AN APOLOGIE For our Publick Ministerie, AND Infant-Baptism.

Written som years ago for Private satisfaction of som Dissenting Brethren; and upon request enlarged and Published for the same ends.

By William Lyford, B.D. and Minister of the Gospel at Sherborn in Dorcetshire.

DEUT. 12.19.

Take heed to thy self, that thou forsake not the Levite, as long as thou livest upon the earth.

1 THES. 5.12, 13.

Wee beseech you brethren to know them, which labor among you, and are over you in the Lord, and admonish you, and esteem them very highly in love for their works sake, and bee at peace among your selves.

Lux. 10.16.

Hee that heareth you heareth mee; and hee that despiseth you despi­seth mee.

LONDON, Printed by William Dugard, 1652.

To my loving Christian friend, M r John Raymond wisheth increas of Grace.

SIR!

ACcording to your earnest desire and my promiss, I have sent up unto you the heads of those Reasons with large additions, which four years ago I tendred to som of our Church-forsakers, with hope to have gained them to unitie and communion with us. But by that time Hous­preaching was counted a fine knack, and our English people taught to question the Calling of their Ministers, to call them by new names, Baals Priests, the black guard, Antichristian Priests, &c. And then 'tis high time to set up themselvs; if they had lived in the primitive times, when Christians did meet in dens and secret places for the worship of Christ, with hazard of their lives, they would have counted it a blessed privilege to enjoy the free use of the Ordinances in publike Assemblies; but now that libertie is granted, it is despised; our people are wanton and unthankful. Surely our Lord Christ was no Corner-creeping Preacher, Hee disclaimed it, I spake openly to the world, I ever taught in the Synagogue, whither the Jews resort, Joh. 18.20. and in secret have I said nothing: Neither doth hee allow it in his servants, whom hee forwarns not to seek him in Corners, Mat. 24.26 if they shall say unto you, Behold he is in the desart [among those which withdraw themselvs from the publike professors,] Go not forth; Behold hee is in the secret Chambers, Believ it not. When men shall say unto you, in such a hous or Chamber, there is one that hold's forth Christ most sweetly in a Gospel-way, let us go to him; Go not forth, saies the Text, Believ it not: How should any believ it? for what one new sweet Doctrine concerning Christ his person, or offices [...]ave yee learned there, which yee were not taught before. Have yee [...]y your new way gotten farther assurance of your salvation? [Page]Have yee thereby grown in grace, and more escaped the corrup­tions that are in the world through lust? or are yee more intangled in the same? What? Christ sweetly held forth, and yet no sa­vour of that knowledg stick upon your souls? I demand with S. Paul, 2 Cor. 11.4. Hee that cometh and preacheth, doth hee preach another Jesus, whom wee have not preached, or another spirit, or ano­ther Gospel which yee have not accepted? Christ held forth in private, is it the same Christ, or another? the same way of Justi­fication, the same spirit of sanctification, which wee have taught, or another? if another, I boldly affirm it, it is a fals Christ, a fals Gospel, a fals spirit: But if the same, why do people desert the Ordinance, as if it were not the same? Yes, becaus other men have a better way of Teaching Christ, and wee go not from one Christ to another, but to the same Christ held forth in a sweeter manner. Answ. If that bee the intent, then it is your wisest and surest way to partake of both, viz. of the Blessing of God in the Assemblies, and of the help of anothers gifts, either before or after the pub­lick, by which means you will avoid the scandal now given (which an honest man will make conscience to do,) and you'l bee sure to meet with Christ, if hee bee any where manifested.

SIR, You may remember that I have often invited the people to com to mee, and open their doubts, which som have don (especi­ally when self-examination of our spiritual estates was more in use amongst Christians.) Yea, I have offered, that if any soul could think of any matter or Text which might serv to answer their doubts, to eas their scruples, to direct their Consciences in particular Cases, or to inform their mindes in any point or Text not usually handled, that they should chuse the way to acquaint mee with their desires, and I would studie to answer their expecta­tion: I do not remember, that any made use of this liberty, be­sides your self, who once desired mee to preach upon that Text, Joh. 6.44. which I readily did in two Sermons, and shall as readily do the like, for any soul in the Congregation. I have not used [Page]to trouble their heads with Controversies of the times; but when I had finished my Bodie of Divinitie, (which was the subject of my morning Sermons, wherein I aimed chiefly at Laying of foundations, as in the afternoons Sermons, going through som entire piece of Scripture (as the whole Epistle to the Galatians,) wherein I aimed especially at larger Applications for instruction in holiness and trials of our spiritual estate.) In the year 1647. The Testimonie of the London Ministers against the Errors of the times coming forth, I (to avoid suspicion of loading the times with Errors,) did take the Opinions as they were there drawn up to my hands and upon each head, I laid down one or two distin­ctions very breifly (not by Obj. and Sol.) that so by sorting every thing apart, the Chaff by it self, the Wheat by it self; Heb. 5.14. my people might have their senses exercised to discern both good and evil, and see in which side of the distinction lay the Truth and in which the Error, Phil. 1.10. and so neither condemn all nor imbrace all things in the Lump, but bee able to discern things that differ. In all which, as in the cours of my ministerie, with all caution and tenderness avoiding this, Never to encourage any thing of the flesh, nor discourage any thing of the spirit in my Hearers. The which exercises, if God bee pleased to restore my health, I intend shortly to revise and publish.

Learned men will wonder, why I should come forth now in the Fag end of the day with a stale Controversie: But so long as sin reign's, we ought not to bee silent. Varietie of Books, though for matter the same, is of good use: You see that notwithstanding all the Ammunition in the Common­wealth or Nation. Kingdom, there is new made daily, some are naked, or the old is lost; so it is in Books, which are more needful then Arms, all com not into all hands, many would read little, if Books were not new. It's noted of the Arrians, that they got the sway of the world, and overtopt the Orthodox, partly by their subtilty crerping into Emperors Courts, partly by their unwearied diligence; the Orthodox after sound Confutation of [Page]their Heresie, sitting down content with that discharge of their dutie: And surely if ever our glorious lights of the sanctuarie bee put out, and new ones set up in their stead, next unto God's wrath penally inflicting such a judgment for a Peoples unthankfulness, it will bee ascribed to our laziness, and their unwearied dili­gence, rather then to any truth of their Caus; or excellence of their Arguing: For they do not or will not know when they are con­futed, but after their Arguments answered ten times over, they are as brisk to offer new. disputation, insisting upon their old bald Arguments, as if never uttered before; their diligence should provoke us to the like, if not their diligence, yet love to their souls should, 2 Tim. 2.25. remembring that of Paul, in meekness instructing those that oppose themselvs, if at any time God will give them re­pentance to the acknowledging of the truth, that they may re­cover themselvs out of the snare of the Divel, wee must not give over a Patient while there is hope, no not though they oppose themselvs, but with long-suffering they must bee instructed, becaus as the gift of grace, so the time of grace is in God's hand alone. It is a great skill to discern who are to bee forborn and who to bee opposed, they that make Divisions and parties in the Church and scandalize the Doctrine are to bee avoided, Rom. 16.17. others that walk hum­bly and peaceably under that weakness and dissenting Opi­nion from their brethren, are to bee forborn, loved, and cherished, till wee meet in heaven, where Luther and Calvin and all, whose Faith and hearts do center in the Lord Christ, shall for evermore bee fully agreed. To his Grace I commend you, who is able to establish you, and rest

Yours, and the Churches servant in the Gospel of Jesus Christ, WILLIAM LYFORD.

AN APOLOGIE FOR Our Publick MINISTERIE.

TOuching the Office and Calling of Ministers, and Lay-men's preaching, the Question is not, Whether Christians may and ought privately to edifie one another by admonitions, counsels, reproofs, repetition of Sermons, reading of good Books and other Christian conferences, all this I grant and commend to practice from these Scriptures, Heb. 3.13. 1 Thes. 4.8. 1 Thes. 5.11.14. Rom. 15 14. But the whole state of the controversie may fitly bee reduced to these three heads:

Quest. 1. Whether the work of a Minister in the Administration of the Word and Sacraments, bee a Calling, Office and work distinct from the rest of the people? Whether there bee any such Calling or Office for that holy work in the New Testament? Affir.

2. Whether Ordination of Ministers for Administration of Word and Sacraments bee an Ordinance of Christ in the New Te­stament? Affir.

3. Whether it bee lawful for men uncalled and unordained to Take upon them the preaching of the Word in the Name and with the autoritie of the Lord Jesus, or the Administration of the Sacraments? Neg.

The answer and determination of these three Questions will clearly state the Caus, which I shall do in three Conclusions.

Concl. 1 1. The Ministerie is a distinct Calling and Office, which they are bound to attend unto, and None but they can or ought to perform.

Concl. 2 2. Ordination of Ministers by imposition of hands of other Mini­sters for the Administration of the Word and Sacraments, is an Ordi­nance of Christ in the New Testament.

Concl. 3 3. No man uncalled and unordained can with good Conscience in­trude or enter upon that Work and Office, it is a great sin so to do. Of these I will speak in order.

1 The first Conclusion in Answer to the first Question, viz. that the Ministerie is a distinct Office and Calling, is proved 1. By express words of the Text, 1 Tim. 3.1. if any man desire the Office of a Bishop, hee desireth a good work: The Text tell's you that Bishop, or Pres­byter, is an Office, a good Office, and hee that is made a Bishop is a man in high Office, even to take care of the Church of God, ver. 5. and in him there are required manie qualifications which are not required in other Believers. Again, Paul writing to the Philippians doth plainly distinguish the Bodie of Saints from the Officers, To all the Saints which are at Philippi with the Bishops and Deacons, Phil. 1.1. By Bishops there, all understand Ministers of the Gospel, in Office of Teaching distinct from the people, who were Saints, but not Bishops. So in the Church of Ephesus, the like distinction between Pastor and People in respect of Office and Calling is obferved. Act. 20. Paul called for the Elders of the Church, vers 17. Hee minde's them of their Office, vers 28. Take heed to all the flock over which the holy Ghost hath made you overseers or Bishops, to feed the Church of God, for so did Christ ordain, and set in the Church som Pastors and Teachers for the work of the Ministerie, Ehes. 4.11.12. e.i. to bee Guides to the Flock, to feed them with wholsom Doctrine, Heb. 13.7, 17. Remember them which have the Rule over you, who have spoken unto you the Word of God, and submit your selvs, for they watch for your souls. In which places you see that Ministerie of the Word is a name of Office given to certain men designed and singled out to that work, as a special work not common to others, take one clear place more, viz. 1 Thes. 5.11. Comfort and edifie one another, [there's the peoples mutual dutie in private.] But vers. 12. know them which labor among you and are over you in the Lord and admonish you, there's the Pastor's Office and dutie, who, though they may bee but even with you in respect of Gifts and Graces, yet they are over you in the Lord: in respect of their Office and Work, they are over all, even over them which were able [Page 3] Concl. 1 privately to admonish one another; and the people's dutie is to know, i.e. to acknowledg them as such, and to esteem them very highly for their work's sake, becaus God hath set them over you in that Office.

By all which places of Scripture it is evident that in the Churches of Christ

  • Som are Pastors and Elders to feed Some are Guides and Rulers
  • Som are Sheep & the flock to bee fed Som are Guided and Ruled.
  • Som are single Saints:
  • Som are Bishops over them in the Lord.

There is a work wholly to bee attended, and men appointed to attend that work wholly. Names of Office, without an Office, are meer mockeries; the Names of a King, of a Steward, Pastor, Bishop, Guide, &c. without their respective Offices are not given in Scripture; In the places now cited, you finde those distinctive Titles and Names joyned with the work it self. I demand then with the Apostle, Are all Teachers? 1 Cor. 12.28. Rom. 14.4. are all Bishops? are all Guids and Pastors? The Minister and his Work are as precisely distinguished by the holy Ghost from all other Callings, as can bee written with ink and paper. Now that which Christ hath set up, who shall dare to pull down? Those which Christ hath distinguished, no may confound. Pastor and People, Bishops and Flock, Guides and guided are relatives, and stand in such direct opposition one to the other, that, in respect of the same subject, the one cannot bee the other: the Father is not the Son, nor the Son the Father; the Master is not the Servant, nor the Ser­vant the Master; the King is not a subject, nor a subject the King; And therefore regularly, the one cannot do the duties of the other. A Guifted man, as such, is not a Bishop, nor a Presbyter, nor a Pa­stor, for these are distinguished from other men, that have Gifts, but not Office.

Secondly, This first Conclusion is proved from the special Charge given to Ministers, over and above what is incumbent on private persons, as for example, Col. 4.17. Take heed to the Ministerie which thou hast received of the Lord that thou fulfil it—and to all the Flock over which the holy Ghost hath made you over-seers, Act. 20.28. with 1 Tim. 4.16. Take heed to thy self and to the Doctrine, meditate upon these things, Give thy self wholly to them, i.e. to Reading, Exhortation and Doctrine, vers. 13.15. The work to which thou wast ordained, vers. 14. And as God hath given a Charge to Ministers, so hee doth require an exact account of their doings in this [Page 4] Concl. 1 kinde. 2 Tim. 4.1, 3. I charge thee before God and the Lord Jesus Christ, Ezek. 3.18. Ezek. 34.2, 4, 10. Zech. 11.17. who shall judg the quick and the dead at his appearing, preach the Word, bee instant in season, out of season, reprove, rebuke, exhort with all long-suffering and Doctrine: This is the Ministers Charge. Now all do not lie under this weightie Charge and account. Hath every Gifted man a Flock to feed? a Ministerie to fulfil? or are they bound to give themselvs wholly to that work forsaking all other Callings? No, but they are persons singled out and designed to this Office and Work, upon whom this Charge doth lie.

