First Assertion. That as the Law now stands, the Free-hold Lands in England may be in­cumbered in diverse Manners, and at diverse Places.
PROVED.

FRee-hold Lands may be incumbered these several ways:

1. By Feofment, which must be exe­cuted in the Place where the Lands lye.

[Page 2] 2. By Grant with Attornment, of which the Tenants must have Notice.

3. By Fine and Recovery (with a Deed leading the Use) which are Matters of Record.

4. By Bargain and Sale, inrolled in ei­ther of the Four Courts at Westminster, or with the Custos Rotulorum of the County where the Lands lye.

5. By Judgments in Three Courts at Westminster.

6. By Recognizances entered in the Courts where they are acknowledged.

7. By Statutes Merchant and Staple trans­mitted into Chancery.

8. By Lease and Release, which may be Executed any where.

9. By Leases granted out of the Lands, which may be Executed any where.

10. By Rent-charges granted out of the same, which may be Executed any where.

11. By Will in Writing.

12. By Bonds to the King, which are in the Nature of Statutes-staple.

All these are Incumbrances made by the Act of the Party: Besides which, there are others that happen by Default, as Acts of Bankrupcy, Eschaets and Attain­ders.

Now I am not a going to Calumniate [Page 3] the Law, for allowing of so many sorts of Incumbrances on Lands, but for permit­ting them to be done in diverse places, Which doth render the Titles to Lands incer­tain, and therefore is a Deficiency in the Law: And tho' the Law hath directed several of them to be recorded, yet this doth not remedy the Incertainty.

First, Because these Records do lye in several Places, which makes the Search thereof chargeable, and the Finding diffi­cult.

Secondly, Because those that are upon Re­cord, have no Preference above those that be not; so that should a Purchaser dis­cover all that are Recorded, he may be de­feated by those that are not; which can never be discovered, but by the Confession of them that made them, because they may be executed any where.

Therefore the drift of this Essay, is to give a Sanction to one Place above all the rest, by annexing a Priviledge to it, and leaving it to every Man's pleasure whe­ther he will purchase that Priviledge or not.

To shew the Necessities and Conveni­encies whereof, I offer the following Ar­guments.

Second Assertion. That the Advantage taken (by the Con­veyancers in the Law) of the Statute of Ues, 27 H. 8. in making Clandestine Conveyances, contrary to the true intent and meaning of that Parliament, and all the avowed Laws and Customs of England, doth oc­casion a Necessity of a Registry to prevent them.
PROVED.

In tracing out the Occasions of mak­ing this Statute, I was drawn through all the Statutes against Mortmain, as far back as Magna Charta, which doth prohi­bit the giving Lands to Religious Houses; by which it did seem to me, that Lands had been so given before that time, or else it had not been prohibited: For hu­mane Prohibitions generally come after the Fact committed, whereas the Laws di­vine prohibit by way of Prevention: Adam was forbidden the Tree, before ever he had tasted of it.

The first Statute against Mortmain was made by God himself, before the Fact com­mitted; [Page 5] for by the Mosaical Law, which instituted the first Society of Priesthood, the Levites are forbidden to have any Inheritance but the Tithes, that they might not dote up­on their Possessions; but Avarice increasing upon them, by an Acquisition of Wealth, which they did not know how to dispose of, they agreed to set up a Publick Trea­sury, by way of a Joint-Stock, for the use of the Church, which was not within the Words of the Prohibition; and out of this Joint-Stock they paid Judas the thirty pieces of Silver, which being re­turned by him, they were loth to part with it, and yet puzzled what to do with it; because being the Price of Blood, it was against their own Canons, to put it again into their Treasury; Therefore they took Counsel, and bought the Potters Field, to bury Strangers in. As my Lord Coke commends the Wisdom of our Ancient Clergy, for always choosing the most Learned in the Law to be of their Counsel, so it seems these Priests of old were endued with the like Wisdom: For the Children of this World are wiser in their Generation than the Chil­dren of the Light.

Now these Lawyers advised their Clients, that notwithstanding this Canon, they might purchase Lands with this Money, and an­nex them to their Church: But this be­ing [Page 6] against the Law divine, prohibiting their purchasing of Lands, the Lawyers found this Stratagem, to purchase these Lands for a Burying-place only, in the Nature of a Church yard; which being a thing of Neces­sity, and made Sacred, would exempt, or at least excuse it from this Statute against Mortmain; and the Priests computing that this might turn to as much Profit as any thing else, (having double Duties for Lodging of Men, and Meat for Horses) they consented to lay out their Money in it, (any thing to get a Penny in an honest way.)

