THE INDEPENDENTS CATECHISME.

OR Some Observations gathered out of Doctor BASTVVICKE his Religious and Learned Treatise ENTITVLED INDEPENDENCY NOT GODS ORDINANCE.

For the use of all poor Ignorant, wavering, and seduced Independents.

BY JOHN BERNARD [...].

MAT. 22. 19.

Ye do erre not knowing the Scrip­tures, nor the power of God.

1 JOHN 4. 1.

Beleeve not every Spirit but try the Spirits, whether they are of God, be­cause many false Prophets are gone out into the world.

London, Printed by John Macock. 1645.

TO THE Wavering or Seduced INDEPENDENT READER.

Deare Brother,

THe Learned Doctor hath presented a large Treatise to the view of the world, which proves the Presbyterian Go­vernment DEPENDENT to be Gods Ordinance, and not [Page 4] the Presbyterian Government INDEPENDENT, by strong Arguments drawn from plain texts of Scripture. For three Reasons following I have pre­vail'd with him that some Ob­servations gathered out of it, and digested into this short Cate­chisme, might be published for thy good.

First because thou maist be perswaded thereby either not to waver, or to be perfectly re­formed from that dangerous errour.

Secondly, because some have objected, The Doctors Trea­tise is redious, though every particular in it be absolutely ne­cessary [Page 5] to vindicate Truth from Error, this Epitome may in­vite thee seriously and speedily to read it, thou mayst happily finde much satisfaction to thy unstable minde in it, if with the men of Berea, Act. 17. 7. Thou search the Scriptures. If niceties delight thee I refer thee to the Doctors Treatise, which is a garden full of such slow­ers.

Thirdly, because thy uncha­ritable Teachers, not able to justifie their fond opinion; yet have unworthily vilified the Doctors sound judgement cal­ling him Apostate, foole, that he is crazed in his braine, being [Page 6] not misled with their New Lights, but hath clearly disco­vered the mist of Errour where­with they have blinded thine, and others eyes. Christian cha­rity binds me to give him deser­ved applause, for his Pious, Lear­ned and Charitable worke; that thou mayst be reformed thereby, is the prayer of him who wish­eth thy souls good equally with his own.

John Bernard.

The first part of the Indepen­dents Catechisme, upon these 4. Positions.

1. That there were more particular Assemblies, and Congregations in the Church of Jerusalem than one.

2. That all those seve­rall Congregations made but one Church.

3. That all those severall Congregations were under one Presbytery.

[Page 8] 4. That the Government of the Church of Jerusalem is to be a pattern of Go­vernment to all succeeding Ages.

THE INDEPENDENTS CHATECHISME.

Quest.

WHat Govern­ment hath Christ Ordai­ned in the Church of Jerusalem, and in the rest of the Primitive Churches, to be a patrern unto all Churches for Go­vernment, Doctrine, and manners unto the end of the World?

Answ. A Presbyterian Govern­ment, that is, by a Common-Councell of Presbyters (as in the Originall) or more plainely of a Religious, grave, solid, learned, and wise Councell of di­vines and ministers, as was in the As­sembly, [Page 10] Act. 1. 15. unto whom Christ had given the power of the keyes, Mat. 18. 16. 17. 18. That this was the Go­vernment established in the Church, plainely appeares by these texts of Scripture, Act. 14. 23. Act. 20. 17. 28. Tit. 1. 5. 1 Tim. 5. 17. Heb. 13. 7. 24. 1 Pet. 5. 1. 2. 3. Jam. 5. 14. Act. 15. 6. 22. Act. 16. 4. Act. 21. 17. The objections made by the Inde­pendent Brethren, concerning the qua­lification of the Presbyters are punctu­ally confuted in the D rs Treatise page 19. to the 29. Shewing that there is no expectation of miracles in our times, though the Apostles and Primi­tive Presbyters were extraordinarily gifted for the confirmation of the truth of the Gospell to all succeeding ages: Christ himselfe proclaimes those bles­sed that believe without seeing of mi­racles, Iohn 20: 29. This qualification in the Apostles, and primitive Presby­ters is continued unto the end of the [Page 11] World in the Presbyters and Ministers of the Gospell. Viz. the power of or­der, and preachings and the power of Jurisdiction, or rulings: Because what soever is written, is for our instru­ction.

Quest. Were there many congre­gations, and Assemblies in the mother Church of Ierusalem, which in our dia­lect are called Churches: or did the multitudes of beleevers in Ierusalem make but one congregation, as the Inde­pendents suppose?