3. Our third proof is from the honor and maintenance appointed for them that preach the Gospel, the Lord hath ordained that they which preach the Gospel should live of the Gospel. 1 Cor. 9.13, 14. And that the Presbyters which labor in the Word and Doctrine should bee counted worthie double honor, 1 Tim. 5.17. And can Lay-preachers challenge this honor and maintenance?

The sum of all is this, Ministers, and none but Ministers, are Bishops, Pastors or Elders; They, and none but they, are bound to give them­selvs wholly to that work; They, and none but they, are under that heavie Charge and account; They, and none but they, can by divine Autoritie of Christ's ordinance, 1 Cor. 9.14. challenge to live of the Gospel; They, and none but they, to whom these Characters do belong, are the men whom God hath made Ministers of Christ and Stewards of the Mysteries of God, 1 Cor. 4.1.

Oject. 1 Two Objections com to bee answered: For som do say, Wee preach not as men in Office, but in another capacitie, as gifted men.

Answ. Answer, See the folly of this Objection, it is as if you would say, there bee two sorts of Preachers, som that are appointed and sent, and som that are not, and yet do it: Som preach in a preaching capacitie, and som not in a preaching capacitie: Som are Called, sent and Autorized by Christ to preach, som are not so Autorized, and yet they preach. It is a contradiction to preach in a non-preaching capacitie, becaus to preach in the Name and by the Autoritie of Jesus Christ, doth imply a publike mission and Autorizing; If an ordinarie Souldier should usurp the office of a Colonel, or a Colonel the office of the General, or a pri­vate man the office of a Constable, would this bee a good answer to say, I do it not in the capacitie of a Constable, or Colonel, or Ge­neral, but in another capacitie, as a man Gifted for such actions; I be­liev such an under-taker would bee severely punished in the capacitie of an Ʋsurper, of a busie-disturber of publike Order. His being Gifted [Page 5] Conclus. 1 cannot excuse his arrogancie, becaus those offices cannot bee duly performed by any other capacitie then of their Office and Patent.

Object. 2 But the better to overthrow our Office, and make no Calling of it,som say, let them work as others do, for their living. Cannot they preach without studie and books? it is a sign they preach not by the Spirit, &c.

Answ. 1 See the honestie of this objection, It is all one as if a laborer should work all the week in plowing or threshing to provide you food, or to make you a suit of clothes against the Sabbath, were it justice to say to him at the weeks end, Go work for your living, when hee ha's been all the while about your work? Such another piece of Justice and Honestie it is to say, Let Ministers work for their living, when as they have spent their time, and spirits, and Talents to do you service, to prepare food and raiment for your souls. Christ count's preaching to bee a labor, els hee would not have said, the la­borer is worthie of his hire; yea and hard labor too, els hee would not have compared Ministers to souldiers, to shepherds, to husband­men, to the labor of the ox that treadeth out the corn.

Besides, 1 Cor 9.13, 14 Christ hath ordained that ministers should live by their preaching, as by a Calling, as the Priests under the Law did: As they that ministred about holy things, did live of the things of the Temple, even so hath the Lord ordained, that they which preach the Gospel should live of the Gospel. These men oft Call for Gospel Ordinances; Lo here is a Gospel-Ordinance, and yet they cannot stoop to it; (for say they, let ministers work—) But let such men remember that Com­plaint of Paul, who though hee did not regard monie, yet hee write's it up among his wrongs and suffrings, that hee was fain to labor for his living, working with his own hands, 1 Cor. 4.11, 12. to this hour wee both hunger and thirst, and labor working with our own hands. Therefore forbear to use this objection, unless yee mean to bee Per­secutors.

Answ. 2 To the second part of the objection, do but observ how directly opposite it is to God's word. Paul bid's Timothie give attendance to Reading and to Doctrine, 1 Tim. 4.13. But you say, Can they not preach without studie? Paul saie's vers 15. Give thy self wholly to these things, that thy profiting may bee known; A man so rarely gifred as Timothie was, of whom there went certain prophecies what a rare man hee would bee in the Church, educated from his infancie [Page 6] Conclus. 1 in the Scripture, yet hee must give attendance to studie and reading, and that whollie, all is little enough; and must not wee much more fol­low our studies? 2 Tim. 2.4. Paul saie's, wee must not intangle our selvs in worldly imploiments. But you say, a man may follow a Trade all the week, Vers. 15. and yet preach the Lord's day. True, after a wilde fashion, but not like a workman that need not bee ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth.

Answ. 3 To the third part of the objection, I say, it is a mere deluding of people to set the Spirit of God against God's means, in and by which his Spirit doth usually work. The Spirit is it which worketh effe­ctually in the ministerie of us all, Gal. 2.8. the sufficiencie, and efficiencie is not of us, but of God, but yet the Spirit worketh by such Gifts as himself bestoweth, 1 Cor. 12.4. There bee diversities of Gifts, but the same Spirit, and by the right use of those Gifts, the Spirit doth work to the edifying of the Churches; For the manifestation of the Spirit is given to every one to profit withall. i.e. Whosoëver hath any Gift manifesting the miraculous power of the Spirit, it is given, not for ostentation, or to bee admired, but for this onely end, for the profit of all, vers 7. Now the Gifts then given to profit the Church withall, in the way of instruction, are reckoned up six. 1. Sapientia, wisdom, to applie Christian Doctrine to Practice and Use of believers. 2. Sci­entia, a knowledg of Principles and deep points of Religion. 3. Pro­phecie, i.e. a Gift to expound the prophecies and secret things of Scripture. 4. Discerning of spirits, viz fanatick and counterfeit in­spirations from true. 5. Divers kindes of tongues, that all Nations and languages might hear and understand the Gospel. 6. Interpre­tation of tongues wherewith others did speak, and wherein the Scri­pture is written: These Gifts of the Spirit are useful and profitable for the Church, they were miraculous for the manner of coming by them, but the Doctrine taught was the same which was before reveal­ed. These Gifts may either bee acquired, or infused; At first they were infused immediately, both for the honor of the Gospel, and the speedier spreading of it; Afterwards they are continued for the good of the Church by the Help of studie or praier: Even as the Gift of Healing is now continued by the studie and Art of Physick; without the Gifts of wisdom, science, and tongues, wee can never soundly, nor fruitfully make known the mysteries of Scripture; and hee that by studie and praier doe's attain the use of any of these Gifts in preaching, hee preacheth by the Spirit: if the Things which wee preach, bee the things [Page 7] Conclus. 2 which the Spirit hath revealed in the written word, and the Gifts by which wee preach, bee the Gifts of the Spirit, then, whether the means by which wee com by those Gifts, bee extraordinarie, as by inspiration, or ordinarie, as by studie and praier, the matter is the same, Wee preach by the Spirit, i.e. by the illumination and guidance of the Spirit, lead­ing us into the truth, which himself hath revealed. Wee pretend not, yea wee detest all pretensions of new and immediate inspirati­ons, whereby the holie Ghost is made the Autor of disorder and confusion, or a cloak for ignorance, non-sence and Heresie.

Conclus. 2 Our second Conclusion in Answer to the second Question in this, viz. Ordination of ministers by imposition of hands of the Presbyterie for the Administration of the Word and Sacraments, is an Ordinance of Christ in the New Testament.

The work of the ministerie is an Office and Calling, as you have heard, and Ordination is Christ's Ordinance whereby fit and approved per­sons are set apart and Commissioned for the execution of that Office, in the Name and with the Autoritie of Jesus Christ. Droved 1. by example. The weight of the Controversie lieth upon this Conclusion, which is directly proved. 1. By example, Wee finde in the New Testament four descents of men sent and ordained. 1. Christ himself was sent of his Father. 2. The Apostles were sent and ordained by Christ, Mark 3.14. 3. The Apostles sent and ordained Timothie and others of their own time. 4. And they that lived in the Apostles times did in like man­ner ordain others to survive, and do the Office of Ministers when they were dead, and this succession of Ministers is to last to the end of the world.

1. Christ was sent and had his Commission from his Father, Joh. 20.21, 22, 23. My Father hath sent mee. Christ himself was sent and Autuorized to preach, els hee had not not taken that honor to himself, Heb. 5.4, 5.

2 d. Descent. Christ send's the Apostles, As my Father sent mee, so sent I you; there's their Commission, hee committed the ministerie to their execution, which himself had received, viz. a power to Preach and Baptize, to binde and loos, Job. 20.23. with Matth. 28.19. Go yee therefore, Teach all Nations and Baptize them. The Man Christ could do nothing, but by Commission from the Father, nor the Apostles, except Christ had given them Commission: both Christ and his Apostles were solemnly inaugurated into their Office of Teaching.

Conclus. 2 3 d Descent. The Apostles ordained Timothie and others of their own time, 2 Tim. 1.6. Stir up the Gift of God which is in thee, by the putting on of my hands, and the hands of the presbyterie, 1 Tim. 4.14. By Gift there, is meant that Ghostly power, or Office, which Timothie received at his ordination, by the laying on of the Apostles hands, in the presence and with the consent of the presbyterie, who joined with Paul in that action. Again, wee finde Paul and Bar­nabas ordaining Elders in every Church where they went, Acts 14.23.

4 th Descent. Timothie and Titus did ordain others, as theniselvs had been ordained, and that by the Apostle's own appointment, Tit. 1.5. for this caus was Titus left in Crete, that hee should ordain Elders in every Citie. So likewise Timothie is directed how to lay on hands, not suddenly, but with good advisedness, 1 Tim. 5.22. As Timothie was entrusted with the word of Christ, so Hee must commit the same trust to faithful men, able to teach others also, that so there may bee a succession of Teachers, 2 Tim. 2.2. Thus yee have recorded in Scripture four descents, 1. Christ. 2. His Apostles. 3. Timothie and Titus. 4. Elders at Creet and Ephesus, and other Churches where the Gospel was planted, all sent and ordained, the two later by ordina­tion in the ordinarie way: thus the Apostles in their own Practice ad­mitted men into the ministerie, and thus they appointed for succeeding times; And can any think that Ordination ended with that Age? Is there not the same caus, necessitie, use, and reason for it in after Ages, as in the first times of the Church, when there were as yet ex­traordinarie Gifts stirring in the Church, which are now ceased, and therefore the more need of a standing ministerie?

Secondly, 2 From Scri­pture-Rules. This Conclusion is proved by Scripture- Rules and Pre­cepts given touching Ordination and the manner thereof: Unto Titus Paul give's commandment to ordain Elders, Tit. 1.5. and pre­scribe's certain Rules and Canons for the trial and qualification of them that are to bee ordained, vers 7. a Bishop must bee blameless, holding fast the faithful word, that hee may bee able to convince the gainsaiers, vers 9. So unto Timothie hee gave directions and rules touching Ordination, 1 Tim. 5. 22. Lay hands suddenly on no man, neither bee thou partaker of other mens sins. i.e. Admit not any into the ministerie without sufficient examination, and good proof of their abilitie for learning, and godly conversation, els the blame will light upon thee, becaus by the laying on of thy hands they were ad­mitted [Page 9] Conclus. 2 into that sacred function. What need Titus bee left in Crete to ordain Elders in every Citie, if Saints of themselvs might do all without Ordination? And to what purpose are those Cautions and Directions about Ordination, if there were no such thing to bee don? if Ordination it self bee needless, then much more is the manner of doing it needless.

Answ. Som think that the cerimonie of laying on of hands may bee omit­ted: Ans. Somtimes wee must bee tied to example in the least ge­sture, though not prescribed, and yet men presume to dispens in a circumstance expresly prescribed. Why should wee bee wiser then Paul? Why should wee bee ashamed of Gods express will? Timothie was ordained by laying on of hands, and enjoined to lay on hands on others in their Ordination: thus were the Deacons ordained, Act. 6.6. and thus were Saul and Barnabas set apart for the execution of their Calling, Act. 13.3. And seeing the Scripture is so punctual about the Manner of Ordination, and the Qualitie of Persons to bee or­dained, the Dutie it self is much more established, even as when God give's us rules for praying, fasting, alms, Magistrates, Matth. 6.1, 3 &c. it doth neces­sarily implie that there must be Magistrates, & praying, &c. And herein is fulfilled that prophecie of Es. 66.21. concerning the Ministerie of the N. T. I will take of them for Priests, and for Levites, saith the Lord. ( i.e.) Though the distinction of Tribes bee taken away, and that old Priesthood ceased, yet God promised it as a blessing to the Church of the Gentiles, that hee would rais up of themselvs som that should bee in stead of the old Priests and Levites, in things pertein­ing to God.

Upon these undeniable proofs, I frame these 3 Arguments, as to the main caus.

Argument. 1 1. Look how the Apostles did ordain, and call Ministers of the Word, and as they appointed others after them to bee ordained and sent, so and in like manner, ought men now to bee sent and ordained. But the Apostles did ordain men for the ministration of the word and sacraments by laying on of hands, and also appointed and enjoined the same to bee don in the Churches of Christ—therefore it is Christ's Ordinance, that so it ought still to bee don, and they that do otherwise do go against the example and appointment of the Scri­pture, and so overthrow an Ordinance of Christ in the N. Testament.

