CHRISTS FERVENT LOVE TO BLOVDIE HIERVSALEM; OR An Exposition, delivered in a Sermon on MATT. 23. vers. 37.
THe summe of my last meditations upon the former verses was, That notwithstanding our Saviours [Page 2] predictions or threatnings of all those plagues shortly to befall Hierusalem, there was even at this time a possibilitie left for this people to have continued a flourishing nation, a possibilitie left for their repentance: that their repentance and prosperity was the end whereat the Lord himselfe did aime, in sending Prophets, and Wisemen, and lastly his onely Sonne unto them.
The former of the two parts; the possibility of their prosperity, and repentance, was proved from the perpetuall tenour of Gods covenant with his people; first made with Moses, afterwards renewed with David and Salomon, and ratified by Jeremie and [Page 3] Ezechiel. The tenour of the covenant (as you then heard) was a covenant not of death onely, but of life and death: of life, if they continued faithfull in his covenant; of death, if they continued in disobedience.
The later part of the same, viz. That this peoples repentance and prosperity was the end intended by God, was proved from that declaration of his desire of their everlasting prosperity; Deut. 5. 29 Oh that there were such an heart in this people to feare me, and to keepe my commandements alway, that it might goe well with them and their posterity for ever. And the like place, Psal. 81. vers. 13. to the end. Esay 48. verse 18. Both [Page 4] places manifest Gods love, and desire of this peoples safety. But the abundance, the strength, with the unrelenting constancie and tendernesse of his love, is in no place more fully manifested than in these words of my text. The abundant fervencie wee may note in the very first words, in that his mouth which never spake idle or superfluous words, doth here ingeminate the appellation, Oh Hierusalem, Hierusalem. This hee spake out of the abundance of his love: But love is oft times fervent or abundant for the present, or whiles the object of our love remaines amiable, yet not so constant or perpetuall, if the [Page 5] quality of what wee love bee changed. But herein appeares the constancie and strength of Gods love, that it was thus fervently set upon Hierusalem, not onely in her pure and virgin dayes, or whiles shee continued as chaste and loyall, as when shee was affianced unto the Lord by David, a man after his owne heart: but upon Hierusalem, often drunken with the Cup of fornications; upon her long stained and polluted with the bloud of his Saints; upon her children, who with the dogge returned unto their vomit, or with the sow unto their wallowing in the mire, or puddle of their Mothers dust, whose sacrifices were [Page 6] mingled with righteous bloud; upon Hierusalem and her Children, after he had cleansed her infected habitations with fire, and carried her Inhabitants beyond Babylon into the North-land, as it had beene into a more fresh and purer aire; not onely before the Babylonish Captivitie, but after their returne thence, and replanatation in their owne land, God would have gathered them even as the Hen doth her chickens under her wings, &c.
In which words, besides the Tendernesse of Gods love towards these Cast-awayes, is set out unto us the safety of his protection, so they would have beene gathered. For as there is no creature more [Page 7] kinde and tender than the hen unto her young ones: so is there none that doth more carefully shroud and shelter them from the storme, none that doth more closely hide them from the eye of the Destroyer. Yet so would God have hidden Hierusalem under the shadow of his wings, from all those stormes which afterwards over-whelmed her, and from the Roman Eagle, to whom this whole generation became a prey; if so Hierusalem with her children after so many hundred yeeres experience of his fatherly love & tender care, had not remained more foolish than the new hatched brood of reasonlesse creatures; if so they [Page 8] had not beene ignorant of his call, that had often redeemed them from their enemies. How often would I have gathered you, and you would not?
Here were large matter for Rhetoricall digressions or mellifluous Encomions of divine love; points wherein many learned Divines have in later times beene very copious: yet still leaving the truth of that Love (which they so magnifie) very questionable. It shall suffice mee at this time, Two points. first, to prove the undoubted truth and unfainednesse of Gods tender love, even towards such Cast-awayes, as these proved, to whom he made this protestation: [Page 9] Secondly, to unfold (as far as is fitting for us to enquire) how it is possible they should not be gathered unto God, nor saved by Christ, whose gathering and whose safety, Hee to whom nothing can be impossible, had so earnestly, so tenderly, and so constantly longed after.
These are points of such use and consequence, that if God shall enable mee, soundly, though plainly, to unfold their truth; you will (I hope) dispence with mee for want of artificiall exornations or words more choice, than such as naturally spring out of the matters handled; as willingly as [Page 10] the poore amongst you pardon good house-keepers for wearing nothing but home-spunne cloth. For as it is hard for a man of ordinary meanes to bestow much on his owne back, and feed many bellies: so neither is it easie for mee and my present opportunities, both to feed your soules with the truth, and to cloath my discourse with choice words and flourishing phrases. And I am perswaded many Preachers might, in this argument, often prove more Theologicall, so they could be content to be lesse Rhetoricall. Yet let not these premises prejudice the truth of the conclusion. My purpose is not to [Page 11] dissent from any of the Reformed Churches, but only in those particulars, wherein they evidently dissent from themselves, 1 Point. That God earnestly desires the conversion of such as perish. and from generall principles of truth acknowledged by all that beleeve God or his word.
