A SERMON BEFORE THE PROVINCIAL SYNOD AT ANTRIM. Preached June 1. 1698.

BY Mr. JOHN MAC-BRIDE, Minister of Belfast.

Published at the Desire of some Persons then Present.

Printed in the Year MDCXCVIII.

Acts XV. 25, 26.

It seemed good unto us, being Assembled with one Accord, to send Chosen Men unto you, with our beloved Barnabas and Paul:

Men that have hazarded their Lives for the Name of our LORD JESUS CHRIST.

AS the Church of Christ, since Militant on Earth, hath not wanted Foreign Adversaries, who have taken crafty Counsels to cut off the Name of Israel from being a Nation; so it hath had Intestine Ene­mies, to its Doctrine, Worship, and Government; some privily bringing in Damnable Heresies, to over-throw the Faith once delivered to the Saints, others corrupting its pure Worship, with Superstition and Idolatry; and some Imperious and Ungovernable Men, subverting its orderly Government, by Tyranny and Anarchy. By any of which, tho' a Form of God­liness may be kept, it's Power is deny'd. But we have been faith­fully fore-warned, that such Offences must come, that such as are approved may be made manifest: Yet He on whose Shoul­ders the Government of his Church is laid, hath well and wise­ly provided proper Remedies against all these Evils, Watchmen and Rulers; who by their mutual Care and Counsels, assisted by His Word and Spirit, are put in a Capacity to defend this Church: Whereof we have a pregnant Instance in this Scrip­ture; in which we may see a wise and holy Assembly of Church-Rulers by joint Counsels and Authority, Deliberating about, and Determining of Ways and Means, necessary to preserve the Purity of Doctrine and Worship, as well as the Unity and Peace of the Church: All which were in manifest hazard, while some [Page 2]Men coming down from Judea to Antioch, taught the Disciples, That unless they were Circumcised, and kept the Law of Moses, they could not be Saved. Whether Cyrinthus was the Ring-Leader of this Party, as Epiphanius and Hierom report, I determine not; but it's evident from Vers. 5. that they were Pharisees. The first course taken to remove this Evil, we find was Disputing, ma­naged by Paul and Barnabas, to convince these Gain-sayers, but to little effect. And therefore secondly, The Church of Antioch determined to send Paul and Barnabas, with certain others, to the Apostles and Elders who were at Jerusalem; where appears an Appeal from an Inferiour, to a Superiour Judicatory, in a Case not determined by the Inferiour. Thirdly, We have an Account of the Constitution of this Assembly, consisting of Apostles and Elders, both these resident at Jerusalem, and such as were dele­gated from Antioch, Vers. 6. Fourthly, The Method used to find out and determine this Controverted Truth, was, A Deli­berate free and full debating the matter, and Reasoning from Scripture. Fifthly, After this a clear and final Decision of the Controversie; the Apostle James, as Moderator of the Assem­bly, summing up the Debate, and giving his Sentence, to which all consented. Sixthly, We have here the Synod's Method to make this its Decision effectual; where, 1. It is Enacted, That a Letter be written from the Synod, informing those Churches to which it was sent, with their final Determination and Judg­ment. 2. It is Enacted, That some Persons be Commissionated to carry, publish, and require Submission to this Decree.

The Words read, contain (1.) An Account of the Authority giving this Commission, or Employing those Persons to Execute this Act, viz. the Apostles, Elders, and Brethren, assembled with one accord. (2.) The Persons commissionated, to wit, chosen Men, with Paul and Barnabas. (3.) The ground of sending, It seemed good to us. (4.) The Character and Recommendation of the Persons sent, which was their Credentials; 1. They were Chosen Men: 2. Men who had hazarded their Lives for the Name of Christ. From which words, thus Explain'd, this Proposition may be rationally deduced.

Doctr. When the Necessity or Benefit of the Church requires, it is the Duty of those whom Christ hath cloathed with Authority to Rule it, to Assemble with one Accord, and make such Acts as may contri­bute to preserve the Purity and Peace of those Churches over which the Holy Ghost hath made them Overseers.

That the Apostles and Elders did Assemble, is here Evident; that they did it as their Duty, from the pressing Necessities of the Church over which they were set to watch, is also evident; both its Truth and Peace being in hazard: The presence and con­currence of the Holy Ghost granted them, the Remarkable Suc­cess by GOD's Blessing bestowed on those their Endeavours, shews us that they had a Call thereunto, and acted in obedience to GOD in it.

But that this may more fully appear to be, not only their Du­ty, but the Duty of all their ordinary Successors, I shall first prove, secondly consider what Assembly this was, for kind and quality, and then shew of what use it is to us.

