Of the expediency of MARRIAGE, To be solemnized by a lawfull, MINISTER In the Church, or publick Assembly.
MARRIAGE, that only positive traduciary Ayrlome we retein of Paradise, as taken in its full extent and latitude, is defined by the Civilians, A conjunction Matrimonium est viri, & mulieris conjunctio individuam vitae consuetudinem continens. Justinian Institut. lib. 1. tit. 9. of Man and Woman, containing an individuall fellowship of life; and falls under a three-fold consideration: First, Oeconomicall, as it is the prime Seminary of Families. Secondly, Politicall, as it is the Embrio of civilized States and Common-wealths. Thirdly, Ecclesiasticall, as it is the root and stem, whence that [Page 161] Vine, the Church, spreads it selfe by numerous branches. These three (as vegetative, sensitive, and rationall life, in living creatures) may be actually separated, one from another, yet, so still, as the latter [...]. Arist. de Anima. virtually comprehends the former, as the reasonable soul does the inferiour faculties; for, there may be a mutuall consent betwixt Salvages and Indies, who live without subordination to superior Laws; and observation of legall rites, relating to Marriage, amongst Turks and Persians, who acknowledge not Christ: But in Christians, who are as well members of the Church as Common-weale, it is requisite, that to private contracting, and submission to municipall or civill Ordinances, there be super-added an acknowledgment of divine Rules, and a solemn benediction upon that Tie, which ought to be sacred and inviolable.
This will appear more perspicuous, if we traverse these three in order: First, taking our prospect of Marriage, as it looks no further then private Families, and herein the consent of both parties, and parents, is necessary; of the parties, for the very form, essence, and being of Matrimony; of the parents, for the bene esse, or legitimation of it: The verity of both these, we may see presented to the life in one glasse, where, Gen. 24. 58. the parents of Rebecca having given their consent to Abraham's servant, requesting her for a wife to Isaac ▪ enquired further [Page 162] of the Damosell, whether she was willing, otherwise, further progresse therein had been obstructed; for, where there is not a free consent, [...], without violence or coaction, [...], without ignorance or mistaking, the Canonists declare it a nullitie. And that the consent of parents is requisite, St. Pau [...] evidences, Ephes. 6. 1. Children obey your parents in all things: And, lest generalls should not conclude, he descends to particulars, 1 Cor. 7. 36. [...], declaring, that it is the priviledge of parents, to deny or give their children in marriage. Which light was communicated to the heathens, as appears by Euripides, Euripid. who in the Scene, introduces a Virgin, thus answering her suitors: Of my marriage my Father will take care, [...], it is not in my power to Ambros. lib. de patriarchis. Iustinian Institut. de nuptiis. digest. de statu hom. code de nuptiis. Concil. de Toledo caus. 4 quest. 21. dispose. And this with approbation is quoted by St. Ambrose, and is further confirmed by the civill Lawes, Canons of severall Oecumeniall Councells; the pith and marrow whereof, Gratian epitomises, saying, In contracting of Marriage, the consent of parents is alwaies to be required.
And as the consent of parties and parents is requisite for marriage, as it is the seed-plat of Families, so the complyance of civill, or municipall constitutions and Magistrates (which are patres patriae, fathers of the Country) is to be taken in, for the further consummation of it, as Families are integrall parts of Provinces, [Page 163] Nations, or Kingdomes. And this is clear from prescription since Adam. Gen. 6. 2. which was first violated when the sons of God saw the daughters of men that they were fair, and they took them wives of all which they chose, and that questionlesse, maugre the advice of Enoch, Noah, and other godly Patriarchs, whom God had set Princes over them. In conformity to this, Gen. 24. 3. Abraham made his servant swear, that he should not take a wife to his son Isaac of the daughters of the Canaanites. Rebecca, Gen. 27. 