The Great CHARTER of the LIBERTIES of ENGLAND, Granted to the People of the same, By King HENRY the third; And accorded between him and them in diverse full
Parliaments, as followeth,
viz.
HENRY, by the Grace of God, King of
England, Lord of
Ireland, Duke of
Normandie, and
Guyen, and Earl of
Angeow.
To all Arch-Bishops, Bishops, Abbots, Priors, Earls, Barons, Sheriffs, Provosts, Officers; And to all Bailiffs, and our faithfull Subjects, which shall see this present
Charter, greeting.
Know ye, that We to the honour of Almightie God, and for the salvation of the souls of our
[Page 2]Progenitours, and Successours, Kings of
England, to the advancement of holy church, and amendment of our Realm of
England; of Our meer free will, have given and granted to all Arch-Bishops, Bishops, Abbots, Priors, Earls, Barons, and to all Free-men of this Realm of
England for evermore.
Cap. 1. Liberties. First, We have granted to God, and by this present Charter have confirmed for Vs, and our Heirs for evermore; That the church of
England shall be free, and shall have all her whole rights, and liberties inviolable: We have granted also, and given to all Free-men of our Realm, for Vs, and Our Heirs for evermore, these Liberties under-written, to have and to hold, to them, and to their heirs, of Vs, and Our heirs, for evermore.
Lord
Coke upon
Mag. Chart. Fol. 1.
‘Here be four rehearsals
(saith the Lord
Coke) of four notable causes of the making this Law. First, for the honour of God. Secondly, for the health of the Kings soul. Thirdly, For the exaltation of the church. Fourthly, for the amendment of the Kingdom. And all granted to all subjects, and their heirs, from the King and his heirs for evermore; That the great Charter might live, and take effect in all successions
[Page 3]of ages for ever.’
Expost and Quer. The last of these causes which the L.
C. in his Preamble calleth the ends for which this Charter was made, being for the amendment of the Realm, was (saith the L.
C. upon the first chapter of
confirmatio Chart. fol. 529.) to amend great mischiefs, and inconveniences, which oppressed the whole Realm before the making of both Charters,
viz. This, and the Charter of the Forrest, which (saith the L.
C. in his Preface) were declarative Acts of the old Common-Law of the Land, and no introductives of any new Law. If the mischiefs, and inconveniencies of the Realm were great before the said Acts were made to declare the Laws of the land, which formerly the lawyers reserved to themselves, till then undeclared? Were there not greater since those Acts were made, and the Lawes thereby declared, and since the accord of King and People, to keep the same inviolable, when, and as often as they were violated by Kings, and their Counsel, learned in the Laws? As hereafter shall appear.
[Page 4]
Cap. 8. Debt. Debtors. Suerties.We, nor Our Bailiffs shall not seise any lands, or rent, for any debt, as long as the present goods, and chattels of the debtors do suffice to pay the debt, and the debtor himself be ready to satisfie: Therefore shall neither the pledges of the debtor be distrained, as long as the principle debtor is sufficient for payment of the debt; and if the principal debtor fail in paiment of the debt, haveing nought wherewith to pay, or will not, where he is able' enough; Then the pledges shall answer for the debt; and if they will, they shall have the lands, and rents of the debtor, until they be satisfied of that which they before paid for him, except that the debtor can shew himself to be acquitted against the suerties.
L.
Coke upon
M. C. fol. 19.We
(saith the Lord
Coke) spoken in the politique capacitie of a King, extendeth to his Successours. And by Bailiffs, are meant Sheriffs, who write
Baliva mea, &c. And by the words
shall not seiz is expressed the Kings Grace, who by the Common-Law had Execution against his Debtors bodies, lands, and goods. And by the Statute of 33.
Hen. 8.
cap. 9. The Sheriff is to inquire
&c. and to exten
[...] all Lands, Goods, Chattels.
&c. and
[...] take and imprison the Bodies, as by the
[Page 5]Stat. appeareth, and as the daily practice sheweth.
Expost and Quer.If We extend to Successors, even to King
Hen. 8. Why not longer? If
Magna Charta was to live for ever, Why not hitherto? If the King of his Grace remitted by this Act the execution which the Common Law gave him before against his Debtors, Bodies, Lands, and Goods, in case of having nought wherewith to pay, through decay of their estates by unavoidable necessities; then the Kings Debtors obtained of the Kings Grace as much Liberty for their bodies, as this King gave to all his free subjects by the 29
th of this Act,
viz. No Free man &c. And for his Estate, as much as the proverb saith;
Where nothing is to be had, the King looseth his due. If the King did not remit so much by this Act, then did he gain thereby more than he gave, contrary to the opinion of all Lawyers, that say, All Acts of Parliament are to be expounded for the benefit of the Subject. And what, and how did he gain? but contrary to his Honour, much more to his Grace, when two more of his subjects were hedged in
[Page 6]by this Act, as Pledges to pay for his undone Debtor, and to undoe themselves and their families by the bargain. And (their estates being too little to pay their own debts) their Creditours must see the King first served out of the same, to their no small prejudice, if not undoing, where by many are injured through one mans occasion. If therefore this Act ought to be construed for the honour of the King, and benefit of the subject (as I believe it ought, and the L.
C. saith, others have thought so) it followeth, That the Statute of the 33.
Hen. 8.9. was made (as many more were before and since) against
Mag. Chart. and not onely against Kings honour, and grace, but also their Oathes, to the undoing of multitudes of their subjects, which was ungracious for their Counsel learned in the Laws, to give advice, or assent to the making such Laws, or when made, to allow them, much more to maintain them; being that all Judges are to receive
Mag. Chart. for a Plea against all Statutes made against it. And all Judgements given against
Mag. Chart. are, and ought to be
[Page 7]void; (as appeareth in the L.
C. preamble) And all such Statutes as were made before the 42. of
Ed. 3. against
Mag. Chart. were then repealed: and (as I conceive) all made so since, are repealed by the Petition of Right, 3.
Car. that restored
Mag. Char. to its primitive vigor, and consequently enervated all its opponents.
Cap. 9.
London &c.The City of
London shall have the old Liberties, and customs which it hath been used to have. Moreover We will, and grant, that all other Cities, Burroughs, Towns, and the Barrons of the five Ports, and all other Ports, shall have their Liberties, and Free-customs.
L.
C. upon
M. C. fol. 20.This Chapter
(saith the Lord
Coke) is excellently interpreted by an ancient Author
(quoting the
Mirrour in the Margent) who saith, that by this Chapter, the Citizens of
London ought to have their Franchizes, whereof they are inheritable by loyal Title, of the gift, and confirmation of the Kings, which they have not forfeited by any abuse; and that they shall have their Franchizes, and Customes, which are sufferable by right, and not repugnant
[Page 8]to law: And the same interpretation serveth for the
Cinque-ports, and other places.
Expost and Quer.Doth not this Charter, and chapter sufficiently declare, and Lawyers, (though unwillingly, yet plainly) confess, that
London and the rest, had old Liberties and customes, and that they are inheritable thereof, and ought still to have the same, so long and so far, as not repugnant to Law, (which I conceive to be this Law, and not any that have been made since against it?) And do not the several Charters of
London, and other Cities and Towns, obtained since this Law, declare further what those Liberties, and Customs were? And if the Kings learned Councel have consented that he should grant, or Professors of the Law advised Londoners, or any other Citizens, to ask things repugnant to this Law, and prevailed with both parties? Have they not misled both parties? And though they have so done often; yet in this case, doth not the Statute of the 19
th of
Henry 7. chap. 7. help the offendors with less danger than the forfeiture of their Customs, and
[Page 9]Liberties, if they offend especially but in those points, which their lawyers so much misadvised them to ask, and the Kings, him to grant?
Ca. II. Common-Pleas.Common-Pleas shall not follow Our Court, but shall be holden in some place certain.
L.
C. upon
M. C. fol. 22, 23.Before this Statute
(saith the Lord
Coke)
Common-Pleas might have been holden in the
Kings-Bench, and all Writs returnable into the same
Bench; And because the Court was holden
coram Rege, and followed the Kings Court, and removable at the Kings will, the Returns were
Ubicun
(que) fuerimus in Angliâ; whereupon many discontinuances ensued, and great trouble of Jurors, charges of Parties, and delay of Justice; for this cause this Statute was made,
&c. And Pleas of the Crown were divided into high Treason, Misprision of Treason, Petty Treason, Fellony,
&c. and limited to this Court, because
contrà coronam, & dignitatem, &c. So that of these
(the Lord
Coke saith) the
Common-Pleas cannot hold Plea. But to shew that
Common-Pleas may be holden in the
Kings-Bench, he saith, That
[Page 10]the King is out of this Statute, and may sue in that Court.
Secondly, If a man be
in Custodia, any other may lay upon him any Action of debt, covenant, or the like personal Action, because that be that is
in Custodia, ought to have the priviledge of that Court And this Act taketh not away the Priviledge of any Court.
Thirdly, any Action that is
Quare vi & Armis, where the King is to have a Fine, may be sued in this Court.
Fourthly, Replevins may be removed thither.
Fifthly, (saith the Lord
Coke) Albeit originally the
Kings-Bench be restrained by this Act, to hold Plea of any Real action yet by a mean, they may; as when removed by Writ of Error from
Common-Pleas, thither for necessitie, lest any party that hath right should be without remedie, or that there should be a failer of Justice; and therefore Statutes are alwaies to be expounded so, that there should be no failer of Justice.
Expost and Quer.Do not the L.
C. words, viz. (
Before this Statute, &c.) imply, that after the Statute,
Common-Pleas ought not to be holden in the
Kings-Bench, nor all Writs be returnable into the same
Bench? Doth the Register,
[Page 11]or
Natura brevium therefore shew any Writ for debt returnable to the
Kings-Bench? Doth not
Fitz. H. natura brevium fol. 119. h.
& k. declare that there is not Writ in Law for debt, but a
Justicies, which is a judicial Commission to the Sheriff to determine the matter,
Nè amplius indè clamorem aeudiamus: So that the
Kings-Bench ought not to be troubled with the matter at all? or if an Original returnable to the
Common-Pleas? Doth not that Original declare it self to be a Summons? And doth not M
r
Kitchen in his
Ret. brev. fol. 4.
Tit. com. bank, declare, that Summons, Atachment, and Distringas, succeslively distant fifteen days one after another, is the onely Proces at Common Law? The
Kings-Bench, and
Common-Pleas ought to practise by the Common Law, declared by
Mag. Chart. and accord of the King and People; declared and injoyned to be observed inviolable, and immutable for ever. Did ever any Judge of the
Kings-Bench, or
Common-Pleas, advise, or consent to the making any Statute, or Law to the contrarie, (being sworn to execute and maintain
Mag. Chart.
[Page 12]as anon shall appear all were, or ought to be) and was not perjured? Did, or doth any Judge of any Court of
Record, observe any such Law being so made; or practice, or suffer to be practised (where he hath authoritie) any suits or proceedings contrarie to
Mag. Chart. and was, and is he not perjured? Doth not the practice of the
Kings-Bench still shew, that thence doth issue no other Writ for debt, than a Bill of
Middlesex, or Latitat, which express themselves to be for Trespass? Are not those Writs still returnable
ubicunquè fuerimus, and the
Kings-Bench therefore still removeable at the Kings will? whereupon (as saith the L.
Coke) many discontinuances ensue, and great trouble of Jurours, charges of Parties, and delay of Justice; for which causes (he saith) this Statute was made. How doth this Statute (if therefore made) prevent such discontinuances, trouble, charges, and delay of Justice, but by declaring, that
Common-Pleas shall not follow the
Kings-Bench? How contradictorie to himself is the L.
Coke then, when he laboureth to make
Common-Pleas lawfull to be holden in the
Kings-Bench?
[Page 13]And if (as he saith) the
Pleas of the Crown were divided into high Treason, Misprision of Treason, Petty Treason, Fellonie,
&c. & limited to the
Kings-Bench, because
cont. Coron. & dign. Regis; so that of these (saith he) the
Common-Pleas cannot hold
Plea. By what Justice can he desire to hold
Common-Pleas in the
Kings-Bench; unless because more gainfull, (as when he was supplanted by his successour, under colour of preferment, from the
Common-Pleas to the
Kings-Bench, he passionately expressed the difference, saying, That he was called from the warm kitchen, to the cold hall:) and that therefore he desired to reduce Justice to his desire, rather than his desire to Justice? But let us examine his Arguments for that purpose. First, (saith he) The King is out of this Statute. How? out of this Statute, which above all other, the King was sworn to observe, and obey, and to violate was perjurie, and punishable in all men without regard of persons, and no less in the Lo.
