THe Armes which Christians can use against Lawful Powers, in their Severitie, are only Prayers and Teares: Now since nothing can equal the infini­tie of those we have shed, but the Cause, viz. [...]spen [...] see our dearest friends forsake us; we hope is will not offend you if (after we have a little [...] our eyes) we sigh out our complaints to you.

Wee had spoke much sooner, had we not been silent through consternation to see you inflam'd (whom with reverence we ho­nour) and also to shew our submissive patience, which used no slights or tricks to divert the debates of Parliament: For no body can imagine, where so many of the great Nobilitie and Gen­try are concern'd, but something might have been done; when as in all ages we see things of publick advantage by the managers dexterity nipt in the bud, even in the verie Houses themselves. Farr be it from Catholicks to perplex Parliaments, who have been the Founders of ther Priviledges, and all Ancient Laws: Nay, Magna Charta it self had its rise from us: Which we do the less boast of, since it was not at first obtained in so submiss and humble a manner.

We sung our Nunc Demittis, when we saw our Master in his Throne, and you in your deserved Authority and Rule; nor could any thing have ever grieved us more, but to have our Loyaltie [Page 2] called into question by you, even at the instigation of our great­est adversaries. If we must suffer, let it be by you alone; for that's a double death to men of Honour, to have their Enemies not only accusers, but for their insulting Judges also. These are they that by beginning with us, Murthered their Prince, and wounded you; and shall the same method continue, by your ap­probation? We are sure you mean well, though their design be wicked: But let it never be [...]rded in Story, that you forgot your often Vows to us, in joyning with them that have been the cause of so great calamitie to the Nation.

Of all Calumnies against Catholicks we have admired at none so much, as that their Principles, are said to be inconsinent with Government, and they themselves thought ever prone to Rebel­lion.

My Lords and Gentlemen, Had this been a new Sect not known before, something perchance might have been doubted; but to lay this at their doors, that have governd the Civilized World, is the Miracle of Miracles to us.

Did Richard the first, or Edward Longshands suspect his Catholicks that served in Palestine, and made our Countries Fame big in the Chronicle of oll ages? or did they mistrust (in their dangerous absence) their Subjects at home because they were of this pro­fession? Could Edward the 3 d. imagine those to be Traytorous in their Doctrine, that had that care and duty for their prince, as to make them (by Statute) guilty of death in the highest de­gree, that had the least thought of ill against the King? Be plea­sed that Henry the 5 th. be remembred also, who did those wonders of which the whole world doe still resound, and certainly all History will agree in this, that 'twas Ol [...]-Castle he feared, and not those that believed the Bishop of R [...]me to be Head of the Church. We will no longer trouble you with putting you in mind of any more of our mighty Kings, who have been feared abroad, and as safe at home as any since the Reformation of Religion, We shall only add this, that if Popery be the enslaving of Princes, France still believes it selfe as absolute as D [...]nma [...]k or Sweden, nor will ever the House of [...] abjure the Pope to secure themselves of the fidelity of their Subject. We shall alwaies acknowledge to the whole world, that there have been as many brave English in this last Centurie, as in any other place whatsoever: Yet since the exclusion of the Catholick Faith, there has been that commit­ted [Page 3] by those, who would be faine called Protestants, that the wickedest Papist at no time dreamt of. 'Twas never heard of be­fore that an absolute Queen was condemned by Subjects, and those stiled her Peers; or that a King was publiquely tried and execu­ted by his own people and servants.

My Lords and Gentlemen, We know who were the Authors of this last abomination, and how generously you strove against the raging torrent; nor have we any other ends to remember you of it, but to show that all Religions may have a corrupted spawn; and that God has been pleased to permit such a Rebelli­on, which our Progenitors never saw, to convince you perchance (whom for ever may he prosper) that Popery is not the only sourse of Treason.