Were I to speake in some Audience of this point, 1 Tim. 2. 1. 2. it would be needfull to dip my pen in Nectar, or sweeten my voyce with Ambrosia, to allay the harshnesse of this position, That God should so earnestly desire the conversion of such as perish. Howbeit, the surest ground of that charitie which God requires should be in every one of us towards all (our greatest enemies not excepted) is firme beleefe of [Page 12] this his unspeakable love towards all, even towards such as kill his Prophets, and stone the Messengers of his Peace. 1 Tim. 2. 1, 2. I exhort (saith the Apostle) that first of all, Supplications, prayers, intercessions and giving of thankes be made for all men: For Kings and all that are in Authority. Jam. 2. 6. Yet did such in those dayes most oppresse all Christians, & draw them before the Judgement Seats, even because they did pray to the true God for them. For they did blaspheme that worthy name, Vers. 7. by which wee were called. This duty notwithstanding, which was so odious unto those great and rich men, for whose good it was performed, 1 Tim. 2. 3. Saint Paul [Page 13] tels us was good and acceptable in the sight of God our Saviour: Vers. 4. why acceptable in his sight? Because he would have all men (and therefore even the sworne enemies of his Gospell) to be saved, and come to the knowledge of the truth which they oppugned. Or if the expresse authority of the Apostle suffice not, his reasons drawne from the principles of Nature will perswade such as have not quenched the light of Nature, by setting not the corruptions onely, but the very Essence of Nature and Grace at ods and faction. Vers. 5. For there is one God: Had there beene moe, every one might have been conceived as partiall for his owne [Page 14] Creature. But in as much as all of us have but one Father, his love to every one must needs be greater than any earthly parents love unto their Children, in as much as we are more truly his, than children are their parents. But here (as the Apostle foreseeth) might be replyed; That albeit God be one, and the onely Creator of all, yet in as much as wee are seeds of Rebels with whom he is displeased; our Mediatour might be more partiall, and commend some to Gods love, neglecting others. To prevent this scruple, the Apostle ads; As there is but one God, Vers. 5. so there is but one Mediatour betweene God and Man; and Hee of the same [Page 15] Nature with us, A man: but Men are partiall; yet so is not the Man Christ Jesus, that is, the Man anointed by the holy Ghost, to be the Saviour of the world. As he truly tooke our flesh upon him, that hee might be a faithfull and affectionate High Priest; so that wee might conceive of him, as of an unpartiall Sollicitour or Mediatour betwixt God and us, hee tooke not our Nature instampt with any individuall properties, characters, or references to any one tribe or kindred. Father according to the flesh, hee had none; but was framed by the sole immediate hand of God: to the end that as the eye, because it hath no [Page 16] set colour, is apt to receive the impression of every colour: so Christ, because hee hath not these carnall references, which others have, but was without father, without brother, without sister on earth, might be unpartiall towards all, and account every one that doth the will of his father which is in Heaven, as Sister, Esay. 564. 5. Mother and Brother. Thus saith the Lord to the Eunuchs that keepe my Sabbaths, and choose the things that please mee, and take hold of my Covenant: even unto them will I give in mine house, and within my walls, a place and a Name, better than of Sonnes and Daughters: I will give them an everlasting name that shall not [Page 17] be cut off. Briefly, Hee is a Brother to all mankinde, more loving and more affectionate, than Brothers of entire bloud are one towards another.
The very ground of the Apostles reason thus bared will of it owne accord reverberate that Distinction which hath beene laid against his meaning, by some, otherwise most worthie Defendants of the Truth.
The distinction is, that, when the Apostle saith, God will have all men to be saved, he means Genera singulorum, not Singula generum, some few of all sorts, not al of every sort: some rich, some poor, some learned, some unlearned, some Iewes, some Gentiles, some [Page 18] Italians, some English, &c.
The illustrations which they bring to justifie this manner of speech, did the time permit, I could retort upon themselves, and make them speake more plainly for my opinion, than for theirs. It shall be sufficient by the way to note the impertinencie of the application, supposing the instances brought, were in themselves justifiable by the illustrations they bring: or how little it could weaken our assertion, although it might intercept all the strength or aid this place affords for the fortification of it. What can it helpe them to turne these words, because they make towards us, [Page 19] from their ordinary or usuall meaning; or to restraine Gods love only unto such as are saved; when as the current of it in other passages of Scripture is evidently extended unto such as perish? In stead of many words uttered by him that cannot lie, unto this purpose, those few, Ezek. 33. 11. shall content mee: As I live, saith the Lord God, I have no pleasure in the death of the wicked; but that the wicked turne from his way and live: turne yee, turne yee from your evill wayes; for why will yee die, Oh house of Israel? If God minde the safety of such as perish, yea even or most desperate and stubborne sinners: no question but he [Page 20] wils all should be saved and come to the knowledge of his truth.
The former distinction then will not stop this passage. Howbeit some learned among the Schoolmen, and other most religious Writers of later times, have sought out another for intercepting all succour this or the like places might afford to the maintenance of that truth which they oppugne and wee defend. That God doth not will the death of a sinner Voluntate signi they grant: but that hee wils it Voluntate beneplaciti, they take as granted. That is in other termes: God doth not will the death of him that dies, by his revealed will; [Page 21] but by his secret will. Not to urge them to a better declaration than hitherto they have made, in what sense God being but one, may be said to have two Wils: That hee wils many things which wee know not, that hee hath divers secret purposes, wee grant and beleeve as most true indefinitely taken. But because these Wils or Purposes are secret; man may not without presumption determine the particular matters which hee so wils or purposes. Otherwise they should not bee secret but revealed to us: whereas things secret as secret, belong only to God.
In that they oppose this Secret [Page 22] will to Gods revealed will; they doe as it were put in a Caveat that we should not beleeve it in those particulars whereto they apply it. For wee may not beleeve any thing concerning the salvation or damnation of mankind, or the meanes which lead to either; but what is revealed. But this Secret will is not revealed. Ergo, not to be beleeved.
Nor are we by the principles of Reformed religion bound onely not to beleeve it, but utterly to disclaime it: For admitting what was before granted, an indefinite beleefe, that God wils many things which hee keepes secret from us: yet wee most absolutely [Page 23] beleeve, that he never wils any thing secretly, which shall bee contrary or contradictory to that whereon his revealed will is set; or, to that which by the expresse warrants of his written word wee know hee wils. Now every Christian must infallibly and determinately beleeve, that God wils not the death of the wicked, or of him that dies, (seeing his written word doth plainly register his peremptory will unto this purpose). Therefore no man may beleeve the contradiction to this, to wit, That hee wils the death of him that dies. Otherwise this distinction admitted, untwines the very bonds of mans salvation. For what ground of hope [Page 24] have the very Elect besides Gods will revealed, or at the best confirmed by an oath? Now if wee might admit it but as probable, That God voluntate beneplaciti, or by his secret will may purpose some thing contrarie to what hee promises by his revealed will: who is hee that could have (I say not any certainty, but) any morall probabilitie of his salvation? seeing God assures us of salvation onely by his word revealed, not by his secret will or purpose; which for ought we doe or can possibly know, may utterly disanull what his revealed will seemes to ratifie.
