[Page] A BRIEF APOLOGIE PROVING THE POSSESSION OF WILLIAM SOM­MERS.

Written by IOHN DORRELL, a faithful Minister of the Gospell: but publi­shed without his knowledge, With a De­dicatorie Epistle disclosing some disordered procedings against the saide IOHN DORRELL.

Quod in religionem committitur, in omnium fertur iniuriam.

1599.

[Page] To the right Honourable St Thomas Eggerton Knight, L. Kee­per of the great Seale of England, S r Iohn Popham Knight, L. chief Iustice of England: Sir William Periam Knight, Lord chief Baron of th' Eschequer, and other the most reuerend Iudges of the Common Lawes of Englande.

MY LL. I doe not doubt, but your HH. haue hearde of the possession & dispos­session of VVilliam Sum­mors, a youth of Notinghā, but in what sence these thinges haue bene carried vnto you, by reason of the manifolde varieties of re­portes spred abroad, it may be well doubted. Where­fore to the end, that your HH. might take knowledge of the trueth herein, and according to your knowledge by that hie authoritie deriued vnto you from her Sacred Maiestie, for the gouernement of hir subiectes, accor­ding to your accustomed iustice and integritie, iustifie the trueth, & discountenance the contrarie: I haue ther­fore presumed to preferre vnto your LL. this plaine A­pologeticall treatise, penned by Maister Iohn Dorrell, a principall partie in this matter, but published altogither without his priuitie or consent therein.

The maine point of the controuersie is, Whether William Summers was possessed and dispossessed, yea or no. Whereby there is called into question a matter of fact, a greater then which, can not almost fall out to bee deci­ded among the sonnes of men, namelie touchinge the malice of Satan, and maruellous authoritie of our Lorde IESVS. They that imagine Summer was not possessed, but did counterfeit, doe by consequence and indirectlie denie the malice of Satan, & the Soueraintie of our Sa­uiour in this action. But if it fall out contrarie, that hee was possessed and dispossessed in deed, what their sinne [Page 4] is, and what their reward shall be that blaspheme this great worke of God, I leaue to the secret iudgement of the great day, when they that now iudge, shall be iud­ged. Onelie, hereby it is euident, that so manie hie or lowe as professe them selues Christians, are greatlie in­teressed in this matter, that so much concerneth Christ their Maister: and ought therefore informe them selues herein, in asmuch as what soeuer is done against the Head, must needes strecht vnto the Members.

Now, euerie matter of fact (as this is) most vsuallie is determined by the othes of men: It is therefore to bee respected what hath bene & may be proued by the de­positions of credible men, touching this matter.

By cōmission from the Archbish of York, directed to 12. especiall Iohn Therold Esq. hie Sheriff of Nottinghan. Sir Iohn Biron Knight. Iohn Stanop. Ro­bert Markham. Rich. Parkins Es. Peter Clerk, Ma­ior of Noting. Archd. Walton. Miles Leigh, offic. Ioh. Treton, Iohn Brown. Rob. E­vington, and Tho. Bolton, preachers. persons neare to Notingham, 17. witnes­ses were deposed, who directlie proue such admitable things to be done or suffered by the saide Summer, that neither Art nor Nature can compasse the like. Besides these 17. the names of others to the number of 60. or thereabouts, were taken in writing, readie to be deposed of the same and the like. But the Commissioners being wearied with examinations of witnesses, & seeing Sum­mer before their faces violentlie cast into one of his sitts, so as he wallowed with his body stretched out at length with an exceeding swiftnes from one ende of the rowme where they sate vnto another, and being pulled by the cares and pricked with pinnes in his legg and hande, of purpose to trie whether he had any feeling or not, yet he remayning sencelesse, and no bloud follow­ing, thē they thought it needlesse to proceed any further

Namely, Miles Laigh, Ioh. Tretō Tho. Bolton. At the same time there was seene to three of the Commissioners onely (the rowme being also full of people) a black dogge running about Sum. head as he laye before them snuffing at his mouth, which the three Commissio­ners supposed to haue bene a dogge in deed, and that o­thers had seene him as well as they, which was not so. To this vision accordeth the speech which Som. vttered when the Commissioners willed him to declare vnto them, who had perswaded him to say he did counter­feit, wherevnto (being interrupted as it seemed by the Deuill) he stutteringlie answered, That the blacke dogge which brought him the bag of golde, did bidde him say so.

To second the trueth of the extraordinarie handling of this Som. Maister Treton, Maister Brown, and Maister [Page 5] Ivington, commissioners, M. Hildersham, M. More, and M. Brincesley, all godly preachers, and some of them of great renowme for learning and grauiue, besides manie Gentlemen and others of good credite, volūtatilie haue offred to testifie the trueth in the premisses, but they haue bene reiected & sharplie censured. Petitions haue bene made for copyes of the allegations and depositions against this matter, and for awarding of new Cōmissions to indifferent persons for more full satisfaction: but hi­therto none of these could be obteined, no not much as patient audience, or any iudiciall course of proceeding.

On the other side, the bare report of Som that he did counterfeit, and was instructed therevnto by M. Darrell (though it bee impossible to be true without the im­peachment of the othes of infallible witnesses) is helde for authenticall, & long libells or legendis drawen ther­vpon, which may be confuted by manifold witnesses, if they might be heard. But as if it were more then high treason to affirme the contrarie to that which one man relying vpon Som. relation hath auouched to the L. Archb of Canterb and it may be to your LL. & other personages of hie estate to be true, all witnesses without respect of their authoritie in the common wealth, their learning, grauitie, and approued credite, are scornfullie contemned, or insolentlie charged to medle no more in this matter, although it hath pleased hir most excellent Maiestic, by one of the Gentlemen of hir priuie Cham­ber M. Fulk Cro­will.to giue speciall commaundement, that the cause re­ceiue indifferent hearing.

