THE Vnjust Mans DOOM: AS EXAMINED By the several KINDS of Christian Justice, AND THEIR OBLIGATION.

WITH A Particular Representation OF THE INJUSTICE & DANGER OF Partial Conformity.

By William Smyth, D. D.

LONDON, Printed by W. Godbid for Walter Kettilby at the Bishops Head in Duck-Lane, 1670.

A PREFACE TO THE READER.

I Would willingly meet so much Cha­rity and Ingenuity from thee, to be be­lieved, while I pro­fess that I propound to my self these two Designs in Publishing these Papers: First, That (by [Page] the former part of my Dis­course) I might contribute some­thing towards the restoring the lost Principles and Practices of Christian Righteousness; & free the Notion of it from such Prejudices and Misprisions which some mens Doctrines, and manner of Preaching the Gospel, have brought upon it. And that the Scandalous Distinction (which the world have had too just a temptation to make, by the observation of some Profes­sors Actions) between Godli­ness and Civil Honesty, Piety, and Obedience, might for ever be removed and forgotten; and that all persons designing to be [Page] Religious, and that do not fully understand their indispensable obligation to the performance of every part of that Justice in or­der to their Salvation, might be delivered from the Ignorance of so considerable a part of Christi­anity, and their Duty to God. For it is too notorious, that ma­ny earnest Pretenders to Religi­on, (by being so especially and continually called upon by their Teachers, to be righteous by the Person, and not the Religion of Christ, by the effects of his Me­rits, and not as necessarily by obedience to his Precepts) even while they presumed to engross the Vulgars belief of being the [Page] only men that are Godly and ho­nest, have in contradiction to the very design of Christianity, & to the shame of it, been grosly Vnrighteous before God and man, by being so to their Superi­ors (both civil and Ecclesia­stick) as to Distributive Ju­stice, nor so careful to free them­selves from the imputation of being unjust in their dealings & transactions, as to Commutative. And though I have cast my Dis­course of Christian Justice in­to the Mould of a Sermon, occa­sionally preach'd, to represent the Danger of Vnjust persons; yet if any man, being convinced of the necessity of doing Righ­teousness, [Page] that he may be Righteous, (1 John 2. 7.) shall resolve to engage himself in that excellent part of his Obe­dience to God; I hope I have so carefully drawn the several Lines of Evangelical Justice, that he may be sufficiently instru­cted in that part of Christiani­ty, which may be accounted the Vniversal Religion of the World; that is, as extensive as Gods Love to Mankind or Christ's Death for it, and by which men of every Nation, even among them that are invincibly ign [...] of Christianity, and so not criminally Vnbelievers, (if Charity may be allowed to [Page] speak her Sense) may be accept­ed for Christ's sake: that is, such as fear God, and do righ­teousness) or Justice (for they are of the same signification) Acts 10. 35. according to the light God hath given them of their Obligation to it.

The next Design (in the lat­ter Part of my Discourse) is to represent the Danger and Inju­stice of Partial and Shuffling Conformity, and to measure the Dimensions of those many wrongs that have been done to the Church of England by it, in all her concerns: and that in order to the finding out the best Expedients, how to redress them [Page] And this I have done without the least uncharitable reflection upon any Man or Parties of men, unless to reprove their miscar­riages, which do so neerly in­trench upon the very Design of Christianity and the Churches Peace, may be so interpreted. And I find upon the most serious examination of the Affairs of the Church since the Reforma­tion, and the most unpassionate observation of things which have been seen done in our time (to which a great part of this present Age can give testimony) That Ministers Puritanizing in their Congregations in com­pliance with some Forreign [Page] Churches of different Models, Perswasions and Practices a­gainst all their Obligations to do the contrary, (with considera­tion had to our many sins for which God hath laid those hea­vy Punishments upon us) to be the Original cause of the great Evils that befel the Church of England in the days of her Late calamity, of the many present Discomforts that are now upon it, and the threatning dangers that are before it. For these men so managed their business in their Churches, that the com­mon People (many of which had honest minds, and upright de­signs of being good) are insensibly [Page] betrayed into such a dislike of the Government, Service, and universal Constitutions of the Church, that they were prepa­red upon the least check of Au­thority to require Conformity from them, to make it the Cause of God, and an eminent Act of Zeal for him, to deny all Obedience to it, if not to endea­vour the universal overthrow of all its Peace and Order. So that I am not so uncharitable as to think, that all the People that were Enemies to the Church of England, hated it because it was good and innocent, but because (through these mens either design'd project of keeping [Page] them in Ignorance; or through their own Inability to instruct them better) they understood it not; and being once prejudic'd with an ill Opinion, and presu­med not to be Masters of so much Reason as to be able to ex­tricate themselves from their Mistakes, and not likely to en­tertain an instruction from them, whom they were taught to sus­pect and oppose, its no wonder if they became such zealous & implacable Enemies to a Church of the most Catholick and Pri­mitive Constitution in the World. Now the grand Argu­ment which they put into the [Page] Peoples Heads, to perpetuate their enmity against the Church of England, is, That the pre­sent Constitution is a Disposi­tion to Popery, and that the en­crease of it is to be imputed thereunto, when themselves are only guilty of it: For though the Designs of the Factious & the Romanists are as distant as the two Poles, yet in this they Centre, that they aid one ano­ther in the boldness of their Se­parations, and allow a plausible temptation to such (who con­sult nothing but the Interest of an unsecure and palliated Peace, or rather to prevent [Page] some little trouble of preserving the Church in its Integrity) to endeavour an universal Tolerati­on of all Perswasions, to the esta­blished Churches infallible fall and ruine. But concerning this and all other wrongs done by them to the Church, the Reader is refer-red to the Dis­course it self.

Now if by Gods blessing I may in any measure attain both my Designs; If by the first I may fully instruct Souls to live ( [...]) Justly, one part of E­vangelical Obedience in St. Paul's Division, ( Tit. 2. 12.) And if by the second I can con­tribute any thing towards the [Page] cure of the Church of England's present Distempers, I shall not much consult what Entertain­ment they shall have among such as are resolv'd enemies to both, and perhaps for that reason will be so to their Faithful Monitor,

W. S.

The Vnjust mans DOOM.

As examined by the several Kinds of Christian Justice, and their Obligation.

In a SERMON at the Assizes at Bury St. Edmunds in Suff. Sept. 13. 1668.

The Vnjust mans DOOM.

1 COR. 6. 9. ‘The unrighteous shall not inhe­rit the Kingdom of God.’

SO far as the principal Design of Christianity is universal Obedience, and the far greatest part of that Obedience is Morality; (Duties to be perform­ed from Man to Man) And the most excellent parts of that Morality, [Page 2] are the Grand Transactions of Go­vernment, Regular Administrati­ons of Common Justice, and Pre­servation of Mutual Rights in all Societies: And so far as the Rule by which all those are accomplish­ed, is Law, grounded upon Right Reason, of which the Gospel (a­bove all Institutions that ever were is highly & designedly perfective) so far, I say, a Divine ex officio, while he moves in his own Sphere, may (must) be especially serviceable to such Assemblies as these: For it is certain, that the happy event of your Affairs, (which is judicially to do all men right, that here ap­pear for it) depends upon every man's uprightly doing his Duty, [...] the part he acts, in this Scene [...] Justice; from the Judge that sentenceth, to the Advocate that pleads; from the Witness that gives evidence, to the Jurates that de­termine.

[Page 3] Now because that every one of these should do right in his place, a civil account (at best) can advance to no other obligation, but that it is fit and worthy to be done; (too weak an Argument, to resist a Temptation from Profit, or Passion, to do the contrary;) therefore they are to be religiously instructed, (which makes this present exercise reasonable above all Apologies and Answers for the practice of former times among us, when Divines sate upon the principal Seats of Justice) I say, men are to be further instru­cted, that to do Civil Right, is, now, of Divine Obligation, and a neces­sary condition of every mans Salva­tion; under Encouragements of in­fallible Rewards, which no man shall lose, that brings but ( [...]) the least refreshment or as­sistance to a just procedure; and under the terrour of dreadful [Page 4] threatnings, which none shall es­cape, that pervert Judgment, do wrong, and shall any way be instru­mental to the violation of anothers Right: And certainly the severest of all of them is this in my Text; They shall not inherit the Kingdom of God.

My Text being thus brought to hand, offers these two Grounds of Discourse:

  • 1. The guilty persons, [...], the unrighteous, or the unjust, words Synonimous, and so are promiseu­ously taken all over the Scrip­ture.
  • 2. Their Doom and Punishment, Shall not inherit the Kingdom of God.

1. As to the first, the word [...], unrighteous, or unjust, is not here to be taken in its larger acceptati­on, by which it is synonimous with [...] Sinners in general, and [Page 5] names the persons, that live in disobedience to all, or any of Gods Commandments indefinitely, as [...] is used, ( Rom. 2. 8.) unrigh­teousness or unjustice for all un­godliness: And that because, (as C [...]. Alex. observes) [...], every sinful act is injurious, frequently to others, alwaies to our selves.

But [...] is here to be under­stood strictly, and so denotes per­sons guilty of the breach of Justice in its limited and natural sense, as it stands distinguished from other Virtues in the Moralists Scheme: And being brought over to be a part of Christ's Religion, was esta­blished as such, when he made love to our Neighbour (that is, the love of practice, to do all men right and good) to be of like obligation with Love to God, as practised in the most immediate Duties, and Services of Faith and Worship: [Page 6] For so saith Christ ( Mat. 22. 39.) The second is like unto it (that is) equally, and as indispensably neces­sary to Salvation, Thou shalt love thy Neighbor as thy self. Now for the Measures of that Love, and (the principal design and excrcise of it). Justice, he gave one general Rule, ( ut primum principium): All things whatsoever you would that men should do unto you, do ye even so to them; that is, Suum cui (que) tribuere (the Definition of Justice) to give to e­very man his Right and Due. The Offenders then against this Rule of Justice, in this strict sense, are the guilty persons in my Text, as the words before it, (and the very oc­casion of it) doth fully evince; where the Apostle chargeth them, ( v. 8.) that ( [...]) Ye do wrong and defraud. And thence infers, that such as do so, are un­righteous, or unjust; and shall [Page 7] not inherit the Kingdom of God.

