The Vnjust mans DOOM.
As examined by the several Kinds of Christian Justice, and their Obligation.
In a SERMON at the Assizes at Bury St. Edmunds in Suff. Sept. 13. 1668.
The Vnjust mans DOOM.
SO far as the principal Design of Christianity is universal Obedience, and the far greatest part of that Obedience is Morality; (Duties to be performed from Man to Man) And the most excellent parts of that Morality, [Page 2] are the Grand Transactions of Government, Regular Administrations of Common Justice, and Preservation of Mutual Rights in all Societies: And so far as the Rule by which all those are accomplished, is Law, grounded upon Right Reason, of which the Gospel (above all Institutions that ever were is highly & designedly perfective) so far, I say, a Divine ex officio, while he moves in his own Sphere, may (must) be especially serviceable to such Assemblies as these: For it is certain, that the happy event of your Affairs, (which is judicially to do all men right, that here appear for it) depends upon every man's uprightly doing his Duty, [...] the part he acts, in this Scene [...] Justice; from the Judge that sentenceth, to the Advocate that pleads; from the Witness that gives evidence, to the Jurates that determine.
[Page 3] Now because that every one of these should do right in his place, a civil account (at best) can advance to no other obligation, but that it is fit and worthy to be done; (too weak an Argument, to resist a Temptation from Profit, or Passion, to do the contrary;) therefore they are to be religiously instructed, (which makes this present exercise reasonable above all Apologies and Answers for the practice of former times among us, when Divines sate upon the principal Seats of Justice) I say, men are to be further instructed, that to do Civil Right, is, now, of Divine Obligation, and a necessary condition of every mans Salvation; under Encouragements of infallible Rewards, which no man shall lose, that brings but ( [...]) the least refreshment or assistance to a just procedure; and under the terrour of dreadful [Page 4] threatnings, which none shall escape, that pervert Judgment, do wrong, and shall any way be instrumental to the violation of anothers Right: And certainly the severest of all of them is this in my Text; They shall not inherit the Kingdom of God.
My Text being thus brought to hand, offers these two Grounds of Discourse:
- 1. The guilty persons, [...], the unrighteous, or the unjust, words Synonimous, and so are promiseuously taken all over the Scripture.
- 2. Their Doom and Punishment, Shall not inherit the Kingdom of God.
1. As to the first, the word [...], unrighteous, or unjust, is not here to be taken in its larger acceptation, by which it is synonimous with [...] Sinners in general, and [Page 5] names the persons, that live in disobedience to all, or any of Gods Commandments indefinitely, as [...] is used, ( Rom. 2. 8.) unrighteousness or unjustice for all ungodliness: And that because, (as C [...]. Alex. observes) [...], every sinful act is injurious, frequently to others, alwaies to our selves.
But [...] is here to be understood strictly, and so denotes persons guilty of the breach of Justice in its limited and natural sense, as it stands distinguished from other Virtues in the Moralists Scheme: And being brought over to be a part of Christ's Religion, was established as such, when he made love to our Neighbour (that is, the love of practice, to do all men right and good) to be of like obligation with Love to God, as practised in the most immediate Duties, and Services of Faith and Worship: [Page 6] For so saith Christ ( Mat. 22. 39.) The second is like unto it (that is) equally, and as indispensably necessary to Salvation, Thou shalt love thy Neighbor as thy self. Now for the Measures of that Love, and (the principal design and excrcise of it). Justice, he gave one general Rule, ( ut primum principium): All things whatsoever you would that men should do unto you, do ye even so to them; that is, Suum cui (que) tribuere (the Definition of Justice) to give to every man his Right and Due. The Offenders then against this Rule of Justice, in this strict sense, are the guilty persons in my Text, as the words before it, (and the very occasion of it) doth fully evince; where the Apostle chargeth them, ( v. 8.) that ( [...]) Ye do wrong and defraud. And thence infers, that such as do so, are unrighteous, or unjust; and shall [Page 7] not inherit the Kingdom of God.
But our Christian Obligation of doing right to all, having an influence upon all the conversation we have with men, that is, almost all the actions of our Lives; It's necessary (that we may throughly find out the guilty in my Text) to make a strict enquiry after this Christian Justice, as it is distinguished by its several Objects, and Relations, and by the various kinds of Right, we owe one to another; the breach of every part of which, doth expose us, as to the guilt, so to the severe sentence of my Text.