If the boyes wordes be of such credite that none may impugn them, why should not his words sealed at other times with othes and exec [...]ations be of like value? After his dispossession & repossession, being sometimes come to him selfe, he voluntarily with his own hand writinge (which is yet to be seene) sheweth how it came to passe that he was induced to giue out that he had bene a coū ­terfeit, not vpon any ground of the trueth, but by the threates of Satan and his instruments. His own wordes are these: Being at A house of correction in Notinghars.Sent Iones, there came vnto me a thing like vnto a Dogg, and said vnto me, And if I would consent vnto him & say that I was a coūterfeit, he would giue me a bagge of golde, and if I woulde not, hee woulde make me be hanged, or else he would teare mee in peeces: Note this.And if I would, I should doe any thing that I would take in hand. And he would come to me like a Mouse, & would [Page 6] * an asse hee meaneth. helpe me. And there came to me a thing like a Nass, and said, if I would not say that I was a Counterfeit, hee would cast me into the well, and so went away. And Ni­cholaies Shepand said, and if I were in a fitt againe, hee would fetch a paire of Knipknapes & a roape, & he would make me cōfess. that he was a coūterfetconfesse, or else hang me. And Iohn Couper and Shepeard said, and if I would saye, that I was a Counter­fait, that Maister Mēre and the Aldermene would giue M. Maior.me ten pound, and I should set vp any trade what I would, and I had better say that I was a Counterfeit, & liue like a man, then to haue nothing. For if I should saye, that I was not a Counterfeit, and goe into the Clergies haude, I should haue nothing. Out of which words of his, may be obserued, that this apparition of the Dogge, consorteth with that which the three Commissioners aforesaid did see, and Som. did vtter in the audience of diuers: Also that the Deuill and his agents conspire in one complott against this mighty worke of the Lorde Iesus. Lastlie, that it is no maruell though Som. delude the vnbelee­uers by some rare actions, seeing the Deuill promised to helpe him in any thing he would take in hande. Thus Som. is confuted by Som. him selfe.

Yet because experience hath proued that this Som. is a viz. to his M. &c. knowne by the name of Frier. H.villanous wretch, and hath discredited him selfe to his friends by sundrie lewd practises of theeuerie and kna­uerie since the Bish. of L. was possessed of him (whiche yet are concealed as Secreta imperij, Matters of State, and may not be spoken of in any case) therfore for more suretie least these prankes should be disclosed, Commis­sions haue bene addressed into Notingham, to gather bet­ter ground for these surmises. But contrarie to the com­mendable course of proceedings vnder your LL. in the Commissions sent to Noting.courts of Iustice, those Commissions haue bene directed to the maine Aduersaries and informers against the de­fendant: he not ioyning in commission with them, not hauing knowledge when they were graunted, or when or where they were to be sitt vpon. The witnesses that voluntarilie offred to be deposed for the trueth, were repulsed: all partiall persons that could be thought vp­pon, were presently called. Such as were vnwillinge to depose, to satissie their malice, were threatned to be sent Katherine Wright.to London, and one was put in feare that she should be burned, because shee would not falselie depose against hir knowledge. These and such like exorbitant courses [Page 7] (tedious to be recounted) haue bene vsed: euery tearme and vacation (for the space of a yeare) yeelding straung example of newe greeuance. To omit many particulars. Onely I commend one or two particulars to your LL. consideration. Thomas Gray of Langloy in the Countie of Leicester, Esquier, hauing bin heretofore Maister vn­to Som. was by the Bish. of Lond. &c. although the Gentleman was bold to tel him, that his dealing should bee made knowen vnto his betters likewise. Whereas Maister Darrell had bene imployed about the disposses­sing of Thomas Darling of Burton vpon Trent, into whō one Alice Goodridg had sent her familiar Spirit called Minnie (as hir selfe confessed, and for the same was cō ­demned as a witch by the Queenes Iustices, accordinge as in the Treatise following is declared) Now to the end there might bee gained some supplement of proofe to giue colour to the pretended counterfeiting betwene M. Darrell and Som. the said Darling and others haue bin examined vpon their othes by the aforenamed Bish. & drawen to confesse contrarie to the trueth, as them selues haue auouched, that Darling was a meere counterfeit, and was neither possessed nor bewitched. Whereby the iudgment giuen by the Queenes Iustices against the said Alice, for bewitching of Darling, is directly deseated & impeached, especiallie, if Sentence should be giuen here­in. For if Darling did counterfeit, then hee was not be­witched: and if he was not bewitched, then was the iudgement and execution against Alice Goodridge erro­niously and wrongfullie awarded. Whether this practise may stande with the statute of Provision and Premunire, and with the honour which is due to the Temporall Courts, your LL. wisdomes cā best determine. Or if it be not in case of Premunire, it is an abuse which your LL. being now acquainted therwithall, will see redressed.

By this short recapitulation of indirect proceedinges, and that in a matter concerning Christ our common Sa­uiour, contrarie to the Royall commaundement of our most gracious and soucraine Lady the Queenes Maie­stie, hir Iawes and lawfull liberties of hir loyall subiects, you see what cause I haue to exhiblie this short Apolo­gie vnto your LL. humblie crauing that you would al­lowe some spare time to read it ouer: assuring my selfe, that though it be penned in simplicitie without colours and pompe of humane learning, yet it will leaue such [Page 8] impression in you, as you will not onely incline to the cause, but also by your authoritie, cleare it of scandall.

