The grievances given in by the Mini­sters before the Parliament hol­den in June 1633.

  • Propositions concerning kneeling before the bread in the Sacrament.
  • Master WILLIAM COUPERS Letter to the Bishop of Dumblane.
  • The Bishops instruction to Master Gawin Hammiltoun, Bishop of Galloway.
  • M r. George Gladstones letter to the King.
  • Master William Struthers letter to the Earle of Airth.

Printed Anno 1635.

The grievances given in by the Ministers before the last Parliament in Iune 1633.

THE Ministers standing for the preservation of the puritie of religion in Doctrine worship, and governement, assayed sundrie meanes to have his MAIESTIE rightlie informed of the estate of our Kirk, but the successe was not answerable to their expectation. Yet having the opportunitie of his Majest. coming to his native countrie of Scotland to be crowned, and hold his first Parlia­ment, they advised upon some grievances to be presented to his Maiestie and Estates. It was ordained by act of Parliament 1594. that foure of everie estate should conveene twentie dayes before the beginning of the Parliament, to con­sider all articles and petitions, which were to be given in, that such things onlie might be put in forme, and presented to the Lords of the ar­ticles in time of Parliament, as were reasonable and necessarie, and that such, as were imperti­nent and frivolous, might be rejected. But it was not determined who should make choice of the persons. Yet this was not observed before the last Parliament. But upon the 16 of May 1633. intimation was made by Proclamation, that all [Page 4] such, as purposed to give in any articles or pe­titions, deliver the same to the Clerk Register betwixt and the first day of Iune, to be presen­ted by him to such of the estates and counsell, as should be appointed to hear and consider them. The ministers fearing not to be heard otherwise, appointed one of their distressed bre­thren Master Thomas Hogge to present their grie­vances to him, which he presented and delive­red and tooke instruments thereupon in the hands of a Notair.

Grievances & petitions concerning the dis­ordered estate of the reformed Kirk with­in this Realme of Scotland, presented upon the 29 day of May 1633. by me M r. Thomas Hogge Minister of the Evan­gell, in mine owne name, and in name of others of the ministrie, likewise grieved, to Sir John Hay Clerk of Register, to be presented by him to such as ought accor­ding to the order appointed, consider them, that thereafter they may be pre­sented to his Maiestie and Estates, which are to be assembled at the next insuing Parliament.

THE opportunitie of this solemne meeting of your gratious Majestie and the honourable Estates con­veened [Page 5] in this high court of Parliament, and the con­science of our dutie to God and the reformed Kirk with­in this Realme of Scotland, where we serve by our mini­strie, constraines us to present in all humilitie to your Highnes and Estates presentlie assembled those our just grievances and reasonable petitions following:

1 Albeit vote in Parliament was not absolutlie granted to ministers provided to prelacies, but onlie up­on such conditions as his Highnes of happie memorie, and the generall assemblies of the Kirk should agree up­on, which is evident by the remit and provision ex­pressed in the act of Parliament holden at Edinburgh in December 1597. And albeit the manner of their ele­ction and admission to the office of Commissionarie, and the particular conditions and cautions to be observed by Ministers vote in Parliament in name of the Kirk af­ter long disputation, were agreed upon by his Maiestie present in person, and the generall assemblie and were appoint [...]d by them to be insert in the bodie of the act of Parliament, which was to be made concerning that pur­pose, Some Ministers notwithstanding have beene and are admitted to vote in parliament in name of the Kirk as absolutlie, as if the act of Parliament did containe no such reference, and as if his Majestie with the gene­rall assemblie had not agreed upon the manner of their election and admission to that office, or upon any limi­tations; wherby the Kirk hath sustained great hurt & prejudice in her liberties and priviledges, and special­lie by their frequent transgressing the first of the con­ditions although grounded upon the verie law of na­ture and nations. That nothing be proponed by them in parliament, counsell or convention in name of the Kirck without express warrant & direction from the Kirck, under the paine of deposition from their office; Neither shall they keep silence, nor consent in any of the said conventions to any thing that may be preiudiciall to the libertie & weal of the Kirck, [Page 6] under the said paine. And the second. That they shall be bound at every generall assemblie to give account [...]ment the discharging of their commission since the assemblie preceeding, and shall submit themselfes to their cen­sure, and stand to their determination whatsoever without appellation, and shall seek and obtaine ratification of their doings at the said assemblie under the paine of infamie and excommunication. Therefore our humble supplication is, that the execution of the acts of Parlia­ment of matters belonging to the Kirk, to which they have voted in name of the Kirk, without any authori­tie or allowance from the generall assemblies of the Kirk, be suspended, till the Kirk be heard, and that in time coming ministers have no otherwise vote in par­liament, but according to the provision of the act of par­liament, and the order of their entrie to the office of that commissionarie and limitation foresaid agreed upon, as said is.