Argument. 2 2. That which is contrarie to the examples, rules and directions of Scripture, cannot bee don without sin. —But to administer the [Page 10] Conclus. 2 word or sacraments without Ordination is contrarie to the examples and rules of Scripture; therefore it is unlawful, and cannot bee don without sin.

Argument. 3 3. If Sending bee more then Gifting (by God's word) then there is somthing more by God's word required unto preaching, then sole Gifting: —But Sending is, according to God's word, more then Gifting, therefore somthing more then Gifting is required to make a preacher of the Gospel.

That Sending is more then Gifting, is evident, becaus Gifted men must bee ordained. Timothie was a man rarely Gifted, yet hee was ordained and sent by the outward calling of the Church, 1 Tim. 4.14. and so were the rest of whom wee read, 1 Tim. 2.7. Act. 13.2, 3.

There bee two things required to make a Minister. 1. Gifts, which must bee tried and approved. 2. Ordination and solemn Inauguration into their Office. Gifts give not Autoritie to any man for any thing; the Lawyer at the Bar may have as great gifts as the Judg upon the Bench, yet becaus-hee hath not the like Commission, hee may not intrude upon the Judges office. A private man may bee as well Gifted as a Justice of Peace, yet, without a Commission, hee may not do his office; so is it in this present case.

There is but one branch of the second Conclusion unproved, which saith that Ordination must bee by the laying of hands of other Ministers, and this is added to put a difference between true and fals Ordination: In som congregational Churches, they have their Pa­stors ordained (i.e.) chosen and appointed by the people: Truely then they may preach and exercise Ministeriall Acts in the name of the People, but not in the name of Christ, unless they did derive their Autoritie by Ordination from Christ.

It is a gross mistake to think or teach that Church-power is Origi­nally in the People, as the proper seat and subject thereof, from them to bee derived and placed upon whom they choos: Christ gave all power to the Bodie of the Church finaliter & objectivè (i e.) for their use and benefit, according to that of the Apostle. 1 Cor. 3.22. All things are yours, whether Paul, or Apollo, or Cephas, all are yours, i.e. for your service and salvation, but they are not yours, i.e. they are not of your making and autorizing: Church-power is first seated in Christ the Head and Apostle of our possession, and from him com­mitted to his Apostles, and from them to Bishops and other Mini­sters [Page 11] Conclus. 2 sters by succession: they commit the same to others which themselvs had first received, but (according to that known rule) no man can give to another, that which himself hath not first received, therefore the people which never received Orders, nor Power to administer the word, sacraments, and keies, how they can can bestow it on others, is be­sides all Scripture and reason: Church-power is in the Ministers of the Church by Derivation from the Apostles, and they alone can commit, and Transmit it unto others. The Text is express which saith, that Ordination is by the hands of the presbyterie.

Object. But how can you can justifie your calling to the Ministerie, seeing you were ordained by Bishops, and Bishops from the Pope, and the Pope is from the devil. You lost your true succession in the Papacie, and the calling which yee now have, is Antichristian.

Sol. The Papists say, wee have no true Ministerie, becaus at the Re­formation wee received it not from Rome. The Brownists say our Mi­nisters are not rightly called into their Offices, becaus wee r [...]eived it from Rome. Thus wee are condemned of all hands, one of these accusers must needs charge us falsly, but admit both their alle­gations to have som truth, yet neither of them do conclude what they intend.

1. To answer the Papist, I shall onely crave leav to insert among my plain pages, a letter of that most godly learned man, D r Reinolds to a friend of his, who craved his help to answer the challenge of som Papists touching the lawfulness of our Ministerie.

Your godly requst (good M r Barker) I should bee somwhat better able to satisfie, Dr Rainolds his Letter. if I knew on what grounds these proud popish challengers do perswade themselvs that none of you can avow your vocation to the Ministerie to bee lawful. But I guess they do it on the same, that Hart in his conference with mee, becaus the ancient Canons Ecclesiastical ascribed to the Apostles say, Episcopus duobus aut tribus Episcopis ordinetur, Presbyter autem ab uno Episcopo: and they think none of us to bee ordained by a Bishop, becaus in the beginning of her Majesties reign, one popish Bishop of Q. Maries beeing then left, none of our Bishops could bee ordained by two or three. Now if they build hereupon (as to mee it seemeth they do, becaus I finde no other reason in Decler. c. 3. Bellarmine, Epitom. Con­trov. part. 1. Con. 4. q. 2. Parsons, or Harding, Sta­pleton, Greg de Valem. the rest, of this objection against us) it may bee, that as Hart, when hee saw the answer that I made thereunto, would needs have that whole point left out in our con­ference [Page 12] Conclus. 2 saying hee would not press mee therewith; so these men will renounce their promiss of subscribing to the profession of the Gospel, and forsaking Poperie, when they see you able to justifie your calling to the Ministerie. For I went to the Archbishop of Canterburie his Register, and taking thence a note how Bishop Freak (who ordained mee) consecratus est à Matthaeo Cant. Roberto Winton. & Edmundo Sarum; and how each of these was consecrated by other three or four, as Matthaeus Cant. by four that were Bi­shops in King Edwards time, these again consecrated by Archbishop Cranmer (whom three with the Pope's consent had consecrated) and so brought every one upward to those times wherein the Church of Rome acknowledged them ordained lawfully, I had no sooner shewed this extract to M r Hart, but hee confessed hee thought no such thing could bee shewed, and that himself had been born in hand otherwise, on the conceit above mentioned. You, who are further from London, where the records are kept (though your friend if need bee, can help you thereunto) may ask them, if they think not Archbishop Cranmer, and the rest in King Henrie's time, to bee lawfully ordained Bishops, which when they acknowledg (becaus the Pope confirmed them) you may offer this proof, that our Bishops succeeding them in King Edwards time, and so in Q. Elizabeths, were consecrated by three of them, or their succes­fors, out of the authentical Records of the Archbishoprick, s [...]il. that Matthew Parker the first Archbishop in Q. Elizabeths daies, was thus by William Barlow, Bishop of Bath and Wells in K. Edward's time, John Scorie Bishop of Chichester, Miles Coverdale of Exeter, John Hodgeskir Suffragane of Bedford. If they acknowledg that hee and all the rest in like sort were consecrated by a number of Bishops sufficient, but these not confirmed by the Pope, as the first in King Henrie's time were, they must bring forth proof that without his consent no Bishop is lawfully ordained, which soundly they never can. If they say the Bishops since Cranmer's time, were and are Here­ticks, and therefore are not lawfully autorized to ordain; first here they will fail in proof too, becaus Heresie is an error repugnant to the word of God, and that wee hold any such, they cannot shew: then admitting the contrarie, and putting the case wee did, to avoid so huge debate of all points in controversie, their own Principal Doctors, In 4. sent. dist. 25. q. 1. Art. 2. Con. 2. Dominicus Soto, De sacram. in genere, l. 1. c. 26. Bellarmine, Com. Theal. Tom. 4 dist 9. q. 3. puncts 2. Greg. de Valentia, do teach out of S. Lib. 2. c. 13. contr. epistolam Parmén. tract. 9. in Evang. Joannis, Jo. 9.33. Augustine grounding on the Scripture, that He­retical [Page 13] Concl. 2 Bishops may lawfully Ordain, and that it is an heresie, such as the Dontatists was, to denie it. What other cavils or sophisms they are likely to use, I cannot imagine, but very willing to yield you any help that I can, upon farther notice, I commend you to the Grace of our good God, beseeching him to direct and strengthen by his holy Spirit, your self, and the rest of your fellow Soul­diers to fight his Battels.

JOHN RAINOLDS,

IF any doubt of this Letter, he may receiv satisfaction touching the Truth of it by som yet living in Corpus Christi Colledg, from whom I had this Copie.

Object. But though this stop the Jesuits mouth, yet it strengthen's the other part of the Objection, with whom wee have chiefly to deal.

Answ. 2 Not at all: 1 For though our Consecration and Succession were continued in the times of the Pop's reign, yet it did not fetch its Ori­ginal from the Pope: the Gospel sounded out of Sion, and the Word of the Lord from Jerusalem even as far as Britain long enough before that Anti-christ of Rome was born. Rom. 16.26. Col. 1.6. And though wee should not think the wors of the Gospel though received from Rome in her first pure state (whom Paul celebrate's for a famous Church.) Rom. 1.6, 8. Acts and Mo­noments, l. 2. p. 1. &c. Whites way to the Church § 49. Yet the light came to England first from Jerusalem, and not from Rome, as M r Fox and D r John White have learnedly demonstrated out of Gildas and sundrie other Autors, who affirm that Britain received the Gospel in the time of Tiberius the Emperor, under whom Christ was crucified; and though there bee som little variance among Autors about the time, yet that confirm's the Truth of the matter in which they all concur, that England received the Gospel very early, either by the preaching of som one of the Apostles or som of that time: mostly received is, that Joseph of Arimathea was sent by Philip from France to Britain, about the year 63. and laid the first foundation of the Christian Faith, which was confirmed and increased by others.

The same is confirmed by the Testimonie of Tertullian, Adversus Jo­daees c. 7. Et Britannorum inaccessa Roma­nis l [...]ca, Christs verò suhdita. in his Book against the Jews, where reckoning the parts of the world, whither the Gospel was dispersed by the sound of the Apostles, reciteth the parts of Britain unsubdued by the Romane's sword, yet subdued unto the [Page 14] Concl. 2 Scepter of Christ. 2. Again, the same M r Fox relateth that about the year 180, King Lucius (the first Christned King) sent to Eleutherius the Bishop of Rome, to receiv of him the Christian Faith [others say to receiv farther instructions from him.] Eleutherius sent unto him Damianus and Faganus, by whom the King was converted, with many of the people, and were baptized about the year 179 the Monumentsand Rites of Heathenish Idolatrie were subverted, Su­perstition decaied, and true Religion increased; there were then in Britain, Fox Acts & Mon. ubisupra. 28 Head Priests which they called Flamines, and three Arch­priests, which they called Arch-Flamines, having the over-sight of the manners over the rest. These 28 Flamines they turned to 28 Bishops, and the three Arch-Flamines to three Arch-bishopricks having then their Seats in three principal Cities, viz. London, York, Gloucester. In these daies, Rome was a Virgin Church not Anti-Christian. And if wee grant that England received the Faith from Eleutherius Bishop of Rome, yet hee was neither a Pope nor Papist. And from this Apostolical root do wee extract our Ordination and Succession, as beeing well assured that very early in the Primitive Church, Whites Way to the Church, § 49. the Gospel was planted here. And though the Papists object that the Faith was again extinguished in England, yet D r White shew's the contrarie, viz. that the Faith continued here from King Lucius to the coming of Austen the Monk, whom Gregorie sent hither 600 years after Christ, who when hee came found divers Brittain Bishops and learned men, with a monasterie at Bangor, who did oppose Arrianism and Pelagianism, and the pride of Austen the Pope's Embassador.

Secondly, I say, that the rightfulness of our Vocation is not cut off, or nulled by such a Succession; for that learned Letter as it confesseth the Succession of our first Reformers to have been from men of the Romish Religion, Mat. 3.2.3. so it teacheth truly, That Heretical Bishops may lawfully Ordain, and that it is an Heresie, such as the Donatish was to denie it. To this agree's the judgment of our Saviour, who Teacheth that the Scribes and Pharisees have a lawful Succession from Moses, (they sit in his Chair, their Calling is of God) though a race of bad men possessed that Chair, and Christ will have them acknowledged for the lawful Mi­nisters. So is our Calling and Succession, though it passed thorough corrupt times: The Scriptures themselvs, Baptism, & the Articles of our Creed, have all passed through the Papacie unto us, and yet they ceas not to bee true Scriptures, nor true Baptism; much less doe's Ordination ceas to be rightful, it beeing an act of jurisdiction, which may bee legally and law fully performed by men of corrupt Faith.

Concl. 2 Wee must carefully distinguish the Acts of Office [which have their form and beeing from a root or fountain without us] from the qualities of the man, that perform's the Office. The man may bee naught, yet his Office good; and Acts don by virtue of his Office just and al­lowable, although the man and his Religion bee naught. As for in­stance, a Popish Landlord make's you a Leas of a Farm, your Leas is not Antichristian, but good in Law, though hee that demised it, bee for his Religion, a Papist. A Popish Judg doth pass a sentence in Court, which stand's good in Judicature: His sentence is not Popish, though hee that pronounced it bee a Papist; the reason is, becaus the legal sentence is not of him, nor from him, as a Papist, but a Judg, who doth but deliver that which hee hath received from an higher root the Law; So in this case, Ordination is an Act of Office derived from Christ, and it is not Popish though executed by a Papist. Wee do not rebaptize them that were baptized by a Popish Priest, becaus the power of Ged's Ordinance depend's not on the person that doe's execute the same, but upon an higher foundation, the Institution of Christ. Ministerial Acts are not vitiated or made nud, though they pass through the hands of bad men; But stand good to all intents and purposes to such as receiv them aright, by virtue of their Office autori­tatively derived from the first Institution.

To right Ordination (besides the parties inward Call) are required, To right Or­dination what is requited. Two things: 1. On behalf of the partie to bee Ordained, hee must have sundrie qualifications, as integritie of life by which hee get's a good report even of those that are without: 2. Soundness in the Faith, hee must not bee an Heretick or misbeliever, but able by sound Do­ctrine to instruct and convince the gain-faier: 3. Hee must bee apt to teach, readie to communicate his knowledg to others.

