Theoremata Theologica: THEOLOGICAL TREATISES.

Octo Theses Theologicae: Eght Th [...]ses of Divinity.

  • 1. Animae Humanae Productio: Production of Mans Soul.
  • 2. Pura Dei Praedestinatio: Divine Predestination.
  • 3. Verum Ecclesiae regimen: The tru Church regiment.
  • 4. Praedictiones de Messia: Predictions of Messias.
  • 5. Duae Christi Genealogiae: Christs two Genealogies.
  • 6. Apocalypsis patefacta: The Revelation reveled.
  • 7. Christi regnum in Terra: Christs Millenar reign.
  • 8. Mundi hujus dissolutio: The Worlds Dissolution.
Scandala si tulerit Criticus quicun (que); legendo:
Seria nil nisi me velle movere sciat.
If Critics ought in reading shal offend:
Know that I nought but weighty things intend.

Compiled or Collected by ROB. VILVAIN.

Price at Press in Sheets 3. s.

LONDON, Printed by R. Hodgkinsonne (for the Author) and are to be sold at his Hous in Thames-street neer Baynards-Castle. A. D. 1654.

Prefatio pro Theologis: A Foretouch for Divines.
SI Medicus crepidam Medicinae transiat ultra,
Parcite Theiologi: nil nisi vera cupit.
It a Phisition beyond his Art aspires,
Bear with't Divines: he nought but truth desires.
Justa pro se Vindicatio: A just Defens of himself.
DUm velut Eccho sonans aliena reverbero verba,
Juste nemo potest insimulare probri.
While I shril Eccho-like others words relat,
Of wrong none can me justly criminat.

Mendae omissae emendandae: The Errats to be emended.

This work hath few faults, and thos of no moment; which every Ey can soon espy, and Pen emend: so it shal sav the Author a labor to specify them. Who in lieu therof, hath published extempore a pety Pamphlet of Chronography (3. d. price at Press) wel worth perusal, which he that wil may annex to this Theologic Theory, or buy by it self, or leav as he lists, being both of one Paper and Letter.

Anglica Prosa minus vitiis obnoxia Preli,
Carmina quàm latio scripta lepore sient.
A [...]tamen hocce libro mendae evascre minutae:
Quas lector calamo rectificare potest.
English Prose is to Press-faults less inclined,
Then Verses are in Latin phrase inscrited
Yet in this Book som smal faults hav passd by.
Which Readers may with Pen soon rectify.
[...]
ACADEMIA OXONIENSIS.
‘SAPIENTIA ET FELICITATE’

THEOREMATA THEOLOGICA: THEOLOGICAL TREATISES.

Summa octo Theorematum: A Summary of eght Theses.

OCTO Theiologi sublimia dogmata tractant:
Quae tenue hoc liquido stamine pandit opus.
Divines of eght high Mysteries doo treat:
Which this slight work doth with cleer stile repeat.
Octo a Theiologis Theoremata tradita constant:
Alia [...].
Ordine quae certo scripta sequente l [...]bro.
Eght Theories handled by Divines ther are:
Which in set rank the folowing works declare.
1. Humanae Thesis est Animae Productio prima:
2. Qûi Deus Adamum praedestinat, altera tangit:
3. Tertia qua forma est moderata Ecclesia pandit:
4. Quarta Propheteias de Messia explicat omnes:
5. Stemma Genethliacum describit proxima Christi:
Naturale & legale.
6. Maxima sexta aperit mysteria visa Joanni:
7. Septima agit Christi de regno mille per annos:
8 Extremum mundi excidium postrema remonstrat.
Mans Souls Production in first file doth proceed:
The next shews, How of Adam God decreed:
The third in what form Church is rul'd, declareth:
The fourth al Prophecies of Messia explaneth:
The fifth describes Christ duple Pedigrees:
The sixth unfolds Johns deepest mysteries:
The seventh Christs thousand yeers reign doth de­bate:
The last this Worlds destruction doth relate.

Questiones Emergentes: Questions on the Theses.

An.
  • Anima cujus (que); Hominis post Adamum sit ex traduce?
  • Praedestinatio sit ex puro Dei placito & absoluto Decret [...]?
  • Regimen Ecclesiae sit Monarchicum, Aristocraticum, vel mixtum?
  • Propbetiae de Messia venturo, praestitae sint in & per Christū?
  • Duae Christi Genealogiae in Evangeliis, sint verae & per­fectae?
  • Apocalypticae Revelationes futurae, sint certo praenoscendae?
  • Christus regnabit in terris cum Martyribus per mille annos?
  • Mundus hic materialis annihilabitur post ultimū Judicium?
Whether
  • Every Mans Soul since Adams, be generated by the Parents Souls?
  • Predestination proced from Gods pure pleasure and absolut Decree?
  • Church Government be Monarchic, Aristocratic, or mixed of both?
  • Al Prophecies of Messiah to com, were fulfilled in and by Chist?
  • Christs two Genealogies in the Gospel (natural and legal) be perfect?
  • The Apocalyptic Revelations to com, can be cer­tainly foreknown?
  • Christ shal reign on Earth with his Martyrs one thousand yeers?
  • This material World shal be annihilated after the last Judgment?

Epistola gratulabunda: An Epistle gratulatory.
To the Right worshipful my dearest of Friends John Mai­nard Esquire, Serjeant at Law.

Honored Sir,

I Presume to prefix your Name before this Book, not in expectance of per­functory protection (tho you best able to plead or patronize a good caus, and a bad wil bewray it self wors by defending) sith every Au­thor must answer for his own faults: but partly as a Testimony of my tru gratitud for al former favors; and partly that it should try the touch-stone of your exact censure: whos intellectuals having attained 50. Yeer [...]. the Jubile of your age; are now arrived to the zenith of perfection. Such sublime speculations here handled, soar abov the Sphere of your and my Profession: yet sith our Theological teachers hav tendred them to public view, with manifold jarrings or janglings among themselfs; we both may boldly like the Bereans take leav to try whether thes things be so: specialy such as concern our Souls salubrity or salvifical felicity.

I am sufficiently conscious by much mutual amity and acquaintance, of your rare rational endowments (for which you are bound to bless God the giver of [Page] al Goodnes) as sharpnes of invention, soundnes of Judgment, suddennes of Apprehension; fastnes of Memory, firmnes of Entelechy, and fluentnes of Expression or Elocution (which I would not enu­merat, were they not evidently eminent to every ey) with other strong practic parts fit for your Faculty; which make you desirable of most men. Howbeit I wil not accumulat Eulogies [...]ho diserved, lest it may render me suspect of flattery, from which I was ever free: but wish you abundance of divine Grace, to dispens his Gifts like a faithful Steward for the general good of this Common-wealth: and even so abruptly conclud with zelous wishes of welfare to you and yours, who wil stil remain ready to serv you with the utmost of my Faculties:

Your most intirely devoted at al Essais Rob. Vilvain.
Hunc, mihi vir multis titulis Charissime; Libr [...]
Pro magnis meritis consecro jure tibi.
Non patrocinium cupio, non ambio grates:
Tantum ego grati [...]nimi pendo tributa mei.
Sir, many wais most Dear; this book I t' you
Devot, for great demerits justly du.
I crav no Patronage, nor seek thanks to find,
But only tribut pay of gratful mind.
Non adulatorem simulo, aut mendacia [...]ingo:
Sed refero meritis inferiora tuis.
I play no Parasits part, nor lies invent:
But som things much beneath your merits vent.

Proloquium ad Lectores: A Preamble to al Readers.

THIS sacred work selected from the learn­ed lucubrations of divers deep Divines, I presum to present as borowed Feathers from sundry rare Birds: having a fa­culty or facility to abstract and abbreviat Authors, that the owners (muchless o­thers) shal scarse know they are collected from them; which hath much steaded me in compiling thes Theological Theo­ries. For I am by Profession a Phisition (no Prophet, nor Prophets Son) utterly unfit and unworthy to meddle with such mysterious matters. The first Thesis was penned in young yeers, but since polished with intent to be published: and latly augmented by Mr. Woolnots labors. The next is taken mostly from Mr. Plaifers Appello Evangelium. The third from Dr. Tailor and Mr. Thorndike. The fourth from Mr. Smiths Arrow against Atheists. The [...]fth from Bishop Cowper of Galoway. The sixth from Mr. Mede and a German Doctor. The seventh from Mr. Baily a Scot. The last from Dr. H [...]k [...]w [...]s apology. In al which I can claim but industry in collecting, brevity in compiling, perspicuity in penning, and fidelity in rendring [...]ch Authors intentions: leaving the censure of al to the [Page] Readers, who are chief Carvers or Comptrolers. I hav gathered almost al the gleanings of every Thesis or Theo­rem together, which lay seattered in several [...]elds, and brought them into this Barn, that every one may the easier thresh out what grain wil serv [...]is turn.

Haply I shal seem somwhat sawcy to put my sickle into other harvests: but 'tis a time when al Laborers are bid welcom, and I plow with others Heifers. If any dislike the doctrins (as divers wildistast, what most Men approv, or contrarily) let them blame thos whos Eccho I am: but if ought be misrelated, misprised, or malitiously torted, let it be laid to my sole charge. For I ven [...] lale or nothing of mine own, nor dare positivly d [...]fine, or peremptorily decide any point. So if any except against the dogmats or docu­ments, let the Authors answer it; unles I be found a falsa­rian, which every one may compare, whether it [...] doon fully, fairly, and faithfully. Som [...] h [...]ply wil disgust the first, as dissonant to the general received Tenet of Soul-Creation: yet is it only alteratratly debated, not actualy determined. Many may no less snar [...] at the next decried by Presbyterians: yet is it defended by divers Zelous Pro­testants. The like virulence wil be spued out against the third, as Demetrius the Silversmith at Athens perse­cuted St. Paul, becaus the great Goddess Diana was con­temned: yet the History only is handled de facto, not de jure. The two next wil pass current among al Christians; but gainsaid by Jews and Infidels, who are of no regard. The sixth cannot be greatly branded tho not generaly beleeved. The penultimat may be traduced by Anabaptists and their adherents, who dream of a dry Summer, that Christ shal reign gloriously on Earth 1000. yeers before or at the Day of Judgment. For the last, som wil like, som dislike ac­cording [Page] to their various palats. For partiality like mor­tality reigns over al Mankind, which none can cast off, no not with a furc; so long as we fare in this fleshy fabric: yea the soundest sincerest Jud [...]ments are so blinded with self conceipt, that they cannot possibly see it in themselfs, yet discern it palpably in al Men els. I am very cautious (as others are captious▪ to discuss al points modestly and mode­ratly, rather relating others opinions then mine own reso­lutions: who can be co [...]tent Men shal censure freely, if they leav uncharitable despite and displeasure. For ther is no ground in reason or Religion, why [...]ne should be angry with another for dissenting in opinions: such ther [...]e so many differing fancies and affections, as Faces and Complexions. If two cannot see with one ey, let them not scratch out ech others eys, lest both becom blind as Beetles. Al are wedded to their own wils, and overween their self-worth by nature, which is tolerable being indeclinable: but to break the bonds of charity, is contrary to the common rules of Christianity and damnable. Listen how the Catholic Moderator checks al contenders about Articles of Religion, and givs good counsil in thes metres:

Why for Opinions interkil we thus,
Whos truth not force, but Reason must discus?
Reason, whos chief force in Opinion lies;
Reason, whos fals gloss oft deceivs the wise.
God doth in peace, lov, concord, unity dwel:
Hate, envy, malice consines are to Hel.
If then Gods Vision thou desire t' attain,
Shun strife, teen, discord, scorn, and proud disdain.

My chief comfort in this case is, what som censure or con­demn, [Page] others wil confirm or commend: but Caesars jacta est alea is the best bulwork of a resolut spirit. If any be apt to quarrel, he shal fight a Sciomachy with his own shadow, and be answered in supine silence: for his teen wil be spent on a sensless stock that regards it not, nor wil accept his chalenge, being supernnited to fight combats. So many Sects swarm abroad, and al so partial to their prin­ciples; that if any shal seem to cross their Tenets, they are ready to gnash their teeth, and stone him with bitter cen­sures or calumnies (as the Jews served Stephan) which is the dismal destiny of al writers: but I hope for better things from the godly. For why should Lutherans hate Calvinists, or th [...]y Lutherans; Presbyterians Cavaliers and Independents, or either of them Presbyterians, only upon discordance in points of Religion? St. J [...]hn exborted Catechumen Christians, Filioli [...] diligite invicem: litle Children, lov one another: for lov is a Christians cogni­sance or Character and fulfilling of the Law: yea the chief Commandment (next to lov God abov al in the Gospel unity in opinion is to be wished, tho hardly hoped: but a­mity in common conversation should be embraced, and cha­rity in Christian profission chetfly practised: without which none shal ever enjoy eternal [...]liss or beatitud. For we have one Creator God the Father, one Redeemer God the Son, and one Sanctifer God the holy Ghost; in which three Persons and one God we al beleev with one Faith one Baptism, and one Profession: let us not then hate in heart for diversity of opinion. If any can cure Peoples spiritual pride or philauty in themselfs; carnal affection or partiality toward their Faction; and Infernal hatred or prejudicacy against others (al three or either) he shal be more famous then Apollo, Aesoulapius, or Hippocrates; and hav [Page] far mo Patients for the Vertigo, Cardialgia, and Icteritia, (a Cephalical, Cardiacal, and Hepatical malady) then al the Emperics, Mountebanks, or Land skippers in this Land: but Iprofes my self no Phisition for such deplored diseases. Over-weening expectation is a main Enimy to al writers; but factious emulation and previous prejudica­tion much more: when men prepostrously devov others works to Vulcan or Stercutins, yer they see the Sun. Preachers may vent what virulences they list in Pulpit, as Authors can at Press: but with this difference or dissonance,

Dictio Praeconis tenues cito, transit in auras:
Scriptorum at remanent dogmata saepe diu.
A Preachers wordst' empty Air turn again,
But Writers works oftimes doo long remain.

Al Men are apt to er, but the modest ready to acknowledg and amend it, if detected or displaied; as I vow in pre­sence of our great God freely to doo, if any shal fairly shew it, nor ever wilbe found a Beast perversly to persevere therin. I wil serv no Person, Sect or Faction for fear, favor or flattery; but only deliver my privat personal Judgment (how weak or worthless soever) sincerely, ac­cording to verity or verisimility: This, such as know my constant resolut disposition, wil easily beleev; but others may take it on trust til they shal hav time to try the contra­ry. Al the Theses are too redious, but ther prolixity con­sists more in multitud of matter then words: for I could hav made the Work twise so voluminous with half the toil: [Page] but doo study brevity to spare the Readers Purs and Pains. The Speculations are somwhat sublime, but stile facil and familiar, fit for vulgar understandings. Let every one take or leav, and take al in good part,

Farewel.

Rustica Ruricolae, Fabri (que) Fabrilia tractent:
Tangere nec Medicos dogmata sacra decet.
Let Clowns the Plow, and Smiths their Forge attend:
Nor should Phisitians to things sacred bend.

Articuli Fidei Anglicae: 39 Articles of our Faith.

THE Articles of Religion concluded in Con­vocation, and confirmed by Act of Parlia­ment under Queen Elizabeth Anno 1562. but ratified or reestablished under King James by the same duple authority Anno 1604. which are here presented to satisfy or gratify al, lest men like Lynces should seem sharp sighted to look into the Confessions of other Reformed Churches abroad; and Lamiae or blind Beetles at home, in be­ing ignorant of our own Principles and Doctrins: the gene­ral Catalog of which follows in order.

1 Of Faith in the holy Trinity. 2 Of the Word which was made Man. 3 Of Christs descent into Hel. 4 Of his Resurre­ction. 5 Of the holy Ghost. 6 Of the Scriptures sufficience to sal­vation. 7 Of the old Testament. 8 Of the three Creeds. 9 Of original birth-sin. 10 Of free wil. 11 Of mans justification, 12 Of good works. 13 Of works before justification. 14 Of super trrogation. 15 Of Christ alone without sin. 16 Of sin after Bap­tism. 17 Of Predestination and Election. 18 Of obtaining salva­tion only by Christ. 19 Of the Church. 20 Of the Churches authority. 21 Of general Councils. 22 Of Purgatory. 23 Of ministring in the Congregation. 24 Of speaking ther in an un­known toung. 25 Of the Sacraments. 26 Of the Ministers un­worthines, which hinders not their effects. 27 Of Baptism. [Page] 28 Of the Lords supper. 29 Of the wicked, who doo not eat Christs Body and Blood 30 Of both kinds. 31 Of Christs Ob­lation finished on the Cross. 32, Of Priests marriage. 33 Of Ex­communicat Persons, how they are to be shunned. 34 Of the Churches Traditions. 35 Of [...]omilies. 36 Of Consecrating Bishops, &c. 37 Of the Civil Magistrat. 38 Of Christians goods which are not common. 39 Of a Christian mans Oath. The Particulars insu.

Article 1. THere is but one only tru living God, everlasting, without body, parts or passions, of infinit power, wisdom and good­ness: maker and preserver of al things both visible and invisi­ble: in unity of which Godhead ther be three Persons of one substance, power, and eternity; the Father, Son, and holy-Ghost.

Article 2. The Son who is the Word of the Father begot of him from everlasting (the very eternal God of one substance with the Father) took mans Nature in the womb of the blessed virgin of hir substance, so that two whol perfect Natures (the God­head and Manhood) were joined in one Person never to be severed, wherof one Christ consists perfect God and very Man: who suffered, was crucified, dead, and buried to reconcile his Father to us, and be a sacrifice not only for Original guilt, but also for al actual sins of men.

Article 3. As Christ died for us and was buried: so 'tis to be beleeved, that he went down into Hel.

Article 4. Christ truly rose from death and took again his body, with flesh, bones, and al things pertaining to the perfection of Mans Nature: wherwith he ascended into Heaven, and ther sits til he shal return to judg al men at last day.

Article 5. The holy Ghost proceding from the Father and the Son, is one substance, majesty, and glory with the Father and Son; very eternal God.

Article 6. Holy Scripture contains al things necessary for Salvation; so that whatever is not read therin, nor may be proved therby; is not required of any man to be beleeved as an Article of Faith, or be thought needful to salvation. By the name of holy Scrip­ture we understand thos Canonical Books of the Old and New Testament, whos authority the Church never doubted of, and [Page 2] the other Books (as saint Jerom saith) the Church reads for exemple of life and instruction of maners, but doth not apply them to stablish any Doctrin. All the Books of the new Te­stament, as commonly received, we receiv and reput them Ca­nonical. See their names and number in the holy Bible.

Article 7. The old Testament is not contrary to the New; for in both everlasting life is offred to mankind by Christ, who is the only Mediator between God and Man, being both God and Man; Therfore they are not to be heard, which fain that the old Fa­thers looked only for transitory promises, though the Law given of God by Moses touching Ceremonies or Rites doo not bind Christians, nor the civil precepts of necessity to be received in any Christian Commonwealth; yet no Christian man whate­ver is free from obedience of the Commandements caled moral.

Article 8. The three Creeds ( Nicen, Athanasius, and that commonly caled the Apostles) ought throughly to be received and belee­ved: for thes may be proved by most certain warrants of Scripture.

Article 9. Original sin stands not in imitating Adam (as the Pelagians vainly talk) but is the fault and corruption of every mans Na­ture, that is ingendred of Adams ofspring: wherby man is far gon from original Righteousnes, and inclined to evil: so that the flesh lusteth against the spirit, and therfore in every person born into the world, it deservs Gods wrath and dam­nationthis infection of Nature remains, yea in the Regenerat, wherby the lust of the flesh (caled in Greek [...]) which som expound the wisdom, som the sensuality, som the affe­ction, som the desire of the flesh, is not subject to the Law of God, and though ther is no condemnation to them that beleev and are baptized, yet the Apostle confesseth, that Concupis­cence hath of it self the nature of Sin.

Article 10. The condition of man after Adam's fal is such, as he can­not turn or prepare himself by his natural strength and good works to Faith, for we hav no power to doc good or pleas God, without his grace preventing us: that we may hav a good wil, and working when we hav that wil.

Article 11. We are accompted righteous before God, only for the me­rit of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ by Faith, not for our [Page] own works or deservings: which is a most wholsom doctrin very ful of comfort.

Article 12. Albeit works (which are fruits of Faith, and follow justifica­tion) cannot put away our sins and endure the severity of Gods judgement, yet are they pleasing and acceptable to God in Christ, and doo spring necessarily from a tru lifely Faith: insomuch that by them a lifely Faith may be so evidently known as a Tree discerned by the fruit.

Article 13. Works doon before the Grace of Christ and justification of his Spirit, are not pleasant to God, for as much as they spring not from Faith in Jesus Christ, nor doo they make men meet to receiv Grace, or (as School-writers say) deserv Grace of congruity: yea rather becaus they are not doon as God hath willed and commanded to be doon; we doubt not but they hav the nature of sin.

Article 14. Voluntary works over and abov Gods Commandements (caled works of supererogation) cannot be taught without arrogance and impiety, for by them men declare they doo not only render to God so much as they are bound to doo for themselfs; but doo more for his sake then of duty is required, which shal transcend to sav others: wheras Christ saith plainly, When yee hav doon al which is commanded, say we be unpro­fitable servants.

Article 15. Christ in truth of our Nature, is made like to us in al things except only sin; from which he was cleerly void both in Life and Spirit, he is the Lamb without spot, who by sacrifice of himself once made, took away the sins of the World, and no sin (as saint John saith) was in him: but we although baptised and born again, yet offend in many things, and if we say we hav no sin, we deceiv our selfs, and no truth remains in us.

Article 16. Not every deadly sin willingly committed after Baptism, is sin against the holy Ghost, and unpardonable: wherfore the grant of Repentance may not be denied to such as fal into Sin after B [...]ptism. After we hav received the ho­ly. Ghost, we may depart from Grace given and fal into sin, and by Gods grace we may rise again and [...]mend our lifes: therfore they are to be condemned, which say they can sin no [Page 3] more so long as they liv here being once justified, or deny place of forgivnes to such as truly repent.

Article 17. Predestination to life is Gods everlasting purpos, wherby before the worlds foundation, he constantly decreed by his Counsil secret to us, to deliver from curs and damnation thos whom he hath chosen in Christ out of mankind; and to bring them by Christ to everlasting Salvation, as vessels made to honor. Therfore they which are indu [...]d with so excellent a benefit, be caled according to Gods purpos by his Spirit work­ing in du season: they through Grace obey the caling, are ju­stified freely, made sons of God by Adoption, like the Image of his only begotten Son Jesus Christ, walk Religiously in good works, and at length by Gods mercy attain everlasting felicity. as the godly consideration of Predestination and Election in Christ, is ful of sweet, pleasant, unspeakable comfort to god­ly persons, and such as feel the working of Christs Spirit, mor­tifying the works of the flesh and their earthly members, and drawing up their minds to high Heavenly things: aswel be­caus it doth greatly establish and confirm their faith of eternal Salvation to be enjoied by Christ, as bicaus it fervently kindles their lov toward God: so for curious carnal persons lacking his Spirit, to hav the Sentence of Gods Predestination conti­nualy before their eys, is a most dangerous downfal, wherby the Devil thrusts them into desperation or rechlesnes of most unclean living, no less perilous then despair. Farthermore we must receiv Gods promises, as they be generaly set forth in ho­ly Scripture, and that wil of God is to be folowed in our do­ings, which is expresly declared to us in his word.

Article 18. They are also to be had accursed, who presum that every man shal be saved by the Law or Sect which he professeth, so that he be devour and diligent to frame his life according to that Law and Light of Nature: for holy Scripture sets out unto us only the name of Jesus Christ, wherby we must be saved.

Article 19. Christs visible Church is a congregation of faithful men, in which Gods Word is purely preached, and Sacraments duly administred according to Christs Ordinance, in al things of necessity r [...]qu sit to the same: As the Church of J [...]usalem, [Page] Alexandria, and Antioch hav erred, so hath that of Rome, not only in their living and matter of Ceremonies, but also in many matters of Faith.

Article 20. The Church hath power to decree Rites or Ceremonies, and authority in controversies of Faith: yet is it not lawful for the Church to ordain any thing contrary to Gods Word, nor may it so expound any place of Scripture, that it be repugnant to a­nother; wherfore tho the Church be a witnes and Keeper of holy writ: yet as it may not decree any thing against the same, so ought it not to enforce any thing besid it, as an Article to be beleeved for necessity of Salvation.

Article 21. General Councils may not be gathered without command and wil of Princes: when they are gathered (being but an As­sembly of men, and al not guided by the Spirit and Word of God) they may er, and som times hav erred in matters per­taining to God. Wherfore things ordained by them as neces­sary to Salvation, hav neither strength nor authority, unles it may be declared that they are taken out of holy Scripture.

Article 22. The Romish Doctrins touching Purgatory, Pardons, Wor­shipping both Images and Reliques, and Invocation of Saints, is a fond thing vainly invented and grounded on no warranty of Scripture, but rather repugnant to Gods word,

Article 23. It is not lawfull for any man to undertake the office of pub­lic Preaching, or ministring the Sacraments before he be law­fully caled and sent to execut the same: such we ought to judg lawfully caled and sent, which be chosen or caled to this work by men that hav public authority given them in the Con­gregation, to cal and send ministers or laborers into the Lord's Vineyard.

Article 24. 'Tis flatly repugnant to Gods word and primitiv Churches practis, to hav public Praier or Sacraments ministred in a toung not understood of the People.

Article 25. Sacraments ordained by Christ, be not only ba [...]ges or tokens of Christian mens profession; but rather sure witnesses and ef­fectual signs of Grace and Gods good will toward us, by which he works invisibly in us: and not only quicken, but also strengthen and confirm our faith in him. There be two Sacraments ordained by Christ in the Gospel; viz. Baptism [Page 4] and the Lords Supper: thos fiv commonly caled Sacraments (Confirmation, Penance, Orders, Matrimony, extrem Un­ction) are not properly Gospel Sacraments; being such as hav grown up partly of corrupt interpreting the Apostles, and partly are states of life alowed in Scripture; but hav not like nature of Sacraments with the o [...]het two: for they hav no vi­sible sign or Element ordained by God. The Sacraments were not instituted by Christ to be gazed on or carried about; but that we should duly use them, and in such only as receiv them worthily, they hav a wholsom effect or operation: but they that receiv the same unworthily, purchas to themselfs damna­tion, as saint Paul saith.

Article 26. Though in the visible Church the evil be ever mingled with the good, and somtime hav chief authority in ministration of the word and Sacraments: yet sith they doo not the same in their own name but in Christs, and minister by his Commission or authority, we may use their ministry, both in hearing Gods word and receiving the Sacraments; nor is the effect of Christs Ordinances taken away by their wickednes, nor the grace of Gods gifts impaired from such as by Faith rightly receiv the Sacraments ministred to them: which are effectual by reason of Christs institution and promiss, tho they be ministred by e­vil men. Nevertheless it apperta [...]s to the Churches Disciplin, that inquiry be made of evil Ministers, and that they be accused by thos which hav knowledg of their offences; and finaly being found guilty, by just judgment be deposed.

Article 27. Baptism is not only a sign of Profession, and mark of distin­ction; wherby Christians are dis [...]erned from others not Chri­stned: but is also a sign of Regeneration or new birth, wher­by as by an instrument, they that receiv Baptism rightly, are grafted into the Church: the promises of sins f [...]rgivnes, and our adoption to be sons of God by the holy Ghost, are visibly signed and sealed, Faith confirmed, and Grace increased by virtu of praier to God. The Baptism of young Infants in any wise is to be retained in the Church, as most consonant to Christs institution.

Article 28. The Lords Supper is not only a sign of Christians lov, which they ought to hav among themselfs, but rather a Sacrament of [Page] our Redemption by Christs death: so that to such as worthily receiv the same, the Bread which we break is partaking of Christs body, and the cup of Blessing is a partaking of his Blood. Transubstantiation or change of the substance of Bread and Wine, cannot be proved by holy Writ, but repugns the plain words of Scripture, overthrows the nature of a Sacra­ment, and givs occasion to sundry superstitions. Christs Bo­dy is given, taken, and eaten in the Supper only after a spiritual heavenly maner; and the mean wherby 'tis received and earen is Faith. This Sacrament by Christs Ordinance, was not reser­ved, carried about, lifted up, or worshipped.

Article 29. The wicked and such as be void of life by Faith, tho they doo carnaly and visibly press with their teeth (as saint Austin saith) the Sacrament of Christs Body and Blood: yet in no wise are partakers of Christ; but rather doo eat and drink the Sign or Sacrament of so great a thing to their condemnation.

Article 30. The Cup of the Lord is not to be denied to lay people: for both parts of the Lords Sacrament; by Christs Ordinance and commandement ought to be administred unto al Christian men.

Article 31. The Offering of Christ once made, is that right perfect Re­demption, Propitiation, and Satisfaction for al sins of the whol world, both Original and Actual, and ther is no other satisfaction but that alone. Wherfore the Sacrifices of Masses, in which it was commonly said the Priests did offer Christ for quick and dead, to hav remission of pain and guilt; are blasphe­mous fables and dangerous deceipts.

Article 32. Bishops, Priests, and Deacons are not commanded by Gods Law either to vow the estate of single life, or to abstain from mariage: but 'tis also lawful for them, as for al other Christi­an men, to marry at their own discretion; as they shal judg it to serv better to godlines.

Article 33. That person which by open denunciation of the Church, is rightly cut off from the unity therof and excommunicat, ought to be taken by the multitud of the whol Faithful as an Heathen or Publican, til he be openly reconciled by penance, and re­ceived into the Church by a Judg that hath authority therto.

Article 34. It is not necessary that Traditions and Ceremonies be one or utterly like in al places: for they hav bin divers and changed [Page 5] at al times, according to diversity of Countries, Times, and mens maners; so that nothing be ordained against Gods word. Who ever doth willingly or purposly on his privat judgment openly break the Churches Traditions and Ceremonies, which be not repugnant to holy Writ; but be ordained and appro­ved by common authority; ought to be rebuked openly, that others may fear to doo the like, as one that offendeth against the public Order of the Church, and woundeth the conscien­ces of weak Brethren. Every particular or Nationall Church hath authority to ordain, change, and abolish Ceremonies or Rites of the Church ordained only by mans authority, so that al be done to edefying.

Article 35. The secund book of Homilies (whos several titles are joyned to this Article) contain Godly wholsom doctrins, and neces­sary for thes times; as the former book doth, set forth under Edward 6: therfore we judg them to be read in Churches by al Ministers diligently and distinctly, that the People may un­derstand them. Their names are thes: 1 Of the right use of the Church. 2 Against peril of Idolatry. 3 Of repairing and keep­ing clean Churches. 4 Of good Works: first of Fasting. 5 Against Gluttony and Drunkennes. 6 Against excess in Apparel. 7 Of Prayer. 8 Of the place and time of Prayer. 9 That Common Prayer and Sacraments ought to be in a known toung. 10 Of the reverend estimation of Gods Word. 11 Of Alms doing. 12 Of Christs Nativity. 13 Of Christs Passion. 14 Of Christs Resur­rection. 15 Of the worthy receiving the Sacrament of Christs Body and Blood. 16 Of the Gifts of the holy Ghost. 17 For the Rogation days. 18 Of the state of Matrimony. 19 Of Repen­tance. 20 Against [...]lenes. 21 Against Rebellion.

Article 36. The Book of consecrating Archbishops and Bishops, and ordering of Priests and Deacons set forth under Edward 6, and then confirmed by Parliament, contains al things necessary to such consecrating and ordering; nor hath it ought that of it self is supersticious or ungodly. Therfore whoever are consecrated or ordered according to the Rites of that Book, since the secund yeer of that King to this time, or hereafter shal be consecrated or ordered according to the same; We decree all such to be rightly, orderly, and lawfully consecrated and ordered.

Article 37. [Page]The Kings Majesty hath chief Power in this Realm of Eng­land, and his other Dominions; to whom the chief Govern­ment of all estates (whether Ecclesiastic or Civil) in al Cau­ses doth appertain, nor ought to be subject unto any forren Jurisdiction. Whereas we attribute chief Government to the Kings Majestie (wherby we understand the minds of som slan­derous folks to be offended) we giv not to our Prince the mi­nistring of Gods word or Sacraments; which thing the In­junctions also somtime set forth by our late Queen Elizabeth, doe plainly testify. But that only Prerogativ, which was ever given to al Godly Princes in holy Scripture by God himself; which is, That they shal rule al Estates and Degrees com­mitted to their charge (whether Ecclesiastic or Tempo­ral) and restrain with the Civil Sword al stu [...]born and evil doers. The Bishop of Rome hath no Jurisdiction in this Realm of England. The Laws of the Land may punish Christian men with death for hainous grievous offences. It is lawful for Chri­stians, at commandment of the Magistrat, to wear Weapons and serv in Wars.

Article 38. The Goods of Christians are not common touching the right, title, and possession of the same, as Anabaptists falsly boast: yet every man ought of such things as he hath, liberaly to give Alms to the Poor according to his ability.

Article 39. As we confess vain and rash swearing to be forbid in Chri­stian men, by our Lord Jesus Christ, and James his Apostle: so we judg that Christian Religion doth not prohibit, but a man may swear when a Magistrat requires it in a caus of Faith and Charity; so that it be done as the Prophets teach, accor­ding to Justice, Judgment, and Truth, for the composing of strife.

Articuli Lambethae cusi. The Articles of Lambeth.
An Appendix of nine Articles touching Praede­stination; agitated by John Archbishop of Canterbury, and others An. 1595. at Dr. Whitakers instance, against three Propositions of Dr. Baro a Frenchman, Lady Marga­rets Professor at Cambridg.

Article 1. GOd from eternity predestinated som men to life, and reprobated the rest to death or damnation.

Article 2. The moving or efficient caus of Predestination to life, is not any foresight of Faith, Perseverance, good Works, or any thing in the persons praedestinated, but only in the Wil of Gods good pleasure.

Article 3. Of the Predestinat ther is a prefined certain number, which can neither be increased nor diminished.

Article 4. They that are not predestinat to salvation, shal necessarily be condemned for their sins.

Article 5. Tru livly justifying Faith, and sanctifying Spirit of God, is not extinguished, doth not fall off, nor vanish in the Elect, ei­ther finaly, or totally.

Article 6. A man truly beleeving or indued with justifying Faith, is certain, by or with ful perswasion of Faith, of his sins for­givenes and everlasting salvation by Christ.

Article 7. Saving Grace is not given, nor communicated, nor granted to al men, whereby they may be saved if they will.

Article 8. No man can come to Christ unles it be given to him, and unless the Father draw him; nor are al men drawn of the Fa­ther, that they come to the Son.

[Page]Article 9. It is not in the free choice and power of every man to be saved.

These Assertious or Positions, like many mo, are obtruded in general, obscure, ambiguous terms, subject to divers interpre­tations.

Animadversio apposita: A usefull Animadversion.

THe first Proposition is tru de facto, but treats not of the order and manner, why God elected som and reprobated the rest; which is the debate.

The second designs the moving efficient caus of election; but mentions not the object (whether it be man simply, or man a sinner, or man repentant, or man persisting obstinat and obdurat) which is al the question: for Gods foresight is no efficient caus of his Predestination, but his Wil.

The third of a set number not to be increased or diminished, is a very verity in regard of Gods infalli­ble foreknowledge and immutable Wil.

The fourth is a bifront Janus most ambiguous; for if it suppose non-praedestination to necessitat con­demnation for sin, it puts non causam pro cau­sa: but if it make non-praedestination a meer nega­tiv in God, and supposes sin unrepented the caus; [Page 7] God may in true Justice condemn the sinner that neg­lects the remedy; for every one perisheth by his own default, as Preachers inculcat dayly.

The fifth is generally granted, That the elect doo not fal away finaly or totaly: but who they are no mortal man knows, and al men may fal.

The sixth in a tru sens is tru, That Beleevers, being reconciled to God by repentance, may be cer­tain of their present condition by a ful perswasion of Faith; yet must not presume of infallible perseve­rance, sith many Saints through frailty have faln dangerously.

The seventh is tru in part, That effectual saving Grace is not given to al, that they may be saved if they wil: but sufficient is offered to al (and that seri­ously or intentionaly) if they wil use and not refuse, reject, or resist the means, working out their salva­tion with fear and trembling.

The eighth is to be rightly expounded, that no man can com to the Son unless the Father draw him; and al men are not drawn by him: but 'tis becaus he foresees that they be obdurat, and wil not com when caled; for his prescience is the condition (not the caus) of proceeding.

The last is indubitat, that 'tis not in every mans nay in no mans free choice and power to be saved without Grace; but by help thereof, and use of the [Page] means prescribed in the Gospel, any man may be sa­ved, if he wil cooperat with Gods Grace, and not wilfully reject the same.

Dr. John Rainolds at Hampton-Court Con­ference (beside many mo both before and since) petioned, that thes 9 Lambethian Arti­cles might be annexed to the other 39 by public authority; but could never obtain it, becaus their meaning or construction was very dubious or dissonant to the tru sens of our Churches seventeenth Article, which handles the point of Predestination more plainly and perfectly then thes.

'Tis said that Dr. Whitgift Archbishop granted this discussion to gratify Dr. Whita­kers importunity, and pacify that present Cantabrigian fury; but left it in such doubt­ful terms, that no prejudice might occur to the said Article of Predestination prede­fined.

THESIS I.
Animae Humanae productio: Production of Mans Soul.

1 A solen Question; Whether every Mans Soul, since Adams, be created or procreated?

THE Case is cleer for creating Adams Gen 2. 3. Soul; God breathed into his nostrils the Spirit of life; whereof S. Austins Axiom (respect stil had to this first Souls production) is infallibly tru; 'tis created in infusing, and infused in crea­ting. Of Eve 'tis said, God in a deep Gen. 2. 21. 23. sleep took one of Adams ribs (closing up flesh in its stead) and the Rib he made a Woman. The lear­ned say it was no dead bone, but animat, the material part be­ing extended to a shapeful human body, and the spiritual at the same instant diffused over the whol and every part, to make a perfect Woman; so caled, becaus taken totaly out of Man sans mention of any Soul infusion: It appears not that the Soul therein died, nor can her Soul be caled part of his more then her body, though both extracted from him: nor can two be confused, but the same transfused in al and every part (as [Page] the Souls Nature is) whol in the whol, and whol in every part of the body.

Of Christ S. Luke speaks: God sent the Angel Gabriel to a Virgin espoused to Joseph, who said Hail Mary; lo, thou shalt Luke 1. 26. to the 36. bear a Son, and cal his name Jesus. Then said she, How shal this be sith I know not a man? He answered, The Holy Ghost shall com upon thee, and power of the most high overshadow thee; therefore that holy thing to be born of thee, shal be caled the Son of God: So the manner of his conception was metaphisical or miraculous without male-seed ineffably and incomprehensibly by the Holy Ghost: yet was he according to his whol humani­ty conceived, formed, fostered in the womb, nine Solar moneths or 39 weeks (the usual time or term of womens gravidation) as other Embryons, being like to us in al things, save sin only, from which he was priviledged, becaus the Vessel divinely pu­rified: So that if other Souls be created, his was; if generated, his was likewise. The debate then concerns al mankind and every individual Soul; which is a perplexed knot to unty, and intricat Maze to tread aright. This blindness bewrais our in­nat ignorance, who scars know what a Soul is, whence it pro­ceeds, or how 'tis produced; Nosce teipsum being the hardest lesson to learn, which none ever wel attained.

Ignorant Homines, quae sit Natura Animai:
Lucretius.
Nata sit, an contra Nascentibus insinuetur?
An simul intereat nobiscum morte dire [...]pta?
An tenebras Erebi visat, vastasque lacunas
An Pecudes alias divinitus ingrediatur?
What the Souls nature is, men know not wel;
Nor whether bred, or in Babes infus'd, can tel.
Whether by death, with us, it quit doth quel?
Or els goes to the dark deep Cels of Hel?
Or by Gods power, in other Creatures dwel?

God knows himself, and [...]hen al things intuitivly in himself; but man other things bette [...] then hi [...]self: yet how can one take measure of any thing (saith Pliny) that is ignorant of himself? [Page 9] To pass by al abstrus virtues of Vegetals, arcane miracles of Minerals, admirable properties of precious Stones, and view their outer surface or color only: Who can tel why Grass is green, a Ruby red, or Pearl pale? But what strange strife hath been about the principles of our Nature, and production of both Parts? For the corporeal, how doe Phisitians and Philo­sophers jar or jangle about the seed, whence it should pro­ced? Archelaus asserts it a milky slime or mud drawn from the earth: A cold muddy conceipt. Pythagoras, the scum or froth of our best blood: A frothy fancy. Alcmaeon, part of the Brain: A brainless buz. Plato, a distilling marrow of the back bone. Democritus, a substance extracted from al members. Zeno▪ Mans spirit and spoil of his Soul. Epicurus, a fragment both of Body and Soul. Hippocrates, a portion of radical moisture. Aristotle, an excrement of the last concoction in the solid parts. Others, blood refined by heat of the Genitals. Al which are lame, not expressing the efficient, matter, or form: For seed materially consists both of Blood and Spirit, conco­cted into a white frothy humor by the Testicles (which Fe­males hav latent, tho not prominent) for the use of pro­creation; and from them (not of brain, back bone, or other part) soly derived: But whether females send or spend any operativ geniture, is much controverted. The Perepatetics de­ny it: But Galenists contest, that no conception can be with­out concurrence of both Parents seed, which is indubitably the truest Opinion.

The spiritual part affords much more matter or fuel of altercation about the Soul: 1. What it is? Aristole refels divers Tenets; but his own description halts at last: 'tis easy to say 1 what 'tis not; not what 'tis. It is no temper of elements, nor blood, nor energy of life, nor Galens Crasis: but in general, an essential quickning form, which givs Plants a life vegetant, Beasts a sentient comprising the Former, and Men an intelli­gent including both; as a Pentagon contains a Tetragon, and that a Trigon. For Souls being Forms, and thos relativs, not subsisting alone; but, as parts of compounds, are hatdly de­fined or disquired.

2. What manner of substance it is; whether corporal or 2 [Page] incorporeal? for God only is simply immaterial, and al things els, in som sort corporal, tho not visible; as neither is pure Air. Hence divers Divines aver Angels to be corporeal, becaus finit and limited to place; being bounded, as it were, with a super­fi [...]ies, that they cannot be ubiquitants every wher or elswher at once: Much more then Mens Souls, which liv in Bodies. The Schools say a Body is in place circumscriptivly, a Spirit de­finitivly: be it so: but is not definit so to be here, as not to be elswhere? Doo not Spirits ascend, descend, and change place? Is not their motion made in time, tho very swift? Are not thes acts proper passions of a Body, though impalpable, invisi­ble, imperceptible? God then is a Spirit in creat, purely imma­terial; Angels creat comparatly material; and so are Souls separat, much more thos in Bodies. But what maner of sub­stance, whether aereal, etherial, or subtler sublimer essence, none, save the Father of Spirits can define or determin.

3. How it attains or acquires knowledg? Whether by re­membrance 3 of what it knew before, as Plato affirms, supposing a precreation, which is improbable? Or by the senses service, as Aristotle asserts, which is ignoble? Or by her own inbred seeds of understanding, which is most honourable? the senses conduce much to manure the mind and improv science; but our Soul of it self apprehendeth, judgeth, retaineth, reasoneth, resolveth without instruction, though better or wors, according to the various temper or symetry of the brain, hir chief organ: For 'tis absurd that so divine an essence should rely on vile de­ceitful sens, which only comprehends accidents (color, sound, savor, odor) not the forms or nature of things, much less Natures secrets, or universal insensible objects. Nay if sci­ence com from sense, then such as hav sharpest sight, hearing, &c. should be wisest or wittiest, which oft befals contrary; and men born deaf, dumb, or blind, are of acutest entelechy: ther­fore that principle of Peripatum (Nothing is in the intellect, which was not first under sens) can scars stand sound: for though it be furthered by sens, yet it depends not thereon; sith the senses are subordinat, and know nothing without it.

4. How many Souls cohabit in one body, whether three or 4 but one? Som say three, whereof the Vegetativ and Sensitiv [Page 10] dy with the body; but intellectiv livs eternaly. The most or­thodox allow only one invested or indowed with the faculties forenamed, which dy not with the body tho their acts and operations ceas for want of fit organs: as the power of seeing remains when the eys ere dimmed or torn out. Nor doth di­versity of faculties and functions derogat from the Souls unity, more then different offices or operations in the Sun to soften, harden, melt, dry up, &c. els ther must be many Souls in the Microcosm, and Suns in the Macrocosm: but as the Sun suffers no decay, when during an eclips it neither shines nor warms: so the Soul dies not nor her faculties, though after separation she useth no faculties being destitut of organs. Zanohy holds the Souls unity consisting of three essential parts; wherof the Vegetal being first infused, at coming of the Sentient perish­eth (others of his opinion say vanisheth or removeth) and that upon access of the Rational, which is harsh doctrin to digest: For hereby a duple death must insu by destruction or departure of those two first Souls. Indeed they are distinct essences in Plants, Beasts, and Men; but subordinat subservient faculties to Mans Soul, and cannot subsist without it.

5. Whence it coms, or how it enters this earthy mansion, 5 whether by infusion or generation? which is the main Sparta, scope, or subject of this subsequent speculation. For as ther be three productions of Man (beside the common) foretouched▪ First, Without natural Father and Mother, as Adam created by God. The secund, From a carnal Father without Mother, as Eve out of Adams Rib. The third, Of a Mother without hu­man Father, as Christ of the Virgin Mary, by the Holy Ghost. So are said to be three several origins of Mans Soul. 1. By in­fusion, as Adams. 2. By transfusion, as Eves. 3. By Traducti­on or procreation, as al their Posterities since; which is the debat here to be discussed, but hardly decided or defined.

Divers dissident opinions occur which shal be fully and fairly vented or ventilated, specially the two principal of Creation and Traduction. They are reduced to three general heads: 1. The efficient, whence Souls com, whether of God, Angels, or Men? 2. The matter whereof, whether of somthing or nothing? 3. The time when, whether from eternity or eviternity? [Page] The particulars shal be handled promiscuously.

1. Pythagoras and Plato thought Mans Soul to proced Opinions. from the Worlds Soul of celical immortal substance; but crea­ted by God in set number, not to be augmented or diminished; which in du time descend to be united with bodies designed for them. Thes, being separat, pass into other bodies, as the Jews deemed, or dreamed, when som said Christ was John Baptist, or Elias, or one of the Prophets, who were dead.

2. Origen, the father of fancies or fopperies, held, That God created al at once, keeping them in a Treasury to be sent into bodies prepared for them; becaus he rested from al crea­tific Works the seventh day, and doth not stil form new Souls. His reason is better then his opinion.

3. Philo, the Maniches, and Priscillianists, from the Stoics, suppos them al created at once of Gods own substance; becaus he breathed into mans face the Spirit of life, divina particulam aurae; which is not meant his own Spirit, but a new created by his word, Fiat: which Moses expresseth Catanthropopeian by breathing.

4. The Massilians, from Philaster, maintain them to be made by Angels of Fire and Spirit; but God is sole Creator.

5. The Traductis are of two sorts: Som hold the Soul is corporeal, and begot carnally, as the Body; whom saint Au­stin justly condemns. 6. Others, that 'tis a Spirit spiritualy de­rived from both Parents Souls, with the Seed, like light from light:

7. So Apollinaris, and many Godly Bishops defended, with most of the Western Church, as S. Jerom testifies: whom sun­dry modernists ( Hunnius, Magirus, Goclenius, Brightman, &c.) folow.

8. The Infusiasts also are bipartit; Som imagin them crea­ted without (as Aristole intimats) and after instilled; which is generaly exploded. 9. Others, within the Body, That it is created in infusing, and infused in creating. The two last of each side shal be sifted, but al the rest excluded.

S. Austin and Eucherius hang in bivio between both, who neither deny lineal traduction from Parents Souls, becaus al are tainted one from another; nor jugial creation de novo & nihilo, [Page 11] becaus universaly received; but conceiv it cannot be evidently evinced out of sacred Scripture. Many of no mean mark in the Traductists Tenets. literary Republic assert, That the Soul is produced or procrea­ted from Parents, by an Animific virtu conveied with the Seed imparted successively from the first Soul; which had a power, property, or prerogativ given by Gods general blessing ( be fruitful and multiply) to beget a spiritual and immortal sub­stance like it self, in a mortal material Body; but contamined with the stain of that sin, which was contracted by our Proto­parents primitiv disobedience (in whom al Mankind offended, as the Root) against the Creators command and commination: so Traduction, if duly weighed, doth no way wound or wea­ken its immortality: For God who inspired an immortal essence into a Casket of Clay, gav it a faculty or energy to pro­duce the like indued with the same immortal authoquality, no less inseparable (though not essential) then Rationality or Risi­bility; according to the received Rule, Naturae sequitur semi­na quodque suae. This is the ground work, or chief Ancher-hold, wherto they stick like Limpets to a Rock. But on the other part, how that primeval pollution of our first Parents prevari­cation (which at once defiles both Body and Soul) linealy transcending through the loins of Mankind, should infect a spiritual pure-made Soul (wherein no corporal thing can im­press) unless it be derived from Parents polluted Souls, is a very hard Theory to conceiv or comprehend: Nor doo the many coyned curious distinctions of Schools satisfy the scruple, if strictly scanned; though Cobweb-Lawns wil suffice to Par­tialists. 'Tis a lepry inseparably hereditary, which may be sullied or slubbered over with palliativ salvs: But al the wiles or wavings of mens wits in the world, cannot cleerly cure it, if it be created pure; which traduction easily skinneth. The Souls immortality on one side, and original sins traduction on the other, are two difficil tasks to reconcile; but neither repugning to evident Scripture, nor to any Article of Faith which con­cerns salvation. Indeed the first Council of Bracarum in Spain, censured Priscillianists for holding with Origen, That al Souls were created together and sinned in Heaven; but the Apollinarians, Tertullianists, or mere Traductists, never were [Page] condemned of error or heresy, for asserting the Souls tradu­ction from Parents Souls, which ever had pious Patrons in the Church; nor doth any absurdity arise therfrom.

The Infusiastists build on thes foundations. 1. That our Infusiasts Grounds. Protoparents personal sin becam natural or universal by deri­vation from the Root 2. That God in his prohibition and commination (Of the Tree of knowledg thou shalt not eat; for in the day thou eatest, thou shalt dy the death) infolded an im­plicit Covenant for al his Posterity to be liable therto, as Trai­tors Children are tainted: Hereof Saint Paul saith, As by one Rom. 5. 12. man sin entred into the World, and death by sin: so death went over al men, sith al hav sinned; viz. in him and by him: for when the Parents eat sour grapes, the Childrens teeth were set on edg; and the whol race of man liable to duple death: dam­nati S. Bernard. antequam nati, forlorn before born. 3. The Soul sinned in consenting and lusting, the Body in tasting and eating: so both are guilty. 4. Neither Soul nor Body apart is the ade­quat subject of sin, but both united, or the whol man: the Bo­dy subjectum a quo of derivation, the Soul in quo of inhesion, the whol de quo of predication; to whom al accidents of both parts are denominatly ascribed. 5. It cannot properly be sti­led sin, til the Souls infusion, becaus the Embryo is inanimat and imperfect; but the rational Soul must first animat, yet it can be stiled sin. For whatever is not capable of Gods Image (as seed is not) is not liable to its privation; becaus the habit and privation belong to the same subject. 6. The Principium a quo is derived by seed from Parents, begetting a depraved disposition in Man, wherto a polluted womb ads more fuel; which by the Souls union breaks forth into a flame, and sets the whol hous on fire; both parts together corrupting and being corrupted by a kind of emanation. So before 'tis infused, we are said to contract sin from Parents, as Infants draw diseases (Stone, Gowt, Lepry, &c.) that is, the impression or inclina­tion only. 7. This sin is no simple privation, as blindness which deprivs sight for ever; but potential only, including a positiv propension therto. 8. Ther be three degrees of purity. 1. Ab­solut of God. 2. Subordinat, according to the creatures ca­pacity, of Angels and Man in innocence. 3. Comparat, when [Page 12] being created pure, they decline from it: So our Souls being formed subordinatly pure, soon degenerat by natural concu­piscence; being, in respect of Adam and Angels, less pure, be­caus procliv to sin. 9. The maner of imparting it from Adam to al Posterity, is rather to be beleeved (saith Doctor Whitaker) then inquired, and better inquired then explored; but easier explored then expressed: For its nature is most ar­cane, and the conveiance much more obscure. 10. Parents Souls work to frame the whol compound Man, not by giving being to the new Soul, but by preparing a place to unite it with the Body: So they may be said to concur in its production cuasaly, by disposing the Body to receiv it; not formaly by pro­creating it, as Peter Lombard and his School Sectators de­fine.

Thes are their curious Cautions, and best bulworks of de­fens, yet al too little. To the Question, Why God sends a pure Soul into a polluted prison? They say, becaus she hath a natural necessary pronenes therto, being ordained to unite with a Human Body, and both guilty of Adams sin. For 'tis not created a simple Spirit to subsist by it self, but in the Body with relation to it: which being derived from Adam, draws the guilt of his sin by that preparation and union, without car­nal traduction; so she becoms guilty both privativly and po­sitivly; yet God no Author, Actor, nor Abettor therin. This sin then folows creation by accident: for at Adams Souls in­fusion, was mens sana in corpore sano; but in every union since is sin. So we must distinguish between Gods making and Adams marring: for he creats every Soul in substance sound; but concupiscence (which S. John sais, is not of the Father) 1 Joh. 2. 16. creeps in instantly by Gods desertion; sith every Soul (even be­fore 'tis infused) is virtualy guilty of Adams fal, as he was Fa­ther and Fountain of al Mankind, both in morals and naturals; becaus God covenanted either explicitly, as Cumel contests; or implicitly, as Sotus saith; that he should stand or fal for himself and al his Of-spring, by his proper power of unrestrain­ed Free-wil. The Schoolmen dissent diversly, whether original sin be positiv, privativ, or mix'd? If positiv, whether Re or Ra­tione? whether God doth necessitat the act or entity, and Man [Page] the defect or obliquity? whether he pacted explicitly with Adam, or implicitly only? but such subtle nicities shal be left to the Schools.

Zanchy the best Patron of Soul-creation, ads mo Proposi­tions. [...]. 2. de Hom. [...]reat. c. 5. 1. That God decreed al things eternaly to be executed in time, and creats no mo nor fewer Souls then predecreed, and as they becom stained by union. 2. That his Decrees are just and immutable, nor is it unjust to unite pure Souls with sin-tainted Bodies. 3. Though he made al Decrees at once, in respect of himself; yet must they be effected or executed suc­cessivly in respect of the things: as his decree to permit sin, and deriv it by one to al Mankind; subservs to the decree of Ele­ction and Reprobation. 4. When Adam received integrity, he had it as the root of al, whence his righteousnes is stiled ori­ginal; and we were created in him just after Gods Image. 5. His disobedience and fal was semblably ours; becaus the Pre­cept ( Thou shalt not eat) belongs to al in him the Stock-father. 6. His transgression being the Head, is justly imputed to us, as Members, and the coruption of Nature or proclivity to evil inflicted as the penalty thereof. This Saint Paul plainly pro­claims in the Antithesis betwixt Adam and Christ: whos Rom. 5. 15. righteousnes wherby we are justified, hath two parts. 1. The Grace or gift, which with remission of sins by his obedience is imputed ours. 2. Regeneration or Renovation of Nature as the effect. So original sin is Adams disobedience imputed to us together with its guilt; and corruption of Nature not only a sin, but a punishment on al, which sinned by his fal. 7. When the Soul is said to be stained by union with the Body; 'tis not meant properly by any Physical impression: but so soon as both are united, a man is formed, to whom the guilt of Adams sin is instantly imputed; and by it a propension to al evil inevita­bly folows, becaus the Command and Commination was given to al Mankind in A [...]am. Thus he is driven to decline sins in­hesion, inferring that the Soul is not infected by the Body, as Wine by a mu [...]y Cask; but by union of both a Man is born Adams son, to whom his disobedience is only imputed: but the corruption or contagion imposed as a pu [...]shment by divine de­cree, and not by any action of the Body. This is a kind of Gal­limaufry; [Page 13] how sound, let Divines define: but certainly ori­ginal sin is inherent in the principles of Nature like Gehezais lepry in al Adams Progeny, and not imputativ only.

Hinc lolium infoelix, [...]vae hinc oriuntur a [...]verbae.
Hence baleful tares doo sprout,
From hence sour Grapes grow out.

The grounds thus laid, and materials brought in place, the building will be better framed: But for fuller disquisition, the Infusiastists Arguments with the Traductists Answers shal first be fairly filed: then their Objections with the others Solutions orderly mustered.

Arg. Dust (saith Salomon) shalreturn to earth, as it was; Eccls. 12. 7. and the Spirit to God that gav it: Ergo every Soul or Spirit coms from God.

Answ. This evidently relats to the first creation of both: for no mans body since Adams is made of dust as his was; but of Seed and Blood; and God gav or inspired his Soul, whence al others derivativly or secundarily com, and shal return to the original Giver, as the body shal to earth its Mother: so this provs the Souls immortality; but no way disprovs the Traducibility: sith every particular Soul proceds mediatly from God the first Fountain.

Arg. The Lord (saith Zechary) spred the Heavens, laid the Zech. 12. 1. Earths foundation, and formed Mans Spirit within him: Ergo God created it in the Body.

Answ. This is the pregnantst place, and best proof in al sacred Scripture, for intrinsecal infusion by creation: but intends apert­ly (as the former did covertly) the protoplasm or primordial pro­duction: for when God spread the Heavens, and founded the Earth, he then formed Mans Soul within him, but ever since ceased to creat either new Spirits or Souls: so this is no plain evi­dence for jugial creation of every particular Soul.

Arg. S. Paul makes an Antithesis between the Father of Heb. 12 9. our Bodies, and Father of Spirits: Ergo God is sole Author and Creator of Souls; not the P [...]ts.

Answ. God is the Father of Spirits, as wel in regard of An­gels and Saints (which is not the Apostles aim) as spiritual rege­neration ther intended, without reference to Soul-creation: yet becaus he breathed the first Soul (whence al since are derived) he may be caled the primitiv Father of Souls, though one imme­diatly beget another.

Arg. God, in Isaiah, saith, I have made the breath, mean­ing Isa [...] 57. 16. Mans Soul, which he originaly breathed in: Ergo he only creats it; nor is it carnaly generated.

Answ. This is meant in S. Pauls sens; in him we liv, mov, and hav our being: or it may be referred to the first Souls inspi­ration, without successiv creation.

Arg. Zedekiah swore to Jeremy, As the Lord livs that made Jer. 38. 16. us thes Souls, I wil not s [...]ay thee: Ergo 'tis evident that he makes al mens Souls.

Answ. Som interpret it by Synecdoche (like the seventy Souls issued from Jacobs loins) the principal part for the person; as the Lord livs that made us both: som literaly of life, as the Lord livs by whom we liv, I wil not bereav thy life. Yet the words may be granted to imply the Souls creation (though he meant not properly or purposly the Souls production) rather then persons or lifes: for 'tis a greater emphasis in the Oath, as the Lord liveth who created our Souls, I wil not take away t [...]ine which he crea­ted: Howbeit in this sens, he could not destroy the Soul it self (sav only sever it from the body) but life the effect therof. Take it either way, or any way, the words may be aptly applyed to the Souls primitiv creation, sans exception or contradiction.

Arg. Godfashions Mens Hearts (saith David) and under­stands Psal. 133. 14. al their Works: Ergo he forms our Souls, ther under­stood by Hearts; as 'tis usual in Scripture.

Answ. The inference is infirm; for by Hearts here, is meant the Wil and Affections; but by fashioning disposing. Other Scriptural Texts are pressed; but of no moment.

Arg. Whatever is generated shal be corrupted, which is an irrefragable principle in Philosophy and Theology: Ergo Mans Soul, if procreated must be mortal.

Answ. This authentic Axiom properly concerns compounds, which are the ad [...]quat subjects of generation and corruption; [Page 14] not principal parts, which are only ingenerated or congenerated; but 'tis verified in al things bred of a corruptible matter, els not: For God the Son is bego [...] of his Father, and the holy Ghost pro­ceds from both; yet eternal, without beginning: so Angels and Mans Soul were created ex nihilo, yet eviternal without ending: but al the rest intire composed of the common Chaos (Heavens, Elements, Meteors, Mixtils, Vegetals, Animals, and Mans Body) which are corruptible in whol or parts; and of thes that Maxime is rightly understood; not of Mens Souls, which are generated of Parents Souls, having al a divine faculty by divine blessing to beget an immortal essence like itself.

Arg. 'Tis a disparagement to Man, the noblest Creature, that his divine part should proced of impure seed like Beasts: Ergo this opinion is to be exploded.

Answ. 'Tis his chief dignity, that he hath power of or in him­self to beget both parts specialy one so noble and divine; els were he wors then Beasts in that behalf: nor doth it proced of seed; but from an Animific virtu of the Parents Souls conveied with the seed. If then it be immortal, as undoubtedly 'tis, what skils it in that respect, whether it be created or generated? and what difference, whether God be immediat Plastes, or giv man power, with his general blessing, to produce it by successiv propa­gation, having the same power of immortality which the first had by himself infused; and power to beget the like incorruptible essence by his special benediction?

Repl. If any Animific virtu be conveied with the seed, then must it be reduced to act instantly, at first conception, which is most imperfect; or gradualy, which argues divisibility: But both thos are absurd, and abhorrent in Nature: Ergo no such virtu can be conveied with the seed, much less proced from it.

Answ. Both Soul and Body are begot in an instant, as every conception is made: but as bodily lims and lineaments are gra­dualy shaped and strengthned from weak waterish rudiments, to more maturity: so the Soul exerciseth hir vegetativ funct [...]ons of nutricion, sensitiv of motion, and intellectiv of reason da [...]ly by slow degrees, as organs are apparated or accommod [...]ed; whi [...]h argues no divisibility: For al things in Nature (as God proceded at Creation) attain to perfection by divisible degrees; [Page] yet no division in the Forms or Souls, which are conceived in a moment.

Arg. If ther be virtu in or with the seed, to beget a Soul; then when 'tis shed, spilt, or spent upon barren or gravid wombs, so many Souls are lost; which is harsh and horrid to hold: Ergo no such Animific energy is conveied with the seed; but al Souls proced from God.

Answ. No Souls are lost, by loss or sterility of seed; but only a power or possibility to produce and procreat them: which being not reduced into act perisheth or is frustrat: so is the said virtu void to beget so many Bodies, and prepare them for reception of Souls; which is alone, and no absurdity ariseth of either, but presseth both sides alike.

Arg. If Souls be begot, then every efflux, shift, and abor­tiv is a Man: But what maner of Man wil such a shapeless sensless substance be at the general Resurrection, when every one shal resum his identic numerical Body? Ergo the genera­tion of Souls is subject to sundry absurdities in Nature and common Reason.

Answ. Such as hold Infusion at time of conception (as Tra­ductists inferences violently inforce) are liable to the same dif­ficulties: so are they that set it at quickning: for if it miscarries the day after (which a few hours distance makes no difference) what maner of Man wil that be? can­not God perfect the one so wel as the other? doo not al bodies turn to dust? doo not Divines say al shal rise in such stature as at Christs age? Why not then the first coagulation so wel as an inform infirm Embryon? cannot omnipotence extend a Body into any dimensions, so wel as amend al imperfections? Thes are arcan mysteries, known only to him that knows al, and can doo al in al: But Insusiasts are equaly engaged to answer it, sith the power to prepare a Body for the Souls union is defeated or destroyed, and by consequence so many Souls lost, which by di­vine preordination should be created and infused: but it crosseth not Traduction; and men must be wise to sobriety, not searching into Gods secrets.

Arg. 'Tis improbable, that impure material seed should be the conduit to convey a power of producing so pure [Page 15] a substance or divine Spirit: Ergo, &c.

Answ. No more then that the Body, a meer putrid mass, should be the seat or subject of the Soul it self, which is a divine, immortal, immaterial essence.

Arg. Spirits doo not multiply or beget one another; nor can Angels propagat or generat, becaus Spirits: but Mans Soul is a Spirit, so scripturaly stiled: Ergo, &c.

Answ. Simple Spirits cannot propagat, and Angels are in­dividuals, subsisting alone: but human Souls organized and united to Bodies wherin they exist, being so ordained to preserv the race of Mankind. Som distinguish that Compounds generat, and principal parts only propagat: but this is a vain evasion, no veritable satisfaction: for propagation properly pertains to Kinds, generation to Individuals, and both to Compounds: nor are the terms convertible in the abstract; for every generation is not propagation: but in the concret or subject, what ever is ge­nerated is propagat, and reciprocaly. To apply it, neither Soul nor Body is truly said to beget or be begot; but the whol Man, who begets and is begot completly, but the parts incompletly.

Arg. Marsilius Ficinus prescribes three sorts of production. 1. The making of Mans Soul from nothing into being, caled Creation. 2. The mutation of a lifeless Body into an Animal by the Soul, hight Formation. 3. The change of an Embryo into the whol Compound, clyped Generation. The object or Terminus of Creation, is immortality, of Formation a Soul; not considered simply, but as in a Body; of Generation an Animal, consisting of both. Now (saith he) in every Genera­tion is a decision of somthing from the Begetter, which a Soul hath not; becaus it admits no division nor decision: Ergo it cannot generat.

Answ. The Traductists exclud the fi [...]st branch, except with reference to Adams Soul soly; yet grant immortality to be the Terminus in production of al. The other two they apply to Com­pounds only, wherein the Soul sends no material seed or substance by decision▪ as the Body doth; but only a procreativ virtu with the spirit of seed, to produce the like spiritual substance: the ma­ner wherof is inscrutable, as is also original sin: for Man is Na­tures miracle and Epitom [...] of al Creatures; yet differs from al, [Page] having an immortal spirit in a corruptible casknet, and his gene­ration wonderful.

Arg. Beasts Souls dy, becaus bred of seed or with it: Ergo if Mens Souls be ingendred in the same sort, by or with the conveience of seed, they must likewise perish.

Answ. This is non causa pro causa; for Beasts souls dy not soly, becaus bred of seed; but specialy becaus formed at first intirely of the common corruptible Chaos: But God made mans Body of dust, wherto it must return; but infused or insp [...]red a Soul, which is im­mortal or eviternal, like Angels, partaking the same divine origin.

Arg. If the Soul proceds from both Parents Souls, then ei­ther two grow into one, or their Souls are extracted, and they remain Soulless; or part of their Souls passeth, and so are di­visible: But al thes are gross enormites, and neither possible: Ergo Traduction is no way tolerable.

Answ. Al thes inferences are impertinent: for both Parents con­cur to beget the Body too; yet two grow not together, nor are they impaired: but God ordained in cours of Nature, that both Sexes shal cooperat in generation: so from their Bodies flows a material seed with a corporific virtu, to beget a Body; and from their Souls proceds an animific power with the seeds spirit to produce a Soul: both which conjoining, is cald Prolific in regard of the Compound: yet neither are the Parents Souls nor any part of them (no more then their Bodies) extracted or exhausted; but only an energy, issuing from them to generat a new.

Arg. The Soul exerciseth her essential operations, to Wil and Understand, without help of bodily organs, as appears being separat: Ergo it needs no Parents seed to its production: for as every thing works, so is its essence and contrarily, as Ari­stotle avers: who concluds mans Soul not to depend of the bo­dy, L 2. de gen. Anim. c. 3. becaus it works within it.

Answ. The Soul, while it is in the Body, useth its organs in hir chief operations of Wil and Intellect, though when separat she needs them not: nor is Parents seed the efficient of producing, to depend thero [...]; but only the instrum ut to carry virtu of pro­ducing a new Soul with the seed which impeacheth not the exer­ci [...]e of hir chief operations without organs in the Body: nor is ther any sap or solidity [...] this Argument against Tradu­ction, [Page 16] any way however wrested.

Arg. The Soul dies not with the Body: Ergo 'tis not gene­rated with it: For ther is the same reason of generation and corruption; sith the Souls presence is the caus of life, as the Suns is of light; and absence of death, as his is of darknes: so if the Bodies procreation caus the Souls production, its death must be hir perdition.

Answ. This is pithier then a former; viz. whatever is gene­rated shal be corrupted: But the Bodies generation doth not caus the Souls production, sith 'tis generated with it, not by it: and though it giv the Body life, as the essential Form; yet dies not with it, as not proceding from it; but from the Parents Souls.

Arg. Aristotle asserts, That the Mind or Intellect alone coms from without, and is of divine origin: Ergo not genera­ted by Parents, as Bodies be.

Answ. 'Tis thought thos words (Sola mens foris adve [...]it) were foisted into the Text without any coherence to antecedents or consequents: for no man by meer reason can conceiv the mystery of Soul-creating: nor doo they infer infusion; for that is doon within the Body: Haply he might learn of his Master Plato, that al Souls were created at once, and descend daily into Bodies designed for them: but he taught the Souls immortality more confidently (being Natures principal Secretary) by many evidences of com­mon reason: which if any Traductist or other Sectist shal doubt or deny, he is wors then an Ethnic or Atheist; sith both Natures light and Scriptures lore so evidently demonstrat it to every ey: nor doth Traduction oppose it.

Arg. Scaliger holds the Soul to be created apart, and infu­sed after du organization; becaus if it be introduced at the in­stant of conception, that first coagulation must be a Man, which is most absurd: Ergo 'tis not infused til the time of quickning; much less ingendred by way of Traduction.

Answ. His opinion is no Oracle, and the reason resolved afore; That 'tis no more absonous to cal the fi [...]st coagulation a Man (im­perfect or incomplet) then a weak waterish Embryo at instant of quickning: Or that a Beasts soul being begot by seed, should deno­minat the first rudiments of conception a Beast, being brought gradualy to more maturity, til time of parturition; but the quick­ning [Page] is or may be retarded by many human contingents.

Arg. Th [...] S [...]hool-men say, That Eves Soul was created, els Adam would hav added she is Soul of my Soul, so w [...]l as bone of my bone, and flesh of my flesh, being a n [...]erer relation then those carnal ones, as Divines define: Ergo as their two first Souls were created, so consequently are al others from genera­tion to generation.

Answ. So say they, but other learned Clercs gainsay: Scaurus ait, Varus negat, utri creditis? yet the consequent halts, sith their two productions differ from al els becaus neither had two Parents, and al els, except Christ, begot by carnal coition: but specialy be­caus created within the first six dais, wherafter God rested from al creatific works. To the Antecedent and reason therof, 'tis an­swered, That she was formed intirely of an anima [...] Rib, and the Soul therin becam hirs by divine operature as the Text seems to speak; for 'tis said of Adam, God made Man ( me [...]ing the ma­terial part) of dust; not made dust a Man as if both parts cam from dust: But of Eve, the Rib made he a Woman (intirely both Body and Soul) not the Woman of a Rib, as importing the material part only. Al parts were built of that bone; why not then the Soul too by diffusion, so wel as the integrals by extension? but sith Scrip­ture is silent, let it pass in suspens.

Repl. If Eves Soul cam of a Rib, and had no divine origin; then either women hav no Souls (as som Dotards dream) or thos material, which wil s [...]ars relish their palats.

Answ. Not so, nor so: for that Rib had a Soul, which God, by diffusing made hirs, as he did her B [...]dy by distending the material part: so both savour of their several principles; one of spirituality & immarcescibility, the other of materiality and mortality; but both apt or able to beget alike substance indowed with the same qualities

Arg Christs Soul was not traducted from Adam; for then it should be tainted with his sin, which is blasphemy to assert: E [...]go not ours, sith he is like us in al things except only sin.

Answ. He was the Womans seed and Son of Adam according to his whol humanity, and his Soul produced in the same sort as ours (wh [...]her by creation or generation, is the main Question) being lik [...] [...] things [...] sin. For ours, if cre [...]ted, are infused no less [...] his; and his by union with a polluted Body, no freer [Page 17] from sin then ours: so this Stork bites both before and behind alike: for if he took from his Mother inanimat fl [...]sh only, his Soul must therby be stained (though created pure) as others are defiled: but one salv shal heal both sores: for albeit she was conceived in sin and Luk. 1. 47. needed a Saviour, as she her self confesseth (which Dominicans grant, and Franciscans deny) yet was sanctified from al stain, and purified from guilt by the wonderful working of the Holy Ghost; being made a clean Vessel to receiv and conceiv that holy thing caled the Son of God, even the immaculat Lamb without spot, slain before the beginning of the World; who could contract no pollution from hir that had none, being perfectly purified, though he should assume both Body and Soul from hir.

Repl. Zanchy saith, Som Traductists forced by this Argu­ment, confess, That Christs Soul w [...]s created, but al els tradu­cted; but the production is like: Ergo al created.

Answ. Haply he dreams so; but ther is no necessity of any such confession or concession; for the Argument is already plenarily sa­tisfied. Certes Christ had his whol human Nature from his Mo­ther, by the Holy Ghosts miraculous operature, in the same maner (by creation or generation) as others hav from Parents.

Arg. Three Sects or Septs of Heretics held Traduction. 1. Luciferians, by Souls transfusion. 2. Marsilians, who denied al Creation. 3. Tertullianists and Apollinarians, who assert that Souls generat Souls, as Bodies doo Bodies: Ergo Tradu­ction is an Heretical Tenet, condemned by the Church.

Answ. They were condemned Heretics; but Traduction no con­demned Heresy, nor a matter de fide; and inserted for aggravati­on (as crossing the common received opinion) to fil up a number, which was usual: yet the two first erred circumstantialy in that point: But al Hereticks held som verities, and the best Orthodoxists som falsities; sith al Mortals are obnoxius to manifold errors.

Thes are the Infusiastists chief Arguments, with the Tradu­ctists Answers sincerely exhibited: Next follow the Traductists Objections or offensiv weapons; and Infusiastists defensiv So­lutions, taken from their best Armories.

Ob. God bid Man bring forth fruit and fil the earth: but this Ge [...]. 1. 28. Precept concerns the whol compound, conflated of Soul and Body: Ergo both parts proceed from Parents.

Sol. Man is said in som sort, to beget the whol, becaus by producing and preparing the material part, he is Author of the union, wherin consists the whol Humanity, which sufficeth to univocal generation, though the principal part be not product by him: How satisfactory this is, shal be left to Arbitrement.

Ob. God ceased from al creatific works the seventh day, [...]. 2. 2. wherof the infusing of mans Soul was one: Ergo he doth not creat multituds of Souls every moment.

Sol. He ceased from creating Compounds and Species or Kinds; but not from forms or Essential parts, such as Souls be.

Repl. If he creat al individual Souls (ther being numberless births every instant in the vast univers) then he concurs as a parti­cular Agent or third Parent: but he is only universal Father of al Creatures: Ergo no particular third Parent in Mans pro­duction.

Sol. God is Omnipotence and Infinity in the Abstract, who can creat millions of Souls (so wel as Worlds) in a moment, by his word Fiat; yet is no particular Agent or Parent: so the Sequel is denied, sith his Word and eternal Decree doth al in al, without any particular concurrence.

Repl. The Souls supposed creation necessarily concurs to Mans generation: But God is sole Agent therin, using no subordinat: Ergo a particular third Parent: for if Parents be particular A­gents, who only prepare the matter for union; why not God so too, who creats the Caus, without which no union can be?

Sol. Parents are particular Agents according to Natures or­dinary cours, but God metaphysical and extraordinary; yet no particular third Parent.

Ob. If God concurs in every generation (whether lawful or lust­ful) to creat a Soul; then he assists al Adulterous, Incestuous, Spurious coitions and conceptions, which is horrid to imagin or im­pose; for a Pagan Poet tels us:

Non vacat obscoenis rebus adesse Jovi.
Ergo, &c.
  • Jehov is not at leisure
  • To wait on ech mans plesure:

Sol. He concurs to the Entity or Naturality, not to the Obli­quity or Morality of evil acts, which is no way horrid to hold: for he givs the earth virtu to multiply al Grain, whether stoln or ones own; yet is not Author or accessary to the stealing: so he decrees [...]o infuse new created Souls into human prepared Bo­dies, however begot in Adultery, In [...]est, or Fornication; yet is no Author, Actor, or Assistant in the sin.

Ob. Jacobs of-spring are by Synecdoche (taking the principal part for the whol person) stiled seventy Souls which cam out of his loins: But why are Souls specialy named, unless they, so wel as the Bodies and persons transcend from Parents?

Sol. 'Tis said to be, becaus the preparation of matter for the Souls reception [...]nd union proceeds from them. Be it so: yet this resolvs not, why their Progeny are caled so many Souls, unless thos issu from their loins.

Ob. God created Man in his own Image, and Adam begot Seth in his own likenes: but this Image and likenes consists soly in the Soul, or in the Humanity; not in the Body: Ergo Adam be­got that part wherin Gods Image chiefly consists, if not soly resides.

Sol. This is soon resolved: God created Man in his Image of righteousnes and tru holines, as S. Paul expounds it: but Adam begot Seth in his natural similitud both of body and whol humanity; not of Soul only.

Repl. S. Paul indeed speaks of spiritual Regeneration, by cast­ing off the old Man and putting on the new in righteousnes and tru holines: But wher doth he cal it Gods Image wherin Adam was created? However, even that spiritual Image consists soly in the Soul; and Adam begot Seth in his natural likenes: Ergo the sub­ject of both resemblances, is sp [...]cialy (if not soly) the Soul; as by comparing the words (Gen. 5. 1. 3.) plainly appears.

Sol. Seths likenes to Adam consist [...] in his whol Nature, which he dispositivly begot ( totum Hominem, non totum Homi­nis) by preparing the matter for the Souls introduction; and consequently the whol Humanity, by union of both parts; though he had no interest in production of the Soul▪

Repl. Adam begot Seth in a triple sim litud (beside that of sin) viz. of Soul, Body, Person: which personal likenes of Ch [...]dren to Pa­rents is also triple. 1. Specifical, as Men, which mostly folow the [Page] Mother becaus she suppeditats most matter (both blood and seed) in generation; and for another reason glanced at by Aristole, that the Male ingenders in another, the Female by another in it self: for if a Ram couples with a shee-Goat, they produce a Kid of soft hair; but if a Buck Goat with an Ew, a Lamb of hard wool, as Athaeneus avers. 2. Sexual, as Male or Female, which proceds from permixtion of both Parents seed according to predominance: for both hav a hot, vigorous, masculin sperm; and a cold, weak, Feminin at several times, as Hippocrates tels. So if both bring Masculin, they beget brav Spirited Boies; if the Womans be weak and Mans strong yet prepondering, they get a Son, though less lifely: If the Womans be masculin and Mans feminin, yet prevailing, they also procreat Males, but weak and womanish: the like in Females: If both Parents seed prov feminin, they engender dul Wenches: If the Mans masculin and Womans feminin, but exceding; they breed bold Girls of middle temper: If the Fathers feminin and Mothers masculin, but predomining, they produce lusty lifely Virago's. So the diversity and dominion of Parents seed, makes the difference of Sex. 3. Individual, which is seen in peculiar properties of vigour, favour, feature, stature, complexions, and conditions, arising usu­aly from the formativ faculty, and casualy from Parents phan­tasy: for the seed flows soly from the Testicles of both; yet al parts impart a plastic power by subtle spirits to the Sperm; which, ac­cording to either Parents prevalence, produc [...]th a similitud in par­ticular parts: Hence som resemble Father, som Mother, som both in several members more then others: yea, many are like their an­cestors, whos fashioning virt [...] lurks in seed sometimes four descents, as Aristotle attests, like a Loadstone which draws four or fi [...] nee­dles appending. So Nicaeus a Poet of Constantinople, born of white Parents was Maurish as his Grandsire; and Helides by an Ethiop had a fair Daughter like her Father: so Children conform to Pa­rent both in Body and Mind: Ergo the Soul is Traduced.

Sol. This multiloq [...]y may be answered briefly: That the maners of the Mind, and personal conditions of Children sem­blant to Parents, folow the temper of Body, as Phisick and Phi­losophy teach; which argues not any traduction of the Soul, but a several disposition of bodily Organs.

Repl. One once a [...]swered al Bellarmins works with two words, [Page 19] Thou liest: but ther be sundry Virtues and Vices of the Wil (which no way rely on the Bodies temper) proper and peculiar to som Stock or Race; as whol Families by lineal descent or natural disposition, are addict to generous qualities and various sports, wherto Mantuan ap [...]ly alluds:

Qui viret in foliis, venit e radicibus humor:
Sic Patrum in Natos abeunt cum semine morcs.
The leass fresh juice doth from the root proceed:
So Parents maners pass to Sons by Seed:

Ergo the Soul is the seat or subject of such Virtues and Vices, tran­scends from Progenitors to their Progeny by Traducal propagation.

Sol. Such hereditary properties folow the bodily tempera­tur of som principal Organs (Brain, Heart, Liver, Spleen, Gal) more or less, as Aristotle saith, Mores Animi seq [...]untur tempe­ramentum corporis: but not from the various inclination of the Soul.

Repl. Maners of the Mind may be somwhat inclined by bodily temper: but Childrens complexions oft-times by matches differ more from their proper Progenitors then strangers; [...]et symbolize in the Souls secret sympathies with them: Ergo thosinnat resem­blances proced from it rather then from bodily temperature, which is only accidental.

Sol. In Mans frame or fabric are sundry secret sympathies of principal parts, on whos temper the maners of the Mind and Faculties of Soul depend; wherin Children may resemble their Progenitors; though in countenance, complexion, or constitu­tion, more like to strangers: so ther is no certain or convincing Argument for Traduction to be taken from such variable ob­servations.

Ob. If aformativ faculty in seed, to build the Body, proced from Parents Souls; then doth also an animific virtu to produce the Soul: But al sides grant the one: Ergo the other folows. For if Parents Souls impart to it a power to prepare a place; that pow­er is able to beget a Soul.

Sol. The formativ animific (or rather Prolific) faculty pre­parativ [Page] to sit the matter for union, proceds from Parents Souls; but not procreativ to beget a Soul; being only able to build the bodily part, and make it ready for reception of the Soul, when it shal be infused.

Repl. This seems a meer Postulatum without proof, not ren­dring any reason why 'tis able to prepare a place, and not procreat the Soul: For what belongs to every Kind cannot, sans derogation or disparagement, be denied to the noblest Creature: but the intire production of Individuals with their principal parts (both matter and form) pertains to al Species els: Ergo to Mankind also.

Sol. 'Tis no disparagement, but a dignity, that God deigns to creat in Man a divine pa [...]t: yet he may be said to beget Indivi­duals intire for perpetuity of his Kind; viz. praeparando & uni­endo, though he begets not the Soul it self: hic murus abeneus esto: this is the main Anchor-hold.

Ob. David saith, Man is conceived in sin; which either is Psal. 51. 5. impressed before the Souls infusion, or the Soul corrupted at con­ception and first creation; or an inanimat Embryo the subject of sin; or els the Soul is traducted, which salvs and sa [...]isfies al scru­ples: but the three first are absonous: Ergo the last alone authen­tic.

Sol. Som say Parents sin, committed in procreation, is ther meant: but that in al lawful Marriages is sanctified; and who can cal that polluted which God hath cleansed? Others fly to the Souls infusion at first conception; which must eeds be, els it wil not hold water. But most say the very seed is defiled with an hereditary stain (as 'tis with the seeds of sundry diseases) which is not properly sin, til the Soul be infused, being the sole subject therof. [...]trum horum mavis? for men wil never agree in this intricat Maze.

Ob. Al Accidents folow their Form, nor can subsist without their Subject: but vegetation is visible and vigorous in an Em­bryo, before the quickning or motion: Ergo the Soul or Subject must needs be ther at conception, and consequently traducted or generated.

Sol. Zanchy answers (how orthodoxly, judg ye) that in build­ing L. 2. de Hom. creat. c. 5. Mans Body, as it hath first the form of blood, next of milk, then of flesh, and last a human shape: so at first is no Soul, but [Page 20] only an energy in the spermatic spirits to produce a vegetant Soul, when the Embryo livs as a Plant; then that Soul perish­ing, the Sentient is generated, and that livs as an Animal: which being also extinct, the Rational succeds or supervens, not pro­duced from the same energy, nor from Parents Souls; but cre­ated and infused by God. This implies a duple death, upon ex­tinction of the two first Souls. Others say the Vegetant pow­ers arising from seed, spirits, and blood, are cherished by warmth of Natures Garden, the Womb, til time of motion; but ever after the new infused Soul exerciseth al functions, til it brings the Embryo to birth and perfection. Thus they are puz­led touching the time when 'tis infused: but certainly the quick­ning is very uncertain.

Repl. The proper source and principal subject of al such Fa­culties is a Soul; not seed, spirits, or blood: Ergo either the seed had a Soul begetting energy, or they were faculties of the succeding Soul, and so subsisted alone without a subject; or els are Creatures distinct and remain divided: but the two later assertions are gross absurdities; and the first rests irrefragable, that the seed carries an animific virtu or Soul-begetting energy from the Parents Souls by natural traduction, which best salvs the propagation of original sin.

Sol. Som say thos Faculties predepend on the Seminal Form til infusion of the Intellectual: yet how can that, being inani­mat, be the subject of vegetation or motion? Or if it were a Soul, how did it vanish? it died not, as Zanchius dreams; nor is swalowed up of the succeding Soul; nor can ther be any coition or coalition of Souls. Others forced by thes pressures, hold 'tis created at conception (which is more tenible of the two) exercising hir functions gradualy, as organs are apparated and accommodated. For that time is fixed; but the quickning sooner or later according to the Embryos vivacity and other various contingents: but God is not tied to creat Souls upon al human casualties, til his set appointed time: yea Christs con­ception, at the Angels salutation ( Ave Maria) is cald his in­carnation, which is the production of his whol Humanity: and his Mother went immediatly to hir Cosin Elizabeth then im­pregnant of John Baptist; who being filled with the Holy [Page] Ghost, caled hir, the Mother of our Lord: so that he was then Luke 1 43. perfect God and Man at first conception, and the Babe leaped in her Womb for joy; being before quick as plainly appears.

Ob. Mans Soul is impure at first conception, and the whol Man polluted; for, what is born of flesh is flesh, saith Christ; but God John 3 6. creats nothing impure: Ergo the Soul is not created, but conceived and generated impure from the Parents Souls.

Sol. God creats the Soul in substance found, sans stain; but corruption or contagion caled Concupiscence, is not of the Father (saith S. John) but of the World: for the guilt of original sin is imputed to the whol Man, so soon as both parts are united.

Ob. Adams Rib was made a complet woman, and the Soul therin becam hirs, no new being infused: Ergo every Soul is not created.

Sol. The School-men say Eves Soul was created and infused, though it be not expressed: yet the extraordinary creation of the first Woman extends not to the ordinary production of al others: nor is it clear that the Rib was animat, or the Soul ther­of made hirs.

Repl. In this case it holds: for the Infusiasts infer, that al Mens Souls are created, becaus Adams was: Ergo it folows of al Women from Eve.

Sol. The reason is not semblable: for he was the root of al Mankind, Male and Female; therfore al our souls infused, as his was: but not she of Womankind: so it skilleth not whether hirs was created ex nihilo, or diffused from that animat Rib, sith 'tis not reveled.

Ob. Christ took his whol Humanity from the Virgin, by the Ho­ly Ghosts overshadowing: Ergo both Body and Soul cam from hir.

Sol. He took only Flesh from her, which includs the whol Humanity; becaus when the Body is prepared, God hath decreed to infuse a Rational Soul. This is soon said gratis; but by what warrant? or wher doth it appear, that God so decreed?

Repl. Flesh animat is Mans whol Nature, not inanimat: Ergo the Flesh which he assumed had a Rational Soul at first conception.

Sol. Som say that Flesh was potentialy animat, to be indow­ed with a Soul in du time. Others which hold Soul-creation at conception, grant it was actualy animat: But as she is caled Mother of God, in regard of the Hypostatic union, though he [Page 21] had only his Humanity from hir. So Parents may be said to be­get the whol Man, in relation to the union, which God hath de­creed in du time; though they beget only the bodily part apt and apparated to entertain the Soul; which sufficeth for denomination.

Repl. The reason reache [...]h not right. sith Men are Parents to Children, becaus the whol Nature is derived from them, as Christs Humanity was from the Virgin: but she is stiled Dei­parent; not in respect of his Deity, which depends not on hir; but for the said hypostatic union of both Natures in one Person; ha­ving his humanity intirely from hir: Ergo the Godhead shal be better tied to his whol Manhood by Traduction of both parts, then barely to cloth him with inanimat Flesh. Beside, she is caled Mother of God for the hypostatic union actualy in being; but Pa­rents are said to beget a whol Man, in regard of the union to com.

Sol. He had his whol Humanity from hir in maner fore­shewed: For when the Body is accomplished and accommo­ded, the Soul shal be necessarily instilled or infused in du time; which is al that can be answered in this point, of the whol Hu­manity derived from Parents.

Ob. The Womans seed shal break the Serpents head: but Christ fulfilled this promiss and prophecy, chiefly in Soul; which descended into Hel, to lead Captivity captiv, and bind the strong Man in his own Kingdom; as his body triumphed over Death in his dominion the Grave, by his tridual Resurrection: for how is he the Womans seed unless he had his whol Humanity from hir? Or how can the Body break the Serpents head? Or how could this victory be atchieved, if his Soul had not descended? Er­go he assumed his Soul also from the Woman by the Holy Ghosts cooperation.

Sol. Divers Divines deny Christs descent into Hel in Soul but that may rest in debat, sith it concerns not the production, sav only to shew that by it he brok the Serpents head. Touching the promiss and prophecy, it was performed principaly by his Soul (or rather person) and that derived potentialy or prepa­rativly from the Woman, in manner foretold; but primitivly and actualy from God the Creator or Infuser.

Ob. To bind up sundry bunches of sour Grapes in one bundle: If the Soul be created pure, how can it be defiled in an instant, by inanimat flesh, not capable of sin? Or why doth God cast his own workmanship into a stinking Prison purposly to be polluted? Or how can a spiritual substance be stained by a material mass? specialy sith sin inheres soly in the Soul; which is primarily guil­ty by willing or consenting, and the Body only in obeying; the one activly as efficient, the other passivly as Instrument. Upon this ground of the Soul created pure, and in capacity to be polluted by lifeless flesh Pelagius built his branded Tene [...], That Children are born free from original sin: And S. Austin, seeking to crush this Cockatrice in the Eg (like such as bow or bend a stick back to bring it right) broched another error, That al dying unbaptized, are infallibly damned or deprived of Beatific vision. being liable to the lack or loss of Heavenly happines; though not to the pain of Hellish torments, whence be is stiled durus Infantum Pater. Lastly our Protoparents personal sin, becam like sap derived from the root participatly ours; not by imputation, as Zanchy con­tests, but by tru inhesion; infecting the whol Nature: which hereditary corruption or con [...]agion is contracted linealy from Parents loins: Ergo the Soul, as seat, source, and subject, is ex Traduce.

Sol. This Gordian knot many hav essaied, few extricated, or cut it asunder like Alexander; who shadow it with a vele of windy words, but no real resolution. Som say the seed is stain­ed ex traduce; which, like levan, sours the whol lump; and the Soul supervening, receivs stain from it, as new Must put into a musty cask, which the best Divines disclaim: For ther can be no proper physical action of material upon immaterial, and the Soul shal be polluted passivly only, which sufficeth not to make it guilty, unless it be a voluntary Agent: yea, the similitud halts; for ther the Vessel taints the Wine; here the Soul was first soi­led, and principal efficient: ther both be material; here the chiefest spiritual; nor can inanimat flesh be capable of sin, be­fore it hath a Soul. Zanchy and others hold, That as Christs righteousnes, so Adams guiltines, is ours imputativly only; but Natures corruption insuing, a just punishment by divine De­cree. Out alas! this sin is a lepry cleaving clos to the flesh, and [Page 22] consequently corrupting our whol Nature; or els could not beget and bring forth such a serpentin spawn of actual sins. Pe­ter Moulin professeth plainly, that the Soul is not vitiated by the Body; for to incarcerat an innocent Creature, his own ope­rature, in a plaguy Bridewel purposly to be infected, repugns Gods Justice and Goodness: but sin being a spiritual vice of the Wil, first seizeth the Soul before the Body becoms accessa­ry: as Adam first sinned in Wil and Consent yer he stretched his hand to touch or cast: so sin passeth from the Soul to the Body; not contrarily. For the maner of spreading, He saith God creats the Soul spotless, but destitut of supernatural light, which Man lost by his fal: hence flows or folows perversnes of Wil, purblindnes of Mind, and proclivnes to al evil, even from inordinat self lov not guided by metaphysical illumination; and the temper of Body doth much incens or increas this con­tagion according to every complexion; yet are not humors the causes, but incentivs to sin; nor doo impress or imprint on the Soul, but only incline it therto. Quot homines, tot sensus, so many men, so many minds; but al driven to sundry shifts, how sin can be propagated without traduction of the Soul; which being granted wil soon satisfy al scruples.

Repl. This last devise, being newest, takes best; but is scars soundest: for sin is an effect of natural corruption, which is more then a defect of supernatural illumination; and a positiv depra­vation of Wil, far beyond deprivation of Grace. Man indeed lost metaphysical light by his fal; yet if our Souls be created spotless, they must at first infusion be sinless: so al the doubts rest intire, how they can so suddenly contract this hereditary pollution, diffu­sed over our whol Nature, unless the Soul bring that stain with it? for we are for lorn before born, being conceived in sin, or at least infected in the Womb: Ergo Traduction (which salvs al scruples, and is subject to none) is the safer Tenet; nor can God otherwise be cleered from being Author of sin: for if he creats it pure, why did he decree to pollut it presently, sith he coula hinder it? Al which inormities, with the like, are voided by Trada­ction.

Sol. Let it serv or suffice for answer, That Gods Wil was so to dispose it; and who can comptrol it? But to shun an incon­venience, [Page] and run into an evident exploded error, is a remedy wors then the Malady. To answer the last branch first, God de­creed to make Man a freewild Creature ad utrumlibet; yet im­posed a command to try his obedience, and foreknew he would prevaricat; but determined to permit or not prohibit it; which was his Wil so to doo: If any ask, why he willed not to hinder it (sith Qui malum non prohibet cum possit, praecipit) either by forbearing the Command, or by inabling man to keep it, or by refraining to creat more Souls for Hel, as if he delighted to tor­ture his Creatures? S. Paul checks such curious Inquisitors with an Interrogation; O man! Who art thou that pleadest Rom. 9. 20. with God? Who hath known the Lords mind, or bin his Coun­siler? O the depth of the riches of his Wisdom and knowledg; how Rom. 11. 33, 34. insearchable are his Judgments and his ways past finding out? but stil just in al his waies, and holy in al his works, as David sings. Touching the rest; 'Tis tru, that sin is a spiritual vice of the Soul or Wil; not of Body, sav passivly or organicaly only; which stains the Soul at instant of infusion by subtraction of spiritual light; wherof being destitut, it precipitats into al evil: for the Sun is not Author of darknes, but light; yet by with­drawing his rais induceth darknes. So God is no Author of Sin, but Grace; yet by with-holding his Spirit, sin instantly folows in a depraved Soul: so saith S. Austin, God hardned Pharaohs heart; not by impressing of obstinacy, but suppressing of Grace: howbeit the maner how the Soul is so soon infected, and the Body by it, is inscrutable, and known only to the Father of Lights; which is a free confession in this Case: But to say it was his Wil to creat every Soul pure, to be presently polluted, is more then can be warranted by his reveled Wil in the Word: For it presupposeth a Postulatum to be granted, that Mans Soul is created pure, and instantly contracts sin, though the manner utterly unknown.

For upshot, the Traductists can better shift the scruple of Immortality then Infusiasts salv or solv that of original sin; yet may they not claim the Laurel of Victory, sith Verity lies in obscurity.

Arduares haec est, & sic sub Judice lis fit.
This thing is hard and high,
So in suspence let it ly.

Thus the Infusiastists Arguments and Replies are 25. so are the Traductists Objections and Replications equal in number, with the Answers of ech part to the other: but which are the most ponderous or prevalent, let the learned Readers judg in­differently and impartialy between both.

The sum of the Traductists Tenets is, That God ceased from Summary of both sides. al Creatific Works (both Specifical and Individual, Com­pounds and principal Parts being al his Workmanship) the se­venth day: That he gav Man a benediction to multiply like other Animals, which beget their own Souls; but theirs mortal, be­caus first formed of the corruptible Chaos; and his immortal, as being breathed or infused immediatly by God: that his Soul by that blessing had a priviledg or dower to produce a like im­mortal essence, though not existing by it self, but in a mortal Body. That an Animific virtu is conveied with the Spirits of Parents seed, to beget or build up a Soul, as light diffuseth light: That this Soul is the seat of sin, being a spiritual vice of the Wil, as the Body is the subject of material accidents; but Man the denominativ or predicativ subject of both their qualities: That this sin is propagated from our first Parents (by explicit or implicit Covenant) to al their Posterity with the Soul, which is produced successivly from Parents Souls, with the same stain of sin.

The Orthodox opinion is fixed on the foundations: That as God primarily inspired Adams Soul, and afterward Eves; so he jugialy creats every Individual: That the new-made Soul instantly at infusion (whether at conception or quickning) ac­quires the guilt of our Protoparents sin; but the maner how, inscrutable and inexplicable: That this generical sin folows Soul-creating by accident, becaus God gav Adam Free-wil, to stand or fal for himself and al his Of-spring; having predecreed to creat a number of Souls, to be infused into Bodies in du times: That though God be the Souls sole Archiplast; yet Pa­rents properly beget totum Hominem (non totum Hominis) in regard of preparing the matter or mansion by the Formativ Fa­culty, whence the union necessarily insues by divine decree. That Man begets Man, becaus he supplies one part intire, and con­curs to the union (though not essence or existence) of the other: [Page] That Mans Soul is not generated as Beasts, which perish with them; but hav a sublimer origin from the Father of Spirits, and shal liv for ever: Lastly, That this Soul, though created pure, is at the instant of union guilty of original sin; not by imputa­tion, but inherent corruption.

S. Austin Bishop of Hippo durst not presum to decide the debate, both parts being so probable: But Doctor Goodman, In a Trea [...] of Mans fal. lat Bishop of Glocester assums to attone them by a motly mo­deration; that the Soul is both created and generated: for God concurs in mans production, being to becom his Son by adoption (yet every one is not so) and Man cooperats by the ordinary way of propagation: so in respect of God 'tis Creati­on, which implies a beginning different from Natures cours; but in respect of Man, a usual generation: so 'tis created ex Traduce in respect of God, and procreated ex Traduce by Man: thus he.

This mixt mungrel action obveled in a mist of words, is a my­stery beyond common capacity, and the terms contradictory, tho shadowed w th the word Respect: For how can one thing be both created and procreated? Or how can Creation be ex Tra­duce? the phrase plainly imports, that the Soul proceds ex Tra­duce from Parents; though in respect of Gods concurrence, as universal Agent, it may be caled extraducal creation. So let it pass for a rare peece of new coined Logico-Philosophico-Theo­logy. But the two forecited Opinions rely on real principles, though very dubitable and disputable. Six Questions are pre­viously agitated. 1. What Seed is? 2. What a Soul is? 3. Whe­ther it be material? 4. How it attains knowledg? 5. How many are in Man? 6. Whether it be created or generated? which last is barely debated or discussed; not boldly decided or deter­mined.

Spiritus an jugiter genitus sit, five creatus
Quim Deus infudit? lis violenta manet.
Whether Mans Soul, which God breath'd and created,
Be stil infus'd, or bred? 'tis much debated.
In dubio lis est, an Mens ex Traduce nata
Aliter:
Sit cujusque Hominis, sive creata magis?
'Tis doubt whether ech Mans Soul be generated
From Parents Souls, or rather by God created?
Particula in nobis divinae Spiritus aurae,
Alias.
(Quaeriter an genitus, sive creatus?) inest.
The Soul's in us a Part, by God inspired:
Whether begot, or creat? 'tis inquired.
Nescit Homo, an sua mens generetur, sive creetur?
Secus.
Se tamen ostentat noscere cuncta, miser.
Poor Man knows not, if's Soul be bred or moulded?
Yet boasts, that he hath al things els unfolded.

Appendix Additionalis. An additional Appendix.

THe ensuing Theory is taken mostly from Mr. Henry Wool­nots Treatis, intituled, The tru original of Mans Soul; which is brifly extracted. God hath a duple voice; one speaking in Scriptures, which is his written word of Grace: another in the Preamble. Creatures, which is his wrought Word of Nature. For as Na­tural Works are his ordinary power, and miraculous extraor­dinary: so Nature is his ordinary Voice, and divine Oracles ex­traordinary. What God spake in his Word, he hath wrought in the World, whos Words and Works agree: for secret things belong to him; but reveled to us and our Children. Wher he hath no toung to speak, we may not hav an ear to hear, nor heart to inquire: but as Creatures we must submit to our Creator, and as Christians beleev wher reason cannot reach. Now to the Question.

The Rational Soul, whether produced immediatly from Thesis. God, or mediatly by Man, is of immortal Nature: yet stained with our first Parents first sin, by propagation: but how can we know how 'tis made, before it be in being, sith we cannot con­ceiv what it is being made? For though we know 'tis a spiritual substance realy subsisting in a Body; yet what maner of meta­physical matter 'tis made of, none knows: No marvel then, if we be ignorant of the origin, which is harder to explore: For 'tis spiritual; and such are difficiler to discern or disquire then [Page] corporals, subject to sens: specialy sith ours is an incomplet Spirit or part of a Creature; Man being composed of a mor­tal Body and immortal Soul: the one indued with senses to re­ceiv al corporeal Images; the other furnished with a faculty of Reason, which from thos Images draws discurses and conse­quents, wherby it gets knowledg of causes and effects, wherof Sens is incapable. Hence it happens, that when we discurs of spiritual Natures, which transcend Sens, we are put out of our usual way, and wander, as half lost, in incertainty, without any exact knowledg to content the Mind. Whatever excellences be in inferior Natures, are much more perfectly in superiors: as thos of other Animals more eminent in Man, chiefly in his Soul; thos of his Soul more conspicuous in Angels; and al perfections of al most trascendent in God. So the knowledg of inferior Natures, is comprehended in superior; but not contrarily: Nor can any, sav God (who hath no superior) know it self purely or properly, but only by reflexion; as the Ey, which sees al things, cannot behold it self, sav in a Glass: Nor can we know our own Soul, but as 'tis shewed in a myrrhour of the Works: and as by it we know other things; so by them we hav a glimps of it.

To omit several Opinions of Pagan Philosophers and Chri­stian Opinions. Heretics: The orthodox jointly agree, that Mans Soul is either immediatly created by God, or mediatly generated by Man: both which are bipartit.

In point of Creation, Hilary, with others, hold it to be formed without the Body, and then infused. But the general Tenet is, that 'tis created and infused in the Body, which runs most current.

So for propagation: Som suppose it a corporeal substance, and begot in bodily maner; which is generaly exploded. Others hold it spiritual, & so produced, like light from light; which was the mind of most Western Doctors: but S. Austin and Eucheri­us stood in suspens between both, inclining chiefly to Creation.

The case is very dubious and difficil: For how can Spiritual substances beget one another? If it be daily created of nothing, how can it stand with Gods rest from farther creating, or his setled cours of al things to multiply their Kinds? 'tis a silly sh [...]ft [Page 25] to say, That he rests from creating new Kinds and Compounds; but not from Individuals or principal Parts: for the words im­ply no such limitation, nor any place els in Scripture: so 'tis spoken gratis, without warrant, and a bare begging of the Question, or meer fiction: for they grant it tru in al things els, except only this their own exception; which they obtrud with­out reason, when Moses makes it general of al Gods Works. A greater obstacle occurs, how it can stand with original sins propagation? This made the Pelagians and Anabaptists (who hold Soul-creation) to deny ther is any such sin, sav by imitati­on: yea divers Divines, seeing the absurdities arising therhence, assert Traduction. This makes the cheif Patrons of Creation stagger, who decline it as a curious Question, sith they cannot giv sufficient satisfaction; exhorting to Faith beyond Reason, and forbid farther disquisition: for if the Soul flow immediatly from God, how is it defiled, being created sinless? the Body cannot doo it, being drawn into sin by it: Nor can this contagi­on com from the union, sith that is Gods Work; who wil not put a Soul in it self simply good, and his own workmanship, into an unclean Vessel, purposly to make it guilty of death and damnation, for anothers fault: shal not the judg of the World doo right? 'tis a poor position, that 'tis created in infusing, and infused in creating; which is al one as to say, 'tis made in mar­ring, and marred in making: Nor is it safe to say, God so willed or decreed, sith it cannot be proved; and being unjust, is just­ly disproved. It stands not with his Justice, that Adams sin should be imputed to us or reputed ours, sav as 'tis our own by sinning potentialy in him as the root; nor is it ours by imputa­tion (sav only in respect to propagation) but inhesion: for if we were simply sinless (as a new created Soul is) his sin cannot justly hurt us. God may punish al for Adams sin; yet not soly for it, sith he saith, The Son shal not bear the Fathers iniquity: Ezek. 18. 2 [...]. but becaus by his sin they becam sinful, or rather sinned in him; they are justly punished for their own sin: so propagation is the sole source of original corruption. Now if we receiv the worst part only from Adam, which is not the subject of sin; sith not the parts, but whol Person sinned: How can a Man be guilty of sin (if his Soul com immediatly from God) sav only [Page] by propagation? Or how can Adam be our Father, if the whol Man descends not from him? One cannot be a proper Father of the whol, unless he beget both parts: for to supply meer mat­ter (which is elementar) makes not a Father, sith the Form only denominats; which if he doth not generat, he can no more be a Father then to Fleas and Lice, which are bred of his Body: Nay, if Fatherhood consists chiefly in giving the Form, God is rather the tru Father, from whom the principal part proceds, then Parents which beget the baser. The Soul is Mans essential part, without which he is no Man: How then can he procreat a Creature like himself, if he produce not the Soul? specialy sith al agree, that he propagats such an accident as sin, which inheres in the Soul as its sole subject. Can he propagat an unnatural accident Sin, which cannot be without the Soul; and not a natural essence the Soul, without which can be no Sin? The faculty of propagation pertains to the Soul so wel as Body, yea hath its chif seat in the Soul soly; for the Body is as a Pen in the Writers hand, but the Soul principal Scribe or Se­cretary: sith then such as the caus is, such is the effect; the Soul must produce a Soul, and whol Man a whol Man; not an in­form lump, which without a Soul is neither Man nor Beast: but the Soul stil accompanies the Seed at first conception, and gradualy builds the Body, fitly framing al the organs from the first rudiments to ful perfection: Nor can such effects be doon Exer [...]. 6. 55. 5. but by a Soul, as subtle Scaliger provs. He allegeth many mo Arguments against Infusion, and answers al advers Reasons; but becaus they are already produced on both parts, 'tis nausity to serv forth twise sod Coleworts: but having refuted Infusi­asts, and rejected Traductists, he vents his own novel Inven­tion.

His Grounds are thes: 1. God created three sorts of spiritu­al A new opinion Natures. 1. Angels so sublime, as they cannot join with Bo­dies. 2. Beasts Souls so material, as they cannot be separat from Bodies. 3. Mens Souls, in a mean, which can both liv without Bodies after death, like Angels, and unite with Bodies in this life like Beasts Souls. So he ordained, That Angels shal nei­ther increas nor decreas: Sensitiv Souls both increas and de­creas: But Rational increas or multiply, not decreas or perish. [Page 26] Hence he infers, that Angels are crated immediatly by God on­ly: Beasts Souls procreated mediatly one from another: But Mens Souls partly produced by Gods immediat power, and partly by mediat propagation, or such a production as coms neerest to creation.

2. Mans Soul is indued with power to use bodily organs in attaining knowledg of al sensible things: yea our knowledg of God ariseth ordinarily from Sens ordered by Reason; which is a mean between Beasts sens and Angels Intelligence. Therfore God united the Soul with a Body, which it naturaly desires, be­ing incomplet without it, nor knows ought ordinarily but by it. As then al ordinary faculties and works are doon mediat­ly by corporal Natures; so is their origin or Of-spring, or els could not hav such sympathy with a Body. Yet as the Nature and Works therof are som way extraordinary, without & abov al Elementar Natures: so God proportioaly hath a supernatural extraordinary work in producing it different from al others.

3. Elementar Natures cannot be produced without a more excellent external efficient then themselfs, viz. the Sun and ce­lical bodies, by their light, motion, and influence: for so al sub­lunars depend on them for being, beside the matter wherof they are particularly compounded, and peculiar Forms: but the Soul having a Spiritual kind of composition, nobler then the rest from Parents by seed, requires a spiritual extern efficient beside it self, which must needs be God the Father of Spirits; sith Stars being bodies, cannot produce Mans Soul, to which they are far inferior.

4. Human conception often fails, and is not so frequent as in other Creatures: which argues it is not of Nature alone, but by Gods more special power and providence, then in other ge­nerations. If then he acts more in Mans conception, why shal not the Soul be produced then, without a duple task of crea­ting and infusing at quickning? When Rachel rashly cried, Giv me Children, els [...] dy; Jacob wisely answered, Am [...] in Gods stead? so 'tis said of Ruth, The Lord gav hir conception, who only opens and shuts the Womb: but 'tis no wher said, he creats Souls: For he sets a constant cours with his conserving blessing concurring, that like shal produce their like.

5. As God eternaly decreed of Man, both who shal com into the World, how many, and when: so he works in his con­ception more then in al others; which must needs be as imme­diat efficient of his Soul, wherby he blesseth or blasteth concep­tion, ordering it by a special providence, according to his decree: contrarily, sundry inconveniences arise from creation, that som Children are fully formed; which dying before the Soul is in­fused, cannot com to Judgment, that God may be glorified; and so his work shal be frustrated.

6. 'Tis evident in promiscuous copulations of Men or Wo­men with Beasts, that Gods efficient power is joined with the Souls propagation; sith such bestial births are not indued with Reason, nor shal com to Judgment, though their sensitiv En­telechy is sharper and subtler then other Animals; as Apes and Baboons are supposed to spring primitivly from such unnatural mixtions or conjunctions. Nor is the Soul immediatly created by God sans natural means, sith Children begot in Incest or Adultery hav it; which God shal seem to approv or further, when he might hinder it, being not bound to infuse Souls. This Reason may be retorted, sith he is not bound to assist at such coitions, being a most free Agent, and not a Natural: so he cannot be an external efficient, as the Sun is in other generati­ons.

7. Sith Nature by divine Ordinance, produceth daily out of dead Elementar matter admirable powers of Seing, Hearing, Phantasy, Memory, belonging to brute Beasts; the maner wher­of our Reason cannot conceiv: how much more can the God of Nature produce out of Mans more excellent Nature others like to it, though we cannot comprehend the manner how? Nor is corporal Seed (which is of far purer temper and subtler Spirits then in other Animals) an unfit Instrument to propagat a Rational Soul; specialy sith the Spirits in Seed are of sublime Nature, which hav neer affinity with the Soul.

8. God hath set a natural order, That a whol Man shal beget the whol, both Body and Soul: yet not one the other, nor Soul a Soul alone, or Body a Body; but the Soul a Soul immediatly by the Body; and Body a Body by the Soul; but both jointly a whol Man: for they are Individualy united, and their opera­tions [Page 27] concur: so Man propagats like other Animals, but by Gods immediat power in maner aforsaid.

9. The Soul being not produced simply by Natures power, nor made of meer corporal matter, transcends the common condition of al corporeal Creatures, and is in it self immortal, having God the extern efficient to produce it.

10. The Soul being propagated from Parents, is polluted with Natures stain contracted from Adams sin; which is deri­ved from Parents to Children, with the whol Man, as the ade­quat subject of it; yet God in no fault: sith our Souls are not corrupted by him, but from our Parents and our selfs. If any cannot conceiv how one Soul produceth another (which is the hardest knot) let him consider how it can be united to a Body and organized with it, which wil allay the difficulty: For if Angels hav aereal bodies (as many Antients deem) or at least are not pure Spirits, compared to God; mu [...]h more may Mens Souls hav such a spiritual composure, as meerly resembles Mat­ter and form in Bodies, which may wel accord with the maner of propagation prespecified, and no way repugn the Souls di­vine essence. If this way oppugn Reason, yet 'tis safer then that which repugns Religion.

By this Card our Author, sailing betwixt Scilla and Charyb­dis, Conclusion. discovered Pachinus (a middle Promontory in Sicil, as Co­lumbus did Cuba) viz. that as the Sun is external efficient in the general generation of al Sublunars, beside their internal par­ticular principles: so is God in the special production of every Mans Soul, beside the peculiar Parents Souls working virtualy in the seed, as his pretended premisses prov:

Which he farther confirms thus. 1. Ther is no diametral Conformation. difference between Soul and Body, but they may be naturaly coupled together: For though the Soul be not visible; yet hath it a spiritual substance, not simply pure, but the lowest degree of Spirits, prone to unite with corporeal natures, and so may be propagated with them, as united to them. 2. Every Na­ture, the more excellent 'tis, hath a neerer union with the first Being, on which it depends, and is more immediatly moved by it: whence it folows, that the Soul being more excellent and neerer to God then any corporal Creature; in which he works [Page] more immediatly then others, after they are made: so he doth in the first production of it. 3. Nothing is generated but hath som extern efficient Caus, which in Coporeals is the Celical bo­dies: whence 'tis said the Sun and Man be get a Man, as the Sun and Lion a Lion: But the Soul being a Spirit, and made at first by God, can hav no other extern efficient sav the same immediat power: So it may more truly be said, God and Man generat the Soul; God as efficient, and Parents as his procreant instru­ments, to produce what, how and when he pleaseth, according to his eternal Decree: Nor is it absurd, that Man hath two ex­tern efficients; but rather an honor that God and Nature con­cur to his generation. 4. Mortality proceds not from natu­ral generation, but divine malediction: for had not Man sinned, his Body should be eviternal so wel as Soul: Ergo if it were compounded and generated in a corporal way (which is not so) yet it folows not to make it mortal. 5. Whatever hath being immediatly from God, cannot be annihilated but by his imme­diat power, which is the tru caus of immortality. Hence the Body being produced soly by Natures power, doth dy or perish; yet the Soul produced by immediat act of the Deity, can never dy but by the same power which gav it life.

Thus it appears, that though the Soul be produced as afore­said; yet is it immortal: sith 'tis neither made of corporal mat­ter, nor generated in meer natural maner: Nor is God faulty, though we be sinful; sith being wholy in Adam, and actualy one with him; our whol Nature is so defiled, and Gods pure ordinance in producing Souls depraved; that a total corrupti­on passeth in the very conception, and we stained with original sin at our very first being.

To cleer the Case, he frames som objections against this mid­dle way. 1. Ob. If the Soul be resolved into a first principle of Adams Soul, whence al are derived, as Mixtils are into Ele­ments; it must needs be mortal as al such are: Ergo 'tis not so derived, or els 'tis mortal.

Sol. The comparison is unlike: for Mixtils are compact of Elements into which they resolv; but Mens Souls not com­pounded of Adams (no nor Bodies) nor one of another; but of the same nature, and so simple as his. Nor doth it folow, if [Page 28] the Soul be compounded like Elements, it must inevitably be mortal: for death and corruption coms not from composition or propagation, but meerly from malediction for sin; the wa­ges wherof is death.

2. Ob. If God cooperats with Man in producing Souls, he no less rests from his works then in jugial creating them of nothing: for the thing is the same, and terms little differing: Ergo this novity of a middle way, to make God the external efficient, is ve­ry vanity and of no validity.

Sol. Here is no creation of nothing, but production of a thing from former principles: Nor doth it repugn Gods crea­tifie rest, to concur in other works of providence, government, and the Souls spiritual acts; nor in assisting its production as an extern efficient, which tends only to preserv Mankind; specialy sith it hath no mediat maner in ordinary cours of nature, sav on­ly Gods immediat concurrence in extraordinary maner.

3. Ob. If Man cannot generat his like without Gods special extraordinary help; he is in this behalf inferior to Beasts, as Tra­ductists urge against Creation: Ergo, &c.

Sol. Not so: for Beasts beget also by the Heavens help, as exterior efficients: If then Mans Soul for excellence hath a far sublimer supercelical efficient: And he acts so much in genera­tion of his like, as other Creatures doo in theirs; 'tis rather a dignity abov al, then any disparagement at al. So this exception holds against jugial creation, wherin Man no whit concurs, which may seem a derogation: but not against natural propa­gation.

4. Ob. If God be immediat extern efficient of our sin-polluted Souls by natural propagation; he is Author or accessary to sin, rather then by creation: Ergo, &c.

Sol. Nothing less: for he is only external efficient of the Soul, not of sin; w ch coms from corrupt Parents, who supply the inter­nal matter of the whol Man, wherin sin consists, sith generation is not of Parts, but Persons; it being his just ordinance in nature, That as the Tree is, so shal the fruit be. Sith then he made Man perfectly good at first, to beget Children perfect like himself; who prevaricated and polluted al his Progeny or Posterity: God performs his part stil to confer his efficient power in the [Page] perpetual production of Mankind: And as he first infused his Soul, so he stil concurs in producing it, though not in the same sort: yet sin is meerly accidental in respect of him, who is nei­ther Author nor accessary: but 'tis propagated in generation by the first Mans fal or fault, through the loins of perpetual po­sterity one from another.

It rests to present som gleanings, gathered from the said Corollary. Treatis, which tends to this Theory. 1. Creation is a meta­physical production of a Thing out of Nothing immediatly by God: so the first Chaos (caled Heaven and Earth) was made of meer nothing, and the rest mediatly out of it: but Adams Body of Earth mediatly, and his Soul immediatly of nothing, by a middle way of Production.

2. Propagation is a Natural act or faculty, wherby a living Creature begets his like, for continuance of the Kind: this is the proper perfection of every Animal (Vegetant, Sentient, Intel­ligent) being the most excellent faculty ingrafted in Nature by Gods special charge and blessing of Increas and multiply; which is duple. 1. Equivocal, when Plants or Animals are bred of putrefaction; as Weeds, Magots, Eeles, &c. 2. Univocal, when ech Animat brings its like; as Wheat Wheat, Whale a Whale, Eagle an Eagle, Lion a Lion, Man a Man.

This is doon by the seed of generation, which contains the whol Nature to continu the Species for ever; wheras Individu­als are al mortal or momentany. So Mans seed, Natures quint­essence containing the whol Kind, is lodged in a place fit for propagation of another conspecifical: which generation being Mans perfection; he cannot be said propagat either part, but the whol, or a third consisting both of Form and Matter. Hence our propagation from Adam, is a deduction of the whol Man, according to Natures cours, in turning our potential be­ing into act, which derivs his Nature to us: but if the Soul be fetch'd from Heaven, and Body from Earth; how shal both ends be brought together; or what shal this mix'd action be caled? Simple Creation it cannot be, nor pure propagation; but a Mungrel like a Mule. For Creation and Propagation dif­fer divesly. 1. One is Gods work by himself, of meer nothing; wrought by his sole Word and Wil: the other Natures of [Page 29] som preexistent matter according to ech Creatures kind, by Gods ordinance setled in Nature. 2. That is doon in an in­stant by an infinit essence which requires no time; this by pre­vious preparations or gradual perfections which take time, tho the very conception is acted in a moment. 3. One is perform­ed without any motion or mutation; but in the other the same matter is changed or varied into several forms. 4. In the first, things are not made of one substance with the Creator; but in the last, both hav the same substance. 5. In Creation privati­on preceds the habit, power act, and darknes light: but in Pro­pagation contrary, habit foregoes privation (as sight blindnes) act power, and light darknes.

The Reasons that Mans Soul cannot be propagated by cours of Creation are thes. 1. It impugns Gods Justice, to put a 1. Reason. pure innocent essence into a condition to be instantly damned for anothers sin; which it must be, if an Embryo dies before born and baptised. To this 'tis said the new Soul is guilty by union; which is a greater aspersion on divine Justice, but no salvo: for if it be in no fault, why shal it be guilty and punished for Adams fal? If it be replied, That God so eternaly Decreed; this farther aggravats: nor doth it appear that he so Decreed; w ch to aver without warrant, is most hainous: for if he Decreed (as Supralapsarians harshly hold) that al should sin and suffer death in Adam, 'tis requisit to be by just means: which if it may be doon by Traduction rather then Creation; yea by that way and not this; then is that to be counted Gods Decree. Can Ju­stice it self deal unjustly? surely in equity is no iniquity. God promiseth and proclameth, that a faultless Child shal not suf­fer Ezek. 18. 20. for his Fathers guilt: why then shal a good Soul be so deep­ly punished for anothers sin, to whom it is scars kin? sith Adam that sinned was no simple Soul, but a Man.

2. If the Soul be immediatly created pure, it cannot be pol­luted 2 by a Body, which of it self is not the subject of sin, nor can defile a spiritual substance, being the first mover of al acts in the Body; and it should rather sanctify that, then be stained by it. So it may better be defended, that we hav original righteousnes, becaus the Soul coms from God; then original sin, becaus the Body coms from Adam. If it should be granted, that the Soul [Page] is polluted by yeelding to bodily lusts; yet this is actual sin, not original corruption: Nor can it com from a pure created Soul. To this 'tis said, That at the instant of Creation, God bereavs al supernatural gifts for Adams laps, which though it put not evil into the Soul; yet original sin necessarily flows or folows. This seems uncouth, that God shal at once doo and undoo, or make and mar so soon as 'tis made; or giv goodness and take it away instantly. Nay if it be created in infusing, 'tis void of su­pernatural gifts, and so cannot be deprived of what it never had. But if it be created without thos gifts which to us are superna­tural, he creats it evil; as al Men are without such; nor can a Soul be good without them. If then God makes it so that it must needs be evil, he makes it evil; sith he makes it that it can­not be good: Yet if al the premisses be conceded, 'tis never the neer to salv original sin; sith this is not to sin in Adam, but to becom sinful for him: So it results, that the Soul if created good, cannot possibly contract Adams sin: nor can al Mens wits or wiles cleerly shew, how a Soul created pure can be pol­luted; and al shifts hitherto devised, are silly Cobweb Lawns, pervious to every ey. The last refuge (that it coms neither by Soul nor Body, but by union of both; sith by it we becom Sons of Adam, and so his sin made ours) is Mr. Calvins curious con­ceipt, but scars satisfactory: For it is a spiritual Lepry which hereditarily infects the whol Man, with al parts and powers. If then the Soul at first union be pure and Body polluted, the Child shal be half holy and half sinful: Or if both be clean at first, how can union make both or either unclean? for when two good are conjoined, both becom better. Hence som say Adams sin is only imputed, not inherent; and so we only re­puted corrupt. Indeed Christs righteousnes is realy ours by im­putation; and a voluntary institution, as a Covenant of Grace differs from ordinary Justice in cours of Nature; sith 'tis free to shew mercy without caus, but not to punish without du de­sert: Nor can this sin be justly imputed to al, unles the whol Man be propagated; for 'tis a real infection of the whol Na­ture both Body and Soul.

3. As by Gods Ordinance original sin passeth from one to al 3 Mankind; so by propagation al Mankind proceds out of one: [Page 30] and as that sin overspreads the whol Man; so both parts being infected must needs be propagated. Again as this sin is seated specialy in the Soul; so 'tis chiefly propagated according to Na­tures cours. Hence three points rest to be proved. 1. That original sin passeth only by propagation, as Scriptures univer­saly testify. By one man death passed upon al, becaus al sinned in him: and 'tis imputed to his Posterity, becaus al were in him as the Root or Stock, and al descend out of him; so his sin becoms ours both by imputation and propagation; but by the first be­caus of the last: For 'tis not anothers sin imputed, which is not ours, but that made ours by propagation actualy, which before was only potentialy. This is cleer by the Antithesis between the first and secund Adam; as in one al dy, so in Christ shal al be made aliv: The one being Root of Mankind, in whom al are by Nature; the other Head of the Elect, in whom they are al by Grace. Such then are deceived, as deem Adams sin only imputed, like Christs righteousnes; sith this last is the Creators voluntary Institution and work of meer Mercy; but the first a necessary operation of the Creature and work of Justice. So the Antithesis holds tru thus: As in Christ we fulfilled the Law, suffered death and attained salvation, being members of his Bo­dy by Grace: So in Adam we eat the forbiden fruit, becam Sa­tans bondslaves, and were in state of damnation, being al mem­bers of his Body by Nature. So Christ derivs his righteousnes to his Children by spiritual regeneration, as Adam did his sin to al Men by natural generation: Ergo as Christs righteousnes is not imputed but by means of regeneration, wherby we becom members of his Body: So Adams sin cannot be imputed but by generation, wherby we descend from him as his members. If Adams sin be simply imputed, becaus we are Men as he was, who received or lost for himself and al Mankind; then must it be imputed to Christ as Man, so wel as to us; which is not so: for our sinning in him, and being sinfully propagated from him, makes us liable; which Christ was not, becaus sanctified in the womb, by the holy Ghost, at first conception: but al els derived from him, and his sin to us through one anothers loins. 2. Ori­ginal sin cannot be propagated, unles the whol Man and both Parts be; which necessarily flows from the premisses: for except [Page] the whol Man descends from him, the whol cannot be infected; sith neither Soul nor Body alone is the subject of sin, but the Person. Or if the whol be not the subject, 'tis not properly sin­ful. The Law likewise is given to the whol, and the Person punished or rewarded. 3. The whol Man cannot be propa­gated, unles the Soul be; sith the whol consists of its parts. To say the Soul coms from Adam quoad existentiam & unionem, non quoad essentiam, is sly Sophistry, not real or rational: for then Man contributs but the worst part, not the whol nor half: Nor is it tru, that Adam is caus of the union; but rather God, if he creats the Soul. Nor if the Soul be infused, can any tel how long time after conception; during which space the Wo­man works alone. But if the whol Man be said properly to proced from Adam, becaus the body doth; much more may it be verified to com from God, becaus the Soul doth: so the uni­on rather to be ascribed to God, as the noblest suprem Agent, then to Man the baser and inferior. If then the whol Man and both parts be not propagated, it results that we were in Adam wherin we are not, viz. the Person: that we sinned in him with­out that, without which he could not sin, viz. the Soul: That the whol Man was in Adam yet never cam from him: That we lost in him which we never had of him, viz. original righteous­nes: That he shal stil be ful of Souls which he never had: That the whol person proceds from him, yet not that which makes the whol.

4. Christs Soul was not created; but his whol Humanity 4 taken from the Virgin: for his birth, life, death are curiosly and circumstantialy recorded by the Evangelists; but no Soul crea­tion: which they would not omit being so pregnant a proof that he was without sin, if it was created pure: Nor is any Souls creation, since Adams specified in Scripture. Christ is caled the seed of the Woman, and Davids seed▪ according to the flesh: which imports the whol Humanity, as opposed to his Deity. but if his Soul was created, the imputation of Adams sin to al Men, must be likewise l [...]able to him as Man. Ad hereto, That the Soul and Body (as 'tis in al others) were conceived at once: for the divine Nature being immediatly united to the Soul, and by it to the Body; the Soul must be produced in the moment [Page 31] of conception with the Body; or els the Deity was first united to a brute Body, which is brutish to imagin. The truth is, his Soul being united with the Body into one Nature at first concepti­on, becam one Person with the eternal Word, by a miraculous working of the holy Ghost, who purified the Womb, that the Birth becam exempt from sin. So his whol Humanity (Soul and Body) was deduced from Adam, and separated from the Virgin by the holy Ghost: But a Soul cannot be produced by Natures ordinary cours (no more then a Body) without con­currence of both Sexes Souls: yet being performed by superna­tural power; 'tis a tru Soul, and so is the Body; both which joined in one Person make a perfect Man; as Eve was a very Woman, though taken out of Man; and Christ tru Man, taken only out of Woman. For in Mans quadruple production, [...] a duple concordance: Adam made immediatly by God, without Man or Woman: Eve mediatly out of Man, without Woman: Christ immediatly out of Woman, without Man: but al els me­diatly by both. 'Tis said the holy Ghost sanctified part of the Virgins substance, assumed by the Godhead, to make Christs Person: which terms are tru, if wel understood: For by part of hir substance is meant, the whol Nature, or both parts, (not Bo­dy only) whereof his Humanity was framed. By sanctifying is not meant clensing that portion from sin; but consecrating it to that holy purpos, indowing it with gifts fit for so divine union: yet was it free from sin, or rather never sinful, by reason of this union. For al substances were created exceeding good, and depend immediatly on God: Nor is sin essential to Mans Nature, but accidental, cleaving to the person by Adams fal; and not properly in the substance of Human Nature. Nor are evil actions or affections stiled simply sinful; but the Man: sith sin consists not in any pravity of matter; but in the corrupt Wil or intent of the dooer: Nor is ther any Law to punish parts or substances, but persons or malefactors. So 'tis cleer that Christs substance, or whol Humanity, taken from the Virgin in such miraculous metaphysical maner, was not stained with sin, becaus not propagat by ordinary generation: For if it had bin sinful, it could never be clensed, nor any Man saved: sith ther is one only Mediator, whos blood clenseth us from al sin; which [Page] the holy Ghosts sanctifying cannot doo, without virtu and re­ference to his redemption. If then his substance never was sin­ful, the holy Ghost did nor clens it from sin; but only separat what in it self was sinless, from a sinful Person, that it might unite and subsist with a divine Person: For his Soul and Body, though derived from Adam, like others, could not be propaga­ted, becaus he was conceived extraordinarily without Male­seed, by severing som of the Virgins sinless substance from hir sinful person, and uniting it to Gods person. Lo here a sum­mary of this sublime mystery; but a Labyrinth which he traceth forth and back, to shew that Christs Humanity, being taken from sinless substance, could not be sinful.

Thus three dissident Opinions hav bin alterutratly agitated. Censure. 1. For the Souls jugial creation, which is most general. 2. For natural propagation from Parents Souls, as Lamps deriv light one from another, which seems more rational. 3. for a mix'd production, betwixt both, which is meerly Mathematical. 'Tis a witty novity, or castle in the air; yet likely to take better with most Men then old received Tenets; being haply borowed from Dr. Goodmans crotchet, but much changed: howbeit if both deny the Souls creation, ther is no necessity to make God an extern efficient in its production; specialy sith al inconveniences may be salved by simple Traduction, so wel as any other way. Nor is ther any warrant, that God concurs in extraordinary maner to propagat Mankind, more then any other Creatures; but leavs al indifferently to Natures cours, first instituted by him, with a general benediction to increas, multiply, and propagat their several Kinds. Indeed his disposing providence is univer­sal suprem efficient of al things, that a Sparow cannot fal to ground without it: but that he is special Agent in Mans gene­ration, more then other Creatures (as the Infusiasts and Mr. Woolnot contest) hath no grounds. God is said to keep the keys of the womb, which he opens and shuts at free pleasure: So he keeps the keys of the Clouds and al other works of Na­ture: But to make him a particular efficient with Man in the Souls production (as the Sun and celical bodies are superior subordinats in other generations) is asserted gratis, without grounds; nor wil Ipse dixit serv to induce a credulity for such a [Page 32] novity. He tartly taxeth the Infusiasts, for asserting God to creat new Souls, and ascribing it to his eternal Decree, without war­rant in his Word; yet he doth the same, having no author con­curing, as they hav. God created al things with a Word, which was no weary work; and could make millions of Worlds (as he did myriads of Angels) in a moment: but his Wil was to proced gradualy, taking six daies time to accomplish one: which having ended, he rested on the seventh from al such works (wherof creating of Mans Soul was one) for ever, and sancti­fied or set it a part for a Sabbath, in memory of his rest; enjoin­ing it afterwards by a Law to be observed by Man for ever. If then he creats Souls continualy, how doth he rest from al such Works? Or how can it be said, that hw wil at last Judgment creat new material Heavens and Earth, when the old shal be de­stroied? Or lastly, that he stil assists Man as an extern efficient in every Soul production, which emulats creation? If any wil seek the premisses of this Postscript in Mr. Woolnots said Trea­tis, he shal so soon find a needle in a Bottle of Hay: so various are our garbs both for stile, structure, method, and matter, one from another; as wil appear in al the rest of the Theses.

Nostram Animam ex nihilo negat Author hic esse creatam:
Externum efficiens vult tamen esse Deum.
This Author our Soul made of nought denies:
Yet God to be extern efficient implies.
Si po [...]erit summus Pater omni assistere partu;
Allter.
Sie Animas potuit Voce creare novas.
If God assists al births when propagat,
He can so wel with's Word new Souls creat.

The Case is cleer as the Sun, to salv immortality: For Adams Soul by Gods immediat infusion, Eves by transfusion from his, and al others since by traductiv derivation (either immediat or mediat) from both theirs; like light from a Lamp, which never wasts by kindling one another; together with Gods command and benediction to increas and multiply their Kinds in ech kind; hav acquired that excellent dower or prerogativ of indubitat immortality, beyond al exception and evasion.

THESIS II.
Pura Dei Praedestinatio. Divine Predestination.

THis is a profound point and very ponderous: for better cleering wherof, certain previous Propositi­ons shal lay a foundation.

1. Providence is Gods general Government of al 1. Proposi­tion. Things: Predestination his special care over free Intelligent Creatures, Angels and Men. Of it are two parts or branches: viz. Election to Life or Salvation; and Reprobation to Death or Damnation. Election (as our Churches seventeenth Article defines) is Gods chusing of som in Christ out of Mankind be­fore the Worlds foundation; and his everlasting purpos secret to us, to deliver them from Curs and Damnation, and bring them as Vessels of honor to eternal Salvation, by the same Christ in whom they are chosen. So Reprobation must be his secret wil 2 Cor. 13. 5. not to deliver from Curs and Damnation thos whom he hath not found in Christ; but to pass them by and cast into everla­sting fire, as Vessels of dishonor. Now this Theorem or Trea­tis concerns the maner and means of Gods proceding in both; which must be the Basis of this great stupendious structure to be raised or framed.