Little did we think (when your prayers and ours were offered up to beg a Blessing on the Kings Affairs) ever to see that day, in which Carlos, G [...]fford, Whitgrave, and the Pendress should be punished by your desires for that Religion, which obliged them to save their forlorne Prince; and a stigmatized man (for his offences against King and Church) a chief promoter of it. Nay less, did we imagine, that by your Votes Hu [...]leston might be hang'd, who again secured our Soveraigne, and others free in their fat possessi­ons that sate as Judges, and Sealed the Execution of that great Prince of Happy Memory. We confess we are unfortunate, and you just Judges, whom with our lives we will ever maintain to be so; nor are we ignorant the necessity of affairs made both the King and you do things, which formerly you could not so much as fancy. Yet give us leave to say we are still Loyal, nay to desire you to believe so, and to remember how synonimous (under the late Rebellion) was the word Papist and Cavaleer; for there was never no Papist that was not deemed a Cavaleer, nor no Ca­valeer that was not called a Papist, or at least judged to be Popishly affected.

We know though we differ something in Religion (the truth of which let the last day judge) yet none can agree with your Incli­nations, or are fitter for your converse then We; for as we have as much birth amongst us as England can boast of, so our breeding leanes your way both in Court and Camp: And therefore, had not our late sufferings united us in that firm tye, yet our like humours must needs have joyn'd our hearts. If we err, pitty our condition, and remember what your great Ancestors were; and [Page 4] make some difference between us (that have twice converted England from Paganism) and those other Sects that can challenge nothing but intrusion for their imposed Authority.

But 'tis generally said, That Papists cannot live without perse­cuting all other Religions within their reach.

We confess, where the name of Protestant is unknown, the Catho­lick Magistrates (believing it erroneous) do use all ca [...]e to keep it out: Yet in those Countries where liberty is given, they have far more Privileges then we under any reform'd Government what­soever. To be short, we will only instance France for all, where they have publick Churches, where they can make what Proselytes they please; and where 'tis not against Law to be in any charge or imployment. Now Holland (which permits every thing) gives us, 'tis true, our Lives and Estates, but takes away all trust in Rule, and leaves us also in danger of the Scout, whensoever he pleases to molest our Meetings.

Because we have named France, the Massacre will perchance be urged against us. But the world must know that was a Cabinet Plot, condemned as wicked by Catholick Writers there, and of other Countries also. Besides, it cannot be thought they were murthered for being Protestants, since 'twas their powerful Re­bellion (let their faith have been what it would) that drew them into tha [...] ill mac [...]inated destruction. May it not be as well said in the next Catholick Kings raign, that the Duke of Guise and Cardinal (Heads of the League) were kill'd for their Religion also? Now no body is ignorant but 'twas their factious Authority, which made that jealous Prince design their Deaths, though by unwarrantable means. If it were for Doctrine that Hugonots suffer'd in France, this haughty Monarch would soon destroy them now, having neither Force nor Town to resist his Might and Puissance. They yet live free enough, being even Members of Parliament, and may convert the Kings Brother too, if he thinks fit to be so. Thus you see how well Protestants may live in a Popish Country, under a Popish King: Nor was Cha [...]lemaine more Catholick then this; for though he contends sometimes with the Pope, 'tis not of Faith, but about Gallicane Privileges, which perchance he may very lawfully do. Judge then worthy Patriots who are the best used, and consider our hardship here in England, where 'tis not only a Fine for hearing Mass, but death to the Master for having a Priest in his House; and so far we are from Preserment, that by [Page 5] Law we cannot come within 10. miles of London. All which we know your great mercy will never permit you to exact.

It has been often urged that our Misdemeanours in Queen Elizabeths, and King James his time was the cause of our punish­ment.