Answ. These plaine texts of Scrip­ture following do clearely prove that the many ten thousands of believers, converted by Iohn Baptist, by Christ, his Apostles, the 70. disciples and the rest of the primitive Presbyters, could never meet together in one, 10. or scarce­ly in 100. congregations to partake of all acts of worship to aedification, as [...]ppeares by the multitude of beleevers mentioned, in Mat. 3. 1. 2. 5. 6. Mat. [Page 12] 7. 12. Luke 16. 16. Luke 7. 29. Iohn 7. 31. 40. 46. 47. 48. 49. 50. Acts 2. from the 37. to the end of the chap­ter. Acts 4. 4. Act. 5. 14. Act. 6. 1. 2. 3. 7. Act. 21. 20. to suppose these mul­titudes could meet in one congregation to be edifyed is not agreeable to sense or reason. Because there were above one hundred preachers, and ministers besides the Apostles, and all these con­tinually taken up in praying & preach­ing unto those many ten thousands of believers distributed into severall con­gregations, that possibly they might e­difie their preachers being all so em­ployed, they could not leave their mi­nistry to serve tables, Acts 6. 2. There­fore of necessity so many ministers must have severall places to preach in, and those multitudes of believers be di­stributed into several congregations for them to preach to, and severall places to baptize in, other-wise there would have beene great confusion.

For but one of them could speake at once to aedification. These plaine testi­monyes of Scripture above cited may convince the Independents error.

Because they clearely take away the Foundation of their New-Churches which are built upon this mistake, that there were no more believers in the Church of Ierusalem then could meet in one congregation.

Four we [...]ke objections to that pur­pose are punctually confuted by the Dr. from page 42. unto the 53. page.

Quest. Were not all those hundred preachers and the many ten thousands of believers so scattered abroad in the persecution we read of, Act. 8. 1. 2. 3. That there was left no more believers in Ierusalem then could meet in one congregation?

Answ. By that place is meant all the preachers, and ministers onely, except the Apostles, as it appeares, Acts 8. 4. they that were scattered abroad, went [Page 14] to and fro preaching the Word: As for the people, they were many of them cast into prison, and it is most probable that the rest were in their owne houses, there is not any mention made of their being scattered abroad; if they had, they had no Call to preach; now the text saith they did preach that were scattered abroad. But by their abiding in Ierusalem the Apostles had both en­tertainment and safety, without them they could not have secur'd themselves from the wolves: And the Apostles care was such of feeding the sheepe of Christ, that they continued in Ierusalem to comfort and support the Church; And refresh the believers in this heat of persecution: when they wanted the helpe of their faithfull ministers, and Pastors.

Quest. Who Govern'd, ordered, and ruled this Church consisting of so many congregations and assemblies?

Answ. The Apostles and Presbyters [Page 15] (as in the Originall.) Act. 7. 19. 29. 30. Act. 15. 2. 4. 6. 22. Act. 16. 4. 5. Act. 21. 17, 18, 25. And howsoever the Apostles in the places above speci­fied are differenc'd by that title from the Presbyters, yet in all acts of Go­vernment performed by them in the Church of Ierusalem, they were for the substance of them ordinary acts such as Presbyters dayly perform. And there­fore the Apostles are in them to be con­sidered as Presbyters who received the power of Jurisdiction or ruling, and acting as Presbyters were in their ordi­nary employment; Though at other times they used Superlative authority as Christs extraordinary Ambassadours 2 Cor. 5. 20. Some Impertinent Ca­vills about the Apostles exercising the office of Presbyters made by the Inde­pendents are clearely taken away by the Dr. from pag. 84, unto the 94. p. And least any should conceit the A­postles were not Presbyters, because [Page 16] in those places above it is said the A­postles and Presbyters making a di­stinction betwixt them. The Apostle Saint Peter resolves the doubt, 1 Pet. 5. 1. 2. 3. in which place, Peter styles himselfe a Presbyter or Elder; In the second Epistle of Iohn ver. 1. Saint Iohn doth style himself Presbyter, or Elder, saying; The Presbyter to the Elect Lady.

Saint Paul likewise styles himselfe a Presbyter if you compare 1 Tim. 4. 14. with 2 Tim. 1. 6. in which places it is evident that Saint Paul was one of the Presbytery.

Quest. Why do the Independent Brethren conclude every of their con­gregations a particular Church, depen­ding upon no other Church; either for Government, Doctrine, or Manners, when the whole current of the Scrip­ture doth so clearly expresse the Pres­byterian Government Ordain'd by Christ in the mother Church of Jeru­salem [Page 17] must be a pattern unto all daugh­ter Churches untill the end of the World.

Now it hath beene plainly proved that the Church of Ierusalem consisted of many congregations, which made but one Church, And that one Church distributed into those particular as­semblyes, was Governed by a Com­mon-Councell or Presbytery. The ex­ample of which Church the Indepen­dent Brethren pretend to follow.