46. was weary of her life, for the daughters of Heth, lest Jacob should take a wife of them. Gen. 28. 8. Esau saw the daughters of Canaan pleased not his father Isaac. And when the Jewes, after their departure out of Egypt, were incorporated into a body politick, God, who is Lord Paramount, as well of judiciall, as cerimoniall, and morall Lawes, gave a Directory for marriage, Levit. 18. which being sleighted by Solomon, he was deserted of God, and lapsed into Idolatry. The Jewes were hurried into captivity for taking strange wives, which crime, after their reducement, Shechaniah and Ezra endeavoured to expiate, by a generall Ezr. cap. 9. &. 10. [...] Aristotl. polit. 1. Gellius noct. Attic. lib. 12. cap. 18. Florus, Plutarch, in▪ vitâ Solonis, & Lycurg [...] ▪ Ad Odyss. [...]. divorce, and deposition of their illegitimate budds, Ezr. 9. & 10. The Pagans had a glimmering sight of this, which Minos expressed in his Lawes at Crete, Rhadamanthus at Lycia, Aeacus in Aenopia, Draco in blood at Areopagus, Numa Pompilius at Rome, Lycurgus at Sparta, Solon at Athens, rearing his superstructure upon [Page 164] Cecrops his basis, who there first instituted the contract of matrimony, and for that cause was saluted by the name of [...], saith Eustathius, as if he were an Hermophrodite, or [...], participating of both sexes; or (according to the Scholiast upon Aristophanes) quasi, [...], In [...], Act. 3. Scen. 3. Because with much ado, the coalition of the two natures of father and mother into one, was his inventory. This the Egyptians received from the Hebrewes, the Phoenicians from the Egyptians, the Ionians from the Phoenicians, the Romans their Justin. Hist. Carion Chron. duodec [...]m tabulas, from the Ionians or Grecians, which twelve Tables were the root, whence the Arbor of the civill Lawes (consisting of the Code, Digestes, Constitutions, Pandectes, Extravagants,) hath spread its branches over the western world; and all treates of Marriage.
This Nation (as far as the Torch of History Ʋxores habent deni, duodeni (que) inter se communes, sed si qui sunt ex his nati, eorum habentur liberi à quibus primum virgines quae (que) ductae sunt. Caesar de Bello. Gallic. l. 5 Libro constitutionum Londinensium, pertaining to the Guild hall. yields us light) had alwaies their Nuptialls regulated by Lawes, even the antient Britaines, while uncivilized, (as Caesar their enemy confesses) had their conjugall knot. But when the Sun of Righteousnesse arose with healing in his wings, Lucius the first Christian Monarch, by Elutherius his direction, gave Scripturegrounded rules for Marriage, as well as other perquisites; how this was inviolably observed, through the Saxon's Heptarchy, till Ina's Monarchy, from thence till Alfrid and Edward the Confessor, from them till Magna Charta, and so successively till [Page 165] our times, I leave it to the recognition of the learned Sages of our Lawes; onely observing this, That what provisoes, as preparatory to Marriage, were formerly executed by the Officers of civill Constitutions, are now defalked, and the power wholly transmitted to the Magistrate, or Ministers of the common Law, the legality whereof, far be it from me to dispute or question, which obliquely all this while I have been proving. But the scope I aime at is this, to which, I doubt not, every unbiassed judgment will subscribe, that as the first step of matrimoniall solemnity, takes in the consent of parties and parents; the second, of Magistrates and municipall Lawes, and both of these but in a domestick and politicall capacity, common to us with Turks and Pagans; so there is a further graduall perfection, which requires the consent and benediction of the Church, (as the parties contracting are members thereof) and so pleads for the expediency of the solemnization thereof by a Lawfull Minister, in the publick Assembly.
This I'le endeavour to evidence, founding the structure of my whole fabrick upon a three-fold bottom; first, the Law of Nations; secondly, praescription of the Church; thirdly, deductions from Scripture. These single may seem weak, but in conjunction, will make a threefold cord, not easily broken.