It wilbe (perhaps) obiected, that by publishing this A cunning praectise to intitle the state to pri­uate abuses. Treatise, I goe about to raise mutinies among y e Queenes subiectes, or to discredite the Ecclesiasticall sta [...]e, or hir Maiesties commission for ecclesiasticall causes, which neuer came within the intention of my purpose. All mu­tinies either among the Subiectes or against my deare Soveraine, I detest from my hart to the lowest hell. And if one ecclesiasticall person among the Commissioners be chalenged before your LL. who are his betters, and equall in commission, and haue authoritie to redresse his abuses, what is this to the Ecclesiasticall estate or hie Ʋnskilfull men are neuer good Iusticers. Commission, which ought to bee honoured of all loyall subiectes? Againe, although by the meanes of the fore­said partie (as being vnacquainted and ignorant how to proceed orderlie in matter of Iustice) it hath bene al­readie Sentenced be­fore hearing. giuen out, for this yeare last past, that all is coun­terfait and Dorrell a cousener, as if he had bene delibe­ratelie heard, the witnesses on both sides indifferentlie Discrete Iusti­cers chide not before the par­tie be cōuicted. examined and produced, and the Sentence in fine iudi­cially and solemnly pronounced, yet in verie trueth the matter depondeth "vndecided: Therefore I trust that without offence, we not being admitted to informe your LL. according to the course of ordinarie proceedinges, Inauditi tan­quam innocē ­tes percunt. may somewhat extraordinarilie in duetifull submission, endeuour to arrest iudgement, which being so vnduelie followed, cannot be lawfull.

Thus referring the consideration of these thinges to your HH. I beseeche the Lord almightie, to continue & increase your cares for the seruice of hir Maiestie, the be­nefite of this Church and common Wealth, to the en­largement of all true honour to your selues with comfort at the time of your death, a blessed memorie after life, and eternall happinesse to your bodies and soules in the life to come for euermore. AMEN.

‘Nullus liber homo capiatur vel imprisonetur, aut dissei­sietur de libero tonemēto, vel libertatibus, vel liberis Enquire Whe­ther this royall law doeth not bind a Bishop consuetudinibus suis, aut utlagetur aut exuletur, aut aliquo modo destruatur nec super eum ibimus, nec su­per eum mittenius, nisi per legale iudioium parium su­orum, vel per legam tortae. Nulli vendemus, nulli ne­gabimus, aut differemus iustitiam aut rectum.’ Magna Carta. Cap. 29.

That William Sommers did not counterfeite a pos­session, but was in deed stranglie and snpernaturally afflicted by the operation of Sathan (as we ve­rely thinke) actuallie possessing him.

IN the Gospell there are diuers signes set downe of Sathan his actuall possessing one, as Mark. 5. 5. Luke 9. 39. cry­inge, Mark 9. 18. gnashinge the teeth, Mark. 9. 18. 20.vvallowing, Mark 9. 18, 20. Luke 9. 39. foming, Mar. 17. 25. Mar. 9: 22. extra­ordinarie & Mar. 5. 3. 4. Actes 19. 16. supernaturall strength, Mar. 5. 1, 2, 5, 6, 7. Act. 16 16, 17. Mar. 1. 25, 26. & 9. 26 Act. 8. 7. supernaturall knowledge, with sun­drie others to the number of 18. but these and euerie of the rest, haue bene seene in Sommer, it must needes ther­fore be, that Sathan possessed him: for vvhere the proper signe, or signes of a thing is, there is also the thing sig­nified thereby: where smoke is, there is fier.

That he was dispossessed, the signes thereof confirme: which are, Crying aloude, renting sore, & lying as dead: these vvere seene and heard at the in­stant [Page 10] of his deliuerance.

Against this it is obiected, That he hath onely counterfeited a possession, be­ing therevnto schooled by me.

To the former part thereof I aun­swere, That sundrie of these thinges, vvhich haue ben done, or rather suf­fred by him, are such, as are impossi­ble to be counterfeited, that is to bee done by any arte of man how cūning soeuer he be: as the extraordinarie & supernaturall Actions or passions of his body, strength and knowledge.

1 The maner of Som. handling during his pos.There hath bene seene and felt a swelling vvhich did run through all the partes of his body: in some parte Supernaturall actions or pas­sions.of his body it was of the bignes of an egge, in some other bigger or lessen: being now in the one arme, it vvould be foorth with in th' other, and so of the leggs: it was seen in his forehead and other partes of his face, yea in his tongue. Being in his eye or toe, & he vttering these wordes, I will goe out at his eye, or, I will goe out at his toe, it was seene presentlie to vanish, or remoue out of that place.

[Page 11] 2 When this Swelling was in his arme or leggs & made any stay there, as often it did, then, and during that tyme, the same member was as heauy and inflexible as so much yron.

3 His body was of that exceedinge waight, that diuers at once could scarsly lift him.

4 He fomed aboundantly (like vn­to the horsse) and that for an houre togither, so as it roped downe all a­long on his brest, and yet euer and a­non vvas vviped away.

5 In his fit neither did the temples of his head, nor the pulses of his handes beate or moue.

6 He lay for the space of an houre as if he had bene dead, cold as yee, his face and handes blacke, no breath be­ing perceyued to come from him.

7 Being oftentymes cast into the fier, vvith his handes sometymes in the fire, sometymes his face, lyeing there also a while, He vvas not burnt at all.