2. Gods Attributs or expressions of his Essence (Omnipo­tence, 2 Omniscience, Infinity, Eternity, Ubiquity, Unchange­ableness, Understanding, Wisdom, Wil, Goodnes, Lov, Mer­cy, Justice, Truth, Patience, Holines, Blessednes, Majesty, &c.) must be considered as conspiring in one, without confusion or contradiction; specialy thos that most concern this subject, which folow to be more precisely and particularly agitated.

3. Omniscience or Prescience is two-fold, as Schools define. 3 1. Of pure simple Intelligence, wherby God knows al things [Page 33] past, present, to com (necessary or contingent) and what might Nota bone. hav bin, if he had pleased to giv them being: yea the very events of al that shal be doon by himself or any Creature from eterni­ty to eternity. This the highest pitch of knowledg in an Intelli­gent Nature to work with Wisdom, and therfore worthy of the wisest Agent; specialy in the first contriving and ordering of al things concerning contingent events of free Creatures. Hereby he foreknew Adams fal, before he decreed to creat or permit him to fal: or to send his Son for a ransom, if he should fal; upon which he contrived the whol work of Mans Redemption. This pure prescience being previous to Predestination in order of Nature (according to our weak apprehension) yet al coe­ternal to God; did not look to the mass of Mankind as to be created incorrupt, nor as lapsed in Adam; Nor to Christ be­leeved or not beleeved on: but beyond al to the first, middle, and final estate of ech particular person, and universal of al Men. 2. Of Vision, which is of things to be doon in time, with al acts and events therof, which depend on his free Wil and Pleasure. Aquinas speaks of both: God knows al things which neither are, were, or ever shal be by his simple understanding: but the rest that hav bin, are, or shal be, after what sort soever, by the science of Vision. This distinction Zanchy, Junius, and other learned Reformists approv to be authentic in the very terms.

4. Gods power or Omnipotence (who can doo what he wil 4 which agrees to his Nature) is duple. 1. Absolut, wherby he can do al that he wil, and more then he wils. 2. Actual, by which he doth what ever he wil, and hinders what he wil not hav doon in Heaven and Earth, with al things therin; whos Maje­sty ruleth and reigneth over al Creatures visible or invisible; nor could ever any resist his power, or defeat his providence.

5. Gods Wil (which comprehends his Lov, Mercy, Good­nes, 5 Truth, Justice, Wrath, Patience, Holines, &c.) first wil­leth himself, as chief Soveraign good, and in himself al other good things freely, which are out of himself. Hereby he decrees (for Decree is no Attribut, but an Act of his Wil joined with power and prescience) what of thos infinit things presented by his understanding shal com into being. For Knowledg is his [Page] Counsilor, but Wil King, and both himself; who works al ac­cording Eph. 1. 11. to the Counsil of his Wil, as S. Paul saith. By it he or­ders al things causing or allowing what shal be, in what ma­ner, Rom. 9. 18, 19. and to what end. Hence S. Paul ascribes al to it, as suprem universal caus, into which al inferior are resolved, as the prime spring. This is absolut and independent: for til God passed his Decrees, al things were known but as possible, if he would giv being or not. Ther be other distinctions of divine Wil, ac­cording to several objects, as that of Sign and good pleasure used in Schools: but to giv God a duple different Wil in him­self (secret and reveled) as if he willed openly in his word to sav al; yet decrees to reprobat most part in his hidden Counsils, is most abhorrent: For he is a God of Truth, no Lier, Dissem­bler or Mocker, using simplicity and sincerity in al his sayings, which are yea and Amen: Nor wil he make general promises in his Gospel to al Beleevers, yet bar them by a clos clandestine decree of his secret Wil, that they shal not beleev: but it hath divers objects, or one placed in divers times: as 'tis his reveled Wil ther shal be a day of Judgment, yet he concels the time. So the Gospel of Salvation was his secret Counsil before the World began; but since opened to the Patriarchs, Prophets, Apostles, &c. which can no more be caled his hidden Wil. In­deed 'tis said, Secret things belong to God, but the reveled to us Deut. 29. 29. and our Children; which provs a diversity of objects, but no duplicity of Wils; warning us only to attend what is reveled in his Word (as his general promises prescribed) and not pry into his privy purposes, to inquire who are elect or who reprobats, lest, like Thales, in gazing at the Stars, we fal into the Pit: for this is a perilous precipice of carnal presumption.

6. The Gospel is a manifestation of Mans Redemption by 6 Jesus Christ; which God first reveled in Paradise, that the Wo­mans seed shal break the Serpents head: Next to Abram at Ha­ran, that in his seed al families and Nations shal be blessed: Then to Moses in Egypt and the Wildernes, when God insti­tuted the Passover and several Sacrifices as Types or Figures of the holy Lamb, slain before the World for the Worlds sins: Afterward to the Prophets: And lastly to the Evangelists, who wrot our Saviours whol life & death, after his Incarnation or ap­peerance [Page 34] in the flesh, which is the mystery of our Redemption.

7. Gospel Grace is Gods free Mercy offered to al lapsed 7 Mankind: whoever wil beleev in his Son, repent their sins, and persever to the end, shal be saved. Which promiss must be preached and published to al sorts, sans respect of Persons; as he is no respecter, nor delights in the death of a sinner: For Man hath som liberty of Free-wil stil left (if revived or quickned by Grace) to obey or resist, receiv or reject the motions of Gods Spirit.

8. Gods Decree is duple. 1. Primary, Proceeding from his 8 Omnipotence; wherby he eternaly willed to creat the World in du time, and to giv Man, made after his Image, absolut Free-wil, Decretum; 1 Absolutum. 2 Condition [...] ­tum. without restraint any way. 2. Secundary, Depending on his Omniscience; wherby foreseing Adams fal (as he did the evil Angels Rebellion) he in meer Mercy ordained a remedy, to send his only begotten Son to be a Sacrifice for al: but with condition of beleef in him, and tru repentance for sin; both which are equaly eternal, flowing from the Fountain of the Deity, who willeth what he wil, and doth what he willeth. Hence proceds Predestination, which is his secundary conditio­nat Decree, depending on Prescience: wherby he freely elects som to lif, being al liable to death in Adam; and rejects or passes by the rest to perish in their disobedience.

9. Sin is of two sorts. 1. Original (so caled by S. Austin) 9 contracted from our first Parents. 2. Actual committed by al particular persons. The remedy of one is Baptism into Christs faith; either by personal confession, as in those of tipe age; or by their Sureties sponsion, as in Infants. The other is cured or clensed by repentance, through the merits of Christs death; whos blood, by tru faith in him, purgeth from al sin.

10. God eternaly Decreed to creat al things in time, indued 10 with several Natures, and to make Man a free Intelligent Crea­ture, like Angels; who gav one only prohibitiv precept upon pain of death; which foreseing in his pure prescience, he would violat or prevaricat, both to his own and Posterities perdition, if justice be executed, as it must necessarily be by a just God: He by his knowledg of Vision decreed secundarily, in meer Mercy, to send his Son, to salv al that shal believ in him, and use such [Page] means of faith, repentance, and obedience, as are prescribed in the Gospel.

11. God commands no more of Man, then he givs power or 11 ability to perform; as Adam had by Nature, and al others by Grace: if then he requires since Mans fal faith, repentance, obedience, and perseverance to work out our salvation by his Grace; certes he givs ability to beleev, repent, obey, and per­sever by cooperating with it; but doth not cross-bar it by any contrary decree, which were meer mockery far from Mercy: for if one ly on the ground bound hand & foot, 'tis mockery to bid him rise or run away; but mercy to loose or let him go: The Case is quadratly semblable and aptly applicable. Our good God is no mocker, but al Mercy; nor respecter of persons, but receivs al that cal on him.

12. God delights not in the death of a sinner, but would hav 12 al to be saved: he hath spoken it who wil not beleev him, so wel as beleev in him? But if he hath absolutly and peremptorily de­creed (from which is no appeal nor repeal) that Man shal sin and consequently dy; he delights in his death, and wil hav but a few saved. Hath he made him according to his own Image pur­posly to make him the wrechedest of al Creatures? Surely his Wil and Decree is to reward every Man according to his works. Thes twelv stones thus laid (like Josuas twelv stones paralel to Jos. 4. 20. Israels twelv Tribes, set up in Gilgal for a memorial of Jordans retroversion) for a fair foundation, the fabric wil be the better finished: but becaus Mr. Plaifer wel versed in this point, hath handled it at large in his App [...]li [...] Evangelium▪ the chief contents shal be sincerly abstracted or abbreviated, and applied to com­mon capacities, sans ambiguity.

He reckons fiv dissident Opinions touching the order of 1 Opinon. Predestination. 1. Calvin, Beza, Piscator, Whitaker, Perkins, &c. hold, that God eternaly Decreed to creat a set number of Men, wherof he elected som to everlasting life, and reprobated the rest to eternal death of his free wil & pleasure; only to shew his Grace, Goodnes, or Mercy on the one; and his Justice, Power, or Dominion on the other. To which end he Decreed sin should enter on al, that he might justly punish most part for sin; and to send his Son for redemption of the Elect in Mercy by free Grace.

This peremptory position, is generaly condemned by Papists, Refutation. Lutherans, Arminians, and divers Reformed Divines, as peri­lous and erroneus; becaus it makes God the prime Author of sin▪ rejecting Men before they were evil by an antecedent abso­lut Decree, without respect to Adams future fal, but elects som before they are considered as sinners, sans respect to the ones faith or the others failing; as if prescience had no place in Prae­destination.

2. The Synod of Dort, Peter Moulin, and many English 2 Opin. Theologists defend, That God eternaly decreed to make Man holy and good; giving him perfect Free-wil: but foreseing he would by Satans tentation fal into sin, if he hindred it not; de­creed to permit it, and out of this lost lapsed lump, chos a cer­tain number to salvation, suffering the rest to perish in sin, whom he passeth by of free pleasure, but punisheth for just de­merits. Yet decreed to send his Son to redeem or sav the elect, and his Spirit to cal or sanctify them, that they may be glorified. The first sort are stiled Supralapsarians, having no respect to Adams fal, decreed to send his Son: so they grant prescience in order to preced Decree. This opinion freeth Gods justice on Infants dying unbaptised (which the first doth not) who hav no other desert of death but original sin.

This Tenet is scarce veritable or warrantable, which Refut. to defend divine justice, supposeth mankind corrupted, before any Decree of election passed; which seems needless: becaus ther be good and bad Angels without any corrup­tion or fal, and Christ was not in the lapsed lump, yet as man elected to life. It also supposeth Original sin to be caus of Reprobation, which is remitted to many Repro­bats condemned for actual sins, as Doctor Whitaker a­vers, it likewise teacheth, that Christ is sent to sav the elect only, as dying for them alone; who are to be caled by the Word and Spirit: but Reprobats being outwardly caled (who are barred from obeying) are more deeply condemned for refusing it; yet hav no power to embrace it, which is harsh do­ctrin.

3. Doctor Overald a late learned Bisshop, coined a new 3 Opin. Tenet, That God decreed to creat man good, but foreseeing [Page] his fal, appointed his Son to dy for al, and to cal men by his Word, offering Salvation to al: with common suffi [...]ient Grace to work Faith by the ordinary means, if they be not wanting to themselves: but knowing our infirmity that none would beleev by the common Grace; decreed to ad a more special effectual to whom he pleased, being chosen according to his purpos: wherby they shal not only be able, but actualy and necessarily beleev, being drawn by the Father irresistibly.

This is plausible, but scars solid: for that common Grace Refut. which savs none, is not Gospel Grace offered to al, nor deservs that name; nor indeed is any such, sith it never produced the effect: Nor can a special superabundant Grace be it, sith 'tis re­jected by none to whom 'tis offered: but tru Gospel Grace is received by som, and refused or resisted by others. Thes three Opinions infer a kind of despair into mens minds, becaus none shal be saved by that special Grace given to a few according to Gods secret purpos; which whether he intends to giv or not, the general promises cannot assure to any Soul.

4. The Lutherans with som Papists maintain, that God de­creed 4 Opin. to make Man a free Creature; but permit him to stand or fal; and to send his Son upon foresight of his fal for redem­ption of al, by a general conditionat Decree of Faith, Repen­tance, Perseverance; with a special absolut of electing such as he knew would beleev and persever under the means: but to pass by and damn the rest, whom he foresaw incredulous and impenitent; making Prescience or Prevision the occasion on which his Decrees proced.

This is faulty in som points: 1. Becaus ther is no such gene­ral Refut. conditionat Predestination. 2. Becaus the special Decree of Election makes Men chus God first, rather then God them, which is preposterous. 3. Becaus the Decree of Justification and Condemnation is confounded with election and Reproba­tion, which S. Paul distinguisheth. 4. Becaus it allows no more Rom. 8▪ 19. Grace given to the Elect then Reprobats, nor greater caus of gratitud. Yet this opinion rightly extends the objects of Pre­science, not only to Adams fal; but to Christ Incarnat, and be­leeved on in the World: to the last end of al that shal persever in Faith or unbeleef. This sutes with Scripture, which builds [Page 36] Predestination on Foreknowledg simply and properly taken at large: promising salvation to al beleevers which shal persever to the end. Thes four opinions (ech of which hath som peeces of truth) giv great light to this deep dark mystery: for the first 1 Pet. 1. 1, 2▪ holds forth Gods power or dominion: The next his Mercy and Justice: The third his Truth and special Grace: The last his Wisdom and Prescience: Yet al, with S. Paul, acknowledg his Judgments inscrutable, and waies past finding out; the depth Rom. 11. 32. wherof none can fathom.

5. Arminius (startle not, he is no Bugbear; but a lat learned 5 Opin. Protestant Professor at Leyden after Junius) taught, That God by his infinit intellect knew al things as possible to be, if he would giv them being: and among al conceived this visible World, with al Mankinds race, from first to last, every one in order, government, and event; yet only as possible, if he plea­sed: That som things might be necessary, som voluntary; som Causes, som Effects; som as ends, som as means; som his own acts, som of free Creatures; som good, som evil; som as re­wards, som as punishments: That he knew how to order and vary al, or any part or person; so as other effects or ends might be produced then thes now extant, if he otherwise willed: But deemed it good for manifestation of his Power, Wisdom, Ju­stice, Mercy, to put this Worlds frame and order of Mankind (then only as possible) in execution or being. That he foreknew if he should doo it, som particular persons would by this order of means be brought to eternal life; and others by neglect or disorder go to perdition through their own fault, if Justice be doon upon them. That foreknowing al, he determined of his absolut Wil and Pleasure to say F [...]at▪ and execut al which he in­tended in du time: and in so doing predestinated som to life, som to death eternaly. In reference wherto, S. Luke stileth the Elect such as are ordained to eternal life; and S. Jude cals Re­probats Acts 13. 48. thos that were of old ordained to condemnation. Under Jude vers. 4. this order is comprised the Creation of Man righteous, permis­sion of his fal, correction of his fault, means of redemption by Christ, caling and converting of a sinner; his Faith, Repentance, Perseverance, Blessings, Chastisments, Trials, and what els is found in order of any Mans salvation; or aversions and aber­rations [Page] from that order, wherby Men com to perdition.

Hence Predestination is defined to be a Preparation of Gods Definition. benefits, wherby al are delivered which are freed: Or (as Ful­gentius fuller) the preparation of Gods Works which in his eternal Providence he foreknew he would doo, either merci­fully or justly. Here two things are to be observed in the De­cree of Predestination: 1. An act of Gods understanding, in respect of things not in being, caled Prescience; which in order of Nature preceds al Decrees, as prespecified. 2. An act of his Wil, which is proper to Predestination: for God works accor­ding to the Council of his Wil, as S. Paul speaks. Thes two acts Eph. 1. 11. 1 Pet. 1. 1, 2. Rom. 8. 28. being coeternal, hav priority of order only, not of time; and Prescience put as the first link by S. Peter and Paul. This Tenet of simple Prescience previous to Predestination, advanceth al Gods Attributs more then the four former: 1. His Wisdom and Knowledg in foreseing not only his own Works, but thos of free Creatures, and al circumstances of each, how to govern them for his glory, in permission of sin, and obedience or resi­stance of Grace, that he may judg the World righteously▪ 2. His power in creating and governing al things, bringing light out of darknes, life out of death, happines out of misery. 3. His goodnes in making al good, and overcoming evil with good. 4. His universal Grace and Mercy in preparing a wa [...] of Redemption for al Men, who were becom slavs to sin and Satan; and ordaining means to apply or accomodat the same. 5. His truth in extending his promises to al that shal keep the Covenants or Conditions: for he is truth who speaks no other then as he ordains, nor intends otherwise then as he speaks. 6. His Justice in punishing al that use not the rectitud of their Nature, or benefit of Redemption offred. 7. His special Grace or singular lov in confirming them (as he did the good Angels) whom he foresaw would use his Grace if it were given, in em­bracing the means which should bring them to Glory: shewing less Grace to thos whom he foresaw would fail by their own incredulity, ingratitud or obstinacy; whom he could hav cured by bettering his benefits; but decreed to make Vessels of wrath by their own deserts. 8. His dominion and soveraign Lordship, in that being suprem Ruler, he orders al after his free pleasure; [Page 37] chusing or refusing whom he wil, becaus they wilfully forsake him: as Irenaeus saith, the Father excels in Wisdom, becaus he savs whom he ought, and judges such as are worthy of judg­ment: to be counted cruelty, considering his foregoing pre­venting goodnes. 9. It excluds Stoical Fate, which the three first Opinions making Mans salvation or damnation necessary by an antecedent absolut Decree, cannot possibly decline: wheras this, by placing it in order after Prescience, makes both infallible to his knowledg (which, as simple science, is no caus) but free and contingent to Man; who must work out his salva­tion by coworking with divine Grace; or incur damnation by refusing his Mercy extended to al. 10. It makes Gods Ele­ction absolut, immutable, and irrevocable, wherby he chuseth Man; and not contrarily: but the fourth opinion is liable to thes imputations. 11. It diverts despair on the one side (which too many fal into, supposing themselfs decreed to damnation) and prevents presumption on the other, which som confiding too far on infallable certitud of salvation and final perseverance, hav becom their own Butchers to accelerat their glory; as may be shewed by sundry instances in both kinds. 12. It ministers much matter of comfort to the Godly, which walk in the wais leading to life; confirming their saving Faith in Christ and lov toward God. Lastly, It magnifies the deepnes of Gods Judg­ments, and inscrutablenes of his Counsils: for who can conject, why he loved Jacob and hated Esau; or decreed to elect Peter and reject Judas; or savs one and suffers another to perish, who could dispose them to contrary ends? al which proceds from his Prescience; sith none is rejected, but upon prevision of re­fusing life offered; and ther is sufficient Grace in the means of conversion, to Remedy the weaknes or perversnes of depraved Nature: Nor is any decreed to salvation, but upon foreseen readines to accept life offered: and Gods general promises hav conditions, which Men by his Grace must observ on their part, if they wil partak the benefit.

For God decreeing to make Man a free Creature in al his Corollary. actions, and foreseing his fal, wherby he forfeted that liberty of Wil for himself and Posterity in al spiritual supernatural Gra­ces; permitted Men to use or abuse it in al other matters of this [Page] life (Natural, Moral, Civil) as Man had before his laps: Wher­by, according to his first precept or privilege of increas and mul­tiply; Parents beget Children in a corrupt Nature, but better or wors disposed and inclined: which is greatly altered and ad­dicted to Virtu and Vice by better or wors education, good or il company and divers other concurring circumstances. This makes som by pious tutorage becom more apt to embrace Gods Grace and cooperat with it, which draws willing, not nilling minds. But others by bad breeding, il company, and other lewd incentivs, grow obstinat and obdurat, like deaf Adders which wil not be charmed. Al which God in his infinit Omni­science foreseing, chos som to be Vessels of honor, and passed by the rest to perish in the suds of their sins, through wilful impie­ty, infidelity, and impenitency: for S. Paul makes Prescience Rom. 8. 29. the prime link of Predestinations golden Chain.

Next folow som particular points appendent to be briefly agitated, viz. Gods Knowledg, Wil, Providence, Predestinati­on, Election, Reprobation before Time: Creation, Govern­ment of Man under the Covenant of Works, Mans fal with its effects, Mans Government under the Covenant of Grace: by Caling, concurrence of the Word and Spirit, Conversion, Grace, Freewil, with both jointly, Regeneration, Perseverance, and last Judgment, al doon or to be doon in Time.

This is a large field, which tends to unfold the verity of this mystery. 1. For divine knowledg, S. James saith, known to God 1 Divine Knowledg▪ Acts 15. 18. 1 Pet. 1. 1, 2. are al his works from everlasting: S. Paul, whom he foreknew, he predestinated: S. Peter, To the strangers elect according to Gods foreknowledg. Som interpret Prescience by Precognition, presupposing lov or approbation, rather than simple science: but this is a very verbal nicity; for the Greek word (Prognosis) properly imports foreknowledg, but approbation arbitrarily: as when 'tis said, God knoweth (i. approveth) the way of the righte­ous; Psal. 1. 6. yet it folows not from the bare word: for if Peter and Paul make foreknow and predestinat, or foreknow and elect or ap­prov al one; then they refer the act of his Understanding to the Wil (yet our Wil is guided by the Intellect, and that by Judg­ment) imputing to Foreknowledg what properly belongs to Predestination and Election: fith approbation is more disco­vered [Page 38] by the Act of Wil, which is to Predestinat and Elect; then by that of understanding, which is to foreknow. Yet if with Origen, they wil join Prescience with his good liking or approving the subject foreknown, as capable of chusing; it shal be granted: for in Scripture only the elect are stiled Praesciti, not Reprobats; though they also are foreknown simply, but not with approbation, which hinders not his simple foreknow­ledg, nor infers any argument, that men are chosen for any good approved in them; nor that they must be chosen becaus good in Gods knowledg: For God might see many Worlds of Men (to be created, if he pleased, whom he hath covered in dark­nes of never being) so eligible as thos whom he hath chosen; sith to be eligible and elect are two distinct things, which doo not folow one another. For cleering wherof, his duple know­ledg of simple Intelligence (which is of al things possible or comprehensible by his Omnipotence) and of Vision (which is of things that shal be by his Decree depending on his Wil) must be wel weighed.

Here two doubts occur: 1. Whether the objects of thes 1 Doubt. Knowledges (possible and future) be divided, so that possibles pertain soly to pure Intelligence, and future to that of Vision? as if the same things cannot be first known as possible to simple Intelligence; and after as future (the divine Decree intervening to make them future) to be objects of Vision.

This is easily resolved, That knowledg is no caus of things, Resolution. unles his Wil concur: for 'tis not from his knowledg that things are, but only that they may be. Zanchy saith, God created al things, having the Idea, form, or model first in his mind: for what Artisan doth any thing, whos patern he conceived not be­fore? So S. Austin, God made nothing ignorantly, as no Ar­tist L. 11. de Civ. c. 10. or Architect doth: whence we see a kind of miracle, yet truth; that this World could not be known to us unles it had bin; but unles God had known it before it was, it never had bin. Dr. Prydeaux in his Scientia media saith, That God is caus of al things which he framed, not simply in himself; but by his Wil adjoined: For his knowledg of pure Understanding re­spects al things possible; that of Vision only future, which cau­seth al to be by concurrence of his Wil. So simple Intelligence [Page] preceds al acts of Wil, wherby the same things respected as pos­sible, are now looked on as future; becaus the act of his Wil supervening, makes them to be future in their times.

2. The next doubt is, whether future, contingent, conditio­nal 2 Doubt. things (specialy free acts of a created Wil placed in this or that order) be a subject of Gods simple Intelligence? becaus such as dislike the Jesuits Scientia media say, that the object hereof is nul, and therfore the knowledg taken away: for al acts of Free-wil are determined by divine Decree; so that God no otherwise foreknows they shal be, then becaus he decreed them to be.

This middle Science partakes more of simple Intelligence Resolut. then free knowledg; which sees no more then a possibility of things in futurition only, upon a supposition if God make them to be by his word Fiat. For al agree, That before God decreed to creat, he had a certain absolut knowledg of al things (pre­sent, past, future, contingent, necessary) together with al their connexions; and after knows conditionat things to com: but the Question is, whether he knows them by pure Understanding (which foreruns al Decrees of his Wil) that they shal absolutly be; or by Vision while they lay suspended under Gods free­pleasure, whether they should be or no? for God by his infinit essence knows what shal be necessarily, and what shal com to pass by his Wil. Bellarmin best resolvs both doubts, That God by his simple Understanding knew Man would fal if he were made, before he willed to creat him; for things necessary are in God first, then the voluntary: but 'tis necessary for God to know al things possible, els he cannot be Omniscient, and Vo­luntary only that he should decree to make Man. If then God hath a simple Intelligence, he can shew it in no act more then Predestination: for as 'tis the first and highest act of his Wil, so is that of his understanding; and the wisest Agent willeth no­thing but what he perfectly knew and understood.

Now the first Opinion excluds al use of Prescience, referring Application. al to his free Pleasure, which with al their fine distinctions and similituds can hardly free him from being the Author of sin. The secund acknowledgeth his simple Prescience of Mans fu­ture fal, if he were created, before he decreed to creat: but why [Page 39] they should not extend it to al Mens free acts so wel as to that one of the first Mans, no reason can be rendred. God foreknew if Christ were sent to the Jews, they would despise him; if Pe­ter should be tempted, he would deny him, even before he de­creed to send Christ, or to creat Peter. But if it be asked, Quest. how far this knowledg extended, before he decre [...]d ought con­cerning Men? Whether to the Creation of Mankinds mass in Adam or to the fal of al in him, or to Christs mission, or to Mens faith beginning and persevering to the end? Surely 'tis Answ. most sutable to Gods infinit Wisdom, Justice, and Mercy, to extend it unto al and over al ( universa & singula) even to the Worlds end, which agrees best with al his Attributs. This is al they intend, who refer Christ and faith in him to pure Presci­ence, before the act of Electing or Predestinating, not staying at the knowledg of Mans foreseen fal: not that they make Be­leevers faith any Caus of Gods Predestination; but only an ob­ject of his simple Prescience, concurring with his good pleasure and Wil, to make som Vessels of honor, and som of dishonor. Howbeit People are taught to admire or adore som Men as Oracles, and abhor others as Scorpions, whos Tenets they know not.

2. Touching Gods Wil, which Predestinats or decrees 2 Gods Wil. what of thos infinit things presented by his understanding shal com into being: for unles both Wil and Power conjoin, their being known is not enough to be: For Gods Wil being in it self one and simple (not duple, secret and reveled) may be consi­dered diversly, as conversant about divers things. 1. Som as to be doon by himself, or his own power; as the World to be cre­ated of nothing; his Son to be sent made of a Woman, &c. which never fa [...]l, becaus he works alone. 2. Som which he wils to be doon by his Creatures, either Natural Agents, as Flowers to grow by Sun; or Voluntary, as righteous Works to be wrought by sinful Men, but with his concurrence or coopera­tion: this often fails by the Creatures failing which he wils to work it; yet permits and not hinders the failing, as he could doo. 3. Som which he wils and doth of himself, or with others; as al the good we hav in Nature or Grace: part wherof he doth as leading or antecedent of his free goodnes, caled the Wil of [Page] his Mercy; part as folowing, led or urged, upon occasion of evil in the Creature; as to forsake punish or destroy; which is the Wil of his Justice. Thes may wel cohere; as a Merchants chief wil is in a storm, to sav al his goods; yet by a secund wil, casts som into Sea. So God wils al Men to be saved, as his Crea­tures; but permits som to perish, as impenitent sinners. The first act of Gods Wil in chusing things to be; and refusing the rest, of infinit variety, which might hav bin if he would, con­curs with his simple Intelligence; ther being an act of his Wil even in knowing; as David saith, God hath doon whatever plea­sed him: but the secund, wherby he decreed al things which concern Creation, Election, Reprobation, &c. presupposeth pure prescience, as previous in order of Nature, according to our apprehension.

3. Of Providence concerning Gods Decree or Wil in al 3 Providence and Predesti­nation. things sav about Man; and Predestination, wherby he decrees touching Man the principal part of his Providence (as Fortune concerns Man, and Chance al things els) which last is an act of his Wil from eternity, decreeing the ends of al Men, and means which he foreknew would bring them to thos ends of Life or Death. So by Predestinating som to thos means, which he fore­knew by their own obstinacy (not by any insufficience of the means, sith others by the same attain it) wil not bring them to Life, becoms a negativ Reprobation, by their own default or disobedience, or by their fault who hav charge over their Souls: but that God hinders it not or givs not effectual Grace (which he knew would sav them if given) proceds soly from his just Wil and free pleasure. Nor can this be rightly nicknamed Post­destination (as som aspers it) sith it folows his simple science: and knowledg is not of things absolutly to be, but conditionaly, if it pleas him to say, they shal be.

4. Anent Election and Reprobation, wherin God useth 4 Election and Reprobation. both Knowledg and Wil; as the Scriptures somtime stile the Elect from one of those whom he foreknew; somtime from the o­ther, thos whom he predestinated according to purpos or Wil: Rom. 11. 2. Rom. 8. 28. hence they may be described either way; viz. Election is a fore­knowledg of Gods benefits, wherby a man wil be saved, if they be given him: Or election is Gods purpos and Wil to giv Man [Page 40] thos benefits, by which he knows he wil be saved, if given him. So Reprobation is a foreknowledg of Gods benefits, under which a Man, through his own ingratitud wil perish, if no other be given or wil be given: Or 'tis Gods Decree, to giv a Man no other benefits then thos, under which he foreknows he wil by his own wilful ingratitud perish, if no other be given. Here Prescience looks precisely on Mans ingrat neglect of saving be­nefits, and Gods wil denies to giv any new, or more then thos which are ineffectual by their abuse or neglect. So God hath mercy on whom he wil, and hardens whom he pleaseth: giving to one Grace of repentance, and leaving the other in his cor­ruption, by withholding thos Graces, which he knows would sav him, if granted. Not as if he gav not sufficient to life; for he received the Graces given in vain, and God would confer no more: for to harden is not [...]o subtract al Grace sufficient to salvation, but to bar or withold that high hidden Grace of his Power and Wil, which he knows would convert and sav, if gi­ven; but that it would be refused. Thus Man first hardens his Psal. 95. 8. Exod. 8. 15. own heart (as Pharaoh did) by refusing Grace offered; and God secundarily, in not adding or increasing stronger Graces, which would mollify if given. But if they were extended to al, none could perish; for 'tis his pleasure to exercise Justice on wilful despisers of his sufficient Grace by making them Vessels of wrath; and mercy on thos whom he foresaw would obey his Cal. Let profound Hooker put a period to this point: That L. 5. part. 5. which moveth God to work is goodnes; which orders it, Wis­dom; which perfects it, Power; al things produced in their times were eternaly in him, as a work unbegan in the Artificer, which he after frameth: therfore whatever we behold in this World, was inwrapped in the bowels of divine Mercy, writ in the Book of eternal Wisdom, and held in the hands of Omni­potent power, the foundation being yet unlaid. So al things in that respect are his Of-spring (as S. Paul saith) being effects in Acts 17. 28, 29 their highest Caus, who also is actualy in them, and the assisting influence of his Deity their Life. Let hereto saving Grace be added, which begets a special Of-spring of Men, to whom he givs the gracious name of Sons. We are by nature Adams Of­spring, and God in creating him created us al, and so many as de­scend [Page] from him, hav the root from which they spring: But al are not Sons of God, nor any one sav by Grace and favor. The Sons of God hav his own Natural Son as a secund Adam from Heaven, and such as descend from him hav the root from which they spring, whos tru Progeny they are by spiritual birth. God therfore loving his Son eternaly, must needs lov eternaly & prefer them before al others, which since spiritualy sprung from him. Thes were in God as their Saviour, not as their Creator on­ly: It was the purpos of his saving Goodnes, saving Wisdom, and saving Power, which inclined toward them, such as were eter­naly in God by intended admission to Life, have God by voca­tion or adoption actualy abiding in them, as an Artisan is in the Work, which hand is presently to frame. We are therefore in God eternaly through Christ, according to that purpos, wherby we were chosen to be made his, through the knowledg had of us, and lov born towards us from everlasting; but are actualy no longer in God then from the time of our adoption into the body of the tru Church, or felowship of his Children: for he knows and lovs his Church; so that al which are in it, are therby known to be in him. For our being in Christ by eternal foreknowledg saveth us not, without actual adoption into the society of Saints here: for we are in him by actual incorporati­on into that Communion, which hath him for their Head. Thus he.

5. Things doon in Time are; Creation of the World, which was 5 Creation. Gods first act of Power, to execut in time his eternal Counsil and Decree: It is his whol frame of building perfected and fur­nished Rom. 1. 20. according to the model of his Mind, wherin he made manifest the invisible things of his Wisdom and Goodnes to his own Glory. Abov al he made Man to a more excellent end it his own Image, so far as was fit for a Creature to partake of di­vine Nature, that was to be good but mutable. This Image o [...] likenes appeered in three things: 1. Understanding. 2. Ho­lines or Righteousnes. 3. Immortality and Blessednes. The two first as perfections, the last as his end; being subalterna [...] one to another; viz. Understanding to Righteousnes, this to Blessednes, which is Righteousnes reward, and it the work o [...] willingnes.

6. Government of Man under the Covenant of Works, 6 Government which is the secund temporal act of Gods eternal Counsil; that Man might use his perfections, and attain the end: wherin God, as suprem Lord, was to command; and Man, as Vaslal, obey. Yet it pleased his Goodnes to com into Covenant with him, as a free Rational Creature ( Doo this, and thou shalt liv) caled the Covenant of Works. For the Natural moral Law, writen in Mans heart, comprised al works to be doon by him: but the positiv prohibitiv Precept ( not to eat of the Tree in the midst of the Garden) only a trial or experiment of his obedi­ence, and exercise of the moral Law duties in that one particu­lar; becaus Man was to observ them, and God to perform the Promiss or Covenant of life, if he kept them faithfully.

7. The fal of Man; who being tempted of Satan, broke that 7 Mans fal. one Mandat, and so becam guilty of al, becaus he consented willingly, having strength enough to resist it: But God fore­seeing it, decreed to permit and not hinder it, though he could. 1. Becaus he would not impair or imped the liberty of Wil gi­ven him. 2. Becaus it would the more manifest his own Good­nes and Glory, by providing a remedy for forlorn Mans ransom or redemption. 3. Becaus he knew it would oblige and make Man more thankful and careful to observ a new secund Cove­nant of Grace circumscribed with easy conditions.

8. Effects of the fal; wherof part is within Man, as original sin, 8 The effects of Mans fal. comprising the loss both of primitiv righteousnes & supernatural perfections; beside a decay of his natural faculties: Part without him, as the curs of the ground, the subject of his Labor; the miseries of this life; and death, both temporal and eternal. Thes effects fel on Adam and al his Posterity: sith he was not as one single person only; but Mankinds whol Nature: for God might justly hav rejected and condemned al the race in him the root, which brought so bitter fruits: Yet he promised Mer­cy to al that wil return to him, and prescribed means of remedy, If they wil apply them, being offered by Grace in his Son Christ Jesus, who died for the sins of al Mankind in general.

9. Government of Man under the Covenant of Grace; 9 Covenant of Grace. which God ordained to restore him, being falen, that his end of creating might not be quit frustrat by Satans fraud, though he [Page] L. 3. 0. 33. permitted it. Irenaeus saith, God ordered Mans salvation at his good pleasure, that he might not be overcom by the Serpents craft, to destroy al Mankind; nor his skil impaired to sav whom he willed. To this end he decreed, that the Womans seed shal break the Serpents head; wherby he might be reduced from Hel, and set in a fair way to Heaven; on condition of a new Cove­nant, tending to the same ends of righteousnes and life; which, partly by the remains of Gods Image, and partly by supply of his propitious help, he was capable to observ; els were the Co­venant vain. 'Tis caled a Covenant of Grace; yet tru or real, wherin both parties are to perform their parts. 1. God to send his Son and Spirit for Mans relief, to forgiv his sins, imput righteousnes, and giv life to al that shal obey his Son and Spirit: Jer. 31. 33. So Jeremy saith, This shal be my Covenant, saith the Lord: I wil put my Law into their inward parts, and write it in their hearts: I wil be their God, and they shal be my People. This is a Covenant of Grace, becaus freely pacted with Man a sinner, whos salvation is wrought rather by God then himself; being more in receiving then giving, and in beleeving then doing. 2. Man is to humble himself for his sins, to God the Creator; to beleev in Christ the Redeemer, and be led by the holy Spirit the Sanctifier. This part is unfolded in the Gospel, re­quiring Faith, Repentance, and new Obedience: Which Cove­nant was made to al Mankind in Adam and Eve as the stock of al their Seed. For som remnents of Gods Image (Life, Knowledg of good and il, liberty of Wil in Natural, Moral, and Civil things; Conscience accusing or excusing) are stil left after the fal: which, though given at Creation, and so belong to Na­ture; yet to retain them, is of Grace, both by giving capacity to contract or Covenant, and to be a beginning of his restaura­tion; but sith thes alone be not able to rais him or recover righteousnes, or keep the new Covenant by his old remains, God being no hard Task-master or Covenant maker, supplies by his Spirit what is farther needful to keep it, sith none is bound to impossibilities. Upon this keeping the new Covenant, depends the eternal Bliss or bale and wo of every Man, which he must obediently observ.

10 Caling. 10. Dispensation of the Covenant by Caling; which is a proclaming [Page 42] therof from time to time, by preaching the Word; els it would soon be forsaken, forgoten, and slighted. This S. Paul Rom. 8. 30. conjoins with Predestinating, as he puts Prescience before it: which is defined to be a revelation or proclamation of the Go­spel Covenant, injoining repentance toward God, and faith in the Lord Jesus Christ; promising remission of sins, and life eternal to al that obey. It consists of two essential parts or di­vine acts, to make one complet work of Vocation; viz. the ex­tern preaching of the Word (wherto belong Sacraments, Bles­sings, Corrections) and intern operation of the Spirit, accom­panying or assisting the outer means. This Caling hath bin di­spensed diversly by Gods Wisdom and good Pleasure, accor­ding to the difference of Times.

1. In the old Testament, before Christs coming; as an out­ward means and measure of the Spirits operation, with effects sutable to both: When the bounds were narrower, the Word obscurer, the Sacraments more mysterious, the Spirit more spa­ring, and obedience slenderer then under the new Testament: for from Adam to the Confusion of Toungs, the caling was universal, being al one language under the righteous Patriarchs: But afterward God permitting Men (which forsook their Re­ligious Ps. 147. 19, 26. Fathers) to walk their own waies; renewed his Caling or Covenant with Abram and his Seed, contracting the bounds Eph. 2. 12. of his Church. The Gentils then were al under wrath and Sa­tan, without God in the World, Aliens from the Covenant of Promiss. For as the Church excommunicats ungodly persons, so God excluds unworthy Nations for many generations, to punish their ingratitud and contempt of his Word; or to make future Ages cleav faster to him by default of former, being left to themselfs. The mystery of whos Judgments (why he one while shuts out Gentils, admitting the Jews; another extruds the Jews, receiving the Gentils) is admirable and inscrutable: Rom. 11. 25. 33 But why he left al to Covenant with Abram and his Seed, no reason can be rendred, sav only his free Grace, not of Works, but Rom 9. 10, 11. of him that caleth.

2. Under the new Testament, after Christs coming: which outwardly hath the Word and Sacraments, exhibiting Christ with his benefits more cleerly: And inwardly more abundant [Page] measure of the Spirit intended to multituds of Nations, with greater fruits of mens conversion then under the old Testament. This is termed the caling of the Gentils, when Jews were shut out, til their time shal com. Here Gods Judgments are to be admired, why he witholds from the Jews his inward illumi­ning Spirit and softning Grace, which he grants to Gentils? keeping stil his word or outer Caling, from many Nations which never heard of Christ, no more then the old Heathen: But we that be under the Grace of Gods caling, must be more thankful for it, and more careful that it be not conferred in vain upon us. Divers Divines make Caling duple: 1. Out­ward of the Word only, common to Reprobats, and never obeied with truth of heart, being ineffectual. 2. Inward of the Spirit joined with the Word, peculiar to the Elect and never disobeied, which is effectual. This is not orthodox, sith ther is but one Caling both of the Word and Spirit, as Body and Soul; which is effectual in it self to al under it: but if it fail, the fault is in the Caled, which obey it not: For the Spirit goes not so with the Word; as to make Man perform what he can by natu­ral strength, sith 'tis given to help Natures failings; but to keep it waking and attentiv: So if the Spirit be not present with the Word to som, 'tis becaus they are not present to it, through their stupid supine security. Nor is the concurrence of Word and Spirit natural, necessary, or inseparable; but free or arbitrary in Gods good pleasure. For as Grace is annexed to the Sacra­ments, so is it to the Word by divine ordinance: Hence the Church, before Sermons, prais for the Spirits illumining power, to concur with the Word; which God expects he should ask, who is to pray for himself and others. Another defect why the Spirit doth not stil work with the Word is, when 'tis not duly and diligently asked. Som also are past Grace, given to Repro­bat sens; to whom the Spirit is not present with the Word for former contempt or neglect in their Visitation, when God ca­led; who now givs them up to blindnes and hardnes, holding back the light of his Spirit and dew of Grace from the Word preached in their hearing; though Men know them not in par­ticular, and so admit al.

We must distinguish betwen the word Caling, Persons Ca­led, [Page 43] and operations of the Spirit with the Word in them. The Word is duple. 1. The Law, which hath two parts; viz. the 1 The Law. Precepts, to accuse or convince; and the Curs for al transgres­sors therof, to wound or kil. The Persons Caled by Gods Mi­nister, using the Law, are al natural unregenerat sinners; or Regenerats relapsed into grievous sins; who are either igno­rant of their evil estate, to whom Law-precepts must be preach­ed, to make them know their sin; or know it but are secure and sensless of their carnal condition; and to such the curs must be denounced. The Spirits operations on thes by Laws ministry, are to open their eyes and prick their hearts with fear of the Curs: which effects the Spirit, with the letter of the Law, or­dinarily produceth, by working on thos remains of light left in the mind, and of Conscience accusing: which works are wrought in many Reprobats, who hav som initial parts of Grace, as Papists grant.

2. The Gospel which hath a Precept to repent of sin shew­ed 2 Gospel. by the Law, and beleev in Christ, who givs life wher the Law-Curs killeth; with a Promiss of sins remission, and eternal life Acts 2 38, 39. to al that repent and beleev. The Persons caled in the words of the Gospel are al sorts of sinners; but convict, terrified, wound­ed, Mat. 11. 28. ful of compunction, and self-condemning; wrought by the Spirit in preaching the Law. The Spirits operations on such by the Gospels ministry, are to open their eyes to see the light of Gods marvellous mercy toward sinners; of Christs infinit lov in dying for them, the inestimable merits of his death; the pow­erful Gifts, Graces, and aids of the holy Ghost: To pour into sinners hearts hope, which shal stay them from desperat sinning: To inspire the Grace of praier, that they may escape the wrath to com, and receiv Gods favor: to beget repentance and work Faith; that they rely wholy on him, and cast themselfs into the arms of his goodnes, to be saved by him. Thes Graces the holy Ghost is stil ready to work by the Gospel in a repentant sinner, humbled and prepared by the Law: for what proportion of power the Spirit had in the Law on Unregenerats, to humble them; the same it hath in the Gospel on the humbled, to work hope and infer the other Graces of Praier, Repentance, Faith, Justification, Mortification, Vivification, and new Obedience. [Page] Howbeit if the Spirit is not present in preaching the Law, to giv Unregenerats strength of new obedience, becaus 'tis present to convince and condemn their wickednes: Nor is it present in preaching the Gospel to one not yet penitent or beleeving, to giv new obedience or work Peace, Joy, and Lov, as it doth in Beleevers; for such degrees com not per saltum. The sum is, Gods Spirit is annexed to his Word for such Gifts and ope­rations, as the hearer is a fit disposed subject to receiv: for God works by order of things antecedent or preparativ; which, if they find no admission, the subsequent are suspended. Hence coms the frequent just separation of the Spirit by the word by the great Pastor of Souls, who sercheth the heart and renes. To prov this point, that Gods Word in the Law and Gospel, is perfect and powerful to convert Souls, read Psal. 9. 7. Joh. 17. 17. Joh. 20. 21. 2 Cor. 3. 8. Heb. 4 12. wher the Gospel is caled the ministration of the Spirit▪ not of the Letter; becaus it givs what it commands: but the Law commands and givs no help: for, the Law was given by Moses (not hearts to receiv it) Joh. 1. 17. but Grace and Truth cam by Jesus Christ, saith S. John. To prov that Caling is al one to them that obey not and obey, Christs words are cleer; Many are caled, but few chosen: Here Mat. 22. 14. two sorts are specified; som caled, but not chosen; and som caled and chosen of thos many; yet the Caling one of both: which is not by the outward Word alone, for by it none are chosen; but by the Word and Spirit in common: So the few chosen excelled not in number or Caling, but in obeying when the rest refused, as the Sun hardens clay and melts wax. Christ saith, The Ninivets shal rise in judgment with this generation Mat. 12. 41. and condemn it: If Jonas preached without the Spirit, how did they repent? If Jesus preached without it, how is he greater then Jonas? If refusers be not al equaly caled, how can Nini­vets rise in Judgment? they can answer, we were not caled like you, by Gods voice speaking to the heart; but by Mans, barely to the ear: If God had excited us as he did you, we would re­pent as you did. The Jews exemple confirms the same, being yet uncaled; not becaus they liv without the Gospels sound, sith they convers scatterdly with Christians, and may hear Ser­mons or read Scriptures: but becaus they persist obdurat, and [Page 44] reject the illumining softning Spirit, often offered: therfore the distinction of Caling into outward ineffectual; and inward effectual is fals or frivolous. Bare preaching may be a comman­ding, like the Law; not a Caling, as the Gospel: for God may stil require obedience as a natural duty, sith he created Man able; but becaus the new Covenant cals Men to Faith and Re­pentance, being unable to rise or recover of themselfs; it were a mock, and no cal to say, turn, repent, beleev, and liv, unles som Grace be prepared to doo it. The effect of this Caling is ascri­bed to one caus chefly, the Spirits operation; yet ther be mo, and if any fails, the effect fals: for obedience to Gods Caling is an act of Mans wil, under aid of the Spirit, which is oft refused or resisted, and Grace offered in vain; sith God doth not cross the cours of the secund Causes, established at first. It also makes Gods Covenant differ from al other, in which no party per­forms al, but ech a part for himself: wheras here God is made to perform al pacts and promises for both; who only under­takes to make his conditions feasible, and afford his help so far as is needful, as Isaiah intimats: For 'tis not safe to rely soly on Isai 59. 21. Gods absolut Wil, as if we were tied to nothing; or to gul our selfs, as if God required nothing of us: For this Covenant of Grace hath som conditions for Man to fulfil, which by Gods universal Grace he is able to doo, as shal be shewed.

11. Conversion of a Sinner (which is the end of Gods Ca­ling 11 Conversion Men by the Word) is the obedience of him that is Caled; for he must hear and obey, els no conversion. The terms a Quo & ad Quem, are from Satans power to God, viz. in his mind from darknes to light; in wil, from Idols to serv the living God, Acts 26. 18. and in his whol life from unrighteousnes to holines. This con­version is duple: 1. When a natural Man is regenerat and made a Member of Gods Church, as the Gentils, being Aliens, were converted. 2. When a Regenerat faling into sin returns 1 Thes. 1. 9▪ Acts 1 [...]. 3. by repentance; as Peter, being converted after his Ap [...]stasy, was bid strengthen his Brethren. The prime principal Caus of Luke 22. 32. Lam. 5. 21. conversion is Gods holy Spirit working on a sinners heart, both at beginning, middle, and end: The ordinary instrumental, is the word preached: the adjuvant means are the cross that cha­stens, Jer. 31. 18. blessings which draw or allure others praiers, and exem­ples [Page] of Men already converted. The main scruple is, what part a sinner to be converted bears in it, being a living rational sub­ject, whether he be Activ or meerly Passiv? whether he can further or hinder it? whether, supposing two equaly Caled, one may be converted and not the other? if so, whether it riseth from God or Man?

12. Gods Grace is al that proceds from him of free favour, 12 Free Grace universal. tending to a sinners salvation: wherby is not meant the remains of Nature (as som light of Reason, sens of Conscience; though thes by Grace, were left after the Fal) nor the Law describing the righteousnes of Works, though the Preacher of Grace useth it to prepare a sinner for Christ; nor the bare outward Word of the Gospel, though cal'd the Word of Grace, becaus inter­nal Grace goes with it: but only the inward illuminations, teachings, tractions, motions, operations, inspirations, and gifts of the holy Ghost, merited by Christ for Adams sons, in their time and order, to rais them faln, and sav them lost; which S. Austin terms the Grace of Christ. For in Man is no merit of Grace, but only an occasion of God to shew it; which yet he is free to receiv or refuse: Nor is the good use of former Graces any merit or caus of giving mo; which are so freely gi­ven as the first, els Grace were no Grace. This Grace being one in essence, hath divers denominations, according to the difference of relations and effects: the most usual distincti­on is into preventing, working, or exciting Grace; and folow­ing, coworking, or helping: but to divide it into sufficient and efficacious, is an idle buz: For how can it be Grace or suffici­ent, which never produceth any effect? sith if it becom effe­ctual, it loseth the name of sufficient, and is one with the other; for al Grace in it self is sufficient or efficient alike; but the defect in the subject or som other caus: Yet Grace may be caled effe­ctual from the event as issuing from Gods special mercy guided by Prescience, not els. Lapsed Man hath a necessity of Grace, as S. Austin maintains against Pelagius, who denied original sin, or any loss to Adams Of-spring by his fal; holding Mankind so sound as God made it, as ther needs no Grace: al which are gross errors. For Man without God, can doo no good, becaus the Commandments are beyond his strength without Grace, [Page 45] to which nothing is impossible: and 'tis most just the Creature should rely on the Creator, that he may stil apply to him. The Air is not a lucid body like the Sun; for then it would continu so stil in absence of his light: So Man is illightned by Gods pre­sence; but in his absence immediatly darkned, whom we forsake wilfully. The power of Grace is glorious, such as wrought in Christ when he rose from the dead; whence our conversion is Eph. 1. 19, 20. caled a new Birth, a new Creation, and first Resurrection. For the power to Wil good, is created again as at first; sith our in­deavors are vain unles they be stirred, and void unles helped, as Bernard saith. The habits of Faith and Lov are no more in our Rom. 7. 18. power, then a blind Man can giv himself sight: he may hav pre­sent to wil; but to doo what the Law injoins he finds not, ex­cept the Spirit help him: So that when we are ready to receiv Phil. 2. 12. 1 [...]. Gods mighty power, he works and givs our desire: hence S. Paul exhorts to work our Salvation, having power given to work, by him which works both to wil and doo. Yet when Man wilfully resists his power, he yeelds out of wil, not weaknes; and lets him fal into a reprobat sens, who wil not necessitat or hold up any in obstinat disobedience: for that power which builds up supernatural things, doth not destroy natural; such as is the liberty to disobey being before the Fal.

Touching universal Grace, Origen extends it to al Men and Devils, whom S. Austin refuts. Huber held universal Ele­ction, 2 de Civ. [...] that Christs death brought al into state of Salvation, whom the Lutherans and Synod of Dort condemn. Andradi­us and other Papists say, that Ethnics hav sufficient saving Grace by Natures light; which if they use wel, Gospel Grace shal be reveled to them.

Al which are evident errors, but three Orthodox: 1. That 3 Pregn [...] Points. as Christ took the Nature of Man (not of Angels) so he paid the price of Redeeming al Mankind, as our common Catechism teacheth; I beleev in God the Father, who made me and al the World; in God the Son, who redeemed me and al Mankind; and in God the holy Ghost, who sanctifies me and al the Elect. 2. That the promiss of the Gospel is universal to al within hearing, and may be seriously profred to al Men, as 'tis preached to Pagans: for our Church wils al to receiv the Promisses, as they be gene­raly [Page] held forth in holy Scriptures. 3. That with the Promiss and Word of the Gospel, ther goes ordinarily sufficient Grace of the Spirit, to work beleef and obedience in al under the Go­spel: but that al doo not obey, proceds from Men, being want­ing [...] Cor. 2. 1, 2. to Gods Grace; not for any defect on his part, as S. Paul plainly provs. Now wheras 'tis said, how Christ laid down his life for his Sheep, for Gods Children, and for his Church; but elswhere, that he died for al, Men interpret as they list or like: yet must such Texts be cautiously and conscientiously construed, lest they clash one against another. It may wel cohere, that God in mercy to Mankind, sent his Son to dy for al, being no accepter of persons; willing primarily to sav al: but foreseing the fruit or success of his death, that som would thankfully em­brace it, and the rest not, he accepted even thos few, and sent his Son by a secundary wil to sav them in whom he would glorify his bounty; who could hav changed the cours of his Graces and Government to sav mo, if he pleased. Hereof S. Chryso­stom speaks; 'tis meet every one be no less thankful, then as if Christ cam into the World for his sake only, sith he would not refuse it even for one: so mightily he lovs every particular with the same measure of affection, as he doth al Mankind: therfore he was offred a Sacrafice for our whol Nature, which he assu­med into his Person; being sufficient to sav al; but wil be useful or available only to Beleevers: yet was he not scared from this dispensation for the paucity; but as the Feast was prepared for Luke 14. 16. &c. al, yet such as were invited would not com; the Lord did not presently take away what was provided, but caled in al sorts of Guests: So doth God. S. Austin saith, as to the valu or virtu of the price, so far as concerns al Mankind; Christs blood is a Redemption of the whol World: but such as liv without Faith and the mystery of new Birth, are Aliens therto. When therfore by that one Nature of us al, which he took for al our sakes, we are truly said to be al Redeemed, yet not al freed from capti­vity: for the cup of immortality hath enough to profit al, yet to such as wil not drink, 'tis nothing profitable.

13. Free-wil is more debated then wel discerned, how far the 13 Freewil. Liberum ad [...]. prints remain since Adams fal. 'Tis a natural power in a Rati­onal Creature to wil or nil, chuse or refuse, be it good or evil. [Page 46] This is looked on with great prejudgment, and by Dr. Abbot somtime Bishop of S [...]rum scornfully stiled Tomsons strumpet: but sundry Fathers stifly defend hir as the Hand-maid of Grace, against the Manichees and other Heretics. 'Tis a tru saying, If ther be not Grace, how shal God sav the World? and 'tis as tru; if ther be not Free-wil, how shal he judg the World, sith al shal be judged according to their free works? Free-wil to good was a faculty in the first Mans Soul, corroborat [...]d or guarded by the gift of super [...]atural Grace, which God con­ferred to make him wil good more cheerfully and constantly: but he by wilful disobedience lost this indowment, and the very freedom of wil to any good of the highest kind: as to lov G [...]d abov al, to work righteousnes of the Law, or doo any spiritual act sutable to thos, as to repent, beleev, obey: yet som freedom to Human, Natural, Moral, Civil acts remains stil, with out­ward good acts of Religion, as to frequent the Church, hear Sermons, kneel at praier, &c. which any Man can doo as he learns Sciences in Schools. So al freedom of wil to spiritual su­pernatural good is forfeted in Mans Nature faln, unles it be re­newed or restored by Grace of Christ, which goes with the Gospel: but if the Son make us free, we shal be free indeed; els not.

Ther is a triple spiritual good, wherto freedom is restored by Grace: 1. That which the Law commands, as righteousnes and tru holines: in this Free-wil is lost, and not immediatly re­stored by Grace, til after one is justified and made a new Crea­ture. 2. That which is suppositivly, not simply good; when sin is committed (as Aristotle saith, blush [...]ng is good ex hypoth [...]si) as compunction, terror, sens of guilt, conscience accusing: freedom of wil hereto remains in a sinner, who is oft stru [...]k with fear, as Adam fled and hid his head. 3. That whi [...]h th [...] Gospel com­mands, as to repent and beleev: herein Man hath no Free-wil left, but the same Gospel brings freedom two waies: 1. By framing the Commandments so facil or feasible to the wils weaknes, as may be a proportion between it and them; wherby Gospel Grace shal apply or accommodat the work to the Workman, or task to the Laborer. 2. By giving the Wil so much help or power as is requisit to inable a sinner, though it [Page] be a task so hard and heavy as the works of the Law. To repent of sin, beleev in Gods Mercy, and rest on his Sons merits, seem to be acts very mercifully prepared, as fittest to a sinners weak condition: yet this way of freedom is not so evident as the later, which prevents the wil, and prepares it by infusing Grace, to wil spiritual good required, in that order or proportion as is prescribed to depraved Nature assisted by Grace, which brings power with it to quicken the dead, strengthen the impotent, and loosen the Captiv: wherby Gospel Precepts are made lya­ble to be obeied by Man lapsed, which the Law doth not inable: so that none can be excused in disobeying them, for want of power to repent or beleev.

Free-wil on the left hand to evil, is under Gods Grace or notwithstanding it; wherby one may wil good, or decline to evil. This in Adam was a single innocent possibility or a Crea­tures mutability toward evil; sith God only is immutably good. So Adams supernatural Grace given to corroborat him, did not immobilitat his wil to evil: for he is prais-worthy, who can transgress and wil not; not he that is good, and can be no other; as som say Grace cannot be resisted. This natural free­dom to evil (caled resistentia connata) remains in Man falen, and is not removed by Grace; but ther is added resistentia ad­nata, or a precipitat proclivity to evil, by thraldom to Satans tyranny and dominion. So the natural freedom to sin, is not in it self evil; but the use and practis only: yet prones to evil, and servitud to sin, which is in us since the Fal, is evil. Thes differ so much as a mortal man living, and one actualy dead: The first Grace takes not away in this life, but essais to remov the other, and to weaken or restrain it; preserving the natural freedom to evil stil. This Doctor Baro, in his learned Lectures on Jonas ac­curatly unfolds, which must be carefully heeded in this dark Theory.

Free-wil (as Doctor Charlton in his abstruse Treatis inscri­bed, The darknes of Atheism dispeld by Natures light shews) is not taken in Tullies sens, for a liberty to liv as every one lists; nor as the Civil Law intends, for freedom from servitud: but for what is properly in Mans power or disposing, to elect or re­ject what object he wil, good or evil: which concerns only [Page 47] Mans natural condition; wherto in equity, the reward of Piety or Virtu, and punishment of Impiety or Vice is soly du. This liberum Arbitrium is not only an assent or approbation, but an adhesion to that abov others, which the Mind or Intellect shal chus: for the essence of it consists primarily in the Rational fa­culty, and dependently on the Wil; which in it self is blind or undiscerning, except guided by the Intellect to inform and con­duct it. Som Divines say Mans wil is most free, when 'tis so fixed on the chief Good, as it cannot wil Evil, becaus the dile­ction and fruition of that is voluntary, and therfore free. This is an evident error, by confounding spontaneous and voluntary actions: for a spontaneous is a blind impuls of Nature, ground­ed on no foregoing deliberation; as Fire spontaneously mounts up, Bruts mov from place to place, Infants suck; without rati­ocination or liberty of wil: but a voluntary arbitrary action depends on previous deliberation, dijudication, and delection; which is free indifferently to Good or Evil: So that if the ap­petit be restrained only to Good; it may act spontaneously (as a stone movs downward) but not arbitrarily ad utrumlibet. They say the appetit confined to good is volent, and therfore free: but this volence is a meer libence, free from coactiv vio­lence; no tru liberty to chus several objects; and therfore not arbitrary, becaus bar'd of indifferency. They reply, that 'tis the perfection of Free-wil so to embrace Good, as not to be capable of evil. Tru, 'tis the perfection of Mans wil or appetit, so to enjoy tru Good (specialy the chief) that nothing can divorce or divert it to seek any counterfet: Yet this is not the wils li­berty to either; nor incident to Man in this life, being a beati­tud of Souls separat, which hav no other object sav the tru Summum Bonum, nor other appetit then a ful fix'd dilection therof.

Thus Wil is guided by the Intellect, and this by Judgment which it givs concerning Good & Evil objects; that this is good and that evil, or this more and that less good. So when the wil is averted from one and converted to another; that mutation proceds from mutability of Intellectiv Judgment, which is now for one thing and anon for another: for the Intellect makes use of som notions caled simple apprehensions, wherby it givs judg­ment [Page] of their Natures; as it hath a prenotion what Hony is, and what sweetnes; yer it can judg Hony to be sweet: But though in matters of speculation it relies on this simple Judg­ment, nor can infer farther by necessary consequent: yet in ob­jects reducible to action it hath a compound notion caled Pro­position or Enunciation, immediatly annexed to the former simple notion and superadded as a Conclusion, which is caled Practical Judgment: as when it judgeth Hony sweet, it ads a secund complex notion, if sweet 'tis to be tasted; and infers in­stantly a Conclusion, that Hony may be tasted. Now becaus practical objects are singulars, the Intellect givs judgment that this present Hony is sweet; and secundly infers that 'tis to be tasted, wherto the wil assents and chuseth it. Hence Aristotl [...] L. de motu Animal. c. 7. allows no distinction between an action or execution, and a Conclusion; becaus this resulting from two Propositions is the very action, which he provs by several exemples: So this Con­clusion which is the action it self, wherto the execution co­heres, is caled Practical Judgment. This action or execution of a Judgment cannot succed, unles the appetit or wil concurs: so that every judgment or notion of Good hath annexed an ap­petition of that Good; and every judgment of Evil, an aversion from it. So soon then as the Intellect judgeth a thing to be sweet, and therfore to be tasted; up riseth the appetit and wils actual degustation of this sweet presented, wher both Intellect and wil conjoin. Thus when the Intellect givs judgment of Good (which is the Wils proper object) the Wil is instantly incited to desire fruition, which folows on the heels of Judg­ment, as a shadow attends the Suns body: so that if the one judg it good, the other desires it; if evil, the Wil declines it. Now becaus the Intellect is mostly fickle or inconstant in judgment, the Wil no less wavers or varies in appetition: so that when the one to day judgeth a thing good and to morow evil; the other affects it to day and abhors it to morow: so the Wil conforms wholy to the Intellects judgments concerning Good or Evil.

Good is duple: 1. Tru or real. 2. Seeming or counterfet. So evil is either realy so, or gilded with the specious shew of Good. Hence Cicero aptly compares it to a Ballance, which if [Page 48] Geometricaly adjusted by dimidiation, is indifferent to be de­pressed at either end or extrem, and so forced from its equilibry, or depressed at that side on which the greater weight is laid: As the contrary end may be depressed by over-poising it with a greater weight: Semblably the Intellect is in it self indifferent, and inflected to that object, wherto the greater appeerance of Verum & Bo­num. Truth or Good adheres; as it can upon a greater appeerance of either reflect to a secund, being stil led by verisimility: for the Wil is as the Needle, and Intellect the Magnet, by whos verticity it turns parallel to the point of Good, whether real or appa­rent. Or the Wil is as a Mariner, and Intellect the compass by which she steers. For the Wils indifferency is but a shadow or representativ of that indifferency congeneal to the Intellect; and consequently the determination of that indifferency in the Mistriss, causeth a like determination of indifferency in the Maid, to this or that object. For oftimes our Minds are equili­brated betwixt two judgments, or waver betwen two objects equaly attractiv: which fluctuation riseth, becaus the weights of reason are equal on either side, that the Mind can acquiesc in the election of neither. Hence three excellent consequents oc­cur. 1. That so oft as the Intellect having embraced tru judg­ment, quits it to pursu a fals one; so oft somthing intervens, which diverts the genuin appeerance from a good object to an evil one, and so causeth a mutation of the Intellects assent or judgment. 2. That the change of the objects appeerance, is sole immidiat caus of the Intellects varying in judgment and as­sent. 3. That the Wil is hereby obliged to conform to the In­tellects guid or conduct; whos flexility flows from the others flexibility. So 'tis in vain to attempt a change of the Wils ap­petition, til care be had to change the Intellects judgment: Or to make the one constant in appetition, unles the other be set­led in judgment. Thus he of Free-wil in general.

14. Of Grace and Free-wil jointly, which cooperat in every 14 Grace and Freewil. Phil. 2. 13. spiritual work: wherin three Principles or Axioms are to be declared. 1. That in all their operations at our first conversi­on, or in every good work; Grace is stil prime principal Lea­der from first to last: But Mans Wil never works first, not a­lone; being as a wheel in a Mil, which is kept going by the wa­ters [Page] motion, and that staying it soon stops: So is this kept working by Gods Grace, which flows from his goodnes or de­sire of our salvation. 2. That when Grace works on Mans Understanding, Wil, or Affections; it preservs the natural po­wers, properties, and motions of a Reasonable Creature: for it destrois not Nature but helps it; nor doth Nature repel Grace, but receivs it. Though then the habits of Faith, Hope, Charity be infused by God, and not acquired by human industry; yet are inspired after the manner of Acquisits; becaus instilled by means of hearing, praying, meditating, reading, studying, and endeavoring. For so saith S. Austin, not I, but Gods Grace [...] Grat. & [...]. [...]b. c. 5. with me: that is, not I alone, nor his Grace alone; but both jointly; sith he that made thee without thee, wil not sav thee without thee. 3. That in al operations of Grace, Mans Wil is to rely on God, as the Creature on the Creator; Receiver on the Doner; Weak on the strong; Imperfect on the Perficient; and Supplicant on the Lord: as the Earth depends on Heaven for rain, heat, and influence: which when Man neglects, rejects, or forgets; he is dry, void, and barren of al spiritual fruits, by his own fault.

The imperfect work on Mat. 6. saith, Lo, how appositly Homil. 14. Christ speaks: he saith not Father sanctify thy name in us, bring thy Kingdom to us, thy Wil be doon of us; lest God should seem to sanctify himself by Men, or bring his Kingdom on whom he lists, or make his Wil be doon of whom he pleaseth; and in that regard be an accepter of persons: Nor did say, Let us sanctify thy Name, take thy Kingdom, doo thy Wil; lest it should seem to proced from Man only: But he speaks inde­finitly or impersonaly, Holowed by thy Name, thy Kingdom com, thy Wil be doon, to shew how needful the work of both is; becaus Man hath need of God, and he is helpful to Man in per­forming righteousnes: For as Man can doo no good without Gods help, so he works no good in Man except he be willing: as if he had said, if ye doo thes things, if ye pray for thes, ye are worthy of such a Father, who wil giv them.

To try the truth, take thes four Propositions. 1. Mans Wil, without Grace, can and doth Wil and perform spiritual good: this is Pelagius's Heresy, condemned by the whol Church. [Page 49] 2. Mans Wil, without Grace, cannot wil good; but being in­abled by it, can after, sans farther Grace, both wil and perform alone: this is the Massiliens or Semipelagians error. 3. By or through Gods Grace working on the Wil, it can both wil and doo good; but not without it, nor can continu without far­ther assisting Grace: this is truly orthodox, which subjoins Mans Wil to Gods Grace in willing and acting good. 4. The Wil, by or through Grace working on it, cannot but wil and perform good: this S. Austin held in heat of arguing against Pelagians and Massiliens, who fel too far into the extrem, like such as bow a crooked stick back to make it streight, as S. Chry­sostom compares. S. Austin asserted, that Grace affords such help to the Predestinat, as they were not only unable to perse­ver without it; but by means of it could not chus but perse­ver.

The state of the Question (which if rightly put, is like an Hebr. 6. 16. Oath to end strife) consists about the maner and measure, how Grace works on the Wil, or with it? whether the Wil co­operats, as the third Proposition holds; or whether it so works that the Wil must needs concur, as the fourth avers? For ex­plaining wherof, Grace meant in the third, shal be stiled effici­ent; that in the fourth (which works necessarily or infallibly, causing the Wil to consent) efficacious, Which in tru terms is, whether Grace be resistible, or not? If it be so prevalent or Of resisting Grace. prepotent, as it carries the Wil to obey willingly (if that be willing which cannot doo otherwise) the fourth is tru: But if Grace be only an efficient, adjuvant, prior Caus; and Mans Wil prepared by it, a cooperant secund Caus in the work of Conversion; which may fail, resist, or disobey; then the third is more authentic. To prov it for brevity sake, read Acts 5. 32. Acts 7. 5. Rom. 10. 16. 2 Cor. 9. 13. Gal. 3. 1. Gal. 5. 7. 2 Thes. 5. 8. Al which places are most plain, that one may dis­obey Gospel Grace. Dr. Ward, a stif Stickler for effectual Grace, defines thus: We freely confess, that neither operating, nor cooperating Grace, at Conversion or after; doth take off from Mans Wil the power to resist, if it wil: for resistibility is natural born with us, and inseperable from the Wil, as a nativ faculty: but 'tis not questioned simply, whether God in the [Page] work of Conversion or any other doth mov the Wil resistibly, for that's granted: only the maner of resistibility is in contro­versy; wherin we say, when God works in the Wil ipsum Velle to wil, Grace produceth non resilience, which is effected by cer­tain knowledg and prevalence of delight, as S. Austin saith. Therfore we avow actual resistence to be taken away for that time, sith 'tis impossible such should stand with effectual Grace: for two opposits (the Wil to be wrought on by effectual Grace, and to resist it at once) cannot coexist; which were to make the Wil obey and resist at one instant. Thes shif [...]s pass current among Partialists: but he saith al the Controversy is about the maner or resistibility, which indeed is none at al: for al grant resistibility or power to resist, is not removed by Grace: the Question only is of actual resistence or maner of not resi­sting: wherin none is so silly to say, that when the Wil yeelds actualy to Grace, ther is then any renitence; sith contingence is not when things are in Esse, but before they were so, whether they might not possibly be otherwise: that is resist, when it did obey? so the debat lies in resistibility before the act of good or evil, not in it: for a Regenerat may sin resistibly, not in the very moment of willing it; but becaus he could hav resisted yer he willed it. So a Convert obeyeth Grace, or willeth his conversion resistibly; becaus yer he willed it, he could hav re­sisted: els why doth S. Paul so seriously exhort not to resist the Spirit? Sin may be resisted, but not after consent: so may Grace, but not when the Wil ha [...]h embraced it: for to be actu­aly received, and then resistible, cannot cohere. Howbeit if non­resistence be granted, 'tis dub [...]ous what the caus is, and wherin it consists; whether in effectual Grace, or effectual Wil? for what is said of the one, may be verified of the other; sith when it obeys, 'tis impossible it should wil to resist; but it may before. Nor can any tel by the very act of obeying, which is caus of non­resisting: for put either to remov resistence, 'tis surely gon by consenting: and it seems Wil is [...]h [...] proper caus which ends re­sistence. 1. Becaus effectual Grace is n [...]men sine re, which cannot determ in the Wil without destroying it, whos nature is to determin it self. 2. Becaus to resist or not, are special acts of the Wil: as to convert, repent, beleev, belongs to Man, who [Page 50] converts, repents, beleevs; for God promiseth only to circum­cise Deut. 30. 6. the heart; and Man is bid to circumcise his own heart: so De [...]t. 10. 16. God promiseth to put a new Spirit into Man; and Men are in­joined Jer. 4. 4. Ezek. 11. 1 [...]. to make them a new heart and Spirit, both being evan­gelical. So the promiss implies or supposes an impotence in us to doo supernatural acts; tendering Gods power, assistance, and operation to incourage us: but the Precept imports som power in us, under his assisting Grace, to indeavor or doo som­what toward thos acts, which appeer to be ours, becaus they sa­vour of our imperfections. Hence we stil accuse our selfs, complaining on the weaknes of Faith (Lord, I beleev, help my unbelief) coldnes of lov, pride of heart; yet God givs Faith, Lov, Humility, who is al perfect. Why then doo we not ra­ther magnify his Goodnes and Graces, if he doth al; then in­gratly disgrace them, as being impotent or imperfect? sav only becaus we hav impaired or made them defectiv by being want­ing to Grace.

Let sweet Bernard, a magnifier of Grace, end this point: Grace so operats with Free-wil, as it only prevents in the first act, and accompanies in the rest; but is so far preventing, as it even cooperats with Grace; yet so, that what is begun by Grace alone, is perfected by both alike: so they work jointly, not se­veraly; together, not by turns in particular degrees: not partly Grace, partly Free-wil; but ech jontly performs the whol. Free-wil doth al, and Grace al; but as the whol is wrought in the Wil▪ so is it wholy doon by Grace. Thus he; which is the t [...]u state of the whol debate.

This wil better appear by consistence of Grace and Free-wil in Mans four estates. 1. Of Nature sound. 2. Of Nature lap­sed. 3. Of Nature renewed. 4. Of Nature glorified: which sh [...]l be particularly agitated, together with the order of a sin­ners Conversion.

Man, at Creation, had to wil or nil naturaly: by supernatural Grace to wil more fully, which took not away the natural po­wer to nil: by Sin both natural and supernatural power to wil wel is lost; but to nil naturaly remains, and to nil supernatu­raly augmented: By preventing Grace to wil is restored; to nil both naturaly and supernaturaly remaining stil: by assisting or [Page] recovering Grace both to wil and doo; but to nil naturaly and work contrarily by augmented nilling: by Grace of Regenera­tion to wil and doo, more fully augmented; but natural nilling remaining, and augmented nilling diminished: in state of Glo­ry, Man by the beatisic Vision wils and doth perfectly, al nil­ling being removed.

Hence 'tis cleer, how Grace and Free-wil concur or cohere in Nature sound, depraved, renovated, and glorified: For Man under Nature corrupted without the Law, hath his Mind bound, Wil obstinat, Life impure, Conscience stupified; being the most wretched Son of wrath, yet not knowing his misery. Man under the Law (as it refers to Grace) acknowledgeth his sin in Mind, and hath compunction of Conscience by the spirit of fear, being less miserable becaus conscious therof. Man under Grace Caling, preventing, working, learns by the Gospel the Mercies of the Father, Merits of the Son, Helps of the holy Ghost, wherby he conceivs hope of salvation; desiring as a sick Patient, to be cured, having no power to doo it. Man under Grace of Regeneration being helped wils, willing beleevs, be­leeving is justified and saved: whos endevors are vain, unles holpen; but being heales, takes up his bed, and the Just livs by his Faith. Man, under protecting and perfecting Grace, is joi­fully thankful for it received, watchful over his wais, strong to resist Satan, fighting against tentations, fervent in praier, root­ed in Faith, and persevering in holines. Lo, thou art healed; sin no more, lest wors betide thee. Obdurat Sinners (whos Freewil resists divine Grace) are of several sorts. 1. Al such as be out of the Church uncaled, of whom 'tis said, whom he wil Rom. 9. 18. Rom 2. 12. Deut. 29. 19. he hardens, and thos that sin without the Law, shal perish with­out the Law. 2. Thos which harden their hearts against the Law, who hide, excuse, or defend their sins, presuming on peace and impunity. 3. They that being wounded by the Law, de­spair of Evangelical Mercy, and commit al wickednes, as Cain and Judas. 4. Such as receiving hope of salvation by the Gos­pel, abuse the riches of Grace to wantonnes, and d fer repen­tance or conversion. 5. Al that being ingrat for Grace recei­ved, and given over to security or carnal lusts, neglect praier; or shaken with fear, deny the Faith; or tempted by Satan, fal [Page 51] into hainous sins: who are in danger of damnation, unles they Ezek 18, 26, 27 return to God by a new act of Faith and Repentance to be ju­stified by him. In every of which degrees, Gods severity hath just occasion to desert Man, and not proced to procure his conversion, or assist his Wil; but if he doth, 'tis of superabun­dant Grace.

Here som doubts occur concerning Caling or Conversion, what part a sinner to be converted bears in it? Whether he is activ or passiv, and how far? Whether he can further or hin­der it? Who puts the difference, God or Man? To thes it is briefly answered: 1. That he is passiv, in having the Law and Gospel preached to him; but activ in hearing or attending. 2. That he is passiv in receiving impressions of fear by the Law, and hope by the Gospel; but activ in nourishing them, by co­working with Grace, or cashiring them from his heart by dis­obeying. 3. He is passiv in admitting good thoughts, holy de­sires, & power to wil; but activ in ruminating on thos thoughts, cherishing such desires, and endevoring to exercise that power offred by Grace to assist his Wil. 4. He is stil passiv in pray­ing, yet a willing Patient, thirsting after Repentance, Lov, or what els he prais for; but activ by help in producing of the acts therof, out of thos gifts and habits infused into him. 5. He is both passiv under Gods power protecting him, being a Belee­ver converted; and activ in watching over himself, with Gods Grace concurring to guard and defend him.

S. John saith, he that is born of God keeps himself: wheron S. 1 J [...]h. 5. 18. Austin descants, he takes not away Freewil in saying keeps him­self: who keeps us but God? yet he doth not keep the unwil­ling: therfore when thou joinest thy Wil to God, thou keepest thy self, not of thy self, but by him that coms to dwel in thee. Somthing is ascribed to thee, becaus thy Wil concurs: but so that thou mayst stil say with David, Lord, be thou my helper: If thou saiest, be thou my helper, thou must doo somwhat, els how can he help? Thus a sinner is never first, but secund; no leader, but folower in every degree: at entrance a meer Patient, at next step a willing Patient, in progress an Agent helped by Gods adjuvant and cooperant Grace, saying, like a sick Man, sith you hav cured me, lift me and I wil rise; stay me and I wil [Page] stand; lead me and I wil com. God shield us from such mad­nes [...] 2. ad Bon. c. 9 as to make our selfs first and God last in his Gifts and Graces; saith S. Austin to Pope Boniface. 'Tis a question when, Quest. two are equaly caled, and one only converted (both being sup­posed p [...]ssible) who puts the difference, God or Man? The Answer is Man: for God judgeth Mens acts, not his own: as Answ. every just Judg finds differences betwixt Clients, but makes none. Cain and Abel were bred both alike in Religion, but the difference was in themselfs, that God accepted Abels sa­crifice and rejected Cains. Pharaoh and Nabuchadnezer were by Nature both Men, by dignity Kings, and held Gods People in bondage: One then occasioned their desperat ends, only that one sensible of Gods hand groned under the memory of his iniquity; the other by his Free-wil fought against Gods mer­ciful verity, as S. Austin saith: Who also puts a Case of two [...]. & [...] l. 12. de civ. c. 61. Equals tempted by one fair Woman; wherof one yeelds to lust, the other persists chast: wher's the difference, sav that one would, the other would not lose his chastity? the Ninivets re­pented at Jonas preaching; but the Jews refused at a greater then Jonas: If God put it, how shal they rise in judgment against thes? yet S. Austin wrests S. Pauls words ( who makes 1 cor. 4. 7. thee to differ from another? or what hast thou which thou didst not receiv?) to Dona gratum facienti [...], as Faith, Charity, re­pentance, Conversion; which plainly intend Dona grat is data, as Knowledge, Eloquence, Toungs. For in Gifts necessary to Salvation, God wils no difference between Beleevers and Un­beleevers, but would hav al beleev and obey the Gospel. So the defect proceds so much from the Unbeleevers disobedience (wherof God is not the Author) as from Beleevers obedience. To want the Gifts of Toungs and Prophecying is no sin or shame, sith they were given suddenly without means: but to fail in Faith and the rest requisit to salvation, after means af­forded, is sin; sith men used not such diligence as they should▪ the difference in measure of Gifts coms from the Giver, but the different using from Man; as the Lord gav one Servant fiv ta­lents, Mat 25. 15. another two, another one; but they imploied it diversly (which was from themselfs) and were regarded or reward­ed accordingly.

Ob. If Man makes the difference in receiving or using Grace, then God doth no more for the Elect then Reprobats; nor hav Saints more caus to be thankful then the wicked; but one may glory against oth [...]rs, that he did more then they: al which Scripture [...]on [...]emns: Ergo it proceds from God.

Sol. If it be granted ▪which is not so) that God doth no more in the Grace of Vocation for the Elect then Reprobats; yet in Predestination h [...]doth incomparably more; becaus fore­knowing the different success of his Caling and ends of the Caled; he decreed to confirm it unto som which would be sa­ving to them, and leav the rest to that which would not be sa­ving through their disobedience, when it was in his power to alter it. So in the preparation and execution of his gracious Caling, his election and lov to them appeers singular, who hav infinit caus of gratitud abov Reprobats; [...]et hav they reason to thank God for preparing that Caling, wherby they might be saved so wel as others, being to blame their own refusal only. Nor was God bound to alter their Caling, as seing the event would prov evil by their own fau [...]t; for then none had perish­ed. Here is much inequality in Lov and favour, but stil a liberty left of Mans Wil under Grace: that of two equaly caled one may obey and not another; or unequaly obey, when both being often Caled, one obeis sooner then the other. For ther is infinit variety in most, yet God indifferent to al, and damns none but by their own default.

Touching thankfulnes, Grace is not therfore Grace, becaus given to one and denied to another; but becaus 'tis given to the unworthy (for it were not lesss, but greater if extended to al) so that my thanks are du to God, becaus he had mercy on me un­worthy; not becaus he shews more mercy to me then others: Nor are my thanks the less, becaus many mo partake with me in the benefits; but should rather be greater, if millions mo were partakers then be.

Salvianus saith men ow a general debt for Christs passion, and al Mankind sans exception bound therto: yet none ows the less, becaus others ow the like: For though the debt be ge­neral, yet 'tis special too, and every particular equaly ingaged: sith as Christ suffered for al, so he did for ech; and bestowed [Page] himself on al, as he did on every one: wholy for al and wholy for ech individual. In which regard as al ow themselfs wholy to him for it, so doth every one wholy; sav that ech ows more then al Mankind, becaus he reaps so much benefit as al Men. This is a good rule, but beware of the Pharisees comparativ form of thanks, too rife now adais: Lord, I thank thee I am not as other Men. Indeed as som put the Case of Mankind like a cru of Rebels, of whom the King pardons such as he lists, and executs the rest, thos pardoned ow more thanks. But the Scrip­ture states it thus: God mercifully proclaims a general Gospel pardon to al Rebels, on condition that he which submits and yeelds his Sword, taking a Ticket of his pardon, shal go safe; but such as refuse or stand out shal be destroied. Such as sub­mit, magnify his Mercy and griev for their Felows obstinacy, justifying the execution doon on them. Thos that in the first way amplify Gods Grace for sparing som simply, prejudice his Truth proclaimed to al: But such as advance his Grace for spa­ring al on fair, facil, feasible conditions exhibited in the Gos­pel; set his Favor forth, Mercy, and Truth much more. It may more literaly be laid thus. If a King having al his Subjects in his power and pleasure to destroy for Rebellion, shal publicly proclaim pardon to al that wil submit to his Son, on such con­ditions as they shal be able by his gracious assistance and accep­tance to perform; knowing that som wil tractably obey, but the rest persist obstinat or obdurat in their Crimes: he then is bound by promiss or Covenant to pardon the penitent; but re­solvs to punish the rest according to their deserts.

Here both his Mercy and Justice is equaly or eminently ex­tended to al, without respect of persons: but the difference consists in the new obedience of one sort, and old obstinacy of the other: yet doth not the Caus depend on the effect (as som fondly object or cavil) but the Monarch, according to his mer­ciful Proclamation freely pardons the penitent, and justly de­strois the impenitent.

As to glorying that one doth more then another; Let him that glorieth glory in the Lord, or not glory: for Gods Gifts are duple. 1. Immediat from himself soly (as Toungs, Mira­cles, Prophecying) of which Paul speaks, What hast thou which [Page 53] thou hast not received? and if thou hast received, why boastest thou? 2. Mediat, which proced from Gods Grace and Mans Wil jointly (as Faith, Repentance, Obedience) being both Gods gifts wrought by Grace; therfore no glorying but in the Lord, as S. Paul saith: and duties owing by us upon peril of 1 Cor. 15. 10. Phil. 4. 13. 1 Cor. 9. 16. salvation, which proced from the Wil helped by Grace; and in that regard no glorying: as S. Paul saith, though I preach the Gospel, I hav not to glory; for necessity is laid on me, and wo is me if I doo not: So wo to al which beleev not in Christ. To re­ceiv as a Gift not only excluds glory, but includs duty: for in doing al which is commanded, we doo but our duty being un­profitable servants. Christ saith, doth the Master thank his ser­vant, Luk. 17. 9. becaus he did what was bid? I trow not. Yet we may glo­ry with S. Paul, in the testimony of a good conscience; as Samuel 2 Cor. 1. 12. 1 Sam. 12. 13 Neh. 5. 15. cald witnes of his integrity; and Nehemiah recorded his own sincerity. Howbeit whatever our natural parts be, or labor and industry beyond others, or how prosperously soever it succeds; who is so void of piety as not to ascribe it to the fountain of al good? God builds the hous more then al Laborers, keeps the City abov al Warders, givs more increas then al Planters or Wa­terers; yet Builders, Warders, Planters, Waterers hav al subor­dinat Offices, which being neglected the Hous is unbuilded, City unguarded, and Plant unmanured: Becaus God doth most in converting, and Man nothing in comparison, but al by him; the Saints may rejoyce and say, not unto us Lord, not to us; but to thy name giv the glory. Yet (not unto us) implies somthing to be doon by us, whereof we must not glory, being our duty.

Nor should thos poor things of Mans Wil (to wish or wil, labor, endevor, yeeld or obey) be once named when Gods Grace is praised or works pleaded: yet somtimes a necessity compels therto. For Men, under color of piety, to magnifiy Gods Grace and reprov Natures Parasits, becom disparagers of Free-wil and Flatterers of Grace; wherby Satan seeks to subvert Gods truth and righteousnes, destroying tru Piety and Religion in Men; by bringing a stupid sloth on som, a remors­less infidelity or impenitence on others, and an invincible de­speration or obduration in most; which is the genuin Of-spring [Page] of that Doctrin, which deprivs Mans Wil of al freedom in mat­ters of salvation, by turning the Gospels general promises into particular limitings of special Grace, effectual only to a few se­cret ones by direct absolut Decree; leaving the rest forlorn or destitut of tru Grace, though caled by the same word of the Gospel.

Melancthon speaks herof before Arminius was ever heard of: Loc commun. de Praedest. Let us remov from S. Paul such Stoical disputs as destroy Faith & Prayer: for how could Saul beleev or pray, when he doubted whether the Promiss belonged to him, or when the fatal Table of Destinies had prepossesled him? for 'tis decreed thou shalt be a Castaway. If Free-wil avail nothing, til I perceiv Rege­neration wrought in me by the Spirit; I wil be indulgent to my self-unbeleef and other vitious affections of the flesh.

This Manichean imagination is flat falshood, and our minds are to be drawn from it, and taught that Free-wil with Grace avails much. Thus he, who also in point of discrimination saith: When Promises are universal, and no contrary or contradicto­ry Wils in God; ther must needs be som caus of difference in us: as why Saul was rejected and David received, som disparity in thos two caused it: yet stil remember that the doing som good or il action, is not to be conceived to be by meer natural strength of Wil, but as 'tis helped by divine Grace: beware lest in shunning Scilla thou fal not on Charybdis.

15. Regeneration is caled by som the first Resurrection, and 15 Regenera­tion. Conversion a new Creation: who assert that Man doth no more to his new Creation then he did at first; nor to his Re­generation then Generation; nor to his Resurrection from sin then Lazarus did in raising his dead body. Hence Pemble saith, that the seed of spiritual life, and habits of Faith and Grace, are infused like a new Soul, before Men be supernaturaly illumi­ned: sith illumination goes before the act (not habit) of Faith and sanctifying Grace in the Soul. So Mr. Tailor on S. Pauls words ( whoever is in Christ, is a new Creature) infers that Grace cannot be resisted, becaus no Creature can resist his Crea­tor in framing him. Such dangerous dogmats thei grand Rabbies instil into their credulous Disciples. This savours too much of Enthusiasm, and in our spiritual Nativity as in the Natural, are [Page 54] many preparatory dispositions, not al by infusion: nor are Ar­guments taken from Allegories (which is too rife among Se­ctists) authentic, if extended beyond Scriptures tru sens. Saint Pauls words ( if any Man be in Christ, he is a new Creature) 2 Cor. 5. 17. are not strictly to be sensed; for new Creation is meant of qua­lities, not substance: els if literaly pressed, a kind of Tran­substantiation in Mans Conversion may be better maintained, then Papists doo of Christs body in the Eucharist. Chrysostom expounds it wel; That new birth is not the substance, but dig­nity of Grace: for it intimats the universality of this change in qualities to be so diffused over the whol Man, as one shal not know him to be the same: whence 'tis more bluntly caled Re­surrection, to shew the great mutation or variation. So Saint Paul describes the old and new Man by alteration of quality: Gal. 3. 9. 10. Gal. 5 6. 1 Cor. 7. 19. 'tis faith working by lov which makes a new Creature, and to keep Gods Commandments. It respects also the necessity of this change, in opposition to our first birth in Adam: Except a John 3 3. Man be born again he cannot see the Kingdom of God, saith Christ: but by Faith we are new born to righteousnes and ho­lines, as in a secund Adam. Ther is a supernatural Principle of this change or Conversion, even God; for he makes us, not we our selfs, in both creations. So saith S. Paul We are his work­manship, Eph. 2. 10. created in Christ Jesus to good works. Ech Creation and Generation hath a proper peculiar maner: for he that made us without us, wil not sav us without us. In the one is a change a non Ente ad Ens, from a rude inanimat Chaos; In the other a non Tali ad Tale, in a living Rational Creature. Ther God wrought immediatly, here by means; ther no Creature ever said, Creat or renew me, Lord; here David cries, Creat Psal. 51. 10. in me a clean heart, O God, and renew a right spirit within me: Ther it never was said to any, Make thy self: here God saith, Make you a new heart and spirit, for why wil ye dy? Ther no Ezek. 18 31. Creature was ever blamed for not being, or being as it is; but here to keep on the old Man or not put on the new, is reputed a notorious fault to them which profess Christ and the Go­spel.

Nazianzen saith, It was a sicknes in his time, not to estimat In Apologe [...]. good or bad men by their maners and conversation, but from [Page] Faction: for thos things which in such a Man pleased to day; if he turned to morow another way, were disliked: and what was commended yesterday, shal be condemned to day. How wel this agrees with our age (indeed with al times since Adam) let the world judg and apply as they list.

Under Henry 8. was a Book published by the Clergy (wher­of An. Reg. 35. A. C. 1543. Archbishop Cranmer was chief) and confirmed by Parlia­ment, stiled A necessary Erudition for a Christian: wherin Free­wil is declared to remain in Man after Adams fal, as thes Texts testify; Be not overcom of Evil: Neglect not the Grace in thee: Lov not the World: If thou wilt enter into life, keep the Com­mandments: al which doubtless were in vain, if Man had no power or faculty, with help of Grace, to understand the Com­mandments and freely obey them: but it wils not any good ac­ceptable to God, unles holpen by Grace; willing what is il of it self. Hence som Divines define it to be a power of Reason and Wil, by which Good is chosen w [...]th assistance of Grace, or Evil without it. Next it shews the disparity between our Pro­toparents Free wil to obey or disobey, and their Posterities; which is prone only to Evil, unles illumined and made free by special Grace, or supernatural working of the Holy Ghost: which Gods goodnes offers to al; yet they only enjoy it, who by Freewil accept the same. Nor can they, being so holpen, accom­plish or perform things for their saving health, but with much labor and endevor: For though Reasons light remains, yet 'tis much dimmed or darkned, and hardly discerns inferior things of this life; but utterly unable to understand spiritual belong­ing to a better. So though ther is left a freedom of Wil in works of this present life; yet to act high and Heavenly, 'tis of it self insufficient, and being wounded or maimed, needs help Psal. 119. 18. to heal and repair it. Hereto David reflected, Open thou my eys, that I may see the wondrous things of thy Law: and Jeremy, Heal me, Lord, and I shal be made whol. S. Austin avers the same, That Free-wil is in Man since the Fal, which no Catholic can deny: But in spiritual desires and works to pleas God, 'tis so frail and feeble, that it cannot begin or perform them, unles it be prevented and excited by Grace the principal Agent, with­out which Man can doo nothing good or Godly, as thes places [Page 55] prov: Without me ye can doo nothing: No Man coms to me ex­cept John 15 5. John 6. 44. 2 Cor. 3. 5. the Father draw him, and unles it were given of my Father: We be not sufficient of our selfs to think any good. So Free-wil must be helped by Grace preventing, but being so enabled may freely cooperat with it; and being by the same susteined, may persist or increas in Grace. Surely 'tis soly by it, that we be first inspired, incited, or moved to good: But to resist tentations and go forward in goodnes; is both of Gods Grace and our own Free-wil jointly. Lastly, when we hav persevered to the end, 'tis Gods free gift and Mercy to Crown us with glory, who hath graciously ordained to reward Men after this life, ac­cording to the good works doon by his Grace. Therfore al are to be monished (chiefly Preachers) that in this deep dark point, they neither so teach Gods Grace as to exclud Free-wil; nor extol Free-wil to impeach Grace. Thus they very orthodoxly. Here is no Free-wil to spiritual good without Grace, nor Grace so prepotent or violent but may be resisted or refused: yet enough to glorify Gods goodnes, and convince Mans in­gratitud. Al which is sound Theology, and shews that they were learned in thos dais.

16. Perseverance or Assurance to the end, is Gods special 16 Perseve­rance. gift or Grace; becaus no Man of himself alone can continu against al assalts of the World, Flesh, and Satan: yet no doubt the Elect doo finaly persist in Faith and Sanctification by Grace; els they are not of that number, whom God infallibly foreknew wil so persever. Nor is the Question whether every Beleever may lose his faith; for many fal from som degrees, and not lose al Graces at once, retaining only such as be essentialy ne­cessary to Salvation? but 'tis whether tru Faith working by Lov, can be lost? for ther is a strong, vigorous, rooted Faith, which cannot fal or fail: and a feeble, green, tender (yet tru salvific) which may. Such was Peters, which a silly Damosel shattered: but after the Holy Ghost given at Pentecost, his Faith and Lov were so corroborated, as he despised the Whips and wounds of al Persecutors; yea death it self by preposterous crucifixion of his heels upward.

Hence two Questions arise: 1. Of Men not Elected, whe­ther Two Questi­ons. som such doo not attain tru Faith, Repentance, Justifica­tion, [Page] Sanctification; yet lose them, and not finaly persever, but perish? 2. Of the Elect, Whether som of those doo not somtimes fal into hainous sins (Theft, Adultery, Murder) and if so, whether they be then justified or in state of Salvation? For perseverance is of two sorts or degrees: either continued by constant holding Faith and a good Conscience to the end, which is rare: or interrupted with fals and risings, or renewings by Repentance, which brings Salvation at last.

For the first which are not Elect, 'tis said, He that endures to Mat. 24. 13. the end shal be saved. Here he that hath Salvation promised, if he persist finaly, is supposed to be in a right cours wherin he should continu, and so be saved: but it implies that he may possibly fal from Faith, or wax cold in Lov, and not be saved. Herof S. Bernard saith, falendued with Lov had persevered, our Lord in vain exhorts his Disciples to continu therin: for if they did not yet Lov, he would not say continu, but be in Lov: or if they did Lov already, he needed not exhort to perseve­rance, according to som Opinions: Els wher he saith, such hav no root, who for a while beleev, but in time of tentation fal away. Whence or whether doo they fal? even from faith to unbeleef. I ask, could they be saved in that Faith, or not? If they could not, what prejudice had our Saviour, or Satan pro­fit by their faling away? S. Jerom saith, If every one born of God cannot sin nor be tempted, why doth Christ warn us to fly tentation? Som say such Exhortations, Precepts, and Pro­mises are used to uphold Perseverance: But if it be infallible, they are used in vain; unles obedience to them be in Man, who failing on his part, thos means often fail. David knew the two Commandments, as means to restrain his two sins; but they failed through him. Peters forewarning of his denial was a means to humble his confidence, but he made no use of it. O­thers say, In regard of our weaknes we may fal, and means must be used for support: but by Gods Election, and Christs Medi­ation, we shal stand sure. Tru, But the Question is of those which 'tis uncertain whether th [...]y be Elect or no? Or if a few means be infallible, al other supplies are superfluous, and we may securely rely on them.

Ezekiel speaks more plainly to the purpose: If the wicked Ezek. 18. 21, 26, 27. [Page 56] wil turn from al his sins, and keep my Statuts; he shal surely liv, and not dy. When a righteous Man turns from his wais, and commits iniquity, he shal dy: Again, When a wicked Man turns from his iniquity, and doth what is lawful and right, he shal sav his Soul. What evasion can be here, if the comparison be wel observed? For if it be denied, that a righteous Man can fal and dy; it may also that a wicked can turn and liv, which is to giv the Holy Ghost a ly. If the wicked ther meant or men­tioned be truly and legaly wicked, then are the Righteous truly and Evangelicaly Just: For legaly just none but one ever was. If then any wicked Man ever turned from sin and lived; a ju­stified Man may turn from his righteousnes and dy, els Ezekiel speaks untruth.

The Dort Divines answer not this place, being too hard a knot: but say to others, that the Apostles speak of initial de­grees of Faith, from which Men a little entred may go back: But not of tru justifying, from which they that hav attained cannot finaly fal. Let the Touchstone try the truth: 'Tis im­possible Heb. 6. 4, 5, 6. (saith S. Paul) for thos who once being illightned, tasted of the heavenly Gift, and partaked the Holy Ghost, and tasted Gods good Word and powers of the World to com; if they shal fal away to renew them unto repentance. He speaks not of non. En­tities nor of Novices, but such as were illightned and tasted the heavenly gift, Gods good Word, and powers of the World to come, and partaked the Holy Ghost: which metaphors of Sens (tasting, seing, &c.) imply in Scripture no slight superficial sens of spiritual things. So S. Peter: If after they hav escaped the 2 Pet. 2 20, 21, 22. Worlds pollutions, through knowledg of the Lord Jesus; they be again intangled and overcom; the la [...]ter end with them is wors then the beginning: For it had bin better not to hav known the way of righteousnes; then having known, to turn from the holy Commandments delivered to them: But it hapned to them ac­cording to the tru Proverb, the Dog returned to his vomit, and the washed Sow to hir walowing in the mire. To escape the Worlds pollutions through knowledg of our Lord Jesus, is no smal fruit of the Spirit; but a ful, cleer, certain fruition: whence it is so hard or impossible for such as fal from so great a measure of Grace to be renewed by Repentance; but from [Page] De Cor. & Gr. c. 6. lesser lapses ordinary. S. Austin saith, 'Tis much to be marveled, why God givs not perseverance to som of his Children whom he regenerated in Christ, and gav Faith, Hope, Lov; when he forgivs so great wickednesses to others, and confers the grace of Sons on them: he wonders why God did not snatch such away as lived Godly from the evil to com, lest their il inclinations should caus a change. So he holds, if thos Men had dyed while they lived justly and piously, they had been saved: Ergo their Faith was more then initiated, and they more then outside Christians. As God first cals Man before he folows; so Man first fals from God before he forsakes, who is stil ready to re­ceiv al into Grace upon tru repentance. So saith our sixteenth Article: After we hav received the Holy Ghost we may depart from Grace and fal into sin, and by Gods Grace rise again and amend our lifes. Therfore they are to be condemned which say they can no more sin so long as they liv here, or deny to tru Pe­nitents place of forgivnes.

Touching the terms of faling totaly and finaly, it is certain only to Gods Prescience, but unknown to us: for the Faithful may fal, and God alone knows, whether they wil repent or rise again; but we must stil work with fear and trembling. If they cannot fal, why doth Christ bid us pray, Lead us not into tenta­tion, but deliver us from evil? or why doth our Liturgy say, Suffer us not at last hour for any pains of death to fal from thee? For the Elect thos of Dort grant, that a Regenerat faling into grievous sins, is not actualy reconciled til he repent; but in state of damnation, and unapt to enter into Gods Kingdom: but they ad, 1. Though the Regenerats so sinning be guilty; yet they shal be in Gods purpos absolved: Tru, So they were before they beleeved. 2. That God deals not with them in rigour: No more doth he with many Reprobats falen from Faith, whom he would bring to repentance by long suffering. 3. That they hav not lost Jus ad Regnum, but usum Juris: as a Lepet loseth the use of his hous, not right: But similituds are no sound Arguments. Hath an Elect committing murder jus ad Reg­num? then S. Paul speaks fals: I tel you, they that doo such 1 Cor. 6. 9. things, shal not inherit Gods Kingdom, but al that hav right James 2 10. shal inherit. 4. That their universal Justification is not made [Page 57] void by sinning: surely their absolution from former sins is not frustrated; but this new sin which makes them Sons of wrath and guilty of the whol Law, needs Absolution and Justification from it: But universal Justification is no remission of sins past, present, and to com: For what need then Repentance? 5. That their state of Adoption remains immovable: Tru, In Gods pur­pos, not in act; but that they may fal. 6. That som seeds re­main, by which Life may spring again: It may for sooner then in an habituated Sinner; Yet this alters not the Case, if he be guilty of death, no more then a Noblemans crime, who hath ma­ny friends to beg his life. S. John saith, Whoever is born of God, 1 John 3 9. commits not sin; for his seed remains, and he cannot sin becaus born of God. Hence Calvinists infer, if Gods seed remain in a Regenerat and he cannot sin (deadly) then can be no intercisi­on of his Justification. Certes, his scope is not to prov, that thos born of God cannot fal from righteousnes to sin, or that a Member of Christ cannot becom the member of an Harlot by Adultery; and he that hath bin the member of an Harlot, be­com the Member of Christ by Repentance: But he means, that to be born of God and commit deadly sin cannot consist; nor can any be a Member of Christ and an Harlot at once being Asystats.

S. Jerom writing against Jovinian (who abused this Text, as Men doo now) interprets thus: S. John saith, He that is born of God commits not sin, becaus ye should not sin; not that ye can­not; but so long as ye commit not sin, ye are Gods Children: yea such as persist his Sons cannot sin. For ther is first a faling from God, before we fal into sin, sith thos two cannot cohere. Tertullian tels how som say, They hav God sure enough in Heart and Mind, yet shew no sign in their actions, and so com­mit sin, thinking their fear and Faith safe: as if they committed Adultery, yet deemed their chastity not impaired; or poisoned their Parents, thinking to doo God good service. Thus while they continu in sin, notwithstanding their fear; they shal be cast into Hel, notwithstanding their Faith. Bishop Ridley saith S. John means, He cannot sin so long as Gods seed abides in him; but Faith, Hope and Charity cannot stand with evil living, nor without good Works. David, while he stood guilty of a [Page] duple crime, could not be in state of Regeneration; nor Peter, til he repented his denial: Yet som say it was salvo amore & fide; becaus as we are born but once, so we are new born no oftner. This metaphor holds not; for S. Paul saith, Litle Children, of whom I travel in birth again, til Christ be formed in you: mean­ing so oft as we fal into hainous sins, we must stil be renewed by Repentance: but Men wil expound Scripture as they list.

As to the certainty of Perseverance, Election, Salvation; this concerns not God, whos knowledg is infallible, and pur­pos immutable; but us, while we liv here. For deciding or de­fining wherof, weigh thes three conclusions: 1. That a Belee­ver, being in present state and use of holy means, tending to sal­vation, and out of tentation in the peace of a good Conscience through Faith in Christ; may, by the testimony of the Holy Ghost, hav a comfortable assurance of Salvation, which begets trusty fervent lov and thankfulnes to God: specialy when he is neer the end of his race or point of death. So S. Paul by inspi­ration saith, I am now ready to be offred up: I hav sought a good 2 Tim 4. 6, 7, 8. fight, finished my cours, and kept the Faith: Henceforth is laid up for me a Crown of righteousnes. This place Lutherans press against Papists, who wil hav al by doubting, and none certain of his present condition, no not at best: But he that hath right knowledg of God, tru Faith, stedfast Hope, lifely Lov, and awful Filial fear, with an holy trade of Life; he may rejoyce in God, with comfortable confidenre and affiance of perseve­rance to the end. 2. That for time to com (specialy when we hav probably a long race to run, and divers dangers of wild wonton Youth to pass) we cannot hav infallible certitud of future or final persevering; but must confide in Gods Grace 1 Cor. 10. 13. and Goodnes, that he wil assist, if we apply al our indevors to De Civ c. 11. 12 continu in it. Hereof S. Austin speaks, We cal them blessed whom we see liv wel with hope of future immortality, and without such crimes as make shipwrack of Conscience: who, though they may rely on the reward of Pe severance; yet are not sure of persevering. For who knows certainly he shal con­tinu in doing righteousnes to the end, except he be assured by som revelation from him, who is not pleased in his just secret [Page 58] judgment to inform al touching this point, though he deceivs none? S. Ambros thus: David saith not, I offer the sacrifice De bono mo [...] c. 3. of Prais, but wil offer; shewing or signifying that to be a per­fect sacrifice, when every one freed from the fetters of this Body, shal stand before the Lord and offer himself a Sacrifice: For before death can be no perfect Prais; nor can any be truly extold in this life, when his latter times are so incertain. S. Ber­nard Serm. 1 in Se [...]. tuag. also: Who can say I am one of the Elect predestinat to Life, or in the number of Sons; sith we hav yet no certainty? but we may be comforted with hopeful affiance, and not tor­mented with despair or doubting: for som signs or marks are given, that such may be sure they are Elect which hav them: for this caus 'tis necessary to be stil in awful fear and humbled under Gods hand; sith we know in part what we are at pre­sent, but not what we shal be, which is impossible to know: therfore Let him that stands take heed lest he fal; for presump­tion is so perilous as desperation. 3. That certitud of salvati­on cannot be infallible in this life, as S. Austin attests: What De Cor. & Gr. 13. Beleever, so long as he livs in this fleshly Tabernacle, can pre­sum to be predestinat? 'tis needful to be conceled in this life, wher puffing up is to be shunned; sith so great an Apostle was buffeted by Satan, lest he should be puf'd up. Many such things are spoken for the usefulnes of this secret, lest any shal presume: for even he that runs wel may fear, sith 'tis hid whither he shal go.

Much more he vents to the same effect: For Gods Promises in Christ are certain, but made with conditions; so that we may miss of the end, if we fail in the means to fulfil our Cove­nants; sith no Man shal be crowned til he fight it out and the battel ended; triumph not before the victory. Gods Decrees are known soly to himself, but secret to us, who must rely on the Promisses by performing the Covenants. If we may be fully assured of tru Faith, that it cannot fail, but we shal infallibly persever to the end, through al frailties and tentations; then Gods Counsil is not secret to som, nor his Decree unknown: which is high presumption to arrogat or affirm; sith we must stil work it out with fear and trembling. This is a Cavaliers Creed or confidence in the point of final perseverance, and sal­vations [Page] infallible certainty; who holds the middle betwixt two extrems of despair and presumption: but had rather be a meek humble Publican, then a proud presuming Pharisee; Lord, be merciful to me a sinner, and grant me Grace to con­tinu in thy fear til the end.

17. The last Judgment is the execution of al Divine Decrees 17 Last Judg­ment. concerning Men: For Predestination of the ends, is a fore­knowledg and approbation of the last Judgment to Life or Death; which execution shews the Decree, as a building being erected and finished declares the Architects plot or devise; for this Judgment exhibits the consecution of thos ends: So if we grant (as we must) that God proponed an end, viz. the glory of his Mercy or Bounty, in giving som life eternal; and glory of his Power and Justice, in inflicting eternal death on others; he hath attained his end in the last Judgment: So if we admit Note. (as we must) that God prescribed means for Men to aspire or attain to eternal life; or for lack therof to incur everlasting death; thos ends are executed also in the same Judgment: Rom. 6. 23: Howbeit if we grant (as we doo) that Life is given both as a 2 Tim. 4. 8. Rom 9 21. 22. Bounteous Gift and reward of Righteousnes; as also that eter­nal Death is imposed both as the wages or punishment of sin, and a demonstration of Gods soveraign dominion, yet with Justice and Equity. No ordinary understanding can conceiv, how a Decree of thes things could be made from eternity, with­out Prescience; si [...]h Life is a reward and Death a punishment, which no Justice can prepare without foreknowledg of good or evil deserved. This is cald simple or natural Intelligence, as Life is a Gift of Gods free goodnes, and Death a Declaration of his dominion, being both an attainment of his own glory. Hence 'tis cleer, that Prescience (which is Gods first, highest, simple Understanding) is to be put in the definition of Prede­stination, which too many separat or dis-join.

Let Prosper decide this point: If we consider al Men toge­ther, Ep [...]g [...]. 28. wherof som may be saved in Mercy, others damned in Truth; al the Lords wais are distingu [...]shed by the end: but if we look only on the Saints, thes wais are not discerned: for Truth is not distinguished from Mercy, nor contrarily; sith the Saints beatitud is both from reward of Grace, and retri­bution [Page 59] of Justice. So he makes eternal Death a retribution of Justice, which cannot eternaly be decreed without Prescience of sin: which Calvinists ground on Gods pure pleasure, as Lord over his Creatures, without respect to foreknowledg: But for Election to Life, being his free Gift, they more confi­dently ascribe to his mee [...] Wil without Prescience; which they hav more color for, if the Saints glory were only a Gift of Grace, and not also a retribution of Justice. But God makes it a retribution of Justice upon foresight of their laboring to attain the end; and a gift of free Grace too, knowing what wil bring them to happines, if he grant them thos benefits: wherby he shal also attain his end, even the glory of his free Lov in giving eternal life to whom he wil; which is the tru harmony: This Judgment being ex praeteritis, Predestination must be ex praevisis: for the judg ordained by God is the Lord John 5. 22. Jesus; that al may honor the Son, as they doo the Father; John 3. 19. becaus as the Father created, so the Son redeemed Mankind, even the universality: The grand crime for which the World shal be judged is, that Men loved darknes more then light, and John 12. 48. Christs Word shal judg him at last day, whoever rejected or con­temned Marc. 16. 16. Christ. Since the Gospel is preached, the rule of judg­ing is, He that beleeveth and is baptised shal be saved; he that 2 Thes. 1. 7, 8. beleeveth not, damned. Which S. Paul more fully explicats, When the Lord Jesus shal be reveled from Heaven to recompence 2 Cor. 5. 10. thos that hav suffred for his truth, and in flaming fire take ven­geance on them that know not God nor obey his Gospel. The se­verity of this Judgment (to render vengeance) the specification Rom. 2. 16. of persons ( we must, al appear before his seat) the assignation of causes to be judged ( the very secrets of Mens hearts) with the maner of judgment, when such as hav sinned without the Law, shal perish without the L [...]w having a Law written in their hearts; but thos that hav sinned in the Law, shal be judged by the Law; semblably, such as hav not obeied the Gospel, shal be judged by it.

Al this argues, that original sin (which is one just caus of death) shal be alleged against al who hav no other caus of con­demnation but this, as Infants which dy having not this sin purged by the Laver of Regeneration, either in act or vow of [Page] the Church, but to lay it unto them that liv to ripe yeers of knowing God & obeying the Gospel, or haply had forgivnes of sins sealed by Baptism; this seemd strange to Doctor Whitaker, that any shal be Reprobated for sin remitted: so 'tis strange that any should be condemned for such sins as he was not Re­probated for, sith the sentence of Reprobation is the hardest and heaviest that can be, which draws with it the sentence of Condemnation: Surely such sins as the wicked shal be judged of at last, are the same they were Reprobated for at first, being Jude v. 4. eternaly foreseen; specialy their final impenitence and inobe­dience: els what needs this exact differencing of Causes? or how are the guilty more burdned to hear their several crimes, if al be rejected in the common Case of Mankind lapsed, and unable to rise, having no Saviour to dy for them nor Spirit to cal them, nor help to heal them; but are excluded or debarred by Gods absolut irrespectiv Decree? God wil overcom in Judgment; yet not by pleading his Soveraign power or Prero­gativ, and silencing Men with his dominion (els was Abram too bold to expostulat, Shal not the Worlds Judg doo right?) but by Justice and Equity, rewarding every one according to his works, els he would not put himself on trial, Judg I pray between me & my Vineyard; what more could I doo, then I hav doon? God wil Isai 5. 3. convince the ungodly, putting them to silence and shame by their own stubborn ingratitud against his abundant Goodnes, Patience, and long suffering; not by his own plenipotence or Prerogativ. Sadolet to an Objection (We being born of cor­rupt original, are by Nature made to perdition, that thos whom God passeth by and caleth not, might hav no just caus of com­plaint) answers thus: I conceiv that Christ Jesus sitting in Judgment for his Father, on them whom he hath con [...]emned, wil not so pass or pronunce Sentence, sith ye proceded from Adams corrupt loins, and contracted your Parents guilt, doo I condemn you to endless torments; but wil say Go ye cursed in­to everlasting fire; for ye saw me hungry, and fed me not, &c. which are not the common sins of al Mankind, but particular faults of ech several person, which shal be alledged, and wher­by they shal be judged; lest in that sharp torture and grief they presume to ask Mercy of God, who denied it [Page 60] to their poor Brethren begging it.

Mr. Plaifer handles al thes deep points at large, wel worth a serious survey; which are here succinctly summed up, and con­duce much to the main subject. If any mislike his Tenets (as many of different Judgments wil) let them seek satisfaction of him, who can best resolv al scruples: But if I hav misprised any material circumstances through insciousnes, not wilfulnes; let me bear the blame, who undertake to be his faithful eccho. Now for fuller application and farther addition, take what folows in a more confused maner. To found Predestination on Prescience of simple Intelligence, best consorts with al con­ditions, consequents, and circumstances therof: wherby al di­vine Attributs are best accorded and advanced: the sole scru­ple rests, which Opinion best agrees with the Holy Ghosts tru meaning? For al Sects arrogat to sens the Scriptures best (if they may be Judges or Interpreters) to preach the Gospel pu­rest (if faith be given to their bare words) and to administer the Sacraments sincerest (if their new cuts daily varied may pass for current coin) as three main marks of their Church, ca­led the little Flock, when al others censure or condemn them for fals Teachers as every one doth ech other, and al tort or distort Gods Word to serv turns. Howbeit, for trial of truth, the chief Texts shal be brought to test or touchstone: for Pre­science these places are pregnant: S. James saith, Known unto Acts 15. 18. God are al his works from everlasting, S. Peter, To the Elect, 1 Pet 1. 2. Rom. 8. 29, 30. according to the foreknowledg of God the Father. S. Paul, Whom he foreknew he pred [...]stinated; whom he predestinated, he caled, whom he caled, he justified; whom he justified, he glorified. Again, Blessed be God, who hath blessed us in al heavenly things Eph. 1. 3, 4. through Christ as he hath chosen us in him before the Worlds foundation: Ergo we are eternally Elect by Faith in Christ foreseen, which preceds Predestination.

To conceiv rightly the maner and order of this high myste­ry, according to Gods Mind reveled in his Word; we must consider somthing of his Nature who predestinats, and therin revere his infinit [...]intellect, just Wil, matchless Mercy, and so­veraign Dominion; with somthing of Man which is predesti­nated, whom it pleased the Almighty to make more excellent [Page] then any of his visible Creatures; to consist of Spirit and Flesh, being inferior to Angels, and superior to Beasts: for he is a Rational free Creature; yet not so absolutly sufficient of him­self, and wholy independent to be under none (which is pro­per soly to God) but free in his own Nature to wil or nil, chuse or refuse, and rule his own acts: wherby he was capable of ho­lines or sin, obeying or disobeying, to doo good or evil; and therby a subject of Prais or Punishment, Bounty or Justice: which no Creature can properly be, that is not perfectly free in Wil, and loos at liberty from al necessary restraint.

Ob. Som opposits object, that Adam haply had such per­fect Free-wil; but by his Fal that absolut liberty to al things is lessened, and to Spirituals lost: Ergo, &c.

Sol. 'Tis granted, but with Proviso, That God foreseing this fal and loss, with intent not to prevent it, prepared suffici­ent Graces of his powerful Spirit, to repair or restore what was decaied, by giving a new Command or Covenant, fit for Mans infirm wounded Wil; and thos Graces of his holy Spi­rit; which he would be stil ready to supply by preventing, assi­sting, protecting, and preserving, if he be not wanting to his duty: For Gods Wisdom is not so weak to make such a noble Creature only for shew to Angels, or to set him in the World for a day or two, and banish him for ever into Hel fire, under the slavery and tyranny of Rebellious Fiends, of his own free De­cree, without foresight of any deserts good or evil; which is the Manichees error, horrid to conceiv of so gracious a God, who created him purposly to be the subject of his righteous Judgment. 'Tis a tru saying, If ther be not the Grace of God, how shal he sav the World? If no Free-wil in Man, how shal he judg it? We must so defend the one, as not destroy the other, which wil wel consist together.

Hence it folows, That a just Decree before al time what shal be doon to every one at end of time; cannot possibly be con­ceived to be made but by Gods simple Prescience of every Mans works, rendring to ech accordingly. Now becaus that De­cree passeth from a Soveraign Lord of absolut Wil, who wil be Debtor to none, but al to him; it folows also that this fore­knowledg on which the Decree is founded, must needs be (ac­cording [Page 61] to our utmost capacity) Gods natural simple intel­ligence of al things while they were but as possible, before any Decree made for their being. To which knowledg when his om­nipotent Wil was joined, an [...]m [...]t [...]ble inevitable Decree passed (like Laws of Medes and Persians) that things should be as now they are, necessary or continge it; means or ends, causes or effects, such as Prescience previously apprehended: so every Mans salvation is soly from God, and others perdition wholy from themselfs, which divine Prescience neither furthers nor hinders. The disput is not of predestinating al things that are and rejecting the rest; but only of Angels and Men: in what maner or order som were ordained to life, and al els repro­bated? this proceds from Gods simple knowledg which pre­ceds Predestination; not from that of Vision or sight (which is of things that either hav had or shal hav being) which folows and is founded on it. By this God understood if he would endu som Creatures with Reason and a free Nature; 1. He should best shew forth in them his Wisdom, goodnes, mercy, justice, fidelity, and al his sublime properties: 2. That such Creatures wil vary in their choices; som cleaving to good, som to evil (as Men are moraly virtuous or vitious) which he foresaw not only in general, but every particular person if created and put to trial: yet it rested in his free pleasure, to creat and try, or hinder their choices. 3. That of such whom he knew would prevaricat if permitted free, he might justly punish them for disobeying; or could fit means to restore and reconcile them, yet decreed neither. 4. He conceived it juster or equitabler to punish rebellious Angels being created in­dividual and most intellectual; but to spare Men in mercy be­ing to multiply their kind and made more frail; specialy if se­duced by subtle Spirits. 5. He foreknew if he should ordain sufficient means to rais al Men lapsed; that som would grat­fully receiv his bounty to their salvation, and others wilfully or ingratly reject it for the pleasure of sin to their perdition: holding stil the determination what to doo or permit in his ful power. 6. He knew if he should condemn the contumacious, and favor such as returned to him; he should deal justly with the one, mercifully with the other, and judg al righteously. [Page] Al thes things with every circumstance (as they are in being from beginning of the World to the end) God understood as under condition or supposition, it he should pleas to put them in execution: which after du deep deliberation in his eternal counsil (to speak stil after our shalow apprehension) his di­vine Wil and Wisdom was to pronounce this mighty Word or Decree, Fiant, let them be. He could in a moment hav framed millions of Worlds, but proceded gradualy to perfect this one in six dais, that his Majesty might be the more mag­nified: whos Wisdom, Justice, Mercy, Grace, Goodnes, Pow­er, and Dominion be glorified through al generations.

Thes are the Lutheran or Arminian Principles, who make sim­ple Prescience the basis of Predestination: which if indifferent­ly weighed with a single impartial ey, wil not seem half so hai­nous, as 'tis prejudicatly proclamed in Pulpits and Pamphlets. Let Tertullian put the perclos. 'Tis no good nor solid faith L [...]de Exhert. Castit. which refers al to Gods Wil and absolut decree, flattering the world with saying al is doon soly by it: but we must understand ther is som power in us, which God expects to accomplish our salvation. For to say God hath determind of us with­out any reflexion on our works; is to make a Pillow for som Mens sloth, and prepare a precipice for others despair. He sleeps too securely that thinks to carry his happines in a Wal­let: we must ever work, or shal never receiv wages: for doubtles God wil recompens according to every Mans works. Calvinists (both Ante and Postlapsarians) ascribe Predesti­nation to Gods pure pleasure by absolute antecedent Decree; without respect of foreseen demerits in his simple intelligence: whos principal proofs shal be produced in heaps to shun pro­lixity.

Ob. Touching divine Decree in temporal things Job saith, Joh. 14 5. Mans dais are numbred or determined, and bounds appointed Ps. 139. 16. which he cannot pass. So David, in thy Book are al my members Writen: So Christ, not a Sparow shal fal on the ground with­out Mat. 10 29, 30. your Father: and the hairs of your head are al numbred: Ergo al depends on divine Decree.

Sol. Thes Texts tend al to the Registry of Gods simple Pre­science and Providence: which tho they be no causes of any [Page 62] effects, yet are certain in the events, and cannot be frultrat: but make nothing for absolut Decree of a prefixd period to our dais Dr. Charlton debats this point acutly and accuratly, part wherof shal be decurted. God the giver of life, sole moderator, but not Author of death: for al natural motion proceds from one first mover God; whence S. Paul saith, In him we live, mov, Acts 17. 28. and hav our being. The term Life is taken either for the period of every Mans dais, caused by a sensible decay or dissolution of al ligaments which chain the Soul to the Body; or by an extinction of his vital flame upon consumption of the Radical fuel, when no preternatural causes interven to anticipat the dissipation of that elementar temper, on which Lifes subsistence necessarily depends: or els for the end of every Mans Life in general, by what means or whensoever; be it by diseases or vio­lent accidents, without respect to the gradual decay and con­sequent cessation of natural temperament in old age. From the first acception arise 2. Questions. 1. Whether this term of Life circumscribed by a natural deflux of the Body (which is a kind of mature facil faling away of Natures ligaments, like ripe Apples, be definitly fixd by divine Ordinance to leav every in dividual in his own moderation, without prescribing or procu­ring, that this decay of temperature should hav more or less du­ration, then what may naturaly occur from the more or less du­rability therof? 2. If Life be thus fixd by Gods decree not to prolong it beyond the point of its natural durability; whether he can without altering his own established cours of Nature, being moved by Mens praiers or pitty (as he added 15 yeers to Ezekiahs dais) correct thos depravities procured by excess, sick­nes, or other extraneous means, and so hinder the dissolution therof? That is, whether if God hath predetermined that none shal exced the term, to which the durability of his indi­vidual temper or strength of constitution may probably ex­tend; his special Providence doth not permit, that the tem­perament may be vitiated, impaired, or ruined by putrefactiv destructiv preternatural causes obvenient, and so not hold out to that point of time, which otherwise by its primigeneous na­tiv condition it might hav reached unto: For the secund ac­ception of Life in general by what means of dissolution soever [Page] (sicknes, surfeit, shipwrack, suffocation, famin, war, wounds, or other-wais) this question occurs, whether the imma­ture p [...]e [...]natural period therof be so precisely prefixd; that no Human prudence or providence can prevent or prolong it, nor fortuitous accidents accelerat or prevert it? In brief, whether the Catastrophe of ech Mans life be prefined in the Book of Fate or Divine Decree? Life is said to be fixd in a duple sens: 1. In respect of som absolut Decree antegredient to Gods Pres [...]ience of al secund instrumental causes; so that Man can­not possibly prorogue it beyond, or fal short of that fatal term. 2. In respect of som conditionat Hypothetic Decree; whos alteration or accomplishment is superseded by the electiv li­berty of mans Wil, either as guided by supernatural light of divine Grace to pursu the real tru good; or seduced by delusion of its own sensual judgment, to wander in the de­vious tracts of error, and so chus seeming fals Good. Now it skils not, whether this conditionat Decree be grounded on cer­tain prenotion of al concomitant circumstances and corollary relations, concerning Mans election of adhering to good and evil Objects; and his consequent virtuous or vicious cours of life? Or whether it be made without any such infallible preno­tion or volition, yet with a positiv deliberat sentence certainly to be executed in du time, when the right use or abuse of Freewil shal be fulfilled.

Hence arise 3. Opinions: 1. Som hold the term of e­very 1 Opinion. very Mans life, with al causes and clauses conducing to be flatly fatal or immovable, by Gods irresistible Wil and Decree; according to the vulgar saying, his time is com; this is a Stoical devise used as a spur to excite magnanimous spirits against dangers of death, that every Mans destiny is writ with invisible indeleble characters in his forhead: which al Ma­hometans maintain doctrinaly, and many Christians igno­rantly.

But 'tis in it self impious if not blasphemous; to confine Confut. Gods chief attribut of infinit Omnipotence, within the definit lists, laws, or limits of secund causes: and it derogats from the liberty of Mans wil, leaving nothing in his power to elect or eschew, nor to act or shun. For if Fatal necessity be defended, [Page 63] al our actions shal be but so many accomplishments of inelucta­ble Destiny; and results of Counsil the decrees of Fate; so al human pru [...]ence is palpable folly, [...] study of Wisdom painful vanity, and al Laws meer tyranny: si [...]h th [...]y injoyn only what must h [...]v [...]in doon otherwise, or restrain what would els be checked by coercing fatality. Thus shal al pra [...]ers be fruit­less, vows hopel [...]ss, exhortations to good needless, d [...]hortati­ons from evil frivolous, and acts of piety or devotion super­fluous: with a [...]yriod of other incongru [...]ties appendent, if ab­solut fatality be admitted; which is inconsistent to the rules o. Reason and R [...]ligion.

2. Others assert a fixed fatality of every Mans life 2 Opin. a posteriori, not to be extended beyond the natural con­dition of each particular constitution; but not a priori, sith it may be contracted or abbreviated, as 'tis common­ly (but simply) said, one may shorten tho not exced his time appointed by divine D [...]cree.

Certes God made no such absolut decrees for the length Confut. of any Mans life; but leavs every Man free to be his own Carver in al temporal mundan affairs.

3. Divers defend, that Mans life may be lengthned or 3 Opin. shortned more or less of what it usually is in most Men, by the right use or abuse of means: according to Gods pre­notion or Hypothetic determination, leaving the means to every mans Freewil.

This is perpendicularly proved by many plain places and Confirmat. pregnant instances extant in holy Writ; but none that hav any color for a fixed fatal period. Salomon saith, The Prov. 10. 27. fear of the Lord prolongeth dais, but the wickeds yeers shal be shortned. For God promiseth long life to them that honor their Parents, and generaly to al such as shal keep his Commandements. Yea he said to Salomon, If thou wilt 1 Kings 3. 14. walk in my wais as thy Fa [...]her David did, I wil lengthen thy d [...]is. And David definitly saith, Bloody and deceitful Men shal Ps. 55. 23. Ps. 102. 24. Ps 6. 4, 5. Ps 30 Ps. 8 [...]. not liv out half their dais. Again, Take me not away in the midst of my dais. The like he praied in sicknes, That God would not cut off the th [...]ed of his Is [...]: and givs thanks for preserving him from death. Ezekiah hearing imminent death denounced, prai­ed [Page] with tears, and had his life prolonged 15. yeers. Jonah from God threatned destruction to Ninive within 40 dais: yet up­on repentance they were preserved. Contrarily sundry ex­emples are current of such as hav bin cut off for their sins: so was the whol stock of mankind (except 8. Persons) in the u­niversal Deluge: so al the Israelits (except Josua and Caleb) were buried in the Desart: so Corah, Dathan, and Abiram with their families were swallowed quick of the Earth, beside many mo. To Jobs place pr [...]cited he answers, that it means not the term of particular Mens lifes: but in general of man­kind, that his time comparatly is very short, being cycled with­in a smal circle of moneths and dais. In which sens it runs pa­rallel with that of Moses, The dais of our yeers are 70; and Ps. 90. 10. if by reason of strength Men com to 80, yet is their life but la­bor and sorow: for 'tis soon cut off and we fly away. So David Ps. 39. 5. saith, Lo, thou hast made my dais as an handbreadth, and my age is nothing before thee: verily every Man at his best state is al­together vanity. Nor doth Job shew by what maner of or­dinance or decree God made that definition of dais and moneths, but most probably refers to his infallible prescience of every Mans future demeanor, upon the Hypothesis of his good or il use of Freewil.

Ob. 'Tis objected, That it matters not whether Gods pre­science preced his preordination of any future event and so founded upon prevision; or els be subsequent to Preordina­tion, which is the basis of prevision: for it folows both wais, that the term of life is intransibly fixd, sith divine Prescience can no more be defeated then decree.

Sol. Indeed Prescience whether it preced or succed Decree, is ever certain, precise, or infallible in event by necessity of consequence, not of consequent: that is from the Hypothesis or conditionality, tho not from the efficacy or causality. For if God infallibly fo [...]eknows (as he doth) that the period of Mans life shal be by such means or maner; then it wil assured­ly be so: yet his prenotion hath no influence on our actions, as the Schools say. For divine Prescience Prescien [...]e is duple: 1. Ante­cedent to Preordination, whos Object is a future thing with­out any previous Decree: hereby God eternaly foresaw al things [Page 64] to com, both necessary by the impuls of natural causes, and future conti [...]g [...]nts depending on Freewil, sans relation to any after Decrees. Hereof Rabbi Isaac Bar Sesac saith, God from eternity disposed al mundan affairs, and foresaw al effects which should ensu in time, even the action of Free­wil, whether to be doon or not. Hownbeit Man doth not any thing in time becaus God foreknew it: but contrarily becaus Man wil doo this or that in time, therfore God eternaly fore­knew it would so com to pass. 2. Subsequent to Gods De­crees, which hath for its Object a thing to com and presup­poseth it so fully as the former, together with the maner or Order of its futurition as fixd and stable, being so constituted by an antecedent preordination. This last is also duple: 1. Conditionat, That if a Man being born of a sound durable con­stitution, shal observ good courses tending to health, and use fit remedies against maladies; God foresees he shal liv long: but if he take contrary courses, God foreknows he shal be sub­ject to diseases and dy untimely. 2. Absolut, wherby God certainly knows that such a Man wil chus a prudent cours of life, and fit means to prevent or cure diseases, wherby he shal liv long in health: or that another wil liv intemperatly, or neglect means and shorten his dais. Both which suppose a certainty of divine Prescience touching the precise period of every mans life, as also the order or maner of its futurition and al concurring causes. Among which the most energeti­cal is the right use or abuse of h [...]s own Freewil, in whos power it was to prolong or abbreviat that term forward or backward: so far is Gods prenotion or prevision from excluding a tem­perat diet and phisical remedies; that it necessarily includs it, els God foreknows he wil be accessary to shorten his own dais like a F [...]lo de se. For if Man hath no Freewil, to use or refuse sitting means, Gods Prescience is uncertain, sith it determins nothing, but presupposeth al: nor doth he by any Decree subsequent to Prescience preordain, that this or that Man shal recover of such or such a sicknes, unles he shal use the means ordained by divine providence: but if he wilfully or negligently rejects it, he hastens his own Catastrophe.

The result of al is, that God foresees al things and the ma­ner [Page] of means how they wil com to pass; yet doth neither caus nor compel any necessity of the event. Next for the abso­lut Decree of Predestination, their main arguments shal be mustered up together.

Ob. S. Paul saith, The children being not yet born, nor hav­ing Rom. 9. 11, 12, &c. doon good or evil; that Gods purpos according to election might stand, not of works, but of him that caleth, it is writen: Jacob have I loved, but hate [...] Esau. For he saith to Moses, I wil have mercy on whom I wil: So 't [...]s not of him that wil­leth or runneth, but of God that shewe [...]h mercy. For he hath mer­cy on whom he wil, and hardens whom he wil; as he did Pharaoh to shew his power in him. Thou wilt [...]ay [...]h [...]n, why doth he yet find fault? for who can resist his Wil? nay but O Man, who art thou that repliest against God? Shal the thing formed say to the Former, why madest thou me so? Hath not the Potter power over his Clay, of the same lump to make one Vessel of honor, and another to dishonor? What if God to sh [...]w his wratk and make his power known, endured with long suffering the Ves­sels of wrath prepared for destruction; and to manifest the riches of his glory on the Vessels of mercy, which he had prepared to glory? Isaiah crieth, though Israel be as the Sea sand a rem­nent only shal be saved: Ergo al depends on Gods absolut ante­cedent Decree of pure pleasure.

Sol. The Lutherans refer al to simple Prescience, whereto they stick like limpets: nor is any warrant in holy Writ for absolut irrespectiv Decree, or to exclud Prescience from Gods proceedings: but this place of S. Paul is one of which S. Peter speaks, that Many misunderstand to their condemnation. God loved Jacob and hated Esau, before they did good or evil: but not before he knew what both would doo: for Men are prius d [...]mnati, quam nati; sed non quam noti. God knew A­dam the root and al particular branches of Mankind: what their affections, actions, and ends wil be, so wel for matters of this life as that to com, if he should Decree to creat them and passed permissiv Decrees accordingly. He knew Moses and David would be Men after his own heart: Christ knew Peter at a silly D [...]mosels chalenge would deny him, and upon his look repent bitterly: how Saul would obey his cal, and of a [Page 65] bloody persecutor becom a bold blessed Professor. God is Exod 8. 15. 32. said to harden Pharaohs heart by witholding his Grace, who first hardned his own by disobeying, which he would not mol­lify. So he deals with al obstinat obdurant sinners, who first refuse or resist Grace offred, nor wil use the means prescribed: but how far he useth Prescience in al thes works, he self only knoweth. The similitud of the Potter sheweth, that none hath caus to contest or complain against God; sith every one by lapsed Nature is liable to condemnation, and 'tis his meer mercy to sav any. The elect are caled vessels of honor and mercy, but Reprobats of dishonor, wrath, and fury: both which presuppose sin, specialy disobedience and impenitence in thes, whom God endured with long suffering (as he did the wicked of the old World) but being despised, shewed his wrath and power on them. The salvation of al that are saved, and perdition of al which perish, is rightly referred to his Wil as suprem universal caus, mover, disposer and Governor of al; who could hav ordered them otherwise if he pleased: yet must this chief Agent be considered, not as doing al by himsef alone; but suffering other created Natures to use their free faculties, as his Wisdom, Justice, Mercy, Dominion shal judg fit to ap­ply them holily and righteously after his own Nature.