First, the Law of Nations, though barbarous [Page 166] (some of them) concenters in this, that Marriage is but rough cast, till polished by the sacred hand of a Priest; and this Tradition doubtlesse they had hereditary from Noah, Noah from Methusalem, Methusalem from Adam, Adam from God, who consecrated the yoke of our first Parents, not abstractly, as man and woman, but as his servants, and in covenant with him, gave a benediction, not onely as they were to replenish the earth, but as their Seed was to bruise the Serpents head. And that act was managed by the Creator, rather as he was the prototype of Priestly, than Kingly office, leaving a president to posterity, which all future ages observed, till Moses, acknowledging the first-born in this sense, as consecrated to God, which selling Esau heard profane, because the Priesthood, a thing holy, was an appendix of his birth-right. And that the nuptialls of all their children were to be celebrated by the Patriarcks, or heads of their respective Families, is as transparent from Scripture-light, as if writ with the Sun-beams. This, other Nations, whether civilized, or barbarians, religiously observed. Let the Grecians be mustered in the van, who for the consummation of their marriages, usually repaired to the Temple, where, in the presence of the Priest, they engaged themselves Achil. Tat. libr. 5. mutually by Oath, as appears by the practice of Clitiphon and Leucippe, where the man in the Temple of Isis swore, [...], [Page 167] to love sincerely, and the woman, [...], that she would accept him for her Husband, and Lord of all. And as preparative Cael. Rhod. lib. 7. cap. 4. [...], Eurip. in [...]phig. v. 1 112. Eurip. v. 711. to this, which is said to be the invention of Erato, the Priest did sacrifice to Minerva a Heifer, never married in the yoke. Wherefore Clytemnestra, speaking of her daughter (whom they pretended to marry to Achilles) demanded of her husband, [...], whether he had seen the sacrifices performed. They did also [...], offer their baskets to Diana, their [...], and [...], the nuptiall gifts, and nuptiall votes to Juno. And these were not to be interrupted for any civill solemnity, as appears by Agamemnon, who importunately called upon by his wife, to attend the wedding feast, religiously makes answer, [...] Eurip. Iph. v. 721. Flat delegibus. [...], When I have done my wedding sacrifice. Hence their Priests were called [...], celebraters of marriage; and the solemnities themselves, [...], marriage ceremonies, which was performed by the [...], or master of Ceremonies, Theognis [...] v. 16. at the nuptialls of Cadmus, under the Dramma of Muses and Graces, as Theogenis personates it.
[...].
To joyne in one body with the Grecians, the antient Romans may next [...]ally up their Forces, who usually first contracted the [Page 168] parties to be matched in their espousalls, Salmuth. in Pancirol. lib. rerum deperd. cap. de nuptiis. This resembles the preparatory acts of our Magistrates and Registers. Juvenal. Satyr. 6. which were termed sponsialia a spondendo, because each engaged to other to live as man and wife. This preludiatory act might be commenced by the Parents, or civill Officers, who, for their greater security, writ down the form of the Contract upon Tables of Record, as appeareth by Juvenal, ‘Si, tibi legitimis pactam junctam (que) tabellis, Non es amaturus.’
These tables were sealed with the Signet of competent witnesses there present, who thence were denominated Signatores, not without the Omen of Sooth-sayers, procured by either sex, as the Satyrist emblazons it. Veniet cum signatoribus Auspex. Juvenal. Satyr. 10.
This done, certain solemnities were used by a Pontifex, or chiefe Priest, and the woman made sure to the man, by pronouncing a set form of words, in the presence of ten witnesses at least; then a solemn sacrifice was offered, part whereof the married couple were joyntly to eat; especially the consecrated Cake, a farre the bread-corn, or matter of it, the sacrifice was termed confarreatio, and the marriage it selfe farracia, the dissolution of it diffarreatio. If any of these Hieron. ferarius Philippic. orat. Ceremonies (especially the last) were relinquished, they were judged nuptiae innuptae, marriage unmarried, as we call our enemies gifts, no gifts, [...].
The Hebrewes shall bring up the rear, whose Patriarchs (as is formerly glanced) by vertue of primogeniture, being Priested, did sanctifie and blesse their childrens marriages, [Page 169] as Rebecca's Parents and Brother did hers, Gen. 24. 60. saying, Be thou the mother of thousands of millions, and let thy seed possesse the gate of those that hate them. The latter Jewes acted their nuptiall solemnities under a Tent or Canopy, called in their language [...] Elias Thisbite. Chuppa, to which the Psalmist alludes, Psal. 19. 4. In them thou hast set a tabernacle for the Sun, which as a bridegrrom comming out of his chamber, rejoyceth as a strong man to run a race. And this was done in the assembly of ten men at least, where the Master of the Ceremonies was styled by them, Baal Mischte, which by St. John, Joh. 2. 9. is languaged [...], chiefe of the marriage Chamber. The tabernacle or chamber it selfe, was called Beth hillula, the house of praise; the marriage Song, Hillulim, praises; they that sung this Epithalamium, or marriage Song, [...], children of the Scukius de convivio, lib, 2. c. 3. bridechamber, Matth. 