Answ. The Brethrens Answer is se­conded with these reasons. First, be­cause their particular Churches have for their patterne no lesse then the whole Colledge of the Apostles and Presbyters, Act. 1. 15. Where they sate in councell to chuse a disciple in the place of Judas, the number of the men, not of men and women as in verse 14. being one hundred and twenty. The Independent Brethren mistaking the members of the congregation, who [Page 18] were men, and Brethren, verse 16. and not men Brethren and Sisters, do per­emptorily conclude from hence, there were no more believers in Ierusalem, then in this congregation; notwith­standing the multitudes that believed, and were baptized, by Iohn Baptist, and this whole Colledge of Apostles and Presbyters before the Passion of Christ. Secondly, Because their Chur­ches (though made up with a number of women) by imitating the Assembly of Apostles and Presbyters, every par­ticular Church doth thereby gaine the same Authority which our Saviour gave to the whole Colledge of Apostles, Mat. 18. 15. 16. 17. 18. which being extraordinary, and exceeding the te­nure of the Scripture to have so much power confered upon a smal congrega­tion, doth declare our Brethren the In­dependents to be wise above that which is written, 1 Cor. 4. 6. and in knowledge to resemble the children of this world, Mat. 16. 8.

The second part of the INDE­PENDENTS Catechisme, gathered out of the Treatise upon these six following Queres, concerning the ga­thering of CHURCHES.

1. Quere. WHere it is commanded in the word of God that the Ministers of the Gospell shall run about from their owne places, and Charges to gather believing Christi­ans, from amongst believing Christi­ans, into their owne Independent con­gregations, and debar them from all Church-fellowship, and communica­tion [Page 20] with other believers in Gods holy Ordinances and Sacraments. And pro­claime, all that are not molded up after this new-modell to be a people out of covenant, to have no right to the seales of the New-covenant; neither they nor their children, though believers, whether this way of gathering Chur­ches was ever heard of before these daies whether this be to set up Christ as King upon his throne, to make divisions and Scismes in Churches and among be­leivers and Brethren, and that upon groundlesse pretences.

2. Quere. Whether for the making any man or woman a member of the Church, it be necessary to the believe­ing, and being baptized, that they should walke some dayes, weekes, monthes, or yeares with them that they may have experience of their conversa­tion before they can be admitted, and after that a confession of their faith, should be publikely made before the [Page 21] congregation, and the evidences of their conversion, as the time when, the place where, the occasion how, they were con­verted: And if any, either men, or wo­men, shall except against their evidence that then they are not to be admit­ted.

3. Quere. Whether for making a­ny man a member or an officer of a Church, the consent of the whole con­gregation, or the greater part of them besides the Presbyters and Ministers be requisite.

4. Quere. Whether for the admissi­on of any one into Church-fellowship and communion a private solemne Co­venant be requisite or necessary for the making any one a member, the neglect or refusall of the which makes them incapable of their member-ship or ad­mission.

5. Quere. Whether the women and people as well as the Presbyters and Ministers have the power of the Keyes. [Page 22] And whether the women have all their voices in the Church, both for election and reprobation of members and offi­cers as well as the men, and whether the consent of all the women, or the greatest part of them to be requisite, for the making any one a member or officer? So that if they gainsay it, be­ing the greater number, or allow of it, the most voices carry the businesse.

6. Quere. Whether the practice and preaching of all these things, and the gathering of Churches after this manner, be to set up Christ as King up­on his throne; and whether Churches and assemblyes thus congregated be the onely true Churches in the which only Christ rules and reigns as King, and all other that are not molded up after this fashion, be no true congregated Chur­ches, and in the which Christ is not set up as King upon his throne?

Quest. Who were commanded by Christ to preach the Gospell, and to [Page 23] propound to all Nations the conditi­ons upon which they were to be admit­ted into his Church; And who were to admit them?

Answ. The Apostles onely and Presbyters, and Ministers of the Gos­pell; As appeares by Christs Com­mission given unto them and his pro­mise to be with them untill the end of the World: Mat. 28. 19. 20. Marke 16. 15. 16. Acts 26. 15. to the 20. vers. Here the Commission was onely deli­vered to the Apostles and the Mini­sters of the Gospell that they should admit whosoever believed and were baptized.

Quest. Did John Baptist or any of the primitive Apostles, and Ministers ever call for a congregation to joyne with them in the admitting any mem­ber into the Church of Christ, or did they demand such evidences and quali­fications as the Independents do in the foregoing Queres?

Answ. Their preaching, and practise in Baptizing, which is admitting mem­bers into the Church of Christ, doth shew plainely they did it by vertue of their Commission, no mention being made of a new Church, or congregati­on to have voices with them, or any o­ther conditions to be required, then Repent, believe, and be baptized; which is plainely proved: Mat. 3. 2. 6. Luke 3. 7. Luke 7. 29. John 3. 4. Act. 2. 37. 38. 4. Act. 8. 36. 37. 38.

