Vincentius Lirinensis FOR The Antiquity and Ʋniversality of the Catholick Faith against the prophane Novelties of all Heresies.
THe holy Scripture of God saying and warning us in this sort: Ask thy Fathers and they shall tell thee, thy elders and they shall report unto thee. And again, Accommodate thy ears to the words of wise men. Likewise, My sonne forget not these speeches but let thy heart keep my words, Deut. 52. Prov. 22. & 3.
It seemeth unto me a stranger of this world and the least of Gods servants, that it shall by his gracious help be a matter of no small profit to set down in writing what I have of holy Fathers faithfully received, being a thing very necessary for mine own infirmitie, having alwaies therby in readinesse, how by daily reading thereof I may help my weak memory. Vnto which labour not onely the profit to be reaped by the worke, but also the very consideration of the time, and opportunitie of the place moued and inuited me: the time, because reason it is, that seeing it consumeth and bereaueth us of all humane and earthly things, we should also take out of it something which may auaile us to life euerlasting: especially seeing the terrible iudgment of God, which we expect drawing neere upon us, doth seriously inuite and prouoke us to increase [Page 3]our studies and exercises in religion, and the fraudulent dealing of new Heretickes requireth much care and attention. The place because having forsaken the company and troubled of the world and chosen a solitary Abbey in a little town for mine abiding, where I may without any great distraction of mind put in practise that which is sung in the Psalm 45. Be vacant and see that I am God. With which reasons also accordeth the purposed end and resolution of my whole state of life, in that I have by the help of Christ, after long and divers stormes induced in the watres showded my self in the harbour of a religious life (a secure port for all states of men) where contemning the blasts of varity and pride, I may pacifie God with the sacrifice of humility, and so escape not onely the shipwrack of this present life, but also the fire of the next.
But now in the name of God will I set upon that, which I have taken in hand, that is, to set down i [...] writing such things as our forefather have delivered and committed to our charge, using herein rather the fidelity of a reporter, then the presumption of an authour, meaning yet to keep this rule in my writing not copiously to lay forth all, but briefly to handle each necessary points neither that in fine and exact words, but in easie and common speech, in such sort that most things may seem rather touched then declared. Let them write delicately and penne curiously, which trust [...] either upon witte, or moved with respect of duty, enterprise any [...] action, but for me it is sufficient, the for helping my memory or rather forgetfulnesse I have gathered [...] ther this Commonitory, which [...] withstanding by Gods grace I [...] [Page 5]daily endevour by little and little (calling to mind such things as in times past I have learned) to correct and make more perfect. And this have I thought good to forewarn, that if happily this work of mine passing forth, fall into the hands of Censurers they do not over hastily reprehend in it that which they understand present promise to undertake with future correction better to polish and mend.
CAHP. I.
INquiring therefore often with great desire, and at [...]ion, of very many excellent, holy and learned men, how and by what means I might assuredly and as it were by some generall and ordinary way discern the true Catholick faith, from false and wicked Heresie. To this question I had usually this answer of [Page 6]them all, that whether I or any other desired to find out the fraud of Hereticks, daily springing up, and to escape their snares, and willingly would continue safe and sound in religion, that he ought two manner of wayes by Gods assistance to defend and preserve his faith, that is first by the authority of the law of God: secondly by the tradition of the Catholick Church.
Here some man perhaps may ask, that seing the Canon of the scripture is perfect and most aboundantly of it self sufficient for all things, what need we joyne unto it the authority of the Church her understanding and interpretation? The reason is this, because the scripture being of it self so deep and profound, all men do not understand it in one and the same sense, but diverse men diversly this man and that man, this way and that way expound and interpret the [Page 7]sayings thereof, so that to ones thinking, so many men, so many opinions almost may be gathered out of them, for Novatus expoundeth it one way, Photinus another, Sabellius after this sort, Donatus after that: Arius, Eunomius, Macedonius will have this exposition: Appolinarius and Priscillian will have that: Iovinian, Pelagius, Colestius, gather this sence: and to conclude Nestorius findeth out that: and therfore necessary it is for the avoiding of so great windings and turnings of divers errours that the line of expounding the Prophets and Aposties, be directed and drawn, according to the rule of the ecclesiasticall and Catholick sense.
Again in the Catholick Church, we are greatly to consider, that we hold that, which hath been beleeved every where, alwayes, and of all men: for that is truly and properly Catholick [Page 8](as the very force and nature of the word doth declare, which comprehendeth all things that be truely universall) and that shall we do if we follow vniuersalitie, antiquitie, consent. Uniuersalitie shall we follow thus, if we professe that one faith to be true which the Church throughout the world acknowledgeth and confesseth. Antiquity shall we follow, if we disagree not any whit in opinion from them, whom all know that our holy Elders and Fathers reverenced, and had in great estimation. Consent shall we likewise follow, if amongst our forefathers we hold the definitions and opinions of all or almost of all the Priests and Doctours together.
CHAP. II.
WHat then shall a Christian Catholick do, if some small part of the Church cut it self off from the communion of the Universall Faith? What else but prefetre the health of the whole body before the pestiferous and corrupt member? What if some new infection goeth about to corrupt not onely a little part, but the whole Church? Then likewise shall he regard, and be sure to cleave unto antiquity, which cannot possibly be seduced by any crafty noveltie. What if in Antiquity it self, and amongst the Antient Fathers, be found some errour of two or three men; or haply of some one City or Province? Then shall he diligently take heed that he preferre the decrees and determinations of the Universall Antient Church, [Page 10]before the temerity or folly of a few. What if some such case happen where no such thing can be found? Then shall he labour, by conferring and laying together amongst them selves the antient Fathers opinions, not of all, but of those onely which living at diverse times, and sundry places, yet remaining in the communion and faith of one Catholick Church, were approved masters and guides to be followed: and whatsoever he perceiveth, not one or two, but all joyntly with one consent, plainly, usually, constantly, to have holden, written, and taught, let him know that without all scruple or doubt he ought to beleeve, hold, and professe that faith, that doctrine, that religion. But for more perspicuity and light of that which hath been said: each part is to be made clear with severall examples, and somewhat more at large to be amplified, least too much [Page 11]brevity breed obscurity, and overmuch hast in speech take away the substance and weight of the matter.
When in the time of Donatus, of whom came the Donatists, a great part of Africk fell headlong into his furious errour, and unmindfull of her name, religion, and profession, preferred the sacrilegious terrietity of one man, before the Church of Christ; then all those of Afriek which detested that profane Schisme and united themselves to the universall Churches of the world, they onely amongst them all remaining with in the bosome of the Catholick Church could be saved, leaving certainly a notable example to their posteritie how ever after by good custome the sound doctrine of all men, ought to be preferred before the madnesse of one or a few. Likewise when the heresie of the Arians had neer corrupted not a little part, but [Page 12]well nigh the whole world, in such sort that (almost all the Bishops of the latine Church deceived, partly by force, partly by fraud) mens minds were covered as it were with a mist, what especially in so great a confusion was to be followed: then whosoever was a lover and a follower of Christ, and preferred ancient faith before new errour, was not touched with any spot of that infection. The danger of w ch time doth abundantly shew, what calamity entreth in, when a new doctrine is admitted. For at that time not onely small matters, but things of great importance were overthrown: for not onely alliance, kindred, friends, families, but also cities, commonwealths, countries, Provinces, yea & at length the whol Romane Empire, was snaken and overturned. For when the profane novelty of the Arians, like some Bellona or sury, had first taken captive the [Page 13]Emperour, afterward subduing all pallaces to her new laws never ceased after that to trouble and confound all things private and publicke, holy and not holy, putting no difference betwixt good and truth but as it were from an high place did strike all at her pleasure. Then married women were defiled, widows spoiled, virgins violated, Abbeys suppressed, Clergie-men vexed, Deacons beaten, Priests banished, Dungeons, Prisons, Mines, filled with holy men, of which the greater part banished the Citie, like exiles, pined and consumed away amongst deserts, dens, and wilde beasts, with nakednesse, thirst and hunger. And all this misery had it any other beginning? but because humane superstition was admitted for heavenly doctrine, well grounded antiquity subverted by wicked novelty, whilest our Superiours decrees were violated, [Page 14]our Fathers ordinances broken, the Canons of our auncestours abrogated, and whilest the licentious libertie of prophane and new curiofitie, kept not it self within the chaste limites of sacred and sound antiquitie. But perhaps we devise all this of hatred to Noveltie, and affection to Antiquitie? Who so thinketh, at least let him give credit to blessed Ambrose who in his second book to Gratian the Emperour bewailing the sharp persecution of that time, saith thus: But now O God (quoth he) we have sufficiently washed and purged with our ruine and blood, the death of the Confessours, the banishment of Priestes, and the wickednes of so great impiety, it hath manifestly appeared that they cannot be safe which have violated and forsaken their faith. Likewise in his third book of the same work. Let us therfore (quoth he) [Page 15] keep the precepts of our elders, & not with temerity of rude presumption, violate those seales descending to us by inheritance. None durst open that propheticall book close sealed, not the elders, not the powers, not the Angells, not the Archangells: to explicate and interpret that book was a prerogative only reserved to Christ. The Preistlike book sealed by the Confessours and consecrated with the death of many Martirs, which of us dare presume to open? which book such as were compelled to unseale notwithstanding afterward when the fraud was condemned, they sealed again, they which durst not violate or touch it became Martirs: how can we deny their faith, whose victorie we so praise & commend? We commend them I say, O venerable Ambrose, we surely commend them, and with praises admire them. For who is so senselesse, [Page 16]that although he cannot arrive to their perfection, desireth not yet to imitate, whom no force could them remove from defending their aunce [...]ours faith: not threatnings not flatterings, not life, not death, not the King, not the Emperor, not men, not Devills; those I say whom for maintenance of religious antiquitie, our Lord vouchsased of so high, and so great a grace, that by them he would repaire the overthrowen Churches, give life to the dead spiritualtie, restore the overthrown glory of Priests, blot out & wash away with a fountaine of heavenly teares (which God put into the harts of the Bishops) those wicked, not books, but blottes and blurres, of new impiety, finally to restore almost the whole world (shaken with the cruell tempest of upstart heresie) to the antient faith, from new errour, to old sobernes, from new madnesse, to antient [Page 17]light, from new darknesse. But in this divine vertue which they shewed in the confession of their faith this thing is especially of us to be noted, that in that antiquitie of the Church they took upon them not the defence of any one part, but of the whole. For it was not lawfull that such excellent and famous men, should maintaine and defend with so great might and maine the erroneous suspicions, and those contrary each to other, of one or two men; or should stand in contention for the temerarious conspiracie of some small Province, but they did chuse by following the Canons and decrees of the Catholick and Apostolike veritie of all the Priests of holy Church, rather to betray them selves, then the universall ancient faith. For which fact of theirs they merited so great glorie that they are accounted not only Confessours but also justly and worthily the Princes [Page 18]of all Confessours. Great therefore & surely divine was the example of these blessed Confessours and of every true Catholick continually to be remembred who like the seven branched Candlestick, shining with the sevenfold gifts of the holy Ghost, delivered unto all posterity a most notable example; how afterward in each foolish and vain errour, the boldnesse of profane noveltie was to be repressed with authority of sacred Antiquity.