We earnestly wish that the Party had had more patience under that Princess. But pray consider (though we excuse not their faults) whither it was not a question harder then that of York and Lancaster (the cause of a War of such length, and death of so many Princes) who had most right, Queen Elizabeth, or Mary Stewart▪ For since the whole Kingdom had Crown'd, and sworn Allegi­ance to Queen Mary, they had own'd her legitimate, Daughter to Henry the Eighth; and therefore 'twas thought necessarily to follow by many, that if Mary was the true Child, Elizabeth was the Natural, which must needs then give way to the thrice noble Queen of Scots: 'Twas for the Royal House of Scotland that they suffered in those days, and 'tis for the same Illustrious Family we are ready to hazard all on any occasion. Nor can the consequence of the former proceedure be but ill, if a Hen. 8. [...]h. (whom Sir VV. Rawleigh and my Lord Cherbury, two f [...]mous Protestants, have so homely characterized) should after twenty years co-habitation, turn away his Wife, and this out of scruple of Conscience (as he said) when as History declares, that he never spared woman in his lust, nor man in his fury.

Now for the Fifth of November, with hands lifted up to Heaven, we abominate and detest, and from the bottom of our hearts, say, that may they fall into irrecoverable perdition, who propagate that faith by the blood of Kings, which is to be planted in truth and meekness only. But let it not displease you (Men, Brethren and Fathers,) if we a [...]k whether Vlisses be no better known? or, who has forgot the Plots of Cromwell, framed in his Closet, not only to destroy many faithfull Cavileers, but also to put a lustre upon his Intelligence, as if nothing could be done without his knowledge. Even so did the then g [...]eat Minister who d [...]ew some few Des [...]e [...]ad [...]s into this conjuration, and then discover'd it by a miracle. This will easily appear, viz. how little the Catholick party understood the design, seeing there were not a score of guilty found, though all imaginable industry was used by the Commons, Lords, and Privy Counsil too. But suppose (my Lords and Gentlemen, which never can be granted) that all the Papists of [Page 6] that age were consenting; Will you be so severe then to still pu­nish the Children for the Fathers faults? nay, such Children that so unanimously joyn'd with you in that glorious quarrel, wherein you and we underwent such sufferings, that needs we must have all sunk, had not our mutual love assisted.

What have we done, that we should now deserve your Anger? Has the Indiscretion of some few Incenst you? 'Tis true, that is the thing Objected.

Do not you know an Enemy may easily mistake a Mass-Bell for that which calls to Dinner; or a Sequestrator glad to be af­fronted being Constable? when 'twas the hatred to his person and not present office, which perchance egg'd a rash man to folly. We dare with submission say, let a publick invitation be put up a­gainst any party whatsoever; nay, against the Reverend Bishops themselves, & some malicious informer or other will alledge that, which may be far better to conceal. Yet all Mankind by a Mani­festo on the House door are encouraged to accuse us. Nor are they upon Oath though your Enemies and ours take all for granted and true.

It cannot be imagined, where ther's so many men of heat and youth (overjoy'd with the happy Restauration at their Prince, and remembring the Insolencies of the former Grandees,) that they should all, at all times prudently carry themselves; for this would be to be more then men: And truly we esteem it as a parti­cular blessing, that God has not suffer'd many, through vanity or frailty to fall into greater faults, then are yet as we understand laid to our charge.

Can we choose but be dismay'd (when all things fail) that ex­travagant Crimes are fathered on us. It is we that must be the Authors some say of Fireing the City, even we that have lost so vastly by it. Yet truly in this our ingenuity is great, since we think it no Plot, though our Enemy, an H [...]g [...]not Protestant, acknowledged the fact, and was justly executed for his vain Con [...]ession. Again, if a Merchant of the Church of England buy Knives for the busi­ness of his Trade, this also presently is a Papist contrivance to destroy the well affected.