C. to say and write otherwise? But (saith he) the King might sue in his
Bench. And so might he in any Court of
Record which he
[Page 12]
[...]
[Page 13]
[...]
[Page 14]pleased; for all such courts are called his, and have power under him, to administer Justice to all men, according to their Commissions and Charters, as well as the
Kings Bench; and therefore he had his Atturneys, and Sollicitours, attending many such Courts. Secondly, (saith he) if a man be
in custodia, any other may lay upon him any action of debt
&c. because (saith he) that he that is
in custodia, ought to have the priviledge of that Court. Now if a man be
in custodia for Fellonie,
&c. and an Action for Debt, &c. be laid upon him, shall his priviledge in being
in custodia keep him from hanging (if he deserve it) till he pay the debt? or if he be hanged, and have any goods, shall the Creditour be paid his debt out of the same; or if he have any lands, out of the
Escheat? I believe not. If a man be not
in custodia, but a Justice of Peace, or a Grand-Juror, attending Sessions in
Cumberland or
Cornwall, what priviledge of this Court doth he need? If he be arrested there, upon a Writ of trespass, when he is guiltie of none, is he not more disgraced than priviledged by this
[Page 15]Court? when he is forced to appear in this Court for trespass, and nothing declared against him for any such matter, ought he not to be dismissed for that matter, with costs, and dammages, answerable to his disgrace and expences, though arrested at the Kings suit? Shall the King do any man wrong? how then doth the Maxim hold, that he cannot? Shall this Court abuse his name, to wrong his Subject? Is not Injustice, Perjurie in a Judge sworn to do Justice? Is not all against
Mag. Chart. and truth, which is, God himself? If not so dismissed, shall a declaration be admitted against him upon an Original for debt, where neither such Writ, nor cause belong? And shall the Defendant be inforced to wait upon his Bail for trespass, to answer that Declaration? is not that more Injustice? And moreover, if that Writ, or the Return thereof be forged, (as all, or most Originals directed to the Sheriffs of
London or
Middlesex, are; aswel by Clerks of this Court, and so filed upon Record here as by Attorneys in the
Common-Pleas, there;) shall that Declaration be admitted to say, that the
[Page 16]Defendant is
in custodia, (which is false;) and be made a Record, which would be accounted the next truth to Gospel? And shall not the Defendant be admitted to plead
Mag. Ch. against the jurisdiction of the Court, and such lying Records? If not; is not all this more Injustice and Perjurie? Shall Judges give Judgements upon false Records (except to burn them, and punish the makers, and causers) and shall not they be counted, and called false Judges, and Perjurers; and their judgements false judgements and perjuries? Shall they, that commit Debtors into their Marshals custodie, upon such judgements by their priviledge (as they call it,) say that this Statute doth not take away such priviledges, when the Lo.
C. himself saith, that all Statutes ought to be expounded so, that there should be no failer of justice; and this Statute, being
M. Ch. (chief of all Statutes) and all its Confirmations say, that equal justice ought to be done to all men, without regard of persons? What Statute or custom did, or can give any priviledge to any Court to the contrarie? What benefit of priviledge
[Page 17]hath the Debtor, that is so committed by this Court, and its priviledge, but his undoing, and his families, and often his untimely death by famin, and miserie? Is not that so occasioned by the rigour, and illegalitie of this Court, an offence of the highest nature, of Murther and Perjurie? Who gaineth any thing by this priviledge, but the Court, and their Marshal in extorted Fees, to the dammage of both Creditor and Debtor, and often the ruin ob both or either? Why therefore doth the L.
C. call it priviledge to the party in Custodie, when it appeareth to be no benefit, but prejudice unto him, and that more aggravated, to have more Actions laid upon him for more debts occasioned (perhaps) by his imprisonment? What law, or reason requireth any priviledge to any man for debt, since this Statute in the 29 chapter, freeth all mens bodies from imprisonment, untill they be lawfully tried by their Peers? and no law, but an abortive Statute made 25.
Ed. 3.
cap. 17. and repealed in the 42 of the same King (as aforesaid) gave an Arrest against Debtors but Merchants and Accomptants?
[Page 18]and a Statute made in the said 25 year of the said King, gave the Creditors two parts of all their Debtors lands, & all their goods (except the beasts of their plough) for satisfaction of their debts, which Statute is still in force, and daily executed accordingly? As for Accomptants, Debtors, and Tennants to the King, that are so indeed, if the Court of
Exchequer be thought proper for them; why should others that are not such indeed, be sheltered to defend or countenanced to offend under that pretence? And as for Members of any Court, why ought not they to sue, and be sued by their Atturneys in other Courts than their own, since it is unnatural for any bodie to suffer any of its Members (though never so corrupt) to be put to any smart, which it may avoid? And may not, nay ought not every just Court avoid such suits, and the suspition of their injustice by entertaining them, and proceeding therein, by leaving them to the justice of other Courts of competent judicature, as all other Courts do leave their Members to the mercy of the Courts at
Westminster?
[Page 19]or may not, nay ought not all Courts of judicature within their jurisdictions, determine the causes of all such Members of the Courts at
Westminster, as shall be found, and arrested within their jurisdictions, notwithstanding any Writs of priviledge, or other Writs to remove them, before they be determined; rather than the Courts at
Westminster may send for the Members of every Court, to be justified by them? For who can say, he hath ever found any justice there against any priviledged man? And how many that be no Members of any Court there indeed, are so countenanced, as subordinate to some ill Member, or other there, and have their Law for nothing, to bring Fees and gain to one or other of those Courts, out of honest mens purses and Estates, against whom they can shew no colour of right any where, but where they know they shall be favored, and their Adversaries oppressed? And how many men of good Estates have been, and daily are, not onely oppressed, but undone by that means? Thirdly, for Trespass,
vi & Armis; Is it but a Common-Plea, and consequently proper to all
[Page 20]courts of Record, and rather to be tryed within that jurisdiction where the offence is committed, than elsewhere? And hath not the King his Fines imposed and levyed by the authority of all such courts, as wel as by the
Kings-Bench? Fourthly, for Replevins, may they not as well be removed to, and determined by the
Common-Pleas, as in the
Kings-Bench? Fifthly, what meaneth the Lord by his words,
viz. [Originally restrained] but that the
Kings-Bench is restrained from having any original Writs Returnable thither in
Real Pleas,? And is it not as much restrained from originals in
Personal Pleas, that are as
Common-Pleas, as
Real, by this Statute? Or by what other Statute, Law, or President, is it inabled to have any originals returnable to it for debt, when the Register and
Ret. brevium have no such Presidents, as aforesaid? Is not therefore all the practice of the
Kings-Bench for debt, unjust, and perjurious, as aforesaid? and moreover a faint Action,
&c. as the prisoners for debt in that Court have lately set forth by their Petition to the Lord General, and his Officers concerning this matter.
[Page 21]
Caput 14.
Ameirciaments.A Free-man shall not be ameirced for a small fault, but after the quantitie of the fault, and for a greater fault, after the manner thereof, saving to him his contenement, or Freehold: And a Merchant shall be likewise ameirced, saving to him his Merchandize: And any other Villain than Ours, shall be likewise ameirced, saving his Wainage, if he fall into Our mercy: And none of the said Ameirciaments shall be assessed but by the oaths of honest men of the Visionage: Earls, and Barons shall not be ameirced, but by their Peers, and after the quantitie of their trespass. No man of the Church shall be ameirced after the rate of his spiritual benefice, but after the rate of his lay tenement, and the quantitie of his trespass.
Lord Cook upon
Magna Charta fol. 27.A Free-man here, hath a special understanding
(saith the L.
C.) and is taken for a Free-holder; and this appeareth by this clause,
Salvo contenemento suo. viz. Saving his Free-hold,
&c. This Act extendeth to Ameirciaments, not to Fines imposed by any Court of Justice,
&c. Free-men are not intended to officers, or ministers, or officers of justice,
&c. The Writ of
Moderata misericordia, giveth remedie to the Partie that is excessively ameirced,
&c. Albeit the Law of
England
[Page 22]is a Law of mercy, yet it is now turned to a shadow; for where by the wisdom of the Law, these Ameirciaments were instituted, to deter both Demandants from unjust suits, and Defendants from unjust defences, which was the cause in former times of fewer suits,
&c.
Expost and Quer.If amerciaments were instituted to deter Plantiffs from unjust suits, and Defendants from unjust defences; and were the causes of fewer suits in former times; how comes the Law turned to a shaddow in the Lord
Cokes time? when in the
Kings-Beach, and
Cmmon-Pleas, amerciaments were as frequent, and greivous as in any other time, and suits no fewer, nay more numerous than before, (as Records of both Courts declare) unless he means that all the Writs in the Register, and
Natura brevium, both original, and judicial, (whereby suits were determined amongst neighbours friendly at home) became useless, since
Habeas corpus, &c. carried all to
Westminster? And that there injustice shaddowed under the name and habit of justice, remunerated the litigious supporters of her being, with such
[Page 23]shares of her spoils, that though she trebled their amerciaments, she made them alwaies gainers; unless when to satisfie their revenge, rather than their purses, they commuted their monies for counsels, and countenances, to undo the opposers of their malice, whereby both parties became loosers, and often ruined; and injustice onely remained the gainer, and increased her kingdom (as the Divel doth his) by such suitors; and made more suits for
Westminster, than all the Courts of Errors, and their Judges, Lawyers, and Attorneys there, shall wear out while they live, without extraordinary helps of their servants.
C. 15. Bridg: Banks.No town, or Free-man shall be distrained to make Bridges, or banks, but such as of old time, and of right have been accustomed to make them in the time of King
Henry our Grandfather.
C. 16. Banks.No Banks shall be defended henceforth, but such as were in defence in the time of King
Henry our Grandfather, by the same places, and the same bounds, as were wont to be in his time.
Both the next precedent chapters sufficiently expound themselves, so
[Page 22]
[...]
[Page 23]
[...]
[Page 24]that the Lord
Coke speaketh no more to this matter, but that the
Mirrour saith,
That divers Rivers and their-Banks were in his time appropriated, and blocked up by divers persons, to debar common-fishings, which were wont to be used there in the time of King H. 2. And I believe, there are many more so done, more lately, which Commissioners for Sewers shall do well to look to.
C. 17. Pleas CrownNo Sheriff, Constable, Escheator, Coroner, or any other our Bailiffs, shall hold Pleas of the Crown.
L.
Coke upon
M. C. 30.One mischief before this Statute, was
(saith the Lord
Coke) That no Court, but the Kings chief Court, could command Bishops to give their clergy to such as ought to have it: another cause was, That the life of a man ought to be tryed before Judges of learning, and experience of the Laws of the Realm; for
Ignorantia Judicis, est saepenumerò calamitas innocentis. These are the reasons that the Lord
Coke alledgeth, why some Pleas of the Crown were taken from Sheriffs, Castellans, Escheators, Coronors, and Bailiffs, under which names
(saith he) are
[Page 25]comprehended all inferiour Judges, Justices, and Courts of Justice: albeit
(saith he) it be provided by the 9
th chap. of
Mag. Charta, That the Barons of the five Ports should have all their Liberties and Customs. These general words
(saith he again) must be understood of such Liberties and Customs, as are not afterwards in the same
Charter by express words taken away, and assumed to the Crown.
Expost and Quer.Might not the Kings inferior Courts command ordinary Ministers to give men their Clergie? And might not that serve before
Magna Charta, as it is usual fince? For seldom, or never in our memories, did Bishops themselves attend any court for that service: and now, should they be necessary onely for that imployment? So the Kings Court would be onely to command them: put if Bishops may be spared, why may not that Court for that cause? And if by this
Charter the King resumed some Pleas of the crown from
[...]hose that formerly had them; doth
[...] follow, that he resumed all Pleas
[...]om those that formerly had them? And if under the name of Bailiffs be
[Page 26]comprehended all Judges, and Justices, are not the Judges of the
Common-Pleas and Barons of the
Exchecquer so comprehended? And are none of them of such learning and experience in the Laws of the Realm, to try the life of a man, as Judges of the
Kings-Bench? Or else, why are they sent for Goal-deliveries, aswel as Judges of the
Kings-Bench are? Was it not provided by the 9 chapter of
Mag. Charta, That
London, and other cities, Burroughs and Towns, as well as the Barons of the five Ports, and other Ports should have their Liberties nad Free-Customs? Are all these now resumed by this 17. chap? Who can understand so? Or what meaneth the L.