CHAP. III.
NEither is this any new thing, but alwaies usual in the Church of God, that the more religious a man hath been the more ready hath he alwayes resisted novell inventions, examples whereof many might be brought, but for brevity sake I will onely make choice of some one which shall be taken from the Apostolick [Page 19]sea, by which all men may see most plainly with what force alwayes, what zeal, what indeavour the blessed succession of the blessed Apostles have desended the integrity of that religion which they once received. Therefore in times past Agrippinus of venerable memory Bishop of Cart hage, the first of all mortall men maintained this assertion against the divine Scripture, against the rule of the universall Church, against the mind of all the Priests of his time, against the custom and tradition of his forefathers, that rebaptization was to be admitted and put in practise. Which presumption of his procured so great dammage and hurt to the Church, that not onely it gave all hereticks a pattern of sacrilege, but also ministred occasion of errour to some Catholicks. When therefore every where all men exclaimed against the [Page 20]novelty of the doctrine, and all priests in all places, each one according to his zeale did oppose, then Pope Steven of blessed memory, bishop of the Apostolique sea, resisted in deed with the rest of his fellow bishops, but yet more then the rest, thinking it as I suppose, reason so much to excell all other in devotion towards the faith, as he was superiour to them in authoritie of place. To conclude in his Epistle which then was sent to Africk, he decreed the same in these words. That nothing was to be innovated, but that which came by tradition ought to be observed. For that holy and prudent man knew well, that the nature of pietie could admit nothing else but only to deliver and teach our children that religion and that faith which we received and learned of our forefathers, and that we ought to follow religion whither [Page 21]it doth lead us, and not to lead religion whither it please us, and that nothing is more proper to Christian modestie and gravitie, then not to leave unto posteritie our own inventions, but to preserve and keep that which our Predecessours left us. What therefore was then the end of that whole busines? What else but that, which is common and usuall, to wit, antiquitie was retained, noveltie exploded. But perhaps that new invention lacked patrons and defenders? To which I say on the contrary, that it had such pregnant witts, such eloquent tongues, such number of defendants, such shew of truth such testimonies of scripture, but [...] after a new and naughtie fashion, that all that conspiracie and schisme should have seemed unto me invincible, had not the very profession of noveltie it self, so taken in hand, under that name defended, [Page 22]with that title recommended, overthrowen the very ground of so great a schisme. To conolude, what force had the Councell or decree of Africke? By Gods providence none, but all things there agreed upon were abolished, disanulled, abrogated, as dreames, as fables, as superfluous. And O strange change of the world, the authours of that opinion are judged and thought Catholicks, the followers accounted and reputed Hereticks, the masters discharged, the schollers condemned, the writers of those books shall be children of the kingdome of Heaven, the maintainers of those books shall burne in Hell. For who doubteth but holy S. Cyprian, that light of all Saints, that lanterne of Bishops, and spectacle of Martirs, with the rest of his companions shall raigne with Christ for ever? And contrariwise who is so wicked to [Page 23]deny that the Donatists and such other pestilent Hereticks, which by the authority of that Councell vaunt that they do practise rebaptization, shall burn for ever with the Devill and his Angels. Which judgement in mine opinion seemeth to have come from God, for their fraudulent dealing especially, which endeavouring under the cloak of an other mans name cunningly to frame an heresie, commonly lay hold of some dark sayings of one antient Father or other, which by reason of the obscurity may seem to make for their opinion, to the end they may be thought, that whatsoever I know not what they bring forth to the world, neither to have been the first that so taught, neither alone of that opinion: whose wicked device in mine opinion is worthy of double hatred, both for that they fear not to sowe their poysoned feed of herefie amongst others, [Page 24]and also because they blemish the memory of some holy man, and as it were with profane hands cast his dead ashes into the wind, bringing with shame that to light, which rather with silence were to be buried, following therein the steps of their father Cham, who not onely neglected to cover the nakednesse of venerable Noe, but also shewed it to others to laugh at, by which fact of his he incurred so great a crime of impiety that his posterity was subject to the malediction of his sinne: Gen. 9. his blessed brethren doing far otherwise, who neither with their own eyes would violate the nakednesse of their reverend father, nor yet permit it to remain uncovered for others to behold, but going backward as the holy text saith, they covered him: which is as much as to say that they neither approved with heart, nor blazed with tongue the holy [Page 25]mans fault, and therefore they and their posterity were rewarded with their fathers blessing. But to returne to our purpose.
CHAP. IIII.
WE have therefore much to fear the sacriledge of a changed faith, of a violated religion: from which fault not only the discipline of the ecclesiasticall decree doth restraine us, but the authoritie also of the Apostles censure deterreth. For all men know how gravely, how severely, how seriously the blessed Apostle S. Paul inveigheth against certaine which with great levitie. Gal. 1. Were so soon transferred from him that called thē into the grace of Christ unto another Gospel, which is not another. 2 Tim. 4. That had heaped up to them solves masters according to their own desires, [Page 26]averting their ears from truth, being converted to fables: Having damnation because they have made void their first faith. 1 Tim. 5. Whom those men had deceaved of whom the same Apostle, in his epistle to the Romans thus writeth. I beseech you brethren to mark them that make dissentions and scanda [...]ls contrary to the doctrine which you have learned and avoid them, for such do not serve Christ our Lord but their own bolly: And by sweet speeches and benedictions seduce the hearts of Innocents. Rom. 16. That enter into houses and lead captive silly women loaden with sins, which are led away with divers desires, alwaies learning and never attaining to the knowledge of truth. 2 Tim. 3. Ʋain speakers and seducers who subvert whole houses teaching the things they ought not for filthy lucre: Tit. 1. Men corrupt in their minde; [Page 27]reprobates concerning the faith: 2 Tim. 3. Proud, and knowing nothing but languishing about questions and strife of words, that are deprived of the truth, that esteem gaine to be pietie: 1 Tim 6. 1 Tim. 5. And with all idle they learn to go from house to house, not only idle, but also full of words and curious; speaking things which they ought not: 1 Tim. 1. Which repelling a good conscience have made sh [...]pwrak about the faith: Whose prophane speeches do much grow to impietie, and their speech spreadeth as a cancre. But that is also worth the noting which is written of them. But they shall prosper no further, for their folly shall be manifest to all as theirs also was. 2 Tim. 2. 2 Tim. 3, When therefore such kind of men wandring up and downe through Provinces and Cities to set their errors to sale, came also unto the Galathians, who after [Page 28]they had heard them and were delighted with the filthie drugs of hereticall Novelty, casting up againe the heavenly Manna of the Apostolick and Catholick doctrine; The Apolstle used his authoritie decreeing very severely in this sort. But although (quoth he) we or an Angel from heaven evangelize unto you beside that which we have evangelized be he Anathema. Gal. 1.
What meaneth this that he sayeth But although we, why did he not rather say But although I? That is to say, although Peter, although Andrew, although John, yea finally although the whole company of the Apostles evangelize unto you otherwise then we have evangelized, be he accursed. A terrible censure, for maintaining the possession of the first faith, not to have spared himself, nor any other of the Apostles. But this is a smal matter: Although an [Page 29]Angel from heaven (quoth he) Evangelize unto you beside that which I have Evangelized be he Anathema: he was not contented for keeping the faith once planted to make mention of mans weak nature unlesse also he included those excellent creatures, the Angells. Although we (quoth he) or an Angel from heaven, not because the holy Angells of Heaven can now sinne but this is the meaning of that he saith: Although (quoth he) that might be which cannot be, whosoever he be that goeth about to change the faith which was once planted, be he accursed. But peradventure he uttered those words slightly and cast them forth rather of humane affection then decreed them by any reason grounded in Gods word. God forbid: For it followeth, and that very earnestly urged, very often repeated.