We must a little complain, finding it by experience, that by reason you discountenance us, the People rage; and again, be­cause they rage, we are the more forsaken by you. Assured we are, that our Conversation is affable, and our Houses so many [Page 7] hospitable receipts to our Neighbors. Our acquaintance therefore we fear at no time, but it is the stranger we dread: (that taking all on Hear-say,) zealously wounds, and then examines the busi­ness when 'tis too late, or is perchance confirm'd by another, that knows no more of us then he himself. 'Tis to you we must make our applications, beseeching you (as subjects tender of our King) to intercede for us in the execution, and weigh the Dilemma, which doubtless he is in, either to deny so good a Parliament their request, or else run counter to his Royal inclinations, when he punishes the weak and harmless. Why may not we Noble Country­men, hope for favour from you, as well as French Protestants find from theirs? A greater duty then ours none could express we are sure. Or why should the United Provinces, and other Magistrates (that are harsh both in mind and manners) refraine from vio­lence against our Religion, and your tender brea [...]ts seem not to harbour the least compassion or pitty? These barbarous people sequester none for their faith, but for transgression against the State; Nor is the whole party involved in the crime of a few, but every man suffers for his own and proper fault. Do you then the like, and he that offends let him die without mercy; And think always (we beseech you) of Cromwells' injustice, who for the acti­ons of some against his pretended Laws, drew thousands into de­cimation, (even ignorant of the thing) after they had vastly paid for their security and quiet.

We have no other study but the Glory of our Soveraign, and just liberty of the Subjects; nor was it a mean argument of our duty, when every Catholick Lord gave his voice for the Restora­tion of Bishops; by which we could pretend no other advantage but that 26. Votes (subsisting wholly by the Crown) were added to the defence of Kingship, and consequently a check to all Anar­chy and confusion.

'Tis morally impossible that we who approve of Monarchy in the Church, but must ever be fond of it in the State also. Yet this is a misfortune, we now plainly feel, that the longer the late transgressors live, the more forgotten are their crimes, whilst di­stance in time calls the faults of our Fathers to remembrance, and bu [...]ies our own Allegiance in eternal Oblivion and for­getfulness.

My Lords and Gentlemen, Consider we beseech you, the sad con­dition of the Irish Souldiers now in England, the worst of which [Page 8] Nation could be but intentionally so wicked, as the acted villany of many English whom your admired Clemency pardoned. Re­member how they left the Spanish service when they heard their King was in France; and how they forsook the employment of that unnatural prince after he had committed the never to be for­given act of banishing his distressed Kinsman out of his Dominions. These poor men left all again to bring their Monarch to his home; and shall they then be fo [...]go [...]e [...] by you? Or shall my Lord Dougl [...]as and his brave Scots be left to their shifts, who scorn'd to receave wages of those that have declared Warr against England.

How commonly is it said, that the Oath of renouncing their Religion is intended for these; which will needs bring this loss to the King and you, that either you will force all of our Faith to lay down their Armes, (though by experience of great Integrity and worth) or else, if some few you retain, they are such whom Necessity has made to swear against conscience; and who there­fore will certainly betray you, when a greater advantage shall be offered. By this test then, you can have none but whom with cau­tion you ought to shun, and thus must you drive away those that truly would serve you; for had they the least thought of being false, they would gladly take the advantage of gaine and pay, to deceave you.

We know your wisdom and generolity, and therefore cannot imagine such a thing. Nor do we doubt when you shew favour to these, but you will use mercy to us, who are both fellow Sub­jects, and your own flesh and bloud also. If you forsake us, we must say the world decays, and its final trensmutation must need quickly follow.

Little do you think the Insolencies we shall suffer by Committee-Men, &c. whom chance and lot has put into petty power. Nor will it choose but g [...]ieve you to see them abused (whom formerly you loved) even by the common Enemies of us both. When they punish, how will they triumph and say, Take this (poor Romanists) for your love to Kingship; and again this, For your long doating on the Royal Party; all which you shall receive from us, commis­sioned by your dearest Friends, and under this cloak we will glad­ly vent our private spleen and malice.

Wee know, my Lords and Gentlemen, that from your hearts you do deplore our condition, [...]et permit us to tell you, your bravery must extend thus farr, as not to sit still, with pitty only, [Page 9] but each is to labour for the distressed, as far as in reallity his Abilitie will reach: some must beseech our Gracious Soveraign for us, others again must Undeceave the Good, though Deluded Multitude. There­fore all are to remember who are the Prime Raisers of the Storm, and how through our Sides they would Wound both the KING and You; for though their Hatred to us our selves is great, yet the enmity out of all measure encreases, because we have been yours (and so shall continue) even in the Fiery day of Trial.