But our Christian Obligation of doing right to all, having an influ­ence upon all the conversation we have with men, that is, almost all the actions of our Lives; It's ne­cessary (that we may throughly find out the guilty in my Text) to make a strict enquiry after this Christian Justice, as it is distinguish­ed by its several Objects, and Re­lations, and by the various kinds of Right, we owe one to another; the breach of every part of which, doth expose us, as to the guilt, so to the severe sentence of my Text.

The first kind of Gospel-Justice, (as it respects differing Relations) is that which is call'd Distributive, that is, the reciprocal Dues and Rights which Christians must pay one to another, in matters of Supe­riority and Subjection to it; from [Page 8] an Empire, to the little Dominion of a Family.

The first of that kind, is, the mu­tual Duties of Princes and Subjects. As for the Duties which Princes owe to their Subjects, or rather to God for them; it is not our busi­ness to enquire after. And St. Paul in his Epistles, when he carefully provided Rules for all distributive Justice, makes no mention of the duties of Princes; intimating, that they are accountable to none but God, whose ( [...]) Ministers they are. We must not curse them ( Eccl. 10. 20.) not slight them, so the Hebrew, ( ne detrahat Regi) not disparage them, so the Vulgar Latin, in the most retired thoughts of our Bed-chamber, for their miscarriages; For which, (when at the greatest) we must pretend to no other remedy, but the Primitive Churches powerful [Page 9] Engines, Prayers and Tears. But then the Subjects are bound in Chri­stian Justice, to pay their Prince Honour, Tribute, and Obedience. And those that fail in any part of these duties, that is, that shall whis­per Jealousies into the heads of the Multitude, to defraud them of their honour; or refuse, or decline their Tribute, the price of their own protection; or disobey their Laws, the Nerves of all Commu­nion and publick safety, they are [...], they have wronged their Princes, and are unrighteous, un­just persons, in the sence of my Text. But if their unrighteousness in these cases shall ferment to re­bellious Designs, (let them pretend to as much Saintship as Corah, or common Justice as Absolom, or Re­formation as both) they are not then only unjust to a Prince in his Personal Capacity, contrary to the [Page 10] Rule of doing to all men, &c. And though he be a Tyrant, act contra­ry to an express Precept ( [...]) not to resist evil, not allow­able among private persons: But as he is a publick person, they are guilty of a National wrong; they wrest out of Gods hand the Ordi­nance ( [...], Rom. 13. 2.) the only expedient of Mercy, by which the Rights of all men are preserved, and the world kept from Confusi­on; and are therefore answerable for all the Blood, Ruine, and mi­serable Consequences of a Civil War, that is of a Princes Military defence of himself, and faithful Subjects that adhere to him, in the day of Rebellion. So that a Re­bel is an unrighteous person, by a complication of guilt and an accu­mulation of wrongs.

But now permit not your thoughts, nor will I my Tongue, [Page 11] to make application, by reflecting upon the unparallell'd Tragedy of Evils done and suffered, upon the breach of this Justice in our late Rebellion. If I have said so much, as may teach the Guilty Repentance, and others that were not engaged, their duty, it's enough; let us bury all the rest in Prayers and Charity.

But further, if the Nation be Christian, there is another Autho­rity invested in a Prince, over Ec­clesiastick Persons, and Cases; for he is concerned as well in the ( [...], as the [...],) the Reli­gion, as the Civil Concerns of his Subjects (1 Tim. 2. 2.) And there is a Due of Obedience to be paid him in Christian Justice on that account also. This Power was ap­parently conferred by God on the Kings of the Old Testament; Mo­ses had both the Trumpets; David ordered the Courses of the Levites, [Page 12] and the Solemnities of the Publick Service: Joash had the Testament given him in his hand, as well as the Crown on his Head, (2 Chron. 23. 11.) Hezekiah and Josiah re­formed the Church by their Royal Authority. And as Christ found it (there being no retrenchment of that power in the Gospel) so he left it, as his own general Laws ex­pressed and interpreted by the Churches after-practice, can testifie above all exceptions. Ex quo (saith Socrates) Imperatores facti sunt Chri­stiani, ab ipsis res Ecclesiae depende­bant. After that the Emperors be­came Christian, the Churches Af­fairs depended upon them. Thus was Constantine [...]. And Leo the Third could say [...]. that is, they were mixt persons, they were concern'd in the Govern­ment and Protection of the Church. [Page 13] But of this Right, hath the Roma­nist, and Assemblies, defrauded their Princes; the one gets away half of their Crowns, the other of their Scepters; both rob them of their Authority, and of their Sub­jects full Allegiance. And thus it is with us, while we have a Profes­sion establisht by Law, by a power next to God ( Solo Deo minorem, saith Tertullian) and by such Con­stitutions, as God and Man cannot be pretended to stand in competi­tion for Obedience. The Bishop of Rome hath a superior power ac­knowledged by some, and the As­sembly by others, and both profess a Religion in Obedience to those Usurpations, and in opposition to their Lawful Soveraign's Com­mands and Laws: So that the King is robb'd of his Subjects, they, of their Allegiance, and the Church torn in pieces by them both, as be­tween [Page 14] two Milstones (as the late Arch-B. in his Preface to his Con­troversie) This wrong is done on either side, and for that reason they are [...], unjust, unrighteous per­sons that do it. This as to the first part of Distributive Justice, in the Concerns of Princes and their Sub­jects.

The next kind of Distributive Justice in the larger Circles of it, is, the reciprocal Dues and Rights, which the Governours of the Church, and their Charges, are in Christian Justice obliged to pay to one another. Without the mu­tual performance of which a Body of men can be call'd no more a Church, than a Tumult can be call'd an Army, or an ungovern'd Rout, a City. Now as it is in Civils, though the King be ( Supremus Judex) Chief Judge in the Law, yet he administers Ju-Justice [Page 15] by his commission'd Justicers to whom also an Obedience is due on that account: so in Ecclesiasticks, he exerciseth his supreme authority, for the care of the Church, by proper Officers ( [...]) set apart for that design; whose Calling though it be governed and prote­cted by Princes, is yet immediately from Heaven ( [...], Heb. 5. 4.) they are called of God to it. and ( [...], Acts 20. 28.) Whom the Holy Ghost hath made Bishops, or Overseers; and for that reason a right of Obedience is due unto them on that account also.

First then, the Pastors of the Church are bound in Justice ( [...]) to feed the Church of God, by pastoral Govern­ment and Preaching, by Sacraments, and Offices of Discipline, and insti­tuting Canons, for fit Circumstances, [Page 16] that all things may be done ( [...], 1 Cor. 14. 40.) decently, & in order, or uniformity in the Church of God. If they fail of their duties, they are [...], unrighteous, and must answer deeply for the wrong they have done to their Charges.

On the other side, their people in Christian Justice owe them Re­ception, Love, Honour, and (which for the Churches sake, is most espe­cially required) Obedience. Obey them that have the rule over you, ( Heb. 13. 17.) And as S. Ignatius, (the best Interpreter of the Apo­stles meaning and practice) saith [...]) It is necessary that nothing be done in the Church, but in obedience to the Governors of it. And this was the Sense and uni­versal Practice of the Church, it its primitive purity, and best Inte­grity. But if their Charges shall [Page 17] condemn their Callings, contemn their persons, separate from their Administrations, and refuse confor­mity to their Rules of Order, in the service of God; they are [...], unjust persons, they have defraud­ed their Spiritual Rulers of their, due, and (by infallible conse­quence) the Church of the very Essentials of its well-being, Peace, and Unity; the ends for which Spi­ritual Government was especially design'd: Of which Unity the Church being once deprived, in comes the Inundation of Atheism, Prophaness, Contempt of Gods Ser­vice, Heresies and Factions; for all which those unjust persons must an­swer, when they happen. And of all this, our own woful experience is too convincing an evidence. For as it is certain, that those miseries are now upon us, so it is as certain, they own their beginning to the [Page 18] breach of this Christian Justice, and commenced from the days the Dis­ciplinarians first withdrew their o­bedience from their lawful Superi­ors, and taught the people to de­spise, and quarrel with them about indifferent Rites. Which unduti­fulness afterward, fermenting, and gradually increasing, hath in the various agitations of several ages, brought upon the Church, and the Pastors thereof, all these Infelici­ties and wrongs they now unjustly suffer: Grown too great (without a gracious divine Deliverance) for hope of relief. The Church be­ing in that Common-wealth's case, quae nec ferre sua possit vitia, necre­media, neither able to bear its mis­carriages nor remedies. But I de­sire the severe Character of my Text may be applied to no particu­lar persons alive, unless it be in our Prayers, to beg forgiveness for [Page 19] them, as they were instrumental to these heavy punishments, and for our selves, that (for our sins) have justly deserved them at the hand of God.

Thus I have gone over the parts of Distributive Justice, which Chri­stians are to act in the greater Cir­cumferences of Publick Relations; I now contract my Discourse to the lesser Circles of it, in Domestick Concerns: Which though they be less considerable, are not at all less necessary. Our salvation de­pends upon every part of that Ju­stice, as much as the other: Loy­alty to a Prince, or conformity to the Church, cannot make us just, if we do wrong at home to our Wives, Children or Servants. Now the Christian Justice of the Family-Re­lations, are the reciprocal Dues of Husbands and Wives, Parents and Children, Masters and Servants; [...] [Page 22] bread to Dogs, throw it away in luxurious expences; or if both, or either of them, by their carelesse­ness in education, or by evil Exam­ples, shall endanger the loss of their Childrens souls: If the Children, on the other side, grow rough, and untractable, making no Conscience to disobey a Fathers Commands, and disoblige a Mothers tender care; or when their Parents are in want, to evade their duty, shall tell them, with the Pharisees, it is Corban, (Mark 7. 11.) a Gift, not to the Temple (yet that would not exempt them from their Duty) but perhaps to a proud entertain­ment, or a Female Prostitute: Such Parents, such Children, are [...], unrighteous, unjust in the sight of God.

