A LETTER TO A MEMBER OF THE House of COMMONS, In Answer to a Book Entituled A LETTER to the Catholicks of England, Ireland, Scotland, and all other His Majesties, &c.

Written by a lover of his Country.

Aeneid. lib. 2.
ulla putatis
[...] Danaum?—

A LETTER, &c.

SIR,

MEeting the other day with Father Walsh his Dedicatory Address of a large, and, I sup­pose, an Elaborate Book, in which he hath set forth all the Encroachments of the Popes, succes­sively in a manner from Hildebrand, upon the Mo­narchs of Christendome, together with a short Narra­tive of all the Irish, and English Treasonable, as well as Unfortunate Practises, about setting up the Papal Power, from Henry the Eighth's time until the last Rebellion of Ireland: Together with an account of the Oath, by printing the Oath it self (a thing I must confess I am beholden to him for) which, he saies, is the strictest that could be sworn or penn'd, especially, P. 54. Which Oath all their Re­verend Lord­ships of that Communion on course take. P. 16. and so on to p. 23. Aestimant Pa­pam esse unum Deum qui ha­bet potestatem omnem in coelo & terrâ. Joh. Gers. being the Pope himself is the onely Interpreter thereof; As likewise an account of the grand Positions of Popery, which are such as must render the Abettors to be a sort of Bigots, like the Zealous at last amongst the Jews, not fit to be Members of any Humane, much less Chri­stian Society: for he brings it amongst the rest of the Positions, that the Pope is Dominus Deus Noster, Our Lord God, and so stiled by the Glossatour of his own Canon Law, with many incongruities of theirs (that is, of them that are given up to the Pope) to all ends of Civil Government, which Positions he has divided into Eighteen Paragraphs, too many to particularize. Which labour of his seems to be popular enough at this time. For in making the Popes wicked, he hath far o'redone John Fox himself, nay the Zeal of the Rabble, on a Gun-powder day, may pass for Devotion compara­tively to his descriptions. And which is more, after this specious preamble he concludes as plausibly as he begun; for he directs the Catholics (by which, I suppose, he means them we call Papists) to address without any pro­crastination to his Majesty, p. 103. and Both Houses of Par­liament so, as shall convince all Protestants whatsoever, [Page 2] that they have at last, ingenuously bid an eternal Adieu to all those new Positions, which, not disown'd, might continue th [...]ir jealousie of them; by which means, the Gentleman hopes to see the Penal Laws first repealed, and then im­mediately the great work of Reconciliation. P. 104. and to this end p. 94. This I conceive is the great scope, and design, of his three or four years contrivement.

Now give me leave, Noble Sir, according to my wonted freedome, to give you an account of my Ani­madversions upon the Premisses.

The Devil as cunning as he is, they say, can never disguise himself so, but he shall be discovered by his Cloven foot, or some other little Criterion; so the Father discovers, in his very Title Page, more of the old leaven than is fit at this time for his design, or suits with the Sugar-Candy words, in the fourth Appen­dage, p. 83. of breaking down the wall of Partition, &c. By the direction of his Letter to the Catholicks of England, Ireland, &c. All men will grant, I suppose, that by Catholicks, he means onely Christians of the Roman perswasion, otherwaies his labours had as little design, as they deserve success. That being then so; he very charitably takes it for granted, That the Church of England, from whose Sons he hopes such great favours, is no part of the Catholick Church and so not much better than Heathens; otherwise he would not have treated the Papists there by the name of Catholicks, p. 73. when in other places he can call them Roman Catholicks. The latter Title being as much void of common sense, under that great Man's correction, as the former is of Christian charity.