Protect us we entreat you then upon all your former Promises; or if that be not sufficient, for the sakes of those that Lost their Estates with you; Many of which are now fallen asleep: But if this be still too Weak, we must conjure you by the [...]ight of this Bloudy Catalogue, which contains the Names of your murthered Friends and Relations, who in the Heat of Battail, perchance saved many of your Lives, even with the joyful Loss of their own.

THe Earl of Car­narvan slain at Newbury first battle.

Lord Viscount Dum­bar at Scarborough, and two of his Sons much wounded.

• Sir John Smith Ba [...] ­naret-who Rescued the Kings Standard from the Rebels at Edghil) slain at Alresford in Hampshire.
• Sir John Cansfield wounded at Newb. of which he dyed a ling­ring death.
• Sir Hen▪ Gage (Go­vernour of Oxford) [...]ain at Cullumbridge, 11 Jan. 1644.
• Sir J. Digby wounded at Taunton, and dy'd at Bridgewater.
• Sir P. Brown wound­ed at Nasby, dyed at Northampton.
• Sir Nich. Fortescue, Knight of Malta, slain in Lancashire.
• Sir Troylus Turbervil Captain Leiut. of the Kings Life-Guard, slain upon his Majesties marching from Newark to Oxford.
• Sir J. Preston wound­ed at Furnace, of which he died a lingering death.
• Sir Arthur Aston (Go­vernour of Reading) slain at Tredaugh in cold blood.
• Sir Thomas Tildes [...] [...] slain at Wiggan.
• Sir Hen. Slingsby be­heade [...] on Tower-hi [...]l

• Col. Th. Howard (Son of the Lord William Howard) slain at Pei [...] ­bridge.
• Col. Tho. Howard (Son of Sir Francis) at A­therton Moor, The gaining which Battel was principaly ascrib'd to his Valour.
• Col. Tho. Morgan of Weston in Warwicksh. slain at Newb. first bat­tel; he raised a Regi­ment of Horse for the King at his own charg, & his Estate was given to Mr. Pyms Son.
• Col. Cuthbert Conni­ers at Malpass.
• [Page 10] Col. Thom. Dalton of Thurnham mortally wounded at Newb. 2d. battle and dyed at Marlborough.
• Col. Francis Hungate slain at Chester.
• Col. Poor (Governour at Berkley Castle) neer Lidney.
• Col. Will. Ewre (Son to the late Lord Ew [...]e) at Ma [...]ston Moor.
• Col. Ra. Pudsey at—
• Col. Cuthbert Clifton slain neer Manchster.
• Col. Cassey Bental at S [...]ow in the wolds.
• Col. Trollop slain at VViggan.
• Col. VVilliam Bains at Malpass.
• Col. VVilliam VVal­ton at T [...]ed [...]gh.
• Col. Richard Man­ning at Altesford.

• [...]. Col. Thomas Makham of Allorton slain neer Gainsbo­rough.
• L. Col. Lancelot Holt­by at Branceford.
• L. Col. Haggerston at Preston.
• L. Col. Pavver at Line.
• L. Col. Jordan Me­ [...] [...]m at Pontefract.
• L. Col. John Godfrey at Tewksbury.
• L. Colonel George Preston at Bradford.
• L. Col. VVill. Hough­ton at Newbury.
• L. Col. Philip Howard slain at Chester.
• L. Col. Middleton at Hopto [...]-heath.
• L. Col. Michael Con­stable there also.
• L. Col. Sayr at Nasby.
• L. Col. Scot at A [...]es­ford.
• L. Col. Thomas Sal­vin at—
• Lieut. Col. Richard Brown at—
• Lieut. Col. Goodridge wounded at—and dy­ed at Oxford.
• L. Col. Congrave slain at Dean in Gloucester.