Lastly, it is an infallible Rule, or Maxime in divinitie, That we [Page 25] may not attribute any thing to the most pure and perfect Essence of the Deitie which includes an imperfection in it: much lesse may wee ascribe any impurity or untruths to that Holy One, the Author of all Truth. But to sweare one thing, and to reserve a secret meaning contrary to the plaine and literall meaning professed, is the very Idea of untruth, the essence of impious perjury, which we so much condemne in some of our adversaries, who (if this distinction might generally passe for current amongst us) might justly say, that wee are as maliciously partiall against the Jesuites, as the Jewes were against Christ Jesus; that [Page 26] wee are ready to blaspheme God, rather than spare to revile them: seeing wee attribute that to the divine Majestie which wee condemne in them as most impious and contrary to his sacred will, who will not dispense with Aequivocation or Mentall reservation, be the cause wherein they bee used never so good. Because to sweare one thing openly, and secretly to reserve a contradictory meaning, is contrary to the very nature and essence of the very first truth; the most transcendent sin that can be imagined: Wherefore, as this distinction was lately hatched, so it might be wished, that it might be quickly extinguished [Page 27] and buried with their bones that have revived it. Let God be true in all his words, in all his sayings; but especially in all his oathes: and let the Jesuite be reputed, as hee is, a double dissembling perjured lyer.
The former place of Ezechiel, as it is no way impeached by this distinction last mentioned: so doth it plainly refute another glosse put upon my text by some worthy and famous writers, How oft would I have gathered you &c. These words, say they, were uttered by our Saviour manifesting his desire as man. But unlesse they be more than men which frame this glosse, Christ as man was greater [Page 28] than they, and spake nothing but what hee had in expresse commission from his Father. Wee may then (I trust) without offence, take his words as here they sound, for better interpretation of his Fathers will, than any man can give of his meaning in this passage, uttered by himselfe in words as plaine as they can devise. These words indeed were spoken by the mouth of man; yet as truly manifesting the desire and good will of God, for the saving of the people, as if they had beene immediately spoken by the voice of God.
But why should wee thinke they were conceived by Christ [Page 29] as man, not rather by him as the Mediatour betweene God and Man; as the second person in the Trinity manifested in our flesh? He saith not, Behold my Father hath sent: but in his owne person; Behold I have sent unto you Prophets and Wise. Nor is it said, How often would my Father; but, How often would I have gathered you? this gathering wee cannot referre only to the three yeares of his ministery; but to the whole time of Hierusalems running away from the Prophets call, from the first time that David first tooke possession of it, untill the last destruction of it: For all this while, HEE, that was now sent by his Father [Page 30] in the similitude of Man, did send Prophets, Wisemen and Apostles, to reclaime them, if they would have hearkened to his, or his messengers admonitions. Saint Luke puts this out of controversie. For repeating part of this story, hee saith expresly, Luk. 11. 49. Therefore also said the Wisdome of God, I will send them Prophets &c. And Christ is said the Wisedome of God, not as Man, but as God: and consequently hee spake those words not as man only, but as God.
The same compassion and burning love, the same thirst and longing after Hierusalems safety, which wee see here manifested by a manner incomprehensible [Page 31] to flesh and blood, in these words of our Saviour in my text, or the like uttered by him Luke 19. verse 41. & sequentibus, with teares and sobs, wee must beleeve to be as truly, as really and unfainedly in the divine nature, though by a manner incomprehensible to flesh and blood. How any such flagrant desire of their welfare, which finally perish, should be in God, wee cannot conceive, because our minds are more dazeled with the inaccessible light, than the eyes of Bats and Owles are by gazing on the Sunne. To qualifie the incomprehensible glory of the Deity, the Wisedome of God was made flesh, that wee [Page 32] might safely behold the true module or proportion of divine goodnesse in our Nature: as the eye which cannot looke upon the Sunne in his strength, or as it shineth in the firmament, may without offence behold it in the water, being an Element homogeneall to its owne substance. Thus should all Christs prayers, desires or patheticall wishes of mans safety, be to us so many visible pledges or sensible evidences of Gods invisible, incomprehensible love. And so hee concludes his last invitation of the Jewes; Iohn 12. 49. 50. I have not spoken of my selfe, but my Father which sent mee, hee gave mee a commandement, what I should [Page 33] say, and what I should speake. And I know that his commandement is everlasting life. Whatsoever I speake therefore, even as the Father said unto mee, so I speake.
And what saith our Saviour more in his owne, than the Prophet had done in the name and person of his God? Sion complained the Lord hath forsaken me, Esay 49. 14, 15. &c. and my Lord hath forgotten mee: but hee answered, Can a woman forget her sucking childe, that shee should not have compassion on the sonne of her wombe? yea they may forget, yet will not I forget thee. Behold I have engraven thee upon the palmes of my hands, &c. These and the like places of the Prophet compared with our [Page 34] Saviours speeches here in my text, give us plainly to understand, That whatsoever love any mother can beare to the fruit of her wombe, unto whom her bowels of compassion are more tender than the Fathers can be; or whatsoever affection any dumbe creature can afford to their tender brood; the like, but greater doth God beare unto his children. Unto the Elect, most will grant. But is his love so tender towards such as perish? Yes, the Lord carried the whole host of Israel (even the stubborne and most disobedient) as an Eagle doth her young ones upon her wings, Exod. 19. 4. Earthly parents will not vouchsafe to wait perpetually [Page 35] upon their children, the Hen continueth not her call from morning untill night, nor can shee endure to hold out her wings all day for a shelter to her young ones: as they grow great and refuse to come, shee gives over to invite them. But saith the Lord by his Prophet, Esay 65. 2, 3, 4, 5. I have spread out my hands all the day long unto a rebellious people, which walked in a way that was not good, after their owne thoughts: A people that provoketh mee to anger continually to my face, that sacrificeth in Gardens, and burneth incense upon Altars of brick; which remaine among the graves, and lodge in the monuments, which eat swines flesh, and broth of abominable [Page 36] things is in their vessels: which say (adding Hypocrisie unto filthinesse and Idolatry) Stand by thy self, come not neere unto me; for I am holier than thou. Such they were, and so conceited of our Saviour, with whom hee had in his life time oft to deale, and for whose safety hee prayed with teares before his passion.