As I have foretold you (quoth he) and now againe I tell you If any body evangelize unto you beside that which you have receaved be he Anathema. He said not if any man preach unto you beside that which you have receaved let him be blessed, let him be commended, let him be receaved, but Anathema, that is, separated, thrust out, excommunicated, least the c [...]uell infection of one sheep with his poisoned company corrupt the sound flock of Christ. But peradventure this was given in commandment only to the Galathians: then likewise were these precepts following commanded onely to the Galathians, to wit. If we live in the spirit, in the spirit also let us walk, let us not be made desirous of vain glory, provoking one an other, envying one another, Gal. 5. & such like which if it be absurd to say, and no man doubteth but that they were [Page 31]indifferently commanded to all, then certaine it is, that as these precepts touching manners include all, so likewise those concerning faith and doctrine, except none. And therefore as it is not lawfull for any to provoke one another, to envy one another, even so it is unlawfull for any to admit or to receave any other faith or religion then that which the Catholick Church every where teacheth; or happily shall we be so mad to say that then it was commanded to curse and anathematize him that preached any otherwise then before had been preached, and that now it is not commanded, then was that likewise which is there said. But I say walk in the spirit and you shall not fulfill the desires of the flesh, then onely commanded but now is not; which if it be impious & dangerous so to beleeve, then of necessitie it followeth that as these precepts of life & [Page 32]manners are to be kept of all ages, so likewise those set down against innovating of religion and changing of faith, are commanded to all posteritie, wherfore to preach unto Christian Catholick men, besides that which they have received never was lawfull, no where is lawfull, nor ever shall be lawfull.
And on the contrarie to say Anathema and curse those which teach otherwise then once hath been received, was at all times needful, is every where convenient, & ever shall be requisite. Which being so, is there any man either so bold that dare teach that, which in the Church hath not been taught, or of such levitie that will receive ought besides that which he hath received of the Church. Let that vessel of election, that master of the Gentiles, that trump of the Apostles, that preacher of the world, he that was acquainted [Page 33]with heavenly affairs, cry out, and again cry out in his Epistles, to all men, to all times, to all places, that whosoever preacheth a new doctrine is to be accursed. And on the contrary part, let certain Frogs, corruptible Gnats and Flies, such as the Pelagians be, reclaim and that to Catholicks: We being your Authours (quoth they) we being your Leaders, we being your Interpreters, condemn that which before you did hold, hold that which before you condemned. Cast away your old Faith, your Forefathers Laws, your Elders Constitutions, and receive, what a Gods name? I tremble to speak, for they be so proud and presumptuous, that as they cannot be maintained without sin, so neither impugned without some blot of offence.
CHAP. V.
BUt some man will say, why then doth God very often permit certain notable and excellent men in the Church to preach unto Catholicks a new Religion. A very good question and such as deserveth a more diligent and ample discourse, unto which notwithstanding I will not answer out of mine own head, but with the authority of sacred Scripture, and the doctrine of a notable Master in Gods Church: let us then hear holy Moses, let him give us the reason, why learned men, and such as for their great gift of knowledge are called of the Apostle Prophets, be sometimes permitted to preach new Doctrine, which the old Testament Allegorically calleth strange gods, because their opinions are so observed and [Page 35]honoured of Hereticks, as the gods were of the Gentiles: thus then writeth blessed Moses in Deuteron. 13. If there shall arise (quoth he) in the middest of thee a Prophet, or one which saith he hath seen a dream, that is some Master of the Church, whose Disciples or followers suppose to teach by some revelation from God: what then? and shall foretell (quoth he) some sign or miracle, and that shall happen which he hath said: some great Master is here surely meant, and one of so deep knowledge whom his followers imagine not onely to know things humane, but also to foresee future, and such as shall happen, which is farre above mans reach, as the scholers for the most part of Valentinus, Donatus, Photinus, Apollinaris, and such like did brag that their masters were. What followeth? And shall (quoth he) say unto thee [Page 36]let us go and follow strange Gods, which thou knowest not, and let us serve them. What is meant by strange Gods, but forrein errours, which thou knowest not, that is new and never heard of before, and let us serve them, that is believe them, follow them. What then? Thou shalt not (quoth he) hear the words of that Prophet or Dreamer. And why I pray you, is not that forbidden by God to be taught, which is by God forbidden to be heard? Because (quoth he) the Lord your God doth tempt you, that it may appear whether you love him or no, in your whole heart, and in your whole soul. The reason then is more clear then day, why the providence of God doth sometime suffer certain teachers and masters of the Church to Preach certain new opinions that your Lord God (quoth he) may tempt you. And surely a great tentation it is, when as [Page 37]he whom you think a Prophet, a diseiple of the Prophets, whom you esteem a Doctour and maintainer of the truth, whom you have highly reverenced, and most intirely loved, when he suddenly and privily bringeth in pernicious errours which neither you can quickly spy lead away with prejudice of your old teacher nor easily condemn, hindered with love to your old master.
CHAP. VI.
HEre some man haply doth earnestly desire to see that proved by some Ecclesiasticall examples which by the authority of Moses hath already been avouched. The demand is reasonable, and therefore of reason not long to be deferred. Wherefore to begin with those which are yet fresh in memory, and to the world best known. What kind [Page 38]of tentation think you was that of late dayes, when that ungracious and cursed Nestorius suddenly from a sheep transformed into a wolf, began to devoure the flock of Christ, at such time as those which were spoiled, commonly took him for a sheep, and therefore were more subject to his cruelty. For who would have easily imagined him to have erred, whom every man knew to have been chosen with such judgement of the Empire, who was so highly in grace with the Clergy, so much beloved of all holy men, so greatly in favour with the people, who openly expounded the Scriptures, and also confuted the pestiferous errour of the Jews: why could not this man, by such means easily perswade any, that he taught aright, preached aright, believed aright, who to smooth the way, and make entrance for his own [Page 39]heresie, persecuted and preached against the blasphemies of all others. But this was that which Moses saith: The Lord your God doth tempt you, if you love him or no. And to passe over Nestorius in whom was alwayes more admiration then profit, more fame then experience whom for some time humane favour had made greater, then Gods grace exalted. Let us rather speak of them which endowed with many gifts and men of great industrie, have been no small tentation to Catholicks, as amongst the Pannonians, in our Fathers memory Photinus is recorded to have tempted the Church of Sirminum, in which being preferred with the liking of all men unto the dignity of Priesthood, for sometime he behaved himself very Catholickly but suddenly like that naughty Prophet or Dreamer of whom Moses speaketh, he began to [Page 40]perswade the people of God committed to his charge, to follow other gods, that is strange and unknown errours, which before they were not acquainted with. But as this is usuall, so that was very pernicious, that he had so great helps and furtherance for the advancing of so great wickednesse: For he was both of an excellent wit, and singularly well learned, and passing eloquent, as he which both in disputation and writing was copious and grave, in either language, as appeareth by the Books which he wrote, partly in Greek, and partly in the Latine tongue. But it hapned well that Christs sheep committed to his charge very vigilant and carefull in keeping the Catholick faith, did speedily remember Moses warning, and therefore albeit they admired much the eloquence of their Prophet and Pastour: yet were they not [Page 41]ignorant of the temptation. And therefore whom before they followed as the chief leader of the flock, the same very man afterward they avoided as a ravening wolf. Neither do we learne only by Photinus but also by the example of Apollinaris the danger of this ecclesiasticall tentation, and therby also be admonished diligently to keep and retaine our faith and religion. For this Apollinaris procured his auditours great trouble & anguish of mind, whilest the authoritie of the Church drew them one way and the acquaintance of their master haled them another, so that wavering and tottering betwixt both, they were uncertaine whether part was best to be followed. But haply he was such a one as easely deserved to be contemned. Nay he was so famous and worthie a man, that in very many things he vvon credite [Page 42]to fast. For who surpassed him in sharpnes of wit? in exercise, in learning? how many heresies in many and great books hath he overthrown? how many errors against the faith hath he confuted? That most notable and great work of thirtie books in which with great waight of reason he confounded, the franticke cavills of Porphirius doth give credit to my report, and testifie the truth of my relation. It were too long to rehearse up all his works for which he might have been compared to the cheefe pillours of Gods Church, had not the prophane licentiousnesse of hereticall curiositie, by inventing I know not what new opinion spotted and discredited all his former labours, whereby his doctrine was accounted not so much an edification, as an ecclesiasticall tentation.
CHAP. VII.