And this Field of Blood was the first spot of Glebe in the World, to which the Priests will be intituled, (in right of the Church) if ever they gain the posses­sion of the Holy Land.

But having laid this Nest Egg, they went on to join Field to Field, and had they been let alone, had converted whole Kingdoms into Holy Ground before now.

And why Houses of Religion are said to be more haunted with Ghosts than Lay-Tenements, I can't tell, unless some of their subsequent Augmentations were the Price of Blood, as well as their Original Purchase.

But now to begin at our Laws: It is strange to observe, how the Parliaments of England did hunt the Priests and Law­yers with Statutes against Mortmain, from [Page 7] the making of Magna Charta, 9. H. 3. to this Statute in 27. Hen. 8. and yet could never catch them.

The Statute of Magna Charta (as has been observed) prohibited the giving of Lands to any Religious House: To evade this, the Lawyers advised the Clergy two things: First, That whereas several great Estates were held of them, under small Rents, that they might purchase in these Estates to their Church, be­cause they were before held of them. Se­condly, The Prohibition of the Statute be­ing to Religious Persons only, that the Se­cular Clergy were exempted.

To hunt them out of these Holds, the Statute of 7 E. 1. called Statutum de Religiosis, doth prohibit any Religious Persons, or others, (which includes the Secular Clergy) by any manner of Craft or Engine to take Lands in Mortmain, and so they could not pur­chase in the Estates held of them.

To evade this Statute, the Lawyers advi­sed the Clergy, That if they had any silly Confessants who had a mind to be cheat­ed of their Estates, they might suffer a feigned Action to be brought against them, and therein lose their Lands by default, which Recoveries were adjudged by the Justices not to be within any of the words of this Statute, and therefore they were allowed; For that Recoveries being prosecuted [Page 8] in course of Law, were by Law presumed to be [...] just and lawful, tho' they were done in Fraudem Legis.

To drive them out of this Hold, the Sta­tute of Westminster 2. makes all Lands so re­covered to be forfeited to the Lords of the Fee, and for want of their Entry to the King.

To evade this Statute, the Lawyers advised the Clergy two things. First, That for all Lands lying found the Church, they might enter into them by assent of the Tenants, and make them Church-yards by Bulls of the Pope, ( whether they had this by precedent from the Origi­nal Purchase, or according to the Pro­verb, That good Wits jump, is not mate­rial.) Secondly, They advised them, that they might purchase Lands in the Names of other Persons to their Use.

To hunt them out of these Holds, the Sta­tute of 15 R. 2. prohibits both these.

To evade this, the Lawyers advised the Clergy, that they might purchase in the Names of other Persons, in Trust for them­selves; which Trust was not within the precise words of Ʋse.

And thus the Priests continued to Cheat the People of their Estates, and the Lawyers the King of his Eschaets, for above three hundred years together, in spight of all Laws made to the contrary.

[Page 9] In which time they had taught the Lay­ety this Craft, to convey away their le­gal Estates to Persons in Trust, whereby to prevent the Descent to the Heir, and consequently the Wardship to the King and other Lords, and yet to keep the use and pernancy of the Profits to themselves and Families: Of which King H. 8. complaining to his Judges, they advised an Act for Transferring all Uses and Trusts into Possessions; for which purpose a Bill was drawn by the King's Counsel, and presented to the House of Commons, in the 24th. year of his Reign, when it was rejected, but passed in the 27th. which is this Statute of Uses.

And four years after a Statute passed (worth all the former) for Dissolution of Mo­nasteries; by which the Priests lost their Lands, and the Lawyers their Clients, (tho' not their Cunning) as will appear by the Sequel.