2 Seing ratifications of acts and constitutions of the Kirk can not be construed to be a benefite or favour to the Kirk, unlesse the ratifications passe according to the meaning of the Kirk, and the tenor of the said acts and constitutions without omission, addition, or altera­tion of clauses, articles, or words of importance, and that in the ratification of the act of the assemblie holden at Glasgow anno 1610. which past in Parliament holden 1612. under the name of explanation, sundrie clauses and articles were omitted, as the subjection of Bishops in all things concerning their life, conversation, office and benefice, to the censure of the generall assemblie, the censure of Bishops incase the stay the censure of excommunication, the continuing of the exercise of do­ctrine weeklie, the necessitie of the testificat and assi­stance of the ministrie of the bounds for the admission of ministers, and other clauses and articles are added and insert, as the different degrees of Archbishops and Bishops, the power of giving collation of benefices gran­ted [Page 7] to Bishops, the disponing of benefices falling in their hands jure devoluto, the appointing of Moderators in diocesan Synods incase of their absence, and some words of the oath are changed: By all which omissions, additions, and alterations, the Kirk hath sustained, and doth sustaine great hurt in her Iurisdiction and disci­pline. Our humble desire therfore is, that the Kirk may be liberat from the prejudice of those omissions, addi­tions and alterations of the act foresaid.

3 Notwithstanding the generall assemblies have beene holden from the time of reformation till the year 1603. at least once in the year and oftner pro re nata, provinciall Synods twice in the year, weeklie meetings for exercises and presbyteries everie weeke, for matters to be treated in them respective, & their liberties were ratified in parliament anno 1592. and by that as a most powerfull meane, blessed be God, peace and puritie of religion were maintained: And in the assemblie holden at Glasgow 1610. when Commissioners voters in Par­liament provided to prelacies were made lyable to the censures of the generall assemblie, It was acknowledged that the necessitie of the Kirk craved, that there should be yearlie generall assemblies, And the Ministrie were then assured, that libertie would be granted upon their request, whereby they were induced to condescend so farre to the act then made as they did, which act also beareth in the verie entrie thereof a request to his Ma­jestie, that generall assemblies may be holden in all times coming once in the year, or precislie at a set and certaine time, Nevertheles the wonted libertie of hol­ding generall assemblies is suppressed, the order of the provinciall Synods confounded, presbyteries in a great part disordered and neglected, whereby divisions have entered into the Kirk, Ministers are become negli­gent [Page 8] in their callings, and scandalous in their lifes, the godlie are heavilie grieved, the weake are scandalized, erroneous doctrine is delivered in Kirks and Schooles without controlement, the Commissioners voters in parliament lye untried and uncensured, and atheisme and poperie increase: Our humble desire is therefore, that the acts of parliament made in favours of the as­semblies of the Kirk, and speciallie the act of Parlia­ment holden at Edinburgh in Iune 1592. be revised and ratified in this present parliament.

4 Notwithstanding the observation of festivall dayes, privat baptisme, privat communion, episcopall confirmation of children, have beene rejected by this our reformed Kirk, since the beginning of the refor­mation, and it hath beene declared by act of parliament in the year 1567. that such onlie were to be ac­knowledged members of this reformed Kirk, as did participat of the Sacraments as they were then right­lie ministred, which was without kneeling in the act of receaving the sacramentall elements of the sup­per, or immediate dispensing of the same to everie com­municant by the minister; And that it was statute and ordained in the same parliament that all Kings should give their oath at their coronation to meantaine the re­ligion then professed, and that forme of ministration of the sacraments which then was used: Nevertheles pa­stors and people adhering to their former profession and practise are nicknamed Puritans and threatned, not onlie without any good warrant, but beside the tenor of the act of perth assemblie, which containeth no strict injunction, and contrary to the meaning of the voters, and to the proceedings of that assemblie, where it was professed that none should be pressed with obedience to that act: Therfore we humblie intreat that by ratifica­tion [Page 9] of the acts of parliament made before that assem­blie and by such wayes as shall seeme good to your gra­tious Majestie, & honourable Estates assembled, your Majesties good people, Pastors & Professors may both be purged from such foule aspersions, and may be freed from all dangers and fears which may occurre by occa­sion of that act of perth.

5 Albeit it be determined by the generall assemblies of this our reformed Kirk, what oathes Ministers should take at the time of their admission or ordination, yet there is a new forme of oath devised and urged by the admitters or ordainers, upon intrants to the mini­strie, together with subscription to certaine articles de­vised by them without direction and warrant from any assemblie of the Kirk, yea or act of parliament, whereby the entrie to the ministrie is shut upon the best quali­fied, and others lesse able are obtruded upon the people to their great griefe and hazard of their soules: Our humble petition therefore is, that all such oathes and subscriptio [...]s urged upon ministers at their entrie or transplantation, may be discharged.

6 Notwithstanding there be constitutions of the kirk and lawes of the countrie for censuring of ministers before the ordinarie judicatours ecclesiasticall, yet con­trarie to that order, ministers are suspended, silenced and deprived, and that for matters meerly ecclesiasticall before other judicatours, which are not established by the authority or order of the countrey and kirk: There­fore our humble petition is, that ministers deserving censure be no otherwise censured, then the order of the kirk doth prescrive, and that such as are otherwise dis­placed be suffered to serve in the ministrie, as before.