1. I take it for granted, that the Church of Christ is and ought to be an Orderly Society of Reasonable Men and Women, and under Laws and Government, and therefore is it called a Kingdom, whereof Christ is the King and Lawgiver, having Men [...] Authority under Him, enabled to put in Execution His Laws; [...]s call'd a Family, Eph. 3.15. whereof He is the Everlasting Fa­ther, Isa. 9.6. a City compactly built; all which shew that it con­sists of Persons Governing and Governed: For no sooner do we hear of any Publick Worship, but we have it in a Society; Cain and Abel meeting to offer Sacrifice, and bringing them to be offered by Adam, the then High-Priest of his Family, Gen. 4. Those who will have Publick Worship Instituted, Gen. 4.16. must understand Assemblies of distinct Families associating; for no doubt Adam and his House did before this jointly worship the LORD, and Nature's Light hath instructed all Nations who have any Worship, to perform it in Publick Assemblies.

2. It appears that under the Old Testament, GOD did require such as He had Authorized to Rule his Church, to Assemble for that End, as appears from Exod. 24.1. where the LORD said to [Page 4] Moses, Come up unto the LORD, thou and Aaron, Nadab and Abi­hu, and Seventy of the Elders of Israel; all which convened to be Witnesses of, and concur with the Congregation in their so­lemn Engaging in Covenant with the LORD; as also to be Wit­nesses of GOD's Glorious Manifesting Himself to Moses, and gi­ving him Authority, Vers. 10. and particularly to Judge and De­termine in the Matters of Debate among that People, as appears from Vers. 14. That GOD constituted such Assemblies, Rulers for ordinary, appears from Deut. 17.8, 9. where, in all Cases too difficult for their Inferiour Judicatories, the People are comman­ded to go to that Place which GOD should choose to set His Name there, to enquire of the Priests, Levites and Judges, in those Days, and are Commanded also to be Determined by their Sentence. Seeing then the People were bound to Attend, it's evident the Priests, Levites, &c. were obliged to Assemble, to hear, examine and determine such Matters as shou'd come before them: This same is clear from Deut. 19.16, 17, 18. These Assemblies were Revived by good King Jehoshaphat, according the LORD's Ap­pointment, 2 Chron. 19.8, 9, 10, 11. Moreover in Jerusalem did Je­hoshaphat set of the Levites and the Priests, and of the Chief of the Fathers of Israel, for the Judgment of the LORD, and for Con­troversies, when they returned to Jerusalem, and charged them, Thus shall ye do in the fear of the LORD, and with a perfect Heart. In Ezra's Time, the Elders were appointed to meet at certain times, to determine the matter about Unlawful Marriages, Ezra 10.14. From all which is evident, 1. That as the Israelites were the Church of GOD, so they had Rulers Assembled for their Government. 2. That these were Church-Officers, Priests and Levites. 3. That the Matters they were concern'd in, were properly Ecclesiastical, as Matters of the LORD, distinct from the Matters of the King, 2 Chron. 19. 4. The Laws by which they were to Judge. were Divine, Deut. 17.11. 5. The End of such Assemblies was the Preservation of GOD's Ordinances in their Purity, the Maintaining and Promoting of Peace and Ho­liess.