• Major Cu [...]a [...]d slain at the taking of Ba [...]ing in cold blood.
• Maj▪ Rich. Harborn wounded at Malpass dy'd at Kendal.
• Maj. Tho. Vavasor slain at Ma [...]ston Moor.
• Maj. Panton wound­ed at Cover, dy'd at Highme [...]dow.
• Maj. Hudleston slain at York.
• Maj. Thomas Ew [...]e at Newbury 1.
• Maj. Lawrence Clif­ton at Shelford house.
• Maj. Thomas Hes­kith at Malpass.
• Major William L [...]k at Newbury 1.
• Maj. Rively wound­ed at Nisby, dy'd pri­soner at London.
• Maj. Richard S [...]er­burn at—
• Maj. Holmby at Henly
• Maj. Rich. Norwood slain before Taun­ton.
• Maj. Gilbert Mark­ham at Nasby.

• Captain Marmaduke Constable, Standard-bearer to the L. Gen. Lindsey, slain at Edg­hill.
• Capt. Wil. Laborn, & Capt. Mat. Anderton, at Sheriff [...] hutton in Yorkshire.
• Cap. Joseph Consta­ble at Newberry.
• Capt. Wiburn slain at Basing in Cold Blood.
• Captain Burgh slain at Cover.
• Capt. Thurston An­dertan wounded at [Page] Newbury, dy'd at Oxford.
• Cap. Haggarston (el­dest son of Sir Thomas in Lancashire.
• Capt. Anthony [...]ig­by at Baving House.
• Cap. Richard Brad­ford at—
• Cap. Ke [...]elm Digby (Eldest Son of Sir Kenelm Digby) raised a Troop of Horse at his own charge, and was slain at Saint [...]eotes.
• Cap. Ratclif Hough­tod at Preston
• Cap. Rob. M [...]lineux of the Wood in Lanca­shire at Newbury 1.
• Cap. Charl. Thimel­by at worcester.
• Cap. Robert Town­send at Edg-hill.
• Capt. Matthew Rat­ [...]if neer Henly.
• Capt▪ Richard Wol­sole at Newbury:
• Cap Anthony Awd, Cap Thomas Cole at Newark.
• Captain Patison at Wiggan.
• Ca. Maximil Nelson at Ma [...]ston moor.
• Cap. Fran. Godfrey slain at Sherburn.
• Cap. Tho. Meynel at Pontefract.
• Cap▪ John Clifton at Shelford house.
• Cap. Abrah. Lance,
• Capt. Robert Lance at Rowton in Chesh.
• Cap. Anth. Hamer­on neer Manchester.
• Capt. Will. Symcots, Cap Leiut. to the Lord Piercy, slain at New­berry 1.
• Capt. Thomas Sin­gleton at Newberry 1.
• Capt. Francis Er­rington of Denton in Northumberland at Rotheran.
• Capt. George Sin­gleton at—
• Cap. Mich. Fitzaker­ly at Liverpool.
• Cap. Daniel Thorold at Nasby.
• Cap. Franc. Clifton at Newberry 1,
• Cap. John Lance at Is [...]ip.
• Cap▪ George Cassey at Hereford.
• Captain Langdale at Greekhowel in Wales.
• Cap. Carver in Mon­mouthshire.
• Cap▪ John Lingen at Ledbury.
• Capt. Samways at Newberry 2.
• Capt. John Plumton slain at York.
• Cap. Pet. Forcer at—
• Cap. Thomas Whit­tingham at Newberry.
• Cap. Winkley at Leverpool.
• Cap. Thomas Ander­ton at—
• Cap. Rich. Walmsley at O [...]mschurch.
• Capt▪ John Swingle­hurst, and Capt. John Butler at Mars [...]on Moor.
• Cap. George Holden at Uske.
• Cap. Richard Latham at Litchfield.
• Cap. Tho. Charnock at—
• Cap. Robert Dent at Newcastle.
• Cap. Thomas Hes­keth, Cap. and John K [...]ipe at Bindle.
• Cap. Tho. Eccleston at—
• Cap. John Hother­sal, Cap. Nic. Anderton at G [...]eenoo castle.
• Cap. Anthony Gir­lington at Lancaster.
• Capt. Francis Rows in Dean Forest.
• Cap. Randolph Wal­linger at Cover.
• Cap. Chrisloph. Wray slain at Bradford.
• Cap. VVil. Rookwood at Alresford.
• Cap. Rob. Bookwood at Oxford.
• [Page] Cap. Hoskins slain at Lidney in cold bloud.
• Cap. Phil. Darey at—
• Cap. Wil. Jones at Ragland.
• Cap. Henry Wells wounded at Newberry 2. dyed in prison at London.
• Cap. Richardson slain before [...]
• Cap. [...]spen [...] slain in [...]spen [...] .
• Inferiour Officers. [...] slain at Newberry.
• Lieu. Rich. Osba [...]ston at Leeds.
• Lieut. George Ho­thersa [...] at Leverpool.
• Lieut. William Gir­lington at—
• Lieut. John Kulch­ [...]th at Wo [...]al.
• Lieut. William Sin­gleton at Marston.
• Lieut. Peter Board­man at Bredford.
• Lieut. Short slain neer Glocester.
• Lieut. Rich. Brad­ford at Bi [...]chington.
• Lieut. James Brad­ford at—
• Lieu. Tho. Kinsman at Lincoln.
• Lieut. John Birch at Birmicham.
• Lieut. [...]
• Cornet William Cul­chereth at Newberry.
• Cor. Deinto [...] at Ca­diff.
• Cor. Robert Lance in Cheshire.
• Cor. Edward Walker at Burton.
• Cor. Miles Lochard at Gooderidge.