The Presenter attended in Edinburg to cōpear, if need were before such, as were to conveene [Page 10] to consider the articles and petitions, which were given in to the Clerk Register. But there was no appearance of any such convention. The Ministers therefore directed the brother above named to present the supplication following to his Majestie, which he did upon the fifteen day of Iunie in the Castle of Dalkeith, the same day that he was to make his entrie in Edinburgh.

This happie occasion with strong desires long waited for by your Majesties most humble and loving subjects the Pastors and Professors of the reformed religion within this your Majesties Kingdome of Scotland. The great fame, which hath often filled our eares, of your Majesties most pious and princelie inclination to reli­gion and righteousnes, whence this Kirk and Kingdome from their singular interesse in your Majesties birth & baptisme, have reason to looke at this time for a confor­table influence: the bodie of this Kingdome in heart joyning with us, and onelie waiting for the least word from your Majesties mouth: The conscience which we have and which we trust is manifest to all men that we are seeking neither riches nor honours to our selfes, but that the summe and substance of our desires is to procure the advancement of the Kingdome of Iesus Christ, and to see your Majesties flourishing estate, in your King­domes: All these and each of them move us to intreat in all humilitie your gratious Maiestie to be favourable to our petitions, which we have delivered to the Clerk of Register to be presented to your Majestie and Estates at the approaching Parliament, that they may be consi­dered and receave a gratious answer.

The King read the petition at length. Yet there was no more heard of our grievances either among the Lords of the articles, or in open Par­liament, [Page 11] where nothing cometh in voting, but that which first must passe the Lords of the ar­ticles, and usuallie what passeth through their hands is concluded by the whole Estates in pu­blike. Not onlie were our grievances suppres­sed, but also all former acts concerning the Kirk, were ratified. Howbeit it was wel knowne that sundrie former acts had wrought great di­sturbance in our Kirk. An act also in particular concerning the common habits of Kirkmen, (not of surplice or other like superstitious ve­stures, as many mistake) was ratified and made a point of the royall prerogative. Small hope had we of any better event considering the depen­dance either of Noblemen upon the Kings fa­vour for the recoverie of their brocken estates, or of some other men for preferment, or the fear of others to lose it, all knowing verie well the Kings bent and inclination.

For the better clearing of the equitie of our grievances, I will set downe these few observa­tions:

Great opposition was made by manie worthie men of the ministrie to Ministers vote in Par­liament, convention, or counsell, and not with­out reason. When it was carried by pluralitie of procured voces in a generall assemblie holden at Dundie anno 1597. against which and the two former assemblies M. Iohn Davidson protested, the nixt care of the sincerer sort was to have the Commissioner voter in Parliament tyed to a certaine forme of admission, and to some cau­tions, that he degener not into a Roman or An­glican Bishop.

He was to be recommended to his Majestie, by the generall assemblie, and to be admitted by the Synod as it then stood in integritie. The first two cautions ye have heard in the grievan­ces. By the third, the commissioner voter in Parliament was bound not to prejudge the pro­vision of other Kirks planted or to be planted. By the fourth he was bound not to delapidar or dispone any part of his benefice without the ad­vice and consent of his Majestie and the gene­rall assemblie, and to interdite himselfe to that effect. By the fifth, He was bound to attend faith­fully upon his own particular congregation, where he shall be minister, in all the points of a pastor, and here­anent to be subject to the triall and censure of his own presbyterie and provinciall assembly, as any other mi­nister that beareth not commission. By the sixt cau­tion, In the administration of discipline, collation of benefices, visitation, and all other points of ecclesiasticall government, he shall neither usurpe nor acclaime to himselfe any power or jurisdiction, farther then any of the rest of his brethren, under the paine of deprivation. By the seventh, That in presbyteries, provinciall and generall assemblies, he shal behave himself in all things, and be subject to their censure, as any of the brethren of the presbyterie. By the eight, At his admission to the office of commissionarie, th [...]se and all other points ne­cessarie he shall swear and subscrive to fulfill under the penalties foresaid, otherwise not to be admitted. By the ninth, In case he be deposed by the generall assembly, synod, or presbyterie from his office of the ministrie, he shall lose his vote in Parliament ipso facto, and his be­nefice shall vaike.