Lastly, As to the third, of Fa­mily Relations, Masters and Ser­vants: First, Masters owe their [Page 23] Servants, in Christian Justice, civil regard, kind usage, and just re­wards for their Labours: And they again, owe their Masters Honour, Obedience, and Faithfulness. But if the Masters shall use their Ser­vants like Brutes, nay like senseless Engines, like Bodies without Souls, (for so Slaves are call'd [...], [...]poc. 18. 13.) making their Bur­dens too heavy, and their Rewards too light. And if Servants shall be ( [...], Tit. 2. 9.) contradi­cters, or answerers again, and de­ny their Reverence; or shall serve ( [...], Col. 3. 22.) with eye­service, and lose their diligence; or shall be ( [...], Tit. 2.) Pur­loiners, and depart from their Faithfulness: these are wrongs done on either side, and are all unjust, unrighteous persons, on that ac­count: And (as it is of the other Relations) if they had nothing else [Page 24] to answer for, had guilt enough, to be disinherited from the Kingdom of God. These are they, which depart from Christian Justice in Fa­mily-Relations.

Having thus found out the [...] the guilty of Injustice, by the Rule of Distributive, we shall now exa­mine the actions of men by the li [...] of Commutative Justice: Which Aquinas defines to be that, by which a man is directed in such Rights, as are interchangeably to be paid, from one man to another. Now the ground of this Justice is this, God hath so ordered it in his wise dispo­sition of the world, that the well being of every man should depend on the mutual help of one another; to the performance of which, all men being obliged by right reason and Religion, it becomes every mans right, to be done to him in Christian Justice as his duc. Upon [Page 25] this, St. Paul grounds his exhorta­ [...] to his Philippians, to look ( [...], Phil. 2. 4.) to the good and [...]ncerns of others, as well as their [...]. He therefore that shall with­ [...]d this Right, so that his Neigh­bour is injured in any capacity of [...] well-being, he hath done wrong and defrauded, and is an unjust, and an unrighteous person. Now [...]at we may know, how far this [...]stice extends, for the further dis­covery of the Guilty in my Text, we must examine the several cases [...] which a mans well-being consists, and accordingly a right to be done [...].

First, As to his spiritual well-being, we owe the right of saving one anothers Souls, which God hath put in our power to do, as St. James intimates, ( Jam. 5. 20.) And this is done, by brotherly correcti­on, Counsel, Prayer, exemplary [Page 26] Life, and such like Acts of spiritu­al Justice: But on the contrary, [...] any man hinders the salvation [...] another, by neglecting those [...] or shall really prevent it, by scan­dal, ill example, or by tempting him to assist in social sins, [...] Uncleanness, Conspiracies, and the like, that man hath wronged a Soul, he hath destroyed his Brother, for whom Christ died, ( Rom. 14. 15.) and so is [...], an unjust person on that sad account.

2. We owe the right in Christian Justice of preserving one another in our Temporal well-being: And the first of those, next our Neigh­bours life (which we suppose to be a case too apparent to need our present consideration) is his Ho­nour. He therefore that shall de­fraud him of that precious Jewel, either by eclipsing an innocent worth, through a subtil detraction, [Page 27] or wound his Credit, by dispersi­on of false slanders, (following Machiavel's rule, fortiter calumnia­ [...], & aliquid adhaerebit; cast dirt enough that some may stick) or shall publish his private infirmities, [...] his disgrace, or make use of them any way, but in following St. [...]aul's direction, to restore him with the spirit of meekness, (Gal. 6. 1.) [...]ath robb'd his Neighbour of his honour, hath done him wrong, and is an unjust person on that account. The second right we owe in Chri­stian Justice, as to the temporal well-being of our Neighbour, is the preservation of his Estate and Fortune; which whosoever shall vi­olate, upon any temptation, is one of the unrighteous persons in my Text. And we consider not this, as done by acts of horrid oppression only, when the Beams and Stones are disquieted with the cries of [Page 28] Orphans, tears of Widows, [...] perpetuated sorrows of ruin'd Fa­milies; nor only by the intrench­ments that are made upon it, by secret thefts or notorious Rapine but whosoever shal disadvantage another, by fraud, or subtilty, in any Negotiation, Bargain, Trade or Commerce whatsoever, beyond the ordinary profit allow'd to all Callings, by custom and consent of honest minds; or in any kind of Vocation or employment, deal otherwise in every single act, than he himself would be dealt with, is unrighteous, one of the guilty, and consequently one of the un­happy persons in my Text. Lastly, We owe in Christian Justice (as to our Neighbours temporal well-be­ing) the right of preserving one anothers Health, Limbs, and Peace; therefore he that shall wrong him in the first, by ingaging him in [Page 29] intemperate courses, or deprive him of the second, by any act of private hostility, as Duelling, or the like; or defraud him of the third, by uncivil usage, or vexati­bus Suits and Controversies; so far as in any of them, or in any other way, a man is disadvantaged in the comfort of his Life, or means of Livelihood, there is a wrong done, & he that hath done it, is an unjust, an unrighteous person, and as such, stands upon the necessity of restitu­tion, or in the danger of his exclu­sion from the blessed Inheri­tance.

Thus having gone over the Breaches that are made upon the several Branches, both of Distri­butive, and Commutative Justice; there remains two more to be con­sidered apart; because they have a mixture of both. Of the first of these I would give a [...] [Page 32] is the Devil ( [...] v. 3.) The Devil hath filled their hearts with the Design.

5. Gods certain vengeance upon that wrong, by the fatal fall both of the one, and of the other. I shall not controversially apply this evidence, but must (for shortness sake) leave it to your serious refle­ctions, for the ends I mentioned it. Now that portion which hath been set apart for God, and the mainte­nance of 16000 Servants of his Worship among us, are either Lands, or Tithes. As for the wrongs done to the first, they are commonly acted ( per Sorices Palatii, as Bish. Andrews calls them) by the unhappy men about the Courts of Princes; who as they thirst after them, so would not stick to suck the milk of Or­phans, drink the tears of Widows, as well as devour the Demeans of Gods Servants (because as defence­less [Page 33] as either) as Sacrifices to their pride and luxury. But it is alledg­ed by the Favourites of this Design, that the supreme Judicature may, (when they please) take them away: I answer, they may ( impunè) with­out controul; and their Authority ought not (must not) be resisted; but whether ( justè) righteously, or whether every one that hath a vote in their alienation, doth not there­by rob God and man, and may just­ly fear Gods vengeance for doing so, I leave it to the former Evi­dence to determine. As for the wrongs done to the Church in point of Tithes, ( Decimam meam as St. Austin supposeth God to speak) there depraedations happen upon lower contrivements; as when ei­ther the powerful mans heavy hand first presseth out the Vintage for himself, and then leaves some few drops; enough rather to upbraid, [...] [Page 36] I intended should reflect upon the occasion of this Assembly, where the proper business is judicially to administer right to them, that can­not otherwise obtain it. Let every one then, that hath to do this day with the tender Rights of men, (whether they be the Ministers of the Law, of every sort, Witnesses, or Juries) have a care what they do; their Souls are at stake, the Oath of God is upon them, the Curse of God over them, the Cries of the oppressed about them, the Evidence of my Text, and the Law of Christ against them; if there­fore any unjust Cause goes away triumphant, if any mans right be impeached, through any defect in the discharge of their trust, they are [...], unrighteous persons, and wheresoever it lies, must either make a timely satisfaction, or one day appear at the great Assizes of [Page 37] the world, to receive for the wrong that he hath done in this, and where there shall be no respect of persons, Col. 3. ult.

Thus I have finished the whole Scheme of Christian Justice; to the universal performance of which, the Gospel doth so strictly oblige us. And now who would think it pos­sible, that a Christian Nation, pos­sessed with so many advantages of Religion, should in contradiction to the clearest Evidence of Gods Will, so generally degenerate from the practice of it in every part; and that not among them only, that have thrown off all Concern for Religion (that were no wonder) but amidst the very Professors of it, even among them, that pretend to a greater Zeal than others, in appearance for it, I cannot but think, that there hath been some [...] [Page 40] psal. 73. 6.) they were exhorted to the getting the Robe of Christ's Righteousness about, and imputed to, them; and all was well. By these and the like unhappy Modes of teaching the Gospel, men have been driven from their Reason, and Religion, and set their Consciences loose to all unrighteousness. And hence it is, that they are grown every where so cross and intracta­ble to all Authority, Laws, and Order, and the State is full of Re­bels, the Church of Schismaticks, our Houses of undutiful Children, and untrusty Servants; and men are made universally false and un­faithful one to another. But let them pretend what Religion they will, they shall not so escape; all unjust persons (such as I have de­scribed) are upon the Rock, the severe Sentence of my Text; They shall not inherit the Kingdom of God.

PART. II.

So at last I am arriv'd at the Second Part of my Text; The Unjust mans Doom or Punish­ment: They shall not inherit, &c.

In which, are two things to be observed; I. The Nature of the Punishment; it is a disinherison. [...], The Quality of the State, The Kingdom of God.