• Mr. Edw. Talbot (brother to the now [...] of Shrewsbury) slain at Marston Moor.
• Mr. Cha. Townly, and Mr. Charles Sher­burn there also.
• Mr. Nicholas Timel­by at Bristow.
• Mr. Pool of Worral at—
• Mr. John Tipper at Newnam.
• Mr. Christopher Blount at Edgbalston.
• Mr. Francis Darcy at [...] Mr. Theodore Mowse at Langport.
• Mr. Gerad Salvin at—
• Mr. Wiburn
• Mr. Rob. Bowles
• Mr. Wil. Stoner,
  • at Baz [...]ing.
• Mr. Price of Wash­ingly in Northampton sh. slain at Lincoln in cold blo [...]d,
• Mr. Cuthbert Ratcliff slain at Newcastle,
• Mr. Thomas Latham at Newark.
• Mr. Andrew Giffard at Hampton.
• Mr. Lewis Blount at Manchester.
• Mr. Cary and Mr. Gennyngs at Shelford house.
• Mr. James Anderton in Wales.
• Mr. Thomas Roper at Gootheridg.
• Mr. Stephen Pudsey in Holderness.
• Mr. Francis Pavier at Marston.
• Mr. James Banton at Cover.
• Tho. Pendrel at Stow.
• Mr▪ Boniface Kemp & Mr. Ildesons Hesket slain neer York in cold bloud.
• Mr. Mich. Wharton at Scarborough.
• Mr. Errington at Chester.
• Tho. Westby Doctor of Physick at Preston.
• Mr. Peter Davis at Denbigh.
• Mr. Edward Davis at Chester.
• Mr. Bret at—
• Mr. Roger Wood at Chester.
• Mr. Henry Lawson at Melton.
• Mr. Tho Craithorn the elder, at Uphaven.
• [Page] Mr. Hen. Johnson at—Three sons of Mr. Kitby of [...]aue [...] [...]. John Witham and [...] [...] Preston.

• Major General Wil. Webb so wounded at Newbury by Case Shot, that he lives a dying life.