Secondly, on behalf of them that do ordain, it is likewise required; 1. That they take a trial of their Gifts and Life, as Paul saith, Let them first bee proved and then let them minister if they bee sound worthie. 2. Then follow's Ordination it self, which is don, when then they are Consecrated and set apart, and Autorized with imposition of hands and praier to preach the Word in the Name of Christ, 1 Tim. 4.14. 3. Then follow's their Election or designation to their particular places and charges, which is don, partly by the voice of the people, and partly by the wisdom of the Guides of the Church.

Thus are wee Qualified, Called, Admitted and Autorized to execute the sacred Function, according to Scirpture-Rules, and God hath [Page 16] Concl. 2 sealed to us the fruit of our Calling, by the conversion of many thousand souls, in Christ Jesus wee by the blessing and assistance of the holy Ghost have begotten you, so that if wee bee not true Ministers of Christ to others, yet surely wee are to the people of this Nation, and to som, (wee hope) of our present, though uuthankful and Causless enemies.

Object. Object. But private men unordained may convert souls, as the woman of Samaria informed her neighbors, Rahab was converted by the Spies, Aquila and priscilla helped Apollos, &c.

Sol. I shall Answer this point more largely under my last conclusion, for this present thus: I doubt not but much good is don by the faithful reproofs, counsels and instructions of private Christians; women may save their husbands, 1 Cor. 7.16. 1 Pet. 3.1. Tit. 2.3. at least win them to a liking of Christi­anitie; the Elder women must bee Teacher's of good things, and so the Members of the Church do edifie one another: But what? is this Christ's Ordinarie way? must this overthrow Christ's Order and Ordinance? No, by no means. If any of you bee inwardly toucht with the zeal of God's glorie, with a sens of the peoples ignorance and miserie, let such beeing tried, and found Orthodox and competently gifted, bee Ordained. Let them give themselvs to this work, and wee will give them the right hand of fellowship, without asking, of what Ʋniversitie they were. But beware how yee bring disorder and confusion into the Church, and so overthrow the Ordinance of Christ, upon serious consideration of our third Conclusion which now followeth:

Concl. 3 Having proved in the fomer Conclusions, that the Work of the Ministerie is an Office appointed of God, and that Ordination for ex­ecuting that Office is an Ordinance of Christ in the New Testament our third Conclusion will naturally follow, viz. That no man uncalled and unordained can, with good conscience intrude upon that work and Office.

This position or Conclusion is proved by two places especially remarkable for this purpose, the first is that of Zach. 83.3, 4, 5. And it shall com to pass—that the Prophets shall bee ashamed every one of his Vision when hee hath prophesied, neither shall they wear a rough garment to deceiv, but hee shall say, I am no Prophet, I am an husbandman, for man taught mee to keep Cattel from my youth. 1. This place is a plain Prophecie of the times of the Gospel, wherein many blessings are promised when the Messiah is com, vers 1.2. [Page 17] Concl. 3 2. The words, vers 4.5. are words of Recantation and repentance of som that pretended the Spirit, and took upon them the Office of Prophesying, when as they were not Prophets, but husbandmen, or bred up to som other Trades. 3. The means by which this kind of Teachers were brought to shame and repentance, is the zeal of the Christian Magistrate upon complaint made to him of their do­ings by their dearest friends, vers 3. And it shall com to pass, that when any shall yet Prophecie, i.e. notwithstanding all spiritual means used to cleans the Land of seducing spirits and Teachers of fals Doctrines, vers. 2.) if for all this, they shall prophecie, then his Father and his Mother which begat him, shall say unto him, Thou shalt not live, &c. the meaning is this, that as in the Law of Moses, Deut. 13.5, 8. Hee that pretended himself a Prophet and was none, was to bee punished by the Magistrate: such a like zeal should bee used against fals Prophets in the New Testament, their best friends endued with knowledg and discerning, shall oppose them, preferring their zeal and pietie towards God, before the natural affection they bear towards their own children. And there is reason (as M r Borough's thinks) why their best friends should withstand them in this way: ‘1. Becaus it is a thing abhorring to Nature, Heart-divisi­ons, p. 19.23.24. that men should suffer God whom they honor, to bee blasphemed. 2. To see their wives and children, and dearest friends to bee seduced into waies which wee think will undo their souls to eternitie, and not bee able to help them nor our selvs, unless wee can perswade the Seducer to desist, and ask them why they do so, and entreat them to for­bear:’ Therefore these must com under the Magistrates restraining power. 4. Then follow's the fruit of the Magistrates dealing with them, viz. Their shame and repentance, they shall disclaim their usurped profession, and confess that they were never brought up, nor fitted for it, and so return to their former cours and Trade of living. This Scripture is fulfilled in one part, by the rising of fals Teachers in our daies, and if it bee not fulfilled in the other part, viz. in their repen­tance, one principal caus thereof, is, becaus our Magistrates are so far from putting them to shame, that they rather uphold them, having enfranchized every Sect to hold Assemblies to preach who will; yea, to the disadvantage of Christ's Gospel, have suffered his Ministers to bee vilified & reproched even in Almanacks, and to bee made the scorn and derision of the raging waves of the Sea, and mocking spirits, of which S. Jude complains, v. 13.18. I pray God this bee not laid to their charge.

Conclus. 3 Our second place is, Num. 16.1, 2, 3, 5. Dathan and Abiram were Gentlemen of the Tribe of Reuben the eldest son of Jacob, Num. 26. 5, 9. This is that Dathan and Abiram which were famous in the Congregation, they thought they had as much right to the Government as Moses, who came of a yonger Tribe, and therefore [like Levellers] they say to Moses and Aaron, wherefore lift you up your selvs above the Congregation of the Lord, ver. 3. And when they were summoned to appear before Moses, they refused, saying, wee will not com, vers 12.13. Is it a small thing that thou hast brought us out of a Land flowing with milk and honie, except thou make they self altogether a Prince over us? their quarrel was especially against Moses, against the Civil Power. Korah for his part was a Levite, and hee would have none above him in the Church, hee would needs do the office of a Priest as well as Aaron; seek yee the Priesthood also, (saies Moses to him, v. 10.) His quarrel was Ecclesiastical against Aaron, vers 11. What is Aaron that yee murmur against him? Thus yee see how Korah did endevor to make common the Offices of the Priesthood, and why? becaus (said hee) all the Congregation of the Lord is holy, vers 3. All have the gifts of the Spirit; as if God's Ordinarie gifts of Sanctification, did take away distinction of Callings and Offices: But what saies Moses to all this geer? vers. 5. To morrow the Lord will shew who are his and who is holy, and will caus him to com near unto him, i.e. God will, by miracle shew whom hee accepteth for his servant in the Government, you or mee: And who is holy, i.e. whom hee hath consecrated to com near unto him by special Calling to do the Office of a Priest, Aaron or you. All the Congregation is holy, by the Gift of common vocation unto Grace, but not by special Gift of consecration to the Office of a Priest. As Paul, 1 Cor. 11.7. saith, that the Husband is the image of God in respect of domestick Autoritie; the wife is the image of God in respect of the gifts of grace, as well as her Husband; but the Husband, and so every good Magistrate hath on him a twofold image of God: 1. One by gifts of Grace common with other Saints. 2. The other by special Calling and Autoritie to his Office in Church or State.

Well, you see Korah's sin what it is; but how doe's the Lord take this at his hands? see v. 35. Those 250 men which offered incens and invaded the holy Office, were burnt to death with fire from Heaven. And for a Monument to all Posteritie, that None who is not Called and Consecrated, should presume to take upon him the Office of ministring holy things, to make himself near to God in these peculiar [Page 19] Conclus. 3 Services, God commanded the Censers, wherewith they had offered the Incens, to bee kept for a memorial unto the children of Israël, that no stranger, which is not of the seed of Aaron, com near to offer Incens before the Lord, that hee bee not as Korah and his Companie, vers. 40. Also God commanded Aarons rod that budded, to bee kept for a token against the Rebels, and thou shalt quite take away their murmur­ings, Num. 17.10. And they shall know that whosoëver com­eth near to the Tabernacle of the Lord, without a Calling to do the Office of a Priest, is in danger to die, as Korah did vers 13.

But what is this to us? In the Old Testament God had precisely limited the Priests Office to one Tribe, how doe's this reason hold in the New Testament?

Answ. The application hereof is made by S. Jude, vers 11. To the times of the New Testament. Wo unto them, for they have ran greedily after the error of Balaam for reward, and are perished in the gain-saying of Korah: Hence I thus argue, If the sin of Korah is, and may bee committed in the New Testament, then it follows undeniably, that in the New Testament it is a sin to level Church-Offices, or intrude into the actions of sacred Ministerie, whereto one is not Called, least hee perish in Korah's sin.

The Apostle S. Jude fore-telling what Sectaries then were, and should bee in Christ's Church, and setting them out by certain characters by which they might bee known among others, hath this, vers 11. That they are guiltie of Korah's gain-saying.

In which words I note three things: First, that the sin of Korah is and may bee committed in the New Testament.

Secondly, That none can commit the sin of Korah under the New Testament, if there were not a Distinction and reservation of ministerial Offices and Autorities to men set apart for that work, as in Korah's time.)

Thirdly, That those of whom Jude speaks, are therefore guiltie of Korah's sin, becaus they invaded the Office of the Gospel-Ministerie [for now wee have no proper Priests nor sacrifices] as Korah did the Office of the Priesthood under the Law: That old Priesthood is changed, Christ hath erected another Ministerie in their stead, which must bee pre­served inviolable from all invaders, as that of Aarons was, for els the sin of Korah could not bee committed in the times of the New Testament. But seeing the sin of Korah is committed under the New Testament. our conclusion stand's good, that it is a sin for men uncalled to exercise [Page 20] Concl. 3 the Office of the Gospel Ministrie or of a Prophet being bred up to feed Cattel, &c.

Add hereunto, for close of all, that of the Apostle, Heb. 5.4, 5. No man taketh this honor to himself, but hee that is Called of God, as Aaron was. 1 Kin. 12.35. with c. 13.33. It was a sin in Jeroboam to make Priests of the lowest of the people, which were not of the Tribe of Levi: When Jeroboam revolted from the Hous of David, hee changed the worship and the Mi­nisterie, 1 Chron. 11.13.(the honest Ministerie were not for his turn) least the peo­ple should return to their dutie, but God cursed this devillish policie, for this thing became sin to the Hous of Jeroboam to cut it off, and de­stroy it from the face of the earth: As then, so now it is a sin for any man to take that honor to himself: The Apostles words are general and Argumentative to this sens, becaus no man ought to intrude into this holy Office without a Calling, therefore neither might Christ; if a man take an Office, not appointed of God thereunto, it is no honor to him.

Res. No man can make himself a Steward or Embassador, no man can do any thing in God's Hous, as his Steward or Embassador to preach his Covenant and set thereto God's seal, but they that have Commission from God. Now a Commission is the imparting of a power to us, which before wee had not. By virtue of God's Commission wee are Stewards of God and Embassadors for Christ [...]. 2 Cor. 5.20. Christ hath committed to us the word of reconciliation, and wee in his Name and with his Autoritie do tender and seal God's Covenant: With­out God's Commission, all sacred actions are meer nullities and mockeries, like a Judgment without a Jurisdiction; of no more Autoritie, then if a private person should give sentence upon the Bench, or Mid-wife Baptize your Children: The Pharises questioned John for baptizing, Job 1.25. And Christ for Preaching, Mat. 21.23. The Priests and Elders of the people came to him as hee was Teaching, and said, by what Autoritie dost thou these things, and who gave thee this Autoritie? Christ doe's yield the challenge to bee just, if hee could not have shewed his Autoritie, and therefore in his Answer, Christ doth avouch both Johns and his own Ministerie to bee from Heaven, vers 2.25. The Apostle is clear, that God is the Autor, who sel's the ordinarie Pastors and Teachers in the Church, 1 Cor. 12.28. as well as the Apostles and Prophets, and without his setting, wee can no more do the Office of Pastors and Teachers then of Apostles. Wee must attend God's Calling to God's imploiment.

Concl. 3 For the premises, I conclude in the words of M r Hooker. Hooker Pol. 5. § 77. ‘The Ministerie of Divine things is a function which as God did himself Institute, so neither may man undertake the same but by Autoritie and Power given them in lawful manner—They are therefore Ministers of God, not onely by way of Subordination, as Princes and Civil Magistrates are, whose execution of Judgment and Justice, the supreme hand of divine providence doth uphold, but Ministers of God, as from whom their Autoritie is derived and not from men: For in that they are Christ's Embassadors and his laborers, who can give them their Commission, but hee whose most inward affairs they manage? Is not God alone the Father of spirits? Are not souls the purchase of Jesus Christ? What Angel in Heaven could have said to Peter, Feed my sheep? preach, baptize, do this in remem­brance of mee, whose sins yee retain they are retained, and whose yee remit, they are remitted? What think yee, are these terrestrial souls? the power of the Ministerie of God translateth out of dark­ness into glorie, it doth dispose of that flesh which was given for the life of the World, and it poureth malediction upon the heads of the wicked.—The things wee do, shew that wee are and can bee Commissioned by none but Jesus Christ. All the Princes of the world cannot give us this Autoritie and Commission, wee cannot bee Deputies in these Divine things, becaus themselvs have not the chief power to dispence the things in person, nor to bestow the blessings and curses at their will and command, whereof wee are made the Instruments.’ What impudence then is it for Mechanicks who have received Commission neither from God nor man, to intrude into this Office?