In the first, here's a case in Law, a Title supposed, and a Disinheri­son expressed: A Title, these un­just persons had, and heirs at Law they were, (and so were all that are, or shall be deprived of that e­ternal Blessing) or they could in no sence be said to be disinherited: 'Tis true, that Adam once forfeit­ed [Page 42] the Estate, but it was purchased again, or redeemed, by Christ, not with Silver and Gold, but with the dear price of his precious blood, (1 Pet. 1. 18.) And that Redemp­tion was made as large, as the For­feiture, as St. Paul discourseth, ( Rom. 5. 18.) So that the Reason why any man is now disinherited, must be upon another account; not because Adam sinned, or that the Covenant of Grace was renew­ed with any number less than all men, (1 Tim. 2. 4.) or that Christ died for fewer than ( [...]) for every man, (Heb. 2. 9.) but be­cause that universal Covenant, and Redemption, was made condition­al, and required terms to be per­formed on our part, which, whoso­ever should refuse to keep, should forfeit his Title to that new pur­chased Inheritance. Now the Con­ditions of this new Covenant made [Page 43] in Christ, are Faith and Obedience. To which Repentance is to be ad­ded, as Tabula post Nausragium; of which, more anon.

The sum then is, That the unjust man, as such, in all the particular cases I have mentioned, shall not inherit the Kingdom of God, be­cause he failed in both the Condi­ [...]ions.

1. Every unjust person hath fail­ed in the first; he is not a true Be­liever in the sense of the Gospel. For the clearing of which, we are to consider, that Evangelical Faith, when mans Salvation or Justificati­on is wholly attributed to it, (as when 'tis said, that He that believ­eth shall be saved, John 3. 16. and justified by Faith, Rom. 5. 1. and saved by Faith, Eph. 1. 8. and the like) intends not any Act or Ha­bit of believing, in any strict sense, but a comprehension of all Christ's [Page 44] Virtues, and the whole Body of Christianity, of which a just life is the most considerable portion Therefore St. Paul upon the breach of distributive Justice, in one par­ticular Instance of it, that is, a Childs not providing for his Pa­rents, (which by Family, 1 Tim. 5. 8. is undoubtedly intended) affirms, that such a person ( [...]) hath denied the Faith, and is an un­believer, so much worse than an Infidel, as a practical Atheist is a greater Prodigy than a speculative. But if Faith be taken in a stricter sense, as sometimes it is; and par­ticularly by St. Jame.; ( Jam 2.) unless it be [...], ( Gal. 5. 6.) except it worketh, or is consummate by Love, (of which Love the greatest part (in the Go­spel sense) is Justice) it avails not; it cannot, it is dead, saith St. Jam. that is, as useless to a mans Justifica­tion [Page 45] as the Faith of Devils. Who­soever therefore is an unjust person in any of the senses I have descri­bed him, whether a Rebel to his Prince, or refractory to the Church [...] its Order and Institutions, as to Distributive Justice; or does wrong to his Neighbour as to Commuta­tive, let him pretend to what Faith in Christ he will, let it be a receiv­ing, laying hold, or reliance upon him, or howsoever he hath been taught to define it, he is ( [...], Col. 3. 6.) a Child of Un­belief; and upon the non-perform­ance of the Condition of Faith, (in the account of the Gospel) he shall be dealt withal as an Unbelie­ver; he hath forfeited the Inheri­tance, he shall not inherit the King­dom of God.

But then 2. Faith is not the on­ly Condition of the Convenant, by which we may preserve our Title [...] [Page 48] common peace and happiness of the world; that all Superiors might have entire Subjection, and all o­thers Peace and right. So that a Rebel, a Schismatick, and the un­just of the lesser Orders, may not be said only to disobey, but to fru­strate the prime purpose and design of the Gospel, and to offer the greatest affront and contradiction to the very Spirit of Christianity. For wheresoever the Grace of God is predominant, it will certainly, and observedly (as its prime and signal effect) reduce the Soul to the greatest innocency and simplicity, tractableness and obligation of do­ing right, and good to all; with all which, the sins of Injustice in every kind, are perfectly inconsistent, and irreconcileable. The Sum is, who­soever is an habitual Offender a­gainst any part of Christian Justice whether Distributive or Commu­tative, [Page 49] hath broken not only a par­ticular, but an universal Command­ment of Christ, and is grossely dis­obedient; and so hath forfeited his Inheritance, his Title to the King­dom of God.

Thus I have shewn you the unjust mans Doom in the nature of his Punishment; He shall not inherit: which will appear so much the greater, when we consider the qua­lity of the Estate, from which he is disinherited; The Kingdom of God. Which is the next thing to be discours'd.

The Kingdom of God is a Figura­tive Expression, design'd to exalt our Imagination of the blessed state to come: And that because we cannot now behold its unconceiv­able happiness, but as ( [...], 1 Cor. 13. 12. per Speculum) through [Page 50] the dark Perspective of Sense, and a clouded Intellect; and therefore it must be represented to us ( [...]) by little Riddles and Shadows of the best humane Felicities; Here it is by a Kingdom, the greatest and noblest possession this world af­fords; and so enough to confirm us, that (the Design of that lofty Metaphor) the future Bliss, is too great a loss, for so small a recom­pense, as the most prosperous un­just man gains by his unrighteous practices. But that the unjust man may be more fully upbraided for the greatness of his Loss, let me improve the Metaphor, by saying, that first he loseth God; that is, the Beatifical Vision of his Blessed Countenance, which is better than Life it self: He loseth the Com­forts of his Blessed Redeemer, who shall now appear to him with the terrible Aspect of Flaming Fire, [Page 51] taking vengeance on him, and all them that obey not his Gospel, 2 Thes. 1. 8. He loseth the possession (to make use of the most sensible De­scription of the happy issues of an holy Life) of the City of the Living God, the New Jerusalem, the Soci­ety of an innumerable company of Angels, of the General Assembly of the first born, & of the spirits of just men made perfect, Heb. 12. Lastly, He lo­seth his own Soul; that is, he brings himself into such a State, (that prae­stat nunquam natum) it were better for him he had never been born, or that a Milstone were hanged about his neck, and were drowned in a Sea of Forgetfulness, and Annihilation. And all this he adventures that he may add one handful of Earth more to the Turf of his worldly possessi­ons; one grain more to his accu­mulated heap; one garnish more to the pride of his Life; from all [Page 52] which, and from whatsoever else he enjoys in this world, he shall possibly within a few Minutes, pro­bably within a few Moneths, cer­tainly within a few Years, be as much a stranger, as he that holds up the Train of the Persian Emperor, or the Infant that hangs upon his Mothers Breast. These are the mise­rable measures of the unjust mans Doom and Punishment.

But is he past the utmost Confines of Hope? Is his evil an irrepara­ble loss, an irrecoverable danger? Certainly no: For though the Go­spel have drawn up the Indictment against him, it is not yet come to Judgment: He is in a state of dam­nability, but not Damnation. Not so shipwrack'd, but that there is ( Ta­buta post Naufragium) one Raft left to land him safe, one remaining con­dition of his recovery, and that [Page 53] is, a timely Repentance; For (saith God) if the wicked man shall turn away from his unrighteousness (his Injustice) and do that which is law­ful and right, &c. if he shall restore the Pledge, and execute judgment be­tween man and man, he shall save his Soul alive, Ezek. 18. 27. When first by Repentance, must be under­stood nothing less, than (what is necessary for all other sins) a real departure from all unrighteous Actions and engagements: What­soever is called Repentance, and brings not this change (be it Sor­row, Contrition, or Confession) ought in no reason to be account­ed sufficient for Evangelical Recon­ciliation. Much less will ( Lachrymu­la & Suspirium) a Tear and a Sigh at the last period of our Life (by such measures of Mercy as are re­vealed to us) expiate the guilt of the sin of Injustice, or any other [Page 54] sins, habitually and reigningly con­tinued in, to that helpless hour. Therefore 2. Besides this Repent­ance, which is common to all other sins. The unjust (which doth much heighten the sin of Injustice above all others) are obliged to restore the injured persons (to their ut­most capacity) to that Right, of which they have deprived them. Otherwise all other Acts of Re­pentance, (even to the departure from any further Commission of the sin) will be accounted fair, but abortive Attempts. Now in the several cases of Injustice, where the Scene lies not for restitution, as in the cases of Rebellion, Schism, and the like, the unjust person must make satisfaction, and amends, by acknowledgments and recanta­tions, and those to be (if possible) as publickly and earnestly done, as those wrongs had been before [Page 55] committed. For if those attempts of satisfaction be not made (if in his power) whatsoever other acts of Repentance he had performed, (let no man deceive himself, nor mock God) he hath yet no title to the Blessing of the penitent. But where the unjust man (in the cases of the breaches of Commutative Justice) hath defrauded any man by Oppression, Theft, or Subtilty, in any Employment, or Contract whatsoever, so that another is dam­nified by him, if that person should weep an Ocean of Tears for his sins, and pray till his knees became cal­lous, like a Camels, for the pardon of it, if the unjust thing lies upon his hand, if there be not restituti­on made, to the injured person, (according to his power) or if he be dead, to his Heirs; or if nei­ther can be found, to the Poor; (whose Right then it is, by an Es­cheat [Page 56] to the Soveraign Lord, whose Exchequer they are) he cannot be numbred among the Penitents, he is still an unjust man, and shall not inherit the Kingdom of God. It was upon Zacheus noble Restituti­on, that our Saviour pronounced, This day is Salvation come to thy House, (Luke 19. 19.) And, Si res aliena (saith St. Austin in his Epi­stle to Macedonius) cum reddi potest, non redditur, non agitur poenitentia, sed fingitur; If the unjust thing be not restored, the Repentance may be feigned, but is not perform­ed.

And now I beseech all those per­sons here this day before me, whose Consciences can inform them, that they are so unhappy as to be unjust in any of the measures I have men­tioned, first, that they take no of­fence at the Religion, that requires, nor at me that preach, so severe a [Page 57] Method (as men may be apt to think) of their recovery; for they ought to consider, that it was their own wilful prevarications of the most reasonable Rules of Justice, and not the Religion, that made it necessary.