C. by his riddles? Shall
Magna Charta contradict it self, though the Lord
C. would, and doth here and else where? Are not Commissions of
o
[...] yer and
Terminer, usual for Tryal
[...] mens lives, where Judges of the
Kings-Bench cannot reach, or dar
[...] not go? Doth not
London and other Corporations execute their Charter by their Recorders, when the
Kings-Bench gives them leave; and the
[...] do not the Judges of the
Kings-Bench
[Page 27]grant that such Judges may be as learned, and experienced in the Laws as themselves, for the Trying of mens lives? Are not mens lives Tryable for matter of Fact, and not of Law, (except Treasons that reach to thoughts?) Are not Jurors the Judges of matters of Fact? What great learning, or experience in Law is requisite for a Judge to pronounce the sentence of death, where the verdict hath determined the life? But how many true men have been hanged, and thieves saved by Judges interposing, and obtruding thier pestifferous pretended learning and experience in the Laws between the weak consciences of ignorant Jurors, and the truth? which kind of Jurors they make Sheriffs return for such purposes, when they may have such returned as know the Facts, and have sounder learning and experience in express Law than themselves.
C. 23.
Wear, &c.All Wears from henceforth be utterly put down by
Thames, and
Medway, and throughout all
England, but onely by the Sea-coasts.
[Page 28]
L.
C. upon
M. C. fol. 38.It was specially given in charge by the Justices in Eyre
(saith the Lord
C.) that all Juries should inquire of all such as Fished with Wears and Dams: and it appeareth
(saith he) by
Glandvil lib. 9.
c. 11. That when any thing is unjustly occupied within the Kings demesne, or obstructed in publick waies; or Rivers, turned off their right channels, or Citie-streets built upon; and in general, as often as any nusance to the Kings holding, or his High-way, or to any Citie, is committed; That is a purpresture,
viz. an Inclosure, whereby one inchroacheth, or maketh that several to himself, which ought to be common to all, or many; and every publick River, or stream, is the Kings High way.
Expost and Quer.If Wears be nusances (as I ar
[...] sure they are) throughout
England and
Wales; and if Commissioners for Sewers, and Justices of Peace for want of them, be sufficiently authorized to reform such wrongs, and do not, because chief doers thereof, o
[...] sharers in the unlawful gain made thereof themselves: why not Justices in Eyer imployed to execu
[...] their charge, for the general amendment
[Page 29]thereof, for the publick good?
C. 25. Measures, &c.One Measure of Wine shall be throughout our Realm, and one measure of Co
[...],
viz. according to the Quarter of
London and
Haberjects, that is to say, two yards within the list, and as it is of Weights, so shall it be of Measures.
L.
Coke upon
M. C. fol. 49.This Act concerning Measures, and Weights, that there should be one Measure, and one Weight through
England, is grounded upon the Law of God,
Deut. 25. v. 13, 14. And this by Authority of Parliaments hat been often enacted, but never effected.
Expost and Quer.If Weights and Measures throughout
England ought to be one, and that not onely by the Law of God (as the Lord
C. instanceth) but also by this
Charter of Agreement between the King and the People; Why did not the Lord
C. (being chief Justice of
England) sworn to do Law, and Justice too, and between King and People, (as partly before did, and hereafter further shall appear he was, or ought to have been) see this point of Justice, (so highly
[Page 30]required by the Law of God, and so mutually agreed upon by the Kings of this Land, and their Subjects) duly executed?
Ca. 16.
InquisitiOn.Nothing shall henceforth be given for a Writ of Inquisition, nor taken of him that prayeth the Inquisition of Life, or Member, but it shall le granted freely.
L.
C. upon
M. C. fol. 42.A Writ of Inquisition,
viz. De odio & atia, anciently called
De bono & malo, &c. which the Common-Law gave a man that was imprisoned, though it were for the most odious cause, for the death of a man, for which (without the Kings Writ) he could not be bailed; Yet the Law favouring the Libertie and Freedom of a man from Imprisonment,
&c. until the Justices in Eyre should come, at what time he was to be tryed; he might sue out this VVrit directed to the Sheriff,
&c.
Expost and Quer.If a Writ
De odio & atia was given by the Common-Law, to a man Imprisoned for the most odious cause, even for the death of a man; and if the Common-Law favoured
[Page 31]the Liberty of a man Imprisoned, so that he should be Bailed for such a Fact, until Justices in Eyre should Try him; Why not such a Writ still? Since
odium (which the Lord
C. defineth to be
hatred) and
atia (
malice) and Prisoners for those causes are no scanter now, than in former times? And why not Justices in Eyre (made since competent Judges by Commission without Writs) to determine such matters, which before they could but inquire of by Writs (as the Lord
C. saith elsewhere, though he saith here to try them,) imployed for that service? And now if it be Lawfull for a Judge of the
Kings-Bench to determine a debt, and to grant an
Habeas Corpus for money, to bring the Prisoner before him to put in Bail; Why should he take money for the Writ, and refuse sufficient Bail tendred after Oath made of their sufficiency, without the Plantiffs consent? Nay after acceptation of the Bail, Why refuse to File it?
Ca 2.9.
No Free man &c.No Free-man shall be taken, or imprisoned, or be disseised of his Freehold, or Liberties, or Free Customs, or be Outlawed, or Exiled, or
[Page 32]any way otherwise destroyed; nor we shall not pass upon him, but by lawfull judgement of his Peers, or by the Law of the Land; we shall sell to no man, we shall denie, or deferre to no man, either Iustice, or Right.
Lord
Coke upon
Mag. Chart. Fol. 46
&c.Free-man extends to Villains both Sexes,
&c. Ʋpon this Chapter, as out of a root, many fruitfull branches of the Law of
England have sprung. It containeth nine several Branches: First, That no man be taken or imprisoned, but by the Law of the Land;
viz. The Common-Law, Statute-Law, or Customs of
England, &c. Secondly, No man shall be diseised,
viz. put out of his Freehold, that is, Land, Livelihood, or Liberties, or free Customs, such as belong to him by his free Birth-right; unless it be by the lawfull judgement, and verdict of his equals, or by the Law of the Land, that is (to speak it once for all) by the Due course, and proces of the Law. Thirdly, no man shall be Outlawed, or put off the Law,
viz. Deprived of the benefit of it, unless he be Outlawed by the Law of the Land. Fourthly, No man shall be exiled,
&c. unless according to the Law of the
[Page 33]Land. Fifthly, No man shall be destroyed
&c. unless by verdict, or according to the Law of the Land. Sixthly, No man shall be condemned,
&c. but by the judgement of his equals, or according to the Law of the Land. Seventhly, We shall sell to no man, Justice, or right. Eighthly, We shall denie no man Justice or right. And Ninthly, We shall deferre no man Justice or Right,
&c.
Expost and Quer.First, If no man ought to be taken, or imprisoned but by the Law of the Land,
viz. the Common-Law, Statute-Law, and Customs of
England? is it not cleared by our Expostulations before upon the 11. Chapter, that Debtors are taken, and imprisoned in the
Kings-Bench, contrarie to the Common-Law of
England, declared by
Mag. Chart. contrarie to the chief Statute of
England, which is
Mag. Char. and which the Lord
Coke saith, should live (as was accorded by King and people) for ever? And contrarie to the Custom of
England declared by
Mag. Charta, and also by the Lord
Coke, not to extend to the imprisonment of any
[Page 34]Debtours, but onely the Kings. And are not Debtors, other than the Kings, so imprisoned, as well elsewhere, as in the
Kings-Bench? Secondly, if no man shall be disseised,
viz. put out of his Freehold; that is to say, His Livelihood, Liberties, or Free-Customs, such as belong to him by his Birth-right; unless it be by the lawfull judgement, and verdict of his equals, or by the Law of the Land, that is to say, (once for all) by Due course, and Proces of Law. Are not Debtors disseised of their Livelihood, Libertie, and Freedom which belonged unto them as their Freehold by Birth right, when they are imprisoned in
London, Westminster, or elsewhere, by Arrests, and Actions for Debt, whether due, or not, upon meer suggestions of Adversaries, not so much to Judges, as to Catch-pols, without any judgement, or verdict of their equals, and without Due course, or Proces of Law, which should be Summons, Attachment, and Distringas, before any Arrest, as aforesaid? Are they not taken in the Countrey from their Ploughs, which are their Livelihood, and their Countreys, and their Freehold
[Page 35]by Birth-right; by vagant Bum-baylies, and imprisoned there, till they give bail to appear at
Westminster; and thence, instead of being remanded home to their sweet Farm-houses, large fields, and industrious Agricultures; are they not sent to stinking Goals, close dungeons, and idle Monk-cels, whereby they are allowed little more ground to walk upon while they live, than might serve them to lie under, when they are dead? Are not all the Corporations of
England, and their free-chosen Officers, (that should do them justice at home) disseised of their Freeholds by Birth-right, and Charters, before and since
Mag. Char. when they are prevented of the administration of justice in execution of their Offices to which they were sworn, (and heritable successively from their Ancestours by Custom long before
Mag. Char. and since confirmed by the same, and by Charters dated before, and since) by
Certioraries, Habeas Corpus, &c. before Judgement; and pretence of Errors after; and though never any proved, or assigned, yet the causes never remanded, but detained at
[Page 36]
Westminster, where the usual correction of pretended Errours, is not by making any thing that is crooked, straight; but all that is straight, crooked; so that both Plantiffs, and Defendants give their titles for lost in a mist commonly; but he that hath the wrongfull possession, and money, holdeth it; and he that hath the right, and no money, goes to his grave without it? Are not all the People of
England disseised of their Freehold, Liberties, Franchises, and Free customs, when they are deprived of that justice which they ought to have administred amongst them at home, by virtue of the Kings Writs (original for Enquiries, and judicial for Determinations) directed to Sheriffs of their own choise, in their own Counties, or Stewards of Hundreds, and Court-Barons, in their precincts, where the Free-holders themselves are Judges themselves, by ancient Common Laws, and Customs of
England, before
Mag. Char. and by it declared, and confirmed unto them as aforesaid? Can Writs of trespass executed for debt; or Capiases, grounded upon counterselted Originals, be construed by any
[Page 37]Law, to be due Proces of Law? Thirdly, Are men lawfully Outlawed upon Exigents for debt, grounded upon a repealed Statute? and are not all Debtors that are Outlawed, so Outlawed? Are men lawfully Outlawed, that are Outlawed upon Exigents, grounded upon
Summonitus, or
Non est inventus, counterfeitly returned by Attorneys, who at the time of the return were no Sheriffs, or competent officers? and are not all, or most Debtors, and Trespassers, that are Outlawed in
London and
Middlesex, so Outlawed? Are men lawfully Outlawed upon any Exigents, that are Outlawed without the judgement of the Coroners of the Countie wherein they are Outlawed? Are the Coroners of any Countie now adays, present at every, or any Countie, when, and where men are Outlawed? Are not their names nevertheless returned as Judges of every Outlary unknown to them, for the most part, or all? Are not those Returns false, and forged? and are such proceedings, the due course, and Proces of Law? How many thousands of the Free-men of
England are Outlawed yearly, by such means? and how many
[Page 38]of them undone, before they can reverse them? How many are imprisoned thereupon, and have all their estates seised for the King, by Sheriffs chosen without the consent of the People? and often such as purchase their Offices, to gain by such means? How many Outlawries yearly are so clandestinely carried, that the parties so Outlawed, can hear nothing thereof, before they be imprisoned, and their estates destroyed as aforesaid? How many are further damnified by such Outlawries, procured of purpose, to debar them of their just suits in all Courts, until they reverse them? How chargeable are reversals thereof? What lawfulness is it, or what honour, for the Courts at
Westminster, to make unlawfull profit of such unlawfull practises? Cannot the Judges at
Westminster be contented to have counterfeit Returns of their Originals in
London and
Middlesex, but they must also have the like Returns of their Exigents throughout the Kingdom? Are not such Returns false, and perjurious in the Sheriffs that make them? Is it not sufficient for Judges, to perjure themselves, but that they
[Page 39]must animate others to do so too, by not punishing them, when they know that practise? Are not the Sheriffs of
London and
Middlesex, and all the Coroners of the Kingdom made liable by this practise to Actions of the Case, and to pay costs and dammages to the parties grieved? Are such Judges, Lawyers,
&c. for the Peace, or Profit of the Common-wealth, that beget, foment, or suffer the causes of such Actions, causelesly, but for their own ends and gains? Are such Courts to be called, or counted Courts of Justice, that maintain any Actions, or Arrests upon unjust grounds, or colour of any mis-begotten Laws, contrarie to
Mag. Charta? Are not Assaults, Batteries, Rescues, Riots, and Homicides, frequent upon such Arrests? Are not many mens lives lost, and more hazzarded, and their estates ruined thereby? And if a Catch-poll be killed for making, or attempting such unlawfull Arrest, do not the Judges use to adjudge it wilful Murther, though the wronged party doth but endeavour his justifiable defence? And have they not begotten a Statute for officers to plead the
[Page 40]General issue, by colour of which they justifie themselves, and their creatures, and condemn the guiltless? Are not the causers of Murther, as worthy to be hanged, as the doers? Are not they that maintain such Arrests, to the same ends as their Predecessors, Imps of the same generation? Why therefore their advice desired, or received in such matters? Are not the Releases of Errors, which Prisoners are forced to seal before they can be inlarged, rather proofs of their guiltiness, than acquittances of such practitioners? Are not their Errors manifest to be wilfull, and gainfull onely to themselves, and hurtfull to the Common-wealth? are such Errors, or Proceedings, to be called Due courses, or Proces of Law? Then (to speak once for all) is not the Due course, and Proces of Law obstructed, and perverted? and a wrong course practised, full of Errors, Lies, Forgeries, Perjuries,
&c. (as alreadie appeareth, and better shall hereafter) and cannot Law be executed without such practises? Doth not
Mag. Char. and all its confirmations, shew how it may? Are not they sufficient lights,
[Page 41]and guids for the Due course, Proces, and Proceedings which ought to be observed, in the right execution of Law? And doth not the Lord
Coke confess them to be such, and that they never misguided any man, that certainly knew them, and truly followed them? Fol. 526. Fourthly,
If no man shall be exiled, &c. Are not Debtors exiled from their Native Soils in
Cumberland, or
Cornwal, and from all their wordly comforts, of Wifes, Children, Families, Friends, and Estates, both Real, and Personal when called, and forced by
Habeas corpus &c. to attend Duke
Humfrey in
Pauls, or Judge
Owen in
Westminster (as good dead as any Judges living) to hear or dispatch Suits by the Law of the Land in any way of Justice, while the Suitors money lasts; or to relieve them with any Alms, when their Purses are spent? And if at last sent to the
Fleet, or
Marshalsey, where they be pent up as aforesaid; are they not worse Exiled than into
Turkie, where they may have more Liberty of Land and Sea, and live in less Slavery than under Goalers in
England, and have more hopes to return home again
[Page 42](like Sir
Thomas Shirley, and many others) than from these Hells, whence few find Redemption? Had
Henry of
Bullingbrook been Imprisoned for Debt here, (as such now are) when he was banished to
France could he have hoped to be King of
England, except he had made all his Judges, and Goalers, the best sharers of all his Usurpations, as all the cheating Prisoners in these places do theirs, as they and their Creditors can best tell, by dear, and daily experience? Fifthly,
If no man shall be destroyed, &c.