HEre some man perhaps requireth to know what heresies these men above named taught: that is Nestorius, Appollinaris, & Photinus. This pertaineth not to the matter, whereof we now intreat, for it is not our purpose to dispute against each mans particuler error, but only by a few examples plainly and clearly to prove, that to be most true which Moyses saith, that if at any time any ecclesiasticall doctour, yea and a Prophet for interpreting the misteries of the prophetical visions, goeth about to bring in any new opinion into the Church, that the providence of God doth permit it for our proofe and triall. But because it will be profitable, I will by a little digression briefely set down what the forenamed hereticks [Page 44] Photinus, Apollinaris, and Nestorius taught. This then is the heresie of Photinus, he affirmeth that God is as the Jewes beleeve singular and solitary, denying the fulnesse of the Trinitie, not beleving that there is any person of the word of God, or of the holy ghost; he affirmeth also, that Christ was only man, who had his begining of the virgin MARY, teaching verie earnestly that we ought to worship only the person of God the father, and to honour Christ only for man. This then was Photinus opinion. now Apollinaris vaunteth much as though he beleved the unitie of Trinitie with full & sound faith but yet blasphemeth he manifestly against our Lords incarnation. For he saith that our Saviour either had not mans soul at all, or at least such a one, as was neither indued with mind or reason; furthermore he affirmeth that Christs body was not taken [Page 45]of the flesh of the holy virgin MARY, but descended from heaven into the wombe of the Virgin, holding yet doubtfully & inconstantly some time that it was coeternall to the word of God, some time that it was made of the divinitie of the word: for he would not admit two maner of substances in Christ, the one divine, the other humane, the one of his Father, the other of his Mother, but did think that the verie nature of the word was divided into two parts, as though the one remained in God, and the other was turned into flesh, that wheras the truth saith, that Christ is one consisting of two substances, he contrary to the truth affirmeth, of the one divinitie of Christ to be two substances: and these be the assertions of Apollinaris. But Nestorius sicke of a contrarie disease whilest he faineth a distinction of two substances in Christ, [Page 46]suddenly bringeth in two persons: and with monstrous wickednes, will needs have two sonnes of God, two Christs one that was God, and another that was man, one begotten of the Father, another begotten of his Mother. And therefore he saieth that the holy Virgin MARY is not to be called the mother of God, but the mother of Christ, because, that Christ which was borne of her was not God but man. And if any man think that in his books he saith there was one Christ and that he preached one person of Christ, I must needs confesse that he lacketh not ground to say so, for that he did either of craftie pollicie, the rather to deceave, that by some good things, he might the more easely perswade that which is evill, as the Apostle saith. By the good thing he hath wrought me death. R. 7. Wherfore either craftely as I said in certaine places of his [Page 47]writings he vaunteth to beleeve one person in Christ, or else surely he did hold, that after our Ladies deliverie, two persons became in such sort one Christ that yet in the time of our Ladies conception or deliverie, and for some time after, there were two Christs, and that Christ was born first like unto another man, and only was man and not yet joyned in unitie with the person of God the word, and that afterward the person of the word descended down assuming and joyning him self to that man in unitie of person, and although he now remaine in glorie assumpted for some time yet there seemeth to have been no difference betwixt him and other men. Thus then Nestorius, Apollinaris, Phatinus, like mad doggs barked against the Catholick Church: Photinus not confessing the Trinity: Apollinaris maintaining the nature of [Page 48]the Word convertible, and not confessing two substances in Christ, denying also either the whol soul of Christ, or at least that it was indued with mind and reason, beleeving for his pleasure what he liked of the second person in Trinitie: Nestorius by defending either alwayes or for some time two Christs. But the Catholick Church beleeving aright both of God and of our Saviour, neither blasphemeth against the misterie of the Trinitie, nor against the incarnation of Christ, for it worshipeth one Divinitie in Trinitie & reverenceth the equalitie of the Trinitie in one and the same majestie, confessing one Christ, not two, and the self same both God and man, beleeving in him one person, yet acknowledging two substances, but yet beleeving one person: two substances, because the word of God is not mutable that it can be turned [Page 49]into flesh: one person, least professing two sonnes, it may seeme to worship a quaternitie and not to adore the Trinitie.
CHAP. VIII.
BUt it is worth the labour to declare this matter more plainly, more substantially, more distinctly. In God is one substance and three persons; in Christ be two substances, but one person. In the Trinitie there is another, and another; but not another and another thing: In our Saviour is not another, and another, but another & another thing. How is there in the Trinitie another and another, but not another and another thing? Marry because there is another person of the father, another of the sonne, and another of the holy ghost: But yet not another & another nature, but one & the self same: How [Page 50]is there in our Saviour another and another thing, not another and another? because there is another substance of the divinitie, and another substance of the humanitie, but yet the deitie and the humanitie is not another and another, but one and the selfe same Christ, one and the same sonne of God, and one and the selfe same person, of the selfe same Christ and sonne of God. As in a man the body is one thing, and the soule is another thing, but yet the body and the soule are but one and the selfe same man. In Peter & Paul the soule is one thing, the body is another thing, and yet the body and the soule are not two Peters, nor the soule is not one Paul, and the body another Paul, but one and the selfe same Peter, one and the selfe same Paul, subsisting of a double & divers nature of the body and the soule. So therefore in one and the selfe same [Page 51]Christ there are two substances, but one a divine substance, the other humane, the one of God the Father, the other of the Virgin his Mother, the one coeternall and equall to the Father, the other substantiall to his Mother, yet one and the same Christ in both substances. Therefore there is not one Christ God, another Christ man, not one increated, another created, not one impassible, another passible, not one equal to the Father, another lesse then the Father, not one of the father, another of the mother, but one and the selfe same Christ, God and man, the same increated and created, the same incommutable and impassible, the same changed & suffered, the same equall and inferiour to the Father, the same begotten of his Father before all times, the same conceived of his Mother in time, perfect God and perfect man; in him [Page 52]as God is perfect Divinitie, in him as man is perfect humanitie: perfect humanitie I say, because it had both soule and body, yet a true body, such as our body is, and such as his mothers was; and a soule indued with understanding, with mind & reason. There is therefore in Christ, the Word, the Soul, the Flesh, but yet all these together is one Christ, one son of God, our onely Saviour and Redeemer: One I say, not by any I know not what corruptible confusion, of the divinity and humanity together, but by a certain perfect, and singular unity of person: for that conjunction did not change or convert either into other (which is the proper errour of the Arians) but did rather so unite both in one, that as the singularity of one and the same person remayneth alwayes in Christ, so likewise the properties of both natures do for ever continue; so that [Page 53]neither God ever beginneth to be a body, nor now at any time ceaseth to be a body; which thing is also more apparent by some humane example: for not onely in this world, but also in the next every man shall consist of body and soul, & yet never shall either the body be changed into the soul, or the soul ever converted into the body; but as every man shall live for ever, so for ever of necessity in each man the difference of either substance shall continue: So likewise in Christ each property of either substance shall continue for ever, saving alwayes and reserving the unity of person. And when we often name this word Person, and say that the Sonne of God was made man, we must take great heed that we seeme not to say that God, the Word, the second person in Trinitie tooke upon him our actions onely in imitation, and [Page 54]and rather in shew and shadow, and not as a perfect and very man practised humane conversation: as we see used in Theaters and Stages, where one man in a little time taketh upon him many parts, of which notwithstanding himselfe is none; for as often as we counterfeit another mans actions, we so exercise his office, that yet we be not those men whose actions we take upon us; for neither a tragedie player (to use prophane examples and such as the Maniches alledge) when he playeth the Priest or King, is therefore a priest or king, for so soon as the tragedie endeth, that person also which he played forthwith ceaseth. God keep us from this horrible and wicked mockerie. Let this madnesse be proper to the Maniches, which preaching abroad their owne fantasies, affirme God the sonne of God not to have been substantively the [Page 55]person of man, but to have fained the same by supposed action and conuersation. But the Catholick faith affirmeth that the word of God was so made man, that he took upon him our nature & the proprieties belonging to the same, not deceitfully and in shew, but truely and verily, and did such things as belong to man, as his owne, and not as one that imitated other mens actions, and was verily that which in life and conversation he did shew himselfe to be, as we our selves also, in that we speak, understand and subsist, do not counterfeit our selves to be men, but are verily men. For neither Paul and John (to speak of them especially for example sake) were men by imitation, but by subsistence, neither likewise did Paul counterfeit the Apostle or faine himselfe Paul, but was in veritie an Apostle and was Paul by subsistence. [Page 56]In like maner God the Word, by assuming and having flesh, in speaking, doing and suffering, in flesh, yet without any corruption of his nature, vouchsafed perfectly to performe this, to wit not that he should imitate or counterfeit, but exhibit himself a perfect man, not that he should seem or be thought a very man, but should in veritie so be and subsist. Therefore as the soule joyned to the flesh; and yet not turned into the flesh, doth not imitate a man, but is a man, and not a man in shew and appearance, but in substance: so God the Word without any conversion of himself, uniting himself to man, was made man, not by confusion, not by mutation, but by subsisting. Let that exposition therefore of a fained & counterfeit person utterly be rejected, in which alwayes one thing is in shew, another in deed, inw eh. he that [Page 57]doth ought, is never the same person whom he representeth: for God forbid, that we should believe that God the Word took upon him the person of man, after such a deceitfull manner; but rather in this sort, That his substance remaining incommutable in it self, and yet taking upon him the nature of perfect man, was himself flesh, was himself a man, was himself the person of a man not deceitfully but truly, not in imitation, but in truth and substance; not finally after that sort which with action should desist, but after that manner which perfectly in substance should persist. This unity therefore of person in Christ was not framed, and finished after the Virgins delivery, but in her very womb. For we must diligently take heed that we confesse Christ not onely one, but also to have been alwayes one, because it is an intolerable blasphemy [Page 58]to grant him now to be one, and yet contend that once he was not one, but two, that is one after the time of his Baptisme, but two in the time of his Nativitie; which great sacriledge we cannot otherwise avoid, but by confessing that man was united to God in unity of person, not in his Ascention, not in his Resurrection, not in his Baptisme, but in his mothers womb, and immaculate conception: by reason of which Unity of Person, both the Proprieties of God are indifferently and promiscually attributed to man, and the proprieties of man ascribed to God: hence cometh that which is written in the Scripture, That the Son of man descended from Heaven, and the Lord of Majesty was Crucified upon earth: Joan. 6. hence also it proceedeth that we say, that when our Lords flesh was made, when our Lords body was framed, [Page 59]that the very Word of God was made, the very wisdome of God was replenished with created knowledge, as in the foresight of God His hands and feet are said to be digged, Psalm. 21. From this unity of Person, I say it proceedeth, by reason of like mystery, that when the flesh of the Word of God was born of his pure and immaculate mother, we do most Catholickly believe that God himself the Word was born of the Virgin, and most impiously the contrary is maintained. Which being so, God forbid that any one should go about to deprive the holy Virgin Mary of the priviledges of Gods favour as her especiall glory: For she is by the singular grace of our Lord and God her son, to be confessed most truly and most blessedly to have been the mother of God, but yet not in such sort, as impious hereticks imagine [Page 60]and suspect, who affirm, that she is to be reputed in name onely and appellation the mother of God, as she forsooth which brought forth that man which afterward became God, as we say, such a woman is the mother of a Priest or Bishop, not because she brought him that then was either Priest or Bishop, but by generating that man which afterward was made a Priest or Bishop: not in that manner I say the blessed Virgin is to be called the mother of God, but rather, because, as hath been said, that most holy mystery was finished in her sacred womb, wherein by reason of a singular, and one onely unity of person, as the Word in flesh is flesh, so man in God is God.