And let me further assure them, that whosoever shall give his Soul leave (for his own salvation) to in­gage in the performance of this Duty of Restitution (how unkind or difficult soever it may appear at the first view) let him not be dis­couraged (my Soul for his) he shall find such a sensible return of sweet­ness and satisfaction in the very Acts, and much more in the Issue of it, that he would not exchange his Comforts, or have neglected his Duty, for all the Pleasures and Enjoyments in the world. His Soul shall dwell at ease, and he shall lie down in peace; his bed shall be no [Page 58] more shorter, but that he shall stretch himself upon it, nor his Covering narrower, but that he shall wrap him­self in it, (Isa. 28. 20.) that is, he shall have a quiet mind, while he lives; and when he comes to die, he shall not be tormented with the confluence of direful Furies about his Bed, nor behold dreadful As­pects hanging about his Curtains, the usual Attendants of unjust men, living and dying.

What if thy House shall stand one Story lower by removing the Chambers built by wrong, ( Jer. 22. 13.)? Or contract the compass of thy Land by hedging out Naboth's Vineyard? Or lay aside some Cir­cumstances of a splendid Life? Nay: what if thou shouldst be re­duced to a retired condition, or the narrow circles of a low fortune, by restoring what is anothers right? the assurance of Gods Favour a­bove [Page 59] thee, the enjoyment of a good Conscience within thee, the view of a glorious hope before thee; (in a word) a contented life, a peaceable death, and a blest eter­nity, will be a redundant compen­sation for all thou shalt so nobly part with. Thus have I adventured a pre­judice in your opinion, by chusing these unwelcome (though very ne­cessary) Doctrines of universal Justice, and upon the breach of it, Satisfaction, and Restitution. My comfort is, if I have not pleased you, I have done you right, I have dealt justly with you. And I do not despair, but I have met here many persons of David's Choyce, and Ingenuity, ( Psal. 141.) who would rather be smitten friendly, and reproved, than to hear the pleasing Balmes of unconcerning and indulgent Doctrine, to break their heads, destroy their souls. [Page 60] With whom (I hope) these Instru­ctions may so far prevail, that it may be said of them, as St. Paul said of his penitent Corinthians, in the Verse following my Text; Such were some of you, but ye are washed, ye are sanctified, but ye are justified in the Name of the Lord Jesus, and by the Spirit of our God.

A particular Represen­tation of the Injustice of Partial Conformi­ty to the Clergy.

A POSTCRIPT.
Representing the Inju­stice and Danger of Partial Conformity.

I Have in this Sermon (as fully & faithfully as I could) made an universal Survey of the several Branches of Christian Justice, and given notice, that the wilful Transgressors of any part of it, stand arraign'd and condemned for un­righteous [Page 66] persons, as to their guilt, and cannot (upon the Gospels re­quiring universal Obedience in ge­neral, and doing right to all men in particular, as the Conditions of Salvation by it) inherit the King­dom of God, as their punish­ment.

But amongst the great numbers of unjust men, I have (in the for­mer part of my Discourse) sorted those persons, who deprive the Su­preme Magistrate of his due, in that part of his Authority which concern Spirituals; and the Go­vernors of the Church of their right of Obedience from their Charges; by refusing to conform themselves to the Commands of both, so far as they are invested with a power from God, to insti­tute Laws and Canons, for the Peace, Order, and Unity of the Churches, under their Rule and Conduct.

[Page 67] Now because not only the Peo­ple in general are concern'd in that part of Evangelical Righteousness; but the Ministers also of Parochial Congregations stand most especial­ly obliged to it, and because their offences against it, are of far more dangerous consequence, I have for their sakes, who are of the Clergy, made this enlargement in that particular Branch of it, as to them.

And this I have done the rather, because (at this present time) this kind of Injustice is so spreadingly, and unconscionably committed and practiced; that (what with the miscarriage of some, who out of worldly prudence, of others, who out of weakness, of most, who out of wilfulness, neglect their due con­formity to the establish'd Laws) a great number of the Churches are made irregular and disordered in [Page 68] the publick Administrations of Gods service: By which means the Laws are baffled and despised, the Government suspected and defa­med, the Priesthood in general reproach'd as false and careless, and the whole profession of our esta­blisht Religion, is made a scorn at present, and ready to be made a prey in future, to our enemies on every side.

My Brethren, let us have a care therefore in time, we do not too much, and too long (for the nar­row Concerns of our present quiet or profit, or to conciliate vulgar Love or Fame) not only wickedly and unjustly, but weakly and im­prudently comply with the humors of any party whatsoever, in the neglects of our Duties, or partial performance of our Offices: For it is certain, that no man can do it, (upon what pious Motives soever [Page 69] he pretends to be induced to it, as favouring infirmities, or tender Consciences, and the like) but be­sides his real offence against the Laws of Christ strictly obliging Obedience to his Superiors just Commands, he doth thereby pro­mote and cherish a Faction in his own bosom; which being once warm'd into a sufficient strength, shall upon the next advantageous opportunity, not only destroy the Church in its Legal Constitution, but in the same pitch and posture of abasement, to which the con­descension was made.

And of this, let our late expe­rience be an impartial Judge. For when some Bishops, and other emi­nent persons of the Church, who out of a pious tenderness to some mens dissatisfactions, and designing the upholding their own, and the Churches Respect & Credit among [Page 70] them (for which they were distin­guished from their Brethren by the name of Puritans) did either not urge, or not practise strict Confor­mity, found at length their own grand mistake in the frustration of all those ends which they pro­pounded to themselves, as the rea­sons of their compliance: For nei­ther themselves, nor the Church for their sakes, found any mercy at all from them, in the days of their Power and Fury, when nothing less would satisfie them, than the confusion of both. Little did those Reverend Persons think, when they strain'd their Candor to that Party, beyond the bounds of their due O­bedience to Law, that such a pet­ty shew of tender Piety, and Con­sciences so demurely nice (that could not digest so much as a Ring on the Brides Finger, the Infants wearing the shadow of a Cross three [Page 71] minutes at its Baptism, upon its Forehead, or but the colour of the Priest's Vestment; for they pre­tended then but such little offences) should cover such black Designs, of the most unwarrantable pra­ctices that ever were acted in the world.

It behoveth us therefore to sus­pect, when we meet with Consci­ence-scruplings about such, or the like indifferent Rites and Circum­stances that there lodgeth under­neath an unsatisfiable dislike and dissatisfaction to the whole esta­blishment; so that if our Ingenui­ty should be tempted to debauch our Obedience, by a partial confor­mity to indulge them in those lesser things, it were prudence to believe, that we should be so far from giving them full satisfaction, that it would but the more advance and strength­en an unruly appetite, which no­thing [Page 72] could determine, but the de­struction of all. Of this their un­satiable humour, our late experi­ence can convincingly inform us▪ when their first modest desires of a Moderated Episcopacy, ended in nothing less, than its extirpation▪ and of regulating some offensive parts of the Liturgy, in its utter a­bolition. And when (as among many of them) after the Cross, followed Baptism it self; after re­moving the Rails and Genuflexion, went away the Sacrament: And when they had been at first a little gratified with the taking away the Habits, they were never quiet, till they had renounced the very Order & Calling of Priesthood it self. Such effects, and no better than these we must expect from the greatest condescention that can be made, to men of this temper and comple­ction.

[Page 73] In stead therefore of any sinful [...]pliance with any Faction what­ [...]ver, by remitting our Duties, [...] please them, as Friends (which [...] will be no longer than they [...]ot be otherwise) let us gird our selves in all our spiritual Armature a­gainst them, as the Churches, ours, and their own, destructive Ene­mies; that is, let us fast and pray, and weep against their Ignorance and Perverseness in private: Let us preach down their Follies in pub­lik: But especially let us guard the establish'd Church against their designs of unsetling the peoples [...]herence to it, with an intire con­ [...]mity to its legal Constitutions [...] every Circumstance; and then let us conquer their prejudice with [...]nocency of Life and simplicity of [...]anners, till by these holy Me­thods, and Gods blessing, we have [...]tained (or at least endeavoured [Page 74] to administer the most reasonable means to obtain their recovery, [...] Sense and Obedience.

And though, if after all this, we cannot prevail, yet it will be [...] honourable and safe (before G [...] and Man) for us, who are the Phy­sitians of Souls, that they may be said to perish under, than without the application of the most suffici­ent remedy. And if truth must [...] to the ground, yet let it not [...] without a competent witness gi [...] to it, whatsoever we suffer for it. But by no means, let nor futurity lay it to our charge, that we have help'd to betray the best constitu­ted Church in the world to ruine, by neglecting our Duty, to hu [...] and indulge a perverse generation of men, whom no kindness could reconcile, no remissions or conde­scentions satisfie.

For he that thinks, that the les­sening, [Page 75] or laying aside his Confor­ [...]ty, or the concealing some ne­cessary Truths, because distastful [...] their vitiated Palates, or the [...]pping on to some degrees of com­ [...]ance with their popular Modes [...] Praying and Preaching, will se­ [...]re the Church from the danger [...] those Factions; shall find his [...]pedient as unsuccesseful, as that [...]ysitian's, who leaving the Cause [...] the Distemper behind, thinks [...] obtain health for his Patient, by [...]ring the Symptom for the Dis­ [...]se; or as absurd as his expectati­on, who would hope for a regular [...]fect, from the most equivocal [...]ause. For it is observed (and we are ready to make the Observa­tion good by several Instances) that [...] Congregations have contributed greater numbers to the Herds of the different Factions, than those that have been under the conduct [Page 76] of such, who would have the pieced, and partial Conformity and popular Compliances, esca [...] under the specious, yet mista [...] Title of Moderation.

I must confess, amongst the Ene­mies of the Church of England, think that sort of amphibious Cler­gy, not the least, nor less dange­rous than any; who forfeit the Fidelity to their solemn Subscripti­ons and Declarations, and treache­rously decline the work they have assumed, and act their Offices in the Church, in such a manner, that the People may believe, that there is something that is very evil in them, and that they repented them­selves of what they had underta­ken.