2. But it is further to be considered, That this Law, by ver­tue whereof they Assembled, was not a meet Positive or Tem­porary Law, peculiar to that Church only, but a Law which Natures Light directs, and obliges us to observe; so it was neither Ceremonial nor Judicial, unless in some Circumstances: For the Light of Nature being nothing else but the Dictate of Right Rea­son, discovering the Good or Evil of Mens Actions, according to their Agreement or Repugnancy to it; whatever is founded on, or harmoniously agrees with Right Reason, must be accord­ing to the Light and Law of Nature; which plainly teaches us, 1. That no Humane Society, Civil or Ecclesiastick, can subsist without Order and Government; Ordo est Anima rerum, saith the Philosopher, Order is the Soul of things: And when there was no King in Israel, then every Man did what was right in his own Eyes: Then did the Danites set up Idolatry, Judg. 18. Then did the Benjamites practise and patronize barbarous and inhumane Uncleanness, Judg. 19. for which Divine Vengeance pursued all. 2. The same Light of Nature teaches us, That no Society can be preserved without Laws Made and Executed by those on whom the Government lies. Thus, all Humane Societies are Regulated by Laws proper and convenient for them; and if any thing be from the Light and Law of Nature, Laws, Law-Givers, and Law-Executors are. 3. Right Reason dictates agreeable to the Revealed Word of GOD, Prov. 11.14. That where there is no Counsel the People fall, but in the multitude of Counsellors there is Safety; so hath GOD planted in the Natural Body Ears and Eyes to Inform and Direct, for the Preservation of the Whole, and these He hath joyn'd together conveniently. And so the Seers hath He set in His Church, joyntly to employ their Skill and Gifts, for Prevention of those Evils which might hurt the Flocks over whom they are Overseers. 4. Natural Light informs us, That as Equals can have no Empire over one another, so Societies consisting of Equals, the Lesser Number in all matters of Controversie and Difference, ought to yield to, and be determined by the Greater or major part; according to [Page 6]that Maxime, Pars Major Jus habet Universitatis, The Greatest Part hath the Power of the Whole; And Civilians accordingly teach, That refertur ad singulos quod publice fit per majorum partem; It relates to All, what is done Publickly by the Greater Part; for otherwise Debates and Controversies would be endless; and it is Irrational, that a Lesser Number of Equals should over­rule or determine the Greater. 5. The same Light dictates, That in a Society consisting of many Particular Societies, a Subordination of Power is Necessary, by which an Injured Party hath the Right of Appeal, from the Lower to the Superiour; which Appeal is an Application from an Inferiour, or Incompe­tent Judge, to a Superiour or Competent Judge, containing a Complaint of Injury done; for considering the Corruption of humane Nature, Men are apt both to Do and Judge Wrong; and therefore the Learned Whitaker hath declared, That Appeals are of Divine and Natural Right, and that most necessary in every Society, because of the Ignorance or Iniquity of many Judges; for if Innocent Persons might not Appeal under an Unjust Sentence, Ho­nesty and Innocency might be ruined. Yet such Appeals must not be Infinite, but must Sist somewhere, and have their Ne plus ultrà, which is the Supream Authority of that Society. Seeing GOD then hath so well provided Civil Societies, with all that is Necessary, for their Safety and Prosperity, shall we think Him less concern'd for the Church which He hath purchased with His own Blood, and to leave it a confused Chaos or Babel, daily liable to many Diseases, but provided with no Remedies?

3. As GOD hath Commanded, the Light and Law of Na­ture directed and Obliged Church-Rulers to Assemble for the afore-said Ends, so this Law of Nature neither is nor can be Repealed under the New Testament; and therefore in obedi­ence to it, Ministers stand bound to Assemble for Preservation of CHRIST's Vineyard: Those who will Assert that this Law is Repealed, must tell by whom, when, and how it was so: But so far is it from being Repealed, that it is evident it cannot be; for a Law of Nature being in it self Necessary, Just and Equi­table, what would overturn such a Constitution, must be Con­trary, [Page 7]and so Needless, Unjust and Unequal: Yea, all that ever made such Assembling Needful, is so still; and where the Rea­son of a Law (which is Anima Legis) continues, that Law abides in its full force.

4. But so far hath our LORD and Law-Giver been from Abrogating this Law, that he hath under the New Testament Established it, and that by prescribing Church-Assemblies as a Remedy against Offences given: Matth. 18.17. enjoyning the In­jured to tell the Church; and in case of not hearing the Church, that such be counted as Heathens or Publicans. I am not igno­rant of the great Division of Thoughts and Tongues about this Text; all that I desire from it, is what cannot reasonably be deny'd: 1. That it is not a single Person, or Church-Virtual as some Papists are pleased to speak, for so the word never was, nor possibly can be taken, which ever imports an Assembly of Men. 2. This Church is such as hath power to take Cogni­zance of a Complaint made to them, and to determine it, and to censure the Contemners and Neglecters of them, which our LORD would not have Commanded, had he not cloath'd them with Power to hear and judge. 3. This cannot be the whole Community of Believers, but a select Society, and that, 1. Be­cause it is a Church to whom He hath given the Power of Binding and Loosing, Vers. 28. and whose Sentence he will ratifie in Hea­ven, which Power is apparently given to Church-Officers, and not to the Community, as appears by Matt. 16.19. 2. Nor were the Church of Believers all to be heard, or could hear, as this Church is required. 3. This Church might consist of two or three, for to so many is the Promise of hearing Prayer made, Vers. 19. and of Christs presence in the midst of them, Vers. 20. which is a Promise made to Church-Officers, as appears from Matth. 28.20. to encourage them in their Ministry. 4. Nor is it a Church of Civil Magistrates, as Erastians teach: For then 1. The Apostle Paul hath not only not understood his Master, but expresly contradicted him; for 1 Cor. 6.1. he discharges all Saints to carry their Debates before Judges who were their Ene­mies, such as Heathens and Infidel Jews were at that time: Nor [Page 8]is it probable that CHRIST would direct His Disciples in case of private Differences, to Jewish or Roman Magistrates, His and their profest Enemies. 2. If the Civil Magistrate must be here understood, Christians had not such a Church for 300 years after Christ, and so no Remedy in such Cases. 5. The matter appears here to be proper for the Cognizance of an Ecclesiasti­cal Judicature, not being such a Crime as was punishable by the Civil Judge, or for which Restitution was to be made, which is required in case of Injury done; but it was an offence which, tho' at first private, became Scandalous by the Persons Impenitence and declared Rejecting the Admonition of two or three; and if CHRIST would have the Church told in case of offending a pri­vate Brother, and for reconciling them two, can we think he provided no Remedy for such as by Scandalous Practices offend the whole Church; or appoint means by which such Offenders may be Reconciled to the Church? Seeing then there is here a Church Authorized to hear and decide Differences, vers. 17. cloa­thed with a Power of Binding and Loosing, Vers. 18. having a Promise of hearing their Prayers, and of His Presence in perfor­ming their Duty, Vers. 19, 20. we have cause to believe that this was a Church-Assembly of CHRIST's own Appoint­ment.