CHAP. IX.
BUt now what hath already been said touching the foresaid heresies, or concerning the Catholick faith, let us in few words and compendiously for memory sake repeat them over again, that thereby with more facility they may be understood, and with greater certainty retained. Accursed therefore be Photinus, not admitting the fulnesse of the Trinity, and affirming our Saviour Christ to have been onely man. Accursed be Appollinaris, maintaining in Christ corruption of changed divinity, and bereaving him of the propriety of perfect humanity. Accursed be Nestorius, denying God to have been born of a Virgin, teaching two Christs, and so abandoning the faith of the Trinity, bringing in a quaternity. But blessed [Page 62]be the Catholick Church which adoreth one God in perfect Trinity, and likewise worshipeth equality of Trinity in one Divinity, so that neither singularity of substance confoundeth propriety of Persons, nor distinction of Trinity separateth unity of Deity. Blessed I say be the Church, which believeth in Christ two true and perfect substances, but one onely person, so that neither distinction of natures doth divide the unity of person, nor unity of person doth confound the difference of substances. Blessed I say be the Church, which, to the end she may confesse Christ alwayes to be and to have been one, acknowledgeth man united to God, not after our Ladies delivery, but even then in his mothers womb. Blessed I say be the Church, which understandeth God made man, not by any conversion of nature, but by reason and means of [Page 63]person, and that not a fained and transitory person, but substantially subsisting and permanent. Blessed I say be the Church, which teacheth that this unity of person hath so great force, that by reason thereof by a mystery strange and ineffable, she ascribeth unto man the proprieties of God, and attributeth to God the proprieties of man. For by reason of this unity of person she confesseth, that man as he was God, descended from Heaven; and God as he was man, was made upon earth, suffered and was Crucified. Blessed therefore is that venerable, happy, and sacred confession, and comparable to those supernall praises of the Angels, who do glorifie one onely Lord God, yet with a triple Hagiologie: For this is the principall reason why the Church teacheth the unity of Christ, lest otherwise she should exceed the mystery of the Trinity.
And let this suffice touching this matter, spoken by way of digression: hereafter if it please God, I will intreat and declare these points more copiously. Now to return to our former purpose.
CHAP. X
WE have said in the premises, that in the Church of God, the errour of the master is a great tentation to the people; and the more learned he were that erred, so much the greater was the tentation: Which we shewed first by the authority of holy Scripture, afterward by the examples ecclesiasticall of those men, which for some time were reputed and accounted sound in faith, yet at last fell either into some other mans error, or els coined a new heresie of their own: This surely is a great matter, profitable to be learned [Page 65] [...]d necessary to be remembred; which once again we must inculcate and make plain by great store of examples, that all Catholicks may know, that with the Church they ought to receive Doctours, and not with Doctours to forsake the faith of the Church. But I suppose that, although I could bring forth many to shew this kind of tentation, yet there is almost none which can be compared to the tentation of Origen, in whom were very many gifts, [...]o rare, so singular, so strange, that in the beginning any would have thought that his opinions might have been believed of all men. For if life procureth authority, he was a man of great industry of great chastity, patience, and labour: if family or learning, who more noble? being of that house which was honourable for Martyrdome, himself afterward for Christ deprived [Page 66]not of father onely, but also spoiled of all his patrimony, and so much he profited in the mysteries of holy poverty, that as it is reported, for the confession of Christs name he often indured much affliction. Neither was he only adorned with these gifts, all which afterward served for tentation, but was indued also with a force of wit so profound, so quick, so elegant, that he far excelled almost all other whatsoever. A man of such wonderfull learning and erudition, that there were few things in Divinity, in humane Philosophy, haply nothing which he had not perfectly attained: who having gotten the treasures of the Greek tongue, laboured also about the Hebrew. And for his eloquence what should I speak of it, whose talk was so pleasant, so delectable, so sweet, that in mine opinion, not words but hony flwed from his mouth? What [Page 67]things were so hard to beleeve which with force of argument he made not plaine, what so difficult to bring to passe, which he made not to seem easie? But perchance he maintained his assertions by arguments only. Nay, without question there was never any Doctour which used more examples of sacred scripture. But yet happelie he wrote not much. No man living more; yea so much that in mine opinion all his works are so far from being read over, that they can not possiblie all be found; who not to lack anie furtherance to learning, lived also untill he was passing old. But yet perchance unfortunate in his scholers. What man ever more happie, having trained up and been master to infinite Doctours, to Priests without number, to Confessours and Martyrs? Now who is able to prosecute with words, in what admiration he was with all men? in [Page 68]what glory? in what credit & grace? Who more zealous in religion repaired not to him, from the furthest parts of the world? What Christian did not almost worship him as a Prophet? What Philosopher did not honour him as a master? & how greatly he was reverenced, not only of private men, but also of the Empire it self, histories doe speak, which report that he was sent for of Alexander the Emperours mother, to wit, for the merit of his heavenly wisdome with the grace and love whereof he was inflamed. His epistles also testifie the same thing, which with the authoritie of a Christian master he wrote unto Philip the Emperour, the first Christian amongst all the Romane Princes. And if any man upon our report admiteth not the testimonie of a Christian touching his wonderfull knowledge, and learning, at least let him receive [Page 69] [...] confession of an heathen Philopher. For that impious Porphyrie [...]h, that himself being but yet as were a boy, moved with his fame, [...]vailed unto Alexandria where [...] did see him being then old, but [...] such a one and so learned as he [...]t had attained to the perfection [...] all knowledge. Time would soon [...] fail me, then I could touch though [...]efly those notable gifts which [...]re in that man, all which not [...]thstanding pertained not onely to [...] glory of Religion, but also to [...] greatnesse of the temptation. For [...]ho is he that would willingly [...]ve forsaken a man of such wit, [...] so deep learning, of so rare grace, [...]nd would not sooner have used [...]at saying, that he had rather erre [...]ith Origen then believe aright [...]th others? And what should I [...]y more, the matter came to that [...], that as the end shewed, not [Page 70]an usuall and common, but a pass [...] dangerous tentation of so worthy man, so famous a Doctour, so no [...] ble a Prophet, earried very man [...] from the true and sound faith of th [...] Church: For this Origen so ra [...] and singular a man, abusing [...] grace of God, too insolently flatt [...] ing himself, too much in his ow [...] wit, believing himself more th [...] reason would, little esteeming [...] old simplicity of Christian rel [...] gion, presuming to be wiser then a [...] other, contemning the traditions [...] the Church, and the old Fathe [...] documents, waded so far in expounding certain chapters of the Scriptu [...] after a new fashion, that he dese [...] ed that the Church of God shou [...] also say of him: If there arise up the middest of thee a Prophet, a [...] a little after, thou shalt not h [...] (quoth he) the words of that Pr [...] phet, and again, because (quoth h [...] [Page 71] your Lord God doth tempt you whether you love him or no. And surely it is not only a tentation, but also a great tentation, when a man seduceth secretly and by little and little the Church depending upon him (admiring his wit, knowledge, eloquence, conversation, and grace, nothing suspecting him, nothing fearing him) suddenly from the old religion to a prophane and new doctrine. But some will say that Origens books be corrupted: I will not gaine-say it, but rather wish it were so: for that hath both been said & written by some, not only Catholicks, but also Hereticks. But this is now the point we are to consider, that although not he, yet the books passing abroad under his name are a great tentation, which stuffed with many horrible blasphemies, are read and used, loved, and liked, not as the books of others, but as his [Page 72]works: so that although Origen gave no cause of erroneous doctrine, yet his authoritie hath been the occasion why the errour hath been liked and followed.
The case also of Tertullian is the very same with the former: for as Origen is to be thought the best amongst the Greek Doctours, so Tertullian without controversie is the chief of all the latin. For who was more learned then hee? Who in Divinitie or Humanitie more practised? for by his great and wonderfull capacitie of wit, he attained to, and understood all Philosophie, all the sects of Philosophers, all their authours and patrons, all their learning, all sorts of histories and studies. And for his wit, was he not so excellent, so grave, so sharpe, that he almost undertook the overthrow of nothing which either by quicknes of wit or weight of reason he crushed [Page 73]not in peeces? Now who is able to set down the commendation and praise which his stile and phrase of speech deserved, which was so fraught (I know not how) with that force of reason, that such as could not be perswaded, were compelled: whose almost so many words, were so many sentences so many sences, so many victories? This is well known to Marcion and Appelles, well known to Praxeas, and Hermogenes, the Jews understand this, the Gentiles have tryed it, the Gnosticks have proved it, and divers others have felt it: whose blasphemous opinions he hath overthrown with his many and great volumes, as it had been with thunder & lightning. And yet this man after all this, this Tertullian I say, not holding the catholick religion, that is the universal & old faith being far more eloquent then faithful, changing afterward [Page 74]his mind, did at last that which the blessed Confessour Hilarie in a certaine place writeth of him. He discredited (quoth he) with his later errour his probable writings; and therefore he was also a great tentation in the Church. But hereof I will say no more, onely this I add, that by his defending against the precept of Moses, for true prophesies the new madnesse of Montanus springing up in the Church, and those mad dreams of new doctrine of that frantick woman, he deserved that we should also say of him and his writings: If a Prophet shall rise up in the midst of thee, and straight after, thou shalt not heare the words of that Prophet. Why so? Because (quoth he) your Lord God doth tempt you whether you love him or no. We ought therefore evidently to note by these so many, so great, and divers others such weighty examples, and by the [Page 75]law of Deuteronomie most clearly to understand that if at any time any ecclesiasticall teacher shayeth from the faith, that gods providence doth suffer that for our triall whether we love him or no in our whol heart, & in our whol soul.