Now this Statute of Uses, 27 H. 8. hath in­troduced a new Conveyance in the Law, (which was not before) by way of Bargain and Sale, for tho' a Bargain and Sale did raise a Use at the Common Law, yet it was not a compleat Conveyance to trans­fer the Possession, without an actual deli­very of it in the Country: but now this Sta­tute doing that Office by transferring the [Page 10] Use into a Possession, a Bargain and Sale became a compleat Conveyance without any other Ceremony: And the same Parli­ament forseeing that this Bargain and Sale so perfected might become a Clandestine Conveyance, to be executed any where, did intend to provide against it, by mak­ing a Short Statute the same Sessions for that purpose, called The Statute for En­rollments, by which all Conveyances of Inheritance of Freehold, which pass by Bargain and Sale only, are to be Enroll'd within six Months after the Date, that Purchasers may have Notice thereof from the Record.

But of late years the Lawyers have topt their Inventions upon these two Statutes. For, First, They make a Bargain and Sale for a Term only, (now generally called a Lease for a Year) and which is not with­in the Statute of Enrollments, and by this the Lessee gains a Use at Common-Law, and a Possession by the Statute of Ʋses; which makes him capable of taking a Re­lease of the Reversion at Common Law, and then they make a Release to him and his Heirs accordingly. Which two Deeds make him one perfect Convey­ance, and so by putting the Common-Law at both Ends, and the Statute of Uses in the Middle, the Statute for Enrollments [Page 11] is bilkt, and these Conveyances by Lease and Release, which are Clandestine Convey­ances, and invented by the Abuse of one Statute, and the Elusion of the other, are become the Common Conveyances of the Kingdom.

I challenge the Inns of Court to shew, that either the Common Law, or any Parlia­ments of England, ever directed any In­cumbrances to affect Lands, but by Solemn Livery and Seisin, or matter of Record; and therefore these Clandestine Conveyances are crept in, contrary to the Intent and Meanings of Parliaments, and all the a­vowed Laws and Customs of the King­dom.

There are two Common Titles to Lands in England: The one by Descent, which is proved by Marriages, Baptisms and Bu­rials; and the other by Purchase, which is proved by Deeds; and where there is one Dispute of Title by Descent, there are ten by Purchase; because the Titles which shew the Descent are registred, and those by Purchase are not; for were these Mar­riages, Baptisms and Burials, left at large, without notifying of them, as Purchases are, it would soon breed Confusion in all the Descents of the Kingdom. And is it not a Reproach to the Law, that that part of the Titles of Lands, which is the Province [Page 12] of poor Parish Clerks, should have more certainty in it, then that which belongs to the Professors of the Law?

Third Assertion. That all Objections made against a Re­gistry, upon account of Mischiefs which may arise by Discovery of Titles, are not only contrary to all the avowed Laws and Customs of England, but to the very Essence of Title, and the History of Conveyances.
PROVED.

Some Notice is essentially necessary to the Title of every thing that is vendible: To make a Title, is to take the Property of a thing from one Man, and put it into another, of which it is necessary that other persons should have Notice, as well as the Parties, or else the Purchaser can have no Title because there is no Witness to give Evi­dence of it, in case the Seller should deny it. And as some Notice is absolutely ne­cessary to all Title, so the more Notice the better is the Title; it were better for every Man who is Owner of an Estate▪ that all Men knew his Title, and the [...] [Page 13] whenever he had Occasion to dispose of his Estate, there would be no further En­quiry into the Title of his Lands, than to the Title of Money in his Possession.

And as Notice is thus necessary and ad­vantageous to Title, so in the History of Conveyancing, the most perfect Titles are most Notorious, or rather the most Noto­rious are most perfect.

And because Antiquity of Precedents is the greatest Argument in the Law, I'll quote one out of that Authority, which treats of things done before the Foundati­ons of the World, and fortells us of seve­ral things that will come to pass after the Dissolution of it. The History of the World is but a Modern Treatise of things of a late Date, which were done in pur­suance of Counsels and Decrees made be­fore: Matters of Fact set forth, without the Original Design and Institution of them seem irrational, and to have no Meaning in them: Would any thing seem more ri­diculous, than that the taking off a Seal, and delivery of a piece of Parchment by one Man, should give another a Title to an Estate, if the Law were not known, which gives the Sanction to this Cere­mony?