5. The Apostles ordinary Practice of Assembling as they had occasion, informs us, That they look'd upon it as their Duty, which presupposeth a Law; and therefore they are Patterns to us in such Assemblies: Upon the Apostacy and Death of Ju­das, one of the Twelve, after CHRIST's Ascension, we find them Assembled to Elect and Ordain another Apostle in his room, Acts 1. Again, We find them Assembled to Ordain Dea­cons, Act 6. And in Acts 11. we find them convened and call­ing the Apostle Peter to an Account for his Converse with the Gentiles. But here more remarkably the Church-Guides are Assembled to root out a Heresie, and to prevent a Schism arising in the Church of Antioch.

And this leads me to consider what kind or sort of Assembly this was. That CHRIST and His Apostles framed the Govern­ment [Page 9]of the Christian Church according to the Model of the Jewish, is generally asserted and believed, and may safely be allowed, but for this Reason, (neither to preserve the Ceremo­nial nor Judicial Laws) but because the Government of that Church, for its substance, was agreeable to the Light and Law of Nature, and so was Divine and Imitable, as being Irreversi­ble. Now it's generally held that the Jews had three sorts of Assemblies or Church-Rulers, and all agreeable to the Light of Nature.

1. As they had their Synagogues or Parochial Congre­gations for ordinary Moral Worship, so these Synagogues had their Rulers, Acts 13.15. And 'tis probable, as is reported, that in every City where were ten wise Men (as there was supposed to be in every place where was a Synagogue) that they did all jointly concur for Ruling the Affairs of the Synagogue, and so made a Parochial Consistory, which did exercise Discipline on Scandalous Offenders, even to casting them sometimes out of the Synagogues. Now the common Light of Nature thus far directed all sorts of smaller Societies, whether Politick or Eccle­siastick, to compose all particular and more private differences within themselves, and to decide small and easie Cases by small Judicatories for that end appointed; according to the Maxime, Frustra fit per plura, &c. 'Tis in vain to trouble greater Assem­blies, in what can be as conveniently ordered by lesser ones; So Jethro's Reason taught him to give that good Counsel to Mo­ses, That certain Inferiour Judges might determine smaller Mat­ters, reserving harder Cases for his own Audience, Exod. 18.22, 26. And this became a Law, Deut. 17.

2. As there were many Portions called Thousands in Israel, Mi­cah 5.2. so these Thousands had their Government, and a Con­sistory composed of Twenty Three, one of these being in every City, where were one hundred and twenty Families; and this is that, as many say, which was called by CHRIST the Judgment, Matth. 5.22. and was made up of Fourteen of the Tribe of Levi, and Seven others of the Elders of the City; which also ap­pears agreeable to the Light of Nature: For as particular Per­sons [Page 10]may stand in need of Government and Order, so particular Congregations, living contiguously, which as they may be in­jurious to one another, so they may be helpful to one another: And where matters occur of common Concern to the lesser Neighbouring Societies, suppose in a larger City, the same Rea­son will allow and require the Rulers of that City to associate for Government, that requir'd those of a Village to meet: And so the Rule will hold good in this, Quod omnes languit, &c. What is of Common Concernment, ought to be Treated of by All Concerned; and this is supposed to be called the Presbytery, Acts 22.5. which was a Society or Assembly distinct from the San­hedrim; and such an Assembly of Elders seems to have been at Jerusalem, Acts 11.30. & 21.18.

3. The third sort of Assembly was their Sanhedrim, consist­ing of Seventy Elders, with their Nassi or President, which was their Supreme Judicatory. If some alledge, These were Civil Judicatories, they'll find themselves mistaken; for tho' they did concern themselves in some matters Civil, yet they also had their Ecclesiastical Judicatories, acting by Divine Laws in mat­ters Ecclesiastick: For tho' now it hold true, That Ecclesia est in Reipublica, The Church is in the Commonwealth, and not the Commonwealth in the Church; yet this will not hold good of the Jews, who were called to be a Church before they were fra­med into a State, and so the State came into the Church, and not the Church into the State. To accommodate this to our purpose, It's evident that this Assembly was neither of the for­mer Two, but an Assembly of the Rulers of two Presbyteries, to wit, of Jerusalem and Antioch, and so that which we call a Synod, whose Qualities come next to be considered.