CHAP. XI.
WHich being so he is a true and perfect sincere Catholick that loveth Gods truth, that loveth his body the Church that preferreth nothing before the religion of God, nothing before the Catholick faith, not any mans authority, not love, not will, not eloquence, not philosophie; but contemning all these things, setled in faith, stable and permanent, whatsoever he knoweth the Catholick Church universally in old time to have holden, that he [Page 76]purposeth with himself onely to hold and beleeve: and therefore whatsoever new doctrine, and not before heard of such a one perceives to be brought in, of some one man, beside or contrary to the old Saints and Doctors, let him know that doctrine doth not pertaine to religion, but rather to tentation, for his proofe and tryall, especially being instructed with the saying of the Apostle St. Paul: For this is that which he writeth in his first epistle to the Corinthians: There must (quoth he) be heresies also that they which are approved may be made manifest amongst you. As though he should say. This is the cause why the authors of heresies are not straight rooted out by God, that the approved may be made manifest, that is, every one may appear how steadfastly, faithfully and constantly, he loveth the Catholick faith. And certaine it [Page 77]is that straigh: upon the springing up of any Noveltie, the weighty corne is discerned from the light chaffe; then is that easily blown out of the floore which before lightly remained in the floore; for some by and by fly away, others onely shaken are both afraid to perish, and ashamed to returne remaining wounded, half dead, half alive, like unto those which have drunk so much poison, as neither killeth, nor well digesteth, neither bringeth death nor yet permitteth to live. O the miserable state of such persons! with what seas of cares, with what storms are they tossed! for some time as the wind driveth them, they are caried away headlong into errour, another time coming again to themselves, they are shaken and beaten like contrary waves striving together, sometime with rash presumption they allow such things as seem uncertain an [...] [Page 78]time of pusillanimitie they fear those things which are certaine, doubtfull which way to take, which way to return, what to desire, what to avoid, what to hold, what to let go: which miserie and affliction of a wavering and unsetled heart, were they wise, is as a plaister of Gods mercy towards them. For this is the reason why (being out of the safe port of the Catholick faith) they are shaken, tossed & almost killed with stormes and troubles to the end they should take down the sails of their proud mind, which they vainly hoised up to the winds of novelties, and so retire and keep themselves within the most sure port of their calme and good mother; and first cast up those bitter & turbulent waters of errours, that afterward they may drink of the flowing rivers of lively and pure water. Let them learn to forget that well, which well they never learned, [Page 79]and those articles which the Church teacheth, and by reason are to be attained to, let them in Gods name endeavour to understand, and those which surpasse reason let them by faith beleeve.
CHAP. XII.
WHich being so: often times calling to mind and remembring the self same thing; I cannot sufficiently marvel at the great madnesse of some men, at so great impietie of their blinded hearts, to conclude, at so great a licentious desire to errour, that they be not content with the rule of faith once delivered us, and received from our ancestors but do every day search & seek for new doctrine, ever desirous to add, to change, and to take away somthing from Religion, as though that were not the doctrine [Page 80]of God, which was once sufficiently revealed, but rather mans institution which cannot but by continuall correction (or rather corruption) come to perfection.
Whereas the divine scriptures cry out: Do not translate the bounds which thy fathers have set down; and, Do not judge over thy judge; and, the Serpent will bite him that cutteth the hedge; and that saying of the Apostle by which all wicked novelties of all hereticks have often been cut in pieces, as it were with a spirituall sword, and alwayes hereafter shall be: O Timothy keep the depositum, avoiding the prophane novelties of voyces, and oppositions of falsly called knowledge, which certain promising have erred about the faith. And yet for all this, some there be so shameles, so impudent, so obstinate, as not to yield to such force of divine scripture, not to be [Page 81]moved with such weight of reason nor yet shaken with such heavenly hammers, to conclude, which will not be beaten in pieces with such celestiall lightning. Avoid (saith he) the profane novelties of voices. He saith not avoid antiquities, he saith not avoid antientness; nay rather, sheweth what contrariwise should follow. For if novelty is to be avoided, antiquity is to be retained; if novelty be profane, antiquity is sacred. And oppositions (quoth he) of falsly called knowledge. Verily the name of knowledg in the Schools of Hereticks is false, where ignorance is called knowledge; mist, reputed clearnesse; and darknesse termed by the name of light. Which certain (quoth he) promising have erred about the faith. What promised they, when they erred about the faith? What else, but I know not what new and unknown [Page 82]doctrine? For you may hear some of them say. O ye unwise and silly souls, which commonly are called Catholicks, come and learn the true faith, which no creature understandeth besides us, which hath been hidden many hundred of years past, but of late hath been revealed and laid open: but learn it privily, learn it secretly, for it will delight you. And again, when you have learned it, teach it secretly, that the world may not understand it, that the Church may not know it; for it is granted to few to understand the secret of so great a mystery. Are not these, think you, the words of that Harlot, which in the Proverbs of Solomon calleth unto her the passengers: Who is (quoth she) most fool amongst you, let him turn unto me. Proverbs 9. And such as be of small judgement, she exhorteth, saying: [Page 83] Touch willingly secret bread, and drink sweet water privily. What followeth? But he knoweth not (quoth he) how in her company earthly men do perish. Who be these earthly men? Let the Apostle declare: Those (quoth he) which have erred about the faith. But it is worth the labour more diligently to examine the Apostle his whole Chapter. O Timothy (quoth he) keep the depositum, avoiding profane novelties of voices. This exclamation O, both sheweth foresight, and also argueth charity: for he foresaw certain errours which before-hand he was sorry for. Who at this day hath the place of Timothy? but either the whole Church, or especially, the whole body of Prelates, who ought themselves to have the whole knowledge of divine religion, and also to instruct others, what is meant by keep the depositum. [Page 84]Keep it (quoth he) for fear of thieves, for danger of enemies, lest when men be a sleep they oversowe Cockell amongst the Wheat, which the sonne of man hath sowed in his field. Keep (quoth he) the depositum: What is meant by this depositum? that is, that which is committed to thee, not that which is invented of thee: that which thou hast received, not that which thou hast devised: a thing not of wit, but of learning: not of private usurpation, but of publick tradition: a thing brought to thee, not brought forth of thee: wherein thou must not be an authour, but a keeper: not a beginner, but a follower: not a leader, but an observer: Keep the deposttum. Preserve the talent of the Catholick faith pure and sincere, that which is committed to thee, let that remain with thee, and that deliver [Page 85]unto the people. Thou hast received gold, render then gold; I will not have one thing for another: Do not for gold give me either impudently lead, or craftily brasse; I will not the shew, but the very nature of gold it self. O Timothy, O Priest, O Teacher, O Doctour, if Gods gift hath made thee meet and sufficient for thy wit, exercise and learning, shew thy self Beseelel, that divine workman in building of the spirituall tabernacle, ingrave those precious stones of Gods religion, faithfully set them, wisely adorn them, give them brightnesse, give them grace, give them beauty. That which men before believed obscurely, let them by thy exposition understand more clearly. Let posterity rejoyce for coming to the knowledge of that by thy means, which antiquity without that knowledge had in veneration. Yet for all this, in such sort deliver [Page 86]what thou hast learned, that albeit thou teachest newly and after a new manner: yet thou never preach a new religion, and deliver a new faith.
CHAP. XIII.