The first kind of Gospel-Justice, (as it respects differing Relations) is that which is call'd Distributive, that is, the reciprocal Dues and Rights which Christians must pay one to another, in matters of Superiority and Subjection to it; from [Page 8] an Empire, to the little Dominion of a Family.
The first of that kind, is, the mutual Duties of Princes and Subjects. As for the Duties which Princes owe to their Subjects, or rather to God for them; it is not our business to enquire after. And St. Paul in his Epistles, when he carefully provided Rules for all distributive Justice, makes no mention of the duties of Princes; intimating, that they are accountable to none but God, whose ( [...]) Ministers they are. We must not curse them ( Eccl. 10. 20.) not slight them, so the Hebrew, ( ne detrahat Regi) not disparage them, so the Vulgar Latin, in the most retired thoughts of our Bed-chamber, for their miscarriages; For which, (when at the greatest) we must pretend to no other remedy, but the Primitive Churches powerful [Page 9] Engines, Prayers and Tears. But then the Subjects are bound in Christian Justice, to pay their Prince Honour, Tribute, and Obedience. And those that fail in any part of these duties, that is, that shall whisper Jealousies into the heads of the Multitude, to defraud them of their honour; or refuse, or decline their Tribute, the price of their own protection; or disobey their Laws, the Nerves of all Communion and publick safety, they are [...], they have wronged their Princes, and are unrighteous, unjust persons, in the sence of my Text. But if their unrighteousness in these cases shall ferment to rebellious Designs, (let them pretend to as much Saintship as Corah, or common Justice as Absolom, or Reformation as both) they are not then only unjust to a Prince in his Personal Capacity, contrary to the [Page 10] Rule of doing to all men, &c. And though he be a Tyrant, act contrary to an express Precept ( [...]) not to resist evil, not allowable among private persons: But as he is a publick person, they are guilty of a National wrong; they wrest out of Gods hand the Ordinance ( [...], Rom. 13. 2.) the only expedient of Mercy, by which the Rights of all men are preserved, and the world kept from Confusion; and are therefore answerable for all the Blood, Ruine, and miserable Consequences of a Civil War, that is of a Princes Military defence of himself, and faithful Subjects that adhere to him, in the day of Rebellion. So that a Rebel is an unrighteous person, by a complication of guilt and an accumulation of wrongs.
But now permit not your thoughts, nor will I my Tongue, [Page 11] to make application, by reflecting upon the unparallell'd Tragedy of Evils done and suffered, upon the breach of this Justice in our late Rebellion. If I have said so much, as may teach the Guilty Repentance, and others that were not engaged, their duty, it's enough; let us bury all the rest in Prayers and Charity.
But further, if the Nation be Christian, there is another Authority invested in a Prince, over Ecclesiastick Persons, and Cases; for he is concerned as well in the ( [...], as the [...],) the Religion, as the Civil Concerns of his Subjects (1 Tim. 2. 2.) And there is a Due of Obedience to be paid him in Christian Justice on that account also. This Power was apparently conferred by God on the Kings of the Old Testament; Moses had both the Trumpets; David ordered the Courses of the Levites, [Page 12] and the Solemnities of the Publick Service: Joash had the Testament given him in his hand, as well as the Crown on his Head, (2 Chron. 23. 11.) Hezekiah and Josiah reformed the Church by their Royal Authority. And as Christ found it (there being no retrenchment of that power in the Gospel) so he left it, as his own general Laws expressed and interpreted by the Churches after-practice, can testifie above all exceptions. Ex quo (saith Socrates) Imperatores facti sunt Christiani, ab ipsis res Ecclesiae dependebant. After that the Emperors became Christian, the Churches Affairs depended upon them. Thus was Constantine [...]. And Leo the Third could say [...]. that is, they were mixt persons, they were concern'd in the Government and Protection of the Church. [Page 13] But of this Right, hath the Romanist, and Assemblies, defrauded their Princes; the one gets away half of their Crowns, the other of their Scepters; both rob them of their Authority, and of their Subjects full Allegiance. And thus it is with us, while we have a Profession establisht by Law, by a power next to God ( Solo Deo minorem, saith Tertullian) and by such Constitutions, as God and Man cannot be pretended to stand in competition for Obedience. The Bishop of Rome hath a superior power acknowledged by some, and the Assembly by others, and both profess a Religion in Obedience to those Usurpations, and in opposition to their Lawful Soveraign's Commands and Laws: So that the King is robb'd of his Subjects, they, of their Allegiance, and the Church torn in pieces by them both, as between [Page 14] two Milstones (as the late Arch-B. in his Preface to his Controversie) This wrong is done on either side, and for that reason they are [...], unjust, unrighteous persons that do it. This as to the first part of Distributive Justice, in the Concerns of Princes and their Subjects.