1. It is to be enquired, Whether it was an Extraordinary As­sembly, acting by Extraordinary and Apostolick Call and Au­thority, or an Ordinary Assembly, acting by an Ordinary Call, and Ordinary Church-Power? To this we say, 1. Tho' this Assembly had in it some Men Extraordinary for their Office and Gifts, yet did they not here meet or act as such, but as Ordi­nary Church-Rulers, which as Junius hath well observed, so he [Page 11]hath sufficiently proved, That the Apostles in all Constituted Churches, did not act by Extraordinary Apostolick Authority, but Joint with other Church-Rulers in an Ordinary Power, and submitted to them: Therefore we find the Apostles, Peter and John, sent from the Church of Jerusalem, as Missionaries, to Samaria, Acts 8.14. And as we from hence prove against the Papists, that Peter had no Supremacy over the rest of the Apo­stles, because the Senders have Power over them they do send; so their Subjection to that Church is hence evident: It's plain also from Peter's subjecting himself as aforesaid, to the Trial of the Church at Jerusalem: So Paul and Barnabas were subject to the Church of Antioch, as appears from Acts 13.1. and also from this same Chapter; which had not been, had they acted by their Apostolic Extraordinary Authority, wherein they were im­mediately subject to CHRIST only. But that this Assembly was Ordinary, is evident, 1. From its Occasion, which is Or­dinary, viz. a Heresie and Schism arising in the Church. 2. Their Call to this Assembly was Ordinary, the Church of Antioch Determined and Ordered ( Vers. 2.) Paul and Barnabas, with cer­tain others, to repair to Jerusalem; the Call of the Apostles and Elders at Jerusalem was of the same nature, and therefore all but Ordinary. 3. Their Constitution was Ordinary, as consisting not of Extraordinary Officers only, but of Ordinary Elders and Brethren also. 4. These Ordinary Officers act with equal Authority as the Apostles do in this Synod, the Synodical Act going out in their Name, as well as the Apostles, Vers. 22, 23. They joyn with them in censuring the Hereticks, vers. 24. Vers. 28. They assert, That it seems good to the Holy Ghost and us, as well as the Apostles do; and here give Commission to Paul and Barnabas, &c. as well as they. 5. The manner of their Procedure in determining this Controversie, was Ordinary; not by Immediate Infallible Inspiration, but by much Disputing and Reasoning, vers. 7. the several Apostles giving their Judgment according to Scripture; wherein, tho' they were not contrary to one another, yet they differ'd, and the Sentence of James finally acquiesc'd in; not on account of Episcopal Authority [Page 12](as some would have it, who to Exalt a Bishop, would Degrade an Apostle) but on Account of the strength of his Reasons, and evidence of Truth from Scripture: And altho' it be said, vers. 28. It seemed good to the Holy Ghost, &c. it will neither follow that Oecumenick Councils are Infallible, as Papists teach, nor that this Acted by an Extraordinary Apostolick Spi­rit: For as Whitaker says, Other Councils may in like manner assert their Decrees seem good to the Holy Ghost, if they shall follow the same Method and Rule, determine nothing but what is according unto the Revealed Will of GOD, written in His Word, which are called Words that the Holy Ghost teacheth, 1 Cor. 2.13.

6. Had the Apostles determined this matter by their Extraor­dinary Infallible Spirit, what need had the Infallible Spirit in Paul and Barnabas, to appeal to the Infallible Spirit of the Apo­stles and Elders at Jerusalem? Was the Spirit in Paul, &c. an In­competent Judge, and Inferiour to theirs? Nay surely, he might have as easily determined the matter at Antioch, and saved the Labour of Travelling to Jerusalem. Whence 'tis plain they act­ed by Ordinary Means and Power, in dependance upon GOD's Spirit promised to His Church, by the best Rule, His own Word.