9. 15. Now whether that mazel tob, good luck wished for by all the guests, was not specially implored by one, who was consecrated for that end, I leave it to the scrutenie of others. Their marriage Liturgie, copied out at large by Genebrard, speaks no lesse, the system whereof epitomized, was this: The [...], or chiefe of the marriage chamber, took a cup, and blessed it, saying, Blessed be thou, O Lord our God, the King of the world, which createst the fruit of the Vine: Blessed be the Lord our God, the King of the world, who hath created man after his own Image, according to the Image of his own [Page 170] likenesse, and hath thereby prepared unto himselfe an everlasting building. Blessed be thou, O Lord, who hast created him. Then descending to particular invocation for the Bride-groom and the Bride, closes with a benediction; and in that [...], or poculo charitatis, drinks to them both. Now seeing Uzzah by a sudden syderation was unmanned, for touching the Arke; Saul and Uzziah un-kinged, for approaching the Altar; Corah and his complices sodomized in a new Asphaltic gulph, for counter-censuring Moses and Aaron; shall we think, that any did attempt this sacram palestram, solemn wrastling with God, by publick prayers and praises, without holy oyle, and sacerdoticall unction? especially, seeing the Jewes held Targum Hierosolumit: Gen. 30. 21. a quaternion of blessings, more immediately dependent on God; to wit, the key of Rain, the key of Food, the key of the Grave, and the key of the Womb: These (say they) were neither deposited to Angells, nor Seraphims, and therefore fittest to be worn at the girdle of them, to whom our Saviour entrusted the keyes of the kingdome of heaven. The whole, informed, thus.
It is expedient that the Law of Nations Argum. 1 be observed; It is the Law of Nations, [Greek, Latine, Jewes, &c.] that marriage be solemnized by a Priest: Therefore it is expedient, that marriage be solemnized by a Priest: Therefore it is expedient, that marriage be solemnized by a Priest or lawfull Minister.
So I have spent my forelorn hope, consisting of ragged Regiments, emprested out of scattered Lawes of Nations, which if they [Page 171] seem not to charge home; my auxiliaries shall make amends, which now draw up; consisting of whole Brigads of Ecclesiasticall prescriptions, marching with Canons mounted successivly, since the Apostles times, taken out of the Magazin of generall Councells. For the originall of Christian Marriage by Ministers, is like the heads of Nilus, unknown. I'le build upward, ascending the scale of Ecclesiasticall practice, beginning with that demi-canon, of our late Assembly of Divines, charged by Ordinance of Parliament, the Report whereof is this: Because Solemnization of marriage, Directory. pag. 28. die Jovis. 13. Mart. 1644. Anordinance of Parliament, for establishing and observing this present Directory, throughout the Kingdom of England, and Dominion of Wales. The form of solenmization of Matrimony, confirmed by severall Acts of Parliament. such as marry are to marry in the Lord, and have speciall need of instruction, direction, and exhortation, from the word of God, at their entrance into such a condition, and of the blessing of God upon them therein; we judge it expedient, that marriage be solemnized by a lawfull Minister of the Word, that he may accordingly counsell them, and pray for a blessing upon them.Thence up till the Reformation, our Municipall, Civill, and Ecelesiasticall Constitutions required, that Banes being asked, or speciall License indulged, at the day appointed for solemnization of matrimony, the persons to be married shall come into the body of the Church, with their friends and neighbours, and there the Priest shall say, as in the Rubrick of the Liturgy was directed. On this only Basis, our Lawes founded the legality of Marriage, legitimation [Page 172] of children, claim to Inheritances; by vertue of which, all our present Nobility, Gentry, and Yeomanry of England, claim their estates and honours, as did their Progenitors; which being violated, the bed was rendred adulterous, children spurious, patrimonies not hereditary. And this was no novell constitution, but involved in the veteres Angliae consuetudines, Charta originalis sub sigillo. Daniel life of Henry 3. ratified in Magna Charta, received from the traditionall current under Norman, Danish, and Saxon Monarchs, till the Heptarchie, and so looses it selfe into the originall spring of Christianity, as the Britaines Beda Histor. Angliae. Gildas de excid. Brit▪ Augustin Epist. 133. Oportet conjuges sub velo sacerdotali benedictionem accipere, quod si diversae religion is fuerint, quo modo in Ecclesiâ Christi sub eodem velo contegerentur? Ambros. Epist. 7. ad Vigilium. Ex illis verb is intelligimus fuisse tunc morem ut matrimonia in templis consecrarentur, & velo conjuges eodem per ministrum fuisse coopertos, ut astantes viderent fuisse conjunctos. Pet. Martyr. Comment. in 1. lib. Reg. p. 25. Illum Ambrosii consilium vehementer probâsse qui censuit, ut si conjuges in matrimonium consenfissent, Minister Ecclesiae accerseretur. Possidon. in vitâ Augustini. had copied out before them, for severall Centuries, as venerable Bede and Gildas stories it.