These are they, that set up Altar against Altar in the same Church that join the Liturgy and Directo­ry together, at the same Assembly [Page 77] but as much as possible to the Dis­advantage of the former, which they shuffle over with such an un­decent and undevout Mode of De­livery, and then manage their Vo­luntier Effusions in Prayer, and their Hints and Corollaries in Preaching, with such Zeal and Fer­vor, as if they design'd to tell the People, that they never were in earnest till then, or that those Of­fices in the Pulpit might be inter­preted to serve no better end, than to undermine the credit of what they had done (or undone) in the Desk.

Such unconformable Conformists as these began the Church of Eng­lands danger at first Reformation, and the miserable Series, of almost all its Troubles since, hath been propagated by them; and if a [...]imely care in Governors, and the Resurrection of a good Conscience [Page 78] in themselves, do not prevent it, they will yet contribute as much, (if not more) as any enemy we have, to make the present Distem­pers in the Church, to become an uncurable Disease, an unsuperable Evil.

These mens Congregations are the Fountains, from whence the crooked Rivers, and Rivulets, the Mother and Daughters of Factions, have deriv'd their streams, to that swelling greatness, as they now run among us, and almost over us▪ They were the Seraglio's, where the late Warriors against the King and the Church, were trained up and disciplin'd: And what the Se­minaries beyond Seas, are to the propagation of Popery, these are the same to the keeping up of all Factions among us. So that all at­tempts for the recovery of the Churches Peace, and Unity, by [Page 79] suppressing Conventicles (in which are many serious, though abused Souls, who would the rather be [...]itied (so far as can possibly con­ist with the Churches safety) be­cause they received their first pre­judice by them, whom we have too much or too little reason to call our selves) will be found uneffe­ctual for that end, so long as the Nurseries of Faction within the Church, are permitted to perpetu­ate a Succession of such, who up­on the least check or discontent, have prepared Principles and Affe­ctions to depart from us, and to supply their places. And this will easily be believed, when it is consi­dered, that the difference between some Ministers practices in Chur­ches, and those of unlawful Meet­ings is so small, that oft-times the separation may be rather account­ed [Page 80] a Change of Places, than Pro­fessions.

But that these Clergy-men may be more regularly convinced of their sin and folly, and find Argu­ments, both from Conscience and Prudence, to change their destru­ctive practices of popular compli­ances, into a Design of preserving the Church of England's general safety, by a faithful conformity to its Institutions; I shall here offer to their considerations, (besides those which I have already intimated in general) a particular Series of E­vils, certainly consequent to their Disorders.

1. From these mens Miscarri­ages, and the teaching their People to adhere to them (where they are) it comes to pass that the Enemies of the Church, have contrived an Ar­gument, by crying up the numbers [Page 81] of Dissenters (which by their means are more numerous in Chur­ches, than without) as great and formidable; to tempt, and terri­fie the Civil Power, from prote­cting the Church, under its pre­sent danger and oppression. Where­as, as I believe the allegation to be false (especially if a lesser number of men in power, and of learning, and honour, may be allowed to compensate a greater, of the mean and ignorant) so, if this one Ex­pedient were tryed, that all Cler­gy men might be compelled to serve God in publick, in one uni­form submission to Law, without any liberty to extravagate from that Rule; and so no more Beacons on fire in any neighbouring Chur­ches to alarm the Vulgar, to run up and down to gratifie their natural love of Opposition and Novelty; [Page 82] and a diligent care taken that no Factions without the Church, might be headed by men of Orders, or Parts (though the common people were less prosecuted with afflictive penalties) I am perswaded in a few years, the numbers of Dissenters, would be so far from being formi­dable, that they would not be con­siderable for any thing, but our pi­ty and Charity. And I have this ground to assure me of the possible successefulness of this Expedient, because it is certain, that where the strictest Conformity hath a long time been constantly used, there are fewest that do trouble themselves, or their Governors about the De­sign of Relaxation from it; and that there are none that hate con­formity so much, as they who live in places where it is discountenan­ced and neglected. And this ap­pears [Page 83] by the disloyal and undutiful temper of those that dwell in Ci­ties and greater Towns, where, be­cause there was no provision in Law for them, that would obey it; the people were resolved to bestow their Contributions on none, but such, by whom they might be in­structed and indulged in an assured opposition to the Church.

To which one cause, most of our former and present miseries refer, [...] effects; as when from those places were elected Burgesses of Parlia­ment of the same Principles, to cre­ate troubles above (whose heavy [...]and, our late Gracious Princes of Happy Memory felt sufficiently, even to the loss of the life of one of the best Kings that ever was:) and [...] when the People of the Neigh­bour-Villages flockt to their Mar­ket Lectures, and were there train­ed [Page 84] up, in dislike and enmity to the establish'd Church, and prepared to contemn their own Shepherds at home; unless they became such as themselves, which very oft they did, when younger Divines (who for want of Parts or Government, had little encouragement to conti­nue in the Universities) made it a piece of their Education, to go thither, to scribble Notes for their own Pulpits, and to learn the Tones, Gestures, and Phrases, which might give their own People con­tentment at home.

Whereas if our present Parlia­ment (as it was the Design of ma­ny) had upon the Kings Restaura­tion found out a way, to have set­led a competent legal maintenance, and men of the greatest Integrity and Learning (whose abilities are commonly either lodg'd up in Col­ledges [Page 85] and Cathedrals, or obscur'd in little Villages) planted in those greater places; and where they are popularly elective, if they had been brought under the Patronage of the Crown (whose safety is espe­cially concern'd in it) and a way found out, to embetter Trade, in the stead of Factious Lectures, there could not have been a Stone laid, which would have added more to the defence and security of the Church and Throne.

But to recover my self from this Digression, I am confident that this Expedient that I have mentioned, (whatsoever is pretended to the contrary by them that have a de­sign to ruine us) will give far less trouble to the Civil Power to pre­serve the Church, than a Tolerati­on of all Religions (by the making and maintaining so many Rules to [Page] limit it, and so many Provisions to prevent the dangers that will ensue upon it, half of which cannot be be foreseen) will cost to destroy it: Besides the Dishonour of discoun­tenancing that Party, which are the only assured Friends to un­doubted Loyalty, all other Parties lying under a stain of being unfaith­ful to the Crown; of confounding the most absolute platform of Pri­mitive Christianity, which no other Perswasion makes any such pre­tence to; and in defending of which, we have so far prevail'd in all rational Debates, that our ene­mies stand ashamed, and baffled on every side: Of making that Church which hath appear'd hi­therto the honour of the whole Reformation, to become vile and contemptible in the eye of the world, by giving advantage for [Page] the encouragement and immixture of as many false and ridiculous Professions at one time among us, as all the Ages of the Church ever knew in its successive Periods: Of contradicting the sense of both the Universities, and of the principal of the most Learned men of the Age, with a great Blow to Learn­ing it self: Of opening a door to the increase of Atheism and Pro­phaneness, which if they have thri­ven so much under a looser hand of Discipline, what will they come to, when all the Bars of Ecclesia­stick Government are thrown down? Lastly, (with many more evils which a better and more ex­perienc'd skill might foresee) be­sides the dishonour of treading up­on the Bloud and Ashes, and of blemishing the Fame and Actions of our Late Gracious King and Mar­tyr, [Page] who died to prevent the ad­mission of those evils among us.

The Sum is, It is no wonder, (while so many Churches continue in their Irregularities) why the Arms of the Civil Power are wea­ried and discouraged, when all their Endeavours for the establishing an universal uniformity by the method of dispersing unlawful Assemblies, may be too justly interpreted to be but an emptying the streams, while the Fountain is kept running; and cutting down the Branches, while the Root is left entire, to propa­gate a new progeny of the same kind and spirit. So that when some Civil Magistrates have had their aid required, for the redressing of Misdemeanors without the Church, it hath been reasonably answered, and objected by them, let the Chur­ches own work of Reformation [Page] and Order be done at home, and we are ready to give our assistance to endeavour it abroad.

2. From these mens Disorders it comes to pass that it is no won­der that the Government and Dis­cipline of the Church is baffl'd and despis'd, and men are tempted to reproach them as ineffectual, and consequently useless; when it is considered, that besides the known Dissenters, who impudently op­pose them without, the R. R. Bi­shops universal care of their Chur­ches (every Parish being their pro­per Charge) is executed by so ma­ny Curates, who are Traytors to them and their Authority within. Who contrary to their trust (given and taken with all possible Religi­ous and reasonable Obligations) of keeping up the Reverence and E­steem of their Persons, Calling, [Page 90] and Discipline, by conducting Souls, in one legal uniform per­formance of their Offices, in Ca­nonical Obedience (which by Oath they stand oblig'd to) and Filial submission to them; they tempt and teach the people to decline all respect and obedience to their Au­thority, by setting up a new mode of Worship, by the Rubrick and Canon of their own Fancies, and in opposition to their Orders and Injunctions.

Thus in stead of those excellent enjoyned Prayers, and Regular Forms of Worship, which they either omit in whole or part, or render unacceptable by an irregu­lar usage, they substitute such an unsavory Offering of their own in­ventions, oft-times so full of Ri­diculous Clamors and Gestures, and odd Familiarities, if not of [Page 91] non-sense and blasphemies (against which evils, neither the Church, nor themselves, will be secured, while they are permitted to assume a liberty of uttering what they please, and of gaining a reputati­on by it, of praying by the Spirit) that the wiser sort of the Friends to the Church of England, are scandall'd and ashamed, and forsake the Publick Assemblies, whither by Law they are ingaged to go; and the ignorant and credulous Vulgar train'd up and disciplin'd, in the Love and Admiration of an irregu­lar Devotion, and in an irreconci­leable disaffection to the rational setled Service of the Church, and an insuperable hatred to the Laws and Persons that oblige and require it.