Such as plotted the course of Episcopacie and [Page 13] aspired to prelacies were constrained for the present to condescend to these cautions, but were not minded to stand to one jot of them longer then they saw occasions to breake loose. Because they were made countable by these cautions to the generall assemblies, they pro­cured first a prorogation of the diets of the as­semblies by the Kings authoritie, and at last the bereaving of the Kirk of all libertie to indict any assemblies, that so they might bee freed from making any count at all. After they had gathered strength and power to overrule as­semblies of their owne devising, and after that some of the Ministrie were banished, others confined, a third sort drawen up to court, they procured a convention at Linlithgow anno 1606. of Noblemen and Ministers nominat by them and recommended by the King to the presby­teries to be sent to that meeting. The name of a generall assemblie was concealed in the Kings missives. But soone after presbyteries were charged with letters of horning to accept the constant moderators chosen by that meeting, such as were styled vulgarly Bishops in respect of their benefices to be moderators of the pres­byteries where they made residence. Synods likewise were urged to accept these Bishops for constant moderators, howbeit no such thing was concluded at that meeting but their acte falsified.

This moderation did not satisfie their ambi­tious humour, nor was it well accepted by pres­byteries or the Synodes. In the yeare 1610. they were armed with the power of the high [Page 14] commission, of which they were not cap­able, and without consent of the Estates, con­trairy to an act of Parliament Anno 1584. to silence & deprive, fine and incarcerat Ministers, to command them to excommunicat such as in their judgement deserved that censure, and to fine and imprison other whatsoever subjects. After that they become thus great and terrible, and now able to extort any thing from servile ministers, they procured an assemblie to be hol­den at Glasgow soone after like that other at Linlithgow, but that there was more gold delt among mercenarie ministers at this assemblie.

Soone after three of their number went to court to be consecrat Bishops, returned & con­secrated the rest of their fellowes, no such thing being concluded at that meeting as the office of a Diocesan Bishop, Anglican or Roman, that is, to be the proper Pastor of all the congregations within the Diocie, the power of ordination resi­ding in him, and of jurisdiction flowing from him. The presbyteries and Synods were onlie tyed to these who were called Bishops in re­spect of their benefices in the points, and in the manner expressed & upon trust that they should be lyable to the censure of ordinarie and set ge­nerall assemblies. But they were not content with sundrie articles of that act, howbeit the as­semblie was overruled by themselfes, and they consented, to the end that the Ministers there conveened might be induted to yeeld so farre as they did. Therefore when the act was rati­fied anno 1612. they consented in Parliament to additions, alterations, and omissions, of sundrie [Page 15] clauses, as no doubt they had devised themselfes before. In the yeare 1617. they consented in Parliament to the election of Bishops by Deans and Chapters, which was inhibited by the acts of the assemblie holden 1578. and condemned in the second booke of policie as popish. It was likewise farre different from the forme of ele­ction and admission agreed upon with their owne consents in the generall assemblies. What was proponed in Parliament for their advance­ment was granted by the Estates, and consented to be themselfes as no doubt they had devised. So they were their owne carvers.

In end they brought in popish ceremonies to vex the Ministers and Professors, and to give them some other subject to worke upon, then to medle with themselfes, and their usurped authoritie.

Because they are conscious to themselfes of the nullitie of their assemblies, and fear to want the concurrence of Synods and presbyteries they draw Ministers & Professors before their court of high commission. But if this court were not fortified and assisted by the Lords of secret counsell by whom it was first authorised, their power in the high commission would be litle re­garded. Our bondage then resolves upon the counsell.

Whatsoever be, the usurpation of the Prelats, the Ministrie and Professors are not to be excu­sed. First for acknowledging or not opponing to their assemblies. For the safetie of religion dependeth not upon assemblies of whatsome­ever kinde, but upon the libertie of free and [Page 16] right constitute assemblies. As in the common­weale he were not to be thought a faithfull pa­triot, who would not stand as much for the libertie of a Parliament as his owne possessions, because the safetie of all other liberties stan­deth in the preservation of maine liberty. Nixt, because they continue in subjection, notwith­standing we have not the libertie of ordinarie and set assemblies to censure them according to the cautions and acts agreed unto by them­selfes. Thirdlie, because they give farther obe­dience, then is required by the acts of their owne assemblies, as if they had an absolute power to direct and enjoyne as pleaseth them. But the first is the fountaine of all our mischief.

I have here subjoyned certaine propositions concerning adoration before the bread in the Sacrament without the knowledge of the Au­thor, who is knowne to be learned and judi­cious.

1. Besides that manifest and grosse kinde of idola­trie, whereby divine or religious worship is given unto the creature in stead of God, there is another more se­cret and subtile sort, which rendereth not divine wor­ship unto the creature as it is considered in it self, but as it carrieth a certaine relation and respect unto God, who is to be worshipped for himselfe, and therefore is commonly called Relative worship. The reformed Kirks convince the Papists of manifold. Idolatrie of this kinde, and howsoever the Papists gather toge­ther many fig-tree leafes to hide their nakednesse, yet there is nothing more certain, then that both the Gentiles and Iewes pleased themselfes in this sort of worship, as may appeare from Roman. 1. 20. and 23. [Page 17] Deut. 4. 12. and 15. and many other places.