Neither was it confined to this Nation, but as diffusive as Christianity, as appears by antient monuments. St. Augustin being importuned to celebrate a marriage, answers, He would, if the mother of the child were present, whose consent is necessary; which proves, that marriage was a part of the Ministeriall office in his daies. St. Ambrose contends, that persons of severall religions ought not to be matched together, because this could not receive a joynt benediction sub velo sacerdotali, under the veil of the Priest. By these words we understand, (saies Peter Martyr) that it was then the manner, to have matrimonies solemnized in Temples, and that the husband and the wife covered both with one veile, by the Minister, to the intent, that [Page 173] the spectators might see, that they were joyned together; which custom (saith he) is much against clandestine marriage. What is meant by covering under the veil, and whether our wives hence are said to be under Covert Baron, as heterogeniall to my purpose, I will not here engage. And that marriages might neither be clandestine, nor contracted betwixt Infidells and Believers, Possidonius avoucheth, that he did very well like the counsell of St. Ambrose, who judged, That if a man and woman did consent together in matrimony, the Minister of the Church should be sent for, by whom the covenants of marriage should be established, and the Matrimony should be confirmed. And that marriage is not compleated, without ministeriall instruction and benediction, that Canon of the Councill of Neocaesaria confirmes, wherein Ministers of the Church are prohibited to be present to blesse the second marriage of Polygamists, the former wife living. Many such proviso's are scattered in other Councills, relating to circumstantialls of marriage, by Presbyters, or them in holy Orders, none to the substance, as being a thing antidated, and rivetted into the body of Christianity, in the first Embrio of it, when Councells had yet no being: Which premises will enforce St. Augustines Augustinus de Baptismo contra Donatistas. lib. 4. cap. 23. conclusion: That which the whole Church holds, was never begun by any Councell, but alwaies observed, cannot otherwise be believed, but that it came [Page 174] from the Apostles, and such is marriage by Ministers. The whole, abbreviated, thus.
It is expedient, that that pious custom Argum. 2 which hath been since the Apostles, should be continued still: But it hath been a pious custom since the Apostles, that marriage should be solemnized in the publick assembly, by a lawfull Minister: Therefore it ought to be continued still.
The Auxiliaries having thus discharged, the main Battalio drawes up, whose Artillerie consists of Scripture-deductions: Nunc ad Triarios perventum est, This is the Rereward, which this cause most confides in, and being well ordered, may colophonem addere, put an end to the controversie. The first alarum shall be given from marriage-consecration; which is defined, A sacred Est actio sacra quâ sponsus & sponsa in Ecclesiam deducti, coram coetu fidelium, à Pastore docentur de institutione, & finibus conjugii, expressè suum consensum testantur, vel per signum in his qui muti sunt, aut surdi, vel per verba in his qui loqui possunt. Bucan. Institut. Theolog. p. 122. action, whereby the Bridegroom and Bride, brought into the Church, before the assembling of the faithfull, are instructed by a Pastour, concerning the institution and ends of Wedlock, expresly witnessing their consent by signes, in those that are deafe or dumbe, by words, in those that can speak. And this will amount to Scripture-proof, if we consider three things; first, the Author; secondly, the Ends and use; thirdly, the Rules prescribed for marriage. The Author was God, whose first act, after Creation, was Churchplantation, laying the ground-stone of that fabrick in conjugall union; It is not good for man to be alone, I will make him an help meet for him, Gen. 2. 18. Man shall [Page 175] leave his father and mother, and cleave to his wife, and they shall be one flesh, Gen. 2. 2▪4. Mat. 19. 5. God blessed them, and said, Be fruitfull and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it, and have dominion over the creatures, Gen. 1. 28. That which is asscribed to God, without distinction of Persons, is appropriated to Christ, the second Person, by St. John. Joh. 1. 23. The word was in the beginning with God, all things were made by him, and marriage (for it is an undivided act of the Trinity) consecrated Opera Trinitatis ad extra sunt indivisa. Aquinas. by him, and that not only in his Kingly and Priestly, but propheticall capacity, giving commission to his Ministers in the extent he received it, As the Father sent me, so send I you; which ratiotionally may be conceived, to comprehend matrimoniall instruction and benediction, as part of the Ministeriall function, which the parties contracting stands more need of now, than they did in Paradise. These Items laid together, makes up this totall Sum.