And then, as to the executing the Churches tender care of instru­cting [Page 92] Youth in form and manner, as they are ingaged by Law and Duty, they either wholly omit that sweet and charitable Office, and convert it at the time appoint­ed, into a Discourse, that neither for matter or manner, doth suit with either their needs or capaci­ties; or instead of conducting them in the knowledge of the duties of Christianity, by the Church-Cate­chism (which doth so concernedly design it) they have presumptuous­ly substituted a great company of other Forms, full of private Opi­nions, and Heads of controverted Doctrines (as those of absolute E­lection, Justification by Faith alone, and the like) which have no influ­ence upon, if not a contradiction to, the very reason of Christian Obedience; and thence Parents and Tutors, and the Children them­selves [Page 93] are left to a strange uncer­tainty, when (upon change of places) they are either committed to the conduct of men of other Fancies, or to those that follow the Churches Order in their Insti­tutions. Now what kind of Youth such irregular usage of Children is like to make, may be judged by them, which they trained up in their▪ Twenty years Liberty, to use their own Methods without controul.

Then as to the improving the Churches care of instructing men by the Office of Preaching, in the Duties of Justice, and Mercy, Peace and Innocence, Subjection to Authority, and (which is the Sum of all) universal Obedience: the Peoples ears are accustomed to the noises of new invented Phrases, and impertinent Notions; with the Discourses of Gospel-Privi­ledges, [Page 94] Christian Liberties, and controverted Opinions (such as of the Famous five Points, and their dependent Articles). And instead of Preaching upon the Renown­ed Sermon upon the Mount (in imitation of our Saviour's own ex­ample) and pressing the Rules of Life contained in it, the People hear the weight of their Salvation laid upon some occasional expressi­ons in the Epistles of the Apostles, (especially those to the Romans and Galatians) or else they send them to Patmos, to busie them­selves about opening some of the Seals of the Revelation.

By which kind of Preaching, the People (as their Practices do too pregnantly declare) are kept in Ignorance (some think, greater than in the darkest Age of Pope­ry and Superstition) of those [Page 95] Christian Duties, but especially of their necessary obligation, for the attaining Eternal Salvation: which doth evidently appear, when it is observed, that no sort of Peo­ple of the Nation, are so defective in most of them, nor (as to the case in hand) so cross & intractable to all Authorities, nor so apt (on all occa­sions) to rebellious designs against them (which if a strict observation were made what places did most es­pecially afford the greater numbers of them, that were lately ingaged against the King and the Church, would easily be proved) than those that have been under the conduct of such Ministries.

Hence ingenuous persons may consider, what grand and confused difficulties (made so through these mens disorders) the Ecclesiastick Jurisdiction hath to deal with, to [Page 96] preserve the Church in any degree from a present sinking, into a total ruine; and (as things stand) how impossible it is (were its power ex­ecuted to the greatest perfection) to attain its end of universal Peace and Order.

But if all Ministers of Congre­gations were compelled to do their Duties exactly according to Law, and not one permitted to perform any thing in the publick Worship of God, by his own choice or fan­cy, whereby one Church should be distinguish'd from another; and so none be presum'd to come to Church, nor meddle with any Of­fices or Business about it, but such as come thither (there being no temptation from any thing else) in a willing submission to conformity, which ('tis supposed) none would do but such, as would also be wor­thy [Page 97] and civil to the Government of the Church: And that all pro­fessed Dissenters were look'd upon as excommunicate persons (all which are really so, either, by the Sentence of the Church, or by their own wilful Separation) and so no further to belong to the Churches Jurisdiction (while they resolve ob­stinately to continue so) than an Heathen, or an Alien: And that then the secular power would look upon them as only their proper Province, to regulate them by such Laws as they are, or shall be im­powered withal, made on the most Charitative Design to restore them to the Church; its Discipline would do its own work with honour, and all that live under its excellent conduct, enjoy it with comfort and safety to their Souls.

Whereas, while so many Chur­ches [Page 98] remain in their irregular, and mixt conformities, and for that cause as dangerous enemies, as any the Church of England is oppressed with, continue a kind of Commu­nion with it, in her publick places; no wonder, when such persons are either made Officers, or any other­wise dealt withal, by the Churches Jurisdiction, that they appear, ei­ther, to affront it, or to render it as trifling and ridiculous as they can: and when the Secular Power by due execution of Laws, shall bring any man to some publick Churches, it's a question whether he be restored to the Church of Eng­land, or only removed from a les­ser Conventicle to a greater; and so the Law be made use of, rather to confirm the Dissenters in their opposition, than to restore them to the peace and order of the Church.

[Page 99] 3. By these mens humouring the poor people with their Directorian Conformity, it is, that the True Sons of the Church, who in Con­science of their duty to God, shall entirely conform themselves to the Laws established, are made the scorn and hate of the people: who are taught to reproach them (for want of an accusation that hath truth or sense in it) by the names of Popish & Superstitious: where­as their own Teachers might with less Injustice, and upon a nearer a­greement than we have with either the Pope, or the Worship of Dae­mons (as I can shew them if they desire it) be called Jews or Turks, did not a good Cause solemnly ab­hor such Unchristian Defences, though a bad one (and it is a con­vincing sign it is so) hath no other to protect it.

[...]
[...]

[Page 100] And then upon the temptation of those reproachful. Names that signifie and prove no determinate thing (had they said Conformity had been against any Law of Christ, and shewn us a Precept general, or particular to prove it so, they had done like men and Christians) the people think themselves acquitted towards God, if they persecute their conformable Pastors, with all imaginable acts of Cruelty, to make their lives bitter and vexati­ous to them: To which evils they add this also (with him in the Psalm, imagining God to be such an one as themselves) that if any sad Acci­dent (in common contingencies) shall befall them, it shall be record­ed as a Prodigy from heaven to ar­gue Gods disowning them And whatsoever Faults (be they true or false) their watchful eye of envy [Page 101] can find in their lives, they shall (with all possible disadvantage to their Reputation) be rumour'd a­broad as Scandals to their Profes­sion, and as Arguments against the Church. Not considering that the Juggling of their own admir'd Guides with Christian Obedience in some things, and their gross Dis­obedience to Authority in others, (to the universal wrong both of their Civil and Ecclesiastick Supe­riors) are sins so much more scan­dalous against the Gospel, than any their Malice pretends to lay to the Conformists Charge (if the miscar­riage of some were allowed to be a just Accusation of all) as the Hy­pocrisie of a Pharisee is worse than the open Offences of a Publican; and as a sin that passeth under a pre­tence of Godliness, is much more dangerous, than those sins, whose [Page 102] shame is written on the Offenders Foreheads; and for which there is no approbation or allowance from those of their own perswasion, and (so oft as their Spiritual Governors can have it signified to them) for which, some have been obliged to submit to the Penances of publick Recantations; as hath been done in this particular Diocess.

But a wise man may easily disco­ver (though the People cannot) the difference between the Solid Piety, and Innocency of a true Son of the Church (by which as he hath no design, so, to which he hath no temptation, but to please and honour God, and is not much concern'd if any but his All-seeing Eye shall know it) and the Sheeps­cloathing of Wolves, the Angeli­cal Light which the Devil puts on, when he turns Fanatick, and the [Page 103] Form of Godliness of a Deceiver, that is so much outward Sanctimo­ny and framed Piety, as will (by a subtle observation of the Peoples humour) gain an acceptance and re­putation from them of being God­ly, without any regard to the com­mon Peace of the Church. And if any of them shall chance to fall in­to any apparent acts of sin, which they dislike, and of which they so bitterly accuse others, and the Church for them, so long as they comply with them in their disobe­dient humour to the Church, all the condemnation they shall have, shall amount to no more, than, It [...] pity for the man, and God in his [...] time will shew him his Errour, and call him home; but he shall not lose the opinion of an honest man. But wo to the poor Confor­mist, if he falls into the same.

[Page 104] 4. From the example of these mens Disorders it comes to pass, that the ignorant and easie Dissenters are encreased, confirmed, and hardned in their Separations, be­yond all possible recal; when they understand, that what they depart from in the whole, is but that which those men (who by mistake enough and by incompetent Judges are ac­counted the only Godly Ministers do in their Churches reject in por­tions. And when, as to that little they observe, the matter is so or­dered, that they may be believed to do it, but in their own defence unwillingly, and by constraint, and as resolved to continue the doing it no longer, than they can get them­selves set free from the burden of Authority.

But this mischief ends not here & that which makes it much worse [Page 105] is, that such persons, who are yet unconcern'd as to any Religion, and are tempted through Idleness, or Business, or some little Offence to the person of their Priests, to stay at home; do answer all inward Checks of Conscience, and all out­ward Perswasions against their neg­lect of serving God according to the order of the Church, by al­ledging to themselves, that they absent themselves from nothing but that, which those that are account­ed Godly, do make it their Religi­on to scorn, and forsake, and would fight to destroy; and those that use it, seem to be opprest by it, and seek to avoid it as much as they can.

By which it comes to pass, that great numbers of Men (I dare not say how great I think them) and of Youth especially (O unhappy they [Page 106] that gave the occasion!) by conti­nued absence from the Blessings and Ordinances of the Church, and the means of Grace and Knowledge are grown Atheistical and Barba­rous, Vile and Vitious, Bold and Hardened in their opposition to [...] Virtue and Goodness.

Hence it is (what with the one and the other) that some places look like (if they really be not) an universal defection from Christiani­ty: And some Priests who faith­fully perform their duty, could not without great shame and oppression of Spirit, be serving God in the Publick Place, with so few about them (perhaps two or three in some populous places) but that they comfort themselves, that their lit­tle Handful, compared with the Flocks that attend Faction, look so like the different Numbers in the [Page 107] Narrow and Broad way, mention'd in the Gospel, and the unequal pro­portion of the good and evil in the world; and by considering, that Multitudes (when Differences are upon the Stage) seldom (and that by accident) entertain the right side, but do usually suffer them­selves to be conducted by such Im­postors, who because they cannot satisfie their Pride and Ambition in being considerable in real worth and weight, will endeavour to make themselves so, in Throngs and Num­bers.