2. As in the grosser kinde of idolatrie it matters not, as touching the point of idolatrie it self, whither the ob­ject of adoration, and that which we worship with di­vine honour, be the invention of our owne head, or the creature of God, as the Sunne, Moone, or Starres, or made by our hands as an Image, or some thing ordained of God, And finallie whither it be a thing consecrated or not for the adoration of the bread in the Sacrament is idolatrie, no lesse then the adoration of the Sunne in the firmament, or the adoration of an image the worke of mans hands. For their error is more tollerable who worship for God a statue of gold or silver, or an image of any other matter, as the Gen­tiles worshipped their Gods, or a red cloath lifted up upon a speare, which is reported of the Lappians, or living creatures as some time the Aegyptians nor theirs who worship a piece bread. Coster. Enchir. C. 12. In like manner, in the other sort of worship which is rela­tive, it is all one matter touching the point of idolatrie, whither the secondarie or subordinat object of our ado­ration, and that which participats of the worship of God, be a thing naturall, as the Sunne or the Moone, or a thing artificiall, as an image, or some thing ordained of God, but for an other end, as the Brasen Serpent, or a thing consecrated of God, but not to be worshipped, as the Sacramentall bread, for although there be a very wide difference amongst those things in respect of will-worship, And because nothing can be a mean of the worship of God, but that which is ordained of God, and the Sacrament is a meane of Gods worship, an image is not a meane, yet in the point of idolatrie there can be no difference at all, because no creature of what somever kinde can so much as take of the worship of God with­out the guiltines of idolatrie.

3. We fall into two evils, when we adore before an image, one is, when we make the image a meane or midle [Page 18] of the worship of God without a warrant from God, whence it is that adoration before an image is will-worship, and although it had no other evill in it but this one, it behoveth to be (by interpretation as they use to speake or by consequent) idolatrie, for whosoever ap­pointeth of his owne head a new manner or meane of divine worship, by consequence also appointeth an other God, which he thinks delyteth in that forme of worship. The other evill is that adoration before an image is pro­perly and formable idolatrie, because thereby religious worship is rendered unto another then unto God, and in some measure and degree the image is made partaker of the worship of God, which is cleared at large by the divines of the reformed Kirks. Now in our adoration before the bread we are free of the former of the two evils, because the Sacrament is a meane of worship au­thorized by God, but we cannot possibly be free of the other evill, because the adoration before the bread, and before an image are altogether a like in respect of the participation of divine worship. They who are enemies to images (saith Vasquez in his 2 booke of adorat. disp. 8. c. 13.) and use images onlie for historie and remem­brance, doe not bow their knees nor prostrat themselves before them: for so they should adore them, with an ex­ternall signe of worship. He who is religiouslie pro­strat before the crosse (sayeth the Bishop op Spalato booke 7. page 293) he must have the crosse for the object of adoration. Although images were meanes of worship ordained of God, such as the Sacrament is, yet were it not lawfull to adore before them. And the arguments whereby our divines prove the worship of images to be idolatrie, aime not at this point to shew that images are not lawfull meanes of worship, for that were nothing els but to prove that worship before images were will-worship, [Page 19] but they labour for this, that the Papists while they adore before images they give that unto the crea­ture, which is proper unto God, & the Papists in this que­stion use not this defence, that images are lawful means of worship, but that the worship of images is relative, and resolveth upon the paternes whose images they are.

4. That we may have a further insight in this truth, we must learne, as in other parts of divine worship, so in our adoration before the bread, to distinguish betwixt that which is internall in the minde, and that which is externall in the senses and gestures of the body or (as the schoolemen speake) betwixt the spirit of adoration, which they make the inward affection of subjecting our selfes to that which we adore, And the externall mark or signe of adoration, which they also call the materiall part of adoration, for suppose it were true that the whole thoughts and affections of the soule were taken up, and exercised about the thing signified in the Sacrament, and that nothing were intended but to render the whole worship unto God, yet the verie nature of the Sacra­ment (which is well called the visible word) of necessitie doth require that our eyes and therefore our gestures, the bowing of our knees, and that whole materiall part of adoration be directed toward the elements in the act of receaving, in so farre that although the elements were nothing els to the minde but onlie signes to bring us to the right remembrance of the thing signified, it cannot be eshewed, but they must be the object of the outward adoration of the bodie, which is directed toward them, and therefore adoration before the bread, must needs be the adoration of the bread, even as the adora­tien before the image, the adoration of the image, while the image to his minde, that adoreth, is nothing else but a signe, bringing the paterne to his remembrance.

5. Since there be two kinds of divine worship, one immediat, as for exemple, Prayer, Thanksgiving, the religious hearing of the voice of God spea­king to us immediatlie: The other mediat, as the or­dinarie hearing of the word, and receaving of the sacra­ment. It is both lawfull and suitable to use the gesture of adoration in Prayer, in thanksgiving, and when we hear the immediat voice of God, because no visible midle commeth in betwixt God and us that can be the object of our adoration, But in the ordinarie hearing of the word at the mouth of the Preacher, and in the act of re­ceaving the Sacrament, it is neither suitable, nor lawful to adore; for that were to adore in a mediat worship, or to adore mediatlie, which both by force of truth, and con­fession of both sides must be Idolatrie.