A Second Question, Seeing this Assembly was Ordinary, Whe­ther did it act only by way of Council and Advice, or by Ju­ridical Authority, as an Assembly whose Authority obliged the Churches subject to them, to Receive and Observe them? To this we say,

1. That the Authority of this Synod, or of any other, is not Civil, either for Matter, Manner, or End, nor had it, or hath any External Coercive Power to inflict Punishments Cor­poral, or Fines and Imprisonments; but as their Power was Spi­ritual, so it was to be Executed by Suitable Means. 2. Nor was their Power (nor is the Power of any Synod) destructive of the Power of Inferiour Church-Assemblies, but perfective, and assisting to them: For tho' a Superiour Assembly should recti­fie the Mistakes of an Inferiour Assembly, this doth no more deprive the Inferiour of its Power, than he who would better inform a mistaken Man, doth deprive him of the Power of his [Page 13]Judgment, when he only help'd him to judge better. 3. Their Power, as that of other Assemblies, was not Arbitrary, to do as they pleas'd, but Regulated by the Word of GOD; for no Assemblies have Power but for Edification; and no Foundation for this can be laid, but the Foundation of the Prophets and Apostles. 4. Yet we Assert, it was properly and truly cloath­ed with Authority to deliberate and determine in those matters that were before it, and its Determinations (as those of other Lawful Assemblies do) did oblige those under their Care and Inspection, Reverently to Esteem them, and Dutifully to Obey them, as far as agreeable to the Revealed Will of GOD. And this is plain,

1. Seeing GOD hath Commanded Church-Rulers to Assem­ble, hath promised His Spirit and Presence in their Assemblies, and to Ratifie what they Bind or Loose, it is clear that their Acts ought to be Obeyed, else their Assembling is in vain; nor could Controversies ever be ended, if none be obliged to stand to the Determination.

2. All Appeals should be needless, tho' Nature's Light teach them: Were Synods only Consultative, they should be only like that which Lawyers call Arbitrium boni viri, which a Man need not stand to, unless he so please; and therefore all Power of Arbitration ought to have some Juridical Authority accom­panying it, to make their Determinations obey'd, else we shall be as when there was no King in Israel, and no effectual Means provided for the Redressing Grievances.

3. Seeing CHRIST requires that such as neglect to hear the Church, be accounted as Heathens and Publicans, it is plain they have Authority, when such as disobey are to be punish'd for such their Disobedience: And its unreasonable to suppose this peculiar to single Congregations, for then CHRIST should have had more care of single Persons, than of whole Congrega­tions of Men, if no Remedy be provided for Debates arising betwixt Congregations, or Offences done by one to the other: Yea even single Congregations themselves should have no Re­medy, [Page 14]if one part be Injurious to the other, but they must Divide, and so be Destroy'd, as Instances could be given.

As to the particular Power exercis'd by this Synod, and may be by others, it appears to be first that called Dogmatick, which is not a Power to forge new Articles of Faith, or devise new Matter, or Parts of Divine Worship, but it is a Power to Ex­plain Matters of Faith, and Rules of Worship, according to GOD's Word; to discover and declare the contrary Errors or Corruptions: Thus they detected and declared, and so by the Word of GOD prevented and removed, the Corruption both of Doctrine and Worship, which those Pharisaical Men were bring­ing in, with a burden of Ceremonies; hereby they pacify and strengthen the Church, by securing to it that Liberty where­with CHRIST had made it free. 2. They Exercis'd that Power called Diatactick, which relates to the External Order of the Church, in Matters Prudential and Circumstantial, which are to be determined by the Light of Nature, and those General Rules prescribed in Scripture; such as (1.) That our great and chief End be GOD's Glory, according to that 1 Cor. 10.31. (2.) That no Offence be given to Jew or Gentile, or the Church of GOD, according to Vers. 32. (3.) That all be done for Edi­fication, 1 Cor. 14.26. (4.) And in Decency and Order, accord­ing to Vers. 20. By these Rules are Church-Assemblies bound to walk; which if they do, Peace shall be on them, as on the Israel of GOD. Thus, this Synod decreed to frame their Decision in a Letter, and to send it by fit Commissioners. 3. They Exercised that Power called Critick, or Disciplinary, in Censuring those False Teachers as Subverters of Souls, Men running unsent, and Teaching what they had no Command for, vers. 24. And so may As­semblies Use and Exercise Censures, provided it be done with Humility, Moderation, and Compassion; and so shall the Church be preserved from Heresie and Schism. This being our best Pat­tern, I come to make some Application to our selves.

Use 1. Seeing GOD hath Commanded, Nature's Light hath Directed, CHRIST's Precept and His Apostles Precedent hath Authorized Assemblies of Church-Officers for its Safety and Edification, we may meet in Faith, having the Authority of GOD for our Motive and Warrant so to do; and therefore may depend upon His Promised Presence with us, and the hearing of our Pray­ers, seeing what we do, is not from a Principle of carnal Policy, but in Obedience to our Great Master, and for the Service of His Church under our care.