Thus he prepared som to life, som to death, as their several ends; but by intervent of their own acts foreseen so wel as his; who proceds in his purposes so blamelesly, as a Potter in making of the same Clay som Vessels for better, and som for baser uses or services. For though there be much neernes between the Potter and his Clay to dispose at his pleasure; yet is much more betwen God and his Creatures. So whom he chose in Christ and willed to sav by him (supposing his own acts of giving his Spirit to them, and their readines to receiv and obey) such are Vessels made to honor: But thos whom he rejected and de­creed to destruction (upon like supposal of their acts, in despi­sing his Promises and abusing his Graces) such are Vessels made to dishonour and damnation: For such supposals are necessary here, sith Mankind is not like a lump of Clay, sensless and rea­sonless; but a free Intelligent Creature, made to work or pro­cure his own ends both good and evil: good by working with [Page] God, who seeks Mans good; or evil, by forsaking and faling from him in this work: But becaus God could hav altered or amended his whol mass or any parcel, which the Potter perhaps cannot alwais doo in his; therfore he hath a far nobler power over Mankind then a Potter of his Clay to make Vessels of honor or dishonour: wherby al is resolved to his Wil, as the prime suprem Caus, which allows al subordinats to work ac­cording to their Natures, and applies them to his own glory: Nor doth the Potter destroy or cast away his vessels; no more wil God his Creatures sans caus.

Ob. S. Peter saith, the Jews took Jesus of Nazaret, being Acts 2 23. delivered by Gods Counsil and foreknowledg, whom by wicked hands they crucified and slu: Ergo, &c.

Sol. It was doon by Gods Counsil, but foreknowledg con­joined: for the execution of divine Decrees hath two parts. 1. An absolut operation to produce al good things: 2 Per­missiv of any evil to be doon by others, which he turns to good ends. So Joseph told his Brethren, ye purposed evil against me, Gen. 50. 25. but God disposed it for good to preserv his People alive. Sem­blably he turned the Jews malice with Judas treason to Mans salvation: but 'tis not said that he in secret counsil Decreed either; but only permitted and turned it to good. Calvinians distinguish betwixt the Entity of every act which is good from God; and Obliquity which is evil from Man: instancing in a bias Bowl and halting Hors, whos deviations proced not from the Caster or Rider. The Lutherans say such distinctions and comparisons are poor palliations, like Cobwebs to catch silly Flies and partial folowers. For God decrees no evil (either Entity or Obliquity) but only foresaw al in his pure Presci­ence, and determined in his secret counsil to permit it only. For Decree is the act of his soveraign wil which no creature can resist at any time: but he offers sufficient Grace indifferent­ly to al, which may be refused or resisted by any, and is by too many; who hav Freewil on the left hand to evil, as al sides unanimously agree. Som say Grace flows from God by two Fountains of Purpos and Preaching: but that of Purpos flows also from Preaching: for Faith cometh by hearing. S. Paul reconciles both, making Gods foreknowledg the first link [Page 66] which leads al: for though his general lov be the sole source, whence Preaching, Caling and promiss of Grace proceds even to the Elect; whos caling he chiefly intended, as if he sent his Word only to them: yet published it to the rest also, that his goodnes to al may be manifested. So Preaching is the Fountain of conveying Grace to them that receiv it, and might be to the rest which reject it; sith Gods purpos from Prescience, is the Fountain of Grace to such as hav it; but thos who hav it not (to whom also the Word is preached) want it by their own dis­dain or disobedience foreknown; not for default of divine Predestination. For Quos praescivit preceds praedestinavit, as Quos praedestinavit doth vocavit, justificavit, & glorificavit, which are the successiv links of that Heavenly golden Chain leading to life everlasting.

Non decet Ingenuos jurare in verba Magistri:
Dogmata nec pigeat discere falsa retro.
Free Men should not swear their Teachers Word t' observe
Nor griev t' unlearn fals Doctrins, or back swerv.
Ne placido errores exugite lacte latentes:
Nam cum Vino Homines saepe venena bibunt.
Suck not up errors hid in Milk most fine;
For Men drink poisons oftimes mix'd with Wine.

Reprobatio ex praevisis. Reprobation foreknown.

HItherto the bright side of Predestination or Election, hath bin soly shewed: now the black Globe of Repro­bation shal be succinctly surveied. Mr. Calvin (who first bro­ched Instit l 3. C [...] 3. 54. 57. the absolut Decree of Adams Fal, for which Lutherans so bitterly brand him) vents thos peremptory positions: That he fel away according to Gods knowledg and ordinance; who decreed that he should perish by his own faling away: That al Adams Sons fel away by Gods Wil, by whos secret Counsil Mans fal was ordained: That Men hav nothing in agitation, Inst. l. 2. c. 17. sec. 11. nor bring ought into action, but what God by his secret dire­ction [Page] hath decreed: That Devils and Reprobats are not only held fast in Gods fetters, as not to doo what they would; but Inst. l. 2. c. 4 § 3 are forced by his bridle to doo as he wil hav them: That God not only hardens Men by leaving it to themselfs; but by appointing their Counsils, ordering their deliberations, stirring up their Wils, and confirming their purposes by the Minister of his wrath Satan, to destroy them: That he prepared S [...]hon King of Ammorits, by hardning his heart, becaus he intended his ru­in: Inst. l 14 c. 18. §. 1, 2. That the distinction of a permissiv decree, is a fiction of the flesh, and they play the fools that use it as a subterfuge to shift off this seeming absurdity. His contemporar Collegue Mr. Beza, and al his rigid Sectators (stiled Supralapsarians) agree in al Points.

Visne Deum ex placito Reprobos addicere paenae?
Durus hic est Sermo: quis [...]olerare potest?
Wilt make God punish Reprobats of's pleasure?
This is an hard speech: who can it endure?

Ob. He objects, That to permit Mans Fal, and to Wil or In Gen. c. 3. Decree it, is al one in effect: becaus what he could hinder if he would, must com to pass by his Wil in not hindring it, sith he had power to prevent it: Ergo he willed it. This al his Disci­ples vouch as irrefragable verity.

Sol. By their leavs this folows not: for though the Proverb be tru in Men, Qui non vetat cum possit jubet: yet in this case it holds not with God, but crosseth his chief desig [...] or Decree to make Man a free Creature ad utrumlibet, to stand or fal: which could not be if he had limited the liberty of his Wil, and not permitted him to chuse either way. So they say to foresee what wil com to pass, and to decree it, is al one: which is untru. The Decree of Reprobation (both in the privativ act of prete­rition, and positiv of punishment) depends on Gods simple Prescience, which anteverts al Decrees concerning the Worlds Creation or disposal of Man, both for matters of this life and a better; who had absolut Free-wil in al his actions, being not barred or blocked up by any absolut antecedent Decree of pure pleasure, as thos rigid Rhadamants pretend.

The Supralapsarians present Man to God in the Decree of Reprobation abov or beyond Adams fal: as if without any re­spect of foreseen sin (original or actual) in the Creature, he decreed to glorify his Soveraignty in the eternal rejection and damnation of most Mankind as the end, by their wilful disobe­dience and final impenitence as the means. The Sublapsarians to shun som inconveniences incident to that assertion, fal a litle lower, and exhibit Man as guilty of original sin, for which God freely decreed the greatest number of Men to eternal par­dition, only to shew his Power and Justice. The difference is smal, not sufficient to caus a breach betwixt them, as they con­fess▪ nor is any reason to jar about circumstances, when they ac­cord in substance. For both conspire that Gods moving caus of Reprobation is Gods Wil, and not Mans wickednes: So their final impenitence is utterly inavoidable by Gods absolut antecedent irrespectiv Decree, which both sides hold.

This prefractory position is oppugned by many Reasons. 1 Reason. 1. Becaus 'tis a novity which hath no footing in antiquity: for the upper way was never taught by any, no not the stoutest asserters against Pelagians; nor the lower til S. Austins time: but al concurred, that Men might possibly be saved which in event were damned; and to hav repented, who died impeni­tent; sith no Decree of God lais any necessity of perishing on Adam or his Posterity. Hence Prosper, S. Austins Scholar, saith that almost al Antients consent, how God decreed al Mens ends, according to his foresight of their actions. Minutius Faelix presents Pagans, upbraiding Christians, that they held al events inevitable; framing an unjust God, who punished their indeclinable destinies, and not Mens voluntary iniquities: for as others ascribe it to Fate, so you to God. He answers, That Christians Fate is Gods Decree, grounded on his Prescience, which determins retributions according to Mens foreseen acti­ons. S. Jerem, a stif Anti-Pelagian saith the same, that al de­pends on Gods Foreknowledg; for whom he knows wil be righteous, he lovs before he coms out of the womb, and hates the contrary. For his lov and hatred riseth from foresight of future things; els he loveth al things, and hates nothing what he hath made: yea he saith God chuseth whom he seeth to be [Page] good. The result is, That God makes no Decree to damn or sav; but what is built on foreknowledg of Mens actions. S. Au­stin and Prosper held chief Patrons of absolut Decree the Post­lapsarians way, let fal words to this effect; viz. That Apostats ly not under a necessity of perishing, becaus they were not pre­destinat; but were not predestinat, becaus God foresaw they would prevaricat; that becaus God foreknew they would pe­rish by their own Free-wil, therfore he did not predestinatly sever them from the Sons of perdition: That God withdraws not from any Man ability to yeeld obedience, becaus he is not predestinat; but did not predestinat upon prescience of his faling from obedience. So Fulgentius saith, Thos whom God fore­saw would dy in sin, he decreed should liv in endless punish­ment.

The Council of Arles against Pelagians, denounceth thes Held A. C 490 Anathema's. Cursed be he that shal say, a Man which perisheth might not hav bin saved: Or that a Vessel of dishonor may not rise to honor. The Valentine Synod saith, The Wicked perish not becaus they could not, but becaus they would not be good, and by their own fault remain in the mass of perdition. Again, That Gods power predestinats any to evil so as he cannot be good; we doo not only not beleev so great an evil, but with al detestation denounce such accursed. So did the Arausican Council. Thes are only Human testimonies, which are no rules of Faith: yet gray Antiquity and grav Assemblies must be more approved then green Novity or corner Conventicles: specialy sith Calvin and Beza acknowledg, that the common Opinion of conditional respectiv Decree, had many great A. betters in al Ages, who aspers Origen as the Author.

2. It shuns the test or touchstone of trial, which is a shrewd 2 Reason. suspition of falsity: for in the Disput at Momplegart between Beza and Jacobus Andreas, with their Associats, having argued the points about Christs Body & the Lords Supper; Beza flatly refused to touch Reprobation, lest the Ignorant should take scandal, being unacquainted with such high mysteries. At clo­sing up of which Colloquy, Frederic Earl of Wirtenberg ear­nestly exhorted his Lutherans to declare the Calvinians for Bre­thren, by giving hands one to another: but they denied it, say­ing, [Page 68] Th [...]y would pray God to open their Eys and doo them any offi [...]e of charity, but not giv them the right hand of Fra­ternity, being found guil [...]y of gross enormous errors, naming this as chief. At Hague Conference, the Contra-Remonstrants would not condescend to argu this point with the Arminian Remonstrants, but resolved rather to break off then begin it. At Dort Synod, the President warned the Remonstrants to de­bat the point of Election, but not touch the harsh string of Reprobation; yet both are parts of Predestination, the wel or il stating wherof, doth much concern Gods glory and good of Religion: Nor can one be rightly handled without the other, specialy sith al uprores then rose about Reprobation; which doctrin was deeply chalenged of error, and bound to be cleered. Nor was it to be discussed among the simpler sort, who might haply stumble at it, but by profound learned Men, who as threshing Oxen were to beat out the Corn, and bolt out truth couched in the bare letter of Scripture. Vives saith, Tru Reli­gion is not gilded, but gold it self; which being scraped shews the brighter: let's not then fear lest our Faith when 'tis said open appeer filthy; but let fals fucacious Religions be afraid of this. The Jew is loth to argu his Law with Christians; and Mahometans are forbid to disput the Alcoran; becaus their Doctrins are brittle as glass, broken with every touch: But a Christian fears no examination, nay provokes his Adversary to combat: thus he. Truth seeks no corners as error doth, but dares abide the sifting: So saith our Saviour, Every one that John 3. 20, 21. doth evil hates the light, lest his deeds be reproved: But he that doth truth coms to the light, that his deeds may be made manifest to be wrough in God. S. Paul describes an Heretic to be a Self­condemner, Titus 3. 11. as rufusing trial. He is deemed as a silly Sciolist, who is loth to be opposed; and thos Opinions fals, which would walk in a mist or dwel in silence.

3. The obloquy of it: for 'tis odious to Papists, who revile 3 Reason▪ our Religion in this point: opprobrious to Lutherans, who for this causcal us damned Calvinists; protesting they wil rather return to the Papacy, then admit the Sacramentary or Prede­stinary pestilence, as Sir Edwin Sandys reports: who saith the Greecs deeply disgust it, deeming it very injurious to Gods [Page] goodnes and directly opposit to his very Nature. The Jews al­so detest it, that God of his pure pleasure should affect the ex­trem misery of his chief Creatures, to shew the severity of his Justice in tormenting them: or that the calamity and casting away of most part, should redound more to his glory, then the felicity of them al by his Mercy: thus he. Yea Hemingius lea­ving his Lutheran side, joined with Calvinists in the Sacraments and som other points; but would never subscribe to this. Mousieur Moulin saith, If God Reprobats Men sans conside­ration of sin, or ordained them to sin; yet 'tis a wise Mans part to concele rather then utter such things; becaus, being vent­ed or defended, they giv great scandal, and fil Mens heads with scruples; beside the advantage which our Adversaries take to defame tru Religion: such be the fruits of holding this absolut Decree.

4. It hath affinity with the exploded error of Stoics and Ma­nichees, 4 Reason. though differing from both: For Stoics held al actions and events fatal, either by the Heavenly Bodies impositions, or dispositions of Natural causes; that one thing must necessarily folow another and be as they are, though God would hav som things otherwise. The Manichees maintain al Mens actions to be determined, the Good by a good God, who created al things Good; and the Evil by an Evil, who is Author of al evil. Now the Asserters of absolut Decree defend, either that al acti­ons (Natural, Moral, Good, Evil) and al events are simply ne­cessary; or els that al Mens ends are unalterable by any power in their Wils: which in effect is the same. For in vain is free­dom in actions and means, if the end be decreed and determi­ned; sith al actions are for the ends sake, to attain it by them, and involv the means which forego that end: as if a Man be predecreed to damnation; he must needs sin, els he cannot be damned. In thes three Opinions two things may be noted. 1. The substance or formality, which is an indeclinablenes of Mens actions and ends, wherin al consort, that insuperable ne­necessity predominats. Hence Melancthon charged the Church of Geneva with Stoical error, caling absolut Decree the Tables of Destiny. 2. The circumstance or ground, wherin they dif­fer: For Stoics draw this necessity from the Stars or first mat­ter; [Page 69] Manichees from two first Principles eternal and coeter­nal: but Calvinists from Gods peremptory Decree. The two first in som respects hav the better of this last: for 'tis safer to deriv necessity of evil from an evil God or Natures cours, then from a good Gods decree. The first was condemned by the best Philosophers, the next by al the Fathers: specialy for the main matter, becaus it made al things and events necessary, plucking up the roots of virtu, planting vice and leaving no place for reward or punishment: What then shal be said of the last, who realy maintain the same?

5. It dishonours God, charging deeply with Mens eternal damnation, as prime principal caus therof by his voluntary di­sposition 5. Reason. antecedent to al deserts in them, which they cannot possibly decline by reason of his absolut irrevocable Decree. This is contrary 1. to Scripture, which makes God al mercy, and Man sole caus of his own ruin. See Hose 13. 9. Lament. 3 33. Ezek. 33. 11. Wis. 1. 12, 13. and elswher. 2. It re­pugns Gods Nature, who is merciful, gracious, long-suffering, abundant in goodnes. See Ps. 86. 5. Joel 2. 16. Jonah 4. 22. Micah 7. 18. 3. 'Tis advers to sound reason, which can­not but impeach such a Decree of extrem cruelty, far from the Father of mercy. For what natural Parent can resolv to beget Children, and after birth living a while with him to hang up by the toung, tear off their flesh with scourges, pul it from the bones with burning pinsers, or put them to other hideous tortures; only to shew his power and authority over them? Yet wors by infinit degrees is imagined of God, if he should of free pleasure ordain so many myriads of Men made after his own Image to everlasting fire, only to shew his sove­raign dominion over them. Abram held it high injustice in Gen. 18. 25. God to destroy the righteous with the wicked even temporaly, and expostulats with an Absit, far be that from thee, O Lord. How deeply then would he detest any thought, that he wil destroy millions upon his own absolut decree eternaly? Far be it from our God.

6. It chargeth God with al sorts of sins committed since the 6. Reason. Creation, as sole Author or Abettor, being a necessary product of his absolut Decree: yet David saith, he delights not in wickednes. [...]. [...]. [Page] So S. James, Let none say he is tempted of God, for he tempts James 1. 13, 14. no man to evil: but every one is drawn by his own concupiscence. 1. John 2. 16. S. John tels us, That the lust of the flesh, lust of the ey, and pride of life is not of the Father, but of the World. This Tenet makes God wors then the Devil, whos tentation may be re­sisted; but Gods powerful effectual Decree cannot be frustrated. Prosper saith, If this were charged on the Devil, he may in som sort cleer himself, sith he can compel none to sin, what madnes then is it to aspers that on God, which cannot justly be imputed to Satan? Tertullian saith, He cannot be accompted Author of sin, who is Avenger and Condemner of it: nor can he be a just holy God (saith S. Basil) nor Judg of the World, if he decree sin: sith 'tis al one to say God is Author of sin, and to aver he is not God. The defenders disclaim this Tenet in direct terms, being so harsh to Christian ears; but deliver it in truth by necessary consequence. For they avouch the De­cree of Reprobation to be absolut and inevitable; nor can Reprobats be saved, tho they doo al the works of Saints, sith God created them to this very purpos, that they should sin, els he could not attain his principal ends, to manifest his mercy in saving the elect, and execut his justice in damning Re­probats; who are eternaly decreed to sin even to death. Thus say Piscator, Marlorat, Zanchy, and many mo. This is by cleer consequents to make God the Author of sin: which is ordinarily imputed to thos who hav not such interest or influ­ence in production of it, as this assertion ascribes to God. The Devil is caled the Father of lies, and semblably of al sins 1. John 3. 8. 10. els, as sinners are stiled his Sons, and sin a work of the Devil; which the Son of God cam to loos. Yet the Devil only egs or excites Men by outward suggestions and inward tentations to sin, which is al he can doo: but if God necessitats by his absolut Decree, and after determinats by his powerful secret working in Mens Souls, and disposing or overruling their Wils, that they cannot but sin and perish; he doth infinitly more, then barely suggest, intice, or perswade; which is horrid to imagin. So wicked Men are reputed Authors of their sins, becaus they plot, purpos, chuse, and commit them as immediat Agents: but if God overrules their projects and purposes by an uncomp­trolable [Page 70] decree, that they must needs doo as they doo and dy; tho they would fain doo otherwise and be saved; he is chiefly the Author, and they only secund Actors or subordinat Instru­ments under him. Haply they hav free power in it self, but no free use to doo as they list, sith God determins their acti­ons by his Omnipotent Wil.

Evil Counsilors and Allurers to sin, are also esteemed causers, and punished with others which commit crimes by their insti­gation: as J [...]zabel was guilty of Nabaths murder for coun­siling and contriving it: but they say God doth even in­force it by an Almighty Decree, which cannot be resisted: ther­fore he is much more the chief author and actor then meer a­better or accessary. If a King shal procure a Subjects ruin by plotting his offens (as Henry 7. is said to seek Edward Earl of Warwicks destruction, by contriving his escape out of London Tower) al men wil charge him as Author of his crime and death: much more God, if he design the sin and damnation of Reprobats. So saith Moulin, who wil not abhor a King that to hang a man by Law, plots to make him a Thief or Murderer, that he may seem to doo it justly? For he shal not only make an innocent wretched, but wicked too, and destroy him for that offens wherof he is Author. So dissembling Ti­berius decreeing Sejanus Daughter to death, caused the Hang­man first to deflower hir; because their Laws forbad Virgins to be strangled: yet was he chief Author both of hir rape and ruin. If then God Decrees to damn millions upon millions, and shal caus or permit the Devil first to defile them that he may justly destroy them; is not he the chief caus of their sins so wel as sufferings? Al Men grant God to be sole Author of Mens conversion and salvation: yet doth he no more in pro­curing it, then thes Men ascribe to him in reprobation and damnation. For he absolutly and antecedently from eternity decreed to sav the elect, and by irresistible means to work faith, repentance, and final perseverance for their salvation and accomplishment of his Decree: semblably he peremptorily decreed (as they say) to damn Reprobats, leading them on by an insuperable power and immutable providence from sin to sin, til they hav made up a ful measure; and in fine inflicts [Page] vengence for acting what he appointed. What difference then in thes courses, or why shal not God be reputed Author of the ones sins, so wel as of the others salvation? The Fathers held it a parallel case, an therfore made sin an object only of Prescience, bending their Arguments against this perilous position of an absolut, antecedent, irrespectiv, irresistible, in­forcing Decree of Reprobation. Dr. Ʋsher relating the Church [...]st of Got­ [...]s [...]. p 138. of Lyons answer to Seotus against Gotteschalc, hath thes words: whoever saith ther is a constraint or necessity of sin­ning laid on any Man; he grosly and grievously blasphems God, making him to be the Author of sin: nor can al the quaintest wits in the world avoid it. Howbeit to shew fair play, and scan this point at ful; al their Defenses, Devises, Sha­dows, Similituds, Evasions, and Elusions shal be amply agi­tated and aptly answered.

'Tis said ther is a duple Decree: 1. Operativ, by which God 1 Devise. positivly works his purpos; and this would infer him to be the Author of sin. 2. Permissiv, by which he only Decrees to let it com to pass; and this doth not make him Author of sin, which is al that they maintain. If it be al, 'tis wel: let that be tried.

Answer. Indeed God permits al sin, els could be none if he would effectualy hinder it: as he left Adam in the hand of his own Al [...]s 14 16. counsil to stand or fal. So he suffred the Nations to walk in their own wais▪ And stil suffers al Men to slide into sundry sins: not becaus he stands in need of sin to set forth his glory, but becaus he is suprem moderator of al▪ knowing how to bring good out of evil; and specialy becaus he made Man (as Tertullian tels) a free creature undetermined either way in his actions, til he determins himself, and may not be hindered from sinning by Omnipotence, becaus he ordained otherwise. Nor doth a permissiv Decree caus sin being meerly extrinsecal to the sinner, which hath no influence on it. If they intend nothing els in good earnest then a bare permission, 'tis gran­ted: but their main conclusion fals to ground, and the debat at an end. He [...]ce their chief Coryphees reject this distinction as a fiction of the flesh, and make God to decree sin efficati­ously with an energetical working wil; blaming thos that [Page 61] refer ought to Gods prescience only. Permission properly is an act of Gods consequent judiciary Wil, by which he punish­eth Men for abusing their freedom in committing sins day by day, which they might hav declined, and 'tis caled his long­suffering▪ proceding to punish with a slow unwilling pace. See Ps. 81. 11, 12. Ezek. 18 39. Rom. 1. 21, 24. Rev. 22. 11. but Permission by them intended, is an act of Gods antecedent Wil exercised on innocent men lying under no guilt; whom he eternaly preordains to sin and punishment. So tru Per­mission about whomever exercised, is only not to hinder them from faling which are able to stand, and supposeth a pos­sibility in the party permitted to sin or not: but in their sens 'tis a withdrawing or with-holding of Grace needful to shun sin; and so infolds an absolut necessity of sinning: as the fal of Dagons hous folowed Sampsons plucking down the Pillars which supported it. So Maccovius saith, Permission is a sub­traction of divine assistance necessary to prevent sin: so Dr. Whitaker, Permission is a privation of that aid, which b [...]ing present would hav prevented sin. So Pareus, That help which God witheld from Adam, made that he could not so use his in­dowments as to persever; which he saith is the doctrin generaly defended by their side. So their Permission of sin being a sub­traction of necessary Grace, is equivalent to an actual effectu­al procuring and woking of it: for a deficient caus in things necessary is truly efficient: so this devise is a very figleaf to cover the ugly nakednes of their Opinion.

Others consider two things in every evil act: 1. The mat­ter 2 Devise. or Entity, wherof God is Author. 2. The form or Obli­quity which proceds from Satan, as in a lame Hors.

This distinction halts wors then the Hors: nor holds in al Answer. sins, sith in many the very acts are sinful; as Adams eating the forbidden fruit, and Sauls sparing Agag, which in others had not bin sin. NOE wil it serv their turn: for they make Gods Decree caus of al thos means which lead to damnation: ther­fore of sinful actions as sinful, and not as bare Entities; sith they deserv death not as simple actions, but as transgressions of the Law. As to their sly Simile, that Master or Owner, who shal first resolv to kil his Hors, and after lames him that [Page] he may hav color to doo it; is cruel to his Beast, and Author both of his halting and death: so if God first decree to cast Men into Hel, and then bring them into a state of sin that he may effect his purpose justly; he must needs be Author of sin, so wel as the actions to which it cleavs, sith he intends destru­ction. Thes are horrid aspersions.

Som coin a third evasion, that the Wil is determined to an 3 Devise. object two wais. 1. By compulsion against its inclination; so God forceth no Man. 2. By complying with its natural appe­tit or liking: So God may lead a Man to what he would, yet not be Author of sin, but only necessitats it. When Men sin, 'tis tru they cannot chuse, and as tru they wil not but sin: so 'tis not Gods Decree, but their own wicked Wil, which is caus of their sin and death.

The Fathers and School-men make Compulsion and Neces­sity Answer. al one, denying that God necessitats any to sin; for then he is Author of it so wel as if he compeld Men; sith therby it must inevitably be committed, which els might be declined. Nay what necessitats the Wil to sin, is more the caus then the Wil it self; becaus it overruleth and bears most sway, bereaving al t [...] liberty to dispos its own acts, which should be free Lord of it self. For the Necessitater is Commander, Comptroler, and Compeller; but the Wil a servil instrument determined by di­vine Decree: from which al such acts rather proced then from Mens wicked Wils. When two Causes concur to produce an Effect, one principal overruling, the other instrumental at the principals devotion: the Effect is ascribed to the influx or im­pression of the former, and not to the later, which is only a subservient Servant. See Mat. 10. 20. 1 Cor. 15. 10. Gal. 2. 20. wher the work is wholy imputed to the principal Agent. Adams Wil in innocence was whit paper or a clean-Table, equaly in­clined to good or evil: So if God decreed his Fal (as Supra­lapsarians say) that necessity was a coaction: but al others by depraved Nature are disposed to evil, yet determined by divine decree both Elect and Reprobats Wils. Though then Mans Wil works with Gods Decree in sinning; yet si [...]h it doth it by the commanding power of his irresistible Decree, the sin can­not so rightly be attributed to Mans Wil the inferior, as to [Page 72] Gods Decree the superior Caus. Yea that which makes a Man sin by necessity with and not against his Wil, is caus of his sin in wor [...] sort, then he which constrains him against his wil: as he that by powerful perswasion draws one to k [...]l himself, is more g [...]osly the caus of his self-homici [...], then he who inforceth him to it, becaus it makes him consent to his own death. So if Gods Decree makes Men sin, and willingly too (which is both to act and wil evil) he hath a deeper stroke in the sin.

Another shift is suggested, that sin is considered as sin, and 4 Devise. so God doth not destinat Men to it: Or as a means to mani­fest his Justice, and so he doth decree to punish it; yet is not the Author of sin.

This is a silly slide, for a good end cannot justify an il actions: Answer. Both end, matter, and maner too must be good, els the act is evil. If a Man shal steal to giv Alms, as Robin Hooa did; or commit whordom to beget Children for the Church, as the Harlot did which was mother to three famous School-Do­ctors, or the like; be his end never so good, he sinneth hainous­ly; sith 'tis a violation of Gods Majesty, and directly opposit to divine Good; as S. Paul saith, We must not doo evil that good may insu. If then God willeth evil for ends never so Rom. 3. 8. good; yet sith he decrees it with a powerful necessitating Wil, he is Author of it. For sin simply is a means of punishment: If then he wils it as a means of punishment, he wils it as simply sin by an absolut Decree: Absit omen.

This Position loads him with three indignities. 1. Want of Wisdom, which must needs be weak if he can find no way to glorify his Justice but by bringing in sin, which his Soul hates; that he may manifest it in punishing 2. Want of sincerity or plain dealing: as Tiberius, purposing to destroy Drusus and Nero (sons to Germanicus) provoked them to revile him, that so he might justly put them to death. So if God, appointing Men to eternal perdition, decrees they shal sin, that so they may be damned; he dissembles like that Tyran, and destrois them under colour of Justice, for such sins as he draws them in­to, appointing it as a means of their ruin. 3. Want of Mercy, as if he delighted in blood; who rather then he wil not destroy Mens Souls, decrees them to liv and dy in sin, that he may de­stroy [Page] them. Justin Martyr saith of Pagan Princes, They fear­ed Apol. l. 2 lest al should be just, that they might hav none to punish; which is the property of Hang-men, rather then good Princes: far be such foul enormities from the God of Truth and Father of Mercies. Thus we see, Causa patrocinio non bona pejor erit.

7. It overthrows Religion and good Government: 1. Be­caus 7 Reason. it makes sin no sin in deed, but only in Opinion. The Pro­verb is, Necessity hath no Law, and Creatures or actions swai­ed by it, are free from Laws. Lions are not forbid to prey, Birds to fly, or Fishes to swim, nor any thing to doo its kind sith 'tis Natural or Necessary, they can doo no otherwise: But Laws are given to Rational Animals which hav liberty of Wil; yet not to such as hav no use of Reason; nor to Men that can use it, sav in thos actions that are voluntary: For none is forbid to hunger, thirst, sleep, weep, laugh, &c. becaus thos actions and affections are necessary, being trangressions of no Law, and 1 John 3. 4. consequently no sins; as S. John concluds. Justin Martyr saith, if it be destiny (as the Fathers cal absolut Necessity) that Men are good or bad, they be neither good nor bad: So Virtu and Vice wil seem nothing but in opinion only, which is great In­justice and Impiety: For to what purpos was the Son of God made Man and a Sacrifice for sin? Why was Ministry ordain­ed or Heaven and Hel appointed? Faith, the Word, Sacra­ments, and al Religious Rites are meer Fables, if sin be nothing. 2. Becaus it bereavs al conscience of sin: for if it pleas or pro­fit Men, why shal they fear the perpetration which they cannot shun? or why weep and mourn, having sinned, if they be necessitated? sith sin is an effect of that irresisti­ble Decree or nothing, tears may be so wel spared as spent. 3. Becaus it cancels the guilt of sin, sith no fatal offen­ces can justly be punished either temporaly or eternaly; but Deut. 22. 25, 26. Necessity must bear the blame. God gav a Law, If a Maid be forced to incontinence, she shal not dy, being rather a sufferer then sinner. Tertullian saith, The reward of good or evil cannot justly be given to such as are so by necessity, and not freely. So Nemo sit fato nocens. S. Jerom, Wher necessity swais, ther is no place for retributi­on. So S. Austin, We place Mens nativities under no constel­lations, [Page 73] that the Wil may be freed from al hand of Necessity. So Epiphanius, If Stars impose a necessity of sinning, they may with more Justice be punished then Men: shal it then be said that Gods Decree doth the same? Prosper saith, Gods Judg­ments cannot be just, if Men sin by his Wil or determination. So Fulgentius, 'Tis great Injustice if God punish one whom he doth not find, but makes an Offender. Epiphanius refuting the Pharees (who held the Souls immortality and resurrection of the Body, together with fatal necessity) saith 'tis meer madnes to grant a Rusurrection and day of Gods righteous Judgment; yet to say ther is any fatality or necessity in Mens actions: for how can they cohere? which implies, that God necessitats none to sin or damnation. Nor can his Judgments be just, if Men be held by the Adamantin chains of necessity under the power of sinning; teach or preach in words what any can to the contra­ry: For by that position al our actions are Gods Ordinances, and imaginations branches of his eternal Decree: yea al events in Kingdoms and Stats necessary issues of divine Destiny: which wil makes al pillars of Piety and Principles of Policy totter or tumble to ground; the best Laws cannot restrain one sin, the greatest rewards promot one Virtu, the powerfullest Sermons convert one sinner, the humblest devotions divert one Judg­ment, nor the strongest endeavors effect any more then what wil be doon without them: Gods Decree doth al in al. Prosper saith, Whoever holds that Men are urged to sin or damnation by Gods Predestination, as by inevitable necessity; he is no Catholic. Thes Men preach clean contrary in shew, and dehort from sin with terrible threats of vengeance: sed eui bono, if Men by Decree be necessitated to doo it, and hav no possible power to decline it? Lazarus at Christs cal cam forth, but being bound could not walk, til he was loosed and let go. Nor can Men repent or com to Christ, so long as they ly fastned with the fetters of necessity, under a fatal Decree, deprived from al power of Free-wil, til they shal be set at liberty by Gods co­operating Grace. The Arausican Council saith, That any are predestinat to sin by divine power; we not only not beleev, but with greatest detestation denounce Anathema to such (if any be) as will beleev so great an evil; which shal shut up this point.

The Sublapsarians or Disciples of Dort Synod (who, like Lapwings, hide their heads, thinking the whol Body safe; sup­pose Sublapsarians censured. themselvs more flight-free from scandal then Antelapsa­rians) hold, That God looking on the lost lump of forsorn Mankind in Adams foreseen Fal, decreed of free pleasure to send his Son in time to say som Elect Vessels by Ordinances prescribed in the Gospel; but to leav the rest in the suds of their sins to perish everlastingly. This Tenet shal be more pointly touched or taken in task, which is faulty in many manifest re­spects.

1. It repugns sundry pregnant places of holy Writ: As I 1 Reason. liv, saith the Lord, I hav no pleasure in a sinners death, but that Ezek 33. 11. the wicked turn from his way and liv: Ergo he doth not decree of free pleasure they should perish. He delights not in the death of wicked Men, much less of Innocents liable only to Original sin, to seal up so may millions of millions under it vin­cible damnation, meerly to shew his soveraign dominion. Saint Rom. 11. 2. Paul saith, God hath shut up al under unbeleef, that he might hav mercy on al: Here are two Als of equal extent: al Unbe­leevers, and al Objects of Mercy; implying that Gods wil is to hav mercy on al Unbeleevers, if they wil turn from infidelity. If then every Man is under Mercy, God hath no antecedent John 3 16, 7, 18. Wil to exclud som from al possibility of obtaining it. God so loved the World as he gav his only begotten Son, that whoever beleevs in him should not perish: Ergo he loved al lying in the lump of sin, sending his Son to be a Saviour; but hated not most part lying in laps predecreed to Reprobation. Som slily expound the word World for a World of Elect or Beleevers only: which is no wher so taken; but either for al Men, or al living in som certain place, or at som certain time, sans distin­ction of good or bad: Or if it be any wher restrained, 'tis ap­plied to wicked Men wedded to this World. Yet if it be som­wher limited to the Elect, 'tis not so here; for then the words would bear a sensless sens: God so loved the Elect, that whoever beleevs in his Son should not perish: which imports two sorts of Elect, som that beleev and shal be saved, others which be­leev not and shal perish: but Beleevers and Uunbeleevers (sa­ved and damned) includ al Mankind; which S. John cals els­wher [Page 74] the whol World, as an exposition of the former. S. Paul 1 John 2. 2. 1 Tim. 2. [...] saith, God wil hav al Men to be saved, and com to the knowledg of the truth: Ergo his wil is that al shal hav the means of know­ledg and be saved, but none shut up under unbeleef. Som by Al understand al sorts of Men, but not al particulars in ech sort; which is a silly shift. Indeed 'tis somtimes so taken, but not here, as the context shews: for in the first vers a duty is in­joined to make praiers and supplications for al Men, and then a motiv annexed, God wil hav al to be saved. The duty extends to every particular, we must in charity pray for al, even Tyrans, Persecutors, prophane Persons: Ergo the motiv intends al in­dividuals, or els reacheth not home to inforce the duty. Others answer, That God intends al to be saved by his reveled Wil, but millions damned by his secret. O beware of ascribing two se­veral Wils to God, who is no dissembler; sith one must needs be good, the other bad: For if his Word be his reveled Wil, and repugnant to his secret Mind or meaning; it must be un­tru or simulatory, and consequently a ly. S. Peter saith, The 2 Pet. 3. 9. Lord would hav none perish, but al com to repentance. Som fully it, That he means only the Elect or Beleevers; but the context flatly contradicts it: For the next preceding words speak of patience or long-sufferance toward Men, which must be Re­probats rather, who dy in their sins: as the same Apostle tels, That Christ in spirit preached to the spirits, which in Noahs dais 1 Pet 3. 19, 20 were disobediens, and now in prison or Hel for it. Yea Repro­bats are the most proper objects of his patience: as S. Paul saith, He useth much patience and long-suffering to them that Rom. 2 4. go on in sin, that he might lead them to repentance. Again, he suf­fers Rom 9 22. with long patience Vessels of wrath prepared (not decreed) to destruction. See Isai 5. 2. Isai 65. 2. So S. Peters words intend Reprobats so wel as others, or rather them then others; that God wil hav none to perish by his power or pleasure, ex­cept by their own fault or folly. This is confirmed by som con­ditional passages: If thou seek him, he wil be found; but if then [...] forsake him, he wil cast thee off. So God said to Cain, If thou do [...] [...] wel, shalt thou not be accepted? but if thou doo il, sin lies at dore. S. Paul saith, The just shal liv by faith; but if any draw back, Heb [...]. 1 [...]. 38. my soul shal [...] no pleasure in him. By which conditions 'tis [Page] clear, that God forsakes no Man simply considered in the fal, til he first forsakes him.

The result is, That he rejects none by previous Decree, sav such as he foresaw would cast him off by continuance in sin and contempt of Grace: For Gods acts in time, are regulated by his Decrees before time: as 'tis said, He works al according to Eph. [...]. [...]. the Counsil of his Wil. For ther is an exact conformity betwen the Rule and thing squared by it: therfore whatever God doth in the World, he purposed before the World, and by actual ca­sting Men off when they grow rebellious or impenitent; we may be sure he decreed to doo it for foreseen rebellion and im­penitence. Som obscure Texts may seem to favour the Opinion of free pleasure, as Men mis-interpret them; which by presup­posing prevision are rightly reconciled: But S. Austins rule is, we must not contradict plain places, becaus we cannot compre­hend obscure. And Tertullian teacheth, that a few places are to be understood after the current sens of most part, and not contrary to it; as in this case for the most part it seems to be.

2. It crosseth som chief Attributs of God (Mercy, Justice, 2 Reason. Truth, Holines) which are his perfections, wherby he exerciseth his acts among Men conform to them: For they are the same in God with thos virtues in Men, but infinitly differing in de­gree; sith what is just, tru, holy, or merciful in Men, is super­lativly so in God: Els cannot Man be properly made after his Image, nor renewed in Regeneration after the same; or made Col. 3. 10. partaker of divine Nature: but 'tis commanded, Be ye perfect, Mat. 5. 48. as your havenly Father is perfect; and holy, as I am holy: Nor is soveraign power or dominion an Attribut moraly good in it self, sith it may be shewed in cruel unjust acts so wel as con­trary: But our good God is Justice in the Abstract, and wil not exercise it tyrannously contrary to his other Attributs.

1. Now absolut Reprobation repugns his Holines, making him the chief caus of sin in most Men, sith he brings them into a state of sin which they cannot decline: For al are guilty of Adams transgression, and Natures corruption; yet not by na­tural generation, so much as by divine Ordination: as Calvin [...] 3. Inst. [...] 23. [...] 7 [...] faith, Al Men are held under guilt of eternal death in the per­son [Page 75] of one Man: which cannot be ascribed to any natural caus; but must com from Gods wonderful Counsil, who would hav it so. Doctor Twiss saith the same, The guilt of Original sin is derived only by imputation, the stain only by propagation, and both meerly by Gods free constitution. So saith S. Bernard, Adams sin is anothers, becaus we knew not Serm. 1 Dom. [...]. past. 8. Epi [...]. of it; yet ours too, becaus by Gods just (though secret) Judg­ment reputed ours. This agrees with reason; for if we incur guilt of the first sin and Natures corruption only, as being in Adams loins when he sinned; then are we guilty of al his other sins, being virtualy or potentialy in his loins after the fal so wel as before: But Scripture intitles only the first sin which entred the World and invaded al Mankind. Yea Children should be guilty of al their Progenitors (specialy the next Parents) sins, as being in their loins when they sinned more immediatly then in Adams: yet Children partake not their Parents guilt nor punishments, unles they hate God like them, and imitat their Exod. 20 5. sins. God swears that the Proverb (The Fathers hav eaten Ezek 18 2, &c. sour Grapes and Childrens teeth are set on edg) shal be used no more: the Soul that sins shal dy: But if a Man be just and doo right, he shal surely liv. The Son shal not bear his Fathers ini­quity, nor Father his Sons; but the Soul only that Sins shal dy. Wretched would be our case, on whom the ends of al the World are com if children should be guilty of al their Progenitors sins, or liable to their plagues and punishments: who can bear it? Yet 'tis asserted, that God decrees to leav Reprobats in this impo­tent irrecoverable condition, affording no ability to rise from sin by Grace; which Decree he executs in time of his Free-wil and Pleasure, leaving them under a necessity of sinning by the act of absolut Reprobation; both Negativ, which is a flat denial of Grace; and Positiv, which is a preordination of them to endless torments. Som grant common Graces to Reprobats, but not sufficient to sav them: So saith Lubbert, God reveles not the way of salvation to Reprobats, nor givs Faith and Regenerati­on; but leavs them in sin and perdition: Nor doth afford them any sufficient means of salvation, with an intention of saving them.

Thes two Positions (that God necessitats Reprobats to sin, [Page] and leavs them in the snds) make him chief Author of al their sins; for a Caus of the Caus, is Caus of the thing produced, Causa Cau [...], [...] Causa Cau­sati. whether Negativ or Positiv acts: Ergo if God be chief Caus of their impenitence by want or withdrawing supernatural Grace; he is tru caus of their sin according to the saying, He that for­bids or hinders not what is in his power, bids and furthers it, as they say God doth effectually wil it. 'Tis a poor pretext that God by withdrawing his Grace is only accidental, not a direct proper caus of their sins: For an accidental is when the effect is beside the Agents intention or expectation; as if one in digging his ground finds gold: But when an effect is expected, intend­ed, or contrived, the caus cannot be caled accidental: as a Pi­lot witholding his care or skil from a Ship, when he knows it wil perish by such neglect, is caus of casting it away. So if God detains Grace necessary, not as ignorant what wil insu; but precisely determins Reprobats ruin by their impenitence; he becoms a tru direct caus of their sins; which no wiles of wit (sav among their partial poor blind Disciples) can possibly de­cline.

2. It opposeth Gods Mercy, which is his Nature in the Ab­stract: See Exod. 34 6. Mat. 7. 11. Mat. 23. 37. 2 Cor. 1. 3. Eph. 2. 4. 1 Pet. 1. 2. 1 John 4. 16. But such matchless Mer­cy cannot stand with a peremptory Decree of absolut Repro­bation: which if God doth of free pleasure, he is rather a Fa­ther of Cruelties then Mercies, and a Destroier then Saviour. What Parent wil destin their Children to eternal death and torments for one only offens, and that not committed by them, but by others and imputed to them? Is Gods Mercy abundant if limited to a few Elect, scarsone of a hundred shal be inevita­bly saved? Ponder thes points duly: 1. That Adams sin is perso­naly none sav his, but a sin of Nature not committed or con­sented to by any of his posterity; which is derived by traducti­on, but made the sin of Nature by Gods arbitrary imputation, not ordinary generation. 2. That God (as 'tis generaly belee­ved) pardoned Adam who freely committed it: Can it then stand with his Mercy to punish others for the same sin not per­petrated by them? 3. That his only Son was sent into the John 1. 29: World, and suffred death for the sins of the World; which [Page 76] might suffice to satisfy his wronged Justice for al Mankind, and open a way of salvation to every Man, without respect of per­sons: But to damn a world of Reprobats by free Decree, only to shew his dominion, no way savours of Mercy: for he is far crueler to them then any Creature els, or to the very Devils; who are damned for their own personal pride and rebellion: but Reprobats by an absolut Decree for anothers crime. The one know their doom and expect it; but the other are deluded with hope and made beleev the matter is in their own hand; so that if they perish, 'tis not for want of Mercy in God, but o [...] wil in themselfs: Yet by their doctrin al depends on the pe­remptory punctilio of Gods arbitrary absolut Decree. So De­vils are in better case, becaus they are not injoined to beleev in Christ, nor to repent, fast and pray as Reprobats are: Nor pu­nished the more for not beleeving, as Men are: In al which re­gards their condition is far more ruful then cursed Fiends, who are made the tormentors over them. Concerning other Crea­tures, the very basest hav a being (though despicable) which is better then no being: Yet who would not wish, if he might chuse, to be resolved into nothing, then in such doleful direful condition? yea, that they had been Toads or Serpents then Men? Or what Parents wil procreat, if they be perswaded they shal beget Children Fire-brands for Hel, and Slavs to Satan? yet not for their faults, nor hav they power to help it. Let Prosper shape the period: He which saith God wil not hav al to be saved, but a few predestinat persons only; he speaks harsh­ly of Gods high inscrutable Grace. Som say Gods Mercy by this absolut Decree is sufficiently shewed to the Elect, and Ju­stice to Reprobats: but the one is clothed with partial respect of persons, and the other clouded with extrem rigour or seve­rity, as shal appeer.

3. It is incompatible with divine Justice: See Ps. 145. 17. Prov. 16. 11. Isai 5. 3. Ezek. 18. 25. but the absolut decre [...] of Reprobation cannot consist with it; sith it makes God punish the righteous with rebellious, and innocent Men with bad An­gels. For Antelapsarians say expresly, That God decreed Mans Fal or Fate considered without sin, and therfore innocent. Postlapsarians vouch the same by consequent, That he lais a ne­cessity [Page] on every Man to be born under original sin, decreeing to Reprobat most part for that sin: so they make God to doo [...]. 3 Inst. c. 23. § 7. 23. by two acts, which their brethren impute to one. Calvin con­tests, That God may with equal Justice decree Men to damna­tion the first way so wel as the last: for al are made guilty of Adams sin by Gods Decree only; why then not he by the same? Thes kind Patrons of divine Justice wil seem to stumble at a straw and leap over a block: why els wil they not grant that of one Man, which they doo of al? hence we may see what to judg of this opinion: That God cannot justly ordain Men to destru­ction sans consideration of sin: for which is greater to impute another sin to one and punish him for it with eternal death; or to ordain Men to perdition simply without looking at sin? but they say he may doo the one without wrong to Justice: Ergo the other. So saith Doctor Twiss, If God may decree Men to Hel for Adams sin derived to them by his sole constitu­tion; he may so justly doo it without any such ordination. In­deed 'tis al one to decree a Mans misery, as to involv him in a sin which shal make him miserable: but neither is just nor agree­able to the Judg of the World. Is it justice to require Faith in Christ of thos to whom he hath by flat decree denied it? Yet so they fain God to doo. For Zanchy saith, Every Man sans exception (even Reprobats) is bound to beleev, that he is cho­sen in Christ to salvation, or els he sins grievously: as Christ saith The Spirit shal convince the World of sin, becaus they belee­ved not in me. This they generaly hold; yet absolut Reprobats John 16 9 cannot justly be bound to beleev, becaus barred by divine De­cree, and hav no power to doo it: shal any be tied to impossi­bilities? If al be immutable more Medorum, their endevor is vain, and al preaching vain. For 'tis not Gods serious Wil they shal beleev, whom he doth not furnish with necessary power; but rather the contrary, that they shal not beleev. The Devils hav no part in Christ or the new Covenant, and therfore not bound to beleev in the one, nor punishable for transgressing the other: no more can God justly require Faith of Reprobats, or destroy them for not beleeving, if they hav no more part in Christ or the Covenant then Devils; which wil make the do­ctrin ( that Christ died for al Men) a flat [...]ly. What can be more [Page 77] injust then to punish Men for omitting to doo, which his own Decree makes impossible for them to perform?

Som answer that Gods Decree is just, tho it seem hard to 1 Defens. Mans erring understanding.

This is fals, and the contradictory tru, that nothing is truly Answer. just, which human understanding purged from prejudication, hath in al places and persons judged unjust▪ becaus God by Na­tures light and general notions of good and evil, of just and unjust; imprinted in Mens hearts sufficient ability to judg in such cases. If a Man bids his Son or Servant to eat, and pu­nish him for not eating; yet resolvs he shal hav no meat: may we not say he is unjust both in the precept and punishment? Semblably 'tis in God, sith Virtues in Men are but the Image of his perfections, being in substance the same, tho infinitly differing in degrees. God cals Men to be judges of his wais and Ezek. 18. 25. works: judg ye hous of Israel, are not my wais equal, and yours unequal: The high mysteries of Christs Incarnation, birth by a Virgin, resurrection of the Body, and such like, which are pro­per objects of Faith; God never offers to Mens trial, but ra­ther derides those which presume to judg them by Reason, becaus they be supernatural, and Man no competent judg by natural understanding: but he makes him judg in the equity of his Decrees and Wais, who is able to discern what is just in divine acts.

Others say the Scriptures define thes Decrees to be 2 Defens▪ Gods Wil, which is the rule of righteousnes: Ergo they must needs be just.

This Rule is much abused by the Patrons of absolut Repro­bation: Answer▪ for Gods Wil is no rule of justice to himself, as if things were just, becaus he wils or works them; but his justice is rather a rule of his Wil and Works: who decrees and exe­cuts, becaus they agree to that justice which dwels in the di­vine Nature. So S. Jerom saith, God commands nothing sav what is honest, but doth not make things honest which are abo­minable: implying that he doth not wil a thing and so make it good; but willeth it becaus 'tis antecedently good. So Zanchy makes Gods justice antecedent to his wil, and ther­fore the rule of it, rather then regulated by it: nor can God [Page] wil ought which is not just in it self. So Gods Wil is no rule of justice to himself, but to us; who must square al our thoughts, words, and works by it as suprem rule of them. Nor are thes absolut decrees of salvation and damnation any parts of his reveled Wil in Scripture, which to assert is to beg the question. This is al their ground to gain credit (as al sects use to doo) but a fals foundation, unles they may sens it as they list. For absolut Reprobation repugns right reason, and begets ab­surdities which no Truths doth: sith sundry truths are reveled in holy Writ abov reason, but none contrary to it. Faith and Reason, Scripture and Nature are Gods excellent gifts, which never diametraly differ, tho ther is a disproportion betwen them: if then absolut Reprobation be unjust, it cannot be justified by Scripture. Therfore to say Gods Wil is the rule of Justice, and this a part of his reveled Wil (both which propo­sitions are untru) is but a sly evasion and colorable collusion.

They say farther, That God is not bound to restore Men po­wer 3. Defens. to beleev, having lost it by their own fault: as a Master is not tied to renew his Servants stock having misimploied it.

'Tis tru, God is bound to none, being a most free dispen­ser Answer. of his own favors, wher, what, and to whom he wil; sith none is afore hand with him. Who hath given to him first and it shal not be recompenced again? Yet is he conditionaly bound both by decreing being liable to his own Ordinance, or els should be mutable; by promising which is a kind of debt, [...]ith 'tis just to perform; and by giving Men a Law to keep, which without supernatural Grace they cannot. When God commanded his Creatures to increas and multiply, he gav them a generativ faculty: when Christ bad the lame Man rise and walk, he added ability to his lims: so when the suprem Law­giver imposeth a Law, he givs the people power to keep it: els he becoms a hard Master (as the evil Servant stiled his) reap­ing wher he sowed not, being the tru proper caus of transgres­sing it. When God gav Adam a spiritual Law to obey, he con­ferred such strength answerable to doo it: as S. Austin saith, he had a power or possibility not to fal, tho not such as he could not fal. To apply al, If God entred into a new Covenant with Men, which he needed not, and required obedience of al; pro­mising [Page 78] eternal life to thos that observ it, and everlasting death to such as disobey: then no doubt he is bound to restore ability of beleeving unto al, nor can justly punish the disobedient without it: no more then a Magistrat having put out an Of­fenders eys, can require him to read, and put him to death for not reading: so 'tis injustice in God to punish such for not beleeving, as he makes unable to beleev.

4. It oppugns Gods truth and sincerity, who is a God of truth without any fraud or falshood. See Deut. 32. 4. 1 Sam. 15. 9. John 14. 6. Rom. 3. 4. God lovs thos that are tru of heart, and hates Hypocrits with his heart: but absolut Reprobation makes him a Lier and Dissembler; sith he openly injoins such to repent and beleev, whom he secretly intends shal not so doo. S. Peter saith, Repent and be baptized every one, and ye shal receiv the gift of the holy Ghost: for to you and Acts 2. 38, 39. your Children is the promiss made. He makes the Precept and Promiss of equal extent, both universal: for the one is a motiv of obedience to the other. Every one (even Reprobats) is perswaded he is under the gracious offer of eternal life, or els would not strive so much to leav som bosom sins, or doo hard duties: but by this Tenet most of thos to whom God offers Grace and Glory, shal attain neither, as Piscator pronounceth. Zanchy saith, Every one caled ought to think he is elected, els he accuseth God of lying. So saith Bucer, A Man must beleev he is predestinat, or els makes God to mock when he caleth. Thus they seem sollicitous that others shal not make God a mocker, yet they doo it most of al. For if a Creditor resolvs to let his Debtor rot in prison; yet shal profer, promiss, yea and swear to remit al the debt, upon certain conditions which he bars him to fulfil: would we not reput him a rank deluder or dissembler? 'Tis easy to apply it. Al divine comminations are as Caveats to avoid the evil threatned: but if Mens perdition be peremptorily predecreed, it cannot possibly be prevented, which is plain delusion: yea his passionat wishes that al wil re­pent and be saved, are colorable collusions: See Deut. 5. 29. Ps. 81. 11. Isai 48. 18. So are his mournful expostulations. See Isai 5. 3. Jer. 2. 31, 32. Ezek. 33. 11. Yea his melting com­miserations, wil al seem but as Absolons feast, Joabs congee, [Page] Judas kiss, or the Crocodiles and Hyaenas tears: for in al he saith one thing and means another. Nay the whol ministry is meer mockery without tru meaning. For God seems thus to speak by his Ministers: O Reprobats (once dearly loved in your Father Adam, now implacably hated by mine own irrevocable decree, and sealed up under invincible sin to damnation) repent and beleev in my Son if you wil be saved: I would not hav you dy, nor any to perish; but al com to repentance. If your sins be red as Scarlet, I wil make them whit as Wool: I hav cried and caled that you might be converted: I hav long waited and knock'd at the dore of your Hearts for entrance. O that you had a Heart to fear me, and keep my Commandments that it might go wel with you for ever. Can God speak thus (if he decrees they shal not beleev, or repent, or be saved) without deep dissimulation? Or why doth he delude them to use the means in vain?

'Tis said God willeth or wisheth their salvation seriously, A Defens. yet not absolutly; but on condition if they repent and beleev: Ergo tho they perish, God is sincere.

This shift fals too short; God wil hav al saved conditionaly if they beleev and repent: as S. Austin saith, He would hav al Answer. saved, if they selfs wil; for if he would absolutly, who can hin­der his irresistible Wil? 'Tis tru that a conditional promiss may be serious so wel as an absolut, but then the condition must be possible in his power to whom 'tis made, and the perfor­mance according to the promisers Wil or liking; els it can­not be candid or current. For to offer a courtesy under im­possible condition, is frivolous or fucatious: as if one should offer mony to a blind Man on condition he wil tel what coin 'tis; which is al one as to deny an alms: nay in som sort wors, sith 'tis a denial with delusion and derision, or a meer mockery. The case is the same in the pretended decree of Reprobation.

3. 'Tis contrary to the use and end of Gods good gifts, 3. Reason. both of Nature (as Creation, Preservation, Health, Strength, Wisdom) and of Grace; which are means either to purchas salvation (as Christs coming to be a sacrifice on the Cross) or Acts 14 16, 17. to apply it, as the Ministry of the Word and Sacraments, Gods long suffering, the inlightning of Mens understandings, with [Page 79] many mo: for God bestows the gifts of Nature to incourage Acts 17. 26. 27. and inable Men to serv him and sav their own Souls, as S. Paul shews. Prosper saith, Every Creature is made or ordained spe­cialy, that Mankind might by sight of them and tast of so ma­ny blessings, be drawn to lov and serv God. So he confers the gifts of Grace to the same end: For Christ cam into the John 3. 17. John 12. 47. World, not to be a rock of Offens at which most Men should stumble or fal, but to shed his blood for the salvation of al, even thos who for their wilful infidelity and impenitence are not sa­ved. Christ saith, the Son of Man cam to seek and sav what Luke 19 10. was lost: Ergo to sav every particular. S. Peter saith, God ha­ving Acts 3. 26. raised up his Son Jesus, sent him to bless you, and turn every one from his iniquity: Ergo the end of his coming was to sav al and every Man, so wel thos that reject, as thos that receiv him. Yea the Ministry of the Word is appointed for the same use, as an Instrument to convey the Spirit of regenera­tion unto al that liv under it. See Isai 59. 21. 2 Cor. 3. 6. 2 Cor. 5. 19, 20. Titus 2. 11. 1 Pet. 1. 23. Prosper saith, Al such as say, that al to whom the Gospel is preached (even thos that obey it not) are not caled to Grace; they utter un­truth: which he provs by Isai 5. 2. Mat. 23, 37. John 5. 34, 40. Touching the end of Sacraments, see Marc 1. 4. Acts 2. 38. Rom. 6. 3. Gal. 3. 27. Eph. 5. 26. Titus 3. 5. To the same end is Gods patience and long suffering exercised among Men, to work out their repentance and salvation. See Rom. 2. 4. 2 Pet. 3. 9. Wher both Apostles declare, that God for­bears Sinners (even such as despise the riches of his Goodnes) purposly that they may repent and be saved; becaus he would hav none perish. Gods other gifts (knowledg, faith, forti­tud, repentance, temperance, humility, chastity) are bestowed on Men, that they may attain life eternal; for Reprobats are indued with many of them. See Mat. 13. 20. Heb. 6. 4. Heb. 10. 26, 29. 2 Pet. 2. 20. Al which Graces are not given to abuse them, or to doo others good and not themselfs; but that they may obtain salvation. Som Scriptures seem to oppose this: as wher 'tis said, God reveled himself to the Gen­tils Rom. 1. 20. by the Creatures, that they might be without excuse. So Simon saith of Christ, that he is appointed for the faling and Luke 2. [...] [Page] rising again of many in Isarel. S. Paul saith, I preach Christ 1 Cor. 1. 23. 2 Cor. 2. 16. to the Jews a stumbling block. Again, To them that perish we are the savour of death to death. Thes places in general, point out the end which is oft effected by them, not what is primarily or principaly intended in them: sith they may occasionaly produce such effects in som Men by their voluntary rebellion, contrary to the Doners intention. Phisitions minister medi­cins for the Patients good, which somtime by misguidance turn to his hurt: so Gods blessings intended for Mens eter­nal welfare, tend to their perdition by il imploying them. So the event doth not vary the intent, sith no sinful event is pro­perly under Gods decree, but under his prescience or permis­sion at most.

Now by this Tenet of absolut Reprobation, al gifts both of Nature and Grace hav another end: for either God intends them not to such (tho they enjoy them being mix'd with the elect, to whom only they are directed) or if he doth, 'tis only to puff them up abov the common rank of Men, to make their L. 3. Inst. c 24. §. 13. ruin greater. So saith Calvin, God sends his Word to Re­probats that they may be made more deaf; sets up a light to make them blinder, and affords a remedy, that they may not be healed. Beza saith, Let it not seem absurd, that God offers Grace to som Reprobats, not to this end that they should be saved; but that they may be less excusable and more punishable. Maccovius saith, God knocks at Reprobats hearts, who neither can nor wil open: not that he may enter, but partly to upbraid their impotence, and partly to increas their damnation, nor can any other conclusion rise or result from this doctrin: for how can God intend the gifts of Grace for their salvation, whom he hath irrevocably decreed to damnation. Hence it in­fers, that God meerly deludes miserable Men, whom he cals to salvation in his Sons name by preaching the Word; yet intends their perdition: and that Ministers are fals Witnesses, who preach salvation to many conditionaly, whos damnation is decreed absolutly. If a state closly contriv, that no Dutch shal be Denisens, yet publicly proclaim, to giv them high pri­vileges on condition to becom free; doo they not conterfet or cosen the poor people to make them su or seek in vain? [Page 80] Semblably, may not Reprobats rightly plead? Lord, wilt thou punish us for not beleeving in thy Son, being caled by preach­ing to beleev; when thou hast decreed to leav us in Adams sin without al power to beleev? How canst thou justly charge us with sin or increas our torment for not beleeving in him, whom thou resolved st from eternity we should never beleev in? Certes that Ministry givs Men a fair excuse, which is given only to leav them without excuse, as the Patrons of absolut Decree proclaim. For the Sacraments signify nothing, seal up nothing, and confer nothing to such as are not saved; but are meer blanks or empty Ordinances: yet not by their fault, but by Gods irresistible Wil: nor are al other gifts tho never so glo­rious of any avail to promot their salvation in Gods absolut intention; nor given out of lov but meer hatred, that they may use them il and prepare to themselfs a greater damnation. For he that receivs most, of him shal most be required: so they be but as snares to intrap Mens Souls, like baits on barbed hooks to beguil Fishes: sith they are lifted up therby, that with the load of their goodly indowments they may sink the deeper into Hel. So they hav no caus to lov the Doner, but hate him rather; sith such favors are like a griping Usurers bounty, or Jaels courtesy to Sisera.

4. 'Tis prejudicial to Piety and Promoter of prophanes, 4 Reason. cutting off the very sinews of Religion: for it takes away al hope to attain happines by godlines, and fear to sustain any hurt by wickednes; sith al is ordered by absolut Decree. Hope is the sole spur to stir Men on to virtu, and fear the chief bar to withdraw them from vice: For our Saviour in hope of Heb. 12 2. Mat. 10 32. the joy set before him endured al shame of the Cross: who by it hardned his Disciples to suffer for his sake. By this the godly in al ages hav bin excited to wel dooing. See Acts 24 15. Phil. 3. 26 Colos. 1 9 Titus 2. 12, 13. Heb. 11. per totum. Al noble Heroic acts hav sprung from the hope of eternal glory. He that eareth and thresheth, must doo it in hope saith S. Paul: 1. Cor. 9. 10. For hope (saith Aquinas) conduceth to action, as appeers in Souldiers, Mariners, and al Professions. The hope of Heaven then is chief incentiv to piety, and fear of Hel a main bar to impiety: yea fear promots a good action accidentaly; becaus [Page] Men fearing the evil of mischief or misery annexed to the evil of sin think they are never safe, til they attain a contrary state by doing wel. Now by an absolut Decree, Hope and Fear are berea­ved: for hope is properly versed about some good to be attain­ed by industry, not which must be of necessity; and the object of fear is an evil that may be avoided: but by this Decree Hea­ven and Hel are no possible objects, but necessary: for the elect shal infallibly enjoy the one, and Reprobats impossibly escape the other: sith Men hav no power to alter their eternal state being prefined by eternal Decree. Al Gods decrees are immu­table, irreversible, and irresistible: so that al Mens indevors are in vain to alter or avoid them. See Isai 46. 11. Ps. 115. 3. Rom. 9. 19. 'Tis absolutly decreed the Devils shal be dam­ned: so it were folly in them by praier or tears to alter it: Mans Soul is simply decreed to be immortal, and 'tis vain for any to attemp the abolition. 'Tis ordained, that The Sun shal rule the day and Moon the night: what power then can divert their cours? so if no power be left in Man to attain eternal life or avoid death; but he must needs take what is destined or designed; he strivs in vain either way. For if the Decree be absolut, the Minister preacheth and People hear in vain. Not one Soul can be saved by either of their means which is decreed to Hel; nor one damned designed to Hea­ven. 'Tis frivolous and fruitless folly to be studious or solli­citous in what cannot be altered, amended, or avoided: as Christ said to his Disciples, why take ye thought about such Luk. 12. 25, 26. things? 'Tis a misery to toil about impossibles, as Sisyphus is said to rol up a stone to the top of an high hil in Hel, which instant­ly fals down again. If this perswation be rooted or rivited, that both salvation and damnation depends on absolut Decree; Ministers may be fit instruments for Politic States to deter Peo­ple from enormous Offenses: but can do no spiritual good, nor draw one Soul to God. 'Tis said the Defenders of this Do­ctrin are pure pious Men, which open no gap to loos life; but others pervert the truth to their own damnation. So the Epi­cures in defens of their dogmat (that the cheif Good consisted in carnal pleasure) said most of their Sects were honest Men: but Tully tels them, that this proceds rather from their cour­teous [Page 81] disposition, then curiosity of Opinion: therfore the force of honesty prevailed more with them then the folly of plea­sure, which they pleaded for. Another Apology is made, That though they teach absolut Election and Reprobation; yet design not who is elected or rejected; but exhort Men to work out their salvation, and get assurance of it by good works; wher­by they excite or encourage, not stifle or curb holy honest du­ties. Indeed they doo so: But the ignorance of a Mans parti­cular state alters not the case; for if I know the Decree is absolut both wais, why should I be sollicitous of either; sith it can doo no good nor hurt? nor can this knowledg at best be infallible in this vally of frailty, but is obscured with many clouds of in­certity, in the point of undoubted perseverance.

5. 'Tis a Doctrin ful of despair, both to them that stand and 5 Reason▪ thos that fal; to Men out of tentation and in it: But the Go­spel of glad tidings is a sweet store-hous of comfort in our worst condition under al changes: as S. Paul saith, Thes things Rom. 15. 4. are writ that by patience and comfort of the Scriptures we might hav hope. Now absolut Reprobation procures tentation: for sith ther be many mo Reprobats then Elect, the Devil can ea­sily perswade one he is one of the most rather then fewest; or at least that al his labor is lost, sith the Decree is irrefragable and ir­revocable. Bucer saith, To doubt whether we be predestinat or no, is the head of every tentation: for he that doubts cannot confide he is caled or justified: So every Man must presume he is elected. To what end then is S. Pauls exhortation, Work out your salvation with fear and trembling? 'tis a Gorgons head to affright or amaze the Tempteds fancy, that the strongest ar­guments of consolation applied with the best art, cannot avail. Gods lov to Mankind, Christs death for al, the caling of sinners without exception of persons, and al other motivs are easily eluded by this Opinion. Suppose a Minister and tempted Soul talking thus:

Tempted. Wo is me, I am a cast away, utterly rejected from A Dialog. Grace and Glory.

Minister. Be not danted poor afflicted Soul, God hath not cast thee off, he hates nothing which he hath made, but lovs al Men and thee among the rest.

Temp. God hates none as his Creatures, but many as sinners; and lovs al Men with a general lov, affording his outward tem­poral blessings only▪ but not his special lov of eternal life, which he shews to a very few his chosen ones, wherof I am none.

Min. Yes he lovs al so as to desire their eternal good, who would hav al to be saved and none to perish, nor thee in par­ticular.

Temp. Al is taken for al sorts or calings of Men (high, low, rich, poor, bound, free) som of al which shal be saved but not al Individuals of thos ranks, nor me in particular; or if he wils in his Word to sav al, yet by his secre [...] Wil he decrees millions to be damned, wherof I am one.

Min. Nay but Christ cam to seek and sav what was lost, and is a propitiation for the sins of the whol World: Ergo for thy sins to sav thee.

Temp. The word World implies a World of Elect, wherof I am none; not al Mankind: yet if he died for al, it was only dig­nitate pretii, by the worth of his ransom; not voluntate propo­siti, by the intention of his redemption, that al should be saved.

Min. God made a universal Covenant with Man in the Me­diators blood, intending it to be shed for al, and promises to sav every one that beleevs, excluding none, except they refuse.

Temp. God purposed his Son should dy for al, profering and promising remission of [...]ins to every one: but on condition if they wil repent and beleev, which he decrees that far the greatest part shal not doo.

Min. God means truly, that al who are caled shal repent and beleev, that they may be saved; being caled by the preaching of the Word to knowledg of the Truth.

Temp. God hath a duple Cal; an outer by the Word preach­ed in Mens ears; an inward by irresistible working of his Spirit in the heart, which he vouchsa [...]s to a few secret ones only, wherof I am none. Thus no sound solace can accru by this Tenet.

The sole solid grounds of comfort to a dejected Soul are Gods lov to Mankind, Christs death for al, and the new Co­venant of Grace: which three he that applies wisely, may ea­sily releas or reliev the Tempted: But such as hold absolut Re­probation [...]oc. Com. p. 526 cannot doo it. Melancthon saith, The universal pro­miss [Page 82] of Grace and Salvation is a Christians sole Bulwark in this combat of tentation: let us not therfore leav Christ and seek for an Election out of the Word. Again, As 'tis needful to know that the promiss of Salvation is free; so 'tis necessary to take notice▪ that 'tis universal; against som dangerous doctrins of Predestination. This he thought to be the only tru Balsam to cure a wounded Soul: for thes three Gods Lov▪ Christs Death the universal Promiss) are directly contradictory to the tentation, which cannot stand with an absolut antecedent Wil, Intention, or Decree, to cast off the greatest part of Ma [...]kind of meer free pleasure, as if it were his sport or delight, what ever quirks or quiddities are vented or invented to sully or shadow it. If two contradictories cannot be tru, he that pro­veth the truth of one, disproveth the untruth of the other: as he that confirms this Proposition (God wil hav al to be saved, beleev, repent, and be redeemed) to be tru; makes it [...]leer to every understanding, that the contradictory (God wil hav most Men to be absolutly and inevitably damned) is flatly fals: and so raiseth or relieveth a tempted Soul from distress: For de­monstrat to a Man who fears himself to be an absolut Repro­bat, that ther is no such, but every one that repents and beleevs shal be saved; therfore his fear is fancy, and doubt a dream: then you driv out one nail with another and expel the terrible tentation.

This is the pure Nepenthe of a sick sorowful Soul, and Alex­anders sword to dissolv the Gordian knot. Now the maintai­ners of absolut Reprobation, cannot use it against the Replies of the tempted, becaus ther is a plain contradiction betwixt them. For if a Minister com to comfort one that thinks himself a direct Reprobat, how can he usurp the universal promises (that God wil hav al to be saved, that Christ died for al) sith he holds the contrary conclusion, that God wil hav most part to be damned, and hav no part in Christ? for the Tempted wil reply, That God would hav al to be saved by his reveled Wil not by his se­cret: and Christ died for al sufficiently, not intentionaly: or if he intends it, 'tis with a condition, which he purposed most Men should not perform: what then am I the neer, if I be none of those to whom 'tis intended? Al that the Minister can reply [Page] is, Be comforted, you are a Beleever and sorrowful sinner; therfore no Reprobat. But al this the Tempted wil deny: how can he then convince him to be a Beleever or truly penitent? But the universal Promises wil perswade Men to Repent and Beleev. Piscator confesseth, That no sure comfort can be in­stilled into the Souls of afflicted Reprobats; but the Elect in this case may be comforted: yet must it be with the sens of sin, and desire to be freed of it by Christ: which proofs are only probable at best, and to Men in tentation no comfort at al; sith al depends on a bare peradventure, that the tempted is one of the Elect, which none knows but God. For Hypocrits make so fair shew of sanctity, faith, and repentance as the best Zelots: yea such as be sincere may fal through frailty; and who can be assured he shal finaly persever? So thos of this judgment are miserable comforters or unwelcom Phisitions to Men in such heavy afflictions.

If Men censure according to their fancies or Factions, they are Partialists, esteeming al the Gees of their litle Flocks to be Swans, and abjure, abandon, or anathematize al others as Re­probats. Ther be hundreds of Sects among Christians, which chalenge to be Gods Chosen, renouncing al the rest; yet haply al in error one way or other: how then can they judg aright be­ing no searchers of the heart? yea ther be too many Weather­cocks and Ambodexters in every Sept, which shift stations with every wind, and turn with the tide: how then can any di­scern▪ Elect from Reprobats? But surely he that repents and beleevs (persevering to the end) shal be saved, and impenitents damned. So the whol result depends on divine Prescience, which preceds in Natures order to Gods condition at Decree of Election and Reprobation, as is shewd.

Ob. Som say God is Soveraign Lord of al Creatures, who are wholy his: Ergo he may dispose of Men at his pleasure, and doo with his own what he wil.

Sol. The Question is not, what an Almighty Soveraign can doo to poor Vassals, who can cast away al Mankind so wel as any particular person: but what a just power of a righteous Judg stil clot [...]ed with goodnes may doo: which is utterly in­compatible with his Attributs or Properties to damn any of his [Page 83] meer wil or pleasure; no fault of theirs preexisting in his eter­nal Decree. His Justice is a constant Wil to render every one his proper du; vengeance to whom vengeance belongs for ob­stinacy and impenitence, not of free pleasure. S. Austin saith, God is good and just: hee may without desert free Men from punishment as good; but cannot condemn any without il de­servings, becaus just. Goodnes is an inclination in God to com­municat it to his Creatures, so far as he can without wronging his Justice: Ergo if he be good to al Men as Scriptures make him; he cannot of himself, without any causin the Creature, provide al kinds of eternal torments for it, before he decreed to make it and confer any good upon it.

Ob. Mr. Perkins presseth, That Men may slaughter Beasts sans cruelty or in justice: Ergo God may much more appoint so many of us as he pleaseth to Hel torments for his glory, yet be just stil: for ther is greater disparity or disproportion betwen God and us, then betwixt us and Beasts.

Sol. Is the comparison equal? Men hav no authority of themselfs to slay Beasts; but God of his bounty gav it them to G [...]. 9 2 3. eat, and by consequent to be slain, which may rather be reputed his doing then ours. Nor is any equality betwen the Objects compared, much less betwixt the acts; for Beasts are void of reason and liber [...]y in their actions, being made only for Mans use or service, whos beings vanish with their breaths: but Men indued with Intellect, able by the Creators bounty to discern betwixt good and evil, according to their congeneal principles, being made for his sole service, according to his Image of puri­ty and eternity, to enjoy his blessed vision and society for ever. It folows not then, that if God may appoint Beasts to be killed for Mens use; he may with like equity destinat Men of his own Wil to damnation without desert; for he required of his Peo­ple many thousand Beasts for sacrifi [...]e, but not one Man; cha­lenging the Firstlings of clean Creatures for burnt Offerings; but the first born of Men were to be redeemed: which shews how highly he priceth Mans blood abov Beasts. Yea wher he givs Men liberty to kil Beasts, he flatly forbids both to shed Mans blood, becaus he made him in his own Image: but ther is G [...]. 9 6. far wider difference betwixt the acts temporal slaying and eter­nal [Page] tormenting. Man may kil a Beast by his own power, as Lord over him; but cannot prolong his life purp [...]sly to torment him, without savage tyranny: So God being suprem Lord of al, may of free pleasure kil a Man (yea annih [...]at him, sith he made him of nothing, and takes but away what he gav without cru­elty or injustice, to shew his power: but may not predecree to torment him in Hel for ever, a [...]d inflict an infinit evil on an in­nocent Creature, to whom he gav only a finit good; without just caus.

Repl. Som (who wil rather speak against common sens, then forgo their principles) reply, That any being, even in Hel, is better then no being: becaus the one hath somwhat which is good, an Entity; but the other none at al: Ergo if God takes away an innocent Mans life and turns him to nothing, of free pleasure to shew his power; much more may he preserv him for ever in torments, and maintain the good of entity sans in­just cruelty.

Sol. This twist Doctor Twiss spun, and no smal fools folow his clu: But say sooth, is it a truth to trust on, or wil a bare de­nial serv for an answer? Indeed simply to be of it self, is better then not to be caeteris paribus: but in a case of such infinit di­sparity, 'tis incomparably happier never to be then so to be, as the damned know to their cost, and al els cannot but confess, if it were put to choice. Holy Job tired out with temporal tor­ments Job. 3. 11, 12. of bodily sores, seriously (not simulatly) wished he had never been born or had being, and cursed his birth day. Som say he spake out of human passion in the present sens of his pain, yet any being is better then none. A [...]illy shift: surely he preferred the loss of al being, before such a wretched being; as 'tis usualy said, 'tis better dy once then be stil dying; and Sal [...] ­mon Eccles 4. 1, 2, 3 thinks the same. Yea Christ in this very case saith of Jud [...]s, Wo to that Man by whom the Son of Man is b [...]tra [...]d; it had Mat. 26. 24. bin good for him he had never bin born: As if he should say, the Traitor shal be damned, therfore it had been happy, if he never had received life. He speaks not according to Mens opinions (as Dunses being put to a non plus say of Aristol [...], Loquiturix aliorum sententia) but realy. Wil not every one chuse to va­nish into a thousand nothings, rather then be intolerably tor­tured [Page 84] in body for ever, or afflicted with the gnawing worm of Conscience? But the fear of annihilation can never doo what the terror of Hel doth. For carnal Epicures excite one ano­ther to enjoy the present pleasures presented, upon a fals per­swasion, that they shal hav no being after death: How much more then would they walow in sin and sensuality, if they con­ceived to hav a being in Hel better then no being at al? But ungodly livers, sensible of Hel, tremble at the thought of it, as the most terrible of al terrors; and somtime refrain from their darling sins, which fear of being annihilated could never doo. Seneca speaking of one who so feared death, as he desired to L. 17. Epist. Ep. 107. endure any extremity if he might liv, cals it a most sordid wish; becaus in al evils he feared that which was the end of al evils, even the privation of his being. So certes they must be concei­ved and censured sensless stocks or stones, who think a torment­ed being in Hel, a lesser or lighter evil then no being at al. Sir Fr. Bacon refuts this Mathematical Position (as he cals it) that ther is no proportion between somthing and nothing; therfore the degree of privation is greater then that of diminution: wherto he excepts that 'tis fals in sundry cases, specialy this of Hel; wher a total privation far excels a diminution. Som evils and pains haply being but smal or short, are less then annihila­tion, and one had better bear them then lose his being; becaus he may afterward attain so many desirable things, as wil more then countervail his sufferings: but if his torments be many and matchless (yea endless too) that he cannot joy in the good which remains, leaving no more but a poor comfortless entity; it were ten thousand times better for him to hav no being. The ground of this reply ('Tis better to be then hav no being) is a sly sophism a non distributo ad distributum; tru in som cases, but not in al particulars. S. Jerom expounding Christs words of Judas saith They plainly import, that 'tis better hav no being then an everlasting tormentful being.

The result is, That the unavoidable damnation of so many mil­lions, cannot be absolutly or antecedently intended by God with out high in justice. For Plut [...]rch speaking of Pagans (who to pa­cify their Gods fury, sacrificed Men, Women & Children) saith, It had been far better to deny the being of any God, as Dia­goras [Page] with others did, then confes he delights in Mans blood: so we may say, 'tis better be an Atheist and deny God then make him a Soul destroier. Eusebius speaks against Pagans cru­el Gods, If they had any spark of goodnes, they would be di­sposed to doo good, and desire to [...]av al Men; but not delight in their slaughter: and concluds them to be Devils or evil Spi­rits; becaus they would doo good if they were good, as the Evil use to doo evil. To end al Prosper saith, God created al Men, but none for this end, to be damned: the reason why we are created is one, and why damned another.

Al which premisses considered, let none confide or presume A Christian Cav [...]at. too far on the certitud of Election, that he shal infallibly per­sever til the end; but stil work out his salvation with fear and trembling: Nor let any diffide or despair upon denunciation of Gods absolut Decree, that he is rejected or Reprobated; but rely on his general Promises, and use the means prescribed in the Gospel; stil laboring by praiers and tears for farther de­grees of divine Grace, wherby he shal be saved infallibly, rather then any overweening presumptuous Pharisee; sith the end is attained by the means. I profes my self no Divine, nor fit to handle such high Theological Theories; but hav only gleaned or gathered som scattered ears of Corn from several fields brought into one Barn, that every one may take what he likes best.

To say with Supralapsarians, That God decreed Mans Fal Summary. of free pleasure to shew his power is perilous. To define with Sublapsarians, That God upon foresight of Adams fal, elected a few and reprobated the rest, without respect to his Prescience of their obedience or disobedience, no less erroneous. To hold with Doctor Overald, That God offers sufficient Grace to al, but more abundant effectual to the Elect, frivolous; sith the want of efficacy is in every self. So to maintain with the com­mon Lutherans, That God from foreknowledg of every Mans works, decreed to sav som of free Mercy; and pass by the rest to perish in their sins, is obnoxious to exceptions, becaus it makes him an accepter of persons. But to assert, That God up­on simple Prescience of Adams fal, and every Individuals de­merits in receiving or refusing Grace, if he should creat them; decreed the means and maner of Redemption, with the Cove­nants [Page 85] or Conditions prescribed and proclamed in the Gospel, which seems most veracious to conspire best with al divine At­tributs.

In fine, Prescience of pure simple Intelligence, preceds al Di­vine State of the Theorem▪ Decrees in order of Nature: wherby God regulated the whol work or Mystery of Predestination, both concerning An­gels and Mankind: But his knowledg of Vision or Seing fo­lows his Wil and Decree: Which if Calvinists intend by ex­cluding it from Election and Reprobation, their Tenets may in som sort seem tru or tolerable touching pure pleasure: but then 'tis nihil ad Rhombu [...], sith the first only of simple Prescience hath place in Predestination, and not the last of Vision. So thos doleful discords betwixt Brethren, are slight Sciomachies with Ghosts and Goblins, grounded on mutual mistakes of ech o­ther; while Lutherans say God founded al his Decrees on pure Prescience; and Calvinists refer it to his free pleasure, without respect of Vision or Prevision.

Dicere nil superest: hic terminus ultimus esto.
Nought more rests to disclose:
Be this the last perclose.
Scire praeit, sed velle suo venit ordine certe.
Decretum sequitur velle perenne Dei.
To Know preceds, but to Wil coms orderly:
Gods Decrees folow his Wil continualy.
Novit ab aetern [...] Deus omnia tempore danda:
A [...]i [...]t [...].
Postea d [...]crevit, quae fabricare velit.
God knew eternaly al in time to be:
And Decreed after, what he would frame free.
Ordine Naturae Omnisciens prius omnia vidit,
Al [...]a [...].
Quàm quid decrevis mente creare, Deus.
Al-knowing God did al in Nature see,
Yer he in Mind did to creat Decree.
An lapsu praeviso Elohim praedestinet Adae,
Aut m [...]ro ex libito? lis gravis orta fuit.
S [...].
Whether God predestind knowing Adams Fal,
Or of meer Pleasure? great strif did befal.
Simpliei in intuitu, certo omnia praesciit, ant [...]
Sive.
Quam statuit Mundum fabrificare Deus.
In simple intellect God al foreknew;
Yer he would make the World, what would insu,
Antea qu [...]m Decreta fe [...]at, Deus omnia praescit:
[...]
Progreditur constans ordine namque suo.
God foreknows al, before he doth decree:
For he proceds in's order constantly.
Quos Deus aeternum praescit, praedestinat; hosque
Aut.
Eligit aut reprobat pro bonitat [...] sua
God foreknows and foredooms eternaly:
And elects or rejects for's clemency.
Vul [...] salvare aliquos, reliquos damnare Jehovah:
[...]
Sed cur sic voluit, non bene causa patet.
God som wil sav, and th' rest damn to Hel:
But why he wil, the caus appeers not wel.

THESIS III.
Verum Ecclesiae Regimen: The Churches tru Polity.

TIs a known verity, That Paternity was the prime H [...]story. val Polity among the Protopatriarchs, both in sa­cred and secular matters: as Adam is said to be or­dained a Priest by God, becaus Cain and Abel only brought their offerings, til they were ordained to that office by their Father; and so in succession one from another. Which form continued in the Postpatriachs, til their Progeny becam a Nation under Moses and Aaron: who promulged Laws by divine dictat both for Civil and Spiritual causes. For the Israelits had distinct Courts of different persons: one for Church matters [...]aled an Ecclesiastic Consistory; another for [Page 86] Common-wealth causes termed a Temproal Judicatory. Moses speaks of both in general: He that wil not hearken to Deut. 17. 1 [...]. 2 Chr. 19. 5. (or obey) the Priest or Judg, shal dy: but Jehosophat put a more precise difference, who appointed through al Cities secu­lar Judges, (wherof Zebadiah was chief) and at Jerusalem a Spiritual Court of Levits, Priests, and Elders, over whom Amariah high Priest presided: so Jeremy was condemned by Jer. 26 8, 16. the Priests Consistory, but acquited by the Princes Judicatory. Yea tho by Antiochus tyranny, and the Jews slavery under sundry Nations, no evident distinction appeers in the new Testament, yet som prints of both remain; specialy wher the chief Priests and Elders are cited as two divers Courts: the Mat▪ 21▪ 23. Mat. 26. 3. secular caled a Council, the spiritual stiled a Synagog. For the Ecclesiastic was to discern things holy and unholy, clean from unclean, and to determin Appeals in difficil debats; be­ing as a representativ Church. Hence Christ said, Dic Eccle­siae; Mat. 1 [...] ▪ 17. becaus excommunication pertained to them. In civil Courts of seventy Judges (being the suprem Sanedrim) two sat chief: viz. the Nasi as Lord chief Justice, and Abbethdin as Father of the Senat: so in the Consistory, the high Priest and his Sagan or secund (like a Bishop and his Suffragan) as suprem: but the high Priest was not necessarily chosen Nasi, unles for eminent worth and extraordinary Wisdom. For they had two civil Courts: 1. The grand Sanedrim or suprem Senat: 2. The lesser or inferior; which in after ages had su­bordinat branches: whence Christ said, Who ever is angry with Mat. 5. 12. his Brother causlesly, shal be culpable of Judgment; meaning the lesser Court: who cals him Racha in scorn, shal be lia­ble to a Council or chief Consistory: but he that cals him fool malitiously, shal be guilty of Hel-fire. The Sanedrim excelled the rest. 1. In number of Judges being seventy besides the Exod. 24. [...] Nasi or Prince; as God at first institution said to Moses, Ga­ther to me seventy Elders Rulers of the People, and let them stand at the Tabernacle with thee, implying seventy besides him: but the lesser consisted of twenty three at Jerusalem, and three only in smal Cities. 2. In place, for the seventy sat within the Temple-court in the paved Chamber or Pav­ment, John 19. 1 [...]: wher Pilat gav Judgment. 3. In power, for the Sane­drim [Page] received Appeals from al, but from them was none. 4. In causes to be tried, For the seventy Judged al matters of life and death, yea a whol Tribe; the high Priest and fals Prophets: but the twenty three lighter crimes, and thos of three only pecuniary mulcts, whippings, and pety punishments. Many make doubt, whether in Christs dais they had power of life and death; sith they said, Wee cannot do [...]m any to death? John 1 [...] 31. Late Jews say al capital censure was inhibited forty yeers be­fore the Temples destruction, which is about Christs Bap­tism: but Josephus saith Herod suppressed the Sanedrim before: L. 14 Antiq. c. 17. yet thos words to Pilat prov not as if they had no such power; for he bids them take and judg him according to their Law: Yea they pressed or pleaded, we hav a Law, and by it he ought John 19. 7. to dy: but the holines of the time (being the Passovers vigil, and preparation of the Sabbath) made it unlawful to meddle with matters of blood. Indeed the Romans bereaved al pow­er to judg civil capital crimes, but suffred them to try trans­gressions against Moses Law, as Blasphemies or the like, and such they cried that Christ committed in caling himself the Son of God: but with Barabas and the two Theefs they had nothing to doo. For Gallio when Paul was brought before him said, If it were a matter of wrong or wickednes, O ye Jews, rea­son Acts 18. 14. would I should hear or bear with you: but being a question of words, or names in your Law, look ye to it: Distingue res seu causas, & Concordabunt Scripturae. Among them (who were Gods chosen People, and sole Church) were three or­ders of Ministers in the temple, over whom the high Priest (being Aarons first born) was chief. 1. Priests, Aarons younger Progeny: 2. Levits, Levies posterity: 3. Nephenims who hewed wood and drew water; being Gibeonits doomed to that drudgery by Josua for their craft or cunning. At [...]. 9 [...] Consecration, the high Priest was annointed with Chrism [...]. 8. [...] [...]0. powred on his head which ran down his beard and borders of his robe; but the Priests only sprinkled with this oil and blood of the Sacrifice. At ministration in the Sanctuary the high Priest wore eight sorts of raiments, which the Rabbins cal golden Vestments; but the Priests only four. They differed also in office, For the high Preist entred the Holy of Holies once [Page 87] a year, the Priests never; the high Priest might mourn for none; but Priests might for Father, Mother, Brother, Son, Daughter, and next of Kin: the high Priest had his Sagan or Substitut, the Priests none. Thes were the forms of Church government under the Law, wherto that of the Gospel was in part conformed. Christ had sole Evangelical Ministry (be­ing our Apostle, Prophet, Evangelist, Bishop, Pastor, Doctor, Mat. 10 1. &c. Deacon) in himself: but chos twelv Apostles Assistant paral­lel to the twelv Patriarchs and twelv Princes of the Tribes; sending them to preach, heal and cast out Devils: to whom when the harvest grew great, he added seventy inferior Dis­ciples, Luk. 10. 1. &c. like the seventy Fathers of Families and seventy Elders of the People: whom he sent by couples into Cities wher he meant to com; giving them power to preach the Gospel, heal the sick, tread on Serpents [...]o Scorpions and subdu Enimies. Thes two orders S. Paul cals Apostles and Prophets placing Pro­phets E [...]hes. 3. [...] after Apostles as inferiors: for from the seventy, Mat­thias was chosen Apostle, and Presbyters or Elders succeded the seventy, but Bishops or Prelats the twelv as al Apostolic Antients agree. This was the first model of Church regiment under Christ the chief Shepherd: who before his Ascention made the twelv general Shepherds, to supply his stead by a triple charge to Peter. Thes had equal eminent authority or juris­diction John 21. 1 [...]. 16. 17. jointly and severaly: to lay on hands at Ordination and confirmation, to command, contermand, censure, bind, or loos: which before their deaths som of them devolved on Bishops as their indubitat successors. At first the whol weight of Church affairs lay soly on them: but upon the Greecs com­plaint, how their Widows were neglected, they ordeined by imposition of hands (which severs Men to sacred functions) A [...] [...] 1▪ 2 [...]. seven Deacons to distribut offerings and serv Tables. After­ward upon the Disciples dispersion at Stephans death, arose Evangelists, whos duty was to preach, but no distinct order. Then that the Church so planted might perpetualy be watered, they ordeined Priests or Presbyters like the seventy Disciples, for constant attendance in al places. Lastly to contin [...] the Government which rested in themselfs; they appointed Overseers (Greecly Episcopi, by S. John Angels, vulgarly Bi­shops [Page] to supply their steads after them: to whom the chief charge (to command, correct, ordein, oversee) was committed or conferred specially for suppressing of Schisms▪ which spread in the Churches of Rome, Corinth, Galatia, Philippi, Colossi, Thessalonica, and Indea. For S. Paul first constituted Titus Bishop of Cret, and Timothy of Ephesus with their territories: whos patern S. John and other Apostles folowed.

If then this office was necessary in thos times (being the best remedy to repel Schisms, as S. Cyprian and Jerom testify) how much more in after ages, when Sects so swarm, and Am­bition, Avarice, Pride, Philancy, Envy, Emulation, Discord, and Division multiply dayly? this power then was not per­sonal in the Apostles alone, not temporal to end or expire with them, nor common to inferior Disciples: but perpetual to abide til our Saviours secund coming, and confined to Bi­shops for redress of al exorbitant enormities; specialy Schisms and Heresies. What single Presbyters did ever exercise any act of jurisdiction in al the Scripture or prime Churches? In a family are divers officers, but one Oeconomus or chief Ste­ward: In a Ship many Mariners, but one Master: in a Camp sundry Captaines, but one General: so in a Church of large extent several Ministers, but one Bishop, hee is to take charge of al Churches (as Titus did of al Cret a goodly Ile) to see Presbyters doo their duties, to correct what is faulty to con­firm what is orderly, and reform abuses. He is chief in or­deining Presbyters: as S. Paul had company at Timothy's ordination, yet he sole ordeiner (which none can deny) as Christ shal be sole Judg at last day, yet The twelv Apostles sit [...]. 19 28. on twelv Thrones to judg the twelv Tribes of Israel. 'Tis a Luk. 22 30. silly Sophisters squib to say, Bishops are caled Elders, and contrarily: Ergo both are one Order or Office. Indeed such names at first were promiscuous, but functions stil distinct; as every greater contains a lesser: So Apostles were stiled Presbyters or Elders, Deacons or Ministers, Doctors or Tea­chers, Prophets, and Evangelists. Yea that title was inlarged to Barnabas, Paul, Andronicus, Epaphroditus, Titus, Timo­thy: so Presbyters are clyped Prophets and Prelats; yet Chry­sostom saith, can be but one Bishop in a City. Semblably Bi­shops [Page 88] are stiled Apostles, Elders, and Deacons, while ter ms or titles were common: but never in after ages, as Theodore [...], Jerom, Oecomenius, and the Fathers aver: Distingue tempora & concordabunt res; nor doth community of name argu iden­tity of nature or office.

Thus episcopat is of divine right; if not primary or imme­diat from Christ, as in ordaining the twelv to includ their Suc­cessors: yet secundary or mediat from the inspired Apostles, who substituted Bishops to succed. For as our Saviour in som sort instituted his own day, to be sanctified weekly in stead of the Creatific Sabbath, by actual rising from death; which his Apostles celebrated by their practis of meeting to break bread every first day: So he may be said to ordein Prelats and Pres­byters (who are of equal right) Analogicaly, by chusing twelv Apostles, and seventy Disciples, whos rooms thos two orders supplied; yet the Lords day is not so subject to mutation by Man, sith it hath a moral right by the equity (not Letter) of the fourth Commandment; which Men and Angels cannot alter: But the other two orders may, if the end for which they were instituted be changed, els not. Al which premisses wil plainer appeer by particulars drawn from primitiv fountains, which flow from the Rock of Faith, and shal not be falsified in the least point.

The Apostles sent to Teach and Baptise al Nations, had the whol world in common for their general Dioces: but som at­tended special Churches as Rulers or Overseers, and in fine set Bishops of 1 [...]. ruling Elders or Bishops in their Chairs or Charges: For James the Just (caled the Lords Brother, becaus born of Mary Cleo­pas the blessed Virgins sister) resided and presided at Jerusalem as his proper Sea; partly of his own authority, and partly by the Apostles appointment: as appeers by Pauls coming thither Acts 21. [...]. to consult with him and his Presbytery: For at the Proto-Council, Peter as prime Apostle, was Prolocutor; but James▪ Act [...] 15 19▪ [...]0 as President, gav diffinitiv sentence, to which al submited or sub­scribed. After 30 yeers residence he was cast from a Pinacle, and his brains pierced with a Fullers burling Iron; whos Brother Simeon succeded by the Apostles assignment. They also plant­ed Churches elswher, as Paul and Barnabas ordeined Elders Acts [...]4. [...]. [Page] in every Church: but no Bishops are mentioned, becaus yet they created none til afterward to rule in their rooms. For S. Paul caling the Elders of Ephesus to Miletum, bid them Take Act. 20. 17. heed to themselfs and the Flock, wherof the Holy Ghost made them Overseers; naming no particular Prelat sav himself as Head over them. Hence grew thes Schisms saying I am of Paul, 1 Cor. 1. 12. [...] of Apollos, &c. becaus no ruling Elders were then setled, as S. Ambros aptly observs. The reason why he yet set no Su­perintendents is, becaus he self took care or rule of al Churches: whence Tertullian terms Corinth, Ephesus, Philippi, Thessal [...] ­nica, and the rest of that rank, Apostolic Churches, becaus he presided over them. But in process of time, as occasion served, they ordeined Episcopal Supervisers to supply their steads; for 2 Cor. 11. 28. Paul being caled by the Spirit to attend the West parts, passing Acts 19. 21. through Macedonia and Achaia toward Jerusalem, and so to Rome (never to see the East again) sent Titus to Corinth, and going by Sea, put in at Cret to preach the Gospel: wher meet­ing 2 Cor. 8. 6. 16. Ep scopat [...]cted. Titus back from Corinth, he left him ther to ordein Elders in every City, while he went to Epirus and Illyricum, before he cam to Rome. About that time he besought Timothy to abide at Ephesus, who attended him first into Macedon, but at his return resided there.

He was indeed an Evangelist, yet a Bishop too: as Philip who converted Samaria, was a Deacon and Evangelist; yet as­terward Bishop of Tralleis in Thracia. Som cavil, That Saint Paul trusted Titus and Timothy with a temporar Commission only, becaus he employed them elswher: but the rules prescri­bed for continued government to al Bishops cleerly convince that filly shift: For his Instructions how Elders and Deacons Titus 1. 5. should be qualified, plainly purport them to be Superiors to thos whom they shal so ordein and rule: Thus S. Paul leaving two of his Disciples in two principal places to plant Presbyte­ries, and propagat Churches, gav a patern or platform to al, who acted accordingly. For S. John reputed longevest of the S John ordein­ed Bishops. Apostles, wrot long after to the Angels (or Bishops) of the seven Asian Churches, most of which are named by Apostolic Men in Ecclesiastic Histories. Such (saith Clemens Alexan­drinus, and Eusebius) S. John constituted Bishops in divers [Page 89] Cities, after his return from Patmos Exile, planted whol Churches, and ordeined Presbyteries in several places, as Paul and Timothy used to doo. The like did other Apostles before their deaths in divers Dioceses, as Dorotheus, Demochares, Eu­sebius, Petrus de Natalibus, Volateranus, and many mo con­test. For Gaius, and after him Onesimus, suc [...]eded Timothy at Ephesus: Apelles, and after him Polycarpus becam Bishops of Smyrna: Lucius of Laodic [...]a: Clemens first of Sardis (which are four of the said seven Churches) and after of Rome; as Ignatius, Tertullian, Irenaeus, and other Fathers positivly aver: To whos authentic affirmation more Faith is du, then to thousand Novelists negativs, wholy possessed with prejudi­cacy, philauty, and partiality.

The next Apostolic See is Antioch, wher Beleevers were first 2 Antioch. caled Christians; which Church Peter and Paul jointly found­ed, as Ignatius attests: For two Christian Congregations co­existed ther; one of the Circumcision, wherof Peter took charge; another of converted Gentils, which Paul by mutual agreement supervised; who being employed elswher, commit­ted the charge of both being concorporat in one to Evodius Antecessor of Ignatius.

Thes two are also accompted Cofounders of Rome 3 Rome. Church by Irenaeus: but writers differ much about their successors. Som set Linus and Cletus (or Anacle­tus) next after them, and som Clemens: which dissent in cir­cumstance cannot frustrat or falsify their consent and harmony in substance, as partialists infer. Haply ther being two Congre­gations (as at Antioch) of Jews and Gentils, Clemens Peters Disciple succeded him in the first, and Linus Pauls Deacon in the last; til both uniting in one devolved on the Survi­ver Clemens, as Mr. Thorndike probably conjects, by compa­ring semblable cases. However, ther was afterward a constant succession of Bishops (most part Martyrs) til Constantins dais, as al Antients agree: But none are so absurd to say they were al bare Presbyters, as if thos great Cities had one only Minister to Officiat. In the Apostles dais before S. John died, Denys Areopagit S. Pauls Convert becam Bishop of Athens, as Denys Bishop of Corinth avers.

Lastly, S. Marc was made Bishop of Alexandria in Egipt 4 Alexandria. (haply by S. Peter, whos Disciple he was) as S. Jerom saith; That from Mare to Heracla and Dionysius in his dais (mark wel Epest ad Evag. the words) the Presbyters stil chos one in higher degree and dignity, to be Bishop. It was long after yer Corinth had any, which caused such Schisms or strifes among the Elders: yet many Apostolic Men ( Titus at Cret, Timothy at Ephesus, Cle­mens at Rome, Denys at Athens) presided in Neighbor Sees; who in time placed Bishops at Corinth and other Cities: which is a pregnant pedigree of Episcopal History for the first Cen­tury of Christ. Afterward when question aros, which Churches should hav Bishops, which not? It was regulated by the great­nes of Cities, or multitud of Presbyters requisit to such charges; and by slow degrees setled through the world. Hence Sardinia Can 6. Synod ordered, That no smal Towns shal hav Bishops wher a few Priests may serv; but only Populous places that deserv one, or antiently had one. And the Chalcedon Council provided, That Can. 17. when the Emperor established a City (annexing the Territo­ries adjacent or appendent) it should hav a Bishop; which made Itaely so ful of Bishops, becaus so Cityful. Now as Pres­byters assisted the Apostles, who caled them felow-Elders, though not equals: So they assisted Bishops in sacred matters; specialy of Ordination, as Ignatius informs. So saith Cyprian, He did nothing of himself without Counsil of his Clergy, and consent of the People. And S. Ambros, That nothing was doon in the Church without the Elders advise. Hence Bishops and Elders are oft caled by the same names, yet of distinct de­grees; becaus both concurred in functions; being stiled Priests Sacerdotes. in respect of divine service; Elders in regard of age or gravity; and Presidents or Prelats in relation to their rule. Thus their Phaesbytert. Antistices. titles were oft confounded, but Orders and Offices stil distin­guished; which no brass-brow can gainsay. S. Ambros renders a reason, why S. Paul instructing Timothy, passeth from Bi­shops to Deacons; becaus every Bishop is a Presbiter and Dea­con, not convertibly; but he chief over both.

Many maintain, That Presbyteries primarily consisted part of Clerics, part of Laics; as the Jews Sanedrim had som Priests and Levits, som Elders of the People: but 'tis fals; for [Page 90] that was a mix'd Judicature of spiritual and secular persons (like our old high Commission Court) becaus al causes of Church and Common-wealth passed under their censure: wheras the Church is subject to the State in Temporals; but in Spiritual things of the Soul and service of God, Christ intrusts none sav thos to whom he commits the Keis of his hous, wher­in simple Laics may not meddle.

Rustica Ruricolae, tractent fabrilia Fabri.
Let Clowns to Ploughing bend,
And Smiths their forging tend.

Thos then that deny any of thes things, must renounce al History, Authority, and Antiquity: but Men are so wedged to their Tenets, that they wil seek al shifts which their wits can in­vent, contrary to common sens, as the sequel shal shew. Som Objections occur.

Ob. S. Paul saith, That the Elders which rule wel, are wor­thy 1 Tim. 5. 17. of duple honor; specialy if they labor in the Word and Do­ctrin: Ergo ther be two sorts of Elders, som meer Rulers, who meddle not with the Word; som Preachers or Dispensers therof.

Sol. Cujus contrarium verum est: for how can thes labor in the Word and Doctrin, if they be Lay Elders? 'tis a fallacious inference to dis-join what the Holy Ghost conjoins: for he speaks only of spiritual Elders, which were both Rulers and Teachers, no Laics; nor can such labor in the Word: surely S. Paul knew no such: and St. Peter in general exhorts al Elders, 1 Pet. 5. 1 [...]. being also an Elder, to feed the Flock, which no Laic can doo; nor is any so impudent or ignorant to aver, that he or any of the Elders were Laics; only he a superior, and the rest inferiors; yet al of one rank: but no Lay Elders extant or couchant in the new Testament: for Church and Common-wealth are two distinct Oeconomies having several Officers: avant then al in­vasion into ech others Jurisdiction. Indeed they had divers Rom. 12. 5. Eph. 4. 11. Gifts or Graces of Prophecying, speaking Toungs, Ministring, Teaching, Exhorting, Commucating, Ruling: som to be Apo­stles, som Prophets, som Evangelists, som Pastors, som Doctors, [Page] but no meer Laics: such were Chimaera's or Catamountains. 1 C [...]. 12. 28. The Gifts of the spirit to edification are the word of wisdom, knowledg, faith, healing, miracles, prophecy, discerning of spi­rits, interpretation of toungs: But this provs not Ruling El­ders to differ from Bishops, nor any to be Laics; but flatly dis­provs it. St. Paul warns the Elders to be wary of grievous Wolfs, [...]ct [...]. [...] 29. which wil not spare the Flock: so his Elders that ruled wel, were spiritual Overseers: and to labor in the Word by convert­ing som, and confirming others, is the main office of Presbyters ab origine: For the Office of Presbyters is both to teach and govern, of Prelats to govern and teach; but no Laics to doo either in the Church: Gods Word hath not a word tending that way; nor mentions any Ministerial Orders or Officers, sav Bishops, Presbyters, and Deacons: But Evangelists had on­ly a mission or Commission to preach; no Ordination distinct from Presbyters and Deacons.

If any Laics ever Ruled in primitiv times, what becam of them, that no Records remain of their names, nor nois or no­tice of their suppression? sure the Laiety was far too potent and politic to be discarded or degraded by the Clergy. Is it probable or possible, that the whol Church would or could conspire, to smother or strangle in the birth such a sacred Insti­tution of our Lord Jesus and his holy Apostles? Or would Laics so tamely take it? Nay is it credible or conceivable, that al antient Fathers, Ecclesiastic writers, Oecumenic Conncils should so impiously combine, to extirp or extermin its entity and memory, that no one witnes appeers in any History; unless by som who partialy and preposterously wrest obscure word, and bring their meaning with them, as they serv sacred Scrip­tures, wherof they wil be sole Interpreters? If any one can name any one such, he shal carry the caus. Let Christians con­sult with common sens upon thes things, ye [...] they credulously resign up their Reason to every Sectist. Bishops in thos dais did nothing without Presbyters advise or assent; but by degrees assumed and arrogated al rule to themselfs (as haply Presby­ters would, if they had prevailed) of which usurpation St. Je­rom and other Godly Men complained, pressing them to com­municat many matters with Presbyters, as Moses did to the Sa­nedrim: [Page 92] but of Lay Elders like the Sanedrim, ne gry quidem in al the Scripture or Antiquity; which is irrefragable indeniable verity. The Apostles used no Laics service, but ordeined Dea­cons even to serv Tables; much less would they make them Partners [...]n Church government.

Ob. Som say Presbyters alone may ordein, becaus St. Paul 1 Tim. 4 14. exhorts Timothy not to neglect the gift in him, which he had by Prophecy, with laying on hands of the Presbytery: Ergo the El­ders of themselfs ordeined him.

Sol. Speak seriously and sincerely; Doth any beleev this to be tru, or only wish it were so? Certes S. Paul ordeined him 1 Tim. 1. 6. Deacon, Presbyter, and Bishop (though assisted by Elders) as heself avers: which words no way prov, that they can or did ordein alone without an Apostle or B [...]shop in chief. Hence som render them, Neglect not the gift of Eldership (or Epis­copat) given by my Imposition of hands, which carries so fair a color as the former gloss: but however construed they prov not that Elders ever ordeined him of themselfs without St. Paul [...]

Repl. 'Tis urged, That every Presbyter is a Father, so wel as Prelats: for St. Paul saith, Rebuke not an Elder, but exhort 1 Tim 5. [...]. him as a Father, and the yonger Men as Brethren: Ergo Pres­byters are Fathers, and ordein young Novices as Sons or Bre­thren.

Sol. Is not this to wrest, wrench, or wiredraw Scripture on the rack and tainter hooks to a wrong sens? every poor blind ey can see, that the Apostle apertly denots Elders in yeers (even Laics) not in Orders: for the next words are; the elder Wo­men as Moth [...]rs, and younger as Sisters; which cannot be meant of spiritual Elders, unles they wil make old Presbyte­res [...]es, and young Diaconesses: Nor if they be formaly caled Fathers for gravity, doth it folow, that they may ordein Sons: But St. Paul descends afterwards to Ecclesiastic Elders, advi­sing him to receiv no accusation against such under two or three ve [...]s. 19. 20. 21. witnesses; with a strict charge to doo nothing partialy in prefer­ring one before another, nor to lay hands suddenly on any: al w ch argu his eminent Episcopal authority over al the Elders, wher­of were many at Ephesus, yet could they not lay hands on any without him: what can be cleerer? He that hath ears, let him [Page] listen what the spirit speaks, To the Angel or Bishop of Ephesus: Rev. 2. 2, 3 I know thy works, labor, and patience; how thou triedst them which say they are Apostles and are not, but hast found them lyers: and for my names sake hast labored and not fainted. Thes are no functions for every Elder to try fall Prophets or censure them, but only for the chief Angel, wherof was only one in in ech of the seven Asian Churches, to whom he directed his Episties: For Bishops as Fathers ordeined Presbyters, but not they Bishops; nor can Sons ordein Sons without a Father or Bishop; who is superior both in precedence of place and pree­minence of power, as is proved.

The twelv Apostles and seventy Disciples had equal charge Luke 10. 1. or Commission to preach the Gospel, cure Diseases, and cast out Devils; yet the twelv superior to the seventy, as al know. Som too boldly say, Both were one order, becaus caled Disci­ples: sit liber Judex, let St. Luke decide it: After this (rela­ting to what he premised of the Apostles) he appointed other seventy Disciples also: If other then not the same: nor doth community of general title argu identity of special order or specifical Office: For Apostles were caled Disciples, but the seventy no Apostles, and Matthias one of them was chosen Apostle, as to an higher degree: yea Dorotheus flatly avers, that they were subordinat to them, and many afterwards made Diocesan Bishops, who succeded the twelv; and Presbyters the seventy, as al Antients ( Jeronimo non exempto) unanimosly vote and inform.

Men who hav forfeted their Faith, or resigned it to Faction, fear not to vent untruths among the Vulgar; being sure the simpler sort wil be seduced for lack of learning, and their Pro­selits apt to accept shadows for substances, or counterfet cop­per for current Coin: But St. Austins saying to Julius the He­retic, wil wel suit such Sectists; Hath time so confounded al things? is darknes turn'd to light, or contrarily, that Pelagius, Celestin, and Julius can see; but Hilary, Cyprian, and Ambros becom blind? semblably, are al Fathers, Councils, and Eccle­siastic Writers blind Beetles, not to perceiv how primitiv Chur­ches not long before their dais were governed: but Calvin, Cartwright, and Knox such Lynces to see so far into a Milston, [Page 92] what was acted so many ages before their births, without any Perspectivs of Human Histories? a strange instinct, if not in­spiration. Let St. Austins admonition shape the conclusion: 'Tis fit Christians should prefer Antiquity before your Novities, and rather adhere to their solid Judgments, then to your sha­low fancies.

The Answer to nine Questions propounded at last Parlia­ment to the Assembly of Divines touching Jus Divinum in Church Government, is built on the proofs or Principles pre­cited. 1. That Elders and Elderships in Scripture were sacred Officers representing the Church. 2. That Christ hath a tem­poral Kingdom, wherof secular Magistrats are Vicegerents; and a spiritual committed to Church Officers: as 'tis said, Aa­ron and his Sons shal wait on the Priests Office: and a B [...]shops Numb 3. 10. Office is a good work: for they are contra distinct, and may 1 Tim. 3. 1. not confound their powers. Say that Magistrats must guard the Church by positiv Laws, yet not rule in it; nor they to meddle with secular affairs. 3. That no Independent con­gregational Elderships are Jure divino. 4. That Christ gav the Keis to his Apostles and their spiritual successors; but not to Mat. 16 19. Mat. 18 18. John 20, 23. al Members of the Church. Al which are tru Positions, if the head Rulers be included; els 'tis no Church Government of divine Institution. For no Societies, Companies, Colleges or Corporations can be complet without their several Heads, as right Episcopacy is a regulated Presbytery, but single Presby­tery without a Bishop (who may not be secluded or separated) Episcopat beheaded. 'Tis said, That in the black Moneth a headless Hors wanders the streets with a chain about his neck; which haply now is fulfilled, if the Church becom an Anarchi­cal Acephalon, and the World an Antipodical Anarchy. That answer hath two main defects: 1. In not declaring the whol truth, that the Apostles were Heads or Presidents over al Pres­byters, and before their deaths deputed Bishops to be ordinary Rulers (themselfs being extraordinary) in their steads. 2. In not explaining, whether Lay-Elders may be admitted among Church-Officers, which seems to bee a mungrel mixture? But al Sects learn that craft of Satan, to concele what makes most against them. Certes Episcopat and Elderships are Correlats; [Page] nor can ther be a tru Presbytery without a Prelat. Whence Mr. Calvin at Geneva, when they reformed Religion, and had expelled their Popish Prelat Soveraign of the State, offered to readmit him, if he would renounce the Papacy: but upon re­fusal, erected this new form of Ministers and Laics to draw in joint yoke together, to pleas his Popular Patrons. He wished (as his felows did) to hav Protestant Prelats as in England; or Superintendents (which are analogical Bishops) as elswher; for they are truly Christian, yea of Apostolic Institution; not Anti-Christian, unles Antichrist be the head; and many hun­dreds suffred Martyry under Pagan tyranny, beside som here in the Marian persecution: therfore such aspersions savour more of ignorant malice then tru charity: for it may sincerly be said sans scandal, that Episcopacy stood established in this land ever since the dawn of Christianity under Lucius a Brytish King al­most An C. 180. 1500 yeers, both by antient and later Laws from age to age. So that if the primitiv form of Church government be re­tained, it cannot be exiled: for if Titus, Timothy, and the rest were ruling Elders over Presbyters, it should be so stil; yet 'tis not simply unalterable, if weighty causes require an abolition. Epiphanius rightly reputed Aerius an Heretic (though it be no point of Faith but Faction, and such since stiled Schismatics) for opposing Episcopacy: sith if it should be granted (which can never be proved) that 'tis a meer Human Ordinance of A­postolic Men: yet possession and prescription of 1500 yeers sans violence or usurpation, is enough to instal it in a firm right free from extirpation, if their be any sure setled state on Earth. For St. Jerom, no friend to that Order for his teen against John the proud Patriarch of Jerusalem (under whos Jurisdiction he lived long at Bethleem Juda) freely agniseth; that the peace of particular Churches cannot be conserved without it, being the best means to suppress Schisms, Sects, and Heresies, which swarm like Locusts in the open Sun. Many abuses are crept up, specialy in committing too much power to Lay. Chancelors; and detracting divers priviledges from Presbyters; beside ex­cessiv avarice of som Bishops which reigns in scarlet Robes so il as in lawn sleevs; al which may be reformed, and pristin procedings restored, without weeding out pure Wheat [Page 93] with Tares, Cockles and Darnel; which wise Husbandmen wil not doo: but what disorders may grow upon its utter era­dication (as al alterations are perilous) none but Gods alseing Ey can foresee.

To sum up al, thes are Oraculous verities: 1. That Christ Summary. during life kept al rule in his sole power, but after Resur­rection commended it to his Apostles by a Triple charge to Peter, Feed my Sheep. 2. That when Beleevers increased, they erected Elders every wher to officiat under them. 3. That before their deaths they ordeined som Disciples as Superiors over several Churches and Presbyteries. 4. That such were stil­ed Prelats (set over) and Bishops or Overseers. 5. That Peter and James Apostles; Marc and Timothy Evangelists; Gaius and Lynus two of the seventy Disciples; Titus, One­simus, Evodius, Clemens, Lucius, Apelles, Denys Areopagit, Polycarp, Ignatius, Anacletus (Apostolic Men) were actual Bishops in several Sees, as Ignatius, Tertullian, Irenaeus trusty Trustees avow. 6. That in after ages Bishops were chosen by Presbyteries, not occasionaly like Presidents or Mo­derators in Councils; nor annualy as Maiors of Cities; but perpetualy for life, like Masters of Colleges to govern their Dioceses. 7. That such continued in al christian Churches by the titles of Bishops or Prelats, til Luther stiled them Su­perintendents. 8. That after-Records or Catalogs of Epis­copal continued successions, are extant every wher beyond cavil or contradiction. 9. That al Elders or Presbyters (with Deacons, Evangelists, &c.) were Clergy Men by imposition of hands, til Calvin occasionaly admitted Laics Joint Rulers in shew with Clerics: which form hath since crept into a few Churches, as novities stil find vulgar intertainment like new Brooms. 10. That ther is no semblable color for conter­fet Lay-Elders to meddle in Church matters; nor ever were any such except Church-Wardens to keep the common Stock, Goods, and Utensils safe. What needs more light at noon▪ The blind are never the better, nor wil deaf Adders be charmed. So far the History.

Gaudenus de Episcopatu: Gauden about Episcopat.

In his Hicrospistes or Defens of English Ministry and Mini­sters.

LEt Dr. Gauden a learned Divine (ful of piety, and free Appendix. from partiality) moderat the matter: who in his Ele­gant Apology for the Ministry hath thes passages in sundry places. He dotes not on any dross or rust which antient vene­rable Episcopacy may in many revolutions of ages easily con­tract, and be as easily cleered: nor likes thes rigid reformations, which som rash, envious, ambitious Presbyters driv on: who know not how to shav their Fathers Beards without cutting their Throats, pair their Nails without cropping their Hands; nor as unskilful Chymists refine from dross without consuming what is Pretious: nor as blind Empirics purge bad Humors without casting into bloody Fluxes.

Our Lord Jesus Christ the tru Messias (Son of God, Angel of the new Covenant, the great Apostle, Bishop and Father of our Souls, Author and Finisher of our Faith, Suprem Lord and King, Eternal high Priest. and unerring Prophet of his Church) was sent by G [...]d the Father to perform al Prophecies, fulfil al righteousnes, and settle a visible Ministration of holy things in his Church: who cam not in his own Name as Man to be Mediator, or to take the Honor of Prophet, Priest, and a King over it; but had his Mission from the Father by evident Witne [...] from Heaven, both before and at his Birth: but more eminently at Baptism by the visible Shape of a Dov, and au­dible voice; This is my beloved Son in whom I am wel pleased: being annointed with gifts of the Holy Ghost abov al as Head of the Church. Thes were attended with infallible Signs and Wonders, while he taught the Mysteries of his Kingdom, and instituted holy Rites to distinguish his Church from the World, by thos Seals and Pledges of his lov, in dying for [Page 94] the Faithful, when he shed both Blood and Water on the Cross. Which having personaly accompiished as to the me­ritorius part of his Ministry, he being no more to convers in a visible Human presence on Earth, did after his Resurrection commit the Keis of his Kingdom to the twelv Apostles afore­chosen, as Stewards or Ministers of his Houshold, instructing them on what fundation of Faith to build his Church, and by what Sacramental Signs to confirm Beleevers; bidding them to Teach and Baptise al Nations, to ordein Disciples that should succed, and so breathed on them: promising to send his Spirit (as he did after his Ascention) and to be with them til the Worlds end. This cannot be meant of their Persons who shortly died, but of their Survivers or Successors in the Ministry to whom the same Authority and assistance belongs by divine durable Charter or Commission: for publication and confirmation wherof the Holy Ghost cam on them in shape of firy Cloven Toungs, filling them with miraculous gifts fit for the first planting of the Church and al Ministerial power derivable to others, for propagation and perpetuity therof. Which whol fram or Fabric was the proper effect of his Prophetic Wisdom for instructing his Church; an Act of his Kingly power in governing it, and the fruit of his Priest­ly care for a right Liturgy, or Officiating to be stil conti­nued by an holy Succession of Evangelical Ministers in his Name; to Teach, Guid and Govern it in al holy Duties. He made Apostles, Prophets, Evangelists, Pastors, Teachers for the work of Ministry, and edyfying of his body: who had divers gifts, as be several parts in our body; so that al are not Prophets or Pastors which are Beleevers or Members, as every bodyly part is not an Ey, tho it partakes the same Soul, as Be­leevers doo the same Spirit in differing ministrations: of which Gifts thos only are to Judg, whom the Spirit sets Successivly in the Church with power to ordein others: without which divinely constituted Order began by Christ, derived to the Apostles, and delegated to their Successors; the Church long ago had bin a Monster made up of confused excrescences or heaps of Heresies, Sects, Schisms, and blind Baiards, as such mishapen prodigies start up daily: who having cast off Sacred [Page] Order, doo in their varieties exced the promiscuous produ­ctions even of Afric.

The Apostles accordingly first filled up Judas place by Lot out of the seventy Disciples; and took care to ordain others which should so doo after them; distributing their own labors into several Churches; som of Circumcised Jews, others of Gentils, among whom they exercised Divine power and Au­thority with al fidelity, as Christs Ambassadors, Heralds, and Laborers in his Husbandry, or Espousers to make a Mariage betwen Christ and the Church: which office none without do delegation might presum to perform. During which primi­tiv purity, they ordeined Elders in every City and Country, charging them to fulfil the Ministrey and feed their Flocks (both in tru Doctrin and good Diciplin) over whom the Lord had made them Overseers by the Apostles assignation. Som of which had charge to settle a Succession of such as should be apt and able to teach the Word of Life, that Christs Insti­tution might be kept unblamable, til his secund coming, by an holy Order or Office of Ministers duly made by solen impo­sition of sacred hands, as a visible token of their peculiar de­signation to this function. Thus beyond al doubt or disput (which none but Atheists or Infidels wil deny) Christs holy Ordinance was carried on successivly for three genera­tions: 1. In the Apostles: 2. From them to Elders and Rulers: 3. From them to others which were ordeined Bi­shops, Presbyters, and Deacons, as is evident in the new Testa­ment. The next succession is cleer by testimony of Clement and other Apostilic Men beyond exception or evasion: al which entring by the Dore, are as tru Shepherds, Stewards, Fathers, Rulers and Watchmen over the Flock: being caled the Light of the World, Salt of the Earth, Fishers of Men, Stars in his right hand, Angels of the Churches, &c. who are charged to Preach the Word in season and out; to feed Lambs, to care for the Flock, to fulfil their Ministry, to ex­hort, command, and Rebuk with al Authority; to whom Christ gav many peculiar privileges and promises of special assistance. Hence 'tis cleer as the Noonday, that som (not al) and thos ordeined (not voluntiers) are sent successivly by [Page 95] Christs authority, to doo the work of the Ministry: which dreadful imploiment injoined, with a bitter Wo if neglected, the very Angels wil not undergo unles sent, nor then without horror: much less should sinful Men (to whom a duple Wo is du) desperatly dare to intrud being unsent, uncaled, unor­deined, and unfurnished; which is proud presumption. As then som are duly invested with Ministerial power, and strictly injoined to use it for the Churches good: so al others not im­powered (tho never so wel gifted) are flatly forbid to usurp that sacred Office, or confer what they never received on o­thers: which neither Melchisedec, Moses, Aaron, Samuel, nor any of the Prophets; no nor Christ, John Baptist, the A­postles, Evangelists, or any tru Bishops and Presbyters ever durst to arrogat, without divine mission or commission me­diatly or immediatly derived from Christ. This Ministerial Ordination, hath continued abov sixteen Centuries by lawful succession even to wonder, amidst al Persecutions, Confusi­ons, and changes of Human affairs. For Christ promiseth to be with his Church and Ministers to the Worlds end, and Hel [...]gates shal not prevail against them. This laying on of Hebr 6. 1, 3. Hands in Ordination, is reckoned among the fundamental Principles of Religion, joyned with Faith, Repentance, Bap­tism, Resurrection, and last Judgment, nor can Confirmati­on be duly doon to the Baptised, and Catechised, sav by such as are ordeined therto: which to gainsay, is as if Men should reject thos other grand Articles forecited. Surely al divine Ministrations of Preaching, Celebrating the Sacraments, and other Ordinances necessary to the being (so wel as wel being) of a Church, had ceased long since, if God had assigned no peculiar Men to hold forth the great Salvation, which leavs Men excuseless: sith they are taught by such as hav special Characters or Letters of Credence from Christ: if they wil not hear Moses and the Prophets, or Men sent by him; whom wil they beleev? Ther be four sorts of Laborers in Gods har­vest: som sent by him soly, as Moses, most Prophets, the twelv Apostles, St. Paul: som by Gods assignation, but Mans Ordination; as Aaron, Josua, Elisha, Timothy: som by Or­dination of the Church, yet of Christs institution; as al Evan­gelical [Page] Ministers duly ordered: som not sent by God or Man; but run or rush in of themselfs, as fals Prophets, Deceivers, Intruders, Sectists, and al Satans Disciples: who boast of ex­traordinary Enthusiasm as Angels of light saying, Thus saith the Lord; When he never sent nor spak by them. For no Be­leever though indued with great Gifts and Graces (as St. Am­bros had before he becam Bishop) ought to assum Ministerial power: for then every Christian of both Sexes (as ther be sundry She-Preachers, which pretend to the Spirit in thes licen­tious times) may claim the Keis to themselfs, and dispens Holy things to others, or rule Christs Houshold in his stead; which repugns common Reason; as if every domestic Servant or Scul­lion should chalenge the Stewards place, or every Member arrogat the office of Eys, Toung, or Hands; becaus they be­long to the same Soul, Body, and Head. Sith then no Natu­ral Moral, or Religious gifts or abilities can instate any to be a Magistrat, Judg, Ambassador, or public Officer; unles he be invested by the Fountain of Civil power. So ther should be a right derivation of Spiritual Power from Christ Jesus as Head; either immediatly as the Apostles had, or mediatly as Bi­shops and Presbyters since; who without fraud, force, or un­just Usurpation received it from the Apostles by Praier, Bene­diction, and imposition of Hands in Christs name. Which pregnant truth morosely to deny, is as if an Hog should an­swer al Arguments with grunting. Yea to act against so strong a stream of authority; befits only Ranters, Seekers, Shakers, and Enthusiasts; or Jews, Turcs, and Infidels: but not sober Chri­stians or Members of the Church, which ever enjoyed a tru succession of ordeined Ministry: wherby the Gospels light is continued to this day amidst al Pagan persecutions, Heresi­cal confusions, and Schismatical Fractions bent to undermine it. Al Nations by Natures lore owned som Deity, and had peculiar Persons to execut Religious Rites; nor did ever any sober Men reject Gods service for Ministers faults, frailties, or infirmities. For a Divine must be distinguish'd from the Man, sith Gods power works with human weaknes, nor need we be more nice or nauseous. Lastly ther is a necessity of or­deined Ministry, sith none of free accord wil undergo so hard [Page 96] and hazardous a task in times of primitiv Persecutions, to hold forth the doctrin of a crucified Saviour (as al carnal Men deemed it) unles they had the duty of divine caling laid on their Consciences. Yet however in the Gospels Halcyon serenity, many new Teachers, out of avarice or popular ambition, rush rashly upon it, which the best Men durst not weild without weeping (as St. Austin did when he was made Presbyter) and trembling: thos rigid storms of yore, would hav quenched the now so forward flashes of thes Sparks; when to be a Prelat or Presbyter, was to expose themselfs to fire and fagot, wild Beasts jaws, and a thousand tortures.

So unles divine authority had imposed, and special Grace assisted, together with promises of eternal Glory; doubtles the glorious Gospel of salvation had yet this time bin buried in oblivion; fith none had heard or beleeved that report, if none had dared to preach or publish it, as Men sent and or­deined did. Nor would any els be so fool hardy to hazard al worldly interests (honor, estate, liberty, life) on such an un­couth, unwelcom, unsafe message; unles they had bin consci­ous of a special duty laid on them by divine authority, derived in that solen sacred Ordination of Ministry: Whence St. Paul denounced a Wo to himself if he preached not the Gospel. For every one that can handle the Hod, Hammer, or Trowel, is not instantly an Architect: Nor can every gifted Man supply the place of such a Workman as hath both Materials, Tools, Art, and Approbation. Ther is great ods betwen plausible cunning to draw Disciples, and sincere conscience to make folowers of Christ; betwen intruding popular Masters, and tru ordeined Ministers: betwixt clambring over the wal like Robbers or Plunderers, and entring at dore as tru Shepherds of the Flock or owners of the Family: betwen conterfet Cranks and ap­proved Ambassadors of Christ. For the Gospel Ministry is a dreadful imployment to discharge it duly, which requires pecu­liar Workmen fit for so high a Function; nor is it less weighty now then of old: When Ministers must contend with blunt ru­sticity bold barbarity, Schismatical curiosity, fantastical novity, Heretical subtlety, disguised Hypocrisy, superstitious vanity, Factions fury, politic prophanenes, and al sorts of spiritual [Page] wickednes. Nothing old can pleas, though never so tru; nor new com amiss, though never so fals: a new Church way, new fangled Ministry, new ordered Sacraments, new sensed Scriptures, and what not? Every one sings, In no­va fert animus. With such proud, silly, scornful Sophisters (who need Teachers, yet dare to teach) must Ministers incoun­ter, who cast off al Church Order and Government: so 'tis most requisit to keep such unruly Buls of Basan under. Rash­nes is no part of Fortitud, nor confidence a character of cou­rage, nor Confusion any ingredient of Charity, nor Faction a support of Faith, nor disorderly walking fit fuel of holy flames Psal. 122. 3. in Christians hearts: For the Church is compared to a City at unity in it self; and to an Army with Banners: which holy al­lusions Cant 6. 3. argu, that ther is to be exact government in al affairs: but the enemies of reformed Ministry (who affect subtleties more then solidities) becom Ministers Rivals, from whom they had thos pretended Gifts; and like Balaams Beast, presume to teach their Masters, trampling their feeders under feet: but such Sectists or Seducers make Ministers most necessary to op­pose their fury, repel their folly, and reform novity, which els like wild Bores would destroy the Lords Vineyard, if thes faithful Watchmen did not prevent them. Thus much in ge­neral of the whol Ministry: now more neerly concerning Epis­copacy, which is assaulted at first entry.

Ob. If it be granted to be of divine Apostolic Institution at first, yet it hath since declined into Antichristian Apostacy, un­der Popish Primacy, being linealy derived from it: Ergo both Bishops and Ministers, like links of one chain or branches of the same Tree, are to be lopped off.

Sol. Indeed Bishops hav constantly and continualy ordein­ed Ministers ful 1600 yeers: but Popes of Rome usurped Anti­christian Supremacy in the West (as they would over the whol world, if they could catch it) about 1050 yeers yet al sacred Or­dinances used or abused by them, must not be abandoned as Antichristian; for then we may seek new Scriptures, Creed, and Sacraments, with another Gospel and Messias, so wel as Bishops and Ministers; sith al thes hav been defiled by their de­praved doctrins and superstitions. Nor was the Church Ca­tholic [Page 97] (against which Hel-gates shal never prevail to blot out Christs name) wholy ruined by Antichristian superstructures, that the main fabric must be puld down and made Nehustan, instead of repairing or restoring it to pristin purity: For so Christ reduced divine worship to his own Hous, when avarice had made it a Den of Theefs. Nor did the Jews Priesthood ceas for the Priests enormities: Nor the dialectic teaching part fal from Moses Chair, though the Scribes and Pharisees fat therin, teaching Mens traditions: Nor doo the Sacraments or Evangelic Ordinances fail by any Papal alterations or additi­ons. Hence al Godly Reformers (specialy in England) were content to cast out al corrupt doctrins, vain customs, impure mixtures, and superstitious vanities which Papal novity had built on the foundations of Christian Religion, laid by the an­tient Architects al over the World; reserving the Scripture Canon, with al sound Doctrin, holy Disciplin, Sacramental seals, and other duties of Praier, fasting, &c. according to the cleer sens of Gods Word, and practis of primitiv Churches: yet were they not so silly or giddy to reject al which the Popish party received or retained; but only refined gold from dross, the pure from vile, which they had from Christian Predecessors (Martyrs and Confessors) in that once famous Roman Church by du succession, though since much degenerated. No Chri­stian in his right wits (whos Conscience is guided by science and zele tempred with Charity) wil or should reced from them, farther then he finds them to deviat from the rule of Faith, held forth by Apostolic Precepts, and primitiv Precedents: But in matters of extern prudential order, every Church hath like li­berty to use or refuse such Ceremonies as ech thinks fit. In som points we may convers with them as simply Men: in som imi­tat them as Secular or Ecclesiastic Rulers: in many, join with them so far forth as they hold the truths of Religion and Fun­damentals of Faith: But their misexpositions of Scripture, with al Antichristian additionals, we utterly detest, disclaim and dis­avow.

For instances: We celebrat the Lords supper with the same Lords Supper. Elements, but renounce that sens of Christs words on which they rais the new doctrin of Transubstantiation; sith 'tis con­trary [Page] to Gods providence both in Natural and Spiritual things; which change not the substance, but only the relation or use from Natural to Mystical: contrary to Scripture phrase in like expressions, wher things related by religious Institutions, are mutualy denomined without essential changes: contrary to common Reason and four of fiv Senses testimony, which are the proper Judges of sensible objects: contrary to Christs way S [...]ght, Smel, Taft, Touch. or end of strengthning a Receivers Faith, which is not doon by what is harder to be beleeved then the whol Gospel mystery beside: for nothing is less credible then that Christ sitting at Table gav his own very visible Body to be eaten by his Disciples, and al Communicants after; when as he stil sits as Man at his Fathers right hand in Heaven. Thes with like fancies ful of ab­surdities, and consequential Idolatry of Bread-worship, and sacrilegious detaining the Cup from Laics (contrary to Christs express Drink ye al of this. words, and primitiv Churches practis for many ages) we flatly abjure or abandon; yet receiv it with the same pious veneration of purest Antiquity; but doo not determin the ma­ner of that mysterious Union: endevoring for the Graces which may make us worthy partakers, when we receiv that dreadful (yet most desirable) seal of our Faith: not by eating his flesh grosly with our mouths; but by receiving him spiritualy into our Souls: Yet by the same Faith we realy partake his merit, death, body, and blood to eternal life, before we receiv him by the said Sacrament (yea though we should never hav oportunity so to doo, which yet we may not neglect) sith 'tis the same ob­ject received by the same Instrument, to the same end; but in different degree and way: yet the same Saviour of the World.