The Precedent I am going to quote, is, That great Settlement of Eternal Life, [Page 14] made by God upon Jesus Christ, for the Considerations therein mentioned: The Epi­tome or Contents whereof, and the Man­ner of the Execution, I find in that History which we call the Gospel; but because the Contents thereof is not a Subject with­in this Essay, I will not dare to touch up­on it here: But the manner of the Execu­tion being directly within my Argument, (or rather my Argument within that) I dare relate it as I find it. This Settlement was first Enrolled in Heaven, ( in the Volume of the Book it is written of me) afterwards was Sealed and Executed in the Blood of Christ, ( the Seal of the Covenant) in the presence of all the World, ( the Sound there­of is gone through the whole Earth) and since that hath or shall be Written and Preached, Printed and Published in all Na­tions, Kingdoms, Tongues and Countries. ( This Gospel must first be preached in all the World, as a Witness to all Nations, and then shall the End be.) By all which God him­self is bound up from disposing Eternal Life in any other manner, than pursuant to this Settlement, without giving himself the Lye, which he cannot do; and Man hath such Notice of this Title, that he can't accept any other, without becoming an Imposter upon himself.

[Page 15] And this is the highest Precedent for Man to form his Titles by, as far as it is imitable by him; The things on Earth are but the Patterns of things in the Heavens, where the Originals are kept, to try the Truth of all things by. God delivered out the first Forms of all things in the World, of Ships, of Regular Buildings, of Letters written with his own Hand, of Marches and En­campments, taught the first Workers in Brass and Bugle-work, Linnen and Silks, Plowing and Harrowing, Sowing and Reap­ing, Threshing and Winnowing; all which he owns to come originally from himself. A Jove principium.

And now to begin with the Business of Man: The first Purchase I find since the Beginning of the World, was made by Abra­ham of Ephron, the Hittite, in these Words, And the field of Ephron which was in Machpelah, which was before Mamre, the field and the cave which was therein, and all the Trees that were in the field, that were in all the Borders round about, were made sure to Abra­ham for a Possession, in the presence of the Children of Heth, before all that went in at the Gate of the City.

Another was made by Boaz of Naomi, in these words, And Boaz said unto the Elders, and unto all the People, ye are Witnesses this day, that I have bought all that was Elimelechs, and all [Page 16] that was Chilions and Mahlons, of the hand of Naomi: Moreover, Ruth the Moabitess, the Wife of Mahlon, have I purchased to be my Wife, ye are witnesses this day. And all the People that were in the Gate, and the El­ders said, we are witnesses. (O Tempora! O Mores!) Purchases▪ and Marriages made without Lawyers or Priests: However, I have mentioned these Conveyances more particularly, because I fancy our Mo­dern Conveyancers, with all their Trum­pery of Stationers Ware, can't make bet­ter, either for Form or Substance; and these were made by Paroll, being before the Delivery of the Form of Letters to Man.

The first that I have observed in Wri­ting, was the Purchase of Redemption made by Jeremy of Hananael, in these words, And I subscribed the Evidence, and sealed it, and weighed him the Money in the Ballances, so I took the Evidence of the Pur­chase, both that which was sealed according to the Law and Custom, and that which was open, and gave them to Baruch, in the sight of Hananael, and in the presence of the Witnesses, who subscribed the Book of the Pur­chase before all the Jews that sate in the Court of the Prison; and charged Baruch, saying, take the Evidence, as well that which is sealed, as that which is open, and put them [Page 17] in an Earthen Vessel, that they may continue many dayes.

By this it doth appear, that Registring of Deeds is as antient as the Deeds them­selves: Here is the Original Sealed, and then Registred in a Book, to which the Wit­nesses subscribe their Names: Now Baruch had the Custody of the Registry, in the Nature of a Publick Notary, for that pur­pose, being elsewhere called Baruch the Scribe: But that the Original was deli­vered him, was an extraordinary thing, for that belongs to the Purchaser: But it being just before the carrying away Cap­tive into Babylon, (of which Jeremiah had Notice) he delivered them both to Baruch, to hide them till the return of the Cap­tivity.

That which I Cite these Precedents for, is the Notoriety of them, by calling all the People together to bear Witness, and an Inrollment beside to that which was in Writing.

And methinks all the Old Forms in the beginning of Deeds, shew the Intention of making them as publick as they could be; Know all Men by these Presents; and, To all People to whom these Presents shall come, &c.

And as the Law intends Notice of all things done by Deed, so it hath provided [Page 18] Publications for things done without Deed, as Fairs and Markets for Selling of Cat­tel, that the Purchasers may not be cheat­ed; Publications in the Churches before Matrimony, and Registring after it, to pre­vent Bigamy: So the Law marks Felons in the Hand, that none may trust them.