BUt peradventure some will say, shall we then have no advancement of religion in the Church of Christ? no growing on, no proceeding forward? To which I answer and say. Let us a Gods name have the greatest and most that may be. For who is either so envious to men, or hatefull to God which would labour to stop or hinder that? but yet in such sort and with this proviso, that it may appear to be truly an increase in faith, and not prove to be a change in religion; for this is the nature of such things as increase, that in themselves they become [Page 87]and grow greater; and this is the nature of a change and mutation, that something be turned from one thing which it was, to an other which it was not: Convenient it is, and very necessary, that the understanding, knowledge and wisdome, aswell of every man in particular, as of all in common; as well of one alone, as of the whole Church in Generall, of all ages and times past, should abundantly increase and go forward, but yet for all that, onely in his own kind and nature; that is, in the same faith, in the same sense, in the same sentence. In this cafe, let the religion of our soul imitate the nature of our bodies, which although with processe of time they passe over many years, yet they remain the same that they were. There is great difference betwixt flourishing youth and withered [Page 88]age, yet the self same men become old which before were young; so that although the state and condition of one and the self same man be altered, yet one very nature and person doth still remain. The limbs and members of infants be small, of young men great, yet not divers but the very same. So many joynts as young children have so many have they when they be men, and if any parts there be, which with increase of years spring forth, those before by nature were in man virtually planted, so that no new things come forth in old men, which before were not contained in them being yet children. Wherefore there can be no doubt, but that this is the due and right order of growing, the most naturall and goodlyest way of increasing, onely to have in old years, those members, those parts and joynts which [Page 89]the wisdome of our Creatour before framed when we were yet but little ones: And therefore if a man be afterward changed into some other shape or likenes then his nature requires; or if the number of his members be more or lesse then nature prescribeth; then of necessitie the whole body must either perish, or become monstrous, or at least remaine lame and maimed. In like manner Christian religion must follow these rules of increasing and growing; to wit, that with years it waxe more sound, with time it become more ample, with continuance it be more exalted, yet remaine pure and incorrupt, and continue full and perfect with each of his parts, and as it were, with all his members and proper senses: And furthermore that it admit no change or mutation, sustaine no losse of his proprietie, no varietie or mutabilitie in definition: [Page 90]for example sake. Our forefathers in old time in the spiritual field of the Church, sowed the wheaten seed of true faith and religion; it were now very injurious and unreasonable, that we their posteritie in stead of the perfect and true graine should reape the false errour of cockle: And contrariwise it is reason and very convenient, that the beginning and ending not disagreing with it self, we should of the increase of wheaten seed reape the fruit of a wheaten religion; so that when with tract of time, any of those first seeds beginne to bud and come forth, let them be tilled, let them bee trimmed, yet without changing ought of the proprietie of the corn springing up: and albeit fashion, shape, and distinction, be added and put to, yet must the nature of each kind remain and abide. For God forbid that those rosie plants of the Catholick [Page 91]doctrine should be changed into thistles and thornes; God forbid I say, that in this spirituall paradise, of the slippes of Cinamon and Balsame should suddenly grow up darnel and poison. Therefore whatsoever hath by the grace of God and our Fathers faith been sowen in this Church, reason it is that the same be cultivated and maintained by the industry of the children, meet that it flourish & waxe ripe, convenient that it grow and come to perfection; lawfull indeed it is, that those ancient articles of heavenly philosophie, should be trimmed, smoothed, and polished: but unlawfull that they should be chaned, mangled, and maimed. And albeit they receive perspicuitie, light, and distinction, yet of necessitie must they retaine their fulnes, soundnes, and proprietie. For if once this licentiousnes of wicked fraud be admitted, [Page 92]I tremble to speak what danger is like to ensue of rasing and subverting religion; for if we take away any part of the Catholick faith, straight wayes other parts, and after that other, and againe other, and that as it were of custome and by a kind of law, shall be abolished. And what followeth when every part by little and little is undermined, but that in conclusion the whole corps of religion at one blow be come subverted and over thrown? And contrariwise if new things and old, forreine and domesticall, prophane and sacred, begin once to be confounded together, then must needs this custome generally follow, that nothing hereafter remaine in the Church untouched, nothing without corruption, nothing sound, nothing pure, nothing sincere; and so where before was the sacred school of chast and immaculate truth, there [Page 93]shall be a very brothel house of wicked & filthie errours. But God of his goodnes deliver his servants from such minds and let the impious rather, & gracelesse follow that furious & mad proceeding. For the Church of Christ is a carefull & diligent keeper of religion committed to her charge, she never changeth or altereth in it any thing, she diminisheth nothing, she addeth nothing: What is necessarie she loseth not, what is superfluous she forceth not, her own she maintaineth, what is not her own shee usurpeth not, but with all industrie laboureth only about this one thing, that is, by faithfull & prudent handling of our forefathers doings, what by them in times past was well entered & begun, she polisheth; what then was well polished and declared, she confirmeth; what then was confirmed and defined, she retaineth. To conclude what hath she else [Page 94]endeavoured by the decrees of Councells, but that that doctrine which before was simplie credited, the same afterward should be more diligently beleeved: that religion which before was taught more slowly, the same afterward should be preached more instantly: That faith which before was more securely reverenced, the same afterward should more carefully be practised. This I say alwayes and nothing els hath the Church, provoked with the novelties of Hereticks, set down by the decrees of her Councels, to wit, onely to confirme that to posteritie by writing (comprehending a great summe of things in few words, & often times for more easie understanding, to an old article of faith giving a new name) which before by tradition she had received of her forefathers.
CHAP. XIV.
BUt to return to the Apostle. O Timothie (quoth he) keep the depositum, avoyd prophane novelties of voices. Avoid (quoth he) as a viper, as a scorpion, as a ba [...]ilisk, least they infect thee, not only by touching, but also with their very eyes and breath. What is meant by Avoid? 1 Cor. 5. that is, not so much as to eate with any such: what importeth this (Avoid) if any man (quoth he) come unto you and bring not this doctrine? what doctrine but the Catholick and universall, & that which with sound tradition of the truth, hath continued one & the self same, through all successions of times, and that which shall continue to the worlds end? What then? Receive him not (quoth he) into the house nor say God save you for he that [Page 96]sayeth unto him God save you, communicateth with his wicked works. Prophane novelties of voices; (quoth he) What is Prophane? Those which have no holines in them, no jote of religion, wholly unknown to the Church which is the temple of God. Prophane novelties of voices, quoth he, (of voices) that is novelties of opinions, novelties of things, novelties of senses, contrarie to our forefathers faith, contrarie to antiquitie, which if we admit and receive, of necessitie the faith of our blessed ancestours, either all, or a great part of it, must be overthrown, the faithfull people of all ages and times, all holy Saints, all chast, all continent, all virgins, all widowes, all Clerks, all Deacons, all Priests, so manie thousands of Confessours, so many bands of Martyrs, so many famous and great cities, and commonwealths, so manie Islands, Provinces, [Page 97]Kings, countries, kingdomes, nations, to conclude, almost the whol world incorporated by the Catholick faith to Christ their head must needs be saied, so many hundreds of years to have been ignorant, to have erred, to have blasphemed, to have beleeved they know not what. Avoid (quoth he) Prophane novelties of voices, to receive which, to follow which never was the custome of Catholicks, but alwayes the propertie of hereticks. And to say truth, what heresie hath ever peeped forth, but under the name of some certain man, in some certaine place, and at some certaine time? Who ever set abroach any heresie, who first devided not himself from the consent of the universality and antiquity of the Catholick Church? Which to be true, examples do plainly prove. For who ever before that prophane [Page 98] Pelagius presumed so much of mans free will, that he thought not the grace of God necessary to every particular good act? Who ever before his monstrous disciple Celestiut, denyed all mankind to be tyed and bound with the sin of Adams prevarication? Who ever before facrilegious Arius, durst tear in peeces the Unity of Trinity? Who ever before wicked Sabellius, attempted to confound the Trinity of Unity? Who ever before cruell Novatian, affirmed God to be so mercilesse, that he had rather the death of a sinner then he should returne and live? Who ever before Simon Magus (punished by Apostolicall censure, from whom that old sink of filthinesse came by continuall and secret succession unto Priscilian that was the last) durst ever affirme that God our Creatour was the Authour of evill, that is the Authour of our [Page 99]wickednes, impieties, and horrible crimes; because God (as he said) so made mans nature, that by a certain peoper motion and impulse of an inforced will, it can do nothing else but sinne, desire nothing else but to offend, because being provoked and inflamed with the surious rage of all vices, it is with an insatiable desire carryed away headlong into the pit and sink of all filthinesse? Such examples are infinite, which for brevity sake I omit; by all which notwitstanding it appeareth plainly and clearly that it is an usuall and common thing in all Heresies to take great pleasure in prophane novelties, to loath the decrees of our forefathers, and so fall from the faith, by pretending the false and counterfeit name of knowledge and learning: contrariwise that this is proper to all Catholicks, to keep that faith which the holy fathers have left [Page 100]and committed to their charge, to condemne prophane novelties, and as the Apostle hath already said, & again doth say: If any man shall preach otherwise then that which is received, to accurse him.
CHAP. XV.
HEre happily some man may demand whether hereticks also do use the testimony of holy scripture. To which I say that they do and that very earnestly, for a man may behold them ranging & coursing in every part of the Bible, in Moses, in the Kings, in the Psalms, in the Apostles, in the Gospels, in the Prophets: for whether they be amongst their own brethren, or with strangers, whether in private or in publick, whether in talking, or writing, whether in the house reasting, or abroad walking, they almost never alleadge any thing of their owne, which they do not pretend to shadow [Page 101]with the words of sacred scripture. Read the pamphlets of Paulus Samosatenus, of Priscilian, Eunomius, Jovinian, and the rest of such like pestilent Hereticks, and you shall find through all their works an huge heap of examples, almost no page omitted which is not coloured and painted with the sayings of the new and old testament. But the more closely they lurk under the shadow of Gods law, the more carefully are they to be feared, the more narrowly to be watched; for they know full well that their stinking and unsavory drugs be not likely almost to please any, if simply & nakedly they be set forth: and therefore they do temper them as it were with the sweet powder of Gods word, that he w ch would have contemned mans erroneous invention dares not so readily reject Gods divine scripture: wherein they are like to those, which minding [Page 102]to minister bitter potions to young children, do first annoint the brim [...] of the cup with hony, that thereby unwary youth feeling the sweetnes, may nothing feare the bitter confection. This devise also practise they, which upon noxious hearbs and juyces, write the names of good & wholsome medicines, whereby almost no man reading the good superscription any thing suspecteth the lurking poyson. The self same thing likewise our Saviour crieth out to all Christians. Take ye heed of false prophets which come to you in sheeps cloathing, but inwardly are ravening Wolves. Ma. 7. What is meant else by sheeps clothing, but the