The next kind of Distributive Justice in the larger Circles of it, is, the reciprocal Dues and Rights, which the Governours of the Church, and their Charges, are in Christian Justice obliged to pay to one another. Without the mutual performance of which a Body of men can be call'd no more a Church, than a Tumult can be call'd an Army, or an ungovern'd Rout, a City. Now as it is in Civils, though the King be ( Supremus Judex) Chief Judge in the Law, yet he administers Ju-Justice [Page 15] by his commission'd Justicers to whom also an Obedience is due on that account: so in Ecclesiasticks, he exerciseth his supreme authority, for the care of the Church, by proper Officers ( [...]) set apart for that design; whose Calling though it be governed and protected by Princes, is yet immediately from Heaven ( [...], Heb. 5. 4.) they are called of God to it. and ( [...], Acts 20. 28.) Whom the Holy Ghost hath made Bishops, or Overseers; and for that reason a right of Obedience is due unto them on that account also.
First then, the Pastors of the Church are bound in Justice ( [...]) to feed the Church of God, by pastoral Government and Preaching, by Sacraments, and Offices of Discipline, and instituting Canons, for fit Circumstances, [Page 16] that all things may be done ( [...], 1 Cor. 14. 40.) decently, & in order, or uniformity in the Church of God. If they fail of their duties, they are [...], unrighteous, and must answer deeply for the wrong they have done to their Charges.
On the other side, their people in Christian Justice owe them Reception, Love, Honour, and (which for the Churches sake, is most especially required) Obedience. Obey them that have the rule over you, ( Heb. 13. 17.) And as S. Ignatius, (the best Interpreter of the Apostles meaning and practice) saith [...]) It is necessary that nothing be done in the Church, but in obedience to the Governors of it. And this was the Sense and universal Practice of the Church, it its primitive purity, and best Integrity. But if their Charges shall [Page 17] condemn their Callings, contemn their persons, separate from their Administrations, and refuse conformity to their Rules of Order, in the service of God; they are [...], unjust persons, they have defrauded their Spiritual Rulers of their, due, and (by infallible consequence) the Church of the very Essentials of its well-being, Peace, and Unity; the ends for which Spiritual Government was especially design'd: Of which Unity the Church being once deprived, in comes the Inundation of Atheism, Prophaness, Contempt of Gods Service, Heresies and Factions; for all which those unjust persons must answer, when they happen. And of all this, our own woful experience is too convincing an evidence. For as it is certain, that those miseries are now upon us, so it is as certain, they own their beginning to the [Page 18] breach of this Christian Justice, and commenced from the days the Disciplinarians first withdrew their obedience from their lawful Superiors, and taught the people to despise, and quarrel with them about indifferent Rites. Which undutifulness afterward, fermenting, and gradually increasing, hath in the various agitations of several ages, brought upon the Church, and the Pastors thereof, all these Infelicities and wrongs they now unjustly suffer: Grown too great (without a gracious divine Deliverance) for hope of relief. The Church being in that Common-wealth's case, quae nec ferre sua possit vitia, necremedia, neither able to bear its miscarriages nor remedies. But I desire the severe Character of my Text may be applied to no particular persons alive, unless it be in our Prayers, to beg forgiveness for [Page 19] them, as they were instrumental to these heavy punishments, and for our selves, that (for our sins) have justly deserved them at the hand of God.