And yet after all this, there is a Pro­vision intended in the Bill for this Regi­stry, whereby any one may Conceal the Uses declared of his Estate, yet so that there shall be some Notice taken of the Deed, by which the Uses are declared, that the Owner of the Land shall be in­capable of Selling or Mortgaging his Estate, 'till he doth produce that Deed, whereby a Purchaser or Lender cannot be defeated.

Fourth Assertion. That all Objections made against this Registry, upon Account of Reducing the Practice of the Law, are one good Reason for it.
PROVED.

The practice of the Law in Civil Causes is divided into three Sorts: First, The transferring of Titles, which is called Con­veyancing. Secondly, The shewing forth and [Page 19] defending these Titles in Forms of Law, and this is called Pleading. Thirdly, The ar­guing upon these Conveyances, and Pleadings (when they come in contest) before the Judges, and this is called Practice at the Bar: So that the Practice of the two latter doth arise from the Errors or Incertainties of the former. Were the Titles of Lands once made certain (which they may be by a Registry, and no otherwise) I know what I think of the future Gains of the Law. The profit of the Law arises from the Incertainty of Property, and therefore as Property is more reduced to a certain­ty, the profit of the Law must be redu­ced with it; the Fall of the one must be the Rising of the other. Actions of Slan­der and Battery, and Causes on the Crown­side, would scarce find some of the Cir­cuiteers Perriwiggs, and yet (if we ob­serve Evidence) they stand obliged to Dis­putes in Titles for many of these. Theif and Whore, Kick and Cuff, are very of­ten the Effect of forcible Entryes, Tres­passes and serving of Process, in which the Title comes frequently in Question. But the reducing this part of the practice of the Law, are things not seen as yet. The Proximus ardet will fall upon the Conveyancers, and that not by altering the Forms of legal Conveyances, or taking them [Page 20] out of their hands, or putting any stop to the Dealing in Lands, (for that will be encreas­ed) but by exposing their manner of pra­ctice in this Conveyancing part of the Law.

For as it was numbered among the Sins of one of the Kings of Israel, that he made Priests of the meanest of the people, so it is the misfortune of the people of Eng­land, that Conveyancers are frequently made out of Old Attornies or Noblemens-Lease-makers, fumpt up in Bar-gowns. Two Qualifications are necessary to a compleat Conveyancer: First, That he be incapable of dispatching Business so fast as he should. Secondly, That he doth not dispatch it so fast as he can. Not to speak of bantering their Clients with their seeming Care and Cau­tion in delaying their Business, shewing great Trunks of old Writings in their Chamber, calling to their Clerks (before them) for one Lord's Settlement, and ano­ther Ladies Jointure, to tell what great Clients they have; and when they come to be paid, they reckon their Fees by lon­gitude and latitude. I have seen an ori­ginal Mortgage of one Skin, bred up by a Scrivener (in six Year) to one and twenty, by assigning it every Year, and adding one Skin to every assigment, by Recitals and Covenants: As Cows after three Years old, have one wrinkle added to each [Page 21] Horn for every year after, which shows their Age: And I am informed, that one Deed of sixty Skins was heaved out of a Conveyancer's Office the other Day.

At this rate in a little time the Clyents must drive their Deeds out of their Law­yers Chambers in Wheel-barrows. These Assignments and Re-assignments of Secu­rities have been a pretty sort of Perqui­sites; especially if they have but an old Judgment or Statute kept on foot, these are certain annual Incomes. I knew two Serjeants at Law, (Usurers,) made it their common practice every Long Vacation, to swop Securities with one another, to make their Mortgagers pay for the Assign­ments; and (doing this without Advice of Counsel) they once Merged an old Term, and thereby spoiled their Title to secure their Fees; which (as to them) answers the Character given of these Graduates by a Forreign Historian, Est in Regno Angliae genus hominum doctorum indoctissimum communiter vocat, The Learned Serjeants at Law: Now I cann't think but these Con­veyancers and Assigners would be asham­ed to produce such things to a Registry; and that therefore they must either ab­breviate their Conveyances, or loose their Practice.