8 He did speake distinctlie vvith a continuall speach for a quarter of an [Page 12] houre, his mouth being shut close.

9 He spake with his mouth wide open, yea his tongue tetorted into his throate, and namely these words: Ego sum Deus, ego sum Rex: that is, J am God, I am King. Whichhe retortinge vvas vsuall vvith him, and so done, as no parcell of his tongue was to bee seene in his mouth.

10 He was in his fitts without fee­ling to the iudgment of those which sawe him. Pinnes being thrust deepe into sundrie parts of his body (some­times vp to the head,) he stirred not at all, neither did any blood issue at the places so pricked.

Supernaturall strength. His Strength was often such, that 3. 4. 5. sometymes 6. men could not rule him. Three men for an houre togither sweating & labouring much, he strugling with them, was not per­ceiued to pant, or blow: yea scarselio to take breath: he holding his finger vpright: a man of great stregth could not bend it towards the palme of his hande, nor holde and keepe it downo when it was bended.

[Page 13] Supernaturall knowledge. His Knowledge vvas such, that by vettue therof he told of those things vvhich were done and spoken diuers myles of him at the same instant they fel out, and foretold things to come. From hence also it was that diuine­like he continued his speach in ex­pounding the Creed for an houre to­gither.

Herevnto adde that most rare acci­dent, That vnder the Couerlet where he lay, there were certayne thinges sometime foure or fiue at one instant stirring & mouing vnder our handes as if they had ben kittlings, whelpes, or such liuing creatures: the couerlet being fuddenly cast vp, they vanished away: but thrown downe, they vvere presently there againe, and this con­tinued about tenne dayes and nights by tymes.

The first of these hath bin deposed by 11. the Teste some by 4. by 5. and some by more or lesse witnesses, these few excepted where this marke (x) is, which notwithstanding are as true as the rest, and to be deposed.

[Page 14] There are besides these diuers o­thers, as the drawing of his mouth a­wry, sometimes to th' one eare, some­times to th' other: the setting of his face against his backe: a violent bea­ting of his face & head to the groūd, and the casting of him self headlong against the vvalles, and postes of the house, so as one would haue thought hee would haue spoyled or bruised him selfe greatlie thereby, yet recey­ued he no hurt at all: the gatheringe of him self of a rouud heape, & boū ­sing vp a good height being so gea­thered, a straunge voice which was sensibly heard to come out of his bo­dye: his vnnatural swelling, his body being twice so bigge as naturallie it is, and his strange wallowing or swift rowling of him selfe, with his body stretched out to his full length.

If these things, most straunge and admirable, can bee done by any hu­maine skill, I denie not but that hee may be a counterfeite: but vntill that shall appeare, I must needs subscribe them to some supernatural power, & [Page 15] that is the Deuill: for some cause of these rare effects must be had, & that must be either naturall or supernatu­rall, but a naturall cause hereof can not be giuen, of necessitie therefore there must bee some supernaturall, which was an euill spirit possessing him, for the reason aforesaid.

Against these impossibilities much is saide, but let the same be well exa­mined by the premisses as a rule, and it will manifest the same maketh no­thing against vs.

Obiection, That Som. Cō ­sesseth hee did conuterfeit. But the mayne thing that is obie­cted for the proofe of his dissembling is his owne confession.

Answere. Thereto I answere, that no man cū ­fessing or reporting any impossibili­tie, of him self is to be credited, whi­che Sommers doeth in this report of him selfe. If Som. should saye that he (by good footemanship) hath gone on foote in one day from Barwick to Douer, none would beleue him: why then doe any credit him in this his confession? for it is no more possible for him to goe that iourney in that [Page 16] time, then by his owne will & power to doe those things which are about specified, which he in saying he hath coūterfeited affirmeth he hath done. If this be a certayne trueth, that these thinges hee could not possibly doe, which all men may graunt, then for­asmuch as 20. witnesses or therabout, haue vpon their oathes ascribed the same vnto him, or some other power in, or by him, it must necessarilie and inevitablie followe, that if they haue sworne truely, and the hundred saye truly which daylie beare witnes ther­to, and are readie to depose the same, if they might be called, then he is a Iyar in saying he counterfeited: Chuse nowe whether you will beleeue W. Som. or this other companie. If he say crvelie, they are perjured: for vppon their oathes they haue avouched these things by him, which can not possibly be coūterfeited. And if they sweare truely, he lyeth [...] he dissembled. And here we [...] [...] ­member that the questiō is not [...]ther Som. did (or suffered) the thing [Page 17] aboue specified, as vvhether he had such a variable swelling, running vp and downe along his body, and so of the rest. For that such thinges vvere seene in him, is alreadie deposed by many: that therfore is out of all que­stion, & most true, except they be per­iured, which is most vncharitable to conceiue, and daungerous to affirme, but the state of our controuersie or question is vvhether Som. himself by some sleight or cunninge of his, did thē: or (that being impossible) some other power in or by him: they ther­fore that goe from this point, speake nothing to the matter or against it.

What moved Sō. to say that he did coun­terfeit a pos­session. Secondlie, the meanes wherby this cōfession was cōpassed, are to be con­sidered of: First thorough the malice of some, Som. was charged (but most vniustly) to haue bewitched one Ster­land to death, wherevpon he was cal­led before the Maior & Aldermen of Notingham, by thē for a time impri­soned, so as his father in lawe entered bond for his appearāce at the Assises.