These and many like equivalent passages of Scripture are pathetically set forth by the Spirit, to assure us, that there is no desire like to the Almighties desire of sinfull mans repentance, no longing to his longing after our salvation. If Gods love to Judah comne to the height of rebellion, had beene lesse than [Page 37] mans or other creatures love to what they affect most dearely: if the meanes he used to reclaime her, had beene fewer or lesse probable than any others had attempted for obtaining their most wished end: his demand (to which the Prophet thought no possible answer could be given) might easily be put off by these incredulous Jewes, unto whom he had not referred the judgement in their owne cause, if they could have instanced in man or other creature more willingnesse to doe what possibly they could doe, either for themselves or others, than hee was to doe whatsoever was possible to be done for [Page 38] them. And now, Oh inhabitants of Jerusalem, and men of Judah, judge, I pray you, betweene mee and my vineyard, what could more be done to my vineyard, that I have not done to it? Wherefore, when I looked it should bring forth grapes, brought it forth wilde grapes? Esay 5. 3, 4.
But the greater wee make the truth and extent of Gods love, 2. Point. How it is possible then that all men are not saved. the more wee increase the difficulty of the second point proposed. For amongst women many there be that would, amongst dumbe creatures scarce any that would not redeeme their sucklings from death by dying themselves: Yet what is it they can doe, which they [Page 39] would not doe to save their owne lives? And did not God so love the World that hee gave his onely begotten Sonne for it? Yes, for the World of the Elect. If there be Worlds of the Elect, I see not why any should be excluded from the number. But to let that passe: Gods desire of their repentance which perish, is undoubtedly such as hath beene said. Yet should wee say that he hath done all that could be done for them; how chanceth all are not saved? and was the vineyard more barren than Sarah, the fruit of whose wombe he made like the starres of the skie, or like as the sands by the Sea shore, innumerable? [Page 40] was it a matter more hard to make an impenitent Jew bring forth fruits worthy of repentance, than to make a virgin conceive and beare a Sonne? If it were not; how chanceth it, the word of the Lord (and that but a short one) should bring the one to joyfull issue; whiles the other (the repentance of these Jewes and other ungodly men) after so many exhortations and threatnings, after so many promises of comfort, and denuntiations of woes (which the Prophets, the Apostles, and their Successors have used) is not to this day, nor ever shall be accomplished? If repentance of men borne and brought up [Page 41] in sinne be a worke altogether impossible: all of us should utterly perish; none repent. If possible to any; shall it not be possible to the Almighty, who alone can doe all things? If possible in him: why is not repentance wrought in all, whose salvation he more earnestly desires, than the most tender hearted mother doth the life and welfare of her darling infant?
Hence in probability, some may conclude, either Gods love unto such as perish is not so great as some mothers beare unto their children: or else his power in respect of them is not infinite. And against our doctrine perhaps, it will be objected, [Page 42] that by thus magnifying Gods love towards all, we minish his power towards some. From which to derogate ought, is in some mens judgements the worst kind of blasphemie: a point as dangerous in divinity to speake but doubtfully or suspiciously of it, as in matter of State to determine or limit the Prerogative Royall. Howbeit, if no other choice were left, but a necessity were laid upon us of leaving either the infinite power, or infinite goodnesse of our God questionable or unexpressed; the offence were lesse, not to speake of his power so much (as most doe,) than to speake ought prejudiciall [Page 43] to that conceit, which even the Heathens by the light of nature had of his goodnesse. This attribute is the chiefe object of our love, and for which hee himselfe desires to be loved most. And in this respect to derogate ought from it, it must needs be most offensive. But his curse be upon him that will not unfainedly acknowledge the absolute infinitenesse as well of his power as of his goodnesse. Whosoever hee be that loves his goodnesse, will unfainedly acknowledge hee is to be feared and reverenced, as the Almighty Creator and Judge of men. Unlesse he were in power infinite, hee could not be infinitely [Page 44] good. Howbeit hee that restraines his love and tender mercy only to such as are saved, doth make his goodnesse lesse (at least extensively) than his power. For there is no creature unto which his power reacheth not. But so doth not his loving kindnesse extend to all; unlesse hee desire the good and safety of those that perish.
For winding our selves out of the former snare; wee are to consider a maine difference betweene the love of man or other creatures, and the love of God to mankind. Dumbe creatures alwayes effect what they most desire, if it be in the precincts of their power, because they [Page 45] have neither reason, nor other internall law of right or wrong to controll or countersway their brutish appetites. Man, although indued with reason and naturall notions of right and wrong, is notwithstanding oftentimes drawne by the strength or inordination of his tender affection, to use such meanes as are contrary to the rules of reason, equitie and religion, for procuring their safety or impunity, on whom hee dotes. Howbeit among men, wee may finde some, which cannot be wrought by any promise or perswasion to use those unlawfull courses for the impunity of their children or dearest [Page 46] friends, which the world commonly most approveth. Not that their love towards their children, friends or acquaintance is lesse; but because their love to publike justice, to truth and equity, and respect to their owne integritie, is greater than other mens are. A fit instance wee have in Zaleucus King of Louis, who having made a severe law, that whosoever committed such an offence (suppofe adulterie) should lose his eyes: It shortly after came to passe that the Prince, his sonne and heire apparent to the crowne, trespassed against this sanction. Could not the good King have granted pardon to his sonne? [Page 47] Hee had power, no doubt, in his hands, to have dispensed with this particular, without any danger to his person. And most Princes would have done as much as they could for the safety of their successour. Nor could privileges or indulgences upon such speciall circumstances be held as breaches or violations of publike lawes; because the prerogative of the person offending cannot be drawne into example. But Zaleucus could not be brought to dispense with his law, because he loved justice no lesse dearly than his Sonne, whom he loved as dearly as himselfe. And to manifest the equality of his love [Page 48] to all three, hee caused one of his owne eyes, and another of his sonnes to be put out: that so the law might have her due, though not wholly from his Sonne that had offended; but in part from himselfe, as it were by way of punishment for this partiality towards his Sonne.