6. It is therefore unlawfull to adore before the bread, or to kneel in the verie act of receaving the Sa­crament, not onely by reason of the danger of bread wor­ship, wherein the bread is adored in stead of Christ by the ignorant multitude, neither is it onely unlawfull, because it is idolatrie to adore before the bread for re­verence and due regard of the Sacrament, which can not be avoided by them who adore according to the mea­ning of the article of perth assemblie; But it is also un­lawfull, because adoration before the bread, even in the very nature of the action it self, is idolatrie, neither is it possible for any man to make his adoration before the bread not to be Idolatrie, except he will take away the element that is the Sacrament it self from the Sacra­ment, which is impossible.

7. And therefore they are to be commended, who farre from all idolatrie, and from all perill and appea­rance of idolatrie doe sit or use an ordinarie table ge­sture in the supper of the Lord: Since neither the [Page 21] Euangelifls nor the Apostle Paul have written so much as one word, which may give the least suspition, or ground of conjecture, that Christ and his Apostles did change their ordinarie, and common forme of sitting at table: Since it is certaine from the whole frame of the institution that the supper of the Lord was an holy feast or banquet, and since by so doing the whole institution of Christ, which is very many wayes defaced by kneeling, is keeped safe & sound. It is not farre from blasphemie (sayeth Paraeus) to say, that the Kirk hath with greater wisdome made any change in the Eucharist, for what were that but to say, that the Kirk is wiser then Christ himselfe, as if he had not knowne well enough, what was able to procure greatest reverence to the Sacrament, or what should carrie with it the least perill, which is a Blasphemie worthie of the followers of Antichrist.

Master William Cowper minister at Perth his letter, written before he was Bishop of Galloway, to M r. George Grahame Bishop of Dumblane, Anno 1606.

BRother, I have receaved your commendations from B. which were needles, if you had keeped your wonted heart. As for me, I never hated you, your course wherein ye are entered I never loved. Al­though the fruit ye enjoy be sweet, yet the end shall prove it never grew on the tree of life. Doing in a worke of conscience with doubting turneth light in darknes, whereupon followeth induration. Whereof it followeth that manie in our Kirk without feeling are coursers a­gainst their brethren, that have done more good in the Kirk for edification of others then ever themselfes did, [Page 22] having neither eyes to see, nor hearts to feel how dan­gerous their estate is, who can not rise but with the fal­ling of manie who in God have entered this ministrie, closing the fountaine that God hath opened. One of your owne told me, long ere the last Ministers went to England, that they were written for to reason, but the end proved prison, and no appearance of returning to some of them. These are the first fruits of your pre­ferment. Here ye stand, and therefore I can not stand with you, except it be to witnesse to God in mine heart against you, that ye have gone wrong. Ye hope in this course to doe good, but it is hard for you to worke mira­cles. At least ye will hold of evill: But how shall ye draw in a yoke with them that are drawing on evill daylie. Ye will not goe beyond the caveats of the gene­rall assemblie. But the answers given to the commissio­ners of the Kirk at the last Parliament by the Chan­cellar (we enter not Bishops according to an act of the assemblie, but according to that which they were an hundreth yeares since) detexit fraudem. I heard it given, and so did the chiefe of themselfes, A. B. C. ye skarre at them whom ye were blyth to see, ye like not the light ye loved, ye count these preachings unpleasant, wherein ye were wont to rejoyce. These may tell yow ye have fallen. Consider your self, where ye was, where ye are now, & quantulum illud sit propter quod nos reliquisti. Thus loving yourself, and not your way, I end.

Master Gawin Hammilton Bishop of Galloway was sent up to Court by the rest of the Bishops, after the convention of the Estates, which was holden about the end of Ianuarie 1609. I have here set down the in­structions or memorials recommended to him by the rest of the Bishops, written by M. Iohn Spotsewood then pretendit Bishop of Glasgow and subscrived by him in name of the rest.

Memorials to be proponed to his most excellent Majestie.

1. YOu shall relate the proceedings of the late convention, and what affection some that were present keithed therein, that his Ma­jestie may be for seene with mens disposition, for the bet­ter choyce of those to whom the affaires shall be concre­dited.

2. You shall remember the care we have had of re­claiming the Marques of Huntlie, and the Earle of Arrall from their errours, and the small profite we have seene thereof, and insist for his Majesties favour to the petition of our Letter.

3. Anent the Ministers that are confined, your L. shall excuse the requeest made by us in some of their fa­vours, shewing how it proceeded, & further declare that of late they have taken course to give in supplications to the counsell for their enlarging to a certaine time, for doing their particular businesse at session & otherwayes in the country, & that some of thē have purchased licence by the votes of the counsell, albeit we opponed. There­fore beseek his Majest. to remember the counsell, that the [Page 24] confining of these Ministers, was for faults done by them to his H. self, & that they should be acknowledged and conf [...]ssed to his Majestie and his H. pleasure under­stood therein before the grant of any favour, otherwise they shall undoe all that hath beene hitherto followed for the peace of the Kirk.