Object. Som have said, What evil is it for gifted men to preach though un­called, mee thinks they do well, better then your drie dunces of the Clergie, they hold forth Jesus Christ, &c.

Answ. Wee envie no mans gifts, wee diminish them not, onely wee plead for Christ's Ordinance: Let them submit to Christ's Ordinance to bee tried and Ordained and then Preach and spare not; els there's evil enough in such under-takings, judg with equitie. 1. What evil is it for a private man to execute the office of a Constable? to pull a Judg from the Bench? mee thinks hee doe's better reform manners and pu­nish vice, then your old rotten Magistrates: must wee stay for a Com­mission when things bee amiss? Absalom will minister justice better then his Father David; aie, by all means; things are like to go well, [Page 22] Conclus. 3 if every man that reckon's himself gifted, may bee judg what is best, and himself the fittest to do it. But God is a God of Order, Unitie, Peace, and not of Confusion. 2. And this I dare affirm, that the Devil hath not a more subtil prevalent engine to pull down the King­dom of Christ, and set up his own [which is establisht by Heresie, Sedition, Fals-worship, Envie, Hatred, Schism, Dissention, &c.] then by destroying the Ministerie whereby God hath erected and built his Church: But as long as Christ will have a Church among us, hee will hold those stars in his right hand; Rev. 1.16, 20. And whensoëver you see them pluckt out of the Firmament of the Church, Luk. 19.41, 42 2 Chro. 36.16. then look for nothing but a sad night of darkness and miserie upon this Nation: They are the greatest malignants and avowed enemies of our Nation, that are haters of it's Ministerie. But let them beware what they do, for if hee that loveth and receiveth a Prophet in the name of a Prophet, M [...]t. 10 41. shall receiv a Prophet's reward, then hee that despiseth, derideth, hateth, vilifieth a Prophet in the name of a Prophet, or becaus hee is a Mini­ster of the Gospel, hee carrie's in his breast the mark of a Reprobate, and let him bee sure that hee shall receiv the reward of a Prophet-hater.

The truth is, God hath made these Preachers a check, a shame, and a just rebuke to a rotten, See Mal. 2.3, 7, 8, 9. formal, dead Clergie, that understood not, nor ever endeavored the conversion of souls; God would by a foolish people provoke men of abilities to a more spiritual and conscionable discharge of their duties, 'twere good this use were made of it; But what good els this promiscuous preaching hath don, how it hath advanced truth or godliness, is their part to shew. What mischief it hath don, what Errors it hath spread, how many unstable souls it hath be­guiled, what fearful Schisms and Factions it hath brought into our Land, what discord among brethren, &c. There bee too many In­stances in most Counties of England. By such like men, you see what preaching you are like to have, if ever your establisht Ministerie bee extinguished. People by degrees will grow to a loathing and con­tempt of the Gospel preached, through their prophaning it with their fulsom fooleries.

I shall close up this point with a remarkable passage of M r Owens in his Treatise of Toleration, joined with that Sermon of his, which hee preached before the Hous, Jan. 31. 1648.—His words are these: ‘There are a sort of persons termed in Scripture [...] unruly, disorderly, M r Owen of Toleration, p. 82. 1 Thes. 5.14. [...] of the baser sort, Act. 17.5. [...] [Page 23] Conclus. 3 absurd, unreasonable men, 2 Thes. 3.2. [...] lawless and diso­bedient, 1 Tim. 1.9. and the like disorderly, vagabond, wandring, irregular persons, fixed to no calling, abiding in no place, taking no care of their Families, that under a pretence of Teaching the truth without mission, without Call, without warrant, uncommanded, undesired, do go up and down from place to place, creeping into Houses, &c. Now that such waies as these, and persons in these waies may bee judicially enquired into, I no way doubt: I did yet never observ any other issue upon such undertakings, but scandal to Religion, and trouble to men in their civil Relations; Therefore ac­cording to the Aposiles order, 1 Cor. 7.24. Let every man in the same Calling wherein hee was Called (to Christianitie) therein abide with God, studying to bee quiet, and to do his own business, 1 Thes. 4.11. and not other mens, as the Lord hath commanded.

Object. 1 The chief Argument for preaching without Ordination, is taken from Act. 8 ver. 4. with Act. 11.19, 20. they that were scattered abroad upon the persecution that arose about Stephen, went every where preaching the Word, yet these that were scattered, were not Ordained men, therefore men unordained may Preach.

Answ. 1 1. It must bee in such cases as in the Text, This example will not hold in cases altogether unlike: Suppose that when Ministers are persecuted, Congregations scattered, when Christians are fain to flie into strange Countries among Infidels, when such cannot bee had, as by God's ordinary Call have power to preach, I say, admit that in such a Case, any man may preach the Word, declare among the people the name of Jesus Christ, his Death and Resurrection; yet by what analogie of reason can this bee alleged against the established cours provided in Scripture for sending men to preach? In Case of extreme danger, when I am assaulted for my life, I may rather kill then bee killed, I may bee my own Magistrate; But this warrant's not an ordinarie usurping of the Magistrates sword; so in our present Question:

Rule. When wee have a Rule and an extraordinarie Example that crosseth that Rule (as in the case of Phinees and Abraham's killing his son) then wee must leav the Example and follow the Rule; wee must not fol­low dispensations and forsake the standing precept.

Answ. 2 2. But how will it appear that these [They] in the Text, that preached abread, were men unsent and unordained? seeing there bee pre­cepts in Scripture for Ordination, Col. 4.10, 11. Philem. v. 24. if wee finde any doing the work of Elders, wee are to presume that they are Ordained, though their Ordi­nation [Page 24] Concl. 3 bee not recorded, as Marcus Aristarchus, Demas, Lucas, Tychi­chus, &c. And that those preachers above mentioned, were so sent, I shall offer unto you, for proof, these Textual considerations.

1. All that are named, Act. 9.10. Act. 21.8. as Philip the Evangelist, and Ananias, and Lucius of Cyrene, were men in Office.

2. Nothing appear's to the contrarie, but all make's for it, That the seventie were at Jerusalem till that scattering, they kept companie with Christ while hee lived, and with the Apostles at Jerusalem after hee was Ascended, Act. 1.21. (For out of the seventie, Matthias was chosen to bee an Apostle,) and becaus they nestled themselvs in their warm quar­ters at Jerusalem, God send's a persecution to dispers them about their business, that so the preaching might bee more fully known ac­cording as Christ fore-told, Act. 1.8. so it came to pass the seventie were appointed to preach in the places where those that were scattered, did preach, Act. 8.1. Therefore it is altogether likely that these were the men.

3. Besides, it is said, Act. 6.7. that a great Companie of the Priests were Converted to the Faith, and these were Paul's Fellow-helpers unto the Kingdom of God, Aristarchus and Marcus, and Jesus which is called Justus, who are of the Circumcision, these were Preachers of the Gospel with Paul, Col. 4.10, 11. And they beeing Priests, were Autorized by their former Calling to preach. Therefore when the Text saies, Act. 8.1. They were all scattered abroad except the Apostles, this cannot bee meant of all the Church (for there remained many housholds of them, vers 3.) but of them, who did preach Christ at Jerusalem as Stephen had don, these were especially aimed at in the persecution, and they seeing how it fared with Stephen, be­took themselvs to preach abroad, the Apostles that remained behinde were persecuted, James was killed with the sword, and Peter im­prisoned, Act. 12.2.

4. Circumstance evidencing this Truth, is that of Act. 11.20. where it is said, that som of them were men of Cyrene and Cyprus, who when they were com to Antioch, spake unto the Grecians, preaching the Lord Jesus. By these, wee may judg what the rest of them that preach­ed were, when 'tis said, som of them were men of Cyrene, the rest were of the same rank, though not of the same Cities. But these men of Cyrene and Cyprus, were they lawfully Called and sent forth to preach?

Quest. Had they any special Calling? I conceiv they had for these reasons:

Conclus. 3 Reason 1 First, Becaus they were the first that converted the people of An­tioch unto the Faith, Act. 11.21, 22, 24. And God gave testimonie to their word by signs and wonders, vers. 21. the hand of the Lord was with them, viz. to heal the sick, &c. as was usual in the first planting of Churches. If they had not an ordinarie Calling, yet surely they had an extraordinarie one, becaus their Doctrine was confirmed with signs following, Heb. 2.4.

Reason 2 Secondly, These wonder-working Preachers continued at Antioch, Act. 11.22. till Barnabas was sent thither unto them from Jerusalem to confirm the people in the Faith, these men continuing at Antioch, are expresly called Prophets and Teachers, Act. 13 1. Now there were in the Church that was at Antioch certain Prophets and Teachers, as Barnabas, and Simon called Niger, and Lucius of Cyrene; and these ministred unto the Lord, vers. 2.

Reason 3 Thirdly, They that are called Prophets and Teachers, Act. 13.1. are the verie same that fled and came first to Antioch and converted that people, Act. 11.19. For 'tis said, vers 20. that they were men of Cyprus and Cyrene that came first to Antioch and preached, and one of them, Act. 13.1. is Lucius of Cyrene: Lucius therefore of Cyrene, (called a Prophet, Act. 13.1.) was one of them that fled from Jerusalem upon that Perse­cution, Act. 11.20. Hence I gather that seeing they that preached at Antioch and converted them, were Prophets and Teachers: And they that converted the Antiochians were the same that fled from Jerusalem upon that persecution, therefore they that fled and preached were not men meerly Gifted, but duly Called.

These Textual circumstances give sufficient ground to affirm that those which preached upon that scattering, had som spiritual Cal­ling thereunto; far better grounds then can bee alleged to the contrarie. Put altogether thus: They all, i. e. they which had kept companie with the Apostles and were of the seventie, or of the con­verted Priests, They are they that preached abroad: 1. Becaus they onely are named: 2. Becaus the seventie were appointed to preach in those places where they that were scattered, did preach: 3. Becaus they were men approved by signs and wonders: 4. Becaus som of them are expresly Called Prophets and Teachers, beeing the very same men that came to Antioch, and fled from Jerusalem. Let the same bee said of you, and then preach in God's name, els such a pattern will not justifie you, nor bee a fit parallel for for your actions.

Conclus. 3 Object. 2 Answ. Apollos was no ordained Minister, See Church-members set in joint, by Filo. dexter Transylvanus against chil­lenden. p. 17. yet hee preached, Act. 18.24.

Hee was an Autorized publick Preacher in the Church of Corinth, for who is Paul or Apollos, but Ministers by whom yee believ, 1 Cor. 3.5. Paul speak's of him, as his fellow-laborer. and steward of the mysteries of God, 1 Cor. 4 1, 6. Yea, it seem's that Apollos did Baptize as well as preach, for the Corinthians were divided into Sects according to the Names and Number of them that taught, and baptized them, (1 Cor. 1.12.) as Paul's misliking of them doe's import, vers 13. were yee baptized into the Name of Paul? And seeing som did call themselvs by the name of Apollo, it follow's that hee did also Baptize from which time they would call themselvs by the name of Apollo as others did of Paul.

'Its true indeed, Apollos preached at Ephesus before hee came to Corinth, Act. 18.24, 27. But seeing wee read that hee was a Minister, and yet read of no new Ordination received after his coming to Co­rinth, wee must conclude, that hee was an autorized Preacher when hee preached at Ephesus.

Object. But hee knew onely the baptism of John, i. e. the Doctrine of John, hee had been baptized onely with water in the name of Christ.

Sol. What of that? Yet hee might bee as true a Minister of the New Testament as John Baptist himself: for John taught the people that they must repent and believ on Jesus Christ, and so hee baptized them, Act. 19.4. The same Doctrine did Apollos preach, Act. 18.25, 28. Hee taught diligently the things of the Lord, and mightily con­vinced the Jews that Jesus was Christ.

The Baptism of John and of Christ distinguished, Act. 19.4, 5. are not two Baptisms of water, but onely one with water which is called John's Baptism, Act. 19.3. and the Lord's Baptism, Act. 8.16. But Christ's Baptism in distinction from John's, Act. 10.44, 46. was the pouring forth of the holy Ghost upon the Apostles, and others in those daies, as S. Peter doe's expound it, Act. 11.15, 16. saying, That as I began to speak, the holy Ghost fell on them, as on us at the beginning, then remembred I the words of the Lord, how hee said, John indeed baptized with water, but yee shall bee baptized with the holy Ghost—compare, Act. 8.15, 16. when Peter and John were com to Samaria, they praied for them, that they might receiv the holy Ghost, for as yet hee was fallen upon none of them, onely they were baptized in the Name of the Lord Jesus. [Page 27] Conclus. 3 This Baptism of the holy Ghost shed on them, was usually don by the laying on not of water, but of hands, Act. 8.17. Act. 19.6.

Object. 3 Paul saie's 1 Cor. 14.31. yee may all prophecie one by one, that all may learn, for the ministration of the Spirit is given to every one to profit withal, Chap. 12.7. therefore all that bee able, may preach.

Answ. Paul's purpose there, is to give directions concerning the use of spiritual gifts, specially that of Tongues and Prophecie; And be­caus some used their gifts for ostentation, not for edification; there­fore hee telleth them, that in what kind soëver any gift manifesting the Spirit, is bestowed on any man, it is to this one end, for the prosit of all, Chap. 12.7.