For Baptism, we retain the words and form; but discard the Baptism. superfluous superstitious dresses (Salt, Oil, Spittle, Insufflation) which deform that duty, though not destroy it; nor doo re­baptise thos baptised by them. Semblably we hold the Scrip­tures Scripture. tru Canon as Oracles of God, delivered by divine inspira­tion; according to the tru testimony of the old Jewish and later Christian Church: but cashire som Apocryphal Additi­ons of the Romists and Remists from being Rules of Faith: yet allow most of them as useful morals for instruction of life. [Page 98] In privat Praiers and public Liturgies, Papists use the Latin lan­guage Public Praies. under pretext of uniformity; with many vain Tautolo­gies which we dislike: but approv the holy custom of public Assemblies to worship God by Praiers and Praises in the Mo­ther Toung, as St. Paul commends and commands.

In som particulars we dissent both in judgment and practis: Other Poin [...]. as in their profitable Purgatory, popular Image-worship, Ori­sons and Oblations for the dead, Invocations of Saints and Angels, Auricular Confession, works of Supererogation, In­dulgences, and al such bran brought in by avarice and ambiti­on; being but Human superstructures, not warranted by the Word, nor confirmed by general consent, Precept, or practis of al Churches.

Touching the Popes claim of universal Supremacy, Infallibi­lity, Papal Primacy and Superiority over al Churches and Councils; we flatly forbid the Banes as unjust Usurpations, got by Princes favors, or Popes fraud, flattery, power, and policy: yet grant a Priori­ty of place (as Peter had among the Apostles) either in his Ro­man Dioces as Bishop, or in Councils as Bishop of that antient imperial Metropolis; as other Patriarchs, Primats, and Prelats hav precedence by antiquity of their several Sees.

For the sacred Function of Ministry, we hold the antient form Ministry. derived from the Apostles to Bishops and Presbyters, to preach the Word, celebrat Sacraments, reconcile Penitents, anathematise Delinquents, use the Keis in Jurisdiction or Government: ex­cluding al others from thes duties as impudent Intruders, who are no [...] ordeined by just Cōmission. We renounce al imaginary power or Wil-worship annexed to the Office by Human su­perstition, with al spurious spawns of Mens inventions, Scrip­tureless Opinions, and groundless Traditions, dashing thos Babylonish Brats against the stones; yet stil foster the Sons of Sion or Israel of God in al divine Institutions, which were long led Captiv and laid in Antichrists Dungeon, within the Wals or Suburbs of Babylon. In a word, we hold the tru Faith, holy Mysteries, Catholic Orders, constant Ministry, and commen­dable Customs continued in that Church: nor doo deem it a matter of Conscience or Prudence to debar any thing divine, though delivered by Mens impure hands: For divine Ordinan­ces [Page] are incorruptible, nor can pollution of Mens Minds or ma­ners defile them; no more then putrefaction pollut the Sun when it shines on Carrion: we may be corrupted, but holy Or­dinances like God are stil the same, when restored to primitiv purity. We must not cast away Gods provision though sent by Ravens; nor abandon al Romish Tenets of saving Truth, though Trent Council anathematised som Truths. Popes were ever too wary to abject or abrogat tru Religions Essentials (Scrip­ture, Sacraments, Ministry, Church Polity) on which the over­grown structures of Pontifician pomp, pride, profit, power, and policy through Peoples credulity are raised or sustained. Nor can ought conduce more to their content, then that rash Reformers should reject al Rites of Religion retained by them. They know how meager a Sceleton or meer shadow it wil shew (both for Doctrin, Disciplin, Duties and maners) if fa­natic Reformers reject al Principles as Popish: Or if som Mens rapacious avarice may prevail to bereav Ministers maintenance, leaving them nothing to liv on but bare scraps of arbitrary grudging contributions.

Certes Church-reformation is to be carried with al accurat rigour in cleer points of saving Truths; but with much eandor, charity, and circumspection toward Christians in other things, wherin we differ or dissent. 'Tis a laudable Schism to separat gold from dross, not retaining both in confusion, nor rejecting both in passion: wherby they shal not only reform abuses, but invite Men to embrace or approv our wel tempered zele, ma­king them see their own defects or deformity: For Reforma­tion is best doon, not by cutting off Religions head; but by taking off the Visors which hide its beauty; sith Men wil best see their errors, not by tearing out their eyes, but by fairly remo­ving the films or beams of prejudice and pertinacy, which obvele or hinder their sight. By this shield of moderat charity, pro­ving al things and holding what is good, we justly defend al Re­formed Churches from the sin and scandal of Schism; when we truly declare to separat no farther from them, then we are perswaded they hav swerved from Christ and the Catholic Church. We are bid to com out of Babylon, but not to run out of our wits; to act as Gods People with meeknes and [Page 99] charity, not with firy fiercenes and cruelty, like sons of Belial running from one Antichrist to another: For Papists hav much of Antichrist in som kinds, and so may many mo in others: ei­ther by innovations, confusions, or chiefly uncharitablenes. For if nothing savours more of Christ then Charity; nothing hath less of Christ then the contrary; which many Men mistaking for zele nourish a Cockatrice for a Dov, and a Serpent for a Phaenix. This freeth us from the brand of Schismatics, such as the Novatians and Donatists were (like our modern Sectists) who so claimed to be a tru Church, as to exclud al others from communion or accord. Som cry out upon Papists cruelty (which hath bin too barbarous) yet they use more both against them and their Brethren; longing for such a Kingdom of Christ as shal consist in War, Blood, and Massacres against al except thos of their own side or Sect. We may not imput the errors or enormities of every Popish Doctor to al that Pro­fession, nor take them at the worst; sith ther is much difference betwen their public disputs and privat practises; nor are their death-bed Tenets alwais conform to their Chairs or Pulpits: Yea many are much more modest and moderat then hertofore; wherin we ought to rejoice: But for the People most are igno­rant of thos Disputs, wherin to er wilfully is dangerous: which if they hold, being so taught, yet 'tis under perswation or lov of Truth; retaining the foundation of Christ crucified, and expe­cting salvation by his sole merits; of whom we should judg cha­ritably, that God in Mercy accepting their lov to truth which they know, wil pardon particular errors, which they know not to be such: judg as you wil be judged. We are loth or should be, to differ from any Christians, unles Conscience tels they are in evident error: who like not Faction, nor delight in sepa­ration; nor hold any bloody Tenets against thos of advers O­pinion; but wish like charity from them, that we may be al united to Christ and his Church.

Tru Reformation is but a return to Gods way, by retaining such Principles as pertain to al Beleevers: for we may use the Temples holy Vessels if restored from prophane hands of quaffing Balthasaer, being stil pure silver. So our Ministry is Ez [...]a 7. [...] non [...] Ministe. i [...]m. holy and divine, if refined from superstition (as al other Ordi­nances [Page] are) though derived through corrupt chanels of the Ro­mish Church. Hence our Reformers did not dig new Wels of Ministerial Ordination (as Papists falsly aspers, which Mr. Ma­son refuts) but purified the puddle water according to Apo­stolic Institution; not requiring more of any ordeined in the Church of Rome, then to renounce their superstitious errors. Which doon, they were admitted to exercise the Ministry re­ceived, both truly as to the substance, and duly to succession, without reordination. For though that Sword had contra­cted Rev. 2. 12. rust, yet was it the same with two edges, which cam out of Jesus Christs mouth: nor may it be broken or cast off becaus rusty; but cleered, clensed, & furbished from dulnes or bluntnes. Ministers may stil continu Gods Laborers, though Loiterers, Mat. 26 40. as Christ owned his Disciples, when they could not wake or watch one hour in his heavy horrid agony. Our Antiministerial Antagonists hav less color to argu it Antichristian from Papal usurpation; then ther is Reason, Scripture, and Experience (beside common consent of al Reformed Churches) to prov it Authentic: For if envy, teen, and avarice did not blind their bloodshot eys, they might cleerly see som mighty works wrought on Mens Souls by the Ministry: without which thos cavilling calumniators had not bin so much Christian as they boast to be; nor so able to contend with specious shews of Piety against the learned Ministry, with whos Heifers they plough, having nothing but what they received from them, and are most ingrat wretches to their pristin Teachers.

We know that many Churches beside Reformed (Gallican, Popes Primacy began A 604. Venetian, Grecian, Russian, Asian, African) deny the Popes universal Primacy of power, being bought by proud Boniface 3. of proditorious Phocas the Parricid, abov 1000 yeers ago; who by Divine Right had no Jurisdiction farther then his own Dio­ces or Patriarchat, limited by general Councils: wher four other Patriarchs (of Jerusalem, Antioch, Alexandria, Con­stantinople) had equal authority assigned in their several Pre­cincts or Provinces, as al know. This Antichristian arrogation (which gav first hint of revolt to Henry 8.) our Bishops and Ministers stil abhorred, so much as their Adversaries doo the Genevan Presbytery: But it may be feared, lest their prepo­sterous [Page 100] zele or prepensed malice, may prov the Popes best En­gin; if they can so far prevail to cashire al learned, labo­rious, duly ordeined Ministers, which God forbid: For then our Church wil becom a falow unfenced Feild, fit for Papal subtlety; which he wil Plough with an Ox and Ass co [...]yoked (politic Jesuits with fanatic Donatists, Seminary Priests with gifted Brethren, Friers mendicant with Prophets predicant) who condog or comply in consortship under divers disguises, as is wel known. So that no wise Men judg otherwise of this conjuncture, but that Jacobs hand is in the py, and Ahitophel assistant in counsil with Absolon; whos sly plots and practises against tru Ministry good Lord confound.

Reformations may bend so far on one hand, til they meet on the other; forsaking that rectitud of the mean, in which the truth and honor of Religion consists. Antichrist (which som fear in name and in others, more then in the thing or themselfs) is at both ends of extrems: of Prophanes, defect, and confusi­on on one side, and excess of superstition on the other. Every Man may suspect Antichrist in his own bosom, sith the King­dom of Christ and Antichrist is specialy within us: but 'tis bet­ter for the Church to retain what is Christs though in common with Antichrist, then passionatly to cast off al under color of detesting him; sith Men may fal into sacrilege (which is too frequent) while they seem to abhor Idols. 'Tis the same evil Spirit which rents the Church by Schisms, and that which casts into the fire of persecution, and water of superstition: But as the Spirit of Idolatry may be cast out for a fit; so he may soon return with seven Devils wors then himself. Papal darknes and Mat. 12. 4 [...]. Human eclipsings, are no warrant to extinguish the light of tru Ministry set up by Christ: Nor can Men pleasure Satan more, then to put out the Churches Candles instead of snuffing them: but som hate our Ministry, not for lighting their Lamps at the Popes Taper; but for out-shining their dimnes: for 'tis madnes to cut their Fathers throats becaus they were once sick, or descended from diseased Parents, if they are be­com in sound perfect health. Vulgar Spirits are uncouth Re­formers, who beat down or break in pieces with Axes and Hammers, having no Chissels or finer tools to clens and po­lish: [Page] as som pul down Crosses to set up Weather-coeks, and batter Church windows, becaus painted in time of Popery. Mans usurpation cannot prejudice Gods dominion, nor Hu­man traditions or additions vacat divine Commands, nor An­tichrists superstitions cancel Christs Institutions; nor the heady intrusion of som on Churches rights, caus Christians to remov the antient Land-marks of tru Ministry, du order, and good Government fixed by Christ. 'Tis much more madnes to abo­lish the use of holy things, then to lerat som abuses with it: but right reforming is a staid sober restauration of antient venerable sorms; which is never wel handled unless Men hav honest hearts, good heads, pure hands, and cleer eys to discern, direct, and dispose it: but when al meet, they wil seriously, sincerely, and succesfully doo the work of Christ and his Church. Chri­stians hav no caus in Reason or Religion, to reject our reformed Ministry for any succession from, relation to, or communion with the Roman Church or Clergy; no more then the Obje­ctors hav to pul out their eys, becaus Papists see with theirs: or destroy themselfs, becaus issued from Popish Parents or Proge­nitors; For we may so wel refuse al Leagues, Treaties, or com­mon Commerce with them, as al Rites of Christianity; and even that as lawful Ministry or holy succession originaly deri­ved from Christ and his Apostles. So far of Ministry in gene­ral: now of Episcopacy.

Ob. Som at first brunt oppose, that our Ministry being con­veied Epict [...]pacy. by the hands of Bishops (who are not of Christs planting, and now supplanted by power) the whol order, as slips or bran­ches of one stem or stock, must needs fal or fail together with the trunck of the Tree: Ergo both to be annulled.

Sol. Lo how thes Antiministerials cudgel Presbyters with the same staf, which som of them put into Vulgar hands to beat their Reverend Fathers, and banish Episcopat: but what ever thos rigid Reformists secret or sinister intentions were; surely they wanted the Serpents wisdom to sav the main Head, whence life, motion, and direction descends to al parts; wher­by the lesser hurts or bruises might easily be recured. For the envious and ambitious zele of such Antiprelatical Spirits aspi­ring to step up into their steads, hath produced sad events, and [Page 101] given their Enimies great advantage: so they hav work enough to keep the Lepry from their own Heads, which they told the People had so fouly infected Bishops hands, as could ne­ver be clensed unles cut off: but al mortals are apt to doo amiss, and 'tis never too lat to rectify miscarriages. Most Men confes (nor can impudence gainsay it) that the Order or Of­fice is lawful, wherby al Christian Churches were Governed: however som inconveiniences (yea mischiefs too) arise from corruption of finful Men in al Professions. Tho then Epis­copy hath bin much shaken or depressed by power, passion, or privat ends, to the impairing and indangering of the whol fabric or function: yet wise Men may after this thick dust of disput see, what is of God therin, and regulat it by paring off what is depraved or deformed, and restore it to primeval puri­ty. 'Tis now no need to fear or flatter Bishops faces, whos glory is gon; but meer matter of Conscience to testify truth: sith thos of different judgments take freedom to bespatter them so unjustly and unsavourly; as they hoped by their il breath to blast that venerable caling, and render it odious or execra­ble to weak Christians, which to wise Men was ever like Aa­rons Ointment poured out. Nor doth it lose divine fragrance by the fracture of il times, which passionatly break the Ala­blaster boxes of civil protection, which preserved it for many ages from vulgar insolence and Schismatical violence. The like liberty is lawful to vindicat it by pregnant places of Scriptu­ral precepts and precedents, secunded with Catholic custom and practis of the Church, and confirmed by the Laws of this Land.

To omit the main controversy of its lawfulnes, and to whi­ten two Wals with one Trowel; two points principaly shal be handled: 1. To remov a popular Odium or Plebeian pas­sion and prejudication; taken up by weak (yet haply wel mind­ed) Christians, against Bishops Presidential authority over Presbyters. 2. to justify the holy Ministerial Ordination duly doon by their hands. One rub riseth from their lat disasters, whom if Arguments and Words could not, yet Arms and Swords hav suppressed. For vulgar minds are apt to judg thos unjust that are unprosperous, and cursed who are punished, [Page] as Turcs use to doom. Yet in tru sens, their many miseries may no more be urged against their Persons or Places then Jobs af­flictions; which Satan never alleged against his integrity. Many wish that al Prelats and Presbyters were chief Suff [...]rers: yea that the Word, Sacraments, and al holy Ministrations should ceaf, but Religious Rites must not be mesured by Mens passions or prevalences, nor any secular sanctions. For ther were pious Prelats preposited abov Presbyters, before any Civil power protected them; and by Gods Grace may so continu, maugre al oppression or persecution. The things of Christ and tru Religion may not be received or refused, as Ushered in or crowded out by Civil power: nor doth Christ steer his Ship by that compass: sith at the same rate of Worldly frowns, we should hav no Scriptures, Sacraments, sound Doctrins, or holy Ordinances; but al had bin turned into Heathenish bar­barity, Hereticla errors, and Schismatical confusions: if con­science to God and Christ had not conserved thes sacred things, by the pious patience of holy Bishops and Ministers, whom wicked Worldlings ever hated: seeking to destroy root and branch through the sides of Episcopacy. Bishops Government as referred to the chief office of Ordination, is no way Popish or Antichristian, as too many ignorantly or malitiously chatter: tho the pride, ambition, or avarice of some Prelats, might make them justly odious, becaus contrary to Christs precept and patern: whos place Bishops as cheif Pastors or Parents among Presbyters, hav alwais since the Apostles eminently held in the extern polity or Regiment of the Church. So that the antient Presidentship over the Clergy in several Diocesan precincts, as it was justly exercised in p [...]rer times, is no less Christian, then several Churches in al ages and places of the World: Yea far beyond any form, which hath not charity to brook or bear regulated Prelacy, suting with Scripture and Antiquity. For Lutheran Superintendents are Bishops in truth tho not title: yea the most learned Genevins ( Calvin, Beza, Moulin, Sal­matius, Bochartus, Blundel) acknowledg Episcopat a pious institution, succeding in the Apostles steads, by the Churches counsil and Consent. So far is any sober, impartial, uninteres­sed Man from dooming or deeming it unlawful; unles they [Page 102] be blinded with blockish ignorance, or possessed with peevish arogance. Certes, the learnedst Presbyterians are best Friends, and blind Zelots bittrest Foes to tru Episcopat: who want science, prudence, humility and charity; which is the best con­diment of Christianity. Orderly Presbytery which admits one to Preside, is a lesser Episcopy to oversee particular Flocks: yet not to expel or extirp Bishops; nor is headless or many head­ed Presbytery necessary by divine right: but primitiv Prelacy (which imports one grav worthy Person chosen by consent, and assisted by counsil of sundry Presbyters to preside over them) is to be preferred before al other forms for many weighty Rea­sons insuing.

1. Becaus al Apostolic Antients ( Ignatius, Justin Martyr, Reason. 1 Polycarp, Tertullian, Cyprian, Irenaeus) jointly attest, that one stil Episcopized in every City. For at first a few Presby­ters served in ech by Apostolic appointment: but as converts increased, they constituted several Colleges, Companies, or Consistories as the Churches Colonies; which one Super­visor as Captain or Commander overruled. Aerius upon envy against Eustachius, who got a Bishoprick from him, was the first that pressed Clerical parity, contrary to the Churches old Order: but if the Apostles had not instituted it, how could al Churches uniformly conspire therin al the World over? For tho at first the name was common to al Church Ministers (even Apostles) yet after their deaths, it was peculiarly con­fined to their Successors in place and power.

2. To avoid scandal of other Churches, which for far a ma­jor 2 part are governed by Bishops in degree, dignity, and au­thority abov Presbyters. For 'tis no prudence or piety to widen differences, wherby Papists gain great advantage, to e­steem us less Christian in utterly abolishing that Catholic Or­der; and by consequent tru Ordination of Ministers, together with sacred Ordinances. Yea Reformed Churches allow a Presidence among Presbyters: nor doo the learned hold it caus enough to seperat from any Church for having Bishops as Pe­ter Martyr, Zanchius, Vid [...]lius, Gerard, Gro [...]us, D [...]o [...]at and Alsted agree.

3. To preserv the power of Ministerial Ordination and Suc­cession, 3 [Page] which som sober Presbyterians (specialy Blondel) hold to be best strengthned by Episcopy: becaus it was the universal way, wherby Ministry and Christianity hav bin derived to this day: the resecting wherof is most advantageous to al Cavillers against Godly Ministry.

4. Tru Episcopat never had had a free, ful, or fair hearing, 4 as so great a matter requires: nor was it ever convicted to repugn Scripture, as som shamelesly assert. For it neerest re­sembles Gods protopatern setled among the Israelits: who had Heads of Elders like Bishops with Priests and Levits as Epist ad Evag. Presbyters and Deacons according to S. Jeroms parallel.

Now Christ and his Apostles in their institution much re­garded Judaic customs: as to Baptise with Water, to use Bread and Wine in the Lords Supper, to solemnize Weekly the Lords Day in the Sabbaths stead, to giv Pastors and Teachers power of the Keis: nor is any express precept or evident precedent against Episcopat, either commanding parity, or forbidding Luk 11. 25. 26. orderly superiority in Church or Commonweal, Christ in­deed inhibits his Apostles (who were coequal or coordinat) to exercise dominion like secular Princes: which is a Rule for al Churches not to use any preeminence by ambition, tyranny, violence, or usurpation on the Bodies, Estats, Lifes, or Liber­ties of Men in Worldlings way: yet such courses (beside fa­ctious emulations) are so incident to som insolent Presbyters, as to the proudest Prelats. Our Saviours sens is plain, that what ever parts, power, place, gifts, or Graces any Minister hath abov others; he should use them with humility to Gods Glory and the Churches good: laying aside the levan of im­perious oppression: but the very Apostles (who had a priority of place with parity of power among themselfs) exercised su­periority of jurisdiction over al other Disciples and Beleevers, who obeied them as Fathers, doing the like to Bishops after them. St. Paul being to leav the World, left a patern of Church-Government (which was constantly pursued) in ordeining Ti­tus and Timothy Bishops, giving them personal power to ordein, censure, rebuk, or silence al Elders and Deacons under their charge. Which Blondel confesseth, to be a perpetual prece­dent for Church regiment. 'Tis a poor cavil to say they were [Page 103] Evangelists designed to Preach, not to govern; sith that takes not away their power of rule: for then no Presbyters can Preach except they be Evangelists; nor being such can preside in their Consistories. At the same rate we may argu, that none but the chief Appostles may feed Christs Lambs or Sheep, be­caus he committed the charge by a triple command to Peter the chiefest. Or that the power to ordein Elders by laying on Hands, to receiv accusations against them, to rebuk, censure, silence, excommunicat and restore, belong soly to Apostles and Evan­gelists: whereas a succession is necessary for Church societies so wel as civil: as that vehement charge laid on Tymothy (to 1 Tim. 5. 21. 1 Tim. 6. 14. keep th [...]s things unpartialy and unblamably, til our Lord Jesus Christ com) plainly shews. For he declining daily to death, could not doo it, but only transmit the patern to posterity, which he performed by a public way of Government. This prime practis both in the Apostles dais and after, is seen in the seven Asian Churches, and in others registred by Fathers, Councils, and Histories. What insuing times observed, is evi­dent among al Christians of the Eastern, Greec, Muscovit, Abyssen, and Indian Churches which retain Bishops to this day. For no Presbyters ever exercised Ordination or Juris­diction by sole peculiar power, without presence and presidence of an Apostle or Bishop. Presbytery is named but in two Texts of Scripture: (one being falsly al­leged for ruling Lay Elders) which are not preceptiv or in­stitutiv, but only narrativ: without expressing any joint pow­er, office, or authority of Presbyters with Presidents; much less without or against them. St. Jude puts foul marks on such Jude v 8, 11. 19. As despised Dominion or speak evil of Dignities; denouncing Wo against their seditious practises; who are cruel like Cain, cove­tous as Balaam, and ambitious as Corah and his complices. Such factious disturbers of Order prescribed by God in his Church St. Peter cals Presump [...]uous, Selfwilled, and dispisers 2 Pet. 2. 10. of Dignities: Whom thes Apostles would not so sharply check, unles ther had bin som eminences in the Church so wel as a­mong the Jews; which thos mutinous Men confronted or contemned. For they were too wary to oppose Civil powers, whol Sword was too keen: but the Ecclesiastic Orders, Digni­ties, [Page] and Dominions were obvious or obnoxious to al turbu­lent tumultuary Spirits: who under vele of Christian liberty, and pretensions of the Spirit (the better to set off their Schisms and separatings) oppugned authority, even in the Churches Infancy.

5. Common Reason requires a power and polity in the 5 Church so wel as in Cities, Armies, or any Civil societies. For the Lord of his Church hath not divested or denied it good go­vernment, which may lawfully be used with Wisdom and dis­cretion: nor may Ministers which excel others in age, pru­dence, and gubernativ gravity be barred to employ their Gifts in sutable differences for the Churches behoof. Only Christ requires humility in priority (which many Prelats had, and mo Presbyters wanted) and service in superiority proporti­oned to their parts, which God givs not in vain. For som Ministers are young, proud, prone to faction and passion, whos folly and fervor needs a bridle of Episcopal authority to curb them, beyond common contemptible parity. This St. Jerom owns as the ground of that Government to repres [...] Schisms: nor can such a Paternal preeminence prejudice any, in preferring one worthy Person to rule the rest: so that his Presidential priority be kept within du bounds of humility. For woful experience shews, how the want herof hath occa­sioned many main mischiefs by swarms of Sects both here and elswher. If any allege vulgar dislikes of Episcopat; this makes most for it; sith what the many-headed multitud most decry (who wil cry Hosanna and Crucifig [...] with one breath) wise Men most approv: yea the best Christians seing the misery of change, rather desire regulated Prelacy then any other Church-Polity. For headl [...]ss Presbytery and scattered Independency are disliked by moderat Men as a remedy wors then the malady. 1. For the novity, becaus neither was heard of in 1500. yeers, and the last scars of twelv yeers standing: nor hav they the vote of any general Council, or practis of the Catholic Church. 2. They hav prevailed here to justle out Episcopy by force in bro­ken bloody times; being planted not by Preaching or Patience under persecution; but by the Sword; and watered with their Brethrens blood, as Ro [...]ulus founded Rome; or as T [...]i [...] [Page 104] Tarquins Wife drov hir Chariot over hir Father Servius mangled Corps: wheras Prelacy was decreed in al the World (as St. Jerom In Ep. ad Titum. avows) with wisdom, peace, and charity, by consent of Churches. 3. Becaus neither of thes two wais hath such plenary approbation as the old had in al Parliaments and Convocations since this Nation Christianized. 4. Sith the same or wors inconveniences obtruded to Episcopy in its de­clining age, appeer in the bud or prime of thes new wais: so much pride, avarice, ambition, vanity, uncharitablenes: with more prophanes, Atheism, Heresy, Blasphemy, licentiousnes, fa­ction, bitternes, contention, confusion then ever attended E­piscopacy: beside needless scandal given to other Churches; that Men say with the old Woman, Veterem effodit Antigo­num. 5. Neither of the new models can produce so evident precept or precedent, as Episcopat doth, no nor promiss from God, that they shal be free from thos enormities odiously ob­jected against Bishops which may befal to al things managed by Men liable to manifold faults, failings, and frailties in al Degrees, Calings, or Professions. But this Government of a Paternal president among Presbyters, hath far surer grounds from Scripture and Antiquity, then any newfangled form or fashion; as having the preponderating privilege of uniform universal Polity practised by al Churches in purest times; wherto neither of thos can with any face pretend. 'Tis strange how impudently many Men cite or rather rack som broken peeces of Ignatius, Tertullian. Origen, Irenaeus, Cyprian, Ambros, Austin, and other Antients in favor of single Pres­bytery: when al are cleerly contrary for right regular Epis­copacy, which is only pleaded for. Whatever som Fathers are wrested or wrenched to speak for Ministerial parity, or Popular independency; 'tis only to reprov som Prelats arrogance, ambiti­on, and tyranny: who usurped sole power, neglecting Presbyters advise and assistance; or when som Ecclesiastic Officers op­pressed the People, whom primitivly both Bishops and Pres­byters duly regarded in al public concernments of the Church. It were needless and endless to excuse their Personal errors or exorbitances, which are apt to attend al power among Men: yet no wise Man wil reckon them genuin effects of that reve­rend [Page] Order; sith their Accusers would be worse if they had par­rallel power: for ther is nothing useful or laudable in any other way, which is not inclusivly and eminently in that order: nor any error or enormity therin, which is not incident and impendent to Presbytery or any other Polity; though that perhaps purer in primitiv then later ages. So what Pope Pius 2. said of Clerical Celibat (he saw som reason why marriage should be prohibited to Priests; but much more why it should be permitted) the same may be applyed to right constituted Episcopacy: nor can Presbytery or Indepen­dency shew any such tru title of divine right; which infolds al the good of both thos, and superads unity of order beyond both for the common good. Som press the National Covenant against it, as if that were a sufficient battery beyond Scripture, Reason, Antiquity, Civil Law, and Catholic custom; al which approv it: But som chief composers confess, that their main scope or sens was against Bishops corrupt government and ty­ranny, to reform what was decaied or depraved, and retain what was sound or sincere. However, sith that Covenant is no divine infallible Oracle, but a civil Engin of sinful passionat Men for self ends (on whos heads the arrow fel, which they shot against others) al its words and intentions must be redu­ced to the rule of good conscience, right reason, and holy writ: nor should Antiquity and the Fathers stoop or submit to parti­al Novelists (many of whos acts are found faulty or factious:) Nor doth it make ought for headless Presbytery or heady In­dependency; no nor against pure primeval Prelacy. For som stif sticklers for Presbytery, seing the mischiefs of late changes, confess, they know nothing unlawful therin, but many godly Men held it inconvenient: so this long bloody debat results on the judgment of Prudence, not Conscience; of Policy, not Piety. Yet to cloke their malice, they cunningly soddered Po­pery and Prelacy together, implying both to be inseparable Birds of a Feather, then which nothing is more rediculous, fals, and slanderous: For many good Bishops at Jerusalem, Anti­och, Alexandria preceded Rome, and sundry afterward in other Provinces, equal to the Bishop of Rome, and not depending on him, as be divers at this day: Nor is the Pope Founder or Foun­tain [Page 105] of Episcopat, nor caled or counted Antichristian as Prelat or Patriarch of one Province; for then al Bishops are Anti­christs, and Christs whol Church for 1500 yeers Antichristian, which is barbarous to conceiv, and blasphemous to contest. The Pope becam Antichrist upon another score, when Bo­niface 3. with his successors, usurped the stile of universal Bishop, or Gods Vicar General; which his penultimat prede­cessor ( Gregory 1.) foredoomed to be Antichrists Forerunner. So that very title ( Vicarius Dei generalis in terris) carries the number of the Beasts name (666) in Roman numeral letters Rev. 13. 18. (D. C. L. V. V. I. I. I. I. I. I.) as every ey may see. Semblably that Covenant contains just 666 words, as he that tels them exa­ctly shal surely find; which may seem ominous in both. Most Bishops of Rome before Boniface, were humble Men, and very many holy Martyrs; who abhorred the name of uni­versal Bishop or Head of the Church as Antichristian: but thos since grew proud presumptuous persecutors, introducing sun­dry superstitions, contrary to Christs Institutions and Canons of the Catholic Church; for which abuses our Church with others refused their communion.

So reformed Bishops cannot be branded as Popish or Anti­christian, without breach of charity and contrary to verity; sith many of them hav bin Martyred by Popish tyranny. If then the Pope is not Antichrist as a Bishop; nor Episcopat Anti­christian; 'tis a poor, peevish, popular calumny of malitious Men against our Ministry, that they are ordeined by limbs of Antichrist, which is fals, futilous, and fucatio [...]s. Yet it con­cerns al Presbyters ordeined by them, sith al derived from one original root (branch after branch) of pretended Papal Prela­cy. Our Bishops ordeining Ministers in presence of Presbyters, by their joint laying on of hands with fasting and prayer, did but their duty injoined by 1500 yeers prescription, with con­sent of Princes, Prelats, Peers, Presbyters, and People in Parle­ments: so they cannot be punished in that regard, nor charg­ed as a privat crime, which is doon in obedience to public com­mand; much less abolished in that behalf, sith they had our Churches warrant, and vote of al others which retain that order, beside the good liking of thos that hav it not. Why then are [Page] Bishops extruded? is not covetousnes the root of al evil? But Presbyters, two or mo, hav no warrant to ordein or exercise any Jurisdiction without a Bishop in chief; nor is a Bishop forbid to ordein and rule assisted by Presbyters: but simple Pres­bytery Acephalon Anarchy. Civil Magistrats may regulat the exercise, but cannot confer the Office of Bishop or Presbyter, which flows from a spiritual Head Christ Jesus: nor can Acts of Parlement with justice or honor dismount the Canons of Oecumenic Councils, Catholic Customs, or Laws of the Church. If it be said or supposed, that the lat Parlement only restored, and Presbyters resumed their power of Ordination, which Bishops unjustly usurped; why did they never claim it here or elswher for al past ages, til last factious tumultuous times? If they crav only a joint right with Bishops, yet subor­dinat; they may enjoy it stil, giving their Betters preeminence for orders sake: but their fond ambition to ingross al without and against them, hath lost al power to both, and marred al by overweening. Ther were many excellent Prelats antient and modern, whos incomparable worth while som puny pety Pres­byters scornfully or scurrilously vilified, they seem as so many Daws perching on Pauls pinacles, or like living Dogs bearding dead Lions. Nor doo such impotent impudent toungs tuned to vulgar ears against Episcopal caling becom Men which pre­tend to piety, learning, goodnes, gravity, charity, civility, or common christianity. Bishops personal faults can no more be excused then Presbyters or any others in the exercise of their Functions: But som malecontents, like water violently pent up by Fludgates, violently break forth, and bear away the whol sluce of Government; which might be better managed or mo­derated by du bounds set to both.

Ordinary Ministers seem as younger Brothers (who lived handsomly or happily under their Fathers tuition) scattered or exposed to al injuries and miseries, that many as prodigal Sons, are fain to feed on the husks of popular favors; who may not repine at the measure offred by others, which they insolently meted to their Fathers, Elies scandalous Sons annulled not their service or sacrifices, much less the Priestly Office, which de­pends not on the persons administring, but Gods authority [Page 106] commanding, and right investiture into the Function. So that the misdemenors or miscarriages of Bishops and Ministers, may blot or blemish the beauty; but not bereav the being of Religious duties or their calings, no more then lapses after Baptism doo unbaptise any Christian. Wherher Bishops ordeined Presbyters by divine Apostolic right; or exercised Ordination, Confir­mation, and Jurisdiction only by ecclesiastic custom in order of place among Presbyters? it needs no curious debat: But certes tru Episcopat is every way lawful, and Ministers regularly or­deined right Pastors, maugre al Traducers malice or gainsaying. Nor was Christs Gospel or Ordinances any other way dispen­sed and dispersed, sav only by succession of Episcopal Ordina­tion: which custom was ever deemed to be derived from Christ by his Apostles, with a command of continuation. Ignatius [...] Ep. a [...] Ep [...]. compares the harmony betwen a Bishop and his Presbyters, to the strings of a wel set Harp; yea to the accord betwen God the Father and Son as Mediator; wher the samenes of divine Nature is an order of Priority in relation. If the pipes of Mini­sterial power, first laid in the Head-spring, be stopped or defi­led (as al that passeth through earthen vessels wil in time) which hav flowed so long in a du cours of Ordination; they must not presently be cut off, or dammed up, nor the water diverted by Independent Wels and broken Buckets: but rather clensed and repaired to carry holy Water like the Temples Vessels in their primitiv purity; which is easily doon, if pride, policy, and mun­dan interests be separated from thos of Christ and his Church, by cashiring al sordid sinister ends of self-profit in Church Reformations; O utinam. If Ananias and Saphira were smi­ten for dissembling; how much more shal such sacrilegious spi­rits, which rob the Church instead of reforming? As to Pres­bytery, the Vocation is valid and venerable, if in juncture with Bishops, like Tortesses, which are safest under that shel: but som proud Presbyters casting it off, stripped themselfs of their strongest shield; being becom naked, feeble, and contemptible, fit to be trampled under Rustic feet.

One rub rests touching Peoples right to chus and ordein Mi­nisters; Peoples Right. which som say is essential, and Ministry invalid with­out it: But this pretext relies on a fals liberty, which sundry [Page] sorts of Sectists jugging together like Partridges in smal Covies of fained Churches or Bodies, assum to appoint their own Mini­sters, and wil hav none sav such as shal comply with their humor: whence their Chaplains flatter them to arrogat a power in al Church affairs, which belongs not to them: For they hav no such right, either eminently as the Executioners power is in a Judg; or virtualy, as life in the Sun; or causaly, as heart in Fire; or deri­vativly as the chief Magistrats power is in mean Constables and other Officers: so it can only be exorbitantly, as Corah claim­ed to make Priests and Rulers in Moses and Aarons rooms; and Wat Tyler under Richard 2. for Gods Word yeelds no such precept or precedent in the Jewish Church, for People to chus Priests, or meddle with matters of holy concernment: Nor did Christ alter any thing in extern maner or Ministry, as to venture it on the rock of vulgar rudenes or rashnes, which attends their weak heads and wild hands in Religious Rites; but commend­ed that care to his chosen Apostles and their Successors, wher­of Plebeians are incompetent and incapable. If they should be supposed sufficient to try Ministers ability; yet hav they no right to Ordein, no more then a wise Man can send an Ambassador in his Princes name; sith 'tis delegated soly to such as Christ hath designed to dispens Ordination, and not to the multitud, be their gifts or graces never so good or great. The People somtimes recommended Men to be Ordeined, or accepted such Acts 6. 5. as the Apostles or Elders appointed: but it never was derived from them as the Fountain, nor conveied by them as fit con­duits▪ by which this holy stream of the Sanctuary is to flow. Wise, modest, humble Christians, are of al most shy to undergo such bold things, as having no cal or command from Christ or his Church; nor can expect a blessing on their rash attempts: yet in our Church no Orders were conferred without the Peo­ples presence and Presbyters coassistance.

If People had sole power to ordein Ministers, what sorry choice would they make, how weakly would they examin, how wildly ordein, and what slovenly hands impose? for they are more pleased with familiar rusticity then learned gravity, and prefer a confident Mechanic to the ablest D [...]vine. People may so wel be Preachers and Baptisers, as Ordein any to be their [Page 107] Teachers; who may so wel exercise the Ministerial power as confer it on others: But if al hav right to the Keis as Stewards or Ministers of holy things; then 'tis not tru, That Christ gav som to be Apostles, Pastors and Teachers: so every part may Eph 4. 11. 1 Cor. 12. 22. chalenge to be an Ey; which peece of prophane confusion no Church ever allowed. The Peoples presence at Ordination or acceptance of their Minister, is a matter only of human pru­dence and civil compact for that particular place: but no own­ing of power derived from Christ by Church Rulers, to officiat for their Souls good: Nor doth it indow him with any power, but only appropriat him to take care of such a People. For though Beleevers in primitiv times, did oft express their lov to Bishops and Presbyters by their presence and cheerful concur­rence in matters tending to public peace and good Govern­ment, so far as modest discretion deemed decent: yet they ne­ver presumed to claim hands in ordination, but only requested the Rulers, that such as they approved may be set over them, which was somtime granted, somtime not: but to ordein of themselfs, Saul and Ʋzziah had so much right to offer Incens, as they to doo it.

Al humble Christians look to the rock whence they were hewen, and pit wherout they were digged; who did not make Ministers; but they sent by Christ, made People Christians. Such as sat in darknes had light brought them, and were found of God by his Ministers sent as Shepherds to the lost Sheep which sought not God. So ther is no caus for People to em­brace that fury, folly, and faction which would lay al in com­mon: sith Levellers can allege nothing to repeal the divine approbation of Ministry, which hath continued a peculiar peaceable possession to Church Officers by Christs Institution for sixteen Centuries without cessation, in a constant success­on of Ordination. We grant People in a particular Parish or Congregation, may desire a special Man to be their Prelat or Pastor (as thos of Milan did St. Ambros) but cannot chus by their proper power, much less Ordein: as Souldiers may peti­tion the General for one to be their Captain; but cannot chus, creat, or constitut any without Commission. They may so wel set up a new Christ or new Gospel, as new Ministry or new [Page] Ordination; which Christ hath doon once for al times and pla­ces to the Worlds end, without Peoples interest. A wise Spani­ard said, 'Tis better in a State to prefer corrupt Men then silly Sots: the one like a Theef in a Vinyard, wil only take ripe Grapes til he be satiat: but the other as an Ass eats ripe and green, treads down al with his heels, and being filled, tumbles in it to spoil al: such is the unskilful Vulgar in Church affairs.

Quest. Som scornfully ask, what can Bishops confer in Or­dination more then other Men, what charm is in their praiers or imposing of hands, to invest Church power; or how can they giv the Graces of the holy Ghost? why doo they claim to be caled Clerics as peculiar to that Tribe, and contemptuously cal others Laics; sith al the Lords People are the lot of his Inheritance, being spiritualy annointed to be Kings, Priests, Prophets.

Answ. Thes Scarrows are soon repelled: 1. Touching the term or title of Clergy and Laity (which captious Critics imput as pride in Ecclesiastics to incens People against them) this di­stinction was ever used ab initio, as al antient Fathers, Coun­cils, and Histories ratify: nor is the one upbraided as a badg of vainglory to the Ministry; nor the other aspersed as a brand of infamy to the People: but only to difference both calings, as 'tis in our Laws and Language. Nor is it avers to Scripture sens, which cals them Pastor and Flock, Doctor and Disciple, Ruler and Ruled, yea al Faithful in general, are stiled Clerus (a Church) or portion of the Lords heritage: but Ministers in special Clerus Ecclesiae, a lot given by the Lord to his Acts 2. 6. Acts. 13. 2, 3. Church, as consecrat apart to his service. So the Apostles chos Matthias by lot: and the holy Ghost after said, Separat Bar­nabas and Paul for the work wherto I hav caled them; who ha­ving fasted, praid, and layd on hands, sent them away. Gods Ministers disdain not to be counted or caled his People, as Children of one spiritual Father; and brethren of the same Fa­mily of Faith: Nor wil humble Christians covet to be clyped Clerics, or scorn the appellation of Laics to avoid confusion of Calings: who accompt or acknowledg tru Bishops and Mini­sters as their Fathers, Overseers, and Instructers. Men may so wel bogle at the words Trinity, three persons, and Sacraments; [Page 108] which are not found in the letter, but truth and sens of Scrip­ture: Nor is Logomachy or word-war fit for wise Men, being a meer Sciomachy or shadow-fight, like stumbling at straws and syllabical scruples. No Religion bars convenient compen­dious terms to distinguish degrees: but thes word-Carpers hav a malitious meaning, to make People abandon both Name and Thing, even the Office and Ordination. 2. To the demand, what charm is in Bishops hands or praiers to confer the holy Ghost, more then in others so wel or better gifted? It may so wel be asked (as Atheists and Apostats use) what virtu is in Baptism water to wash away sin, regenerat sinners, confer Grace, or represent Christs blood more then in other, as proud Catabaptists contested? Or what efficacy in Bread and Wine at the Lords Supper, more then in the same Elements at usual Tables or Taverns? How doth the form of consecration by using Christs words ad or alter them? At this rate of carnal reasoning, Men may cavil at Christs Deity and Humanity for the outward poverty of his life and death; which made many doubt or deny him to be the tru Messias. So this fond, futilous, frivolous question fals to ground▪ with its own weight or weak­nes; as if there, were more light in lat modern Meteors, then in the great Lamps (Sun, Moon, and Stars) of Scripture, Church, and antient Christians: who with the same holy humble Faith, as they beleev Jesus to be the promised Messias (maugre al which blind Jews and babarous Infidels obtrud) doo also reli­giously reverence al his holy Orders and Ordinances, how poor or plain soever, setled in his Church. Nor doth the means of outward appeerance weaken their duty or devotion: who liv by Faith, see with the ey of Faith, and act with Faiths hand in al divine mysteries: For God makes foolish things effectual by his spirit and Grace, to thos high holy ends for which they were or­deined. So 'tis not any Magic charm which makes common Accedit Verbū Elemento, & fit Sacramentum. Elements becom Sacraments, being consecrat by Ministers; nor in Bishops hands and praiers to ordein them; but his po­werful Word and Spirit: who commands the duty, confirms the Order, and givs a blessing to Ministerial Ordination, so wel as to al other Ordinances.

The result is, That Ordination makes nothing to Ministers [Page] Natural, Moral, or Spiritual endowments; nor doth it confer any Physical power, no more then the Office of a Judg, Am­bassador, or martial Commander, to their personal abilities: but invests them alone with authority to exercise thos Functi­ons, which none els may presum to perform, who hath not that order of Office consigned to him: Nor can any power in Men make a Gospel Minister though never so gifted, to consecrat holy duties, sav only such as are set apart or separat therto by du Ordination. The benefits therof are manifest and manifold: 1. For Gods glory and salvation of Mens Souls, by beleeving tru Ministers testimony, that Jesus Christ is sole Saviour of the World; who began this Ordinance, and sent som special wit­nesses to proclaim him by a constant continual succession in al ages and places til his secund coming. 2. It evidenceth the Churches care and fidelity, both in preserving the divine Ora­cles, and in celebrating holy Mysteries as Seals to confirm Chri­stians Faith; beside the exercise of wholsom Disciplin commit­ted to the Churches chief Pastors and Rulers. 3. It givs per­sons rightly Ordeined a real power derived from Christ, which Mat. 28 20. 1 Tim. 5. 22. 2 Tim. 2. 2. none hath of himself; as St. Paul bid Timothy, lay hands sud­denly on none, but commit the things he had heard of him to faithful Men, who shal be able to teach others also: viz. by per­petual succession, and public Commission. 4. It binds the party Ordeined more strictly to discharge his duty by study, praier, conference, meditation to keep and improv thos gifts or Graces, for Gods glory and the Churches good. 5. It givs tru Ministers comfort, courage, and confidence (as sacred unction did to the Prophets, and Christs solen Commission to the Apostles) to preach; not as popular Scribes, or precarious Pharisees; but as St. John Evangelist authorised by Christ; whos Ministry, like John Baptists, was not of Men (though transmitted by Men) but from Heaven; wherby they can re­buk with authority, and doo al duties of their Ministry. With this confident conscience, they can speak boldly in the Lords name, not fearing Mens faces, no nor the force or fury of Devils: nor wil forsake their Flocks when Wolfs com, as Hire­lings and Self-Intruders doo; but in times of public persecuti­on, chus rather to be exemples of cheerful suffering, in expe­ctance [Page 109] of Christs promised assistance and reward. 5. It con­servs order and decorum in the Church, fortifying their fun­ction with du respect or regard: so that neither Person nor Office is easily despised, when divine Ordination is duly per­formed. For it conciliats much lov, aw, and reverence from al tru Christians; raising a just vencration to duties rightly celebrated by thos of whom Christ saith, He that receiveth you Mat. 10. 40. receiveth me, and who so despiseth you despiseth me, and him that sent me. This makes them esteemed as Prophets, Apostles, or Angels sent of God: yea Christ resents their injuries as his own, and the very dust of their feet becoms a dreadful Witnes against proud contemners: who deeming them to be but of civil courtesy, make no bones to degrade them; that they may prefer a rabble of their own Parasitical Preachers, before any of Christs sending or the Churches ordeining. Such are fittest for their sinister end [...], who wil act in a levelled way by the same insolent irreverent spirit of popularity, which is most prevalent with the Enimies of Ministerial power and Or­dination. The Devil is best pleased with such pragmatic Prea­chers, who doo Satans work under our Saviours livery: which is to extirpat tru Ministry and al conscience of Religion, that so having by thes Nimrods hunted out the race of antient holy Order and Succession; he may erect a Babel of Confusion. 7. It givs great satisfaction to al tru Beleevers in point of duty discharged, and comfort obtained by holy Ministration: when they are assured of the Ministers mission and officiating in Christs name; which none can pretend to without a ly, sav thos rightly ordeined: but other impudent intruders, hav no plea from Scripture or Church custom to justify their acts, or perswad sober Christians to regard them. The old Greec Li­turgies praied at Ordination of Bishops and Presbyters, that God would bestow on them such Gifts, as the holy Ministry might be unblamed and unblemished for the Peoples comfort. St. Paul asks, How shal they Preach unles they be sent? Which Rom. 4. 10▪ implies that none can cheerfully or comfortably doo it without du divine mission. No Churches or Christians were ever eminent for sound knowledg, Orthodox truth, or holy Life; except wher tru Ministry, by right Ordination was countenanced and [Page] continued: for the more defectiv or neglectiv they are ther­in; the more overgrown they are with ignorance, error, Schism, novity, and licentiousnes: when Men make themselfs or o­thers Ministers in new waies.

To sum up al, right Ordination confers no intern inherent Summary. Grace or sanctity (for Judas was an Apostle and Demas a Disciple, yet both dissemblers) but only outward gifts fit for that function, to discern or distinguish them from common Christians: having al their efficacy or authority from the first Fountain, in the same way of subordinat succession, which Christ prescribed, the Apostles performed, and al Churches practised: nor can any Upstarts or Pretenders to new Lights, claim the power of Ministry without du Ordination in the old way: to which no Mans ostentation of Gifts or admiration of Auditors can contribut ought to eithers comfort; but much to the sin and shame of both, as perverters of Christs Ordi­nance and perturbers of public Peace. Yet every ordeined Man in a meer outward form, is not a tru worthy Minister: for ther may be Hypocrits (as Magus was) who hav no real abilities, nor honest purposes; but aim only at base advantages, as Intruders also doo. The Ordeiners too may be deceived in judgment of charity, or corrupted by human frailty (which folows al Flesh more or less) to pervert this holy Institution, sith nothing is free from abuse: but they can hav no comfort in that sacred caling, unles they discharge their duty with ho­nest hearts to Gods glory and salvation of Mens souls, for unworthy Ministers unduly Ordered, are like Ships slightly builded, which caus their own loss and al that sail in them: so dis­orders in ordeining, are a great detriment or disparagement to Religion, as unskilful cowardly Officers are in Armies. Such Laics as in brutish violence or popular insolence arrogat undu power, or abrogat wher 'tis du; commit more hainous sin then Simon Magus, who modestly offered Mony for a part of Ministerial power: but to wrest the Keis of Gods hous from his [...]u Stewards, to whom the chief Master committed them (which Magus never essaied to doo) is Cyclopic fury and Geti [...] barbarity: much more to transmit them unto Bois, Lac­quies, Me [...]hanics, or base Buzzards; who not conscious of any [Page 110] just Ministerial power, can make no conscience to doo that duty being most unfit for it; tho they presum to Preach and ordein whom they pleas; both being fitter for Stocks and Pri­sons, then to feed Flocks or frequent Pulpits. Thus far Dr. Gauden, but far more copiously and curiously, in his learned lucubrations worthy of most piercing perusal; wherof the quintessence only is here briefly presented.

For upshot, It appeers that Episcopat was instituted by Conclusion. Christ Analogicaly in his Apostles, but apertly by them in such as they appointed to succed with precise rules of Ordination and jurisdiction over Presbyters and People committed to their charge: which primitiv patern the Catholic Church through al ages in al places perpetualy prosecuted or practised til thes last worst times: but single Presbytery and Lay-Elders specialy without any Bishop in chief, is a lat devise set up for a shift in case of necessity, as som of the Authors and Fautors acknow­ledg: wishing they were so happy to hav Protestant Prelats, as England injoyed about 100. yeers together (except a quin­quennial Eclips) since Edward 6. of blessed memory began A. C. 1547. the Reformation. Al which particulars with many mo, are previously and pregnantly proved in the premisses, which shal not be vainly reiterated. Thes points are presented to public sifting or scanning sans scandal or scurrility; with hope of like liberty (stil allowed to Scholars) as the Adversaries ever exer­cised against Episcopat freely, if they kept their Pens from trea­son and sedition (as Penry in his Martin Mar Prelat did not) even when Prelats most swaied or domineered. For no Sect can or dare say al their Tenets are infallible Truths: why then wil they not patiently permit them to be tried by the Touch­stone of Gods Word, for the better ventilation of verity, without bitternes or asperity?

His positis, quis non frendet vel cornua tendit?
Foelix, a tergo quem nulla Ciconia pinsit.
Thes things thus laid, who wil not push or winch?
Hee's happy, whom no stork behind doth pinch.

Supplementum mutuatum: A supply taken from many.

THes were Adversaries or Antagonists to Presbyterians, who may be fit Accusers, but no good Judges: nor shal any of their railings or revilings be produced, but only such probable testimonies as concern matters of Fact, Doctrin, or Disciplin; laying aside al uncharitablenes. Wheras Christ hath three Offices of King, Priest, and Prophet; they differ under which to darrain their Disciplin. They say he is considered as Son of God or secund Person in Trinity: so al Persons and Princes (Beleevers or Infidels) are his Vicerois in their Domi­nions: or as Mediator, Head, or Governor of the Church: so al Pastors, Teachers, and Elders are his immediat Vicars or Officers; but civil Magistrats only Patrons and Protectors; the one in Spirituals, the other in Temporals. To this they al stick as limpets to astone, but dissent in particular points of the foundation. Cartwright confines Christ as Son of God coequal with the Father to be Ruler of Civil Stats; but not as our Saviour or Redeemer: the Humble Motioner saith he hath power over al Principalities in Heaven and Earth, not simply as secund Person, but as Son of God Manifested in the Flesh; having sole authority not only as God and Man, but as meer Man. Cartwright contests, that Christ in governing secular Stats hath no Superior: the Motioner saith, As he is King of Kings and Lord of Lords; he receivs this power of the Father: to whom Beza assents, that God governs the World in person of his Son as made Man; and al power given him in Heaven and Earth is spoken properly of his Humanity. If then Chri­stian Princes hav power under him as Mediator God and Man, nay as Head of the Church; their Presbyteries or Elderships hav not sole stroke in spiritual matters of Rulership. Snecanus stifly holds, That St. Paul speaking of Christs body, intends [...] [...]or. 15. 24. E [...]h. 1. 20 21. Co [...]s 1. 1 [...], 17. civil Magistrats as Church Officers joyntly with Aldermen, and 'tis great rashnes to exclud them; accompting such for Adversaries and Anabaptists.

Ob. Cartwright opposeth, that Christ being sole Head of Rom. 12. al the Church and every particular Congregation which hath a wel ordered Eldership; is never severed from his whol Body 1 Cor. 12. nor any part of it. Ergo ther needs no subordinat Head or Governor over any Christian Church.

Sol. This Sophistry is soon retorted thus: Christ is our Priest, Prophet, Pastor; who is never absent but able to per­form al such functions: Ergo we need no Ministerial Officers or Presbyters: as if he sitting personaly in Heaven, had not set such to Preach and preside here visibly on Earth.

Repl. He enjoyns, If the civil Magistrat hath right to rule in Christs Body the Church; it shal hav two Heads, which were monstrous: Ergo 'tis absonous.

Sol. Ther is a Ministerial Head or Spiritual, so Christ is soly over the whol Church; which to claim (as the Pope doth) is Antichristian usurpation: and a Magisterial or Temporal, which imports only a secular Ruler, as al Princes are in their Dominions: so a like inference may be made, if the Common­wealth belong both to Christ and civil Magistrat, it shal hav two Heads, which were as Monstrous: but neither is necessa­ry. Princes may be Christs Substituts or subordinat Rulers, even in Spiritual causes better then base Rusti [...]s or Mechanics admitted to be Elders. 'Tis a tru Tenet, that Christ consti­tuted his Disciples to assist in his Priestly Office: on which score we defend against Papists. that every ordeined Minister is so wel his Vicar as the Pope, having equal power to Preach, pray, and dispens Sacraments: but the Author of Ecclesiastic and civil Polity, denies Pastors to be Ch [...]sts Vicars as he is p. 68. Priest (for so the Pope the Devils Vica [...] assums it) but only as a Prophet: which is a novel Paradox disclaimed by his Bre­thren. For F [...]nner finds only two Offices, making Prophecy part of his Priesthood: so it results, they be his Vicegerents for Regiment only as Kings, and al would fain be so, if they could deriv a Roial right. They urge against Bishops how his King­dom is not of this World; yet place it in the Consistorian El­dership: for Beza saith Christ as King and Head of the Church, rules it by Pastors lawfully caled, which Cartwright and Fen­ner confirm. Sonnius saith, Christ executs his Regal Office [Page] by the internal government of his Spirit, and external of the Ministry: how then doo Lay-Elders being no Priests nor Pro­phets hold their regency? For Christ is suprem Soveraign, the Presbytery his Kingdom, and Spiritual Elders his Vice­rois: so Laics are but pety Princes like the idle Kings of France meer shadows or Cyphers. Beza De Presb. p. 188. saith every Eldership is Christs Tribunal: which is parallel to the Canonists parasitic position, that the Pope and Christ hav but one Consistory. For as Papists prohibit al Appeals from Christs Vicar: so they hold it hainous to appeal from the Genevan Consistory be­ing Christs Tribunal beyond comptrol. So what they deprav or disprov in others; they-selfs practis and patronize.

1. They blame Bishops (as they doo the Pope) for med­ling Criminations. with many matters, and Lording it over others: alleging our Saviours saying, Vos vero non sic, and St. Peters precept, Luke 22. 26. 1 Pet. 5. 3. not as Lords over the Clergy: which is meant of abusiv am­bition. Yet their Elderships undertake a Sea of affairs in or­dine ad Christum like Papists, which they hook in within the compass or cognisance of their Consistorian Commission. Al Crimes (saith Knox) which deserv death by Gods Law (Murders, Adulteries, Sorceries, Blasphemies, Heresies, rai­lings against the Sacraments) incur Excommunication: in which Cases Summons must be sent to the Offenders Parish, or if he hath no setled abode, to the chief Town of that Divisi­on, to appeer and answer at a set time; or shew caus why Excommunication should not be denounced: but if he ap­peer not, he is to be Excommunicat nexts Lords day; not for contempt, but as guilty of the fact: so if Malefactors in France fly, they are hung up in figure. This is round work to Excommunicat for superseding one Citation in Causes of Life and Death, judging him guilty untried. How if the Ma­gistrat pardon this Murderer? Yet wil not they receiv him upon repentance under 40. dais trial, and satisfaction given the next Allies of the party slain. So they take on them al kind of power.

Al other offenses, not capital (Lechery, Ebriety, Swearing, Cursing, Scolding, Fighting, Fencing, Sabbath-breaking, wan­ton words or gestures, neglect of Sermons and Sacraments, su­spition [Page 112] of pride or avarice, superfluity of Fare, riot in Raiments, Dancing, Dicing, hanting Taverns, Tipling houses, Theatres, May-poles, Morrices, and al Merriments, with many mo) are left to the Elderships discretion. So are contentious persons which ve [...] their Brethren sans caus, wherin they wil be sole Ar­biters. How can thes Men know unless they examin the facts, and be skilled in the Laws of the Land? Or who wil run to temporal Courts, if he may be righted at Consistory Bar? Nay if he doth, he shal surely smart for it. Beza saith, Al sins are subject to their censure, as being scandalous to godly Men: for if one wrong me in goods or good name, he commits a duple crime; one in wounding my heart by breach of Gods Law, and giving il exemple; wherin I must complain to the Elders to work his repentance: another in damaging my fame and for­tunes, which Magistrats must right. Is not this a brav devis to inlarge their Jurisdiction, when al actions of the Case com within their compass, and al persons must be Informers to their Court? If I complain to the Consistory that one hath wrong­ed me, and they enjoin him to ask me forgivnes; how can he commence a Law-suit against me? He may (quoth Beza) but 'tis an il sign of repentance or tru remission. Is not this a bar to civil Justice? The wrong is confessed and forgivnes asked; ther needs no trial of Fact, but the Magistrat may award dama­ges and tax costs, which is al he can doo. Avant then Common-Law and Chancery: the Consistory alone can doo al.

Al the ground of this Divinity is drawn from the Jews Sa­nedrim, which Cartwright saith Christ transferred to his Church as a patern for the Elders. Beza concurs, That the Priests were Lawyers, who decided any doubt arising among the Judges. If it be asked, what they had to doo in causes meer­ly Civil? He learnedly resolvs, That matter of Fact is Civil, which the Judg sentenced; but al points in Law the Ecclesia­stic Elders decided or determined. Is this probable or veritable? Doubtless the Jews had not two Courts (one of Fact, anothe [...] of Law) nor any Nation els: but in difficil Cases both of Law and Fact, Appeals were made from inferior Courts in the Country to the Sanedrim at Jerusalem, which handled Civil Causes so wel as Ecclesiastic. Nay Travers and the learned [Page] [...]iscours hold, That the Elders may deal in Civil Causes, as they did under Pagan Princes before they Christianized: for they receiv no more authority by their conversion then they had before, nor may meddle in Church matters; yet they may in Civil. 2. They found fault, That Primats and Prelats were made privy Counsilors of State; much more to be admitted Members of Parlement and Convocation: yet Beza was of the State Council at Geneva, and prescribed to Scotland, That in stead of Bishops som grav Presbyters may be present in Par­lement to advise in spiritual matters, as Judges doo in Law. Yea Field supplicated here, That twenty four learned Divines might hav votes in Parlement, excluding Bishops: but for the Convocation (if it were such as should be, meaning their El­dership) the Parlement may establish nothing pertaining to Gods worship without their direction. 3. They contemn or condemn al antient Councils, and caled our Reformation of Religion doon by Convocation, a Deformation; branding the 39 Articles, Injunctions, Canons, and Church Ceremonies as contemptible; but extol their own Synods (Classical, Provin­cial, National, General) as parallel to the Gospel, and authen­tic Oracles of the holy Ghost. 4. They inveied against Clergy Men to be Commissioners in the lat high Commission Court; yet sued in Scotland, That fourty Ministers should hav Com­mission to suppress their Enemies of Religion. So Field petiti­oned here, That his twenty four Doctors might hav power un­der the Great Seal to censure al Sects, Heresies, Errors, Con­tempts, Misdemeanors against Gods Word and their Ecclesi­astic Laws: to depriv any Pastor not doing his duty after their wils; to examin Witnesses, imprison Malefactors, and certify their names to the Lords of the Council for farther punish­ment. 5. They disliked the High-Commission should send out Pursevants to summon or imprison Men: yet the Genevan Consistorie hath a Beedle to cite Men, whom they incarcerat at pleasure. 6. They exclamed aloud, becaus subscription was required to the Articles of Religion, Communion Book, and Canons: Yet the Disciplinarians at their clandestin Conven­ticles in joined it to their Decrees or Devises: nor can any be chosen a Church-Officer, unles he first subscribe to their Disci­plin. [Page 113] 7. They task the Oath ex Officio used in certain thief Causes; becaus Men may not be compelled to accuse themselfs; and no accusation is liable against an Elder, under two or three witnesses: yet when Henrig a Presbyter refused to swear (touching dancing at Widow Balthasars hous in Geneva) al­leging that place, Calvin jeered at it, and extorted confessions upon Oath, deprived Henrig, exofficiated one of the four Sinders, and imprisoned al the rest. 8. They brand the Com­mon-Praier Book as culled out of the Popes Portuis; The Ce­remonies, Surplice, and other ornaments as Antichristian rags; contesting 'tis better to conform with Turcs then Papists. If it be answered, that we must try al things and hold what is good, using thos things lawfully which were abused superstitiously; al wil not serv or satisfy: yet when they are charged with Do­natism, Anabaptism, or Papism, in perturbing the public peace, for saying the Sacraments are not sincerely Ministred, that we hav no lawful Prelats or Pastors, and Princes may not meddle with Ecclesiastic matters; Cartwright a chief Champion an­swers for al his felows, That in the filth of such Heresies som good things are found, which they receiv or retain, as the Jews did the holy Arc from prophane Philistims. 9. They decry University Degrees (as the Anabaptists did in Germany, whom Melancthon confuts) caling them childish Ceremonies borow­ed from the Pope: But Junius a Consistorian contests they are decent and lawful, which ought not to be abrogated for any abuse, or abandoned becaus borowed from Papists: Yea Cart­wright sued to be Doctor of Divinity, which was denied; and the strictest sort took Academical Degrees sans scruple, and divers swalowed Lawn sleevs without choking. 10. They re­prov others for urging the authority of Councils. Fathers, and School-men: yet if any seem to fit or favor their Caus, they magnify them highly: as Beza stifly pressed St. Austin, Chry­sostom with others against Erastus, giving general Councils glorious titles, when they served his turn, or els slighted them▪ and Cartwright cals such citing of Fathers a raking of ditches▪ 11. They allege against Bishops preeminence over Ministers, that both are caled by one name, and therfore one Function▪ when 'tis answered, That community of title takes not away [...] ­stinction [Page] of Offices, sith even Princes are stiled Deacons Apo­stles, and Priests, yet far disparat in power; this wil not con­tent: Yet Erastus proved, That the name Elder is ever appro­priat to Ecclesiastics, not to Laics; Beza borowed that distin­ction for his defens, how the name of Bishops and Elders are common, but their Offices not al one; nor is it a good conse­quent, every Bishop is a Presbyter, Ergo every Elder is so: for al names of Ecclesiastic Officers (Deacons, Apostles, Prophets, Prelats, Pastors, Presbyters) are sometime used generaly or pro­miscuously. 12. They aspers our State for suffering Bishops to retain som parts of the Canon Law, crying out 'tis Popish and Develish: yet if ought sit their humors, they secretly stole it out of the Decretals; as in their draught of Disciplin more then seven parts of eight are borowed from it. Hence Viret finding how Princes by cashiring the Canon Law, assumed Ecclesiastic power to themselfs; condemns their rashnes or rigidnes who depraved the same. Thus by this Jury of Criminations it ap­peers how palpably partial al mortal Men are in their own be­halfs: yea their factious folowers wil hardly beleev half, and justify the other moity as proceding of piety. Next shal be shewed how they wrest the Fathers to their own sens.

Ignatius wils, That nothing be doon in the Church without [...]. the Bishops consent, who as Prince of Priests hath power over al: Can ought be plainer? Yet Cartwright counterfets, That by Priests he means ruling Elders (Lay ones he never know) by Prince the Moderator chosen to propone matters at one meeting only: and by power over al, his authority over the El­ders in the same Parish (when no such precincts were yet bounded) just after their new cut. Justin Martyr stiles every Bishop Prelat, as preposited over Priests and People: Cart­wright consters it, That he was Prelat of the People, not over Presbyters: or at most a Moderator to propos matters only. Yet if he was superior over Ministers, how fondly is it inferred to be lawful, becaus he was so? for even in thos dawning da [...] som things deviated from the Gospels purity, as the name Pre­lat common to al Elders, was appropriat to one: Thus like Wind-millers, they make every wind serv their turns. Ire [...] saith the Apostles appointed Bishops in thos Churches which [Page 114] they planted: Beza clean contrary to his mind and meaning, interprets it of Pastors, Doctors, and ruling Elders, not con­stituted by their authority, but chosen by the Parishes. For when any Officer was elected, the Apostle present consecrated him to the Lord by laying on hands in the name of the Presby­tery. Jerom testifies, That from St. Marc to his time a Bi­shop was placed in higher degree abov Presbyters, as a Captain in an Army: Cartwright seeks strange shifts to shadow it: 1. That the Presbyters did it without Marcs order. 2. That the words from Marcs time, are exclusiv, as if that superiority began after his time, which is flatly fals: for he cals Marc Bi­shop of Alexandria, and his successors superior in degree o [...] dignity. 3. That in saying it was so at Alexandria, he implies it was not so elswher. Is not his a goodly gloss? 4. He cries ou [...] against the pravity of thos primitiv times; which is a more in­genuous agnition, but a silly shelter or Sanctuary: for no wit of Man can evade or exclude it. Jerom saith farther, It was ordered by Decrce of the whol World; That to suppre [...] Schisms, one should be chosen by the Priests abov the rest: Be­za boldly givs him the ly (which the testy old Man if he the [...] lived, would retort in his throat) that it was not so. Many Anti­ents (Iren [...]us▪ Cyprian, Tertullian, Jerom, Ambros, Austin) cal Bishops the Apostles Successors: And Ecclesiastic Writers draw long Catalogs of their names in several Sees; which thos Fathers urged against upstart Heretics in their dais: but when Papists press such succession at Rome and elswher; we deny not the truth of it, but answer that personal succession is very effe­ctual, if Doctrinal concur; and thos Fathers in urging the first, had a special ey to the last; becaus such Heretics oppugned som points of Apostolic Doctrin. Yet Cartwright and his Cru con­tend, that by Bishops are meant Parochial Pastors, stiled the Apostles Doctrinal successors: and al Episcopal Catalogs are of Parish Priests. Yea Sadeil excluding al personal succession, grants Doctrinal to Laics, if they hold the Apostles precepts and walk in their paths: O dainty. When swarms of Authors are cited, that Timothy was Diocesan of Ephesus; Cartwright givs the ly to al, becaus St. Paul saith, he was Evangelist: So was S. Marc, yet a Bishop. When for Antiquity of Archbi­shops [Page] Clemens, Anacletus, Anicetus, Epiphanius, Ambros, &c. are urged, together with St. Austins rule, That wher a name is so old and origin not extant, it should seem Apostolic: Cartwright cals the citing of antient Authors a raking of Hel, and saith thos times were not pure Virgin-like; branding Cle­mens, Anacletus, and Anicetus as conterfet cranks (haply som forgeries were vented in their names) and slights Epiphanius, that he wrote according to his time: but rejects Ambroses Book de dignitate Sacerdotum as foisted. When for the Office of Archdeacon Damasus, Sixtus, Sozomen, and Socrates are quoted; Cartwright answers, That Damasus spake in the Dragons voice, the best ground bears thistles, and thos times were corrupt.

Thus they either wiredraw the Fathers words to their own fancy, or deny their authority, which are easy evasions. When Ignatius terms a Bishop Prince of Priests, and Cyril and Ter­tullian high-Priest: Cartwright cursedly censures, that such Proctors presum to put our Saviour out of his Office: yet they are only stiled his Substituts on Earth, when al confes it to be the joint judgment of the Catholic Church and Councils, that Bishops are the best remedies to repel Schisms and Heresies: Beza and Cartwright cry they are al deceived; for ther were great controversies and contentions stil under their regiment. 'Tis tru, for Christ foretold it wil be so stil til the end. When a cloud of primitiv witnesses is produced for the lawful use of Holy dais: Cartwright complains, That Truth is measured by the crooked yard of time; and appeals from authority to Scrip­ture, wherof he wil be sole Judg and Interpreter. When the whol stream of Fathers and Councils is urged to prov the Churches power in al indifferent things not prescribed by Gods Word: he carps how he is pestered with human authorities, instead of the Prophets and Apostles, shaking them off (as St. Paul did the Viper) with one blast, that the things asserted are now questioned, as if their cavilling were sufficient. When Cyril saith, That Moses Law to punish Adultery with death is out of date: he comptrols his Opinion as corrupt. May it not more justly be said?

Nomine mutato, narratur fabula de se.
The Tale, change but the Name,
Of them is stil the same.

When Theodoret testifies, That Chrysostom Patriarch of Constantinople had the charge of other Churches in Asia, Thra­cia, Pontus, beside his own See, and Sozomen saith he deposed thirteen Bishops for Simony: Cartwright cogs an answer, That he had no other care over them then al Godly Ministers ought to hav over al Churches in Christendom: or if he took rule over them, he was a proud Prelat like the Pope; yet haply he deposed thos Bishops by consent of the Presbytery, not by his own authority: al which bewray gross ignorance contrary to known truth. When the first Nicen Synod (which placed Pa­triarchs over Primats) is urged for the antiquity and authori­ty of both: Cartwright scofs at it as no famous Council, tax­ing divers Decrees of error, specialy in points of Disciplin: yet al Churches receiv them as authentic; and Arrians or other Heretics may so wel cavil at the Doctrins. When Antioch Council, caled fifteen yeers after, Decreed, That inferior Bi­shops shal not act without their Metropolitan, sav what per­tains to their own Dioceses: He glosseth that a Metrapolitan was only set over a chief City, and the name makes no more difference then to say a Minister of London and Newington: but by Dioces is meant a Parish (so he stil translats the Greec word, becaus it bears a Parochial and Episcopal division, though generaly used for the later) wher a chief Minister had som Mer­cat-Town with vicine Villages appendent to his Church, as at Hitchin and elswher: Sic parvis componere magna solebat. What fine, foists and brazen bolts are thes to bolster a bad caus? When Athanasius avers, That Denys Patriarch of Alexandria (to which Jurisdiction Egypt, Thebais, Mariota, Lybia, and other Provinces pertained) had the Churches of Pan [...]apolis committed to his care: as Epiphanius saith the same of Peter a­nother Patriarch, to whom the Archbishop of Miletus was sub­ject: Cartwright consters it of a voluntary care (not authori­tiv) which every Minister ought to take of Churches round about him. When Theodoret Bishop of Cyprus saith, Heself [Page] had Government of eight hundred Churches: Cartwright checks him for a vain boaster, upbraiding his writing against Cyril, quid ad rhombum? When the Councils of Nice, An­tioch, Carthage, and Sardis declare, that only Bishops hav au­thority to excommunicat: Cartwright from Calvin the chief Coryphee declares, That in so doing they fomented ambi­tion.

Thus they speak Magisterialy from their Chair what they list, which their partial poor blind Proselits hold for Oracles. When Mr. Fox provs Archbishops to be abov Bishops, and them abov Ministers: Cartwright givs a dor, That he writing a Story was more diligent to deliver what is doon, then how wel or il doon. Yea, he censures al learned Men under Edward 6. that they knew only in part, and being sent out in the morning dawn, yer the Gospel Sun was risen high, might oversee much, which som not so quick eyd can better discry: for what they had in acutnes of sight, others enjoy by cleernes of the Suns light. He prescribes two learned observations: 1. That in the Nicen Synod and others within two hundred yeers after, many Ca­nons and Cautions were made touching a Metropolitan in eve­ry Province what honor or title he shal hav; what limits of Jurisdiction; and what place to sit in; which shews that it was opposed in thos dais: intimating, that som Schismatic Spirits opposed the Ecclesiastic Hierarchy then as Disciplinarians did since, which is no warrant so to doo. 2. That among Pastors, Elders and Deacons in every Church, one was chosen by the rest to propone matters (whether doubts to be debated, cen­sures to be decreed, or elections to be determined) who gather­ed voices, and was the common mouth to moderat the whol Assembly. A learned lesson to shew that Episcopal Govern­ment jumps just like Germans lips with Genevan Presbytery, as if they should shake hands; who shape al to their own cut, as an old Dotard at Athens deemed al ships his own which cam into the Haven.

Howbeit they differ diversly among themselfs: For Cart­wright [...] draws the Elderships origin from Moses and Aaron, who assembled the Elders at Gods command, which he inter­prets of Laics: but Gallaesius of Preachers: Pe [...]itan, Ber [...]ram, [Page 116] and Siniler of Civil Rulers, Senators, and Princes. Beza brings proof out of Moses Pentateuch, Chronicles, and Prophets: But Calvin the Founder saith, The Jews Sanedrim was found­ed after their Captivity, being then inhibited to creat a King: yet the seventy being instituted by Jethros advise, were a law­ful Polity allowed by God, to censure maners and Doctrins. The titles given to Ministers in the new Testament (Acts 10. 28 Acts 26. 16. Rom. 15. 16. 1 Cor. 14. 32. Phil. 1. 1. 1 Tim. 3. 2.) Beza, Junius, and Cartwright ascribe to their Elders, which Calvin applies to al Ministers. Thus they run som into Egypt before the Law, som to Mount Sinai in the Wildernes, som elswher to seek their Eldership, yet cannot find it: but agree like Sa [...]sons tail-tied Foxes. Wher any mention is made of Elders, Congregation, Church, Court, Bishops, Rulers, Thrones, Christs Kingdom &c. Beza, Junius, Danaeus, Cart­wright, and that cru imagin it to ring a peal for their Presby­terian platform, suting the Scriptures to their tunes. For as poor folks beget Children, but know not how to keep them: so Sectists breed or broch new Opinions, and seek Scriptures to maintain them; who (as Hilary saith) care not what the words mean, but put their own meaning on them.

Lastly, Listen how highly they prais themselfs, and Hyper­bolicaly Eudog [...]es. extol their Disciplin. We hav Christ and his Apostles, with al the Prophets for us: We striv for everlasting truth which God hath left, and may not leav it: the matters we med­dle in, are according to Gods Wil in his Word: We propound his Caus faithfully, and for it are persecuted: We are his poor Servants, painful Ministers, zelous Professors, feeders of his Flock, Christs litle ones, the foolish things of this World cho­sen to confound the wise: of immortal seed, lawful successors to thos, who by Faith quenched the violence of fire: unreprova­ble, modest, most worthy Watchmen. We hold nothing not taught in Scripture, but what old and new Writers affirm, and exemples of primitiv times confirm: We seek not to pleas Men or pleasure our selfs; but patiently abide, til the Lord bring our righteousnes to light, and just dealing as the noon day. We merit prais of the Law and of Gods Church, seeking only to doo good: our zele is parallel to that of Moses, Elias, the Pro­phets, [Page] John Baptist, Paul, the Apostles, and Christ. Our side detests sin and wickednes: our Ministers suffer al evil at Magi­strats hands, for refusing to doo evil at their commands; pro­fessing to obey God rather then Men. Brav Men by their own report: but doo not al Sects say the same, like the Pharisee who praied, O God, I thank thee 1 am not as other Men? Now hear Luke 18 11. their Eulogies of the Disciplin. Tis the only band of unity, bane of Heresy, punisher of sin, cherisher of righteousnes, pure, perfect, and ful of goodnes: ordeined for Gods honor, the Peoples health, and al Nations happines. The most beautiful order of Government, substantial form of Christs Regiment, and best Gold to build Gods Church: which wil make hir a chast Spous, bright as the morning, fair as the Moon, cleer as the Sun, and terrible as an Army with Banners. The establishing of this Presbytery is the ful placing of Christ in his Kingdom, and Scepter wherby he ruleth among Men, caled by St. Paul, The ground pillar of truth. It is the blade of a shaken sword in the Cherubins hand, to keep the Tree of Life, and chief Throne of al excellence, wherin God sits.

The Temporal Empire is a subaltern under-Court, to decide Causes by dictat, direction, or mandat of the Ecclesiastic Con­sistory, which is Keeper or Overseer of the Civil: The Spiritual Jurisdiction so far excels the secular in degree or dignity, as ou [...] Soul surpasseth the Body, or Heavenly blessings transcend Earthly benefits. Such Ministers as prefer Civil Magistrats to Ecclesiastic, flatter them lucre and belly fare: but the Presby­terial Consistory is Christs Tribunal, from which is no appeal: wherto the mightiest Monarchs are liable, being al Sheep equa­ly subject to their Shepherds. 'Tis the safest Shield for a State to prevent Sedition and Rebellion, to cut off contention and Law-suits; to draw divers from other Trades to study Divini­ty, restoring Men from blindnes to sight, darknes to light, pro­phanenes to purity and piety. Then wil be unity in the Church (when can ye tel, if al Sects stil swarm so?) Papists quail, Ana­baptists wail, and Atheists fail: but the People shal find perfe­ction of Justice, the Nobility be righted, and the Commons comforted: then wil God cloth our Priests with salvation, and satisfy the Poor with B [...]ead: His Saints shal shout for joy, and [Page 117] al ends of the Earth fear him. Sir Thomas Mores Ʋtopia is a meer Anarchy, compared to this peerless Polity of Presby­terial parity. But their somtime best beloved Brethren (Brown, Barow, Greenwood) vilify them, and deprav that Disciplin ten times more then thes boasters magnify both: whos derogations, detractations, and defamations, for mo­desty sake shal be superseded, to shun scandal, slander, and scurrility.

Two Questions were of old debated by Divines chosen on Upshot. both sides: 1. Whether the word Bishop was ever used in any Church for every Pastor and Presbyter, or for one only who ruled both Priests and People within his precincts? 2. Whether the name Elder was ever taken in the new Testa­ment or by the Fathers for meer Laics, or Ministers only? the resolution of both which shal be referred to the premisses, which every Man having perused may easily decide or deter­min; to avoid prolixity and Tautology.

Presbytery is of divine right, as instituted by Christ in caling Summar [...] and sending seventy Disciples to preach; and confirmed by the Apostles in Ordeining Elders every wher: so is Episcopat of equal right on the same score of Christs chusing twelv Apostles, and their substituting Bishops to succed in Government: but Presbyterial Polity without Prelats by a motly mixture of Ministerial and Laical Elders; is a meer novity devised for a shift by Mr. Calvin in case of necessity, when the Genevans had expelled their Soveraign Bishop and were destitut of Ec­clesiastic Disciplin. This is irrefragable verity in point of fact, maugre al contradiction.

Thes three foregoing Theses are transacted too tediously: but in the first, Traduction of every particular Soul from Parents; in the secund Gods Prescience of simple Intelligence, which in Order of Nature preceds al Decrees; in the third a joint Government of the Head with the Body (which is monstrous to sever them) wil salv al scruples that can be ob­jected or imagined; which no other way can possibly promiss or perform.

Quale sit a Mundi genesi, per secula Cleri
Continuum regimen, praevia scripta probant.
What Church-rule from the Worlds birth stil hath bin
Through al times; may by previous proofs be seen.
Antistes Caput est Cleri, sed Presbyteratus
Se [...]u [...]
Corpus Episcopii: J [...]s utriusque patet.
A Bishop is Clergies Head, but Presbytry
(Both's right is cleer) Body of Episcopy.
Historia haec recitat, qua recta Ecclesia forma,
Praesidibusque quibus tempus in omne fuit.
How through al times the Church was governed,
And by what Rulers, in Story is rehersed.
Spirituale fuit Regimen pro more Monarchae:
Alite [...]
Sic Deus instituit, Christus idemque tulit.
Church Goverment was set in Kingly frame:
So God ordain'd, and Christ upheld the same.
Saera Dei Coetus Politia est condito ab Orbe,
Ali [...].
Ʋsque ad Apostolicos rite redacta dies.
Gods Churches Regiment from the Worlds Creation,
Is rightly drawn down to th'Apostles station.
Presbyteris in Clero ascitus Episcopus omni,
[...]
Semper Apostolico j [...]re supremus erat.
Bishops in al Clergies were set Superior
To Priests, by Apostolic right stil Inferior.
Schismatisi suncti rite Haereticique vocantur,
[...]
Qui male Praelatis opposuere suis.
Al that oppos'd their Prelats wrongfully
Are Schismatics and Heretics cal'd justly.

THESIS IIII.
Praedictiones de Messia: Predictions of Messias.

THer be manifold manifest Prophecies in the old Testament of the Messiah or Saviour of the World (stiled by Jacob Shiloh) of whos coming in the [...]sh the Prophets foretold, which was fulfilled in the fulnes of time. Wherupon the Jews ever since expect his glorious reign on Earth like a King, in great extern pomp (as Mahometans vainly look for their Pseudoprophets return) and Millenars apply it to Christs secund coming with his Mar­tyrs and many eminent Saints raised from death; which shal reign with him here victoriously 1000. yeers: at whos first ap­proch the Jews shal be converted, and acknowledg him their tru Messias. Al which predictions concerning Messiah to com, were accomplished in and by Christ at his first coming to suf­fer for the sins of Mankind; nor is any els to be expected, til his last coming to general Judgment: as shal evidently appeer, by comparing thirty two Prophecies with St. Matthews Pa­rallels in the Table subscribed.

Isai 7. 14. Mat. 1. 23.
Mich. 5. 2. Mat. 2. 6.
Isai 11. 1. Mat. 2. 15.
Jer. 31. 15. Mat. 2. 18.
Judg. 13. 5. Mat. 2. 23.
Isai 40. 3. Mat. 3. 2.
Isai 9. 1. Mat. 4. 15.
Levit. 14. 4. Mat. 8. 4.
Isai 53. 4. Mat. 8. 17.
Isai 61. 1. Mat. 11. 4.
Isai 42. 1. Mat. 12. 17.
Jonah 1. 17. Mat. 12. 40.
Isai 6. 9. Mat. 13. 14.
Psal. 78. 2. Mat. 13. 35.
Isai 35. 5. Mat. 15. 30.
Isai 62. 11. Mat. 21. 5.
Zech. 9. 9. Mat. 21. 5.
Jer. 7. 11. Mat. 21. 13.
Psal. 8. 2. Mat. 21. 16.
Isai 5. 8. Mat. 21. 33.
Ps. 118. 22. Mat. 21. 42.
Ps. 110. 1. Mat. 22. 44.
[Page] Isai 8. 14. Mat. 21. 44.
Zech. 13. 7. Mat. 26. 31.
Isai 53. 11. Mat. 26. 54.
Psal. 41. 9. Mat. 26. 23.
Lamen. 4. 20. Mat. 26. 56.
Isai 50. 6. Mat. 26. 67.
Zech. 11. 13. Mat. 27 9.
Psal. 22. 18. Mat. 27. 35.
Psal. 22. 2. Mat. 27. 46.
Psal. 69. 22. Mat. 27. 48.

Nothing was doon by Christ, which the Prophets foretold not; nothing foretold by them which he fulfilled not: for he saith, al things writen of me hav an end; couching al in that one Word on the Cross, Consummatum est 'tis finished▪ Al Prophecies spoken of him are accomplished, al Lawish Ceremonies which prefigured him abolished, his own sufferings performed, and Mans salvation perfected.

For al particulars of his Passion are precisely pointed out: he must be apprehended, so saith Jeremy: The Lords Annointed was taken in their nets: How? To be sold: For What? Thirty Sil­ver peeces: What to doo? To buy a Field: So saith Zechary, They gav thirty Silver peeces the price of him that was valued, and gav them for the Potters Field. By whom sold? By that Child of perdition to fulfil the Scripture: Who was he? One that eats bread with me: So saith David. What shal his Disciples doo? Run away; as Zechary saith; I wil smite the Shepherd, and the Sheep shal be scattered. What shal be doon to him? he must be scourged and spit on: So saith ▪ [...]aiah, I hid not my face from shame and spitting: What more? He shal be led to death: So saith Daniel, The Messiah shal be slain: What death? He must be life up as Moses did the Ser­pent: Whither? To the Cross: So saith Moses, Hanging on a Tree: How lift up? Nailed to it: So saith David, They hav pierced my Hands and Feet: With what company? Even Theefs: So saith Isaia, with the wicked was he numbred: Wher? Without the Gates, So saith the Prophecy. What shal becom of his Garments? They divided them, and on my Vesture or Coat cast lots, saith David: How must he dy? Voluntarily: Not a bone shal be broken: Why? It was pre­figured in the Paschal Lamb, and performed in him the tru Passover as a Sacrifice for sin. How then? He must be thrust in the side with a Spear: so saith Zechary, They shal see him [Page 119] whom they thrust through: What shal he say? Eli, E [...] Lama Luke 23 34. sabactani, My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me? as Da­vid speaks: how shal he resign his Soul: Into thy hands I com­mend my spirit; so saith the Psalmist: What uttered he of his Enemies? Father, forgiv them: So saith Isai, He praied for Psal. 22. 1. transgressors. Lastly, that al predictions might be verified, he said, I thirst; not for any necessity of Nature, but to fulfil di­vine John 19. 28 30 Decree in Scripture. Then he cried, consummatum est▪ If any Jew or Infidel, seing this admirable harmony, or concent of al circumstances, shal demand like Johns Disciples, Art thou Acts 1. 11. he, or shal we look for another? The two Angels appeering at his Ascention, answer with an Interrogation; Ye men of Gallile, why stand ye gazing or gaping into Heaven for another Messi­ah? this same Jesus, now taken up, shal so com as ye saw him go into Heaven. In him only are al Phrophecies fulfilled; and by him al that was predicted to be doon finished. No other Spi­rit could foresee or foresay such things should be doon; nor any power possibly doo them so foreshewed, sav only Jesus Christ the Son of God and Saviour of the World.

2. Touching legal Observations, Christ is the end of the Law: both Moral, which he kept perfectly by himself, and sa­tisfied plenarily for us: and Ceremonial, which was referred to him, observed of him, and abolished by him. For al Lawish Ceremonies (Circumcision, Passover, Tabernacle, Temple, Laver, Altar, Shewbread, Tables, Candlestics, Vails, Holy of Holies, Arc, Propiciatory, Pot of Manna, Aarons Rod, high Priest; his Order, Linage, Habits, Inaugurations, Washings, Annointings, Sprinklings, Offerings, Sacrifices, and other Rites) look'd at Christ; which had their virtu from him, re­lation to him, and end in him. They al died when the Temples vail rent; the Obligation of the Ritual Law being cancelled, and the way into Heavenly Jerusalem opened: for the shews yeelded to the substance, when he said, Al is finished.

3. His sufferings from the Cratch to the Cross are infinit and inexpressible; his whol life being a perpetual passion: he hum­bled yea emptied himself to becom Man, suffering more herein then al Men can: for if Man should be turned into a Beast (as Pythagoras dreamed) into dust, into nothing, 'tis no such di­sparagement, [Page] as God to be made Man. What Man? if Monarch of the World to tread on Kings necks, trampling al Crowns and Scepters under feet, it had bin som port or pomp: but he cam in form of a Servant, and becam the contempt of Men, yea a worm and no Man; the shame of Men and scorn of the multitud. He was born in a Stable, cradled in a Cratch or Manger, caried a Child into Egypt to avoid Herods butchery, basely bred in his Foster-Fathers Cotage, lived poorly and ob­scurely, endured al extremities of hunger, thirst, cold, and other calamities during minority: but coming to Virility and shew­ing the power of his Deity, he was transported and tempted by Satan, derided of his Kindred, traduced by the Jews, persecu­ted by the Elders and Pharisees; restless, harborless, comfort­less: sold by his own servant, apprehended, arraigned, condem­ned, crucified: But wher? not in a corner; but at Jerusalem the Ey and Heart of the World, wher he wrought a world of Wonders: Wherabout? in Calvary among stinking sculs and execrable Malefactors. When? At the Passover, wher Proselits resorted from al parts to receiv the type, and reject the arche­type: who instead of eating the Paschal Lamb, slu and sacrificed the tru Passover. With whom? Betwixt two Theefs. He that thought it no robbery to be equal with God, is made equal to Robbers. What suffred he? A cursed, lingring, tormenting, ignominious death, even on the Cross, being made a curs for us: a curs wors then the shame, but both wors then the pain, and scorn worst of al. His Cross-Companions, had no irrision, in­scription, or insultation over them, but death only: he death with disdain, disgrace, and derision; the Jews, Souldiers, and Theefs twitted or triumphed over him. Al his senses were windows to let in sorows: his Eys beheld the tears of his bles­sed Mother and Friends, with manifold despits of his Foes: his Ears heard the blasphemous railings and revilings of the Multi­tud: His Nostrils smelt the noisom sent of dead Mens bones: His Touch felt the nails: His Tast bitter Gal: Was ever sorow like his sorow? That Head which Angels adored, is harowed with thorns: That face fairer then the Children of Men, is smeared with filthy spittle and furrowed with tears: Thos Eys brighter then the Sun, are shadowed with death: Thos Ears [Page 120] inured to heavenly Harmony, are filled with scofs and scorns: Thos Lips that spake as never Man did, are wet with Gal and Vineger: Thos hands which swaied Heavens Scepter, cary the Reed of reproch, and are fastned to the Tree: Thos Feet to which al powers of Hel were a Foot-stool, are nailed to the Foot-stool of the Cross: That whol Body conceived by the ho­ly Ghost, is scourged, wounded, mangled: yet al this but the outside of his sufferings: but the innner part or Soul of his pains, is so far beyond thos sensitiv torments, as the Soul sur­passeth the Body, or Gods wrath Mans malice. What the in­finit sins of innumerable Men, committed against an infinit Majesty, deserved in infinit durance; al this he in a short space of his Passion suffred or susteined; which made him cry, My God, my God, why doost thou forsake me? he was affrighted with terrors, perplexed with griefs, distraught with both. It was not so much for millions of Men to despair, as for him to fear: yet never was any so afraid of Hel, as he of his Fathers wrath for our sins and in our steads. Thus his Incarnation, Nativity, Birth place, Life, Death, Burial, Resurrection, Ascention, sit­ting at Gods right hand; with many mo circumstanees of Ju­das treason, and reward, the Jews rejecting him, and crucify­ing among Theefs; were al divinely foretold of the Messias to com, and directly fulfilled in or by Christ, to whom only they fitly and fully agree: For he is the Womans Seed which should break the Serpents head, and in whom al Nations of the Earth shal be blessed. The other testimonies touching the time and truth of Messias coming; that he shal be of Davids linage, born of a pure Virgin, perfect God and Man; yea a Spiritual eternal King (no Temporal or Terrestrial) make up a cloud of wit­nesses to convince the Jews, that Jesus Christ is the only tru forepromised Messiah: to whom be rendred al Glory, Honor, Prais, and Power for ever. Al which might be infinitly inlarged, but for brevity omitted.

Supplementum Pietatis. In the Practise of Piety.

THe Souls Soliquy (at end of the Practis of Piety) in con­templation Conclusion. of Christs Passion, shal shape a Catastrophe to thes divine Meditations. What hast thou doon sweet Savi­our, to be betraied by Judas, sold to the Jews, and led bound as a Lamb to the slaughter? What evil didst thou commit, to be openly arraigned, falsly accused, and unjustly condemned? what was thy offens, or whom didst thou ever wrong, to be so pitifully scourged with whips, crowned with thorns, scoffed with flouts, buffeted with fists, and beaten with stafs? Lord, what didst thou deserv to hav thy face spit on, thy hands and feet nailed, thy self lifted up on a cursed Tree to be cruci­fied with Theefs, to drink Gal and Vineger? yea, to hav thy innocent heart pierced with a spear, and pretious blood spilt before thy blessed Mothers eys? sweet Saviour, how much wast thou afflicted to endure al this, when I am so affrighted or amazed but to think of it? which made thee cry as if God had forsaken thee, being al for Mans sake forsaken of God. I in­quire for thy offens, but can finde none, no not any guile in thy mouth: thy Enemies are chalenged, and none dare rebuke thee of sin: the Officers sent to apprehend thee testify, That never Man spak like thee: thy suborned Accusers agree not in their witnes; the Judg publicly cleered thy Innocence: his wife warned him by a dream, that thou was't a just Man, and he should doo no injustice to thee: the Centurion confessed thee of a truth to be the Son of God: the Theef hanging with thee, justified thee to hav doon nothing amiss. What then Lord is the caus of thy cruel ignominy, passion, and death? 'Tis I am the caus of thy sorows, my sins of thy shame, my iniquities of al thy sufferings. I committed the fault, and thou art plagued; I guilty, and thou punished: I deserved death, and thou cruci­fied. O the depth of Gods lov, and unmeasurable measure of his Mercy: the wicked transgressed and the just apprehended: the guilty escaped, and Innocent arraigned: the Malefactor ac­quited, [Page 121] and Harmless condemned: the Servant did the sin, and Master bore the stroke: I committed the crime, and thou hang­edst on the Cross. O Son of God, who can condignly express thy lov, commend thy pity, or extol thy prais? I was proud, and thou humbled; I obstinat and thou obedient; I ate the forbidden fruit, and thou hangedst on the cursed Tree; I plaid the Glutton, and thou fastedst; I tasted the sweetnes of the Garden, and thou drankest the biternes of Gal: fond Eve smiled when I laughed; but blessed Mary wept, when thy heart bled and died.

Now gracious Lord, sith thou hast indured al this for my sake; what shal I retribut for al thy benefits? I ow already for my Creation more then I am able to pay, being bound with al my powers to lov and adore thee: If I ow my whol self for creating me of nothing; what shal I render for giving thy self to redeem me at so deer a ransom, when I was wors then no­thing? Surely Lord, if I cannot pay such thanks as I ow (for who can pay thee, who givest thy Graces without respect of merit or regard of measure?) 'tis the abundance of thy Blessings which make me a Bankrupt, being so far unable to pay the principal, as I cannot satisfy any part of the interest: For Lord, thou knowest since the loss of thy Image by our first Parents fal, that I cannot lov thee with al my might and mind as I should; therfore as thou first didst cast thy lov on me be­ing a Child of wrath and lump of the lost World; so now I be­seech thee shed abroad thy Grace through al my faculties and affections, that though I can never pay such merit of lov as thou meritest; yet I may repay in such maner as thou deignest to ac­cept in Mercy: that in truth of heart I may lov my neighbour for thy sake, and thee abov al for th [...]ne own sake. Let nothing be pleasant to me, which doth not pleas thee: suffer me not to be a cast away, whom thy pretious blood hath bought: Let me never forget the ineffable benefit of my redemption, whitout which it had bin better never to be then to hav any being. Sith then thou hast vouchsafed thy holy Spirits assistance; suffer me Heavenly Father (who art Father of Spirits) by thy Sons me­diation, to speak a few words in the ears of my Lord. If thou despisest me for my iniquities, as I deserv; yet shew Mercy for [Page] thy Sons merits who suffered so much for me. Behold the myste­rie of his Incarnation, and remit the misery of my transgression: so oft as his wounds appeer in thy sight, let my sins be hid from thy presence: so oft as the rednes of his blood glisters in thy eys, let my sin be blotted out of thy Book. The lust of my flesh provoked thee to wrath, O let his chastity procure thy Mercy: that as my pollution seduced me to fal, so his purenes may re­duce me to thy favour. My disobedience deservs sharp revenge, but his obedience merits much more Mercy: for what can Man deserv to suffer, which God that made Man cannot merit to be forgiven? When I ponder the greatnes and grievousnes of his Passion, I see the saying tru, That Jesus Christ can into the World to sav the chiefest sinners. Darest thou then, O Cain, cry, thy sins are greater then can be forgiven? thou liest like a mur­derer: the Mercies and merits of one Christ are sufficient to sav millions of Cains, if they wil beleev and repent. For al sins are finit, but Gods Mercies and Christs Merits infinit: therfore, O Father, for his bitter death and bloody passion, pardon al my sins, deliver me from the vengeance they hav deserved, and let his merits make me partaker of thy Mercies. My importunity shal never ceas to cal and knock with the Man that would bo­row the Loafs, til thou open the gate of thy Grace: If thou wilt not bestow the Loafs, yet Lord vouchsafe the Crums of thy Mercy, which shal suffice thy hungry Hand-maid. Lastly, sith thou requirest nothing but to lov thee in truth of heart (wher­of a new Creature is the truest outward testimony, and 'tis so easy for thee to make me such, as bid me be so) Creat in me, O Christ, a new heart, and renew a right spirit within me; then shalt thou see how, mortifying old Adam and his corrupt lusts, I wil serv thee as a new Creature in a new life, after a new way, with a new toung, new words and new works; to the glory of thy name, and gaining of other sinful Souls to the Faith, by my devout exemple. Keep me for ever, dear Saviour, from Hels torment and Satans tyranny: So when I shal leav this life, send thy holy Angels to carry me (as they did Lazarus Soul) into thy Kingdom: receiv me into that most joiful Paradise, which thou promisedst to the penitent Theef, who at last gasp so ear­nestly begged mercy and admission into thy Kingdom. Grant [Page 122] this, O sweet Saviour, for thy names sake, to whom I ascribe (as is most du) al Prais power and glory for evermore.

Postscriptum sacratum: A very pious Postscript.

THis Appendix is annexed chiefly to the premisses, out of Mr. Henry Smiths Arrow against Atheists, to this effect. The main marks of Messiah to com, were manifested in Christ alone: specialy how the Jews should not know or acknowledg Psal. 12. 22▪ Is [...]i 53. 3. him, but reject and refuse him to the end he might be doon to death for Mans salvation, according to Gods determinat De­cree. For if they had received him as the tru Messias, surely he had not bin so: But becaus they denied, derided, and put him to death; doubtless he was so. Al particular Promises and Pro­phecies pointing out the Messiah, were fulfilled in him or by him: as that the Womans seed should break the Serpents head; that a Virgin should bear him; the Birth place Bethleem; al In­fants thereabouts slain for his sake; Kings to adore him with presents of Gold and other gifts: he should be presented at Je­rusalem for the greater glory of the secund Temple; fly into Egypt, and be caled thence: a Star should shew his coming in­to the World: John Baptist (caled Elias, becaus he cam in his Spirit and Power) should go as a Messenger or Usher to pre­pare the way before him, and cry in the Desart: that he should be poor, abject, and despised of Men; preach with al humility and meeknes of spirit; doo many miracles, and heal al Disea­ses: be slain for Mens sins; betraied by his own Disciple which dipped in the dish with him; be sold for thirty silver peeces, with which a Potsherd field must be bought: the Traitor to be cut off; and another take his Office: he should ride into Jeru­salem on an Asses Foal; be apprehended, arraigned, beaten, buffeted, scourged, spit on; his hands and feet nailed, his side pierced; he to drink Vineger, and be crucified among Male­factors; his cloaths divided, and lots cast for his Coat; but not a bone broken: he should rise from death the third day, ascend into Heaven, and sit at his Fathers right hand as a Conque­ro [...] [Page] Al which were pointly verified in him, or perfectly per­formed by him.

The time of Messias coming, concurs soly in Christ: for Da­niel foretold how in the fourth Monarchy the eternal King Dan. 2. 39 44. shal com, and build Gods Kingdom through the World; which befel under Augustus Caesar, founder or establisher of that Agge 2. 8. Empire. Agge foreshewed, that the desired of al Nations shal com, and the secund hous filled with greater glory then the first: for Herod built and beautified it outwardly in great pomp, and Christ graced it inwardly with his glorious presence: yea Ma­lachy Mal 3. 1. saith, He shal com during the secund Temple; and Daniel, Dan▪ 9. 26. That it shal not be demolished til Messias be slain, who foretold its destruction. Jacob told his Sons▪ That the Scepter shal not Gen 49. 10. depart from Juda til Shiloh com, which is the Gentils expecta­tion. Al which circumstances completly cohere with Christs first coming in the appointed time. He must be an everlasting Psal. 89. 3. 4. King: for God saith, I hav sworn to David my Servant▪ I wil prepare thy Seed for ever, and build up thy seat to al generations; which cannot sort to Solomon; for his Kingdom was rent by Jeroboam, and after suppressed by Nabuchodonosor: nor can the words (for ever) be applyed to any temporal King, but eter­nal, which must descend from Davids loins and linage. This Pre­mist Jer. 23 5, 6. God confirms saying, Behold, the dais com that I wil rais up to David a righteous seed, & he shal reign a King to doo judgment and justice on Earth: in his dais Juda shal be saved, and Israel dwel safely; and this is the name men shal cal him Our just God. To whom can this consort sav to the Son of God, caled Catexock [...]n the Son of David, who was his Father in the flesh and bore his type or figure? Hence Ezekiel and Hose stile the Messiah David, Ez [...]k 34 33. Hos. 3. 5. being to descend of his seed: I wil set over them a Shepher [...] even David my Servant; he shal be their Shepherd and I wil be their God, and my Servant David a Prince among them. Now be­caus the Jews look for Messias to be a Temporal King to reign in Judea, and subdu their Enemies (as Chiliasts deem or dream he shal doo at next coming with his Martyrs) the con­futation of their fond conceipt wil be a strong confirmation of the contrary: For their expected time of the Messias (as the Mahometans of their fals Prophet) is long ago expired, yet no [Page 123] such Terren King ever reigned ther, and it repugns Scripture. Daniel cals him An eternal King: and Micheah saith, He shal Dan. 2. 44. Dan. 7 14. Michah 4 7. Ps 7 [...] ▪ 5, 8, 11, 17. reign for ever: yea God saith to his Son, Ask of me and I wil giv the Heathen for thine inheritance, and utmost parts of the Earth for thy possession: meaning that Messiah shal be universal King to rule over Jews, Gentils, and al the world by his spiritual power. He shal endure with the Sun and before the Moon from generation to generation: he shal reign from Sea to Sea unto the lands end: al Kings shal adore, and al Nations serv him: al Tribes of the Earth shal be blessed in him; and al People magni­fy Gen. 12. 3. him for [...]ver. Yea God told Abram, That in his seed (the Messiah of his seed) al Nations shal be blessed. Isaiah sets down Gods Commission to Messiah: It is too little that thou be my Isai 49. 6. Servant to rais up the Tribes of Juda and convert the preserved of Israel: I wil giv thee for a light to the Gentils, that thou be my Salvation to the Earths end. What can be cleerer that he shal be a Saviour both of Jews and Gentils? 'tis therfore a fond fancy that he shal be King of Judea only to subdu their Enimies. The Prophets foretel how he shal com riding on an Ass, and of no reput, that he shal be led as a Sheep to the slaughter, or a Lamb dumb before the Sheerer; and they shal look on him whom they pierced; that he shal be slain as a sa­crifice for sin, and broken for our iniquity; with whos stripes we are healed, and such like. Wher then is his pomp, if he was to be poor? wher his earthly reign, if he must be despised? wher his able resistance, if he must suffer as a Sheep led to the slaughter? wher his worldly conquest, if he was to be crucifi­ed? nay, how can the Jews deem or dream he shal be so potent or triumphant, when they must be the Men to pursu his death, and look on while they pierced him, as their own Prophets pre­dict or premon sh? add herto how their Rabins testify, that the Messiahs Mother shal be Parthenos a pure Virgin, and he not begot as others by carnal coition, but by the holy Ghost, and his name Jesus. Yea the whol stream of Scripture runs, that he must not be meer Man, but God also: as Isaiah saith, Isai 7. 14. Isai 57. 4. Isai 9. 6. He shal be caled Immanuel, God with us; wonderful Counsilor, the mighty God, Prince of Peace, the everlasting Father, the issu of the Lord, and fruit of the Earth: in al which both Na­tures [Page] are implied. Jeremy saith, He shal be stiled God our righte­ousnes: and God saith of him, Thou art my Son, this day (i▪ Jer. 33. Psalm 2. 7, 8. from al eternity) hav I begot thee. Yea David cals him Lord: The Lord said to my Lord, sit on my right hand til I make thine Enimies thy footstool: al which pregnant places are cleerer then the Sun: therfore 'tis a sensless surmise, that he should be a mundan Monarch.

Quae de Messiae adventu cecinere Prophetae▪
Praestita per Christum cuncta fuere bene.
What of Messias Prophets did foretel,
Were by Christs coming al performed wel.
Ali [...]r:
Quae de Messia veteres retulere Prophetae,
Perspicue in Christo praestita quaeque patent.
What of Messiah Prophets old informed,
Doo cleerly al appeer in Christ performed.
Ali [...].
Ordino retrogrado: quae Christus facta peregit,
Cuncta libris Vates praemonuere suis.
Bacward again: Al things which Christ atchived,
Were by the Prophets in their Books premised.
S [...]u [...].
Quam bene conveniunt praemissa Prophetica Christo?
Quam bene complevit singula Christus item?
How wel to Christ thos Prophecies agree?
How wel by Christ al things accomplish'd be?

THES. V.
Christi duae Genealogiae. Christs two Genealogies.

FOur Evangelists wrot Christs life, acts, death, and re­surrection, This Thesis is taken mostly from William Cowper, Bi­shop of Gallo­way in Scot­ [...]and. at several times and places; who jointly agree in Story, which argues the truth of their testimo­ny: but two only record his Genealogy diversly, not [Page 124] adversly; which shews the sweeter symmetry. St. Matthew, a Jew, reckons Josephs natural pedigree, and Maries legal; be­caus they regarded not womens Parentage: But Luke a Gentil born, reports hir Natural Prosapy and his legal, to whom both Sexes are alike. So betwen both the two Descents are com­pletly displaied to satisfy al Men, and stop Maligners mouths. Matthew descends from Fathers to Children, denoting that we com from God by his divine word: Luke ascends from Chil­dren to Parents, implying that by the same word Incarnat we return to God: for we cam from God the Father only by Christ his Son, as Sons of Creation common to al Flesh; and can go to him by no other then Christ Redeemer, as Sons of Regeneration proper or peculiar soly to his spiritual Kin­dred.

Christs Genealogy deorsum, is sorted into fiv sections: 1. From Adam to Noah. 2. From Noah to Abram. 3. From Abram to David. 4. From David to Zerobab [...]l. 5. From him to Christ. In the first and secund to Abram, St. Luke runs a­lone: In the third to David, both march mutualy: In the fourth to Zerobabel, they take different races from David (Matthew by Salomon, Luke by Nathan) meeting in Salathiel; wher they take two steps jointly, and part again: the one sha­ping his cours from Zerobabel by Abiud to Joseph; the other by Rhesa to Mary; but both concur in Christ, being supposed Son to Joseph, and genuin of Mary. This is the general Genethlia­cal series of both, very obvious to al, specialy to Men versed in Pedigrees; the several sections shal render the reason of al.

The first to Noah contains ten Fathers: Adam Seth, Enos, 1 Section▪ Cainan, Mahalale [...]l, Jar [...]d, Enoc [...], Methuselah, Lam [...]ch, Noah: al which Matthew omits, and next ten too; becaus his chief aim was to convert his Countrimen, and so begins plausi­bly with Jesus Christ the Son of David▪ son of Abram: for it was current among al them, that Messiah should be the Son or Seed of David; and Abram was their first beleeving Progeni­tor after four descents of Idolaters: But Luke a Pagan Phisi­tion Convert, seeking to win al Nations, drew the line twenty links higher; one teaching to seek our Saviour in Abrams seed, the other, that al Beleevers of Adams Progeny hav property in [Page] Christ. Here obsery, That Adam, Christs first forefather after Notae. the flesh, is caled Gods Son by Regeneration so wel as Creation: for as at beginning Adam Gods Son is Christs first carnal Fa­ther; so at Christ end Gods eternal Son becam the Son of Man. A marvelous mutation, that Man made by God, should becom Father to him, who being God, was made Man, to make Men the Sons of God. Lo, what a binding stone the Lord Jesus is, which knits together not only Man with Man (Jews and Gentils) but Man with God: not by personal union proper soly to himself; but spiritual communion common to al the Faithful. We be­leev Adam was a tru Man, yet not begot by Man, nor born of Woman, but formed by God of the Virgin Earth, as Irenaeus cals it: And Eve a very Woman, yet had no Father nor Mo­ther, but made of Adams rib. Why then, can any doubt that Christ was a tru Man, though not begot by Man, but framed of Davids seed in the Virgins womb by the holy Ghost? for 'tis fit sith the first Adam was moulded by Gods hand, the se­cund should be made by the same, without Mans concurrence; that he might hav a semblance or similitud of production like the first. Thus Gods Son becam the Son of Man, of David, of Abram, of Adam: why then doo we not beleev that the Sons of Adam and Abram folowing the Adoption shal becom the Sons of God? For 'tis stranger that God should be made Man in shape of a Servant, to suffer death on Earth; then that Man shal be exalted to reign in Heaven: yet the first is doon; why then doth any diffide of the last, sith he died not in vain?

The next to Abram compriseth ten Fathers: Sem, Arphaxad, 2 Sect. Salah, Heber, Peleg, Reu, Sarug, Nahor, Terah, Abram: but Luke superads Cainan after Arphaxad from the septua­gints version (however crept in by Transcribers mistake) not found in Moses Canon, which is the sole foundation of authen­tic Note. authority. Here note, that of Noahs three Sons (Man­kinds sires or stock Fathers after the Flood) God chos Sem the secund to be Christs Father after the Flesh: who tho Sem had sundry Sons, yet passing by al selects Arphaxad, and con­tracting his Covenant into narower lists or limits, confines it to Hebers family, being content to be caled the God of Gen. 9. 26. 27. [Page 125] Sem; which is the first time he is named the God of one more then another. Yet let not us of Japhets linage be danted, or dismaied, but rely on his promiss pacted with Sem to per­swad Japhet to dwel in his Tents, or allure his posterity to embrace the Covenant made with Sems family, which is since fulfilled. For he dwelt in Sems hous from their first being a Nation under Moses abov 1600. yeers, and in Japhets from their union into Christ abov 1600. mo: having visited us also in the ends of the Earth. So though our Parents be not a­mong Christs Progenitors (after the Flesh, which is the Jews privilege) by natural generation; yet being united by Faith, we com of him by spiritual affinity through the Grace of re­generation, from which they are excluded without tru repen­tance and reception.

The third to David includs thirteen Fathers: Isaac, Jacob, 3 Sect. Juda, Pharez, Ezram, Aram, Aminadab, Naasson, Salmon, Booz, Obed, Jesse, David. Wher mark how 'tis said; Jacob Note. begot Juda and his Brethren, not Abraham, begot Isaac, and his Brethren: to shew that al Abrahams Sons tho Circumcised belong not to the Covenant, nor did God chuse their Posteri­ties to be his Church or peculiar People, as he did Jacobs Sons and their Seed. For to them pertained the Adoption, Glory, Rom. [...]. [...]. Covenant, giving the Law, Gods Service, and Promisses. What a Prerogativ is this? Al Jacobs issu partake of exter­nal Adoption, not so al Abrahams: to import, that Gods caling is free being Debtor to none. Therfore such as are out­wardly caled, should be much more thankful for his mercy; sith he hath passed by so many of Adams and Japhets families far more famous then us with whom he deigned to Covenant: remembring that sundry are externly Adopted, which are not elected by Grace.

Here is a doubt or demand, why Thamar (who subtly Question, sought seed by Incest of her Father in Law Juda) Rahab by Nation a Canaanit, by Conversation a Courtezan; and Bath­sheba guilty of Adultery with David, if not accessary of hir Husband Ʋria's death, are numbred among Christs carnal Mothers: but Sara and Rebecca renowned for conjugal cha­stity omitted?

Three special reasons are rendred: 1. To humble the Jews, Answer. who greatly gloried to be Abrahams Of-spring but folowed not his Virtues deeming their prosapy a sufficient patrociny for al vices: to which end their Parents crimes are purposly pourtraied, that al may know how tru Nobility lies not in preemmence of Blood or Birth; but the Graces of mind and Mens personal maners, which make a Man. Hence Nazian­zen replied to one that upbraided his mean discent, my Pa­rentage perhaps is a reproach to me; but thou to thy Progeni­tors. 2. To comfort poor penitent Sinners: for Christ cam not as a Judg to chastise Mens misdeeds, but a Phisition to cure our maladies; who assumed our Nature to clens us from sin. 3. To set forth Christs great Glory, who took no holines from his Ancestors; for if they al had excelled in piety, it had bin litle for him to be holy: but discending from sinners yet born sinless; he is manifested to be the chief high Priest, holy, Heb. 7. 26. harmless, und [...]filed, seperat from sinners, and higher then the Heavens. Therfore Papists pretending his honor in asserting the blessed Virgin to be conceived sans sin; doo indeed dis­honor him, as if he had holines of Nature from hir, and could not be born sinless unles she had bin so conceived. Cannot the holy Ghost discern Davids seed from sinful contagion? Yes, he sanctified and separated it from sin to make it the Lords Body. St. Bernard blamed the Chanons of Lyons for instituting hir Fest of sinless conception, taxing it as presump­tuous novity, and termed it Mother of temerity, Sister of su­perstition, and Daughter of levity. For 'tis Christs peculiar perogativ (who must sanctify al) to be conceived free from sin. Hence he concluded, that the glorious Virgin wil gladly want such honor, wherby sin seems to be advanced, and fucatious sanctity introduced. Another point to be pondered is, that Salmon begot Booz by Rahab a Canaanit, and Booz Obed by Ruth a Moabit both Gentils, yet Christs Mothers: which may comfort Gentils, That God is no Accepter of persons, but who­ever Gab. 3. 28. Acts 4. 12. cals on his name (the only Name under Heaven Christ Jesus) shal be saved.

The fourth to Zerobabel Records a Role of Fathers; wher 4 Sect. Matthew draws a line by Salomon, Luke by Nathan his whol [Page 126] Brother. Here a doubt occurs, how Christ could descend from both? Which is resolved, that the Jews provided if a Man died Issuless, his Brother or next Kinsman must marry his Wife to rais up seed. Now Solomons race ended in Jeconiah the 1 Chron. 3. 17. eighteenth after him; who died Childless, as Jeremy foretold: yet 'tis said he had Sons, meaning Successors. For Salathiel Son to Neri steps in as Heir, stiled by Matthew Jeconiahs Son, viz. Legal and Regal. For they reckoned a duple descent: 1. Natural by direct generation one from another. 2. Legal by collateral succession of next Kin. Hence grew the Evan­gelists several intentions: Luke drawing Christs natural line from David, to shew how he is his Son after the Flesh: Mat­thew the Legal, to specify how for default of Jeconiahs Issu he succeeded in Davids throne as tru Heir and King of the Jews rightly so caled. Nor can they name any of their Na­tion neerer in succession; yet wilfully cried, we hav no King but Note, Casar a forren Conqueror. So tho Christ was not Salomons natural Son, nor is promised to be; yet was his Legal or Regal by Salathiel, and Davids genuin by Nathan. Here the sudden decay of Salomons Kingdom for ten Tribes in Rehoboam, and the two other in Jeconiah with al his Roial race; warns al how ominous the sins of carnal and spiritual whordom be. For Salo­mon to stablish his posterity and satisfy his Luxury, multiplyed Wifes and Concubins contrary to Gods command, who made one Woman for one Man to be one Flesh: but to pleas them, permitted Idols in a holy Land, and at last fel to Idolatry wors then Harlotry: which was perilous to his own Soul (had not God given Grace to repent) and pernitious to al his poste­rity.

The last concluds al from Zerobabel (Son to Pedaiah, 5 Sect. Grandson to Salathiel) to Christ: wher Matthew recompts by Abiud (alias Hananiah 1 Chr. 3. 19.) Josephs Forefathers in number nine: but Luke from Rhesa (alias Meshullam se­cund Governor after the Captivity, whom Philo cals Rhesa Mesciola) numbers Maries Progenitors eighten just twise so many. At end of which line rests one difficulty; becaus Mat­thew cals Joseph Son to Jacob, Luke to Eli: which is fairly reconciled; for Jacob was his Natural Father, Eli Legal. So [Page] in Christs Natural line deduced from Mary by Luke, Joseph only is not Natural Father, but so supposed as he saith. Hence 'tis cleer, how meet he was to doo the work wherto he was con­secrat. For Zechary cals him Gn [...]mith Jehovae the Lords felow: Zech. 13. 7. Job 19. [...]5. Isai 7. 14. which St. Paul int [...]rprets equal with God in regard of his Deity: but Job Goel my Kinsman, in respect of his Humanity, as foretelling his Incarnation: in which sens he is stiled Shiloh, sig­nifying that skin or tunicle which incloseth Embryons. Isaiah terms him Immanuel, God with us, implying both Natures in one Person. Jobs title Goel (from Gaal. i. Redemit vel vindicavit) imports a Redeemer or Revenger: for by the Law to redeem an Inheritance belonged to the next Kinsman, as also to revenge his Blood: so our Heritage being lost by sin, and Adams Of-spring slain by Satan; our next Kinsman (a Son of Adam) coms to ransom the one and expiat the other: yea to perform what no Typical Redeemer or Temporal Re­venger ever could doo. For Men might kil him which slu their Brethren if they found him out of a Refuge City; yet could not restore them to life: but Christ flu the Murderer Satan found out of refuge, and as a peerless Conqueror gav life to his Brethren, even al the Sons of Adam that shal beleev in him.

One rub rests, to be removed, how Josephs Ancestors can Quest. be clyped or computed Christs Progenitors either Natural or Legal; and why recited in his Pedigree?

Surely they are not properly so termed, sith he was but sup­posed [...] Father: yet inserted for special purpos to stop or satisfy al Cavils, exceptions, and objections. For if only Maries de­scent had bin displaied, Men might say, what matters it for his Mothers Prosapy? His Father was a Carpenter basely born and bred. If Josephs soly, others would object, whats that to Christ, who issued not from his loins or linage? But when both their stock Fathers are so evidently drawn from Jess [...]s root; the mouth of malice and malediction must needs be mus [...]ed or bungd up, nor can detraction derogat or deny his Regal right from David. Thus tho the two Evangelists vary in maner of Accompt or form of words; yet they agree pointly and precisely in the matter and truth of things, without the least clashing or contradicting one another. A Series or Sy­nopsis [Page 127] of the premisses, wil make al circumstances more obvi­ous to every Ey, or common Capacity.

St. Luke draws Christs Golden line of Genealogy (on Summary. which runs the whol Book of God) comprising 77. Genera­tions. 1. God, 2. Adam, 3. Seth. 4▪ Enos, 5. Cainan, 6. Mahalaleel, 7. Jared, 8. Enoch, 9. Methusalem, 10. Lamech. 11. Noah, 12. Sem, 13. Arphaxad, 14. Salah, 15. Eber, 16. Peleg. 17. Reu or Regu, 18. Sarug, 19. Nahor, 20. Terah: In both which Sections he walks alone: in the third St. Mat­thew and he go hand in hand, reckonig the natural line to Da­vid by direct descent. 21. Abraham, 22. Isaac, 23. Jacob, 24. Juda, 25. Pharez, 26. Ezrom, 27. Aram, 28. Aminadab, 29. Naasson, 30. Salmon. 31. Booz, 32. Obed. 33. Jesse 34. David, 35. Nathan, 36. Matatha, 37. Mainan, 38. Melea, 39. Eliakim, 40. Jonan, 41. Joseph, 42. Juda, 43. Simeon, 44. Levi, 45. Matthas, 46. Jorim, 47. Eliezer, 48. Jose, 49. Er. 50. Elmodam, 51. Cosam, 52. Addi, 53. Melchi, 54. Neri, 55. Salathiel, 56. Pedaiah, 57. Zerobabel. In this fourth Section from David he runs apart, except in the three last links, whom St. Matthew cites, caling Salathiel J [...]conia [...]s Son as successor or next of kin: but Luke stiles him Son to Neri being so by Blood and Birth. In the last Section thes 58. Rhesa, 59. Joanna, 60. Juda, 61 Joseph, 62. S [...]m [...]i, 63. Mattathia, 64. Maath, 65. Naggi, 66. Esli, 67. Naum. 68. Amos, 69. Matta [...]h [...]as 70. Joseph, 71 Joanna, 72. Mel­chi, 73. Levi, 74. Matthat. 75. Eli, 76. Mary, 77. Christ. Thus he recites the Natural line only, sav that he saith Joseph was of Eli (not Son) that is belonged to him as Son in Law, having espoused his Daughter Mary Christs Mother. Now Matthew handles the Legal Regal line, to prov him lawful King of the Jews, or next of kin from Jeconiah, to sit on his Father Davids Throne. So if Lukes twenty first Patriarchs be annexed to his Genealogy; both wil be complet from Adam to Christ in their several wais or intentions, which are divers, but not advers one to another. Matthew in the Legal line cites thes after David, Salom [...]n, Roboam, Ab [...], Asa, Jehoso­pha [...], Joram, Ozia, Joatham, Achaz, Ezekiah, Manasse, A­mon, Josia, Jehoichim, Jeconiah, Salathiel, Zerobabel, Abiud, [Page] Eliakim, Azor, Sadoe, Achim, Eliud, Eleazer, Mattham, Jacob, Joseph Christs supposed Father. Wher next to J [...]co­niah, he reckons Salathiel and Zerobabel before Abiud: but omits three successiv Kings of Juda after Ozia (Joas, Amazia, Azaria) beside Athalia the usurping Queen; and P [...]daiah Zerobabels Father: purposly to make a Tesserad ecad of just fourten generations in ech of his three spaces or Sections: which is no falsity or forgery to cut off or abridg som links of the long line. From Adam to David the Parents are one: but from David to Joseph, Matthew numbers twenty seven, and Luke to Mary twenty three in their differing reckon­ings.

Al Penmen of the holy Ghost (Prophets and Evangelists) Note. pursu the right line of Genealogy, til they com to the promi­sed Shiloh: but if they divert (as intermixing Cains ofspring with Seths, Japhets and Chams with Sems, Nahors with A­brahams, Ismaels with Isaacs, or Esaus with Jacobs) 'tis only obiter and obliquely to cleer the History of the golden line, This is a tru exact Examen or explication of al material scruples in this Genethliacal mystery.

Now folows a sincere succinct Chronology of the premisses Chronology. in order. The first Section from Adams Creation to Noahs entry into the Arc, contains 1656. yeers: the next til Abrams birth 353. the third til Davids initiation 942. the fourth til Zerobabels return from Babylon 545. the last til Christs birth 535. in al 4031. curent, or 4030. complet: as is punctualy and Christus natus A. M. 4031. particularly proved from yeer to yeer, in a cleer Chronography or Examination of times; to be prefixed as a previous Pre­cognit to two larger Tomes of general lucubrations shortly intended to the Press.

Here mark wel, how as the World waxed elder, Mans life Note. grew shorter; and mo generations multiplied proportionaly in later ages then former. For in 1656. yeers before the Flood fel, were only ten descents to Noah: in the next 353. to A­bram (which contains litle more then a fifth part of the first ten mo: in the third to David (942.) thirteen, which in pro­portion is far lesser then the foregoer: in the fourth to the Captivities solution (545. yeers) twenty three, which is many [Page 128] mo then any before: in the last to Christ Nativity (535. yeers) 20. which sutes neer with the foregoing. Al which make but 77. generations precited, from the first Adam to the se­cund in 4030. yeers complet. Now compare any one race of Diluvium A. M. 1656. Incendium A. C. 1656. Monarchs from Christs birth til A. 1656. two yeers hence (which som suppose wil be the Worlds Conflagration, as the Inundation befel A. M. 1656.) we shal find many mo suc­cessions proportional to the yeers then in pristin ages or Pro­genies. For if we reckon the Roman Emperors (excluding such as ruled jointly and al Usurpers) from Augustus to Fer­dinand now reigning, ther hav bin 146. If Bishops of Rome Canonicaly chosen and confirmed, from St. Peter▪ to the pre­sent Pope about 246. which is 100. mo then the other, and transcend thos ten Antediluvian generations almost twenty fold: but becaus som Emperors were soon slain, and al the Bishops elected old, the parallel is unequal: therfore take som instances of other Realms, which may better ballance it. To begin with this Land (which being tributary to Rome, had no set succession of Kings til the Saxons cam) let us compare the West Saxon Kings, from Cherdic the Founder (who en­tred A. 494.) to the Norman conquest A. 1066. we shal find 36. successors in 571. yeers: and from the Conquest to King Charls decollation (in 582. yeers) 25. mo; in al 61. to which if 56. Emperors from Augustus to Anastatius (in whos time Cherdic intruded) be supplied, al make 117. since Christs birth. In France from the founder Pharamond (who entred A. 520.) to this present, succeded 63. Kings in 1134. yeers: so allowing 57. Emperors from Augustus to Leo Isaurius when Pharamond initiated for the said 520. yeers preceding; it computs 120. Monarchs since Christ til now, hence it appeers, that in the old Worlds 1656. yeers were only ten descents; but in thes last hav bin in France 120. which is twelv times ten: and in England litle less, according to the prescribed propor­tion of computation. If reference could be made in privat families, the case would be cleerer.

One obstacle occurs, how in the elder age of 353. yeers from Doubt. the Flood to Abram be ten generations, and in the younger to David of 942. yeers (which is almost triple the time) but [Page] 14. as if Men lived longer after Abram then before; yet Da­vid saith Mans common age in his time was 70. and he died at that pitch.

This is a Gordian knot hard to unty: for either we must Resolut. suppose the Evangelists balked som descents, or that they re­ceived imperfect mutilat pedigrees, or conceled som links for secret ends; or that their Transcribers (which is too usual) committed som slips; or lastly that ther were revera but 14▪ generations from Abram to David in 942. yeers, which is scars probable or credible: wherin let deep Divines dive deep to attain the mystery, which 'tis not safe for Sciolists to essay, lest they sink in stead of swimming, and drench themselfs. St. Matthews Genealogy from Juda to David, is taken from the Book of Ruth and Chronicles, wherin can be no error; sav that Transcribers mistake or misprise som Names: as Ezrom for Hezron, Aram for Ram, Naasson for Nashon, Salmon for Salmah, and Jesse for Ishai: weich are but Syllabical, no ma­terial faults. Howbeit sith Naasson or Nashon a Judait Son to Numb. 1. 7. Aminadab, was one of thos that numbred the People at Is­raels Exod from Egypt; from which to David are computed 437. yeers, yet but four generations (Salmath, Booz, Obed, Jesse or Ishai) the main difficulty seems to rise hence or rest here: how ther can be so few descents in so long distance, un­les som be suppressed or superseded, which seems most likely? For upward from Abrahams death to Nahshons numbring the People; were eight generations (which is duple) in like 437. yeers; and downward from David to Josia in the same space sixteen successions in the Kingdom of Juda, which is quadruple: yet we are assured, that al links of this Golden chain are solid and sincere in substance, though a few purposly conceled, or casualy left out, if not lost. If any can bring a more soveraign Balsam to salv this sore, he shal cary the Gar­land of the best Leach.

Hunc scrupulum solvas, & eris mihi magnus Apollo.
Salv this doubt, and to me
Great Phoebus thou shalt be.
Candidus imperti, si quid scis verius istis.

Thes Annotations and observations touching the previous Pedigrees, are not so prolix as perspicuous, considering the darknes of this Subject.

[...]temma Genethliacum Christi, per secula cuncta.
Panditur, a Mundi conditione prius.
Christs Genethliac stock is afore dilated,
Through al times, since the World was first created.
Matthaeus varie & Lucas sata stemmata Christi,
Aliter.
In Geneallogiis explicu [...]re suis.
Matthew and Luke have express'd diversly,
Christs tru descent in their Genealogy.
En Genealogiam Christi d [...] stirpe Davidis,
Alias.
Qui Deus ex pura Virgin [...] factus Homo est.
Lo Christs descent from Davids linage sure:
Who tru God was made Man of Virgin pure.
Symmetria insignis, Christum de stirpe Davidis,
Secus.
Est in Evangelio, rite fuisse satum.
That Christ from Davids stock drew his prosapy,
Ther's in the Gospel a most cleer symmetry.
Matthaeus varie Christi, Lucas que recensent
Sive.
A Davide, suo stemmata quisque modo.
Matthew and Luke Christs pedigree doo display
From Davids loins, ech of them his own way.
Fl [...]s de Jesse fuit, Davidis sanguine Christus:
Catastrophe.
Sicu [...] Evangelii Biblia sacra probant.
Christ Jesses Flower, from Davids blood did spring:
As Gospels sacred Books plain proofs doo bring.

THESIS VI.
Apocalypsus patefacta. The Revelation Reveled.

THe Apocalyps is a sublime speculation of Prophetic Preamble. Visions, reveled by Christ to John Evangelist exiled at Patmos by cruel Domitian (Author of the secund primitiv persecution) Son to mild Vespasian, and Brother to merciful Titus, termed Mankinds delight, whom 'tis thought he poisoned to enjoy the Empire. Al Prophecies, spe­cialy Apocalyptic, are deep d [...]rk mysteries, seldom descried or disclosed til finished and fulfilled: But becaus Mr. Joseph Med [...] late Felow of Christs College in Cambridg (wher he died An. 1638. aged 53) a most rare Phoenix for al learned Languages and liberal Literature, hath set out an exact Key of Synchroni­cisms or ch [...]onical Symetries, and most accurat Comment on most part of the Text somwhat amply, yet very obscurely: they shal be more concisely contracted, and cleerly complicated for every common capacity; to guid their steps in this intricat la­byrinth: wher som things must be premised or predeclared, for better understanding of it.

Clavis Appellativorum. The Key of Terms or names.

THe seven spirits standing before Gods Throne (after caled, Precog [...]s. [...]ev. 1. v. 4. seven Lamps of burning fire, Rev. 4. v. 5. and the Lambs seven horns▪ and seven eys, Rev. 5. v. 6.) are faithful zelous Ministers of the Word, which wait before the Throne of God and Jesus Christ.

The seven golden Candlesticks, are seven Churches in lesser [...]ib. v. 11, 12, 20. Asia ther named; Ephesus, Smyrna, Pergamus, Thyatira, [Page 130] Sardis, Philadelphia▪ Laodicea; to whom John is bid by God to write in a Book what he saw.

The seven Stars which the Son of Man held in his right hand Ibid. v. 16, 10. (out of whos mouth went a sharp two edged Sword, and his Face shone at the Sun) are the Angels of thos seven Churches, al Diocesan Bishops.

The whit Stone given to him that overcometh, with a new Rev. 2. v. 17. Name writen which no Man knows sav he that receivs it; beto­kens purity of Faith and integrity of Conscience. Haply it relats to an old custom at Rome, to giv Men acquited a whit stone, and the condemned a black, that their Officers might dispose of them accordingly: wherof Ovid.

Mos fuit antiquus, niveis atrisque Lapillis;
His damnare reos, illis absolvere culpam.
'Twas an old wont whit and black Stones to giv:
Thes damnd the guilty, thos did the fault forgiv.

The twenty four Elders sitting on twenty four seats, clothed Rev. 4. v. [...]. in whit with gold Crowns on their Heads round about Gods Throne; are holy Prelats, for number answering to the Priests and Levits twenty four courses of attendance in the Temple.

The four Beasts in midst of the Throne and round about it Ibid v. 6, 7, 8, (being ful of Eys before and behind to shew sagacity, ech of which had six Wings implying agility to execut Gods commands) are the Israelits four Ensigns at their incampings in the Wilder­nes: 1. Like a Lion, for Juda's Camp on the East: 2. A Bul­lock for Reubens on the South: 3. With a Mans face for E­phraims on the West: 4. A flying Eagle for Dans on the North side.

The Book writen within, and sealed with seven Seals on the Rev. 5. v. 1: back side (which the Lamb only was found worthy to open) shews the various changes and chances of the secular Roman Empire til the end or dissolution therof.

The Lamb slain from the beginning, Which stood in midst of Ibid. v. 6. the Throne; and of the four Beasts and Elders (having seven Horns, and seven Eys) is the Lord Jesus Son of God and Man, That taketh away the sins of the World by his Death.

The seven seals which the Lamb opened in order, are plagues Rev 6. per to­tum. or punishments inflicted by God on the World: wherin he useth the ministry of Angels.