2. We are hence informed, That the want of a Call or Com­mission to Assemble, from Secular Power, (we being permitted to meet) doth not make our Meeting Unlawful before GOD, as some may fancy; nor doth the want of a Civil Sanction to our Acts, make them void: For this Assembly had neither, yet was blessed of the LORD. The Civil Magistrate, we confess, may and ought to call Ministers to their Work, and protect them in it; yet this is necessary only to the well-being, but not to the being of such Meetings. The Primitive Church for the first Three hundred years Enjoyed no such Priviledge more than we, yet wanted not their Assemblies, nor dare we condemn them as Unlawful; and as we have reason to bless GOD that we are Permitted to meet in Peace, tho' not Commanded so to do; let us, as we have hitherto endeavoured, so behave our selves, as to give no just ground of Offence; for sure we can do nothing prejudicial to the Civil Interest, if we keep within our own Sphere, and pursue the just Ends of our Meeting, which are the Preservation of Truth and Peace, and promoting Holi­ness among our selves, and those over whom the LORD hath set us; for certainly such will be found the best Subjects, who conscientiously mind these Duties.

3. Seeing GOD hath Commanded Ministers to Assemble, when it is necessary, then such ought to make Conscience of Meeting when called, and not to forsake the Assembling of them­selves together, as the manner of some is. It's true, such as GOD [Page 16]hath Disabled to come, are hereby Excused; For the LORD Himself hath done it, and who may say, What doth He? But those who are able to go about their own particular Affairs, and yet excuse themselves from attending these our Assemblies, seem to mind more their own things than the things of CHRIST.

Some indeed despise these Assemblies, as being in their Opi­nion a Yoke, but we have cause to bless GOD for this Yoke, which ties us together, binds us to our Work, and strengthens us in the Performance thereof; for by our Meetings GOD hath been pleased to preserve us in as great Unanimity of Judgment, Unity of Affection, Uniformity in all our Ministerial Actings, as any such Number of such Men we know in the like Circum­stances with our selves: By these, we have been helpt to mind the same thing, and walk by the same Rule; and by our united Care and Counsels in our darkest Times and greatest Dangers, have been inabled both to avoid giving just ground of Offence, and have thereby defended our selves; our own, and the Publick Peace, have been considerably secured by these means, when it hath fared otherwise in other places: And Experience daily tells us, that the Church shall never be Comely as Jerusalem, Terrible as an Army with Banners, while every small Company with their several Captains, have sole Jurisdiction, and no Common Coun­cils kept for War or Peace, no Subordination or Authority for Exercise of Discipline, Redress of Grievances, or Establishing of Order. Had some of our Brethren what we Enjoy by these, they would soon be more Terrible to their Enemies, more Com­fortable to their Friends, more Peace should be in their Palaces, and Prosperity within their private Walls.

4. This also may convince us that CHRIST never Appointed His Church to be Governed by Sole Jurisdiction of single Per­sons, for even in case of a private Offence, He commands to tell the Church, not any single Person, howsoever dignified; the Promise of His Presence is made at least to Two or Three ga­thered in His Name, Matth. 18.20. As the Apostles with the Knowledge and Consent of the Church, chose and ordained an [Page 17]Apostle, Acts 1. so they would not exercise sole Jurisdiction even in the Ordination of Deacons, Acts 6.3, 6. The Apostles joyntly sent Peter and John to Samaria, Acts 8.14. The Apostles and Brethren in Judea call'd Peter to Account, in respect of his Carriage to the Gentiles, Acts 11.1, 2, 18. It was the Church, and not any one Church-man, that sent Barnabas so far as An­tioch, Acts 11.22. Yea, the very matters of Charity were ma­naged by Common Consent, for the Disciples in Antioch sent to Barnabas and Paul, and the Elders at Jerusalem; so that there was not so much as sole Jurisdiction in the Distribution of the Chur­ches Charity, Acts 11.29, 30. Paul and Barnabas are sent by the Ministers of the Church of Antioch assembled, Chap. 13. And here it is more evident than to be deny'd: so that I would glad­ly know any Constituted Church within all the New Testament or Old, when Church-Jurisdiction was exercised by any single Person. And seeing our Laws and Law-Givers have thought it unreasonable and unsafe, to trust the Legislative Power in the hands of any single Person, or the Lives, Liberties, Limbs, or Estates, to any less than a Jury of Twelve Men, then is it rea­son to consider of the Safety and Reasonableness of trusting Church-Power in the hand of single Persons, who tho' they thrust themselves into Civil Assemblies, are seldom known to assemble as the Apostles and Elders did at Jerusalem.

5. It is the Duty of Christian People under the Care of such Assemblies, Reverently to Esteem, and Dutifully to Regard their Lawful Constitutions: So the Churches to which this Decree came, rejoyced for the Consolation they had thereby, Acts 15.31. As it's a People's Mercy to have Government, so none but Pre­sumptuous and Self-will'd Persons will despise it, and profane Men, whose Immoralities make them justly obnoxious to their Censures.