[Page 18]2 To this ende Sathan visibly appea­ring vnto him (as his vsuall maner is to those he possesseth) sometime pro­mised him golde, and that he would be at hand to do those things for him hee had done howsoeuer hee would haue him, if he would say he had coū ­terfeited: at other times threatned to pul him in pieces if he would not say so. 3. For the obteyning therof Cou­per and Shepherd (two most lewd and euil disposed persons) threatned him: the one to whippe him, the other to pinch him with a paire of pincers, as appeareth both by Som. cōfession and their own vpō their oathes before 12 Commissioners. These baytes thus layd by Satan & wicked men, caught him, for presently after & not before, he made the cursed cōfession of coū ­terfeiting: & no maruell, these things well considered, though he vsed his tongue against the trueth and God him selfe and the great worke which he had wrought for him, seeing that thereby he should not only escape (as he no doubt thought) that which Sa­than threatned, and haue that he pro­mised, [Page 19] which hee hath hitherto per­formed: but also to avoid the present punishment. his keepers threatned to inflict vpon him, &, vvhich was most of all, thereby he should saue his life: for he in saying hee had dissembled, vvas thereby freed from all suspition (or rather that malicious & false ac­cusation) of witchcraft, and thervpon made not so much as any appearance before the Iudge of Assise: Whereas vndoubtedly if hee had stoode to the trueth, and neuer acknowledged any coūterfeiting, he had bene arraigned and sore layd at for his life. Now the prouerbe is, life is sweet: and who (al­most) will not make a lye for the sa­uing of his life? If then any aske the question why he should say he coun­terfeited, if it were not so? he hath his aunswere heere, for hereby wee may plainlie see, that there vvas in carnall reason much to lead him to that con­fession, though it was altogither a­gainst the trueth.

3. As before so after he had made this wretched confession, and stoode [Page 20] in it for the space of a moneth, he ac­knowledged that hee neuer counter­feited, yea in wretched maner he hath betaken him selfe body and soule to the Deuill, if euer he dissembled, and this he did for x. dayes, during which time the worke of God was manifest, and that by the cōfession of the grea­test adversarie. Nowe seeing he hath said both wayes, and varied so often, euen foure times. For first he said and protested, that he did not coūterfeit, thē, that he did dissemble, after again that he did not, and lastlie, he saith & faceth it out, that he did counterfeit: Why should we rather beleue him af­firming then denying, seeing (I say) he hath saide both wayes and alike times of both: yea vvho that is vvise will giue credit to such a double and false tongue? Considering also hovve notoriouslie wicked he is: For take him at the best, and as him self and o­thers would faine haue you: He is an infamous deceauer, hauing faigned to be possest with a Deuill, and there­by (if it were so) prophaned the holy [Page 21] vvorde of God, and the holy exercise of prayer and fasting: besides he is as notorious a lyar as euer was heard or read of, and by consequent the child of the Deuill, yea not onely a lyar but a forsworn wretch, for he hath sworn both wayes: lastlie, he is an horrible blasphemer, for hee hath saide that there is no God, and sometimes these wordes, I am God, as is deposed. These things cōsidered, doe not they great­lie forget themselues which wil haue Will. Som. a counterfeiter, and my self to haue taught him, because Will. So. saith so? Is it not a straūge thing that vvhatsoeuer this graceles boy saith shalbe held for trueth: If he saye hee hath Counterfeited, it must bee so, though God and men affirme the cō ­trarie, and reason it selfe say, it is not possible so to be. When he for pretēce hereof alleadgeth many false, foo­lish, and absurd things, not once wor­thie the hearing or aunswering, they are received for true & invincible ar­guments therof. If he say, Jo. Dorrell. taught him, and for shew thereof al­leadge [Page 22] many thinges as false as false can be, which Io. Dorrell offereth, and is as vvell able to proue them false, as to proue it true that euer hee was in the Gatehouse, yet that must needs be true. In a vvord, if Som. and he alone say many thinges for his dissembling a possession, and my schooling him, though against him, & that he saith, Many, euen hundreds affirme the cō ­trarie, & aboue 20. haue sworne that which proueth the same, and among those some were learned & reverend men, of great wisdome and godlines: yet behold Will. Som. is beleeued be­fore them all, What marvaile is it thē though he be credited and his word, & oath receiued before myne, thogh I be a Minister of Christ Iesus, & such (by the grace of God) as they vvhich seeking advantage against me, can finde none: yet in a worde you shall heare what I say in myne ovvne de­fence.