It is most expedient, that marriage of Church-members be solemnized by those, Argum. 3 who are Christ's Embassadours, and Deputies in his Propheticall Office, and are best qualified and authorised, to instruct the parties, concerning the institution, use, and ends thereof, and confer a benediction upon them. But Ministers are Christs Embassadours and Deputies in his Propheticall Office, and are best qualified and authorised to instruct the parties, [Page 176] concerning the institution, use, and ends thereof, and to confer a benediction upon them: Therefore it is most expedient, that marriage of Church-members be solemnized by a Minister.
Secondly, the tripartite use and end of marriage (as filed by the Schoolmen) pleads for the same, which is, issue, fidelity, Targum Hierosol. and the sacred mystery thereof: The key of Issue is Gods speciall peculiar, God remembered Rachel, and opened her womb, Gen. 30. 22. Numerous issue is his peculiar, with a more signall benediction, Thy wife shall be as a fruitfull vine by the sides of thine house, thy children like olive-plants round about thy table. Behold, thus shall the man be blessed that feareth the Lord, Psal, 128. 3, 4. But numerous issue, sanctified from the womb, and in covenant with God, is a more transcendent superlative peculiar: The Lord shall blesse thee out of Sion, and thou shalt see the good of Jerusalem all the daies of thy life; yea, thou shalt see thy childrens children, and peace upon Israel, Psal. 128. 5, 6. The result is this.
That, whose end and use is Gods sole peculiar and his signall and transcendent Argum. 4 blessing, ought to be solemnized with Ministeriall benediction; But the ends and use of marriage [issue, numerous issue, sanctified issue, with pious education,] is Gods sole peculiar, and his signall and transcendent blessing: Therefore marriage of Christians ought to be solemnized with Ministeriall benediction.
Another end and use of marriage, is fidelity, which includes unanimity, chastity, constancy. Yoke-fellowes in wedlock ought to be Turtle-like, unanimous in all estates; Cael. Rhod. lib. 28. cap. 21. Husbands, [...], be not bitter to your wives, Col. 3. 19. This the Grecians Hieroglyphicked, in flinging the gall of their marriage-victim, with most eager loathing, behind the Altar, during the time of their sacrifice. Wives should, like Hero, (who [...], Masaeus, Hero & Leander. expired with her perishing husband) sympathize in affection with them. As unanimity, so chastity is a flower in this marriage-garland: To avoid fornication, let every man have his own wife, and let every woman have her own husband: Let the husband render unto the wife due benevolence, and likewise also the wife unto the husband. The wife hath not power over her own body, but the husband; the husband hath not power of his own body, but the wife. Defraud not one another, 1 Cor. 7. 2, 3, 4. Therefore amongst the antient Romans, the man, in token of this, gave a Ring unto the woman, which she was to wear upon the next finger Aulus Gellius, Noct. Attic Ea enim cornicum societas est, ut ex duobus sociis altera ex tincta, vidua altera perpetuò maneat. Plinius unto the little, of the left hand; because unto that finger alone, proceedeth a certain artery from the heart. Their Soothsayers, in their nuptiall. Divinations, accounted the apparition of Crows the most auspicious Omen, because they live chast, and, one extinct, the other continues single; the Turtle mournes to death, if her fellow miscarry; the same is observed of the Stork. To these, joyne constancy, which crowns [Page 178] the rest: Whosoever shall put away his wife, [...], except it be for fornication, and Ʋt signarent illam ibi perpetuò mansuram, ne (que) inde ullâ tempestate recesseram. Alex. ab Alex. Sig. de jure Rom. c. 9. Salmuth. in Pancirol. lib. rer. depérd. cap. de nuptiis. shall marry another, committeth adultery, Mat. 19. 9. The Grecians emblem'd this, by carrying the Bride from her chamber to her husbands pavillion in a Carroach, where arriving, they brned the axletree, to signifie, that she must make her perpetuall abode there, and never to depart; the Romans by a Spear, wherewith some Fencer had been slain, with the point whereof, the Bridegroom divided the hair of his Bride, to intimate, that nothing but death, or such violence, should separate them. The extract is this:
It is expedient, that that vow which is Argum. 5 made unto God of unanimity, chastity, and constancy, should be solemnized by Ministeriall instruction and benediction: But marriage-vow of Christians is made unto God, of unanimity, chastity, and constancy; Therefore it is expedient, that the marriage of Christians be solemnized by Ministeriall instruction and benediction.