4. Touching the erections, it is our humble desire to his Majestie that the Noblemen, in whose favours the same have beene past, may take order for the provision of their Kirks, according to the conditions made in Par­liament, or then discharge their erections: which seemes best to be done by an act of this ensuing session of Par­liament, for which his Majesties warrant would be had. And some such like course would be taken for the prelacies erected, which have past also the constant plat, that the presentation of Ministers to the modified stipends at the vacantie of the Church should be in his Majesties hand, whereunto though his Majesties ex­presse commandement was given of before, no heed was taken by such as had the charge of affaires.

5. Since this matter of the commissariats importeth so much to the reformation of our Church governement, as this being restored in a litle time, the rest may be sup­plied which will be wanting, it shall be good to remem­ber it by a serious letter to my Lord of Dumbar, that we may know in due time what is to be expected. And since our greatest hinderance is found to be in the ses­sion, of whom the most part are ever in heart opposite unto us, and forbeare not to keith it when they have oc­casion, you shall humblie intreat his Majestie to re­member our sute for the kirkmens place, according to the first institution, and that it may take at this time some beginning, since the place vacant was even from the be­ginning in the hands of the spirituall side with some one [Page 25] kirkman or other till now, which might it be obtained, as were most easie by his Majesties direction and com­mandement, there should be seene a suddaine change of many humours in that estate, and the commonwealth would find the profite thereof.

6. Anent our conference with the ministrie, your L. will declare the time that is appointed, and reasons of the continuation of the same.

7. Because in the time of Parliament cheeflie, it should be expedient to have the Bishops to teach in the pulpits of Edinburgh, his Majestie would be pleased to commend this to my Lord of Dumbar by a particular letter, and to require also the Ministers of Edinburgh to desire their help at that time, if it were for no other end, but to testifie their unitie and consent of minds to the Estates.

8. Because the Kirk of Leith lyeth destitute in a sort through the Bishop of Rosse his age, and the impri­sonement of M r. Iohn Murrey, and that the said M. Iohn is no wayes minded, as appeareth, to give his Ma­jestie satisfaction, neither were it meet, in respect of his carriage, that he should returne to that ministrie, and to insist in his deprivation with the Commissioners might perhaps breed us a new difficultie, if his Majestie shall be pleased, we doe hold it most convenient for the er­rand, that the said M. Iohn be conveened before the counsell by his Majesties command, and by them charged to waid in the towne of Newabbey, and some miles about, having libertie to teach that people, among whom he shall find some other subject to worke upon then the state of Bishops. And for the provision of Leith, that his Majestie would be pleased to command the presby­terie of Edinburgh, in regarde of the Bishop of Rosse his age, and the said M. Iohns transportation by his [Page 26] H. appointment, to have care that the said Kirk of Leith be planted with all convenient diligence by M. David Lindsey sometimes Minister at Sant An­drewis, for whom both the people is earnest, and we may have sufficient assurance to his Majesties service. And incase the said presbyterie prove wilfull, that ano­ther letter to the same effect may be sent to the Com­missioners of the generall assemblie, who may take order to see that matter ended, if such shall be his Majesties pleasure, and this would be done with all diligence con­venient.

We cannot but remember also the misorder keeped in the countrie, that once was happily repressed, wea­ring of gunnes and pistols, and humblie beseech his Maj. that some new course may be established for searching of such persons, and delating of them to the counsell, that they may be punished, and the Thesaurer may have commandement to make choise in everie countrie of cer­taine that shall be thought fittest to search, who shall be knowne onelie to his L. self, and satisfie them for their paines, to the end this insolence may be restrained. Par­ticularlie it would be forbidden in the granting of com­missions, that this libertie be not permitted, for this is one of the causes of their so open dealing, as said is.

These particulars, your L. would have care to pro­pone to his Majest. at some fit time, and see the answers thereof dispatched accordingly.

Glasgow by the warrant and at the desire of the rest of my Lords the Bishops.

Master George Glaidstones sent this let­ter following to the King in August 1612. whereby the reader may perceave what were their plots and preparations before the Par­liament following in October where the act of Glasgow was ratified, or rather alte­red.

Most gratious Soveraigne.