That Io. Dor. did not teach Som. to coun­terfeit. First, besides that vpon myne oath I haue denyed that I taught him, which indeed should suffice both the [Page 23] law of God, and that lavv by which I am to be iudged (except there were some further proofe then Som. accu­sation, as there is not) I affirme and reason for my selfe thus: That foras­much as the aforesaid straunge acci­dents which were seene in him, can­not possiblie bee taught or learned by any, It is impossible therefore that I should haue instructed him therin. 2. He was so straungly handled a mo­neth before I set eye on him, how thē is it possible that he should haue bin taught by me? For wheras it is allead­ged against me, that for 4. yeares or more he & I had our secret meetings (let that be proued that to my know­ledge I euer sawe him before the sift of Nouember 1597. which was but 2. dayes before his dispossession) and I refuse no punishment: and before I did see him, I was importuned there­vnto by diuers letters, whereof one came from the Maior. I am able also to prove by good witnes that I vvas not desired thither by any direct or indirect meanes from my selfe: nowe [Page 24] let euerie one iudge, whither it is not likely that I would not haue winded my selfe into the action by some de­vise or other, if I had had any such ab­omination in hand as is layde to my charge. Moreouer, Som. saieth, that when he, to this said end, repayred to me (I meane, to be taught) hee came frō one Mr Grayes of Langly (with whō as he saith he then dwelt) to Ashby de la zouche, where I then dwelt, as hee affirmeth, & in a parke there we met, and this our meeting began about 4. yeares past. Now the trueth is that he was gone 2. or 3. yeres frō Mr. Grayes, before I came to dwell at Ashby, & 5. yeres before our pretended meeting, for it is ix. yeares or therabouts, since he went frō M. Grayes, and but 6. yeres since I went to Ashby. And during my aboade at Ashby, he neuer dwelled in that coūtrie wherein Ashby standeth, nor nearer it, then Notinghā is, which is 14. miles distant, and frō whence he himself doth not say y t euer he came to me: Thus then the case stādeth, the lying youth having charged me with [Page 25] instructing him, and beeing charged thervpon of necessitie where & when we met to that end, and not knowing what place to name, at length he be­thought him of his dwellinge some­times with the aforesaid gentlemā, & mine at Ashby: & having none other he named the aforesaid place, because then as he thought, we dwelt within 5. miles one of another, but therin he was deceiued, as is alredy by oth pro­ved: this his accusatiō therfore is ma­nifestly false. But admit he had dwelt with M r Gray when I dwelt at Ashby, doth that so greatly cōfirme our mee­ting in the parke, and my instructing him there: & yet besides his bare oth (who is such as wee heare, and hath sworne the cōtrarie) there is nothing to strengthen his accusation but this, yea, this is all that is layde to my chardge, saue that he addeth that vpō the 6. and 7. of November 97. at Not­tingham I acted his trickes vnto him, which I haue offred (and still doe) to disproue by a multitude of witnesses. And is it not to bee vvondred at, that such an open and notorious lyar, [Page 26] as this boy is, should prevaile so long and so farre against a Preacher of the Gospell, by so palpable a lye and false accusation as this is. Further more So. Som. varieth in his testimo­nie. his owne tale herein doeth so varie, that his accusatiō can deserve no cre­dite at all, for to some hee reported that he beeing at Nottingham, vexed with a strange collike, through much going into the water, I should dome to him thither from Ashby, and per­swade him to say that hee was posses­sed, & that so we first became acquainted. To others he said, that the first time that he became acquainted with mee, was when I was with Katherino Wright in Darbishire, whiche was a­bout 12. yeares past, at which time he was some 8. yeres old, vnfit as any mā would thinke, to communicate such a matter vnto. Furthermore he tolde the Bishop of London (as it may ap­appeare by one of the articles) that our first meeting & acquaintance was in the streetes at Ashby, I talking with 2. strangers, and that about Katherine Wright forsooth, who departing vpō [Page 27] his comming, we tvvo (as he saieth) vvent into the fieldes togither. And now he saieth, that our first acquain­tance Mai. Dorrell known to be a man that haū ­teth no ale­houses. was in an alehouse at Ashby, a­mong other boyes: Which allegaci­ons as they seuerallie confute one an­other, so I am wel able (helped by cir­cumstances) to confute thē all: wher­in if I faile, yea further if I make not myne innocencie and righteousnesse heerein manifest as the day light at midday, so that I may be hearde and haue leave to produce my proofes, as I trust in time I shall, then let me bee held guiltie, & dealt with according­lie. In the meane season I vvill vse 2. reasons more in the defence both of the vvork of God, and my selfe. If So. counterfeited, & was instructed ther­vnto by me, thē in all reason the same is true of Th. Darling of Burton, & of those 7. in Lancashire, for they were Seauen dispos­sessed in Lanc. by M. Dorrels ministerie. al handled alike, & I dealt with them all, and they vvere all helped by the same meanes, that is, prayer & fasting but that is not so, as God and they wil beare me vvitnes: yea, it is a thing ab­horring [Page 28] frō cōmon sense, so to con­ceyue of thē; Som. therefore hath nor counterfeited, nor I instructed him. That Th. Dar­ling was no counterfeit. Against those 7. in Lācashire nothing is obiected, but of Darling it is saide that he also coūterfeited. I answere, that that cā not possibly be: for in the booke which is printed concerning him, it is reported that hee (being a boy of 13. yeares of age) was of that strength that 2. strong men could not hold him downe, or rule him. And in another place, that 3. men could scar­slie doe it, which is impossible to coū ­terfeit, for no man can add any thing to his strength by coūterfeiting. 2. It is said here in sundrie places, that his armes & shoulder bones were in ma­nie of his fitts thrust out of ioint, and indeed this hath bene seene and felte many a tyme, and by manie who are readie to depose it. Nowe besides the painfulnes, how is it possible that he should thrust his bones out of their iointes, and in againe, and presentlie after vse his armes all one, as if no such thinge had bene done, I can not [Page 29] conceyue nor thinke anie other. 3. It is there reported, in his traunces hee vttered certaine speeches there men­cioned, with his mouth wide open, Tho. Darring bewitched.whiche is impossible to be donne by man. Moreouer, the Witch Alice Goo­dridge by name, sundry times confes­sed, that she mistaking Tho. Darling for one Sherrats boy, sent her famili­ar or spirit in forme of a dogge (par­tie coloured, redd and white) called Mynny, to torment him in his bodie, and that she had caused his vexation: & further that at hir sending of him, she streyned all hir body, & vomited, bidding hir Minny to goe and doe so to the boy, who returning, saide, hee had done so. Now the trueth is, that besides the child was most fearfullie tormented in and thorough all the partes of his body, he was much troubled with vomiting, & making shew thereof. It is also to be remembred, that shee named the tyme, place, oc­casion, and the vvordes shee vsed, when shee sent the Deuil to vexe and torment him in his body, as appea­reth [Page 30] pag. 26. Herevpō this Alice Goo­dridge vvas cōmitted to Derby gaole, indited, arraigned, by the Iurie foūd guiltie thereof, and by the Iudge sen­tence Verdictes and iudgements at common lawe impcached. giuen of hir to imprisonment: vvhere shortly after shee died. These things considered to say that Darling coūterfeited, is not only to denie the trueth of the booke printed, vvhich (for the substance of it) hath ben of­fred to be confirmed by the oathes of a great many, as is still, if by authori­tie Inquire whe­ther the Bish. of L. be not in a Premunire, 27. E. cap. 1. they shalbe therevnto called, but to cōdemne also besides the Iurie, the Iudge, if not of iniustice, yet of sim­plicitie. Besides, if the boy conterfei­ted, vvhat an intollerable abusing of Iudge, Iustices of peace, and Iurie is there? And vvhy is not that counter­feiting boulted out by some of the Wor in that Countie, and the parties therin offending punished according to their desertes? But it may be there is none so wise in that coast. Let them send then to Nottingham, and craue helpe frō some there: thay that foūd out Somer his dissimulation, can (no [Page 31] doubt) doe asmuch for Darling too, if they vvould but take the paines to make diligent search and inquiry in­to it. My second reason is this: If Som. be a coūterfeit, & I haue taught him, then vndoubtedly Marie Cooper his Marie Cooper sister is such, and hath also confedera­ted with vs herein, for she cannot on­lie doe some of his tricks (as they call them) but besides, for a time began hir fittes whē he ended his: he in like sort following her, having their sitts by course, and this they did, although they were in seuerall roomes, as I am able, & offer now to proue by a mul­titude of witnesses. But hereof as she will cleare me, so it hath not hitherto bin said, that shee hath any hande in this counterfeit accusation, why then doe any charge that vpon me? For she in all reason is (at least) as surely con­federate with him as I, or any private christian: And therefore also I vnder­tooke not the meanes for So. his dis­possession, till I had three other Prea­chers to ioyne with me: yea I am per­swaded that the faithfull prayers of [Page 32] the parties friends may prevaile with God in this case: though no Preacher be present, as in the dispossession of Thom. Darling it was evident. Onely this I holde, that one being possessed, prayer & fasting is to bee vsed for the casting out of Sathan, as a meanes ap­pointed of God to that end. And this I doubt not, but I am able to prove by the holy scriptures, & further to con­firme by the testimonies of auncient and late Writers, and by the practise of the Church in all ages, & the good successe thereof.