5. From these mens disorderly performance of Gods Service in the Church, and the Confusions which they bring upon the Government by it, the Romanists (whose Ends are chiefly served by it) have their Hands daily strengthened, and Hopes advanced, for the accom­plishing [Page 108] their Designs. And I am assured (of which sufficient Rea­sons and Instances may be given that nothing can so fully defeat their Endeavours for the introdu­ction of their Spiritual Empire a­mongst us, as an entire practis [...] Uniformity in all our Churches, and a full adherence to, and a faithful preservation of, the establish'd Ec­clesiastick Government; as the main Bulwarks, which they endea­vour to overthrow, and which we must chiefly trust to (under God for the Churches universal Safe­ty.

But the truth of this is so infete [...] ­ed with Riddles, and made so like the doubtful Answer of an Oracle to the People, that they are perfectly cheated into the Belief of a Sense as contrary to it as it it's possible and so are delivered into an Opini­on [Page 109] of pursuing the Churches safety against Popery, by that Method, which is the only probable means of delivering up the Church unto it.

The Romanists know, that they can never bring this Nation back to their Religion, but first the esta­blisht Church must be overthrown; and they know also (no other dan­ger yet appearing) it must be done, by improving the Dissenters Ma­ice, and the Peoples Folly, to confound the Peace and Order of it, by the ruine of Episcopacy and Liturgy: which that they may do with the greater Zeal, the Cheat [...], they must be made believe, that all that they do is to pull down An­tichrist, and keep out Popery; and to hate the Conformist, as designing to uphold both: whereas there is no man, but he, that prevents the [Page 110] setting up of both among us.

Thus the best Prince, Prelate, and Statesman then in the world, lost their Lives, by being first ren­dred the Peoples hate, as design­ing to bring in Popery; when wise men knew, that there were not three persons under the Sun, whom the Romanists would rather have removed out of the way, as the grand hinderers of their Design. The people are taught not to con­form to the Liturgy, because it is Popish; whereas the Papists hate it, because it is not so; and when some of them have been dispensed to hear our Sermons, they are al­ways prohibited to hear the Ser­vice.

And whereas the Factions are at work to make the People ruine E­piscopacy, as Popish; there is no­thing the Romanists desire to see [Page 111] rather, than it's confusion; as knowing that it was that Order of men, that did at first throw, and now keeps out their Usurpations. And it is known, that the strictest Adherers to the Pope, are but back-friends to the Order of Bi­shops in the Countries of their own perswasion; and that the Order of Jesuites was first rais'd up, and now continued in its greatness, on design, to retrench the power of Bishops, as an Order that can only endanger the Popes Usurpations, and yet themselves stand upon a firm bottom of primitive Catholo­cisme.

But fully to confute the Peoples grand Mistake, who have been so falsly and disingenuously tempted, and instructed, to suspect the strict Conformists, as inclinable to Pope­ry (the spiteful Artifice of the Fa­ctions [Page 112] to render them odious) I wish them to consider, against whom hath the Romanists bent their For­ces in all their Debates, and with what bitterness they have some­times managed them (to instance in Mr. Serjant's Schism-Disarm'd, against Dr. Hammond) not against the Factions, one or other, but al­ways against the establish'd Church of England? And who hath main­tained the Disputes against them, but the strictest Adherers to it, and those generally of the Episcopal Order it self? And if this cannot sufficiently manifest the falseness of the Accusation, and how far the Faithful Sons of our Church are from being Favourers of Popery, what can be said or done more to convince them?

Then let them consider on the other side, what kindness the Ro­manists [Page 113] have shewn to the Factious, (not that I think they love them more than us, or would not destroy them also, when they had done their work of confounding us) of which none can be ignorant, that will enquire after so many Stories that pregnantly prove it, and that are Printed, and not Confuted: Of which there is hardly any Clergy­man, but can say something from the Circle of his own Observation. Let the world therefore judge, whether they that have so unwor­thily prejudg'd the People with a suspition of us, have not given occasion to be accused as really guil [...] of the same themselves.

The Sum is, So far as a partial Conformist, doth by his unworthy usage of his Offices, cherish in the People a dislike and disaffection, to the Service, Orders, and Go­vernment [Page 114] of the Church, whereby they are prepared to oppose them, (if not to destroy them) on all oc­casions; so far he must be suppo­sed to be doing the Papists work, to be digging down the Wall, pluck­ing up the Hedge, which fence and secure the Church against them; and laying all open to give them opportunity to re-enter and possess the holy Vineyard of God amongst us. And I think of this they have been sufficiently forewarned, by the late Incomparable Prelate and Martyr, when in his dying Sermon, he foretold what a Harvest the Pope would make of our Confu­sions; though for his good will, and dying-tender care of the Church, the Head of a Faction, (who afterward lost his own) was so impudent, as in a Triumph, to dip his Handkerchief in his Blood, [Page 115] in requital for his Kindness.

6. And Lastly, By these mens undutiful practices it comes to pass, that the Parochial Officers, who should inform Authority of the Miscarriages of Congregations, are for their sakes, tempted to break their solemn Oaths to God, given and taken, for the good end of the Churches Order and Unity, and of the purity of Life in the Mem­bers of it, which are wholly de­feated by it.

Of which Oaths so broken, those Ministers cannot but be highly guil­ty, as being in no capacity to re­prove them, and necessarily oblig'd to indulge them, in their abomina­ble sin of Perjury: And all to save themselves from being justly questioned, for their own Disor­ders and Disobedience.

[Page 116] And the event is, that most Chur­ches will be (without all visible re­medy) kept unreformed from the grossest Abuses; and the Nation in general will be taught by such remarkable Presidents of Perjury, almost in every Neighbourhood, to contemn all other Obligations by the solemn Religion of an Oath; that the King can promise to him­self little assurance of Fealty, from them that have sworn it; and no man secure of his Life or Fortune, when both are committed to the tryal of the Law, when only the tye of an Oath can assure any man to have right done him. And there are already Complaints made of gross Miscarriages, where Favour or Interest have tempted men to deal unfaithfully, and to betray the Truth, to the preservation of which, they stood engaged by oath.

[Page 117] And if men still proceed to be so Atheistical, and hardy, as to make no Conscience of an Oath, and consequently not of the lesser tyes of Honour, and common Honesty; the whole world will in a short time be sensible, that we are a false, per­fidious, and perjurious People, a­bominable to God and Man.

All these evils (till they shall en­deavour to convince me to the contrary, which if they do, I shall either give them a sober Reply in my own Defence, or a just acknow­ledgment of my Mistake) I con­clude to be done or occasioned by them. And do yet believe, that without Repentance towards God, and a sincere endeavour to make satisfaction to the Church, for the wrongs they have done, they must answer deeply for them, at the Bar of Divine Justice, and be reckon­ed [Page 118] among the urighteous in my Text.

As for the People who are abu­sed by them, in their Judgment and Affections against the Church of England, so many of them as are invincibly prejudiced, that is, such as having derived their Errour from the force of an unhappy Edu­cation, and since been kept up in their prejudice, by the strong Temptation of their Teachers seeming Godliness (in which it is no hard matter to de­ceive a weak, though innocent, mind) and have not natural capa­cities to discover their Mistake, by the help of an ordinary and gene­ral Means of Conviction; My Cha­rity tells me, that such may be dear and beloved Servants of God, and such as may attain the end of the [Page 119] Gospel in pure and innocent lives, that is, that would not for any earthly advantage, wilfully and deliberately persist in any evil way, (except in the Instance of their (which I suppose) invincible Mi­stake) whereby God should be of­fended, or dishonoured by them.

And I wish that the best care might be taken in every part of the Nation, to distinguish them from those, who observedly, out of a [...]oss humour, pride or envy, wick­edly maintain their opposition a­gainst the Church, and that then there were a particular application made to them, managed with the greatest meekness, and prudence, to undeceive them; and that all Churches did the same thing with­out distinction, and no subtle heads of Factions permitted any more to abuse them, and that Church-men [Page 120] would be exactly careful of giving them no offence, by the Irregulari­ties of their Lives, I am perswaded in a short time, the greatest part of the Innocent Dissenters might be gained to the Church, and be an Ornament to it, and the obstinate would either hide their Faces in shame and discouragement, or ma­nifest their Falseness by the evi­dence of some grosser universally acknowledged Miscarriages.

But as to the persons whom I am now reproving, as it is not possi­ble but they must know the tenur of their Oaths, Subscriptions, and Engagements, and cannot but un­derstand that a departure from them, to a contrary practice, must needs be a wilful transgression of their duty to God & man, so I know not yet what Argument to give my­self, [Page 121]upon which I may ground a charitable interpretation of their Irregularities and Compliances.

Thus have I (laying aside all ap­prehension of Fear or Favour from any man, or parties of men whatso­ever) dealt plainly and faithfully in this great Concern of the Church of England, by laying the occasion of the present evils of it, on them that practised, and do yet continue to practise their Partial Conformity and Compliance with the Factious humour of the Age in the Publick [Page 122] Churches. If I have touch'd a tender Sore, it is because I in tended to cleanse and heal it not to inflame or torment it If any man becomes my enemy for telling the Truth, it is none of my Fault, and so shall be none of my Discomfort. But [...] the Representation (which I have made) of the Sin and Danger, shall prevail with any one ( [...] but one) who hath hitherto halt­ed in his Duty, to entertain a Resolution in future to keep a good Conscience, consult the Right of his Superiors, and the Safety of the Church, by keep­ing himself strict to his Obedi­ence, I shall have a sufficient Compensation for whatsoever I shall suffer from that angry Ge­neration of men I have to deal [Page 123] with, and an ample Reward for whatsoever is here done, by him, who among the Servants of Jesus, is

W. S.

This keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above is co-owned by the institutions providing financial support to the Text Creation Partnership. This Phase I text is available for reuse, according to the terms of Creative Commons 0 1.0 Universal. The text can be copied, modified, distributed and performed, even for commercial purposes, all without asking permission.