Thus I have gone over the parts of Distributive Justice, which Christians are to act in the greater Circumferences of Publick Relations; I now contract my Discourse to the lesser Circles of it, in Domestick Concerns: Which though they be less considerable, are not at all less necessary. Our salvation depends upon every part of that Justice, as much as the other: Loyalty to a Prince, or conformity to the Church, cannot make us just, if we do wrong at home to our Wives, Children or Servants. Now the Christian Justice of the Family-Relations, are the reciprocal Dues of Husbands and Wives, Parents and Children, Masters and Servants; [...] [Page 22] bread to Dogs, throw it away in luxurious expences; or if both, or either of them, by their carelesseness in education, or by evil Examples, shall endanger the loss of their Childrens souls: If the Children, on the other side, grow rough, and untractable, making no Conscience to disobey a Fathers Commands, and disoblige a Mothers tender care; or when their Parents are in want, to evade their duty, shall tell them, with the Pharisees, it is Corban, (Mark 7. 11.) a Gift, not to the Temple (yet that would not exempt them from their Duty) but perhaps to a proud entertainment, or a Female Prostitute: Such Parents, such Children, are [...], unrighteous, unjust in the sight of God.
Lastly, As to the third, of Family Relations, Masters and Servants: First, Masters owe their [Page 23] Servants, in Christian Justice, civil regard, kind usage, and just rewards for their Labours: And they again, owe their Masters Honour, Obedience, and Faithfulness. But if the Masters shall use their Servants like Brutes, nay like senseless Engines, like Bodies without Souls, (for so Slaves are call'd [...], [...]poc. 18. 13.) making their Burdens too heavy, and their Rewards too light. And if Servants shall be ( [...], Tit. 2. 9.) contradicters, or answerers again, and deny their Reverence; or shall serve ( [...], Col. 3. 22.) with eyeservice, and lose their diligence; or shall be ( [...], Tit. 2.) Purloiners, and depart from their Faithfulness: these are wrongs done on either side, and are all unjust, unrighteous persons, on that account: And (as it is of the other Relations) if they had nothing else [Page 24] to answer for, had guilt enough, to be disinherited from the Kingdom of God. These are they, which depart from Christian Justice in Family-Relations.
Having thus found out the [...] the guilty of Injustice, by the Rule of Distributive, we shall now examine the actions of men by the li [...] of Commutative Justice: Which Aquinas defines to be that, by which a man is directed in such Rights, as are interchangeably to be paid, from one man to another. Now the ground of this Justice is this, God hath so ordered it in his wise disposition of the world, that the well being of every man should depend on the mutual help of one another; to the performance of which, all men being obliged by right reason and Religion, it becomes every mans right, to be done to him in Christian Justice as his duc. Upon [Page 25] this, St. Paul grounds his exhorta [...] to his Philippians, to look ( [...], Phil. 2. 4.) to the good and [...]ncerns of others, as well as their [...]. He therefore that shall with [...]d this Right, so that his Neighbour is injured in any capacity of [...] well-being, he hath done wrong and defrauded, and is an unjust, and an unrighteous person. Now [...]at we may know, how far this [...]stice extends, for the further discovery of the Guilty in my Text, we must examine the several cases [...] which a mans well-being consists, and accordingly a right to be done [...].
First, As to his spiritual well-being, we owe the right of saving one anothers Souls, which God hath put in our power to do, as St. James intimates, ( Jam. 5. 20.) And this is done, by brotherly correction, Counsel, Prayer, exemplary [Page 26] Life, and such like Acts of spiritual Justice: But on the contrary, [...] any man hinders the salvation [...] another, by neglecting those [...] or shall really prevent it, by scandal, ill example, or by tempting him to assist in social sins, [...] Uncleanness, Conspiracies, and the like, that man hath wronged a Soul, he hath destroyed his Brother, for whom Christ died, ( Rom. 14. 15.) and so is [...], an unjust person on that sad account.