Casting out of Deuils no mi­racle. 1 And whereas many cōceyue of this matter as a Miracle, and therevppon speake hardlie of it, because miracles are ceased, they are therein (by their patiēce) as I take it, greatlie deceiued. To cast out Deuills by a worde, so as one no sooner commandeth the spi­rit to go out, but sorthwith he depar­teth, as Christ and his Apostles did, is not onely a miracle, but of them the greatest: but by the meanes of prayer and fasting to drive out Sathan, or ra­ther to intreat Christ (to whom all [Page 33] power is giuen in heauen & in earth) to cast Sathan forth is no miracle, be­cause of the said meanes, for whatso­ener is brought to passe by meanes, is no miracle, because of the saide meanes, be it neuer so wonderfull, as might bee shewed (but for brevities sake) in a thousand instances. This is mirandum, non miraculum, that is a wonderfull worke, but not a wonder. 2. When Satan is cast out, the Church (or anie member of it) worketh no miracle, for that shee cannot in the vsing of the meanes, be assured to pre­vaile. For although the assurance is, or may be great in this case, yet vvee can not be sure that the partie shalbe deliuered, the meanes being vsed, be­cause GOD is at libertie to blesse the meanes he hath appointed to this, or that end, and to withhold & to keepe backe his blessing from it: and in this latter case, what will anie meanes profite or prevaile. As touching my opinions herein, and matter of lear­ning, I submit my selfe to the iudge­ment of the learned, as one most rea­die [Page 34] to giue eare vnto them, if they shall informe me better. And as con­cerning the matters of fact, and other thinges reported by mee, If I prooue them not ttue in whole and in parte, Let Som. be helde for a Counterfeit, and my selfe his instructor, and both of vs condingely punished.

‘Is it not the maner of the Romanes for favour to deliuer any man to death, before that he which is ac­cused haue the accusers before him, & haue place to defend him self, concerning the crime.’ Act. 25. 16.

A brief of the depositions taken at Notingham, the 20. of March 1597. by ver­ tue of a commission from the Archb. of York and others hir Maiesties hie Commissio­ners, before 12. Commissioners of worship, proving that William Somers of Nottingham, of th'age of 20. yeres, was possessed by Sathan, and did not counter­feit as some pretend.

1 THat there seemed to runne along his legg, and thence into his toe, bel­lie, throat, tongue, cheeke, eie, and other partes, a lūpe sometimes bigger or lesser then an egge beeing soft. Deposed by

  • Thom. Hayes, art. 1.
  • Rob. Aldridge, art. 2
  • Williā Hinde, art. 3.
  • Tho. Westfield, art. 4
  • Ioane Pie, artic. 6.
  • Willi. Lāgford, art. 5
  • Iohn Strelley, art. 12
  • Richard Mee, art. 13
  • Iohn Pare, artic. 15.
  • Iohn Clerk, artic. 16
  • Williā Hunt, art. 17.