unless by Verdict, &c. Are not all Prisoners for Debt, who are first forced themselves to destroy their small Estates to buy bread to eat in Idleness, and to pay Fees to Goalers,
&c. and at last to Famish in the
Fleet, or
Marshalsey, &c. destroyed both in Lives, and Estates, and their Families to boot, without any Verdict given, or intended for their Lives? Nay are not all the Free-men of
England, that are, or may be subject to Debts, consequently subject to the like destruction? And worthy so long as they suffer the Laws of
England, (contained in the glorious Fabrick of the
Great Charter
[Page 43]
of the Liberties of England, built by their Ancestors for a perpetual Monument of ther care of their Posterity, and their Liberties for ever) to be thus destroyed by an Hypocritical Generation of Pharisaical Pretenders to the onely knowledge of these Laws, which by that pretence, they thus pervert, to destroy all honest men whom it should save, and to save all whom it should destroy or punish; and that for unlawful respect, and considerations tending onely to their own profits, and ends. Sixthly,
If no man shall be condemned, &c.
but by the judgement of his equals according to the Laws of the Land; Are not all Debtors that are Famished as aforesaid, Condemned for their Lives in effect, though but for their Debts in appearance, without any Verdict of their equals, so intended, contrary to the Law of the Land? Seventhly, do not all the Judges at
Westminster, sell Justice, when they sell Prisoners for Debt, their Writs of
Habeas Corpus, &c. for money, when the King would have all his Writs of Grace to be given to his Subjects
Gratis, and no Judge to take any Fee, or Reward for any
[Page 44]thing but of himself? Eightly, Do they not deny Justice when they deny such Writs
Gratis? Ninthly, Do they not defer Justice, when they detain poor men that are Bailable in Prison, while they have sufficient men ready to tender for their Bail, till they be forced to borrow money of other friends, and to send far, and stay long before they can receive it to loose their Bail in the interim, and be forced to seek others; by which delays, their Goalers Fees increase, and their Dyer, Lodging, and Expences draw charges, which they might have saved to find Bread for their Wives and Children at home; who perhaps are forced to fast by that means, and to sell, or pawn their Cows, or Clothes for this money, this damnable money, thus extorted by a Judge, for scribling his Infamous name to a Writ, which doth but wrap a man, and his cause, faster in his clouches? O Merciless, Miserable, Mercinary Judge! that can neither give, nor lend so little as his name, to so much goodness in Policie, (if not in Charity) to give a man Liberty to breath, and take leave of his Home, upon security of
[Page 45]more advantage both to Court, and Party, than his imprisonment to return to his Pinfold.
Radamanth himself abhorreth such foolish covetousness. Do they not defer Justice, when by their Writs they cause Indictments, Informations, and just Suits Commenced in other competent, and more proper Courts in all parts of the Kingdom, to be removed to
Westminster, and there detained without any Tryal these 40 years? How many thousands of Papists, and heinous Malefactors that should have been punished in, and by their Counties, and Courts at home, have by this means found
Westminster, and its Courts, their onely Sanctuaries, and Priviledges for none but Eminent, Opulent, Impenitent Offendours? But is not Justice denyed, when any Bailable man is denyed to be Bailed? Or more, when Bail is accepted upon Oath for its sufficiency, and is denyed to be Filed, and the Party so Bailed in Law, detained Prisoner still, at the Judges, and Plantiffs pleasures? Briefly, Is not the Administration of all the Law, and Justice in
England, Ingrossed and
[Page 46]Monopolized at
Westminster, where the Judges and Courts assume to be chief, and do exercise a plenary jurisdiction over all others, so that they suffer none but themselves to erre, or to abuse Law; nor any to accomplish any Justice, or to reform any Errors, but onely themselves, who do pretend to correct all in their
Exchecquer-Chamber, where instead of correcting any, they confirm their own; which must be all as aforesaid. Lastly, is it unknown that they were wont to Buy their Offices of the Kings Servants, and therefore to Sell their Under-Offices to their own Servants, Attorneys,
&c? And was not this the Buying and Selling of Justice that is yet unpaid for, & had need to be Reformed? Is it any reason that any should Buy Justice, and not Sell it for gain by the Bargain? Is it not Bought to that end? Is it not to that end, Judges neglect to give Attorneys their ancient Oath, whereby they were wont to be Sworn to do no Falshood, nor cause any to be done in their Courts; and if they knew any, to give knowledge thereof to the Judges,
&c. that they should increase no Fees,
&c. (as
[Page 47]you may read it at large in the latter end of the
Attorneys Academy. Is it not to the same end that Judges neglect to give all Plantiffs for Debts or Trespass, their Oaths that the Debt or Trespass amounteth to 40
[...] or more or else let the Suit be Tryed in the Sheriffs Court at home, according to the
Stat. of Gloc. 6.
Ed. 1. c. 8? And is it not likewise to the same end, they neglect to take security of all Plantiffs, to prosecute all Actions with effect, or pay Costs and Damages to the Defendants, if they prove not their Issues? which Judges anciently used to do, and still ought, before any Declaration be admitted, or Plea required, as saith the
Mirror of Justice? fol. 64. b. Is it not to the same end the
Chancery neglecteth to take the Oath of all Complainants to make good their Bills in all points, or pay Costs and Damages in case they fail, and that before any
Sub-poena be granted them, according to the Statute 15.
H. 6. cap. 4
o? And were not all well ended, if all the end were that none were forsworn for Injustice, but the chief Justices? (though comfortless for them to be so wretched as to have no associates,)
[Page 48]is it not the worse for the People, that their Ministers which ought to be Sworn as aforesaid, are not? Whereby old Attorneys without hazard of Perjury, lead young Judges Sworn to what they know not, to do what they should not? as when so many subtil and lying
Mercuries, direct so many covetous and blind
Cupids to shoot forth their arrows, that they may stick them where they please, and commend the shooters for hitting the marks that yield them the best sprots of the gain?
The rest of this
Charter I shall omit as aforesaid, for the reasons aforesaid, and shall conclude this with the beginning of another, made in Confirmation, Renovation, and Perpetuation thereof, by King
Edward the first, in the 28 year of his Reign, as followeth:
viz.
‘
EDWARD by the Grate of God, King of
England, Lord of
Ireland, Duke of
Guyen. To all Arch-Bishops,
&c. greeting. We have seen the great
Charter of the Lord
Henry our Father, of the Liberties of
England in these words:’And so beginneth the
Charter as aforesaid, and endeth this, and it together, saying,
‘We ratifying and approving these gifts, any grants aforesaid, confirm, and
[Page 49]make strong the same for us, and our Heirs perpetually, and by tenor of these presents renew the same, Willing, and granting for Vs, and Our Heirs, that this
Charter, and all and singular its Articles for evermore, shall be stedfastly, and inviolably observed; And if any Article in the same
Charter con
[...]eined yet hithirto peradventure hath not been observed, nor kept; We will, and by Our Authoritie Royal command from henceforth firmly they be observed. These,
&c. being witnesses. Given at
Westminster under Our own hand the 28 of
March, in the 28 year of Our Reign.’
Again, where the L.
C. maintaineth the Statute of
Marlebridge made 51
Hen. 3. cap. 5. which saith,
‘The great
Charter shall be observed in all its Articles, as well in such as pertain to the King, as to others, and that shall be enquired of before the Justices in Eyre in their Circuits, and before Sheriffs in their Counties when need shall be, and Writs shall be freely granted against them that do offend, before the King, or the Justices of the Bench, or before Justices in Eyre, when hey come into those
[...]arts,
&c. And the offendors when
[...]hey be convict shall be grievously pu
[...]ished by our sovereign Lord the King,
[...] form above mentioned.’
[Page 50]
Expost and Quer.I shall but ask, Why not Justices in Eyre still? And why not Writs
Gratis sent to the Sheriff of every Countie, to enquire of offences, and offendors against the great
Charter? And doth not this Statute prove, that Sheriffs ought to have such Writs, and to make such enquiries? And that the King referred himself, as well as others, to the judgements, as well of Justices in Eyre, as of the Justices of the Bench? and that he would have his Writs granted as well against him, as others, and that
Gratis? doth it not futther prove, that Kings accounted the Justices in Eyre, his Justices, and their Court, his Court; as well as the
Kings-Bench? how therefore doth the Lord
Coke hereafter call them new Justices, and their Court, new Court? But more of that in its place.
Now having done with so much of
Mag. Charta as I promised: and with the 5 Chapter of the Statute of
Marlebridge: and the 8 of the Statute of
Glocester. Here ensueth the Confirmation of the great
Charter, made at
London 10
Octob. Anno 25.