The one hundred forty four thousand which were sealed of Rev. 7. v 3. to 8. Israels twelv Tribes (twelv thousand or twelv times one thou­sand in ech) are Christs elect Church, caled afterward unde­filed Virgins, which folow the Lamb wherever he goeth Rev. 14. 1, 5.

The great multitud which none could number (clothed with Ibid. v. 9, 14 whit Robes and Palms in their hands) are the numberless Na­tions, Kindreds, People, Tribes and Toungs, which cam out of tribulation singing praises to God.

The seven Angels with seven Trumpets given them (which Rev 8. v. 1, 2. sounded in order when the seventh Seal was opened) are holy heavenly Messengers, sent to denounce Gods heavy Judgment on the Earths Inhabiters.

The great Star burning like a Lamp or Torch which fel from Ibid. v. 10, 11. Heaven into a third part of Rivers and Fountains (caled Worm­wood which made the Waters bitter that many died) is Augu­stulus Romes last Emperor: who fel from his high Throne, and bittered a third part of Waters, being a Prince of much bale­ful bitternes, anguish, and affliction to al his folowers.

The Angel flying through midst of Heaven, and crying aloud Ibid. v 13. Wo, Wo, Wo to the Earths inhabiters; is an Usher or forerun­ner of three others ready to sound great Woes.

The Locusts or long winged Grashopers, coming from the bot­tom Rev. 9 v. 3. &c. less Pits smoke; are Mahometans derived from Arabia the Country of Locusts, which plagued Egypt.

The King of Locusts (caled in Hebrew Abaddon, in Greec Ibid v. 11. Apollion the destroier) is the Angel of the bottomless Pit, stiled before Satan the old Serpent, the Dragon, the Devil; and af­terward the Accuser.

The four Angels bound at the great River Euphrates (which Ibid. v. 14. &c. the sixth Trumpeting Angel loosed) are the Tures four Sultanies or Signiories: who lay long confined neer that River: but long ago let loos into the Eastern Empire, which it hath since swalowed, with much of West.

The litle open Book which a mighty Angel (Christ) had in his Rev. 10. v. 2, 30. [Page 131] hand, and made Johns belly bitter, being bid to eat it; declares the Churches destinies.

The Temple or inner Court to be measured, is the primitiv Rev. 11. v. 1. Churches State under persecution of Pagan Emperors, before Constantines conversion.

The outer Court not to be mesured, but given to the Gentils Ibid. v. 2. (who shal tread the holy City under foot forty two Annal months or 1260. yeers) is the same Church given to new Idolaters or Image-worshipers caled Gentils.

The two Witnesses clad in sack-cloth, which shal Prophecy Ibid v. 3. 4 5. 1260. annal dais (being two Oliv trees and two Candlesticks) are Patrons or Preachers of divine truth: caled two becaus in the Law every Word shal be established by two Witnesses, and in regard of Gods two Testaments which they use in prophecying. Thes are compared to three famous Pairs in the old Testa­ment viz. Moses and Aaron in the Wildernes, who turned Waters into Blood; Elias and Eliseus under the Baalitic A­postacy, who shut Heaven from rain; and Zerobabel with Jesua at the captivity, who recovered the Jews liberty.

The great City (spiritualy caled Sodom and Egypt, afterward Ibid [...] 8. great Babylon and the Whore) wher our Lord was crucified; is Rome, in whos Street or Province (for so street is often taken) they shal be slain, as our Saviour also suffred.

The Woman travelling with Child, clothed with the Sun (of Rev. 12 v. 1. &c. Righteousnes) having the Moon (the lawish Pedagogy, and Eth­nic Idolatry) under hir feet; and on hir head a Crown of twelv Stars; is Gods tru primitiv Church then in continual partu­rition of spiritual Children.

The great red Dragon with seven Heads and ten Horns, and Ibid. v. 3. 4. seven Crowns on his heads; whos Tail cast a third part of the Stars to Earth, watching the Woman to devour hir Child,; is Heathen Rome worshiping the Devil, which subjected three parts of the then known World to hir rule or Empire: whos rednes denots hir embruing in Saints blood, laying wait for the Child, as Pharaoh did for Israel, and Herod for Christ.

The Manchild who was to rule al Nations with a rod of Iron, Ibid v. 5. is mystical Christ (or Son of the Church) formed in his Members as shal be shewed.

The Womans Child caught up to God and his Throne, is not Identice v. 5. Christ Theanthropos the Virgin Ma [...]ies Son (as many mista­kingly maintain) who is properly and personaly lift up to Gods Throne, sitting at his right Hand: but mystical Christ (or annointed) Son of the Church, analogicaly advanced to the imperial Throne, as al higher Powers are of God: which is meant and realy fulfilled by Constantine and his Christian Successors.

The Angel Michael, who with his Angels fought against the Ibid. v 7. Devil and his il spirits; is not Christ (as som suppose) but one of the chief Princes or seven Archangels specified by Daniel, caled the great Prince, which stands for the Children of Gods People; being a principal Patron or Protector of the Faithful against Satan, whom he here overcam: to whos honor the primitiv Church consecrated September 29. day.

The great Eagle, whos two Wings were given the Woman to Ibid. v. 14, 15. fly into hir place in the Wildernes to be nourished for a time, times, and half; is the Roman Empire divided into East and West: which protected hir in an Erimitical estate from the Dragons fury in perfect tranquility, for 1260. annal dais: but tossed with a flood of Heresies cast from the Serpents mouth to se­duce hir.

The Beast rising out of the Sea with seven Heads and ten Rev. 13 v. 1, 2. Horns, having on his Horns ten Crowns, and on his Heads the name of Blasphemy; is the secular Empire, which had Blasphe­mous new devised Idolatry on his seven Heads at Rome: which was shared into ten Kingdoms or dominions, and al worshiped the Dragon, becaus he gav his power, seat and great authority to this Beast for worshiping or serving him.

The Beast coming out of the Earth, which had two Horns like Ibid. v. 11, 12, a Lamb, but spake as a Dragon; is the Spiritual Roman power or whol Papacy: whos two horns of a Lamb, signify (as Mr. Mede opines) the power of binding and loosing: but as o­thers aver) the two Keis and two Swords born before the Pope to typify his spiritual and temporal Jurisdiction; which seems properer and probabler: but his Doctrins are the voice of the Dragon.

The Image of the ten-horned Beast, which was wounded and did Ibid. v. 14, 15. [Page 132] liv or reviv; is the West Empire or seven headed Beast of Rome, which lay suppressed long, but restored by Pope Leo 3, who ereated Charlemaign Emperor, and his Successors enjoied it for six descents, til it was translated into Germany.

The Beasts mark or name (which is al one, as 'tis after caled Ibid. v. 16. 17. the mark of his name, Rev. 14. 11.) without which none could buy or sel; is Papal Ana [...]hema or Excommunication (as Master Mede maintains) which excluds Men from civil Commerce, company, and communion; but this, by his leav, is a prohibi­tiv brand to exclud such as hav it; not permissiv, to admit such as hav it, and repel only thos that hav it not: Nor can it be ap­plyed as a name or mark. Why not rather Roman Catholic, being a name which al the Beasts Folowers arrogat as their pe­cul [...]ar mark or badg? nor can any sav such communicat.

The number of his name (666) being the number of a Man, Ibid. v. 18. becaus set in numeral letters, is the two horn'd Beast, whos name (wherin that number is infolded) is [...] which grew up when Theodosius divided the Empire into East caled Greecs, and West clyped Latins or Rome, which name ( [...]) subducting the letters of number (as Hebrews, Greecs, and Latins use in Chronograms) by fatal instinct make 666. Vicarius Dei generalis in terris (subtracting the Roman numeral letters) import 666: but this is a periphrastic title, no personal name as the other.

The Lamb standing on Mount Sion, and with him 144000 Rev. 14. 1, &c. undefiled Virgins, having his Fathers and his name writen in their foreheads, who folow the Lamb wherever he goeth; is the Lord Jesus and his impolluted Church, which hated spiritual whordom or Image-worship, and continued constant in the tru Faith amidst Papal p [...]rsecution, as a pure Virgin under Ba­bylon; being the Apostle [...] genuin Progeny.

The name or marke of the Lamb and his Father; is the sign of Iden [...]ice. the Cross in Baptism, as a Seal of their Faith, and Ensign of Christian Profession, to discern them from Infidels; maugre the malice of al Snarlers, Scoffers, or Slanderers.

The Harvest ripe to be reaped, into which the Son of Man Ibid. [...]. [...]. thrust his Sickle; is the cutting down of mystical Babylon, or destruction of the Romis [...] Beasts whol dominion.

The Vintage or Winepress of Gods wrath without the City, Ibid. v. 17. ad finem. from which cam blood to the Horsbridles, by the space of one thou­sand six hundred furlongs; is the final fatal perdition of the Beast and fals Prophet, with al their Complices, Comrads, and Confederats; which shal be acted or accomplished with hor­rid slaughter at the battle of Armageddon, one thousand six hundred furlongs (or two hundred miles) without the City: but whether in Palestine or the Popes Territory, is not reveled.

The seven golden Phials of Gods wrath, which seven Angels Rev. 15▪ v. 7. having the seven last Plagues, received from one of the four Beasts; are so many degrees of punishments preceding the An­tichristian Beasts ruin, even as it grew up gradualy to greatnes: as ther must be a paralel proportion in al things.

The three unclean Spirits of Devils like Frogs, coming Rev. 16. v. 13▪ 14. out of the mouths of the Dragon, Beast, and fals Prophet working miracles, are Papal Emisaries or Ambassadors sent to sommon the Kings and Potentats of the whol World to the battel of that great day of God Almighty: wherin the Dragon shal assist the Beast and fals Prophet, with al his warlike powers, worldly plots, and wily policies: but the seven Angels poured out their seven Phials of Gods wrath.

The Woman in rich attire (sitting on a Scarlet Beast ful of Rev 17 v 3. &c. names of Blasphemy, having seven heads and ten horns) on whos forehead was writ a Mystery, Great Babylon, Mother of Harlots, drunken with the blood of Saints and Martyrs of Jesus; is Romes Papacy which rides on the Empire in the seven headed City; being both but as one head (the seventh and last) consisting of the Temporal and Spiritual State; which is even the eighth, yet one of the seven reigning jointly together.

The Man which sat on a whit Hors in Heaven, caled the Word Rev 19 v 11, &c. of God, who was clothed with a Vesture dipt in blood, having on it and on his thigh a name written, King of Kings and Lord of Lords; is our Lord Jesus, who shal smite the Nations, ruling them wi [...]h a rod of iron, and subdu al with great slaughter.

The Beast and fals Prophet which shal be tormented in a lake Rev 20. v 10. of fire and brimstone for ever; is the whol Papacy and Anti­christ the Pope, head of that State or Society.

The holy City, new Jerusalem, prepared as a Bride adorned for Rev. 21. vers. 2 [Page 133] hir Husband; is the Company of Elect ever ready to receiv hir Bridegroom or best beloved Lord.

The Lambs Bride or Spous that great City holy Jerusalem; is Ibid. v. 9, 10. Christs Militant Church on Earth; which jointly with the tri­umphant in Heaven, makes Christs Spous.

Thes new notions of names (forty four in number) never vented til now, wil, if wel digested, make the meaning more ob­vious in most mysteries. Many mo circumstantial terms are sparsed in the Text, which are amply unveled in the insuing Commentary: but this short Index shal serv to lead strangers steps in this Labyrinth.

Analysis Apocalypseos: The Apocalyps Analysed.

THree principal parts are considerable: 1. The Preface, Analysis▪ Part 1. which is both general of the whol Prophecy, noting the Matter, Pen-Man, and Profit; and special relation to the seven Asian Churches, and in them to the Catholic Church: wherin is a nomination of the person writing, and thos writen to; with a salutation of them and description of Jesus Christ. 2. The 2 substance and Body of the Book; which contains a narration of the Churches State both Militant and Triumphant. The Mili­tant is deciphered at present as it was when John wrot; and for future as it shal be at last day. The Triumphant is declared both for the inchoation at general Judgment, and duration to eter­nity. 3. The Conclusion, which confirms the whol Prophecy: 3 1. By an Angels testimony, who shewed it to John from the Lord: 2. By Christ, who testifies it to be tru, and amplified by Johns earnest request on the Churches behalf: 3. By John who denounceth direful judgments on al that shal ad to, or take from it; with a salutation to the Saints at end of al.

The particulars of the Church Militant exhibit two points. 1 Vision. Ch. 1. 2. 3. 1 A Vision of seven golden Candlesticks, and seven Stars, signi­fying the Asian Churches. 2 A description of thos Churches in seven Epistles directed to the Bishop-Angels of thos seven Seas; in al which is one current constant form observed: which im­ports [Page] 1 A description of Christ Jesus sutable to his Vision: 2 A narrativ of the good commendable, or evil culpable in eve­ry Angel and Church: 3 Promises or menaces proportional to their Virtues or Vices: 4 An exhortation to attend things writen to the Churches. The Churches State for future (speci­aly in Europ) is more mysticaly unfolded: which is to premo­nish hir of grievous persecutions by Tyrans, Heretics, and lims of Antichrist; against al which the holy Ghost givs many com­forts: That God wil be with her in al distresses, whos tribula­tions shal terminat in short space: but hir Enemies shal perish, and she in fine set safe or secure in the life to com: al which things are pointly or precisely expressed in six Visions one after another. Thes are comprised in two Prophecies or Systems Ch 4 [...] 11. of Visions contemporar: the first begins with the sealed Book: the last lasts to the end of Apocalyps: taking in som passages of five Trumpets: viz. the litle Book, the measuring of the Tem­ple, the out Court not to be measured, and fate of the two mourning witnesses.

The Churches future estate is reveled in a mysterious Vision [...] Vision. Ch. 4. of a Book fastned with seven seals; wherin is comprised a pre­paratory to open them, which displais Gods sitting on a Throne in Heaven, with his Ensigns or Emblems of Majesty: viz. twen­ty four Elders and four Beasts, Lightnings, Thunders Voices, Trumpets, seven Lamps which are his seven Spirits, a Sea of Ch 5. glass like Crystal, and Songs of prais by them al to him that sits on the Throne. The sealed Book held in his right hand (which none was worthy or able to open sav the Lamb) shewed to John the Churches future state til the worlds end. In the seventh seal are Ch. 6. presented seven Trumpets, and in the last seven Phials of Gods wrath, ful of the last seven plagues or punishments. The first Seal shews a whit Horse: the secund a red: the third a black, his Ri­der bearing Ballances in his hand: the fourth a pale, his Rider death, with Hel folowing at heels: the fifth the Martyrs Souls under the Altar crying for vengeance, which had whit robes given them with promiss of complet glory, when their felow Brethren should be fulfilled: The sixth sets forth Gods direful Judgments on the Churches Enimies, attended with dreadful signs: viz. A great Earthquake, the Sun becam black, and Moon as blood, [Page 134] the Stars fel to Earth, Heaven departed as a scrole, and every Mountain and Ile moved out of their places. Herat Kings, great Men, cheif Captains, Bond and Free (even al Perse­cutors) fel to despair, hiding in Dens, desiring the Mountains and Rocks to cover them from the Lamb.

The seventh contains more Mysteries then any: viz. A Vi­sion 3 Vision. Ch. 7. Ch. 8. of seven Angels with seven Trumpets, as shal be specified: but the holy Ghost comforts the Church, and an Angel seals Gods Servants in the Foreheads as a sign of their deliverance. At opening wherof was half an hours silence in Heaven, beto­kening great things to com; and the Angels addressed to sound. The first sounded, And Hail mixd with Fire and Blood insued: which burnt a third part of al green things. At sound of the secund, A mighty Mountain burning with Fire was cast into Sea, and a third part becam Blood. At the third, A great Star caled Wormwood burning as a Lamp fel, making a third part of Rivers and Fountains bitter, that many died of them. At fourth, A third part of Sun, Moon, and Stars was dark­ned: that the day and night for a third part shined not. Here intervens as a preparatory transition to the three last Trum­pets, An Angel flying through midst of Heaven, crying a loud, Wo, Wo, Wo to the Earths Inhabiters by reason of the three Angels yet to sound. The fift sounded (which is the first Ch 9. 1 Wo. of Wo) And a Star fel from Heaven to Earth: and he opened the bottomless Pit with a Key, whence arose Smoke darkning Sun and Air; out of which cam Locusts, whos effects are notably described, together with their King Abad­don or Apollyon. The sixt (or secund Wo) sounded, wh [...]ch 2 Wo. Ch. 10. loosed four Angels bound at Euphrates, who were prepared to slay a third part of Men: their Army being two hundred thou­sand thousand Horsmen, which are largely described, with their woful effects. Here a mighty Angel (Jesus Christ) descended with a litle Book in his hand open: who set his right Foot on the Sea, and left on Earth; swearing with lifted up hands by him that livs for ever, ther should be no more time: but at sound of the seventh Trumpet, the mystery of God shal be finished, as he declared to the Prophets. This Angel cried loud, as if a Lion roared, or seven Thunders uttered their voices: which [Page] John was about to writ, but a voice from Heaven bid him seal it up, and eat the little Book (which in his mouth was sweet as Hony, but made his Belly bitter) that he might Prophecy. Then [...]b 11. was John bid to mesure Temple, Altar, and Worshipers with a reed, but not the out Court; for the Gentils must tread the holy City under foot forty two Moneths: and he gav his two Witnesses power to Prophecy, one thousand two hundred sixty dais clad in Sack-cloth; but the beast rising from the bottomless Pit shal kil them, whos dead Bodies shal ly in the street of the great City three dais and half unburied: who shal reviv and ascend to Heaven to their Enimies great grief and terror. The seventh 3 Wo. (or third of Wo) sounded, which finished Gods mysteries, and his Churches miseries: then were great voices heard in Heaven say­ing, the Kingdoms of this World are becom the Lords and his Christs: to whom the twenty four Elders sung a gratulation at­tended with Lightnings, Thundrings, Voices, Earthquake, and great Hail. Here the first Prophecy or System of Visions (which contains chiefly the fourth Empires condition) ends: after which the secund (contemporar with the former of Seals and Trumpets) folows: foretelling the Churches future state til the last day. Herin three principal points are handled [...] 1. Hir tribulations 4 Vision. by several Enemies: 2. Hir deliverance by their destruction: 3. Hir happy condition after deliverance. Most Interpreters make both Visions one continued Prophecy, yet not so pro­perly; tho in substance neer one. The Churches persecutions Ch. 12. by several Enimies; are pourtraied in this fourth Vision: but the parturient Womans pursuit by the Dragon most pointly; who waged war with the remnent of Hir seed. The Dragons Ch. 13. instruments are the Beast with seven heads and ten borns ri­sing from the Sea; and that coming out of the Earth which had two horns like a Lamb, but spake as a Dragon. The events Ch. 14. of this persecution, is the Saints victory by their constant con­fession of Christ even to death; which is amplified by the causes and effects.

The Vision of seven Phials ful of Gods wrath, and the seven 5 Vision. last plagues poured out by seven Angels; declare the Churches Ch. 15. deliverance by hir Enimies destruction. The first poured his Ch. 16. plagues on the Earth: the next on the Sea: the third on Rivers [Page 135] and Fountains: the fourth on the Sun: the fift on the Beasts seat: the sixt on Euphrates: the seventh into the Air, whos effects see in the context.

In the sixt Vision many mysteries are manifested, being be­fore 6 Vision. Ch. 17. but obscurely mentioned: which point out the Rise, Reign, Seat, Vassals, Success, and final fal of Antichrist with al the Churches Enimies. Here behold the great Whores judg­ment and event: wherin a lifely description of the Whore to be judged, both by visional representation of a Woman sitting on a scarlet Beastful of Names of Blasphemy (having on hir fore­head a Name writen, A Mystery, Babylon the Great, Mother of Harlots and Abominations) and by real explanation, that the Beasts seven Heads are seven Hils, and ten Horns ten King­doms. The Instruments which shal destroy the Whore are thos ten Horns or Kings, who shal hate and make hir desolat or naked, eat hir flesh, and burn hir with fire. The promulga­tion Ch. 1 [...]. of Babylons perdition, is performed by three Angels: one declares the certainty, 'tis falen and becom the habitation of De­vils: another warns al Gods People to com out of hir for fear of hir plagues setting forth hir V [...]ssals sad laments crying; alas, alas, that great City: the last seals up hir ruins irrecoverablenes, under the type of A great Milstone cast into the Sea. Then folow gra­tulatory Ch. 19. exultations of the Heavenly company singing Hale­lujah to God, both for the Whores judgment, and preparation of the Lambs Wife to marry with him: together with the Lamb and his Armies total conquest over the Beast, fals Prophet, and earthly Kings with their Armies: wherto al Fowls are invited to eat their flesh.

The last Vision shews the event of the Whores judgment, 7 Vision, Ch. 20. which is triple: 1. The Saints safety by chaining up the Dragon or Devil for one thousand yeers in the bottomless pit: 2. The Martyrs living and reigning with Christ one thousand yeers; but the rest of the dead lived not again til thos yeers were fini­shed: 3. The Saints miraculous deliverance from the Nations (Gog and Magog) by fire from Heaven to devour them; when their Deceiver is cast into a Lake of fire and Brimstone; wher­upon folows the general judgment of the dead (smal and great) according to their works. So far the Church Militants future [Page] state on Earth: next folows the Triumphants happy condition in Heaven for ever: which is gloriously decyphered with the Water of Life and Tree in midst of the Street, as the Text Ch. 211 Ch. 22. shews.

The conclusion with its three parts, is Analysed at first a­mong the three chief Heads of this Prophecy, which shal not be Tautologicaly repeated or reiterated.

Mr. Dury in a prolix Preface to the German Divines Clavis, hath prefixed an ample Analysis, which is abundantly abridged, and annexed for variety of wit. The Title tels, that the Book Ch. 1. v. 1. is a Revelation of Jesus Christ, who is the Subject-matter, sith the sole scope is to make him manifest. This Title contains three things: 1. the Author God, who gav it to Christ: 2. The use for which he gav it, to shew his Servants the things that shal shortly befal.: 3. The means by which Christs ma­nifestation is put forth to this use. 1. He sent and signified Ibid v. 2. 3. &c. it by an Angel to John: 2. The Preface directs either generaly to al Churches that bear record of Gods Word and Testimony of Jesus, and al things he saw; which wil make them blessed that read, hear, and keep the same: or specialy to the seven Asian Churches of Jesus Christ: who is described: 1. By the properties or effects of his first coming in the Flesh, who is the faithful Witnes and first begotten of the dead, Prince of al earthly Kings; which loved us and washed our sins in his Blood; making us Kings and Priests to God his Father: 2. By the properties and effects of his secund coming with Clouds: when every Ey (even thos that pierced him) shal see him, and al Kindreds wail becaus of him. 3. By a narrativ of the Vi­sions, which extends from ch. 1. v. 9. to ch. 22. v. 6. 4. By the conclusion comprised ch. 22. v. 6. ad finem. Here consi­der: 1. The certainty, importance, and use of it: 2. The effects which it wrought in John, who was ready to worship the Angel, but bid to forbear: 3. The command which he had not to seal the Prophecies, with the reason of it: 4. The authority therof is repeated, becaus Jesus sent his Angels to testify thes things in the Churches; becaus 'tis ratified by the Spirit, Bride, and al Beleevers; becaus the perfection is such, as no thing may be added or subtracted on pain of eternal [Page 136] plagues and perdition. The Contents of the Prophecy are tri­ple: 1 The things which John saw in the first Vision: viz. 1 Vision. Chap. 1. Christs presence with his Churches, who is their Mediator and high Priest, as walking in the midst of the seven golden Candle­sticks; their King, as holding their seven Stars or Angels in his right hand; and Prophet, as out of whos mouth went a sharp two edged sword of Gods Word. 2 The things which then were; Chap. 2, 3. viz. the seven Churches to whom John, by Christs appoint­ment sent Epistles; wherin al perfections and imperfections, promises and menaces, admonitions and reproofs, exho [...]tations and precepts, are intended to al Churches and Pastors so wel as thes; sith no Prophecy is of privat interpretation: for the pro­em and period of every Epistle is, Let him that hath an ear h [...]ar what the spirit saith to the Churches. 3 The things to b [...]fal here­after, Ch. 4 t [...]l ch 22. which transcend from the Churches on Earth to the Kingdom of Heaven, wher John saw the things which must be hereafter. The secund Vision shews, 1 What the Churches constitution 2 Vision. in Heaven is; how ordered about Gods Throne, and set in his presence: 2 What the administration of affairs in Heaven, and Chap. 4. the Churches government on Earth by Jesus Christ is; who a spotless Lamb flain meritoriously, purchased that honor to open Chap 5. the sealed Book of Gods Counsils; being his seven Eys of Wisdom, and seven Horns of Power, able alone to discharge such a trust: 3 What changes chanced in the World, and the Chap. 6. Churches condition at opening of the first six seals; wher is shewed, how at preaching of the Gospel great troubles and ter­rible Chap. 7. wars arose among Men, wherin Christs Martyrs ly as Sa­crifices under the Altar crying for vengeance; but are comfort­ed that they shal be avenged after a short season, and their Eni­mies terrified at first executing of the Lambs wrath upon them: Yet lest judgment prepared should fal on his Friends, a pre­ventiv Chap. 8. provision is made to seal and sever them from the rest, that no hurt, heat or hunger shal annoy them. 4 What de­struction betides or is brought on the World at opening the seventh seal, and what glory to the Saints: which last includs al that folows to the end of this Book. Here seven Angels with seven Trumpets declare Gods Judgments on the Earth; but the [Page] three last remarkably differ from the four first, which giv warn­ing of great Wo thrise threatned by tripetion to the Earths In­habitants: but the four first tend to depriv the World of a third part of their comforts, as in trees, green grass, the Se [...], with al Animals therin, Ships, Rivers, Fountains, Sun, Moon, Stars the light of day and night. The three Wo-Trumpets Chap. 9. produce heavier plagues, both by Locusts (which shal so torment Men, that they shal seek death, but not find it) and Euphratean Horsmen, which shal slay a third part of Men; yet the rest re­pented not.

The third Vision of A mighty Angel coming from Heaven, 3 Vision. Chap. 10. clothed with a cloud and Rainbow on his head (his face like the Sun and feet as pillars of fire, who stood on the Sea and Earth) had a litle Book open in his hand, which John being bid eat up, and in­abled him to Prophecy. The three past Visions shew three sub­stantial Note. differences of things reveled to John, and three main changes of his Spirit in receiving them: the first contains Christs ministration of his Offices on Earth among his Chur­ches: the next of his Offices in Heaven over al the World, to preserv and propagat his Church: the last of his Offices both in Heaven and Earth, to finish al wickednes in the World, and to perfect his Churches felicity. In al which manifestations, he is presented sutable to the things reveled: 1 As a Man in dealing with Men: 2 As a Lamb offred to God in dealing with God: 3 As a mighty Angel to incounter Satan with his Angels and powers of darknes in the World. The matter of this Vision is Chap. 11. to shew, when and how the mystery of God, spoken by the Prophets shal be finished? wherin 1 John had a Reed as a Red given to mete the Temple, Altar, and them that worship: 2 The out-Court is given to the Gentils, who shal tread on the holy City fourty two moneths: 3 The two sack cloth witnesses had power to Prophecy one thousand two hundred and threescore dais: 4 The Beast rising from the bottomless pit shal slay them, but after three dais and a half, they revived and ascended to Heaven in a cloud, which terrified their Enimies: 5 Great joy was in Heaven, becaus this worlds Kingdoms are becom the Lords and his Christs; that he may reward his Saints and Servants. Ther folow several sub­ordinat Visions, which concern the Church typified by a wo­man, Chap. 12. [Page 137] and respect 4 times: 1 Before she fled into the wildernes, who brought a Man-child, which the Dragon waited to devour; but he was rapt up to Heaven, and the Dragon with his Angels cast to Earth by the Angel Michael: yet he persecuted the Woman, and made war with the remnent of hir seed. 2 While she abode ther, wher two Beasts occurred; one rising from the Sea with seven Chap. 13. heads and ten horns, and on his horns ten Crowns, with the name of Blasphemy on his heads: A secund coming out of the Earth, who had two horns like a Lamb, but spake as a Dragon: he did great wonders making fire descend from Heaven, and deceived them that dwel on Earth; bidding them make an Image to the other Beast, which was wounded and did liv; and caused such as would not worship it to be slain: He also made al receiv a mark in their right hands or foreheads, that none might buy or sel sav he that had the mark, name, or number of his name, which is 666. During thes Beasts joint reign, the Churches state on mount Chap. 14. Sion, and Gods imparting his Wil to the World (touching the everlasting Gospel, Babylons future fal, punishment of the Beasts folowers, and gathering the Harvest and Vintage) are declared. Gods Judgments on the Beast, are poured out in seven Chap. 15. golden Phials of his last plagues, by seven Angels coming out of the Temple in Heaven, clothed with pure white linnen, and their brests girded with gold girdles. The first poured his on the Earth, Chap. 16. and a noisom sore fel on the Beasts worshipers: The secund poured his on the Sea, which becam as blood of a dead Man: The third his on Rivers and Fountains, which turnd to blood: The fourth his on the Sun, which scorched Men with fire, that they blasphemed Gods name: The fift his on the Beasts seat, whos Kingdom was darkned, that Men gnawed their toungs for torment: The sixt his on Euphrates which was dried up, that the way of the Eastern Kings might be prepared: The seventh his into the Air, whence folowed Voices, Lightnings, Thunders, and such a mighty Earth­quake, as the like was never seen by Men; and huge hail [...] eve­ry stone weighing a Talent, and Men blasphemed God [...] of this plague. Ther cam three unclean Spirits of Devils, lik [...]ogs from the mouths of the Dragon, Beast, and fals Prophet; which by lying miracles gathered the Kings to battel of that great day of God Almighty at Armageddon. Next the judgment and mystery [Page] of Babylons great Whore, sitting on a scarlet Beast with seven Chap. 17. heads and ten horns, is shewed to John; that the seven heads are seven hils, and ten horns ten Kings. After it Babylons destru­ction Chap. 18. is declared, and great lamentation of several sorts made for it, as may ther be read. 3 As she cam out of the wildernes, Chap. 19. great gratulations are given to God for perdition of Baby­lon, and preparation for the Lords marriage with his wife: then the Armies of Heaven on whit Horses, under conduct of Christ ( caled the Word of God, who had on his vesture and thigh a name writen, King of Kings and Lord of Lords) made war with the Beast, fals Prophet, and Kings; wherto an Angel invited al Fowls to eat the flesh of the slain; but the Beast and fals Pro­phet were taken, and cast alife into a lake burning with fire and brimstone. 4. During hir reign with Christ (after she cam out Chap. 20. of the wildernes) one thousand yeers; when Satan being loosed a little space, shal deceiv the Nations ( Gog and Magog) to ga­ther them to battel: but fire cam from God and devoured them. Lastly, A new Heaven and Earth (caled the holy City, new Je­rusalem, Ch. 21. Ch. 22 coming down from God) prepared as a Bride for hir Hus­band; is pourtraied at large.

Thes Analyses in a prosal method or maner, are plainer bet­ter, At end of his Annotations and briefer for the vulgar sort, then such as are set in Secti­ons and Subsections: but Dr. Deodat hath a very ample one on the Apocalyps, in substance the same with the 2 former, or very litle varying, which he that lists may survey. Now to my main task. The Author of Apocalyps, is John the Divine, Christs best Introduction. beloved Disciple (Son to Zebedee a Fisher Man, and Brother of James the greater, whom Herod the King [...]lu with the Sword) who wrot the fourth Gospel, and three general Epi­stles: but not John a Presbyter in thos dais, as Eusebius and Di­onysius Alex: deem; nor any other of that name, as al Antients agree: for he only was exiled to Patmos A. C. 97, wher thos Rev. 1. 9, 10. Rev. 1. vers. 1, 2, 11. Visions were presented on the Lords day, to which he gav that appellation, mis-named by many the Sabbath, without any Scriptural warrant, nor did any of the Fathers so stile it. The Authority also is every way divine, being indited by Christ Je­sus, Authority. as God gav it him, and sent to John by an Angel, that he should communicat it to the Churches; who wrot it in a Book, [Page 138] and sent it to the seven Churches of minor Asia. So John im­parted it to the Churches, an Angel to John, Christ to the An­gel, and God to Christ Jesus: what can be a more divine Ori­gin or Pedigree? Specialy being an inspired Prophecy? For Moses the Man of God and his peculiar Favorit, had the ho­nor to Pen the first Book of the old Testament, and John Christs chief favorit the last of the new Testament, so the one commands old Israelits not to ad or take from Gods Word; Deut. 4. 2. and the other threatens al, which shal ad to the Words of his Prophecy, that God wil inflict the plagues writen therin: but Rev. 22. 18, 19. if any shal detract, God wil take away his part from the Book of Life and holy City.

The Excellence of it apppeers many wais: for the stile is Excellence. most statly and sublime; the matter ful of Majesty and My­stery: the expressions pathetical and pithy: som mystical in dark Visions, to exercise the Judgments of the wisest; som more facil or familar to succour the infirmities of the weak­est. Much more might be added ingeneral: but I hasten to Mr. Medes Clavis and Comment, whom Dr. Twiss highly admires saying, he hath sundry rare notions stiled Specimina or Essais, wherin he excels; specialy in rendring the Revelations right sens, which is most Tropical or Figurativ. As in the mystery Rev. 12▪ of the battle in Heaven, and casting Satan to Earth; he shews that Stats and Kingdoms in the politic World, are resembled in Scripture sutable to the Natural: wherin Heaven and Earth denot the Nobility and Commonalty. For Heaven consists of Sun, Moon, and Stars of greater or lesser magnitud: as in a Realm is a King, Queen, Nobles, and other officers of divers degrees: but on Earth, is much more variety of Creatures: as Trees, Herbs, Flowers, Fishes, Beasts, Serpents: so among People of any Community no less difference of Trades and Professions.

He destinguisheth the whol Prophecy into the Book closed Division. with seven Seals, comprising an History from the Gospels first preaching to the Worlds end, which sets forth the fates or fortunes of the Roman Empire: and the litle open Book, which includs the doings or destinies of the Christian Church. The first presents the seven Seals and seven Trumpets: for the [Page] seventh Seal produceth the seven Trumpets. 1. The first six Seals contain the story of the Empires condition or con­tinuance til Constantin; when ther being a marvelous meta­morphosis from Pagan to Christian; this change is compared to the Worlds end, and by giving of a new, which is very semblable. 2. The seven Trumpets (which contain the seven Rev. 9. Seals) represent Gods judgments on the World, for opposing the Gospel, and oppressing the Saints. 1. By Ethnic Empe­rors, for which the dition or dominion was gradualy rent into ten Kingdoms. Which is unfolded in four degrees therof, be­ing the subject of the four first Trumpets. 2. The other three are termed Wo Trumpets, denouncing divine judgments on the Antichristian World, or degenerat Stats of Christiendom: 1. By Sarrasens in the first Wo Trumpet: 2. By Turcs in the Rev. 11. 15. secund: 3. By the Worlds end in the last.

Medi Clavis & Expositio: Med's Key and Exposition.

HIs Clavis contains sundry Synchronicisms or concur­rences The Key. of things in one time, set forth under the Seals. For ther is a Quaternion of Prophecies Synchronizing in e­quality or identity of Time: 1 Of The Womans abode in the Wildernes for a time, times and half: 2. Of The seven headed Beast restored and ruling forty two months: 3. Of The out-Court or holy City troden by the Gentils so long: 4. Of The two Witnesses prophecying in Sack-cloth one thousand two hun­dred sixty daies: al which three times signify the same. For chro­nical identity hinders not, but one may be before or after another, tho they agree in term of yeers: therfore the coevity shal be proved by other characters, that they belong to the self same times.

1. The times of the Beast and Womans mansion in the Rev. 12. 6. 14. Wildernes, begin at one instant; viz. the Dragons foil, when he was cast to the Earth: for when Michael threw him from Heaven, the Woman escaped: Ergo they identicat.

2. The times of the Beast and Two Witnesses testimony Rev 11. 7. [Page 139] being also equal, expire together at end of the sixth Trumpet: Ergo they commenced at once, and synchronize through­out.

3. The Witnesses times and the Court or holy City pos­sessed Ibid. v 2. 13, 18. by the Gentils forty two months, which conspire, as al grant: Ergo they synchronize most exactly and equaly.

4. The Woman in the Wildernes, the Beasts dominion, tread­ing down the holy City, and two Witnesses prophecying joint­ly concur: Ergo al four synchronize.

5. Now for the next Synchronicism; The two hornd Rev. 13. v. 3. to 15. Beast (wherin the fals Prophet is Head) complies with the seven-Headed or ten Hornd Beast (caled the other Beasts Image) which when his deadly wound was restored to pristin estate, was to rule forty two months: and thos being ended, he did great wonders, exercising al his power in the seven Headed Be [...]sts presence: but both are taken and cast alife into a firy Lake burn­ing Rev. 19 v. 20. with Brimstone: Ergo both sympathizing in their rise and ruin (wherof one used the others power in his presence) con­temporize throughout. Wher Note, that whatever is ascribed Note. to the Septicep Beast of the evil he commited, or worship given him; was doon after his instauration or cure of the wound: but the ten Horns belong to his first Head, or restored estate, as the Angel informs saying; Ther are seven Kings: Rev. 17 10. fiv are falen, one is, and the last is not yet com, which must con­tinu a short space: so the sixth was then in St. Johns dais, but the Horns not then com: Ergo it must pertain to the seventh or last Head.

The two hornd Beast and fals Prophet are one, as Irenaeus App [...]ndix. observed: as by comparing Rev. 13. v. 13. to 16. with Rev. 19. v. 20. wil cleerly appeer. The septicep ten-hornd Beast, Rev. 13 12, 14. is caled the Beasts Image Rev. 14. 9, 11. Rev. 15. 2. Rev. 16. 2. Rev. 19. 20. Rev. 20. 4. For this Beast acknowledging the fals Prophet to be his restorer, is ruled by his Wil as suprem Lord, and cald his Image: not whos similitud he bears (for in that respect he rather resembles the seven headed Dragon, nor of his estate before the wound, after whos exemple he blasphemed God, and made war with the Saints) but that which the two hornd Beast speaking as a Dragon restored, [Page] and claims for his own; the Genetiv being passivly taken to signify the Possessor: as the Beasts mark is not stamped on himself, but on thos that worship him. For the Beasts Image wherto the fals Prophet gav life, caused al which would not worship it to be slain. Ther be but two Beasts pourtraid in the Apocalyps, and wher the Beast and fals Prophet are named together, the Image is not cited being both one. For 'tis that Rev. 15. 2. Beasts Image (whos Name and number is specified) viz. the two-hornd, who is the others prime principal founder.

6. The times of the great Harlot or mystical Babylon and Rev. 17. 3. septicep ten hornd Beast synchronize: for the Beast carries the Whore sitting on him, whos ten Horns or Kings, take au­thority with him at once when he was restored: but when his body cam to be dissolved, they hated the whore making hir na­ked and desolat, whos flesh they burnt with fire.

7. The hundred forty four thousand Virgins sealed, con­temporize Rev. 14. 1. with the Whore and Beast; for they deter men from al Communion with him, or his Image or mark: being so opposit to him and his folowers, when the bonds of holy Souldiers persevered in allegiance to the Lamb, bearing his name and his Fathers in their foreheads, as other Apostats did the Beasts mark in their right hands or foreheads. Thus the Capitulation. ten hornd Beast revived, synchronized with the Woman in the Wildernes, with treading the holy City under foot, and the Rev. 12. 7. witnesses mourning in sackcloth: so doth the two hornd Beast with the ten hornd, and the Whore with both: as also the company of sealed Virgins with the Whore and Beast: al which make a singular synchronical symphony of al with al and ech.

8. The inner Court measured with a Reed, the VVomans parturition, the Dragons watching hir, and his fight with Mi­chael Rev. 13. 1. 2. 3. temporize: for so soon as she brought forth a Manchild (who was to rule al Nations with a rod of Iron) she fled into the Desart to be nourished for a time, times, and half, or one thousand two hundred sixtie daies; and immediatly insued that battle in Heaven: when the Dragon and his Angels were cast to Earth: then he resigned his place and great authority to the cured septicep Beast, whom al the world wondred at, [Page 140] and worship the Doner Dragon: Ergo the Courts measuring, the womans Childing, the Dragons waiting, and his Duel with Michael synchronize, even at the very Epoche of St. Johns re­peated Prophecy.

9 The pouring out of seven Phials by seven Angels, synchro­nize Rev. 15. 2, 3. with the Beasts downfal and Babylons destruction; for which the Victors sing Moses triumphant hymn.

Thus far of the nine chief Synchronicisms: Now the Apoca­lyps contains three parts: 1 The Vision of seven golden Can­dlesticks or Asian Churches, which takes up the three first chap­ters. 2 The Prophecy of seven Seals and Trumpets, from Chap. 4. to 10. vers. 8. 3 The Prophecy of the litle open Book, Rev. 16. 10, 19 or body of Prophetic Visions, which John being bid eat up, from Chap. 10. vers. 8. to the end of al. That this is a repetition of the Prophecy, appeers by the Angels words to John; Thou must Prophecy again ( [...]) to many People, Nations, Toungs, and Rev. 10. v. 11. Kings: which are plainly distinguishd from the rest of Prophe­cies.

He hath other synchronicisms of Seals, Trumpets, and Phi­als too tedious and invious or obscure: beatus qui intelligit. Howbeit som confused collections shal be exhibited to be bet­ter sifted or scanned.

1 The seventh Seal touching the first six Trumpets, is the Rev. 8. same with the two Beasts; which concur with the company of one hundred forty four thousand Virgins, being opposit to the Rev. 7. Beasts reigning: this initiats with the sixth Trumpet or begin­ning of the seventh; for sith the witnesses mourning one thou­sand two hundred threescore dais, ends with the sixth Trum­pet, or as the seventh begins; the Beasts forty two moneths must needs expire then also, and by consequent the Beasts ty­ranny is confined in the compas of the first six Trumpets: For the Vision of witnesses being the first repeated Prophecy; the most wise Spirit runs through (as a Weaver doth his warp with Rev. 11. his woof) the whol body of repeated Prophecies, to connect them aptly with the Seals. The Beasts overthrow, Cities fal, Note▪ slaughter of Men by an Earthquake, are not meant of the Beasts utter destruction, but end of his authority and reigning forty two moneths; which the Beasts and two witnesses synchroni­cisms [Page] being granted, must determin together: For the Beast shal remain a short space, but so unlike former, as scars to be reputed the same; which soon after, under the seventh Trum­pet, shal be absolutly abolished.

2 The seven Phials of wrath (being so many degrees of the Rev 16. 10. Beasts fal or fate) synchronize with the inchoation of his de­struction: but his Kingdom fel so fast the sixth Trumpet yet sounding (which put a period to his power of forty two months over the Saints) that he cannot be quit ruined til the fifth Phial be poured out, when his seat shal be shaken and king­dom Rev. 10. 6. darkned: Ergo fiv Phials were poured out, yer the sixth Trumpet ceased: for the seventh Phial of consummation con­curs with the seventh Trumpets initiation, which also sounds the termination.

3 The thousand yeers of the Dragons binding and shutting up in the Rev. 20. the bottomless pit with a seal set theron, that he should no more de­ceiv the Nations; concurs with the seventh consummation Trumpet and Beasts confusion: for the use was to seal up a place or prison sure, as Darius did the Lions Den with a ring, and the Jews Christs Sepulcher by sealing the stone. Som sup­pose his casting down to Earth and shutting up is the same; but 'tis not so. For his ejecting from Heaven hindred not his do­ing harm on Earth: but being clos prisoner in chains he cannot Rev. 12. wander to doo hurt; nor doo the things related agree, sith du­ring the first six Seals, and under the six first Trumpets of the seventh, he was free or loos: Ergo his shutting up for one thou­sand yeers fals under the seventh Trumpet: For he was not bound at the battle, nor while the woman staid in the wilder­ness, nor during the ten hornd Beasts reign; sith his Scholar, the fals Prophet seduced People with signs and wonders al that Rev 9. 11. time. Yea the Locusts King (caled the Angel of the bot­tomless pit) is the very Dragon or Satan then not sealed when the sixth Angel poured out his Phial, and seventh ready to pour his. For three unclean Spirits like Frogs, cam out of the Dragons, Rev. 16. 13, 14. Beasts, and fals Prophets mouths, which wrought wonders, and went to the Kings of the World: Ergo the thousand yeers of his being bound, belong to the seventh Trumpet. So the war when Satan, after a thousand yeers, is loosed a little space differs from [Page 141] that when the Beast and fals Prophet are cast alife into the burn­ing Rev. 20. 10. Brimstone Lake. For the first war is waged by him that sat on a whit Hors (caled Gods Word) who smot the Nations with a sharp Sword, and was folowed by Armies in Heaven on Whit Horse [...]: But in the last at Armageddon, God sent fire from Hea­ven to devour them, and Satan is cast into that Lake wher the Beast and fals Prophet are before: For he is first clapt close in prison a thousand yeers and then loosed; but now condemned to be incessantly tormented for ever. Sith then the war with the Beast and fals Prophet differs from this last, either 'tis to be waged during thos thousand yeers (which cannot be, sith Satan was then bound) or before, as it must needs be: Ergo thos yeers commence at or after the Beasts casting into a firy Lake, or ra­ther together at one time.

4 The thousand yeers of Christs Imperial reign (at coming Rev. 20. 4. wherof, the triumphant Elders sang gratulatory Hymns to God) being immediatly at conquest of the Beast and Babylon, which contemporize with the seventh trumpet: For this King­dom is given to the Saints as a reward of their faith and con­stancy, becaus they did not worship the Beast, nor his Image, nor receiv his mark. This is that Kingdom caled Christs, who Rev. 11. 15. shal reign for ever: which the Angels foretold, that the mystery of God should be finished at sound of the seventh Trumpet, as the Rev. 10 6, 7. Prophets declared. Then neither the Beasts forty two months, nor the witnesses mourning one thousand two hundred three­score dais, nor a period of a time, times, and half (no nor time it self) shal any more remain.

5 The new Jerusalem, the Lambs Bride, and seventh con­summation Rev. 21. 2. Trumpet, or time of the Beasts and Babylons con­fusion synchronize: for new Jerusalem is the Lambs Bride or beloved City, which immediatly at the thousand yeers end is compassed by the last troop ( Gog and Magog) of Satan then loosed for a little space: Ergo it was extant before at sound of the seventh trumpet. At pouring out the seventh Phial, when the Beast is destroied, ther cam a loud voice from the Rev 16 [...] 17. Throne saying, it is doon: so he that sat beholding new Je­rusalem descend from Heaven said to John; Lo, I make al Rev. 21 5, 6. things new, it is doon: I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and [Page] end: Ergo new Jerusalem begins at the Phials last term, It is doon; when the whore was dispatched, and so symbolizeth with that time which ins [...]eth the Beasts perdition. For one of the Phial Angels shewd John the whores condemnation while the Rev. 17. Phials were pouring out, and one at least behind: which Angel shewed him the great City holy Jerusalem (or Lambs Bride) descending from God when it becam glorious, the Phials being ended, and Beast with Babylon destroied: Ergo it began with the seventh trumpet.

6 The numberless multitud of al Nations, Kinreds, People, and Toungs bearing triumphant Palms, who are Citizens of new Rev 7 9. 16. 17 Jerusalem (that shal hunger or thirst no more; for the Lamb shal lead them to living Fountains of water, and God shal wipe al tears from their eys) concur with the seventh trumpet, or space of time from the Beasts destruction.

Thes are his several sorts of Synchronicisms, which I hav put in so plain English as my smal skil in such sublime speculations can perform: wherto heads this brief period or perclose.

After Christs thousand yeers reign, and Satans condemnati­on [...]. to eternal fire, folows the general Resurrection and final Judgment. After new Jerusalem folows Paradise with the tree of Life in midst, like Eden; having a River on ech side Rev▪ 20. 11, 12, 13. 14. Rev. 22. 12 of the street: which is the worlds consummation, and conclu­sion of this Revelation, when God wil giv every Man as his work shal be. Such a Key of Synchronicisms (or Apocalyptic compass) wil open al the hid mysteries of this Book; with which no part of the old Testament (no not Daniels Visions or Vati­cinations) can compare for certainty or singular structure, to find out the right interpretation by concent or harmony of times, and concurrence of things. Lord, open every Mans [...]ys, that he may discern thy wondrous works of wisdom.

Commentarii Compendium: The Brief of his Commentary.

NExt ensues his cu [...]ious Comment, which contains two Comment. principal parts: 1 Of the seven Seals and seven Trum­pets: [Page 142] 2 Of the litle Book, both being vastly tedious and im­perspicuous: but som sporadical excerptions shal be presented more plausible and perceptible; craving pardon for not abbre­viating al particular parcels.

He begins with the Apocalyptic Theater) wher John behold Part 1. al as on a Stage) which is that imperial Heavenly Session of God and the Church: exactly framed after the form of old Israels incamping in the Wildernes: both which he compares Rev 4. Numb. 1. 52. at large wel worth perusal, but too prolix to capitulat. He o­mits the Vision of seven Asian Churches in the three first chap­ters, and parts the rest into two Prophecies: 1. Of the Seals, which comprehends the Empires destinies: 2. Of the litle Book which concerns the Church or Christian Religion; til in fine both be united in the Church, and this Worlds King­doms Rev. 11. 15. becom the Lords Kingdoms, and his Christs. The scope of the sealed Book is to shew the distances of insuing times di­stinguished by characters of events: in what order of changes and chances (the Roman Empire running on) Christ should vanquish the Gods of this World with whom he waged war: Rev. 5. who must reign til he hath put al Enemies underfeet: viz. al terren power and authority, as St. Paul expounds. The first 1 Cor. 15. 24. 25. six Seals distinguish divers different times of the Empire then florishing; til Christ shal suppress the Heathen Gods or Idols in al thos dominions.

The first shews the origin of Christs victory, when 1 Seal. Rev. 4 7. the fals Gods fel, and the worshipers being pierced with the Gospels arrows▪ submitted to Christ the conqueror: who hath not yet fully overcom, but laid a fair founda­tion of Victory to be gradualy finished. The discloser of this Seal is The first Beast like a Lion, shewing one on a whit Rev 6. 1. 2. Hors, with a Bow and Crown given him: this is Christ or som Emperor (haply Vespasian) by whos conduct the war is wa­ged, and victory won; as the folowing Seals are disposed or directed by Emperors.

The secund shews murders and intestin slaughters, which 2 Seal. the next Beast like a Bullock discloseth, by One riding on a red Hors with a great Sword: which was Trajan a mighty warrier born in Spain: who made the third bloody primitiv persecu­tion, [Page] and the Jews raised fierce wars in Lybia, beside many momutinies in most parts of the Empire.

The third shews a voice saying, A measure of Wheat for a 3 Seal. Rev. 6. 5. 6. penny, and three of Barly for a penny: see thou hurt not the Oil and Wine: by which most Men deem dearth and famin to be meant; yet he rather resembles it to the severe justice then executed. The discloser is The third Beast with a Mans face, by one on A black Hors, with a pair of Ballances in his hand: which is Septimius Severus an African: in whos reign was no noted famin, but famous justice, wherof the Ballance is an Emblem. The pricing of Victuals seems to sound thus: take not Wheat or Barly from any til du price be paid, and keep the like law in Oil and Wine: that is defraud none, nor steal or purloin for this Septimius and Alexander Severus (both of one name) shortly succeding, were most strict justiciars denoted in this third Seal. See Aurelius of the first, and Lampridius of the last.

The fourth shews Killing with the Sword, Hunger, Pestilence, 4. Seal. Rev. 6. 7. 8. and Beasts of the Earth: whos discloser is The fourth Beast in shape of an Eagle, presenting one whos name was Death, and Hel folowed; who rode on a pale Hors, having power over a fourth part of the Earth. This is Maximinus a big barbarous Bubulc born in Thracia, under whom the Sword raged every wher. For in this Seals compas of thirty three yeers, ten lawful Caesars (wherof Maximin one) were slain by the Souldiers, besides thirty usurpers; as Orosius tels: wherof Galienus the last ex­ceded al the rest far in savage ferity, as Trebellius Pollio in­forms. In the same age also the pestilence prevailed for fiften yeers over al the Empire, as Zonaras testifies. Lastly folowed famin in most ruful maner: for al was wasted by thos wild Beasts, and tillage abandoned: so that a fourth part of the Earth (or Empire) perished.

The fift and sixt Seals hav [...] no Beast to usher them, nor any 5 Seal. sitting on Horses; but must begin wher the chance of the Rev. 6. 9. 10. 11. foregoing Seal left: viz. at Aurelians reign A. 268. when the fiften yeers pestilence ceased, In which the Souls of them slain for Gods Word and Testimony which they held, lay under the Altar crying aloud; how long Lord holy and tru, d [...]ost thou not [Page 143] judg and avenge our Blood on them that dwel on Earth? Thes had whit Robes given them, and were bid rest a smal season, til their felow-Servants or Brethren which were to be killed, should be fulfilled. This denots the grand persecution by Dioclesian, which was longer and crueler then al former, as Orosius ob­servs. Rev. 14 1. 4. For in Egypt only were massacred 144000. sutable to the Virgins number, as Ignatius relats: beside infinit multi­tuds in al other Provinces.

The sixth ( at whos opening was a great Earthquake, the Sun 6 Seal. Rev 6. 12. ad sinem. becam black as hairy Sackcloth, and Moon red as Blood) begins when the fifth ended A. 311. when Constantin initiated, the persecution ceased, and heathen Idols with their Priests, Tem­ples, and Sacrifices vanished: which is the finishing or fulfilling of Christs victory founded in the first Seal. By the Earthquake is understood the change of things turned topsy turvy: which tends not to the Empires Politic state, as the former Seals did; sith 'tis not yet to be dissolved: but as 'tis subject in a Reli­gious respect to Satan and his Angels; which was now broken in peeces with great nois. The Suns blacknes and Moons rednes (betokening their Eclipses) design the Dragons down­fal with al Pagan Priesthood. The Stars fel to Earth, as a Fig­tree casts hir fruits being shaken by a mighty Wind: Heaven de­parted as a Scrole roled together: viz. the Stars appeered not, as letters rold up in a Book are not seen. This is taken from Isaiah: The Heavens shal be roled up as a scro [...]e, and al their Isai 34 4. Host fal as a leaf from the Vine, and Fig from the Figtree. Al Mountains and Ilands were moved from their places, [...]. Men of eminent quality and inferior: or by Iles may be meant their Temples invironed with Wals like ro [...]ks. Thos Ethnic Temples Constantin only shut up; which Julian soon opened: but Theo­dosius quit demolished, and abolished al reliques of Idol. wor­ship. The Kings of the Earth, great Men, rich Men, cheif Cap­tains, mighty Men, bond and free hid themselfs in dens and rocks; saying to them, Fal on us, hide us from his face that sits on the Throne, and from the Lamb. For the great day of his Wrath is com, and who shal be able to stand? This shews that al Christs Enemies ( Maximian, Galerius, Maxentius, Marti­mian, Licinius, Julian Emperors; with Eugenius and Arbo­gastes [Page] Tyrans) shal perish most miserably, and the Lamb get a signal victory. For most persecutors feeling Gods judgments heavy on them, confessed Christ to be only tru God, and gav him glory.

Here betwixt the sixth and seventh Seal, is interposed a Vi­sion Int [...]rslice. Rev. 7 4. of Gods Servants sealed ( viz. 144000. which are the elect faithful Church) contemporizing with thos said six sails. This Vision is twise cited: 1. At entrance of the Trumpets, wher 144000. of al Israels Tribes are s [...]aled for their preservation amidst the Trumpets destruction: 2. In opposition to the Rev. 4 1. 4. 5. Beasts reigning, wher they are caled Virgins, in whos mouth was found no guile, being free from fault before Gods throne; for prais of their alleigance to God and the Lamb; when the rest of the World revolted and received the Beasts mark. Hence 'tis cleer, that the Prophecy of the Beast, synchronizeth with the Trumpers: yet no further then going forth of the sixth; when the Beasts forty two months ended with the Wit­nesses Rev. 11. 14. 1260. dais. Now touching the first Vision of the Sealed, wher their preservation is handled. After this I saw four Angels Rev. 7. 1. Jer. 49. 36. stand on the Earths four corners, holding the four Winds; that no wind should blow on the Earth, nor Sea, nor any Tree. The Angels (who are not the same with the Trumpeters) had Jer. 51. 1. 2. power to restrain the winds or tempests of war: for the Para­bol of winds among Prophets, imports martial motions, ho­stil D [...]n. 7. 1. 3. invasions, and violent impulsions: which thos Angels could curb out of what coasts or corners soever they rose: til it pleas God to giv leav or liberty, that wars shal rage and reign for Rev. 7. 2. 3. correcton of sin. I saw another Angel (haply Christ) ascend from the East, having the Seal of the living God who cried loud to the four Angels which had power given (by setting the Winds free) to hurt the Earth and Sea; saying, hurt not Earth, Sea, nor Trees til we hav sealed Gods Servants in their Fore-heads; to sever them from the plagues of others (as som at Jerusalem wer [...] mark­ed which must be preserved) lest they should be damnified. For 'tis a wonder, how in that Empires grand vastation by barbarous Aliens to Christ; the Church could continu amidst thos storms (when al conspired hir ruin, and the Beast polluted al places Rev. 7. 4 &c. with fals worship) untainted and unstained. I heard the num­ber [Page 144] of the Sealed which were one hundred forty four thousand of al the Tribes, viz. twelv thousand of ech, or twelv times twelv thousand in al. Here the Gentils Church to be fenced with Gods Seal, is figured by the type of Israel; the twelv Apostles aptly answering to the twelv Patriarchs: nor is it doon without good caus; specialy sith the Church, since the Jews rejection, is to be gathered of the Gentils, and fitly stiled surrogated Israel: whom God owned a while, til the fulnes of the Gentils was com in stead: Hence S. Paul saith, The Jews Rom. [...]11. 11. [...]5 fal brought salvation to the Gentils, and their casting off was the Worlds reconciling. Not that els they should not be caled in du time (for al the Prophets proclaim it) but not by way of substitution or surrogation to the Jews, unles they had first re­nounced Christ: So St. Paul tels them; It was necessary the Acts 13. 46. Word should be opened to you first: but sith ye reject it, and judg your selfs unworthy of eternal life; Lo we turn to the Gen­tils.

This number of 12, multiplied by 12 times 12, is an Ensign of Apostolic Race, or Prosapy: for as the Beasts number (666) denots thos which folow him: so the Apostles number designs their legitimat of-spring. The Analogy of new Jerusalem Rev. 21. 12. 14. 16. shews the same: in the frame wherof, the dimensions of Gates, Foundations, Courts, compas of Wals, Longitud, Latitud, Al­titud, express the number of 12 or multiplication by 12. Of the Tribe of Juda, Reuben, Gad, Aser, Nepthali, Manasses, Si­m [...]on, Levi, Isachar, Zabulon, Joseph, Benjamin were sealed twelv thousand in ech; which Tribes are no wher in Scripture so reckoned, yet diversly registred: for Dan and Ephraim are here excluded, and in the rest no birth-order observed: but the last mix'd with the middle, and younger Sons of Hand­maids set before the elder-born of Wifes Sons. This no doubt Judg. 17. Judg. 18. is doon for som mystery hid in so unusual order: for Dan and Ephraim are rejected from this type, as being chief Coriphees of the Idolatrous Apostasy under the Judges: Ergo unfit to present Professors of tru Religion: yet to complet the number, L [...]vi is set for Dan, and Joseph tacitly supplies Eph [...]aim: but the Wifes and Handmaids Sons promiscuously interserted, and Handmaids Children adopted for their Dames; to shew or [Page] signify that both bond and free are al one in Christ. Sith then Leahs Sons (Natural and Adopted) are duple to Rachels: in the first six are four of Leahs (Juda, Reuben, Gad, Aser) and two of Rachels, Nepthali, Manasses: So among the last six, four of Leahs (Simeon, Levi, Isachar, Zabulon) and two of Ra­chels, Joseph, Benjamin: but on both sides thos are preplaced or preferred, which holy Writ commends for som memorable act touching Gods Worship or Zele. As Juda is prime, becaus Josua 22. 21. Christ issued of that Tribe: Reuben next for their sacred pro­testation about the Altar of Witnes built on Jordans bank: wherby, and becaus first born, he must stoop to none sav the Re­gal Tribe. Gad is third, being Reubens companion in that fa­mous action: as also in that Eliah and Jehu Destroiers of Baalism descended of that Tribe. Aser fourth, becaus the wi­dow of Sarepta (who fed Eliah) and the Prophetess Anna (who proclamed Christ at his presenting in the Temple) sprung of this Tribe. Leahs last quaternion ( Simeon, Levi, Isachar, Zabulon) are not so renowned as the rest or blasted with som Crime. Among Rachels issu, Nepthali and Manasses lead the Family: for from the first sprung Barach Siseras Vanquisher; from the last Gidion subverter of Baals Altar, and Elisaeus the Prophet: But Nepthali more noted, becaus his Seat is Galile and chief City Capernaum, wher Christ most conversed. Yet Joseph and Benjamin, being youngest, bring up the Rere: But Ephraim, guilty of much Apostat Idolatry in Jeroboam and Achab; beside that Saul a Benjamit hated David a Judait. Censure. Thus the order of the sealed Tribes is explicated; which is a curious Cobweb of wit, if of so much worth, or congruous to the holy Ghosts intention; but 'tis briefly, plainly, and truly presented, to satisfy al subtle or serious speculators.

Under the six foregoing Seals, the Empires state yet florish­ing til Idols should fal, is described by intestin Chances: Now succeds the seventh or last Seal of the seven Trumpets; wherin 7 Seal. the destinies of its decay are displaied: for they sound Alarms to the fatal battle, for the blood of so many Martyrs slain by Roman Emperors. Now though they becam Christians, yet that staid not Gods hand from avenging thos which cried un­der the Altar; no more then Josiahs godlines did from destroy­ing [Page 145] the Kingdom of Juda, for the Idolatries and murders of Manasses. At opening this Seal was silence in Heaven half an Rev. 8. 1. 2. 3. 4 5. 6. hour: when seven Angels had seven trumpets given them: and another standing at the golden Altar with a golden Censer, offere [...] much Insens with the praiers of the Saints. Then were Voices, Thundrings, Lightnings, and an Earthquake being al prepatories to thos trumpets. Al Divines know, that the works of divine Providence are executed by Angels or Mes­sengers, and thos seven prepared to sound: but the four first Plagues of less moment or extent then the rest: which rest most­ly on the Western World or Bishop of Rome, who was to be Head. For the Empire with other Kingdoms, is tacitly re­sembled to the Worlds body; whos parts are Earth, Sea, Ri­vers, Heaven, Stars which every Monarchy resembleth. The often repetition of a third part (as of Trees, Earth, Sea, Ri­vers, Heaven) implies the Empires extent over a third part of the then known World in St. Johns dais: as afterward the se­ven headed Dragon with ten horns ( i. that heathen Empire) drew a third part of the Stars (or Princes and Rulers under Rev. 12. 3. 4. his Dominion) with his tail, and cast them to the Earth. The Rev. 12. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. first Angel sounded, and Hail and Fire mixd with Blood fel on the Earth, and a third part of Trees was burnt up, with al green grass. The secund sounded, and as it were a great Mountain was cast into the Sea, which turned a third part into Blood, and a third part of al Creatures therin that had life died, and a third part of Ships destroied. The third sounded, and a great Star (caled Wormwood) fel from Heaven, burning like a Lamp; which fel on a third part of Rivers and Fountains, making them bitter, that many Men died of them. The fourth sounded, and a third part of the Sun was smiten, with a third of the Moon, and Stars: so as a third part was darkened, and a third part of the day shone not, nor of the night.

The first Trumpet entring at the Roman Idol Government 1 Trumpet. (which was shaken at end of the sixth seal) being ready to strike the first blow, destrois a third part of the Ea [...]th with a Isai 28. 2. Isai 30. 30. terrible tempest of Hail, Fire, and Blood: which was the im­petuous irruption of Northern Nations, wasting the Nobles and Commons. For Hail in Prophetic notion indicats hostil [Page] assalts: but lightning and fire is joind with it (as David doth) Ps. 18. 12. 13. wherto blood is added, to shew great slaughter insuing. Trees in Prophetic Parabols imply great Lords and rich Men: as Okes of BasanIsai 2. 13. Cedars Isai 14. 8. Firtrees Zech. 11. 2. in al which places Princes and Potentats are pourtraid: but green grass imports the Commons. To apply it, the Wo of Applicat this Trumpet began at Theodosius death A. 395. when Alaric with a vast Army of Goths and other Barbarians, broke in up­on Macedon, and raged fiv yeers; but then betook to the West, committing most savage spoils and slaughters in al parts: as Epist 3. St. Jerom an Ey witnes wofully relats. At last he invaded Italy, and besieged Honorius at Hasta: whos Lieftenent Stilico levy­ing puissant forces, resisted his fury, and repeld him to Panno­nia; who by composition retired to Illyricum in the East. Soon after Rhadagaiso a Scythian with 200000. Goths, Sarmatians, and Germans attempted Italy and besieged Florence: but Stilico subdued and beheaded him. Immediatly a swarm of Vandals, Alans, Marcomans, Heruli, Suevi, Almans, Burgundians, and other barbarians broke into Galle, Spain, and Africa; as St. Epist. 11. Jerom also dolefully declares. This is that direful Hail storm mixd with fire and blood: for sundry writers ( Achmetes and others) aptly resemble War by such Meteors and Meta­phors.

2 Trumpet. The next Trumpet (the Empire being enough wasted on the Earth therof) assails the Sea with a far greater stroke, killing the living Creatures, and destroying Ships. For Rome the Me­tropolis being once or twise taken, and burnt with hostil flames; the Enemies possessed the out Provinces at pleasure, and set up several Kingdoms: which is signified by the Sea of that Jer. 31 36. Isai 19 5. Ezek 31. 4. Ezek. 14. 19 Rev. 16. 3. Politic World. So Babylons dominion is expressed, wher the Lord threatens to dry up the Sea and springs. The Assyrian Kingdoms amplitud is described by the same Metaphor: the deep or Sea hath exalted hir. 'Tis said of Pharaohs Kingdom, the waters shal fail from the Sea therof, or his Dominion shal be bereaved. So the four great Beasts or Kingdoms rose from the Sea, which implies largenes of Dominion Dan. 7. 3. Now a third part of the Roman Sea becam blood, which denots slaughter of Animals, and inanimats ruin too: therfore the [Page 146] Sea becoming blood by a great Mountains fal, betokens vio­lent destruction, as a Beast is butchered bleeding. For so 'tis said in the Phials, that the Sea becam as the blood of a dead Man or one slain. The like mystery of a Mountain meant by a City, is applyed to old Babylon, even a Mountain burning Jer. 51. 25. with fire as here. For point of History, Alaric after Stilicos death returned as a Ram, and took Rome; creating Attalus A. C. 410. the Hun Emperor: whom he soon deposed, and reinthroned Honorius. Immediatly insued a total renting of the Empire, which was shortly shared into ten Stats or Soveraignties: 1. Brytans, 2. Saxons in this Ile: 3. Francs in Galle: 4. Bur­gundians in Belgia: 5. Visi-Goths in Aquitain and part of Spain: 6. Sueds in Gallaecia: 7. Alans in Lusitania: 8. Van­dals in Africa: 9. Almans in Germany: 10. Ostr [...]-Goths in Pannonia beside Greecs in the East Empire, which is counted one of the ten, when the West was dissolved; in al which be­fel notable changes. Howbeit the number of ten is not taken so strickly, as if should be no mo, nor fewer, nor other: but that it should be severed into about ten. So after Alexander, four Kingdoms are predicted ( Macedon, Asia, Syria, Egypt) Dan. 8. 22. yet a fifth of Thracia was added by Lysimachus, which ended with his life.

The third Trumpet is of a Star falen from Heaven (burning 3 Trumpet. like a Lamp) on the third part of Rivers and Waters, named Wormwood; making the waters bitter, wherof many died. This is meant of Hesperus or west Caesar: who after Genseri­cus K. of Vandals had sacked Rome, fel headlong to ruin; strugling a while with death, under the obscure Emperors Avitus, Majoranus, Severus, Anthemius Olybius, Glicerius, Nepos, Augustulus: who were Princes of baleful bitternes, and perished by mutual Massacres or Trecheries. Augustulus (which is an ominous diminutiv of the first founder) was ex­peld by Odoacer K. of Heruli but when the west Empire lay A. C. [...]. A. C. [...]. Note. buried 324 yeers, P. Leo 3. surrogated Charlemaign to be Emperor: becaus under this coverture of Caesar revived (or the Beasts sixth Head stil reigning) the Pope may not be re­puted seventh or last which is Antichrist; as is too evident to every judicious Ey. This Papal Caesar pertains not to the [Page] Heads of the Roman Beast, but to the Horns or Kingdoms, into which it was to be torn: being ready to resign his room to the last seventh Head. By the Star burning as a Lamp, the blazing Star Lampadios is described: and such is the Hesperian Caesar great in dignity, but of short durance; whos coming must continu but a short space. Isaiah saith of Babylons King, How art thou falen from Heaven, O Lucifer Son of the morn­ing? Isai 14. 12. For by Stars great Princes, Powers, and Potentats are figured.

The fourth sounded greater calamities of darkning the Sun, 4 Trumpet. Moon, and Stars of Roman Majesty which before shined dimly under Ostro Goth Kings. For after the Consulship failed, and Totila demolished a third part of Rome; it was in som sort re­stored A▪ C. 542. by Belisarius and Narsetes Justinians brav Commanders: but now this Worlds Queen was stripd of al Consular power, Senat, and Magistrats, which as Stars gav great light: yea be­cam inslaved to the Exarchat of Ravenna hir Handmaid vas­sal. [...]. 1. 1. Jer. 31. 35. O deep darknes, how doth the City sit solitary that was ful of People? How is she becom a Widow? She that was Queen among Nations and Princess of Provinces; how is she made tribu­tary? This is that smiting of Sun, Moon, Stars that they could giv no light by day or night. For when Senat, Consuls, and other Officers were suppresd, what could be but a total E­clips, such as never was before? Next folow three Trumpets of Wo (so stiled, becaus an Angel flying through Heaven cried Wo, Wo, Wo to the Earths inhabiters) which are the most grievous of al. For when thos of the Christian Empire had de­filed themselfs with Idol-Images of a new stamp, during the four former Trumpets sounding; God sent thos new plagues to punish a duple sin: one for the Martyrs deaths under Hea­then Rome; the other for Iconolatry under Christians: as 'tis Rev. 20. intimated, that they worshiped the Devil, and Idols of Gold, Silver, Brass, Stone, and Wood.

The fifth or first Wo Trumpet is of Locusts rising from the 5 Trumpet. Rev. 9. 1. 10 12, smoke of the bottomless Pit: which is meant of Mahometans seduced by their Pseudo-prophet to the perdition of many Na­tions. This smoke obscured the Gospels light latly shining Exod. 10▪ 13 14. abroad, whos professors rightly resemble Locusts in many re­spects. [Page 147] For thos which plagued Egypt cam from Arabia, wher Mahomet spred his Hellish smoke, and the Arabs likened to Judg 7. 12. them for multitud. They are also stiled Sons of the East re­lating to Egypt, wher the [...]sralites learned so to term them. Achmetes refers Locusts to troops of Enemies, which devour ordestroy Countries. Thes are compared to Scorpions for pow­er and fo [...]m having tails like Scorpions: so they were Locusts-Scorpions, which had power in their teeth, and poison in their tails. Thes were forbid to hurt grass, trees, or any green thing (as the common sort doo) but only M [...]n not marked with Gods Seal: so no Natural but Symbolical vermin are here im­plied. They were like Horses prepared to battle, with Mens faces and Womens hair; but had Lyons teeth with brest-plats of Iron, and sound of their Wings as Chariots of many Horses running to battle. Al which import armed Souldiers, as the Sarrasens erected a vast Kingdom by war; yet subdued not the East Empire like the Turcs. For while the former Trum­pets sounded, a new pontifical State started up from the ruins of the old Politic; but Sarrasens subverted neither: whos King­dom crept up to so sudden greatnes as never any: for Maho­met was but a Merchant (as Romulus a Shepherd) whos King­dom in one Century subjected Palestine, Syria, Armenia, mi­nor Plin. l 6 c 28. l. [...]. c. 29. Asia, Persia, India, Egypt, Numidia, Barbary, Portugal, Spain, and part of Italy: beside S [...]cil, Sardinia, Corsica, and other Iles; wheras 500. yeers expired, yer Rome subdued al Italy. They had long hair like women, as Arabs then and stil use: whos durance to destroy was but fiv months, as Locusts com at Spring and dy in Autumn, leaving Egs in the Earth to increas their issu They had a King (the Angel of the bottom­less Pit, caled [...]n Hebrew Abaddon, in Greec Apollyon, de­stroier) which imports them Infidels or Children of unbeleef subject to the Prince of the Air, as St. Paul saith: wheras Eph. 2. v. [...]. Christians are freed from Sarans power, and converted to God. This Prince cald before the Devil, old Serpent, Satan, Dragon; is here new named Abaddon: wheras Mahometans profes to worship one sole God Demiurgus Maker of the uni­vers; to whom they giv the Epither Abdi or Abada i. Eternal: wheras the holy Ghost givs this King a title of semblable sound [Page] but opposit sens Abaddon the Worlds destroier, instead of De­miurgus the Maker.

The sixth, or secund of Wo, hath a voice from the four horns 6 Trumpet. Rev. 9. 13. to 2 [...]. of the golden Altar saying, Loos the four Angels which are bound at the river Euphrates. Thes Angels being Patrons of thos parts, metaphoricaly signify the confining Nations, which breaking in upon the Roman Regions, stopped a few ages neer this River, but are now loosed. They may probably imply the Turcs four Sultanies or Signiories ( Asia minor, Aleppo, Damas­cus, Antioch) but becaus Antioch lying a little remot from Eu­phrates, lasted but fourten yeers, being surprised by Boemund in the holy war; som instead reckon Bagdet beyond Euphrates in Persia. Such was their State at first irruption under Trogul­becus or Tongrolipix, who took Bagdet An. 1008. Seididrud­dulas or Cutlumuses Nephew to Tangrolipix, founded the Asian Kingdom An. 1012. Siarfuddulas subdued Aleppo An. 1079. Tagaddaulas another Nephew of Tangrolipix surprised Damascus at the same time. Al which Angels were long limit­ed to thos parts with manifold changes, and now at last let loos; being prepared for an Hour, a Day, Month, and Yeer, that they might slay the third part of Men.

This loosing befel, when the Tartars abolished Bagdets Ca­liphship A. C. 1621. An. 1258. and the Turcs were cast as it were with a sling into the Empires territories on this side Euphrates. For the Latins (who staid their incursions two hundred yeers) were about that time driven out of Syria and Palestine. Then the Turcs shared lesser Asia, til Ottoman grew great: whos Son Orchanes entred Europ, and his fith Successor Mahomet 2. took Constantinople; which is that slaughter of a third part of Men here intimated; as the time (a Day, Month, and Yeer) plainly indicats. For a Prophetic Day implies one yeer, a A nice obser­vation if v [...]ri table. Month thirty, a yeer three hundred threescore and fiv, in al three hundred ninty six. Now Tangrolipix was inaugurated King of Persia An. 1057. and Constantinople sacked An. 1453. just 396. yeers asunder. Haply the very hour (which in that proportion makes fiften dais) agreed also with the event, if Almachinus had recorded the Month of his Inauguration so wel as the yeer. They are said to be Horsmen (as Turcs and Persians are mo then [Page 148] Foot) in number two hundred thousand thousand; which in­timats huge Armies, as David saith, The Charets of God are Psal. [...]8 17. twenty thousand, even thousands of Angels: such vast Armies the East Nations bring into field. I heard (saith John) the num­ber of them, viz. by voice; for he cannot see numbers in Visi­on: and so must other places be understood, which appeer not by Vision. Ezekiel in his Prophecy against Gog the land of Ezek. 38. 2, 3. Magog, chief Prince of Mesech and Tubal (from whom Tures descend) describes them to be Horsmen armed: for Persians and Parthians take name of Paras a Hors or Horsman: But Turcs, since their long plantations ther, are by Nicetas and others ca­led Persians: So thes Euphratean Horsmen are Turco-Persians. They had brest-plats of fire, Jacinthian smoke and brimstone; which is no wher els in Scripture: Ergo it may wel allud to Guns: and the Horses heads were like Lions, out of who [...] mouths issued fire, smoke, and brimstone, by which a third part of Men was killed. For the Turcs used Guns (latly before in­vented) See Chal [...]di­las. at siege of Constantinople, and slu a third part of In­habitants; as their Successors did since at Corinth and other Cities. Such sharp sawces make meats seem more savoury, and Mr. Mede hath many such unvulgar unparalleld Annotations. The Horsmens power was in their mouths and tails, having tails like Serpents, and heads, with both which to doo hurt. So Sarasens are said to hav sharp tails of Scorpions; which is tru of Turcs, who had tails of Serpents; signifying their Mahome­tan subtlety or imposture, wherby both did more mischief then by the Sword. The rest of Men which were not killed by thes plagues, repented not of their works, that they should not worship Devils and Idols of gold, &c. which can neither hear, see, nor walk: Nor of their Murders, Sorceries, Fornication, and Thefts. This is manifestly meant of Christians in the Roman Empire, which worship Images made of those metals and ma­terials: for none but they doo [...] on this side Euphrates. Thes indeed are no Devils or unclean Spirits, sith no Christians wil 1 Tim 4. 1 2 3. wittingly or willingly worship such: But Demoniacs or Dea­stri, dead Men Deified, whom they make Mediators of Inter­cession betwen God and Men.

The seventh Trumpet (or third of Wo) is ready to sound: but 7 Trumpet, Rev. 10 v. 1, &c. [Page] a mighty Angel cam from Heaven clothed with a Cloud, a Rain­bow on his Head, his Face as the Sun, and Feet pillars of Fire. He had in his hand a little Book open; who set his right foot on the Sea, and left on Earth; crying loud, as when a lyon roars, and seven thunders uttered their voices. John was about to write it; but a voice from Heaven said, seal up thes things which the seven thunders uttered, and write not. Then the Angel lift­ed his hand to Heaven, and swore by him that livs for ever; that Time shal be no more: But in the dais of the seventh Angels voice, when he shal begin to sound; the mystery of God should be finished, as he declared to his servants the Prophets. The sound of this seventh Trumpet should succed the sixth, but is super­seded by the litle Book intervening: yet lest ought be omitted in the interim to fulfil the Prophecy of Seals; the holy. Ghost shews the last trumpets event in general: viz. that at sound ther­of the Roman Beast being destroid, and the last heads time com to an end, the mystery of God shal be finished, as he foretold his Prophets. For so 'tis declared to Daniel, that the fourth Dan 7. 13. 14. Beast being slain, the Son of Man or King of Saints should rule over the World and the gratious promises of restoring Israel be fulfilled. The finishing of which mystery is Christs glorious Kingdom, which arose or appeered at sound of the 7 Ttrumpet: when the grand acclamation of Voices in Heaven was heard saying, The Kingdoms of this World are becom the Lords and his Rev. 11. 15. Christs, who shal reign for ever. What can be cleerer? Ergo the Time which the Angel swore shal be no more, is the period of al four Monarchies in general, or Roman in special; which is one effect of a time, times, and half. This consummation of Gods mystery is the matter of the seventh trumpet attended with seven thunders, which uttered their voices while the An­gel proclamed it, and synchronize with that trumpet: But John is bid to seal up thos things of the thunders, being inscrutable til the proper times that God shal revele it. This trumpet dis­covers the mystery reserved to another place: but both Pro­phecies of the Seals and litle Book, are concluded with one issu, which this trumpet exhibits: the ful opening wherof is deferd, til a ful passage be made to the litle Books new Prophe­cy, and then the seventh trumpets mystery (which is the Cata­strophe) [Page 149] is aptly and amply declared, as shal be shewed. Hence this busines is undertaken by no other Angels, but by that ex­cellent one, who held in his hand the litle Book eaten by John. If that Angel be Christ (as his Roial attire and furniture im­ports) this suspending the last sound in favor of the other Pro­phecy, agrees to none so wel as him: but if it were Michael the great Prince, or another Angel clothed in linnen, and his Dan. 1 [...]. [...]. Dan. 1 [...]. 6. [...]oins girded with fine gold of Ʋphaz, as appeered to Daniel; the case alters not, being from God.

Here the first part or Prophecy of Seals ends touching the 2 Part. Empires affairs: the next or nobler concerns the Churches fate to be agitated. John proceds herein: The voice which I heard Rev 10. 8, 9 [...] 10, 11. from Heaven spake to me again saying, Take the litle open Book in the Angels hand, who oat it up as he was bid; wherby he was prepared to Prophecy again before many People, Nations, Toungs, and Kings: but the mystery to be reveled, was sweet as hony in his mouth, and the secret part of the Churches wo­ful condition bitter as Aloes in his maw: the representation is taken from Ezekiel. The Prophecy proceds, which begins from Ezek 3. 1, 2, 3. his work about Gods Temple [...] which presents the Churches duple state by two Courts; one measured, and another cast out. Ther was given me a reed like a rod, and the Angel said, Rev. 11. [...] measure Gods Temple, and Altar, and them that worship: but the Court without measure not; for 'tis given to the Gentils, who shal tread the holy City under foot forty two Months. Here the primitiv state of Christs Church conformable to Gods Word, is described by measuring the inner Court: the type wherof an Angel shewed to Ezekiel. The outer Court not to Ezek [...]. be measured, sets forth Gods holy City or Christian Church: which must be given to new Idolaters, caled Gentils, becaus they defiled it with Antichristian Apostasy fourty two annal months, as shal be fully handled in the Story of the two horn'd Beast contemporizing herwith. Jerusalems Temple had two Courts: 1 Inner, wher the burnt Offrings Altar stood at the 2 [...] Temples entry, which was open only to Priests and Levits. 2 Outer or great Court, common to the People, cald the Court of Israel.

The first, termed Thyasterium, or Altar of Sacrafice, John is [Page] bid to measure: but ths outer is given the Gentils to prophane fourty two months. If it be said, 'tis the holy City, not out Court, which must be troden under foot: 'Tis answered, that both are one, and cald the holy City, becaus People assembled here for holy Services. To thos Herod, at rebuilding the Tem­ple, added a third for Gentils and unclean persons, who were prohibited the two others. I wil giv power to my two witnesses, V. 3, 4, 5. who shal Prophecy in sackcloth one thousand two hundred three­score dais: thes are two Oliv Trees and two Candle sticks stand­ing before the God of the Earth. If any wil hurt them fire pro­ceds from their mouths to devour their Enemies; and if any wil hurt them he must thus be killed. Thes mourning witnesses are Preachers or Patrons of divine truth; which shal bewail the filthy pollution of Christs Church Idolizing like Gentils: as Monitors to desist from their abomination, and guids for the Saints to persist pure. They are named two according to three famous Pairs in the old Testament; viz. Moses and Aaron in the wildernes; Elias and Elisaeus under the Baalitic Apostasy; Zerobabel and Jesua at the Babylonish Captivity: For they sympathise with thos types in number, power, and acts: as the state of the Church when thes Prophecied suting with that of Israel, is resembled to the wildernes, Baalatism, and Babylon. V. 6. Thes hav power to shut Heaven, that is rain not during their Prophecy (as Elias and Elisaeus had) and to turn waters into blood (as Moses and Aaron had) and to smite the Earth with al plagues so oft as they pleas. Thes are caled Oliv Trees and Candle sticks standing before the Lord (like Zerobabel Prince of Juda, and Jesua the high Priest) whom God annointed to restore Zech. 4 3 11. the Jewish Church under Captivity, as Zechary alluds, This Prophecy, til the seventh trumpets sounding, is not presented in Vision; but dictated by an Angel personating Christ. The witnesses are caled two, as the Law requires to confirm every word; and in regard of Gods two Tables or Testaments, which they used in Prophecying. They shal Prophecy one thousand two hundred threescore dais, being forty two months: which are not natural dais, nor three dais and half (when they shal ly dead) so meant: becaus the Beast whos time they contain, con­temporized with the hundred fourty four thousand sealed, and [Page 150] they with the six first trumpets, which cannot run out in so short a space as 1260. dais. If any ask, why the Gentils propha­nation Note. is measured by months, & the witnesses defending Gods pure Worship by dais? 'tis becaus Idolatry is the power of darknes or night, which the Moon rules: but tru religion com­pared to light or day which the Sun governs: So Paul is said To turn the Gentils from darknes to light, from Satans Acts 26 18. power to God. Sith then Months are measured by the Moons motion, but dais and yeers by the Sun; the Beasts blasphemy is stil reckoned by months, and the Womans stay in the wilder­nes by dais or yeers. Zechary likens the two Oliv trees to the Zech. 4. 14. two annointed ( Zerobabel and Jesua) which stand by the Lord; but he mentions only one Candlestick signifying the Temple of that time; and John two implying haply the East and West Church, as it was divided during the witnesses mourning. Thes did not avenge or afflict their Enemies by war and weapons, but by fire from their mouths, or denouncing Gods wrath on the abusers of his Ministers, As the Lord speaks to Jeremy, I wil make my Words in thy mouth fire, and this Peo-ple Jer 5. 14. Wood to devour them. Eliah brought tru fire from Hea­ven on Ahazia's Captains (as Moses and Aaron did on Co­rah 2 Chr. 10. [...]2. and his complices) but the witnesses fire is symbolical or spiritual, as Egypt and the wildernes is after so taken. They had power to shut Heaven that it rain not: both being mysticaly meant, one for the power of the Keis to shut it against thes new Idolaters; the other for the dew of Gods Word, that it shal not descend or destil on them: For they debar them from hope of eternal life, promised only to tru Worshipers, til they shal return to serv one God by one Mediator Christ Jesus, accor­ding to their Covenant in Baptism; and put an end to the mourning witnesses Prophecy: As Elias restored not rain to Israel, til Baals Prophets were destroied.

When they be about to finish their testimony, the Beast a­scending Vers. 7. from the bottomless pit, shal make war against them and kil them. This is their destiny at end of their Prophecy, sutable to our Saviours passion: for having ended his preaching in three yeers and half, as the witnesses did their testimony; he is slain by this Roman Beasts Deputy under the sixth Head: [Page] who on the third day after in a great Earthquake rose from the dead, and fourty dais after being received in a Cloud ascended into Heaven. Al which he resembles to the witnesses slaughter: that as they bear the likenes of thos three famous couples in their function: so they should conform to their Lord Christ that faithful witnes in suffering. When they were about to fi­nish their testimony, having brought part of the holy City (or Province) to renounce Idolatry, and cleans the Temple within themselfs; they began to put off sackcloth, yet were not wholy freed from fear: for the Roman septicep Beast chasing at their so far prevailing, shal make war and kil them. The first part touching their mourning, hath bin performed since beginning of Reformation til this present: But the last of war is to com. Brightman thinks it already accomplished in the Smalcaldian war by Charl [...] the fift: Others apply it to the lat German war, and it were wel if such doleful disasters were past: but it can­not be, sith the tragic times of the Gentils trampling on Chri­stian Religion fourty two months cannot be fulfilled so long as the Beast reigns; nor the dais of the witnesses wailing, which contemporize with them: whos killing next, foregoes Romes ruin, as the Crier of the Phials (to the fifth of which this ruin belongs) apertly declares. For this destruction is the last, which shal be more grievous then any yet, and a sign that the [...] [...]1 [...]0. witnesses VVoes shal instantly end with Romes ruin; as Jeru­salems siege by Cestius Gallus before the sackage by Titus, was foretold by Christ to be a Forerunner of their utter desolation: so is this of Babylons fal. Slaughter signifies Death, whether ta­ken properly or metaphoricaly and analogicaly. For 'tis a civil death, when any being setled in a Politic or Ecclesiastic State, ceaseth to be as he was, and he is said to kil him that bereavs it; in which sens divers are killed daily. So in sacred stile to liv is to be, and to dy not to be: as we dy to sin and Satan when we ceas to be their Slavs; and liv to Christ, when we becom his [...] Sevants. To apply it, Such as is the witnesses resurrection after three dais and half, such is the slaughter: but that is analogical, sith no proper can be til Christ com to Judgment; Ergo the other. So this death may be a dejection from the Place or Office which they enjoied in the Reformed Church, or not [Page 151] leading a Prophetic life to preach or exercise their spiritual Function as yerst, which often haps in distracted times. This Note. last war of the Beast, is not like the former waged with the Rev. 13 7. Saints, who had it given to overcom them: for why should it be said peculiar to this last time, if familiar before? But the for­mer was against Saints in general, this with the Prophets ( viz. Bishops and chief Ministers) in special, as is evident by event. For that was with success, wher the Beast prevailed over every Tribe, Toung, and Nation: this with his sodain fatal fal or ruin.

Their dead Bodies shal by in the street of the great City (spi­ritualy [...] stiled S [...]dom and Egypt) wher our Lord was crucified. This City is Rome, caled great being Queen of the World, and stil Quean with whom the Kings of the Earth commit Forni­cation, and the Inhabiters made drunk with the wine of hir abomination: as 'tis said, the Woman which thou sawest is that Rev. 17. 2. [...] great City: and this Epithet is often given hir, as great Babylon, the great Whore, &c. But he that deems Jerusalem meant, had need of Ellebor to purg his brain: for no Jerusalem was then extant, nor the old ever caled great, til that title is ascribed to new Jerusalem. Rome is spiritualy stiled Sodom for Luxury, Rev. 21. 10. and Egypt for Cruelty: wherby the holy Ghost intimats, that wherever Sodoms plagues, or Egypts punishments are specifi­ed; they are mysticaly meant as here. So that great City is certainly Rome; but what street means, is not so cleer: for it cannot be taken literaly, sith our Lord was slain in no street of Rome or Jerusalem, but without the Gate in Golgatha. Street also is taken in the singular number, as if it were only one; yet in a City are many. The witnesses Carcases lay in the street wher they were slain, which the People, Kinreds, and Nations triumphantly beheld, not suffering them to be buried: but Men seldom make war within the City wals, but in open fields or Provinces of a State. Whence it may be inferred, that the street wher our Lord also was crucified, intends som Province pertaining to Romes dition or dominion, as Jeru­salem then did; which sens the word [...] wil wel bea [...]. Many interpret it of Christs suffering by Romes power, which may be probable; but not so fitly or fully as [Page] of the place which is more persuasible being their Pro­vince.

The People, Kinreds, Toungs, and Nations shal see their Vers 9. dead bodies three dais and half, but not permit them to be put in gravs. 'Tis a doubt, whether this be cruelty doon in despite and disgrace by Enimies, to deny them burial, or courtesy of Friends and Favorers, to provide for their rising again? nor can it be decided but by fulfilling the Prophecy: For in the first sens it must be a type or token of ignominy intended by the Beasts folowers against them: In the last 'tis a rescu of Reformists, wherto the text-phrase rather inclines: for in the insuing vers 'tis said of the Enimies, they that dwel on Earth shal make mer­ry and send gifts one to another: but here People, Kinreds, Toungs, and Nations; which denots divers dispositions. The time (three dais and half) cannot imply natural dais: for how could Nations diversly dissit know it so soon or send gifts one to another? nor is any time alotted to the killing of them; but to their lying dead, being slain. So how long the war shal last, or time limited to kil the Prophets; must appeer only at ful­filling this Prophecy: which is to be reveled by the event or iflu; els we shal only grope in the dark upon uncertainties.

They that dwel on Earth shal rejoice over them, and send Vers. 10, 11. gifts one to another; becaus thes two Prophets tormented them that dwel on Earth: but after three dais and half, the spirit of life entred into them, who stood on their feet, and great fear fel on al that saw them. Such as was the witnesses death, such is their rising or restoring to pristin estats, even by God wonder­ful in his works; not by human power as the words plainly purport.

They heard a voyce from Heaven saying, Com up hither: and Vers. 12. they ascended in a Cloud, in their Enemies sight. They shal not Isai. 14. 13. only be restored to their places, but promoted to more emi­nent preferments: for so ascending in a Cloud signifies, as Achmetes from Persian and Egyptian Mysteries interprets. This reflects on Reformed Churches, which shal be punished for reproches offred to Christ in vilifying his Prophets or Preachers, and sacrilegious surreption of revenues wherby they should be honestly and honorably maintained: but now [Page 152] they shal be promoted to higher places according to their Am­bassy or Function.

The same h [...]ur was a great Earthquake, and a tenth part of V. 13. the City fel, and ther were slain seven thousand names of Men: but the rest being affrighted gav glory to God. By Earthquake is meant a great commotion of Nations, and alteration of Po­litic affairs: in which a tenth part of the City fel, and seven thousand names of Men (or Men of name and note) slain. For understanding wherof, two points are to be previously proved: i. that every fal of the decaying Beast being contained in some of the Phials; this destruction belongs to the fifth be­caus the same subject of plagues is in both: ther stiled the Beasts Seat or Throne; here the great City, which is both the Beasts seat. So the destruction here described, preceds the Beasts utter abolition at the seventh Trumpet or last Phial; and nothing intervens sav the departure of the secund Wo, which is the plague from Euphrates at the sixth Phial: Ergo Rev. 18 21 this fals into the fifth. 2. This fal of the great City, is the same with that of Babylon; becaus it was to forego the Beasts final perdition, and Christs imperial reign to begin with the seventh Trumpet. The fal of a tenth part, must be squared by this rule Rev. 17. 16. and tried by this touchstone. Philip Nicolas a learned Lutheran, thinks the Decarchy denots ten Kingdoms subject to the Em­pire, which shal fal from Rome; becaus 'tis said the ten Kings which submitted to the Beast, when Gods Word is fulfilled, shal hate the Whore, make hir desolat or naked, eat hir flesh, and burn hir with fire. This is plausible, but not punctual: for Decaton or tenth part, cannot import a Decarchy or ten King [...]: but is rather a title of Tribut or Tiths, which the Pope receivs either out of the Beasts Kingdom, or the Cities large posses­sions by way of Lordship. Which tenth of the City by this commotion of Nations shal fal or fail; when he shal lose his Patrimony and Prerogativ. For tribut is a Symbol of domi­nion, and under that notion most Provinces paid a tenth of other fruits to the Empire. Howbeit this exposition is not altogether authentic: for the Word (fel) which refers to the Earthquake, implies Babylons ruin rather then loss of Tributs or Tiths: therfore a tenth part of the City, intends a tru tenth: [Page] yet not any part as 'tis at this day; but whol Pontifical Rome, which is only a tenth of the old Imperial, as it was in St. Johns dais. For Lypsius a curious Critic saith it was almost circular; the semidiameter from the golden Pillar in the Mercat place, to the utmost buildings being reckoned seven miles, and whol compas of that semidiameter 42. whence he demonstrats al the plot to be 126. but Rome now only 13. in circuit, which is a tenth part of what it was then. For explaning wherof he sets a sexangular Schem which he that lists may survey. Rome was VValled by Pope Adrian 1. and Leo 4. much whereof is un­habited, and no Suburbs: but the old extended every way with continued buildings. If this sens be taken, a tru tenth part on­ly remained at time of the Earthquake; the other nine being falen long before. For partly by Barbarians often sackings, partly by devouring time, partly by thunderbolts, partly by fire and other casualties; but specialy by the Empires decay or desolation; a tenth part only was fataly reserved to the Pope, who was to be Head of the new Empire, and Mother of Christian Harlots: but this left must by the Earthquakes con­currence, and witnesses resurgence be quit demolished. Yet haply a tenth part is not so strictly taken by Geometric rules: Isa. 6. 13. but as God said to Isaiah of Jerusalems destruction, a tenth shal remain and return, which was not exactly so. The seven thousand slain in the Earthquake, are not counted by pole; for they seem far too few for the great destruction intimated els­wher: but by the City buildings. A duple ruin of Babylon is described: 1. The Beasts Metropolis at the fifth Phial: 2. The Citizens and State, even Pope, Cardinals, and al others: who when Rome is fired, remov elswher til pouring out of the last Phial; when the greatest destruction that ever was of any Rev. 16 19 Land, People, or City, shal betide. Herof 'tis said, Babylon Rev. 18 v 19. the Great cam in remembrance before God, to giv hir the Cup of his fierce wrath: yet that burning and overthrow postdated, Rev. 19. v. 20. preceds the ful final ruin of Beast and fals Prophet, which suc­ceds. Som seek to unty this knot, that Babylon cited in the last Phial is Constantinople: but the holy Ghost cals not two Cities by one name; and 'tis more probable, that Babylons first destruction is Romes ruin by fire without much bloody [Page 153] slaughter, and seven thousand may suffice to be slain. So names of Men may import Men of name, sith such Hypallages are usual in Scripture: as the silver of shekels for shekels of Levit. 5. 3. 15. silver, the uncleannes of a Man, for a Man of uncleannes, the Rom. 9. 31. Law of righteousnes for righteousnes of the Law: so name almost in al tong [...]s signifies renown, and Children without name base or ignoble. Hence Beza concerning Christs exal­tation abov every Name, expounds it of his worth or dignity. In this sens names of Men imply Men excelling in eminence, such as are the Popish Clergy, of whom shal perish seven thou­sand a few more or less. Ther is a third interpretation, that by names of Men are meant Companies, Corporations, Cities, Boroughs, or Societies which hav their names so wel as Men: but we may not rashly resolv future things, whos chief com­mentary is event: nor is name tied to any one certain signifi­cation.

The secund Wo is past, and lo a third coms quickly. The fifth V. 14. Trumpets Earthquake, ended with the secund Wo of the sixth, and the Witnesses mourning prophecy is to finish together with it, being al synchronicals. If then the sixth Trumpets Wo or plague be the Turcs over flowing from Euphrates into the Empire doon long ago; this end of the same plague must be a drying up of the said water at pouring out of the fifth Rev. 16. 1 [...]. &c. Phial: wherby the way is prepared for the East Kings to com in: but lest a gap be left betwen either Trumpet, the seventh seems to begin: so that wondrous preparation of the Dragon, Beast, and fals Prophet for the last war in Armageddon with its issu; should be set here at beginning of the seventh to which the war pertains.

Hence a doubt occurs not to be slighted: sith ther is one term Doubt of the Beasts fourty two months, and witnesses one thousand two hundred sixty dais (which expired with the sixth Trumpets plague or secund Wo) it may be asked, why the Beasts months are reckoned no farther; sith after that term much of the Beast remains unabolished til the seventh Trumpet begins?

This is doon either becaus the Jews conversion being as a Resolv. new Kingdom then commenceth; or becaus in the Beasts con­tinuance special consideration is had to the Empire of Rome-City: [Page] which being the Beasts throne is overthrown in that great Earthquake: so the Beast being driven from his Metro­polis, shal as it were change his form and be no more a King­dom of seven Hils, which is another signification of the seven Heads.

At sound of the seventh Trumpet or last Wo, Christs im­perial V. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. reign in that great day of Judgment is touched: the in­terpretation wherof he suspends til the end of al; that he may handle the prophecies pertaining therto jointly together. To make up the Body of the open Book, the other prophecies of Ecclesiastic affairs, com to be knit to the same: among which the Woman in travel (or Church laboring to bring forth Christ as spiritual Head of the Empire) is chief: which after 300. yeers persecution she effected in Constantin; but hir Enemy the red Dragon watched to devour the Child.

Ther appeered a great wonder in Heaven, a Woman clothed Rev. 12. v. 1. with the Sun, the Moon under hir foot, and on hir head a Crown of twelv Stars. Lo a glorious Image of the primitiv parturien: Church; which shined by the faith of Christ the Sun of righte­ousnes: treading under foot the Worlds rudiments (both La­wish shadows, and Heathenish superstitions) and triumphing in the Ensigns of Apostolic Ofspring. Most Men make the Moon a Type of terren transitory things, which the Church contemns as below hir self. This is tru, but no wher so noted in Scripture, which should be our warrant. Indeed most Fests wher Typical worship was celebrated by Sacrifices (as new Moons, Paschal, Penticost, Tabernacles, and Ecclesiastic yeer) were ordered by the Moons motion; which may resemble Mosaical worship put under foot by reveling of Christ: who blotted out the hand writing of Ordinances, and nailed them Colos. 2 14. to his Cross, as St. Paul speaks. So sith God made the Sun a great Light to rule the Day, and Moon a lesser to govern the Night; she may be a symbol to signify the power of darknes or Satans worship, and his spirits in Idols: wherby the matter may be referred to Baptism, by which the Church being illu­mined trampled on Idolatry, renouncing the Devil and al his works. Hence such as abjured, turned to the West wher night begins; as contrarily al Professors of Christs Faith and holy [Page 154] Trinity, looked to the East, wher Sun dispelling darknes begins the day.

She being with Child, cried travelling in birth and was in pain V. 2. to be delivered. The Church universaly and separatly taken as an Idaa, is a Mother: but in relation to Children continualy begot in hir, is said to travel or bring forth. See Isai 54. 1. Ezek. 23. 4. Hosea 2. 45. The throws or torments in travel, are painful pangs or paroxisms of persecution, which the in­fant Church suffred in parturition. For tribulations are usu­aly resembled to sorows in Childbearing Isai 66. 7. Jer. 30. 6, 7. Mat. 24. 8, 9. Marc 13. 8. and elswher.

Another wonder appeered in Heaven; lo, a great red Dragon V. [...]. [...]. with seven Heads and ten Horns, and seven Crowns on his Heads: his tail drew a third part of the Stars, and cast them to the Earth. This is a type of heathen Rome worshiping the Dragon, who drew a third part of Stars with his tail to Earth: or subjected three parts of the Worlds Rulers to his Empire. The effigies of a Dragon points out his Pagan worshipers Enimies to Chri­stianity, as the Serpent was to the Womans seed: but his rednes notes his embruing in the blood of Saints. This type repre­sents Pharaoh the old Synagogs cruel enemy bearing Children in Egypt; as the Roman Dragon was of the Christian Church Ezek. 29 3. bearing hir Children. For Ezekiel cals Pharaoh the great Dra­gon lying in midst of his Rivers: and David saith, thou brokest Ps. 74. 13. 14. the heads of Dragons (Egyptians) in the waters. The Dragon stood before the Woman ready for delivery, to devour hir Child so soon as 'tis born: as Pharaoh laid wait for old Israel born in Egypt, and Herod for Christ in Judea (which places are sited in Afric and Asia) so the Roman Dragon in Europ watched for mystical Christ, which the Church was to bear, that he might soon slay him after birth.

She brought a Manchild, who was to rule al Nations with a V. 5. Rod (or Scepter) of Iron. She bore mystical Christ formed in his Members (not the Son of Man) as St. Paul saith, My litle Gal. 4 19. Children, of whom I travel in birth again, til Christ be formed in you. Here a Christ is pourtraied (as Prophetic types use) not properly Theantropos; but analogicaly a Son of the Church; who▪ was to rule al Nations with an Iron Scepter or [Page] Sword; sith they were not Citizens or Denisens, but Enemies Rev. 19. 15. or Aliens: As 'tis said, Out of his mouth went a sharp Sword, that he should smite the Nations; for he shal rule them with a rod of Ps. 2 9. iron. Which words are taken from David and applyed to my­stical Christ or a Christian Man, to whom Christ the Head pro­miseth like power, under name of the Church of Thyatira. Rev. 2. 26. Hir Child was caught up to God and his Throne: Real Christ is literaly lift up to Gods Throne; but mystical here meant analogicaly to the Roman Throne, as Constantin and his Suc­cessors were: for al power and their Thrones is of God. If any ask how mystical Christ rules with an iron Scepter or Sword of war? 'Tis in a duple way: 1. Divine, against Devils, Prin­ces of this world, which is stoutly waged. 2. Human, when Constantin crushed Maxentius, Maximian, and Licinius Christs Enemies. This Child was not lift up to Gods Throne so soon as born (for he was to rule) but when he was ripe and ready for a Kingdom: so tru Christ entred not his Kingdom so soon as born, but at thirty yeers of age fit for Priesthood or spiritual Government.

The Woman fled into the wildernes, wher God prepared a Vers. 6, 7, 8. place to be fed one thousand two hundred threescore dais. This Prophecy is afterward somwhat fuller repeated and described, wherto it shal be deferred. Ther was war in Heaven, Michael and his Angels fought with the Dragon, who with his Angels fought, but prevailed not; nor was their place found any more ther. Here is shewed, how the Woman escaped the Dragons wait by Michaels rescu; who being conqueror cast him down to Earth: wherby hir Son was lifted up and she departed to a Desart. This war was waged while the Woman travelled, not after she was delivered, as many misdeem: for the battel befel before the Woman fled (which was after hir dilivery) and Rev. [...]2. 10, 11: hir Sons taking up to Gods Throne. Michael and his Angels having with them Christs Martyrs and Confessors fought: for in the triumphant song 'tis said, they overcam by the blood of the Lamb, and word of their testimony, who loved not their lifes to death. Semblably the Dragon and his Angels took with them the Roman Tyrans in their Train which worship them. This Michael is not Christ (as som suppose) but chief of the [Page 155] Princes or seven Archangels specified by Daniel: viz. that Dan. 10. 13. Dan. 12. 1. great Angel said to stand for Gods Children; whom Christ King of Angels and Men opposed to Satans black Guard ra­ging against his Saints. For Angels are sent to defend the heirs of Salvation, whom they invisibly protect against evil Spirits: So in this war of the primitiv Church against the Dragons wor­shipers, the Angels under conduct of their Chieftain, acted both in strengthning Martyrs against Tyrans threats, and miti­gating or sweetning their torments; beside many mo wais of weakning the Enimies spirits, and dejecting their minds; that oftimes they desisted, or granted truce for a time: til in fine after two hundred yeers war of persecution, it pleased Christ to giv ful victory: the Womans Child being lift up to the Im­perial Throne, and Satans Kingdom subdued: as 'tis said, the Dragon prevailed not, nor was his place found any more.

The great Dragon, that old Serpent caled the Devil and Sa­tan, Vers. 9. which deceivs the whol World; was cast out into the Earth, and his Angels with him. He and al his Fiends being before worshiped as God, was cast down from the top of Divinity to the Abyss of curs, contempt, and contumely. For as God executed judgment on the Egyptian Gods at Israels delivery Exod. 12. 11. from their tyranny; so he doth here: they prevailed not or were overcome, which is al one Hebraism; and they cam [...] no more ther.

I heard a loud voice in Heaven: Now is com Salvation, Vers. 10. 11. strength and Kingdom of our God, and power of his Christ: for the Accuser of our Brethren is cast down, which accused them be­fore our God day and night; but they overcam him by the Lambs blood. Thes words being most cleer sans Allegory or ambiguity, are a Key to interpret the whol Vision. For hence appeers, that the Childs lifting up to Gods Throne, is an intro­duction to Salvation, strength, and Kingdom of God, and power of his Christ into the Imperial throne: that the Enimy ejected is the Accuser, who traduceth the faithful day and night: that the forces used by Michael and his Angels were Martyrs and Confessors, who overcam by the Lambs blood, freely yeeld­ding their lifes to death. Satan, caled before Dragon and De­vil, [Page] is now new named Accuser, as the Hebrews term him: But contrarily the holy Ghost is Paraclet or Advocat: the one De­stroier, the other Defender. This title best agreed to thos times, when Christians were accused by Roman Idolaters of Thyeste­an Fests, Oedipean Incests, Medean Murders, Adultery, Treason, burning of Houses, Poisoning, Plagues, Famin, and al hainous crimes or hidious calamities which hapned: but it aims chiefly at Satans trial of Job by tribulations, as Pagans did Christians by persecutions.

Rejoice O Heavens, and ye that dwel in them: wo to the Inha­biters Vers. 12. of Earth and Sea; for the Devil is com down to you, ha­ving great wrath, becaus he knows his time is but short. Though the Dragon was cast from the throne by Constantin, yet Peo­ple continued his worship, specialy under Julian Apostat: but soon after Christianity prevailed, and al the Empire was wash­ed with Baptism: which made Satan rage and seek by al strata­gems to undermine the Church. This while the woman dwels in a Desart: who being freed from Heathen tyranny, til the se­venth trumpets sounding, and Christs secund coming, lay not hid or invisible; but lived in a midle condition like the Israelits before they entred Canaan; who escaped Pharaohs slavery, yet attained not the Land of promiss. So Christians escaped Pagan bondage, and served Christ freely: Yet as the Israelits Apostatized to worship a golden Calf, Baal Peor, Balaam, &c. So Christians fel to semi-Idolatry or Iconolatry. The Wo­mans abode in the wildernes fourty two months, answers to See Numb 33. the Israelits so many mansions in the Desart, not without a ta­cit typical mystery.

When the Dragon saw he was cast to the Earth, he persecuted the Vers. 13. 14. 15 Woman which brought forth a Manchild: to whom were given two wings of a great Eagle, that she might fly from the Serpent into hir place, to be nourished for a time, times, and half a time: but the Serpent cast out of his mouth water as a Flood after the Woman, that it might carry hir away. Satan is cast down, but not cast out: who staying below, essaied to oppress the Wo­man by what wais or wiles he could. She began to fly, but cam not instantly to the Desart, as neither did the Israelits: for Pharaoh pursued them into the red Sea; and the red Dragon [Page 156] hir with a Flood of water: quam bene cuncta quadrant? the great Eagle is evidently the Roman Empire: hir two wings the East and West Caesars, under whos protection she fared in an Eremitical Estate three yeers and half; expressed before by one thousand two hundred threescore dais, to comply with Daniels times. This Eagle in Esdras typifies the fourth Kingdom, and 1 Esd. 11. 16, 17 the twelv feathered wings the twelv first Caesars from Julius to Domitian. Thus Israel was freed from Egypt on Eagles wings, as the Lord saith, Yea hav seen how I bore you on Eagles wings, Exod. 19, 14. and brought you to my self. By water cast out of the Dragons mouth, is meant Words and Doctrin: as Salomon saith, The Prov. 18. 4. words of a Mans mouth are as deep waters, wisdoms Wel­spring Prov. 15. [...]. as a flowing Brook. So water here is pestilent poison of Heresies, specialy Arrianism against Christs Deity, which grew up in Con­stantins dais, and spred far under his Successors: totus mund [...] miratus est, se tam subito factum Arrianum. This was the Flood of water issuing from the Dragons mouth, like to carry away the Woman: for 'tis wonder the new initiated Emperors seing such dismal discords, had not faln from the Faith (as Julian did) to their old Dagon the Dragon, as finding most unity in impiety.

The Earth helped the Woman, which opened and swalowed the Vers. 16. 17. Flood cast from the Dragons mouth. That is, the Orthodox Oe­cumenic Synods drank up that Diabolical Deluge, as dry thir­sty Earth doth water, which is a fit figure therof; specialy sith Earth is oft put for the Inhabiters.

The Dragon was wrath with the Woman, and went to wage war with the remnent of hir Seed, which keep Gods Command­ments, and hav the testimony of Jesus Christ. This is an entry to the next Chapter, and as a Prolog to a new Tragedy raised by the Dragon against the Woman: who at first footing in the Desart, was encountred by two Beasts, not so hideous in shape as the Dragon whom she most dreaded; which history must be unlocked or unfolded.

I stood on the Sand, and saw a Beast risa up from the Sea, ha­ving Rev. 13 v. [...] seven heads and ten horns, and on his horns ten Crowns, and on his heads the name of Blasphemy. The Dragon, seing he could not prevail by his new Arrian devise, nor reign as yerst in [Page] his own name; being divested of the Empire; covertly erected a Vicarian Kingdom, to rais a new deputed form of Monarchy then beginning. 'Tis a twofold Beast (ten horned, and two horned neerly allied) representing the Secular and Spiritual State which reign jointly. The first is the ten Kingdoms, into which Barbarians shared the Empire, when the Dragon was expeld. This is the septicep Roman Beast▪ under the cours of the last Head; which after bore the Whore: being here de­scribed by ten Kingdoms: wherin he shal (as he did before) blasphem the only tru God by Iconolo-Idolatry: for as the number of seven Heads is the Roman Empires Ensign; so the name of Blasphemy is a note of Idolatry. The ten Crowns set on his horns, shew he shal be subject to the last head and sway­ed by it, as wil cleerly appeer in the sequel.

The Beast which I saw was like a Leopard, his feet as of a Vers. 2. Bear, and mouth as a Lyon; to whom the Dragon gav his power, seat, and great Authority. Thes three Beasts are resembled by Daniel to the three first Monarchies (Lion to the Assyrian, Dan. 7. Bear to the Persian, Leopard to the Grecian) al which this last Kingdom resembles in a certain confused mixture: For in Bo­dy it was a Leopard like the Grecian, which was divided into four parts, as this into ten: in Feet a Bear like the Persian, which managed State affairs by Magi, as this doth Ecclesiastic by Moncs or other Shavlings: In mouth a Lion like the Babyloni­an, which made Edicts to worship golden Images on pain of death; as this denounceth death to such as shal refuse to adore theirs. Som interpret thes Beasts literaly of proper cruelty, which this last Beast shal exercise, and the text wil bear both senses. Now that the ten horns are meant only of the last se­venth cours, and not promiscuously of al, as most deem; is thus demonstrated: The horns which florish and vanish with their head, could not be of the fiv first, becaus they (as the Angel at­tests) passed in St. Johns age, together with the courses of thos Rev. 17. 10. 12 Heads: Nor the sixth, becaus that reigning then, the time of horns was not com, as the said Angel apertly avers: Ergo they remain to the last Head. Such then as distribut the ten horns among seven heads, giving one to som and two to others at pleasure; are in evident error, crossing the plain text and An­gels [Page 157] interpretation, becaus they belong soly to the seventh Head, as aforesaid. By power which the Dragon gav, is meant his Militia or Army, as the Septuagints use the word Phara [...]h [...] Host, and God is caled the Lord of Hosts. Now Satans Hosts or Forces, are evil Angels and Idols the Devils Receptacles. Thos he gav to this last Beast, together with his seat and great Authority: viz. that universal dominion which he exercised in shape of a red Dragon, but in far unlike form; that he might beguile the Womans Seed in the wilderness; for he demeaned not as before, nor professed to be as he was (a sworn Enimy to Christianity) for then they would shun him out of inbred an­tipathy which God at first set betwixt them: but when he put Gen. 3. 15. off a Serpents skin, and shewed as a Leopard or Panther (which Beast the Dragon loths, but al els lov to look on for his beauty and sweet smel, as Isodor informs) it was easy to deceiv the L. 12. [...]. [...]. Church, being secure from his old form, not deeming or dream­ing such close Idolatry should be professed or practised in an Empire which pretended Christianity and demolished Idols, under a new masque of Image worship.

I saw one of his heads (the sixth) as it were wounded to death V. [...]. (by Michael) and his deadly wound was healed (by the salv of this substitut authority) and al the World wondred at the Beast. That the 7 headed Dragon or Heathen Rome, was the Beast of the 6 th head wheron the old Serpent sat, is cleer: becaus the 7 th succeded next in the same Seal, to whom the Dragon gav his Rev. 17. 1 [...] Seat. For 'tis said after, that fiv are falen, and one is (the sixth in St. Johns time) and the other not yet com: for though the Beast stil appeered septicep, and the heads kept order one after another; yee the Beast with al his furniture of heads and horns is presented under any State: So that the same Roman King­dom may be every wher signified under several sorts or courses of Government. The last ten horn'd Beast began at healing of the sixth Beasts wound, but not before; as the series shews: For what ever evil he did, or adoration was given him; al is said to befal after curing of that wound: for the whol world won­dred at him being healed; but none of thos blasphemous acts against God are cited before.

They worshiped the Dragon which gav power, and the Beast Vers. 4. [Page] saying; Who is like the Beast? who can make war with him? They worshiped not the Beast simply, but as the Dragons Deputy, or Dragon under the Beasts disguise. For to worship the Beast unles as the Dragons Idolatrous Vicegerent, was no more im­pious then to obey any temporal authority: therfore the Beast signifies his Kingdom, whos worship is subjection to it: that is, they freely obeied him, as if none could resist his power: but to worship him in a religious capacity, as he resembles the Dra­gon, is blasphemy against God.

Ther was given him a mouth speaking great things and bla­sphemies, [...]. 5. and power was given him to continu fourty two months. The Beasts condition or constitution is exhibited before: now rests to shew how he exercised the power delegated by the Dragon, viz. blasphemy and cruelty. This Vision agrees with Daniels Prophecy of the same fourth Beast and his last cours D [...] 7. v. 8. here specified: but the things declared to him more succinctly, are here dilated more largely. He had a mouth speaking great things saith Daniel, which John cals blasphemies: by which Ido­latry is implied, being the highest contumely against God. He shal also continu to blasphem fourty two months: during which space the Gentils shal trample on the out Court or holy City. For sith this prophanation tends to the same impiety with the Beasts blasphemy, both may signify the power of dark­nes or night measured by months or the Moons motion; & not by dais or yeers after the Sun: els why doth the holy Ghost infer it immediatly upon the Beasts blasphemy, unles the time be re­ferred therto? Ergo the Beasts 42 months begin not at this wrath and war with the Saints, but at his Blasphemy: So the meaning is, that he continued to blasphem so long. That by blasphemy is intended Idolatry or spiritual fornication is plain: 1. Becaus Babylon the Beasts Metropolis is caled Mother of Harlots with whom the Kings and Inhabiters of the Earth Harlotized. 2. 'Tis such blasphemy as may fal into the courses of the next Foregoer or rather al the Heads, which are charged with it; but no blasphemy can be laid to his Antecessor, not to al in com­mon sav only Idolatry. 3. The word blasphemy imports Idolatry in many mo places Isai 65. 7. Jor. 23. 15. 17. Ezek. 20. 27. Deu. 31. 20. 2 King 19. 22. Prov. 14. 31. Ps. 44. 16. Psal. 69. 10. in al [Page 158] which to rebuke, reproch, and blasphem God is al one sens.

He opened his mouth in blasphemy against God, to blasphem Vers. 6. his Name, Tabernacle, and them that dwel in Heaven. What was spoken of blasphemy in general, is here specificated by a triple Idolatry: 1. He blasphems Gods Name or Peson by Image-worship, ascribing it to Stocks and Stones. 2. His Ta­bernacle or Christs Humanity, wherin the Deity dwels perso­naly: which Temple or Tabernacle is blasphemed by be­leeving his Body to be daily made of bread; becaus transubstan­tiating John 1. 14. Priests caus it to be adored for his tru Tabernacle. 3. He blasphems Heavens Inhabiters (Angels and Saints) in caling John 2. 19. Hebr. 9. 11. Idols by their [...], which is also a contumely against Christ their Lord: for they are made Mediators or pretended Inter­cessors with him against their wils (as Patrons or Pleaders for mortal Men in Heathen maner) and many faigned miracles fa­bled, fast [...]ed, or fathred on them, which is more blasphemy.

It was given him to make war with the Saints and overcome Vers. 7. them; and power was given him over al Kinreds, Toungs and Nations. This is his other part of power viz. persecution; wherby he provs himself the Dragons Deputy. Daniels words Dan. 7. 2 [...] are, he made war with the Saints (the Womans Seed) and pre­vailed against them. The Beasts whol reign is a war against the Saints; but this is waged with bloody slaughter: as 'tis said vers. 10. He that kils with the sword, must be so killed: For here the Secular Beast (not Spiritual) is meant, which must be so handled. He made not this war in Infancy, but in maturity; A. C. 1 [...]. about the twelfth age from Christs nativity. The first war fel heavy on the Albigenses, Waldenses, and other Professors; of whom were slain only in France (as Peronius tels) about a million of Souls: who were massacred by mighty Armies levi­ed against Sarrasens: which bloody broils lasted seventy yeers. Many mo slaughters befel elswher for three hundred yeers af­ter: yet about An. 1500. sundry Stats, Kingdoms, Countries, and Churches fel from the Beasts dominion: against whom cruel wars were raised, which continu to this day, and shal not ceas til the Beast be destroied. So this persecution, for number of slain, far exceds al the primitivs: for from the Jesuits A. C. 1580. ori­gin in thirty yeers space, Baldwin computs nine hundred thou­sand L. de Anti [...]. c. 16. [Page] Orthodox Christians doon to death by Executioners: yea Duke d' Alva boasts, that he executed thirty six thousand in Belgia: and Vergerius vaunts, that the Inquisition consumed a hundred and fifty thousand in thirty yeers by several tortures. They excuse it, that the Clergy doth it not, but Magistrats: yet they condemn them for Heretics and make the others their Hangmen. For so 'tis said here of the Secular Beast, that he shal make war and overcom the Saints: but of the Ecclesiastic, that he shal caus so many as wil not worship the Beasts Image to be slain, and not kil with the Sword or by his own hands. His power reached over al the Roman dominion with so great persecution, that no Kinred, Toung, or [...] can resist his impiety: yet al particular Men are not included in this genera­lity: for very many in al ages (as God said he had seven thou­sand 1 Kings 19. 18. in Israel that never bowed knee to Baal) kept their Cove­nant with the Lamb: but al intire Kinreds or Stats served the Beast: so thos few disperst in the Beasts Provinces, made for a while the intemerat Virgin Church.

Al that dwel on Earth shal worship him, whos names are not V. 8 9. writen in the Book of life of the Lamb slain before the Worlds foundation. Lest any presuming on a catholic consent of Kin­reds and Nations which folow the Beast, or deterred with grie­vous persecution; shal think they may run safly with the multi­tud, the holy Ghost here reads their doom: that their names are not registred in the book of Life. Hereto is an Apostrophe anne­xed of attention: If any hav an ear let him hear ( i. al godly Chri­stians listen deeply and devoutly) to what is foresaid (not what folows) of their unhappy condition which folow the Beast.

He that leads into Captivity, shal go into Captivity: he that Vers. 10. kils with the sword must be so killed: here is the patience and Faith of the Saints. This is a consolatory close, that God wil be their avenger, to afflict their Adversaries with such measure as they mete: wherof they being confident, are no whit daunt­ed with tribulations, but patiently, faithfully, and constantly endure al, expecting revenge from God.

I saw another Beast com out of the Earth, which had two horn [...] Vers. 11▪ like a Lamb, but spake as a Dragon. He proceds from the Se­cular Beast of C [...]sars, to the Spiritual or Pseudoprophetical of [Page 159] the Pope with his Clergy; which exerciseth the government and blasphemies of the former. He hath two horns like a Lamb, boasting of his power to bind and loos by deputation; but speaks Idolatry and slais the Saints as a Dragon: for he is Author or Founder of the ten hornd Beast, by reviving the West Empire; but succeds the Dragon for ferity and blasphe­my under the Visour of Christianity: using his Authority as high Priest, and takes on him as Head or Monarch therof, no less then of his Clergy: with whom jointly he makes up the Pseu­doprophetic Beast or seventh Head of the Roman State in the City sited on seven Hils. The Pope single (though a fals Pro­phet) is not that Beast, but joind with his Clergy; which make a company composed of many members, as a Beast hath. Thes by fained signs and miracles (specialy thunder-bolts of Excom­munication, as a divine revenge) gradualy subjected the Kings risen up in the dissipated divided Empire to their yoke; who tamely submitted their necks, and put on the Image of the old Empire now crushed. So that the Caesarean Head being wound­ed, not only revived in that Image; but at the fals Prophets pleasure, punished with the Secular sword (as he with the Spi­ritual) al disobedient murmurers. This Beast coms out of the Earth, not from the Sea as the former, which had another pe­digree: for Sea signifies many People in one dominion, and an Army in war: but Earth, Upstarts of low condition, springing Terr [...] f [...]i. up secretly as Herbs sans nois or notice. He had two horns like a Lamb, pretending to bind and loos as Christs Vicar Ge­neral on Earth: but speaks as a Dragon, patronizing Idolatry (as the Dragon did) by Decrees and Canons; and seeks to de­stroy the Lambs tru worshipers.

He exerciseth al power of the first Beast before him, and cau­seth Vers. 12▪ the Earth with them that dwel in it to worship the first Beast, whos deadly wound was healed. This two hornd Beast useth as high Priest the Dragons fiduciary power intrusted to the former Beast: which consists in Idol-worship; being the ten hornd Beasts Chaplain in Religious Rites: causing the Earths dwellers to worship that Beast, stiling it the holy Empire. The words (before him) may import preceding, or in his presence; it skils not which. For whatever power the first Beast had, he [Page] agniseth the high Priest Author, by whos means the Earths In­habiters worshiped him: who being cured of his deadly wound, rose out of the Sea; but by what wais or wiles he did it, rests to be declared.

He doth great wonders, making fire com from Heaven on Vers. 13. 14. Earth in sight of Men, and deceiv them that dwel on Earth, by reason of thos miracles which he had power to doo in sight of the Beast: saying to them that dwel on Earth, they should make an Image to the Beast, which was wounded with a sword and did liv. The Pontifical Pseudoprophetic Beast, perswaded the Na­tions by wonders or miracles to reestablish the ten hornd Beast; wherby the Dragons power revived, and to frame the Beasts Image slain in the sixth Head. Which being formed af­ter his pleasure, that wound which the Dragon received seems recured, and the Beast renewed by substituting new Idolatry and tyranny like the former: For the Beast of the last Head is the others Image slain in the sixth. He said they should make the Beasts Image which was slain and did liv or reviv: which words belong not to the Beast whos Image was to be framed, as if the fals Prophet spake it; but to the Angel reporting the event, how the slain Beast revived. For the Dragon gav the Secular Beast his Power and great Authority: which healed his wound by imprinting his form of worship on a Beast of another Reli­gion; placing his Angels or Devils (not as before, by those ti­tles of professed Enimies to the Lord Jesus, but under Christi­an colors or cognisances) to be worshiped as Saints and good Angels: but who worships Idols under any name or notion, he worships Devils. Yea, to complet the slain Dragons ful Image, the Pope arrogats or assums divine titles, as divers Emperors 2 Thes. 2. 4. Devil-servers had doon: For he sits as God in the Temple of God, shewing himself to be God. Yea he makes fire com down from Heaven on Earth: which Graserus interprets by a Proverbial Hyperbole, that he doth such or so great wonders, as may emulat Eliah's; wherby he vindicated Gods worship. Which exemple of fire the Jews use for al wonderfulworks, wherin Gods Glory is more conspicuous. This is plausible; but it rather relats to that which folows, shewing how the fals Pro­phet induced Men to make the Beasts Image: viz. he caused al [Page 160] to receiv a mark, that none might buy or sel sav he that had the Beasts mark, name, or number of his name, vers. 17. 18. This he effected both by seducing miracles, and inforcing Excom­munication: For 'tis said, He deceived them by wonders which he had power to doo, that they should make the Beasts Image in maner aforesaid. The Ecclesiastic Anathema, forbidding common Commerce, is aptly resembled to fire from Heaven or Lightning; for it delivers over to everlasting fire, as a punish­ment 2 P [...]t 2. 6. Jude v. 7. proceding from God, usualy caled a Lake of fire or Asphaltites, wher Sodom and Gomorrha were consumed by fire raining from Heaven. The wonders were fained cures fastned on Angels, Saints, Images, and Reliques: but specialy by their breaden God, said to driv out Devils. Al which the two hornd 2 Thes. 2 9 10 Beast, with his fals Prophet pretended to doo, as St. Paul fore­told; That the Man of sin shal com after the working of Satan, with al signs and lying wonders, and with al deceivablenes of unrighteousnes. Touching the Lightning of Anathema, 'tis used in al ages; specialy about advancing Iconolatry: For when it was A C. 7. [...]. first agitated (which continued with fierce fervor one hundred twenty yeers) Leo Isauricus, a stif opposer of it and Saints In­tercession, was basely branded by the Popes Parasits (as Con­scanti [...] is ni [...]k-named Copronymus for the same caus) and struck with Anathema-thunder by the Pope: who absolved his Sub­jects in Italy from their fealty, and strov to bereav his Exarchat of Ravenna, with other dominions; wherby he animated Ico­nolaters in the East, and scared the West Monarchs from da­ring or doing the like. With the same Lightning he blasted the Albigenses, &c. for oppugning Idolatry in the Lateran Sy­nod under Alex. 3. So another Lateran Council decreed, That such Lords temporal as refused to quel them, should be Excom­municat by the Metropolitans and other Comprovincial Pre­lats: absolving their Vassals from fealty, and exposing their Lands or Territories as a prey to other Princes.

He had power to giv the Beasts Image life, that it should speak, Vers 1 [...]. and caus so many as would not worship it to be killed. Nebuchad­nezar decreed the same of his Image: but if this had not re­ceived life, the slain Beast could not reviv in him; no [...] was the former Dragon-Worshiper idle, but activ and stout to fly on [Page] his Enimies; as this Image ought to be, in which he should re­viv. Therfore the fals Prophet had power not only to allure People to make the Image of the last cours; but to inlifen him, wherby he may by Edicts injoin such things as shal support his dignity, and punish Opposers by temporal death. For al power of the Image or Secular Beast, is derived or delivered by the Pseudoprophetic: who denounceth sentence of Heresy against al which resist his Authority, and the other must execut it. This is commonly caled a delivery over to the Secular Power, which is but his Hangman, becaus he wil not seem or deem to defile his holy hands with blood. The like use other Sects or Septs make of Civil Magistrats.

He caused al great and smal, rich and poor, free and bond, to Vers. 16. 17. receiv a mark in their right hand or forehead: that none might buy or sel, sav such as had the mark or name of the Beast, or number of his name. The mark is his name, as 'tis caled the mark or name, and afterward the mark of his name. This allud [...] Rev. 14. 11. to an old custom of marking Servants with the Masters name, specialy in the foreheads; but Soldiers of their Captains in the hand. So the Lambs Folowers being contrary to the Beasts, had his name and his Fathers in their Foreheads. The number of his name is the same with himself, but cald the number be­caus brought into letters of number; God so disposing it: but the mark and number differ, if the interpretation be directed after the analogy of other places: For the mark shews to which Lord they belong that bear it: but the number indicats from what stock they spring that are marked: as the number of twelv made in the multiplication of twelv Virgins, is a symbol of Apostolic linage or Of-spring, as shal be shewed. The Beasts name which includs the number, is [...] imposed soon after the Revelation was writ. For at the Empires divi­sion by Theodosius, and rising of the ten Kings; the Roman fals Prophet, and West Inhabiters under him, were stiled La­tin by fatal instinct, which very name, subducting the numeral letters (as Hebrews and Greecs use) make the mystical number 666. noted by the holy Ghost: which provs the Beasts prosa­py, who vaunts himself to succed the Apostles; but indeed de­scends from the Dragon: for the Apostolic number 12, wil [Page 161] never cast into 666. however multiplied: but from the num­ber 6. (which belongs to the red Dragon and Beast of the sixth Head) neatly and naturaly. For the whol sum how great soe­ver, is compact out of six by units, tens, and hundreds: as if the Dragons whol seed, were diffused through this last Beasts whol Body with al his Ministers.

Here is Wisdom: let him that hath understanding count the V. 18. Beasts number, which is the number of a Man, even 666. The Virgins number one hundred forty four thousand contrary to the Beast, is altogether Apostolic, begot of 12. multiplyed by twelv times twelv thousand: for the reason or result of con­traries is contrary: wher both the name writen and number of the company is expressed: but here the name is conceled, or left to be collected and conjectured from the number, wherin lies a mystery. The forbidding to buy and sel is a brand of Papal Excommunication, excluding commerce or company with such. To receiv the mark of the Beasts name, is to ac­knowledg Note. him Lord and obey his authority: but to receiv his number is to embrace his impiety derived from the Dragon. Now tho none can hav the mark of his name or obey his autho­rity, unles he partake his number and impiety: yet may a Man admit the number or impiety, and abandon his name or au­thority. As the Greecs hold the Dragons impious Idolatry with the Latins, as first erected or established in the secund Nicen Synod by a Pope, who labored earnestly to reviv the slain Dra­gons Image: yet reject his authority, and wil not bear his name or yoke as formerly: but made a Schism (as 'tis stiled) from the Latin Church, which hath lasted abov 700. yeers, maugre al brute Anathemas.

Let me intrud or interpose a few words: Excommunication Animadvers. is a prohibitiv brand to bar al that hav it from commerce, com­pany, and communion; but no permissiv badg to admit any, nor can be caled a proper name. Now Roman Catholic is the general appellation which al own, and the Oath of Papal Su­premacy (caled reconciling to the Church of Rome) a common mark or cognisance; without which none may buy or sel spi­ritual wares among them. Quam bene conveniunt? Thes two terms (Roman Catholic and Papal Supremacy) applyed to [Page] the name and mark of the Beasts folowers; I must own how fit or unfit soever: humbly submitting them with al els to pub­lic censure. No Symbols, similituds, nor allusions run on al four feet; but are obvious to various applications, which may and doo differ in divers circumstances, as here haply it hap­pens. For the Beasts number, Vicarius Dei generalis in terris (DCLVVIIIIII. 666.) is the Beasts tru paraphrastical title, and right number therof: but no proper name, nor number of a Man as [...] is: nor are the numeral letters collected from the original Greec (wherin John wrot, as the others be) but from the Roman Latin, which is a considerable case. Let Readers ruminat on it, and judg deliberatly.