[Page 22] But whether this Registry will make these Reductions: 1. Of the Length of Conveyances. 2. The Incertainties of Ti­tles: And, 3. By Consequence, the other Practice in the Law, I cannot tell: How­ever, I hope it, and believe some of them fear it.

But if the Cryes of Monks and Fryers had been regarded, we had never heard of the Dissolution of Monasteries; and if the Clamours of Masters of Request, Clerks and Eschaetors had prevailed, the Court of Wards and Liveries had been standing at this day: And yet perhaps most of these had either purchased their Places, or were bred up to that part of the Law only.

Fifth Assertion. That the Assurance of the Title, and Dispatch of Business by this Regi­stry, will be more than equivalent to all the Charge in Registring the In­cumbrances.
PROVED.

The Certainty of Titles being the main drift of this Essay, it would be too mean an Argument to use for it, to say, That [Page 23] the Charge of Registring of Deeds will be saved by reducing the Charges in ma­king them; (altho' this be true) yet granting it should not, and that this Re­gistry should be an additional Charge to all others, yet the Priviledge of it will be worth the Price.

It is said, that whenever the Ld. Ch. J. Hales had made a Purchase, he would say, Now I would give a Years purchase more to be sure of my Title: And if we should ask those who have lost their Estates, for want of a discovery of Deeds, they would set a higher Price upon it.

Men generally make their Purchases (with the acquisitions of all their former life) to settle them on their Posterity, for whom they are more sollicitous than for themselves; and therefore they are always more jealous of the Title than the Value, because a deficiency in Title goes to the whole, but a deficiency in Value goes but to part only; and for that Reason they would almost think nothing too much to assure them of their Title.

If a Man one hundred and fifty Miles from London, is to sue his Neighbour but for 10 l. he must employ an Attorney in the Country, who must send to another in London to make out a Writ, and this must be▪ Entered in one Office, and Sealed in [Page 24] another, and then sent to the Sheriff, who must make out a Warrant, and deliver it to his Under officers; who must arrest the Defendant, take a Bail bond to the She­riff, and after Bail given to the Action, the Plaintiff must declare, to which the Defendant may plead almost what he pleases for Delay; and if he pleads to Issue, (which is the fairest can be expect­ed) there must be Issue joined, a Record sealed, and sent down to the Assizes, a Ven. and Distringas to return the Jury, Notice of Tryal to the Defendant, a Tryal had, the Verdict returned upon the Postea, Judg­ment entered, Execution sued out and deli­vered to the Sheriff, and a Warrant from him to his Under-officer to levy it.

Now I don't calumniate this Process for recovery of Debts, nor did I ever hear the Lawyers complain of this as a Bur­then to the People. But why of all troubles the trouble of a Registry should be only grievous, I can't tell, unless because it puts an End to Strife: Is it such a mighty trou­ble for an Attorneys Clerk, when he is to enter up a Judgment, to step into the Registry, and leave an Entry made of it? and is it such a great trouble for a Man, when he has sealed a Deed, to go to the Register to acknowledge it?

[Page 25] There's more trouble than all this in trans­ferring Copy-hold Estates, and yet we don't hear much Complaint about them: Men are seldom in such hast about laying out their Money, or at least their Law­yers are not so violent in dispatch of their Business, but they may dispense with the Ceremony of a Registry, to prevent the loss of their Estates.

Festina Lente is the Conveyancers Mot­to, and therefore they advise their Clients not to hurry them, nor put them out of their own pace; they must think nothing troublesome but the Entering the Deed in a Registry. To come to a Lawyers Chamber twice a Week, to know when they shall come again; then to have a Bill of Directions to send for some Deed which the Lawyer wants, and which per­haps is a hundred Miles distant, in they know not whose hands, to employ an Attorney to search for Judgments, Sta­tutes, Recognizances, Deeds Inrolled in four Courts, to send for a Copy of a Will proved in a remote Diocess, and bring an Account of all this to the Lawyer, and give him a New Fee, and then begin a­gain: and may be two or three such Re­cipes before the Title be finished; and the Clyents must not think much of all this, but take it as the Nature of Business.

[Page 26] And yet I cann't say but all this may be Necessary, as the Case now stands, which must still grow worse, if let alone: For the Troubles and hazards of Titles must continually increase, until they are reduced to a greater Certainty by a Registry.