It were possible no doubt for a King to reclaime many inferiours from theft, from robbery, or other ungracious courses; so hee would vouchsafe to abate his owne expences to maintaine theirs, or afford them the solaces of his Court, make them his Peeres, or otherwise allow them meanes to compasse their wonted pleasures. [Page 49] But thus farre to descend to unthrifty subjects humors, were ill beseeming that Majestie and gravity which should bee in Princes. If one should give notice to a Prince how easie and possible it were to him by these meanes, to save a number from the gallowes: his replie would be, Princeps id potest quod salva Majestate potest: That onely is possible to a Prince, which can stand with the safety of his Majestie: but thus to feed the unsatiable appetites of greedy unthrifts (though otherwise such as hee loves most dearly, and whose welfare he wishes as heartily as they doe that speake for them) is neither Princely [Page 50] majesticall. For a King in this case to doe as much as by his authority or other meanes hee is able to doe, were an act of weaknesse and impotencie, not an act of Soveraigne power; a great blot to his wisdome, honour and dignity; no true argument of royall love or Princely Clemencie.
In like manner we are to consider that God, albeit in power infinite, yet his infinite power is matched with goodnesse as truly infinite; his infinite love, as it were, counterpoised with infinite Majestie. And though his infinite mercy be as Soveraigne to his or her Attributes: yet is it in a sort restrained by [Page 51] the tribunitiall power of his justice. This equality of infinitenesse betwixt his attributes being considered, the former difficulty is easily resolved. If it be demanded whether God could not make a thousand worlds, as good or better than this: it were infidelity to deny it, why? Because this is an effect of meere power; and might be done without any contradiction to his goodnesse, to his Majestie to his mercy or justice: all which it might serve to set forth. And this is a Rule of faith, that all effects of meere power, though greater than wee can conceive as possible, may be done of him with greater ease, than we can [Page 52] breath. His onely Word would suffice to make ten thousand worlds. But if it be questioned, whether God could not have don more than he hath done for his Vineyard, whether he cannot save such as dayly perish: the case is altered, and breeds a fallacy Ad plures interrogationes. For mans salvation is no worke of meere power: it necessarily requires a harmony of goodnesse, of majesty, of mercy and justice, whereunto the infinite power is in a manner subservient. Nor are we to consider his infinite power alone, but as matched with infinite majesty; nor his infinite mercy and goodnesse alone, but as matched with [Page 53] infinite justice. And in this case it is as true of God as man; Deus id potest, quod salva Majestate potest; quod salva bonitate & justitia potest: God can doe that which is not prejudiciall to his Majestie, to his goodnesse and justice. And hee had done (if wee may beleeve his oath) as much for his vineyard, as the concurrence of his infinite power and wisdome could effect without disparagement to the infinitie of his Majestie, or that internall law or rule of infinite goodnesse, whereby hee created man after his owne image and similitude.
God as he hath his being, so hath he his goodnesse of himselfe, [Page 54] and his goodnesse is his being: as impossible therefore, that he should not be good, as not be. Man, as he had his life and being, so had he his goodnesse wholly from his Creatour. And as actuall existence is no part nor necessary consequence of his essence: so neither is his goodnesse necessarie or essentiall to his existence. As his existence, so his goodnesse is mutable: the one necessarily including a possibilitie of declination or decay; the other an inclination of relapse, or falling into evill. As he was made after the similitude of God, he was actually and inherently good. Yet was not his [Page 55] goodnesse essentiall, necessarie or immutable. Nor did hee resemble his Creator in these essentiall attributes: but rather in the exercise of them ad extra. Now the exercise of them was not necessarie, but free in the Creator. For God might have continued for ever Most holy, righteous and good in himselfe, albeit hee had never created man, nor other creature. Wherefore hee made them good, as hee was freely good. And such is the goodnesse communicated to them in their creation, not necessarie, but free: And if free, as well including a possibilitie of falling into evill, as an actuall state in goodnesse. [Page 56] If then you aske, Could not God by his almightie power have prevented Adams eating the forbidden fruit? None, I thinke, will bee so incredulous to doubt, whether he that commanded the Sunne to stand still in his sphere, and did dead Ieroboams arme, when he stretched it out against the Prophet, could not as easily have stayed Adams hand from taking, turned his eye from looking upon, or his heart from lusting after the forbidden fruit. All these were acts of meere power. But had he by his omnipotent power laid this necessity upon Adams will or understanding, or had he kept him from transgression [Page 57] by restraint: hee had made him uncapable of that happinesse, whereto by his infinite goodnesse hee had ordained him; for by this supposition hee had not beene good in himselfe, nor could he be capable of true felicitie, but he must bee capable likewise of punishment and miserie. The ground of his interest in the one, was his actuall and inherent goodnesse communicated in his creation: nor was hee liable to the other, but by the mutability of his goodnesse, or possibilitie of falling into evill. In like manner, hee that gave that knowne power and vertue to the load-stone, could as easily [Page 58] draw the most stony hearted son of Adam unto Christ, as it doth steele and iron. But if hee should draw them by such a necessarie and naturall motion, hee should defeat them of all that hope or interest in that excessive glorie, which hee hath prepared for those that love him. If againe it bee demanded, why God doth not save the impenitent and stubborne sinner; it is all one, as if wee should aske, why hee doth not crowne bruit beasts with honour and immortality. That this he could doe by his infinite power, I will not deny. And if this he would doe, no creature justly might controll him, none possibly [Page 59] could resist or hinder him: yet I may without presumption affirme, that thus to doe, cannot stand with the internall rule of his justice, goodnesse and majestie. Nor can it stand better with the same rule to save all men, if wee take them as they are, not as they might bee; albeit hee hath indued all with reason to distinguish betweene good and evill. Jude 10. For many of them speake evill of those things which they know not: but what they know naturally, as bruit beasts, in those things they corrupt themselves. It stands lesse with Gods infinite goodnesse or power, if we consider them as linckt with infinite justice or majestie, to bring [Page 60] such into true happinesse, than to advance bruit beasts unto immortality. Isa. 27. 11. It is a people (saith the Prophet) of no understanding, therefore hee that made them, will not have mercie on them; and hee that formed them, will shew them no favour. God out of the abundance of his goodnesse, mercie, and long-suffering, tolerates such as the Prophet and Apostle speakes of; and out of his infinite love seekes by the preaching of the Word and other meanes, not prejudiciall to his justice and majestie, to gather them as hee would have done Jerusalem here in my text. But finally there is a certaine measure of iniquity, which where it [Page 61] is full, an height of stubbornnesse and prophannesse, whereunto if once they come, the stroake of his infinite justice fals heavie upon them, for wilfull contempt of his infinite mercie; that as hee himselfe somewhere saith, Hee cannot any longer endure them.