I looked, and lo a Lamb stood on Mount Sion, and with him Rev. 14 V. 1. one hundred forty four thousand having the name of the Lamb and his Fathers in their forheads. The company of Virgins which folow the Lamb standing on Sion, and elect Gentils put in place of Israel mentioned at beginning of the seventh Seal (for 'tis described in a duple Vision, to conjoin the prophecy of Seals with that of the litle Book) signifies the Church, which in midst of Papacy continued constant to the Lamb as a Virgin under Babylon; being the Apostles genuin progeny: who were not confined to any set station, but folowed the Lamb wherever he did go. By the number one hundred forty four thousand (12. times 12000.) it appeers, that the same company is specified both whers, being the Apostles tru Of­spring, which bear the number twelv as an Emblem or Ensign of their peculiar prosapy or pedigree. Mount Sion was Davids Kingdoms Throne or Roial mansion, caled his City: becaus he got it from the Jebusits, and walling it built a Tower, Streets, and Courts. It may here parabolicaly imply that part of the Earth, which Christ having vanquishd made his Churches habitation; viz. the Christian World: wher she keeps hir faith and chastity undefiled, when the Beast polluted al with adul­teries and slaughters. The name Lamb is left out in most Eng­lish Bibles, and his Fathers only inserted: but the best Transla­tors hav both, and the matter requires to read it so. For the allusion to mark Servants and Souldiers, belongs to the Lambs folowers; that they should bear his name so wel as his Fathers [Page 162] in their foreheads at Baptism being signed with the Cross. At which time they giv faith (personaly or by Sureties) to renounce Satan and al his works and worship: which in Apo­calyptic phrase is to abandon the Dragon and his power, with al his Angels or Devils. In this Sacrament we solenly profes faith to the Lamb and his Father: for 'tis the Lords Seal, as the Antients cal it. Origen saith, let us bear the immortal laver in our forheads: which when the Devils shal see they tremble. St. Austin terms it the Roial mark of our Redeemer: which Seal is defaced or obliterated by Idolatrous superstition, as Tertullian, Isodor, and many mo teach or testify. The Persons Rev. 7. 4. sealed both before and here are the same: but the reason for the end of sealing different: for ther the matter of protection is treated, here of fealty: yet 'tis needless to seek another Seal beside Baptism, which performs both: becaus with it God ads his Grace, wherby he owns them as his, and takes them into tuition: the one is handled in the other Vision of the sealed, the other in this. Hence Clemens Alex. cals Bap­tism a perfect safeguard, and Nazianzen a seal. S. Basil saith, unles the Angel take notice of thy mark, how shal he fight or defend thee from the Enemy? hereby saith Nicetas, we are kept safe from Satans snares. Thus Baptism is the seal, and sign of the Cross the mark of the Lamb, as al agree.

I heard a voice from Heaven as many Waters & a great Thun­der: V. 2. 3. and the voice was as of Harpers playing with their Harps. They sung as it were a new Song before the Throne, and four Beasts, and Elders: and none could learn it, but the one hundred forty four thousand which were redeemed from the Earth. The voice as of many Waters and Thunder, signifies a great mul­titud: Rev. 19 6. such as was the Levits singing with musical Instruments: for 'tis after caled the voice of a great multitud, as of many waters and mighty thunderings. Daniel describing the Son of Dan. 10. 6. God saith, the voice of his Words was like a multitud: which St. John cals many waters. The Singers were Celical Angels glorifying the Father and the Lamb, as they did before, when he unsealed the Prophecies. The Song is stiled new in both places, being different from that sung before Christ was sent, and for the new benefit of his coming granted to no foregoing [Page] ages, but only to the last times; the form wherof is expressed Rev. 5. 13. before: viz. to him that sits on the Throne, and to the Lamb be blessing, honor, glory, and power for ever, Amen. Which agrees with the Evangelical Hymn after Christ appeered in the flesh: wher to him that sits on the Throne and the Lamb joint­ly redemption, power, riches, wisdom, strength, honor, glory, and blessing are devoutly ascribed. None could learn that song so long as the Beast bore sway in Christendom, sav such as be of the one hundred forty four thousand, who only sans spot of Idolatry glorify the Father on Earth, as Angels doo in Heaven; as Christ teacheth us to pray.

Thes are not defiled with Women, but Virgins: they folow the V. 4. Lamb wherever he goeth: thes are bought from among Men, being first fruits of God and the Lamb. Women here meant in a Prophetic phrase, are Christian Cities addicted to Idols, whos Queen is great Babylon Mother of Harlots, with whom Kings and Nations commit fornication: but the Lambs company convers not with such, being Virgins free from Idolatrous Incest or pollution. Thes folow the Lamb or faithfully cleav fast and never forsake him: in what City or Country he shal set up his Standard, thither they folow. Thes are bought out of the pro­phane multitud, to be a peculiar People like first fruits (which imply al things exempt from il uses) to God and the Lamb.

In their mouth was found no guile: for they were without fault. V. 5. No ly was found in them: but al Christian Idolaters are Liers, who say they worship God the creator, but giv it to Creatures as St. Paul saith, They turned the truth of God into a ly, worship­ing Rom. 1. 25. the Creature as the Creator. Hence Amos cals Idols lies: but thes tru worshipers were faultless, and no ly found in their Amos 2. 4. mouths.

I saw another Angel sly in midst of Heaven, having the ever­lasting V. 6. Gospel to preach unto the Inhabiters on Earth, and to every Nation, Kinred, Toung, and People. After a description of the Company folows the history of things doon by them, and their leader the Lamb against the common Enemy, which is duple: 1. Of Admonition to the Beasts folowers, presented by three Angels. 2. Of Revenge, by a Parabol of Harvest and Vintage. The Monitor Angel is caled another in respect of [Page 163] thos foregoing musical Angels, wherof this Prcacher was none. Wher note that in such Visions, the Angels represent them Note. whom they govern: but this lofty Flier seems to be more e­minent then any Rulers of Men; being emploied to declare his Gospel caled everlasting: not so much in respect of time to com, as that past: viz what was promised (touching the Womans seed to break the Serpents head) at beginning of the World; as St. Paul saith, that which God promised before (or Titus 1. 2. when) the World began, is eternal life.

He said with a loud voice, fear God and giv him glory: for V. 7. the hour of his judgment is com: worship him that made Heaven, Earth, Sea, and Fountains of Waters. This Angel knowing Gods Kingdom to be at hand, when Judgment must be exe­cuted on Idols and Idolaters (the Devils being cast down and despoiled of the Roman Throne) exhorts al Nations, Kin­reds, and People to becom Christians, to worship God only as he is declared in the Gospel, and beware of Idols. Surely Iconolatry is analogical Idolatry, tho not identical with Hea­then. Fear God and giv him glory; for the hour of his Judg­ment is com: viz. wherin Christ by his Cross hath spoiled Pow­ers and Principalities, declaring by his Apostles and Evange­lists to the Nations (which through so many ages he suffred to walk in their own wais) that they should turn from Idols, or at his coming suffer eternal death. Why then doo Christi­ans who profes faith in this Judg, return as it were by a back dore to adore Idols or Devils under new names; having no Textual warrant of precept or precedent so to doo? St. Paul Acts 14. [...]. 15, 16. cried to the Lycaonians, we Preach, that ye should turn from thes vanities to the living God, who in times past suffred al Nations to walk in their own wais: but now the time of his Judgment is com. The Instruments used to denounce Gods judgments, were holy Bishops and Confessors: who first opposed Martyrs Reliques, as appeers in the story of Vigilantius and others: but A. C 720. afterward more conspicuously in the Greec Church against Image-worship; which many zelous Emperors ( Leo Isauri­cus, Constantinus Iconomachus, Leo Armenius, Michael Bal­bus, Theophilus) stisly opposed: yet in fine it prevailed by the power and policy of the two horned Beast and fals Prophet. [Page] For tho som condemned Images, yet many favored invocation of Saints: under which notion Iconolatry crept up closly, which Constantin with divers orthodox Fathers impeached of error. For the nominal honor of Saint given to Apostles, Martyrs, and Confessors was never denied (til in this last ignorant age by giddy Sectists) as a Christian compellation; but only the real invocation and intercession, which drew on superstitious ado­ration of their Images: yet to decry the name of Saints to such is no less erroneous, though not so enormous. The cry of this flying Angel sounded in the West so wel as East: for the Synod of Francfort, under Charlemaign, of almost three hundred A. C. 790. Bishops, condemned Image-worship, and the secund Nicen Council which established it. So the Synod of Paris, sum­moned A. 825. by his Son King Lewis, declared it to be impious, and rejected that Nicen cru as superstitious. Now listen to the se­cund Angels proclamation.

Ther folowed another Angel crying, Babylon is falen, is falen; Vers. 8. that great City, becaus she made al Nations drink the Wine of the wrath of hir fornication. He declares the foundation of Babylons ruin to be laid: wherin he imitats Isaiah touching Isai 21 9. Babylon in the same words, is falen, is falen; when the Medes and Persians were about to destroy hir. The Ministers of this cry against mystical Babylon, were the Waldenses and Albigen­ses: who by word, deed, and death declared Rome to be Apo­calyptic Babylon for hir Spiritual whordom of Idolatry, wher­with she intoxicated al Nations. Thes Champions began hir downfal: for multituds of Men in al hir Provinces gradualy started or revolted. By poisoned Wine is meant the amorous phil [...]ry or sorcery of hir spiritual fornication: but the Wine of hir wrath alluds to mortiferous potions usualy given to Male­factors, specialy among the Grecians in antient times.

The third Angel folowed saying aloud, if any worship the V. 9. 10. 11. Beast and his Image, and receiv his mark in forehead or hand; he shal drink the Wine of Gods wrath mingled with the Cup of his indignation, and shal be tormented with fire and brimstone in presence of the holy Angels and the Lamb: and the smoak of their torment ascends up for ever and ever. They hav no rest day or night, which worship the Beast and his Image, and receiv the [Page 164] mark of his name. This Angel proceding farther then the two former, forewarns the Beasts folowers, how dreadful dangers hang over their heads, unles they speedily shun his society. The chief Minister of this cry was Luther with his Sectators & Suc­cessors, who began that great glorious Reformation: when whol Stats, Kingdoms, and Provinces (not single Men as before) cast off the Beasts yoke with al his abominations. Here is threat­ned a terrible punishment (look to it Romish Catholics) if they persist in their old drunkennes, they shal drink the Wine of Gods wrath mix'd with bitternes (Myrrhe, Aloes, Gal, Frank­incens, or Wormwood) such as the Jews gav them that were put to death, and offred to our Saviour. Here the first Angel admonished them to worship God aright: the next menaceth ruin to Babylon: and this denounceth judgment to al his Fo­lowers.

Here is the Saints patience: Here are they that keep Gods Vers. 12. Commandments and Faith of Jesus. This cry is the Touch­stone to try the Saints patience in so long expecting the Beasts punishment: not being dejected or discontented at his prospe­rity, nor deterred with his tyranny, in obedience to Gods Commands and Faith of Jesus; by abondoning the Beasts com­munion and renouncing his Image, mark or cognisance.

I heard a voice from Heaven saying, Write, blessed are the Vers. 13. dead which dy in the Lord henceforth, saith the Spirit, that they may rest from their labors and their works folow them. This de­claration most Men refer to the preceding words, as a comfort henceforth to the Saints in the Lord: but they rather tend to the subsequent matters, as a warning of the Judgment and Re­surrection to com under the seventh trumpet. As if he said, Now is the time wherin thos that dy in the Lord, shal rise to a blessed life eternal. This interpretation seems best for three reasons: First, becaus the day of death is never caled a reward; but Judgment and Resurrection is. Secundly, becaus a Voice from Heaven imports som notable matter insuing: nor is any command given to write, sav only at beginning. Thirdly, be­caus R. v. 11. 11. 18 it agrees with the seventh trumpet, wherin the caus of thos that dy in Christ shal be judged, and God shal reward his Ser­vants which fear his name: as here 'tis said, Blessed are the dead [Page] from this time, that they may rest from their Labors, and their works (or a blessed reward) folow them. Both expositions in­tend specialy such as dy for the Lord, viz. Martyrs, who giv their lifes for Christ, rather then other Saints or Confessors which dy in the Lord and put faith in him: for so the context evidently evinceth or argueth by the Saints patience in suffering persecution even to death.

I looked, and lo a whit Cloud, and on it one sat like the Son of Vers 14▪ 15. 16 Man, haveng on his head a golden Crown, and in his hand a sharp sickle: and another Angel cam out of the Temple crying aloud to him that sa [...] on the Cloud, thrust in thy sickle and reap, for time is com and Harvest is ripe: and he thrust in his sickle, and the Earth was reaped. By Harvest three things are meant: viz. Cutting of Corn, gathering it in, and threshing it out. Hence a duple Parabol of contrary sens is used in Scripture: one of killing or destroying by cutting down and threshing: as Jeremy saith, Babylon is a threshing floor, 'tis time to thresh hir: Jer. 51. 33. yet a litle while, and Havest time shal com. So Isaiah speaks of Israels overthrow by Tiglatpeleser: It shal be as when the Har­vest Isai 17. 5. man reaps the ears of Corn with his arms. Another of sa­ving or restoring by gathering in used in the new Testament: as Christ saith, The Harvest is great, but the Laborers (or Ga­therers, such as shal be saved) are few. Now which of the two is here presented, rests to be sifted or scanned by order of things doon. The treading of the Winepress at Vintage (which suc­ceds this Harvest) is the same with that bloody slaughter exe­cuted by him which sat on the whit Hors; wher 'tis said, He treads the Wine-pr [...]ss of the fierce wrath of Almighty God: Rev. 19 11. 15 which provs that the two Prophetic Parabols here (no other interveining) signify the same matter: or if divers, yet som way, tied together: sith then Harvest ther goes next before Vintage here, and the preparation of the Lambs mariage, and Babylons destruction, preceds that cruel slaughter ther: it must needs folow, that the said preparation and destruction are this Har­vest, or belongs to the same with it, or the Harvest with them. If Babylons destruction be the Harvest, it agrees to the type of cutting down and threshing, sutable to Jeremies foretelling old Babylons fal by the same figure: but if both Harvest and [Page 165] Vintage (which end the yeer) set forth the consummation of things, the Harvest preceding in time; then both may signifie the period of Roman tyranny: wher Harvest may denot the Cities overthrow as first fruits, and Vintage insuing the Beasts who. Kingdoms ruin. Haply Harvest may imply that prepara­tion to the Lambs mariage or adorning his Bride, or somthing to be doon therat: which probably is the Jews conversion, and gathering of Israel so long looked for. Thes are they in our Ma [...]. 22. 1. Saviours Parabol, who being invited to the Kings Sons wed­ding refused to com: but being now ready make hast. For the Gentils cannot be this Bride, sith they hav bin the Lambs Spous abov one thousand six hundred yeers ago. With this conversi­on or return of Israel (who shal be ascited as part into the Lambs Virgin company) shal be joined the Turcish Empires cutting down, typified by drying up of Euphrates at pouring Rev. 16. 12. out the sixth Phial, that the way of the East Kings may be prepared: For the time of this Phial pointly agrees with the Brides preparation, being set betwen Babylons overthrow and the Enimies last slaughter. Christs Church (which by Israels conversion wil seem dupled) shal hav ech a peculiar Enimy: one the Roman Beast of uncircumcised origin; the other the Mahometan Empire of circumcised Of-spring, derived from Ismael, which was ominous and odious to Isaacs Issu: the abo­lition of both being to be accomplished at Christs coming. So Harvest may resemble the first, and Vintage the last. Joels Joel 3. 1. 2. 13. Prophecy (whence this duple type is taken) treats of Israels conversion saying, In thos dais when I shal bring again the Cap­tivity to Juda and Jerusalem; I wil gather al Nations into the Valley of Jehosaphat, and plead with them ther for my People and heritage Israel, whom they hav scattered among Nations, and parted my Land. Then folows by Hypotyposis; put ye in the sickle, for Harvest is ripe: com get ye down for the Press is ful, the Fats overflow, and the wickednes is great. Now though both notions of Harvest (one to gather in, the other to cut down and thresh) comply to Israels gathering into the Chur­ches Barn, and subduing the Enimies with slaughter: yet becaus the Churches vindication is here handled, the sens of cutting and threshing is to be preferd. The Lord is Christ the King [Page] stiled the Son of Man, whos power next appeers.

Another Angel cam out of the Temple in Heaven, having [...]. 18. 19. 20 also a sharp sickle: and another from the Altar which had power over fire, and cried loud to him that had the sickle saying; thrust in thy sharp sickle, and gather the clusters of the Vine, for hir grapes are ful ripe. And the Angel thrust his sickle into the Earth and gathered the Vine, nnd cast it into the great Winepress of Gods wrath: and the Press was trod without the City, and blood cam out even to the Horsbridles, by the space of one thousand six hundred furlongs. Here a Vintage is described, which Para­bolicaly in Scripture signifies bloody slaughter: and this is the same with that great carnage expressed by the same words, which shal be in the war of that great day at last Phial. For Rev. 19 15. both are the ruin of one Enimy, and ech shal befal at last on the Beast and fals Prophet, with al their Complices and Confede­rats. If then this Vintage be that slaughter, it must fal on the said Enimies. So the Vine or Vineyard is the Beasts Dominion, the ripe Grapes his Assistants ful of blood-guilt ripe for judg­ment; the Vessel or Wine-press the place of slaughter caled Armageddon or destruction: but wher this place or pitch [...] field shal be, is not reveled, nor may be curiously inquired. Yet the holy Ghost points out its dimension to be one thousand six hundred furlongs without the City; but within the Region or Territory therof. St. Jerom computs Palestin to be 200. Epist ad Dard Italian miles long (which make one thousand six hundred furlongs, eight to a mile) whence many conject or conceiv, that ther shal be this great battels Cockpit: specialy sith it hath an Hebrew appellation; which such as beleev Antichrist shal com from the East or descend of Dans Tribe, easily credit: but we who find him seated in west- Babylon, can hard­ly relish it: unles we deem (as divers doo) that after Romes demolition he shal divert into the East, as som of his sworn Vassals suppose he shal reside at Jerusalem before the day of Judgment. For 'tis not probable he wil freely lead an Army (as he perswaded Princes to doo) into Palestine leaving so ma­ny Enimies behind his back. Som find a place in the West of like extent (one thousand six hundred furlongs) viz St. Peters Patrimony, which from Rome to the farthest mouth of Po and [Page 166] Marishes of Verona, is about two hundred miles long, wher haply the blow wil be struck. The Cutter of clusters is not the same with the Wine-press treader; but hav several workmen: for an Angel with a Vine-dressers sickle cut the clusters and gathered the Grapes: but Christ the King with a troop of Rev. 19. 11. 13. 14. Heavenly Horsmen trod the Press, clothed in a vesture sprink­led with blood, whom the Armies in Heaven folowed on whit Horses. Nor is the Grape-gatherer said to tread the Press, but only to cast the cut Clusters into it; and then the King coming with his Heavenly troop of Hors, trod the Press without the City. Then blood cam from the Wine-press to the Horsbridles for one thousand six hundred furlongs space: So the sum may be, the Angel Vintager with the Saints help, shal lop off the Clusters belonging to the Beast, and so force them into Arma­geddon; wher the Lord Jesus shal tread them in a Wine-press: as St. Paul saith, The Man of sin shal be destroied by the Lord with 2 Thes. 2. 8. the brightnes of his coming. What can be cleerer? yet no in­fallible certainty, sav bare conjecture, can be had before the event makes it evident.

Here our Author, Atropos-like, cutsoff the web of his curi­ous Comment, modestly pretending he wil not meddle with Prophecies yet to com unfulfilled: but left a few fleeces or fragments formerly scattered among friends; which concern other mysteries contained in the last eight Chapters. Som of thes he promiscuously and preposterously presents by peecemeal, observing no such precise order of Chapters and paragraphs as before: which shal be pithily abstracted.

Mystical Babylon, the Metropolis of Antichristian Apostacy, is the City or Sea of Rome somtime Christs spotless Spous; Rom. 1. 8. whos Faith was famous over the World: but since becam an Harlot and Mother of Harlots; causing other Cities or sig [...]io­ries to commit fornication. For though she be guilty of other Heresies (as whores be of sundry Vices) yet this spiritual whor­dom so much laid to old Israels charge, is the grand Apostasy wherwith the great whore is marked.

This Vision is plainly shewed to John by one of the Phial­bearing Rev 17. Angels, and the interpretation reveled (which is not Vers. 8. usual) to be literaly taken as ther dilivered. 1. The Woman [Page] sitting on the Beast, is that great City then reigning over the Kings of the Earth. 2. The scarlet Beast carying the whore, is the same shewed before in another shape; viz. the Roman Vers. 10. 11. Empire. 3. The Beast with seven Heads or Romes seven Hils, and seven forms of Governors in that State: wherof fiv (Kings, Consuls, Tribuns, Decemvirs, Dictators) were falen before Johns time: one (of Caesars) then extant, which was to be changed into Christian Emperors of short continuance; seeming to be the eighth, yet indeed the seventh; which is the Bearer of this whore not yet sprung up, being not under the cours of the last Head, the Popedom. If then the sixth Beast (Pagan Emperors) reigning at Rome in Johns age, ceased to be as it was abov twelv hundred yeers ago: that which now swais ther, is the seventh and last Ruler, which he saw bear the whore. Vers 12. 13. 4. The Beasts ten horns are ten Kingdoms not then risen, into which the body of the Roman Beast should be rent in this last cours, by the wound of this Caesarcan Beast: al which should jointly confer their authority on the Beast that was to be cured Vers. 14. 16. or restored under the Rule of that last Head now past. 5. Thos ten Kingdoms which shal grow together under the fals Pro­phets Government, being their Head, shal fight with the Lamb, but be overcom by him. That war was waged long ago, and is stil in action or agitation: the Victory being in som sort at­chieved, but shal be accomplished much more gloriously. For som of the ten Horns or Kings, shal at length hate the Whore whom they so long bore, and shal make hir desolar, naked, eat Vers. 4 5. hir flesh and burn hir with fire, as the Angel interprets. 6. This Whore held in hir hand a golden Cup ful of abomination and filthines of his Fornication, and on hir forehead was a name writ, Mystery &c. This needs no explication, being taken from the common custom of Stews-Strumpets, who drank philtres or amorous potions to their Paramores in a Cup of gold: and the Cels or Chambers had several whores names set on them, as Seneca, Martial Juvenal, and other Authors inform; yea thos of most note had their name set in their foreheads; as Ju­venal seems to intimat of the insatiat Empress Messa­lina, who assumed the name of Lycisca an infamous Pro­stitut.

—Nuda papillis
Constitit auratis, titulum mentita Lyciscae.
She stood with bare gilt Paps bestained,
And by Lycisca's name hir self fained.

So this name (Mystery, Babylon the great, Mother of Har­lots and Abominations of the Earth) may fitly be applied ei­ther to the Whores person fastned on hir forehead; or to the place set on hir Brothel hous the City Rome where she re­sides.

Concerning the seven Phials of Plagues poured out by seven Rev. 15. V. 2. 3. Angels, preceding Antichrists ruin: wher before any particu­lar narration of Angels or Phials be made, another Vision is exhibited together with them: how the Church being clensed from Idolatrous pollutions in the sacred Laver or Sea of the Temple (not made of brass like Salomons, but of Glass or Cry­stal) sung a triumphant hymn of Moses for hir victory over the Exod. 15. 1. Beast saying, Great and marvellous are thy works, Lord God Almighty; just and tru are thy wais, O King of Saints. Then the clothing or preparation of the Angels with the Phials, are described more particularly. The seven Angels cam out of the V. 6. Temple clothed in pure whit linnen. having their brests girded with golden girdles; viz. in their Priestly habits. 1. The pou­ring Ezek 44 17. out of Phials signifies the Antichristian Beasts ruin: for as the Roman Kingdoms first state was to be subverted by the plagues of Trumpets so this last by Phials: which argues a great parity betwen both, sith this last bears the Image of the former Roman policy. 2. The seven Phials are so many degrees of its ruin: for as the Beast gradualy grew up; so he is to be destroied by degrees. 3. On what ever any Phial is poured, that suffers som damage thereby; sith 'tis the effusion of Gods wrath. 4. The Earth, Sea, Rivers, Fountains, Sun, Beasts Seat, Eu­phrates, Air, import somthing in the Antichristian Beast sem­blable or sutable: for al Phials are poured on the Beast or som­what of his, which toucheth his safty or utility. 5. The Beasts whol Body or Antichristian Univers is covertly compared (as it was in the Trumpets) to the worlds System: whos principal parts are Heaven, Earth, Sea, Rivers, Lights. 6. Becaus God [Page] useth Angels as Ministers of his Providence in governing the changes of Human affairs; therfore such things as are to be acted by many, are attributed or ascribed to an Angel as the guid and Ruler therof. Thes be his previous cautions touching the Phials, which folow in order.

The first Phial is poured on the Earth, and there fel a noisom Rev. 16. V. 2. grievous sore on Men which had the Beasts mark, and thos that worshiped the Image. This is poured on the Beasts whol body the Earth: which denots the People or common sort of Chri­stians, as Antichrists Footstool: on which basis the Papal Hie­rarchy being built, reacheth, like Babels Tower, to the very Skies. This Phial fild the Beasts Folowers with fury, like incu­rable Ulcers not to be cicatrized. Which was fulfild by the Waldenses, Albigenses, Wicklifits, Hussits, and other pious Professors; who renounced the Beast, caling Rome apocalyptic Babylon, and the Pope Antichrist: which so inflamed his Se­ctaries with sores of indignation, tyrannizing many yeers with Fire and Sword. Yet al in vain: their Ulcers were cureless like Exod. 9. 8 9. Egypts biles and botches sprinkled with dust and ashes; wher­to they mysticaly comply by way of Analogy.

The secund is poured on the Sea, which becam as blood of a V. 3. dead Man, and every living Soul died in the Sea. This is the whol cru or circuit of Papal Communion; containing al Nati­ons, Kingdoms, Dioceses, conjoind in spiritual society, though dis-joined severaly. This becam cold or congeled as a dead Mans blood, when the Pontifical Sea is dismembred: which Lu­ther and other Reformers performed, when they drew off whol Lims of People, Provinces, Princes, and Potentats from Papal communion.

The third is poured on Rivers and Fountains of Waters, which Vers. 4. 5. 6. 7. becam blood: thou Lord art righteous, becaus thou hast judged thus: for they hav shed the blood of Saints and Prophets, and thou givest them blood to drink. The Rivers and Fountains of the Beastian world, are the chief Champions of Antichristian Jurisdicton: whether Ecclesiastics (Priests, Jesuits, Moncs, Friers) or Secular Governours, who uphold the declining Pa­pacy. For their Emislaries were justly doon to death in Eng­land, as they unjustly served the Saints. Yea the Duch began [Page 168] to revenge that blood which Duke d' Alva and the Spanish In­quisition cruely spilt to fulfil this Phial.

The fourth is poured on the Sun, and Men were scorched with Vers. 8 9. great heat; who blasphemed Gods name, which hath power over thes plagues: but repented not to giv him glory. To know what Sun signifies in the Antichristian world, we must serch what Heaven imports: which is either the Popes universal Authority, or any eminent Monarchic power in the Beasts world. Now in it are sundry Stars of several magnituds (Kings, Princes, Dukes, Prelats, Free States) yet but one Sun, which seems to be the German Emperor (the King of Spain being the Moon) who hath bin of the Austrian Family two hundred yeers. This is the Sun on whom the fourth Phial shal be poured to his conversi­on or confusion.

The fifth is poured on the Beasts Seat (Rome City) and his Vers. 10. 11. Kingdom was dark, and they gnawed their toungs for pain; blaspheming the God of Heaven becaus of their pains and sores: but repented not of their deeds. Here the holy Ghost useth no Allegories, becaus great light shal then arise to the Prophecies by this evident sign: wherby wil appeer what Phials are past, and what to com. This destruction of Rome seems to be intima­ted before; but the name Pope shal not quit perish: only his Rev 11. V. 12. 13. glory and greatnes shal be clipped, that they shal bite their toungs through teen, and curs God persevering stil in the King­dom of darknes to despise light.

The sixth shal be poured on Euphrates, and the water dried Vers. 12▪ up, to prepare a way for the East Kings. Thes Kings seem to be the Jews which shal be converted: whom haply the Beasts Fo­lowers wil misdeem to be Antichrists Army, rising from Don as they dream; and so shal be hardned in their error. To prov that the Jews are meant by East Kings, this reason is pregnant: becaus this is the penultimat Phial, and unles they be then con­verted, they must needs perish with Christs Enimies (among whom they yet abide) at the day of universal Judgment, which the seventh or last Phial shal bring on them: Isai [...]h saith, The Lord shal destroy the toung of the Egyptic Sea, and with a Isai 11. 15. 16. mighty Wind shal shake his hand over the River, and smite it in the seven streams, and make Men go over dry shod. Ther shal be [Page] an high way for his People left from Assyria, as it was to Is­rael, at their Exod out of Egypt: but this Prophecy seems not so pregnant for Euphrates and Assyria, as for Nilus and Egypt. Now by Euphrates the Turcish Empire is mysticaly meant, which borders Eastly on it; who shal be thes new Converts chief obstacle, and the Beasts best bulwork: but this Euphratean deluge shal be dried up or destroied: yet whether by the Jews, or other Aliens, or their own intestin discords, is not re­veled.

Vers. 17. The seventh or last is poured into the Air, and ther cam a great voice out of the Temple of Heaven from theThrone saying: It is doon. Hereby is meant the power or Prince of the Air, even Satan: who fosters not only the Beasts dominions, but al Christs Enimies in what Coast, Climat, or Country soever: for as the Beast had his Spirit or Life from him at first; so the last Fortunes of al his Folowers and Worshipers shal depend chiefly on his charge or conduct: as appeers by the preparati­ons of so many Aids and Allies for war, to be procured in this last Phial by his Diabolical devises. Who bestirs by al means possible, both of his Lieftenents (the Beast and fals Prophet) and by his own Artificies; to rais this universal Army in the last danger of his Kingdom.

Vers. 13. 14. For ther cam three unclean Spirits (Devils working miracles) like Frogs, out of the Dragons, Beasts, and fals Prophets mouth; which go forth (as Emissaries with Summons) to the Kings of the whol n orld to gather them to the battle of the great day of God Almighty. So the Prince of the Air musters al his Forces and Fautors to assist thos two at this last exigent: on whom being pent up in a Coop at Armageddon, This last Phial shal thunder; not with arm of Flesh, as formerly; but an Hea­venly voice of revenge: wherby the Beasts total downfal shal be consummat: not only within Babylons wals, as before under the seventh Trumpet; but of the whol City wherever scattered or dispersed: Yes, of al Kings, Cities, or Stats which commit­ted filthines of fornication with hir Idol fals Gods: together with other forren Tyrans joining in opposition against Christs holy Spous or Church.

V. 19 20. 21. The Cities of the Nations fel, and God gav Babylon the Cup [Page 169] of Wine of his fierce wrath. Every Iland fled, and the Ma [...]n­tains were not found: a great Hail from Heaven (every stone a Talent weight) fel on Men, who blasphemed God becaus of the Hail; for the plague was exceding great. Mr. Mede proceds no farther to the excution of thes threats on the great Whore, sitting on the seven-headed Beast with ten horns: who with the fals Prophet, are to be cast into a burning Lake for ever, as 'tis expressed in the 17. 18. and 19. Chapters: but treats tenderly with much modesty of Christs 1000. yeers reign on Earth with his Martyrs and som chief Saints, at his secund coming to Judgment: which last day he makes one continued act with the triumphant millenium of his reign, to decline a third coming of Christ, as common Chiliasts assign without warrant. But this sublime speculation shal be suspended or superseded to the next Thesis peculiarly addicted or appro­priated to this Subject. This 1000. yeers reign after the Mar­tyrs resurrection (but before the day of Judgment) is speci­cified in the twentieth Chapter of Apocalyps wheron the Millenars build their Doctrin; beside som other obscure places in the Prophets: which shal be fairly yet briefly debated or dis­cussed in the Theory immediatly insuing.

Commentarii Compendium: A Compend of the Comment.

THe Comment contains two Prophecies: 1. The sealed 1 Part. Book: 2. The litle Book open. In the Seal- Prophecy is described the celical Imperial Session sutable to Israels in­camping

The twenty four Elders signify Bishops resembling the Rev. 4. 4. &c. Priests and Levits in their twenty four courses.

The four Beasts are Israels Ensigns: 1. Like a Lion: 2. A Rev 6 per to­tum. Bullock: 3. With a Mans face: 4. A flying Eagle. They were ful of Eys to shew sagacity, and ech had six wings im­plying agility. The first Seals opener, a Lion, shewed a whit Hors and his Rider armed: viz. Christ (the Lion of Juda) from the East; who laid the foundation of conquest over the [Page] [...] [Page 170] [...] [Page] Dragon, when Oracles ceased. The next a Bullock, presented a red Hors and his Rider; denoting Trajan a Spaniard from the West; whos reign was Bloody. The third with a Mans face, exhibited a black Hors and his Rider, importing Septim: Severus an African from the South; who held Ballances in his hand, indicating justice in the Empire. The fourth an Ea­gle sh [...]wed a pale Hors with his Rider; which points out Maximinus a Thracian from the North: in whos time and som Successors, the Sword, Famin, and Pestilence (messengers of death) raged every wher.

The fifth (no Hors nor Rider) enters with A. C. 268. Aurelian til Rev. 7 4 to 10 Dioclesian; presenting the primitiv persecutions. The sixth declares a strange shaking of Heaven and Earth, signifying the change or conversion of Heathen Rome by Constantin. But before the seventh, care is had for the Church, to seal a com­pany of one hundred forty four thousand viz. of every Tribe twelv thousand. In which type is an unusual reckoning; yet such as best resembles the profession of tru Religion, miracu­lously preserved in midst of the old and new Idolatry. The twelv Apostles aptly answer Israels type: the number twelv being the Ensign of Apostolic race, which by multiplying sets forth their progeny. Hereto is added by representation of innumerous Palmbearers, a most ample state of every Nation, People, Tribe, Toung which praised God.

The seventh seal contains seven Angels with seven Trumpets Rev. [...] 7. to 12. sounding alarm to the Empires ruin by sevenfold plagues; the four first of less extent. The first wasts the Empires terraetenures by terrible▪ incursions of north Nations like hail mixd with blood and fire: who destroied a third part of al green things (the Empire swaying a third part of the known World) which began at Theodosius death by Alaric, Rhadagaso, and others. A C 395. A 410. A 455. A 476. A [...]42. The next assails the very Empire, expressed by the Sea, when Al [...]ic sacked Rome. After which it daily declined, til Gense­ricus took it, and then began the ten Kingdoms. The third casts down the Western Caesar (omniously named Augustu­lus) who being a baleful bitter Prince, is resembled to a Star caled Wormwood. The fourth bereavs the light and lustre of Roman Majesty with a third part of Sun, Moon, and Stars [Page 170] (which shone bright before under Ostrogoth Kings) when Romes Consulship with al Pomp of other Officers c [...]ased.

Then folow three Wo Trumpets: the fifth being the first of Rev. 9 per to­tum. Wo, sends hostil bands of Arabians (Sarrasens likened to Lo­custs) who not only spoiled the soil from A. 830. to 980. (150. yeers or 5. annal Months) but poisoned Mens Souls with Ma­hometism like the venom of Scropions, having a King cald in Hebrew Abaddon, in Greec Apollyon destroier. The sixth or secund Wo Trumpet, looseth four Angels before bound at the River Euphrates, being the Turcs four Sultanies, as they were long so divided, til Ottoman united them into his Mo­narchy. This is to be accomplished in a Prophetic Day, Month, and Yeer ( viz. 396. yeers) from A. 1051. when Tangrolipix took Bagdet, til Mahomet 2. surprised Constantinople, slaying a third part of Men A. 1453.

Their number of Horses is computed two hundred thousand Rev. 10 [...] to 11. thousand: their Ordnance, Powder, and Munition explicated by smoke, fire, and brimstone then invented. The seventh or third Wo Trumpet is suspended til the litle Books Prophecy which contains the Churches destiny, and John bid to eat it; which was sweet in mouth, but bitter in belly: who is com­manded to prophecy again before many People, Nations, Toungs, and Kings. This comprehends the consummation of Gods mystery: the event wherof is declared by a mighty An­gels Oath, at whos loud cry seven Thunders uttred their Voices; which John is forbid to write, and bid to seal up.

The measured Court displais the primitiv Churches state con­formed Rev. 11. 2. to 13. to Gods Word contrary wherto is the Court not to be measured, being not his operature; but to be prophaned by renewed Idolatry or Antichristian Apostasy, which shal reign forty two Annal months. During this space, two Wit­nesses clad in sackcloth testify Gods truth, and exhort to repent 1260. dais (or yeers) equivalent to forty two months of pro­phanation. Thes denounce Gods Judgments, which begin at pouring out the Phials, and debarring the Idolaters from hope of eternal life. Their fate is after finishing their testimony, to suffer semblably with Christ, as the Roman sevenhead Beast shal inflict on them. Thes must dy mysticaly, lying unburied [Page] three dais and half: but then shal be restored to pristin place or eminenter estate and dignity. Upon a Commotion or change of Politic affairs, the City Rome (being but a tenth part of what it was) shal be overthrown at fifth Phial, and seven thou­sand Men of mark and name (the Clergies or Companies of Men) slain. This is the end of the sixth Trumpet when Kings of the East (the Jews) shal erect a new Kingdom, and the two hornd Beast (the Papal Clergy) with Antichrist the fals Pro­phet (the Pope) driven from Rome, before the great battle.

The Vision of the open Book, goes through the whol cours 2 Part. of Revelation; to shew its connexion with Seals and Trum­pets: Rev. 12. per [...]. after which insu many great mysteries. The Roman Empire worshiping the Dragon or Devil, persecuts Gods Church (represented by a Woman in travel of mystical Christ) 300. yeers: but when Constantin cast him from the Throne, he and his Successors enjoied it: which chance or change con­temporizeth with the sixth Seal. The Woman being delivered of a Son, dwels in the Desart forty two months: or a time, times, and half; or one thousand two hundred sixty dais: typifying the Churches middle condition; as being freed from Pagan persecution, yet stil tossed with a flood of errors and Heresies cast from the Dragons mouth.

A new tragedy of troubles pursues hir, who lighted on two Rev. 13▪ per [...] Beasts at entring the Desarts porch: one tenhornd rising from the Sea, viz. the secular Empire shared into ten Kingdoms: another two hornd coming out of the Earth, which is the Ec­clesiastic State or Pope and his Clergy. Both reign with neer alliance together, under the seventh Head of the old Beast, exercising the Dragons cruelty, and under color of abolishing Idols, introduce Iconolatry, or new devised disguised Idola­try; termed Blasphemy against God, his Name (when ought is divinely worshiped beside him) his Tabernacle ( viz. Christs Humanity wherin the Deity dwels) by transubstantiation; and them that dwel in Heaven (Angels and Saints) whom they John 2. 19. adore in derogation of Christs sole Mediatorship of Inter­cession.

The company of one hundred forty four thousand Virgins R [...]. [...]4 per [...]. folowing the Lamb (forecited at the seventh Seal to connect [Page 171] the two Prophecies) signify the Church in midst of Papacy, persisting faithful to the Lamb and his Father; who are the Apostles genuin progeny multipled by twelv. Then folow three Angels sharply warning al the Beasts worshipers to with­draw from thos Idolaters, lest they perish eternaly. The first monisheth to worship God soly and sincerely, which the Greec Emperors ( Leo Isauricus and others) fulfilled, when they sup­pressed adoration of Saints, Images, and Reliques. The next threatens mystical Babylon for spiritual fornication, with ine­vitable destruction: which the Albigenses and Waldenses Ministers of this Cry performed by Word, Deed, and Death; boldly proclaiming Rome to be Apocalyptic Babylon, and Pope the fals Prophet. The third denounceth horrid hidious tor­ments easless and endless to al the Beasts train that shal abide in his obedience. After this folows the Churches vindication against his Enemies, under the types of Harvest (which inti­mats the Brides preparation by the Jews conversion, and Turcish Empires confusion) and also Vintage, which is the Beasts dominion; the Grapes being his folowers: but the Wine-press Armageddon, the Shambles or Slaughter place specified in the seventh Phial. Wher the Grapes being gather­ed together by the Angel Vintager, w [...]th the Saints help; shal be trod by the Lord Jesus at his coming: but both are obtained by praier of the Church Universal.

Next seven Angels having seven gold Ph [...]als ful of Gods Rev. 15. per▪ tot [...]m. wrath (at whos pouring out the pure Church sung a trium­phant Hymn of Moses and the Lamb) signify the Antichristian Beasts ruin, with the sevenfold plagues or degrees therof; for whatever any Phial is poured on, suffred prejudice therby.

The first is poured on the Earth or common sort of Chri­stians, Rev. 16. per tot [...]m. fulfilled by the Waldenses, Albigenses, Wiklifits, Hus­sits, and others. The next on the Sea or Popes jurisdiction accomplished by Luther and other reformers. The third on Rivers or Ministers and Maintainers of Antichristian Doctrins; haply Priests and Jesuits by Laws executed in England or els­wher. The fourth on the Sun or German Empire stil in exe­cuting. The fifth on the Beasts Throne ( Rome) which shal be [Page] [...] [Page 172] [...] [Page] shortly effected. The sixth on Euphrates to prepare a way for the East Kings or Jews conversion, by removing the Ottoman Empire, a main obstacle. The seventh into the Air or Satan Prince therof: which infolds al Christs Enimies to be levied under his conduct, and shut up in Armageddon for the great battle.

After that mystical Babylon the great Whore, is described to Rev. 17. per totum. John: resembled to a Woman in rich attire, sitting on a scar­let Beast (the Empire) having seven heads (seven Hils or seven sorts of successiv Rulers) and ten horns or Kingdoms, as the Empire is divided: which may seem another Ruler, but is the same; being that great City, reigning over the Kings of the Earth. The gold Cup in hir hand, alluds to Whores Stews where such pranks are plaid.

Afterward another Angel shews Babylons fal, with great Rev. 18. lamentation made by Monarchs, Merchants, Mariners and mighty Men: who bid Gods people com out of hir; lest par­taking of hir sins, they receiv of hir plagues.

Then the Saints prais God for his judgments on the great Rev 19. Whore, and avenging their blood: after which folows the Lambs mariage with his Wife; and the Fowls are caled by ano­ther Angel to the supper of the great slaughter; when the Beast and fals Prophet were taken, and cast a life into a Lake of fire burning with brimstone.

The seventh Trumpet with the thousand yeers pertaining Rev. 20. (granted to new Jerusalem Christs Spous on this Earth) signi­fying the day of Jndgment, is circumscribed with two real resurrections; 1. As the morning beginning with the Judg­ment of Antichrist and fals Prophet, the chaining of Satan the Devil, and casting him into the bottomless pit for a thousand yeers, after which he shal be loosed a short space. 2. As the Evening, ending with the general Resurrection and Judgment: when the wicked shal be cast into Hel to be tormented for ever; and the Sai [...]s translated into Heaven, to reign with Christ their King for evermore.

Mr. More (who translated the whol work into English) made this compend of the Comment (not the Key of Synchronicisms) which is here much alter [...]d, abridged, and accommodated [Page 172] to vulgar capacities, being made most pervious and perspicu­ous; differing mainly from the Translators patern, and more conform to the Authors prototype.

Monitio pro Catholicis: A warning for Catholics.

HEnce results a caution or Conclusion to al Roman Ca­tholics, worth serious observation; which concerns neer­ly their eternal bliss or bale, joy or pain: 1. That Rome is my­stical Babylon or great whore, with whom the Kings and Earths Inhabiters commit spiritual fornication; and from whom we are bid to depart, lest we partake of hir plagues: al so plainly proved or pourtraied, as cannot be comptroled or contra­dicted. 2. That Iconolatry flatly forbid by the very letter of the secund Commandment (which is therfore expunged, and the last bipartited, being otherwise before) is Analogical Idolatry or Devil-worship; though not the self same with Heathen, but dis­guised under new names or notions of Angels and Saints: which are made Mediators of Intercession; yet thos blessed Spirits hear not their Orisons, and hate such honors as derogatory to our Kingly Redeemer, who is sole Intercessor between God and Man. 3. That the whol Papacy or body of Religion under the Pope as Head, is the Beast with two horns like a Lamb (whos Vicar he pretends to be) but speaks as a Dragon in the Doctrins of new devised Idolatry and Mens Traditions. 4. That the Pope is the fals Prophet and seven headed Beasts Image (which he caused to be caled the holy Roman Empire) whos Seat, Power, and Authority he assumes. 5. That Roman Ca­tholic (which is contradictio in Adjecto, sith no particular Church can be caled Catholic or Universal) is the Beasts name, and Oath of Supremacy (wherby Men are reconciled to the Pope or Church of Rome) his mark, without which none may buy or sel spiritual wares: both being badges belonging to the Popish Profession. 6. That [...] (Latin o [...] Roman) in numeral Greec Letters makes 666, the number of the Beasts name (which the holy Ghost bids Men to observ neerly) and [Page] precisely points out who he is. 7. That the Papal State is the Rev. 17. 5. 6 Woman richly clad (on whos forehead was writ a mystery, Great Babylon drunken with the blood of Saints) sitting on a scarlet Beast with seven Heads and ten Horns: which can be no other then the Roman Empire, and thos States over which the Papacy bears sole sway. 8. That the real destruction of mysti­cal Babylon and consummation of the Beasts whol Kingdom, with al their Complices or Confederats; is the Harvest ripe to be reaped, into which the Son of Man shal speedily thrust his sickle to cut it down: And the Vintage or Wine-press also of Gods wrath ready to be poured on them. 9. That the whol Papacy with Antichrist, Head of that Society, is the Beast and fals Prophet, which shal be tormented in a Lake of Fire and Brimstone for ever, wherto to the Devil is to be cast. 10. The Papal Emissaries (Priests, Jesuits, Friers, and other Shavlins) are the three unclean Spirits of Devils like Frogs, coming forth from the mouth of the Dragon, Beast, and fals Prophet to work miracles: who are sent to the Kings of the whol World, to gather them unto battle of that great day of God Almighty in Armageddon.

Al which premisses are largely and lucidly proved in the pre­vious Comment if impartialy perused, and imprejudicatly pon­dered. Els ask your Ghostly Fathers, on whom ye rely for the food of life (lest they giv poison for milk) what other Babylon or great whore is meant but Rome? or which is the great City that made al Nations drink the wine of hir Spiritual Fornica­tion? What Beast with seven Heads and ten Horns on whom the Whore rides, beside the Roman Empire? Who is the two hornd Beast like a Lamb, which spake as a Dragon; and who the fals Prophet or Antichrist but the Pope? What Image of the seven hornd Beast is ther except the two hornd; or who re­vived that Image sav Pope Leo 3? What other name or mark of the Beasts Folowers so apt as Roman Catholic and Oath of Papal Supremacy? What fitter number of the name (666) then [...]? Whether Iconolatry be not larved Idolatry or Diabolatry; and whether be any warrant for it in al Gods Word? What woman els richly attired, sitting on a scarlet Beast with seven heads and ten horns can be typified, if not [Page 173] Rome; or on whos forhead is writ Mystery, sav in the Popes triple Diadem; or to whom doo the words (great Babylon, Mother of Harlots, drunken with the blood of Saints) any way consort or correspond, but only to the Papal power, which hath shed the innocent blood of many millions meerly for mat­ters of Conscience and Religion?

O then lay thes things deeply to heart, as ye tender your sa­ [...]ing health. Com out of Babylon betimes while 'tis caled to day; lest siding with hir in the same sins, ye partake of hir ever­lasting plagues and punishments. What plainer description can St. John giv of the woman in glorious garments? Here is Rev. 17. 9 12, 13. 18. the Mind which hath Wisdom: the seven Heads are seven Mountains on which the Woman sits, and ten horns ten Kings, who receiv power one hour with the Beast: thes hav one mind, and shal giv their strength to the Beast: The Woman is that great City, which reigns over the Kings of the Earth. If then ye wil be wise to salvation, serch the Scriptures seriously and sin­cerely (which are therfore interdicted to Laics, lest they should see) what the Woman is which sits on seven Mountains and many waters, importing multituds of People under hir po­wer? or what the mighty City Babylon mentioned Rev. 18? al Read Rev. 18. incessantly. which chapter is worth perpetual perusal. Hir Merchandise ther specified is Gold, Silver, pretious Stones, Pearls, fine Linnen, Pur­ple, Silk, Scarlet, Thyin Wood, al sorts of Ivory Vessels, of pre­tious Wood, Brass, Iron, and Marble: Cinnamon, Odors, Oint­ments, Frankincens; Wine, Oil, fine Flour, Wheat: Beasts, Sheep, Horses, Charets, Slavs, and Souls of Men. In hir was found the blood of Prophets, Saints, and al that were slain on Earth.

Now ruminat hereon: what City els makes Merchandise of Mens Souls, or is drunk with Saints blood? 'Tis too too evident to every ey. Therfore listen what the Angel saith aloud: If any Rev. 14 9 10, 11. worship the Beast and his Image, or receiv his mark in forhead or hand: he must drink the Wine of Gods wrath, poured out without mixture into the Cup of his indignation, and shal be tor­mented with fire and brimstone in presence of the holy Angels and the Lamb: and the smoak of their torments ascends up for ever and ever. They hav no rest day or night, who worship the Beast [Page] and his Image, or receiv the mark of his name: That is, be re­conciled by the Oath of Papal Supremacy. The holy Ghost in al thes Prophetic predictions, doth not pourtrai Chymaeras or Mathematical fictions, but real places and persons, which can no where be found in Ʋtopia or al the World over, sav only in that great City, which hath for so many ages reigned as Empress over Nations, both in hir temporal capacity and spiritual. This Rev. 18. 4. then is a fair forewarning to the Beasts Folowers, or Roman Catholics, how dreadful dangers hang over their heads, unles they speedily shun his society; as al Gods People by voice from Heaven are bid to doo. O then renounce hir communion for fear of this direful commination, sith it so much behovs your eternal bliss: God of his goodnes grant, that we may at last be brought into one fold or unity of Faith under one Shepherd of our Souls, the sole Mediator al sufficient betwen God and Man. Which effect, if it shal pleas God to produce in al or any that shal read thes lines, the labor is happily em­ploied.

For a surplusage, hear Mr. Medes deep dis [...]urs touching the Supplement. origin of Idolatry, or Doctrin of Devils. Belus, Bel; or Baal, son to Nimrod, was the first mortal Man made a God, or Dei­fied by his son Ninus: from which first Bel or Baal al other Demons were denomined Baalims; as the Romans stiled their Emperors Caesars from Julius; the Egyptians their last Kings P [...]olomes from Lagus; and other Nations theirs in like sort. Plutarch tels, that Mens Souls after death took divers degrees; becoming first Heroes as Probationers to a Demonship, and after Demons, or a sublimer dignity as they deserved: but He­roes and Demons diffred only in antiquity, the elder Heroes being caled Demons, and contrarily. Soul-Demons or Mor­tals Deified after death, are like Saints whom Papists adore, and their Images as Heathen Idols: but the other Numens (Jupiter, Mars, Sun, Moon) parallel to Angels. The Gentils plead or pretend they worship not stocks and stones, the works of their own hands, but the Heroes or Souls in them; as the Israelits adored God in the golden Calf. So Papists assume the same Apology for Iconolatry: that they worship not the Image, but thing represented.

Nam Deus est quod Imago docet, sed non Deus ipsa:
Hanc videas, sed mente colas quod cernis in illa.
'Tis God which th' Image shews, but that no Deity:
Look on that, but adore this not seen by ey.

This is a poor palliativ plaster, but both are Idolatry of the same bran. For Heathen Demons were a middle sort of divine Powers, betwixt their Soveraign immortal Gods, and subordi­nat Men Deified after death; whos office was to be interce­ding Agents betwen thos Celical Gods and Terrestrial Men: in lieu wherof People erected Statues, Images, Temples, and Pillars to them; yea, adored their Reliques and Sepulchers. Semblably Papists Semi-Idolaters Deify Angels and Saints, adore their Images, erect Churches to their names, worship a breaden God for Christ, and set up Crosses like Demon-Co­lumns. Hereof St. Paul forewarns: The Spirit speaks expresly, 1 Tim. 4 1. 2 3. that in later times som shal fal from the Faith, attending to sedu­cing Spirits, and Doctrins of Devils or Demoniac dogmats: But the chief is that grand general Apostasy into Analogical larved Idolatry, stiled in the Apocalyps spiritual Fornication, and Rome mystical Babylon: becaus Idolatry was first founded at old Babylon built by Nimrod (wher his son Belus and Grandson Ninus with their Successors resided) but since revived in a new form at Rome. Thes Demons or Deastri (saith the Apostle) through lying hypocrisy, hav seared Consciences, for­bidding to marry, and commanding to abstain from meats. Thes indeed are parts of their demoniac Doctrins; but the principal is Idolatry disguised under the conterfet color of Ico­nolatry.

Ob. The sole exception to this exposition is, That Demon or Devil in Scripture sens, is stil taken for an evil Spirit or foul Fiend; never for a good Angel or Saint, though Prophane Au­thors use both promiscuously: Ergo to invoke thos glorified Spirits as Intercessors on our behalfs; or adore their Images, or consecrate Churches to their honor; deservs not to be brand­ed as Doctrin of Devils: specialy sith holy Men yet living are so honored, and their praiers desired, which was ever commend­ed, but never condemned in any Church.

Sol. 'Tis tru, the Scripture stil takes Demons or Devils in the wors sens, becaus Gentils deemed their worthies Dei­fied Souls for Demons, which were wicked Spirits seducing Mankind; using the word for what they are in truth: sith no good Angel or blessed Soul wil freely admit or assume such di­vine honor derogatory to their Creator, nor accept Mens In­vocations. So the worship of Angels or Saints, and their Re­liques, Pillars, or Images may properly be caled Doctrin of De­vils; sith 'tis spiritual whordom and renewed Idolatry: wher­by they make like evil Demons or Devils; what fained fashions or conterfet colors to delude people soever they set, to varnish this superstition. This is his mellifluous morsel to chaw the cud on, which who shal piously digest, it wil turn to feed his Soul, by abandoning this disguised abomination.

Germani Doctoris aucta: A German Doctors supply.

A Late Silesian Divine Anonymal, set forth a Book caled Clavis Apocalyptica, with a confused Comment an­nexed: who is Mr. Medes Ape, if not a Plag [...]ary (as many of his Countrimen be) from whom he borows the Title, Method, and most speculations (citing him twise or thrise) both in the Synchronicisms and Explications: but varies in som circum­stances applied to his Country, and comfort of his exiled Bre­thren; assuring their Redemption to draw nigh, even at end of A. C. 1655, which is his single or singular crotchet, as wil ap­peer in the book briesly contracted.

God in his faithful Fatherly providence, to comfort the Preamble. godly and warn the wicked, prefixed certain times in the old Testament, how long he would forbear to punish. For before the Flood he set one hundred twenty yeers to repent, and then destroied al impenitent sinners with a Deluge of waters. After it, he declared to Abram, That his Seed should be a stranger in a Land, and serv them in affliction four hundred yeers, but that Nation he would judg, and they should go out with great substance: which promiss at period of time he truly performed, [Page 175] drowning Pharaoh with al his Host. Indeed [...]e destroied So­dom & Gomorrah without prefining time becaus their si [...]s were so transcendent, and they obduratly impenitent: but prescri­bed fourty dais to Niniv [...]s destruction, which was averted by mature repentance. He assigned seventy yeers to Babylons cap­tivity: which being accomplished, he stirred up Cyrus spirit to releas the People. In Daniel seventy annal weeks (four hun­dred ninty yeers) were determined on the Jews, in which time Messiah should be cut off, and Jerusalem desolated, which were effected in their times. Even so ther be set seasons appointed to Gods Church in the new Testament, how long she shal be per­secuted, and when delivered: which is expressed in thes places of Scripture. 1. The Saints shal be given into the fourth Beasts hand for a time, times, and dividing of a time. 2. An Angel asks, how long it shal be to the end of thes wonders? another answers for a time, times and half: So John saith, The Woman (Gods Church) shal be in the Desart a time, times, and half. 3. The two witnesses shal be clad in sack [...]loth one thousand two hundred threescore dais. 4. The Gentils shal tread the holy City under foot fourty two months. 5. The Beasts blasphemies shal continu fourty two months: which three sorts of numbers (a time, times, and half, one thousand two hundred threescore dais, fourty two months) are one, and explain ech other: taking thirty dais to a month, and expoun­ding dais by yeers; both which the Prophets and Saint John used to doo. 6. Thes three times begin and end together. 7. Daniels one thousand two hundred ninty dais of the Sacri­fices surreption and setting up abomination, begin thirty yeers sooner then the one thousand two hundred threescore; but end both at once A. 1655. now next insuing: For three yeers and half make fourty two months, and one thousand two hun­dred threescore dais, after twelv months (ech of thirty dais) and three hundred sixty dais in a yeer. So al exactly comply or correspond.

The Hebrew yeer contains twelv months, in ech thirty dais, in al three hundred sixty: but our Julian fiv mo with six hours. One day Propheticaly implies a yeer: as Daniels hebdomad is D [...]. 9. 24. seven yeers, and his Vision or Vati [...]iny of seventy weeks [Page] seven times seventy, or four hundred ninty yeers. On thes two grounds the whol fabric of future Chronical computs consists. Dan. 7. 35. 'Tis said, the Saints shal be given into the fourth Beasts hand t [...]l a time, times, and dividing of time: i. one yeer, two, Dan. 12. 7. and half: so an Angel swears by him that livs for ever, it shal be for a time, times, and half a time. Semblably John saith, The Rev. 12. 14. Woman (Gods Church) shal be nourished in the Wildernes (of Persecution) from the Serpent for a time, times, and half: which is fore-expressed ( vers. 5.) by one thousand two hun­dred Rev. 11. 2. 3. threescore dais: as the two witnesses shal be clad in sack­cloth so long: but 'tis said the Gentils shal tread the holy City Rev. 13. 5. under foot fourty two months; and the Beasts blasphemies shal continu the same space. Al which sorts of sums are one, and sute each other. For the fourth Beasts three times and half in Daniel make fourty two months, or one thousand two hun­dred threescore dais, according to twelv months and three hun­dred sixty dais in a yeer. So the Womans hiding for a time, times, and half, or fourty two months, or one thousand two hundred threescore dais uniformly or sinchronicaly signify one thousand two hundred sixty yeers. Some suppose natural dais (not annal) are meant, which make three yeers and half or fourty two Hebrew months, or one thousand two hundred threescore dais simply: which cannot be, sith the holy City hath bin calcitrated, the Witnesses prophecied, the Woman nou­rished, and the ten hornd Beast blasphemed long ago: nor is it possible to accomplish al things ther spoken in so short a space. 'Tis writen, your Children shal wander in the wildernes fourty Num. 4. 33. yeers, after the number of fourty d [...]is, in which ye searched the Ezek. 4 6. Land, ech day for a yeer. Again, thou shalt bear their iniquity fourty dais: I hav appointed ech day for a yeer. John Napier, and most Expositors jointly agree, that Prophetic dais are meant, which imply yeers. So three times and half, fourty two months, and one thousand two hundred sixty dais being uni­vocal or consignificant, begin and end together: as the Beasts three times and half commence with the Womans. For when the red Dragon was cast to Earth by suppressing Heathen Ido­latry; he persecuted the Woman by the ten hornd Beast, to whom he gav his Power, Seat, and great Authority: but she [Page 176] fled and was fed in the wildernes one thousand two hundred Rev. 13 2. threescore dais. The Beasts time and two Witnesses expires with the sixth trumpet: Ergo they began together.

So the Gentils trampling on the holy City and two Wit­nesses time initiats at once: but sith the Angel in Daniel speaks Dan. 12 7 11. of three times and half, and after of one thousand two hundred ninty dais, which are thirty mo then one thousand two hundred sixty precited: many make doubt, whether both signify the same? Most Authors assert them for one, but the Text infers it not, and futures were only obscurely reveled to Daniel. For three times and half concur with one thousand two hundred threescore dais, which is the duration of the Beasts dominion: but one thousand two hundred ninty is the terminus a quo of another Chronical computation to commence thirty yeers be­fore it, and expire both together: So the two sums speak dark­ly of several subjects. The words are thes, indoctos doc [...]o: From the time that the daily Sacrifice shal ceas, and abomination of de­solation set up, ther shal be one thousand two hundred ninety [...]ais. Now listen how he assoils it: this time begins under Julian Apostat A. C. 363. (or as som Chronologers comput A. 365) when the greatest devastation of Jerusalems Temple hapned (to fulfil Christs prediction, that not a stone should be left on Mat. 24 2. a stone) as Cyril, then Patriarch of Palestin, acknowledged. For tho the daily Sacrifice or Jewish Service ceased when Titus sacked Jerusalem, yet was it not quit abolished: sith the Jews under Constantin celebrated the Passover ther, having hope to rebuild the Temple, which Julian, to despit Christians, encou­raged them to doo, furn [...]shing them with meat, mony, and ma­terials: At which time God sent su [...]h th [...]nder, lightning, bals of fire, and Earthquakes; as disgorged the foundations, kill [...]d divers workmen, and deterred al to persist: which was the abo­minable desolation foretold by Christ from Daniel. So the one thousand two hundred three score annal dais, must inch [...]at thirty yeers later ( A. 395. at Theodosius death) but terminat together A. 16 [...]5. (next yeer) as shal be shewed.

Here we must consider, whether the Characters set on the 1 Character. said sums may concur or cohere? which are three: 1. The Ro­man Empires bip [...]rtit division in thes words; To the Woman R [...]. [...]. [...] [Page] were given two wings of a great Eagle▪ to fly into hir place in the Wildernes. The two wings are the Empires two parts, as The­odosius shared it betwen his two Sons An. 395. to which Aera al three characters coincide: but then the Barbarians broke in, treading the holy City under foot, and the Woman fl [...]d into the Desart.

2. The holy City is given the Gentils to tread on fourty 2 Character. two months. At Constantins conversion, the Womans new born Child was set on Gods Throne, and the Dragons worship got a great b [...]ow; but Theodosius cast him to ground: yet at his death, the holy Cities cal [...]itration commenced under his two young Sons; when Goths, Huns, Alans, and others under con­duct of Alaric, swarmed in on al sides, first of the East Empire, and after of the West; who took Rome, An. 410, destroying Churches, and persecuting Christians in al places.

3. A Beast rose out of the Sea, having seven heads and ten 3 Character. Rev. 13. 2. horns, and on his horns ten Crowns. Old Heathen Rome is resembled to a red Dragon, with seven heads Hils, and ten horns Provinces: and upon his heads in Rome City seven Crowns, or seven sorts of suprem Rulers forenamed: but the Christian Empire hath ten Crowns on ten horns, (not seven on seven heads) being the ten Kingdoms into which it was part­ed. Now the beginning of this Beast was when it first rose out of the Sea, under Alaric. An. 395. but the ten horns were not ful grown til threescore yeers after An. 455. when ten Kings or thereabout reigned distinctly. So al three characters (1. the spreading of the Eagles two wings, when the Woman fled. 2. The ten hornd Beasts rising out of the Sea at Ala [...]i [...]s entry. 3. The Gentils treading the holy City) comply or con­temporize at once An. 395. but Daniels abomination (which is to continu one thousand two hundred ninety dais, being not the same with the Womans flight) befel under Julian thirty yeers sooner An. 365. yet shal determin both together An. 1655. as aforesaid. For al Writers date the downfal, distraction, and destruction of the fourth Monarchy at Theodosius death, the last single intire Emperor: after which it declined, decaied, or decreased daily.

This is very obvious or p [...]rspicuous; but he makes the six [Page 178] 6000. yeers of the Worlds continuance to end at the same time A. 1655. by his wrested calculation, wherin Chronologers infinitly vary: which argues partiality of a Man wedded to his own opinion. Yet the comparison of 1656. yeers from Mans creation to the Floods initiation, corresponds somwhat semblably to our next yeer 1655. consummar, or 1656. in­choat (that the first destruction by VVater, may symphonize or synchronize with the last by Fire) if any faith may be given to such Chronical conjectures. Howbeit we may make this use of it, as Christ bids us, Watch, Pray, and lift up your Heads; 1 Thes. 5. 2▪ 3. for your redemption is at hand: but such as liv securely (as as­sured of their salvation) speaking peace and safety to their Souls; Sudden destruction shal com upon them, as travel on a Woman With Child, and they shal not escape. The day of the Lord shal com as a Thief in the night: therfore watch and pray, for great things and terrible revolutions are at dore to befal at end of A. 1655. wherin this Author is most confident, who proceds thus. It rests to be shewed: 1. What hitherto hath bin fulfilled: 2. What at present is effected: 3. What shortly is to be expected, which is chiefly contained in the 11. and 16. Chapters. The Revelation describes the State of Christs Church in the new Testament and what shal betide the fourth Monarchy under which it subsists. This description includs three Periods of time.

1. The Dragons Ethnic Kingdom, when seven Crowns 1 Period. stood on his seven Heads, being publicly adored, and Christi­ans persecuted by Pagan Emperors: to which reign Constantin Rev. 12. 3. Rev. 13. 1. 2. put a Period A. 312. and the Church triumphed til Theodo­sius died A. 395. At which time the Devil left his shape of a Dragon resigning his Host▪ Seat, and great Authority to the Beast with seven Heads and ten Horns, which rose from the Sea.

2. Antichrists Vicarian Lieftenentship under the Dragon 2 Period. Rev. 12. 15 16. from A. 395. til A. 1655. now neer. During which space, the Pope or fals Prophet blasphemed Gods name, and perse­cuted his Saints for one thousand two hundred sixty yeers: but when the Dragon was cast to ground, he cast water out of his mouth as a Flood to carry away the VVoman: that is, he [Page] stirred the North Nations to invade the Empire and infest the Church: but the Earth swalowed the Flood, for they embra­ced Christanity, and erected sundry Kingdoms. The Dragon seing Idolatry could not be publicly erected, resigned to the Bea [...]t risen from the Sea (on which, the great Whore or Anti­christ the Dragons Deputy▪ Vicar crept up in thos wars, rode) his seat, power, and authority: viz. his host of Devils or Idols, wherin Ethnics worshiped him; which his Antichristian Vicar stil continues under the name of Saints. Herof St. John speaks, Rev. 13. 3, 4. al the World wondred at the Beast, but worshiped the Dragon which gav him power, and the Beast also, saying; who is like him, or able to make War with him? This Lieftenentship is to last forty two months or one thousand two hundred sixty an­nal dais: which beginning A. 395. must end A. 1655. as is said.

Then folows the Churches tru peace or prosperity at last 3 Period. Rev 20. 1, 2, 3. Period: for at sound of the seventh Trumpet, the seventh Wo cam on the Empire, and the seventh Phial of Gods wrath was poured o [...]; wherwith the Churches Enimies are cut off, and the Devil shut up in the bottomless Pit for one thousand yeers: so that nothing but tru tranquillity can insu. Hence the Church Rev. 11. 15. exults with great voice saying, the Kingdoms of this World are becom the Lords and his Christs, who shal reign for ever.

To thes three times al three Parts of the Apocalyps are Analysis. squared: for the Son of God des [...]ribes the state of his Church and what shal befal the Empire in a triple maner: 1. By seven Epistles chap. 2. and 3. 2. By a Book sealed ch. 4. 5. 6. 7. 3. By a litle open Book ch. 10. to the end. He also appeered to John in several shapes: 1. As a Son of Man ch. 1. who suf­fred in the fi [...]t Period. 2. As a Beast like a Lamb with seven Horns and seven Eys ch. 5. which fights in the secund Period. 3. As a strong Angel clothed with a Cloud ch. 10. who reigns having al things put under his feet in the third last Period. As a Son of Man in m [...]st of seven golden Candlesticks, he de­clares the Churches condition in general by seven Epistles; wherof the two si [...]st belong to the first Period: the [...]iv last to the se und: but the Promises ch. 2. and 3. to the last. As a Lamb he opens the sealed Book (Gods hidden Decree) implying the [Page 179] Roman Empires estate distinctly, under which the Church is built and subsists ch. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. and 9. viz. in the Politic State for the first Period, til A. 395. (which by opening the six first Seals is performed) the Ethnic Emperors condition is shewed in the first fiv; but the fal of Paganism in the sixth, from Con­stantin to Theodosius death. In the secund Period from A. 395. to 1655. when the seventh Seal is to be opened, seven Angels with seven Trumpets, declare by seven Judgments then executed the Empires ruin Ch. 8. 1. By Barbarians A. 395. 2. By Romes first sackage A. 410. 3. By suppressing the West Empire in Augustulus A. 476. 4. By abolishing al public Offices A. 552. 5. By Sarrasens, as the first Wo tels ch. 9. 1. to 12. 6. By Turcs ch. 9. 13, to 19. 7. By Papists palpable Idolatry, Murders, Sorce [...]ies, Fornications, and other abominable sins; as in the secund Wo ch. 9. 20, 21. In the third Period at entry of A. 1655. the seventh Angel sounds, and Judgment is exe­cuted with the third Wo on the Churches Enimies, wherby Gods mystery is fulfilled ch. 10. 9. As an Angel covered with a Cloud, having a litle Book opened which John swalowed; he foretels what shal befal the Ecclesiastic State in al three Periods. 1. The Church is built up under persecutions ch. 11. 1, 2. 2. 'Tis gloriously beautified with the Sun, having the Moon under foot, as despising al mundan things; and a Crown of twelv Stars (the twelv Apostles) on hir Head ch. 12. 1. 2. 3. The red Dragon raiseth many Heresies and troubles; but Constantin (as Michael) overcam him, and expeld Heathe­nism v. 9. In the secund Period, thes seven Synchronicisms are set forth. 1. The holy City trod down by the Gentils ch. 11. 2. 2. The two VVitnesses mourn in sack▪ cloth v. 3. to 10. 3. The VVoman fled into the Desart ch. 12. 6, to 14. 4. The ten hornd Beast blasphems God, and makes war with the Saints. 5. The two hornd drivs a pety ped [...]ing trade ch. 13. per totum. 6. The company of one hundred forty four thou­sand sing a new Hymn and liv blamless ch. 14. 1. to 6. 7. The VVhore of Babylon (or Papal Hierarchy) rides and rules the ten hornd Beast of free accord ch. 17. Herupon God forewa [...]nd hir by declaring his plagues and punishments ch. 15. and 16. but when no redres folowd, he past sentence to confound hir. [Page] Hence in the third Period, the Churches joy or ovation over hir Enimies total ruin is displaied: with hir wished peace or tranquillity ch. 19. Thes are the general Contents of al: but many mo important particulars relating to our times occur; which shal be summarily collected for the Churches comfort specialy the two Witnesses History ch. 11. and description of the seven Phials ch. 16. which two being of neerest concern­ment, shal be most accuratly agitated. For the first explicats the entrance of the third Prophetic part from the litle Book, com­prising al three Periods as an abridgment of the whol Revela­tion. It consists of two Parts: 1. What is reveled to John by word of mouth, how things shal obvene; as in the first Period at erecting the Church; in the secund under the Antichristian Vicar, by two Synchronisms of the Gentils calcitrating the holy City forty two months, and the Witnesses mourning one thousand two hundred sixty dais. 2. What is realy re­presented to him by a sudden change in Vision, at beginning of the third Period. Thes are the terms of our undertaken task.

In the first Period under the Dragons reign, the Son of God Exposition. causeth his Temple or Church to be built, the place of Sacri­fices be measured, and charily protects his Servants in thes A reed like a rod was given me, and the Angel said; arise, Rev 11. v. [...]. measure Gods Temple, and Altar, and them that worship therin. Sith then the building and gathering Christs Church, is com­mended by measuring the Jews Temple; the form therof must be considered, to attain the tru meaning of the Text. It stood 2 Chr 3. 1 3 4. [...] King. 6. 16. on Mount Moriah: the length sixty Cubits, bredth twenty, height one hundred twenty. It was divided into two parts: 1. The lower westly twenty Cubits long and twenty broad cald Sanctum Sanctorum (Holy of Holiest) into which the high Priest alone entred only once a yeer, 2. The forepart eastly fourty Cubits long and twenty broad, stiled Sanctum the Holy Place; wherto only Priests entred, termed here Gods Temple. Before it were two Courts: 1. The inner cald the Priests, wher the Altar for burnt Offerings stood, twenty Cubits square and ten high; which is here cald Thysiasterium. 2. The outer or great Court compassed with a whit Marble wal in [Page 180] circuit four furlongs or half a mile, which none but purified Israelits might enter; excluding al unclean Jews and Gentils. About this Herod walled in a large place for the unclean to­gether [...]zek 40. Z [...]ch. 2. 1. [...]. with Heathens. By this Temple the Angel represents the Churches condition: for by measuring is meant building and propagating: by the Altar the tru Professors persecution, to be slaughtered as sacrificed Sheep: but measured or bounds set, beyond which Tyrans cannot go til vengence overtake them. By thos that worship therin, Kings and Priests are meant, who are a Royal Priesthood in the inner Court.

Next folows the Churches State in the secund station of V. 2. Popery from A. 395. til A. 1655. into Synchronisms: 1. Of the Gentils treading the holy City under foot fourty two months: wherby Gods extern worship is implied, consisting in Ceremonies, which he rejects. Here we must refl [...]ct [...]on the Heathen Nations invasion: for from Constantins conversion til Theodosius died, the Church triumphed over the Gentils; and demolished the Dragons Idolatrous Temples: but im­mediatly the Barbarians broke in, wherby the holy City was trod on, & Antichrist had occasion to shew himself. For in stead of Idols (Saturn, Jupiter, Mars) Saints Images were gradualy introduced. 2. Of the two Witnesses prophecy in Sack-cloth, one thousand two hundred sixty dais: by whom is meant faith­ful Teachers and Rulers of the Church: which number of two is smal, yet sufficient to testify truth Deut. 17. 6, 10, 15, Mat. 18 16. John 8. 17.

The Angels Words (to my two Witnesses) imply, that he Vers 3. 4 5. 6. is the Son of God. They were clad in sack-cloth, but the Whore in Purple and Scarlet deckd with Gold, Pearl, and pretious Stones. Thes were two Oliv Trees and two Candle­sticks, Z [...]ha. 4 14. as Zerobabel and Jesua are described. If any Man wil hurt them, fire proceds from their mouth to devour their Enimies, who must thus be killed: as at Elias request fire from Heaven 2. King. 1 10. 12. consumed two of Ahaziahs Captains with their fifty Men ech. Thes have prower to shut Heaven, that it rain not during their Prophecy (as Elias also had) and power to turn Waters into Blood; and to smite the Earth with al plagues as Moses and Aaron had: wherby God declares, what Mercies he shewed [Page] his Servants of old; which he wil extend to Beleevers in the new Testament and wil giv them faithful Teachers like Jesua and Zerobabel to inlighten them as Candlesticks with pure Doctrin; and assist them as Oliv-trees with powerful con­solation beside zelous Eliahs and Elisha's, who shal oppose the Whore Jezabel, Baals Priests, and other persecutors: but at last a Moses and Aaron to bring them out of al affliction.

When they hav finished their testimony, the Beast which ascends Vers 7. Rev 17. 8. 11. from the bottomless Pit (viz. which rose from the Sea with ten horns, wherof the Angel saith, the Beast which thou sawest, was and is not, and shal ascend from the bottomless Pit) shal make War against them, overcom, and kil them. This Beast that was and is not, but is the eighth, and one of the seven; is the Hea­then Empire, wher the Dragon reigned, or was openly wor­shiped: but is not, being no more adored in public: yet ascends again out of the Pit by the ten honrd Beasts means, or kingdoms erected in the Empire; when a new holier form of Idolatry is established, and the Dragon with the Beast disguisedly afresh worshiped. This is the eighth Head, but one of the seven: for the Rider (the Woman-whore) in the divided Empire, governs the civil State: so the ten hornd Beast (or seventh Head) and Ecclesiastic Popish Regiment make one, as it were the eighth: but becaus the Woman sits as one Rider; therfore the two last forms (Ecclesiastic and Politic) are reckoned or re­puted one, as the Angel saith, the eighth is of the seven. Hence 'tis cleer, the Beast rising out of the Pit, is the spiritual Papal Government using the Temporal Sword of terren Princes: which Woman-Beast shal kil the Witnesses, or depriv them of Ecclesiastic preferments and Politic emploiments (cald a civil death) by persecuting Evangelical Professors (which is his own case) at the Popes instigation.

Their dead Bodies shal [...]ly in the Streets of the great City, spi­ritualy Vers. 8. caled Sodom and Egypt, wher our Lord was crucified. The City is Rome the place of persecution; as the Angel saith, Rev. 17. v. 18 the Woman is that great City which reigns over the Kings of the Earth, caled Babylon: by which name Viega, Bellarmin, and other Jesuits own Rome: but by the City and Streets the whol Popish Empire is designed; as 'tis elswher compared to [Page 181] a ten hornd Beast, and to a Sea with Rivers and Fountains. Rome-City and Papacy is spiritualy or mysticaly stiled Sodom, by reason of their Paederestia or unnatural sin, not only com­mitted, but commended in a privileged pamphlet penned and published by John de la Casa Archbishop of Benevent: as Isaiahs words intimat, Their countenance doth witnes against them; who declare their sin as Sodom, they hide it not. She is also like Egypt in blindnes and hardnes of Heart; beside their oppression of Gods People. She resembles Jerusalem in kil­ling the Prophets; refusing to receiv the Son of God: but re­jects, reviles, and crucifies him in his members, as every ey sees. A City hath sundry Streets and Papacy divers dominions: wherin the wars and persecutions for sixty yeers last past, must be exactly examined. The Oriental Antichrist (Turc) doth not persecut Christians for Religion: the Occidental (Pope) hath no Streets or Provinces under his power, wherin hav hapned any remarkable persecutions, sav only the Germam Empire or cheif Horn. This is that great Cities principal Street caled Ca­texochen the Street, being a bare Sceleton left of the West Empire or fourth Monarchy: having yet seven Heads (the seven Princes Electors) and ten Horns (the ten Circles or Provinces) as 'tis divided. In this Street we must seek the war and shal find it; if we weigh wel what is past since A. 1595. til now. For the Pope, since Luther began to reform, alwais aimed to extirp Gospel Professors; for which end he caled the Council of Trent: but this took no effect in Germany, til the crafty Jesuits incited credulous Princes by fraud, flattery, and calumby to persecut Protestants. Which began A. 1598. in Styria, Carniola, and Krain the success wherof ther and els­wher (specialy in Bohemia and Austria) is too wel known to the World: but the last act lacks to be executed in Silesia, which being finished, this war shal hav victory and execution end: at which time the three yeers and half are to begin, wher­in the Witnesses dead Bodies shal [...]ly in the Streets. This Au­thor seems to be a Silesian Minister living in Polonia; who draws al to the Meridian of his Country, and comfort of his exiled Brethren.

Som of the People, Kinreds, Toungs, and Nations shal see their Vers. 9. [Page] dead bodies three dais and half; not suffring them to be put in gravs. Thes are forren Nations met in the German war for Religion: but by a Treaty of peace, the Protestants were cir­cumvented, and liberty of Conscience denied, with al their pro­per privileges, which produced manifold miseries. Hence it appeers that the three annal dais and half (before the appointed one thousand two hundred sixty terminat) can agree to no other; but when the said Silesian pacification shal be finished, persecution stinted, and expeld Evangelists restored; al which shal be at end of An. 1655. Most Expositors refer the last words of not putting them in grav, to their Enimies despite, who bar their burial: but they are used or uttered tropicaly (as their quickning or rising must be taken civily) not properly or literaly: for their Enimies are caled they that dwel on Earth. So forren Nations wil not wholy lay down the Sword, but cast a watchful ey on al emotions in Germany, and not per­mit Protestants to be totaly destroied or laid in grav under­ground, as he perswads them to doo.

They that dwel on Earth (Papists who hav their Heaven here, Vers. 10. for the just are strangers or Sojourners) shal rejoyce over them, make merry, and send g [...]f [...]s one to another, becaus thos two Pro­phets tormented them that dwel on Earth. They are said to tor­ment, becaus they scan or sift their Enimies Doctrin and Con­versation by the touchstone of Gods VVord, cross their gross 1 Kings 18 17 Idolatry, and exprobrat their filthy Sodomy. So Eliah and Michah tormented Ahab: Jeremy the Priests and Pseudopro­phets: Jer. 27. 9. 14. Amos 7. 10. Mat. 8. 29. Amos the People: Christ the Devils. This their Foes nickname Sedition to color their own oppression.

Thus far John writes what the Son of God declared by word of mouth; wherby a sudden change insued in the Vision, re­presenting a like alteration in the Empire. For he sees what af­ter the end of three yeers and half befel the witnesses; and what unexpected events shal betide. Here the last period begins An. 1655. when al the Gospels Enimies are quelled, and tru peace to Gods People redintegrated.

After three dais and half, the Spirit of life from Godentred Vers. 11. into them. Thos dais expire An. 1655. when the treading on the holy City fourty two months, the VVitnesses mourning [Page 182] one thousand two hundred threescore dais, the VVomans abode in the Desart so long, and the Beasts blaspheming fourty two Months conterminat or expire at once together. Then also the term of Nebuchadnezars Image▪ and period of al four Mo­narchies Dan 7. 12. 25. D [...]n. 12. 11. for a time, times, and dividing of time shal concur: as also the one thousand two hundred ninety dais of abominati­on which makes desolat, being al tru synchronicisms. Ezekiel Ezek. 37. 14. hath a like expression, wher God on the Jews behalf, at Baby­lons Captivity saith, I wil put my Spirit in you, and ye shal liv, I w [...]l put you in your own Land. The like God wil doo to al exiled Professors, restore them by unthought of means to their own Land, and render their functions: yea giv them greater dignities then ever they had before. They stood on their feet, or possest their Places and Stats: but great fear fel on al that saw them. Papists had great joy at the issu of this war: but shal now tremble no less, when the exiled reposses [...] their hereditary Fortunes and honorable Functions. A life­ly exemple herof is extant Wisdom 5. worth reading or re­view. See Wisd. 5.

They heard a great voyce from Heaven saying, Com up hi­ther. Vers. 12. They shal ascend in a cloud, and their Enimies shal see them. Heaven signifies the Church: the voice implies, that af­ter three yeers and half God wil rais a chief Protestant Poten­tat as a Patron, to the Papists terror; who shal open a free cours to the Gospel: caling aloud by his Diploma or Letters Patents to al Exiles; Com up, resum your pristin prefer­ments and emploiments. So they shal suddenly ascend in a cloud to their charges, with great glory and authority. Their Enimies who before exulted at their afflictions, inflicting al sorts of plagues; shal fare as Jeremy threatned Chaldea and Baby­lon, Jer. 50. 10. 1 [...]. that al which go by shal hiss at them.

At the same hour was a great Earthquake, and a tenth part Vers. 1 [...]. of the City fel: viz. a fearful Commotion or Combustion in the Empire: but a tenth part intends either the whol Papacy, or one of the Empires ten streets, or Rome City, which is now but a tenth part of what it was, as Lipsius provs. In the Earth­quake [...]. 3▪ Admirand. (or war) were slain seven thousand Men (or a mighty multitud) but the remnent were affrighted, and gav glory to [Page] God. The rest of Papists stood amazed, and acknowledged Gods just judgments on them.

The s [...] und Wo is past. This imports not as if al were ended Vers 14. at Romes destruction and the rest precited; but intimats speci­aly Rev. 8 1 [...]. Rev. 9 1. to 19. the Turcs ruin: For an Angel flying through midst of Hea­ven cried, Wo, Wo, Wo to the Earths Inhabiters, by reason of 3 An­gels trumpets yet to sound. The first hapned by Sarrasens, the next by Turcs, as generaly granted: whence thos words ( the se­cund wo is past) are unanimously interpreted, that instantly after Romes ruin, and the German Empires revolution, the Turcs East Empire shal fal. Behold, the third Wo coms quickly; al three fal on the Empire, but the last ensues.

The seventh Angel sounded, and Voices in Heaven said, the Vers. 15. 16. 17 Kingdoms of this World are becom the Lords and his Christs, who shal reign for ever. Here begins the seventh or last plague poured on Babel, wherin the Evangelical Churches great joy is briefly described: becaus they hav got a good Head, Rome de­stroied, Germany revolted from Popery, and the Turcs Empire ended. This joy is set out by John Rev. 19. as David reflects on it Psal. 93. 1. Psal. 97. 1. Psal. 99. 1.

The Nations (Papists) were angry, and the wrath is com to Vers. 18. 19. cut off or destroy them. This act is confirm'd by a duple sign: 1. Gods Temple was opened, and ther was seen the Ark of his Testament. 2. Ther were Lightnings, Voices, Thunders, Earth­quake, and great Hail. The contents wherof are elswher ex­plicated, wher the Son of God with Celical Armies appeer on whit Horses: but the Beast and Kings of the Earth are utterly Rev. 19 11 to 21 destroied. The time of the dead to be judged, and that thou shouldst reward thy servants the Prophets, Saints, and them that fear thy Name; and shouldst distroy thos which destroy the Earth. This Judgment is darkly described, being before caled the my­stery Rev. 10 4. 7. of God, and uttered by seven thunders, which must not be writen. This is also after rehearsed in Christs thousand yeers reign, which the Author declines to define, yet inclines to it. Rev. 20 4. 5 6. As in the secund part of Apocalyps, seven Judgments are given on the Roman Empire by seven trumpeting Angels in the se­cund Period; so here in the third are described seven Plagues to be poured out by seven Phials on the same. The seventh at [Page 183] end of the one thousand two hundred threescore yeers concurs with An. 1655. and fils up Gods wrath. The seven Plagues fel on the Politic State presaging its fal: but the seven Phials are poured on the Ecclesiastic too, declaring both their punish­ments. Thos began An. 395. but thes under the sixth Judg­ment, a litle before the total final ruin. The seven Plagues pro­ced from the Lord holding a Cup of red wine, who poured it on his litle Flock: but now the ungodly shal drink the dregs Psal. 75. 8 9. wrung out, as David denounceth. Thos seven Angels with the Rev. 15. 5. 6. 7. seven Plagues, cam out of the Temple of the Tabernacle of the Testimony in Heaven: and one of the four Beasts (the Lion of Juda) gav the seven Angels seven golden Phials ful of Gods Wrath: the event or effect folows.

I heard a great voyce out of the Temple saying to the seven Chap. 16. V. [...] Angels, Pour out the Phials of Gods wrath on the Earth: viz. Earths Inhabiters, who rejoiced at the Beasts Victory: or on the whol world, which wandred after the Beast, worshiping Rev. 13. 3. 4. both Beast and Dragon: so the Popish Empire is plainly un­derstood.

The first poured his Phial on the Earth, and ther fel a noisom Vers. [...]. grievous sore on the Men which had the Beasts mark, and them which worshiped his Image. Earth implies the whol Empires extent: but reflects on the peaceable part, and on the Beast coming out of the Earth; which is the Pope and his Clergy: who prevail not by open Power, as the Sea-bred did by war; but crept in slily and softly as grass grows out of the ground without nois or notice. This Phial was poured at time of Re­formation: but when tru Professors opposed Papists, repro­ving their fals Doctrins and foul deeds: a noisom sore of fierce wrath, hate, and enmity fel on the Men so marked against al Protestants, sith they could not seduce them by words or wiles, nor subdu by the Sword.

The secund poured his on the Sea, which becam as blood of a Vers. 3. dead Man, and every living Soul in the Sea died. By Sea is pointed out the ten hornd Beast rising from the Sea, & his trou­bled state; which fel on al parts (specialy Germany) with much bloodshed: and al Men ingaged in the war through the Pro­vinces, died in that Flood of waters.

The third poured his on the Rivers and Fountains of Waters, Vers. 4. which becam blood. VVaters, both in Scripture and among al Authors, signify Kingdoms: the Roman Empire is compared Rev. 17. 1. 18. to a Beast with ten horns, and to a City with streets; but here to a Sea with Rivers, which are the Popish dominions: for the great VVhore sits on many waters: the Fountains are Kings with their Peers and Parlements: but how this Phial hath bin poured on Great-Brytain, and the Head-spring becom blood stil sprouting out, is evident to al Men: but though thos that are the Voice or Trumpet in thos actions cannot be excused; yet we must say with the Angel here, Lord, thou art righteous, Vers. 5. becaus thou hast judged thus. How France feels Gods wrath of the third Phial, and how much more it may, time wil disco­ver. Vers. 6. For they hav shed the blood of Saints and Prophets, and thou hast given them blood to drink, being worthy. This more particularly concerns France, wher such floods hav been shed within a hundred yeers last past: but how other Realms shal fare, time wil revele.

I heard another from the Altar say, even so Lord God Al­mighty, Vers 7. tru and righteous are thy Judgments. This voice ca [...] from the Thyasterion, wher Martyrs Souls incessantly prais God.

The fourth poured his on the Sun, who had power given to Vers. 8. scorch Men with [...]ire. Most Expositors understand the Sun of Righteousnes, wherwith the woman is clothed: but this re­pugns the plagues poured on the Popish world or Earth, oppo­sit to the Church-Heaven, Gods faithful Children, wherof the Lord Jesus is Head: so we must serch what Sun signifies els­wher in the Apocalyps. The Sun becam black as sackcloth of Rev. 6. 12. hair: which imports the ruin of Imperial dignity in Hea­then Church-Heaven by Constantin. The Suns third part w [...] Rev. 8 12. smiten: that is, the old Empires smal remaining splendor shal vanish. An Angel stood in the Sun: meaning a potent Evan­gelical Rev. 19. 17. Rev. 21. 23. Prince gathered Forces against Papists. The City had not the Sun or Moon to shine in it: or needs no temporal Po­tentat to govern it. If we compare thes texts with the Sun here, it must import the Supporter of the Pop [...]sh State, who givs splendor and strength to al, as the Sun doth in Nature: [Page 184] for he had power given to scorch Men with fire, even thos of his own side.

Men were scorched with great heat, and blasphemed Gods Vers. 9. name, which hath power over thes plagues: but repented not to giv him glory. When the Sun or Supporter of Papacy shal ly down to rest, Gods wrath wil extremly blast Papists: the Lord Psal 21. 9. shal make them like a firy Oven; yet wil they not relent to giv him glory, but blasphem his name st [...]l.

The fifth poured his on the Beasts Seat, whos Kingdom was Vers. 10. 11. ful of darknes: and they gnawed their toungs for pain. They blaspemed the God of Heaven, but repented not. So soon as the ten hornd Beast rose from the Sea, the Dragon gav him his Power and Seat of residence, Rome, which he retained with the two hornd Beast, like Hippocrates twins, ever since, and reign over the Kings of the Earth: but now by the fifth Phial his Kingdom is darkned, yet not quit demolished or dissolved, which shal be doon at pouring out the last Phial.

The sixth poured his on Euphrates great River, and the water Vers. 12. was dried up to prepare the way of the East Kings. Euphrates signifies the Turcs which border on it: but drying up the wa­ter implies their ruin or overthrow, as the Prophets use that phrase Isai 19. 5. Isai 44 27. Jer. 48. 34. Jer. 50▪ 38. Jer. 51. 36. Ezek. 30. 12. Ezek. 31. 4. the drying up is a preparation to the great work which shal be performed at pouring out the seventh Phial: for as the red Sea was divided for Israel to pass, Exod. 14. 12. Josua 3. 17. when Pharaoh pursued; and Jordan dried up for them to go into Canaan: So here Euphrates is mysticaly dried (i. the Turcs destroied) to make way for the East Kings, meaning the Jews conversion. Next folows the seventh Phial, the seventh Angel sounded, the seventh plague (or third and last wo) fel on both Beasts which sit in the City sited on seven Hils, caled seven Heads; the preparativs thus pourtraied.

I saw three unclean Spirits like Frogs com out of the Dra­gon, Vers. 13 14. Beasts, and fals Prophets mouths: thes are the Spirits of Devils working miracles, which go forth to the Kings of the whol World, to gather them to the battle of that great day of God Almighty. Al three are Companions or felow Commo­ners, which stick close together; and now at end of their reign [Page] send abroad Agents or Ambassadors (croking Spirits) which work miracles. For when Rome the Popes Seat, and Turcs Em­pire shal be suppressed, and Jews converted; the Devil, the whol Papacy, and fals Prophet seing their end at hand, wil stir every stone, and send out their chief Emissa­ries to al Popish Princes, perswading them to rais war against Protestants in that great day of Almighty God. The time of Constantins subduing the Dragon and supplanting Idolatry, is Rev 6. 17. cald the great day of Gods wrath: but this (when the Beast with fals Prophet are to be cast into a firy Lake, and Dragon shut up in the bottomless pit) stiled the great day of God Al­mighty; being before termed the time of the Dead that they shal be judged: but by the Prophets, Apostles, and Christ cly­ped Rev. 11. 18. Catexochen, That Day, which he spares to explicat.

Behold, I com as a Theef: blessed is he that watcheth and Vers. 15. 16. keeps his garment, lest he walk naked, and they see his shame. He gathered them into a place caled Armageddon. This is the sudden pouring out of the seventh Phial and Plagues on the Papacy, for which Men are warned to watch: but the place of Papists Rendevous caled Armageddon (Mountain of Lamen­tation) 2 Chr. 35. 24. 25. alluding to the place wher good King Josiah was slain and much bewailed: which argues that Papists shal mourn for the issu of this war, as the Jews did for that direful defeat at Megiddo.

The seventh Angel poured his into the Air: and a great Voice Vers. 17. cam out of Heavens Temple from the Throne saying; It is doon, The preceding Phials were poured on particular Places or Per­sons (1. On the Popish State and Religion in common: 2. On the Politic State by the German war: 3. On peculiar Popish Kingdoms and their Heads: 4. On a strong Pillar of Papi­stry: 5. On Rome City: 6. On the Turcs Territories) but this Eph. 2. 2. last universaly on the Air or whol Body, and Satan Prince of the Air with al his Spirits; becaus he is worshiped together with the Beast. At pouring out of which Phial, the time draws nigh Mat. 24. 28. foretold by Christ of his coming to Judgment.

Ther were Voices, Thunders, Lightnings, and so great an Vers. 18. Earthquake, as was not since Men were on Earth; so mighty and great. Here begins the Execution on the Devil and his Ar­my, [Page 185] with his Vicar and his Dependents; even on the whol Pa­pacy and its Kingdoms. In the Air are heard terrible Voices, Thunders, and yellings of Devils: on Earth War and rumors of War: in al parts Tumults, Seditions, Insurrections, Massacres, and horrid Bloodsheds, such as never were heard of before.

The great City was divided into three parts. Rome City is spe­cified Vers. 19. in the sixth Phial; but here the whol Papal State signified: which is shared among three Chieftains, typified by the triple Crown, the Dragon, Beast, and fals Prophet: For thes gene­rals shal levy or lead forth the Battle, as ech severaly raised their Forces before, and now join ready to fal on. But with what success? The Beast and fals Prophet being taken, are cast Rev 19. 10. a [...]ife into a burning Lake of brimstone; but the Dragon (Ge­neralissimo) shut up in the bottomless pit for a thousand yeers. Rev. 20. 1. 2. The Cities of the Nations fel: that is, Idolatry, Sodomy, and other abominations practised under Popery are altogether abo­lished.

Great Babylon cam into remembrance before God, to giv hir Vers. 20. the Cup of Wine of his fierce Wrath. God sat stil long, seeming to take no notice of the Beasts blasphemy and tyranny: but when the prefixd time of fourty two months expired, remem­bers hir, fils ful the Cup of Wine of his fierce wrath, and punish­eth after hir demerits. Every Iland fled away, and the Mountains were not found: viz Al that depend on the Papacy (the remotest Iles and loftiest places by Land) shal [...]ly away, va­nish, be vanquished, and seen no more.

Ther fel on Men a great Hail from Heaven, every stone Vers. 21. about a Talent weight: and Men blasphemed becaus of this plague; for it was exceding great. Thes great H [...]lstones denot Gods grievous punishments; the weight of a Talent, his hea­viest Judgments: yet Men ceased not to blasphem his holy name. Here the Author ends his Explications; but answers sundry scruples, doubts, and difficulties emergent; which shal be curtly explained. In this deep dark discurs divers Objections occur, which wil require debate and resolution.

1. Whether the Text not torted, but literaly or tropicaly Doubts. referred to the times, hath bin rightly unfolded? 2. Whether the Figures or Images which make thes mysteries obscure, be [Page] cleered by other places of the Apocalyps and Prophets, from whom they are taken and applied to Things, as the Text and Times require? 3. Whether what is past or now in acting, should be serchd in the Acts of the Roman Empire, to see what may be more sutably applied another way, without disturbing the method o [...] harmony? 4. Whether the Text doth tel what is to be expected at end of Gods determined time, on the fourth Monarchy and Papacy? viz. when the fourty two months or 1260. yeers expire.

Hence riseth a main rub, whether the Epoche or beginning Answer. of thos 1260. yeers be rightly related to An. 395. at Theodo­sius death? This is proved in the previous Prophetic Key, by certain characters or marks to be summarily repeated. 1. Be­caus Daniels Epoche of 1290. dais fals exactly on An. 365. when the Temples grand desolation hapned under Julian: so the 1260. must com 30. later An. 395. sith they shal end to­gether. 2. Becaus at the Empires bipartition An. 395. the Ro­man Eagle got two wings, and the Barbarians broke in; dri­ving the Woman into the Desart, wher she must be fed three times and half, or one thousand two hundred threescore annal dais; the period wherof fals An. 1655. 3. Becaus the treading of the holy City (or Church) fourty two months, begins at that Invasion, and ends alike. 4. Becaus at that Invasion, the ten hornd Beast rose from the Sea, and soon clipped the Eagles wings: that in threescore yeers ( An. 455.) al ten horns or Kingdoms visibly appered. Hence Authors date the Prolog of the Empires decay at Theodosius death: and Ecclesiastic wri­ters from St. Pauls words agree, That Antich [...]st shal arise, [...] The [...]. 2 6 7. when the Empire begins to fal: generatio un [...]s, est corrupti [...] alterius: So Tertullian, Iren [...]us, and many mo define. 5. Be­caus the two hornd Beast (west Antichrist) cam out of the Earth silently An. 395, when he assumed a primacy or preemi­nence both in Civil and Spiritual affairs; which he never before arrogated over other Church [...]s. For Aeneas Sylvius (after­w [...]rd Epist. 28 [...] Can. [...]6 Pope) writes, That til the Nicen Synod, smal respect was shewed the Roman Sea; but every one lived to himself. In the third Carthage Council An. 390. a Canon passed, That the first Bishop shal not be stiled chief Priest or Prince of [Page 186] Priests, but Bishop of the first Sea. For Innocent, first A. C. 404. usurped authority over Princes and Prelats (as Presbyters wil hav suprem Magistrats submit to them like Sheep to their Shepherds) who Excommunicated Arcadius Emperor of Constantinople, and removed Chrysostom the Patriarch: busily bestirring to get a primacy over al African Churches. His suc­cessors ( Zosimus, Boniface 1. Celestine 1.) attempted the like Hist. l. 7. c. 3 [...] aspiring, as Socrates storieth: but Siricius first forbad Priests to marry, which St. Paul cals the Doctrin of Devils. 6. Becaus the two Witnesses at end of thos one thousand two hundred sixty yeers shal be subdued and slain, but two accidents shal befal after the seventh Trumpets sounding ( Romes dest [...]uction, and determination of the secund Wo) so that haply the Wit­nesses shal be raised (he flatters himself and his Brethren) be­fore A. 1655. for smal circumstances are not regarded in great Prophecies.

Hereto may be added som new Arguments: 1. St. Austin Proofs. writes, how the Gentils reported that St. Peter prophecied Christian Religion should dure but 365. yeers; which he re­puted a Heathen fiction: yet haply he predicted the continu­ance without interruption should be so long. For Christ at 30. yeers was baptized and began his Minist [...]y: which being added to 365. foretold by St. Peter, make 395. at which time Antichrist appeered, the holy City was calcitrated, the Wit­nesses mourned, and the Woman fled, as is plainly prespeci­fied. 2. That the 6000. yeers of the Worlds durance from the Creation (equivalent to the six dais works, every day 1000. yeers) expire next yeer 1655. which he strangely strivs and strains to justify: but that Rabinical prediction is a frivolous fiction, and his computation a ridiculous distortion; for that 6000. yeers fals short A. 1655. about 315. yeers by the best accompt. 3. The yeer of the Flood began A. M. 1656. which concurs with A. C. 1655. complet or 56. current; when the Dan. 7. 11. Rev. 19. v. 20. Churches Enimies shal be destroied with fire, as the old World was by water: this indeed is a brat of many Mens brains, which haply Men shal shortly see dashd against the Stones. 4. The Roman Monarchy initiated when the Suns Eccentricity was greatest: whence Astrologers ( Aueis nulla fides) infer, that it [Page] shal end when 'tis least; which som refer to last yeer 1653. but this bare guesse is notum per ignotius. 5. The Turcs hav two Prophecies (to be read in the Author) touching their Empires expiring: that this young Achmet the secund (Son to Ibrihim) shal be the last Emperor. For surely strange al­terations hav hapned since Achmets death A. 1617. who con­trary to custom having three young Sons, caused his Brother Mustapha to succed, a precedent never known before: but he after nine Months reign deposed, and Achmets eldest Son Os­man set up: whom the Janizaries strangled with his Wife and two infant Sons A. 1622. Next succeded his Brother Morat or Amurat the fourth who died Issuless A. 1640. and after him Ibrihim (or Abraham) whom the Janizaries also bow­stringd with his three Wifes A. 1648. but advanced his sole Son Achmet aged six (now twelv) yeers: who reigns at their de­votion or disposing; and is like to be the last, if such fopperies be worthy of faith.

By al which premisses 'tis probable: 1. That the two Chro­nicisms Inferences. character (1290. and 1 [...]60.) are incident to A. 365. (of Julian) and 395. (of Theodosius) as foresaid. 2. That the Terminus a quo of Daniels 1290. yeers, can be applied to no other then A. 365. when God blew up the foundations of Jerusalems Temple. 3. That the Epoche of thos 1260. yeer [...], must be referred to A. 395. becaus both numbers necessarily expire together. 4. That the ten-hornd Beast began from A. 395. til 455. becaus the Eagle got two Wings A. 395. and his ten horns appeered A. 455. 5. That in al Roman Histo­ries, no yeer sutes so semblably to al Characters as 395. Erg [...] we may stick to it and expect the event A. 1655. specialy sith killing the two Witnesses eventualy provs the thing. Som are shy to put a Period of thes Prophecies so precisely at A. 1655. but let such consider: 1. That the Angel held up his hand to Dan. 12 7, 11. Rev. 10 5, 6, 7, Heaven and swore by him that livs for ever, it shal be for a time, times, and half, or 1260. yeers, and from the Temples abominable desolation to that time 1290. 2. That the Son of God lifted his hand to Heaven, and swore by him who cre­ated Heaven, Earth, Sea, and al things in them; that time shal be no longer, or ther shal be no delay, nor any time intervene: [Page 187] But at the seventh Angels voice or sound of his Trumpet, the Rev. [...]. 18. mystery of God shal be finished, as he declared to his Proph [...]ts. Thes things saith the Son of God, whos eys flame as fire and his feet like fine Brass. Thes things saith he that is boly and tru, that Rev. 3. 14. hath the key of David &c. Thes things saith Amen, the faithful tru Witnes, and beginning of the Creation of God. Who then wil not beleev him? Sith then according to Gods decree An­thichrist shal rage or reign but three times and half or 1260. yeers (which terminat at end of A. 1655.) Let us look up and Luk. 21. 28. lift our heads on high, for our redemption draweth nigh.

Ob. Som Objections occur: such meer mysteries may not be pried into, specialy of things yet to com: for divers deep Divines and solid Scholars hav been lost in this labyrinth: Ergo it should remain as a book sealed til the event or accomplisHment be reveled: as Christ to his Disciples curious question of Isra­els kingdoms restauration answered, 'tis not for you to know the Acts 1. 6, 7. times and seasons which the Father hath put in his own power, much less for us.

Sol. The Apocalyps is ful of dark deep mysteries, which wil [...]y hid til the event detect them, by applying Histories to see or search the effects therein meant or mentioned, yet it folows not that we must lay it aside, and not inquire what is already accomplished or shortly to be expected; specialy touching the time when the Churches Enimies shal be destroyed and it resto­red to rest, for Daniel observed by Books what the Lord told Je­remy, Dan. 9. [...], Rev. 1. 3. that he would accomplish seventy yeeres in Jerusalems desolation: and John saith, Blessed is he that reads, and they which hear the words of this Prophecy, to keep the things writ therin, for the time is at hand. 'Tis a book of memorable Acts, which foretels what shal betide Gods Church and the Empire under which it subsists: being writen to be read, and such stiled blessed as read it, for many things are already fulfilled, and by comparing thos past with the Apocalyps, we may the better descry what to look for yer long: but he that forbears to read, or is not versed in Roman Histories, nor knows how to distinguish Revolutions or Changes, but confounds Apoca­lyptic numbers, making many Epoches (wheras they synchro­nize, containing only Relativs and correlativs) or carelesly [Page] slights the numbers as an arcane mistery; to such it remains a Book unopened ful of obscurities: Is qui nil dubitat, nil ca­pit inde boni. Men must dig Diamonds out of Rocks, and never be daunted or deterred with difficulty: many learned hav mi­stook for thes causes. 1 Most primitiv Interpreters apply things to their times which had no relation, and som modernists fo­low their steps (as wild Gees doo their leaders) misleading o­thers out of the way. Secondly, a right method is not used: for in the Apocalyps al things are orderly set, as they shal befal; the synchronisms folowing one another, and revolutions exa­ctly distinguished; as Histories doo in describing human a­ctions and affaires: but too many Expositors pervert this cours, thinking to set things as succeding one another, which being Relata belong to the same time: Who place before Ba­bylons fal what shal be after, not knowing wher they stick, nor how to wind out. Thirdly, they confound the Civil and Ec­clesiastic State, oft applying Monastic matters or Antichrists actions to Monarchic, and contrarily. Yet that the Revela­tion shall remain a Book sealed or shut up, repugns the very Text: for the seven Epistles were never sealed, the Lamb o­pened the sealed Book: the other was a little open one: and Rev. 10. 2. 8. Rev. 22. 10. at end an Angel saith to John, Seal not the Prophecies for the time is at hand.

Now tho Daniel was bid to close his Prophecy, yet was it Dan. 12 4. 9. but til the time of the end: for it was unsealed after by Johns Revelation. Christ spak of times and seasons occasioned, that John 2. 4, 8, 9. 'tis not for men to know what God conceals: as he said to his Mother, my hour is not yet com: yet soon supplied the Wine out of Water. Here we tak time in general, which is deter­mined on Antichrists blasphemies and tyrannies, in what yeer it shal begin or end (which God hath reveled, as is shewed) not month, day or hour, which the Father keeps in his own power: So tho no infallible certainty in al circumstances can be had; yet many most pregnant conjects are prefined.

Ob. The chief O jection is, that al Divines and Statesmen set the period of the fourth Monarchy and Papacy at Christs secund coming either to reign a thousand yeers (as Chiliasts cry) or to judg al fl [...]sh (which Master Mede makes one day [Page 188] or time) but there is no certainty of confining the Catastrophe to A. 1655. Ergo 'tis presumption for you so to doo.

Sol. The Apocalyps mentions no such matter, but clean con­trary: Rev. 19. 1. to 20. for upon Romes destruction great joy was heard in hea­ven, and the Son of God (who at opening the first Seal went forth to Conquer on a whit Hors) appeers again on the same, whom the Armies followed on whit Horses, clad in clean whit linnen. Thes are Martyrs, who having whit Robes given them, Rev 7 14. cam out of great tribulation and washed their robes; being caled, chosen, and faithful. Against them the Beast and Kings of the Rev. 17. 14. Earth made war: the issu wherof was, that the Beast and fals Prophet (Empire and Popedom, or rather popish Clergy and Pope) shal be cast alife into a Lake of fire burning with bri [...]stone: Rev 20. 1, 2, 3. but the Dragon had Quarter, who is only shut or sealed up in the Ibid. v. 11. to 15. bottomless pit for a thousand yeers that he should deceiv the Nati­ons no more, nor excite them against the Church. In the inte­rim Gods faithful Children hav rest; but the last judgment is described afterward: hereto agrees Daniel's Image represent­ing Dan. 2. 34 35. the four Monarchies, til the stone smot it on his feet (which was not when the fourth began, for feet and toes were not then til the end thereof) and broke it in peeces, but the stone becam a great Mountain or Kingdom (when al four Monarchies are grinded to dust) which shal break in peeces al the rest. Daniel in this Monarchic Vision beheld til the Dan 7. per totum. Thrones were cast down, and the Antient of dais sat (not for the last universal Judgment, for that is committed to the Son, but in particular over the Churches Enimies in the fourth Monarchy and Papacy) which Daniel saw til the Beast was [...]lain, and his Body given to the burning flame, and the power of the other Beasts cam to an end for a term was set how long e [...]h should last: and the Saints shal be given into the fourth Beasts hand (so long as the Whore rides the B [...]ast) til a time, times, and dividing of time: but at end of these three times and half, the judgment shal sit, and his power totaly abo­lished; yet the World not destroyed: but al kingdom, do­minion and greatnes under Heaven given to the Saints of the most High▪ whos kingdom is everlasting, and al dominions shal serv him. Saint Paul's words ( The Lord shal destroy him 2 Thes 2. 8. [Page] with the brightnes of his coming) are expounded in the Apoca­lyps: but it seems the two judgments ( ch. 19. and 20.) are Rev. 19. 11. &c. different, and not reduced to one self time; sith one thousand yeers intervene; for the two great Guests (the Beast and fals Prophets) are lodged in a Lake of fire and brimstone: but their Host the Devil associated to them a thousand yeers after at end of the World, when the last judgment is immediatly held: Weigh al wel, and God giv thee wisdom unto Sal­vation.

The Author intimats, that Christ shal com to destroy the Churches Enimies A. 1655. finito, and bind the Devil in chains a thousand yeers; at end wherof he shal judg the World: yet protests he wil not presume to penetrat too far into thes secret sublime mysteries, which he borows from Ma­ster Mede. He exhorts us out of the Apocalyps, to address our Rev. 3. 20. 21. ears and hearts to the Son of God: Who stands at dore and knocks saying: If any wil hear my voice and open dore, I will sup Rev. 1. 3, 6, 8. with him and he with me: to him that overcoms wil I grant to sit Rev. 22. 7, 14. with me on my Throne: as I overcam, and sat down with my Father on his Throne. Blessed is he that keeps the sayings of this Books Prophecy: nay blessed are they that doo his Command­ments, that they may hav right to the Tree of life, and enter the Gates into the City. To him which is, was, and is to com, the Al­mighty, be glory and dominion for ever, Amen.

The sum of al his Explications is: 1. The last act of Refor­mation Summary. and releas of Protestants in Silesia Rev. 11. 7. 2. The three yeers and half, when the Witnesses bodies ly in the street Ibid. v. 8, 9. 3. The continuance of war in thos Kingdoms, til the Martyrs innocent blood be avenged. 4. The sudden fal of a strong Pillar or Protector of the Papacy. 5. The exal­tation of an Evangelical Head or Protestant Patron. 6. A Reformation in Germany. 7. The destruction of Rome City. 8. The end of the Turcs Empire Rev. 11. 14. Rev. 16. 12. 9. The Jews Conversion Ibid. 10. The Papists sedulity to gather their utmost forces Rev. 16. 13. Rev. 19. 16. 11. The total ruin of al the Papacy Rev. 16. 18. 21. Rev. 19. v. 20. 21. 12. The fulfilling of Gods mystery Rev. 10. 7. Wherby the Devil is shut up in the bottomless Pit: the Son of God takes [Page 189] possession of the Kingdoms: the Church fares in peace and tranquillity: al which he writes to comfort his afflicted Coun­trimen, and draws al Chronical lines to one Center of A. 1655. as the common gulf: which is a conjectural crotchet, no certitudinal conclusion, wheron Men may rely. One yeer and half wil bewray the verity or vanity therof to Gods glory and Mens satisfaction: who must stil wait and watch; but not sift or serch into his secret hidden Counsils. The fu­ture contingents which he proposeth to be shortly expected A. 1655. are thes: 1. Romes final ruin: 2. The Papacies total confusion: 3. The Jews conversion: 4. The Turcs Empires abolition: 5. The Churches restauration: 6. Christs read­vention: al which materials he hath from Mr. Mede.

Neither of them handle the Lambs mystical mariage with Rev. 19 7. his spiritual Spous: which Dr. Preston compares to civil car­nal Nuptials in [...]iv respects. 1. As Parents consents is requisit in the contract: so God the Father hath freely given his Son to us, and us to him. 2. Both Parties must mutualy consent to be wedded: so Christ the Husband (as the Man stil is Sui­tor, tho the Woman most needs it for hir perfection) first in­vites us to this match; and the holy Ghost prepares our hearts to intertain it. 3. Both make a Covenant: Christ on ever­lasting one, to bestow himself and al that is his (salvation, re­mission of sins, grace glory) on us; if we giv our selfs intirely to serv him. Thes are but the Espousals: 4. Ther folows a solen union or celebration of Mariage betwen both: which is doon in Baptism, when as we promiss in We [...]lock to take ech other renouncing al other; so here we vow by word of mouth or sureties, to forsake the World, Flesh, and Devil with al their Works, cleaving soly to Christ both in prosperity and perse­cution; and keep our Souls chast to him, not prostituting them to unclean lusts or service of any Creatures. 5. The Nuptial consequents correspond in both, which is an inseparable union of hearts, and communion of goods: my Beloved is mine, and I his: what Christ hath is made ours, and our his: our debts becom his, as al his riches, righteousnes, honors, and privileges ours by imputation. O what a blessed condi [...]on is it to say with the Spous in the Canti [...]les, I am my Beloveds, and his de­sire C [...]nt. 7. 10. [Page] is toward Me? He feedeth me among the Lilies: O let his pretious Blood make my scarlet sins so whit as Wool, or as the Snow in Salmon. In this peece are mo tedious repetitions then in al the work els: which is doon purposly to make it more obvious or perspicuous unto every common capacity. Quae placuere semel, decies repetita placebunt.

Sunt patefacta sacro mysteria magna Joanni:
Quae Deus in seclis efficienda d [...]cet,
To holy John great mysteries were told:
Which to be doon in Times, God doth unfold.
Medus vir celebris, nulli bonitate secundus;
Artibus, Ingenio, Judicio (que); praeit.
Quae (que) revelavit mysteria magna Joanni
Christus, in illius sunt patefacta libro.
Mede was a rare Man, for goodnes next to none;
In Learning, Wit, and Judgment cheif alone.
And what high hid things Christ to John declared,
Are in his Apocalyptic Book explaned.
Mira brevi obvenient, Germanus praedicat Author:
Si modo venturis est adhibenda fides.
Mira canit, quae anno simul efficienda propinquo:
Vix credenda tamen, dum patefacta forent.
Strange things, saith a German, shortly shal befal:
If faith to futures may be giv'n at al.
Wonders he tels, which next yeer doon must be:
Yet scars to be beleevd, til cleer'd wee see.

THESIS VII.
Christi regnum in terra: Christs millenar reign.

THis is a very dubious dogmat or difficil debat, raised Preamble. in the Apostles dais; which som Orthodox Fathers defended, but others decried and detested: the chief grounds wherof on both sides, shal be sincerely deli­vered; specialy from Rob, Baily a Scot on the Negativ, part, and Joseph Mede a most learned Divine for the Affirmitiv. Tros Tyrius (que) mihi nullo discrimino agetur.

Cerinthus a prime pestilent Heretic hatchd this Cockatrice, Pedigree. which Papias an Apostolic Man fostered, and Justin Martyr much favored: whos steps other primitiv Fathers (specialy Lactantius) mor or less folowed: yet in after ages the Catholic Church and som Oecumenic Councils condemned it. So it lay long buried in obscurity or oblivion, til som late Anabaptists and Independents their Allies raked it out of grav. Howbeit al Protestants rejected it since revicton, til Alsted returning from Transylvania, renewed som parts of this poison; which Piscator (a Man more heady and humorous then judicious) swalowed: but they disagree in divers points, as Sectists use to doo. Thes laid the foundation, but Mr. Archer advanced the main fabric: which Mr. Burroughs in his London Lectures on Hosea, pressed as a most comfortable Article of Christian Religion, to be instilled into the hearts of al tru Beleevers. Sundry other Sectators published or proclamed it with Trum­pets: who like Presbyterians, (which wherever they find Elders named, think it rings a peal for their motly Disciplin) wrest the one thousand yeers mentioned by David, Peter, and John to Christs millenar reign in person on Earth before or at the general Judgment, straining Scriptures to serv their turn.

Cerinthus to justify his invention, fathered it on St. John; as Fiction. if Christ whispered it to his best beloved Disciple, not to be divulged for an Apostolic Tradition: nor is it probable, that if John received it as a secret, he would revele it to that vile Heretic; whom he so hated, that seing him com into a public Bath instantly left it, bidding his Disciples com off, lest the hous fal on them: which befel accordingly on Cerinthus and his folowers with som others, crushing them to death. That John imparted it to him, is a fond fiction: but whether he deli­vers it in the Apocalyps a grand question.

The Chiliasts teach, that Christ in his Human glory shal Positions. com from Heaven into Palestin (som say A. 1655. now at hand, or 1695. at farthest) wher the Jews from al parts shal resort to rebuild Jerusalem, and folow him as the tru Messiah: who is to reign with al his Martyrs and som select Saints raised from death, one thousand yeers before the general Resurrecti­on. During which Millenium, he shal go in person to subdu al stubborn Nations, except a few lurking in corners. Then shal the Church of convert Jews and Gentils liv peacably from any Enemy and free from sin: without the Word, Sacraments, or other Ordinances in al Worldly delights; eating, drinking, getting Children, and enjoying al lawful pleasures, til thos yeers expire, at end wherof the Infidels remaining in number­less Troops, shal besiege new Jerusalem: but Christ with fire from Heaven shal destroy them al, and immediatly des­cend to the last Judgment at general Resurrection of good and bad, according to their works. Master Burroughs in his Trea­tis Chap. 37. cald Moses choice speaks thus: If the opinion be tru (which I dare not deny) of Christs coming to reign a thousand yeers on this Earth before the last Day, ther are riches of glory pre­pared for the Saints here: els cannot I expound many places of Scripture, specialy Rev. 20. 5, 6, 7. The rest of the dead li­ved not again til the thousand yeers were finished; which is the first Resurrection: blessed and holy is he which hath part therin, on such the secund death hath no power: but they shal be Priests of God and of Christ, to reign with him a thousand yeers: this is usualy interpreted of rising from sin to Grace, and reigning with Christ for ever in Heaven: but cannot be the true meaning; [Page 191] for this reign must be before the Judgment day, sith Satan must Rev. 20. 7. be loosed at end of it. O then the riches of glory, which thos that suffer for Christ shal hav, being to be raised and reign with Christ! For 'tis said, I saw Thrones, and they sat on them, and Rev. 20. 4. Judgment was given to them: and I saw the Souls of them that were beheaded for the witnes of Jesus and Word of God; which had not worshiped the Beast, nor his Image, nor received his mark on their forheads or hands, and they reigned with Christ a thousand yeers: so the more any suffer for opposing Antichrist, the more glory shal they have when Christ coms to reign on Earth, for I am confident he shal reign personaly ( Mar [...] tha [...]. I wil not say in his flesh as others aver, but spiritualy) far more glori­ously then he hath doon: Thus he, but more plainly in his Comment on Hosea; yet he needs an Interpreter to shew, how Christ can reign personaly, if not in the flesh, which is never separat from his person: or how far more gloriously then yerst, for he cam not first to reign. Tho. Goodwin trans­cends the Talmudists, that at Christs coming to reign, the Lion shall feed with the Kid, the Leopard and Lamb, Serpent and Child shal so sympathize as not to hurt one another: mans life shal be so long, as an hundred yeers old shal seem a Babe; with like fancies as fabulous Poets or Romanzers devise, but L. 7. de divine praemio. A model of the Millenium. without divine warrant: only they are taken from the smooth Pen-man Lactantius, who being intoxicat with this conceipt thus descants. The Son of God shal com to judg both quick and dead: but when he hath abolished wickednes, and resto­red the Saints to life, he shal liv with men and rule them righ­teously a thousand yeers: then those alife shal multiply infinit generations, exceding Methuselahs age; whos ofspring shalbe holy and dear to God; the rest to be raised, shal rule over the living as Judges, and al Gentils shal not be destroyed, but som reserved to Gods victory, that the just may triumphantly subdu them in perpetual servitud, as the Israelits did the Gibe­onits. At that time the Prince of Devils Author of evil, shalbe bound in chains a thousand yeers, when righteousnes shal reign, that no hurt be perpetrated against Gods people: the just shal be gathered from al the Earth, and when judgment is ended, the holy City shalbe in midst of the Earth, wher God [Page] shal abide with the reigning just; then shal darknes be dispeld from the world, and the Moon shal shine as the Sun never to be lessned; but Sun seven fold brighter then now; the Earth shal shew hir fecundity, and bring forth fruit freely: the Rocks and Mountains shal destil Hony; Wine shall flow from Fountains, and Milk run in Rivers. The World shal rejoice, and al Nature be glad, being manumised from the dominion of sin, impiety, and al error. Beasts shal not feed on Blood, nor Birds on prey; but al things quiet and amicable: Lions and Calfs shil eat at the same Cratch, Wolfs shal not woorry Sheep, nor Dogs hunt, nor Eagles or Hawks doo harm: Chil­dren shal play with Serpents. Finaly it shal be as Poets tel of the golden age in Saturns time, but they erred, becaus tru Prophets (to whos Eys divine Visions were presented as pre­sent) foretel future contingents as if they were already acted; which Prophecies when fame had spred, prophane men not witting why they were uttered, or when to be performed, thought them to be antiently accomplished, which yet could not be completed while Man reigned: but when wicked Re­ligions are extinguished, and Sin extermined, then shal the Earth be subdued to God, and al thes things com to pass; yea men shal liv long and happily, reigning together with God. The Kings of Nations shal com from the Earths ends with gifts to adore the great King, whos name shal be reverenced and renowned to al People under Heaven, and al Princes bearing sway on Earth: so far this fine Orator; and with such confi­dence, as if he received it by special Revelation: but later Chi­liasts are contrary to him, who say Christs millenar reign shal anteced the day of judgment; but Lactantius, that Christ shal first Judg the World. Master Archer a most acut Lynx, but boldest Bayard of al (who shoots at blind mans Buts) con­jects from Daniels words; From the time that daily Sacrifice Den 12. 11. 12. shal ceas, and abomination which makes desolat be set up; shalbe one thousand two hundred ninty dais: blessed is he that waits and coms to one thousand three hundred fifty fiv dais; this is forty fiv mo then one thousand two hundred ninty, and both Pro­phetic dais or yeers, thes (saith he) began under Julian Apo­stata, who revived Paganism, and incited the Jews to rebuild [Page 192] their Temple: but God defeated it by an Earth-quake and Subterraneal fires, which cast up the foundations, as Christ foretold. So by his calculation the first sum (1290.) should expire A. 1650. now past: and the last A. 1695. 46. yeers hence. But if that shal elaps too, his Disciples like the Maho­metans wil date it to a farther day. He hath another cringe, that no Soul ever entred the third Heaven (no not Christs, how then can he sit at his Fathers right hand?) But a Celical or Elementar Paradise, as he promised the good Theef: nor shal any Saint go thither til the last Judgment pass. For H [...]l he saith al Christians hav erred except himself: for Hel wherto Reprobats now go, is not the place of fire prepared for the damned at last day; but a temporar prison in the Air, Earth, or Sea to confine their Souls til the Judgment day: when they shal be sent into a most spatious Hel, containing al the created World; or what els is beside Gods mansion. Lo the audacity and temerity of Sectists! Who bear or boast as if they were inspired or of Gods Cabinet Counsil; affecting novities tho never so fals, frivolous, or fanatical.

Thes great Clercs like Arrius and other learned Heretics, Refutation. mislead many ignorant Idiots, specialy in dark mysteries: but such squibs end in an Ignis fatuus of their fantastic brains, for they hav no sound proof that Christ shal reign on Earth a thou­sand yeers, but that the Saints shal reign with him in new Jeru­salem, which is no terren place, but caled by Saint Paul Hea­venly Jerusalem the City of the living God: and by Joha that Hebr. 12. 22. Rev. 21. 2 10. great holy City, descending down from God out of Heaven; prepared as a Bride adorned for hir Husband the Lamb.

The contrary Reasons are thes: 1. Christ ascended into Reason. 1 Heaven, and shal com to judg the World: Ergo not to reign a thousand yeers before that day, for to say he shal descend to reign, and ascend after a thousand yeers to com again, is a­gainst the Scripture, which warrants only two comings. Ma­ster Mede to shun this Scilla fals into Charybdis of a strange singular crotchet; making Christs secund coming to judgment one continued act with his millenar reign: becaus Saint Peter speaking of the judgment day and perdition of ungoly men, [Page] subjoyns immediatly or interruptedly, that one day with the [...] 3. 7. 8. Lord is as a thousand yeers, and a thousand yeers as one day, which he saith is meant precisely of that particular day, but the same Apostle elswher saith, God shal send Jesus Christ, when Acts 3. 19 20 21. the times of refreshing shal com, whom the Heaven must receiv til the restitution of al things, as he hath spoken by al his Prophets. This time of refreshing and restitution Chiliasts conceiv to be his millenar reign: for they say none but Martyrs and som priviledged Saints shal partak the first Resurrection: which is Dan. 12. 13. such a singular prerogativ, as Daniel could not obtain it but by special promis; but it shal be when the Jews refreshing by Christs presence shal com, viz. at the general Resurrection. For Christ saith, I go to prepare a place for you, I wil com again John 14. 2, 3. and receiv you to my self, that wher I am, ther ye may be also: this plainly provs, that he wil com back but once at last day, to tak his Disciples with him into Heaven, not to dwei with them here a thousand yeers or for ever. Saint Paul saith, God Eph 1. 20. set Christ at his right hand in Heavenly places til the last day: so David. Sit at my right hand til I make thine Enimies thy foot­stool; Ps. 110. 1. &c. which shews he shal not com thence til al is sub­dued to him at last day. See Psalm 110, 'tis short, but expounds four chapters of the Apocalyps (16. 17. 18. 19.) cleerly.

2. Al the godly or elect at Christs secund coming shal 2 immediatly rise to glory upon sound of the Trumpet, and 2. Thes 4. 16, 7. thos then living shal be caught up in the Clouds together with them to meet the Lord in the Air: Ergo he coms not to reside with them, but to carry them with him for ever.

3. Christ saith his Kingdom is not of this World, but the 3 Kingdom of God is within you, that is Spiritual, not Terren Luke 17. 21. or Temporal consisting in worldly Pomp, Power, Pleasure, Armies, Victories, Slaughters, Triumphs, or such carnal cour­ses as Chiliasts conceiv or vainly confide.

4. The Church Militant is a amixd multitud of good and 4 bad, as a draw net; which needs the comfort of Gods Word, Sacraments, and other Ordinances: having Christ the high-Priest inceffantly interceding in Heaven on their be­half, [Page 193] as Scriptures speak: Ergo it shal not consist a thousand yeers soly of Saints; which need no ordinary helps, as they dream.

5. None know the day of Judgment nor direct time of it, 5 no not the Son of Man: but if Christ shal reign on Earth one thousand yeers before it; any Man can then tel it wil be one thousand yeers after.

6. Jerusalem shal never be restored, no more then Sodom 6 or Samaria, as the Prophets inform: but eternal life in new Jerusalem is the reward of just Men at last day, as St Paul Ezek. 16 53, Amos 5. 3. 2 Tim. 4 6. tels: Ergo none shal reign on Earth with him in a rebuilt new Jerusalem, much less he with them here.

7. Antichrist is to be cast alife into the Lake burning with 7 Brimstone at the Lambs mariage, which shal be celebrat with his whol Church of Elect (not part) at the general Resurre­ction. Rev. 19. Rev. 7. 20. Ergo he shal not be totaly destroyed til last day, as is shewed.

8. The reward of Mattyrs is eternal life in Heaven: Ergo 8 not temporal on Earth a thousand yeers; but their Souls ac­cording to Chiliasts are in wors condition then other Saints, which stay behind that space to enjoy the beatific Vision, while they grovel below, and return to bodies that eat, drink, sleep, and delight in carnal things; not like Christs glorious body, nor thos immortal ones promised to the Faithful, which must needs be irksom to them.

9. The holy Martyrs Souls rest under the Altar in Heaven, 9 til their Brethren be fulfilled: Ergo shal not return to reign here a thousand yeers. Archer seing how absurd 'tis to bring Rev. 6. 9. back Souls til last judgment, rovs at random, that no Soul shal enter the third or highest Heaven til then, but abide in a sublunar Paradise with Enoch and Elias; yet how knows he their Mansion is sublunar, or can that be under the Altar? To silv which scruple, he frams a new Moon-calf-model of Heaven, Hel, and Paradise after his own Pythagorean Noddle.

10. Antichrist is to continue til the last day of Judgment: 10 Ergo he shal not be fully or finaly abolished before thos thou­sand yeers commence, as Chiliasts say; who agree not toge­ther [Page] whether thos Saints during the millenium shal beget chil­dren, as others then living must multiply incredibly, nor how al shal be sustained with food and raiment; whether miracu­lously or by industry? Such are Sphynx Riddles, and many mo Reasons may be alleged, but let thes suffice. Now to answer their arguments, the chief arrows in their quiver folow: who like al other Sects and Factions, cul out the obscurest places of Scripture either misunderstood, or misapplied, or misinterpre­ted, putting their own sens on them, which shal be sincerely scanned.

Ob. To begin with their best Basilisc of battery: Saint John Rev. 20 4, 5. saith, I saw the Souls of them that were beheaded for the witnes of Jesus, who lived and reigned with him a thousand yeers, but the rest of the dead lived not again til thos yeers were finished, this is the first Resurrection: Ergo they shal regin so long.

Sol. The Apocalyps is a most misty mistical Prophecy, and this the darkest part: which treats of the Resurrection only obiter or occasionaly; wheras first Resurrection in al places els is spiritual of the Soul from the grav of sin to Grace; and the very words apply to the Souls (not Bodies) of thos that were behea­ded, for holy Writ hath no first Resurrection of the Body; but we must seek the tru meaning wher Resurrection is purpo­sly handled: and much more is here included or intruded in the premisses then the conclusion can bear, for no Ey able to pierce a Milston, is able to espy Earth in al the Context, nor that Christ shal reign with the Martyrs, but they with him: to the tru meaning of the words, the very next much conduce: They shalbe Priests of God and Christ, and shal reign with him: Now his Priesthood is spiritual as his Kingdom; so al Christi­ans are Priests, but not to offer bodily Sacrifices; and al Kings but not to rule mens temporal stats: els ther would be more Kings then Subjects in thos thousand yeers, sith not only the Martyrs, and a few privileged Saints; but al the godly (milli­ons of millions that must be born in that space) must reign as Kings, nor can it in any property of speech be applied to Christs personal reign on Earth, sith 'tis eternal not to be measured by time: but if it be referred to his regal office of Mediator, that is far longer then a thousand yeers, for if al his Monarchy past [Page 194] from his byrth til now (1654 yeers) be cut off, whith repugns al Scripture, sith he stil sits on Davids Throne ruling his Church as King, yet the future cannot be confined to so short a scantle, sith sundry secular Stats, Signiories, or Soveraign­ties hav lasted far longer; hence master Archer makes the mil­lenium the evening or last daun of his personal reign, contrary to master Mede, assuming to the morning many mo; as if Christ by his omniscience and opening the Books of every Con­science, cannot dispatch Judgment in a moment, but must im­ploy thousands of yeers, as men will presum to appoint him. Saint Paul hath three parallel phrases; If Children then Heirs Rom. 8. 1 [...]. of God, and joynt Heirs with Christ: if we suffer with him, that we may be also glorified together: here we are Heirs, Sufferers, and glorified with him; yet none imply his personal presence with men here, but our spiritual communion with him in Hea­ven; the case is semblable of this Millenar reign which is meant mysticaly and metaphoricaly of the Saints eternal reign with Christ; this is the King-key of al the Fabric, and therfore so amply answered.

Ob. Daniel saith many (not al) that shal sleep in the dust of Dan. [...]. [...] Earth shal awake: som to eternal life, and som to shame and everlasting contempt: but al shal rise at last day: Ergo this is meant of the Millenar reign and real first Resurrection of Martyrs and som special Saints to Earthly glory.

Sol. He had need of cleer Crystal Specticles or Galilaeus great perspectiv who can see such a meaning: for the Prophet speaks soly of the last Resurrection, which Martyrs shal not partake, as Chiliasts teach; nor the wicked of the first, til thos one thousand yeers end. The Word (many) so hotly pressed, provs not that al shal not rise at once; but that thos which rise shal be many. So Dr. Deodat senseth it wel to the Original: the multitud of them that sleep in dust shal awake. For al and many are oftimes Synonyma signifying the same, as several subjects prompt and plain precedents prov.

Repl. Daniel ads, the wise shal shine as the Firmament, and Ibid. v. 3. Saints as Stars: but at last Resurrection they shal shine as the Sun: Ergo he means the first.

Sol. He expresseth no absolut but comparativ glory of Saints: [Page] As St. Paul saith, ther is one glory of the Sun, another of Moon and Stars: so is your Resurrection. Nor doth it folow that such are said to hav so much glory here, may not be said elswher to hav more. Shal the Saints Bodies during thos one thousand yeers shine as the Firmament and Stars; yet eat, drink, sleep, go to wars or wors? Surely so great glory cannot sort or sute with such sordidity.

Repl. The first Resurrection is promised to Daniel as a prime privilege ( Thou shalt stand in the lot at end of dais) but the last Ibid v. 13. common to al: Ergo &c.