Secondly, Note that these gifts were diversly distributed, not given all to one, nor any one gift to all; 1 Cor. 12, 10. but to one was given to speak with Tongues, to another Miracles, to another Prophecie. And every one might exercise his own gift, but not anothers: Hee that had the gift of Miracles, might do his Miracle, but not go about to speak with Tongues, and hee that spake with Tongues might not attempt to heal nor to Prophecie; God gave not all these gifts to one, but one to one, another to another, vers 11. dividing in parts to every man as hee will. Prophecie was a chief gift, extraordinarily in­spired, as was the gift of Tongues or healing, and the Prophets were they, 1 Cor. 14.3. which by a special and extraordinarie gift interpreted Pro­phetical Scriptures to edification and consolation; Now Paul beeing to regulate this gift, saith, yee may all prophecie one by one, i. e. all that bee Prophets, all that have a matter revealed to them, (vers 30. if any thing bee revealed to another that sitteth by, &c.) All, 1 Cor. 12, 29. such may take their turns in Prophecying, not any one els; for at Corinth, all were not Prophets.

This then 'is the plain meaning of that place, as hee that had not the gift of Tongues or of healing might not attempt to heal or to speak with Tongues, so hee that had not the gift of prophecie, might not undertake to exercise it.

Thirdly, Becaus our men take these Prophets to bee ordinarie gifted Christians, and so their practices imitable: 1 Cor. 14. I shall by three reasons prove the contrary, viz. That prophecying in that place, was an extraordinarie, and not a standing ordinarie gift in the Church.

Reason 1 1. Becaus S. Paul saie's of them, that they had som special matters revealed to them of a sudden, whilst another was prophecying, they [Page 28] Concl. 3 onely sitting by, and not using the help or operation of any facultie of their own, as their wit, memorie, reading: they spake by divine in­spiration, like the old Prophets.

Reason 2 2. And accordingly wee finde them in a rank and order of men set with the Apostles above the most eminent Gifted Christians, 1 Cor. 12.28. first Apostles secondarily Prophets—And as the Apostles, so they had their knowledg of the mysterie of christ by revelation, as Paul wit­nesseth, Ephes 3.5. as it is now revealed to his holy Apostles and Prophets by the Spirit. Prophecie therefore was no standing gift, and Prophets were not ordinarie gifted believers, but a rank of men in Office above Pastors.

Reason 3 3. All these gifts (1 Cor. 14) were of the same nature for the manner of their Donation, and for their continuance, i. e. to last for a time onely, wherefore seeing the gift of Tongues and Miracles is ceased, the gift of Prophecie is also ceased, for this was given in the same manner, and placed among the extraordinarie gifts, 1 Cor. 12.10. whereupon I conclude, that the Prophecying in the Corinthians, is no pattern for the practice of our gifted Speakers, who, I presume, have not the face to take the place of Prophets next to the Apostles above Evan­gelists and Pastors,—Nor to affirm that they have their knowledg by revelation [for then what need they plead their parts or gifts, seeing Inspiration or Revelation is not a facultie of the minde.] and seeing the gift or prophecie is ceased, it is now a gross taking of the name to counterfeit it, as also it is to imitate the miraculous works of Christ and his Apostles.

Object. If they had been inspired, they could not bee subject to the judging of others, seeing they could not then err: But the Text saies, that the spirit of those Prophets is subject unto the Prophets; therefore they were but ordinarie men, 1 Cor. 14.29.32.

Answ. This Argument follow's not becaus the Apostles were inspired and could not err, yet they submitted their Doctrine to trial, Act. 17.11. And becaus Satan ean transform himself into an Angel of Light, and his ministers as the Ministers of Christ; 2 Pet. 2.1. 1 Joh. 4.1. and becaus as there were fals Prophets of old, so there shall bee fals teachers among you, for this caus wee are commanded to trie their spirits, ie. the Doctrines pro­pounded under the name of the spirits instiration: And to prevent dilusions in this kind, God gave a gift of discerning of spirits, whereby to know a true Prophet from a fals, which spake for his own spirit: yea, the Prophets themselvs had a spirit of judging, vers 29. And [Page 29] Conclus. 3 therefore it was ordained that the Doctrine of every Prophet should bee subject to the Examination of other Prophets, who ought to judg by the Rule of God's Word, whether that which was spoken, were by the motion of God's Spirit, or by a spirit meerly humane; and this was no disparagement to those Prophets, to have their Doctrine and Interpretations judged by others endued with the same Spirit. (Nam etsi bomo spiritualis à nemine judicatur, tamen qui à nemine judicatur, judicatur à spiritu Dei.) These Prophets were greater then the Ordinarie Pastors and Doctors, yet inferior to the Apostles and Prophets which were the Pen-men of holy Scripture, Lect. Apoer. To. 1. l. 34 p. 300, 301, 305. as that learned Dr Rainolds hath observed) they had indeed gifts and inspirations more then ordinarie for opening of Scriptures, but not the Spirit so incessantly assisting them, as they had that wrote the Scrptures. Nathan though a Prophet, yet hee had not the spirit incessantly speaking in him, hee spake out of his own humane judgment and reason, 2 Sam. 7.31. when hee had David to build the Temple, so did Samuel judg concerning Eliab the eldest son of Jesse, 1 Sam. 16.6, 7.

Meminisse oportet (saith Dr Rainolds)) dona spiritûs secundùm mensuram hominibus distributa esse, & cùm insint in ill is primitiae quidem Spiritûs Sancti, unà etiam inesse reliquias spiritûs humani. Nemo autem novit, quae sunt hominis, nisi spiritus hominis; Nec quispiam novit, quae sunt Dei, nisi Spiritus Dei; Ita (que) quae tradunt viri Dei, Prophetae hi, de quibus loquimur, profecta esse possunt ab humano spiritu, qui adhue etiam in illis est, idcirco do­ctrinam suam submittere debem fratrum suorum examini & judicio, ne (que) enim omnia semper Deus servis suis revelat, sed id quis (que) potest aliquando dicere, quòd Elizeus, cùm adipsum Shunamitis accederet, hoc Jehova celavit me, ne (que) indicavit mihi, ibi. p 305.

If their Doctrine may bee judged, 2 King. 4 27. it may bee refused as beeing possibly subject to error, not when they speak by Inspiration, but becaus 'tis possible, they might speak by a humane spirit, or by a fals spirit, and that could not bee known, but by examination; therefore the Apostle will have those Prophets Teaching submitted to the judgment of others, that have the spirit of Prophecie, that so by the harmonie and consent of their Doctrines, the unitie of the spirit, by which they all speak, 1 Cor. 14.37. may bee evidenced and approved. Now this could not befal the Pen-men of holy Scripture, who spake as they were moved by the holy Ghost, and not of their own spirits at any time when they preach't or writ any part of Scripture. Whatsoëver the Apostles preached or wrote, it is of Divine Autoritie, becaus they wrote it.

Conclus. 3 Object. 4 Som be so inconsiderate as to plead for their pattern and warrant Christ's making Preachers of Fishermen; why therefore may not Tradsmen preach?

Answ. Nothing can make more directly against you: 1. Christ called them from their Trades to an higher imploiment to bee Fishers of men, and they left their Trades to do this Work; But you say, keep on your Trades and preach too. 2. Christ, who is the Autor of the Ministerie of New Testament, Called them, trained them up in his School as Dis­ciples, then hee Ordained Twelv that they. should bee with him, that hee might send them to preach, Mark 3.14. But you preach without any such Calling, Training up, Ordaining or sending. 3. Christ sent them out two and two to preach, and gave them power to heal the sick, cleans the Leapers, rais the dead, cast out Divels. Christ en­abled them for the work which hee sent them about; But you have no such mission, nor new abilities: Here is the difference between Christ and men, hee doe's not finde men fit, but make's them fit, and so send's them; But wee must finde them fit, or els not send them: Neither must any run before they bee sent. Jer. 23.21. I have not sent these Prophets, yet they ran, &c. These are the chief Arguments for preaching without Ordination, for farther satisfaction wherein, and of all M r Chillenden's Objections, I refer the Reader to that acute, so­lid short Treatise, entituled, Church-members set in joint, written by Filodexter Transylvanus; and I the rather recommend that Treatise, be­caus my people have grounded their Opinion and Practice upon Mr Chillenden's Book.

The second Question.

WHether Baptism belong's and bee rightly administred to Infants of Christian Parents in the New Testament? Affir?

Baptism is the first visible Act of God's Grace whereby hee doth receiv us into his favor and familie: And the first visible means where­by hee doth apply to us by Word, Sign and Seal the blood of Jesus Christ for remission of sins. Now the Question is to whom this Seal of mercie doth belong.

Anabaptists have sundrie pretences to scorn and deride Infant bap­tism: in their account the Baptism of Infants is no Baptism, becaus according to Christ's Institution (as they conceiv) true Baptism doth alwaies presuppose actual belief in the receivers, and is otherwise no Baptism; therefore they rebaptize.

Others allow of Infant-baptism, they esteem it as an Ordinance which Christ hath instituted in special love and favor to his people, onely they restrain this priviledg to the Infants of Parents who joyn themselvs in Church-Covenant to som particular Congregation. My debate is with the former, who deny all Infant-baptism, the which, if it be proved to belong to any Infants, it is enough for my purpose; and the same Arguments which prove it to belong to Infants of this or that Congregation, do prove it to belong to the whole visible Church and their Infants; it being a vain pride and great presumption to make new conditions of Church-membership, which God hath not made, and to ascribe to the inventions of men a power to supersede the Or­dinances of God, to cast both us and our Infants out of the Cove­nant; us, that were baptized into that one bodie, if wee subscribe not to their Articles, and our children, becaus wee subscribe not, thus making voide the Commandment of god, by the commandments and Ordinances of men.

I the rather force my self to speak somthing of this beaten point, be­caus there bee three yong heathens in my Parish, and three others [Page 32]dead out of the Covenant, through their Parents frowardness. Now for the convincing and satisfying, if it may bee, of theirs, and other poor peoples judgments in the present Controversie, I shall content my self with five Arguments; the first will depend upon a clear po­sitive Answer to another question, viz.

Quest. Did God make the Covenant of grace onely with actual Believers, or with them and their Infant-seed? Did God take into Covenant the Parents with their children or the Parents onely?

Answ. Not the Parents onely, but with them their Infant-seed; this is the express Tenor of the Covenant, Gen. 17.7. between God and Abraham, between mee and thee, and thy seed, to bee a God unto you: What seed meaneth hee? his Infant-seed, vers 12. Hee that is eight daies old, whether it bee a child of thy loines, or of a stranger, a proselyte, which is not of thy seed: this Covenant was first made with Abra­ham, Gen. 12.3. wherein God promised that in his seed shall all the Nations of the Earth bee blessed, Of God's Co­venint. i. e. in Christ; And it was renewed with the Sign of Circumcision added unto it, Gen. 17 7, 12.

Wherein observ three things: 1 1. That the Covenant made with Abraham was the Gospel-Covenant, wherein blessedness was promi­sed in and through Christ the promised Seed, for God preached the Gospel to Abraham, when hee said, In thy seed shall all Nations bee blessed, as S. Paul reasoneth, Gal. 3.8. the which Covenant, seeing it was 430 years before the Law, and not disanulled by the coming of the Law, it was to endure till the Seed should com to whom the promiss was made, vers 17.19. and consequently to the end of the World, becaus Christ came to establish the Covenant made to the Fathers, Rom. 15.8. and after Christ, no more changes to bee ex­pected.

2 2. Note, that the Persons with whom that Gospel-Covenant was made, were Abraham and his Infant-seed, and all Nations, even us Englishmen and our Infant-seed, as appear's, Gen. 17.4.12. My Covenant is with thee and with thy seed in their Generations, and with the stranger that is not thy seed, all of them must bee Circumcised. Com­pared with Rom. 15.8, 15. Now I say, that Jesus Christ was a Minister of the Circumcision, i. e. of the Jews, for the truth of God, to confirm the promises (of the Covenant) made unto the Fathers, and that the Gentiles might glorifie God for his mercie, beeing made par­takers with them of the same promises, according as it is written, Rejoice yee Gentiles with his People, &c. Now this Covenant of [Page 33]promises made with the Fathers, Christ should not confirm, but clip and curtail it, if so great a part as all our Infants bee left out and ex­cluded: But if God take our Infants into Covenant, who shall dare to exclude them?

3. Note, when God at first gave that Covenant to Abraham and to the Nations, hee gave withal a Commandment, Gen. 17.12 that the initial mark of the Covenant should bee set upon all whom hee had taken into Covenant both Jews and Gentiles and their Infants: The Cove­nant it self and the mark of the Covenant are alike extended to all the same persons whether yong or old: Note farther, that when Christ, renewed and established that Covenant in his own blood, though hee changed the Sign, yet hee repealed not that Commandment: Nay, Mat. 28.19. hee added a new commandment, enjoining the new Sign, Baptism, to bee given to all Nations, without exception of any persons formerly received into Covenant: so that wee are under a twofold Commandment to Bap­tize our Infants, one, of God who first made the Covenant and gave that Commandment, the which is still so of force, that if Christ the Lord of the hous had not changed it, wee were all bound at this day to bee Circumcised; and seeing hee hath changed that Sign into Baptism, but not the Covenant it self, nor the Commandment thereto annexed; it followeth, that by the old Commandment enjoining Infants to bee marked, and by Christ's new Commandment, enjoining Baptism to bee that mark; all, that are not excepted out of the Cove­nant stand bound to recei it. In like manner as the fourth Com­mandment injoining one day of seven for an holy Rest to the Lord, doth binde us to observ our Lords-day; the Commandment stand's of force, though the first day bee changed: so the Commandment for signing of the Nations whom God received into Covenant and their seed, doth still oblige us to set the New Seal upon them; especially, seeing wee are again commanded by Christ so to do without any exception of Infants. Hence I thus argue,

Argument. 1 All that are taken into the Covenant of Grace, ought to receiv the judicial Sign of the Covenant [what ever the Sign be, that God shall chuse,] and that according to the Commandment of God and our Lord Jesus Christ.