Having now done with the Title Page, I beg your pardon a little to say something of the Gentleman, and his great and healing design. Good man, he was persecuted a long time by the Pope with Censures, Precepts, P. 74. Monitories, Denunciations, Affixions, Decrees, and what not, for meer Loyalty, he mist his prefer­ment,P. 68. was imprisoned in a Forreign Country, as far as Spain, upon some such account as he inti­mates. To all which I only say, That Zopirus was worse used by Darius his Master; you know what followed, the Babylonians trusted him upon that [Page 3] account, and he betray'd them; for Darius and he understood one another all the while, as 'tis possibly others may do. I'le only ask the Good man this Que­stion, What was he in Prison in Spain for? It must be either for ill Manners, or Religion: For the for­mer I am sure hee'l not own, and none e're came out for the latter, without the powerful solicitation of some Embassadour, which I do not hear he stood in need of; but there can be no counterfeit in this, He has been so long in persecution, as he saies, has wrote a Book of three or four years study; and yet that all this may be practic'd 'tis very possible, if you consider that the third and last opportunity of red integration was lost 1666,P. 80. by not signing the loyal Remonstrance or Formulary, at Dublin, as he saies, which may be was neglected or slighted out of either the fore-sight, or accident of the fatal fire in London, immediately suc­ceeding the most terrible Pestilence that ever was: so this famous City lying, with the Nation, under those terrible Judgments, of Fire, War, and Pestilence, that Party might then morally hope there would never be opportunity of putting any strict Test upon them, considering the supposed ruine of this City, and the potency of the Enemy, the Dutch, and French being Leagu'd in a War against us, which they expected more from a great deal than hapned, and possibly soon after that time our Author might go about the large Book the Stationer talks on, knowing that if the projects fail'd, which by some were then design'd, as thanks be to God, and the Industry of you, and your Fellow Members, they have almost to miracle; then his Address, as the last effort, might do their business as well as if they had bin white Boyes all along, and by his fine Harangue, stuft now and then with mis­apply'd Scripture, and some passionate Adjurations to his Country-men, by all civil and religious Tyes, p. 94. to sub­mit to his Formular, or Recognition, by that means to endear the Parliament to break down the partition wall, as he calls it, by letting them into immunities, which they at present are destitute of. But Sir, remember you have heard of one Squire Sinon, a crafty Knave, who made as many pious pretences to King Priam, to break [Page 4] down the Wall to let in the Trojan Horse, and then you know what followed. Another Argument that all may be practice, is this: Why does not he, seeing the Pope is so naughty a man, and all have in a manner been so, since Hildebrand, as he intimates often in his Book, reconcile himself to our Church by renouncing his Order, and other fopperies, founded solely upon the Popes Authority, without any ground in Scri­pture, or Four first General Councels; as, praying to Saints, Purgatory, Transubstantiation, Communion in one kind, and the like? For certainly no man that is sa­tisfied of the Popes fallibility in definitions of Faith, as he saies he is, can forbear to give himself that satis­faction as to conform to the dictates of right reason. Another Argument he proposes, and that he thinks a strong one, That, conditionally, the Laws may be taken off so, P. 79. as they, viz. the Priests, might live in their native Country, and so by degrees serve themselves and their Friends into all preferments, above five hundred English Priests, besides more of Irish, should declare by a Publick Instrument under their hands, as amply, and as clearly against all the new Doctrines, and all vain Pretences of Rome, as he has done, and shall be ready to renew that assurance as oft as shall be required. In Answer to this, I'le remind you of a Story: A Scotch Lord, and an English Gentle­man, were contending about the bigness of a Park; the Lord said that he had a Park had five hundred Dear of Antler in it; the Gentleman made a kind of wonder at it: Sbread, quoth the Scot, do you not believe me? Yes, saies the English man, but my wonder arises to think what a world of Raskals there must be. The story applies it self: For if we have so many well principled Priests, there are sholes of the rest; and can you forbear, Noble Sir, to be instrumental in performing this good Man's re­quest, seeing he promises you such plenty of excellent Company. I remember a passage in a certain French Authour, which is called the Conversation, not much a­miss to this purpose: A Mareschal of France invited a certain Friend to dinner, to maintain Discourse a­gainst half a dozen Scholers; Who certainly, saies he, are passable Company if they understood Common sense. Examine all his Arguments at leasure, and you will [Page 5] find that they are grounded upon a self-end, or worldly-account as well as Religious; for he conjures them, viz. the Papists, by all the designs they have of their own, P. 94. and their Posterities living comfortably in this world, to make this Recognition,P. 95. thereby to take away that grand Rock of Scandal (meaning their constant Rebellion) that there­by they may have the better opportunity, I suppose, to bring us into their Communion; that is, to invade all that we count dear to us, our Religion and Property: the latter being as inconsistent with Popery, as our Bodies are with everlasting burnings. In answer, I'le give you some Politicks from self-love too: You may remember who, in a manner, engrost all the prefer­ments before this late Test, and what impossibility is there, that they shall not again, if you take away the wall of Partition: that Party being like the Children of this world, wiser in their generation than others; viz. industrious in preserving, and preferring one another, whereas others do not so much regard such carnal practices perhaps.