Ed. 1. three years before that which
[Page 51]is Printed before it, because that containeth all the
Charter in 38. chapters at large, and this but 7. In the First of which it confirmeth both
Charters, and every Article thereof; both made 9
o
H. 3. in general words, as followeth,
viz.
Cap. 1.
Charters.
Edward by the grace of God, King of
England, Lord of
Ireland, and Duke of
Guyen. To all those that these present Letters shall hear or see, Greeting: Know ye, that We to the Honour of God, and of Holy Church, and to the profit of Our Realm, have granted for Vs, and Our Heirs; That the
Charter of
Liberties, and the
Charter of
Forrests, which were made by the Commonalty of the Realm, in the time of King
Henry Our Fathers, shall be kept in every point without breach. And We will, that the same
Charter shall be sent under Our Seal, aswel to Our Iustices of the Forrest, as to others; And to all Sheriffs of Shiers, and to all Our other Officers, and to all Our Cities throughout the Realm, together with Our Writs, in the which shall be contained that they cause the foresaid
Charters to be published; And the Declare to the People, that We have confirmed them in all points. And that Our Iustices, Sheriffs, Maiors, and other Ministers, which under Vs, have the Laws of Our Land to guid, shall allow the same
Charters
[Page 52]Pleaded before them in Iudgement, in all their points,: That is to wit; The
Great Charter, as the Common Law; And the
Charter of the
Forrest, for the Wealth of Our Realm.
L.
C. upon
Conf. C. f. 526.The Title of this Statute
(saith the Lord
Coke) is
Confirmationes Chartarum de Libertatibus Angliae & Forrestae, viz. The Confirmation of the Charters of the Liberties of
England, and of the Forrest: And true it is
(saith he) that hereby the said
Charters are expresly confirmed; but they are also excellently interpreted, (which is a Confirmation in Law) for here is nothing Enacted, but it included within
Magna Charta. And by the Commonalty
(saith he) is to be understood, by the consent of all the Realm, by Authority of Parliament: and many times by the Commonalty of
England, is signified an Act of Parliament,
&c. before Printing, and before the Reign of King
Hen. the 7
th, Statutes were Ingrossed in Parchment, and by the Kings Writ Proclaimed by the Sheriff of every Countie: this was the ancient Law of
England, that the Kings Commandments issued, and were published in form of Writs (as then it was.) An excellent course, and worthie to be restored,
[Page 53]
&c. This Clause
(saith he) is worthie to be written in letters of gold,
viz. That our Justices, Sheriffs, Majors, and other Ministers, which under us have the Laws of the Land to guid them shall allow the said
Charters in all points, which shall come before them in Judgement. And here it is to be observed, That the Laws are the Judges Guides, or Leaders, according to that old Rule,
Lex est Exercitus Judicum, viz. The Law is the Judges Armie:
Tutissimus Doctor, viz. The safest Teacher: or
Lex est optimus Iudicis Synagogus, viz. Their best Synagoug. And
Lex est tutissimus cassis, viz. Their safest Fortress. There is an old legal word
(saith he) called
Guidagium, viz. Guidage, which signifieth an Office of guiding Travelors through dangerous and unknown ways. Here it appeareth that the Laws of the Realm, hath this Office to guid the Iudges in all causes that come before them, in the ways of right Justice, who never yet misguided any man that certainlie knew them, and truly followed them. The sence of the words, That the great
Charter is to be holden for the Common Law, is, that it is a Common Law to all, in amendment of the
[Page 54]Realm; that is, of great mischiefs, and inconveniencies, which oppressed the whole Realm, before the making thereof.
Expost and Quer.Doth not the Lord
Coke by all this his expression, commend this Statute very highly? Why did he not in his duty cause it to be observed in his time? And had not Iustices of the Forrest, and other Iustices, Sheriffs Majors, and other Ministers of his time (had they received the Great
Charter with the Kings Writs) power thereby, as well as he, to cause the said
Charter to be published to the People, and that the King had confirmed it in all points? Why did he (by neglecting his duty to send the said
Charter and Writs unto them accordingly) make them fail of their duties? Doth not the Lord
Coke confess by this clause,
Worthie, (as he saith)
to be written in letters of gold, That Sheriffs, Majors, and other Ministers, as well as Justices, and other Justices as well as those at Westminster,
have, or ought to have the Law of England
to be their guid, and ought to allow Magna Charta
in all points, which in any Plea
shall be before them?
[Page 55]Why then do the Iustices at
Westminster by their
Habeas corpus, and other Writs, (as aforesaid) disturb, and prevent all Sheriffs, Majors,
&c. to exercise their Offices, before Judgment, or after, without proof of Injustice, or manifest Errors committed by them in their Iudgements? Why do not the Iustices at
Wistminster (when they have Persons, and Causes brought before them by virtue of their Writs) allow
Mag. Car. to be Pleaded before themselves, since they will suffer no others to hear it? How can it be true, (when they do not) that the Law is their guid? Do not they assume the sole Guiding, Learning, Interpreting, Exercising, and Over ruling of the Law to themselves, when they suffer no other Iustices, or Ministers of the King, but themselves to have any Judgement therein, as aforesaid? Why do they bely the Law so much, as to call it their
Guid, their
Teacher, their
Army, their
Synagogue, their
Fortress; when it is manifest, That their Attorneys, their Sollicitors, their Catch-polls, and their Goalers, are their
Guids, Teachers, Supernumerous Armies, and
Invincible
[Page 56]Fortresses, (as they trust, but may be deceived) all whose ways are to Injustice as aforesaid? How can that Law be called Common to all, which They, and these their Creatures, Monopolize, Ingross, and Appropriate all to themselves as aforesaid?
C. 2.
Judgements.And We will, That if any Iudgement be given from henceforth, contrary to the points of the
Charters aforesaid, by the Iustices, or by any other Our Ministers, that hold
Plea before them against the points of the
Charters, it shall be undone, and holden for nought.
L.
Coke upon
Con. C. f. 527.Whatsoever Judgement it given against this Statute of
Magna Charta, &c. is made void by this Act, and may be reversed by a Writ of Error, because the Judgement is given against the Law; for this Act saith,
Soir de fait & pur nienttenus, viz. as the Stat. Englisheth it self,
It shall be undone and holden for nought.
Expost and Quer.If so? Why should not all Iudgements (appearing as aforesaid, to be contrary to
Mag. Charta) which are given for Arrests, and Imprisonment of mens Bodies for Debt, be undone,
[Page 57]and held for nought? Why did M
r.
Garland lately trouble the most High Court of Parliament (whereof, by so doing, he shewed himself an unworthy Member) with a ridiculous useless Act of his drawing, for the Enlarging poor Prisoners for Debt? Why did not he, (if he did ever read this place of the Lord
[...].) mind the Parliament to command the Judges (who seem, if they have read it, to have forgot it) to reverse their Erroneous judgements against Debtors, so far as they extend to their Imprisonment, and to send their
Liberate to all their Goalers, to set open all their Goal dores, and let forth so many of the Prisoners for Debt, as they have left alive? The poor, because they have no Estate whereof to pay; the rich, because they have Estates sufficient for all, or part; against which Estates, so much of their judgements may stand, as concerneth that, and not their Bodies: and Executions may be taken thereupon, by
Elegit, or
Fieri facias, according to the Statute of
Westminster the 2. cap. 18
th. agreeable to
Magna Charta, and the Parliament not to be troubled, except to Impower
[Page 58]the Iudges by an Order, to rectifie their judgements according to that Law which is in force, and so forgo their Errors, and Repealed Statute of the 25
th of
Ed. 3
d c. 17
th. which ought to be no Guid, Leader, or Teacher, to learned and grave Judges, that can never be misguided by the right Law, if (as the Lord
C. saith)
they certainly know it, and be pleased truly to follow it. And by this course, as well the Creditors of the rich Debtors, as the poor Prisoners for Debt, (that have been wronged by the Judges Erronious judgements, and proceeding against
Mag. Charta) may be partly redressed, and so rest satisfied, until the Parliament be pleased to right them further (as shall appear hereafter they may.) So likewise may that Prisoner, (which is Imprisoned again after his inlargement by
Garlands Act) be Enlarged again by the same Judge that Committed him, without troubling the Parliament, or People with any such Appeal, as is lately divulged; or suffering the
Apprentices Out-Cry to run so far, That now it will never be stopped till the Thieves be taken.
[Page 59]
Cap. 4.
Excom. &c.And that all Arch Bishops, and Bishops, shall pronounce the Sentence of Excommunication against all those that by word, deed, or counsel, do contrary to the said
Charters, or that in any point break, or undo them; And that the said Curse be twice a year Denounced, and Published by the Prelates aforesaid: And if the same Prelates, or any of them, be remiss in the Denunciation of the said Sentences; the Arch-Bishops of
Canterbury, and
York, for the time being, shall Compel, and Distrain them to the Execution of their Duties, in Form aforesaid.
L.
C. upon Confir Cart. f. 527.This Excommunication the Prelates could not pronounce without Warrant by Authoritie of Parliament, because it concerned Temporal causes.
Was not the Authority of this Parliament sufficient Warrant for Prelates to pronounce Excommunication according to the Tenor, and limitation of this Act? Doth not the Lord
Coke say before,
That this Act is not onely an Express Confirmation of Magna Charta,
but also, a Confirmation of it in Law? Doth he not say before that;
That Magna Charta
should live forever, and in all Successions of Ages for evermore? Is not the substance
[Page 60]of the Excommunication given by this Act to the Prelates to pronounce? Had the Prelates any more to do therein, but to pronounce an Excommunication? What meaneth
Ipso Facto in the Act, but to let all future Ages understand, That the breach of
Mag. Char. which is a Declaration of the Fundamental Laws of
England, is such an Offence as deserveth an everlasting Curse inflicted by the Law it self upon the Breakers for ever? Which Curse receiveth no more strength from the Pronouncer, than a Sentence of Death from a Iudge, who doth but tell a Fellon whom the Law condemneth, what shall be the manner of his Death. If any Excommunication was ever pronounced by virtue of this Act (as there were two in two several Kings Reigns) were not those Excommunications in force, and so to continue as long as
Magna Charta it self? the Prelates, and their Successours neglect of their Duties, by discontinuing such Denunciations twice yearly, afterwards notwithstanding? If so? Are not those Excommunications still in force, except Absolutions be produced,
[Page 61]granted, and given by equal Authority to that whereby those Excommunications were Denounced? If so? Are not Excommunications, until Absolutions, of the same accompt, and validity in Law, as Out-lawries, until they be reversed? If so? Are not all the Lands, Goods, and Chattels of all Excommunicats, now the States, as formerly they were the Kings, and so Seizable, Sequestrable, and Convertible to that use, until Absolution? And ought not satisfaction precede Absolution? Ought not that satisfaction extend to every particular man that hath been wrong'd in this case, which (as the L.
C. saith)
is a Temporal case, and so called, in respect of the interest of all men, called by the Clergy,
Temporal, for distinction from themselves, that would be called
Spiritual? And so (as I believe) not to be commuted by a
Prelatical Sentence, to a trivial Pennance; nor pardoned by Parliament, without excepting every particular Interest. And what Parliament can Pardon, or Absolve Offendours against
Magna Charta, but by the Rules of
Magna Charta, without offending
Magna Charta
[Page 62]themselves, and incurring the same Excommunication, as they have incurred that would be Absolved? If Excommunications be no Terrors to
Atheistical Judges, Justices,
&c. who neither Believe, nor fear, Heaven, Hell, God, Justice, nor Laws, (though they cannot in nature and reason, but know that such there are, and are to be beleived, feared, and obeyed) shall nor Excommunications be sufficient Warrants for Christians, English Christians in
England, (being warranted not onely, as the L.
C. saith,
By Authority of Parliament, but of many Parliaments, such Parliaments of such Infallibility as were those wherein
Magna Charta, and all its Confirmations were made, and grounded upon the Common-Laws of
England, which, as all Lawyers profess, were grounded upon the Law of God, the Word of God, the God of Christians, Christ Jesus, the God of Truth, even Truth it self,) to put them in Execution? If not? To what ends are Parliaments, or the Laws of God, and man, to such as dare not, or will not, if, and when they may? Doth not the Statute of
Ano. 1
o.