2. We owe the right in Christian Justice of preserving one another in our Temporal well-being: And the first of those, next our Neighbours life (which we suppose to be a case too apparent to need our present consideration) is his Honour. He therefore that shall defraud him of that precious Jewel, either by eclipsing an innocent worth, through a subtil detraction, [Page 27] or wound his Credit, by dispersion of false slanders, (following Machiavel's rule, fortiter calumnia [...], & aliquid adhaerebit; cast dirt enough that some may stick) or shall publish his private infirmities, [...] his disgrace, or make use of them any way, but in following St. [...]aul's direction, to restore him with the spirit of meekness, (Gal. 6. 1.) [...]ath robb'd his Neighbour of his honour, hath done him wrong, and is an unjust person on that account. The second right we owe in Christian Justice, as to the temporal well-being of our Neighbour, is the preservation of his Estate and Fortune; which whosoever shall violate, upon any temptation, is one of the unrighteous persons in my Text. And we consider not this, as done by acts of horrid oppression only, when the Beams and Stones are disquieted with the cries of [Page 28] Orphans, tears of Widows, [...] perpetuated sorrows of ruin'd Families; nor only by the intrenchments that are made upon it, by secret thefts or notorious Rapine but whosoever shal disadvantage another, by fraud, or subtilty, in any Negotiation, Bargain, Trade or Commerce whatsoever, beyond the ordinary profit allow'd to all Callings, by custom and consent of honest minds; or in any kind of Vocation or employment, deal otherwise in every single act, than he himself would be dealt with, is unrighteous, one of the guilty, and consequently one of the unhappy persons in my Text. Lastly, We owe in Christian Justice (as to our Neighbours temporal well-being) the right of preserving one anothers Health, Limbs, and Peace; therefore he that shall wrong him in the first, by ingaging him in [Page 29] intemperate courses, or deprive him of the second, by any act of private hostility, as Duelling, or the like; or defraud him of the third, by uncivil usage, or vexatibus Suits and Controversies; so far as in any of them, or in any other way, a man is disadvantaged in the comfort of his Life, or means of Livelihood, there is a wrong done, & he that hath done it, is an unjust, an unrighteous person, and as such, stands upon the necessity of restitution, or in the danger of his exclusion from the blessed Inheritance.
Thus having gone over the Breaches that are made upon the several Branches, both of Distributive, and Commutative Justice; there remains two more to be considered apart; because they have a mixture of both. Of the first of these I would give a [...] [Page 32] is the Devil ( [...] v. 3.) The Devil hath filled their hearts with the Design.
5. Gods certain vengeance upon that wrong, by the fatal fall both of the one, and of the other. I shall not controversially apply this evidence, but must (for shortness sake) leave it to your serious reflections, for the ends I mentioned it. Now that portion which hath been set apart for God, and the maintenance of 16000 Servants of his Worship among us, are either Lands, or Tithes. As for the wrongs done to the first, they are commonly acted ( per Sorices Palatii, as Bish. Andrews calls them) by the unhappy men about the Courts of Princes; who as they thirst after them, so would not stick to suck the milk of Orphans, drink the tears of Widows, as well as devour the Demeans of Gods Servants (because as defenceless [Page 33] as either) as Sacrifices to their pride and luxury. But it is alledged by the Favourites of this Design, that the supreme Judicature may, (when they please) take them away: I answer, they may ( impunè) without controul; and their Authority ought not (must not) be resisted; but whether ( justè) righteously, or whether every one that hath a vote in their alienation, doth not thereby rob God and man, and may justly fear Gods vengeance for doing so, I leave it to the former Evidence to determine. As for the wrongs done to the Church in point of Tithes, ( Decimam meam as St. Austin supposeth God to speak) there depraedations happen upon lower contrivements; as when either the powerful mans heavy hand first presseth out the Vintage for himself, and then leaves some few drops; enough rather to upbraid, [...] [Page 36] I intended should reflect upon the occasion of this Assembly, where the proper business is judicially to administer right to them, that cannot otherwise obtain it. Let every one then, that hath to do this day with the tender Rights of men, (whether they be the Ministers of the Law, of every sort, Witnesses, or Juries) have a care what they do; their Souls are at stake, the Oath of God is upon them, the Curse of God over them, the Cries of the oppressed about them, the Evidence of my Text, and the Law of Christ against them; if therefore any unjust Cause goes away triumphant, if any mans right be impeached, through any defect in the discharge of their trust, they are [...], unrighteous persons, and wheresoever it lies, must either make a timely satisfaction, or one day appear at the great Assizes of [Page 37] the world, to receive for the wrong that he hath done in this, and where there shall be no respect of persons, Col. 3. ult.
Thus I have finished the whole Scheme of Christian Justice; to the universal performance of which, the Gospel doth so strictly oblige us. And now who would think it possible, that a Christian Nation, possessed with so many advantages of Religion, should in contradiction to the clearest Evidence of Gods Will, so generally degenerate from the practice of it in every part; and that not among them only, that have thrown off all Concern for Religion (that were no wonder) but amidst the very Professors of it, even among them, that pretend to a greater Zeal than others, in appearance for it, I cannot but think, that there hath been some [...] [Page 40] psal. 73. 6.) they were exhorted to the getting the Robe of Christ's Righteousness about, and imputed to, them; and all was well. By these and the like unhappy Modes of teaching the Gospel, men have been driven from their Reason, and Religion, and set their Consciences loose to all unrighteousness. And hence it is, that they are grown every where so cross and intractable to all Authority, Laws, and Order, and the State is full of Rebels, the Church of Schismaticks, our Houses of undutiful Children, and untrusty Servants; and men are made universally false and unfaithful one to another. But let them pretend what Religion they will, they shall not so escape; all unjust persons (such as I have described) are upon the Rock, the severe Sentence of my Text; They shall not inherit the Kingdom of God.