The suspitions to which these resolutions seeme liable, are specially three:
First, 1. Object. that they derogate from Gods extraordinary favour towards his elect.
Our answer is briefe; Answer. the offence (if any there be) is taken, not given: seeing wee onely affirme, that none so perish, but that they had a possibility to [Page 62] be saved: we deny not that many are so saved, as it were not possible for them finally to perish; yet so saved they are, not by Gods infinite power, laying a necessity upon their wils; but by his infinite wisdome preparing their hearts to bee fit objects of his infinite mercy, and fore-casting their finall salvation, as necessary by assenting not altogether necessarily to the particular meanes whereby it is wrought. That is, in fewer termes, unto their salvation, an infinite power or infinite mercy matched with justice infinite, without an infinite wisdome would not suffice. To call some (how many none [Page 63] may determine) extraordinarily, as hee did Saint Paul, may well stand with the eternall rule of his goodnesse; because hee used their miraculous and unusuall conversion as a meanes to win others by his usuall and ordinary calling. Speciall privileges upon peculiar and extraordinary occasions doe not prejudice ordinary lawes. Albeit to draw such privileges into common practice, would overthrow the course of justice. It is not contrary then to the rule of Gods justice, to make some feele his mercy and kindnesse before they seeke, that others may not despaire of finding it: having assured all by [Page 64] an eternall promise, that seeking they shall finde, and that they which hunger and thirst after righteousnesse shall be satisfied.
2 The second suspition and imputation is, on. that this doctrine may too much favour free will.
In briefe wee answer; Answer. there have beene two extremities in opinions continually followed by the two maine factions of the Christian world. The one, That God hath so decreed all things, that it is impossible ought should have beene, that hath not beene: or not to have beene, which hath beene. This is the opinion of the ancient Stoicks, which attribute all events to fate; and [Page 65] is no way mitigated, but rather improved, by referring this absolute necessity not to second causes or nature, but to the omnipotent power of the God of nature. This was refuted in our last meditations; because it makes God the sole author of every sinne.
The second extremity is, That in man before his conversion by grace, there is a freedome or abiliment to doe that which is pleasing and acceptable to God, or an activity to worke his owne conversion. This was the errour of the Pelagians, and communicated to the moderne Papists; who hold a meane indeed, but a false one, betweene the Pelagians [Page 66] and the Stoicks. The true meane from which all these extremities swerve may bee comprised in these two propositions: the one negative; In man after Adams fall there is no freedome of will, or ability to doe any thing not deserving Gods wrath or just indignation: the other affirmative; There is in man after his fall, a possibility left of doing or not doing of some things, which being done or not done, he becomes passively capable of Gods mercies; doing or not doing the contrary, he is excluded from mercy, and remaines a vessell of wrath for his justice to worke upon. For whether a man will call this contingence in humane actions, not a possibilitie [Page 67] of doing or not doing, but rather a possibilitie of acknowledging our infirmities or absolute impotencie of doing any thing belonging or tending to our salvation; I will not contend with him: Onely of this I rest perswaded, that all the exhortations of the Prophets and Apostles, to worke humility and true repentance in their Auditors, suppose a possibilitie of humiliation and repentance; a possibility likewise of acknowledging and considering our owne impotency and misery; a possibility likewise of conceiving some desire, not meerely bruitish, of our redemption or deliverance.
Our Saviour (yee know) required [Page 68] not onely a desire of health, of sight, of speech, in all those whom he healed; restored to sight, or made to speake: but withall a kind of naturall beleefe, or conceit, that he was able to effect what they desired, Hence saith the Euangelist, Marke 6. 5. Mat. 13. verse last; Hee could not doe many miracles among them, because of their unbeleefe. Yet CHRIST alone wrought the miracles, the parties cured were meere patients, no way agents. And such as sollicited their cause in case of absence, at the best, were but bystanders. Now no man (I thinke) will deny, that Christ by the power of his Godhead [Page 69] could have given sight, speech, and health to the most obstinate and perverse: yet by the rule of his divine goodnesse, he could not cast his pearles before swine. Most true it is, that wee are altogether dead to life spirituall, unable to speake or think, much lesse to desire it, as wee should. Yet beleefe and reason morall and naturall survive, and may with Martha and Marie beseech Christ to raise up their dead brother, who cannot speake for himselfe.
The third Objection will rather be preferred in Table-talke discourse, Object. 3. than seriously urged in solemne dispute. If God so dearly desire and will the life and [Page 70] safety of such as perish; his will should not alwaies be done.
Why? Answer. Dare any man living say or thinke that hee alwaies doth whatsoever God would have him doe? So, doubtlesse, he should never sin or offend his God. For never was there woman so wilfull, or man so mad as to bee offended with ought, that went not against their present will. Nor was there ever or possibly can be any breach, unlesse the will of the Law-giver be broken, thwarted or contradicted. For he that leaves the letter and followes the true meaning of the Lawgivers will, doth not transgresse his law, but observe it. And unlesse [Page 71] Gods will had beene set upon the salvation of such as perish, they had not offended, but rather pleased him in running headlong the wayes of death. Yet in a good sense, it is alwayes most true, that Gods will is alwayes fulfilled.