sayings of the Prophets and Apostles, which they with sheep-like sincerity did weare like certaine fleeces of that immaculate Lamb, which taketh away the sins of the world? And what is to be understood by ravening [Page 103]wolves, but the cruell and destructive opinions of hereticks, which alwayes trouble the sheep-folds of the Church, and by all means possible teare in pieces the flock of Christ? But to the end they may more craftily set upon the sheep of Christ mistrusting nothing, remaining stil cruel beasts, they put off their wolvish weed, and shroud themselves with the words of scripture, as it were with certain fleeces, whereby it hapneth, that when the silly sheep feel the soft wooll, they little fear their sharp teeth: But what saith our Saviour? By their fruits you shall know them. That is, when they begin not only to utter those words, but also to expound them, not only to cast them forth, but also to interpret them, then doth that bitterness break out, then is that sharpness espied, then is that madness perceived, then is that fresh & new poison ejected, then are prophane [Page 104]novelties set abroach, then may you see straight-way the hedg cut in two, the old fathers bounds removed, the Catholick doctrine shaken, and the Churches faith torn in pieces. Such were they whom the Apostle sharply reprehendeth in the 2. Epistle to the Cor. Chap. 11: For such false Apostles (quoth he) are crafty workers transfiguring them selves into the Apostles of Christ. What is transfiguring them selves into the Apostles of Christ, but this? The Apostles alleaged the examples of scripture & they likewise cited thē: The Apostles cited the authority of the Psalms, & they likewise used it: The Apostles used the sayings of the Prophets, and they in like manner brought them forth. But when that scripture which was alike alleadged, alike cited, alike brought forth, was not alike, & in one sense expounded, then were discerned the simple from the craftie, the sincere from the [Page 105]counterfeit, the right and good from the froward and perverse: and to conclude, the true Apostles from those false Apostates. And no marvel (saith S. Paul) For Sathan himself transfigureth himself into an Angel of light, it is no great matter therefore if his ministers be transfigured as the ministers of Justice. Wherefore according to Saint Paul, whensoever either false Apostles, or false Prophets, or false Doctours do bring forth the words of holy Scripture, by which they would according to their corrupt interpretation confirm their errour, there is no doubt, but that they follow the crafty slight of their master, which surely he would never have invented, but that he knoweth very well, that there is no readier way to deceive the people, then where the bringing in of wicked errour is intended, that there the authority of the word of God should [Page 106]be pretended. But some will say, how prove you that the Devill useth to alledge the Scripture? Such as doubt thereof let them reade the Gospel, where it is written: Then the devill took him up (that is our Lord and Saviour) and set him upon the pinnacle of the Temple, and said unto him, If thou be the Sonne of God, cast thy self down, for it is written that he will give his Angels charge of thee, that they may keep thee in all thy wayes, in their hands shall they hold thee up, lest perhaps thou knock thy foot against a stone. Mat. 4 How will he, think you, handle poor silly souls, which so setteth upon the Lord of Majestie with the authority of Scripture? If thou be (quoth he) the Son of God, cast thy self down. Why so? For it is written (quoth he): we are diligently to weigh the doctrine of this place and to keep it in mind, that by so notable an example of the Scripture, [Page 107]we make no scruple or doubt, when we see any alledge some place of the Apostles, or Prophets, against the Catholick Faith, but that by his mouth the Devil himself doth speak. For as at that time, the head spake unto the head, so now the members do talk unto the members; that is, the members of the Devil to the members of Christ, the faithlesse to the faithfull, the it religious to the religious, to conclude, Hereticks to Catholicks. But what I pray, saith the Devil? If thou be the Sonne of God (quoth he) cast thy self down. That is to say. Desirest thou to be the Son of God, and to injoy the inheritance of the kingdome of Heaven, Cast thy self down, that is, Cast thy self down from this doctrine and tradition of this high and lofty Church, which is reputed to be the Temple of God. And if any one demand of these Hereticks, perswading them such things, how [Page 108]do you prove and convince me that I ought to forsake the old and Universall Faith of the Catholick Church; straight wayes is ready at hand: For it is written: and forthwith he will alledge you a thousand Testimonies, a thousand Examples, a thousand authorities out of the Law, out of the Psalms, out of the Apostles, out of the Prophets; by which, expounded after a new and wicked fashion, he would throw headlong unfortunate souls, from the Tower of the Catholick Church, into the deep dungeon of wicked Heresie. Now with these sweet promises which follow, Hereticks do wonderfully deceive simple men. For they dare promise and teach that in their Church, that is in the conventicle of their communion, is to be found a great and speciall, yea and a certain personall grace of God: So that whosoever be one of their crew, they shall straightwayes [Page 109]without any labour, without any study without any industry, yea although they never seek, nor crave, nor knock, have such speciall dispensation, that they shall be carried up with the hands of Angels, that is, preserved by Angelicall protection; that they never hurt their foot against a stone, that is, that they never can be scandalized. But some man will say, If the Devil and his Disciples, whereof some be false Apostles, false Prophets, and false Teachers, and all perfect Hereticks, do use the Scriptures, cite their sayings, bring forth their promises; what shall Catholick men do? How shall the children of the Church behave themselves? How shall they in the holy Scriptures discern truth from falshood? To which I answer, that, They must have great care (as in the beginning of this Treatise I said, holy and learned men taught me) that they interpret [Page 110]the Divine and Canonicall Scripture according to the Tradition of the Universall Church, according to the rules of the Catholick doctrine: in which likewise they must of necessity follow, universality, antiquity, and consent of the Catholick and Apostolick Church. And therefore, if at any time a part rebell against the whole, novelty against antiquity, the dissention of one or a few (seduced with errour) against the consent of all, or the farre greater part of Catholicks; in that case let them preferre the integrity of universality, before the corruption of a part; and in universality, let them also preferre the religion of antiquity before profane novelty; and again in antiquity, let them preferre, before the temerity of one or a few, the decrees of a generall Councell, if any be; or if no such be found, let them take that which is next [Page 111]hand, that is, to follow the opinions of many and great learned Doctours agreeing together: All which faithfully, soberly, diligently observed and kept; by Gods grace, we shall without any great difficulty discover the errours of new upstart Hereticks.
CHAP. XIV.
HEre I perceive in order it followeth, to shew by examples how the profane novelties of Hereticks are, by bringing forth and comparing the old Doctours opinions agreeing together, to be found out and condemned: which ancient consent of holy Fathers, is not so carefully and diligently to be sought for and followed in every small question of the Scripture; but onely, and that especially in the rule of faith; neither yet alwayes, nor all Heresies [Page 112]are after this sort to be impugned, but onely such as be new and upstart; to wit at their first springing up, and before they have (as hindred by the shortnesse of time) falsified the rules of the antient faith, and before the poyson spreading farre abroad, goeth about to corrupt the Fathers works: But those heresies which have already got ground, and be of some continuance, are not this way to be dealt withall; because by long tract of time they have had opportunity to steal truth. And therefore such kind of profane schisms and heresies which be of longer standing, we must not otherwise convince, but either onely, if need be, by the authority of the Scriptures, or els avoid and detest them being already convicted and condemned in old time by generall Councels of the Catholick Church. Therefore so soon as any infectious error begineth to break [Page 113]forth, and for her defence to steale certain words of holy scripture, and craftily and fraudulently to expound them; straight-wayes for the right understanding thereof the Fathers opinions are to be gathered togither, by which let any what soever new, and therefore prophane, doctrine growing up with out all delay be dejected & speedily condemned. But those Fathers opinions only are to be conferred togither which with holinesse, wisdome, and constancy, lived, taught, and continued in the faith, and communion of the Catholick Church, and finally deserved tody in Christ, or happily for Christ to be martyred: whom notwithstanding we are to beleeve with this condition, that whatsoever either all, or the greater part with one mind, plainly, commonly, and constantly, as it were a Councell of Doctours, agreeing together have decreed and set down, [Page 114]receiving it from their ancestours, holding it for their time, and delivering it to their posteritie; let that be had and accounted for undoubted, for certain and firme truth. And whatsoever any, although holy and learned, although a Bishop, although a Confessour, and Martyr hath holden otherwise then all, or against all, let that be put aside from the authoritie of the common, publick, and generall faith, and reputed amongst his own proper, private, and fecret opinions, least with great danger of eternall salvation, we do according to the custome of sacrilegious Hereticks and Schismaticks, forsake the trueth of the universall faith, and follow the novell errour of some one man. The holy & Catholick mind of which blessed Fathers least any man think that he may rashly contemne, The Apostle sayeth in his first epistle to the Corinthians: And [Page 115]some verily hath God set in his Church, first Apostles 1 Cor. 12. of which himself was one: Secondly Prophets as Agabus was, of whom we read in the Acts, cap. 11. Thirdly Doctours, which novv are called Tractatours, vvhem also this Apostle some time narneth Prophets, (because their office vvas to expound and declare to the people the mysteries of the Prophets;) these therefore, disposed and placed by God at divers times and sundry places, agreeing and consenting all in one mind in Christ, touching the understanding of the Catholick faith whosoever contemneth, doth not contemne man but God: and that we disagree not by any means from the perfect and true unitie of those Fathers, the same Apostle doth earnestly beseech all Christians, saying: I beseech you brethren that you say all one thing, and that there bee no [Page 116]Schismes among you, but that you be perfect in one sense and in one knowledge. 1 Cor. 1 And if any man separate himself from the communion of their opinion, let him hear that saying of the same Apostle: He is not the God of dissention, but of peace: ch. 14. that is, not of him that leaveth consent and unity, but of them that remain in peace and agreement: As I do (quoth he) teach in all the Churches of the Saints, that is, of the Catholicks, which therefore be holy because they continue in the communion of the faith. And least happily any one should contemne others, and proudly require onely to be heard, onely to be beleeved, straight after he saith: What hath the Word of God (quoth he) proceeded from you, or hath it onely come unto you? And least this might be taken as spoken slightly, he addeth: If any (quoth he) seemeth a [Page 117]Prophet or spirituall, that is, a master in spirituall matters, let him be a zealous lover of unity and peace, in such wise that he neither preferre his own opinion before the judgement of others, neither leave or forsake the sense and common consent of all men. The commandements of which things he that is (quoth he) ignorant of, that is, he that learneth not those things which he yet knoweth not, or contemneth those which he knoweth, he shall not be known, that is, he shall be thought unworthy, whom amongst such as be united in faith and equall humility, God should regard and look upon: a greater evil then w ch I doubt whether any man can invent or devise; which yet notwithstanding (according to the Apostles commination) we see to have fallen upon Julian the Pelagian, who either contemned to be joined at all in opinion [Page 118]with his fellows, or else presumed to separate himself from their societie and communion.
But now it is time to bring forth the example which we promised: how and after what sort the judgement and opinions of holy Fathers were gathered togither, that according to them by the decree & authority of a Councell the rule of faith might be set down: which to the end that I may more commodiously do, I will here make an end of this commonitorie, and so take another beginning for declaring of those things which do follow.