PART. II.
So at last I am arriv'd at the Second Part of my Text; The Unjust mans Doom or Punishment: They shall not inherit, &c.
In which, are two things to be observed; I. The Nature of the Punishment; it is a disinherison. [...], The Quality of the State, The Kingdom of God.
In the first, here's a case in Law, a Title supposed, and a Disinherison expressed: A Title, these unjust persons had, and heirs at Law they were, (and so were all that are, or shall be deprived of that eternal Blessing) or they could in no sence be said to be disinherited: 'Tis true, that Adam once forfeited [Page 42] the Estate, but it was purchased again, or redeemed, by Christ, not with Silver and Gold, but with the dear price of his precious blood, (1 Pet. 1. 18.) And that Redemption was made as large, as the Forfeiture, as St. Paul discourseth, ( Rom. 5. 18.) So that the Reason why any man is now disinherited, must be upon another account; not because Adam sinned, or that the Covenant of Grace was renewed with any number less than all men, (1 Tim. 2. 4.) or that Christ died for fewer than ( [...]) for every man, (Heb. 2. 9.) but because that universal Covenant, and Redemption, was made conditional, and required terms to be performed on our part, which, whosoever should refuse to keep, should forfeit his Title to that new purchased Inheritance. Now the Conditions of this new Covenant made [Page 43] in Christ, are Faith and Obedience. To which Repentance is to be added, as Tabula post Nausragium; of which, more anon.
The sum then is, That the unjust man, as such, in all the particular cases I have mentioned, shall not inherit the Kingdom of God, because he failed in both the Condi [...]ions.
1. Every unjust person hath failed in the first; he is not a true Believer in the sense of the Gospel. For the clearing of which, we are to consider, that Evangelical Faith, when mans Salvation or Justification is wholly attributed to it, (as when 'tis said, that He that believeth shall be saved, John 3. 16. and justified by Faith, Rom. 5. 1. and saved by Faith, Eph. 1. 8. and the like) intends not any Act or Habit of believing, in any strict sense, but a comprehension of all Christ's [Page 44] Virtues, and the whole Body of Christianity, of which a just life is the most considerable portion Therefore St. Paul upon the breach of distributive Justice, in one particular Instance of it, that is, a Childs not providing for his Parents, (which by Family, 1 Tim. 5. 8. is undoubtedly intended) affirms, that such a person ( [...]) hath denied the Faith, and is an unbeliever, so much worse than an Infidel, as a practical Atheist is a greater Prodigy than a speculative. But if Faith be taken in a stricter sense, as sometimes it is; and particularly by St. Jame.; ( Jam 2.) unless it be [...], ( Gal. 5. 6.) except it worketh, or is consummate by Love, (of which Love the greatest part (in the Gospel sense) is Justice) it avails not; it cannot, it is dead, saith St. Jam. that is, as useless to a mans Justification [Page 45] as the Faith of Devils. Whosoever therefore is an unjust person in any of the senses I have described him, whether a Rebel to his Prince, or refractory to the Church [...] its Order and Institutions, as to Distributive Justice; or does wrong to his Neighbour as to Commutative, let him pretend to what Faith in Christ he will, let it be a receiving, laying hold, or reliance upon him, or howsoever he hath been taught to define it, he is ( [...], Col. 3. 6.) a Child of Unbelief; and upon the non-performance of the Condition of Faith, (in the account of the Gospel) he shall be dealt withal as an Unbeliever; he hath forfeited the Inheritance, he shall not inherit the Kingdom of God.