Quest. Where did the Apostles and primitive Presbyters delight to gather Churches?

Answ. Amongst the lost sheepe of the house of Israel, to bring them into Christs fold; as appeares by Saint Paul accompting it a dishonour to build upon another mans Foundation. Ro­mans 15. 20.

Quest. What command have wo­men in the Church either for preach­ing, or giving their voices, in the ele­ction [Page 25] or reprobation of members or of­ficers?

Answ. No more command have they for any such practise, then by Saint Pauls words is due unto them, 1 Cor. 14. 34. 35. 36. 1 Tim. 2. 11. 12. in both these places it is the Apostles speciall care to prevent womens inter­medlings in matters of the Church, which may for ever silence the Indepen­dents weake opinion who tolerate wo­mens voicing it in their Churches con­trary to the Word of God.

Quest. May diversities of Religions be tolerated amongst Christians, or were they ever tolerated in the Old or New-Testament?

Answ. The practise of the holy men of God sheweth they may not, and their practise is for our imitation; 1 Cor. 10. 6. 7. Rom. 15. 14. Gen. 17. 1. 2. 3. Gen. 18. 17. 18. 19. Jos. 24. 14. 15. 16. In these places it is cleare that Abra­ham, Isaac, Iacob, and Ioshua suffered no [Page 26] Idolatry nor Sects in their families, for this had been to tolerate all Religions, or to worship the true God in a false manner, and not to do Justice and Judgement.

Quest. Are the examples of the Pa­triarches, Prophets, and Apostles, who tolerated onely the true Religion; or the examples of Poland, Transylvania and Holland, to be followed, who tole­rate all Religions?

Answ. Saint Paul will decide the controversie sufficiently for us, if we delight not more in novelties then in the old way prescrib'd in the written Word: Rom. 12. 1, 2. Phil. 3. 17. Phil. 4. 8, 9. In which places Saint Paul doth declare that we must not fashion our selves according to this World, we must not imitate the Saints of God in their failings, and we must walke so as we have him & the rest of the Saints for an example, Our blessed Saviour blames the Angell of the Church of Per­gamus [Page 27] Thyatira, Laodicea, Revel. 2. 12. 13, 14. to the 20. Revel. 3. 14, 15, 16. Because they tolerated Balaam and Ieza­bell, shewing his great displeasure against them for it; Now these that labour for a toleration of all Religions must needs be Luke-warme, such as God will spue out of his mouth.

Quest. What examples have we in Scripture for the suppressing of false Teachers, when they are openly disco­vered?

Answ. The Prophets and Elders of Israel in all ages who had the sword of justice in their hands to punish all se­ducers as appeares, 1 Kings 18. 21. Deutr. 13. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5. Iudges 6. 30, 31. and their practise is for our Magistrats imitation, 1 Cor. 10. 6, 7. Romans 15. 14.

Quest. What esteeme ought Chri­stians to have of those Independent mi­nisters who instead of preaching the Word of God, in season and out of [Page 28] season to convert soules, preach their owne traditions and inventions, to de­stroy those precious soules which o­ther Godly Ministers have conver­ted?

Answ. Saint Pauls sentence is of a­ny such false teacher, Let him be accur­sed, Gal. 1. 8, 9. And if we will believe our Saviours words; Such mens con­dition is very dangerous whatsoever they may promise to themselves, Mat. 18. 6, 7. Woe be unto that man by whom the offence cometh. Now such offence is come by wandring after the Inde­pendent Ministers New-lights, that all Godly Ministers may with Saint Paul wish they were cut off, who trouble the Church, by such groundlesse pre­tences.

And whereas all Godly Presbyters and Ministers, who preach Christ out of good will, open the eyes of the blind, turne them from darkenesse to light, and from the power of Satan unto [Page 29] God, ought highly to be Honour'd for their workes sake; 1 Thess. 5. 13. Yea, that they deserve double Honour; 1 Tim. 5. 17. Yet the same Apostle doth on the contrary give unto all believers a speciall caution To beware of false teachers Rom. 16. 17, 18. (Coloss. 2. 8. 2 Epistle of Saint Iohn 9, 10, 7. verses) Concluding that they that are such serve not the Lord Iesus Christ, but their owne bellies, and with faire speech, and flatter­ing, deceive the hearts of the simple.

FINIS.

Imprimatur,

Ja. Cranford.

This keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above is co-owned by the institutions providing financial support to the Text Creation Partnership. Searching, reading, printing, or downloading EEBO-TCP texts is reserved for the authorized users of these project partner institutions. Permission must be granted for subsequent distribution, in print or electronically, of this EEBO-TCP Phase II text, in whole or in part.