The third end and use of marriage, is the sacred mystery thereof, recorded, Eph. 5. 31, 32. A man shall leave his father and mother, & [...], shall be joyned unto his wife, and they two shall be one flesh. [...]. This is a great mystery, a great Sacrament, saies the vulgar translation: A Sacrament, not in a strict sense, as the Romanists canonize it, nor one of the confined number of seven, (though lesse D r Cosin [...] devotions. principall) as some of our own have languaged [Page 179] it; but in a large extent, which takes in with it, the calling of the Gentiles, Eph. 1. 9. Eph. 3. 3. and the incarnation of the Word, 1 Tim. 3. 16. in which acceptation, Common places, part. 2. pag. 462. Pet. Martyr. Libr. de bono conjugii cap. 18. cap. 24. libr. de fide, & operibus. cap. 7. Augustin. the precise number of Sacraments or Mysteries, is a mystery inscrutable. In this latitude, Peter Martyr, (who marched as Primipilus, or a prime frontier, in the vanguard of Reformation) owns Matrimony for a Sacrament, and so before him did St. Augustine, thus descanting; In the marriages of women, the sanctity of the Sacrament is more to be valued, than the fruitfulnesse of the wombe. The good of matrimony, in respect of the people of God, consisteth in the sanctity of the Sacrament; in the Church, not onely the band of marriage, but also the Sacrament is commendable. Thus taken, marriage is defined in the Schooles, Imago conjunctionis inter Deum, & Ecclesiam. Ursinus explicat. Catechet. pag. 696. Typus, & imago fuit verè divini, & spiritualis conjugii▪ quod futurum erat inter Christum, & ipstus Ecclesiam. Bucanus de conjug. pag. 108. A conjunction of man and woman, representing and signifying, the union of Christ with his Church by Incarnation; of God with the soul, by grace and sanctification. Therefore the Apostle having said, Ephes. 5. 32. this is a great mystery, addes, [...], I speak concerning Christ and the Church, saies ours, in Christ and the Church, saies St. Jerom's Tanslation. Now we never finde in sacred or prophane Histories, that Sacraments and Mysteries, were immediately entrusted to any, but Ministers or Hierodulists; hence Mysterie is etymologized, [...], as Suidas, [...], as Eustathius, Because the Priests [Page 180] were to keep the mysteries of Religion Augustinus de doctrinâ Christiana. l. 2. c. 1. (especially visible signes of invisible grace) secret and inviolable, [...], from dogs and profane; or of [...]; to initiate to holy things, as Budeus. From the same root, Nazianzene calls the Ministeriall function, [...], the solemnity of Mysteries; Ministers themselves [...], or [...], dispensers of mysteries. The quintesscence extracted, is this.
It is expedient, that that mystery (or sacrament) Argum. 6 that represents and signifies, the union of Christ with his Church by Incarnation, of God with the Soul by sanctification, should be solemnized by dispensers of Mysteries, or Ministers; But Marriage is a Mystery (or Sacrament) that represents and signifies, the union of Christ with his Church by Incarnation, of God with the Soul by sanctification; Therefore it is expedient, that Marriage be solemnized by the dispensers of Mysteries, or Ministers.
The Author, use, and ends of marriage displayed; arguments drawn from the prescribed rules thereof, brings up the Rere. One Scripture-Canon is, that marriage be sanctified by the Word and Prayer. The Apostle of the Gentiles, 1 Tim. 4. 1, 3, 4, 5. having told expresly, that in the latter Paulus conjugium, cibos. & similia [...] ait sanctificari per verbum & oratiorem. B [...] can. institut. Theol. pag. 111. times, some should depart from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits, and doctrine of devills, forbidding [...], to marry, [...], to abstain from meats, which God hath created to be received with thanksgiving, of them that believe and know the truth, gives [Page 181] his reason, For every creature of God is good, and nothing to be refused, if it be received with thanksgiving, for it is sanctified by the word of God and prayer. This forbidding to marry cannot rationally be interpreted, to be a prohibition of mutuall consent, and carnall copulation, which nature dictates, and continuation of mankind necessitates; but, a forbidding the sanctified solemnization of marriage, by the word of God and prayer, which, as Castitatem esse concubitum cum propriâ uxore. Sozomen. lib. 1. cap. 23. Argum. 7. Paphnutius avouched in the Councill of Nice, renders the marriage-bed chast. The Elixir is this.