But then 2. Faith is not the only Condition of the Convenant, by which we may preserve our Title [...] [Page 48] common peace and happiness of the world; that all Superiors might have entire Subjection, and all others Peace and right. So that a Rebel, a Schismatick, and the unjust of the lesser Orders, may not be said only to disobey, but to frustrate the prime purpose and design of the Gospel, and to offer the greatest affront and contradiction to the very Spirit of Christianity. For wheresoever the Grace of God is predominant, it will certainly, and observedly (as its prime and signal effect) reduce the Soul to the greatest innocency and simplicity, tractableness and obligation of doing right, and good to all; with all which, the sins of Injustice in every kind, are perfectly inconsistent, and irreconcileable. The Sum is, whosoever is an habitual Offender against any part of Christian Justice whether Distributive or Commutative, [Page 49] hath broken not only a particular, but an universal Commandment of Christ, and is grossely disobedient; and so hath forfeited his Inheritance, his Title to the Kingdom of God.
Thus I have shewn you the unjust mans Doom in the nature of his Punishment; He shall not inherit: which will appear so much the greater, when we consider the quality of the Estate, from which he is disinherited; The Kingdom of God. Which is the next thing to be discours'd.
The Kingdom of God is a Figurative Expression, design'd to exalt our Imagination of the blessed state to come: And that because we cannot now behold its unconceivable happiness, but as ( [...], 1 Cor. 13. 12. per Speculum) through [Page 50] the dark Perspective of Sense, and a clouded Intellect; and therefore it must be represented to us ( [...]) by little Riddles and Shadows of the best humane Felicities; Here it is by a Kingdom, the greatest and noblest possession this world affords; and so enough to confirm us, that (the Design of that lofty Metaphor) the future Bliss, is too great a loss, for so small a recompense, as the most prosperous unjust man gains by his unrighteous practices. But that the unjust man may be more fully upbraided for the greatness of his Loss, let me improve the Metaphor, by saying, that first he loseth God; that is, the Beatifical Vision of his Blessed Countenance, which is better than Life it self: He loseth the Comforts of his Blessed Redeemer, who shall now appear to him with the terrible Aspect of Flaming Fire, [Page 51] taking vengeance on him, and all them that obey not his Gospel, 2 Thes. 1. 8. He loseth the possession (to make use of the most sensible Description of the happy issues of an holy Life) of the City of the Living God, the New Jerusalem, the Society of an innumerable company of Angels, of the General Assembly of the first born, & of the spirits of just men made perfect, Heb. 12. Lastly, He loseth his own Soul; that is, he brings himself into such a State, (that praestat nunquam natum) it were better for him he had never been born, or that a Milstone were hanged about his neck, and were drowned in a Sea of Forgetfulness, and Annihilation. And all this he adventures that he may add one handful of Earth more to the Turf of his worldly possessions; one grain more to his accumulated heap; one garnish more to the pride of his Life; from all [Page 52] which, and from whatsoever else he enjoys in this world, he shall possibly within a few Minutes, probably within a few Moneths, certainly within a few Years, be as much a stranger, as he that holds up the Train of the Persian Emperor, or the Infant that hangs upon his Mothers Breast. These are the miserable measures of the unjust mans Doom and Punishment.
But is he past the utmost Confines of Hope? Is his evil an irreparable loss, an irrecoverable danger? Certainly no: For though the Gospel have drawn up the Indictment against him, it is not yet come to Judgment: He is in a state of damnability, but not Damnation. Not so shipwrack'd, but that there is ( Tabuta post Naufragium) one Raft left to land him safe, one remaining condition of his recovery, and that [Page 53] is, a timely Repentance; For (saith God) if the wicked man shall turn away from his unrighteousness (his Injustice) and do that which is lawful and right, &c. if he shall restore the Pledge, and execute judgment between man and man, he shall save his Soul alive, Ezek. 18. 