Sol. This inference is improper and impertinent: for Mr. Archer holds how al the Godly shal partake the first Resur­rection so wel as Daniel: nor is any sound reason to includ him rather then Moses or David. The truth is, no Resurrection is their imported; but a free promiss, that Daniel shal liv in peace and prosperity (as he did) al dais of his life til the end. So bold are Sectists to scru Scriptures and seduce Idiots

Ob. Daniel saith from the time daily Sacrifice shal ceas and Ibid. v. 11. 12. abomination which makes desolat be set up; ther shal be one thou­sand two hundred dais: blessed is he that coms to the one thousand three hundred thirty fiv dais. Mr. Archer taking yeers for dai [...] (as is usual) makes them to begin under Julian Apostata, who invited the Jews to reedify their Temple, til not a stone was left on a stone: so by his comput, the first Sum (1290.) com­pleted A. 1650. the last A. 1695. as he presumes.

Sol. In this confident assertion no part is sound, for what warrant hath he to take yeers for dais? Yet so writers use. Or what reason to begin them with Julian? Indeed he opened Pagan Temples and set up Idolatry: but caused not the Jews daily sacrifice to ceas, but desired to promot it, had not God prevented; nor erected any abomination in Christian Churches. Daniel designs only two times, when solen sacrifice shal be put down, and abomination set up: viz. by Antiochus and Titus, not so late as Julian: nor is the Earthquake story authentic, but application to Christs prophecy most audacious; sith 'tis in­tended to Titus time, as the Text plainly provs. Daniels words declare the short durance of Antiochus desolation; viz▪ a time, times, and half: which is three yeers and half, or 1290. [Page 195] simple dais: and from it, til a plague shal fal on his Person 45. mo (1335.) which betided precisely to Antiochus (as the Maccabees and Josephus testify) but nothing to Julian.

Ob. David saith, when the Lord shal build up Sion, and his Psal. glory appeer: Ergo Jerusalem shal be rebuilt by God, and Christ reign gloriously ther.

Sol. This is to snatch at shadows or semblance of words: but the Text treats of Babylons captivity, and the Saints earnest longing to see Sion restored; which is promised that the Lord shal get glory by it: but of Jerusalems rebuilding or the Lords appeering ther in glory; ne gry quidem nor ground.

Ob. Peter saith, The day of the Lord wil com as a Theef 2 Pet. 3. [...]. in the night: in which the Heavens shal pass with a nois, and Ele­ments melt with heat, the Earth with al Works therin shal be burnt up. Nathless we according to his promiss, look for a new Heaven and Earth wherin dwels righteousnes: Ergo al old Creatures shal be consumed with fire, and new substituted for the Saints use, far more glorious and righteous [...] as som presum to model.

Sol. Several Sects diversly and dangerously distort this Text: but the Apostles answers som Scoffers which ask, Wher is the promiss of his coming? Not to reign one thousand yeers (as Chiliasts fondly imagin) but to judg al flesh, as is evidently expressed: which is after thos one thousand yeers, or at last end of them. Yea many words ( That day wil com as a Theef, 2 The [...]. [...]. 7, 8. in which the Heavens, Elements, and Earth shal be burnt up) cleerly convince Christs coming to Judgment: the last words wheron they most rely ( A new Earth wherin dwels righteousnes) as if they cannot mean the Judgment day, becaus no righte­ous Men shal then dwel on Earth: the Original runs, we in whom righteousnes dwels, look for a new Heaven and Earth. For the habitation of righteousnes refers to just Men, who ex­pect the performance of promiss: but if they be read as we translat: righteousnes relats soly to the Heavens ( in quibus Coelis, not in qua Terra) sith one Pronoun respects not [...]oth Substantivs, as Junius observs. Yea Archer agniseth, that no righteous Soul is to inhabit Heaven in thos one thousand yeers, nor any after within the verge of created Heaven; for [Page] a [...] that space shal be Hel as he holds: so al tends nothing to a Millenar reign.

Ob. Isaiah saith, I creat new Heavens and a new Earth: but Isaiah 65. 17, 21, [...]2. the old shal not be remembred nor com to mind. They shal build houses and inhabit them, plant Vineyards and eat the fruit of them: for my elect shal long enjoy the works of their hands: but thes things cannot be doon after the last Judgment: Ergo &c.

Sol. The Prophet means not, that after Heaven and Earth is burnt or new created; Men shal build or plant: but Mr. Burroughs expounds it by a Metaphor, that God in later dais shal doo such glorious things for his Church, as if he made al new: which is far from burning the old, being no more then what Peter brings from Joel 2. 30. I wil shew wonders in Hea­ven and Earth; Blood, Fire, and pillars of Smoke: which was accomplished at Pentecost, when the holy Ghost descended. [...] 12. 26, 27. Nor more then that in Haggai 2. 6. Yet 'tis a little while, and I will shake the Heavens, Earth, and Sea: which was perform­ed at Christs first coming, and the Apostles preaching to the Gentils: wherof Isaiah speaks in the cited chapter, as St. Paul Rom. 10. 20. expounds the first vers. I was found of them that sought me not: but to interpret it of his secund coming, wil make the Jews sus­pend their faith, til those promises of building and planting be fulfilled.

Ob. 'Tis said God hath not subjected the World to com to the [...]b. 2 5, 8 Angels; but now we see not al things put under him: Ergo Christ is to hav al put under him. This is not yet doon at his first coming, as the Words are cleer: nor shal be in the life to com, for then he must resign the Kingdom to his Father, so by con­sequent it must be exe [...]uted during his interstitial Millenar reign; when he shal triumphantly subdu al and al sorts of Enimies.

Sol. The World to com ther meant and mentioned, is the time of the Gospel; which was not ministred by Angels like the Mat 28. 18 Law on Sinai, but by the Son of God; this new world diffe­red more from the old then the Earth after the Flood from it before, and began at Christs first coming, but manifested at his [...] 1 31. Resurrection, when al power in Heaven and Earth was given [Page 196] him, being set abov al Principalities: yet the full accomplish­ment is not til last day, when Death, Hel, and Satan shal be made his footstool. Al this cannot be verified of the intersti­tial Millenium: for yer that inchoats, many things must ter­minat, which cannot be subjected, nor his chief Enimies sub­dued, sith Death shal stil hav dominion; Satan only bound in the bottomless pit, not cast into the burning lake, and Hel not utterly trod under foot.

Ob. Jeremy saith, They shal say no more the Arc of the Lords Jer. 3. 16, 17. Covenant, nor shal it com to mind or memory: then they shal cal Jerusalem the Lords Throne, and al Nations shal gather to it, nor shal they walk after their hearts imaginations: Ergo al past things shal be forgot, and Israel return to Jerusalem which shal be a Throne of Glory, and al Nations joyn to them: al which can be fulfilled at no time sav in thos thousand yeers.

Sol. The old things to be forgot are lawish Ceremonies, not Gospel Ordinances: the Arc and Temple were by Christs first coming removed: the walking of Juda and Israel toge­ther, with the Nations conjoyned, imports the caling of Jews and Gentiles to the tru Church Heavenly Jerusalem: For so saith Isaiah; It shal com to pass in the last dais, that the Lords Isai 2. 2, 3. hous shal be established in the Mountain top, and al Nations shal flow to it: for out of Sion shal go a Law, and the Lords word from Jerusalem. The last dais were the Apostles times, who from Sion and Jerusalem blew the Gospel; Trumpet to al peo­ple: as Jeremy speaks; I wil giv you Pastors according to my Jer. 3 15. heart (Christ and his Apostles) which shal feed you with knowledg and understanding. The walking after Gods heart implies no freedom from sin, but a state of grace, wherin God givs new hearts and writes his Law therin. their main ground (that Jerusalem new built shal be a Throne of Glory, being before Jer. [...] but his footstool) is a groundless crotchet, for Sion, Jerusa­lem and the Arc, are caled in the old Testament not only Gods footstool, but his Throne; and in the new Testament not only his Throne, but footstool. Thus like other Sects they sens the Scrip­ture literaly or tropicaly as they list.

Ob. Daniel saith, In the dais of thes Kings God shal set up a [...]. 2. 44. kingdom never to be d [...]stroyed; but shal stand for ever: Ergo [Page] Christ shal hav an everlasting kingdom, and Jerusalem enjoy endless joy on Earth.

Sol. What a pretious inference is this? so Preachers quote Texts, and people turn their Bibles, but may go beyond Seas to seek their glosses. Daniels everlasting kingdom is meerly spiritual and celical, as the Angel said to Mary, The Lord shal Luk 1. 32▪ 33. giv him his Father Davids Throne, and he shal reign over Jacob for ever: This kingdom for the matter is everlasting, being the Glory which the Saints shal enjoy for ever with Christ in Heaven; but for the maner of administration, he shal resign it to the Father, when the work of Redemption is perfected: but no Millenar Earthly kingdom as they dream.

Ob. Saint John saith, He was clothed with a vesture dipt i [...] Rev. 19. 13▪ 14▪ 15. blood: Ergo Christ shal slay his Enimies and embru his vest­ments in blood, that none shal be left to trouble the Church during that Millenar reign.

Sol. So they say, but the next words speak contrary: for his Armies in Heaven (not on Earth) folowed on whit Horses, clothed in fine whit linnen, not bloody: yea his war-weapon is a sharp sword out of his mouth, not in his hand: who shal rule the Nations with a rod of Iron, and tread the winepress of Gods wrath. In a word, thes bloody battles are not ascribed to Christ lite­raly, as appears by a parallel place: Who is this that coms from Isai 63. 1. &c. Edom with died garments from Bozra? meaning Christ by reason of the slain Edomits, when in property of speech he had no body or bloody raiment, being seven hundred yeers before his byrth.

Ob. 'Tis said the City had no need of Sun or Moon, and the Rev 21. 23. 24. Kings of the Earth bring their glory to it: Ergo Jerusalem ther meant shal shine in great temporal glory, and terren Princes be subdued to it at Christs coming to reign a thousand yeers.

Sol. Indeed Heavenly Jerusalem is ther meant, and al such places or passages are Allegorical, to shew the Churches con­dition on Earth, and Saints state in Heaven: which is elswher expressed by Metaphors of gold, pretious Stones, Fountains, Fruits &c. but to interpret them literaly of any City on Earth, is like the Athenien Dotard, who deemed every ship that cam into the Harbour to be his own.

Ob. Zechary saith, hee that is feeble among them at that day, Zech. 12. 8, 9. shal be as David, and Davids hous as God: I will seek to destroy al Nations that shal com against Jerusalem: Ergo the Saints who are to reign with Christ shal excel in glory, and he wil destroy al Jerusalems Enimies.

Sol. Excellent inferences: Ergo Potlid. The Prophet plain­ly speaks of gifts poured on al Saints of the new Testament by the spirit of supplication, which makes the least of them like David; yea greater then John Baptist, as Christ declares: but Mat. 11. v. 11. what is this to earthly Jerusalem, or Chiliasts Mathematical Kingdom? Surely ther is no soundnes in it nor semblance for it in al Gods book. Other places are heaped up, which like Bay leafs cast into fire, make much crackling in Pulpits and Pamphlets: but if al the former be shadows, the rest wil vanish into vapor.

Ob. The word Day in Prophetic phrase or Hebrew Idiom sig­nifies som space of time, not simply twelv or twenty four hours: as the day of tentation in the Wildernes is fourty yeers long: the Day of Babylonish captivity seventy: Giv us this Day our daily Bread, purports our term of life, and 'tis som­times used for Eternity, this day sh [...]lt thou be with me in Pa­radise: Ergo the Day of Judgment is to be taken in the same sens.

Sol. The antecedent is granted, and consequent shal not be denied: for none can tel how long that Judgment shal last, specialy sith time shal be no more, as the Angel swore. Yet Mr. Mede makes it a continued act with the reign of just one thousand yeers. For as Rabbi Elias confines the Worlds con­tinuance to 6000. yeers: so he puts the Millenium of Mes­siahs glorious reign, to be a periodical consummation of al things, when shal be a Sabbath of Eternal rest. Why then doo common Chiliasts assign one thousand to that reign, either before, at, or after the Judgment day? Let them render a rea­son of the one and the other wil soon be resolved, why Day implies a larger space (more or less) then twenty four hours: becaus al time to God is but as a Day to Man. In the interim many puzzeling questions may be proposed to them.

1. Whether the holy Martyrs and chosen Confessors to com Interroga [...]s. [Page] with Christ, shal multiply their generations in subordinat suc­cessions, like the Saints then living here? If so, then must they marry and giv in mariage, which scars sutes or sorts with glo­rified bodies.

2. Whether thos then living shal surviv al thos yeers, and not tast of death; but be only changed at last day? If so, then shal they exced Methusalah and al the Protopatriarchs in lon­gevity.

3. Whether their Progenies shal be al elect vessels, being none of Gog and Magogs race which are to be destroied both Bodies and Souls? If so, then is Christs Flock no litle Fold, sith their Ofspring wil multiply incredibly in one thousand yeers.

4. How so many millions of millions can be maintained; whether miraculously as Elias was, or by industry as al others? If so, then must every particular person provide for himself, sith al servitud wil be cashired.

5. Wher such numberless multituds shal inhabit, whom the Earth can hardly contain, much less sustain? Whether al must cohabit in new built Jerusalem, to eat and drink at Christs Table, wher Infidels shal assiege them; or scatteredly abroad wher they shal be subject to the Enimies swords? Whether they shal be invulnerable and incorruptible to slay thos with whom they wage war, yet never be hurted? How they shal liv so gently with al sorts of Serpents and wild Beasts, yet hold hostility with Men? Lastly how the natures of al Animals shal be so miraculously Metamorphosed, as not to fear Mans face, nor to feed on prey▪ but al liv familiarly one with ano­ther on the same foods? Beside sundry such scruples touching eating, drinking, sleeping, voiding excrements, and other works of Nature simply in themselfs sinless. Haply they wil answer with a vulgar Proverb. One Fool may ask mo questions then many wise men can resolv: therfore let this by business be buried in silence, lest they sting my long ears,

Stulte, cave quid agis: noli irritare Crabrones.
Fool, what thou doost take heed,
Stir not the Hornets breed.

Be wise or wary: too many such nests are roused already, and mo wil be, when thou ministrest more matter of wrath by future provocation.

Mr. Burton and som of his Brethren, allege a few Fathers Fathers. to countenance the Chiliastic caus: yet no Sects so much slights or scorns the Antients as they: but infinit authorities may be mustred to the contrary, were it not lost labor. For deaf Adders wil not be charmed, nor self wedded Sectists informed or reformed. Such as desire to know the primitiv Churches verdict herin, may consult St. Austin L. 20. de Civ. Dei. and L. Vives commentary: but let al wise sober Christians reject such vain doctrins or delusions, which tend not to amend maners, or sav their Souls: expecting with patience our blessed Saviours secund and last coming in the Clouds to Judgment, not to a temporar reign (to begin A. 1650. 1655. 1695. or ad Graecas Calendas) being stil prepared like wise Virgins with oil in their Lamps to meet the Bride-groom, and sing St. Johns Epithalamion: Even so com Lord Jesus: the grace of our Lord Rev. 22. Jesus Christ be with you, Amen: which being the last per close of holy Bible, shal be the final upshot or Catastrophe of this harsh Scene: sav a Supplement touching their cheif Coryphee, Mr. Mede, who is much more cautious and curious (tho alike Mr. M [...]. veracious) then the rest. Therfore his scattred speculations shal be carefully collected and faithfully presented to public examen: whos principal proofs are almost al answered ple­narily in the premisses.

1. The Millenar doctrin was so general in the next age after Apostles, that Just. Martyr saith both he and al Orthodox be­leeved it: yea Irenaeus, Tertullian, Lactantius, Cyprian and others defended it from St. Peters words, One day with the Lo [...]d is as a thousand yeers: but it was soon decried or discarded, being not rightly understood, or corrupted in som circumstances, which drew Men diversly into Factions: so that the Antichiliasts being pressed with pregnant proofs from the Apocalyps which they could not answer; suspended that Book from the Scrip­ture Canon, til they found shifts of a spiritual and corporal Resurrection, and other such to elude thos places, and then allowed it.

2. Justin in his Dialog to Trypho a Jew speaks thus: You ask, whether we seriously confes Jerusalems restauration, and expect the gathering of Israel with their Tribes, Patriarchs, and Prophets; or g [...]ant it only to gain us? I answer, That many pious Professors, with my self, sincerely assert it, but others not so Orthodox deny it: For som prophane Atheists and Heretics (who blasphemed the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, say­ing ther is no resurrection) gainsay thes things: but we know and beleev both a Resurrection of the Body, and a thousand yeers reign in Jerusalem; which shal be reedified and inlarged, as the Prophets testify. Isaiah saith, Ther shal be a new Hea­ven Isai 65. 17. 22 and Earth, the dais of my People are as a Tree of Life, Which last words plainly point out the thousand yeers: For God said to Adam, In that day thou eatest of the Tree, thou shalt dy: but he did not accomplish a thousand yeers. We also know that saying one day is as a 1000. yeers, to be to the same purpose. For a certain Man, with us caled John (one of Christs twelv Apostles) prophecied by Revelation, that Christs faith­ful Members should fulfil thos yeers at Jerusalem, when the last Judgment and general Resurrection shal be of al jointly toge­ther: Ergo 'tis no new Opinion.

3. The Rabins say the World shal dure six thousand yeers as it was created in six dais) & the seventh thousand shal be the great day of Judgment or reign of Messiah. So R. Ketina: the World lasts six thousands yeers, and in one it shal be destroied: of which 'tis said, the Lord only shal be exalted in that day: Isai 2. 11. 17. Psal. 90. 4. David saith a thousand yeers in thy sight are but as yesterday: which later Rabbins understand of the general Judgment to be a thousand y [...]ers, and then ensues an eternal Sabbath: but they differ (as Christian Sects doo in divers dogmats) at what Millenium this day shal be. The School of R. Elias makes the Judgment day the last Millenium of their six thou­sand: but others assign a seven thousandth for that day. Hence St. Jerom chargeth Chiliasts with Judaism, as a chief brand of error: yet to hold their Opinions in tru Tenets (as of Paradise, Gehenna, the World to com, &c.) is not culpable; no more then to maintain the Trinity with Papists: but to reject al, wil harden and exasperat them. The 92. Psalm is intitled, A Song [Page 199] for the Sabbath, wherin is nothing but rest: so Tradition agrees, that as every seventh yeer is a time of releas, so the seventh Millenium shal be the Saints rest or reign, & the worlds releas.

4. Christs coming is immediatly to folow Antichrists con­fusion: and the seventh Trumpet with thos thousand yeers, and other appendent Prophecies, forego the great day of Judgment which the Jews so much celebrat, and Christ with his Apostles commemorat. This is no short space of hours, but of many yeers in Hebrew dialect; circumscribed with two real Resur­rections, as peculiar precincts. Which day begins at the mor­ning Judgment of Antichrist, and other the Churches Enimies then alife, by the Lords glorious appeering in flames of fire; but ends at the general Resurrection and Judgment after the thousand yeers reign: when Satan shal be loosed a short space, and the wicked cast into Hel torments; but the Saints transla­ted into Heaven to reign with Christ for ever. This St. Peter 2 Pet. 3 7. 8. 13 cals, The day of Judgment and perdition of ungodly Men: adding immediatly, Beloved, be not ignorant that one day (ther newly named) with the Lord is as a thousand yeers: apertly intimating, that the very Judgment day shal be a thousand yeers; when he and his Brethren the Jews look for new Heavens, and a new Earth, wherin dwels righteousnes according to his promiss. Wher was this promiss (being before John saw the Apocalyp­tic Vision) except in Isaiah? I creat new Heavens and a new Isai 65. 17. Earth, and the former shal not be remembred or com into mind. Isai 66. 22. Again, As the new Heavens and new Earth which I wil make, shal remain before me; so shal your seed and name remain: which is a main evidence how God wil rebuild it.

5. This is that Kingdom ready to judg the world, as St. 2 Tim. 4. 1. Paul saith: I charge before the Lord Jesus Christ, who shal judg quick and dead at his appeering, and his Kingdom: For at last 1 Cor. 15. 24 28 general Judgment he shal resign the Kingdom (of his Church) to God the Father, that he may be subject to him who subdu [...]d a [...] to himself, that God may be al in al. So far is he from entring a new Kingdom: Ergo that which shal neither be before the Lords appeering, nor after the last Judgment, must needs be betwen both, which is the Millenar reign. This is a sly subtle Argument.

6. This is the Son of Mans Kingdom which Daniel saw, to Dan. 7. 14 27 whom was given dominion, glory, and a Kingdom; that al Peo­ple, Nations, and Toungs, should serv him: when dominion and greatnes of Kingdoms under Heaven shal be given to the Saints of the most high, as the Angel interprets. This cannot be after last Judgment, sith he must then resign, not receiv a Kingdom: but his and Johns is the same, becaus they begin at one term, the destruction of the fourth Roman Beast: viz. that in Dani­el, Dan. 7. 11. when he was slain and his body given to the burning flame: that in John, when the Beast and sals Prophet are cast alife into Rev 19 v 20. a lake burning with fire and brimstone. As also becaus both their Judgments are alike, which by comparing wil appeer. For Da­niel saith, I beheld, til the Thrones were set, and Judgment given Dan. 7. 9 10 22 Rev. 20. 4. to the Saints, who possessed the Kingdom. So John, I saw Thrones, and they sat on them▪ and judgment was given to them, who lived and reigned with Christ a thousand yeers. What can better conform or cohere? For whatever the Jews, or Christ and his Apostles delivered touching the great Judgment day, is taken out of Daniels said Vision: viz. that Judgment is to be accomplished by fire, Christ to com in the Clouds in the glory of his Father, the Saints to judg the World with him, and An­tichrist abolished with the brightnes of his coming. Lastly▪ This is that large Kingdom shewed to Nebuchadnezar in a statu of Dan. 2. 34. 35. 4 Kingdoms: not that of a stone cut out of the Mountain, while the series of Monarchy remained; for this is Christs Kingdoms present state: but the stone which becam a Mountain, when al Kingdoms were utterly defaced or destroied: which must needs be his Millenar reign.

7. The Roman Empire is the fourth Kingdom reveled to Daniel Imagine confusa, but not according to the distinction of Facts, or specification of Fates, as it was to John: nor is it strange to see a thing unveled in general; yet most particulars sealed or conceled. For the surrogat Cal of Gentils in Jews stead, was shewed to Peter and other Apostles: but the parti­cular Fates and Stats not known, til Christ reveled them in Apocalyptic Visions. For the order of times and cours of things to be acted, was reserved til Johns revelation. The Mo­ther-Text whence the Jews ground an expectation of the great [Page 200] Judgment Day (wherto almost al descriptions in the new Te­stament refer) is Daniels said Vision of a Session, when the Dan 7. 9, 10. &c. fourth Beast was to be destroied: but the grand Assises resem­ble their Synedrion or chief Court, wher the Pater Jud [...]cii had his Assessors sitting on semicircle seats before him. I beheld, saith he, til the Thrones were pitched (not cast down, as late Translations render) and the Antient of dais (Pater Consisto­rii) did sit: and the Judgment (of the whol Sanedrim) was set, and the Books opened. Here the name and form of Judgment is cited, and twise after repeated: 1. At amplification of the V. 21. 22. [...]6. wicked horns tyranny, when judgment was given to the Saints of the most High. 2. In the Angels interpretation, That the Judgment shal sit and take away his Dominion, to consume and destroy to the end: Wher note, that Cases of Dominion, Bla­sphemy, Apostasy, or the like belonged to the Sanhedrim: whence St. Jude and the Jews cal it, The great day of Judg­ment, Jude v 6 7. and describe it by fire, becaus the Throne was a firy flame, and wheels as burning fire: a firy stream issued out before him, and the Beasts body was given to the burning flame. The like expressions are in the Gospel, wher this day is intimated or in­ferred, the Son of Man shal com in the Clouds in the glory of his Father with his holy Angels: thousand thousands ministred to him: as Daniel saith, I saw one like the Son of Men coming in the clouds to the Antient of dais: Hence St. Paul, learning that the Saints shal judg the world, becaus Thrones were set and judgment given them, confuted the Theslaloniens fals fear of 2 Thes. 2. 2 3. Christs coming then at hand: becaus that day cannot be, til the Man of sin first com and reign his appointed time, as Daniel foretold; whos destruction shal be at the Son of Mans appee­ring in the Clouds, but not before. For Daniels wicked horn or Beast acting in it, is Pauls Man of sin, as the Church from hir in fancy ever interprrted.

8. The Kingdom of the Son of Man and Saints of the most High in Daniel, begins when the great judgment sits: but Christs Millenar reign is the same with Daniels: Ergo it begins at the Great judgment. That both are one self Kingdom, ap­peers thus. 1. They both began at the fourth Beasts destructi­on; Dan 7. 11. [...]2, 2 [...]. that in Daniel when he was slain, and his body given to [Page] burning flame: That in John, when the Beast and fals Prophet Rev. 19 20, 21. ( Daniels wicked horn) were cast alife into a lake burning with brimstone. 2. Becaus John begins the Millenium at the same judgment Session; for both say they saw Thrones and thos that sat on them; and the Saints lived or reigned with Christ the Son of Man. If then thos yeers begin with the judgment day, it cannot consummat til the end: for Gog and Magogs destru­ction, and general Resurrection is not til then: Ergo the thou­sand yeers are included in that judgment Day. Hence it results, that what Scripture speaks of Christs Kingdom at his secund coming, or at Antichrists confusion, is of necessity the same which Daniel saw should be then: and consequently the Millen reign is included betwen the commencement and consummati­on of that great Day. So thos sayings of St. Luke concerning Luke 17. 20 19 11 2 [...] 31 Christs coming in Clouds with power and great glory (conclu­ding, when yee see thes things com to pass, know that the King­dom of God is at hand) refer to Daniels Prophecy, being no wher els found in the old Testament: for Christ cals himself oft the Son of Man, as he is stiled in that Vision of the great Judg­ment, wherof we must at his secund coming expect the accom­plishment. 3. The Apocalyptic thousand yeers, folow the times of the Beast and fals Prophet, as the series shews: which if we deny we must disclaim Rome to be Babylon, the Papacy the two hornd Beast, Antichrist the fals Prophet, and the Apoca­lyps Canonical: as the Opposers of old Chiliasts were driven to doo.

9. Thos thousand yeers are yet to com: but what the ma­ner or condition of that Kingdom means, Men much differ. Most say Antichrist shal not be fully or finally destroied til Christ com to judgment; which may be asserted without hol­ding that this shal be before that Day, as common Chiliasts contend: for it may be a third time during it, which shal con­tinu so long: At entrance wherof the Beast and Antichrist must perish: for this is not a Day of few hours, but a continued act of divers yeers, wherin Christ shal destroy al his Enemies, beginning with Antichrist, and ending with the general Resur­rection; which is his Millenar reign in new Jerusalem. So ther is one only Millenium, which begins at the Beasts perdition: [Page 201] when Satan shal be bound in chains and cast into the bottom­less pit (being before only cast from Heaven or the Imperial Roman Throne in Constantins time) not to peep out til the thousand yeers expire.

10. The first or secund Resurrection are proved to be bo [...]h real: 1. The place of the first Resurrection seems plainest for Rev. 20. 4, 5. allegory, sith it refers to the Martyrs rising. 2. 'Tis said, Thos that were beheaded for Jesus lived and reigned with him a thou­sand yeers; but the rest of the Dead lived not again til that time was finished: Ergo if one be literaly of them which lived not again til the thousand yeers end; the other must be so too of thos that lived and reigned when that time commenced, caled the first Resurrection. 3. Though the Jews had no direct di­stinct notice of two Resurrections, sav only in gross, to be at the judgment Day: yet they expect such wherin som which rise shal reign somtime on Earth: as 'tis said, The Souls of the Wisd 3. 1. & [...]. righteous shal in time of their Visitation judg the Nations, and their Lord shal reign for ever. So the twenty four Elders sing, We shal reign on Earth. 4. The whol Church after Apostles Rev 5. 10. held, as Justin informs, that the first Resurrection belongs soly to Martyrs and chief Confessors as a special privilege; which made Men much more affect Martyry, and induced praier for the Dead, that they might partake that Resurrection, as Ter­tullian tels. Thus we are bound to beleev the matter: but the maner of the Saints thousand yeers reign with Christ in new Jerusalem, is not so cleerly unveled.

11. New Jerusalem and the Nations walking in the light of it, are not one: for new Jerusalem is not the whol Church, but the new Worlds main Metropolis: The Nations which walk in hir light shal be happy and glorious; but changable and lia­ble to great commotions at end of thos thousand yeers: wher­as thos in new Jerusalem shal be manumised from al mutation; on whom the secund death hath no power, and God shal wipe al tears from their eys. Christs words prov ( God said to Moses, Mat. 22. 32. Exod 3 8. I am the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob: he is not God of the Dead but of the living▪) that they shal possess Palestin the Land of promiss in person▪ which yet they never enjoied but as Strangers or Sojourners: For the Covenant is made to ech so [Page] wel as to their seed: viz. to Abram Gen. 13. 15. Gen. 15. 7. Gen. 17. 8. to Isaac Gen. 26. 8. to Jacob Gen. 35. 12. to al three jointly Exod. 6. 4, 8. Deut. 6. 18. Deut. 11. 21. Deut. 20. 30. Now this promiss is not yet performed to them, nor shal be while they ly dead: Ergo they must be raised to inherit the promised Land: from which places the Rabins proved the Resurrection against the Sadduces. This St. Paul intimats saying, Abraham looked for Hebr. 11. 10. a City whos builder is God. Again, now they desire a better Coun­try, that is an Heavenly or from Heaven; for God hath prepared for them a City. This probably is new Jerusalem, said to com down from God out of Heaven, prepared as a Bride adorned for hir Husband. Zacharias in his Prophetic Benedict us saith, to Luke 1. 72. perform the mercy promised to our Fathers, and to remember his holy Covenant: meaning how he wil herafter remember to ful­fil his Covenant to them of possessing the promised Land in persons, which is not yet doon: so they must liv bodily at first Resurrection to enjoy this promiss actualy. Christ saith, many Mat. 8. 11. 12. (not al) shal com from East and West, who shal sit down with Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob in the Kingdom of Heaven: but the Children of the Kingdom shal be cast into outer darknes. This seems to imply their Kingdom of new Jerusalem, which shal dure one thousand yeers.

12. Christs Kingdom the Church wher he reigns in his Church is one thing, and that wher the Saints shal reign with him another: the first began at his first coming, which he shal resign to the Father: the last is to commence at his secund, and continu one thousand yeers on Earth. Herof see Dan. 7. 14. Luke 9. 11, 15. Luke 21. 31. 2 Thes. 1. 5. 2 Tim. 4. 1. For the Millenium (caled by the Jews and St. Juae the great Day Rev. 11. 15. of Judgment, or Judgment of the great Day) is the seventh Chiliad current, which Christ shal consummat with the general Judgment. This is his grand Assises beginning with the se­venth Trumpet: the process wherof John describes by a duple Rev. 20. 5. 6, 12. Judgment and Resurrection, beside the millenar reign betwixt both. The morning shal be of Antichrist and his adherents, whom Christ shal confound at his coming, and then shal be 2 Thes. 2 8. the first Resurrection: the Evening on the remnent of his Eni­mies ( Gog and Magog, whos number is as the Sea sand) which [Page 202] shal end with last universal Resurrection: when the last enimy Death being totaly vanquishd, he shal yeeld up the Kingdom 1 Cor. 15. 24. 28. (his Church) to the Father, that God may be al in al. This is the one thousand yeers Sabbath, in which the Saints shal reign with their King on Earth, and ever after enjoy an Eternal rest in the highest increat Heaven, not in a new material World of Heaven and Earth, as som suppose. So saith Irenaeus, the L. 5. c. 28. World was created in six dais, and in 6000. yeers shal con­summat: at end of which coms the 7000 th. or Sabbath to the Saints. Thes are his sublime nicities or self-singular novities, if Ipse dixit may pass current for warrant. He hath many mo, but thes the best: which shal suffice to shun prolixity.

His best basis of building (beside what is before answered) Epilog. 2 Pet. 3. 7, 8. relies on St. Peters words of one thousand yeers as one day: which he stifly presseth to be the precise day of Judgment im­mediatly forenamed: yet Davids one thousand yeers as yester­day, and Peters one day as one thousand yeers, doo not denote so many solar yeers in special, as they dote or dream: but only in general, that no time dimensions (no not thousands of yeers) are any way considerable to God, who is al Eternity, and his works not to be measured by transitory time. St. Ibid. v. 9, 10. Peters words are directed as an apt answer to Scoffers, who instantly ads: The Lord is not slack concerning his promiss (ac Men count slacknes) but long suffering to us ward, and unwil­ling that any should perish; but that al should repent. But the Day of the Lord wil com as a Theef in the night, wherin the Hea­vens shal pass away with great nois, and the Elements melt with servent heat &c. Which cleerly indicats, that God wil cer­tainly perform the promiss of his coming, and is not slack: for one thousand yeers to him is but as one day. So thos words doo not relat to the preceding Day of Judgment (which he toucheth obiter or occasionaly only) but is a meer answer to the said Scoffers, which is his sole scope or subject, as al Or­thodox exposiors agree.

Medi Paraphrasis acuta: Medes witty Paraphrase.

TO set a fairer gloss or garnish on his Devise, he givs a Paraphrase on 2 Peter 3. prety Paraphrase on the whol Chapter, which shal be curtly contracted. St. Peter exhorts the beleeving Jews, to Vers. 1, 2, 3, 4. mind the holy Prophets words concerning Christs coming to Judg­ment, which also the Apostles confirm: but forewarns that in the last dais shal com Scoffers which walk after their own wais or wils saying, wher is the promiss of his coming? For since the Fa­thers fel a sleep, al things continu as they were from the Creation. Thes last dais are the times of the Churches Apostasy under Antichrist, as St. Paul speaks; in the later times som shal depart 1 Tim. 4. 1. from the Faith, giving heed to seducing Spirits and doctrins of Devils.

They consider not, how the Heavens were of old by Gods Word, Vers. 5, 6, 7, 8. and the Earth standing out of the Waters (the great Deep) and in or amidst them (the Clouds or Floodgates hanging about it) wherby the World then (in Noahs dais) perished: but the Hea­vens and Earth now are by the same Word kept in store reserved unto to fire against the Judgment Day (which Irenaeus cals a flood of Fire, as the Prophets express it by firy flames) and per­dition of ungodly Men. But beloved, be not ignorant of this, that one day with the Lord is as one thousand yeers, and one thousand yeers as one day. As if he should say ( Glossa corrumpit Textum) wheras I mention the Judgment day, lest ye may mistake it for a common day; know that one day with the Lord is as one thousand yeers, and contrarily, for the Prophets speak of Christs coming indefinitly in general, not distinguishing first and secund, which the Gospel from Daniel more cleerly teach­eth, but we being rightly instructed in both, must apply ech to its proper time. The Jewish Doctors writing of this Day, cite Davids words, one thousand yeers, in thy sight are as ye­sterday: yet is not that Day named: but St. Peter specifies it, and immediatly subjoins his words, seeming rather to re­spect the Jews saying of that day then Davids. For they are [Page 203] usaly taken as an argument why God is not slack in his pro­miss: sith 'tis not a question, whether the time be long or short to God (in whos eys millions of yeers are as yesterday) but to u [...], who measure by dais and hours. Justin Martyr and Irenaeus apply St. Peters words pointly or precisely to the Judg­ment Day or great Day of the Lord, which is to last or con­tinu complet a thousand solar yeers.

The Lord is not slack in his promiss (tho this day be deforred) Vers. 9, 10, to the end. but long suffering toward us (which is caus of th supposed slack­nes) not willing that any (of Israels seed) should perish, but that al should repent (as he exhorted them at Jerusalem to doo, that Acts 3. 19. 21. their sins may be blotted out, when the times of refreshing shal com, til the restitution of al things which God speaks of by al his Pro­phets) or els they must perish with the rest of Infidels. For that Day wil com as a Theef in the night, when the Heavens shal pass away with great nois (as crakling of fire) and the Elements melt with fervent heat: the Earth also and works therin shal be burnt up. Sith then al thes shal be dissolved (or abolished) what persons ought ye to be in al godly conversation? (Which should sute to our faith) looking for that Day of God to com; if we wil sbun the peril of it. Nathelesse (whatever thos Scoffers say, who doubt or deride the promiss) we according to it, expect new Heavens and Earth (a new refined state of the World) wherin dwels righte­ousnes (as Isaiah speaks, ch. 60. 20. 21. ch. 65. 17. ch. 66. 22.) wherfore beloved, sith ye look for such things, be diligent to be found spotless and blameless of him in peace: accounting his long suffering for Salvation: as our beloved Brother Paul according to the wisdom given him, hath writ to you: who in al his Epistles (wherin are som things hard to be understood, which the unlear­ned and unstable wrest to their own destruction, as they doo other Scriptures) speaks of thes things viz. Rom. 2. 4, 5, 6, 7. 1 Cor. 1. 7, 8. 1 Cor. 3. 13. 2 Cor. 7. 11. Phil. 1. 10. Ph. 2. 15. Ph. 3. 10. Col. 3. 4. 5. 1 Thes. 2. 12. 1 Th. 3. 13. 1 Th. 5. 32. 2 Th. 1. 8, 11. 1 Tim. 6. 14, 25. Tit. 2. 12. 13. Heb. 12. 14, 28, 29. For better understanding St. Peter of the Worlds conflagration or combustion, consider thes cir­cumstances.

1. That the old Hebrew (the Scriptures language) hath [Page] no one word to express the univers of superior and inferior Bodies (caled in Greec Cosmos, in Latin Mundus, in English World) but Heaven and Earth jointly: so when St. Peter saith (the World then being perished by water; but the Hea­vens and Earth now are reserved to fire) he might convertibly utter, the Heavens and Earth then perished by water, as the World now shal by fire: so a new Heaven and Earth in Scrip­ture notion imply a new World.

2. That no other World or Heaven and Earth shal perish by fire; then what before perishd by water, as the antithesis argues: which is the sublunar, whos Heaven is Air, and Earth the whol Geographic Globe: both which were vitiated or defiled by the deluge, and the Creatures destroied or much depraved. Such a World then and no other Heaven or Earth shal suffer a secund flood of Fire for restauration, as it had be­fore a deluge of Waters for corruption. This is a witty novi­ty (as ther be sundry such now adais) but scars Orthodox: sith 'tis a Catholic Tenet, that the Ethereal Heavens with al their Starry host shal be burnt up.

3. That the Word [...] (translated Elements) is not di­stinguished from Heaven and Earth ther named; becaus Hea­ven includs Air, and Earth Water: so three Physical Elements are implied, and Fire (if it be a fourth, or not rather a quality of intens heat inherent in another Body) must burn the [...], and can be none of that to be burnt. So it must be rendred the whol Host of them, or Furniture belonging to them, as [...] signifies the works or Host of the Earth which shal be burnt. Gen 2. 1. For Moses saith, The Heavens and Earth were finished, with al the Host of them, which the Septuagints stile Furniture. So the meaning is, the Heavens and Host therof, with the Earth and works or Furniture therin shal be fired. The Scripture spe­cifies three Heavens: 1. Empyreal of Glory, whos Host or Army are invisible Angels and blessed Spirits. 2. Ethereal or Starry, whos Host are shining Stars and Planets. 3. Aereal or Sublunary, whos Host are either visible as Meteors and Fowls; or invisible, as evil Spirits and Fiends, with their Prince of the Air Satan the Devil. To apply it: St. Peter cannot in­tend the Empyreal, which is increat and impassible; nor Ethe­real, [Page 204] which is of vast immensity and sublimity, in regard wher­of this lower world is but a point or Center: nor did thos two receiv any curs for Mans sin, or contagion or contamination by the Deluge; nor doo any of Gods enimies dwel ther to de­file them: So it rests, That the Aereal only, with al their Host, shal be burnt up at last day. Thes Heavens then shal melt with fervent heat, being a metaphor taken from refining Metals, which is his meaning: who expounds dissolving by melting or purifying, as the Septuagints stil interpret that word by refi­ning: but when the Aereal is so refined, the Ethereal Lights wil shine to them on Earth far more glorious, as passing their rais through a purer medium; so that the world shal seem re­newed. As to the word (passing away) 'tis an Hebraism signi­fying any change of a thing from the old Estate: so al imply a secession from their pristin condition; but no utter abolition by Fire, more then the former destruction by Water. If any ask, whether the Host of invisible Spirits shal suffer by it? 'Tis answered, That they shal not be burnt as the visible; yet shal be exiled or excluded from thos lofty mansions into lower Dungeons, as St. Jude intimats: The Angels which lost their Jude v. 6. first estate and left their habitations, he hath reserved to everla­sting chains of darknes, at the Judgment of that great Day. Ther is another exposition to the same effect: for Christ describing Mat. 24 29. the coming of this day, useth prophetic expressions, that the Sun shal be darkned and Moon giv no light, the Stars shal fal from Heaven, whos powers shal be shaken; this cannot be con­strued literaly, sith som Stars are bigger then the Earth, and cannot fal on it, nor can be darkned, being essentialy lucid bo­dies; so the meaning may be, the World is either Mundus conti­n [...]ns, viz. the whol frame of Heaven and Earth; or contentus, viz. the Inhabiters and kingdoms therin; so the Heaven of this politic world, is the Soveraign part therof, whos Host and Stars are the ruling powers or Magistrats, and Earth the Pezantry or Plebei­ans, together with al terren creatures serving mans use; such ac­ceptions are usual in the Prophets, as Poets strains are to us. If this notion of the contained world be admitted, the whol Host of Heaven and Earth (high and low, Princes and Pesants, Men and Beasts) shal be consumed at Christs coming to judgment: [Page] but wheras at the Flood the Contained only perished; yet the Containing was also corrupted or contamined: In the destru­ction by fire it shal be contrary: For the world of wicked ones being destroyed, the Heavens and Earth Containing shal be purged or purified for the righteous to possess. This expositi­on is not so proper as the former: yet if ther be som whom neither can satisfy, but wil needs hav the Fire totaly to annihi­lat this visible world: it may be answered, that the judgment Day shal last a thousand yeers (so saith he but none els) and this Fire not be at beginning (when Christs Enimies with Sa­tans Kingdom shalbe destroyed, and then a restauration) bu [...] at end or evening shal be an utter annillation of the whol Crea­ture: so Saint Peters words may bear thus: however Heaven and Earth shal in fine perish by Fire; yet before that be, we look for new (or the worlds restauration) to anteced this abo­lition, according to his promiss. Howbeit this suits not so wel with his chief scope, nor with the Prophets promiss poin­ted at; which specifies such a Fire only as shal forego a restau­ration, and not caus a final abolition of the whol Univers with al therin; nor hath it any ground in Scripture: or if any such annillation shal be, it stands with reason to be by Gods imme­diat hand or power (as he first framed it of meer nothing) with­out help of any Agent or Instrument, rather then by Fire. Thes are his self singular speculations: Quis (que) suo sensu, sed Medus maxime abundat. His wit reacheth beyond the Moon, and diveth beneath the bottom of the great Deep; being in­deed incomparably piercing or profound: for the familiarly conversed in the darkest deepest mysteries of al Prophecies (specialy the Apocalyps) and was most ready in al learned lan­guages (Hebrew, Syriac, Chalde, Perfic, Arabic, Greec, La­tin) and in the Jewish Rabbins or Doctors, wherin he super­excelled, nor was any part of abstruse literature strange to him or hid from him: yet his gay gloss (how specious soever it shews) that as God created the Univers of nothing by his bare word Fiat; so if his wil be to dissolv it into nothing, he would doo it by his sole word sans help of Fire: this is of li­tle solidity; for he made only the Chaos or rude Lump of sim­ply nothing, as the common stock of al the rest wherof they [Page 205] were compact, so at last dissolution he wil consum them al by Fire, but the ashes or reliques left at last like the first Chaos, shal be quite annihilated by his bare word, Cesset or Desinat, that is, as Saint John renders it; Let their place be found no Rev. 20. 11. more, so the proportion holds pointly or perfectly, between the first Creation and final Consummation of this World, as the next Thesis shal shew.

His other cringe concerning Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, to Answers. possess the promised Land in person, hath no more solidity or sincerity then the former, for they dwelt ther personaly, though but as Sojourners, and bought som parcels (wherin their bodies ly) as a livery and seisen of the whol: as their progeny or po­sterity enjoyed it proprietarily for many ages, according to Gods Covenant pacted to them and their Seed. Gods saying to Moses, and Christs inference, He is God of the living not of the dead; doo not argu, that thos Patriarchs shal be raised to possess the promised Land in person a thousand yeers with or under Christ: but only that they now liv in blessed condition with God, and shal rise at last day to inherit eternal glory (both in Body and Soul united) in the highest Heaven: wher­as damned Reprobats ly dead in Hel, whos God he cannot be caled.

The City which Abraham looked for whos builder is God, must needs be Heavenly Jerusalem clyped his Country: which is prepared for al the faithful: not any new material Metro­polis to be made in Palestine or any place of this Earth; as they dream. Zacharias words of performing his mercy pro­mised to our Fathers, and remembring his holy Covenant, cleerly concern Christs first coming so oft promised in the old Testament wherof John Baptist then born was the faithful forerunner. Lastly Christs words (many shal com from East and West to sit down with Ab [...]aham, Isaac, and Jacob in the Kingdom of Heaven) cannot in property of phrase possibly purport any terren temporal reign: but Men are too prone to strain Scriptures after their own sens, how violently or un­truly soever. God giv us al grace to be wise to sobriety, and not wrest his holy Word according to our own Wils: which may turn to our damnation, and perdition of sundry silly se­duced Souls.

For the main Thesis of Christs Millenar reign, Mr. Mede Opinions. saith Eusebius a strong Adversary to it, fains one Gaius to father it on Cerinthus: but none knows any such Man sav himself. Surely he was a sincere Historian not given to foist­ing or faining, and Cerinthus generaly reputed the original Author, nor is any other alleged. He farther saith St. Jerom did h [...]s best to decry or disgrace the Tenet: but he usualy mis­related things out of peevish, petulant, partial passion: yet durst not damn it, becaus many authentic Authors and Mar­tyrs maintained it. Contrarily Justin Martyr an Apostolic Man, ascribed the origin herof to St. John, and told Tryp [...] that none but Heretics gain said it. Now for later writers, Piscator holds, that the Saints of the first Resurrection shal reign with Christ a thousand yeers in Heaven: but Alsted, Mr. Mede, and almost al els on Earth. Yet Piscator, Alsted, and the rest agree, that it shal be at Christs secund coming to reign, before his third to Judgment: but Mr. Mede find­ing no warrant for a third coming, dissents from them al, making the Day of Judgment one continued act with the Millenar reign: which is a devise of his own subtle wit, never broched before.

Sic a principi [...] est fratrum concordia discors:
In varios sensus lis furiosa trahit.
Thus Brethren from beginning il agree
Who into different minds distracted be.

My privat resolution in this point, and that other (whether Christ shal reign personaly on a new Earth for ever, resigning his Kingdom of glory wher he now sits to his Father?) Must needs amidst such a copious cru of learned Clercs, who hav diversly debated it both wais; be very amphibolous or ambi­guous: as a giddy Ostrich, which having laid hir first Eg at rovers on the sands, regards not how she lodgeth the rest, nor on what heap she sits on brood: so that I may truly cant out thes two dubious Distichs.

Me trahit in dubios aliorum assertio sensus:
An reget in Mundo hoc Christus, an Arce Poli?
Nec patet, an terris regnabit mille per annos
Cum superis, sanctis, Martyribus (que); suis?
Others Opinions make me doubtful, whether
Christ shal rule in this World, or Heaven for ever?
If he shal reign on Earth one thousand yeers
With Angels, Saints, and Martyrs; it not appeers.

Touching the Argument or Contents of the Premisses, they are couched or concluded in a few familiar verses like the former.

Impius asseruit Christum annis mille Cerinthus
Persona in terris velle manere sua.
Vile Cerinth said, Christ wil in person reign
One thousand yeers, and here on Earth remain.
Velle Redemptorem regere annis mille, Chilarchae
Alite [...].
Judicii in terris asseruere die.
Chiliarchs affirmd, that Christ on Earth wil sway
One thousand yeers at the last Judgment Day.
Mille annis Christum, Chiliarchae in somnia produnt,
A [...]ias.
Hic cum Martyribus velle manere suis.
Vain Chiliasts dream, that Christ with's Saints wil stay
One thousand yeers, and here on Earth bear sway.
Regnare in terris mille annis velle Chilistae
Secus.
Christum cum sanctis, dogmata f [...]lsa tenent.
That Christ with's Saints one thousand yeers wil reign
On Earth, bold Chiliasts doctrins fals maintain.
De christ▪ imperi [...] Chiliastae mille per annos
[...]ve.
Ante Diem extremum, somnia vana canunt.
That Christ one thousand yeers on Earth shal reign
Before last Day, Chiliasts vain dreams doo fain.

THESIS VIII.
Mundi hujus Dissolutio: The Worlds dissolution.

THe wisest Heathen held, that this World shal hav an end even by fire; as St. Jerom and L. Vives vouch. Eusebius saith the chief Stoics ( Zeno, Cle­anthes, Chrysippus) defended this doctrin: yea Se­neca a Master of that Sect saith, fire shal be the end of it, as moisture was the beginning: the Stars shal war together, and what now shines in comly order, shal burn in one fire or flame. Numaenius saith, good Souls continu til al things be destroied by fire: this Ovid provs from their Prophets or Poets Re­cords.

Juppiter in fatis reminiscitur affore tempus:
L. 1. M [...]am.
Quo mare, quo tellus, convexaque Regia Coeli
A [...]deat; & mundi moles operosa laboret.
Jov cal'd to mind that Time by fate shal be:
When Sea, when Earth, and Heavens convexity
Shal burn in flames, and the Worlds Axeltree.

In the means or maner of Dissolution, D [...]ines diversly differ [...] Opinions. som approv perfectiv renovation, som supplementiv substituti­on, and som destructiv abolition or annullation. They also vary in sundry subaltern circumstances: som say al Creatures shal be restored to pristin perfection as before Mans fal; som that the Heavens shal be reserved and al els annihilated: som that Heaven, Air, and Earth shal be refined, but al beside con­founded: som that the whol visible Machin with al works therin (except Angels, Devils, Men, and Hel expresly exempt) shal be totaly resolved to nothing, as it was first framed of [Page 207] nothing. The issu or result is, whether a new World or none? The grounds or reasons of which several Opinions shal be succinctly scanned.

To begin with Annihilators arguments, sundry Texts are Scriptures. alleged in favor of it.

  • 1. The Heavens shal perish and be no more, but vanish like
    Isai 51▪ 6.
    smoke, and wax old as a garment.
  • 2. Al the Host of Heaven shal be dissolved, and roled toge­ther
    Isa [...] 31. 4.
    as a Scrole: they shal fal down as a leaf from the Vine, and a faling Fig from the Figtree.
  • 3. Man lieth down and riseth not, til the Heavens be no more:
    [...] 14. 12.
    meaning til the general Resurrection
  • 4. The Heavens shal perish, but thou shalt endure &c.
    Ps. 102. 26▪
  • 5. The Heavens shal pass away with great nois, and Elements
    2 Pe [...]. 3. 10. [...]
    melt with [...]eat: the Earth with al works therin shal be burnt up.
  • 6. St. John consorts, Heaven and Earth sted away, whos place
    Rev. 20. 11▪
    was found no more. Al which phrases (to pass away, perish, vani [...]h, be no more, be burnt up, [...]old together as a scrole, fal down as a Vine leaf or Fig from the Tree, melt with heat, fly away, and no place found for them) strongly imply, if not inforce annihilation, or at least impugn a perfecter condition and new substitution.

The Reasons for it are thes: 1. This World was made of Reasons. meer nothing: Ergo it shal return to nothing.

2. Al Visible things were formed for Man (as he for Gods glory) who wil not need them, when he is translated to a far better mansion: as when a Hous is built for Inhabiters, if it be decreed to be no more inhabited; 'tis in vain to repair or trim it better then before: much more to pul it down or build a fairer.

3. If God intended a restitution of the old, or substitution of a new: he could doo it by changing the qualities, as it shal be with the faithful found alife at last Day: when cor­ruption 1 Cor. 15. 52. 53. shal put on incorruption, and mortal immortality (which is analogical Death and Resurrection) without burn­ning it up first.

4. If they say his wil is so to doo, wher is their Warrant? [Page] 'Tis his wil to destroy it by fire: but not reveled in holy writ, nor can be resolved by human wit; what, how many, or whe­ther any Creatures shal be restored to pristin integrity? Nor whether they shal propagat to infinity, or persist to eternity? Yet many bold Baiards or Buzzards bring blind Brats of that kind.

5. If the World be renewed or perfected, it shal hav no end: But 'tis said, the end of al things is at hand▪ the Worlds ends are com upon us: Ergo this World shal be abolished, and no new substituted. Indeed som thing Analogical shal supply the stead in far transcendent maner: viz. the third increat Heaven for the Materials, and that which David Tropicaly Psal. 27. 15. terms the Land of the living for this Earth: which are pro­portional to our future state of glory, as thes confort to our present condition of misery and mortality. For in lieu of thes created Heavens, which somtime give light, and anon leav us da [...]k, We shal be translated to a Celical Paradise (stiled new Rev 21. 12 13. Jerusalem) wher is light infinitly brighter then the Sun: for Gods Rev. 22. 5. glory lightens it, and the Lamb is its light. Ther shal be no night or need of Candle or Sun: for God givs light, and they shal [...] 60 19 20. reign with him for ever. So saith Isaiah, the Sun shal no more be thy light by day, nor Moon giv brightness: but the Lord shal be thy everlasting light, and God thy glory. Thy Sun shal never go down, nor Moon be hid: but thy mourning shal end. Thes Texts imply that Sun and Moon shal be no more, sith the Saints sh [...]l not need them, having God to stead them; who is a Sun that never sets, and Moon never hid: his Vision being an everlasting light of glory. For we shal see God by intuition face to face as he is, and know him as he knows us. One that stands by a friend to view his face fully, needs no Picture or looking Glass to behold him: nor doth Christs Vision in his Humanity, re­quire other Creatures to improv the Saints glory; sith he is Author and they coheirs of endless felicity: but the rest being made for the Church Militant, can no more conduce to Tri­umphants happines, then a Candle in open Sun shine. For [...] [...]. 13. 10. when that which is perfect is com, then that which is in part shal be doon away. So ther wil be no use of a new World to be substituted, or old restituted; but space, time, al things infinit, [Page 208] immens, eternal, In natura nihil datur infinitum: post nil nisi infinitum: the Worlds conflagration apertly refuts renova­tion: for it cannot be brought to better condition, sith God saw al was good: then what needs burning to bring it in the same form?

6. Many instances are extant of annillation: as Christ abo­lished the essence of Water to make it Wine: the Dov in which the holy Gost appeered at Christ Baptism, was seen no A C. 1572. more: the new Star in Cassiopeia gradualy vanished: the sound of wind is annihilated: the Relation of Father and Son at Fathers death is extinct: the time past exists no longer: yet the three last are real accidents, and the three first substances. Why then may not this mundan Machin be utterly abolished, if it pleas Omnipotence so to dispose? For the debat rests on his meer wil reveled in his holy Word.

7. Their clashing contradiction is a plenary confuta [...]son: for som say no mixtils or Animats shal subsist, but only C [...]lical bodies and two Elements, yet can shew no caus or colour, why they rather then the rest; or how the world shalbe more glo­rious, being as a bare house unfurnished and unhabited; sith variety makes it Mundus or comly: som that al creatures shal be restored so wel as men; yet know not how to stow them (as two were of ech kind in the A [...]c) in the world, un­les they fain it of infinit capacity: som that such only shal be reserved as are extant at last day; that is good luck and bad (as al the world is now ruled) for why they rather then the rest? sith al shal be incinerated, so wel as thos already corrup­ted: som that none now or then existent, are capable of resti­tution or resurrection, but new shalbe formed of rare kinds (like thos in the Lunar world) to serv the Saints in a new ma­terial world to com. Touching this Earth, som say it shal be re­fined like gold in the fire, and bettered or beautified tenfold for the Saints mutual commerce: som that it shal be a mansi­on for such as neither deserv Heaven for their good deeds, nor Hel for hainous crimes: som that it shal be the habitation of un­baptized Infants, which they hold better then Saint Austins dark dungeon.

Thes are al carnal conceipts, or ungrounded unwarranted [Page] Phantasms, sith the kingdom of Heaven is stiled the Seat of blessed Spirits; wher they shal reside as in their proper place of perpetual possession; not as an Inn to lodg in for a space, and at last leav it for ever; nor shal they hav a City hous and coun­try Grange to remov from Heaven to Earth at pleasures, as som sottishly surmise, but shal enjoy a Heavenly habitation and beatific Vision for their eternal inheritance, which wil be no boot to change for an Earthly mansion; though they should enjoy Christs personal presence to boot, which they also hav stil in Heaven.

Most Greec Fathers with many Latin assert annihilation: Authorities. Hilari saith, this Heaven caled Firmament shal pass away and not be; but that invisible wherin God dwels abides for ever. Clement fains his Master Saint Peter to tel Simon Magus, that ther be two Heavens, one superior, increat, eternal wher bles­sed Spirits inhabit: another inferior, visible, studded with stars, which at last day shal be abolished. Saint Jerom saith thos two Fathers Opinion was most approved, as cohering with Saint Pauls saying, The things seen are temporal, but thos not seen 2 Cor. 4. 18. eternal: meaning that al Visibles shal perish to nothing▪ but invi­sibles abide for ever in infinity. Dr. Hakewil cites sundry late L. 6 Apol. sub [...]nem. Protestant Professors as Patrons of annillation, viz. Luther, Melancthon, Bucer, Beroaldus, Bartolinus, Vorstius, Junius, Rivet, Hunnius, Tilenus, Cassanius, Meisnerus, Polanus, Martinius, Brentius, Wollebius, Gerard, Arnobius, Frant­zius, and others, whos pregnant testimonies to that purpose he produceth worthy of exact perusal, which to recit or ca­pitulat, consorts not with my affected brevity, who must hasten to answer the Ronovators and Substitutors Argu­ments.

Ob. Saint Peter saith, The Heavens must contain Christ, til the Acts 3. 19 21. times of refreshing and restitution of al things, which God hath spo­ken by al his holy Prophets: Ergo al shal be restored.

Sol. The Syriac Interpreter renders it, til the end of al times or worlds consummation: but the times of restitution or re­freshing, signify the complement of our Redemption: for (as Calvin comments) becaus our restitution or redemption is yet imperfect, while we grone under the bond of bondage; we [Page 209] shal be restored to liberty at last day when 'tis perfected: but speaks nothing of the Worlds renovation after 'tis burnt, nor can it be wiredrawn or wrested to any such construction if rightly sensed.

Ob. David saith, God laid the Earths foundations, that it Ps. 104. 5. sh [...]uld not be removed for ever: So Salomon, One generation passeth and another coms, but the Earth abides for ever, Ergo Eccles. 1. 4. shal not be annilled.

Sol. Thes places are stifly urgd against the Earths diurnal motion with more color then to oppugn abolition; yet truly against neither; for the intention is, that by Natures cours it is laid to remain for ever, without decay or diminution in the whol like other elements; had not God decreed to dissolv it: but the parts of them al are subject to jugial alteration and corruption. the word (for ever) is so long as Time or the World lasts, so caled in comparison of mans mortal condition: as circumcision is stiled perpetual.

Repl. The Lord saith, Lo I creat new Heavens and Earth, Isai 6 [...] [...]7. Rev. 21. 1. for the former shal not be remembred: So Saint John cals them new; for the first passed away and ther was no more Sea: so Saint Peter: The Heavens shal pass away with a nois, and Elements 2 Pet 3 10. 13. melt with heat; but we look for new Heavens and Earth: Ergo being burnt, they shal be refined and renovated, or new created and substituted; but not al utterly abolished or an­nulled.

Sol. See how partial Sectists are; it was pressed last, that the Earth abides for ever; now that it shal be renewed or a new surrogated: but truth lies in the kernel of genuin sens, not in the shel of words, surely they are not meant literaly of materi­al Heavens and Earth, or if they be, it tends rather to annilla­tion then restitution o [...] substitution; for Isai saith, The for­mer shal com in mind no more: Saint John, They passed a­way and there was no more Sea: Saint Peter, The Heavens shal pass away with a nois, and Elements melt with heat, how then renewed? such as constru to perish, pass away, be no more, &c. of the worlds instauration or melioration, and not of annihilation, must answer wher in Grammar 'tis so ta­ken; for in Philosophy and Theology renovation diametraly [Page] differs from destruction. Beza applies Isais alleged words to the Churches State or Christs kingdom: which also alluds to the Saints condition in Heavenly Jerusalem; as Saint Johns immediat ensuing words import: I saw the holy City, new Je­rusalem Rev 21. 2. coming from God, prepared as a Bride trimmed for her husband; which intimats their continual cohabitation or hir eternal Mansion with God hir Bridegroom. So Saint John and Peter by new Heavens intend the Saints glory in new Je­rusalem with God or the Lamb, and not any material new Heavens as al authentic Authors expound.

Rep. Isaiah saith, The Moons light shal be as the Sun, and Isai 30. 26. Suns sevenfold as of seven dais: Ergo at last day al things shal be perfected in far greater glory, not totaly abolished to be no more.

Sol. The Prophet speaks Mysticaly and Metaphoricaly (as oft elswher) of the Church under Christ, which he cals a new Heaven and Earth: as the new Heavens and Earth which I wil Isai 66. 22. 23. make shal remain before me; so shal your seed and name continu from one Moon to another, and from Sabbath to Sabbath shal al flesh com to Worship before me saith the Lord. All which Texts our Expositors aptly apply to Christs kingdom, when his Church shal be renewed, but no new world implied: so thos words of the Moons light as the Sun, and Suns seven fold, are meant of the Churches restauration, whos glory shal septuply exced the Suns splendor, as Junius interprets, which consorts to our engllsh Annotations: for by the glory of thos excel­lent Creatures, is shewed the super eminent beatitud of Gods children in Christs kingdom the Church; but tend nothing to a new, real, material World.

Rep. David saith, Thou shalt change them as a Vesture, Ps. 102 26. 27. and they shal be changed; which Saint Paul repeats of thes ma­terial Heavens and Earth: Ergo they shal hav a perfectiv alte­ration, Heb. 1. 11. 12. no destructiv annillation.

Sol. Both indeed speak of thes Heavens and Earth, but nei­ther of any perfectiv renovation; sith both say they shal perish by the word Balah, which properly purports Brought to nothing: for change is many wais, as in quality better or wors; in quan­tity bigger or less; in substance by generation and corruption: [Page 210] but mostly by annihilation, which is the greatest mutation ab ente ad non Ens, even to nothing. So Bellarmin blunders on that Psalm. God only is unchangeable, who brought the Heavens from no being to be, and wil reduce them, from a being not to be; concluding al other Creatures in the same condition. Bartholinus observs that mutation is often taken for annillation: as Can. 2. 11. the Winter is past, i. quit ex­tinct Isai 2. 18. the Idols shal utterly abolish. Now the Hea­vens also may be said to be changed in respect of us, who shal be translated from a material visible World, to an immaterial invisible Kingdom; from a terren possession to a Celical Pa­radise, stiled new Jerusalem and a new Heaven. The approved Annotations interpret al Texts of new Heavens and Earth Tropicaly, touching Christs Kingdom or Church. See Psal. 110. 3. Jer. 31. 36. Jer. 33. 26. Joel 2. 28. Hebr. 12. 28. and elswher.

Ob. St. Paul saith, The fashion of this World passeth away: 1 Co [...]. 7. 31, Ergo the extern form only shal be altered, but the essence or substance not abolished.

Sol. Are thes handsom inferences? The Apostle asserts no­thing of the material World, but only denots the vanity of mundan matters, that al passeth away like a tale that is told, as Calvin and Junius interpret.

Ob. Christ saith▪ som shal sit at my right hand, som at my left: Luk. 22. 30. ye shal eat ana drink at my Table in my Kingdom: Ergo the Saints shal sit and eat corporaly at his Table in his Human Kingdom.

Sol. This is a gross carnal conceipt of Chiliasts and other Novists (addle devisers) who hold a new World shal be created for Christs personal Kingdom, wher he shal reign or reside for ever, resigning the highest Heaven to his Father: as if Infinity could not contain al things. Christ speaks of eating and drinking at his Table Tropicaly (as al sober Orthodox agree) deriving it from his last Supper, which he newly insti­tuted before thos words were uttered: signifying the effect of it, that therby they shal participat eternal life in his Heavenly Kingdom, not at Jerusalem a thousand yeers before the Judgment, as common Chiliasts conceiv; nor after it for [Page] ever in a new created World to com, as other Opinionists deem or dream.

Ob. St. Paul saith, The Creatures shal be delivered from cor­ruptions Rom 8. 21, 22, 23. bondage, into the glorious liberty of Gods Children: for the whol Creation grones and travels in pain together til now and not only they, but we also which hav the first fruits of the Spirit: even we groan within, waiting for the adoption, to wit redemption of our body: Ergo al Creatures shal be restored.

Sol. This is like a Rabbets head left last to slay, as requir­ing most labor: for such obscure places al Sectists obtrud, as Men lov to fish in troubled waters. 'Tis most abstruse of any in the new Testament as St. Austin avers: wherto many apply St. Peters words, That in Pauls Epistles som things are hard 2 Pet. 3. 16. to understand, which the unlearned and unstable wrest (as they doo other Scriptures) to their own destruction. 'Tis a good cavest for bold Buzzards, not to build doubtful doctrins on dark O­racles without good guids, unles they be found or founded on Faiths analogy elswher. The first words (The Creatur shal be delivered from Corruptions bondage) may best be doon by annil­lation, being therby freed from Mens abuses, and farther possibility of decay; tho not restored to perfecter estate, as the letter seems to say. The next (Into the glorious liberty of Gods Children) may be safly expounded together with their liberty, or by reason of it, or at same time with it. So St. Chrysostom best skild in his Mother toung, interprets the par­ticl [...] (into) by [...] (together, for, or by reason of) that they shal be freed by means of the Saints liberty. Semblably St. Ambros saith, it shal be at the same time together, when the Saints shal attain their glory: which two Expositions seem soundest to salv al scruples. For dumb Creatures cannot be coheirs with the elect of eternal bliss, by redemption or resur­rection of the body (as the bare words imply) having no saving faith in Christ. Thos words (Not only they, but even we which hav the first fruits of the Spirit, groan within our selfs, waiting for the adoption, even the redemption of our body) plainly distin­guish betwen the Saints state, who groan and wait for the re­demption of the Body: and al other Creatures, which groan only to be delivered from corruptions bondage, together with [Page 211] the liberty of Gods Children, or at the same time, or by means of it. Which deliverance may best be atchived by a total final abolition, when they shal no more be subject to slavery, abuse, and villany. This cleerly resolvs al difficulty, to interpret the particile (into) by together with the liberty of Gods Chil­dren; according to thos two orthodox Fathers authentic ex­position. Such as assert any other liberty of restauration or melioration, must answer al foregoing Arguments for anni­hilation; or shew sufficient caus why som shal be restored and not al: sith St. Paul names the whol Creation or every Crea­ture, Kinds and Individuals. To say, Mixtils, Vegetals, and Bruts shal partake the glorious liberty of eternal felicity with Gods Sons or Saints; is a Brutish buz which no sound sober Divines dare own. He useth the phrase of delivery from cor­ruption rather then annihilation, as parrallel to Mans manu­mission from like bondage. Marlorat (who is for restitution) comments thus: hence it appeers, into how great glory Gods Sons shal be exalted, sith for their sakes al Creatures shal be renewed with them, as they were cursed for Mans fal and fault. Yet shal they not partake the same measure of glory; but a better condition after every capacity: yet what that shal be in Inanimats, Plants, and Beasts is curiosity to inquire; sith the chief part or pitch of corruption is annillation. This implies that they may be freed from bondage of corruption (not simply from corruption, as Regenerats are released from sins reign) by utter abolition, which he cals a cheif part or pitch of corruption: but renovation is the Acme of perfection. Now if the Text be taken literaly, how can mute Creatures groan or travel in pain? But say 'tis meant Metaphoricaly of their Natural appetit to be freed from bondage: yet how can they enjoy a like liberty of Gods Sons for whom Christ died? Or grant too, that no identity is intended, but only an analogical proportion by exemplar resemblance: yet how can they par­take a redemption of the Body, which having bin the Souls receptacle here, shal be reunited to it for ever? 'Tis sown a 1 Cor. 15. 23. corruptible Body, raised incorruptible: sown in dishonor, raised in glory: sown in weaknes, and riseth in power. Which is evi­dence enough for restitution of Human Bodies: but al Crea­tures [Page] els being compact of the common Chaos (which was made of meer nothing) shal probably revert to nothing: this seems to sute best with Faiths analogy and Scriptures harmony, which tends more to utter abolition then restitution or substi­tution; for al at last day shal be delivered from corruptions bondage, when Gods sons shal be, and for their sakes; tho the maner diametraly differ: viz. the one by Redemption of the bo­dy, the other by deletion of the whol substance. So saith Saint Ambros, the Creature travelling in pain, hath this comfort, that it shal rest from labor for ever, when al shal beleev, whom God knows are to beleev. Howbeit if it be granted, that al shal be Individualy raised, yet it folows not that a finit containing World shal be restored, or new created: but rather al turned to infinity (so wel as time to Eternity) for such infinity of Creatures, as hath bin since the World began. In brief, St. Paul intends the time when they shal be delivered, not the terminus or thing into like liberty with the Saints.

This Question is very difficil to decide by Scripture; nor is Perclose. defined by any Synod, nor any Article of salvific Faith. Pa­raeus declines the decision; but saith som points are plainly as­serted, Rom. 8. 20, 21. which must be beleeved: as that al Creatures are sub­ject to vanity for mans sin, that al shal be delivered from bon­dage 2. Pet. 12. 13. of corruption into the glorious liberty of Gods Sons, or rather for and together with it, that good Angels shal abide with the Saints: that the Elect shal enjoy eternal glory with Christ: that the created Heavens, Elements, and works ther­in shal be burnt up: that a new Heaven and Earth must be expected, wherin dwels righteousnes: but other clauses; how dumb Creatures shal partak the liberty of Gods Children? whether by renovation, or abolition? How many sorts of Creatures shal be released? Whether al, a few, or none? How Heaven and Earth shal be dissolved by fire? whether as Gold is refined, or utterly annilled, being of no farther use? what manner of fire it shal be, material or immaterial? what shal be the condition, use, place, quantity, quality, glory of the new Heaven and Earth, if any such shal be? Al which with other like Saint Austin saith tis better to leav hid in doubt, then litigat about incertanties; sith they may be debated with [Page 212] danger, but left in suspens sans harm or hazard: he holds that al scruples are safest satisfied by annihilation: that the fire shal be material, as the old world was drowned by ordinary water: so saith Aquinas and most School-men, but on no good grounds: yet al agree, it shal not work as a natural Agent, but divine Instrument, to consume the whol mundan Machin with al things therin, as God eternaly decreed; therfore it be­hovs al to decline the fury of it by turning from our sins, and returning by repentance to God in Christ. Master John Down a pious Pastor of Insto (sororal Nephew to Bishop Juel) had a smart bout by Pen with Doctor Hakewil his intimat friend, for the worlds renovation; specialy touching the tru sens of that dark precited Text: but in fine approved Annihilation; peruse it pondrously, but I forbear to abridg it for the pro­lixity. Surely of al three opinions (about Restitution, Substi­tution and Annillation) the last brings best Cards or fairest Colors, both of Scriptures, Reasons and Authorities:

Judicio extremo, post ultima secula, Mundus
Ignibus extinctus materialis erit.
At the last Judgment, when Time is finished,
This real world with fire shal be extinguished.
Non renovatus erit praesens, nec conditus alter
Alit [...]r.
Cosmos: cum veniet sero suprema dies.
This world shal not renewd be, nor new formed;
When the last day at length shal be performed.
Mundus hic, ut perhibent passim sacra Biblia, postquam
Alias.
Vertitur in cineres, ann [...]hilatus erit.
This world, as Scriptures speak, after 'tis burned
To ashes, shal be into Nothing turned.
Quod fuit ex nihilo factum, post secula tandem
Secus.
In Nihilum hoc Mundi, grande adigetur Opus
This worlds huge work, which was of nought compounded;
Shal into Nought at last day be confounded.
In cineras Mundi redigetur maxima moles:
Sive.
In Nihilum cineres mox adigentur item.
The worlds huge Mass int' ashes shal be brought,
Thos ashes too shal soon be turnd to Nought.
Inchoat hicce liber primaeva ab origine Mundi:
Epiphonema.
Cum Mundi excidio terminat istud Opus.
At the Worlds origin that Book inchoats:
With the Worlds period this work terminats.
Incipit a Mundo primus liber iste creato:
Aliud.
Cum Mundi exitio desinit hicce liber.
That first Book took rise at the Worlds creation:
This last takes end with the Worlds annillation.
Juvenci carmina de mundi conflagratione.
Immortale nihil mundi compage tenetur:
Non Orbis, non Regna hominium, non aurea Roma:
Non Mare, non Tellus, non ignea Sydera Coeli.
Nam statuit Genitor rerum irrevocabile tempus.
Quo totum torrens rapiet flamma ultima mundum.
In Mundan machin naught's immortal found:
Not golden Rome, not realms, not the Globe round.
Not Sea, not Earth, not Stars within Heavens bound.
For the Worlds founder fixd time doth propound,
When the last fire shal the whol World confound.
FINIS.

SƲPPLEMENTA SƲBJƲNCTA SUPPLEMENTS SUBIOYNED Supplementum de Festis: A Supply about holy Dais. Festa Christi sacranda: Christian Fests sacred. Natalis Christi Festum: Christs Birth-days Fest.

The two debats (touching Name and Thing) about, celebrating Essay. Christ was fairly agitated.

THe name, term, or title (Christmas, Christide, State of the Question. Christs Nativity or Birth-day) may indifferently be used sans scandal, as men pleas; being meer tittle, tattle or word-war: but the thing or matter of most concernment is, whether it be lawful, useful, or behooful to set apart, solennize, and sanctify one day or mo annaly in memory of Gods greatest mercy to Mankind; for sending his only begotten beloved Son to sav sinners: by assuming our Nature into his Person, and suffering death for us? Specialy sith his dear Spous the Church hath instituted and injoyned it to be religiously (not riotously) observed by al tru Christi­ans. Which causless controversy shal be succinctly and sin­cerely discussed with al modesty and moderation on both [Page] sides, not declining to by diverticles. The Opposers cheif Objections folow in order.

Ob. The tru time, set season, main month, and direct Day is utterly unknown, or cannot certainly be prefined or pre­scribed: Ergo the thing is not to be used.

Sol. The consequent halts on al four feet: for the thing is pious and imposed by authentic authority; tho the time dubious or disputable: nor is the antecedent veritable or irrefragable; for al antient Tradition tels, that it befel at the Hyemal Sol­stice then sited on December twenty five; but now removed farther forth ful twelv dais and eight hours: because we fo­lowing the Julian Calender without reforming, take in ten mi­nuts and forty four secunds every yeer more then the Suns tru revolution allows: which in one hundred thirty four yeers complet a day; yet still December twenty five tho not at Sol­stice. So the Gregorian Calendar subtracting ten dais (which should hav bin twelv) keeps so long righter before us. Hence Luk. 1 [...] 8, 9. our Saxon Ancestors caled it Midwinter day (as John Baptists byrth day is caled mid-Summer, being just six Solar months or half a yeer asunder; and known to be Estival Solstice by his Fa­thers then waiting in the cours of Abia) implying that day: John 3. 30. for Christ was born as dais were beginning to lengthen, and John at shortning: whence John saith, He must increas, but I decreas alluding (as som surmise) to the time of both their births. Justin Martyr makes it most manifest by Augustus Caesars Censual Role (which grand general Tax accited Joseph and Mary to Bethleem) that he was born December 25. about Winter Solstice: which Tertullian the best Antiquary, precisely ratifies. Chrysostom saith they received it from most accurat Observers dwelling at Rome, who had it traditionaly from their Antecessors up to the Apostles: wherto Origen, Cyprian, Austin, L [...]o, and al Antients agree. Leo saith Christs genera­tion is the Churches initiation, and the Birth-day of the Head a beginning of the Body. For the Church in imitation therof, consecrated Fests to the Apostles, Martyrs, and som Con­fessors: which in process of time multiplied beyond du bounds but most of them expunged by our Mother Church since the In Ni [...]omedia. Reformation. Dioclesian burnt twenty thousand Martyrs on [Page 214] Christs byrth day December the twenty fifth, as tru Records te­stify, which are proofs sufficient for the season, month, and day, yea far better then al their negativ cavils to the contrary: yet to gratify them, it shal be granted gratis that the time is incer­tain, if they will freely and fairly confess the Thing (which im­pudence it self cannot deny) to be lawful, That Christians may without offens keep holy one Anniversary day appointed by the Catholic Church, in memory of our Saviours manifestation in the flesh.

Ob. The bug. Bear title (Christmas) is taken from the Po­pish Mass: Ergo the thing represented or celebrated, must needs be superstitious, idolatrous and antichristian.

Sol. The word Missa (Mass) is derived from missio sending, becaus at celebration of the Eucharist, al non-Communicants were dismissed or bid go forth: but used by the Church to sig­nify sacred service long yer Popery was hatched or Antichrist appeered: and al superstitious Ceremonies crept up since, are crushed or cashired by our Church. Mass in old Saxon language imports a Fest or Holy-day, as Verstegan informs; yet more probably Fests had that appellation from Mass: but no matter of moment lies in words (no more then to cal our week dais by their old Heathen names) which may be al­tered or innovated at the imposers wils, and al words meer wind free or far enough from Popish superstition and Anti­thristian Idolatry.

Ob. Many Ethnic customes remain stil among the Vulg in our Land: Ergo the thing which occasions them is to be abo­lished as Ezekiah demolished the brasen Serpent.

Sol. The inference is infirm, for good grain must not be cast out with weeds: nor is the brasen Serpent a semblable instance, which the Israelits made an Idol, and burnt Incens to it, but rude People adore the tru God with som mixture of foolish fashions, now mostly left being better taught. Yet the Antecedent argues, that this levan hath continued ever since their conversion: and is a proof beyond exception of its Antiquity, and that it was stil celebrated on December 25.

Ob. Sundry superstitious Rites, of Carols, Wash [...]ils, Riots, Drinking, Dancing, Dicing, Carding, and prophane sports [Page] borowed from the mad Saturnalia held in Decem. for the honor of Saturn and Ceres (to whom they sung filthy Cariles like thes Carols) are retained stil: Ergo such scandals should be suppressed root and branch.

Sol. Let al just scandals and abuses be rooted out, as most are: but the impeachment is impious, invented by the Scrip­ture Almanack maker; that becaus Pagans did such wicked pranks to fals Gods, Christians doo the same in serving the tru God. Indeed the Saturnalia were held in December, but Ceres Cariles in April: and what is either to Christmas? Nor may common Carols (which are sacred songs like holy Anthems suted to the Seasons) be compared with Heathen Hymns: but Washails are rude ridiculous revellings almost antiquated. Such attendant abuses may be redres [...]ed or re­pressed by Ministers prudence and Magistrats penalties: with­out which the Lords day would be prophaned like the rest. The Church only appoints praiers and praises to God, not allowing any abuses: nor are riots practised on Christmas day (which was ever sanctified very devoutly with divine Service, Sermons, and Sacraments) when al Houskeepers fed at home temperatly: but al excess doon on the dais appendent, which is reasonably restrained. Drinking, Dicing, and al exorbitant enormities may be decried by preaching, or discarded by pu­nishing: but civil Dancing, moderat Carding, and harmless country sports for recreativ mirth to shew Peoples rejoycings tolerated. 'Tis preposterous to use the Mattock, when a prun­ning Hook wil better rectify. For noxious surcles may be pared or pruned off, yet the main Tree or thing preserved from rooting up. Lastly for Belly fare, ther is modus in rebus, and much ods betwixt gurmandizing superfluity and gratuitous hospitality, with charitable feeding the poor: which yet through general poverty and parsimony is greatly abated; that ther is more caus to complain of defect then exuberance that way. Howbeit thos rigid Rhadamants lov luscious luxu­rious feasting at al times els (specialy on Ashwendsday, good-Friday, or other fasting dais) more then any Christmas Men used heretofore. Yea the Scots at first Reformation, cashired al Popish customs and ceremonies, except their beloved Grece-Cup [Page 215] (which was to serv in at end of meals al liquor [...] then used) wherof ech drank what he listed.

In sum, Christmas harmless sports in sit seasons are lawful, Summary. good fires behooful, holy Hymns useful, New-yeers gifts fruitful, begetting mutual amity among Neighbors; and plen­tiful fare without surfet or ebriety cheerful: whatever Sectists ca­vil in their Chairs or Pulpits to the contrary. It folows not that every thing which Pagans or Papists doo, is Heathenish or Po­pish: for Gentils doo many excellent things by Natures princi­ples (which Gospel Principles confirm) that are commendable in Christians: so Papists retain sundry points of Doctrin, Disciplin, and maners, which Protestants may imitat.

Ob. Such Fests are not warranted by Christs precept, nor Apostles practise, nor any authentic authority: Ergo 'tis Wil­worship fitto be extirped or extermined.

Sol. The Lords day hath no warrant of precept or practise in Scripture; yet lawful, necessary, and generaly (tho not specialy) Moral by the first words of the fourth Command­ment: but neither this nor Christmas wants authentic autho­rity of the universal Church through al ages: nor is one wil­worship more then the other. For wil-worship (as St. Paul Col. 2. 23. shews) hath no Scripture warrant general or special, but only the vain wil or phansy of Men: as worshiping Angels, and placing an absolut necessity of holines in things indifferent. The general rule of St. Paul (Let al be doon decently in order) 1 Cor. 14. 40. is sufficient warrant without particular precept, precedent, or practise for Christs Spous to ordain occasional Fests, in them­selfs lawful and laudable, tending to Gods glory and Peoples good; as som are often appointed among us upon emergent occasions or occurrents. So the Jews freely observed an an­nal Fest of dedicating the Altar instituted by Judas Macha­beus, 1 Ma [...]. 4 [...]9. after the Temple had bin Idolatrously polluted by An­tiochus Epiphanes: which yet is not specified (much less san­ctified) in the old Testament or Canon of Scripture: but Christ honored it with his presence; as he did their septidial John 10 22. mariage Feasts with his first transubstantiating miracle of turn­ing Water into Wine in Cana. So the Catholic Church or any particular may constitut or celebrat set dais for pious [Page] purposes (yeerly or extraordinary) if they shal see good caus.

Ob. Tatling Tradition tels, that Christ was born Dec. 25. then at Solstice, immediatly after Midnight, as the dais began to lengthen: but the Church of England celebrated the Birth day ful twelv dais after the Hyemal Solstice: Ergo hir Ac­compt was erroneous.

Sol. This is already answered to the first argument, and the reason rendered of that deviation, becaus we folow the Julian Calendar sans reformation: but tho the Church of England doth not observ the tru precise time of the Winter Solstice; yet she celebrats the tru day (Dec. 25.) according to the Julian Accompt stil, which is sufficient: nor is the time so exactly to be regarded, as the thing or benefit to be remem­bred.

Ob. No Magistrats can make Dais holy, nor impose them Gal. 4 9. to be necessarily or perpetualy observed: For the Apostles cal such observances weak beggerly Elements, the yoke of bondage, Gal 5. 1. and rudiments of the Law, which destroy Christian liberty: Ergo Col. 2 20. they cannot institut Fests.

Sol. Indeed they cann [...]t make dais holy, or impose them to be observed under pain of damnation, which d [...]strois Chri­stian liberty; and is a proper privilege of Gods power: nor are dais properly holy inherently, no more then Churches or Elements of the Sacraments, which yet are cald holy being appointed or appropriated to Religious uses: so Magistrats may sanctify or set apart certain dais to holy services for Gods glory; having free ful power to order things indifferent. The Jews ordained occasional Fests, which Christ and his Apostles observed with their presence: so our Magistrats ap­point dais of Humiliation and Thanksgiving, which People are bound to keep holy: much more Christmas day for many reasons. 1. God promised it when he said to the Serpent, John 8. 56. The Womans seed shal break thy head: 2. Christ saith, Abra­ham rejoiced to see this Day: 3. Jacob foretold it, that the Scep­ter Isai 7. 14. shal not depart from Juda til Shiloh com: 4. Isaiah saith a Virgin shal conceiv and bear a Son cald Immanuel: for unto us a Child is born, to us a Son is given; the Prince of Peace: at [Page 216] whos byrth was public Peace through al the Roman world. Saint Paul cals it the fulnes of time, when Men and Angels Gal. 4. 4. Luk 2. 10, 11▪ 13. were filled with ineffable joy and admiration. The Angel which told the Shepherds of his byrth, had a multitud of heavenly Host praising God saying, Glory to God in the highest, and on Earth Peace, good will towards Men. Clement an Apo­stolic man bids Christians keep Fests diligently, and in the first Const. Apost▪ l. 5. c. 1 [...]. place Christs byrth day, which al primitiv Fathers and others from age to age, til our mad-brain days, hav most devoutly celebrated; yea on the very twenty fith of December, whos exemple and exhortations in their sacred Sermons, Homilies, and Treatises, the late reformed Churches of Helvetia, Bohe­mia, Bremen, Auspurg, Savoy, Poland, Hungary, Scotland, France, Belgia, Palatinat, (beside Denmarc, Sweden, and al Lutheran Churches in Germany or elswer) folow both by pra­ctise and Precept.

Ob. The Lords Day sanctified weekly in memory of Christs Resurrection, is sole-sufficient in stead of al els: Ergo to ad any on work dais without warrant, is superstitious wil-wor­ship, specialy sith tis commanded six dais thou shalt labor, but keep holy the (or a) seventh day.

Sol. Thos harsh terms of superstitious wil-worship cast on Ana [...]me [...] the Service Book. Christian Fests, are causless calumnies, being their common brands or badges bestowed on our public Liturgy which they cal rank Atheism, a proud Strumpet, a cursed Mass of super­stition, ful of Serpents, bathed in the blood of Bodies, Souls and Estats; the reliques of Popish dregs; the very (head not st [...]mp or l [...]) of the Dragon; the jugling or conjuring of Magicians, and character of Antichrist; who say our thirty nine Articles are stuffed with Popery and Arminianism: but scorn the book of Homilies as most cours contemptible kitch­in-stuf. If to rail or revile be sufficient, who cannot be elo­quent? and how easy is it to cast such base dirt in their deerest mothers face, which may fitly be retorted: they reviv the Pe­trusians Heresy, who decried al Christian Fests, to introduce Atheism, which in milder language is stiled Libertinism. The Lords day is most necessary and must be doon, yet the rest not left undoon, sith al tend to one end; nor is it so sole-sufficient [Page] to shuffle out the right religious celebration of al other Festi­vals, for wher is it said we shal sanctify that only, or why doo we ordain others upon occasions: the Ascension was Christs last act of appeering on Earth, yet may it not exclud the com­memoration of his Resurrection, no more then that can includ the celebration of al antecedent blessings or benefits imparted by his Passion, Circumcision, Nativity and Conception; let God be glorified in al his wondrous works; yea thos Annal Fests were instituted by the same authority that the weekly Lords Day, tho this haply first by the Apostles meeting theron A. C. 324. to break bread (which yet they did at other times) but Constan­tin published the first Edict or Law for strict observing of it: (which Decree enjoyns also an Anniversary celebration of o­ther Fests consecrat to our Saviours name, as Eusebius and So­zomen relate; thos words of the fourth Commandement ( six dais thou shalt labor) are only permissiv (thou shalt hav leav to labor six dais) not preceptiv to injoyn it; sith the sole intenti­on is to sanctify the seventh.

Master Fisher who writes judiciously of this subject saith, Of Gospel Festivals. that the moral part of the fourth Commandement in the first words ( Remember to keep holy the Sabbath Day) injoyns only a Sabbath (no precise particular time) to Gods public service; but the Ceremonial commands the seventh day (since abroga­ted) on which God rested to be halowed: yet the Lords Day is not appointed to be sanctified by the Letter of that Commandement, nor is it moral: no nor doth the Gospel giv any warrant to keep it weekly.

St. John specifies two times of Christs appeering to his Dis­ciples John 20. 9. 19. after his Resurrection: 1. At evening the same day he Luk 24 29. 33. 41. 42. rose, when they assembled with the dores shut for fear of the Jews, and had broild fish with an Hony comb for supper: but they met not to celebrat his Resurrection, as new Sabba­tarians teach: nor had they any Praying, Preaching, or other Divine duties ther mentioned. For Mary Magdalens go­ing to the Sepulcher with Spices, and the two Disciples tra­veling John 20. 26. to Emaus, cleerly convince it in their reput to be a or commonday. 2. After eight dais (or when eight dais were complet) which haply was the ninth: so it fals on the secund [Page 217] third of next; but cannot be on the first day of the week, unles they say (as som doo) that after eight dais must be interpreted before eight dais ( viz. on the seventh) which is preposterous. In al the Acts of Apostles is no appointment of holy Assemb­lies on the first day abov the rest. St. Paul being to depart next morow, cam together with the D [...]sciples at Troas on the Acts 15. 28. 29. first of the week to break bread (which al grant was Sunday night) and continued together til Day-break: must we ther­fore keep the Lords day from Sunday night til Monday morn­ing, or rather from Saturday night to Sunday night, as they say, surely they then met daily to Pray, Preach, and break bread without distinction of one day before another: and that assembly was in the night, when the Lords day was past. In al the sacred Epistles of Paul, James, Peter, John, Jude is not one syllable of the Lords day: thos words ( ther remains ther­fore Heb 4. 9 11. 14. a rest to Gods People) are not meant of a temporal weekly rest, but a spiritual eternal in the Heavens; wher Christ Jesus our high Priest is gon before us, into which Men must striv to enter by Faith: being begun in this life by ceasing from sin and dooing righteousnes; but finished or perfectly conti­nued in the life to com. Indeed St. Johns speech ( That he Rev. 1. 10. was in the Spirit on the Lords day at Ile Patmos) shews ther was a day then so caled: but whether it were a Festival, whe­ther weekly or Annal? And if weekly, whether the first of Christs Resurrection, or sixth of his Passion (which the Greecs kept weekly til Constantins Edict, and Patmos is a Grecian Iland) is not expressed, nor is the weekly celebration of it commended or commanded in sacred Scripture. Yet it is very antient even in the Apostles dais, grounded on the foresaid words, and generaly received in al Churches: so 'tis a custom, constitution, or tradition of the Catholic Church; but no Doctrin or Article of Faith prescribed in Gods Word, as al Orthodox Authors agree. The Church set it apart in stead of the seventh day on good grounds.

1. The Morality of the fourth Commandement requires set dais or times for Gods public service: so the Church accor­ding to the liberty wherwith Christ hath made her free, conse­crated the first day among other Annals to be weekly kept holy, [Page] without any affi [...]mation of morality, which is but the blind zele of som men. 2. The equity of a seventh day under the Law, moved the Church to assign a like proportion of the first day every week to be Religiously halowed, howbeit sh [...] hath sufficient Reasons to refuse the last day and chuse the first: 1. that by not observing the Sabbath, Christians might be and they are freed from the yoke of the Ceremonial Laws. 2. that herby a difference or distinction might be put betwixt us and the Jews. The like two motivs or inducements she hath to chuse the first. 1. Becaus God began the Creation on that day. 2. In memory of our Saviours Resurrection, becaus therby he mightily declared himself to be the Lord, in which regard tis caled the Lords Day; yet tis so spoken by way of affirmation, not appropriation; as if he declared himself to be the Lord at Mat. 1. 23. no other time, or no day els to be termed the Lords. 1. For he mightily declared himself to be the Lord by being born of a pure Virgin, as no meer man ever was, and that is so wel to be caled the Lords day; yea he self expresly cals it his day, John 8. 56. Semblably in sustaining Gods wrath, for the sins of the World, he mightily declared himself to be the Lord, and the Passion day may be so stiled. Again by ascending into Heaven in his Apostles view, he mightily declared himself to be the Lord, and that is also the Lords day. 2. Christ by his Resurrection occasioned the first day to be kept holy; whence som Writers say he changed the Sabbath into that day: not as if he were Author or Institutor, and did actualy set it apart to be halow­ed; but only was Causa sine qua non or occasion of it: as 'tis said here, the Papists made Nov. 5. an holy day, yet the Parle­ment inacted it. 3. That Christs rising is a part of Mans re­demption, but not the whol work: but his Incarnation, Birth, Passion, Ascention hav their several shares so wel as the Re­surrection. Sith then to be conceived, born, crucified, buried, rise again, ascend into Heaven had not bin sufficient singly, unles al had concurred: the Nativity day when he was openly manifested to Men, being celebrated in memory of a work so wonderful as the Resurrection; and the day instituted by the same authority of the Church; is to be equaly esteemed as the weekly Lords day: nor is this more or otherwise ap­pointed [Page 218] to rejoyce in then the day of his Birth. To this effect he which is not absolutly authentic in al circumstances; but he bows a crooked stick back to make it straight, and pregnantly provs the lawfulnes, usefulnes, and behooful [...]es of celebrat­i [...]g Christmas with other Gospel Festivals: which is al that I aim at, sans comparing any to the weekly Lords day, which may seem odious or scandalous to such as hav bin otherwise taught, trained, or tutored. Howbeit to contemn it wilfully when it was established both by Spiritual and Secular Lawes to rail or vilify it, to work upon it and restrain from Church (which was too too frequent and familiar in times of yore) must needs censure and condemn for peevish, pervers, maliti­ous ignorance, or wild zele sans knowlege. For 'tis a violation both of the fourth Commandment (which they allege for Morality of the Lords day) sith it was a day of rest appointed by lawful authority for Gods special Service: and also of the fifth, sith they despise and dishonor their Mother the Church: in which respect Christ compares such to Pagans and Publi­cans: Mat. 18. 17. beside the breach of al order and decency in Divine worship, which St. Paul so much commendeth to be ob­served 1 Cor. 14. [...]. by al Christians. Pardon the prolixity of this Solu­tion.

Ob. Som idely prattle, that new yeers gifts and gratulations (God giv you a good yeer &c.) savour of gross Gentil super­stition: Ergo, &c.

Sol. They are meer civil courtesies (no Religious Rites) like presents sent to great Persons or privat friends; and pa­rallel to common salutations (good morow, good night, good speed) which are liable to no superstition, so that mote is re­moved: but if they would conscientiously cast out the beam of fastidious prejudication, prophanation, and defamation with al uncharitablenes remaining in their own eys; they should more cleerly descry or discern good from evil, light from darknes, and verity from falsity.

Ob. Others cast a captious bone in my Dish, that our state hath cashired set Fests, together with Monarchy, Prelacy, Li­turgy, solen service at Burials, Mariage by Ministers, and other Religious Rites: Ergo 'tis presumption to plead for or protect any one of them.

Sol. This is a two edgd Sword sharp on both sides, wher a rude hobling vers must be remembred: contra Argumentum e [...]siserum contendere noli, but this in point of Evangelical Fests, concerns Magistrats and Ministers, not privat persons. For if they dare to celebrat Christmas or other holy dais, I wil presume to be present by way of devotion, without wilful disobedience to Superiors; so wel as at their arbitrary exer­cises of Thanksgiving or Humiliation; appointed publicly by the State, or privatly in particular Congregations upon self­devised Edw. 6. 5. 6. [...]. 3. Eliz 1. c. 2. made A. 1645. occasions. Two Parliments hav inacted a du cele­bration of Christmas with other Fests, which stil stand inforce: for one only ORder condemns holy dais not warranted in the Word (yet Nov. 5. stands stil, as 'tis fit it should) which cannot annul an Act; sith 'tis a Maxime in Law, that every thing must be dissolved the same way 'tis made. Nor is Christ­mas contained in thos general words of that Order, being warranted by the general words of Scripture, instituted by Apostolic Churches, and practised in the Reformed. Yea the procurers of that Order (who wronged many privat Men, and very unjusty took from me a Mannor bought of the Dean and Chapter of Exceter, worth twelv thousand pounds) were since routed or thrust out of the Hous, and publickly de­clared to be a Party or Faction Apostats from their first Princi­ples, Parl. Declar. Sep. 27. 1649 bearing only the name of Patriots and Lovers of Religion, but indeed needed Reformation. The authority of Divines assembly Antipol. 256. is of no validity: for Edward, their Favorer saith, That an Assembly chosen by Magistrats (as that was by Parlement) hath no power by any primitiv patern to draw up a Government or Directory of worship, for so many Churches (being about 10000. Parishes in England) wherof most part had not one mem­ber present. Mr. Fisher saith, that Presbyterists decry Preach­ing or administring Sacraments on Christmas day, or any other sav the weekly Lords day: yet they Lecture any day, or make Fests and Fasts at their pleasures: nor wil permit any to com­municat, unles [...] be confessed or approved by the Pastor and his Pr [...]sby [...]ery. They Preach and Teach, that 'tis unlawful to eat Min [...]d Pyes, Plum broths, or Brawn in December: to trim Churches or Houses with Holly and Ivy: to stick a C [...]llar of [Page 219] Brawn or Rost Beef with Rosmary: to play at Cards or giv mony to Tradesmens Boxes, or send a couple of Capons or any other Presents at Christmas: to use a Ring in Mariage, or cover a Hers with a whit Sheet. Al which with many mo such pety fopperies, they cal Popish Antichristian superstitions: yet they most sottish in so saying and seducing poor People into a dangerous detestation of observing our Saviours Birth day Fest.

Here I desire al to take notice once for al, that in a larger Folio work intended to the Press so soon as this hand can transcribe it, I no wher meddle with state affairs, nor tax the suppression of any Religious Ordi­nances, which were high presumption to doo: for who made me a comptroler of others, specialy my Superiors? But only defend the lawfulnes of them, leaving al to their free dispo­sal. I am a plain welmeaning Man, who claim a Scholars pri­vilege to dispute de omni Ente, for better ventilation of verity: but in the preceding Theological Treatise, produce nothing sav what very learned Orthodox Authors prescribe publicly in Print, which is a sufficient warrant. The things in them­selfs are the same under al mutations of State, and used latly in our Mother Church: nor should good writers turn their tunes with every Wind. I maintain Monarchy to be the best form of civil Government, and Episcopy of Ecclesiastic: I hold set Praier best in public Congregations, and sacred Fests fit for special occasions; beside solen seasons of fasting for our sins; but prefine no rules in thos behalfs. I like divine Service and Sermons at Funerals for the Auditors edification, desiring the like shortly at mine own; and dislike dumb shews: but we may not be our own Carvers or Chusers, and Inferiors must submit with al meeknes, modesty, and humility, as I ever hav doon, I approv Mariages by Ministers in public Churches before thos by Magistrats in privat places: sith 'tis a sacred Ordinance of God in Paradise, and not simply civil or carnal. Generaly I prefer venerable Antiquity ratified by our Church, to phantastic fanatic novities of modern devisers in al Adia­phorals. Let thos that lov Monarchy, Prelacy, Liturgy, Burial Sermons, Mariage by Ministers, and harmless holy dais; hold [Page] their Opinions stil: but such as wil hav none, shal hav none with my good wil; so every one may ride his own Hobby-Hors. If Adders wil not be charmed nor Panthers tamed, let them remain wild or wilful stil. One punctilio rests, whe [...]in I would gladly be right understood: that I somwher blazen the personal virtues of som Soveraign Princes, and brand o­thers Vices (as Henry 6. and Richard 3.) which al Histories doo for Mens instruction: but never handle their Regal per­fections or imperfections. For 'tis oft seen (as in thos two, with many mo) that a good Man is an il Magistrat, and con­trarily: which writers may display for the general good; but I hav more moral maners and Serpentin sublety then to meddle with State-matters that are too high for me. If they shal de­press or discard Ministry, Tiths, Glebes, Patronages, Universities, Hospitals, Corporations, Common Law, Chancery, or what els (as is doon to Monarchy, Prelacy, Cathedral Churches, Liturgy, holy Fests, Civil Law, high Commission Court, Ser­vice at Burials, Ministerial Nuptials) I shal sit silent in a cor­ner, to condole such reverend ruins: but wil never put Pen to Paper against the Authors, Actors, or Abettors having no au­thority so to doo: only I vent my Opinion in point of retio­cination (not resolution) touching the lawfulnes or useful­nes of them (as others doo theirs) sans scandal or offens to any, unles, gauld Jades wil winch. This is the common Cha­racter or cogniscance of a so caled cursed Cavalier, which I cannot but own or acknowledg how odious so ever.

Couste qui couste: non est mortale quod opto
Let cost what cost it may:
No mortal thing I weigh:

Howbeit I claim the privilege of Conscience promised and proclamed to al except Popery and Prelacy, which concern me not. For what crime, caus, or color of hate can be alleged against such simplicians as never acted on any side, nor were ever questioned for Delinquents (as I was not, yet twise im­prisoned both by Sea and Land) sav that they dissent in Judg­ment or Opinion? So doo al Sects, Septs, and F [...]ctions one [Page 220] from another, yea among themselfs in ech; which is no Moral vice nor civil fault: Quot homines, tot sententiae; so many fancies as faces. The Catholic Moderator checks al conten­ders about points of Religion, and givs good Counsil in a few Rythms to this effect.

Why for Opinions inter-kil we thus.
Whos truth not force, but reason must discus?
Reason whos chief force in Opinion lies;
Reason whos fals gloss oft deceivs the Wise.
God doth in lov, peace, concord, unity dwel:
Hate, envy, malice confines are to Hel.

Now to return from this Apologetic digression, thos ten foregoing cavils are their best Basiliscs of Battery: which are cast or couched into Enthymems for easier capacity, and both Propositions in ech fals or fucatious: but the astructiv Arguments folow built on surer foundations.

1. The universal Church in al ages, both institued thes Fests 1 Argument in Oecumenic Councils by precept, and injoined them to be observed by al Christians in practise: who annaly celebrated Christs Birth day, and others for his sake: which is so good or better warrant, then any particular Churches or Congre­gations can pretend to erect Fests or Fasts: yet thos very lawful and laudable.

2. The Lutherans celebrat Christmas with som other Fe­stivals 2 Arg. stil: and sundry Calvinists wish it had bin never decried or disused among som of theirs.

3. Our Church since the first plantation of Christianity, 3 Arg. hath constantly celebrated them with al Religious Rites of divine Service, Sermons, and Sacraments; specialy Christmas day.

4. Divers Divines (who in youth decried them most fierce­ly) 4 Arg. hav of late waxing wiser defended and solemnized them to their great glory: which palinodial reca [...]tation both in Exp [...]rt [...] [...] Pulpits and practise (like St. Austins Retractation) is a stronger proof on their behalf, then the best Bulrushes prealledged a­gainst them. 'Tis tru that the hearts inward holines in thanks­giving [Page] for this chief work of our Redemption, is a most ac­ceptable sacrifice to God: yet may not extern worship in Congregations and other lawful exultations be rejected or vilipended.

5. The disusing or despising them, is a ready step in the 5 Arg. vulgar to Atheism or Irreligion, when no solen Service or Sermons are used.

6. Their nauseous contempt or explosion, is an act of af­fected 6 Arg. Apostasy from the Catholic Church, and of Schism or separation from our Reformed Mother, which al obedient Sons should detest or decline; for Aerius first branded set Fests, and levelled Prelats with Presbyters for which pride with o­ther heresies, he was justly condemned and cast out of the Church.

7. The Church of Smyrna soon after the Apostles dais, 7 Arg. celebrated Polycarpus Martyry: praying that God would permit them to consecrat the Birth-day (so they cal it) of his blessed death, with joy and gratulation at their holy conven­tions: to bestow that lov on Martyrs which is du for Christs sake, whos disciples and imitators they were. This pointly provs the antiquity of set Fests dedicated to Apostles and Martyrs, which exemple the Smyrniens folowed. Yea Christians from the Gospels very dawn met at Martyrs Monuments to serv God yer Churches were erected, and from such Assemblies Churches had their origin.

8. The end or necessity of Christs Nativity is triple: 8 Arg. 1. That Gods promises and his Prophets predictions might be fulfilled: 2. That God by it might manifest his lov to Mankind: 3. That al lying under the Law might be redeem­ed: els eternal death had passed on al Men, sith al sinned. Hence we are bound to render sincere thanks for thes inesti­mable benefits, by a triple outward expression of gratulation: 1. In Psalms, Hymns, and spiritual Songs: 2. In providing plentiful fare for our family, inviting needy Neghbors to our Tables, and large liberal alms at our Dores: 3. In harmless mirth, music, and sports of recreation for Gods glory (every Man more or less according to his ability and quality) but not in prophane pleasures, riots, surfets, excess, drunkennes, cham­bering [Page 221] or wantonnes; as too many heretofore hav doon.

9. If we may every 5. of Nov. (as the Jews did in the Fests 9 Arg. of Purim) declare our joy for a temporal deliverance of the State: much more may we with praiers and praises re­cord Gods special spiritual mercy in Christs Birth, being a great joy to al People.

Al Fests lat celebrated in our Church, are consecr [...]t to Christs honor or for his sake, as shal appeer by exact enumera­tion of ech in order of the several Moneths. 1. the Circumci­sion, Jan. 1. 6. when he fulfilled the Lawish Covenant in his flesh. 2. E­piphany or Apparition, either in memory of the Star which led the wisemen to the house wher he was (as is commonly con­ceived) one ful yeer after his birth: or from the holy Ghosts appeering in shape of a Dov at his Baptism thirty yeers after (whence the Churches in Egypt celebrated both birth and Bap­tism on one self day) or rather from both: for thos Magi cam along journy from Persia or Arabia, which they could not fi­nish in the first twelv dais, and immediatly after their depar­ture Joseph warned from God by an Angel in a dream, fled with Mat. 2. 13 14. his wife and the Babe into Egypt: but at hir Purification forty dais after his birth they were al three at Jerusalem, and went Luk. 2 22. back to Bethleem, wher the Magi found them in a privat hous, for the Shepherds (not they) found him at an Inn in a Manger Luk. 2 7. 12. wrapped in swadling clothes; so they returned not to their Ci­ty Nazaret (as most men from Saint Luks ambiguous words Luk 2. 39. mistake) til their coming from Egypt, as the current conte­ [...]ure Mat. 2 2. 9. of Scripture makes it cleer. The Star indeed appeered to the M [...]gi twelv dais after his birth in their own Country, but they took their journy almost a yeer after, when it reappeered to their ineffable joy, and led them to the hous (no In) having bin before at Jerusalem to enquir wher the King of the Jews was born: Yea H [...]rod being deluded by their not returning, slu Mat. 2. 16. al males born in Bethleem and coasts therof from two yeers old and under, according to the time he had learned of the wisemen, which evidently implies that Christ was abov a yeer old at the Epi­phany of the Star, and immediatly carried into Egypt. Now his Baptism is referred to that same day ( J [...]. 6.) which Alias Syriacus an Arabic M. S. and others cal the benediction of [Page] waters: hence our Church appointed the first Lesson of that day Isaei 40. touching John Baptists mission, and the secund Mat. 3. which [...]nds with Christs Baptism; but the Gospel is Mat. 2. about the Stars appeering, which appertly argues, that tis cald Epiphany from both. Som cal Christmas day Epiphany becaus he appeered then to the world, but Circumcision and Purification may so wel hav that name; becaus at the first he appeered in the Synagog, at the last in the Temple, which is Feb. 2 [...]. 24. not so proper, plausible or persuasible. 3. The Virgins Purifi­cation, when he was publicly presented in the Temple, and proclamed by Simeon and Anna to be the Messiah. 4. Mat­thias, who after Christs Ascention was chosen Apostle by Lot, March 25. in Judas room. 5. The blessed Virgins Annunciation, when the Angel Gabriel declared his Conception or Incarnation by the holy Ghost, which together with hir perpetual vir­ginity, is ratified by a remarkable Story if tru, which may be doubted.

The Rabies kept a Register book in the Temples Archivs of A rare story. al their Priests elections with their Parents names, and Death­dais: so when Jesus began to preach at Jerusalem, one of them died, in whos place they had none fit to surrogat; but hearing wel of him, sent for his mother (hir husband being then dead) and asked who was his Father? she said, I am stil a very Virgin; but in Youth as I was devout at Prayer, an Angel told me I should conceiv a Son by the holy Ghost, and he to be caled Jesus; whom at the set time of women I brought forth, without throwes of travel or torments, which som women yet alife then present (whom she named) can testify: The Rabies wondring at it (who bore him no malice then, til the fame of his divine miracles excits their teen) accited the said women, who attested the same; wherupon they chose him, and inscri­bed thes words on their Registry. In the place of such a Priest we hav by joint consent of the whol Society elected one Jesm Son of the living God by the Virgin Mary. This book since the Temples destruction by Titus, is said to ly hid in Tyris (som say Tiberias) but the Tradition is current among the chief Jews, as a late London convert relats in Print, howbeit the truth may be su­spect, becaus no parcel or particle appeers in the Gospel, that [Page 222] he was of their company, but ever an Enimy; yea al Jews blasphemously brand hir for a whore, and him for a Bastard; utterly denying any such Tradition, which wil make most a­gainst them. 6. Marc an Evangelist, who penned his life, April 25. acts, miracles, death and resurrection. 7. Philip and James the lesser caled the Lords brother, both being his Apostles and May 1. June 24. [...]9. Martyrs. 8. John Baptists birth day, who was his Messenger or forerunner, to prepare the way before him: he preached and baptised, being caled by Isaiah the Voice of one crying in the Isai 40. 3. Wilderness. 9. Peter and Paul both chief Apostles and Martyrs at Rome in one day: the first crucified with his head downward the last beheaded, but whether in one yeer of Nero writers va­ry. 10. James the greater (Brother to John, sons of Zebedee) July 2 [...]. an Apostle and Martyr, slain with the sword by Herod the king (miscaled Agrippa major) not the Tetrarch, who slu John Bap­tist. 11. Bartholomew, who was his Apostle and Martyr. 12. Aug. 24. Sep. 21. 29. Matthew, who being a Jew born, and Publican or Tole Cu­stomer by profession, becam an Apostle and Evangelist. 13. Michael an Archangel who figured Christ, and fought for his Oct. 18. 28. Church against the red Dragon (or Devil) and his Angels. 14. Luke a Phisition of Antioch, one of his Evangelists and Pen­ner of the Apostles Acts. 15. Simon Zelotes and Jude the Lords Brother or Cosen German (whos Mothers were Si­sters) being both his Apostles. 16. Al Saints, which is a day Nov. 1. 30. dedicated to his Apostles, Martyrs, and holy Confessors in general, even al. 17. Andrew Brother to Peter, who was his Dec▪ 21. 2 [...]. 26. 27. 28. Apostle and Martyr. 18. Thomas Didymus, who was also his Apostle and Martyr. 19. His Nativity, which too many through peevish ignorance make a stumbling block and laugh­ing stock; being self-proud, supercilious, and super-singular: but shew themselfs most ridiculous to play on such poor Oa­ten Pipes of thred bare Arguments, which make Mens ears glow to hear their harsh gaglings. They stile the celebration of it superstition, Heresy, Heathenism (terms without truth) and a malitious Minister in London publicly preached, that any A 164 [...] Fest consecrat to Christs honor, name, or memory is no better then that which the Israelits made to the molten Calf: so like a Calf spake the Man, ther be so good Records that Christ [Page] was born Dec. the twenty fifth as that William the Conqueror was Crowned King of England on that very day. Yea Ma­gistrats had so good power to injoin Fests heretofore, as any Modernists hav for theirs, or to suppress the old. 20 Stephan one of the seven Proto-Deacons and prime Martyr actualy and arbitrarily, who gladly gav his life to preach or publish him for the tru promised Messiah. 21. John his best beloved Apostle Evangelist, Analogical Martyr: who suffred cruel torments and was exiled, being ready to lay down his life. 22. Innocents of Bethleem Juda, who in deed (not desire) were slain by Herod the great in Christs stead, tho not for his sake. Thes are al the fixd Fests: but his Resurrection is san­ctified weekly in lieu of the seventh day Sabbath, and yeerly too at Easter: his Ascention 40. dais after. Which are al except the holy Ghosts decent at Pentecost, and Trinity seven dais after consecrat to the three Persons in Deity. The last with som Appendices are Movables, and three of them ( Easter, Pen­tecost or Whitsunday, Trinity) celebrat on the Lords day. Al the rest which relish of superstition (invention and exaltation of the Cross, the blessed Virgins pretended sinless Conception and supposed Assumption, al Souls in Purgatory, beside Tho. Becket a Pseudo Martyr, and many mo of like bran) we ut­terly reject, renounce, or repudiat. What harm then in al this, sith it tends soly to sanctity? Yes say Malignants, becaus Pa­pists ordained, prescribed, and pro phaned them. Indeed they abused (not appointed) them, being instituted before by the primitiv Church, as is plentifully proved: but such as they superstitiously superadded, are abrogated and abandoned. Yet what if Papist ordeined al, shal we receiv or retain none? If they go on their heels, shal we walk on our heads? If they profes one God in three Persons, shal we beleev three Gods in one Person? Let pious institutions be embraced, but al im­pious abuses or Ordinances exiled and extermined.

In sum, I prescribe no Fests to be sanctified, nor find fault Sum [...]ary. with their suppression; but only assert the lawful Religious use of them: freely agnizing that the state or such as sit at stern, hav lawful human power to annul or abrogat them, and to restore or reestablish them, with other Adiaphoral Ordinaces; [Page 223] except Articles of Faith, wherin we must obey God and not Man: so far am I from taxing or traducing our Superiors acti­ons that I doo and wil obey them in al indifferent things (either Religious or Civil) which doo not trench on a good consci­ence. Yet if they wil be pleased to redintegrat the public Li­turgy and principal Festivals (which stand ratified by several Acts of Parlement unrepealed) they shal make glad millions of good hearts in this Common-wealth, which greatly griev at this interruption (rather then abolition or suppression) of them. On whos behalfs (sith 'tis no Mony-matter, nor can any way prejudice the State) this poor Distich may humbly be presented.

Gratum Opus Angligenis, si restituatur ut olim
Publica forma Precum, Festa (que) sacra; foret.
If Common-Praier Book could as of old be had▪
And sacred Fests; English hearts would be glad.

Let incomparable Bishop Andrews words, concerning the In a Sermon on John 8. 50. chief Soveraign Queen of Festivals, close up the Catastrophe: Ther is no day so properly Christs as that of his Birth, which by comparing it with others wil appeer. For the Passion day is not so truly or peculiarly his, becaus two Theefs suffred with him at the same time, place and maner: nor Resurrection day, sith many mo rose then too, and went into the holy City, appeering unto many: nor Ascention day, for that Enoch and Elias ascended bodily long before him: much less the Circumcision day, which was com­mon to al the Jews Male-Children: but the Birth day of a pure Virgin by power of the holy Ghost; is soly his without Felow: none ever so born none born such God and Man in one Person. Therfore as no Fest els, 'tis attended (as Christ he-self was) with an A­postolic retinu of twelv Holy days. Thus this sweet singer of England, or golden mouthd Chrysostom descants.

The final result rests on two questions: 1. Positiv, whether Up [...]or. it be lawful for Gods Church and al obedient Members to set apart or sanctify one day of 365. in a yeer, for the memory of our Saviours manifestation in the flesh; as the Jews did the Altars dedication, and our State the deliverance of that [Page] Devilish Powder-plot, which no sober Christian can deny? 2. Comparativ, whether it be superstition thankfully to cele­brat one day annaly with public worship, in remembrance of Mans redemption; or rather wilfully to scorn, slander, pro­phane, and contemn it? If thes two be laid in the scales of unbiassed impartial judgment, the pious veneration wil far preponderat the impious irrision in al good Mens eys. Shal we set apart or sanctify divers dais of Thanksgiving and Humi­liation for Temporal benefits of Victories or other occasions; and cannot be content to afford to allow one for the greatest Spiritual blessing of our eternal Redemption from the power of sin and slavery of Satan; began by his blessed birth, and finishd by his bitter death and burial, with other consequent glorious works of Exaltation: viz. his Resurrection, Ascention, and continual intercession at his Fathers right hand in Hea­ven? God shield us from such guilt: wherto thes two He­roics may be aptly applied.

Absit tale nefas: pudet haec opprob [...]a nobis
Aut dici potuisse, aut non potuisse refelli.
Far be such crime: 'tis shame should be imputed
Thes scandals to us, or could not be refuted.

For sh [...]me then, let Pulpits ring no more of such rediculous reasons prealleged not worth a Fig: which if a young Sophi­ster should urge in Schools, he were worthy to be hissed out; as being unwo [...]thy to be answered. Dr. Hammond a deep Divine (from whos learned lucubrations I hav pickd som pre­cited materials, as he and al writers borow from others) in his Resolution to certain modern Quaeres wherof this con­cerning Christmas and other Fests is the last) answers sixten addle interrogatories of his Antagonist in this point, which he that lists may peruse: but to requite his pains, proposeth three pithy Quaeres at end of that Treatise, wherto three mo shal be superadded.

1. Whether the Church Catholic or any particular (speci­aly [...] n [...]rest the Apostles age) hath sufficient power to make one or mo dai [...] sacr [...]d and let apart f [...]om servil works to Gods [Page 224] service, in memory of som eminent mercy conferred on his People; to be yeerly celebrated with tru piety: which shal bind al dutiful Children to obey and observ them?

2. Whether the annal Fest of Christs Birth, being both law­ful 2 Q [...]aere. and laudable, in the right religious use weeding out al a­buses (ordained by the Catholic Church) may justly be abo­lished or abandoned by any Church or State (much less pri­vat Persons without regard to the universal: sith it hath so long continued sans comptrole or contradiction by any?

3. Whether it be a good ground in Conscience or Com­mon 3 Q [...] e. reason, to cancel or cashire so pious a constitution, under a fucatious color of causless superstition: becaus som pedisse­quent dais hav bin rudely prophaned or mispent in riotous re­vellings by wicked persons: specialy sith 'tis founded in honor Th [...]s three are [...]. of our Saviour, and commemoration of his chief mercy?

4. Whether an express warrant of Christs precept or his 4 [...] Apostles practise, be necessarily required to ratify every Re­ligious Rite of the Church? Or whether late Reformists walk by that Rule of Scriptural authority, in sanctifying ar­bitrary dai [...] of Thanksgiving and Hamiliation, with many mo Ordinances, Customs, and Ceremonies which they use?

5. What warrant is ther to annul the seventh day Sabbath, [...] or surrogat the Lords day in stead; sav only that the Apostles somtimes meet on the first day to break Bread? Yet the obser­vation of this is no abolition of that: specialy sith they stil fre­quented the Jews Synagogs on thos dais to convert them. Or what for the Name, sav that St. John saith, He was in the Spirit at Patmos on the Lords day? Yet is ther no irrefragable evi­dence that it was the first day. O [...] what for Pedo B [...]p [...]s [...], exc [...]pt that the Apostles Baptised whol Families, in which most probably (not infallibly) were som Infants? The bare letter reacheth not so far to assert a precise precept or precedent for either: but we rely on the Churches testimony, tradition, in­terpretation, and authority for al three with many mo. Why not then in this point of holy Fests instituted and i [...]tended soly to our Saviours honor and service; wherin is no danger but much devotion and sanctity?

6. Whether Quis requisivit (who required it) be rightly 6 Q [...]e. [Page] applied to such cases, specialy the three precited? Or whether it may not be better retorted, who requires thes irregular Fests and Fasts appointed by particular Churches, or privat Congre­gations; upon arbitrary wil-worship or ordinary occasions? Hav not Church Governors so much power or authority as modern Innovators? Consider that thos great Clercs had far cleerer judgments to discern truth then silly shalow Sciolists: and know that in al matters or mysteries of Religion, 'tis safer to offend by way of piety, humility, and devotion then in proud self-lov, contempt, or despication. To take a sober reckon­ing on the other side, what warrant hav Ministers to examin Communicants before the Lords Supper, and repel whom they l [...]st? Christ at first institution (whos patern they pretend to folow in al particles) did not examin his Disciples, nor bid them so to doo: but admitted Judas to partake it at his own Luk. 22. 21. peril, knowing him to be a Traitor and Reprobat. St. Paul 1 Cor. 11. 28. exhorts every Man to examin himself, and so eat of that Bread, and drink of that Cup: but neither he nor any of the rest pra­ctised examination of others: so ther is no precept, practise, or precedent for this modern innovation. Yes say they, St. Peter bids al be ready alwaies to render a reason of the hope in 1 Pet. 3. 15, 16. them, with meeknes and fear. Tru: but speak sincerely, is this given as a rule for Pastors to examin Communicants; or ra­ther for Al Christians to satisfy Infidels or others? Read the next words, having a good Conscience, that wheras they speak evil of you as of il doers, they may be ashamed that falsly accuse your good conversation in Christ. Here is no cloke or color for exa­mining Communicants: therfore beware how ye wrest or wiredraw Scripture to serv turns.

Hos scrupulos, solvas, & eris mihi magnus Apollo.
Cleer thes points, and to me
Great Phoebus thou shelt be.

This brief Essay or Epigram being a Theological Theory, Corollary. is purposly premised as a Prodrom or Patern of 670. such (som larger, som lesser) to be published by Gods grace in two Folio Tomes, so soon as they can be transcribed and impressed: [Page 225] wherof the Enchiridion now com forth jointly with this work, is as it were the Table or Catalog, containing the Arguments of them al. Thus writers toil and travel in vain, to pleas or profit variously disposed Readers, led wholy by Opinion, Affection, or Prejudication, most of which wil rather retribut sharp scofs and scurrilous censures, then deserved thanks or commendations: but 'tis best Buoy-like to bear up amidst al boisterous billows of spite and scandal, maugre Mens malice and al envious or venemous toungs. To shut up al with two homespun verses:

His Epigramatibus facies non omnibus una,
Nec diversa subit: quales soluere Gemelli.
Thes Essais hav not al one face to see,
Nor much unlike: as Twins are wont to be.
Sitne superstitio Natalis Festa sacrare
Christi, inter varios lis odiosa fuit.
Ther's hateful strife 'mongst som, whether to keep holy
Christs Birth-day Fest, be superstitious folly?
Scaurus ait, renuit Varus: utri credere vultis?
Tam facile est lites conciliare graves.
Scaurus saith, Varus gainsaith: which wil ye
Beleev? So easy 'tis great brawls t' agree.
In dextram potius pietate offendere praestat,
Quam laeva opprobriis spernere Festa sacra.
'Tis better right hand-wise by zele t' offend,
Then Holy dais left-like with scorn vilipend.
Discite quod verum est moniti, nec temnite Christum:
Sed colite aeterno Festa dicata Deo.
Learn truth that's taught, and doo not Christ defy▪
But Fests ordained t' eternal God apply.

Though my silly reason and shallow resolution (specialy in Vale [...]ct [...]. Dotage) be no way regardable or reliable on in the learned Common wealth, yet to satisfy som special Friends who ear­nestly entreat it, I will openly unmasque, or declare my judgment in six controversal points, but very briefly and bluntly.

1. Touching Mans Souls production; I hold Traduction a­gainst the universal Tenet of Infused by Creating, and Crea­ted in Infusing.

2. For Predestination to eternal Life or Death; I beleev it to be with reference to Gods prescience of pure simple Intelli­gence, not of his free Pleasure to shew his Power, by any abso­lut irresistiv Decree.

3. Concerning Church Government; I defend Episcopa­cy for the best form of Ecclesiastic Polity, as instituted by our Saviour analogicaly, and by his Apostles actualy or apertly: but continued in al Churches ever since, til Mr. Calvin changed it in case of necessity.

4. About Christs Millenar reign on Earth immedialy be­fore, in, or at the last day of judgment, and general Resurre­ction of al human flesh; and for his eternal personal reign on a new Earth, resigning his kingdom of Glory to his Father: my Opinion amidst such a copious cru of learned Clercs, who de­bate it diversly both wais, must needs be amphibolous or am­biguous, like a giddy Ostrich, which having laid hir first eg at rovers on the sands, regards not wher she lais the rest, nor on what heap she sits abrood: but doo rather declare then incline to the former, and profes my self advers to the later.

Me trahit in dubios aliorum assertio sensus,
An reget in Mundo hoc Christus, an Arce Poli?
Others opinions make me doubtful, whether
Christ shal rule in this World or Heav'n for ever?
Nec patet, An Terris regnabit mille per annos,
Cum Superis, Sanctis, Martyribus (que) suis?
Whether he shal reign on Earth one thousand yeers,
With Angels, Saints, and Maryts, 't not appeers.

5. As to the Worlds final dissolution, whether it shal be by a refined renovation of the Old, a created substitution of a New, or a predecreed abolition into Nothing? I stand stif for the last against al Opposers or Oppugners.

6. Anent Christmas and other holy harmless Pests forecited, I suppose them to be both lawful and needful among prophane [Page 226] people, who should be compeld to Church in season and out of season (as the Spaniards at first drov uncatechised Indians like herds of Cattle to Baptism) for the service of God, yet al too little among stupid carnal Gospelers; for al which asserti­ons with others on the by, I have rendred strong sufficient Reasons from other mens works in the particular Theses, Trea­tises, or Theorems: but the three middle (of Prophecies con­cerning the Messiah to com: Christs two Genealogies, and Revelation reveled) are no Polemical points, nor wil require farther explication or exposition; therfore take this dry Distich for a final Farewel.

Quid volo, scire voles? sic stat sententia nostra:
Qua data, hoc addo tibi: Lector, Amice, Vale.
Wilt know what I hold? So sounds my judgments knel:
Which giv'n, I bid thee, Reader, Friend Farewel.
Protestatio Verissima A most tru Protestation.
Tu Domine Omnipotens, mea qui praecordia nosti;
Spargere velle nihil me nisi vera vides.
Thou, Lord Almighty, who my heart doost know;
Knowst that I nought but truth abroad would sow.
AN END.

Additio de Anima Humana: An Addition of Mans Soul

WHile my Pen was busy to transcribe the Prolog. previous Theorems, I met with Mr. Hobbs learned Leviathan of a Common-wealth: and among divers Paradoxal points or [Page] positions (as who cannot devise new dogmats, and colorably defend his devises?) Found four flatly opposit to so many of my Theological Theses or Tenets: which I thought fit by way of vindication to enumerat, but not by way of refuta­tion to recriminat; being far too weak to incounter so strong a Champion, as a Dwarf to a Giant.

1. That Mans Soul is no special Entity, Essence, or Exi­stence distinct from the Body: which after separation by death shal subsist in Heaven or Hel til the general Resurrection of al Flesh, and particular reunion of every individual Soul with its own identic Body: but only the Breath, Life, Energy, or Accidental quality therof; as is in other animats or animals so denomined of Anima, not Vita: yet the Body shal rise at last day the self same living Man it was in this World.

This novity crosseth cleerly my first Thesis concerning the 1 Thesis. Souls origin or production: wherin I maintain with the cur­rent stream of al Orthodox writers, that 'tis an essential part of Man so wel as the Body: but after death or dissolution of one from the other, a distinct individual, immaterial (tho no simple Spirit) and immortal substance; which shal imme­diatly by Gods particular Judgment partake of Heavenly jois or Hellish torments; and in fine reunite with its own Body at general Resurrection. The whol controversy is largly de­bated already, needing no vain repetition: but the Souls Verity, Unity, and Immortality shal be farther proved by a few select places of sacred Scripture, promiscuously collected and con­gested together for the present occasion. God breathed into Gen. 2. 3. Adam the Spirit of Life: or infused a living Soul, as 'tis ge­neraly interpreted. Which cannot be simple life, sith Zechary expounding it saith, The Lord spred the Heavens, laid the Ze [...]h. 12. 2. Earths foundations, and formed Mans Spirit within him: which provs intrinsic infusion. Semblably saith Salomon. Dust shal [...]. 12. [...] return to Earth, as it was, and the Spirit to God who gav it: which cannot imply life or Breath, sith that only ceaseth or vanisheth, but returns not to God, who first infused into A­dam a substantial Spirit, whence al others are successivly de­rived. David speaking of Christ saith, My flesh shal rest in hope: [...] 16. 9 [...] for thou wilt not leav my Soul in Hel, nor suffer thy holy one to [...] [...] 26, 27. [Page 227] see corruption. This is meant of our Saviours condition after his Passion (as deep Divines define) that his flesh in the Grav shal rest in hope: but his Soul descend into Hel to con­quer the strong Man (Satan) in his own Kingdom; not to be left ther: nor the whol compound see any corruption, be­ing to rise speedily. The blessed Virgin saith, My Soul doth mag­nify Luk. 1. 46, 47. the Lord, and my Spirit rejoice in God my Saviour: which two pathetical terms (Soul, Spirit) she would not use of life or breath (a blast, bubble, bawble) nor can Christ be caled hir Saviour in that respect, sith hir life did not depend on him. Christ saith, Ther was a rich Man clothed in purple, that fared Luk 16. 19, 20. sumpt [...]ously every day: and a begger named Lazarus, who lay at his gate ful of sores: Lazarus dying was caried by Angels into Abrahams bosom: but the rich Man tormented in Hel flame. This he whiffles off slightly, that 'tis a Parabol: yet many learned Men take it for a tru story, becaus the begger is named: nor would Christ so pointly pourtray Abrahams bosom, the rich Mans dialog with him, and Hel-torments (no not in Pa­rabols) to teach People old wifes fables, if al were fals fig­ments: or that Mens Souls did not liv after dissolution from the body; which was his main scope to instruct, or to what end els did he propone it? Yea elswhere he bids Men not to fear them which kil the Body, and cannot kil the Soul: but to fear Mat. 10. 28. him which is able to destroy both Soul and Body in Hel. How can this be eluded? Here are two distinct parts directly spe­cified, Body and Soul: nor can the last be life, for he that kils the Body, is able and actualy doth take away that too at once together with it: nor would he ad fear him which is able to destroy both Soul and Body, if he meant life only.

Christ said to the penitent Theef on the Cross, Today (instantly Luk. 23 43. [...] and immortaly) shalt thou be with me in Paradise; which must needs intend both their Souls; sith their Bodies were to be buri­ed that night. Indeed many able interpreters expound to day eternaly: yet al apply it to their Souls which shal liv with God for ever and ever. St. James bids his Countrimen with Jam. 1. [...] meeknes to receiv the word, which is able to sav their Souls: not their lifes, for Gods word cannot sav them. Many mo places may be alleged, beside Reasons and testimonies of Authors, [Page] if any refutation were intended: but sith he saith the contrary to his Assertion (that Soul and Life signify the same) cannot be proved by Scripture; thes few pregnant Texts shal serv to vindicat the truth.

Politia Ecclesiastica: An Ecclesiastic Polity.

2. THat the Church is no different or distinct Oeconomy or Corporation from the civil Common-wealth; but subject and subordinat to it in al things: nor hav Clergy Men (except they be temporal Princes) any spiritual Government or coerciv jurisdiction, unles delegated by suprem Magistrats special Commission: but al their function is to Preach, Teach, administer Sacraments, and doo other Ecclesiastic duties. Which the Soveraign Magistrat may also execut if he pleaseth, so wel as perform a Constables Office or any other civil fa­culty: yea he can constitut what Books of the Bible shal be Canonical, and which Apocryphal: binding the Subjects to observ the one or other, as he shal dictat, direct, or determin, under pain of civil obedience or disobedience. For Ministers are only our Ghostly instructers and School-Masters, not Rulers or Governors (no not in spiritual sanctions which concern the life to com) whos precepts are pious Counsils, not positiv commands.

This [...]latly contradicts my third Tenet touching Church-Government 3 Thesis. from the Creation to the first Century after Christs Birth, and consequently to our times: who defend that for divers of the first generations, al Rule (both sacred for Soul, and secular for Body) consisted in Fathers and El­ders of Families: but after when Men gathered (like Par­tridges in Covies) into several Societies; public Poli [...]y grew up to two distinct Bodies, which had sundry privileges of Rule; but subordinat or subalternat one to another. This is [...]ati­fied at large in the unwrested History of both Bodies drawn down from the first times to our modern ages: which to re­ [...]terat wil be tedious, if not nauseous. Yet som few proors [Page 228] or places of Scripture shal be briefly subjoined as in the former. Moses who first instituted Government over Gods people Is­rael, Deut 17 9 12. erected by divine dictat or direction two distinct Courts: one for Church-matters caled a Consistory; ano­ther for Common-wealth affairs clyped a Judicatory: as Je­remy Jer. 26. 8. 16. was arraigned, accused, and condemned to dy by the first; but acquited and released by the last. Thes two in process of time by long slavery of the Jews to sundry Nations, were much pared or impaired; yet som prints remained til Christs coming: Who cals the secular Councils, and spiritual Synagogs: Mat 10 17. yea if any offend a Man, and he tel him of it privatly, but the o­ther wil not hear; Christ bids the party tel it to the Church: Mat. 18 17. which if he also neglects to obey, let him be as a Pagan or Publi­can. Mat. 5 22. He describes both Courts in thes words: Who ever is angry with his Brother causlesly, shal be culpable of Judgment (mean­ing the lesser Court) who cals him Rhaca in scorn, shal be liable to a Council (or cheif Consistory) but who shal say thou Fool, shal be in danger of Hel fire. Thus far of Church government under the Law: which had power to punish Blasphemy, Ido­latry, Adultery, and som other crimes with death.