6. Having such an Excellent Example as this, let us imitate them in ours, and particularly in these things:

First, In their Unanimity: They were Assembled with one Ac­cord; they acted with one Accord, let us do so also. Their Unanimity appeared,

1. In that they were Acted by the same holy Spirit on which they depended, vers. 28.

2. They walked by the same Rule, Phillip. 4.16. Let us do so also: They had divers Apprehensions and Expressions about the Rule, much Disputing and Debating, not to confound, but to find out Truth, to convince Gain-sayers: And therefore none should be offended at our Debates, when managed with Mode­ration, in order to Confirm Truth, or Refute Error, or find out proper Expedients for our Work: The Matter about which, Persons with whom, and our own Infirmities, occasion these De­bates; We have no Intuitive Knowledge, but only Discussive, and therefore must dig for Wisdom as for hidden Treasure.

3. Let us with them mind the same thing, Philip. 3.16. The Churches Preservation and Edification, Truth, Peace, and Pure Gospel-Ordinances, was all they Contended for, and Aimed at; not, as sometimes they had Contended, who should be Greatest, Mark 9.34. By this Unanimity we shall Beautify and Fortifie our Assembly, gain Respect to our Persons and Acts.

Secondly, Let us imitate them in the Ground and Reason of their Conclusions, They determined nothing but what seemed Good to the Holy Ghost, as well as them; and this is best known by the Word of GOD. Let the things be necessary, Vers. 28. No burdensome Ceremony; this they delivered the Church from, as a Yoke which neither they nor their Forefathers were able to bear; for rigid imposing of Things Unnecessary, makes Church-Con­stitutions Contemptible, and the Contrivers and Imposers of such needless Burdens, as Imperious and Tyrannical.

4. Let us with them, what we have on due Deliberation En­acted, Execute with all prudent Expedition: A Flame was be­gun in the Church, they presently sent to quench it: Delays in this kind may prove dangerous.

5. Let every Member of the Assembly, as they did, main­tain the Credit and Authority of the Assembly, by a chearful Submission and Obedience to its Appointments. Paul, Barna­bas, Judas and Silas, tho' chief Men, did not decline, but Re­verence the Authority of this Assembly, by undertaking a Toil­some and hazardous Work. Nature's Light teacheth us, that the several Parts of a Politick Body, as well as the Natural, are to be subject and serviceable to the Whole, and why not also in Church-Assemblies?

6. Let us imitate their Spiritual Prudence, in the chusing and sending Men to the Work that are fit for it; They sent chosen Men, &c. As GOD hath intrusted us, we cannot be Faithful to Him, or those with whom He hath trusted us, unless we em­ploy fit Persons. And therefore,

1. Let us be careful to lay hands suddenly upon no Man, that we be neither Partakers with them of their Sins, nor Au­thors of Plagues to others; but such as are faithful, able, and apt to teach, let such be chosen at first, 2 Tim. 2.2. We injure the present, and betray the after-Generation, if we do otherwise.

2. Seeing there be diversity of Gifts, we ought to make pro­per and suitable Application of those to Places and Work; so is done here, They sent Chosen Men. Nature hath taught every Mechanick not to use his Tools promiscuously: GOD hath instructed the Plowman to Discretion, not to thresh Fitches with a Threshing Instrument, neither is a Cart-Wheel turned about upon the Cummin; but the Fitches are beaten out with a Staff, and the Cummin with a Rod, Isa. 28.27, 28. This cometh from the LORD, who is Wonderful in Counsel, and Excellent in Work­ing. Neither a Mans own Desires or Inclinations, nor partial Respect to Persons, should guide us in this, but Experience of a just Proportion betwixt their Gifts and the Work, should direct us: For mis-application of Persons to Places, hath been of very ill consequence to the Church.

7. The choicest Persons in our Assemblies are not to think themselves too good to serve the Church of CHRIST, but [Page 20]when call'd, are to go on her Errands chearfully, as these Chosen Men here do: Men ought not to seek only Ease, Honour, and Advantage; but are call'd to Labour in the Vineyard, and the Great Shepherd will provide them their Reward.

8. Such Persons may be safely Trusted with the Important Interest of the Church, who have given proof of their ha­zarding their Lives for the Name of CHRIST: Men Deny'd to Themselves their Ease and Advantage; Men of Courage, who dare Engage in Difficulties, such Men will have a Native Care for it. Having therefore the SPIRIT promised to be our Guide, the Word of GOD given to be our Rule, and so Excellent a Pattern as this Assembly: Let us follow our Guide, according to the Rule, after so Holy an Ex­ample.

FINIS.

This keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above is co-owned by the institutions providing financial support to the Text Creation Partnership. Searching, reading, printing, or downloading EEBO-TCP texts is reserved for the authorized users of these project partner institutions. Permission must be granted for subsequent distribution, in print or electronically, of this EEBO-TCP Phase II text, in whole or in part.