AS it hath pleased your Maj. to direct mee, and my Lord your Majesties Secretarie for advising anent our affairs to be handled in this approaching parlia­ment, so happilie did I find him, and my Lord of Glas­gow both in this towne, and conveened them both im­mediatlie after mine arriving, and with good advise­ment we have made choise of these things which are most necessarie, and have omitted these articles which may seeme to carie envie or suspition, or which your Ma­jestie by your royall authoritie might not performe by your self. But we all hold fast this conclusion, that it is most necessarie and convenient, both for your Majesties service, and weill of the Church, that the Day viz. the 12. of October shall hold preciselie, to the which the par­liament was proclaimed upon the 24. of this instant. I will assure your Majest. that the verie evill will, which is caried to my Lord Chancelor by the nobilitie and peo­ple, is like to make us great store of friendship, for they know him to be our professed enemie, and he dissembled it not. I thank God, that it pleased your M. to make choise of my Lord Secretary to be our Formalist, and adviser of our acts. For we finde him wise, fast & secret We shall not be idle in the mean time to prepare such, as have vote to incline the right way. All men do follow us and hunt [Page 28] for our favour, upon report of your Majesties good ac­ceptance of me and the Bishop of Cathnes, and sen­ding for my Lord of Glasgow, and the procurement of this Parliament without advice of the Chancellar. And if your Majestie will continue these shining beames, and showes of your Majesties favour, doubtlesse the purpose that seemes most difficill, will be facilitat to your Majesties great honour and our credit, which, if it were greater then it is, your Majestie could receave no interesse. For besides that no estate may say, that they are your Majesties creaturs as we may say, so there is none whose standing is so slipperie, when your Majestie shall frowne as we. For at your Majesties nodde we must either stand or fall. But we referre the more am­ple declaration of these purposes and other points of your Majesties service, to the sufficencie of my Lord of Glas­gow, and my good Lord Secretarie, the fourteenth Bishop of this Kingdome. But my Lord of Glasgow and I am contending, to which of the two Provinces he shall ap­pertaine. Your Majestie who is our great Archbishop must decide it. Thus after my most humble and heartie thanks for your Majesties good acceptance, and gratious dispatch lately which hath filled the eares of all this Kingdome, I beseech God to heape upon your Majestie the plentie of all spirituall and temporall blessings for ever, I rest

Yours Majesties mosthumble subject and Servitour S. Andrewis.

Master William Struther one of the Mi­nisters of Edinburgh, and a Conformitane, howbeit he was content to accept a fat Bi­shopricke, yet was content in end to forgoe the lean ceremonies to live in the greater ease and peace, as this letter following dire­cted to the Earle of Airth, to be presented to his Majestie, testifieth.

My very good Lord,

I Visite your L. with this letter, and that for the end which I spoke mcore largelie in conference, ever for the peace of this poore Kirk, which rent so gree­vouslie for ceremonies. There is also some surmises of farther novations of organes, Liturgies and such like, which greatly augments the grief of people, but the wiser sort assure themselfes of his Majesties royall wisdome and moderation, that his Majestie would impose no new thing, if his Majestie were timouslie informed of these, and the like reasons.

1. Because King Iames of happie memorie made the Marques of Hammilton promise in his Ma­jesties name to all the Estates of this Land solemnely in face of Parliament, that this Church should not be urged with any moe novations then these five articles, that then were presented to the Parliament, upon which pro­mise the Parliament rested, and gave way the more chearfully that these articles should passe in act of Par­liament.

2. Nixt, because the motion, that is said to be made to his Maiestie of these novations, is made by and beside [Page 30] the knowledge and conscience of the kirk of this land, who are heavily displeased for that motion, and more because it is alleadged to have been in their name, who knowes nothing thereof but by report.

3. Because our church lyes already groaning under two woundes, the first of the erection of Bishops, the other of kneeling. But if a third be insticted, there is no appearance but of a dissipation of this church. In the first people were onely anlookers on Bishops state. The second touched them more in celebration of the holy sa­crament, but yet lest arbitrarie to them, But this third will be greater, because in the whole body of publike worship they shall be forced to suffer novelties.

4. Because the Bishops are already publici odii vi­ctimae and borne down with contempt, and that vexa­tion is intollerable, when they depose any brother for not conformitie, they scarcely can finde an expectant to fill the empty place, and that because they become so odi­ous to the flock, that they can doe no good in their mini­strie. But if any farther novation be brought in, the Bishops will finde ten for one to be deposed, and that of those who have already given obedience to the five arti­cles, who will rather chuse to forsake their places, then to enter in a new fire of combustion.

5. Lastly, because it is observed by such as are judi­cious, that the former shismes have shaken the hearts of the people in religion, and hath produced odium vati­nianum among brethren, poprie is encreased in the land, and if any farther come in, it will be seen, that uni­versally people will be made susceptible of any religion, and turne Atheists in grosse.

Your L. knowes I am not one of these who stand out against order, but doe suffer for mine obedience, and therefore the more boldly I suggest these reasons unto [Page 31] your L. I dwell in the most eminent part of this land, and so have occasion te see more what is the fruit of a shisme. I professe an unspeakable griefe to see any thing done that may trouble the peace of a church, and devide the hearts of a good people from a good king. Our fire is so great already, that it hath more need of water to quench it, then oile to augment it.

This keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above is co-owned by the institutions providing financial support to the Text Creation Partnership. Searching, reading, printing, or downloading EEBO-TCP texts is reserved for the authorized users of these project partner institutions. Permission must be granted for subsequent distribution, in print or electronically, of this EEBO-TCP Phase II text, in whole or in part.