But then as a Registry would reduce the Incertainty of Titles, it must thereby take away the Delayes in Conveyancing, and consequently abridge the Charges: For as the Pharisees made long Prayers, as a Pretence or Equivalent for devouring Wid­dows Houses, so Practicers in the Law must make out long Bills, on pretence for demanding large Fees: Like some Tooth-drawers, who dragg their Patients by the Jaws about the room, to shew them how hardly they earn their Money. To cure Deficiency in Titles, would be as fatal to Conveyancers, as the Cure of a lame Legg to a Beggar.

It is pleasant enough to any one (but those who are to pay for it) to read a Con­veyancers Bill of Fees, made out for Cli­ents who don't pay well by the gret.

To Counsel for perusing several long Deeds of the Title, which from the beginning to the end was near six Months, and drawing several long Conveyances, in all thirty Skins of Parchment, 100 Guineas.

[Page 27] To his Clerk for Engrossing the same, and Expedition, 30 Pounds.

So here the Counsel is paid for delay, and the Clerk for Expedition, which puts me in Mind of three Items set down in a Country-Scriveners-Bill, Pro speciali labore, 6 s. 8 d. pro expeditione, 6 s. 8 d. pro dis­patch, 6 s. 8 d. the first was for keeping the Business a great while, and the other two for doing it presently.

Sixth Assertion. That in case this Registry be admitted, it seems more practicable, and less troublesome, to settle it in the Metro­polis, than to dispose it into the seve­ral Counties.

Tho' the Soil of Lands lyes in in seve­ral Counties, yet Concourse of Business to the Metropolis, doth generally occasion the transferring of Titles there, (especially of all that are considerable) scarce a Purchase or Mortgage of 500 l. but is transacted in London; and by Posts and other Corre­spondencies, it is less trouble to transmit any thing thither, than few Miles in the Country.

[Page 28] 'Tis observable, that the Statute for In­rollment giving Liberty to enter Deeds in either of the four Courts at Westminster, or in the County where the Lands lye, the latter is seldom used.

And many Deeds containing Lands in several Counties, it would be inconveni­ent to enter them in all.

But should it afterwards be found ne­cessary to extend this elsewhere, it will be better done from this as a Precedent, than to settle it altogether.

The Judges of the Kingdom were at first resident in the King's Courts only, and from thence were made Itinerant, as the Occasions of the Country called for them.

There can be no Streams without a Foun­tain, but when that is finished, the Wa­ter may be directed to any place.

Nothing can be perfected without a be­gining, and therefore to resolve to do no­thing, till we can do every thing, is an absolute Resolution to do nothing, and puts us in the case of the impotent Man at the Pool of Bethesda, who (by Con­clusion) was under an Impossibility of be­ing healed, for he could not be healed till he stept in, and he could not step in because he was lame.

[Page 29] And having thus argued for Publication of Titles, as a Notice against Frauds, I hope Envy cannot say, but I have fairly published my Thoughts about it: And were all Pro­positions for New Laws made as publick as this before they passed, perhaps it might save the labour of subsequent Acts to repeal or ex­plain them.

As to what I have said in the Law, I ap­peal to them that know it, whether I have mis­recited or misinterpreted it.

And notwithstanding all that I have said of some of the Lawyers, I am so well satis­fied in my Relation to that Science, that I would not exchange it, to be a higher Gra­duate in any other. And it is more ow­ing to the Candor of the Cheifs of the Law (who sit in the Seats of Judgment) in dis­couraging all fraudulent Practices, and to the Care and Fidelity of the Practicers of the Law, than to the Law it self, that there are no more Frauds committed in the Titles of Lands, under the present Incertainty of them: For we see, if but One or Two in an Age of that Profession (and none of the most Learn­ed neither) do apply themselves to drawing Deeds, and forgeing Evidence, what Work they make in Westminster Hall.

And as my Lord Coke, speaking of the then Court of Wards, said, That tho' the [Page 30] Parliament had rejected several Proposals for taking away those Tenures, yet he did not doubt but God had that Kindness for the People of England, that an Act would once pass for that purpose, by giving the Crown an Equivalent: All which was fulfill­ed since his Death: So I have that foresight of the growing Mischiefs for want of a Re­gistry, that I am confident the Necessity of it will force its own way: And therefore were I now a dying, I would send this out into the World to take its Fate, with this Motto only.