It is expedient, that, that which is to be sanctified by the Word and Prayer, (the contrary whereof is a doctrine of devills) be solemnized by a lawfull Minister: But marriage is to be sanctified by the Word of God and Prayer, (the contrary whereof is a doctrine of devills); Therefore it is expedient, that marriage be solemnized by a lawfull Minister.
A second Scripture-rule is, 1 Cor. 7. Religiose, & in timore Dei, Bucan. institut. Theolog. p. 119. 1 Thess. 4. 3, 4. [...]. 39. that marriage be [...], onely in the Lord, that is, religiously, and in the fear of God: This is the will of God, your sanctification, that ye should abstain from fornication, that every one of you should know how to possesse his vessell in holinesse and honour: Which is best glossed in the antiquated form, of solemnization of matrimony, where it is said, to be commended of St. Paul, to be honourable amongst all [Page 182] men, and therefore not to be enterprized, nor taken in hand by any unadvisedly, leightly, or wantonly, to satisfie mens carnall lusts and appetites, like bruit beasts that have no understanding; but reverendly, discreetly, advisedly, soberly, and in the fear of God. The rebound, is;
That which ought to be onely in the Argum. 8 Lord, and according to his will, our sanctification, and possessing of our vessells in holinesse and honour, is expedient to be solemnized by a lawfull Minister: But marriage ought to be onely in the Lord, and according to his will, our sanctification, and possessing of our vessells in holinesse and honour: Therefore marriage ought to be solemnized by a lawfull Minister.
A third Scripture-rule is, That marriage Argum. 9 be without scandall, and that we may avoid that [...], tragick woe, denounced by our Saviour, Matth. 18. 7. [...], Wo to the world because of scandalls: But by marriage-solemnity by a Minister, Greek, Latine, Popish, Reformed Churches abroad, many conscientious Brethren at home, cease to be scandalized.
A fourth rule is, that it be, 1 Cor. 14. Argum. 10 26. [...], done to edification: But marriage tends most to the edification of the parties contracted, & of the spectators, when it is solemnized by a Minister, who is commissioned from Heaven to endoctrinate [Page 183] them, concerning the institution, nature, use, and ends of marriage; and, after exhortation to mutuall duties, is impoured to confer a blessing.
A fifth, that it be in subordination and Argum. 11 Facit mos iste ad matrimonii dignitatem, & novos conjuges omni provâ suspicione liber at, nè scortorum instar cohabitare putentur. Bucan. obedience unto God, who, 1 Cor. 14. 33. is not the author [...], of confusion, but peace, as in all Churches of the Saints: But the author of peace, to avoid confusion, hath established matrimoniall solemnity by Ministers, in all Churches of the Saints; and if any one seem to be contentious in opposing it, 1 Cor. 11. 16. our British Church may answer them in the Apostles Dialect, (after fifteen hundred years prescription) We have no such custom, neither the Churches of God.
A sixth, that it be, 1 Cor. 14. 40. [...], decently, and in order: Argum. 12 But it is most decent, that marriage be solemnized in the Assembly of Believers; most orderly, that from consent of parties and parents, as men, they should proceed to approbation of Magistrates, and politicall Lawes, as civilized men; from thence, to the Churches complacency, and Ministeriall instruction and benediction, as they are Christian men: And this is the Herculean pillar, beyond which, nè plus ultra, is no further progresse; and if we make a halt before, Marriage is abortive, and born before its time.
Now to sound a retreat, and [...], gather my Forces to within [Page 184] their Trenches: The Law of Nations, Greek, Roman, Jewish; Prescription of the Church, Eastern, Western; Deductions from Scripture, whether taken from the Author, God, or the end and use of Marriage, Issue, Fidelity, and the sacred Mystery; or the Rules praescribed for Marriage, that it be sanctified by the Word, and by Prayer, that it be in the Lord, that it be without scandall, that it be for edification, that it be in obedience unto God, who is not the Author of confusion, but peace; that it be done decently and in order: All of them single respectively, and all of them joyned composedly, conclude, the expediency of Marriage to be solemnized by a lawfull Minister, in the Church, or publick Assembly.
[...].