P. & M. cap. 12
o. which
[Page 63]made it Fellony for twelve English persons, or above, to assemble together of purpose to break any point of the Laws of
England, imply it to be Warrantable for all the People of
England to Assemble together, to cause the Laws of
England, made by all their consents, to be observed, and to punish not onely the Breakers, but also the onely begetters, and causers of all the Breakers, and Breaches of all the Laws of
England, the onely assumers of the knowledg thereof, and concealers of that knowledge from the People; so that none but themselves, can knowingly break the Laws, because they will not let them know them? Lastly, If Excommunications be nothing formidable to Lawyers, to make them care whether they incur, or shun them, but as their profit guids them? Let us see what the L.
Coke saith, fol. 536. concerning the conclusion of this Act, and the Seals that were put to it, and the Oaths of the King and Parliament, then and for ever, for the Ratification of it, omitted in the Stat. at large, in Print, but to be seen in the Tower,
Rot. Parl. 7
o.
Hen. 4
th.
n
o. 60. begining
[Page 64]with the word
Simile, &c.
Note (saith he)
the Solemnitie of this Act, in that all the Arch-Bishops, Bishops, Earls, B
[...]rons, &c.
did put their Seals thereunto. A rare example, which was done for the obliging of them the more firmly to the observation of this Act, which concerned the Laws, Liberties, and Free-Customs of their Countrey; and for their greater Obligation for the due Observation of this Act, they took a voluntary Corporal Oath.
Expost & Q.And let us note, that if the Judgement of God, and this Parliament, hath made the Prelates sensible of their slighting of their Predecessors Excommunications, seals and oaths? by what justice, or excuses, shall Lawyers avoid the same Judgement? And though the Ignorance of
Mag. Charta, and the Law (which Lawyers have begotten & caused by concealing the same from them as aforesaid) can be no safe Plea for any with God, or man, without prayers for Remission, and manifestation of Repentance; yet is Ignorance a better subject for mercy, than knowing wilfulness; and the people, while ignorant of
Mag. Charta, are more capable
[Page 65]of grace for the breaking of it, than when they know it, if they put not the Iudgements of it, in Execution, against the causers of their offence.
Now I shall let you see, that there were two
Excommunications denounced against the breakers of
Mag. Charta, according to this Statute; as followeth.
Excomunic. prim.The Year of our Lord One thousand two hundred fiftie three, the third of
May, in the great Hall of the King at
Westminster, in the presence, and by the assent of the Lord
Henry by the Grace of God, King of
England; and the Lord
Richard Earl of
Cornwall his brother;
Roger Bigot Earl of
Norfolk and
Suffolk, Marshal of
England; Humphrey Earl of
Herford; Henry Earl of
Oxford; John Earl
Warren, and other estates of the Realm of
England: We
Boniface, by the mercie of God, Arch-bishop of
Canterbury, Primate of all
England; T. of
London, H. of
Ely, S. of
Worcester, E. of
Lincoln, W. of
Norwich, P. of
Herford, W. of
Salisbury, W. of
Durham, R. of
Excester, M. of
Carlile, W. of
Bath, E. of
Rochester, T. of S.
Davids, Bishops, apparrelled in Pontificals, with tapers burning against the breakers of the Churches Liberties, and of the Liberties, or other Customs of the Realm of
England, and namely of those which are contained
[Page 66]in the
Charter of the Common Liberties of
England, &
Charter of the Forrest; have denounced the sentence of
Excommunication in this Form: By the Authoritie of Almightie God, the Father, the Son, and the holy Ghost, and of the glorious Mother of God, and perpetual Virgin
Mary; of the blessed Apostles
Peter and
Paul; and of all Apostles, and of all Martyrs; of blessed
Edward King of
England; and of all the Saints of heaven; We Excommunicate, accurse, and from the benefits of our holy Mother the Church, we sequester all those that hereafter willingly, and maliciously deprive, or spoil the Church of her Right; and all those that by any craft, or wiliness do violate, break, diminish, or change the Churches liberties, and Free-customs contained in the
Charters of the Common liberties, and of the Forrest, granted by our Lord the King to Arch bishops Bishops, and other Prelates of
England: And likewise to the Earls, Barons, Knights, and other Freeholders of the Realm; and all that secretly or openly, by deed, word, or counsel, do make Statutes, or observe them being made, or that bring in Customs, or keep them being brought in, against the said libertis, or any of them, the Writers, Lawmakers, Counsellors, and the Executors of them, and all those that shall presume to Iudge against them. All and every which Persons before mentioned, that willingly
[Page 67]shall commit any thing of the Premises, let them well know; That they incur the foresaid sentence
Ipso sacto, first upon the deed done. And those that commit ought ignorantly-and be admonished, except they Re, form themselves within 15. daies after the time of the Admonition; and make full satisfaction for that they have done, at the will of the Ordinary, shall be from that time forth, wrapped in the same sentence. And with the same sentence, we burthen all those that presume to perturb the peace of our Sovereign Lord the King, and of the Realm. To the perpetual memory of which thing, We the aforesaid Prelates have put Our Seals to these Presents.
Expost and Quer.What though the Form of this
Excommunication be Popish? Is not the Substance the maintenance of
Englands Liberties? And is not that all which the meaning of this Law requireth? If Judges and Prelates, as well since King
Hen. 8. as before, have neglected their Duties in Itterating the charge of their Functions, the first, in pronouncing Sentence, and the other in Executing it; doth not once Pronouncing, & once executing of such one Sentence of Law, as concerneth all Ages, Sexes, and
[Page 68]Conditions of People to learn and remember, no less for the Preservation of their lives, and livelihoods, than Scriptures for their Salvation, take away the plea of Ignorance from all men? Shall any man commit that sin which he knoweth to be once so Declared by the Law, and think to avoid punishment because not often so Declared by Law-Professours? Are not all men bound to search the Scriptures, and learn the Laws at their perils therefore? If Ignorance were a plea, shall knowledge be excused? Professors of knowledg? nay, such as ingross that Profession from all others; nay more, such as are the onely causers and punishers of all other mens Ignorance?
It appeareth that this Sentence was Denounced in the time of King
Hen. 3
d. Now followeth another, Denounced upon the said Confirmation made in the 25
th. year of King
Ed. 1
o.
viz.
Excom. 2.In the Name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost,
Amen. Whereas our Sovereign Lord the
King, to the Honour of God, and Holy Church, and for the common
[Page 69]Profit of the Realm, hath granted for him and his Heirs for ever, these Articles above written.
Robert Arch-Bishop of
Canterbury, Primate of all
England, Admonished all his Province, Once, Twice, and Thrice. Because that shortness will not suffer so much delay, as to give knowledge to all the People of
England of these Presents in Writing: We therefore injoyn all persons of what Estates soever they be, that they, and every of them, as much as in them is, shall uphold and maintain these Articles, granted by our Sovereign Lord the King, in al
[...] points; And all those that in any point do resist, or break, or in any manner hereafter procure, counsel, or any wise assent to resist, or break those Ordinances, or go about it by word, or deed; openly, or privily, by any manner of pretence, or colour: We the foresaid Arch-Bishop by our Authority in this Writing expressed, do
Excommunicate, and accurse, and from the Lord Iesu Christ, and from all the company of Heaven, and from all the Sacraments of Holy Church, do sequester, and exclude.
Expost & Q.Doth not the word,
Hereafter, extend to all successions, and implie a Duration, as long as there be a
Mag. Charta, and a breaker of it? Do not Parliamentarie Oaths, as well as their Laws, include absents, and futures,
[Page 70]as well as present? If neither Oaths, nor Excommunications be obligatorie to Atheists, shall not their hands, and seals, bind them and their Heirs, and Executors after them, as common Bonds signed and sealed between private parties, commonly do? And more specially, such as take upon them the sole Execution, and Administration of the Laws, Liberties, and Freehold of
England? Shall not
Charters of Parliament, made, signed, sealed, and confirmed by Authoritie of Parliaments, bind all Subjects, their Heirs, Executors, and Administrators, as well, and as far, as private
Charters of Feofments shall bind their Contractors, and their Heirs,
&c. Nay, as far as Acts of Parliament can bind, till repealed? Is not every Court called
Curia, of the Care it ought to have to execute that charge it undertaketh? and not to exact, and raise Fees,
&c. for discharging themselves of all their said Obligations to do even Justice to all men, and to force men to pay those exactions, even for doing injustice? If all before written be not sufficient to discover that to be true, and that therefore the Lives,
[Page 71]Lands, & Goods, possessed by Judges, Lawyers, all, or most of them, are in the States power to seize into their hands, to the use of the Common-wealth, as aforesaid; let us look a little further, and we shall find more that may.
Stat. of Artic. on the great
Chart. A. 28.
Ed. 1.And first, the Statute called
Articuli super Chartas, viz. Articles upon the great Charters, made 28. of
Ed. 1.
viz. the same year as the Confirmation at large (which consisteth of 38. chapters of
Magna Charta) was made; proveth further, as followeth.
Preamble.For as much as the Articles of the great
Charter of the Liberties of
England, and of the
Charter of the Forrest, the which King
Henry, Father to our Sovereing Lord the King, granted to his People for the Weal of his Realm, have not been heretofore observed, ne kept, and all because there was no punishment executed upon them which offended against the points of the
Charters before mentioned: Our Sovereign Lord the King hath again granted, revived, & confirmed them at the requests of his Prelates, Earls, & Barons assembled in His Parliament holden at
Westminster in the 28 year of his Reign. And hath ordained, enacted, and established certain Articles against all them that offend contrary to the points of the said
Charters, or
[Page 72]any part of them, or that in any wise transgress them, in the form that ensueth,
viz.
First of all, That from henceforth the great
Charter of the Liberties of
England, granted to all the Commonaltie of the Realm, and the
Charter of Forrest in like manner granted, shall be observed, kept, & maintained in every point, in as ample wise, as the King hath granted, renued, and confirmed them by this
Chart. And that the
Charter be delivered to every Sheriff of
England under the Kings Seal, to be read four times in the year before the people in the full County, that is to wit, the next County day after the Feast of
S. Michael, and the next County day after the Feast of the
Circumcision, and after
Easter, and after the Feast of
S. John Baptist.
Justices of
Oyer &
Term.And for these two
Charters to be firmly observed in every point, and Article (where before no remedy was at the Common Law) there shall be chosen in every Shire Court by the Commonaltie of the same shire, three substantial men, Knights, or other lawfull, wise, and well disposed Persons to be Iustices, which shall be assigned by the Kings Letters Patents under the great Seal, to hear, and determine (without any other Writ but onely their Commission) such plaints as shall be made upon all those that commit, or offend against any point contained in the aforesaid
Charters, in the Shires where they be assigned, as well
[Page 73]in Franchises, as without, and as well for the Kings servants out of their places, as for other. And to hear the plaints from day to day without any delay, and to determine them without allowing the delays which be at the Common Law: And the same Knights shall have power to punish all such as shal be attainted of any Trespass done contrary to any point of the two said
Charters (where no remedy was before at the Common Law, as before is said) by Imprisonment, or by Fine, or by Amerciament, according to the Trespass. Nevertheless the King, nor none of his Councel that made this Ordinance, intend that by virtue hereof, any of the foresaid Knights shall hold any manner of Plea by power, for to admit any suit in such cases wherein there hath been remedy provided in times passed, after the course of the Common Law by writ. Nor also that the Common Law should be prejudiced, nor the
Ch. aforesaid, in any point. And the K. Willeth, that if all three be not present, or cannot at all times attend to do their Office in form aforesaid, the King commandeth that two of them shall do it. And it is Ordained that the Kings Sheriffs, and Bailiffs shall be attendant to do the commandments of the foresaid Iustices, as far forth as appertaineth into their Offices. And besides these things granted upon the Articles of the
Charters aforesaid. The King of his special Grace for redress
[Page 74]of the grievantes that the people hath sustained by reason of his Wars, and for the amendment of their Estate, & to the intent that they may be the more ready to do him service, and the more willing to assist, and aid him in time of need; hath granted certain Articles, the which he supposeth shall not onely be observed of his leige
[...] people, but also shall be as much profitable, or more, than of the Article
[...] heretofore granted.
L.
Coke f. 537, 538, 539.One of the causes for the making this
[...] Act, was
(saith the Lord
Coke, as in the Preamble is suggested) that there was no certain punishment i
[...] many points established by the said
Charters against the violators of the same; which also by this Act
(saith he) is remedied: And the word,
People here
(saith he) doth include all the Kings Subjects,
&c. And again, the word,
Pain ne fuit estable, some
[...]