• JOhn Lord Marquess of Winchester, who so Valiantly defended Bazing-house.
• Henry Lord Mar­quess of Worcester, who has been at least 300000. l. looser by the Warr.
• Francis Lord Cot­tington.
• Lord John Somerset. Marmaduke L Lang­dale, and his Son.
• Sir John Winter, who so stoutly defend­ed Lidney House.
• Sir Thomas Tildesly himself slain, and his Estate sold.
• Sir Hen slingsby be­headed, at Tower Hill, and his Estate sold.
• Sir Peircy Herbert, now Lord Powys.
• Sir Francis Howard Sir Hen. Bedingfield.
• Sir Arth. Aston, Go­vernour of Reading.
• Sir Tho. Haggerston-Rog. Bodenham, Esq Charles Townly, Esq Rowland Eyre, Esq Peter Pudsey, Esq John Giffard, Esq

• HEnry Lord Vis­count Dunbar and his Son.
• Sir Wil. Vavasor. Sir Edw. Ratcliff.
• Thomas Clifton, Esq Peter Gifford of Chillington, Esq
• Walter Fowler of St. Thomas Esq
• Thomas Brook of Madely, Esq
• Francis Biddulph of Biddulph, Esq
• William Middleton of Stocton, Esq,
• Lance Errington, Esq
• Nich. Errington, Esq
• Hen Errington, Esq John Jones of Din­gestow, Esq
• John Weston, Esq Phil. Hungate, Esq Ro. Dolman Gent. Rich. Masley Gent. Gen. Smith. Gen. Ralph Pudsey Gent.

• [Page]HEnry Lord Arnu­del of Wardor, who reised a Regiment of Horse for the King, and whose Castle of Wardor was so gal­lantly defended a­gainst Sir Edward Hungerford.
• Henry Lord Marley and Monteagle.
• VVilliam Lord Ewre. VVilliam Lord Powis, who keptlong his castle of Powis against the Enemy, and afterwards taken in it; and there­upon was kept a great while Prisoner at Staf­ford, and died in du­rance at London.
• Lord Charls Somerset.
• Sir Wal. Blountlong a prisoner in the Tow.
• Sir Edw. Widdrington who raised a Regi­ment of Horse.
• Sir Richard Tichburn Sir Charles Blount (slain also by one of his own Captains.)
• Sir Jo Clavering dy'd a Prisoner at London.
• Sir John Cansfield.
• Sir John Timelby of Ernam.
• Sir Phillip Constable. Sir Edward Plump­ton.
• Sir Nicholas Thorn­ton, who raised a Troop of Horse at his own Charge.
• Hugh Anderton of Exton, Esquire.
• Thomas Langtree of Langtree, Esquire.
• Wil. Hoghton, Esq William Hesketh, Esq William Latham, Esq
• Tho. Singleton, Esq John VVestby, Esq
• Sir Edward Charlton▪ VVilliam Sheldon of Beoly, Esquire.
• VVilliam Gage of Bently, Esquire.
• Tho. Clavering, Esq John Plumpton Esq Marm. Holby, Esq Hen. Englefield, Esq
• Robert VVigmore Esq Ro Cramblington Esq VVill Sherburn, Esq John Constable, Esq Richard Latham, Esq VVilliam Bawd, Esq
• James Anderton of Birchley, Esq
• Tho. Singleton Esq John Talbot, Esq Nich▪ Fitzakerly, Esq John Peircy, Esquire.
• Thomas Acton of Burton, Esquire.
• Tho. Gill [...]orand, Esq Tho. Grimshaw, Esq Ralph Rishton and VVilliam [...]loyer, Gen­tlemen.
• Richard Chorley of Chorley.
• James Anderton of Clayton, Esquire.
• William Anderton of Anderton, Esquire.
• VVith many others.
• Mr Edm [...]nd Church of Essex was one of the first whose personal Estate was plun [...]red, and his real sequestred, which so continued (without any allow­ance to his VVise and Children) from 1642. till 1649▪ when he dyed a Prisoner.
• Mr. John Barlow of Pembrookshire, his whole Estate (being at least 1500l. per annum) was given to Col Hor­ton, and Cap Nicholas, without allowance of of any fifths, or other sustenance for his wise and many children.

November 16. 1666.