But Infants are taken into Covenant with their Parents, as is proved; therefore by the Commandment of the Lord, they ought to re­cev the Sign which God hath enjoined to bee used, and that Sign is Baptism:

Or thus,

If Infants have a right to the Covenant and the initial sign thereof then it is a wrong to deny them. But Infants have a right to the Co­venant and the initial Sign thereof both by God's Original Grant. Gen. 17.11, 14. And by Christ's confirmation of that Covenant made with the Fathers, Rom. 15.8. therefore it is a wrong to deny it to them. The Covenant under which wee are is the Gospel-Covenant, made long since with us Englishmen and our Infant-seed, with a command of giving them the Sign, which at first was Circumcision, and now Baptism by the same Divine Autoritie enjoyned, and commanded to bee given without any exception of any within the Co­venant.

Argument 2 My second Argument is grounded on Act. 2.38, 39. then Peter said, Repent and bee baptized, &c. In which passage of Scripture, I note three things.

1 1. Who the persons were, of whom Peter saith, The promise is to you and to your children, they were a mixt multitude of many Na­tions, as appears, vers 10. strangers of Rome, Jews, Proselyts, Creets, and Arabians. Note

2 2. What promise that is, of which S. Peter saies, it belongs to such peo­ple and their children, and is applied to his hearers as the ground of their beeing baptized: It is that grand promise made to Abraham to bee a God to him and his seed, [...] that Gospel-promiss of good tidings, gratuitum Dei promissum, quatenùs opponitur legi, saith Beza; in a word, it is that promiss of blessedness, Jer. 31.34. which consists in remission of sins to bee obtained by the promised Messiah.

Object. Nay, Why not rather understand it of the promise of the gifts of the holy Ghost promised Joel 2.27. and given by laying on of the Apostles hands, especially becaus it is said in the end of vers 38. Bee baptized and yee shall receiv the gift of the holy Ghost.

Answ. The promise here spoken of, cannot bee understood (I conceiv) of the miraculous gifts of the holie Ghost. 1. Becaus Peter's bearers received no such gifts, and therefore S. Peter made no such promise to them, for doubtless they received what was promised. 2. Such a promise must here bee understood as belongs to Parents and their children, and to all that shall bee called to the worlds end; But there is no such promise in all the Scripture, that the miraculous gifts of the holie Ghost shall fall upon Parents with their children, and all that are to bee converted to the worlds end. 3. A promise of such gifts seems not sutably applied [Page 35]to Peter's hearers comfort; for their Question was, what shall wee do to bee saved? And Peter gives them; 1. A direction: 2. And a Promise: A direction to repent, and to acknowledg Christ to bee head and foundation of the Covenant of Grace, and that life and remission of sins is in his blood, where of Baptism is the Seal: And then hee recites and applies to this comfort the promises of the Covenant, q. d. yee shall receiv the benefit of the Covenant, remission of sins, and also the gift of the holie Spirit, the Seal thereof; those first motions now begun in your hearts, shall bee followed with increas of Sanctification of spiritual light, of joy, comfort and assurance. This interpretation doth exactly agree with the Apostles discours, Gal. 3.14. where speaking of the blessing of Abraham to com on the Gentiles, hee saith, that wee being delivered from the Curse, and restored into God's Grace by Christ, shall receiv the promise of the Spirit through Faith, i.e. the spirit of Grace (which is the Seal of the promises of the new Covenant) the gifts of the holie Spirit which had been so often, and so solemnly promised by the Prophets, Es. 44.3. I will pour water upon him that is thirstie (as Peters hearers now were) and Floods upon the drie ground, I will pour my spirit upon thy seed, and my blessing upon thine off-spring, and one say, I am the Lords, and another shall call him­self by the name of Jacob, with Ezek. 11.19. & cap. 36.27. A new spirit will I put within you, I will take the stonie heart out of your flesh, and give you an heart of flesh: Act. 2.38. Gal. 3.2, 14. So that the gift of the Spirit in Peter's Sermon, and the promise of the spirit in the Galatians and in the Pro­phets, is all one thing for substance.

As for that place Joel 2.27. S. Peter expounds it, Act. 2.17. of the descending of the holy Ghost upon the Apostles in fierie Tongues, and it may well have relation to all those, upon whom in like manner it did descend: But if any man conceivs, that that place hath a farther accomplishment in the New Testament in the larger pouring forth of the gifts of the spirit of illumination and understanding in the mysteries of Christ, and his Kingdom more generally upon all sorts and conditions of people, and in a greater measure, so that all sorts and sexes, now, shall have as much, or more light and illumination then the Prophets had in the old Testament; the common light of the Elect now under the Gospel shall bee clearer and better, then that of pro­phecie of old, (according to that of Zach. 12.8. Hee that is feeble, shall bee as David and the hous of David, as the Angel of the Lord.) I shall not withstand him, and so that place of Joel in this large sens, [Page 36]doth contain a part of the promises of the new Covenant, whereof Baptism is a Seal. But as for those miraculous gifts of the holie Ghost, I no where finde them communicated with or annexed unto Baptism. Sometimes they were poured forth before Baptism received at the Apo­stle's preaching, as upon Peter's hearers that were with Cornelius, Act. 10.45, 47. Somtimes after Baptism, by another Ceremonie of laying on of hands, as Act. 8.16, 17. Act. 19.6.—Somtimes upon their fervent praiers, as Act. 4.31. And upon these considerations it is, that I take the promiss here spoken of and applied to Peter's hearers and their children, to bee the promise of blessedness made to Abraham and all Converts.

3 The third thing to bee observed in Peter's words, Act. 2.39. is this that this promise, (bee it what it will) did belong as well to his hearers children, as to themselvs, (it is to you and your children.)

Object. True say they, when they are in a capacitie to receiv the promiss, i.e. to as many of our children as are calld to actual faith, not of our Infants.

Answ. This is a miserable shift for those words, [as many as the Lord our God shall call] are quite a new thing, clearly relating to another sort of people, then his present hearers, viz. All that are afar off, which as yet never heard of Christ. Those words do not exegetically expound to which of his hearers children the promiss did belong, as if Peter meant to tell them, to som of their children it doe's belong not to others, but by the very order of the Text, they point out others that were afar off, in their several generations to bee called by the Gospel, to whom saie's Peter this promise doe's belong, to them and their children, as well as to you, and your children. The children then of Peter's Converts were within the promiss.

4 Fourthly, Observ Peter's reasoning and argumentatisn, in this word [For] vers 39. where S. Peter give's a reason of his direction, why those hearers should bee baptized, viz. becaus that grand promiss of blessed­ness by remission of sins, did belong to them; and upon this, as upon a principal foundation, he build's his Exhortation to them to bee bap­tized; the holy Ghost in that manner of reasoning clearly teaching this Doctrine. Doct. viz. To as many as the blessings or promiss of the Covenant belong's, to them also belong's Baptism; For therefore doe's the Sign belong to Peter's hearers, becaus the Promiss did first belong to them. And by the like reason­ing, the same Apostle doth justifie his Baptism of Cornelius and his Family, Act. 10.47, 48. Can any forbid water that these should not bee [Page 37]baptized who have received the holie Ghost as well as wee? And hee commanded them to bee baptized in the name of the Lord; which discours, if reduced to form of Argument, saie's this; they that receiv the same Grace are capable of, yea have right to, the same Sign; but Infants are capable of the same Grace (of the holy Ghost, and of remission of sins, as shall bee proved anon) therefore of right they are to receiv the same Sign, i.e. the Sacrament of Baptism.

The same Doctrine doth our Saviour teach, using the same manner of reasoning; for the admission of Infants to the outward sign of bles­sing, Mat. 19.13, 14. There were that brought unto him little chil­dren that hee should put his hands on them and pray; and his Disci­ples rebuked them, but Jesus said, Suffer little children to com unto mee, for of such is the Kingdom of God: In which words observ 1. Christ's practice: 2. The reason of his Practice: By his practice, Hee admitted Infants to the outward sign of Blessing, though they understood not what was said or don unto them, yet did Christ give them his Blessing, and the Sign thereof (hee laid his hands on them) contrarie to the carnal judgment of his Disciples, who thought it a mockerie to give Infants a Sign, which they understood not. 2. The Reason of Christ's practice is this, Infants are not excluded from the Kingdom of Hea­ven, therefore they are not to bee excluded from the outward Sign of the right and entrie to such a Grace. And if Christ did esteem it a suf­ficient reason, why little children should bee admitted to the Sign of his Blessing, becaus of such is the Kingdom of God; then by the same reason, Infants must bee admitted to Baptism and not debarred from the first Sign of entrie into Christ's Kingdom, viz. Becaus the King­dom of Heaven belong's to Infants before actual Faith.

Now if they will give us leav to make use of Christ and his Apo­stle's manner of reasoning, my second Argument for Infant Baptism will bee this.

Argument. 2 All those to whom the Blessings and Promises of the Covenant do belong, to them also belong's Baptism, the Sign thereof (by the Do­ctrine of St Peter and of Jesus Christ himself.)

But to Infams of believing Parents, the Blessings and Promiss of the Covenant do belong, before actual Faith; therefore by the Do­ctrine of the holie Ghost in Scripture, such Infants ought to bee baptized before actual Faith.

The Major, or first part of this Argument, is the very reason of the Text: The Minor Proposition, viz. that the Blessings and Promisses [Page 38]of the Covenant do belong to Infants before actual Faith, is proved by these reasons. 1. By the express words of Peter, which say, the Pro­mise is to your children. 2. By the express words of our Saviour, (of such is the Kingdom of Heaven) 3. By example of Isaac and Jacob, they were children of the Promise before actual faith, and had applied unto them the Seal of the righteousness of Faith. 4. Som Infants dy­ing are saved, they are members of Christ's Kingdom; therefore the Blessing of the Covenant, viz. Regeneration and Remission of sins through the blood of Christ, do also belong to them, for except an Infant bee born again, Joh. 35. and cleansed by the bloud of Christ, hee cannot enter into the Kingdom of Heaven; Heb. 9.22, 23. But som Infants do enter into Hea­ven; therefore som Infants are born again justified and sanctified in the bloud of Christ. Now what hath the Anabaptist to except against this plain Doctrine of Scripture?

Object. 1 The Blessings of the Covenant belong to Elect Infants, not to all: Shall wee under that pretence baptize all in general? (This was objected to mee in our Conference.

Answ. If Baptism belong but to one Infant, it is enough to confute them who deny it to all, becaus they are Infants. 2. And if it belong to som Infants, why not to all? for who shall judg which are elected and which are not? It concerns not us to know who are and who are not Elected, becaus the Sacraments do belong to the Elect, not as Elect, but as visible members and Professors; upon which account S. Peter bap­tized Simon Magus: And Abraham by God's appointment circumcised Ismaël though a reprobate, Esau and all the children of the flesh were circumcised. 3. Lastly, by your reason, Men of years should not bee baptized, becaus wee cannot tell whether they bee Elected, or not.

Object. 2 But where have you any Example of children baptized?

Answ. There is no need of example when wee have the Doctrine of the holie Ghost for it, which is of greater Autoritie and force, then bare Example; Howbeit, the practise of the Apostles may go for an Ex­ample; their baptizing of whole housholds, is an Example of baptizing all within the hous old and yong, that are not excepted; Even as un­der the name of Abraham's houshold, are comprehended his Infants: Abraham and his houshold were circumcised, so the Jailor and his houshold were baptized, the phrase is the same, the case the same, and why not the persons?

Object. 3 Yea, but the Scripture saies, Go, Teach and Baptize: and they that [Page 39] gladly received the Word, were baptized: and again they were baptized confessing their sins; therefore men must bee capable of teaching of Faith and repentance before they bee baptized.

Answ. Tis true, When wee first bring the Gospel to a People, they must bee first Taught, confess their Faith and their Repentance, and then bee baptized; But it as true, that when the Parents have received the Faith and are baptized, their children also are taken into Covenant. Thus Abraham was first taught, and then circumcised; But his Infants were first circumcised and then taught. This one Error doth much bemist your understandings, you conceiv that the Covenant take's in onely actual Believers: That is indeed a part of the Covenant, but not the whole extent of it, as hath been proved. For as wee by deeds do purchase and convey Lands holden in Leas or Copie to our children, yea, to children which shall bee born, as well as to them that bee already born; and though our children at that age knew not what their Fathers did for them, yet when they come to age, they claim those Lands by virtue of the Land-Lord's Grant and Seal annexed, paying their Rents and doing their covenanted Services and Homage: So doth the great Land-Lord of Heaven put both us and our children into the Copie of Heaven, and confirms it by Seal of Baptism; And when our children com to have Faith, they may claim the good things cove­nanted by virtue of God's Grant and Covenant made with their Fathers, they performing the conditions of their Father's Co­venant.