I must confess they have one Argument which I wonder is not made use of, though he does of many weaker: That the English Papists were generally for the King, not any one Arming against him, and this so true that Malice it self cannot object against it; but yet withal, you cannot but remember, that they were beaten into the Kings Garrisons, to preserve them­selves from the Rabble; but they were so frighted with the terrour, and noise of War, that they would never be got into any thing like it again, for if any body can make out, that there were three ingaged in any plot for this Kings Service: you may safely, I think, grant their desires, whereas the restless endeavours, and constant struglings against the Government, by the Sons of our Church, tired out the Ʋsurpations, L. K. Sp. p. 19. as a great Person hath candidly observed, and therefore they are the fittest Objects of Yours, and the Kingdoms kindness, or marks of favour.

One thing I had like to have omitted, very well worth taking notice of, though the Father be so particular in giving a List of all the Popish Treasons all [...]g, as if they had been an Inventory of Goods to [Page] be priz'd, yet he omits Father Watsons: This Watson you must know was a healing man like himself, wrote against the Jesuites, and what not; yet upon King James's coming into England, for want of a little skill in LawHe plead [...] u [...]n his Tryal that the King was not C [...]wn'd, and some Treason: but that Max­ime of the Kings never dying, took him off., as well [...]s Obedience to his Majesty, fell into a Conspiracy, and was hang'd, drawn, and quarter'd at Winchester; which shews they cannot forbear that old trade of Trencher making, but like Cats upon op­portunity will be Cats still.

One observation of his I cannot omit, speaking of the Penal Statutes: Do not we perceive, saies he, that they are with-held at present from execution, by a very small and weak thred, not only of one life that is mortal, but even of one will alone, that yet may be altered of a sudden upon many occasions, p. 11. which may happen when least expected? But I hope you have so much Logick amongst you, to make the Argumentative to serve our Religion by stricter Laws, as he does to induce the Papists to make a hollow Re­cognition.

One thing more I have to hint to you. The most extravagant Princes that ever sway'd this Scep­ter, nay Henry the Eighth himself, whose Will like a torrent bore down all before it, never upon State account, entrencht so far upon Magna Charta, as to force Confessions by Torture: yet, and even after the Popes Supremacy was abrogated, the Rack was used in order to the extorting of Confession about Religion, by the zealous assertours, of the six Articles to a per­son of Quality,Mr. Kyme, af­ter the Pope's restoring Cut­bert, Symson, and others. the Lord Chancellour Wriothesley, and Sir John Baker, playing the Torturers themselves, so dangerous is that Religion, by whomsoever managed to our Laws and Liberties.

Now in Conclusion of all, you after Thirteen years sitting, and Loyally, as became you, asserting our Laws, both as to Religion, and Property, which is all our concerns in this world: You, Noble Sir, after all this will not, I hope, be whedled out of all by an Irish Priest, and this is the earnest desire of,

Your humble Servant, PHILANAX.
FINIS.

This keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above is co-owned by the institutions providing financial support to the Early English Books Online Text Creation Partnership. This text is available for reuse, according to the terms of Creative Commons 0 1.0 Universal licence. The text can be copied, modified, distributed and performed, even for commercial purposes, all without asking permission.