Now under the Gospel, Christ as suprem Head held al rule soly to himself: but after his death and departure into Hea­ven, the Apostles in a joint Copersigniory governed al: who toward their deceas, appointed Bishops or Prelats to preside over Presbyters (which were ordained before like the s [...]v [...]nty Disciples sent abroad by Christ, to Preach, Baptise and doo other spiritual duties) for suppression of S [...]hisms and Heresies sowen by Satan in thos dawning dais: Men of pervers minds, Who despise dominion, and speak evil of dignities. St. Paul be­ing Jud [...] v 8 Acts 19. 21. to leav the E [...]st and go to Rome, substituted Titus in his stead as Bishop of Crete (a large Ile) To ordein Elders in every 2 C [...]r 8 6 16. Titus 1. 5. 1 Tim. 1 3. 1 Tim 5 20, 21, 22. Tit. 2. 15. City: so he appointed Timothy about the same time to abide at Ephesus, that he might charge som to teach no other doctrin. The Rules which he prescribes to both being before but common Presbyters, plainly indicat that he gav them coerciv power over other Elders, to over see, censure, rebuke, or silence them, with al Deacons under their charge; but to doo nothing par­tialy, nor lay hands on any suddenly. St. J [...]h [...] after his return [Page] from Patmos exile, constituted som supervisors in divers Cities, planted whol Churches, and ordained Presbyteries in several places, as Paul and Timothy used to doo: the like did other Apostles in divers Dioceses; as many antient writers and au­thentic Historians truly testify. Much more might be added for proof of the premisses, which is omitted to avoid pro­lixity.

De regno Fidelium aterno: Of Saints eternal reign.

THat no elect Saints (when their Bodies shal be raised to life at last day, according to Gods iterated promisses) shal reign in the Kingdom of Heaven or third Heaven Gods highest Throne; but only here on a new Earth, with our Lord Jesus Christ as King: not for a thousand yeers before or at the day of Judgment (as Chiliasts conceiv) but for ever and ever. For it sutes not with the Majesty of so great a King, that his Subjects or Servants shal hav place so high as his Throne, or abov the Earth his Footstool: which yet is com­monly caled the Kingdom of Heaven, in reference to that place of Eternity wher God reigns in glory.

This diametraly opposeth my seventh Theorem, against the 7 Thesis. Millenar reign of Christ with his Martyrs and som Saints at Earthly Jerusalem: who hold that Christ shal com in the Clouds to judg al mankind (whos bodies shal then be raised, & every one reunited to its proper identic Soul) according to their works: but shal carry his Saints with him into Heaven, ther to reign or remain in ineffable jois eternaly. Which position is proved by thes pregnant places, without descant, division, or distortion. Earthly Jerusalem shal be never restored, no more then Sodom Acts 6. 17. or Samaria; as the Prophets inform: but eternal life in new Jerusalem (which is Metaphoricaly meant of his Spous the Church) is the reward of just Men at last day, as St. Paul te­stifies: 2 Tim. 4 6. Ergo none shal reign on Earth with him, much less he with them in Jerusalem new built. The holy Martyrs Souls Rev. 6 9. rest under the Altar in Heaven: but shal not return to reign [Page 229] here on Earth, either temporaly or everlastingly. For al the Godly at Christs secund coming, shal rise immediatly to glory 1 Thes 4. 16▪ 17. upon sound of the Trumpet, and thes then living caught up in the Clouds with them together, to meet the Lord: who coms not to reign or reside with them here, but to carry them with him into Heaven, ther to reign and remain for ever. Now if it sutes not with the Majesty of God so great a King, that his Subjects and Servants shal sit so high as his Heavenly Throne, or abov his earthly Footstool: how can it consist with the dignity of Christ our King, that his Saints shal sit at Table (som at his right hand, som on his left) to eat and drink wi [...]h him freely and familiarly for ever? Let this suffice for Scriptural confirmation of the elects eternal reign with our blessed Saviour in Heavenly habitations.

De aeterno Christi regno: Of Christs eternal reign

THat Christ at the Judgment day and general Resurrecti­on of al Flesh, shal resign up the Kingdom of Glory (wher he now sits in Majesty) to his Father, and reign per­sonaly on Earth at his Metropolis of Jerusalem (to be new built) with his Saints eternaly, never to see Heaven again: which is to suscipere gradum Simeonis, from a C [...]lical infinit Kingdom to a Terrestrial finit Paradise. Thus Scriptures seem to hav several sens [...]s, according to Mens various interpreta­tions of arbitrary authority.

This openly oppugns my last Opinion of the Worlds anni­hilation, 8 Thesis. against renovation of the old, or substitution of a new: wherto this Position of Christs eternal Personal reign at new built Jerusalem principaly tends: but I defend, that this present finit World which was at first made of meer no­thing; shal in fine be utterly abolished or resolved into no­thing: when 'tis once dissolved or destroied by fire. This is expresly evinced or evidenced by thes texts of sacred Scripture current coin. David saith, Heaven and Earth shal perish: Ps. 102 26. Mat. 24 3 [...]. Job 14. 12. Christ, They shal pass away: Job, They shal be no more: Isaiah, [Page] they shal vanish like smoke; al their Host shal be dissolved, and Isai 51. 6. Isai 34 4 2 Pet. 3. 10 Rev 20 11. roled together as a scrole: they shal fal down as a leaf from the Vine, and a faling fig from the figtree: St. Peter, they shal pass away with great nois: St. John, they fled away, and no place found for them. Al which phrases (to perish, pass away, be no more, vanish like smoke, roled up as a scrole, fal down as a Vine-leaf or fig from a figtree fly away and their place no more found) strongly imply abolition, or at least impugn a perfecter condition; to be the place for our Saviours perpetual personal reign with his Saints: yeelding up the Kingdom of Glory (the third Heaven) never to return. 'Tis a sory unequal exchange to quit a Celical, infinit, increat mansion; for a Terrestrial, finit, created habitation: nor can any of the premised terms plainly purport or senisibly signify melioration; as if the new Heaven and Earth shal be bettered or beautified: sith in al language of Men or Grammatical construction, perfection is advers to per­dition; and to perish or pass away asystat to perfection. If the World is to be renewed or repaired, it shal hav no end: but 'tis said the end of al things is at hand, and the ends of the World are com upon us. In nature is nothing but time, place, and space: but afterward al eternity, ubiquity, and infinity: as in Man corruption shal put on incorruption, mortality immortality, weaknes power, and dishonor glory. Many most pressing reasons and authentic authorities are alleged on behalf of annihilation in the eighth or last Thesis: which 'tis not my guise or property to reaccumulat. Howbeit having gleaned or gathered sundry select speculations scattered through his whol work (som veracious, som fucatious, som dubious, som suspitious, som erroneous) I presume to present them in public, sans answer or animad version.

Specimina diversimoda: Several sorts of Essais.

MAster Hobbs is a great general Scholar, who hath an ex­cellent Entelechy to devise novities; but deems them al verities; and would fai [...] hav the World dance after his Pipe, [Page 230] which wil never be. For Men may catch Ruddicks or Thrushes in Pitfals, and Woodcocks in Springals: but bigger Birds are too wild, wily, and wary then to be snapd in such silly snares. Real inventions if good, are very laudable; and verbal too, if veritable: but novel Opinions contrary to com­mon current Tenets of al Authors most suspitious, and mostly erroneous. Not to linger any longer in the Porch, thes which folow are som of his sporadical Positions. Touching the sig­nification of som words in Scripture, he saith they depend not Chap. 34. on the writers wil or vulgar use, but on their tru proper sens in Gods word.

Body and Spirit in Schools language, are stiled Substances Body what. Corporeal and Incorporeal: but a Body naturaly imports that which fils up som space, room, or place, being a real part of the visible univers: which is an aggregat of al Bodies, and no part of it but a Body; nor is any thing a Body which is not part of it and contained or included in it. This Body being subject to change in various apparence to Animals senses, is caled Substance or Subject of sundry Accidents: as somtime to mov, somtime to stand stil; somtime hot, somtime cold; somtime of one color, sound, smel, tast, or touch, somtime of another. Which several seemings (produced by diversity of Bodily operations on our Senses Organs) we cal Accidents of thos Bodies: according to which acception, Body and sub­stance signify the same: so to conjoin or cal ought an Incor­poreal Substance, is to destroy ech other, as if one should say an incorporeal Body. Thus much for the interpretation of the word Body.

Now the vulgar doth not denomin al the univers Body, but Spirit what▪ only such parts as they find by feeling to resist their force; or by seeing to hinder farther prospect: but Air and such subtle substances not subject to the Ey, they term wind, breath, or latinly spirits: as that which in any Animal givs life and mo­tion, is caled the Vital and Animal spirits. Wheras thos Idols of the brain representing bodies wher they are not (either in Dream or to a distempered brain waking) are nothing, as St. Paul cals al Idols: nothing at al wher they seem to be, and in the brain it self nothing but tumult rising from the objects [Page] confused action, or Organs disorderly agitation. Hence som which search not their Causes, but rely on others knowledg; cal them thin Bodies supernaturaly compact of Air, becaus the depraved sight judgeth them Corporeal: and som term them Spirits or Spectres, becaus the Touch descries nothing wher they appeer that resists their fingers. So the genuin significati­on of Spirit in common speech, is either a subtle, fluid, invisible Body; or a Ghost, Idol, or Phantasm of the Brain: but meta­phorical meanings are many. Somtimes it signifies a Mans di­sposition or inclination of Mind, as one having a humor to comptrol others, is said to hav the Spirit of contradiction: if one be addicted to uncleannes, an unclean Spirit: If to peevish perversnes, a froward Spirit: If to sullennes, a dumb Spirit: If to holines, the Spirit of God. Somtimes any eminent ability, or extraordinary passion, or diseas of Mind; as great prudence, is clyped the Spirit of Wisdom, and mad Men are said to be possessed with a Spirit. Thes are al the acceptions, and whe [...] none can answer or satisfy that words Sens in Scripture, it fals not under Human understanding, and Faith consists not in our Opinion, but submission: specialy wher God is said to be a Spirit, or wher by Spirit is meant God. For his Nature is in­comprehensible; and we know not what he is, but that he is.

The Spirit of God moved on the Waters: If God heself be 1 meant hereby, then is motion and place proper to Bodies only, Spirit of God. Gen 1. v. 2. Gen. 3. 1. ascribed to him: but the like words are used at the universal Deluge; I wil bring my Spirit (Wind, Air, or moving Spirit) and the Waters shal be diminished: Both which may be caled Gods Spirit, being his special work. Pharach cals Josephs Wis­dom Gen. 41. 38. the Spirit of God: And God saith, Speak to al that are wise hearted, whom I hav filled with the Spirit of Wisdom, to make Exod 28. 3. Aaron garments to consecrat him.

2. Isaiah speaks thus of the Messiah: The Spirit of the Lord shal abide on him, the Spirit of Wisdom and Ʋnderstanding; the 2 Spirit of Counsil and Fortitud; the Spirit of the fear of the Lord. Isai. 1. 2. 3. Wher is manifestly meant so many Gifts or Graces of God, not Ghosts or Goblins.

3. Extraordinary Zele and courage in defens of Gods Peo­ple, 3 is stiled the Spirit of God: Judg. 3. 10. ch. 6. 34. ch. 11. 29. [Page 231] ch. 13. 25. ch. 14. 6. So 'tis said, The Spirit of God cam on Saul 1 Sam. 11. 6. 1 Sam. 19. v. 20. ( against the Amonits) and his Anger was kindled greatly: no Ghost but a vehement heat of vengeance. So Gods Spirit cam upon him being among the Prophets that praised God in songs: which was no Ghost, but a sudden unexpected zele to join with them in holy Hymns or musical harmony.

4. A fals Prophet said to Michaiah, which way went the Lords 4 Spirit from me to thee? This cannot be any Ghost: for Micai 1 Kings 22▪ 24. declared the event of that Battel before, as from a Vision, not from a Spirit speaking in him So though Prophets spake by Gods Spirit or special gift of Prediction: yet their knowledg was not by any Ghost within them, but by som supernatural Dream or Vision. Was not that inspiration by God?

5. 'Tis said, God made man of dust, and breathed into his Nostrils Quaere. (Spiraculum vitae) the breath of life, and he was made a living 5 Soul. This breath only signifies life▪ not any Individual inspired Soul. As Job saith, So long as Gods [...] is in my Nostrils: that is, so long as I liv or breath. So Eze [...]l, The Spirit of Life was in the wheels: not any Soul, but they had life. Again, The spirit entred Ipse dixit. Job. 27. 3. Ezek. 1. 20. into me (not any Ghost or Spiritual substance possessed his Body) and set me on my feet: meaning I recovered vital strength to go.

6. God saith, I wil take of the Spirit upon thee, and put it on them (the seventy Elders) and they shal bear the burden of the People with thee. Whereupon two of them ( Eldad and Me­d [...]d) Prophecied; whom Josua, not knowing they had autho­rity, 6 praied Moses fo forbid: but he refused, wishing God N [...]mb. 11. 17 25. would put his Spirit on al the People to make them Prophets: or giv them authority subordinat to his own. So Josuae was ful of the Spirit of Wisdom, becaus Moses laid his hands on him: viz. ordained him to prosecut the work of bringing Gods People into the promised Land; which he-self began but could not D [...]ut. 34 9. finish. So Saint Paul saith, If any man hath not Christs Spirit (not his Ghost, but submission to his Gospel) he is none of his. So saith St. John, hereby ye shal know the Spirit of God: every Spi­rit which confesseth that Jesus Christ is com in the flesh, is of God; Rom. [...]. [...]. [...]. meaning the Spirit of Christianity or main Article of Faith, that Jesus is the Christ; but not of any Ghost or Goblin. Thos words ( Luke 4. 1.) Jesus ful of the holy Ghost, are expresd [Page] or expounded ( Mat. 4. 1. Marc. 1. 12.) by Spirit: which means zele to doo the work for which God the Father sent him into the World: but to interpret it of the third Person in holy Trinity, is to say God was filled with God, which is most improper o [...] insignificant. Spirit literaly implies a thin real sub­stance, and metaphoricaly som extraordinary ability of Body, and affection of Mind: but to translat it Ghost (which imports imaginary Inhabitants o [...] Mens Brains) ther is no reason or Censure. cau [...]. By his leav Saint Lukes words ( ful of the holy Ghost) which the other Evangelist hav not) refer to Christs Person: for it folows he returned to Jordan, and was led by the Spirit into the Wildernes: al which three relat alike to Christ: but our In­terpreters generally expound this of the third Person in Trini­ty: nor is it incongruous to say, God-Man was [...]d by God: but 'tis more presumptuous if one Writer w [...]l seem wiser then al his Felows.

7. The Disciples seing [...] walk on the Sea, supposed him 7 a Spirit or Aerial Body, [...] Phantasm: for al saw him, which Mat. 14 26 Marc 6 49. could not be a delusion of the Brain incident to one at once, or a very few surprised with like fear; but a Body only compact [...]cts 12. 15. of Air. When Saint Peter was excarcerated by an Angel, and the Maid said he kno [...]kd at dore; the rest thought hi [...] mad, and said it was his Angel; which is a corporeal substance compact upon occasions: els the Disciples folowed the Jews and Gen­tils Opinion, that ther be real Apparitions or Spectres, which the one stiles Spirits or Angels (Good and Evil;) the other Demons both evil and good. For God can form subtle sub­stantial Bodies, to use as Ministers or Messengers (so Angel sig­nifies) in extraordinary metaphysical maner.

Cannot the Devil doo the like? Did he not assum the simi­litud [...]are. of Samuel, when the Witch of Endor caused him to con­fer with Saul? for Samuels Soul it could not be, though Saul surmised it to be h [...]s Ghost.

Such Angels so formed are Corporal substances, which take up room as Air doth, and mov from place to place in time: but are no Spiritual Ghosts in no place or no wher, or definitly here as not to be elswher; seeming somwhat, yet be Nothing. For thos thin Substances, though invisible as Air, hav the same [Page 232] real dimensions (greater or lesser) as material grosser Bodies. Thus the Spirit of God is taken: 1. For Wind or Breath: See the seven Marginal [...]gures. 2. For extraordinary gifts: 3. For vehement Affections: 4. For the gift of Prediction: 5. For Life: 6. For subordi­nation to Authority: 7. For Aerial Bodies.

Now for Angel: 'tis generaly a Messenger, or spicialy Gods Angel what. Messenger, which relats any thing that makes known his ex­traordinary presence or power; principaly by Dream or Vi­sion. The Scripture speaks not of their Creation, but cals them ministring Spirits: and Spirits (as is said) somtime sig­nify thin imperceptible Bodies, as Air, Wind, vital or animal Spirits: somtime Images of the phansy in Dreams and Visi­ons; which are no real substances, but intentional or acciden­tal appeerances in the brain: yet when God raiseth them su­pernaturaly to signify his Wil, they are termed his Messengers or Angels.

Were not multituds of real individual Angels created by Q [...]. God (as Divines deem or define) to wait on his Wil? Or are the Good only formed on occasions, and dissolved again? If so, then doth not God ceas from his work, but creats new, thin, Aerial Bodies continualy.

Here he hath a large discurs, that the Jews from the G [...]ntils (not by any proof or pressure in the old Testament) h [...]ld thos apparances (which God somtime raiseth in Mens ph [...]sy for his service, caled Angels) to be real substances or perma­nent Creatures wherof som which they thought beho [...]ful or beneficial, they caled Angels of God: but such as they deemed hartful, evil Angels, foul Fiends, Spirits, or Devils. For they [...]s [...] e [...]ed Pythonists, mad-Men, Lunatics, Epilectics or the like Demoniacs. Then he shews, how the word Angel in the old Testament is only an Image supernaturaly raised in Mans ima­gination, to signify Gods presence in executing som superna­tural work: but no permanent Creature or incorporeal Ghost, Touching Angels names in Daniel (Michael, Gabriel) by the Dan. 12. 2. first is meant Christ under the title of a great Prince: but the last was a supernatural Vision, by which Daniel deemed or Dan. 8. 16. dreamed (as divers doo) that two Saints talked together, and one said to the other; Gabriel, make this Man to understand Dan 9. 21 [Page] the Vision: but God needs not to difference his servants by names, which are helps only for weak, short, mortal memories: nor can it be proved in the old Testament that Angels (except when they are put for Men made Messengers or Ministers of Gods Wil, Words, or Works) are permanent or incorporeal individuals, as the Schools say. The chief places alleged in the Mat. [...]5. 41. new Testament are thes: Go ye cursed (saith Christ) into ever­lasting fire prepared for the Devil and his Angels. This indeed provs their permanence, but not immateriality: sich no simple 2 Pet. 2. 4. spirits are patible of material fire. St. Paul saith. know ye not, that we shal judg the Angels? St. Peter, if God spared not J [...]d [...] v. 6. the Angels that sinned, but cast them into Hel? St. Jude, the Angels which kept not their first estate, he reservs in everlasting chains under darknes, unto the Judgment of the great Day. Thes prov both the permanence of Evangelical nature, and imma­teriality also. For as incorporeal is taken for not Body (not for a subtle invisible Body) an incorporeal substance is a con­tradiction: and to an Angel or Spirit in that sens incorporeal substance, is a Cambridg Bul, and in effect to say, ther is no Angel or Spirit at al. He was of Opinion, that Angels were only supernatural apparitions of the Phansy, raised by God to notify his presence and precepts to Mankind, specialy to his chosen People: but confesseth, that upon so many pregnant places and Christs plain words he beleevs ther be real, sub­stantial, permanent Angels: yet not incorporeal, immaterial, indefinit, or nothing. 'Tis wel he sees his error in this point, which argues he may overween in others: and it were to be wished he would review sundry strange singularities, to re­tract what he finds faulty or erroneous: but not seduce or lead on the silly sort, who are apt to clasp any shadows.

Was not the Angel Gabriel, who audibly annunciated to Quaere. the Virgin Mary hir present Conception by the holy Ghost; Rev. 12 7. the same with Daniels so caled? And Michael who with his Angels fought against the great red Dragon and his Angels the same?

Inspiration literaly (as Spirit is a thin Air) implies a blow­ing Inspiration. into Man som thin air, vapor, or wind; as one fils a blad­der with his breath: but if Spirits exist only in the phansy, 'tis [Page 233] but the blowing in of a Phantasm: which is improper or im­possible to say of such things as only seem to be somwhat, yet are nothing. The word is used in Scripture Metaphoricaly soly: as when God inspired into Adam the breath of Life; vital Gen. 2. 7. motion is meant.

Why not rather his rational Soul the fountain of Life and Quaere. motion; which was infused at creating, and created in infu­sing, as St. Austin asserts?

St. Paul saith, Al Scripture is given by inspiration of God: 2 Tim 3 16. speaking of the old Testament which is tru of the new Testament, but 'tis a Metaphor, that God inclined the Spirit or mind of thos writers, to pen infallibly tru as they did by his special dictat or direction. St. Peter saith, Prophecy cam not in old time by 2 Pet▪ 1. 21. Mans Wil; but thos holy Men spake at the holy Spirit moved them. Here holy Spirit signifies Gods voice by supernatural Dream or Vision, which is not inspiration: nor when Christ breathed on his Disciples saying ( Receiv the holy Spirit) was that John 20. 22. breath the very holy Ghost; but only a sign of thos spiritual Graces he gav them. So when 'tis said of our Saviour (or o­thers) he was ful of the holy Spirit: 'tis not meant any in­fusion of Gods substance, but accumulation of his gifts: whe­ther supernaturaly attained, as the firy cloven toungs sat on the Acts 2. 3, 4. Apostles, filling them with the holy Ghost; or ordinarily ac­quired by industry, as Men get learning by study: which in al Cases are Gods gifts alike. Thou then that hast received more then others, must be most thankful: Infusion and inspiration are not taken properly, as if good or bad Spirits entred into Men; but only for Gods imparting his Graces or Virtues: which are not to be poured in as Bodies into Barrels; but instilled or­dinarily or supernaturaly.

Gods Kingdom is taken by most Divines metaphoricaly, Kingdom of God. Chap. 35. for eternal felicity after this life in the highest third Heaven which they cal the Kingdom of Glory: or somtime for sancti­fication (the earnest of it) clyped the Kingdom of Grace: but properly in Scripture 'tis Gods real Monarchy or Sove­raignty over any Subjects by their own consent or Covenant: so the Israelits peculiarly chose God for their King, upon his promising them the Land of Canaan: but very seldom meta­phoricaly, [Page] and then 'tis used for dominion over sin in the new Testament only: becaus such a dominion every subject in Gods Kingdom shal hav, without prejudice to the Soveraign. From the Creation God reigned over al Men naturaly by his might, and commanded his peculiar Subjects by voice, as one Man speaks to another: prohibiting Adam to eat of the Tree of knowledg; and upon disobeying exiled him out of Eden from enjoying eternal Life, wherto he was created had he not sinned. Gen. 7. 7. Afterward he punished his Posterity for their Vices (al sav egth Persons in whom his Kingdom consisted) with a deluge Gen. 8. 18. of Waters: but his first Kingdom by solen compact, was with Gen. 17. 7, 8. Abram in thes words: I wil establish my Covenant between me and thee and thy Seed after thee for an everlasting Covenant, to be a God to thee and them: and wil giv thee and thy Seed al the Land of Canaan (wherin thou art a Stranger) for an ever­lasting possession. In memorial herof he instituted Circum­cision Exod. 19 5, [...], 8, caled the old Covenant, as the sign or Sacrament therof. The same Covenant God renewed by Moses at Sinai (they be­ing newly becom a Nation) which is expresly stiled (tho the name of King and Kingdom not before used) a Kingdom of Priests and holy People: for they promised to doo as the Lord commanded: which argues their peculiar consent, compact, or covenant: but al the Earth is the Lords by power, property, and precedent. So 'tis a cleer case, that by Gods Kingdom is meant a civil Common-wealth instituted by Subjects consents for regulating their behaviour, both toward God their King in obeying his Laws; toward one another in point of Justice; and toward Forreners in peace or war. This was properly a Kingdom, when God was King of Israel (which befel to no People els) and the high Priest after Moses his sole Lieftenant or Viceroy: whence 'tis forecaled Regnum Sacerdotale a 1 Pet 2 9. Kingdom of Priests: and by St. Peter Sacerdotium Regale a Roial Priesthood: sith none but the high Priest might enter Sanctum Sanctorum (only once a yeer) to inquire Gods Wil 1 Sam. 8 7 &c. of him. Many mo places prov the same: as when the Elders greiving at Samuels Sons corruption, required a King to rule them Like al Nations; God said they did not reject Samuel but himself, that he should not reign over them. Thus God was their [Page 234] King, and Samuel only delivered what he dictated. So saith 1 Sa [...]. 12. 12 Samuel, when ye saw Naash King of Ammon com against you, ye said to me, a King shal reign over us, when the Lord God was King. After they had rejected God and broken the Covenant by that revolt or rebellion, chusing another King: the Pro­phets foretold his restitution, that it shal be in Zion Davids Throne at Jerusalem on Earth. See Isai 24. 23. Ez [...]k. 20. 33, 37. Micah. 4. 7. So saith the Angel Gabriel of Christ: He shal be great, and caled the Son of the most high, and the Lord Luk. 1. 32, 3 [...]. shal giv him his Father Davids Throne: and he shal reign over the hous of Jacob for ever, and of his Kingdom shal be no end. This is a Kingdom on Earth, for whos claim Christ was cruci­fied as an enemy to Caesar; and on his Cross inscribed: Jesus of Nazaret King of the Jews; being in scorn Crowned with Thorns. So 'tis said of the Disciples, That they did contrary Acts 1 [...]. 7. to Caesars Decrees saying, ther is another King one Jesus. Ther­fore Gods Kingdom is real, no metaphorical Monarchy, and so taken in both Testaments. When we say, For thine is the Kingdom, power, and glory: 'tis understood by force of our Covenant, not by right of his power. So it were frivolous to pray, Thy Kingdom com: unles it be meant of Gods King­doms restauration by Christ; which was interrupted by the Jews electing Saul. Nor is it proper to say, the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand or thy Kingdom com, if it had stil continued: for Gods Kingdom of Power is every wher.

In sum, Gods Kingdom is a civil Monarchy, which con­sists Summary. in the Israelits obedience or obligation to observ thos Laws which Moses first should bring from Sinai, and what the high Priest afterward shal deliver before the Cherubins in Sanctum Sanctorum: which being cast off by electing Saul, the Prophets foretold should be restored by Christ; and we daily pray for its redintegration, thy Kingdom com: acknow­ledging the right of it in adding: For thine is Kingdom, Power, and Glory for ever. Amen. The proclaiming herof was the Apostles Preaching, wherto Men are prepared by Gospel-Teachers: and to promiss obedience to Gods government is to be in the Kingdom of Grace: becaus God givs such power to be his Subjects gratis, when Christ shal com in Majesty to [Page] judg the World, and actualy govern his own People, which is caled the Kingdom of Glory. If Gods Kingdom (caled for its gloriousnes and celsitud the Kingdom of Heaven) were not a Government which he executs on Earth by Vicars or Vicerois, who deliver his commands to the People; ther needs no digladiation, who it is by whom God speaks to us: nor would Priests trouble themselfs with spiritual jurisdiction, nor any suprem Rulers deny it them.

From this literal interpretation of Gods Kingdom, ariseth Holy what. a genuin Exposition of the word Holy: signifying what in Mo­narchies Men cal public or the Kings property: who is the pub­lic Person or Representativ of al his Subjects. As God King of Israel, is stiled the holy one of Israel: and the Jews Gods People a holy Nation. So the Sabbath (Gods day) is a Holy day: the Temple (Gods hous) a holy Hous: Sacrifi [...]es, Offer­ings, Tiths (Gods Tributs) Holy duties: Priests, Prophets, Annointed Kings (Gods Ministers) holy Men: the celical Spirits (Gods Messengers) holy Angels, or the like. For wher­ever holy is taken properly, ther is stil somwhat signified of property got by consent. For al Mankind is Gods Nation by property of power, but Israel only an holy Nation by Cove­nant. In saying Halowed be thy Name, we pray for Grace to keep the first Commandment, to hav no other Gods but him.

The word (Prophane) is usualy taken in Scripture for com­mon: Prophane what and consequently the contraries (holy and proper or peculiar) must signify the same thing: but figurativly, such as liv godly giving themselfs to devotion (as if they forsook the World) are caled Bonhoms.

That which God makes holy by appropriating it to his own Sacred what. use, is stiled Sacred or Sanctified: as the seventh day in the fourth Commandment; and the elect in the new Testament are said to be sanctified, as indued with the spirit of godlines. That too which Men dedicat or giv to God for his public service (Churches, Chapels with their Utensils, Priests, Victims, Oblations, external Rites of Sacraments &c.) is stiled Sacred or set apart to God. Now ther be divers degrees of sanctity or holines; when things are sequestred or consecrated for Gods neerer service th [...]n others: as al the Israelits were a holy Peo­ple [Page 235] peculiar to God, yet Levies Tribe more holy, and Priests among Levits more: but the high Priest most holy, so Judea was a holy Land, but Jerusalem the City of general worship more holy, the Temple holier, and Sanctum Sanctorum holiest of al places.

A Sacrament is a separation of som visible thing from com­mon use, consecrated to Gods service; for a sign of our ad­mission Sacrament. into his Kingdom, or a commemoration of the same. Circumcision was the sign of admission in the old Testament, Baptism in the new: but the commemoration in the one was eating the Pascal Lamb once annaly, to mind them of the night when they were delivered from Egypts temporal bondage; and celebrating the Lords Supper in the other, wherby we are remembred of our deliverance from sin and Satan by our Saviours crucifixon. The Sacraments of admis­sion (Circumcision and Baptism) are used but once to every one, becaus we are admitted no oftner: but thos of comme­moration (Passover and the Lords Supper) often reiterated, becaus we must be often minded of our deliverance and alle­giance. Ther be other Consecrations which in ample accep­tion may be stiled Sacraments, as the word implies a sacred institution for Religious uses; as Ordination, Matrimony, and many mo: but as it imports an Oath, Promiss, or Covenant of Allegiance to God; thos precited are soly so named. A Common-wealth cannot possibly consist, wher any sav the Soveraign hath power to giv greater rewards then life, or in­flict Chap 38. grievouser punishments then death: but sith eternal life excels temporal, and endless torments exced death of nature; 'tis worthy to be wel weighed of al that wil obey Authority to avoid the calamities of confusion and civil war; what is meant in Scripture by eternal life and endless torment: as also for what offenses and against whom committed, Men are to be eternaly tortured, and for what actions to enjoy everlasting life.

Adam had enjoied it in the terren Eden Paradise for ever, had he not broken Gods commandment to eat the forbidden fruit; who had the Tree of Life allowed to eat: but so soon Eternal Life; Gen. 3. 22. as he tasted the one, God thrust him out of the Garden, lest he should take of the other and liv for ever. So if he had not [Page] sinned, he should liv on Earth perpetualy: but mortality seized on him and al his posterity for this first sin. Sith then he for­feted eternal life by sin; he who is to cancel that forfeture, must recover it by righteousnes: which Christ Jesus did by satisfying for the sins of al that beleev in him; and so reco­vered life eternal lost by Adam to al beleevers. So saith St. 1 Cor. 15. 21, 22. Paul, sith by Man cam death, by Man cam also the Resurrecti­on of the dead: for as in Adam al dy, so in Christ shal al be made alife. Touching the place wher Men shal enjoy eternal life, the precited Texts seem to set it on Earth: for if al for­feted it in earthly Paradise by Adam, they shal enjoy it on Earth by Christ: els the comparison were not consonant nor complet. So saith David, God commanded the blessing on Zion, Ps. 133 3. even life for evermore. So St. John, to him that overcometh, Rev. 2. 7. I wil giv to eat of the Tree of Life in the midst of Gods Paradise: Rev. 21. 2. 10. This was the Tree of eternal life on earth. Again, I saw the holy City new Jerusalem coming down from God as a Bride adorned for his Husband. As if he should say, new Jerusalem Gods Paradise (or rather the Church Christs Spous) shal descend from Neaven at Christs next coming to Gods people, and Acts 3. 11. not they ascend to it. So the two Angels in whit clothing said to the Apostles looking at Christ ascending: This Jesus who is taken up from you into Heaven, shal so com as you see him go up into Heaven. As if they had said ( Glossa corrumpit textum) he shal com down to govern them under his Father eternaly on Earth (he coms to Judg, not to Rule) and not take them into Heaven. This conforms to the restauration of Gods Kingdom began under Moses, which was the Israelits Politic Mat. 12 30. government on Earth. Christ saith, In the Resurrection Men neither marry nor giv in mariage, but are as the Angels in Hea­ven: This describes eternal life like that which Adam lost at point of mariage. For sith Adam and Eve (if they had not sin­ned) had lived on Earth eternaly, yet could not continualy propogat Progenies: becaus if immortals should immortaly procreat as Men doo now; the Earth in short space could not afford Foot-room to stand on, much less food to sustain them.

How then can a new created Earth (except extended to Quae [...]e. i [...]finit immensity) contain al Mankind (which are unimagi­nable [Page 236] multituds) born and to be born since the Creation?

Thes with sundry such quirks surpass the reach of reason to resolv. The comparison betwen life eternal lost by Adam, and recuperated by Christs victory over death holds thus: that as he lost it by sin, yet lived long after: so a faithful Be­leever recovers it by Christ. though he dy [...] natural death for a long time, even til the general Resurrection: for as death is counted from Adams condemnation, not execution: so is life reckoned from the absolution, not from the Resurrection of thos elected in Christ Jesus. Such are his specious specula­lations favouring of singularity.

That Men after the Resurrection shal liv eternaly in Heaven Ascention into Heaven. (caled by St. Paul the third Heaven) is not evident in Scrip­ture: by the Kingdom of Heaven is meant Gods Kingdom who dwels in Heaven; which was Israels People: whom he ruled by Judges, Prophets, and high Priests as Lieftenents, til they rebelled and required a mortal King like other Nations. So when our Saviour by his Ministers shal perswade the Jews to return, and accomplish the fulnes of Gentils: ther shal be a new Kingdom of Heaven, becaus God (whos Throne is Heaven) shal be King: yet it folows not that Man shal ascend to his seat of happines, or higher then his Footstool. No Man John 3. 13. hath ascended into Heaven, but he that cam down from it; even the Son of Man that cam down from Heaven. Wher note that thos are St. Johns words, not Christs as al the rest were; who was not then in Heaven. So David saith, Thou wilt not leav Ps 16. 10. my Soul in Hel, nor suffer thy Holy one to see corruption: which St. Peter provs to be spoken of Christs Resurrection; not of Acts 2 31, 34. himself; becaus David is not ascended into Heaven. If any an­swer, 'tis tru they shal not ascend in bodies til the Resur­rection; but their Souls enter Heaven so soon as they dy: As Christ confirms, Who provs the Resurrection by Moses words Luk 20. 37, 38. at the bush; when he cals the Lord the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob: who is a God of the living, not of the dead. This can­not be construed of the Souls immortality, sith Christ ther treats only of the Bodies resurrection or immortality of Men who shal liv again. He means thos Patriarchs were immor­tal, becaus God in meer grace confers eternal life on the faith­ful [Page] (who tho dead liv stil to God, being writ in the Book of life with thos that are absolved of their sins, to reviv at resur­rection) but not by any property consequent to Mans essence or Soul. For to make it a living entity independent after se­paration on the Body; and in it self immortal: or that any Man is immortal (except Enoch or Elias) hath no cleer war­rant Job. 14. 10, 12. in the word. Job complains of Mans mortality by nature, Man dies and wasts away: yea givs up the Ghost and wher is he? Down he lieth and riseth not, til the Heavens be no more. Which 2 Pet 3 7. 13. St. Peter shews shal be at the universal Resurrection; when the Heavens and Earth shal be dissolved by fire: but new ex­pected according to promiss, wherin dwels righteousnes. So wher Job saith, Man riseth not til the Heavens be no more: 'tis as if he said, immortal life (for Life and Soul in Scripture sens is the same) begins not in Man til the Resurrection or day of Judgment: and the caus of it is Gods promiss (as St. Peter tels) not Mans specifical Nature or Essence. Now sith Gods Kingdom is a civil Common-wealth wher he-self is Soveraign, by virtu first of the old, and now since of the new Covenant: it evidently appeers, that when Christ shal com again in Majesty and Glory, to reign existently and eternaly; his Kingdom shal be on Earth, as God was in Israel. So Gods Enimies and their torments after Judgment shal be on Earth: for the place wher al remain til the Resurrection, is usualy stiled in Scripture under ground, in Latin Infernus or Inferi, Greecly Hades; wher Men cannot see or dy: implying the Grav so wel as any other deep place: but the damneds place after Resurrection, is not designed in al holy writ by any note of situation, but only by their company: wher such wicked Men were, whom God in miraculous maner had cut off.

Touching Hel, 'tis no real place in any part of the created Hel what. World, but a Metaphorical word signified by wicked Men ther being: 1. 'Tis caled Infernus, Tartarus, or bottomless Pit from Corah, Dathan, and Abiram swalowed alife into the Earth. 2. 'Tis said to be under water, becaus the Giants (mighty Men in Noahs dais, caled Greecly Heroes) were drowned in the Deluge. 3. Becaus Sodom and Gomorrha consumed by Fire and Brimstone, becam a bituminous Lake, [Page 237] 'tis caled a Lake burning with fire and brimstone, which is the secund death. So Hel fire is expressed by Sodoms fire indefi­nitly Rev 21. 8. taken for destruction: as 'tis said, Death and Hel were Rev. 20. 14. cast into the Lake of fire: or destroied: for after the last day Men shal dy no more nor go into Hades. 4. 'Tis termed from Egypts triduan deep darknes, utter or extern darknes; viz. without the habitation of Gods elect, which is ful of Light. 5. Neer Jerusalem is the Vally of Hinnon: in part wherof caled Tophet, the Jews most Idolatrously sacrificed their Children to Moloch: wher they cast out their Carrion; and to clens the Air, made continual fires: whence Hel is caled Ge­henna or Vally of Hinnon: and from thos incessant Fires, cam the name or notion of everlasting unquenchable Fire. Now none is so sensless to expound any of thes literaly, as if the damned after rising from death, shal be for ever under Earth or Water (both which are but one Globe like a Pins point compared to the Heavens) in a bottomless Pit: or that they shal be eternaly punishd in Gehenna the Vally of Hinnon: or shal liv in utter darknes not one to see another: or be scorched for ever with Fire and Brimstone: Ergo the meaning is Me­taphorical, and must be disquired by the nature of the Torments and Tormenters.

The Tormenters are termed Satan or Enimy, Diabolus or Tormenters. Accuser, and Abaddon or Destroier: which significant titles set not forth any individual Persons like proper Names; but only an office or faculty, and are very Appellativs: which should not be left untranslated (as they are) becaus therby they seem to be proper names of Demons; and Men sooner seduced to beleev the Doctrin of Devils then Pagan Religion contrary to Christs. So becaus the Enimy in Gods Kingdom of the Jews, is meant by Enimy, Accuser, and Destroier; if Gods Kingdom after the Resurrection shal be on Earth, the Enimy and his Kingdom must be ther also; as it was when the Israelits deposed God and chose Saul: sith Gods King­dom was in Palestin, and the Nations round about Enimies: whence it appeers, that Satan signifies any Enimy of the Church.

Metaphoricaly it may: but is not Satan properly or literaly Quaere. Rev. 12. [...]. a foul Fiend Enimy to Mankind, as the great red Dragon that [Page] old Serpent was, who deceived Eve and since the whol World? Are al the Dialogs between betwen God and Satan about Job conterfet Chimaeras? When the seventy rejoiced that the [...] 10. 17. 18 20. Devils were subject to them, Christ said, I saw Satan as light­ning fal from Heaven: but rejoyce not that the Spirits are Mat 12. 24. [...] Cor. 5. 5. subject to you. Here Christ cals Devils Spirits, and names Satan as one: yea Beelzebub is named Prince of Devils Ex­communication 1 Tim. 1. 20. is caled a delivery to Satan: is this meant only a Jailor or temporal Enimy.

Hel torments are somtime caled weeping and gnashing Torments. of teeth: somtime the worm of Conscience: of time fire wher Dan. 12. 2. the worm dieth not, which is never quenched: but by Daniel shame and contempt. Al which Metaphoricaly denote great grief or discontent of Mind, from sight of others felicity, which they lost by their own disobedience and incredulity: but be­caus others felicity is known only by comparing it with their own misery; it results that they shal suffer such bodily pains and calamities, as Men that liv under cruel Governors, having God the King of Saints their eternal Enimy. Yea beside al torments of Body and Mind, they shal likwise endure a secund Death. For tho the general Resurrection be evident, yet it 1 Cor. 15. 42 no eternal life promised to Reprobats: St. Paul to the questi­on with what Bodies Men shal rise saith, 'Tis sown in corruption, and raised in incorruption; sown in dishonor, raised in glory; sown in weaknes, raised in power: but Glory and Power, cannot comply to wicked Mens Bodies; nor the name of secund Death apply to such as can never dy but once. Howbeit tho a calamitous everlasting Life, may Metophoricaly be termed eternal Death: yet can it in no property of speech be stiled a secund Death.

Everlasting fire prepared for the Damned, is an estate wher­in Secund Death. none can liv after the Resurrection without torture of Body and Mind: in which sens it shal endure for ever un­quenchable, and the torments endlesss. Yet it folows not, that he so cast in shal so endure or resist it, as to be eternaly burnt and tortured; but never dy or be destroied. Yea tho many places prov everlasting fire and torments (into which Men may be cast successivly one after another for ever) yet none as­sert, [Page 238] that any individual Person shal perennaly abide or en­dure therin: but he shal hav an everlasting secund Death. For when Death and the Grav (Hel) hav delivered up the Rev. 20. 13, 14. dead in them, and every Man judged according to his works; Death and Hel shal be cast into the Lake of Fire: this is the se­cund Death. Hence 'tis cleer, that every Reprobat condemned at general Judgment, must suffer a secund Death, after which he shal dy no more.

But what is meant by Mind so oft iterated, if not Mans Quaere. Soul.

The jois of eternal Life, are comprised in Scripture under Eternal Life. the name of Salvation or being saved: which signifies to be secured, either respectivly against special evils, or absolutly from al, as want, sicknes, death. Now becaus Man was made immortal or immarcescible, and fel from it by sin; it results that to be saved from sin, is to be freed from al evil and af­flictions acquired by the same: Ergo Remission of sin and Sal­vation from death and misery is al one. As when Christ Mat. 9. 2, 5. cured a Paralytic Man saying, Friend be of good cheer or com­fort, thy sins be forgiven; the Scribes said within themselfs, he blasphems: but he asked, whether 'tis easier to say thy sins be forgiven, or arise and walk? Yet he used that form of speech to shew he had power to remit sins: which implies that 'tis al one to the saving of the sick to say thy sins are forgiven, or rise and walk. For sith death and misery are punishments of sin, the discharge of it relea [...]eth the other two; being absolut Sal­vation, such as the elect shal enjoy after the Judgment day, by Christ Jesus favor, who for that caus is caled our Saviour. Touching particular Salvations, from enimies or miseries, 'tis needless to treat: but becaus the general Salvation must be in the Kingdom of Heaven; ther is great debate or difficulty about the place.

Becaus Kingdom is an Estate ordained by Men for security Kingdom of Heaven. against enimies and want, it seems this Salvation (which sets forth our Kings glorious reign by conquest, not a safety by escape) shal be on Earth. For wher we expect Salvation, we must look for Triumph, Victory, and Battle in order: which cannot be supposed in Heaven, and wher els, we must serch [Page] the Scriptures. Isaiah largely describes it To be at Jerusalem Isai 33. 20. &c. a quiet habitation, a Tabernacle not to be taken down: The Sa­viour is Our Lord, Judg, Lawgiver, King: The condition of the saved is, The People that dwel therin shal be forgiven their ini­quities. By this 'tis cleer, that it shal be in Jerusalem, wher God shal reign at Christs next coming, and fil up the Salvation of Gentils, which shal be received into his Kingdom for ever. Isai 66 20 21. Isaiah more expresly declares it, That the Gentils (who had any Jews in bondage) shal bring them from al Nations on Horses, Charets, and Litters to Jerusalem the place of Gods John 4. 22. worship: As our Saviour told the Woman of Samaria, that Salvation is of the Jews, or begins at them. As if he should say, ye worship God, but know not by whom he wil sav you: we know it shal be by one of Juda and not a Samaritan. This Rom. 1. 16, 17. St. Paul explains, The G [...]sp [...]l is Gods power of Salvation to every one that beleeveth: to the Jew first, and also to the Greec. Joel 2. 30, 32. So Joel describing the Judgment day saith, God wil shew won­ders in Heaven and Earth, Blood, Fire, and Pillars of smoke: wherto he ads, In Mount Zion and Jerusalem shal be Salvation. Obad. v. 17. &c. So saith Obadiah, On Mount Zion shal be deliverance and ho­lines, Jacobs hous shal possess their possessions: which he parti­cularly points out by The Mount of Esau, Land of Philistins, fields of Ephraim, Samaria, Gilead, and Cities of the South: concluding thus: The Kingdom shal be the Lords. On the other side, no plain pregnant place provs the Saints Ascention into Heaven, sav that 'tis caled the Kingdom of Heaven: which was becaus he governed the Israelits by commands sent to Moses from and after sent his Son (as he wil again) thence: or els that his Throne is Heaven, and Earth his Foot­stool: but that his Subjects or Servants shal sit so high as his Throne, or abov his Footstool; sutes not with the glorious Majesty of so great a King.

Al thes Kickshews of arguing from similituds (which he Answer. derides in others) are soon satisfied: that his subjects shal not sit on his suprem Throne as Coequals or Coordinats; but only dwel (as Princes Servants doo in their Palaces) in his holy John 14. 2. Hous of Heaven. This saith Christ, hath many mansions, be­ing infinity it self: wheras not a tithing pa [...] of Mankind can [Page 239] possibly find place to stand on a new Earth or finit world. Three Worlds are specified in Scripture: 1. The old before Noahs flood, wherof St. Peter speaks: 2. The present, of 2 Pet. 2. 5. which Christ saith, My Kingdom is not of this World: 3. That to com: of it St. Peter saith, We according to his promiss look for new Heavens and Earth: which is that World wherin Christ coming in the Clouds with great, glory shal send his An­gels to gather the Elect from the four Winds or utmost parts of the Earth, to reign over them under his Father everlastingly. Thus he:

But wher is the World to com taken for a Real material Quaere. World, as the other two be?

'Tis not Cosmos or Mundus venturus; but Seculum, vita, vel Aevum futurum, the Time, Life, or Age to com. Nor is ther any warrant in al Gods word for thos last words, that Christ shal reign over the Saints ( [...]iz. on Earth) under his Father everlastingly: but that they shal reign with him 1000. yeers, as Chiliasts contest.

Touching Understanding, he saith 'tis only imagination Understand­ing. raised in Man or any Animal that can imagin, by words or signs: which is common to Man and Beasts. As a Dog by use understands his Masters cal or check; with sundry strange tricks by [...] calture: so doo divers other kinds: yea som [...] to speak: but understanding peculiar to Man, is not only to know one anothers wil; but his thoughts or conceptions, by the consequents of things Names into affir­mations, [...]e [...]ations, and other forms of speech: of which he wil treat elswher.

For Witchcraft, he holds it to be no real power: yet are Witchcraft. Witches justly punished with death, for their fals beleef that they can doo such mischief, and a wil or purpose to act it: their Trade being neerer to a new Religion then a Craft or Science. Such as are content to be poor, may easily resolv to Censure. be honest: so thos that hold Hel to be no real place, and De­vils meer Metaphors, must of cours deny Witchcraft: yea many who pretend to be wise pious professors, are too incre­dulous of Witches; contrary to the faith of al Gods People Exod. 22 18. (both Jews and Christians) who wil not suffer a Witch to [Page] liv as God commanded. The best is, only privat persons deny it: but al public Princes and Christian Common-wealths make strict Laws against it. Saul destroied Wisards and such as had familiar Spirits: yet in distres, caused a Witch of En­dor to rais Samuel, as the spectre seemed) with whom he con­sulted. Serjeant Glyn (who at last Lent Assises in Cornwal, condemned eght Witches upon pregnant presumptions and personal confessions) can scientiously satisfy any Man, that ther be such impious confederats with Satan: els al Laws and Magistrats that question them for their fals imaginations, or intentions to work mischief (if they can doo none) were most unjust, and to execut them bloody.

De Regno purae Caliginis: Of pure Darknes Kingdom.

BEside al Soveraign powers Divine and Human precited, Eph. 6. 12. Mat. 12. 26. Mat. 9. 34. Eph. 2. 2. John 16. 11. the Scriptures specify rulers of this Worlds Darknes; even the Kingdom of Satan and Principality of Beelzebub over Devils or Phantasms in the Air: as Satan is stiled Prince of the power of the Air, and Prince of this World, becaus he rules in this Worlds darknes. So they under his dominion, in oppo­sition to the Faithful (caled Children of the Light) are properly Children of Darknes.

The Kingdom of Darknes is a confederacy of Deceivers, who Kingdom of Darknes. to get dominion over Men in this World, devise erroneous doctrins, to extinguish the Light both of Nature and Scrip­ture: p. 333. &c. therby to seduce silly Disciples, and so disprepare them for the Kingdom of God to com.

Fabula narratur, mutato nomine, de te: Let the name changed be The tale is told of thee.,

The darkest part of Satans Kingdom, is without Gods Church among such as beleev not in Christ: yet doth not the Church (like the Land of Goshen) enjoy al Light necessary to [Page 240] the work injoined by God: but as Men born blind hav no Idae [...] of any bodily Light; nor can any conceiv greater then he hath perceived somtimes by his own senses: so is it with the Light of the Gospel and understanding too, that none can imagin any greater degree therof then he hath attained. Ther be four causes of spiritual Darknes:

1. By abusing or abolishing the Scriptures Light, for weer 1 Caus. not knowing the Scripture: the chief is (wherto almost al the rest are consequent or subservient) wresting it to prov Gods Kingdom so oft cited, to be the Church or multitud of Christians now living, or that shal rise at last day: but the Kingdom of God was first erected by Moses ministry over the Israelits (so saith he, but none els) cald his peculiar Peo­ple: which after ceased when they refused to be longer go­verned by God, and chose Saul. Since which time God had no proper Kingdom by pact or covenant; but only as he ever was, is, and shal be, universal King of al Creatures; ruling according to his absolut Wil and infinit Power. Nor are any now under any King or Kingdom by pact (sav our secular Soveraigns) til Christ shal com again to reign eternaly on Earth. Succe­daneal to this said error is, that Christ (now in Heaven) hath som one Man or Assembly, by whos mouth he speaks, givs Laws, and which represents his Person. This regal power un­der him the Pope claims generaly over al the Church: but in particular stats the Pastors or Presbyteries of thos places: which begets such darknes in Mens understandings. Hence re­sults another error, that a Christian Kingdom had need to receiv his Crown by a Bishop: as if the claus of Dei gratia depended on that Ceremony. So al Ecclesiastics assume the title of Clergy, caling al others Laity or People simply. Hence also arose the distinction betwen Emperors Civil Laws, and Popes Canons: which last were but bare Canons or Rules vo­luntarily received by Princes, til Charlemaign becam Empe­ror: but afterward as the Popes power increased, becam com­mands or Laws, and Emperors allowed them. For the Pope pretending al Christians to be his Subjects, makes it capital for any not to be of Roman Religion: but tolerats Jews, Mahometans, and Pagans to enjoy their own Rites, if they [Page] offer no scandal. A secund abuse of Scripture is turning con­secration into conjuration or inchantment: for to consecrat is to offer, giv, or dedicat decently and devoutly any thing to God; by separating it from common use or prophane, to be holy and peculiar for Gods service by his Ministers hands: but when Papists pretend to change the nature or quality of a thing (as in the Lords Supper to make Bread and Wine by saying this is my Body, this is my Blood, to be Christs very Body and Blood) it must either be Gods extraordinary work (which 'tis not being doon daily and frequently) or a vain impious conjuration: wherby they would hav Men beleev a change of Natures contrary to the testimony of their sight and other senses.

If the Aegyptian Sorcerers (who turnd their Rods to Ser­pents, and Waters to Blood, or at least to seem so) had made no change in shew, but only outfaced the King, that they were Serpents which looked like Rods: would not al Men tax them for Liers? Thus Priests tel the People, that they hav turned Bread into a Man, nay a God; requiring Men to wor­ship it, which is gross Idolatry. The words (this is my Body, or represents my Body) can extend soly to the Bread which Christ consecrated with his own hands: for he said not, the Bread wherof any Priest shal say (this is my Body) shal be instantly transubstantiated into it: nor was this doctrin harched in the Church of Rome, til under Innocent the third not 500. yeers ago: when the Popes power was at highest, and Peoples darknes heaviest; that Men could not see the Bread they eat, specialy being stamped with Christs figure on the Cross, as if the very wood was transubstantiated, which they ate together with the Body. So at Baptism they use many Charms in name of the holy Trinity, with the sign of the Cross at naming ech Person: as in consecrating holy Water the Priest saith, I con­jure thee Creature of Water in the name of God the Father Almighty, and Jesus Christ his only Son our Lord, and by vir­tu of the holy Ghost; that thou becom conjured Water to driv away al the Enimies powers &c. The like is doon in Be­nediction of Salt and Hony mixd therwith: but the chief charms are reserved for the Children to be Baptised, as ap­peers [Page 241] in their Ceremonies. The like are used in Mariage, Vi­sitation of the Sick, extrem Unction, consecrations of Churches and Church-yards to expel Phantasms, Faieries, and imaginary Spirits: al which belong to the Kingdom of Dark­nes, being effects of our natural ignorance. Another error is from misinterpreting the words eternal Life, everlasting Death, and secund Death: of which three in order.

Adam had an estate to liv for ever, not by nature in himself Eternal Life. or any part of his; but by eating the Tree of Life, which he had leav to doo, so long as he obeied God: but was thrust out of Paradise so soon as he sinned; lest he should feed theron and liv for ever. Now Christs death is a discharge of sin and restitution of Life eternal to al the faithful who beleev in him, and to them only. Yet the general doctrin of Divines is, that every Man hath eternal life by nature of his immortal Soul: so that the flaming Sword at entrance of Paradise, may hinder him from tasting the Tree of Life; but not from immortality which God bereaved. Nor shal he need Christs sacrifice for recovery of the same: sith not only the faithful or righteous, but the wicked and Heathen shal enjoy eternal Life without Death, much less a secund everlasting death. To salv or shadow this, they say by secund everlasting Death, is meant a secund everlasting Life (but Torments) which is a figure never used sav in this very case.

Is not secund Death an eternal being both of Body and Quaere. Soul in Hel-fire under Satan?

This tenet of the Souls immortality, is founded on som obscure places of the new Testament, which yet in a different sens (of his own mint) are cleer enough, and unnecessary to Christian Faith. For suppose when a Man dies nothing re­mains but his Carcas; cannot God who made clay a living Creature by his word, rais it again by another word? Yes, but not to the same life, which vanished to nothing: wheras the Soul being immortal persists identical. Soul in Scripture stil signifies either Life or a Living Creature, and Body jointly with Soul a Body alife. As God saith, Let the Waters produce Rep­tile animae viventis, the creeping thing with a living Soul; we translat that hath life: Again, God created Whales & omnem [Page] animam viventem; in English every living Creature: but of Man, God made him of dust, and breathed in his face the spiracle or breath of life; & factus est Homo in animam viventem, and Gen. 8. 21. Man was made a living Creature. So God said when Noah cam out of the Arc, I wil no more smite omnem animam vi­ventem, Deut 12. 23. every living Creature. Eat not the Blood, for 'tis the Soul or Life: But if Soul signified a substance immortal exi­sting after separation from the Body; it may be said of any other Animal so wel as Man.

Is it said of any other, that God having made the Body of Quaere. Earth, breathed into his face spiraculum Vitae the Spirit of Life? Which al interpreters expound of creating and infusing the Soul together. He goes on: the Souls or Lifes of the Faithful (which being accidents that annihilated when the Bodies died, must be new made) are by Gods special Grace (not of their own Nature) to remain in their raised Bodies for ever after Judgment. Wher 'tis said in the new Testament that any shal be cast Body and Soul (as if they were distinct Quaere. parts) into Hel-fire; it imports Body and Life (how can Life be cast being a bare accident?) That they shal be cast alife into Rev. 19 v. 20. Gehenna. So 'tis said The Beast and fals Prophet were both cast alife into a Lake of fire burning with Brimstone.

This dark doctrin of the Souls subsistence after separation, opens a sluce to let in the superstitious superstructures of Purga­tory and Indulgences; Ghosts or Goblins and Exorcisms; invocating of Saints (yea Heaven and Hel too) with som o­thers. For Men before Christs coming, being taught from the Greecs Demonology, that Mens Souls were distinct sub­stances, which after separation must subsist somwher by their own Nature: the Doctors of the Church long doubted wher they resided til the general Resurrection, supposing they lay under the Altars: but finding that Martyrs Souls of them slain for Gods word (if they hav Souls, why not others?) Quae c. Lay under the Altar; the Church of Rome for their profit Rev. 6 9. erected Purgatory. Surely they doo al for profit to maintain their pomp, pride, power, and prodigality.

Beza to prov Gods Kingdom began at Christs Resurrection Mat. 16. 28. and continues stil; urgeth his words: Verily I say to you, som [Page 242] of them which stand here shal not tast of death, til they hav seen Mat. 16. 28. Marc 9. 1. Luk. 9. 37. Gods Kingdom com with power: Ergo either Gods Kingdom cam shortly after, and is now in this World; or els som then standing by Christ are yet alife.

Sol. This is a darke difficil place, which provs nothing ne­cessarily: but if Gods Kingdom began at Christs Resurrecti­on, why doo we stil pray thy Kingdom com? Therfore 'tis not meant therof. Yea after his Resurrection, the Apostles asked, Wilt thou now restore the Kingdom of Israel? He an­swered, 'Tis not for you to know the time or season, which the Father hath put in his own power: but ye shal receiv power by the holy Ghosts coming on you, and shal be my Witnesses in Jeru­salem, in al Judea, and utmost part of the Earth. So he told them his Kingdom was not com, nor shal they foreknow when 'tis to com. Christ said to Peter of John, If I wil that he tarry Jo [...]n [...]1, v. 22. til I com, what is that to thee? Which bred a beleef that he should not dy: yet the truth of it was neither confirmed nor confuted by thos words; but left as a dark saying, and so must this. Howbeit sith Christs transfiguration is the next Act handled by al three Evangelists; haply he cals that Gods Kingdom, which som ther should see, being a representation or vision of his glory and Majesty as he shal com in his King­dom: which cannot be proved to begin til the day of Judg­ment.

Wher is it proved, that any terren Kingdom shal com­mence Quae [...]e. then?

Then shal the Faithful rise with glorious spiritual Bodies inlifened, and becom Christs Subjects in his Kingdom: wher they shal not eat, drink, marry as they did in their natural Bodies; but liv happily in their individual Persons for ever. The elect then alife shal be suddenly changed, and their Bodies made spiritualy immortal: but Reprobats shal rise to receiv punishment: yet not eternaly in their individual Persons, nor can any place prov it. As after the Resurrection the Elect shal be restored to Adams estate before he fel: so Reprobats shal be in the same condition that Adam and his Posterity were since his fal: sav that God graciously promised a Redeemer to such as should repent and beleev; but not to thos that dy [Page] in their sins impenitent, as Reprobats doo, so they may liv as they did before with gross corruptible Bodies (as al Men now hav) and haply beget Children continualy, which no 1 Cor. 15. Scripture gainsais. St. Paul treats only of the Resurrection Luk. 20 34. &c. to life eternal; not a word of that to pnuishment: nor Christ, who saith the Children of this World (which liv in the estate Adam left them) shal marry, and generat successivly (by an immortality of Kind, not of Persons) who are not worthy to be counted among thos that shal rise and obtain the World to com (that is life to com, not a terren World) which alone are Heirs of eternal life, equal to Angels and Children of God. So a secund eternal death remains to Reprobats; when after the Resurrection shal com a time of torment or punish­ment: which by succession of sinners, shal last so long as the kind of Man by propagation shal endure, that is eternaly: but not so every single Person; nor shal the Tormenters be F [...]ends or evil Angels. Touching the Souls natural immortality, that 'tis a spiritual substance subsisting by it self after separation; he answers som objections.

Ob. Salomon saith, Dust shal return to Dust as it was and Eccles. 12. 7. the Spirit to God that gav it: Ergo God created the Soul distinct Spirit.

Sol. He shews how Mans Body made of dust must return to dust: but God only knows what becoms of his Spirit, Chap. 3. 20. Breath, or Life. He hath a sentence of semblable sens: Al (Man and Beast) go to one place: al are of dust, and turn to dust. Who knows (except the Omniscient) that Mans Spirit goes Ibid. v. 19. upward, and a Beasts downward? Sith 'tis said, That which befals the Sons of Men, betides Beasts: as one dies, so doth the other: yea they hav al one breath (before spirit) so that a Man hath no preeminence abov a Beast, for al is vanity. He praiseth Ch [...]p. 4 2, 3. the dead beyond the living, and ads: Better is he which hath not yet bin, nor seen the evil work doon under the Sun then both the dead and living which cannot hold current, if Mans Soul be immor­tal, that no Soul were better then it, only for a little oppressi­on in this life. Lastly he saith, The living know they shal dy, but the Dead know nothing (naturaly, before the Body shal rise) nor hav any more a reward, for their memory is forgot. Al [Page 243] which places prostern the Souls immortality, and by Spirit is meant Breath or Life, as often foresaid.

Ob. Christ saith, Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob are living: Ergo their Souls separat subsist stil; for their bodies lay buried many ages before.

Sol. This purports Gods promiss and certitud of their Re­surrection; not any actual life: as God said to Adam, on the day he should eat the forbidden fruit, he shal certainly dy: so from that day he was a dead Man by Sentence; but not by actual execution til 930. yeers after.

Ob. The wicked shal rise to Judgment, and go into ever­lasting fire, torment, or punishment; wher the worm of Con­science never dieth: which is caled a secund everlasting Death, and general everlasting Life in torments far wors then Death, as appeers in the new Testament: Ergo &c.

Sol. Al this is tru: yet it no wher appeers, that the Damned shal liv in torments everlastingly: for God the Father of Mercies and fountain of Goodnes, who doth al what he wil and holds al Mens hearts at his disposing, working them to wil and doo; without whos free gift no Man hath any incli­nation to good, or repentance of evil: wil not punish Mens transgressions committed by inevitable ignorance, natural frailty, or wilful obstinacy sans end of time, or with extremi­ty of torture, more then Men can conceiv or imagin. Then he proceds to answer Bellarmins places or proofs in both Te­staments touching Purgatory: which he that lists may read p. 346. &c.

The next Caus of spiritual Darknes is heathen Demonology 2 Caus. or doctrin of Devils, as St. Paul cals it: which their Poets as principal Priests diffused, divulged, or dissipated over the World: witnes Hesiods goodly Genealogy of Gods. For they caled al Spirits (good and bad) Demons: but the Jews gav the name Demon only to evil Spirits; stiling the good (which Prophets or others inspired had) the Spirit of God. So they caled Lunatics, Maniacs, Lycanthrops, Epileptics, Hy­sterics, or the like direct Demoniacs possest with evil Spirits. They said unclean Persons had an unclean spirit, dumb Men a dumb Devil: aspersing John Baptist and our Saviour himself [Page] to hav Devils: but Devils specified in Scripture are meer Diseases.

If any ask, why Christ did not cross, comptrole, or teach Quest. the contrary; but confirms it by bidding D [...]vils go out of Men; which is improper to speak unto any Diseas that can­not hear?

He answers, that Christs command to any Diseas, is no more Answ. improper then to rebuke the Fever, Wind, or Sea which o­beied him, yet can hear no more then the rest. Nor are such speeches improper, becaus they import or impart the power of Gods word, to command such contumacious Diseases un­der the appellation of Devils (as they were then generaly deemed) to depart out of M [...]ns Bodies. So Devils, Spectres, or evil Spirits which they dreamed of; are meer Phantasms or Inhabitants of their own Brains: nor are any Ghosts of the Dead or ever were extant in the Air, Heaven, Hel, or any real place as som surmise. Al this must be taken upon his bare Phythagorean Ipse dixit.

Was that legion of Devils, who besought Christ to enter [...] into the Gergesens Swine, and caried a whol Herd headlong into Sea, only a Diseas? Can Metaphors discurs or doo such mischeef? When Christ cast out a dumb Spirit, the traducing Pharisees denied not the dispossessing or matter of fact: but said he did it by Beelzebub Prince of Devils: can Christians then deny it?

Christ (saith St. Matthew) was led by or of the Spirit into Ma [...] 4. 1. Ma [...] 1. 12. Luk 4. 1. the Wildernes: which Spirti drov him into the Desart, saith St. Marc: but Luke that he being ful of the holy Ghost (which descended on him as a Dov newly before at Baptism) was led of the Spirit into the Wildernes, al which imply the holy Ghost: nor can this be a possession of one substance by ano­ther, sith Christ and the holy Ghost are one self same sub­stance. 'Tis said after, the Devil took him up into the holy City, and set him on a Pinnacle: but anon after caried him on a very high Mountain, to shew him al the Worlds King­doms: but certes the Devil did not transport him by force, nor is any Mountain so high to shew him one Hemisphere of the World▪ The meaning then must be, that Christ went [Page 244] into the Wildernes freely, and the carying to or fro was a very Vision: as St. Lukes words (in the Spirit) apertly indicat or demonstrat.

Ob. Satan entred into Judas Iscariot, who communed with Luk 22 3. 4. the chief Priests and Captains how to betray Christ: Ergo Satan is a Spirit.

Sol. Satan signifies Enimy; who is said to enter into Judas, when he intertained a tra [...]terous hostil intention to sel his Lord and Master: for Satan cannot be said to enter before he harbor­ed any such hostil design; and 'tis impertinent to say he entred in afterward: therfore his wicked plot or purpose, and Satans entring was one and the same thing: but Incorporeal real Spi­rits be none.

Why then did not Christ and his Apostles instruct silly Quest. People so plainly, that they might no more doubt the truth therof?

Becaus such questions are more curious then salutiferous: Answ. and it may so wel be asked, why he gav faith, piety, and obe­dience to som only, but not to al, which he could so easily doo? Hereto reason may be rendred, that as God when he brought the Israelits into Canaan, did not instantly destroy al Neighbor Nations; but left som as thorns in th [...]ir sides to awaken their industry and piety: so Christ in conducting us toward his Heavenly Kingdom, did not destroy al difficulties of natural questions; but left them to whet our industry, in­tellect, and Judgment: his chief scope being to sh [...]w this one Article, that he is Christ Son of the living God, sent to sacrifice himself for sins, and at next coming to reign gloriously over the Elect, and to sav them from their Enimies eternaly.

Ther be Angels or Spirits (good and evil) but not incor­poreal, Confession. such as Men suppose they see in the dark, or a dream, or vision, which the Latins cal Spectra and took for Demons, Yea ther be corporeal Spirits (subtle and invisible) yet not that they possessed any Mans Body: and Saints Bodies shal be such viz. spiritual as St. Paul cals them. Howbeit the doctrin of incorporeal Spirits prevailed in the Church and Introduced Exorcism, which is not fully extruded. Then were many De­moniacs, but few mad Men: now many mad Men, but few [Page] Demoniacs: which proceds not from any change in Nature, but only of Names.

It may be asked whether the bad Spirits (be they comparatly [...] coporeal, or incoporeal) shal realy torment the damned with fire for ever, or what els they doo?

Another Relique of Gentilism (not brought in, but left Images. when they gav their names to Christ) is Image-worship: not instituted by Moses or Christ, being meer Ideas, Idols, Phan­tasms, Conceipts, or Representations of extern Bodies extant in their Brains from the Organ of Senses; though they seem realy without us, being like things in a dream; which intruth are nothing, as St. Paul tels. For tho their metal or mattet (Gold, Silver, Copper, Stone, Wood) be somwhat; yet the very Figure or Sculpture which they honored or adored, was a meer figment, having no habitation existent of it self; but only in the motions of Mens brains: the worship of which is in Scripture flat Idolatry or Apostasy from God; who was the Jews sole King, and Moses his first Lieftenant. His prime Law was, that they should hav no other Gods but or beside him­self. The next, that they should make no carved Image of their own invention to worship it. For 'tis al one in deposing a King and setting up another, whether he be set up by a Neigh­bor Nation or the Subjects. To honor is highly to valu any Persons power by comparing him with others: but none can compare with God: therfore we dishonor him by any valu less then infinit. Honor properly is internal in the heart: but Mens thoughts which appeer outwardly in words and actions (by praying, genuflexion, obeying, serving) are signs of ho­noring, commonly caled worsh [...]p, latinly Cultus.

Worship is duple: 1. Civil du to Men, as to Kings by Sub­jects, Worship. to Masters by Servants, Fathers by Sons, Pedagogs by Scholars, Captains by Souldiers &c. 2. Divine, which we render to God soly, or things consecrat to his service. To seek a distinction of Divine and Civil worship in the words ( Latria & Doulia) and not in the worshipers intention, is very fallacy or foppery. For ther were two sorts of Servants: 1. Such as their Masters had absolut power to kil upon dis­content or disobedience; as Slavs with their issu: who were [Page 245] caled Douloi and their service Doulia, being sold like Beasts. 2. Thos that served spontaneously for hire or hope: termed Thetes Domestic Servants upon mutual Covenants. Both kinds hav their labor appointed by others, and such stiled Latres as work for others. So latria signifies al service in general, but doulia only of Bondmen: both are used promiscuously in Scripture to signify Gods service, sith we al are his Sons, Ser­vants, and Slaves: in al which sorts is contained not only O­bedience, but worship with fit words and gestures.

An Image is the representation of somthing visible, finit, Image what. and figured; which is a quantity every way determiend: so ther can be no proper Image of God, Angels, Spirits, or Souls, sith they hav no definit dimensions; but only of visible bodies in fantastic forms, shapes, or seemings. The species or shew of things in water by reflexion or refraction, or of the Sun and Stars in the Air (which are not wher they seem to be, nor [...] or figures the same with that of the Objects) [...] termed Ideas, Idols, Phantasms, or Apparitions: whence one inward Sens is stiled Imagination: for a man can Fiction what. fancy shap [...] he never saw, like Dreamers, as Poets fain Cen­taurs, Chimera's and other Monsters, so can he frame them in mat [...]er of wood, clay, stone, metal, stiled Images; not to re­semble any real thing, but only som phantastic Inhabiters of the devisers brain; sith ther is a similitud of one to the other, as 'tis painted, carved, melted or moulded in matter by Art; like the Image of that Idol conceived in nature. Image in an ampler acception implies any resemblance of one thing by ano­ther, as a King is caled Gods Image, and an inferior Magi­strat a superiors; yea Pagans adored such for Gods as had no semblance of the Idol in their phansy; as an unhewn stone for Neptune, and Images of the same Saint diametraly differ, yet serv their turn wel enough, as names doo in History to present the Persons described. Idol is extended farther in Scripture Idol what. to signify Fire, Sun, Star, or any other Creature (visible or in­visible) worshiped as God; but to put worship and Image together divers doctrins wil occur. To worship an Image, is Idolatry. voluntarily to doo such extern acts as are signs of honoring ei­ther the matter (wood, Stone, metal) or phantasm of the [Page] brain, for which it was formed or figured, or both together as one animat compound of both Body and Soul. To be bare before a Prince or man of Place, or regal Throne or chair of State, is civil worship only; but if one shal suppose the Prin­ces Soul in the Stool, and present a Petition to it, 'tis divine worship or Idolatry; so to pray to him for what he can doo (tho on our knees) is civil worship; but to pray to him for fair weather or what els is in Gods power only, 'tis flat Idola­try. To worship God in a peculiar place, or turn ones face toward it in Prayer, or toward an Image, is not to adore the place or Image, but to acknowledg it holy or set apart from common use, by a new relativ appropriation to Gods service: yet no more Idolatry then for the Israelits to worship God before the brasen Serpent, or in time of captivity to pray to­ward the Temple, or for Moses to put off his shoos before the firy Bush as being holy ground, not by inherent sanctity, but by separation to Gods use; as Christians on the same score serv God in consecrat Churches: yet to serv God as if he anima­ted an Image or inhabited the place of confinement, is Idolatry, Moses set up the brasen Serpent by Gods appointment or com­mandment, Ergo no Idolatry; but Aaron made the golden Calf by the Peoples importunity, which was Idolatry; the Gentiles adored Jupiter and other great men (who haply had doon much good) as Gods, which was gross Idolatry, but Christians worship our Saviour as God and Man in one Person by special warrant of Gods word shewing his reveled wil, which cannot be Idolatry: so for adoration of the Eucharist, if Christs words ( This is my Body) signify, that he self and see­ming Bread in his hand, with al seeming morsels since conse­crated (or shal be hereafter) by Priests, be so many Christs bo­dies, yet al but one Body; then 'tis no Idolatry: but if they doo not import or imply so much, 'tis a worship of humane in­stitution and flat Idolatry: Nor is it enough to say God can transubstantiat Bread into a Body; for so Pagans may plead or pretend a transubstantiation of their wood, stone, metals into God omnipotent.

Such as make divine inspiration a supernatural entring of the holy Ghost into a man, and not acquisition of Gods graces by [Page 246] study or industry; are in a dangerous Dilemma: for if they worship not thos Men whom they beleev so inspired, they fal to impiety in not adoring Gods personal presence: but if they worship him, they commit Idolatry; sith the inspired Apo­stles refused al worship: therfore 'tis safest to beleev, that when Christ breathed on them the holy Ghost, or it descended on them in firy cloven toungs, or was given by imposition of hands; are understood the signs which Godused, or ordeined o­thers to use of his promiss to assist thos Persons on whom they were conferred, in their studies or indevors to preach his Kingdom; and in their conversation, that it might not be scandalous to any, but edifying to al.

To melt, mould, carv, grav, or paint Images in memory of Friends dead or living, is no Idolatry; but fancy or folly: but to beleev such things as hav no Eys nor Ears, doo see his actions, or hear his orisons; and he kneels before it or prais to it, 'tis Idolatry: nor is Romish worship of Saints, Images, or Reliques less. For the Gentils at first conversion left it in Origin of Iconolatry. the Church, which Popes since countenanced and confirmed. The caus was the high prices set upon their workmanship, which the owners loth to lose, gav them new names of Christ, the Virgin Mary, Peter, Paul, or others: which stil grew more and more by imitation. Yet after Constantins time, di­vers pious prudent Emperos, Prelats and general Councils disliked, detested, or deposed them; but too late or weakly. Canonizing of Saints is another Relique of Gentilism, taken from Romes Common-wealth, who upon Oath of Julius Pro­culus, that Romulus after his death or discerption told him how he dwelt in Heaven, and was caled Quirinus; made him a Demigod, as they did long after Julius Caesar with many mo Emperors. So the Popes received their Title, Pomp, and Power of Pontifex Maximus from the Heathen; as also cary­ing of Images in Procession: who caried their Idols in a Cha­ret cald Thensa or Vehiculum Deorum, placing them on a shrine or frame caled Ferculum; as the Senat decreed both to Caesar. In semblable sort they borowed their burning of Torches and Waxcandles before Images and in Churches from Ethnic supersttion: Holy water is derived from their Aqua [Page] Lustralis: the Wakes or Revels from their Bacchanalia: the Carnivals from their Saturnalia: the Procession in Rogation week, from their Ambervalia: and som other scandalous Rites from their Religious Reliques.

A third Caus of spiritual darknes is the Greecs vain Philo­sophy, 3 Caus. specialy Aristotles: but leisure is Mother of Philosophy, and Common-wealth of peace or leisure. For the study of Philosophy began in great florishing Cities or Stats: as the Gymnosophists of India, Magi of Persia, Priests of Egypt and Chaldea the first Kingdoms; are held the most antient Philo­sophers: but when seven Men in Greece had got the reput of wisemen (som for venting Moral and Politic precepts; som for studying the learning of Chaldeans and Egyptians) the Atheniens having quelled the Persian Armies, and becam Masters at Sea; erected Schools of Arts and liberal literature to train up their Youth. Plato betook to teach in certain pub­lic walks cald Academia of one Academus: Aristotle to a walk caled Lycaeum in Pans Temple: Zeno to the Stoa wher Merchants goods were landed, and others elswhere. Hence the place was stiled Schola leisure, and the disputations Dia­tribae passing of time. This custom prevailed over al Europ, Afric, and Asia: wher public Schools were erected in most Republics. Such were the Jews Synagogs, wher Moses Law was taught every Sabbath: but they corrupted the Text with fals glosses and fond Traditions, turning their Lawish doctrin into phantastic Philosophy; of Gods incomprehensible na­ture and of Spirits: which they drew from the Greecs Theo­logy, mixd with their own fancies and fabulous devises of their Ancestors, by wresting obscure places to their pur­pos.

A University is a cojoining or incorporating of sundry pub­lic University. Schools under one Government, wher the Principal are de­signed to three Professions (Divinity, Phisick, Civil-Law) but Arts only a subservient handmaid, wherin Aristotles autho­rity soly is current: so that study is not Philosophy properly, but Aristotelity: yet nothing can be said more absurdly then what is vented in his Metaphysics, nor more repugning reason of Government then what is extant in his Politics; nor more [Page 247] ignorantly indited then much or most part of his Ethics.

Is it not said of Erasmus that general Scholar and great Quaere. Critic, Quantum gloriae detraxit ab aliis, tantum ad se accessisse putavit.

To examin his Metaphysics (which he means Books writen Metaphysics. after his Physics, but others discurses of supernatural Philoso­phy, 'tis a certain Philosophia prima, on which al other ought to depend: consisting chiefly in right limiting the fignificati­ons of most universal names or appellations to avoid am­biguity or equivocation in reasoning. Such are caled De­finitions (as of Body, Time, Place, Matter, Form, Essence, Subject, Substance, Accident, Act, Power, Fi­nit, Infinit, Quantity, Quality, Motion, Action, Passion, &c.) necessary to explane a mans conceptions concerning the Na­ture and Generation of Bodies; which Theory is termed Me­taphysics. Thes mixd with Scripture to make School Divinity, teach that ther be certain Essences abstract or separat from Bo­dies caled substantial Forms: for interpreting which Jargon, take these solid grounds.

1. The univers or Mass of al created things, is corporal or an aggregat Body; having the Dimensions (length, bredth, depth) of ma [...]nitud: so is every part of it a Body with like dimensions: but what is not Body, is no part of it, and con­sequently Nothing or No wher, becaus the univers is al in al. Yet it follows not that Spirits are Nothing or No wher, sith they hav dimensions, though commonly caled incorporeal.

2. Of Words, som are the names of things conceived, as of al Bodies in the World; som names of Ideas, Images, and I­maginations of things, which we see or remember; as Defini­tion, Affirmation, Negation Syllogism, Interrogation, Pro­miss, Covenant, and other forms of Speech: som names of names or several sorts of speech, as Universal, Plural, Singu­lar: som to shew the dependance or repugnance of one name to another; as when 'tis said a Man is a Body, being but several names of the same thing Man, by coupling them together with the word, is, in Latin, est, which signify their consequence, and may be expresd by placing two names in order without est or is, if it were the custom.

But what then wil becom of thos terms (Entity, Essence, Essential) derived from it, with many mo depending on them, as commonly applied: so they are no names of things, but signs which notify how we conceiv the consequence of one Name or Attribut to another; as when we say a Man is a li­ving Body, we mean not that the Man is one thing, a living Body another, and Is or Being a third: but that Man and li­ving Body is one thing, becaus the consequence is tru being sig­nified by the word Is: so to be a Body, walk, speak, see, and lik Infinitivs which signify just the same, are the names of just Nothing.

3. This doctrin of separated Essences built on Aristotles vain Philosophy, frights men with empty names (as Birds are scared from Corn with a bare doublet, hat, and crooked stick) from obeying the Laws of their Country, for hence 'tis infer­red that a Mans Soul or L [...]f can walk after death, and is seen a­mong Graves: that the figure, color and tast of bread hath being ther wher they say is no Bread, but Christs Body: that Faith, Wisdom and other spiritual Virtues are somtime pou­red into a Man, somtime blown from Heaven; which beleefs lessen Subjects dependance on Soveraign power: for who wil obey his Country Laws, if he expects obedience to be blown into him? or who wil not obey a P [...]irst that can make God, rather then his Soveraign or God? or who that fears Ghosts, wil not honor such as can make holy water to chase them away? This Error of separated Essences draws on divers other absurdi­ties: for if thos forms be real, they must hav som place; but becaus they hold them incorporeal (they doo not, but only in­visible) sans dimension, and Place must be filled with corpo­rals; they are driven to devise a ridiculous distinction, that they are in place Definitive, non circumscriptive, when circum­scription is the defining or determining of a thing to its place, and so both terms of their distinction are the same. Touching Mans Essence (Soul) they say 'tis al in the whol, and al in every part: who wil swalow such gudgeons or beleev thes gulleries? Yet they must who beleev the real existence of a Soul or Spirit separat from the Body. If it be asked, how a Soul can be tormented with fire being incorporeal? They only [Page 248] say it cannot be known how fire can burn Souls. Sith mo­tion is change of place proper only to Bodies; they are trou­bled to resolv, how a Soul can go hence to Heaven, Hel, or Purgatory without a Body? Or Mens Ghosts (with Cloths) can walk by night? Haply 'tis definitive, non circum­scriptive; or spiritualy, not corporaly and temporaly.

Are not inanimats compounds consisting of two consti­ [...]ntiv Quaere. parts (matter and form) which last distinguisheth one kind from another, as a Stone from Iron? And are not ani­mats so differenced by their several specifical Souls, as a Man, Mous, Marygold? If it be said they differ in external shape of Body, which is sufficient: how doo we differ from Mair­men (in shape not at al) sav only in rational Souls which they hav not, nor any use of Reason more then brute Beasts? Much more may be alledged.

4. For eternity, they wil not hav it an endless succession of time; for then they can render no reason, how Gods Wil or Decrees to com, should not be before his Prescience of the same, as an efficient caus before the effect; or Agent before the action: but a standing stil of the present, caled in Schools Nunc stans: which they nor any els understand, more then they can Hic stans for an infinit immensity of place or the like. Wheras we hold a Body having many parts, to hav many places for them: they teach that by Gods Almighty power one may be in many places, or many in one at once: as if it were a magnifying of Divine power to say, that which is, is not; or that which has bin, hath not bin. Such incongruities with many mo Men fal into, who disputing Philosophicaly of di­vine nature, in stead of admiring or adoring it; heap absur­dities one upon another.

Of Physics or natural Philosophy, they render no secundary Physics. subordinat causes of events, but empty words: if ye ask, why som Bodies sink down to Earth, and others ascend? They say from Aristotle 'tis through heavines: if ye ask what hea­vines is: they say an endevor tending to the Earths Center, or to be below: is not this like a Horsin a M [...], to say Bodies ascend or descend, becaus they doo? They say 'tis becaus the Center is a resting place for al heavy things wher they desire [Page] to be: as if stupid inanimats can discern the place they aim at, or desire rest like animals: or a peece of Glass were less safe in a window then faling to ground. If y [...] ask why the same Body (without adding or subtracting) seems somtime greater, somtime lesser? They say it only seems so being ratified or condensed: as if ther can be matter which hath not a deter­mined quantity, and one Body greater then another: or as tho a Body were made without any quantity, and more or less of it put in afterward to appeer more or less dens or thin.

For Mans Soul, they say 'tis created by pouring in, and poured in by creating: whats that? For the caus of Sens, they make an ubiquity of Species (or shews of objects) which ap­peering to the Ey make sight, to the Ear hearing to the Palat tast, to the Nostril smelling, and to the rest of the Body feel­ing. For the caus of willing to doo any act, they make the fa­culty or wil it self doo somtime one thing, somtime another; making the Power caus of the act, as if on should assign Mens ability to doo any things, the very [...]aus of good or evil acts. Yet oftimes they put their own ignorance to be caus of na­tural events or effects; but disguised in other words: as when they make Fortune a caus of contingents, wherof they know no caus: or when they ascribe effects to occult qualities not known to them, nor as they s [...]rmise to any els: or to Sym­pathy, Antiphaty, Antiperistasis, specifical properties: which neither signify the agent producing, nor operation produced, being only Clokes to cover ignorance.

Their Moral and Politic Philosophy, hath the like or greater Politics. absonances, for if any doo injury or injustice contrary to Law, they say God is prime Caus of the Action, but not of the in­justice or deviation; this is vain Philosophy as to say, that one makes a right and crooked line, but another the incongrui­ty or inconformity. This distinction was devised to defend the doctrin of Free wil not subject to Gods wil.

Why not to vindicat God from being Author of sin, not­withstanding Quaere. his absolut irrespectiv Decree to Reprobat men, who must needs sin: Aristotle defines Good and Evil by mens appetit, which may seem tru, sith every one is ruled by his own list or lore; but in a Common-wealth the measure is fals, [Page 249] wher not mens privat appetits, but public Law of the State is sole Rule: yet their doctrin soly practised, wher every one doth what seems good in his own eys. To make lawful mari­age unchast or impure (as they doo who deny it to the Clergy, under color of continual chast continence, to attend at the Al­tar, and administer the holy Eucharist) is vain Philosophy: wherby they make mariage a moral vice, and themselfs by ab­staining spiritual, like the Angels in Heaven. From Aristotles Civil Polity, they cal al Common-wealths sav the popular (such as then Athens was) Tyranny, and al Kings Tyrans: so they termed thirty Legislators set up by the Lacedemonians (who subdued Athens) thirty Tyrans, and Democraty liberty. yet Tyran truly taken signifies simply a Monarch; but when that Government grew odious in all Greece, it was branded with the Popular hatred of Tyranny; and when Kings were expeld from Rome, they did the like. So when the same men are displeased with Democraty or Aristocraty, they nickname the first Anarchy, the last Oligarchy or Tyranny of a few. Hence riseth another error of Aristotle; that Laws (not men) should govern: as if men wil be ruled by words or pa­per, and not by men which hav power by the Sword to punish or put them to death, giving life to the Laws: this is a pesti­lent pernitious error, wherby they seduce men so oft as they like not their Governors to rais war against them, which the Cler­gy cherisheth. Another error in Civil Philosophy (which they never learned of Pagans) is, to extend the Law (the Rule on­ly of actions) to mens very thoughts and Consciences, by exa­mination or inquisition of what they hold, tho they conform in Words and Actions. Herby they are forced to answer the truth of their thoughts, or an untruth for fear of punish­ment.

Another error (not drawn from Heathens) is, that a privat Man without the Cōmon-wealths authority, may interpret the Law by his own Spirit; but are not Scriptures wher they are a Law, made a Law by the Cōmonwealths authority, and conse­quently a part of the Civil Law? So they which impropriat Preaching to one certain Order of Men, wher the State leavs it free, commit the like error: for if the State forbids me not [Page] to Preach, none els can. If I be among Judians or Infidels, shal I being not in Orders, think it sin to Preach Christ Jesus, or expound Scriptures? In such cases of necessity (say they) wher is no Ministry, it may be doon without mission: as wherever a dispensation is du for necessity; ther needs none, when no Law forbids it. Ergo to deny thes functions to whom the civil Soveraign denies them not; is to take away lawful liberty.

The Schoolmens writings are mostly insignificant terms or trains of strange barbarous words, otherwise used then in common Latin language; which would pose Cicero, Varro, or any Grammarian of antient Rome. For let any try whether he can translat them into any modern Toung: which if he cannot, how can that be intelligible in Latin, which is not so in other languages? Howbeit this insignificance of speech is no fals Philosophy; but both a quality to hide the truth, and make Men think they hav it being skild in School-notions; and so desist from farther serch of it in others. He saith els­wher, what kind of felicity God ordains for them that de­voutly serv him, one shal no sooner know then enjoy: being Quaere. jois now so incomprehensible, as the School-mens words bea­tific Vision unintelligible: but doth not that signify to enjoy the perpetual presence of the divine Trinity, as Men delight in ech others company face to face? Which if Christ must reign on a new finit Earth with his Saints for ever, none ever shal doo. For beatific Vision is to see the blessed Trinity face 4 Caus. to face in his eternal mansion.

The last caus of spiritual Darknes, is to mix uncertain Tra­ditions and untru Histories (like the golden legion of fals fictious miracles in Saints lifes) of Ghosts, Goblins, and Ap­paritions alleged by Romish Doctors to varnish their Doctrins of Hel, Purgatory, Exo [...]cisms, and such like. Which tho som pious Fathers (Pope Gregory 1. St. Bernard &c.) broched; yet they were Men, and might take it on trust from others, as Beda also did: but if any speak it of their own knowledg; 'tis no confirmation of such vanity, but a detection of their fraud, fallacy, or frailty. The suppression of tru Philosophy by Men that hav no authority, nor sufficient study; may be [Page 250] joind with the introduction of fals [...]: for our late Navigators and al learned Men acknowledg Antipodes: as it appeers daily more, that yeers, and dais are determined by the Earths motions: yet such as only supposed it heretofore, were punishd by Ecclesiastic power. What reason had they? Is it becaus 'tis contrary to tru Religion? That cannot be if the opinions be tru [...] let the truth be first disquired by competent Judges, or refuted by such as pretend to know the contrary. Is it becaus they disturb Government, or Religion established? Let the Tea­chers be silenced or punished by civil Rulers who can cha­stise disobedience in thos that teach even tru Philosophy a­gainst Laws: but Ecclesiastics who are subject to any State, hav no proper right to govern; but al what they assum to doo, is meer usurpation, tho they gild it with the gloss of Gods right.

Tully tels, that one Cassius a Roman Judg, if the Witnesses could not make cleer a crime; would ask the accusers Cui bono, what profit the Prisoner expected by the fact? For no pre­sumption so evidently declares the guilt of an Author, as the gain which he shal get by the action. So in the foresaid cases it must be inquired, what gain, glory, or greatnes accrued to any by holding the same? 1. That the Church militant on Earth is Gods Kingdom of glory or Land of Promiss (not that of Grace, which is but a Promiss of the Land) thes benefits arise to the Clergy: that the Priests, Pastors, or Prelats ac­quire as Gods public Ministers or Teachers of the People, a right to govern the Church, and consequently the Common­wealth, both being the same Persons. Hence the Pope pre­vailed with al Christian Princes subjects to beleev; that to disobey him in spiritual causes, was to oppose Christ himself, whos Vicar he was as St. Peters successor: which in effect is to usurp an universal Monarchy over al Christendom. For tho the Christian Emperors at first constituted them suprem teach­ers in al their Dominions under them, by the title of Pontifex Maximus or cheif Prelat: yet when the Empire was divided and after dissolved; he easily induced People being his Sub­jects already, to adore him as Christs Viceroy in the Church as his Kingdom of Glory: so it may be presumed, that he [Page] having the best benefit by this universal Monarchy, was au­thor of that Theory. Afterward, when Princes, Stats, and Churches rejected the Popes universal power; the civil Sove­raigns should hav reserved their right before they let it go; as England in effect did: sav that the Clergy maintaining their function under them to be Gods right; seemed to usurp if not a Supremacy, yet an independence on civil power: yet seemed only, acknowledging a right in the King to suppress the exercise of their function at his pleasure. Indeed wher the Presbytery prevailed, tho they abandoned many Romish Do­ctrins; yet this that Christs Kingdom is already com, and be­gan at his Resurrection, is stil retained. Yea they claim po­wer to excommunicat Kings as ordinary Sheep of their Fold, and be sole Moderators in al matters of Religion wher they rule; as the Pope chalengeth it over al Christians. For to excommunicat a Soveraign, is to rep [...]l him from al places of public service, and resist him by the Sword, as they did in Scotland. So to excommunicat any privat Person without the Soveraigns leav, is to bereav his lawful liberty, and usurp un­lawful power over their Brethren.

To uphold this spiritual Soveraignty ( non minor est virtus, 1 Infallibility. quam quaerere, parta tueri) they use many Engins: 1. To perswade that the Pope in his Pontifical Chair or public capacity cannot er: so Presbyters would be beleeved in Pul­pits.

2. That Bishops hav not their right, immediatly from God, 2 Suo [...]ection of Bishops. nor mediatly from Soveraigns, but soly from the Pope; that they may side with him upon al occasions: wheras Presbyte­rians shuffle off Prelats to usurp their power.

3. That al Clergy-Men (Seculars and Regulars) are ex­empt 3 Exemptions of the Clergy. from power of Civil Laws: who wil be protected by the State, yet pay no part of public expens to prop their power, nor are liable to penalties: the Presbyterians wish it to themselfs.

4. That their Priests must be stiled Sacerdotes Sacrificers, 4 The Name Sacerdotes. which was the Israelits title both of their civil Magistrat while God was King, and public Ministers afterward; which with mak [...]ng the Lords Supper a Sacrifice, puts People in beleef, [Page 251] that the Pope hath the same power over al Christians which Moses and Aaron had over Israel, both Civil and Clerical: the Presbyters are intitled Elders, who were chief Assistants to the Apostles.

5. That Marriage is a Sacrament, which givs the Clergy 5 Mariage a Sacrament. authority to judg the lawfulnes of it, and consequently what Children are legitimat: Presbyterians pretend no proper right in this kind, sav only to hav the father at Baptism testify the child to be his own, which is of no great use.

6. That Priests may not marry, which assures the Popes 6 Priests Celi­bat. power over sundry Princes: for if a King be a Priest (as many Soveraigns are Prelats) he cannot marry, nor transfer his Re­gal right to Posterity, without the Popes special dispensation: Presbyters are no way guilty herin, who marry twise, thrise, or four times.

7. That auticular Confession is a Sacrament, wherby they 7 Auricular Confession. acquire better intelligence of Princes purposes and Peoples projects in the Civil State, then thes possibly can of their sub­ [...]leties, stratagems, or machinations in the Ecclesiastic Polity: here the Presbyterian parallel ceaseth.

8. That to Canonize Saints and declare Martyrs, pertains so­ly 8 Saints Cano­nization. to the Pope, which assures his power among simple sottish people, who wil obstinatly oppose their Soveraigns (either ho­stily or proditoriously) even to death, if the Pope Excommuni­cat or pronounce them Heretics, and Enimies to the Church.

9. That divers doctrins (Transubstantiation, Penance, Ab­solution, 9 Doctrins. remitting and retaining sins) greatly ratify this spi­ritual Monarchy among the vulgar.

10. That the devise of Purgatory justification by external 10 Purgatory. works, and sale of Indulgences doo chiefly inrich the Clergy; the subtraction wherof excited Luther to revolt from the Pope who conferred the Indulgences of al Germany on his Sister.

11. That by Demonology, Exorcisms, and other bug Bear 11 Demono­logy. Rites they keep (or think they keep) people the more un­der their girdle; as doubtless men stand in more aw of them.

12. That Aristotles Philosophy (Metaphisics, Physics, E­thics, 12 School▪ po [...]nts. [Page] Politics precited) and School Divinity taught in every University erected or regulated by the Popes authority, keep al thos errors from being detected, and make men mistake Ig­nis fatuus of vain Philosophy for his very Light of the Gospel. So that Roman Quaere (Cui bono?) descries the Pope to be principal Author or Fautor of thos dark doctrins, from which, Good Lord deliver us.

Ther be three knots on Christian liberty: [...] Knots untied

1. That which the first Presbyters knit; who assembling to agree what they should teach, and binding themselfs to teach nothing against their assemblie Decrees, deemed People obli­ged to folow their doctrins, and forsook ther company (then caled Excommunication) if they refused.

2. That which Presbyters of the chief City or Province got on Parochial Ministers, caling themselfs Bishops or Prelats. Is Qu [...]e. it not the same office or order which Saint Paul first conferred on Titus and Timothy, to reside over al Presbyters in Crete and Ephesus? compare them; no Eg can be liker one another.

3. That which the Bishop of Rome (the Imperial Metro­polis) assumed as Pontifex Maximus over al Bishops in the Empire. Thes three were ravelled or resolved here by the same way, but preposterously for order, the last first and first last. For Queen Elizabeth totaly dissolved the Popes power: but Bishops retained their Jurisdiction under hir, as under the Pope; yet with a claus or claim of jure divino derived from God. 2. The Presbyterians in Parlement, put down Prelats with al their pomp (which perhaps they repent since) and so the secund knot was untied. 3. The Presbyterians soon after were unhorsed or at least unsadled, and so the last untwisted. So we are now reduced to the Independence of primitiv Chri­stians, [...] to folow Paul, Cephas, or Apollos (was not that stiled Schism?) as every Man likes best. Which if it be without raising debate, or measuring Christs doctrin by our partial affection to his Ministers Person; is perhaps best: but not ab­solutly. 1. Becaus ther ought to be no power over Mens Consciences, fav by the word it self working Faith in every ones heart, according to Gods purpose. 2. Becaus such as [Page 252] teach ther is great danger in every litle error, should not require a Man endued with his own reason, to folow any others opi­nion, or most voices of many Men: which is to hazard his salvation at Cross and Pile. What is it then for People to Quaere. obey the chief Civil Ruler in al points of Religion?

Lastly he compares the Papacy (specialy in the point, that Comp [...]risons. the Church Militant is Gods Kingdom spoken of in the old and new Testament) to the Kingdom of Faieries or old Wifes fables teaching Ghosts and Spirits, with the fine feats which they are fained to play at night. For the Papacy is the Ro­man Empires very Ghost sitting triply Crowned on its Grav: for the language used in their Liturgies is Latin or old Roman toung. The Faieries in al parts or places hav only one uni­versal King caled Oberon, but in Scripture Beelzebub Prince of Demons: such is the Pope in his Clergy over the World. The Faieries are Spirits of Ghosts inhabiting darknes, solitud, or Gravs: so are Ecclesiastic spiritual Ghostly Fathers, who walk in dark Doctrins, Cels, Cloisters, Churches, and Church­yards. Faieries hav inchanted Castles and Gigantic Ghosts domineering over al Regions round about: so hav they Ca­thedral Churches, which by virtu of Holy water and charms cald Exor [...]isms, can turn Towns into Cities or Imperial Seats. Faie­ries take Children out of Cradles, and change them to natural Fools caled Elfs fit only to doo mischief: so they bereav young Men of Reason by certain charms composed of Metaphysics and Miracles; with old Traditions and abused Scriptures: wherby they becom good for nothing but to execut their Su­periors secret commands. Faieries are never seized on nor brought to answer the hurts they doo: so Ecclesiastics vanish from al Tribunals of Civil Justice. When Faieties are angry with any, they send Elfs to pinch them: so if the Clergy take teen against any State, they make superstitious Subjects to pinch their Princes, or one Prince inchanted with promises to pinch another. Faieries marry not, but their Incubi couple with flesh and blood: so their Priests marry not, nor are any of the chastest sort. Faieries hant Daieries, and feed or feast on the fat of Cream, which they skim from Milk: so that Clergy is crammed with Cream or fat of the Land, by Zelo [...]s [Page] devotions or donations, and toillest Tiths. In what Shop or Officin Faieries make their Inchantments, old Wifes resolv not: but the Clergies operatories are Universities erected and established by the Pope. What coin Faieries use, no History records: but Popish Ecclesiastics in al Receipts accept the same mony we doo; yet being to repay, doo it in Masses, In­dulgences, and Canonizations. Finaly Faieries hav no real existence, but in the fancies of fond ignorant Idiots, rising from old Wifes traditions or young Poets fictions: no more hath the Popes spiritual plenipotence (beyond the verge of his own civil Territories caled the Churches Patrimony) any right or reality, sav only in the Panic fears of silly seduced People, which stand in aw of his Excommunications, upon hearing of fals Miracles, Traditions, and interpretations of Scripture. Thes are Mr. Hobbs singularities (with many mo superseded) but his special Tenet is, that God was the Israelits sole King (to whom Moses, Aaron, Josua, Judges, and high Priests were Lieftenants or Deputies) and they his peculiar chosen People by Contract or Covenant for many ages: til at last they cast him off, and would hav an Earthly visible King like other Na­tions: but Christ shal be King over al the chosen People of Beleevers, at the last day of Judgment and Resurrection of Men with whom he shal reign personaly in Earthly Jerusalem for ever.

The premisses speak him to be a singular Scholar of most acut wit; who hath a rare invention, ready pen, concise stile, and elegant elocution: with whos Apollinean Harp my poor Panlike Pipe cannot contend.

Cedat Apollineae Panis Avena Lyrae.
Let Pans plain oat-Pipe yeeld
To Phaebus Harp the Field.

In such points wherin he and I differ (specialy Four) I only confirm mine own Opinion by Scripture, but no way confute his by Arguments: but hav selected sundry excerptions, and subnected som scattered quaeres extempore, for the Readers better satisfaction to ruminat on. I hope he shal hav no just [Page 253] caus, nor any Author els (such is my sollicitud in exemplify­ing exactly) for any falsification, to say with Martial:

Quem repetis meus est, O Fidentine, Libellus:
Sed male dum recitas, incipit esse tuus.
Fidentin, the Book which thou repeatst, is mine:
But while thou il recit'st, 'gins to be thine:

It rests that according to my common cours or custom, I doo close up the Catastrophe of al with an Essay or Epigram applied to Mr. Hobbs.

Domino Hobso Epigramma: An Essay to Master Hobbs.

The seven Distichs in Defens of Mans Soul, Church govern­ment, Christs, and the Saints eternal reign in Heaven.

SIR, having a purpose in my extrem old age, to publish a few Theological speculations, tho beyond the lists of my Phisical Profession, that they may remain the Heir of my Brain, sith God hath bereaved the Heir of my Body; I met with som strange seeming passages or positions in your learned Levi­th [...]n (which is diversly censured, as al others works are, and generaly construed to savor of self-conceit) contrary to my te­nets, which I was bound by scholastic ingenuity fairly to vindi­cat, but not to refut yours, being far unable to grapple. If you take me for an Emulist or Antagonist, God the heart searcher knows me to be neither; who would gladly imitat (not emu­lat) your accomplished abilities sans sordid envy, and doo af­fect your person with amicable amity, free from servil flattery. Figulus Figulo invidet (a quality of base Mechanics) never tainted my thoughts, nor is fit for any free minded Artist to intertain: but Ais, Aio; Negas, Nego (a property of self­secking turn-coat Parasits) becoms no tru Scholar, nor ever harbored in my candid Dov like habitation: the worth of Mut [...]m a [...]i­lium. your work wil shine the better and brighter by this foil, or at [Page] least spread farther. Opposita juxta se posita, magis & melius elucescunt: and my Book haply wil be more esteemed, becaus it brings such dainty exotic fruits and excellent flowers from your ful furnishd Eden. When Sir Francis Bacon, Vis­count St. Alban intended to divulge his Instauratio Magna to new model al liberal literature, he sent a MS. copy to crav Sir Thomas Budleis accurat judgment on it, who after perusal highly commended (as indeed it deserved) both stile, stuf, and structure; but told him the world would never want new De­visers, and old Readers like Carriers horses could not leav their beaten Road, being more addicted to antiquity then novity: the application is obvious and superfluous. Of later ages many Mr. withers and others. men hav translated Davids Psalms into English meters, seek­ing a priviledg to print them with our Bibles, instead of thos allowed by Queen Elizabeth, but could never obtein so base a Monopoly, savoring more of filthy lucre then Scholastic inge­nuity. King James compiled a Translation, but neither he nor his Son caused it to be inserted in the Bible, sith new things seldom excel the old. I wish you would revise or examin my excerptions (not exceptions) as Aliens, and not your own; to see what faults you can find in the Positions so wel as mispri­sions, that fitting retractations may be made by your self, or me, or both in future Editions, or new Additions; for al men are too partial, and obnoxious to errors.

To recapitulat, the points that I dissent in are. 1. That mans Summary. Soul is an immortal substance first inspired by God into Adam, and ever after produced successivly one from another (though most Divines differ from us both) by virtu of the general bene­diction to Increas and Multiply in their kinds; but not life or breath only, which as an accidental quality or effect of the Soul, vanisheth, ceaseth, and perisheth with the Body: That after separation from the Body by Death, it subsists in Heaven or Hel for ever; whereas al Essential parts els extinguish with their Bodies.

2. That Church government belongs to the Clergy or Eccle­siastic Hierarchy, being a Body distinct (but subordinat) from the Civil State.

3. That the real kingdom of Heaven (Gods high Throne) [Page 254] wher Christ sits at his Fathers right hand in glory, shalbe the Elect Saints eternal Mansion, wher they shal enjoy the beati­fic Vision or blessed presence of the sacro sanct Trinity face to face eviternaly.

4. That Christ shal reign or remain in this Kingdom of Glory for ever (resigning the Kingdom of Grace or Go­vernment of the Church to his Father, that God may be al in al) but not in any new finit World on Earth: sith after the general Judgment al shal be infinity. Your other Tenets touchig Gods Kingdom in Israel by contract or Covenant: that Hel, H [...]lfire, Torments, Tormentors, Satan, Devil, Ac­cuser, D [...]sticier, and such like are meant Metaphoricaly (which al Divines take realy) for the Vally of Hinnon caled Gehenna, B [...]imstome Lake of Sodom and Gomorrha, the Churches Enimies or temporal Foes; but no real Fiends which fel by pride: that Christ never dispossessed any Men of Devils, but only h [...]aled their bodily diseases or violent malad [...]es: that ther is no Demonology, Sorcery, Witchery, or Witches: yet such justly deserv death for their fals opinion and wi [...]ked intention to doo mischief if they could, which is hard Justice: that suprem Soveraigns in al Stats (whether legal Successors by long lineal Ancestry; or late Conquerors and Intruders by power or policy) are to sway al matters of Re­ligion by their decrees, dictats, or directions: both in defining the Canon of Scripture, and al Articles of Faith; wherto People must simply submit or implicitly obey, whatever the civil Magistrat shal impose or innovat in Doctrin or D [...]sciplin; which is contrary to what they are taught, that in such cases of Conscience, they must rather obey God then Men. This the stubborn English wil scars subscribe, whos contumacy was such against our last King, that they rooted out him and his posterity upon pretext of Tyranny: wherwith the mutinous male-contented multitud, usualy brand or blast al their Roial Rulers. Indeed Men ought with the noble Bereans to sift or serch whether thes things be so or no: els al Common-wealths shal be stil Subject to put on new Masques or Visors of Re­ligion at their Princes pleasures, as Camaeleons change colors: wheras Catholic constancy (even with loss of life) was ever [Page] esteemed the best blessed seed to sow Christian soil; either under Pagans or Papists, as our Marian Massacres make ma­nifest: but versatil wits like Weather-cocks, can turn every way or with every wind to serv turns: as Proteus is fained to vary:

Nunc violentus Aper, nunc quem tetigisse timeres, Anguis erit.
Now a fierce Bore fearful to see;
Next Snake horrid to touch hee'l be.

Al the premised Positions with som other suspected No­vities, I touch not nor trench upon: but commend them to the Readers free judgment.

If you wil deign to accept thes bold addresses or advertis­ments, from an old Dotard (who intends them fairly, sans scandal or scurrility) in good part; you shal shew a la [...]dable disposition and liberal education; according to the tru in­tention, as they are tendered for the public behoof or bene­fit of the literary Republic: if not, I hav discharged my duty.

Docte, tuum Nomen colo, magnopere (que); recordo:
Si modo veridicus vis humilis (que); fore.
Noli Animam violare tuam, nec tollere nostram:
Quam simul Authorum comprebat omne genus.
Nec tunicam spoliato tuam renuendo, Ministros
Jure suo Gregibus posse praeesse suis.
Nec Christo & Sanct is Terrestria pradia finge,
Qui modo celsa Dei Coelica regna tenent.
Nec Tropice reputa Reprobos descendere ad Orcum:
Nec Coelum Electis detrahe post obitum.
Parce mihi, mea si Theoremata redder [...] certo
Justis vindiciis sospita ab omne malo.
Audeo non verbis contendere, viribus impar;
Artibus, Ingenio. Literulis (que) bonis.
Unius haud oculus licet integer, omn [...] cernit:
Multa scienda sapis tu, resipisce tamen.
Learnd Sir, your Name I lov, and weigh greatly:
If you'l embrace truth and humility.
Doo not your own Soul wrong, nor ours take away:
Which Authors of al sorts maintaind alway.
Nor doo your Coat desile, right to deny;
That Pastors hav power their Flocks to rectify.
To Christ and Saints fain not Earthly mansions,
Who now posless Gods Heav'nly habitations.
Nor deem the Damnd go t' Hel Tropicaly:
Nor Heaven after Death to th' Elect deny.
Spare m' if I to guard thes Theses contend,
And by just means from al il to defend.
I dare not striv in words, being short in worth:
In Arts, Wit, and Learning to set it forth.
No one Mans Ey tho sharp and sound al doth see.
Many known things you know, yet retractant be.

Postscripta subjuncta: Postscripts subnected.

MAn's Soul at first Creation on the sixth day, was infused 1 Thesis. or breathed into Adam by God, a Living, Rational, Intellectual Spirit, distinct from the Body; Invisible, Imma­terial, Immortal: having a power, dower or faculty by his general blessing of Increas and multiply; to beget a substance (like Light from Light) endued with the same qualities of intel­lect, Rationality, and Immortality, as al other Creaturs doo in their several kinds.

God can doo no wrong, nor ly, nor sin being contrary to 2 Thesis. his Nature: who is Essentialy and Abstractly Justice, Verity, and Goodnes it self. Al that he doth is just; but to say 'tis al just becaus he doth it, is a pure error: for Justice is a car­dinal Moral virtu, the same to God and Man by Nature; nor can God make an unjust act just becaus he doth it. A Pope in Consistory having denounced Fiatur (which a Cardinal whispered was fals Latin) broke forth furiously into thes words: in contemptum omnium Grammaticorum Fiatur. 'Tis not so with God, who wil not make an unjust thing just, nor untruth truth: but if he should Reprobat Men of meer free pleasure, by absolut irrespectiv Decree to shew his power, Soveraignty, or Dominion over al his Creatures: it were a [Page] flat unjust act, which al the water in Thamis cannot wash whit becaus he did it: but to make Man a free Creature able to stand or fal; and foreseing in his simple intelligence who wil embrace the means ordained by him for salvation, and who refuse or resist his Grace: to elect the one, and reject or Reprobat the other; is tru Justice mixd with Mercy: which is al that God doth in his Decrees of Election and Repro­bation.

Before Kings converted to Christianity, the Apostles held 3 Thesis. al Ecclesiastic power in their hands, and after them such as they ordained to succed: who appointed others subordinat (caled Elders) to preach the Gospel by imposition of hands: which imports a giving of the holy Ghost or Spirit of God, inabling them with gifts fitting to discharge that office: as Moses laid his hands on Josisa being to succed him. Now the Divine Tri­nity Mr. Hobbs. in Unity is, that the Person of God was represented by Moses and the high Priests in the old Testament, but by Christ during his abode on Earth, and by his Apostles with their law­ful Successors ever since. The holy Spirit wherby the Apostles spake is God: the son who represented his Father is God and Man: but the Father as represented by Moses and the high Priests, is the same God. Hence thos terms (Father, Son, holy Ghost or Spirit) are never used for God in the old Testament becaus they be Persons denomined of representing: which could not be til divers Men had born Gods Person in [...]uli [...]g or di­recting under him. The holy Spirit is somtime stiled Para­cletus properly Assister or caled to help; but commonly tran­slated a Comforter: who givs gifts or graces to Men, fit for such spiritual offices wherto they are ordained.

Presbytery or Ministry is of divine right, instituted by Christ in cal [...]ng seventy Disciples, whom he sent as Harbingers to Preach and prepare the way; and confirmed by the Apostles (to whom they were subordinat) in ordaining Elders every wher. So is Episcopat by the same right of Christs chusing twelv Apostles, and their substituted Bishops to succed them: but Presbyterial single Government without Bishops by a motly mixture of Ministerial and Laic Elders, a meer novity devi [...]d by Mr. Calvin, when the Genevans had expeld their

Soveraign Prelat, which exigent was caus of this change. This is most tru in point of fact.

ƲLTIMAT END.

Valedictio ad Lectores: A Farewel to the Readers.

Pro libito Lectoris habent sua fata Libelli:
Noster & expectet publica Fata liber.
On Readers pleasure Books doo depend:
And let my Book the Fate attend.
Opinion is a lofty Roial Dame:
Whos plumes are raisd on Air of vulgar Fame.
Who Courts hir Grace, shal with Ixion find
In Juno's stead, an empty Cloud or Wind.
Let such as list hir giddy favor curry:
I like not to be tossd with common whoorry.
Fair Readers which to take or leav are free,
Scorn to return base Censures for a fee.
Let Critics, Momes, and Mimics doo their worst:
He that regards their scoss shal be accurst.
My resolution fears not Censors knocks;
Nor shal this Book, unles it fal 'mongst Blocks.

VALETE: FAREWEL.

Postscriptum dc Formis. A Postscript of al Forms.

Mr. Pemble a late learned Oxford Man, holds (which few els doo) that al inanimat Forms, and two Souls (Vegetant, Sentient) are no distinct substaances, but only the crasis or temperament of qualities in every Compou [...]d or Subject. His grounds or proofs are thes: if the Form of a natural Bo [...]y be a substance, it must be, either material and corporeal; or immaterial and spiritual: but 'tis neither. Som say 'tis an imperfect substance in a middle degree between it and an accident; which is a silly shift or shelter. For an imperfect substance wil require a new Predicament; and Peripatetics repute Form most sublime, yea the perfection of matter in it self most imperfect: but a middle nature betwen both, is a meer Chimaera or Catamountain not contained in any Category nor hath it any Entity.

That Form is no material substance, thes Reasons evince: 1. That which informs the matter ( i. so pierceth into al parts and principles, as to giv specifical essence) is not material or corporeal, becaus one Body cannot penetrat another, nor ma­terial substance matter. 2. Every corporeal thing is of it self quantitativ and divisible: but a form according to Aristotle is indivisible void of quantity. 3. Nothing generable or cor­ruptible, is material or corporeal; sith matter according to Aristotle cannot be begot or perish: but al forms (except Mans Soul) vanish or perish, and new are ingendered. 4. Prin­ciples of Constitution are divers or distinct in essence and pro­per passions, els al things generable would be uniform and ho­mogeneal: but if forms be material, they differ not from matter sav in som degrees of sub [...]ety and purity; which suffice not [Page 257] to take away uniformity nor diversity. 5. A form is the foun­tain or origin of al actions: but if it be material, matter is also activ, not purely passiv: for it hath that activ virtu from mat­ter, not elswher; or els cannot be a Principle. That 'tis not an Immaterial spiritual substance, thes pregnant Arguments prov: 1. Whatever is bred of matters essence must be mate­rial, as what is generated of pure Air is Aerial: but a Form is not material as foreproved, or being Immaterial cannot be bred from the essence of matter; nor can Principles be ingen­dred one of another. 2. A Form cannot proced from the accidents of matter, sith no substance is bred of accidents, nor can a Principle be made of any former Entity; sith that is the Principle, and Form an accident being framed of accidents. 3. Thes accidents are either the matters passiv power, or illimited quantity, or previous dispositions to receiv a Form: but the two former cannot possibly be, sith they are not ge­nerativ: and the later may concur in the agent to produce a Forms existence; but cannot conduce to the constitution of its essence being meer Accidents. 4. Forms are not generated of nothing, for thats Creation: non vacat exiguis rebus adesse Jovi. To salv this scruple, they devise divers disguised distin­ctions: 1. That Forms are in the matter potentialy, not actu­aly: this is a contradiction, they are yet are not, but may be. 2. That they are in their causes not realy, but eductivly: this is an Antiphrase, for their causes are in the matter, by which they also may be herafter. 3. That they are in it habitualy, as Science is in a Scholar asleep: this is preposterous, sith Science is actualy in a sleeping Scholar, tho he doth not exercise, nor is habitual inexistence opposit to actual: but Forms til edu­ction are not actualy in the matter: as the form of Air is not in water til it be turned into it; nor the form of Gold in Earth, til it becom Gold: so thes evasions are very asystats. 5. Souls are not Spiritual (except Mans) much less inanimat forms: for what sober Man wil say [...]av in a Chymical sens, that ther is any substantial Spirit in a Stone, Herb, or Beast? 6. Every divi­sible substance is material and corporeal; for division folows quantity as an inseparable companion of matter: but form is divisible, and no spiritual indivisible substance. 7. No imma­terial [Page] substance is corruptible: but al forms vanish and perish. 8. Every immaterial substance is nobler then any material: but if [...]orms be immaterial, 'tis contrary in them, sith the base mater of a dumb Flea is permanent and can not be destroied; but the Soul of a Roial Lion vanisheth to vapor, being no spiritual substance. It rests then that 'tis an accident or Temperament of qualities, but no substance, as abundantly foresh [...]wed. This is farther proved by three Parallels: 1. Accidents are generated, cor­rupted, and new produced: so are al forms. 2. Accidents are diffused through the whol Subject, and penetrat the least particles of matter: so doo forms. 3. Accidents depend on the matter for being and producing, nor can subsist without their Subject, nor depart from one to another: so 'tis with al forms except Mans Souls. Now the chief contrary objections shal be answered.

Ob. Every substantial compound consists of matter and form: but al natural Bodies are substantial compounds: Ergo &c.

Sol. Composition is duple: 1. Of matter and accidents, as al corporeal compounds: 2. Of substance and substance, as Man only, who hath a material mortal Body, and a spiritual immortal Soul: but al els only matter indowed with several accidents.

Ob. Whatever actuats, specificats, and givs existence to matter, is a substance: but the form doth al this: Ergo &c.

Sol. To actuat is either to giv the matter actual being that it shal be a substance: or to endu it with effectual qualities: in the first sens 'tis fals that a form actuats the matter; sith 'tis a substance subsisting of it self together with the form; and is more actuated by the form, then it by the matter: but in the last sens 'tis tru, that a form actuats the matter or makes it activ. Yet it folows not that 'tis a substance, sith al action and acting power, may proced from the qualities of an effi­cient caus: but the matter being indifferent to al forms by re­ceiving several sorts of qualities; exists in such or such a species. As a lump of Wax is formed into sundry shapes, and exists in form of a Creature by taking a new figure, which is an ac­cident: [Page 258] so the matter subsists of it self, tho not separat from a form: but exists with the form, not by it: yea that alone exists of it: sith forms according to Aristotelians depend on it both for essence and existence.

Ob. That from which the matter receivs al activity and ope­rations, is a substance: but so doth matter from form: Ergo &c.

Sol. Philosophers seeing matter dul or unable to action, and deeming accidents too weak to giv it; devised another nature to be fountain of action which they cal form: but they are deceived in so deeming, sith accidents wil suffice to make any natural Body activ, without help of another substance. As light being sole form of al lucid Bodies (Sun, Stars, Fire, Carbuncle) illumins al opacous obscure Bodies. So heat of fire an intens quality is its form: cold in water, Earth, Ice, and Winter air, hath the same effects to quench fire and condensat things: yet their forms differ, nor doo depend one on ano­ther to work thos effects. So the siccity of fire and Earth dries up water having distinct forms. The like may be said of the humidity in water and air, which works the same effects under different forms. In semblable sort water and earth by their gravity descend, as fire and air by levity ascend: yet not by diff [...]ring forms, but by divers accidents only.

Ob. That which essentialy distinguisheth one kind from another, is a substance: so doth the form: Ergo &c.

Sol. Every essential distinction is not made by a substance: for accidents (virtu and heat) differ essentialy: so doo sub­stances in their definitions by accidents. For in every Defi­nition is a Genus (as the common matter) wherin al agree; and a difference consisting of accidents to distinguish that matter. As fire is a simple Body most hot and light: water a simple Body coldest and heavy. Here the differences con­sist of accidents, yet are essential and internal: for as accidents are first causes of operations, so are they of essential distin­ctions in natural Bodies, and included in their definitions, without any substantial forms: which plainly provs that ac­cidents or temperaments of qualities are forms.

Ob. A form hath no degree of more or less, nor is varied: but accidents and their temperaments may be varied and re­ceiv [Page] degrees: Ergo they cannot be essential forms.

Sol. The Major Peripatetic proposition is fals: for al forms (of simple Bodies, Mixt, and Animat) receiv intension and remission of degrees: as when Earth turns to Water, it re­quires divers preparations or predispositions before it becom water: doth then the form of Earth al that while remain firm or unchanged? If not, then 'tis more or less varied. So al Elements concur in mixtion, and continu in mixtils: doo their qualities remain, or forms, or rather both? as appeers at dissolution, when they return to Elements: yet not in in­tens vigor as formerly, but remitted or reduced to harmonical symmetry. Zabarel saith, forms may be varied with change of kind, not els: as forms of Elements are so changed, not otherwise. This is meer obscurity fu [...] of contradiction: as if the form of water in mixtils be less a form then formerly, con­tinuing stil the waters form: yet cannot be caled water having changed its kind and becom another B [...]dy. Therfore 'tis truer, that Elements forms receiv intension and remission: which va­riation provs them to be accidents not substances; and when their just temperament is taken away, they transcend or are transmuted into new Kinds. So thos are idle questions touch­ing Elements essential forms, or integrity in mixtils: of ge­neration and corruption in an instant; as if a form were e­duced or perisht in a moment, with many mo of like bran. For water is made gradualy in time, by changing its tempe­rament: so in mixtils (Stone, Apple, Flesh) corruption corns by depraving the temperament: which if vitiated beyond the utmost degree of proportion, a dissolution folows by break­ing the bonds of union: which is doon by mixture of qualities.

Repl. If the temperament be varied, definitions of things must also be altered: but they are alwais constantly the same, til the forms be changed: Ergo form is no tempera­ment.

Sol. This is Childish, for definitions are made of things intire or perfect, and abstracted by imagination of the intel­lect: but if things be considered as they are in nature, defini­tions must be changed as nature varies. Can fading Flowers, rotting Apples, putrifying Flesh, or sickly Bodies retain the same definitions of sound? Shal the essence be changed by [Page 259] mutation of accidents, and not varied with them? Let such as so think feed on corrupt carrion, til they acknowledg ther is one definition of sound food, another of putrid Flesh: or let them languish so long, til they learn to distinguish betwen Corpus sanum, aegrum, & nutrum. What is substantial or material in Elements and mixtils, that remains invariable: but al accidental or formal is changed, generated, and cor­rupted by degrees, as temperaments alter: according to which definitions must be changed.

Now touching Souls, ther be three sorts, Vegetant, Sentient, Intelligent: but for better explication, he premiseth som A­phorisms. 1. Ther be three Principles of Bodies: viz two con­stitutiv, matter of subject, and accidents or qualities; and one transmutativ, the contrariety of thos accidents or qualities. 2. Matter is al that is substantial in natural Bodies. 3. Matter is indifferent to receiv al accidents, yet is not simply the foun­tain or root of al. 4. The origin of accidents and subjects is one, viz. Creation and concreation. 5. The accidents of matter are duple: 1. Som which immediatly folow its essence and coexist with it, as passiv power, quantity or extension, place, and time, or successiv duration, of which matter is the fountain: 2. Such as make existence in a specifical kind, as al first and secund qualities: which doo not inhere primarily by necessity of nature, but at the Creators pleasure to distin­guish kinds. 6. Both thes qualities are impressed immediatly like light in the air, needing no intermediat substance to unite them. 7. As quantities inhere immediatly in the matter: so the operations and powers of working flow directly from the qualities. 8. Al first qualities (light, heat, cold, humidity, siccity) and sundry of the secund (thicknes, thinnes, heavines, lightnes, fluidnes, firmnes) existed the first day of Creation. 9. The material substance of Heaven (wherof Philosophers know little) is common with inferior Bodies, being made of one chaos: so are the first accidents; but thos of the secund sort differ, by the discrepant conjunction of first and secund qualities. 10. Ther be three Elements (Air, Water, Earth) needful to mixtion, and haply two wil serv. 11. Thes Elements essentialy differ in their proper qualities given by God: in the Earth are conjoined cold, siccity, density, gravity, consistence: [Page] in the water cold, moisture, remisser density, gravity, fluidnes: in the Air remiss heat, weak moisture, levity, tenuity, and fluidnes. 12. Fire is only intens heat, whether in Elements or mixtils; but no Element, Body, or Substance. 13. Heat in Air or Mixtils, is partly implanted at Creation, partly in­fused or introduced by the Sun, Soil, and Elementar Fire if any such be: but the implanted soon decais without supply of infused. 14. Composition is duple: 1. Of Matter with both sorts of qualities, as in the Heavens and Elements: 2. Of Mat­ter so qualified and new mixture of qualities arising from the other; as in al Bodies els. 15. The union of qualities in Ele­ments is most simple, but in Mixtils more compound; as 'tis said of Colors, that whitnes and bl [...]es, are made with the various mixture of bright and dark: but middle colors rise from the mixtures of whit and black. 16. The measure and maner of al Temperaments, is founded on the first Creation: from which primary patern if nature dev [...]at in excess or defect, a deformed Monster is bred. 17. To beget a like is the pro­perty of al activ qualities in Inanimats and Animats, as God bid them by his benediction to increas and multiply. 18. The qualities doo so diffuse themselfs and beget others, that they make the matter proportioned to exercise their forces or functions. 19. The formativ faculty is founded on the very qualities: which the more simple, so much the more uniform configuration they produce: but if compounded of divers qualities, they make more diversity or difformity in figuring the material parts. 20. Mixtion the less simple, the more sub­tle; for 'tis a great Art to unite so many varieties of unlike qualities into one crasis or temper: but the more compound the weaker, becaus it consists of so many contrary qualities. 21. Ther is a recripocal propagation of Temperaments in Animats: viz. of the Seed, and life of the Seed. 22. The Prolifical power in the Seed, proceds not from any spiritual substance inherent in it; but only from a subtle temper of qualities in a pure spirituous matter. 23. This energy is actu­aly in the Seed stil, but asleep or unactiv, til it meet with a fit Patient or rather Coagent to excite that virtu: as the strong spirits which ly hid in Barly, Wheat, Plants, Grain, or Seeds are easily extracted by destillation. 24. In Plants the Earth is [Page 260] a Womb to bring forth Seeds, by supplying heat from the Sun and moisture from Soil wherby the Spirits in Seeds swel, and extend the matter to fit proportion of several Figures. 25 In Egbreeders Male and Female must concur to make them fertil: but to hatch and inlifen them, any heat natural or artificial (if wel ordered) wil suffice: becaus the yelk is moist enough, and needs only help of heat to rouz up the whits spirits. 26. In perfect Animal-begetters, both Sexes must actualy join to make one mass of Seed: which being aptly mixd, spirituous substance of that mass is blown up and augmented by heat of the Matrix and moisture of menst [...]ual Blood: which begins to form the Birth, and in fine brings [...] to perfection. 27. To the ge­neration of living Creatures, Seed is not simply necessary; but a mixture of in [...]fening qualities in fit matter wil serv: as sundry Plants propagat sans Seed, and som Animals of putre­faction.

28. Summarily the Souls vegetant in Plants, and sentient Summary. in Animals (whether general wherby they becom Plants and Animals, or special specifical which distinguish them into Kinds) are only the nobler Temperament of more activ qua­lities in a subtler matter, whether propagated of Seed, or other wais ingendered; but no substances. This needs no other proofs then thos already alleged to refute the Substantiality of Forms: but why Mans Soul should be a substance rather then Beasts (many of which are so intelligible and docible as most of simple People, witnes the dancing Hors cald Asinago) no satisfactory reason can be rendred in nature, sav only som dark places of Scripture.

The result of al is, that no substance ever dies or perishes: for matter is invariable, and al Forms of Inanimats, together with the Vegetant and Sentient Souls meer mortal accidents or temperaments: only Mans Soul is a substance or Spirit in­fused or inspired at first by God, which is immortal and livs of it self for ever. Thes are his Principles of new Philosophy, touching the origin of Forms and Souls: which let every one relish as his palat affects. Now to answer Objections.

Ob. If the Soul be only a Temperament, every natural Body that hath a tempered Crasis shal be Animat: but 'tis not so: Ergo a Soul is no Temperament.

Sol. This Argument consists of meer affirmativs in the secund Figure, and therfore is a filthy Paralogism: but every Tem­perament of Inanimats is not fit for a Soul.

Ob. A Temperament is changed according to age, place, and diet: but a Soul is not so changed: Ergo 'tis no Tempe­rament.

Sol. Forms are changed or varied gradualy, as foreshewed: but in the argument is a duple error. 1. That it doth not di­stinguish betwen a total essential, and partil gradual change of Temperament: for in the total is not only a mutation but corruption of the Soul, and makes nothing to purpose: in the partil is a change more or less, which doth not vary or alter the kind: as a tender young Plant being removed from its natu­ral Soil to a Forren, grows better or wors without changing the kind; yet the unity of Form remains, with an alteration in the degrees of perfection. 2. That a transition from other Animals to Man is improper: for if his Bodily temper change, yet the Soul being a distinct substance varies not: but in al els Soul and Temperament: are one.

Ob. If the Soul be a Temperament, ther be in Animats so many Souls as Tempers: one of the rind and wood in Trees, another of Flesh and bones in Animals: but in every Animat is one only Soul: Ergo 'tis no Temperaments.

Sol. The Peripatetics place two Souls at least in every Ani­mat, and three in Animals; but divers forms in Inanimats essentialy distinct: so according to them 'tis no absurdity to grant plurality of Souls: yet is ther no plurality of substances, but diversity of Temperament.

Ob. If the Soul be but a Temperament of humors and spi­rits; it could not bridle the Bodies passions or perturbations: but it doth and is not led by them: Ergo &c.

Sol. This is tru in Mans Soul, which somtimes bridles or moderats passions, and somtimes yeelds to them: but in no other Animats, whos Soul not only folows, but is Tempera­ment it self.

Ob. That can be no Accident or Temperament, from which the noblest faculties and functions of imagining, remembring, and perceiving or judgin [...]ensitiv objects proced: but Beasts Souls hav such operations remblable to Mans: Ergo they are not Accidents.

Sol. Al such operations are meerly Organical in a material sub­ject, and depend on it: the Organ is a pure, cleer, activ Animal spirit sited in the Brain as the seat of Sensation: which Spirit is not only the Organ, but first Principle therof. For in al Animal Spirits two things are found, viz. matter and mixture of lifely qualities: mat­ter is the first Subject and Organ of Sens, qualities the first caus or origin; and in both commixd consist al the faculties of apprehen­sion, imagination, and memory which Brutes hav. Thes Spirits are the sole Instruments of al Sensation: but no substance useth or ruleth them being the first caus of Sens. That which they cal Soul, must be either material, or immaterial: if material, 'tis either purer then the Spirits, which cannot be, sith they are purest; or viler and impurer, but 'tis absurd to grant that to the baser, which is denied to the best: if immaterial, let them answer al arguments alleged against Forms.

Ob. 'Tis abov or beyond the power of purest matter, indued or invested with most exquisit qualities to judg, remember, desire, shun, &c. but Brutes Souls doo al this: Ergo &c.

Sol. 'Tis not, nor is it more strange that such effects should pro­ced from the Temperament of Brutes Brains, then doo other ad­mirable properties (as in the Magnet and many mo simples) from Inanimats Temperament, which is weaker then Animals. Thes are magnalia Dei Gods wonderful works, which Men must ad­mire, not inquire.

Lastly he treats of Mans Souls origin which was first in inten­tion, Upshot. and sole scope of this Subject or Speculation: touching whos essence, that 'tis a rational immortal substance or spirit; none but Atheists or Sadduces wil doubt: but of the origin is much dispute. Som deem they were al created eternaly, and re­served in blessed Seats or Stars, til they be incorporated into Bo­dies. Som that they be created by Angels. Som that they be ge­nerated by the Soul of the World, and made of Celical Substance. Som that they consist of Elements. Som that they are framed of Gods own substance. Som that they be produced by the Heavens as an extern Efficient. Som that they propagat successivly one from another. Som that they are continualy created and infused in the Body by God like Adams first Soul, which is the common Tenet. Thes two last Opinions (rejecting al the rest as futilous and frivi­lous) he debats more freely and fully, which he that lists may con­templat: [Page] but being before abundantly agitated in the first Thesis, shal be suppressed or superseded.

Touching the Vegetativ and Sensitiv Souls, 'tis probable they Censure. are a meer Temperament of qualities or life it self; nor doth Scrip­ture them to be substances: but they vanish or perish with the Bodies like forms of Inanimats, and new ingendred or educed from the power of matter by the efficient Caus. For God made al Creatures in their kinds intire Bodies at once (both Plants and Animals) but Created Man in his own Image: th [...] Body first of Dust or Earth from the previous preexistent Chaos like other Creatures; into which he breathed the Spiracle or Spirit of Life, even a Rational Soul; being far more divine and immortal then the rest, as al Orthodox writers agree. Hence 'tis said, Man be­cam a living Soul, meaning that his Soul should liv for ever; as he had doon in Body too, had he not eaten the forbidden fruit, con­trary to Gods command upon pain of temporal and eternal death: yet afterward in mercy he ordained a remedy, that the Womans Seed (even Christ our blessed Saviour) should bruis the Serpents head, by dying for the sins of al such as shal penitently beleev in him.

Peroratio ad Theologos: A Conclusion to Divines.
Haec quicun (que); legent Medici Theoremata sacra; Censuras rigidas parcite ferre, precor.
Who shal a Phisitions sacred Theses read,
I pray, spare to giv Censures ful of dread.
Nunc opus exigitur: Laus Patri debita summo, Christo incarnato, Spiritui (que) sacro.
The work's now doon: to God the Father du prais,
To Christ incarnat, and th' holy Ghost alwais.

ALLEUIA.

This keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above is co-owned by the institutions providing financial support to the Text Creation Partnership. Searching, reading, printing, or downloading EEBO-TCP texts is reserved for the authorized users of these project partner institutions. Permission must be granted for subsequent distribution, in print or electronically, of this EEBO-TCP Phase II text, in whole or in part.