2 The lumpe beeing in his legg, it was heauie, and in­flexible like yron. Depos. by

  • Iohn Strelley, art. 12
  • Ioane Pie, artic. 6.
  • Eliz. Milward, art. 14
  • Iohn Clerk, artic. 16

3 He had such extraordina­rie strēgth, that sometimes 3. 4. 5. 6. or moe were scarse able to rule him. Deposed by

  • Rob. Aldridg, art. 2.
  • Ioane Pie, artic. 6.
  • Iohn Wood, art. 111
  • Iohn Strelley, art. 12
  • Richard Mee, art. 13
  • Willi. Lāgsord, art. 5

[Page 36] 4 When 4. or 5. strugled with him, so as they were weari­ed, he did not sweat, pante, or chāgecolour. Deposed by

  • William Langforde, artic. 9.
  • Richard Mee, art. 13
  • Iohn Wood, art. 11.

5 He walowed, gnashed with his teeth, stared with his eies, & fomed at his mouth excessiuelie, hauing neither eate nor drunke all the day before, as Langford depos.

  • Robert Aldridge, ar­ticu. 2.
  • Willi. Aldred, art. 5.
  • Iohn Strelley, art. 12
  • Richard Mee, art. 13.
  • William Langforde, artic. 9.

6 Ther seemed to runne vn­der the couerlet where hee lay, as it were kittlinges, to the number of foure or fiue Deposed by

  • Robert Aldridge, ar­tic. 2.
  • Ioane Pie, artic. 6.
  • Thom. Gray, art 10

7 His face and mouth fear­fullie distorted, one lipp to­ward one eare, and another toward th'other, deposed by

  • William Aldred, ar­tic. 5.
  • Ioane Pie, artic. 6.
  • Richard Mee, art. 13

8 His face turned directlie backward, not moving his body at all, Deposed by

  • Richard Mee, art. 13
  • Ioane Pie, artic. 6.

[Page 37]9 His necke doubled vnder him, Deposed by

  • Richard Mee, art. 13

10 His bodye doubled, his head betweene his legges, suddely plucked round like a round browne loafe: hee was cast vp like a ball from the bed 3. or 4. tymes togi­ther, half a yard hic, depo. by

  • Ioane Pie, artic. 6.

11 Beeing cast into the fire, where he lay sometimes a­gainst the walls & irō barrs of the chimney with great violence, he receiued no ap­pearance of hurt at all, de. by

  • Ioane Pie, artic. 6.
  • Iohn Strelley, art. 12
  • Richard Mee, art. 13

12 His body semed to be ex­tended to the height of the talest man, whē once he en­deuoured to hang himself, Deposed by

  • Ioane Pie, artic. 6.

13 That hee tolde of diuers things done in his absence, without notice giue by any person, Deposed by

  • Elizabeth Milward, artic. 13
  • Ioane Pie, artic. 6.

[Page 38]14 Strange speeches vttered by him in his fits, in a strang voice, as, that hee was his, that he was God, Christ, & a King: that he made bap­tisme: I wil vse W. So. tonge and members for 3. dayes: Ego sum Rex, ego sum Deus: That there was no God, that he was King and Prince of darkenes. And in saying the Lordes prayer, could not say, leade vs not into temp­tation, but lead vs into tem­ptation. Also before Mai­ster Dorrell had seene him, he said, Dorrel comes, Dor­rell comes, he will haue me out, but I will come againe, for Notingham & Lenton are iolly townes for mee: Depo­sed by

  • Robert Aldred, art. 2.
  • Richard Newton, artic. 5.
  • Richard Mee, art. 1 [...]
  • Elizabeth Milward, artic. 14.

15 Being recouered out of his fitts, he knew not what he had saide or done: De­posed by

  • Iohn Wood, art. 11.
  • Ioane Pie, artic. 6.

[Page 39]16 In his fitts strange smelles were in the place where hee lay, sometymes like brim­stone, somtimes very sweet: Deposed by

  • Ioane Pie, art. 6.
  • Richard Mee, art. 1 [...]

17 A straung knocking per­ceitted about his bed, in his fitts: both his feet & hands beeing helde vnmoveable: Deposed by

  • Robert Aldred, art. [...]
  • Ioane Pie, artic 6.
  • Elizabeth Milward, artic. 14.
  • Iohn Parc, artic. 15.

18 Hee did crie hideouslie, sometimes like a bull, bear, swine, and in a small voyce vnpossible to be coūtetfei­ted: Deposed by

  • William Langford, artic. 9.
  • Robert Aldridg, artic. 2.
  • Richard Mee, art. 1 [...]

19 His legge would be croo­ked with his falles, and re­maine vnflexible: Depo. by

  • Richard Mee, artic. 13.
  • Thomas Haics, artic. 4.

20 He spake in a continued speeche, his mouth beeing wide open, his tōgue drawn into his throat, neither his lipps nor chaps moouinge: Deposed by

  • Richard Newton, artic. 7.
  • Henry Nusiey, art. 6.
  • Ioane Pie, art. 6.
  • Iohn Strelly, art. 12.

[Page 40]21 He spake a quarter of an houre, his mouth beeing shut close: Deposed by

  • William Hunt, artic. 17.

22 In his fittes his pulses and temples did not beat: he lay for dead, cold as Ice: De­posed by

  • William Langford, artic. 9.
  • [...] Milward, artic. 14.

23 His eye was black, & chaū ged colour in his fitts: De­posed by

  • William Hinde, ar. [...]
  • Thomas Westfield, artic 4.
  • Richard Mee, art 13.

Folio 8. Lin 38. libero tenemento add suo.

This keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above is co-owned by the institutions providing financial support to the Text Creation Partnership. This Phase I text is available for reuse, according to the terms of Creative Commons 0 1.0 Universal. The text can be copied, modified, distributed and performed, even for commercial purposes, all without asking permission.