We are therefore to consider, that God may will some things absolutely, others disjunctively: or that some things should fall out necessarily, others not at all, or contingently. The particulars which God absolutely wils should fall out necessarily, must of necessity come to passe; otherwise, his will could in no case be truly said to be fulfilled. As, unlesse the Leper, to whom [Page 72] it was said by our Saviour, I will, be thou cleane, had beene cleansed, Gods will manifested in these words, had beene utterly broken. But if every particular which hee wils disjunctively, or which he wils should be contingent, did of necessity come to passe; his whole will should utterly be defeated. For his will (as wee suppose in this case) is that neither this nor that particular should be necessarily: but that either they should not be, or be contingently. And if any particular comprised within the latitude of this contingency with its consequent, come to passe; his will is truly and perfectly fulfilled. As for [Page 73] example, God tels the Israelites, that by observing his Commandements they should live; and dye by transgressing them. Whether therefore they live by the one meanes, or dye by the other; his will is necessarily fulfilled: Because it was not that they should necessarily observe his Commandements or transgresse them: but to their transgression, though contingent, death was the necessary doome; so was life the necessary reward of their contingent observing them.
But the Lord hath sworne that he delighteth not in the death of him that dieth; Object. but in his repentance: if then hee never [Page 74] repent, Gods delight or good pleasure is not alwayes fulfilled; because hee delights in the one of these; not in the other. How then shall it be true which is written, God doth whatsoever pleaseth him in the Heaven and in the Earth, if hee make not sinners repent, in whose repentance hee is better pleased, than in their death?
But unto this difficultie, Answer. the former answer may bee rightly fitted. Gods delight or good pleasure may bee done two wayes, either in us, or upon us. In the former place, it is set upon our repentance or obsequiousnesse to his will. For this is that service, whereto by his goodnesse, [Page 75] he ordained us. But if we crosse his good will and pleasure, as it respects this point; that is, if wee will not suffer our selves to be saved; the same delight or pleasure is set upon our punishment and fulfilled upon us. And if wee would enter into our owne hearts, wee might see the Image of Gods will hitherto manifested by his word, distinctly written in them: and that the Rule which his justice observes in punishing the wicked and reprobate, is to measure out their plagues and punishments according to the measure of their neglecting his will or contradicting his delight in their subjection. [Page 76] That as the riches of his goodnesse leading them to repentance hath beene more plentifull: so they, by their impenitencie still treasure up greater store of wrath against the day of wrath. To this purpose doth the Lord threaten the obstinate people before mentioned in Esay; Esa. 65. 5. These are as a smoake in my nose, and a fire that burneth all the day; as hee hath spread out his hands to them all the day. Behold it is written before mee, I will not keepe silence, but will recompence into their bosomes, your iniquities, and the iniquities of your Fathers together, saith the Lord: which have burnt incense upon the mountaines, and blasphemed [Page 77] mee upon the Hils: therefore will I reward their former workes into their bosome.
Both these parts of Gods delight are fully expressed by Salomon: Wisdome cryeth without, Prov. 1. 20, 21, &c. shee hath uttered her will in the streets, shee cryeth in the chiefe places of the concourse, in the opening of the Gates, in the Citie, shee uttereth her words, saying; How long yee simple ones will yee love simplicitie, and the scorners delight in their scorning, and fooles hate knowledge? Turne you at my reproofe; behold, I will powre out my spirit upon you, I will make knowne my words unto you. These passages infallibly argue an unfained delight in their repentance, [Page 78] and such a desire of their salvation as the wisdome of God hath expressed in my text, But what followes? Because I have called and yee refused, I have stretched out my hand, and no man regarded: but yee have set at nought all my counsell, and would none of my reproofe; I also will laugh at your calamitie, I will mock when your feare commeth. This his delight remaines the same, but is set upon another object: To the same purpose, Esay 65. 12. Therefore I will number you to the sword, and you shall all bow downe to the slaughter: because when I called, yee did not answer; when I spake, yee aid not heare: but did evill before [Page 79] mine eyes, and did chuse that wherein I delighted not. So then, whether by the destruction of the wicked, or salvation of the chosen; Gods name is still glorified. His justice expects what should have beene done, but was not paid unto mercy. Hee can be no loser by mans unthankfulnesse or ungratefulnesse. The case is all one, as if one should take that from a theefe with the left hand, which hee hath picked out of our right hand. Thus much of the two points proposed.
I doe desire no more than that the tree may be judged by the fruit: and questionlesse the use of these resolutions, for [Page 80] convincing our selves of sinne, or quelling despaire, or for encouraging the carelesse and impenitent unto repentance, by giving them the right hold of the meanes of life, is much greater than can bee conceived without the admittance of their truth.
First, seeing the end of our preaching is not so much to instruct the elect, as to call sinners to repentance; not so much to confirme their faith that are already certaine of salvation, as to give hope to the unregenerate, that they may bee saved: how shall wee accomplish either intendment by magnifying Gods love towards the elect? who [Page 81] these are, God and themselves know. How shall he that lives yet in sinne perswade himselfe, there is probability that he may bee saved, because God hath infallibly decreed to save some few? Rather seeing by the contrary doctrine, the most part of mankinde must necessarily perish, hee hath more reason to feare, lest he be one of those many, than one of the few. The bare possibility of his salvation cannot be inferred, but from indefinite premisses, from which no certaine conclusion can possibly follow: and without certaine apprehension or conceit of possibility, there can bee no certaine ground of hope. But if [Page 82] wee admit the former extent of Gods unspeakable love to all, and his desire of their eternall safety, which desperately perish; every man may, nay, must undoubtedly thus conclude; Therefore, Gods love extends to mee: It is his good will and pleasure, to have mee saved amongst the rest, as well as any other: and whatsoever he unfainedly wils, his power is able effectually to bring to passe.
The danger of sinne, and terrour of that dreadfull day, being first made knowne to our Auditory; the pressing of these points, as effectually as they might bee, (were this doctrine held for current) would kindle [Page 83] the love of God in our hearts, and inflame them with desires answerable to Gods ardent will of our salvation: and these once kindled, would breed sure hope, and in a manner inforce us to embrace the infallible meanes thereunto ordained.
