allow'd, accor­ding to my Title, to be a full and plain Exposition of the Word A GOOD PEACE; and may tell us all, what we are to under­stand by it. Nor may it be altogether useless to us, in helping us to judge calmly and coolly of the Steps that are, or shall be taken towards it, either by Us, or by Our Allies.

By this we may determine, when these are too forward, and yield too much to France; or those too backward or refracto­ry, as not to see when good Terms may be obtain'd; both which will prevent the mutual Reproaches which pass now on either Side, with so much ill Nature.

I know we have some, who fill our Ears with Clamours against our Enemies; and answer all Arguments, with telling us, that the King of France is sincere in no­thing; that he designs to keep no Treaty any farther, or longer, than till he is in a Condition to break it.—That he vi­sibly design'd, from the beginning, to an­nex the Spanish Monarchy to the Kingdom of France, and does so still; and the Con­sequence of this, is, by their own Confes­sion, That we should neither treat of Se­curity, or Evacuation, or any Thing else; but that our only Safety consists in re­ducing the King of France.

[Page 48] To what we must reduce him, how, and when it shall be done, and when we shall be allow'd to have reduc'd him e­nough, they do not undertake to deter­mine. Indeed, these are Gentlemen I can­not join with; and I doubt, it is such as these that give some People so much Ground to say, That there are a Party; who are for perpetuating the War.—I am as willing to be Sanguine upon the War as any Body; and if it were continued, should be as willing to be hopeful of Suc­cess.—But to say, that the King of France cannot put us into such a Case by a Peace, as MAY effectually prevent him ever annexing Spain to France, and that this is his avow'd Design in this, and in all Treaties, is such a Confirmation of what has been all along offer'd by others, viz. that a few Years would make King Philip as much a Spaniard and as much an Enemy to France as any King of Spain before him, that I wonder to hear Men of Sense bring it for an Argument; and a Man can hardly re­frain telling such Men, that they are ar­guing for our giving up Spain to King Philip.

Lewis XIV. has set up Philip Duke of An­jou, upon the Spanish Throne, and has fought hard to keep him in Possession; in Gratitude [Page 49] and Duty to his Grand-father, I doubt not but Philip V. would on all Occasions do any thing for his Grand-father that lay in his Power; but if now after a Peace should be made (sup­posing, for Argument sake, that Peace were to give Spain to King Philip;) let us bring in the King of France writing such a Letter as this to his Grandson.

Will any Man say that Philip will immedi­ately Obey, resign his Crown and Kingdom, to the King of France, tho' he is his Grand-father, or had been his immediate Father, or were a thousand times nearer, if that could be?

Would not King Philip rather write a sub­missive Letter to him, acknowledging his Fa­vour in preferring him to so great a Dignity, and his Kindness in maintaining him therein unto a General Peace; professing his Zeal for his Majesty's Interest, and his Readiness to hazard himself, and all his Kingdoms in his Majesties Service; But that he is now so en­dear'd to his Subjects, whose Fidelity has [Page 50] been so manifest, and they are so endear'd to him that he is become the Father of his Peo­ple▪ and that he hopes his Grand-father will not put him to such an Extremity to quit those Kingdoms, and the Spanish Nation, who have spent so much Blood to keep him in Pos­session, and so in short Excuse himself, that is, make a Decent Refusal.

If upon this, the King of France, went about to Invade him, Would he not say to him, that his Spanish Subjects would by no means consent to his Abandoning them, &c. and that they are resoly'd to defend themselves; and would he not rather fight his Grand-father, after all he has done for him, than quit his Possession? And I am sure you will all say, he would be in the right to do so—And what would be the Consequence of such Fighting? but that very King Philip joining with the Allies, and seeking to them for help against France.

And if this would be so under his Grand-father, let any Man tell us what it would pro­bably be in half an Age after to his Elder Brother, if he being King of France, should make such a Demand? Would not he, Philip, Laugh at him, and bid him do his worst; and in both Cases, fly to the Confederates, viz. to England, Holland, and to the Empire for help?

This is so Natural and so unanswerably Just to suppose—That let these People but make it out, that this is the King of France's Design, and that he is only making a Shew of King Philip, but really resolves to annex Spain to the Kingdom of France; I say, let them but make [Page 51] this good; and they have brought on the Stage the strongest Reason that ever was yet given, or ever will be, why all the Spanish Monarchy should be given to King Philip, and I Challenge them to Answer it if they can.

Let any one but ensure the Confederates, that the King of France will endeavour to annex Spain to the Crown of France after a Peace; I dare say, none of the Confederates would scruple leaving King Philip upon that Throne—But this is so wild a Notion, that I think it Merits to have no more Notice taken of it.

Two things this Discourse tends to: 1. To remove that Notion, gotten among us, that all is Lost and Given up, if King Philip is not entirely Depos'd and Un-king'd, and the whole Spanish Monarchy taken out of his Hands by the Confederates; a thing, I must confess, however I acquiesce in the Opinion of our Superiors, I never saw either Rational to be so strictly limited, or possible to be brought to Practise; and a thing which those who adher'd to, yet tacitly own'd themselves wrong in, by keeping the Houses, by short Adjournments, just at Hand, to alter as they saw Occasion. 2. To Allarm us, and that with great, Reason too, to Consider, Suppose we could take it from King Philip; What the Danger of giving it now to the same Person to whom we would have given it before, will be; and Lastly, To Convince us all, how reasonable it is that the Powers of Europe should in ge­neral [Page 52] Congress, Meet, Treat and Debate, of these great Affairs, that if possible, out of all those Interfering Interests, some Happy Me­dium may be found to Re-establish the Tran­quility of Europe in a GOOD PEACE.