(saith he) Pain ne fuit execute,
[...] that is true in effect; but the Original is,
Pain ne fuit estable; that is,
[...] pain was set down certain: And
(saith he, fol. 539.) This Act had but
[...] force of a
Charter, until confirmed
[...] this Parliament, the 34
th Ed. 1.
[...] that these
Charters should be read
[...] times in the year, in full County, here
[...]
[Page 75]an order taken for the publishing. And
O
[...] remedie ne fuit avant, &c. is to be construed
(saith he) where no Action was given by the Kings Writ, to be pursued at Common Law,
&c. Again, here
(saith he) for the better Execution of those glorious two Lights,
Magna Charta, and
Charta Forestae, a new Court, and new Justices were appointed,
&c. Again
(saith he) these clauses against the Kings Servants out of their places, as well as others: And to hear the Plaints without delay, day by day, and to determine them without admitting such delaies as be at Common Law, was the first ground of the raising of the Justices called,
Trail Baston, and their Courts so called, in respect of their precipitate proceedings from day to day, without such convenient leisure and time, as Common Law allowed,
&c. they in the end had such Authoritie, as Justices in Eyer; but albeit they had their Authoritie by Act of Parliament, yet if they erred in judgement, a Writ of Error did lie by the general Rule of the Common Law, to reverse the Judgement in the
Kings-Bench; which being once resolved, and known, and their Jurisdiction fettered with so many limitations, their Authoritie, by little and little vanished.
[Page 76]
Expost and Quer.Was there any certain Pain established by this Statute, against the violators of
Magna Charta, other than by Commission in Eyer, that the Justices might determine, and punish the Offendors by Imprisonments, Fines or Amerciaments, according to the Trespass? Ought not the Justices of the
Kings-Bench to have so punished all such as were Indicted before Sheriffs, or Justices in Eyer, who had power to inquire, and certifie them of all such Offendors, and Offences against
Magna Charta, by the Statute of
Marlebridge? 51.
Hen. 3
d? Doth not the Lord
Coke say elsewhere,
That all Statutes ought to be construed so, as that there should be no failer of Justice: should not the Justices of the
Kings-Bench have construed
Magna Charta so? Doth not the 14
th chap. of
Mag. Charta expresly direct;
That all offendors ought to be Amercied by their equals, according to the quantitie of the Trespass? Doth the Lord
Coke speak truth, when he saith,
this Statute gave any man Remedie for the certaintie of the punishment, other than Magna Charta
did before? Was it not made more uncertain by referring it to the Justices
[Page 77]in Eyers discretion, whether Amerciaments, Fyne, or Imprisonment? Doth he not confess plainly, (when he saith,
It is true in effect, that the Pain was not Executed, as some read, instead of the Pain was not Established,) That it was the fault of the Justices of the
Kings-Bench, in not Executing the Pain of Amercying,
&c. (as they might, and ought to have done) was the cause of Impowering the Justices in Eyer, (who were but Enquirers before) now to determine, and punish such Offendors, and Offences, as they did forbear,
viz. The Kings Servants, with whom by this time, they of the
Kings-Bench tampered for their Offices? And was it not for the same cause, the people were Declared to be choosers of Justices in Eyer? And doth not the Lord
Coke shew a great spight between himself, and his brethren; whom he would have to be ancient; and the Justices in Eyer, whom he calleth a new Court, and new Justices? And shew his Memory to be weak, as his Envy was strong, when he is forced to give himself the Lye, (either here, or in his Exposition of the Stat. of
Marlebridge,
[Page 78]where he saith;
They were then Justices, and a Court, though but for Inquirie? And upon the 23
th
Chap. of Magna Charta; he saith, they used before that time to give charge to all Juries concerning Wears
&c. Doth not the Lord
Coke say, fol. 235.
That Bracton
wrote before the making West. 1.
which was 3. Ed. 13 And doth not
Bracton lib. 3. cap. 11, 12, and 13. say,
Justices in Eyer were before his time? Doth not
Camden in his
Britannia, pag. 104. say,
They were Instituted by King Hen. 2? Doth not
Hoveden in his
Anna
[...]s, part. poster. fol. 113. b. confirm the same? And add that K.
Hen. 2. divided the Realm in six parts, & setled three Justices in Eyer to every part, whose names he relateth? And doth not the
Mirror of Justice lib. 3
o. Tit. 1
o.
Justice in Eyer, declare their power at large? And as for their Election by the people, doth he not say, fol. 538.
That Magna Charta,
&c. containeth the substance of all that is contained in these Articles? And doth he not say in his Preamble,
That Magna Charta
is an Act declarative of the ancient Laws, and Customs of England
before it, and no introductive of any new?
[Page 79]And fol. 558.
That of ancient time, before the making of this Act, all such Officers, or Ministers, as were instituted, either for Preservation of
[...] Peace of the County, or for execution of Justice (because it concerned all the Subjects of that County, and they had a great interest in the due and just exercise of their places) were by force of the Kings Writs in every several County, chosen in full and open County, by the Free-holders of the same County? Again, (saith he,)
So it was then, and yet is, of Coroners, and so it was then, and yet is, of
Knights of the Shire for Parliaments; and of the Ve
[...]dors of a Forest, and likewise it was of ancient time of the Sheriff of the County, and restored by this Act: but this is altered by divers Acts of Parliament. Now were not Justices in Eyer therefore that were before
Magna Charta chosen by the peole, as they were Ministers of Justice, wherein the people were concerned? And were they by this Act but restored to their ancient jurisdiction, as (the Lord
Coke saith) Sheriffs were? Was not that alteration which was made by divers Acts of Parliament, made by such Acts as were contrary to
[Page 80]
Magna Charta? And are not, or ought not all such Acts to be void, (as the L.
Coke hath elsewhere said?) Doth not these contradictions declare the Lord
Coke to have been distracted with spight and envy against
[...]ustices in Eyer? And where in this leaf, he would perswade the people to suspect Justices in Eyer, of corruption, and Monopolizing justice to wrong the people that chuse them; can the people believe that these Justices (who are to be chosen by them, and to be displaced by them, when, and as often as they see cause) will, or can wrong them more, than those chosen by the King and his Servants, without their consents, unless they can believe that they may be perswaded to give their consents to wrong themselves? Is it not a Bull of less formality than ever any Popish Bull was, (keeping a man off with his Horns, That he shall have no hold of his tail) when he saith,
That the clause, where no remedy was before, &c.
ought to be expounded, where no Action was given by the Kings Writs, to be pursued at Common Law? Since by the Statute of
Marlebridge, Justices in Eyer were to
[Page 81]inquire by the Kings Writs; and now are, by express words of this chapter, not onely to inquire, but also to determine by virtue of their Commissions, without the Kings Writs? And what cause could they, or can any other Court determine by virtue of their Commission, without the Kings Writs, but is Actionable by the Kings Writs? What doth this Statute give by virtue of this Commission, if all things Actionable by Writs, be not determinable by these Commissions, without Writs? And what doth this Statute avail, if not constructable as others, so that there should be no failer of justice? Where was the failer of justice, but in the Kings Courts, and Iudges, in not executing justice upon the Offendors of
Magna Charta? Doth it not therefore appear that the said clause
(Where no Remedy was before) ought to be expounded, where no remedy was given before by Iustices in
Westminster against the Kings Servants, and themselves, that were the greatest contractors in the breaches of
Magna Charta? Were not the Iustices in Eyer therefore inabled with a power to supply their defaults,
[Page 82]and to do right to the People, against the King himself, and all his Servants at
Westminster, that wilfully failed in their justice and power? And where he saith;
The Justices called, Trail Baston,
had like authoritie as Justices in Eyer, and committed Errors, & upon pretence thereof, had all their proceedings transported to the Kings-Bench; doth it not appear by the Statute called,
Ragman, that those Iustices were made by the King, without the consent of the People, and sent abroad (perhaps of purpose) to err and abuse the people, to give colour to the
Kings-Bench, to send their Writs of Error, for the proceedings of the Iustices in Eyer (upon pretence of like Errors) so to suppress all Iustice against themselves, and their Creatures? Doth not the Lord
Coke herewithal prefer the chargeable delaies of causes (spun out by Termes, and Years,) before speedy justice done day by day, at mens own doors, which he calleth,
Precipitat? Doth he not ground this course, for suppressing speedy justice by Writs of Errors, upon the resolution of the Iudges at
Westminster, which he alleadgeth
[Page 83]as sufficient to maister Authority given by Act of Parliament? And is it not the resolution of all Lawyers, that no power but Parliament, is equal to Parliament, and no Parliament to be so impowred as to cross
Magna Charta, and its Confirmations? Doth he not further (fol. 599.) alleadge the resolution of all the Iudges of
England, against the King and his Councel, for an Erroneous Act, when they had chosen a Sheriff for
Lincoln in a case of necessity, without the consent of the People? But to hasten this Treatise to an end, I shall end this Statute for this time, with few chapters following,
viz.
Cap. 8. Elect. of Sheriffs.The King hath granted unto his people, that they shall have Election of their Sheriff in every Shire (where the Sheriffalty is not of the Fee) if they list.
I shall say no more to this, than hath been said before.
C. 15. Summons & Atach.In summons and Attachements in Plea of land, the Writs from henceforth shall contain 15. days full at the least, after the Common Law, if it be not in Attachement of Assizes
[Page 84]taken in the Kings presence, or of Pleas before Iustices in Eyer, during the Eyer.
Expost and Quer.Upon this I must ask, Is not a Writ of Debt, Summons? Should not that be given to the party which ought to be summoned? Should not an Attachement follow by distinction of 15. days, as this Statute prescribeth? Shall the repealed Statute of the 25
th of
Ed. the 3
d, serve Lawyers turns to make a distinction between a Plea real, and Personal? And shall that Writ of Summons be counterfeited, either in it self, or in its return, as aforesaid.
Ca. 16. False Retur. of Wr.Such Executions shall be done of them that make false Returns of Writs, (whereby right is deferred) as it is ordained in the 2. Statute of
Westminster, with like pain, at the Kings commandment.
L.
C. upon Ca. 16. f. 568.This is an Act of Confirmation, Whereby the Statute of
Westminster the 2
d. cap. 39
th. touching false returns, is confirmed.
Expost & Q.Doth not the 2
d Statute of
Westminster cap. 39. say,
That the King hath commanded that Sheriffs shall be
[Page 85]punished by the Justices once or twice if need be for such false Returns? and if they offend a third time, none shall have to do therewith but the King, &c? Doth not the Court of
Kings-Bench assume the King to be always there in Person? And what they speak, to be his own speech? Is it not they therefore that should punish Sheriffs for their false Returns, the third time of their offence? But is it not indeed they, and their Creatures, as well as those of the
Common-Pleas, do make false Returns in the names of the Sheriffs of
London, and
Middlesex, and do consequently make those Sheriffs liable to Actions, as aforesaid? How can they punish those Sheriffs for those false Returns, which they themselves suffer their Clerks to make, unknown to the Sheriffs, as aforesaid? And who but they cause, or suffer all Sheriffs falsly to Return Exigents with the words,
Per judicium Coronatorum, and the Coroners names, who know no such thing? And if any man be Out-lawed without the judgement of the Coroners of his County, or any mention made thereof in the Sheriffs Return, is not that Outlawry as injurious to
[Page 86]the Party, Perjurious in the Judges who admit such a Return, and proceed upon it, and as Illegal in the Sheriff that makes such a Return, and as different from due Proces of Law, as the other? And do not those false Returns filed upon their Records, make all their proceedings thereupon, false, and faint Actions as aforesaid? And if all before written be not sufficient to make it appear to the world, that they are not onely Forgers, Perjurers, and Anathema's themselves, but also the onely causers of all others to be, or be accompted the like? And that their Lives, Lands, and Goods, are in the immediate dispose of the present State, by the judgements and confessions of their own mouths? Behold their Oath, which they voluntarily take when they assume their places, whereby they binde themselves further, before God, and man, as followeth,
viz.