Without admission of the former doctrine, it is impossible for any man rightly to measure the hainousnesse of his owne or others sinnes. Such as gather the infinity of sinnes demerit, from the infinite Majestie against which it is committed, give us the surface of sinne, insinite in length and breadth; but not in solidity. The will or pleasure of a Prince in matters [Page 84] meanly affected by him, or in respect of which hee is little more than indifferent, may bee neglected without greater offence, than meaner persons may justly take for foule indignities or grievous wrongs. But if a Princes soveraigne command in a matter which he desired so much as his owne life, should be contemned; a loyall subject conscious of such contempt, though hapning through riot, or perswasions of ill company, would in his sober sits be ready to take revenge of himselfe; specially if hee knew his Soveraignes love or liking of him to be more than ordinary. Consider then, that as the Majesty [Page 85] and goodnesse of our God, so his love and mercy towards us is truly infinite: that he desires our repentance as earnestly, as wee can desire meat and drinke in the extremity of thirst or hunger; as wee can doe life it selfe, whiles wee are beset with death: This our God manifested in our flesh, did not desire his owne life so much as our redemption. We must therefore measure the hainousnesse of our sinne, by the abundance of Gods love, by the height and depth of our Saviours humiliation.
Thus they will appeare infinite, not only because committed against an infinite Majesty, [Page 86] but because with this dimension, they further include a wilfull neglect of infinite mercies, and incomprehensible desires of our salvation. Wee are by nature the seed of rebels, which had lift up their hands against the infinite goodnesse of their Creator, in taking of the forbidden fruit; whereby they sought to be like him in Majesty. Conscious of the transgression, the first actors immediately hid themselves from his presence: and, as if this their terrour had imprinted a perpetuall antipathy in their posteritie, the least glimpse of his glory for many generations after, made them crie out, Alas wee shall die, because [Page 87] we have seene the Lord. We still continue like the offspring of tame creatures grown wilde, alwayes eschewing his presence, that seekes to recover us; as the bird doth the fowlers, on the beasts of the forest the sight of fire. And yet, unlesse hee shelter us under the shadow of his wings, wee are as a prey exposed to the destroyer, already condemned for fuell to the flames of hell, or nutriment to the breed of serpents. To redeeme us from this everlasting thraldome, our God came downe into the world in the similitude of our flesh, made as a stale to allure us with wiles into his net, that hee might [Page 88] draw us with the cords of love. The depth of Christs humiliation was as great as the difference betweene God and the meanest man; therefore truly infinite. Hee, that was equall with God, was conversant here on earth with us in the forme and condition of a servant. But of servants by birth or civill constitution, many live in health and case, with sufficient supplies of all things necessary for this life. So did not the Son of God: His humanity was charged with all the miseries whereof mortality is capable; subject to hunger, thirst, temptations, revilings and scornings even of his servants; an indignitie [Page 89] which cannot befall slaves or vassals, either borne or made such by men: or, to use the Prophets words, Hee bare mans infirmities, not spiritually onely, but bodily. For who was weake and hee not weake? who was sick and hee whole? No malady of any disease cured by him, but was made his, by his exact and perfect sympathic: Lastly, Hee bare our sinnes upon the crosse, and submitted himselfe to greater torments than any man in this life can suffer. And though these were as displeasant to his humane nature, as to ours: yet were our sinnes to him more displeasant. As he was loving to us in his death: [Page 90] so was hee wise towards himselfe, and in submitting himselfe unto his cruell and ignominious death did of two evils chuse the lesse; rather to suffer the punishment due to our finnes, than to suffer sinne still to raigne in us, whom he loved more dearely than his owne life. If then, we shall continue in sinne after the manifestation of his love: the hainousnesse of our offence is truly infinite: in so much as wee doe that continually, which is more distastfull to our gracious God, than any torments can be to us. So doing we build up the workes of Satan which hee came purposely to destroy. For of this I would not [Page 91] have you ignorant; that albeit the end of his death was to redeeme sinners: yet the onely meanes predestinated by him for our redemption, is destruction of the workes of Satan, and renovation of his Fathers Image in our Soules. For us then to reedifie the workes of Satan, or abett his faction, is still more offensive to this our God, then was his Agonie or bloudy sweat.
For taking a fuller measure of our sinnes: let us hereunto adde his patient expectation of his enemies conversion after the resurrection. If the sonne of Zaleucus before mentioned should have pardoned any as deeply [Page 92] guilty as himselfe had beene of that offence for which hee lost one of his eyes, and his father another; the world would have taxed him, either of unjust follie, or too much facilitie, rather than commended him for true justice or clemencie. But that we may know how farre Gods mercy doth over-beare his Majestie, he proceeds not straightway to execute vengeance upon those Jewes which wrecked their malice upon his deare and onely Sonne, which had committed nothing worthy of blame, much lesse of death. Here was matter of wrath and indignation so just as would have moved the most mercifull [Page 93] man on Earth to have taken speedy revenge upon these spillers of innocent blood; especially the law of God permitting thus much. But Gods mercy is above his law, above his justice. These did exact the very abolition of these sinners in the very first act of sinne committed against God made man for their redemption: yet hee patiently expects their repentance which with unrelenting fury had plotted his destruction. Forty yeares long had hee beene grieved with this generation after the first Passeover celebrated in signe of their deliverance from Aegyptian bondage, and for their stubbornnesse Hee swore [Page 94] they should not enter into his rest. And now their posterity, after a more glorious deliverance from the powers of darknesse, have forty yeares allotted them for repentance, before they bee rooted out of the land of Rest or Promise. Yet hath not the Lord given them hearts to perceive, eyes to see, or eares to heare unto this day: because seeing they would not see, nor hearing would not heare; but hardened their hearts against the Spirit of grace. Lord give us what thou didst not give them; hearts of flesh that may melt at thy threats; eares to heare the admonirions of our peace; and eyes to forefee the day of our visitation: that so [Page 95] when thy wrath shall be revealed against sinne and sinners; wee may bee sheltered from flames of fire and brimstone, under the shadow of thy wings so long stretched out in mercie for us. Often, Oh Lord, wouldst thou have gathered us, and wee would not: but let there be, we beseech thee, an end of our stubbornnesse and ingratitude towards thee; no end of thy mercies and loving kindnesses towards us. Amen.