27. When first by Repentance, must be understood nothing less, than (what is necessary for all other sins) a real departure from all unrighteous Actions and engagements: Whatsoever is called Repentance, and brings not this change (be it Sorrow, Contrition, or Confession) ought in no reason to be accounted sufficient for Evangelical Reconciliation. Much less will ( Lachrymula & Suspirium) a Tear and a Sigh at the last period of our Life (by such measures of Mercy as are revealed to us) expiate the guilt of the sin of Injustice, or any other [Page 54] sins, habitually and reigningly continued in, to that helpless hour. Therefore 2. Besides this Repentance, which is common to all other sins. The unjust (which doth much heighten the sin of Injustice above all others) are obliged to restore the injured persons (to their utmost capacity) to that Right, of which they have deprived them. Otherwise all other Acts of Repentance, (even to the departure from any further Commission of the sin) will be accounted fair, but abortive Attempts. Now in the several cases of Injustice, where the Scene lies not for restitution, as in the cases of Rebellion, Schism, and the like, the unjust person must make satisfaction, and amends, by acknowledgments and recantations, and those to be (if possible) as publickly and earnestly done, as those wrongs had been before [Page 55] committed. For if those attempts of satisfaction be not made (if in his power) whatsoever other acts of Repentance he had performed, (let no man deceive himself, nor mock God) he hath yet no title to the Blessing of the penitent. But where the unjust man (in the cases of the breaches of Commutative Justice) hath defrauded any man by Oppression, Theft, or Subtilty, in any Employment, or Contract whatsoever, so that another is damnified by him, if that person should weep an Ocean of Tears for his sins, and pray till his knees became callous, like a Camels, for the pardon of it, if the unjust thing lies upon his hand, if there be not restitution made, to the injured person, (according to his power) or if he be dead, to his Heirs; or if neither can be found, to the Poor; (whose Right then it is, by an Escheat [Page 56] to the Soveraign Lord, whose Exchequer they are) he cannot be numbred among the Penitents, he is still an unjust man, and shall not inherit the Kingdom of God. It was upon Zacheus noble Restitution, that our Saviour pronounced, This day is Salvation come to thy House, (Luke 19. 19.) And, Si res aliena (saith St. Austin in his Epistle to Macedonius) cum reddi potest, non redditur, non agitur poenitentia, sed fingitur; If the unjust thing be not restored, the Repentance may be feigned, but is not performed.
And now I beseech all those persons here this day before me, whose Consciences can inform them, that they are so unhappy as to be unjust in any of the measures I have mentioned, first, that they take no offence at the Religion, that requires, nor at me that preach, so severe a [Page 57] Method (as men may be apt to think) of their recovery; for they ought to consider, that it was their own wilful prevarications of the most reasonable Rules of Justice, and not the Religion, that made it necessary.
And let me further assure them, that whosoever shall give his Soul leave (for his own salvation) to ingage in the performance of this Duty of Restitution (how unkind or difficult soever it may appear at the first view) let him not be discouraged (my Soul for his) he shall find such a sensible return of sweetness and satisfaction in the very Acts, and much more in the Issue of it, that he would not exchange his Comforts, or have neglected his Duty, for all the Pleasures and Enjoyments in the world. His Soul shall dwell at ease, and he shall lie down in peace; his bed shall be no [Page 58] more shorter, but that he shall stretch himself upon it, nor his Covering narrower, but that he shall wrap himself in it, (Isa. 28. 20.) that is, he shall have a quiet mind, while he lives; and when he comes to die, he shall not be tormented with the confluence of direful Furies about his Bed, nor behold dreadful Aspects hanging about his Curtains, the usual Attendants of unjust men, living and dying.
What if thy House shall stand one Story lower by removing the Chambers built by wrong, ( Jer. 22. 13.)? Or contract the compass of thy Land by hedging out Naboth's Vineyard? Or lay aside some Circumstances of a splendid Life? Nay: what if thou shouldst be reduced to a retired condition, or the narrow circles of a low fortune, by restoring what is anothers right? the assurance of Gods Favour above [Page 59] thee, the enjoyment of a good Conscience within thee, the view of a glorious hope before thee; (in a word) a contented life, a peaceable death, and a blest eternity, will be a redundant compensation for all thou shalt so nobly part with. Thus have I adventured a prejudice in your opinion, by chusing these unwelcome (though very necessary) Doctrines of universal Justice, and upon the breach of it, Satisfaction, and Restitution. My comfort is, if I have not pleased you, I have done you right, I have dealt justly with you. And I do not despair, but I have met here many persons of David's Choyce, and Ingenuity, ( Psal. 141.) who would rather be smitten friendly, and reproved, than to hear the pleasing Balmes of unconcerning and indulgent Doctrine, to break their heads, destroy their souls. [Page 60] With whom (I hope) these Instructions may so far prevail, that it may be said of them, as St. Paul said of his penitent Corinthians, in the Verse following my Text; Such were some of you, but ye are washed, ye are sanctified, but ye are justified in the Name of the Lord Jesus, and by the Spirit of our God.