The Oath of the Kings JudgesYe shall Swear, that well and lawfully ye shall serve our Sovereign Lord the King, and his people, in the office of Iustice, and that lawfully ye shall Counsel the King to his business, and that ye shall not
[Page 87]councel, nor assent to any thing which may turn him to dammage, or disherison, by any manner way, or colour. And that Ye shall not know the dammage, or disherison of him, whereof Ye shall not do him to be warned by Your self, or by other. And that Ye shall do even Law, and Execution of right to all his Subjects, rich, and poor, without having regard to any person. And that You take not by Your self, or by other, privily, nor apertly, gift, nor reward of gold, nor silver, nor of any other thing which may turn to Your profit unless it be meat, or drink, and of small valure, of any man that shall have any Plea, or Proces, hanging before You, as long as the Proces shall be so hanging, nor after the same cause. And that Ye take no Fee, as long as Ye shall be Iustice, nor Robes of any man, great or small, but of the King himself. And that Ye give none advise, nor Counsel to no man, great nor small, in no case where the King is party. And in case that any of what Estate or Condition they be, come before You in Your Sessions with Force, and Arms, or otherways against the Peace, or against the form of the Statute thereof made, to disturb Execution of the Common Law, or to manace the people that they may not pursue the Law, that Ye do their Bodies to be Arrested, and put in prison: and in case they be such, that Ye may not Arrest them, that
[Page 88]Ye certifie the King of their names, and of their Misprision hastily, so that he may thereof ordain a covenable remedie: And that You by Your selfe, nor by other, privily, nor apertly, maintain any Plea, or quarrel, hanging in the Kings Court, or else-where in the Countrie: And that Ye denie to no man common right by the Kings Letters, nor none other mans, nor for none other cause; and in case any Letters come to You, contrarie to the Law, that You do nothing by such lett, but certifie the King thereof, and go forth to do the Law, notwithstanding the same Letters. And that Ye shall do, and procure the profit of the King, and of his Crown, with all things where Ye may reasonably do the same. And in case Ye be from henceforth found in default in any of the points aforesaid; Ye shall be at the Kings Will, of Body, Lands, & Goods, thereof to be done as shall please him: As God You help, and all Saints.
Anno, 18.
Edward, 3.
Stat. 3.
Expost and Quer.If Atheists can perswade Christians that this Oath was no binding for them that had taken it, (even the Wise, Learned, Reverend, Judges, Sages, Scientissimous Interpreters of the Laws of
England,) sufficient to keep them within the compass of their Oath, Law, and
[Page 89]Knowledges? Shall not Christians perswade themselves, that it is a sufficient Confession, Declaration, and judgement of their own mouths that made it, that their forfeitures,
viz. their Lives, Lands, and Goods, in case of their breach of any point of this Oath, are now immediately in the power of the State to dispose of to the publique use, at their pleasures, without any further Proces, or proceedings in Law, but onely to give Order, and Warrant to Arrest the persons of such Offendors to stand to their censures; and to Sequester their Estates, and to divide them to the said use, accordingly? Did Lords ever use any more Law than their own Wills, when they Sequestred, and punished their villains? Had Lords any more Law, Right, or Reason, to Sequester, and punish their villains at their own Wills, but for that their villains did take their Lands upon conditions to do those services which they and their Lords agreed upon, and gave their Lords their Oaths (as their greatest bonds) to perform those conditions, or in case of breach, to suffer their Lords to repossess their Lands, with the
[Page 90]forfeitures of their Goods, (which they gained) and their Lives (which they sustained) upon the same? Was the Oath of a Villain (though made by Parliament, to the end that Lords should be well served by their Slaves in their private and meanest Offices) of as considerable consequence to be observed, or in default thereof, their forfeitures to be executed, as the Oath of Judges, made and Confirmed by several Parliaments, to the end, that the common-wealth should be well served by their Justices in their publike, and most honourable (if rightly served) Offices of Judicature, and administration of Justice? Are not such Villains, as dare incroach, not onely upon their Lords Lands, and Estates, but also upon their Lives, and Liberties, dangerous, transcendent, Hyper-Prelatical Usurpers? Are not such Usurpers intollerable mischiefs in a Common-wealth? Who being sworn servants to the Common-wealth (as by this Oath it appeareth the Kings Justices were) make all the Common-wealth their servants, to attend their Trains at
Westminster at their pleasures? And
[Page 91]all Prisoners for Debt, not onely their own Villains, but also Villains to their Villainous Goalors, and Slaves to their Slaves? Are not the meanest of the Free-People of
England, interessed in the due execution of Justice, to which these Judges were sworn? (as well to them, as to Kings) and consequently ought they not to be such Lords as dare, and will take the forfeitures of such Villains, as do them daily Injustice? Is not this Oath a sufficient Evidence in it self, that the takers of it, have, & do dayly break it? & cause all others that have, or do break it, to do so likewise? Since Kings and People have wholly referred themselves, and their Estates, not onely to the Justice of their Judges, but also to their fatherly advertisements, and admonitions (whereby they ought not to suffer any that depend upon them, to err through ignorance) and they (contrariwise) admonish none not to offend, but suffer, and cause more to offend than willingly, and wittingly would; and so do, for want of such admonitions, much more increase, and enhance the Markets of their Justice, by suffering no other
[Page 92]Judges to admonish, or Justifie any offendors at home, and ingrossing all to themselves at
Westminster, or before such as they send to fripper for them, in Assizes, Goal-Deliveries, and
Nisi prius
[...]s. Have not some present Grafts of the old stock Judges of Assizes in possibility for the
Countrey) & their Agents in
Chancery, procured several late Injunctions to be dissolved in
Chancery, without the privity of both parties whom they concerned, to the end onely to beget work for them in the Assizes, lest they should want better? Did our late Judges lawfully counsel King
Charls in his busines, when they gave their Resolutions for him concerning the Ship-money? Did they not assent to a thing, or things, that turned to his dammage and disherison, and overturned him, and his Posterity out of three Kingdoms, and his life to boot, when they assented to Ship money, and Monopolies? Did not the Kings Councel and other Serjeants, and Lawyers, draw (if not plot) all such Patents? Got they not more by their Fees, for their advise therein, (which were present pay) than the King did by his reservations for interest in
[Page 93]those Grants which are yet in Arrear? Was any thing reserved to the King thereby, but what his Councel learned thought fit, and advised him to take, and the Patentees to give? Did not those Judges, that had the keeping of both the Kings Seals, assent to all those unlawfull things, whatsoever they Sealed? Briefly, doth not this Oath in every point evidence the Judges at
Westminster, and their brethren to have been the chief betrayers of Kings and People in their chief trust, to guide and hold both in the right way, and did they not lead both wrong? And thereby are the chief Authors of all the blood spilt, and estates ruined in these three Kingdoms, in and by these late Wars, which were undertaken for Reformation, onely of such deformities in Law, and Government, which (you see) they had power to keep in form by their lawfull judgements, or admonitions to the right, or not consenting to the wrong? Do not our Records, and History testifie, that all the Civil Wars of
England, were alwaies undertaken for Reformation of Injustice, evil Government,
[Page 94]and corrupt Lawyers that were alwaies the causers thereof, by breaking, and causing to be broken the Liberties of
Magna Charta, which the People sought alwaies to recover? Were not
Hugh D'Burgo, Chief Justice of
England, Walter D'Lancton, Lord Treasurer of
England, Brember, Trisilian, Bellknap, Thorp, &c. examples of their times in that case? If so few examples will not serve to make all Judges mend, should not all such Judges be made examples, to serve posterity to see that such evils are not necessary for Common-wealths? Shall such Extrajudical Judges, such lawless Lawyers,
&c. as will not be tied by Oaths, made in, and by Parliaments; Excommunications denounced by Authority of Parliaments;
Charters Signed, Sealed, and Confirmed in, and by Parliaments; nor by Acts, Laws, and Statutes made by full and free Parliaments; be suffered to sit with Christians in Parliaments to make Laws, Votes, Oaths, and other Obligations upon Christians, which shall be none to themselves? But let us see further, what an other Act of Parliament saith to this Oath, as ensueth,
viz.
[Page 95]
The Statut. 20.
E. 3. Pream. Letter. Justice.
Edward by the Grace of God,
&c. To the Sheriff of
Stafford, greeting. Because that by divers complaints made to Vs, We have perceived that the Law of the Land, which We by Our Oath are bound to maintain, is the less well kept, and the execution of the same disturbed many times, by maintenance, and procurement, as well in the Court, as in the Countrey: We greatly moved of Conscience in this matter, and for this cause, desiring as much for the pleasure of God, and ease, and quietness of Our Subjects, as to save Our Conscience, and for to save and keep Our said Oath, by the assent of the Great men, and other Wise men of Our Councel: We have ordeined these things following,
viz.
Cap. 1.First, We have commanded all Our Iustices, that they shall from henceforth, do even Law, and execution of right to all our Subjects rith & poor, without having regard to any person, and without letting to do right for any letters, or commandment which may come to them from Vs, or from any other, or by any other cause.
Letters.And in that any letters, writs, or commandments come to the Iustices, or to other, deputed to do Law and right, according to the usage of the Realm, in disturbance of the Law, or of the execution of the same, or of right to the parties; the Iustices, and other aforesaid shall
[Page 96]proceed, and hold their Courts, and Processes where the Pleas, and matters be depending before them, as if no such Letters, Writs, or commandments were come to them. And they shall certifie Vs, & Our Councel of such commandments as be contrarie to the Law, (as before is said)
JusticeAnd to the intent that our Iustices should do even right to all people, in the manner aforesaid, without more favour shewing to one, more than to another, We have done Our said Iustices to be sworn, that they shall not from henceforth, as long as they shall be in office of Iustice,
Fees. Roabstake Fee nor Roabe of any man, but of Our self. And they shall take no gift, nor reward by themselfs, nor by other, privily, nor apertly of any man that hath to do before them, by any way, except meat and drink, and that of small valure; and that they shall give no counsel to a great man, nor small, in case where We be Partie, or which do, or may touch Vs in any point, upon pain to be at Our will, Bodie, Lands, and Goods, to do thereof as shall please us, in case they do contrarie: And for this cause We have increased the Fees of the same our Iustices, in such manner, that it ought reasonably to suffice them.
Expost and Quer.Doth not the King say here, He is bound by his Oath to maintain the
[Page 99]Laws of the Land? Doth not the Lord
Coke say before,
That a King in his Politick capacitie cannot dye? Did not, or ought not all Kings of
England take the like Oath as this King did? Were they not therefore bound to maintain the Laws of
England as well as he? and to be advised, and ruled by their Judges, how to maintain them? as the Oath of the Judges, this Statute, and others, do manifest they were? Are not Judges as Immortal as Kings in their Politick capacity? Are they not bound by their Oaths, not onely to maintain, and execute the Laws of
England against all men, without regard of Persons, but also to advise their Kings to maintain them, and how so to do, and to hinder, or not consent with their Kings to break them? Were not the maintenances (whereof the King here complaineth, and the procurements as well in Court, as in Countrey, whereby (he saith)
the Laws, and the due execution thereof were disturbed) the remainders of the Factions of the
Spencers, and others, who in
Edward the 2
d his time had made such Judges, as had put all Laws out of all order; so
[Page 100]that this King, being
Edward the 3
d. could not reform what had been deformed hitherto? but now endeavoureth to do it by means of this Oath made in Parliament in the 18
th. year of his Reign, and this Act made in the 20
th. If Kings endeavoured to perform their duties (as this King did, and Judges would not) should not such Judges suffer, as in this Kings time divers did? If Kings, and Judges, (contrary to their Oaths, and Offices) om
[...] their duties (as this Kings Father, and his Judges did) should not such Kings and Judges suffer for their defaults, as he and they did? If Kings and Bishops did lately neglect their duties, (contrary to their Oaths, and Offices) and were punished for their defaults? why not such Judges
[...] were the greater Delinquents for suffering them so to offend? and more for consenting thereto? And more than that, when they advise
[...] the same? If the secret Sacriledg
[...] of one
Achan deserved Gods indignation against all his People of
Israel, until they discovered, and punished him, and his Offence? Wh
[...] doth the manifest extortion (a sin
[...]
[Page 101]less prohibited than Sacriledge) of so many
Achans, merit of Gods Judgements against the whole Nation of
England, if they prosecute not, or leave unpunished, their Offences, which are more than Extortions; as Perjuries, Forgeries, Sacriledge it self, and divers others spoken of before.
Judge, O People? Judge, your selves, O ye People, least ye be Judged.
FINIS.