From Scripture I proceed to som Reasons for Infant-Bap­tism.

Reasons 1 Infants are capable of the thing signified in Baptism, viz. of the blood of sprinkling; therefore of Baptism it self: If they have the thing signed which is the greater, why should they bee debarred the Sign which is the less? It cannot bee denied them upon any just ground of Faith or Reason.

Object. Yes, Say they, becaus Infants have not Faith nor Repen­tance.

Answ. You must add 1. that have not Faith, nor ever will com to have Faith. 2. You must add that they have not Faith nor any other means of applying Christ's blood, els your exception is not sufficient: In men of years, it is applied by the Spirit of God, and by Faith in Infants by the Spirit alone, which is given unto them. It is the Application of [Page 40]Christ's righteousness that justifieth us, not our Act of apprehending it; the thing applied, not our Act of applying: God by his Spirit in Infants doth all things on our part, which Faith should do. Joh. 3.8. the wind bloweth where it listeth, thou hearest the sound thereof, but canst not tell whence it cometh and whither it goeth; so is everie one that is born after the spirit, i. e. As the power of God is seen in the wind moving the aër, so it is in the changing and renewing of us, though the manner bee bid from us. Thou knowest not what is the way of the Spirit, nor how the bones do grow in the womb of her that is with child, Eccles. 11.5. Thus much wee know from Christ's own mouth, that Infants are blessed, for hee blessed them, Mar. 10.16. Shall wee denie it be­caus wee know not the manner how they are blessed? Or, shall wee deny them to bee reasonable creatures, becaus wee cannot discern in them the use of reason? Or, shall wee deny them to bee sinners, becaus they know not what the Law is, nor what the transgression of the Law is? Wee need not trouble our selvs about the manner how Christ's righteousness is applied to them, seeing God is as gracious to apply unto them the righteousness of the second Adam, as in justice hee did the sin and condemnation of the first Adam.

2. That Exception about Faith and Repentance is no more a barr against the Baptism of Infants, then against the Cir­cumcision of Infants, forasmuch as in Circumcision were re­quired all the same qualifications, which you say are required to Baptism, viz. the inward Circumcision of the heart.

Little children must bee brought unto Christ and none forbid them, and by Baptism they do com unto him, where the Minister in Christ's stead receiveth them, and blesseth them, and the Lord sealeth up unto them their receiving into his favor and grace for his own mercies sake without any merit of ours.

Reason 2 Christ confirmed the Covenant made unto the Fathers, Rom. 15.8. Hee bettered it and no way worsted it: And when hee comman­ded a new Seal to bee set in stead of Circumcision, hee did it without altering the substance of the Covenant in the least degree; but now the very substance of the Covenant would bee altered to the wors, if som persons formerly received into Grace, should by Christ bee excluded; yea, and Believers children are in wors condi­tion [Page 41]then in the Jewish Church, which to affirm, were not onely derogatorie to Christ's Grace, but against Scripture it self, which saith, Ephes. 3.6. that the Gentiles are Fellow-heirs with the Jews, and of the same bodie, and partakers of his Promise in the Gospel; of which they are not partakers, nor Fellow-heirs, if so great a part of the Gentiles as their chil­dren should bee excluded. The Infants of Jews and Pro­selyts at the coming of Christ had interest and right to the Covenant of Grace: And if that right bee taken away, then their condition after Christ is wors then before: Shall they bee loosers by becoming Christians? This, no sober man will affirm: Neither is this a complaining against God but against them, who would exclude, whom the Lord hath not excluded: God's grace is not straitned by Christ's coming; there­fore our Infants are not excluded.

Reason 3 Our last Reason is grounded on 1 Cor. 7.14. The Apo­sile there speaks of such an Holiness, which belongs to the Corinthians children from this ground, that one of the Parents is a Believer, and whereof the children of Parents beeing both un­believers are not capable, but remain unclean: Now this cannot bee meant of a civil holiness or cleaness, for so the children of unbelieving Parents were holie, as well as the children of Believers, seeing holie Matrimonie is not an Or­dinance peculiar to the Church: And no where in Scripture are children called holie, becaus their Parents are joined in holie Wedlock, and may lawfully live together: Federal ho­liness what? But it is meant of a Federal holiness, whereby the children are joyned with God in Covenant, dedicated to his Service, have right to the means of salvation, and the sacrament of Baptism, and whereby they are distinguished from Heathens, Turks, Apollonius, p. 84. and such other Infidels. This Federal holiness is transferred from the Parents to the children, not by Generation or Legiti­mation, but by the merciful will of God, whereby hee pro­miseth to bee a God to them and their Seed. Thus the whole Church both yong and old by virtue of God's Co­venant with them, are severed from other Nations, dedi­cated to God's pure Worship and Service, and for that caus are counted holie, Deut. 14.1, 2. Thou art an holie people unto [Page 42]the Lord, with Ezra 9.2. the holy Seed had mingled them­selvs with the people of those Lands: the Jews were the ho­ly Seed, the Heathens unholy, not becaus they were illegi­timate, or wanted a civil holiness, but becaus they were without God's Covenant, as Paul describeth the State of all Heathens, Ephes. 2.11. Remember that in time passed, yee were Gentiles in the flesh, without Christ, Aliens from the Commmon-wealth of Israël, and strangers from the Co­venant of Promisses.

Quest. Som at Corinth thought themselvs defiled by their marri­ages with Infidels, though contracted before their conversion, and thereupon moved a question, Whether it were law­ful to continue their marriage with the unbelieving par­tie, or whether they must not seek a separation? 1 Cor. 7.1, 12.

Answ. Paul is utterly against separation, vers 12.13. Let not him put her away, and let not the Wife leav her Husband: His reason is, vers. 14. Becaus the unbelieving Wife is sanctified by the believing Husband, though the unbelieving partie bee unclean before God, and is not made an holy Person, yet the use of Matrimonie with her is Holy to the believing par­tie; and of this truth, the holiness of their children is brought for an evidence, to this sens, that seeing the Lord counted their children holy and in Covenant with him, the believing partie might rest assured, that their abode together, and the use of their marriage is not polluted, but acceptable in the sight of God.

Object. The sanctification of the Wife is but a civil sanctification in that place, i. e. shee is sanctified to his use, that hee ought not to put her away. Again, the holiness there spoken of, is a fruit of that sanctification of the Wife, whereof it will fol­low, That seeing the effect cannot bee greater then the Caus, the Caus cannot produce a greater effect then it self, the Caus beeing onely a civil sanctification, Of Christ ex­alted, p. 166. the holiness of the children must bee the same, thus argueth Tho: Collier.

Answ. 1. The question was, Whether the Believer were polluted by his unbelieving Wife; the Apostle saie's, No, quia pluris est pietas unius ad sanctificandum conjugium, Calvin. in loc. quàm alterius im­pietas [Page 43]ad inquinandum, i. e. the faith of the Believer is of greater force to sanctifie their present cohabitation, then the unbelief of the other to pollute it. This hee proveth from a greater effect and fruit of the Husband's faith, viz. The holiness of the chil­dren born of such a Husband by such a woman. The chil­dren are holy, not onely civilly, as beeing born of lawful Wedlock, but federally as beeing severed from all children of unbelievers by special prerogative, holy to the Lord, con­secrated unto him, whereas by nature they were Aliens and unclean; according to that of Paul, Rom. 11.16. if the root bee holy, so are the branches.

The faith of the believing partie sanctifieth the unbelieving Wife to bear not onely a lawful, but an holy Seed; yea, it sanctifie's the children and severeth them from the common condition of other children, which are prophane and un­clean, without the Church, without God in the World.

2 2. Note, That the Holiness of the child received from one of the Parents believing, is, more then the sanctification of the Wife by her believing Husband, becaus such a Wife is not taken in­to Covenant with her husband, but the child is; and there­fore the Apostle saie's not, that such as is the sanctification of the Wife; such is the holiness of the child: But thus, Such as is the holiness of the believing partie, such is the childs ho­liness in respect of Church-membership; and so the faith of the believing Husband is the caus of both these effects, viz. That his coupling with his Wife is not impure, and also that his children are holy: And this latter an evidence of the former. And thus the holiness of the childe is a sign of the mother's san­ctification to holy cohabitation, and an effect of the Father's Faith by virtue of God's Covenant. To have said, That their children were lawful, was no more then to have said, That their marriage was lawful, which was not the question; But to say, that the children of their lawful marriage were holy, This did inferr not onely the lawfulness of their marri­age but the sanctified Use: As M r Baily hath well observed, of Anabaptism, p. 138.

3 Lastly, If by holy, bee onely meant a civil holiness, then on the contrarie, by unclean, must bee meant a civil uncleanness. [Page 44]But when Paul saie's (els were your children unclean) his in­tent is not to make them all as an unclean birth and impure off-spring, which were born at Corinth of unbelieving Parents; but to shew that they are not comprehended within God's Covenant: And so when hee saie's, (but now are they holie,) hee notes som preheminence of the children of Christians above the Heathens children: Though in civil respects, in re­spect of a lawful birth, both sorts of children were equal, yet that civil holiness beeing common to both, there is a prehe­minence of the Christians child above the Heathens. The child of an Infidel at Corinth is to day unclean and the next day holie, in case his Parents turn Christians; And what's the reason of this so sudden alteration? It must needs bee in regard of the Covenant into which the partie now believing is taken with his children, his unbelieving Neighbor with his children still remaining unclean: Hence I conclude with Calv. in loc. Seeing our children are exempted from the com­mon condition of lost mankind, and admitted into God's Church and Family, Cur eos à signo arceamus? upon what reason can wee drive them from the sign of their admittance?

‘It is (saith a Learned man) God's great Work to Church the World, A Treatise entituled a blow at the root [...] or a discoverie of Satan's de­vices, p. 154. and the Divel's counter-work is, to Heathenize the Church. It troubles the Divel much, that children from their infancie should bee under an Engage­ment to receiv nurture and admonition in the Lord, to frequent the Ordinances and to own Jesus Christ by an external pro­fession, if hee could but contriv to prevent their coming into that Engagement, hee might hope more easily to keep them out when they are grown up, then to work them out, (so grown up) to a renouncing of Christianitie, which yet hee hath brought som unto.’

For a close of both the questions hitherto debated, I desire to bee resolved by our Adversaries, What is meant by the do­ctrine of Baptism, and laying on of hands, reckoned up among the principles of Christian Religion, Heb. 6.2. By laying on of Hands, must bee understood, either the rite of confirma­tion, which stood 1. In instruction and examination of those who had been baptized Infants. 2. And in Praying for them, [Page 45]that God would continue them in the Faith, &c. This was performed, when they grew up to years of discretion, and were called to give account of their Faith before their admis­sion to the Lord's Supper. And of this minde is judicious M r Calvin: Inst. l. 4 c. 19. de confirmati­one, §. 4. And hee wishes that this Rite and Custom were again restored and practised in the Church of God, Talem ergò manuum impositionem quae simpliciter loco benedictionis fiat, laudo, & restitutam hodiè in purum usum velim; and gives weightie reasons of what benefit it would bee to the Church. Sect. 13.

Or secondly, by imposition of hands must bee understood a Rite or Ceremonie used in the Ordination of Ministers. Now chuse which sens you pleas; if the later, then you confess that Ordination is a Scripture-principle, to bee acknowledged of all Christians, and so you yield our first question; if the former sens, then you acknowledg Infant-Baptism to bee a Scripture principle, fit for all men to imbrace; and so you yield our later question: But why may wee not understand this laying on of hands in both respects? and so conclude both points? judicent docti. It is necessarie for all men to bee instructed and catechized in these six Principles of the Doctrine of Christ, and to believ.

  • 1. That wee must Repent of all our sins, which are dead works, and turn from them to serv God in newness of life.
  • 2. That penitent persons must believ in God and rest on his mercie in Christ for salvation.
  • 3. And, (for the grounding of people in Religion) that they bee instructed concerning the nature, use and signification of Baptism, whereby wee are baptized and planted into Christ,
    Rom. 6.3.
    to bee partakers of the benefits of his death.
  • 4. And farther to bee instructed, that by laying on of hands, our baptized Infants ought to bee trained up in the knowledg and fear of the Lord seasoned with the principles of Christ's Religion; and that for their good and the instruction of the whole Church, and for right dispencing of Gospel-Ordinances, and the means of sal­vation, it is necessarie that a succession of Ministers bee Ordained, for gathering and perfecting the Saints till wee all meet in Heaven.
  • [Page 46]5. And that all Christian people bee taught to believ the Resurrection of the dead.
  • 6. And the last judgment, whereby all men shall be judged, and eternally disposed of,
    2 Cor. 5.10.
    according to that they have don in the bo­die, whether it bee good or bad.

O Lord our God, God of all Grace, Father of all mercies, vouchsafe for thy Son's sake, to open all our understandings, that wee may conceiv and bow all our hearts to imbrace all saving Truthes: And let us never bee of the number of those that strive or rebel against the light.

Soli Deo gloria.

FINIS.

This keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above is co-owned by the institutions providing financial support to the Text Creation Partnership. Searching, reading, printing, or downloading EEBO-TCP texts is reserved for the authorized users of these project partner institutions. Permission must be granted for subsequent distribution, in print or electronically, of this EEBO-TCP Phase II text, in whole or in part.